Are these better than Pioneer SP-FS52? I can get them at the same price but I'm not sure if these are worth the extra?
1303394
I have the Polk TSi400's. Doing a side-by-side sound comparison is virtually impossible anymore since few if any stores will carry both speakers you are considering like these. I have seen the Pioneers before and will say that the Polks are much more expensive looking. The Pioneers have gotten favorable reviews in the audio publications however. I have zero regrets about buying the Polks and I paid more than the current selling price.
1303395
Comparisons of comparable speakers is in the ear of the listener, I can tell you at 229 you will not be unhappy with the tsi 400s
914366
Hi M., sorry I didn't get right back to you...Yes, I'm surprised that people aren't commenting. Sound is not an insignificant element! Soooo... Does the 210 sound more "lively" and "present"... more Sony-like!? :-) If so, I certainly should have bought THAT one recently when I went to Sangean (El Monte, CA) distribution and swapped 400's, after I lost FM reception on my old one!Thanks,Alan
560457
Never bro.. Never compare pyle with pioneer.. Best advice? Buy a pioneer and secure you money!
1101558
If you have the extra $200 bucks to spare for the SVS give it a shot, try it out, they have a customer satisfaction trial return window if it doesn't feel right to you return it. I have not heard the SVS pb so I can't compare. I have an SVS tube with amp. It is quality sound but not too room filling. I added this Klipsch 12 HG and wow what a difference. Hands down it has more room filling bass for my movies. You can spend a lot of money for promised quality or you can spend the right amount for the delivered quality your looking for. I started with one SVS sub and over time have gone for two subs (Klipsch 12HG) and that is an awesome set up. FYI- I have two Klipsch subs in my game room also, for the price, it's a great deal. Enjoy!
704963
Jayce gave you the frequency swipe. The fs is on the speakers is 58.4. I have them with 45WRMS on the back deck of my car, and they do fill in the bass wonderfully. Not sure how they'll perform without an amp.The treble attenuator is very handy as well, it handles highs terribly well!These are at level with some kenwood excelon I had some years back... if not better (due to treble response)If you buy them, you will not be disappointed!
338416
All I know is for $104 they blow away the more compact PA tl2 and tl3 that cost more. They put out tons of clear midrange sound. I have to go into my Denon receiver menu and turn them down just a bit. And my Ascend acoustic front Bookshelf speakers are no slouch's.
1927948
I have own all three series (2, 3, 20) and have to say that the 3 is easily the best because of the separate sub-woofer. But when comparing the 2 and 20, the 20 has a much richer bass and I love the remote with the volume and I/O mini jack ports. Is it worth twice the price? That's debatable. If money is not the issue then the 20s are the way to go, but then again, if money isn't the issue, go for the series 3.
1801287
I would go with a pioneer. I was not impressed by the sound. Plus the max volume was not enough for my system. It has some cool features but I wouldn't reccomend. I give it 3/5 stars
553724
The pioneers are Dj headphones. The sound is a little bit better on the ue 6000 because they have an Emplifier built in. The highs on the pioneers are a little too low however the build quality is better on the pioneers... hopefully this helps
1519992
They sound great for both but definitely get a sub too (I use an SVS SB 2000) . I have a Denon 2100w receiver powering mine and I also use one as a center channel. Oh and its in a 19 X 17 living room with 20 ft ceilings.
2252339
A2+ is a better setup, but it is a little bass light due to the small size.They sound good alone, but a sub really fills them out and makes them that much better.Personally, I would not like to run them without a sub; I run mine with a Polk PSW10.
657741
Can't really provide an opinion based on comparison. I have not had the opportunity to hear the Polk DB6501's. Have really liked the Alpine SPR60s though. When I did my research before purchasing the Alpines Polk's rated very high. Try to visit a local audio shop in your area that carries both brands and listen for your self. I can tell you that you can't go wrong with the Alpines they produce good quality sound.
1085703
I'm not too sure how they compare to the Polk audio but I do know how they compare to the Energy Take Classic, and these out performe the Energies by leaps and bounds!!! The sound that come out of these are AMAZING!!! The only issue I could see having with these would be the size but with big speakers come BIG clean sound!!! I do not think you will be upset with these.
1885787
Get the Kicker subwoofer. I have heard both and the Pioneer is warmer but I blew two within a month. The power rating on this sub is extremely inflated. I know the Kicker will take abuse and come back for more.
230538
They are both great, but the 315's are better sounding. I have a pair of 535's that sound good, but I use these more often than most all my earbuds. If I am listening through my home system, I use Beyerdynamic's either mt T-70's or my T-90's. Also as with all speakers and headphones there is going to be a break in period. They will sound different in a few weeks than right out of the box.
727490
I went with the Polk Audio RM6750 5.1 set. Plenty of volume, no distortion, nice range and they look great. They're currently going for $258 here on Amazon. If you search a bit you can find them for $200 somewhere else (hint: egg). These speakers are good. For $200 they're a steal. There are better speakers out there, but none that I know of that are better for the price.
890684
They sound better to me. Clearer crisp sound. They get very loud even when they are half turned up.