Does this adapter combined with UV filter cause vignetting in wide angle mode on the SX-50? Can I see as much edge to edge and top to bottom?
2046570
I use the adapter, a UV filter AND a Cokin filter ring on top of those two and get no vignetting on my SX-50.
2046571
I use the adapter and filter together all the time. and get no vignetting on my SX-50.
2046572
Yes I find it works great and no distortion or shortage of field of range when using with any filters
2100404
I have the "Regular" B&W UV filter on my Canon 10-22 with no vignetting. I took 2 shots for you off my deck. The first one has no filter; the second one has the regular B&H UV fiter. OOPS! There is no way to attach files to this reply. Give me a few minutes and then go to my web site for the pix: http://michaelsimonds.com Look for "Test Shots." Good imaging to you!
534706
Sorry for being this late Pal..... I believe No...... Because when I used Canon EOS glass, images were(in my opinion) equally lit at same stop. I used 50 1.7 & 35 2.8 there was no vignetting. Aperture reaches its lowest point without any problem. Most importantly it doesn't have any play.
1398060
What you are seeing are GROOVES, NOT threads!!!The grooves are parallel and not spiral.Anyone who has threaded a filter or lens to the SX10is Or SX20is have tapped their own threads onto the grooves.Although, this may work for a while, after a few changes, the rigged threads will soon wear out and become buggered up.There are some 3rd party adapters that are slotted the same as the hood for filters, but attaching heavy lenses will soon wear out the internal lens mechanism.
453189
After researching thru Amazon, the SX 520 HS will accept the 58mm adapter ring. It fits very nicely on my SX 50 HS. I wanted to use a UV filter primarily for lens protection so I had to get the adapter. Also Amazon has a 67mm adapter ring that will fit your 520 with corresponding filters.
642635
HI, due to the angle of the lens if you don't use a thin filter it will vignette around the edges.
1252945
For the 24-105, you shouldn't have problems with vignetting if you've got a single filter (no stacking thereof) and are shooting with with your aperture closed down a bit. Good Luck!
417554
From my experience using this adapter with an FD 50mm f1.4, the corrective lens causes a soft edge, or "bloom" effect at F-stops faster than around f2.8, creating an unusable image. Im not sure how the difference in focal length will affect it though.
630851
I use regular thickness filter - and have not had issues with vignetting. I am using the D300s so DX sensor may not be at risk as much. I do not have a FX sensor body so cannot say. Overall, the VR seems to help a great deal in low light situations.
1122733
Keith: The filter should work since the SX 30 (the one I have), the 40 and 50 all have 67 mm lenses. WRL
1806935
The lensmate adapter works great. I'm using one with my SX1 with the circular polarizer and infrared.
1674275
Congratulation on the purchase of your SX50. What an amazing gem of a camera! It seems you have solved the problem. I'm pleased that you were dealing with Gojo... A great company that always takes care of their customers. Now, you should consider getting a polarizing filter and a lens shade. If you are doing any landscapes or seascapes you will find that the polarizing filter is the most valuable tool in your bag. When you get a lens shade I strongly suggest getting the soft collapsible rubber shade. Those hard tulip shades are a waste of money. Your lens on the SX50 goes from 24mm to 1200mm. At the 24mm, wide angle setting, the rubber lens shade will vignette very slightly in the corners when the shade is mounted on one of the filter. Without a filter in place it won't vignette at all. Gojo sells both items. Just make sure you get the collapsible one. I leave my rubber lens shade on all the time. In the collapsed position it gives great added protection to the lens by acting like a rubber bumper. Your 58mm lens cap will snap right into the threads of the shade when the shade is in the collapsed position. Don't hesitate to contact me if you have any additional questions on the SX50 or related topics. I am a photojournalist and I use this camera for many of my magazine features. Good luck and good shooting! massey_23@msn.com
120699
I would wager based on my experience with the B&W standard lens filters that you would see some vignetting on both of these filters, even with the 010M I have to be aware of a slight darkening of the edges of my photo if I back off to 17mm ( I currently shoot a 17-40mm lens) The polarizer will definitely vignette. To avoid this issue I'd go with the "Slim" model filters B&W produces for wide angle lenses.
2178270
I tried it with a PANA 45-200mm micro 43 lens on a PANA GH2. There was no issue of vignetting. However, the DOF can be shallow that may require focus stacking for close-up work. Otherwise, I am happy about it.
2224986
I bought it for my Canon SX40 and it works perfectly, but I'm not sure if the SX50 lens diameter is larger. This set does come with an adapter ring that fit snugly on my Canon SX40 which allows placement of the filters and you can also stack the filters and/or add the lens hood. I mainly just use the lens hood without filters as UV filters are a bit controversial on their protection vs image quality loss on poor glass. So sometimes I'll remove the UV and just use the Hood for bright days and it works nicely, but make sure you zoom out just a tad with this hood on or you get vignetting or see the edges of the hood in the corners of the photo unless you zoom out just a tad I bought it for my Canon SX40 and it works perfectly, but I'm not sure if the SX50 lens diameter is larger. This set does come with an adapter ring that fit snugly on my Canon SX40 which allows placement of the filters and you can also stack the filters and/or add the lens hood. I mainly just use the lens hood without filters as UV filters are a bit controversial on their protection vs image quality loss on poor glass. So sometimes I'll remove the UV and just use the Hood for bright days and it works nicely, but make sure you zoom out just a tad with this hood on or you get vignetting or... » Read More I bought it for my Canon SX40 and it works perfectly, but I'm not sure if the SX50 lens diameter is larger. This set does come with an adapter ring that fit snugly on my Canon SX40 which allows placement of the filters and you can also stack the filters and/or add the lens hood. I mainly just use the lens hood without filters as UV filters are a bit controversial on their protection vs image quality loss on poor glass. So sometimes I'll remove the UV and just use the Hood for bright days and it works nicely, but make sure you zoom out just a tad with this hood on or you get vignetting or see the edges of the hood in the corners of the photo unless you zoom out just a tad « Show Less
1124393
Yes it works fine but it causes vignetting after about f/5.6 (using the aperture ring on the mount)
253342
Yes a UV filter will fit. 77mm is the size. I use a UV on all my lenses and have done so for 40+ years. With the 11-18mm super-wide I do not experience any vignetting with the filter. Vignetting is darkening in the corners of your pictures. All superwides are vulnerable. I really like this lens.For all specs go to: http://store.sony.com/WFS/SNYUS/en_US/-/USD/-zid27-SAL1118/cat-27-catid-All-Alpha-DSLR-Lenses?k_id=_kenshoo_clickid_&kpid;=SAL1118&adparam;=sem73pla&XID;=O:SAL1118:dg_gglsrch:pla&cagpspn;=pla&gclid;=CKL1vvGW58ACFbRzMgod7gYAhw