Why is this monitor 500 cheaper? Is it not Perfect Pixel?
1300230
3rd party re-sellers are once again price gouging on the sales price for this monitor. This really is an awesome monitor, but is NOT worth paying 35% over the MSRP. Just have patience and wait for Amazon to get them back in stock. The second order will definitely have a higher number since Amazon is now aware this is a high demand product :-)
1300231
$999 is the actual MSRP of the 34UM95. The $1500 price you've seen is from people importing the Korean version of this monitor and price gouging.
140842
it's acceptable, but i have mine setup with hdmi, mainly for gaming. you can't go wrong with this monitor no matter what you use it for, especially the price.
1712505
go to pcvonline.com better prices, thats where I got it from. fast shipping too, great monitor im using it as we speak. HUGE.
1866398
1st of al, and once in for all, I purchased a "VP2365-LED", a 23" IPS..NOT the 27"..It does not have or need an HDMI connection for photo editing..Top rated bang-for-the-buck by Photoshop Guru Tim Grey..Accurate color right out of the box..It swivels and tilts.No dead pixels. Has 3 or four USB2 connecting points. Viewing angle 178 degrees north and south..It's a steal at around $250..3 year warranty..It replace an aging NEC24" which was NOT an IPS, and depending uponmy viewing angle, I wouldget inconsistent output..I get an excellent screen to print match at least 90% of the time..I'd buy it again!Eddie 1st of al, and once in for all, I purchased a "VP2365-LED", a 23" IPS..NOT the 27"..It does not have or need an HDMI connection for photo editing..Top rated bang-for-the-buck by Photoshop Guru Tim Grey..Accurate color right out of the box..It swivels and tilts.No dead pixels. Has 3 or four USB2 connecting points. Viewing angle 178 degrees north and south..It's a steal at around $250..3 year warranty..It replace an aging NEC24" which was NOT an IPS, and depending uponmy viewing angle, I wouldget inconsistent output..I get an excellent screen to print match at least... » Read More 1st of al, and once in for all, I purchased a "VP2365-LED", a 23" IPS..NOT the 27"..It does not have or need an HDMI connection for photo editing..Top rated bang-for-the-buck by Photoshop Guru Tim Grey..Accurate color right out of the box..It swivels and tilts.No dead pixels. Has 3 or four USB2 connecting points. Viewing angle 178 degrees north and south..It's a steal at around $250..3 year warranty..It replace an aging NEC24" which was NOT an IPS, and depending uponmy viewing angle, I wouldget inconsistent output..I get an excellent screen to print match at least 90% of the time..I'd buy it again!Eddie « Show Less
778382
the monitor is great for gaming, I don't have ghosting or tearing. Pixel speed is fine.You need decent video cards to use it although. 3840x2160 is tough with 16xAF, 4xMSAA, occlusion, parallax and all the other visual candy. Also you need a video card that can specifically talk to the monitor with supporting drivers, both aspects. display port 1.2 is the only connection that will give you 60fps, dvi and hdmi can't push it at 60, only 30.To get decent frames over 60+ I use 2 Titanz sli.
507267
Great, I'll go for the 2159M and am still gonna check them out in person since I need another monitor for my brother anyway. Thanks for the post Thomas! It helps alot~~
248137
Mine was less than perfect in this regard too. 27$ screen, has to compromise somewhere..
1277018
It's got to be the screen resolution. The Vision is 640x480=307,200 pixels versus the W which is 480x272=130,560 pixels. Given it has 2.4 times as many pixels, it is probably a much more expensive screen. CNET reviews the vision as the best display they have seen on this size device.
793482
Of course it also depends on what you believe, the specs say 1920x1080 for the screen but the description says 1366x768, for the price I'm guessing the 768 but the review model that anandtech got was 1080. But they expected the price to be 1200-1500 and asus told them that they would probably ship lower cost models with.. you guessed it 768 screens. I'd hold off till someone at amazon updates everything to be accurate. I really want this but I'm not willing to guinea pig it.
51649
Believe it or not I didn't know what one to get. So I called into Amazon. By the way, to me, and I am fussy, Amazon is the best. Alibaba is not American so screw them. Now back to the answer. So you want to get a new monitor for sure because they have changed also. I would have gotten a Gateway, I always have bought Gateway and never disappointed. However they cost more, so I got an LG 27 inch baby and I tell you its like magic. This computer is like a wizard and so fast. I am still learning 8.1 and all the tiles, but its not hard just do it. I had an Acer screen before and you can't go wrong with one of them. If you can afford it go bigger, this 27 is a monster and doesn't take up a lot of room. So either one, from Amazon I would say, Acer, or LG.
357081
I guess it all depends on how good of a resolution you are looking for. Personally, I wouldn't recommend it if you are to do a lot of photo or video editing, but it is in general a good and cheap touch screen monitor.
303246
I don't think this is one of their "eye care" monitors. Personally, I haven't had any flickering problems. I run all my games in 1080p and don't have any problems. I hope this helps and wish you well on your search for a good monitor.
1666508
yes its similar to the apple monitor but a tad bit less glossy. Watch out as mine came with 4 dead pixels...
198943
Not to be rude but Hank really doesn't know what he is talking about. First point: " Both LED and LCD televisions can have 120 hz, 240hz, and even 480 hz and in this case both tv's are 120 hz. Refresh rates are the same so "clarity" from refresh rates will be identical. Second: He says he will never buy a "straight up lcd tv." that's ok but he says he will buy one with LED or LED/LCD. Unless he is looking at a 4inch screen, they will all be LCD backlit withe LEDs. oLED technology in TV's is years away. My thoughts: Both these TV's have their ups and downs. The 630 is thicker and more power hungry but will have a more uniform picture (which if you are in low light situations is better). The 6300 LED/LCD is slim, "cool", better contrast ratio, green, (more expensive) BUT (and a big but) will be brighter around the edges than the center. This is the problem with "budget" LED/LCDs. Most edge lit LED/LCD TVs have this problem. To avoid it and get the best of both worlds one would need to buy one with Local Dimming. This is where the LEDs are placed behind the entire screen, not just the edges. It is a true difference maker. Not that the prices for TV's with Local Dimming are substantially higher (unless you buy the new outstanding Vizio models). Either way, if you don't mind spending a little more and getting a little less with picture uniformity, go with the 6300.
1711314
We're in the same boat. The prices on the 55" 950 is essentially the same as the new 8000 since everyone is trying to reduce the stock of "last year's model". However, the 8000 is slightly different technology than the 950, so perhaps that explains the initial price differences.The 950 has consistent reviews that are very good, but I have seen one or two of the 8000 that doesn't fill me with confidence. Since they're the same price now, I don't feel I could go wrong with the 950, but if the 8000 turns out to be as good as they talk it up...
1604854
thanks everyone! I am going with the 120hz 100,000 to 1 ratio 46" 1080p Samsung LCD. its $1199 on Amazon with 2 yr same as cash. Best buy is $1309 plus tax with 3 yr same as cash.I am not going with plasma because I have windows in livingroom that will affect glare.
1112179
Hi Thank you for your interest. The difference is pixel policy. Please check the pixel policy of each description. This monitor is Perfect Pixel(0 defective pixel) monitor. Thank you.