Which one is better the 62 or the 85?
1281967
Hello, The Epson MovieMate 62 and MovieMate 85 have a lot of similar features, such as the built in DVD player, Dolby Digital speakers, and both are portable. There are two main differences between the 62 and 85. The 85 has a little bit better resolution than the 62, but I watch the 62 on my wall and the picture turns out great. The other difference is the price. The 62 is about $200 less than the 85. At the end of the day, if high resolution is important, the 85 is the way to go. However, if you want a good, quality product for your money, the 62 makes more sense. Please let me know if you have more questions. Thank you.
1346891
i have both, i prefer the image quiality of the 85 F1.4, the 50mm is a little bit overexposed.Both have similar construction quality and USM autofocus system, but after 4 year of normal use the barrel system of the autofocus mechanims in the 50mm got deformed and stop to work.
578412
its simply perspective, the 50 is too short (on full frame) to get a headshot, 3/4 or longer shots are fine with the 50mm. but for a nice headshot the 50mm brings in distortions where the 85mm is more natural looking. Either at 1.2 is very very touchy for technique as DOF is very small at close distances, I own both and prefer the 85mm 90% of the time. the only time I break out the 50mm is if space is really cramped and need the wider field of view or for groups but then I am not shooting at 1.2, the 8m 1.2 and the 50mm 1.4 would probably be my ideal combo but since I had the 50mm 1.2 first I just keep it along with the 85. its simply perspective, the 50 is too short (on full frame) to get a headshot, 3/4 or longer shots are fine with the 50mm. but for a nice headshot the 50mm brings in distortions where the 85mm is more natural looking. Either at 1.2 is very very touchy for technique as DOF is very small at close distances, I own both and prefer the 85mm 90% of the time. the only time I break out the 50mm is if space is really cramped and need the wider field of view or for groups but then I am not shooting at 1.2, the 8m 1.2 and the 50mm 1.4 would probably be my ideal combo but since I had the 50mm 1.2 first... » Read More its simply perspective, the 50 is too short (on full frame) to get a headshot, 3/4 or longer shots are fine with the 50mm. but for a nice headshot the 50mm brings in distortions where the 85mm is more natural looking. Either at 1.2 is very very touchy for technique as DOF is very small at close distances, I own both and prefer the 85mm 90% of the time. the only time I break out the 50mm is if space is really cramped and need the wider field of view or for groups but then I am not shooting at 1.2, the 8m 1.2 and the 50mm 1.4 would probably be my ideal combo but since I had the 50mm 1.2 first I just keep it along with the 85. « Show Less
109972
The 85 HD is the newer version of the 72 MovieMate. The 85 has the same projection system with a brighter (2500 lumens rather than 1200) image. The 85 also has more keystone correction and a higher contrast ratio.
1186439
Not sure if the 90 is better, however my oldest son has the k70, and I have the k95. The only complaint I have is the led stopped working on my u key. And the cap locks is very sensitive.
810659
I prefer the more powerful ones like the 9280. I bought my daughter one also. It is well worth the money..
1163968
The 2-700 is much nicer and more functional. it also has the high back support and handle for easy moving!
1706892
Although I have both, I prefer the 102 is it is smaller, its blade is thinner and narrower which in my mind makes it a more useful and versatile knife. The 119 is a cool knife also but it is very large and stout. I do love the brown handle versus the black, it is worth the extra cost in my view.
448719
i dont have the 24 85mm to truly give you a comparison. but according to a few reviews and test i saw the 24 85mm has a slightly better sharpness wile the 24 to 120 has more focal length. so it depends on what you are going to be shooting and what you want to pay for your lens.and fyi if you go for a 24 to 120mm i dont reccomend this version of it as its one of nikons worst modern lenses . get the Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 24-120mm f/4G ED VR its the revised version and supost to be a better lens. or if you really want focal length the 28mm to 300mm hope this helps
2054212
The 85mm is more zoomed in than the 50. You may want to look into getting a 35mm lens.
2272949
M57 appears to have a larger capacity, is heavier (more metal parts I believe). I switched from the M53 to the M57 with no problem in the sump pit in my basement. I figured the bigger capacity might make it last longer. Both are very quiet and efficient.
1244446
The 60 works very well for this type of picture. Bugs and flowers do better with a 105 - 200 but people do better with the shorter macros.
2240580
The 17-85 is a nice lens unless you got a poor copy - it has more reach & was designed for the crop cameras. The 17-40 is a superlative lens with astounding deep, rich color and photo quality. If you want longer, you won't be happy but if you can work with this range it is great!
1309819
Go with the 850. I have the 860 and from a distance of 10 feet you will not be able to tell the difference between red and blue. It's all a marketing ploy to gain a couple of extra bucks from you under the smoke and mirror extended warranty haze. Save your money. There is no difference between the 850 and 860 in terms of picture quality and that is what you should be paying your hard earned cash for. 850 vs 860...both are exceptional sets. Enjoy!
1150054
Yes. The lens shoots with zero distortion or CA and is much lighter and easier to carry. Although, it depends on the amount of use you get from your 80-200. If that's an effective focal length, this lens is basically perfect.
2054815
The 62st uses the 100k gamin map.Not worth buying.Get the 62s and buy the garmin 24k map.I also would recommend the garmin 24k card rather the download.Gary
1353448
Well, right now, the 85U is $900 and the 80U is $975!!!Better go with the 85U!