Hi, is there a chart that I can get to use as a benchmark. I would like to use it to compare my clients' readings to it.
1313216
Good morning Keeon, Unfortunately our scale does not have that feature, but it does allow multiple people to have a profile on the scale (up too 8 people).
1313217
Good morning Keeon,Unfortunately our scale does not have that feature, but it does allow multiple people to have a profile on the scale (up too 8 people).
1708426
You can at the Bullworker website. Also at the same website they have a some of the exercises listed that will help you until you get another chart.
911245
I have not been able to find a conversion chart either. Sure would help if we could find one.
1917744
Use what you got :), I would start by having it hooked up and take readings with my VOM to compare all hookups to verify accuracy of all readings.
891537
I checked the accuracy by using a charcoal canisters {2 separate tests} from a good, local lab...so I trust the lab results were accurate as benchmark. The meter read about 45% higher. The canister was 9 and meter about 13 on one test, and appx same on second test. So I just adjust divide my meter reading my 1.45. So if meter reads 2....divide by 1.45=1.38. In other words....if you increase 1.38 by 45% you have 2.00.
778281
I would maybe think about purchasing a hydrometer test jar. It makes getting accurate readings easier
1797178
It's a static display, and is not giving you a dashboard view. You click it and it cycles though the metrics of measures. Otherwise it is giving you the current measure of what metric you have it on.
1195776
Sorry, I returned 20 for v.21. It would depend on the stats you need to run whether it is appropriate for your project.
128314
I can't speak to "accuracy", as I don't have access to an analytical grade scale to verify the reading on the Gem Pro. But i can speak to repeatability. I put small amount of Red Dot on my scale and it read 2.72 grains. I reweighed the same sample 10 times and got eight readings at 2.72 and two readings at 2.74. I'd say that is pretty darn good. One thing I do is re-tare often, usually before weighing each sample.
707595
there is a template with it. so you can measure and run tests. I actually scanned in the template and designed over it, but, i am also a graphic designer and have some nice programs to play with.
709018
N200-990 will work Maybe the chart isn't up to date. Message me with any other concerns.
1691933
I confirm using an old style, non digital Sphygmomanometer. That said, an exact comparison can never be made unless measurement made simultaneously - which isn't done. Even a reading with the Omron will differ when taken moments later. Consequently, accuracy is is considered OK when readings are consistently in the same range.
205737
Well, in practice it gives a display at speeds up to 34. How much time lag and how accurate it is relative to the changing bottom I don't know. I also don't know the sample rate. But yes, it'll give you a depth reading at speed.
1161259
Here is the comparison sheet --> http://cookina.co/store/ca/themes/cookina_ca/pdf/OZ3190_Tableau_comparatif_GENERAL.pdf
2273895
I export attendance data monthly from the TCMS software to (I think) csv. FingerTec technical support helped me set up the export parameters, which are saved in the system. I could never have done it by myself.
206045
Try pressing the black and white pie chart button for a black and white document. It might work.
1416941
I'm afraid I can't answer your question:(All I know is since I've been using this monitor, it has given me results that Is much the same or similar results to what I would get when I go see my doctor. Cheers