DSLR with Image stabilization in camera body or the lens ?? which is better Hi all,I am a novice in the DSLR field and on the brink of buying my first DSLR. I see some brands(Sony, Pentax, Olympus) having Image Stabilization included in the body of the camera (I think so) and Cannon has ImageStabilization in the lenses. The lenses with IS cost more than the ones without IS.So is it better to buy camera body with IS and save some money with lenses as camera already has IS or invest more for lenses with IS??Thanks... DSLR with Image stabilization in camera body or the lens ?? which is better Hi all,I am a novice in the DSLR field and on the brink of buying my first DSLR. I see some brands(Sony,... » Read More DSLR with Image stabilization in camera body or the lens ?? which is better Hi all,I am a novice in the DSLR field and on the brink of buying my first DSLR. I see some brands(Sony, Pentax, Olympus) having Image Stabilization included in the body of the camera (I think so) and Cannon has ImageStabilization in the lenses. The lenses with IS cost more than the ones without IS.So is it better to buy camera body with IS and save some money with lenses as camera already has IS or invest more for lenses with IS??Thanks... « Show Less
133469
Just as NLee said -- in general, the in-camera stabilization is cheaper while optical lens stabilization is more effective. Canon and Nikon have released some relatively inexpensive optically stabilized consumer lenses, however, and various third-party lens manufacturers have also started adding OS to their more popular lenses as well as some longer telephotos. In-lens optical stabilization technology is starting to get cheaper and more common.
133470
NLee and Technology Guy,Thank you very much for the clear information... makes my choices much more clearer than before.Appreciate it
133471
NLee,Now I know what each exactly is, makes it better for me to be ok with the choice I make knowing exactly what is whatThanks
133472
I should also add that for a point-and-shoot camera, in-body image stabilization is relatively effective. This is because:1. The image sensor is very tiny at only 10% that of a full-frame sensor. This means less mass to move around, and hence less inertia.2. The physical focus length is much shorter at about 5-15mm. This means a smaller travel at the sensor is sufficient for IS.
1994305
I think you mean "image stabilization"? Yes, it does have an image stabilization option. The lens has a fast aperture of f/1.8 (meaning the lens opens wide to let in a lot of light) which can enable shooting in low light conditions with a decent shutter speed such that image stabilization may not be as critical as on other cameras.
1974761
This lens does not have image stabilization. However, you can shoot wide open at f1.8 to increase your shutter speed, and still get sharp sharp images. Hope this helps!
646892
Hmm, it seems that Canon believes that the kits should come first because they are higher revenue than the body. Those of us cheapskates who forego the lens should wait. Now if only the camera worked without a lens. It seems I spent a lot more money on getting a better lens from Canon than I would have had I accepted the lens that comes from the kit. Surely the bodies should come first - it is the true enthusiast that would buy a body only and then complement it with a good lens?
191715
Hi Craig J., I don't know if it has image stabilization. I returned it the same week. The closure on the lens would not open properly, after only taking one picture. I did some research and found out it was a common problem with this particular nikon camera.
1987592
Olympus bodies have built in image stabilization, and so does this lens. That is not a problem, and in my opinion, the lens is better than the Olympus 40-150, if only because it is significantly smaller and lighter. Conclusion: Not a bad idea at all.
298205
Olympus dust removal is far superior, compared to any other Dslr's on the market.I'm changing lenses on my "Oly" quite often and never had any visible dust in my photos.So if you're going to switch lenses a lot, then Olympus is the right choice for you.You wrote: "When looking at the features of the Olympus E-510 vs. the XSi it is quite interesting as the E-510 has many similar features like: live view, dust removal, image stabilization." Canon never had & probably never will have "in body image stabilization", if that's what you're suggesting.They make lenses with IS - image stabilization and you have to pay extra for it every time you invest in a new glass.I hope this helps a little bit.BRN Olympus dust removal is far superior, compared to any other Dslr's on the market.I'm changing lenses on my "Oly" quite often and never had any visible dust in my photos.So if you're going to switch lenses a lot, then Olympus is the right choice for you.You wrote: "When looking at the features of the Olympus E-510 vs. the XSi it is quite interesting as the E-510 has many similar features like: live view, dust removal, image stabilization." Canon never had & probably never will have "in body image stabilization", if... » Read More Olympus dust removal is far superior, compared to any other Dslr's on the market.I'm changing lenses on my "Oly" quite often and never had any visible dust in my photos.So if you're going to switch lenses a lot, then Olympus is the right choice for you.You wrote: "When looking at the features of the Olympus E-510 vs. the XSi it is quite interesting as the E-510 has many similar features like: live view, dust removal, image stabilization." Canon never had & probably never will have "in body image stabilization", if that's what you're suggesting.They make lenses with IS - image stabilization and you have to pay extra for it every time you invest in a new glass.I hope this helps a little bit.BRN « Show Less
446817
You can get Olympus OMD or Panasonic GX7 with in-body stabilization. Yes, in-body stabilization is still quite rare on DSLR and interchangeable lens camera, maybe due to the size requirements, laws of physics, and cost reasons.
1295251
Image stabilization is not amateur at all. The XA20 features both optical and sensor based IS, as well as the "Dynamic IS" mode, which means both at the same time. The results with Dynamic IS on the XA20 are some of the best I've seen in 18 years of shooting. Using the top handle, I'm able to get shots that look like they were taken with a full stabilizer rig. The zoom on the XA20 is VERY long, so you'll probably still need a tripod at full zoom, but even there I've captured viable shots freehand at full zoom.
810999
The Lumix has OIS built into the lens, so you'll get stabilization with Panasonic bodies that lack stabilization in the body.
2155975
The 20-50 mm lens does not have stabilization; however some of the accessory lens does have that feature. I have been using my NX2000 for about a month, I like it, and the images it produces are very good. Mine does not have stabilization and I compensate by using the carrying strap around my neck, while holding the camera out in front with my arms slightly out stretched. This stabilizes the camera giving me an image that is clear and steady. Bob Kelley Jasper, Ga
658102
Hi Dennis. There is no stabilization on this lens. It's very fast and we don't have a need for it. Now, if you are shooting videos, yes they will appear a little jittery of course, but for pictures it's perfect.
2198412
It is actually much better to spend a lot of money on a lens rather than a camera body. A lens will last you tens of years while camera bodies are updated about every 6 months. So spending $500 on a lens will actually be more worthwhile in the long run than spending that much to upgrade the camera. If you asked a group of professionals, most if not all of them would tell you to save money on the camera body and spend that on some good lenses.
856431
If your question is about Image Stabilization. The lens does not have this feature.
857715
No it is not an image stabilizer lens. For the money it is a great everyday lens. I have had some trouble with it on auto focus at 250mm. I would still recommend the lens.
1817488
I use both Olympus and Panasonic lenses, and Panasonic lenses both with and without OIS, with my GX7 (and E-M5). If there's a difference in the way it handles stabilization with the different lenses, I haven't noticed it.
206684
The image stabilization is through the lens. I shoot without a tripod however for best use of the lens or for shooting for longer periods of time, use a tripod or monopod.