How is the quality of photos taken with the kit 14-42mm lens?
1308206
Thank you for taking time to answer my question. I decided to purchase the Fujifilm XE2 with their kit 18-55 lens last July. I couldn't be happier with the product quality and the great photos this combo produces.
1308207
I guess that depends on what you are used to. I had no complaints about the image quality from it... it was an enormous step up from using an iPhone and actually, it produced better pictures than my nikon d3200 (with the 18-55 kit lens). But in the end, I found myself using prime lenses instead... I enjoy the 'hand-on' a little more.
1308208
Quality is OK, but the distortion on the wide end is some of the worst I've ever seen. Trees, buildings, etc. are all leaning inward toward the center of the image.
1308209
Sharp and clear lens : several websites on photography published tests with this lens (generally very positive opinions), if you want a closer look on the photographs taken with it you can also consult the GX7 group on flick river. Personally I prefer prime lenses, but i'm satisfied with the14-42 II kit lens.
1308210
The kit 14-42 is the version 2 and therefore on a par with the well regarded 14-45. The photos should be very sharp and clear. Of course, the lens is only part of the story. It is necessary to learn to use the camera body to get the best results.
2188489
I have not used my lense for sports yet but have gotten some really good pictures of the moon. Distance is really good. I shoot in manual mode.
582699
Okay, thanks a lot, new at this and I wasn't sure if the lens quality is the same. I appreciate everyone's help!
1244806
I think you are underestimating the quality of the "old kitzoom" lens. By any rational standard, this is a very good lens. The Olympus tradition or providing a good kit lens up to the standards of the body it is sold with continues with this lens, I think. I would remind you that the legendary Zuiko DSLR lens, the 14-55 mm f2.8/f3.5 started out as a kit lens for the original 4/3s camera the E1.
1712750
Hi there, it is a good lens but I wouldn't say its as great as some. the movement is more like the 14-42 than the 14-45. However, it is the only lens in its range for the panasonic line, that I know of. if you need the far end of magnification you will want it. If not, I'm finding I use the 45-175 zoom instead, which is very compact and good quality. In low light it is more likely you'll get a good photo with the lens easier to hold still. Unless you go to the tripod, which may solve the wobble factor on the big lens.
1308483
I have the 14 to 150 and hardly ever put any other lens on. It takes beautiful pictures from near to far. Love it.
392884
OK, well here are my thoughts on the kit lens. It is lighter, so for backpacking orhiking it could be a really good thing. As you say, it is only an extra $75 or so,so there isn't much wrong with having it along with a truly fine lens, unless $75makes or breaks your budget. Get the kit lens AND as many other lenses asyou can justify.
1907929
I did not buy the kit lens. I already have a full range of L lenses by Canon and did not need it. In general I find I prefer not to use kit lenses as they are of lower quality and do not suit my needs. For someone just starting in SLR photography, the kit may make sense, but if possible I think it's better to spend more and get a really good general purpose lens such as the 24-70 or 24-105.
939836
I agree. Make sure your lens is decent. Other than that it takes great photos!
1282795
Yes I bought mine brand new years ago. I did not expect it to be a very good camera as I paid a heck of a lot for it. But I did get to lens with it one close the other far. It is totally computerized but you can do your own shooting if you wish. Here is what I can say about the camera. You would think only 14.2 mp wouldn't give you a perfect picture? Well let me tell you the pictures it gives are way to perfect and I will say I'd like to see you shoot a bad picture! As you won't. I'd buy it and have the best fun you ever have experienced!
557615
I've stopped using the kit-zoom-lens (14-42). I have a 14-mm and a 20-mm prime lens ($300). I like night-photography too; I mostly use the 20-mm-lens, however. I like the 14-mm lens though, since it's small ... if you only want to get one more lens, get the 20-mm prime lens. It's worth it. If you don't wanna spend 300, spend the 150 or so (ebay) on the 14-mm lens ... it's small and good for night shots ...
1564873
This is a great deal....It comes with a pretty decent starter kit of lenses. While they are not the greatest lenses out there, they def take awesome photos. I would def recommend this package to anyone.
19800
It has performed very well for me in low light situations. I have been startled a few times by the brightness of the recorded image. I usually use a Pentax 18-250mm lens.
173418
Hi, I was faced with the same dilemma last year. I chose 14-45. It is a sharp lens with good auto focus and stabilization. I use it mainly as a travel lens and photograph historical monuments.Prakash
1674903
I have been more than pleased with the image quality of the LF1. I have not seen the images you are evaluating. Check out Gordon Liam & Camera Labs for his review and serious sample photos.
1183760
For me, a big selling point was the 16-50mm f/2.8 (weather resistant) lens and weather resistant body. I knew I would be out when photographing nature stuff and it might start raining. Plus the f/2.8 lens is spectacular and you get a $200 discount when buying is as a kit.
1642872
It depends onthe lense, this camera can accept all types of lenses. The 14-42 power zoom is an excellent lense for compactness. This setup is a very small almost point n shoot size yet provides interchangeable lense and has flash. If on manufacturer says thier camera is 10x, that doesnt mean another 10x manufacturer has same zoom. 10x is measured from min focal to max focal. So 14 - 42 mm is 3. Also keep in mind that this is Micro Four Thirds lense so you must multiple by 2 when comparing to full framed 35mm camera.