Will this work for at&amp;t uverse - wireless? or will it still require another box to be plugged into it? thanks!
200145
att has a wireless feature,,cost more and you have to plug a wireless reciever to the 9 inch,,but its very small
2002698
You have to use the cable supplied...it isn't wireless. The cable supplied has different connectors on each end.
1249394
That may be a question the manufacturer should answer. I use this on my WD TV HD box so that I do not have to plug a cable from my router to the WD box. The wireless speed is a bit slower than a wired connection so I still use a wired connection in the living room. It is convenient to plug in the wireless Airlink and I can take it into another room or upstairs and use the WD box on another tv to use Netflix, YouTube, etc. I would suggest you check with your manufacturer for an answer or contact Airlink for help too. My personal guess would be that if you have a USB on your unit, then the Airlink should work but this is my opinion only.
1876224
It is necessary for this device to "sit" between the incoming "phone line" and your actual telephones. I use AT&T; U-Verse. There are two RJ sockets on the AT&T; box marked "Phone 1" and "Phone 2." In my house, "Phone 2" is not connected. I just put the Call Blocker between the AT&T; box and the wire that feeds all the phones in the house. This should work for any WIRED phones. In my case, one of those wired phones is a wireLESS base station, so my handhelds are all blocked.If Verizon has a system that receives calls from the cell system and parses them out to individual phones, it won't work, but as long as there's a single wire that carries the telephone signal in your system, this will block anything AFTER it. It is necessary for this device to "sit" between the incoming "phone line" and your actual telephones. I use AT&T; U-Verse. There are two RJ sockets on the AT&T; box marked "Phone 1" and "Phone 2." In my house, "Phone 2" is not connected. I just put the Call Blocker between the AT&T; box and the wire that feeds all the phones in the house. This should work for any WIRED phones. In my case, one of those wired phones is a wireLESS base station, so my handhelds are all blocked.If Verizon has a system that receives calls from the cell... » Read More It is necessary for this device to "sit" between the incoming "phone line" and your actual telephones. I use AT&T; U-Verse. There are two RJ sockets on the AT&T; box marked "Phone 1" and "Phone 2." In my house, "Phone 2" is not connected. I just put the Call Blocker between the AT&T; box and the wire that feeds all the phones in the house. This should work for any WIRED phones. In my case, one of those wired phones is a wireLESS base station, so my handhelds are all blocked.If Verizon has a system that receives calls from the cell system and parses them out to individual phones, it won't work, but as long as there's a single wire that carries the telephone signal in your system, this will block anything AFTER it. « Show Less
1589334
I have AT&T; and after a complete runaround mine works FABULOUSLY. There are times I'm thrown off microcell but typically within 5 mins I can be reconnected. It has to be plugged into your router- I have a newer home and so mine is plugged in to my whole house control panel which is in a closet. After I installed it I was told it had to be next to a window to work- which is not the case mine works fine from a closet.
256755
Hi Ken - Yes! It is COMBINED modem and wireless router which replaces two (2) pieces of equipment. HOWEVER... The damned thing DIED last week! I replaced it with an ATT supplied DSL Modem/Router (NetGear 7550). Setup was a breeze and if needed, there is STATE SIDE support. Stick with an ATT supplied modem/router!
155938
Wow, good question. The wires you need to connect to are the ones that go from the button outside the house, to the box on your wall. You have a wireless setup, so I really doubt you have those wires to connect to.I really doubt it will work.
1299966
Yes, Colleen. It worked for me , with the caveats listed in review, (so you will need someone knowledgeable with computer setups. It requires the browser to be setup in an insecure mode to utilize their Java script to install the device; change the browser back to secure after installation). I can confirm that it worked on ADSL2/2+. AT&T does have other flavors (products) about which I have no knowledge. So if you want to be absolutely sure, ask AT&T exactly what you are getting and see if it is compatible with ADSL2/2+. There was also a good bit of compatability information online and at the manufacturer's site. It looked like it worked with most of AT&T offerings to me, but check to be safe.
1421882
I do have ATT dsl but not uverse.I suggest if you have problems or questions CS is great.. I was having all kinds of problems with losing connection every time we loose power which is often. They spent a very long time with me. I never bothered to up date the firmware for 4 years and they took the time to walk me through the whole process of installing 4 updates. My router is at one end of my 2400 sf ranch home. I had 0 coverage in the family room at the other end. The unit works better than ever and now I don't have to go through the process of finding the router every time I loose power. I do have ATT dsl but not uverse.I suggest if you have problems or questions CS is great.. I was having all kinds of problems with losing connection every time we loose power which is often. They spent a very long time with me. I never bothered to up date the firmware for 4 years and they took the time to walk me through the whole process of installing 4 updates. My router is at one end of my 2400 sf ranch home. I had 0 coverage in the family room at the other end. The unit works better than ever and now I don't have to go through the process of finding the router every time I loose power.
1346995
Dave. Thanks for your input. It was thorough and cogent. I will follow your advice. I do have a stand alone Motorola modem supplied by ATT. i will still need the connection to my computer. Do I get a splitter so that I can have an output to both the computer and the wi-fi roouter?
1212065
Sorry but I haven't managed to make it work myself. I was just told that my ATT gateway needs to be set up so that it recognizes the IP number of the Netgear device; otherwise, it won't let it into the network. Good luck! Did you try to find instructions online?
867786
I also have Uverse. If you go with the UniFi AP I recommend to continue using the the 2wire, configure the settings on the UniFi the same as the 2wire settings e.g. security method, password, etc. except make sure you turn off DHCP. I think some of the people who are having problems getting it configured to work properly are not doing this.
1867300
This unit will work with most AT&T; modems but to be sure we would need to know the model of your modem. Thanks, WirelessNWifi
185537
found this post when looking up what this thing i found was...It sounds like what you need. Sony wireless Transeiver. I see its a year later but let me know if you still need this.
1963267
Hi Eduardo, are you referring to setting it up with separate wireless extenders or repeaters? If so, then the setup is actually done in the extender or repeater device, and it should be compatible with no issues.
1105553
The package says "does not work with Verizon FIOS or AT&T Uverse" on the outside.
963769
Yes, I have our Vonage phone system wireless to the Uverse router. Did away with AT&T land line. The Vonage interface box is wireless to the router. Works perfectly. Very easy to configure. No dropout at all on the transmitter.