how dose this product differ from the " Manfrotto MVM500A Aluminum Fluid Monopod with 500 Head" ?
1307114
This product doesn't have a fluid head. The Manfrotto MVM500A monopod with 500 head, to my knowledge, doesn't include a fully functioning 500 head, but rather one modified for the monopod, which removes the panning function of the head since the monopod's fluid base provides this function. I purchased the 500AH head separately from the 562B-1, and use the QR receiver on my shoulder rig. Using the fully functioning 500AH head, I can choose to add a 75mm ball base attachment, or leave it flat for use on other tripod legs, sliders, etc. Much more useful than a botched version of the head.
1307115
Have no idea as I don't have that one, sorry. I do find this monopod quite heavy.
680532
What is the difference between the Davis & Sanford PROVISTA7518XB Provista Tripod with FM18 Head & the Davis & Sanford PROVISTA7518 Provista Tripod with FM18 Head? Anyone know?
1238710
It will depend on the diameter of the screw on the monopod. If the thread on the monopod is of smaller diameter, there are adapters available that are very inexpensive. If the thread is larger, then the ballhead will not fit on the monopod
2169328
Yes, it has a standard mounting screw on the top which will allow any Manfrotto head w/ screw hole on the bottom to be mounted onto the monopod.
2172653
This tripod head works for me. Manfrotto MVH500AH Fluid Video Head with Flat Base
2261033
The monopod has to different size screws to use with different equipment. One is the size of the mount on the bottom of an SLR and the other is larger. To change them, all you must do is to unscrew the piece on the top, pull the metal screw out and flip it over, then screw the top part back on that holds it in place. I believe that it will work. I use a Kirk ball head on mine and it works fine.
80229
No, this is the ball mount version. You will have to get something along the lines of a Manfrotto 501HD head since it has a flat mount.
1455551
The Giottos MH621 would be a less expensive option vs. the Manfrotto 577 the reviews as far number customer stars are very similar the only difference seems to be the price. The only issue that I've had after a year of continued use of the MH621 was that the red release spring popped out. But that didn't affect the functionality. My suggestion is from time to time check any thing on you equipment that screws and tighten if needed.
683980
Yes its the same exact as the manfrotto quick release. If you need to know more about the monopod, theres a couple of videos showing the benro monopod, also comparisons of the benro and manfrotto monopod.
1065993
Price was definitely a factor but the reviews are what pushed me over the edge. I was looking at a couple of Manfrotto (lower end) tripods but there were some consistent quality and durability issues. I always read the 1 and 2 star reviews first when choosing a product and if all of the complaints are about the same issue, I steer clear regardless of the 4 and 5 star reviews. A consistent problem is a likely problem. The reviews on this particular model were mostly about problems carrying a full frame camera or one with a heavy lens attached, neither of which applied to me. I use a Nikon D90 and my heaviest lens is a 18-200mm and I have had no problems. I also have some experience with Slik products. I have a monopod that I've used for a while now and have been very happy with it even though some reviewers complained about it being a bit on the flimsy side. I don't use it as a hiking stick or try and carry a full frame camera on it so I've never experienced any issue of durability. Quality and functionality wise, this tripod meets all of the criteria I had in mind when I started looking for a lightweight alternative to my 8# Ravelli. I wouldn't use it in high winds or expect it to dampen most vibration like a heavy duty tripod does but it does the trick for shooting around town and night shooting (I do a ton of it!). I do recommend, however, replacing the pan head if you are used to a ball head with a pistol grip. I just can't get used to the multi-lever and twist knob ordeal just to get the camera in position although once it's there, it's solid. I've replaced it with a Sunpack pistol grip head which maintains the lightweight requirement but adds ease of adjustments. I hope this helped you with your decision regarding this nice little tripod.
1331865
It should. I have the Manfrotto 685B and it works fine with that. According to Manfrotto's website, both monopods use the same screw attachment: "1/4" and retractable 3/8" screw attachment type". I also use it with the Manfrotto Super Clamp, it works great for clamping a camera to a railing or attaching a second camera to a tripod leg.
431093
I don't understand the question. I use this tripod with a manfrotto ball head and it works fine
61254
Nope! I wouldn't risk it. This thing is crap. I have the 290 series Tripod and Monopod from Manfrotto and am very satisfied. Not worth it to skimp a few bucks.
794381
I'm not exactly sure what you're asking. However, perhaps this will help. I have the ball head with quick release mounted on a Manfrotto monopod. The ball head works nicely on the Manfrotto, and the quick release is easy to use. The connection to the Manfrotto required an adapter, which I easily found at a local camera store.
721683
The mounting screw has 3/8" threads on one side, 1/4" on the other and the base accepts both. Just unscrew, flip and tighten to suit your needs. Mine is married to a head that required the 1/4" thread, but the monopod shipped with 3/8" showing. Easy to loosen, flip and mount...no issues.
2020155
I ended up getting a ballhead because the grip is too big--i want it to be smaller profile and portable. I got the Manfrotto head 494RC2. It's a smaller base than designed for this tripod but it works and is cheap: Manfrotto 494RC2 Ball Head with Quick Release Replaces Manfrotto 484RC2
2176184
I suggest you go to the Dolica website to compare but I believe the DS has an integrated monopod.