I have a couple friends who bought the GR004's. I want something with a larger lens but I don't want the metal frames. Which glasses would you suggest
747876
Sorry but I don't know much about the difference in lens. I have only owned these ones. The lens are a pretty decent size. Just by looking at the picture of the GR004's it seems like these ones may just be larger.
747877
I really like the GR 801's. They're very flexible as long as you treat them with respect they do great. For the price I don't think you can beat them. I'm probably going to order a few more pairs just to keep around in case something happens ones that I have. I like them that much. They aren't really heavy or anything. They look good. And the lenses themselves aren't an obnoxious amber color. I have several pairs of firing range glasses and if I wanted to wear those, I'd wear those. The actual tint on the GR's is subtle but the perfect amount in my opinion and experience. I had severely burning eyes periodically and headaches before I bought these. After three days of wearing them that all started going away. Five days in completely gone. I wear them all the time now.
1811007
The binocs are great. I love the extending eye pieces, but don't use my glasses. I use mine to look at the night sky when I don't want to drag my telescope out. The only downside is they do get a bit heavy when holding them parallel to the Earth landscape (I typically lay in my sleeping bag and set them on my face). But, having looked at other large binocs-weight is the normal downside. The 10x50 wide angle is better preferred by the astronomy crowd-anything more and a tripod may be needed due to weight/instability. I've never had any fogging problems in the cold Wisconsin nights, I have not tested the waterproofing. The rubber coating is nice and these are very well built. Definitely recommend these to anyone.
221466
I don't wear glasses, but without them the scope is amazing. I have try different scopes and this o e is provably the best yoi can get. Specially when you make the relation cost/benefit.
784054
I personally would go with the 18-105mm. It is more "flexible." Hope this helps.
1682433
o frame mx lenses or go to the website. They have a few different lenses suited for different applications, but the iridium lenses are the best for desert riding, can't speak for mx or anything else but they're probably still good as long as it isn't too dark. I have fire iridium and it blocks out a good amount of sunlight but doesn't hinder contrast too much. the website also has an interactive guide to show you how things look with/without the lenses.
2171241
I would go to expand websites frist and see if they make them for the JVC.It would let you know what type of expand glasses you need.
1329391
no, i would recommend something around a 70 -200 f/2.8 yuor choice on what you want to spend. i can tell i have a tamron in this and i love ,a little heavy but smoking fast glass , shot my kids sporting events for years , great pics
1358758
I haven't used the sony w800 bit these are the best I have used. Although I think my favorite part is the frame. They feel like real glasses and not some cheap disposable plastic glasses. They also hold up well I've bought 3 pairs and have 2 left...the third ended up at a friends house.
653028
DLP link built in or a free standing DLP link will do it. Take note, the glasses they have for $5 more by Okeba have the large side pieces, that keeps out ambient light a bit better. However these are more comfortable as they are lighter. I have both and they both perform great.
1913663
What are you wanting to know? They are both excellent lenses just depends on what you are wanting to do with them!!
418760
You do need specific glasses. You need to buy the: TY-ER3D4MU GLASSES. They are not cheap the the 3D is Great!
558801
Although these are very good, I'd recommend the LG AG-F220 Cinema Clip On 3D Glasses for over glasses use. They are LG but work with other brands of passive 3d TVs (mine are used with a Vizio set).
1943521
Our advice if you're interested in something along these lines? Go to the Gunnar Optik site and create a pair of glasses with the features you want, and check out the price. Then go to a local optometrist and see if they can beat the price with the same set of features. Buy whichever is cheaper. If you cant afford either try the Gamma Rays
137017
Honestly, there are some available on ebay with buyer protection (but I understand why you would want to get it from the above places instead). The 70-200mm is a great lens, but if you have your heart set on this particular lens you should wait to get this one :)I just ordered one from ebay but I did my research on the seller first.
1232587
Hi, you should not have any problems. You will also like the comfort and well made. Like them more than my other more expensive glasses. Enjoy, Best Regards RJ
2029245
Hi Pablo, I have a similar camera (and lens set). I have the GF5 with the X series (compact) 14mm-42mm and I recently got the x series 45mm-175mm. After a ton of reading all the reviews and comments and factoring price and everything (for me) I decided this was the best 2nd lens for me. That said, it is no good UNLESS one is 20+ feet away from what you basically want to shoot. When I take a group shot I have to switch back. I will say the 45x175 is a superb lens, but if you were going to mount one and leave the other home, you would really want the 14-140 (IMO). When I chose the 45-175 I figured why get a lens that was already a range of one I had but in practical use I now see the 14mm-140mm There were a few other factors, one was the price was significantly higher (I got my 45-175 for one hundred ninety two using "like new" on warehouse deals) the other was I really wanted a "X" series lens and the 14-140 is a "G" series only. Two other factors were the 14-140 was almost 8 years older and twice as heavy. I have a GF5 and LOVE how with the 45-175 mounted I can hold it like a soda can in one hand when not using it. I am sure the 14-140 is a great lens, and with the GH2 being a much bigger and heavier camera, I am not sure the increase weight would be an issue. Next time I get another lens my quandary may be similar to your, but it would be the 100-300 vs the very useable 14-140. I already get "Wow" comments with the 45-175 mounted on my tiny red GF5 camera. I can only imagine the comments the humongous 100-300 (zoomed out) would get. I do like how the 45-175 it totally internal and am a tad fearful of the 'zooming/slide' tube feature of the 100-300. I know they have to do it, but it's a tad scary. Overall I really think if you are going to REPLACE (meaning sell or no longer have access the 14-42mm lens) you should opt for the 14-140. That way you ONLY change if you want CRAZY zoom potential! Take care!
608746
I have both of these and they are excellent lenses. This is my profession and it I were to choose go with the 17-70, unless you don't need the extra reach and you mostly work in low light.