how does this compare with tokina 100mm?
1313302
I don't own a Tokina 100mm lens...any Tokina lenses. I'm a Nikon guy, and stay with Nikon lenses, with this one exception: The Sigma 105mm. It weighs a ton, but is sharp as a tack. It has three swtitches for serious control of all macro situations. I recommend checking it out.
1313303
The Sigma has been rated a 5 star lens by Nikon Magazine when compared to several other comparable lenses (chosen as the best)... bought it on that alone and found it to be fantastic.
1313304
I have owned both and they are great lenses with fantastic results. The Tokina will increase in length as you change focus, whereas the Sigma moves the glass when focusing within the body of the lens. If you plan to shoot insects or really up close, you may prefer to go with the Sigma (as I did). Another reason to go with the Sigma over the Tokina is if you plan to use a lens-mounted ring flash or similar. Although you can use these on the Tokina, I was concerned about extra stress on the plastic part of the lens that extends. Otherwise, you can't go wrong either way. I suggest visiting your local photography store that has these in stock to test out, or renting the lenses to try out and see which one you like before purchasing from Amazon. Good luck!
1313305
Tokina is $260 cheaper but extends while focusing and it does not have image stablization..so that is enough to convince me to go for the sigma.
464337
Sure! It's an excellent lens. Very sharp. Here's a review. http://www.kenrockwell.com/tokina/100mm-f28.htm
296612
A prime lens will always have optimized optics for the focal length it is (because there is only one). A zoom will have to have compromises, even if minor, due to moving parts/optics/etc. I own a tokina zoom that is quite good, but second-tier lens makers can also have quality concerns compared to the major manufacturers. If you can actually resolve the optical issues (if any) is another issue. It's easy to find fault of a lens with a picture blown up to 100%+ on a big computer screen. Much tougher at practical sizes and print. So don't sweat it. That saiid, this is a marvelous lens with great optics and low-light capability in a reasonably compact size. Highly recommended.
1273247
This is the canon version, you want the nikon version:Tokina 80-400/4.5-5.6 AT-X 840 D Telephoto Zoom Lens
1625588
Just in case you run across it there is an older model of the 12-24mm that had flair/ghosting issues, the newer one has better coatings which has taken care of the issue.one with flair/ghosting issues: Tokina 12-24mm f/4.0 ATX Pro DX Zoom Lensone with better coatings: Tokina 12-24/4.0 Pro II Zoom Lens
1794211
I actually compared the two a little bit, doing some research on them and looking at reviews (both individually and compared to each other). The general consensus that I found was that even though they each have their specific pros and cons, the Tokina suited my needs better, and at a better price point. I felt that in most regards it was superior lens; but considering the price difference it was the clear choice for me. I use a Canon 7D (crop sensor) and that's what the Tokina is made for; the downside is that I couldn't use it if I decided to step up to a full frame camera (that's an advantage of the Canon). But for now this is the lens I wanted for capturing landscapes (both photo and at some point video from an r/c quadcopter), as well as night photography - and it works great!
1249483
It's not fair to make the comparison between these two kind of lenses in my opinion as each has its own forte and fulfills a different function.If you want both portrait work and macro then you should get the 100mm macro. While you can use the 50mm for portrait work, it is more suited for full body portrait. For closeup, the 100mm is better (less distortion). Of course you can use just about any lens for any application...some just won't perform very well.With the 100mm, it would be very tough to take landscape pictures (wide angle scenics shots). The 50mm would be better (though not ideal for your T2i which has a 1.6x crop factor). If you must have only one lens, I'd go for the 50mm. It's not fair to make the comparison between these two kind of lenses in my opinion as each has its own forte and fulfills a different function.If you want both portrait work and macro then you should get the 100mm macro. While you can use the 50mm for portrait work, it is more suited for full body portrait. For closeup, the 100mm is better (less distortion). Of course you can use just about any lens for any application...some just won't perform very well.With the 100mm, it would be very tough to take landscape pictures (wide angle scenics shots). The 50mm would be... » Read More It's not fair to make the comparison between these two kind of lenses in my opinion as each has its own forte and fulfills a different function.If you want both portrait work and macro then you should get the 100mm macro. While you can use the 50mm for portrait work, it is more suited for full body portrait. For closeup, the 100mm is better (less distortion). Of course you can use just about any lens for any application...some just won't perform very well.With the 100mm, it would be very tough to take landscape pictures (wide angle scenics shots). The 50mm would be better (though not ideal for your T2i which has a 1.6x crop factor). If you must have only one lens, I'd go for the 50mm. « Show Less
11860
Hopefully, you've already made your decision since the prices of both lenses has gone up significantly. I have these two lenses and both lenses are incredibly sharp. The 60mm's IQ in many respects is indistinguishable from the 100mm's. The build quality of the 60 is very nice as well although it isn't weather sealed. The two main advantages the 100mm brings to the table are IS--which would be of limited value with the 60mm--, and length--the extra 40mm means you don't need to get as close to those creepy crawly critters. IS doesn't add much for shorter focal lengths. A lot of macro shooters claim IS doesn't matter regardless because they always shoot with a tripod. I shoot with a tripod only when I have to (I'm stubborn). Thus, I do like it on the 100mm. I really see the value when I switch to my 135L. The shake is quite obvious and would be just a bit better for the 100mm without IS. The added length is indisputably worthwhile. However, you have to determine whether these benefits are worth paying 2.5 times the price.
768835
It depends on what you're shooting. I've owned both. If you're shooting landscapes and the like get the Tokina. If you're shooting nightlife, portrait etc get this lens.
681557
My recommendation is Tokina 11-16mm (sharpest UWA lens)+ 18-55mm + 70-200mm f/4 IS for most of traveling and hiking in the mountain, kit lens is actually very good and light. If you are in vacation you also need fast prime for indoor activity like 50mm f/1.8 and dedicated flash like 430EX or bigger. If you only need to bring 1 lens, get 18-200mm IS, very useful and acceptable sharpness in whole range compared to any third party superzoom lenses.
1211538
It will work fine, but will be like a 52 mm with the 1.5 crop factor...I like the Tokina 35 2.8 macro better, however, for a 'normal' (52 mm equivalent) lens on Nikon DX format bodies..more versatile with its close focusing ability, and less prone to flare from in-frame light sources, and pretty much the same price.
1630950
It's not fair to make the comparison between these two kind of lenses in my opinion as each has its own forte and fulfills a different function. If you want both portrait work and macro then you should get the 100mm macro. While you can use the 50mm for portrait work, it is more suited for full body portrait. For closeup, the 100mm is better (less distortion). Of course you can use just about any lens for any application...some just won't perform very well. With the 100mm, it would be very tough to take landscape pictures (wide angle scenics shots). The 50mm would be better (though not ideal for your T2i which has a 1.6x crop factor). If you must have only one lens, I'd go for the 50mm.
563693
Not grey market. Brand new Tokina with 3-year warranty. This is definitely a Pro level lens. Big. Heavy. Durable. Mine came with a pretty good lens cover. Use it to protect the front element, as this lens will not take filters, much like the Nikon 14-24mm f/2.8. I'm a photojournalist, not a "pixel-peeker." In real-life image making, it's as sharp and robust as any Nikon or Canon lens I've ever used. Auto-focus not quite as fast or silent as a Nikon or Canon, but at this focal length range, those things aren't as crucial. Haven't missed any shots due to those issues. Highly recommended if you can't afford a Nikon or Canon equivalent. Not grey market. Brand new Tokina with 3-year warranty. This is definitely a Pro level lens. Big. Heavy. Durable. Mine came with a pretty good lens cover. Use it to protect the front element, as this lens will not take filters, much like the Nikon 14-24mm f/2.8. I'm a photojournalist, not a "pixel-peeker." In real-life image making, it's as sharp and robust as any Nikon or Canon lens I've ever used. Auto-focus not quite as fast or silent as a Nikon or Canon, but at this focal length range, those things aren't as crucial. Haven't missed any shots due to those issues. Highly... » Read More Not grey market. Brand new Tokina with 3-year warranty. This is definitely a Pro level lens. Big. Heavy. Durable. Mine came with a pretty good lens cover. Use it to protect the front element, as this lens will not take filters, much like the Nikon 14-24mm f/2.8. I'm a photojournalist, not a "pixel-peeker." In real-life image making, it's as sharp and robust as any Nikon or Canon lens I've ever used. Auto-focus not quite as fast or silent as a Nikon or Canon, but at this focal length range, those things aren't as crucial. Haven't missed any shots due to those issues. Highly recommended if you can't afford a Nikon or Canon equivalent. « Show Less
2193168
yes. you will need to lock the aperture ring at f/22 to enable autofocus. on DX it will be a 43-112mm equivalent lens, making it great for portraits. however, you will still need to cover the wide end, making it less than ideal as a walkaround lens. for the wide end, i would recommend getting the tokina 12/24/4
651270
Did you ever figure out if this will work with the Tokina or find a good substitute that does work?
433204
I have both, but use the 50mm more (for portrait). Now that I have a tokina 11-16mm 2.8, 35mm won't be used as much, but I did get some good shoots from it.
610149
Used this on Sony a7s with Tokina 11-16mm V1. Aperture works, AF is a bit slow but that's Tokina.