how much better is this than the hd 5700
2021749
Don't really know haven't owned one but I can tell you that it has run just about every game at 1080p, 60fps and very high to ultra settings. I highly recommend this card.
1889532
It should work but I would get the HD 5770 it will be faster and it is about $79 compared to the $125 for the 6670.
1639695
Not much of a difference just remote codes and color led nothing too happy about 570.4x is a good alarm. Why pay a few for bucks for 2 letters saying hd.
1210567
They are both good, you need to see benchmarks for what you are using your videocard for
733927
Its a worth while upgrade , Even if it will last 1 -2 years before the next gen cards come in. If you sell the 560ti for $100 its a big improvement for $150 moreIf you look at benchmarks its way higher , If i run everything maxed on most new games i get 60fps, with the 560ti that would drop and get glitchy
119540
The 290 is a powerhouse and is bout 50-60% faster than the 760 FTW, costs $125 more, runs significantly hotter, and consumes almost double the power. But is 50-60% faster.If you already have the 760 FTW, I'd think carefully about whether the upgrade is worth it or not.Source: I own rigs with both 760s (non-FTW) and 290s.
905479
Gigabyte 6670 doesn't exist I'm guessing it is Raedon HD6670 that you are referring to and yes this card is slightly better than that according to: http://www.videocardbenchmark.net/compare.php?cmp[]=1432&cmp[]=96
785275
No the 650s frame is different. The Halo is not a problem, some even think it's a bonus (I Like it actually). You can remedy the halo with bias lighting that gets rid of it and improves your blacks. Don't let the talk of a Halo help to make a bad decision. The 650 is the same as the 750 except for the fact the 750 can do HD PIP and the 650 can't. The 750 plays video through it's usb drive or streamed using a bridge and a dlna client.Good luck
733929
Over all, I would say this card is better in every way, it is super cocked, has more DDR5 ram, 1 more gb. It is priced very well. I bought this card and I have no problem running new games on my PC, on Highest quality, like Tomb Raider, Borderlands 2, in my opinion it`s the better buy.
1146602
Much better. You won't be disappointed. There are tons of sound presets to suit your tastes, plus 4 presets that you can fully customize. Even without any enabled the sound quality is still better thanks to the Wolfson DAC in the device.
246749
The HD version is made of aluminum while this one is plastic. This one is also slightly larger. The sound quality on the HD is better also. It can go louder, has more bass, and is also more clear. They are both excellent products for their prices though.
1109496
HD72 cost much more than HD70, it must has it's reason, but unless you use testing tools, as most of people, you can not even tell the different in a dark room. if money is not problem, go get HD72, it will make you fell better. otherwise HD70 is the best for the value. I pick HD70 for my home theater, by the way.
1249280
I do not know the difference. I think the 570 is an awsome machine It is better thab a 600 Stihl. I would not consider anything else.
1375921
In fact, they are not recording the same quality, HG20 is a set ahead than HF100, 24Mbps against 17Mbps, resulting better quality. Can we see the difference? Who knows? But it's there...I aggre with you, HF100 feels cheap(in fact it's cheaper) but does not give the quality feel of HG20, it's not as ergonomic as HG20...HD part of HG20 lets you to handle it better, HF100 feels too small..But, are these enough to pay about 65-70$ more?
332851
The 580 has a 50mm mylar driver whereas the 780 has a 40mm gold plated driver. Gold plating actually DOES matter for electrical throughput, although how much exactly is debatable. The 780 also has a higher frequency range, and it does show. It has clearer, higher treble. And before you burn the 780s in for about 100 hours, the treble can be a tad harsh. The bass on both models is punchy and clean, and can get pretty heavy if you have a DAC with bass boost options
1172440
As J. Madonna said, the 590 is bigger and has a 250GB hard drive in it. Other than that, not many other differences. The 590 does have the hard drive in it, but it doesn't record stuff off of TV. You can connect a USB flash or hard drive or connect wirelessly to a computer and transfer videos, music, etc. to it. (I don't know if you could insert DVD's/BD's into the player and have it rip them?) The 580 is a 3D blu-ray player, but doesn't have some of the features that the 570 or 590 has, like being able to play video files through USB. (At least as far as I could tell it can't)
246743
Hey. I have never owned the HD 650 but I can tell you that they are very commonly used in the studio and therefore have very flat sound. That's why you get that veil in the vocals (especially female vocals). The HD598 was made with audiophiles in mind but they are very enjoyable to listen to. The vocal and acoustic part of the midrange is the best I've heard in that price range. It's clear, spacious, and full without being heavy. I personally use my Hd598s to edit female vocals and piano and I am very happy with them. Many audiophiles say that the 598s are more enjoyable to listen to than the 650s or 600 despite the cheaper price.