Can anyone get their adapter to run faster than 65mbs? If so any suggestions?
2023676
Hello Russell Holloway, If you are seeing this speed as your 'connection speed', then that is the transmission speed between the adapter and the router and should not affect download speeds. If you are referring to a download speed measurement (such as from Speedtest.net) then that speed is normally determined by your internet provider as well as the router itself. If you need any assistance, please call or email our free US Based Tech Support for assistance. Thanks, Mediabridge Customer Support 856-216-8222 support@mediabridgeproducts.com
145697
I was not able to get the adapter to work with my equipment ... sorry I can't be of more help.
1911583
Yeah, this is seems common, they aren't exactly a "high speed sync" solution. 1/160 seems to be the best speed for reliability
191225
It may be because you have an RT. You might want to research that. I have 8.1 pro. But with the size of the adapter, I wasn't able to use my ac adapter. Research your RT and USB issue or maybe try a VGA adapter.
1932908
That's pretty much a given. If ur using usb 2.0 to connect you can't have speeds higher than the usb 2 limit.
1818255
Not sure this is helpful but my adapters (4) all have the same throughput as being connected to my comcast modem- 50Mbs.
1392321
From my personal experience, I found using the adapter on USB 2.0 port actually give me better and stable performance over USB 3.0 port. At first, I plug it into my USB 3.0 port, I got very poor performance and very unstable connection but when I switch it to USB 2.0 port, it was working fine for me.
1897037
You cannot honestly tell if latency will exist until you use it. What interface are you using? USB or Firewire? 2 gigs of ram seems like a VERY basic machine so I can see potential software slowness, but again, you'd have to try. Just my experience with PCs I am going to say you will have some performance issues across the board.
1550203
I had mine run at that slow of a speed due to the provider's link being lousy slow. Whether a 56K 13, 24, whatever it runs at a lot and some old old system are alike in other electronic ways I do not know.
810054
It is 1866MHz but it'd work with your system, just set it to the correct speed and everything should be fine.
1187084
Get the mushkin adapter. It keeps the connectors pretty close to 3.5 correct
2179643
Google the manufacturer and model name for drivers. And do the same for forums. That's what I did. You can find different driver packages but I believe as far as my last search went nearly a year ago, the maufacturer's latest drivers at that time were beginning to solve lingering user issues. Most reported good success though not necessarily the bandwidth specified, though still rewarding. Time has passed so a search should yield even newer drivers. I have not had a chance to actually install mine, but I look forward to it.. I think anyway.. by what I did read about driver developments.
817425
If you are using an older machine that does not have USB 3.0 support the slower transfer rate can cause an issues such as this and there is no fix. If you are using a USB 3.0 port make sure your motherboard drivers and bois settings are up to date. After trying all this if the drive continues not to perform to your expectations I would exchange it for a different one.
2256038
Yes. I have a Sandisk Extreme Pro 128GB UDMA7 card rated at 160MB/s. On this reader, I'm getting a whopping 50MB/s. junk.
1561872
Try the card in a few other computers, or different brands to figure out if the problem lies in the card itself. BTW, theoretical top speeds are never achieved in practice. See Wikipedia article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_device_bit_rates#mediaviewer/File:Speeds_of_common_interfaces.svg
1777358
I've got one on a windows 8.1 system and I can see and access either the 2.4 or 5.0 bandwidths without any problems. Maybe its an issue that is discussed on the Linksys and/or Apple support websites.
1591423
Look at he timings for AMD memory sold as 1866Mhz. I would try them first. They should be a lower latency.