Does anyone feel it is worth the difference in price to get the 'Quattron/3d' feature as without and save almost $1000?
1313919
Yes i was watching a 3d movie last night and the viewing was exciting to watch so YES. 1/20/13
1313920
Only if u watch a good amount of 3d programing, ie movies or games not much broadcasting 3d available, i own two 3d sets but only because i wanted the 240 hz, which does make a difference to me, if i could of found a set with the 240 hz and no 3d for less i would of chose it, 3d is just a gimmick to me in my opinion.....
1313921
I haven't watched 3d on my Sharp but I hv watched it on my Sony and I am now a 3d fan, so is my 19 yr old son. He initially thought it was a waste of money then I had him watch a nature show in 3d and he was hooked (let me emphasize, it was a nature documentary and he was mesmerized). So I would say yes to 3d.
2147688
Check all sellers. Amazon right now is $1298 (60"), a great price for this set IMO. The non-3D version is cheaper, of course.
505410
I just ordered one through Amazon, from Vanns. It is discontinued, but with Sony, I have no worry about their ongoing support. I went to the Sony Style store here in San Diego, but they don't know when a replacement may come out. I'm guessing that it will include some 3D options and maybe wifi for online Netflixs and such.
481515
gt 25 better deal if you can get a deal on the vt series go for it, higher reviews but i will not spend 500.00 more wait till end of january 2011 prices will drop and there will be alot of promotions free glasses and also blue ray players. i recently purchased a toshiba 46 wx 800 led 3 d tv from amazon for my bedroom, free glasses 3 d and blue ray player 1,200.00 excellent tv toshiba are under rated too me there piture is same as samsung lg sony god bless vito
1335268
By all means go for it.I ended up paying a lot more to get a 3d Blue ray player. It works great but it cost a lot more than you are putting out. Good luck.
1335267
I just ordered these: http://i-glassesonline.stores.yahoo.net/dlp3d-wireless-2set.html For $120 shipped with the emitter and 2 pairs of glasses, I've read on other sites that the Mits converts the 3D from the PS3 to the checkboard 3D tech the Mits supports. Not sure how well it's all going to work, but they look like they're pretty open to returns if people aren't satisfied, and for a little over $100, it's a pretty minimal investment.
1296629
There is 300 USD difference for a start!You are correct about the mirror. The video auto-focus is far faster and 10fps is the fastest you'll get at that price.
1492945
I can only comment on the M3D550KD because that's what I own. The price difference is very close, so I consider the price as not a factor. The 240MHZ refresh rate was a big deal for me and I still think it's worth having. The picture is very smooth on DVD's and Blue Ray. HDTV is really nice as well. Standard definition is noticably worse, but I guess that's why they went to HD. The 3D is really cool. I didn't buy the TV for 3D, but it's one of my favorite features now. I've owned it for several months with no problems. Bottom line, if it was stolen off my wall, I'd buy another one to replace it. I can only comment on the M3D550KD because that's what I own. The price difference is very close, so I consider the price as not a factor. The 240MHZ refresh rate was a big deal for me and I still think it's worth having. The picture is very smooth on DVD's and Blue Ray. HDTV is really nice as well. Standard definition is noticably worse, but I guess that's why they went to HD. The 3D is really cool. I didn't buy the TV for 3D, but it's one of my favorite features now. I've owned it for several months with no problems. Bottom line, if it was stolen off my wall, I'd buy another one to... » Read More I can only comment on the M3D550KD because that's what I own. The price difference is very close, so I consider the price as not a factor. The 240MHZ refresh rate was a big deal for me and I still think it's worth having. The picture is very smooth on DVD's and Blue Ray. HDTV is really nice as well. Standard definition is noticably worse, but I guess that's why they went to HD. The 3D is really cool. I didn't buy the TV for 3D, but it's one of my favorite features now. I've owned it for several months with no problems. Bottom line, if it was stolen off my wall, I'd buy another one to replace it. « Show Less
1101479
I assume so because my TV and DVD player are both internet enabled so the glasses worked immediately. If I were you, however, I would not get into the current 3D technology because it is not good enough at this point to be worth the cost. It may take a few years to be worth it. I wouldn't have bought the glasses had I known it. Even my 9 and 7 year olds lost interest in 3D after one or two movies.
50684
I haven't seen a brand new 3D for this year. The ones I have seen are a couple years old, but with this one its great quality and you don't need powered glasses like some other models. However normal HD bounces btw 720/1080 and is not Always without the 'streaky blur'. If mainly 3D viewing, I say it's worth it, if u can handle a few glitches-but can maybe be repaired with the perfect settings.
1855829
well the hd models are pretty close to the price of the non hd, so go for the hd
235177
I only evaluated to models with 3D; the Sharp and the Samsung UN75F6400. I thought they were very comparable in 3D mode and the price difference was obviously substantial, even though the Samsung is a 75-inch. I purchased the 70-inch Sharp in early August and we have watched a half-dozen movies in 3D since we received it and our family has been thoroughly impressed. Some movies, like Avatar, have some shadowing and clarity issues in the background imaging, but I was the only one of our family who really noticed it; probably because I was looking hard to evaluate the entire picture. The 3D features along with the internet / video streaming capability have been very good so far.
1620391
I'll second that. I would buy it right now if this model included the $100 Amazon coupon. Otherwise, it's a little expensive.
558157
If you have the money, this one is the better market value. I see other's buying the higher priced ones and are complaining already.I love the 3d on my Tv and I plan on keeping it for a while. You will see for the price you didnt make a mistake.
725268
I have no idea since I didn't purchase that model. Generally paying substantially more for the new model of anything is not justified when only incremental changes have been made. It all comes down to research and a value decision.
764885
Actually, it looks to me like the 360 is not only the less expensive but the better, improved, and more compact model. The inflated price of the 350 is most likely attributable to its being out of production.
1026507
I really have not seen a difference; never even thought about it. The view finder is awesome, but pricy. I paid more for the view finder than the camera, but no regrets. Bright sunny day, you need the view finder.