how does this compare to the Panasonic, specifically the MC-UG729?
1280281
Not familiar with Panasonic vacuums. We have had a Kirby, a Hoover wind tunnel and most recently an LG (who no longer makes vacuums). We bought then returned the Prolux. We tested the Dyson Animal, the Shark Rotator professional, the Electrolux (forgot the model). Then we went to a couple of local vacuum shops. Tried the Riccar and the Meile. We bought the Meile and very glad we did. It is worth the money.
1280282
It was my second choice. The Panasonic was $150 more(at the time) and I liked the sealed motor on the Prolux 7000. I had a older Panasonic industrial before before but it was not as good, smaller motor, more plastic parts and kind'a noise. But the Panasonic is still a good sweeper. Its your money I can't tell you which is best. I just liked the Prolux more for the price. Time will tell it I made the right choice. My girlfriend thought the red color was bad ass and as long as she is on the other end of it (and not me). What mom'a wants mom'a gets!
244045
I believe it is analog- but I would have to check the Panasonic specs to be sure.
1856928
I have used both. The hands down winner is the Panasonic. It's just more powerful. I get a better shave and it seems more waterproof.
2192834
Yes but after using the set for a while I'm less than excited about it. Had the Panasonic before and now find it was easier to use.
1134715
I went with the Panasonic. Got it yesterday. I'll report back for those interested.
132645
I have the sony and love it. I particularly like the fantastic panoramic feature - I dont see a reference to that on the panasonic description here. I have had the Olympus variants of the waterproof cameras in the past and they were quite good. Have not taken the sony into the water yet - I assume it will be trouble free (as the olympus cameras have been in the past). The picture quality on the sony is a step up from my past cameras. Having not tried the Panasonic yet, I recommend the sony.
671574
Sorry I missed your question earlier, but hopefully you can change your mind about the Panasonic. Viera has awful color and any SD source just looks atrocious. My experience with this SONY is that most SD cable looks sharp and clean, with good motion handling and less noise that you'd expect from the typical LCD. It all depends on how you're viewing your SD cable. Most cable providers send digital, analog, and HDTV network channels thru their line. I have a splitter on my cable line, sending one output to the set's RF input and the other to my cable box and then thru S-video cable. SD cable boxes today are mostly SD-digital. The digital SD stations actually look quite good, far better than you'd expect from an LCD. SD-DVD is even better, and BluRay looks best if your player can downscale to 720p (the SONY's own built-in 1080 downscaler is likely not as competent as the one on your BR player). The HD feeds thru your cable line look outstanding with 1080, 720, nd even 480 signals -- pure analog SD thru that line is tolerable, but not nearly as crisp as the SD-digital versions of those same channels. Thru your cable box, pure analog stations look a bit grim, red, and undersaturated; but digital-SD stations look very clean, almost as nice as SD-DVD. I'd avoid the Panasonic. In fact, this SONY might not be perfect (you'll have to use the RGB controls to tone down the really heavy Red), but it's the best 26" LCD I've seen in a while. Samsung makes a 26" that looks good in reviews, but build quality and reliability are extremely poor, and the Samsung suffers from motion artifacts that look much worse than with the SONY.
1487995
I believe it isnt but on the Panasonic websit you can check it better http://shop.panasonic.com/shop/model/DMW-MCFT3
658928
I read a review at one of the camera review sites, sorry I can't remember which one, that compared the shutter lag times of the two cameras. The Canon had a shorter lag time than the Panasonic in their findings.
1356816
A full comparison between these two models are available in the below link. http://shop.panasonic.com/compare/?itemNbr=HC-W850K&itemNbr;=HC-V750K
180265
Thanks Pat T!I will email both uniden & Panasonic & see what they say!God Bless! I appreciate your help!Sincerely,Ds8944
2133599
A few testing co. like CNet and CR rated the Panasonic over the Sony. They are the tech people and I am not. And for the Panasonic to be at $400 is something I felt could not be beat. Now my only problem is picking out an SD card.
1100519
Panasonic - it works really well. We use ours maybe 5 times a week and the first one lasted 7 years before the loaf pan gave out. Replacement working just as well. Simple to use and great results.
629897
Would recommend the Panasonic over the Braun due to better shaving experience. I found the Braun to perform poorly.
1909512
Edward... it's been too long ago... I really don't know the difference now... I will say that the system didn't last very long... It was the first time that a Panasonic product let me down... Hope this is helpful...Walt.
1233005
Zero lag to the naked eye, mine anyway, very minimal motion blur, there's always gonna be a little...even on $5000 set. The tested response time, I believe, is under 25 ms which placed it 4th out of 5 tv's (the Panasonic was out of is league with the other 4 as they were priced at a minimum of $1300 and still beat at least one! ). Hope this helps.
2124488
My dilemma was mainly the SD770 or SD790. I didn't like the 1100 because it was too small, cheap feeling, only 8MP (I was upgrading from a 7MP), and I thought the colors were gimmicky.To me, the 770 is a grownup version of the 1100, but the 790 is a different class. I only wish the 790 had a viewfinder and even though I'm now used to the dial, I still wonder if I'm not doing something right when I use it for pics. I haven't been out on a big trip yet though, so the real test is still to come.