Fluance AVBP2 or the Newer Fluance XLBP-DW? Seems the OLDER has a VASTLY wider FREQUENCY RESPONSE of 130Hz - 20KHz. The newer on shows 60Hz - 20KHz?
1286625
60hz-20kHz is a wider range then 130hz-20khz. I wouldn't run these any lower then 100hz though. These are great for surround sound speakers but not for full range. The lower frequencies are there but much better when paired to a subwoofer.
1286626
Iam not sure about the older model, but I am very very happy with the new, so first off let me explain, I have infinity alpha 50 in front eith mission satalite off the the alpha 50 center, a Yamaha receiver, a Yamaha sub, 160 watts, then in back I have a Yamaha sub 50, satellited the flaunce, the sound is amazing. I don't know what you got going but they will make u happy. Hoo ra my friend than u for your service to our country
1126699
Haven't tried that. I will give it a go today or tomorrow. Get back to me then. So I tested the unit on both program content and commercial content. Both were in the range of 38-40 db. Didn't see any difference in the sound level between them.
640687
The new version is the 5800ES. 2 more channels of amplification -- 7.2 vs 9.2. A few other changes, too.
671473
15 - 28,000 Hz is the frequency response. The comfort is good, it's not great. It's definitely a step up from the ATH-m50. I guess it really has to do with your head size. My head is huge - it's about a large in helmet size - so with a smaller head, it should be a lot better.
360967
My wife and I have similar problems and just bought a ZVOX 555. It has definitely made it easier to hear vocals. Vocals appear to be clearer to us on all settings and are further enhanced when the DE mode is enabled.
995090
Hi Euripedes, it only scales the HD down to 720. Brightness and Audio delivery, will be similar to the source levels. You can then trim the signal to suite your requirement, on the receiving equipment. I do not know what legislation is in place in the US with regard to "max recommended volume or brightness features" in the EU maximums are set, however most modern equipment can override the max' if you grant permission (factory reset will override if executed). The AV360 is an EU designed unit, not subject to these maximums. It is a read only unit, the power supply to it is probably used only for conducting the digital signal across it. Then the recipient computer provides amplification of both signals...Please be aware the AV360 does not pair with post 2011, Apple 27" all in ones. This is not stated in the literature provided with the AV360. Strange coz it was designed for that particular computer. Although I have heard of it being used with non Apple comps. Connecting to other comps seems to be reasonable safe! ATB mediumjohnsilver
449191
I don't have any experience with the dragonfly, but I can tell you that for zoned sound, SONOS is terrific. I have been using their stuff for almost 3 years, and will continue to change out older technology for their product as older equipment fails. The clarity of both the amplified signal, as well as the preamp-only version is very good. If you are looking for audiophile/serious listening with, say $5000 invested in a pair of speakers, then this is not what you want. For everything else, SONOS is a very high-quality solution.
37766
There is no published measurement of frequency response. However I can recommend buying a pair of the Companion 2 or 3 speaker systems for your PC They have a very good sound with all the games that are played on my PC The sound effects are awesome & come in with clarity. I know this isn't the exact answer you are looking for, but I would buy them again if anything ever happens to either set I own.
1706325
I currently have two iLive sound bars - the most recent is the ITP 280B. Had it for a month and used it a couple of times - so far so good.
661700
Date 14 October 2009. Hey I am late in the game. Can still find the 876 online. My question too you is do you think the 876 power rating is accurate. Also looking at the 806. The 806 is maybe $300 to $400 dollars less. Do you think their is a big difference? It is 140x7 to 130x7 does it sound as close as it seems? Speakers are JBL Studio Series. Also like to watch movies in Dolby and my Denon 1082 which is 110x6 seems to run a little quiet on the center channel. Please give me your thoughts if you have time. Thank You.
1117953
I purchased a polycom soundstation 2W and was very disappointed in the sound quality so I returned it. Instead I got a Konftel 300W and have been very pleased. Check with the manufacturer to see if there would be any problem with two unit.
1912929
i am using monitor audio bx2. it sounds ok, but i returned them. I said them because the first one come with one channel no soundthe second one became one channel no sound after few days use.
1995526
Hi. I was exactly where you are about 9 months ago. The onyx has 2x3" woofers and 2x3/4" tweeters while the Fi30 has 2x3" drivers with a total output of 12W, but don't be fooled by what seems like low power, the Fluance can get loud enough for small to medium sized rooms. Both look really good. The Onyx has more connectivity with Bluetooth, DLNA, line in and Airplay while the Fi30 is only Bluetooth and line in. I heard the Onyx at a store (not the best setting) end the sound was good but not impressive IMO, I though the bluetooth only HK Go+Play sounded better. The Onyx is about $500 and the Fi30 about $150. The fluance is a gorgeous wood enclosure with no frills (no remote and no wall wart which is good IMO) and great sound for its size and price. We move ours around the house for small parties and reunions and have received only compliments and disbelief when I tell my friends about the price. Hope this helps.
917809
oops, you asked about throughout FREQUENCY, not boost range. As I understand it, it's a parabolic curve that tails off on both sides of the 35hZ spec.
1940518
Robb, Thanks for your input. Before I installed the Series II to its designated spot in my home, I tested them by letting them sit in my family room HT system (TSi 400, CS10, RTi4,and PSW111) but it did not sound as good as TSI400, especdially in mid range - solo violin and piano did not sound clean. As I purchased Monitor 70 as it is supposed be an old model of TSi500. I hope the SeriesII was not designed to sell a cheaper model with cheaper price. As CS10 might be the reason for a poor mid range, I will continue to figure out how to work it out.
293423
http://www.avsforum.com/t/1409431/the-official-denon-avr-xx13-model-owners-thread-faq/3390#post_22646765
1756978
I, too, had to choose between the RC Micro and the Classic. I worried the the RC Micro's were too small to provide a full sound. I ended up choosing the RC MIcro's. Here's why: 1. I scoured the different audio forums to get the opinion of people who knew more than me. In the AVS forum (http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=1153061), I found a posting by a member who posted frequently and who seemed to be highly respected by other forum members. This is what he wrote, "RC-Micro are smaller, with higher build quality and better drivers (than the Classic). They will have a more "refined" sound. The sub is a little better also. Whether it is "worth it" is strictly up to you and how critical you are in your bedroom listening. If you can afford the extra and are seeking the maximum sound quality from the smallest possible package, the RC-Micro will be great. If you aren't super critical and will only be doing casual, moderate volume listening, the Take Classic will probably be fine." 2. I called the tech help at Energy Speakers (they're very helpful, by the way). I told them I could buy the Classic or the RC Micro for the same price. Their tech guy said absolutely take the RC Micro's. 3. They sound better, they look better. I'm really happy with the RC Micro's. Hope that helps!