How many inches wide &amp; tall is the 3 liter bladder? I'm replacing a 2.25 liter bladder, but will keep using my old pack.
1295505
I don't have the bladder handy to measure. We replaced a 2 liter bladder with this one and it fits in our small pack well. We love this bladder ...no leaking at the mouthpiece! I don't think you will have any trouble with the size, if you do...Amazon has a great return policy.
253614
They all come with the 3L bladder. The 2.5L, 2.0 and 2.0 light are sold separate and are close to $30 ea on average.
1314681
The max capacity of this pack is 30L. Sorry for the mistake. It has been corrected.
2273063
Bladder is not included. Although, if you want an expectional pack at this price them I would highly recommend it. The only downfall I have found is if you have broad shoulders then it will be a little snug on you. Besides that, I am very happy with this purchase!
360916
I have put 2 80oz bladders in side by side and a 100oz by itself with no issues. Not sure if anything larger will fit, or the official capacity.
1598035
its fits perfectly in my goruck bullet ruck pocket. this bag: http://www.goruck.com/10l-hydration-bullet-black-/p/gear-000002goruck also says "Sized to hold a 3L hydration bladder in a separate compartment next to your back"their site says its got an "18″ tall compartment next to your back perfectly houses a Standard Source Hydration bladder, keeping it in place with a retention loop."Sorry im not home to actually look at it, but the 2.5L 7" by 17" HAS to be correct from what I received. Its definitely taller than a foot.
610382
The 4 digit number in the product name is the capacity in cubic inches. Divide by 61 to get litres. I have the Outfitter 4600, which is 75 litres, and gives dimensions as 35.5x14.4x14.5. I believe that the first two numbers may be the dimensions of the pack's frame, with the 3rd number being the height of the shipping box, rather than the physical dimensions of the pack. Also note that the "carry weight" of the pack is about a pound less than the shipping weight.
1595698
Hi,I can't answer that in cubic inches, but I must say I was disappointed with the size of the bag. The bladder part is awesome, but the bag seems small. I haven't tried filling it up yet, but it seems like less things would fit in it than in my Targus school backpack... I've also purchased this bagpack (Lowerpro Sport 200 AW) for my camera: http://www.amazon.ca/dp/B004XNLR16/ref=pe_386430_30332290_TE_3p_dp_1 and it has a bladder compartment but no bladder. However, the lowerpro seems to have more storage space than the geigerrig, even with the space taken by the camera pocket. So, if I were to do it again I would get the Lowerpro, and buy a separate bladder that I would install manually.All the best,Alex Hi,I can't answer that in cubic inches, but I must say I was disappointed with the size of the bag. The bladder part is awesome, but the bag seems small. I haven't tried filling it up yet, but it seems like less things would fit in it than in my Targus school backpack... I've also purchased this bagpack (Lowerpro Sport 200 AW) for my camera: http://www.amazon.ca/dp/B004XNLR16/ref=pe_386430_30332290_TE_3p_dp_1 and it has a bladder compartment but no bladder. However, the lowerpro seems to have more storage space than the geigerrig, even with the space taken by the camera pocket.... » Read More Hi,I can't answer that in cubic inches, but I must say I was disappointed with the size of the bag. The bladder part is awesome, but the bag seems small. I haven't tried filling it up yet, but it seems like less things would fit in it than in my Targus school backpack... I've also purchased this bagpack (Lowerpro Sport 200 AW) for my camera: http://www.amazon.ca/dp/B004XNLR16/ref=pe_386430_30332290_TE_3p_dp_1 and it has a bladder compartment but no bladder. However, the lowerpro seems to have more storage space than the geigerrig, even with the space taken by the camera pocket. So, if I were to do it again I would get the Lowerpro, and buy a separate bladder that I would install manually.All the best,Alex « Show Less
999395
Pat B. The replacement bladder is approximately 3.75"D, 50.75"W and 71.50"L. It is smaller than my original bladder but fits fine. On my bed it sits in its own compartment top of the cloud coil compartment.
2245383
Yes, but it is not very large, even without the bladder. It has been a good day pack for me. It is just too small to pack the extra clothing needed in the high mountains, so for those hikes, I add a lumbar pack.
2087217
I have a wide mouth 3.0 liter Camelback hydration bladder. It has a thick plastic hook on the cap portion of the bladder which works nicely with the velcro tab in the pack's bladder compartment. This prevents the bladder from collapsing to the bottom of the compartment. I hope this helps.
1845313
There is one sleeve for a bladder. I'm not positive, but I think it will take a 3 liter bladder.
1818582
not sure, I use this in a CamelBak mule. bladder dimensions are 18L x 7w empty.
1919536
I replaced the 2L that came with it with this one when I need over 2L, but otherwise I use the factor bladder: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001KZGYLS/ref=oh_details_o00_s00_i00?ie=UTF8&psc=1 With 3L in it, it is a tight fit and the bladder is taller than the one that came with it, but I thought it worked ok. That said, I don't normally carry 3L and if I did all the time, I'd probably want a bigger pack. The other option would be to throw a couple bottles of water in the side webbing pockets. With the other stuff I normally carry, 3L makes the pack pretty tight when it's full of water, but obviously as you drink it down, it gets looser. I can say I really like the pack overall, it's great quality.
1588834
25L....I fit my jetfoil with two small canisters, knife, water bottles on the sides, cereal bars, instant coffee, spare jacket. The capacity isn't the issue...it's a great daypack...it just feels small on the back...probably because it is an internal frame so there's some rigidity to it even though it is small. I returned mine just because I wanted more capacity but part of me wishes I kept it...
390182
I believe this will fit 2.25 was way too small for 3in so I'd say it's safe.
504447
over time I have switched to other bladders. My favorite right now is http://www.geigerrig.com/. I have tried Camelbaks and Platypus bags but I find the geigerrig's ability to turn inside out the easiest to clean and keep dry. The problem with the sawyer bags are they are hard to keep clean and the handles/small hole at the bottom tear under full weight of water (or maybe a bit more if you hang it wrong) so they become (imo) worthless. If I had to do it all over again, i would just order the filter and make my own system with it. Just my .02