how well do these perform at 75 + zoom with respect to clarity?
1288835
To be honest, mine Works really nice even at 125X. About clarity in my opinión at 100x is the average. Please just learn how to use them porperly. I´ve had very good moments with my binoculars for around 2 years.
1288836
To be honest, mine Works really nice even at 125X. About clarity in my opinin at 100x is the average. Please just learn how to use them porperly. Ive had very good moments with my binoculars for around 2 years.
1288837
They don't. Just like the other reviews, they're worthless and will be sent back almost immediately. Sorry for the negativity, but I'm trying to save you a big hassle.
1288838
Not very well. Unless you are viewing a non-moving object or have a tripod to look at a single object, the shakes and wobbles nullify any "zoom" power. Nice binos, but I would rather have gotten a telescope for any power viewing.
2049640
They are very clear and work well for me hunting and bird watching. Unless you need some very long distance viewing they should be fine.I have some very expensive Zeiss optics and these are just as clear at about 1/4 the the price.
1191834
I think they are fair in low light conditions not as good as the higher power binoculars but when you considering a compact pair they are fair and for the price to it was worth it not spending alot of money on a pair that might not be that good. Hope that helps answer your question.
1870736
The resolution is very sharp and fine on this unit but not really an issue in a browser since they all zoom. I primarily use Chrome myself with no issues at 110% zoom, 125% also looks fine. You can alway pinch and zoom with your fingers on the mousepad or the screen when you really need to.
357725
To my understanding it is usually believed that 2470 is a better version than this one in the same focal length range. But there are other things to consider. How important is it for you to have the extra versatility, that is, the focal length of 70 to 120? How much do you care about the lost of aperture range? (And that depends on what you plan to shoot most often.) How important is the price difference to you? And weight differs, too. Actually, I envy the newest 750 model so much! lol. It certainly deserves good lenses.
1191835
I actually haven't used them in low light conditions. I purchased them for a music event that took place during the day. For being a low cost option they are very easy to use and offer a very nice clear view. I would imagine that you would still enjoy a pretty good view in a slightly darker setting.
1939069
I've used them at a baseball game and they worked very well. They are a fixed focal length so you cannot zoom so if you are sitting too close they might be too powerful.
1438322
Realistically anything past a quarter of one mile will be luck. Using them in a desert/lake environment (some small tress and hills) that is the best they could do. Even in a clear line of sight we never achieved much more than the 1/4 miles without distortion.
357729
To my understanding it is usually believed that 2470 is a better version than this one in the same focal length range.But there are other things to consider. How important is it for you to have the extra versatility, that is, the focal length of 70 to 120? How much do you care about the lost of aperture range? (And that depends on what you plan to shoot most often.) How important is the price difference to you? And weight differs, too.Actually, I envy the newest 750 model so much! lol. It certainly deserves good lenses.
1734202
They do make quite a bit of noise. I read a lot of reviews saying that but didn't realize what they meant until I experienced it myself. I own 4 fuji lenses and they all are kinda loud. The image quality is fantastic though. After a few days of shooting I got used to it. I barely notice it now. If you are outside or on the street it isn't as noticeable either.
1721966
I can only speak about the c1 and it is very light in tint. Hardly any tint. I cant even tell they are tinted but they work well and the focus is right for the distance from the computer. I do after using them a while really like them. I have a 1.75 magnification.
881592
They are an excellent binoc. I do have some problem with lost width due to wearing glasses but that's not a big deal.
43415
I've not used them in that environment, use mostly for birding which is perhaps a more challenging use for binoculars. Thus I see no reason why they would not be very good for that. I do not think you would want greater magnification with narrower field of view because you have to move them quickly in that scenario. THese are very good overall, especially for the price. If it rains, the lenses have built in attached covers to keep them dry when not in use.
1620700
I have not tried it, but these are not 'fast' lenses, they are great for all 'round general use, but I think not so good for action in low light.
629121
The image quality is good, particularly for the price. Its sharper & brighter than my Nikon binoculars and not quite as good as my pricier Zeiss monocular. For objects at 300 yards, you probably want something with a higher magnification.
20819
The clarity is great at 10x magnification - but as with all binoculars, the larger magnification, you lose it's light gathering capabilities. I think you will like these,
1161716
I've not had a problem with blurring due to vibration when using my lens and besides because of the nature of the beast lenses with that short of a focal length don't really require a Vibration Reduction feature because they are used for indoor shots or landscapes when you would most likely be be using a support of some type.