Good for early 2009 Mac Pro 2x2.26 GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon?
2050375
I have tried two cards prior and had them send back for a new card for the upgrade of (OS Maverick). If you do or still can send it back, that if you did an upgrade, tell you need a card compatible with new OS "Maverick". Good luck.
1847149
it might be a bit of an overkill - this RAM overclocks to 1600MHz and max that your Mac supports is 1333MHz.
1150571
try it being that you're already running 10.9 on a 2007 mac pro...it should work...
1188825
Nope. This board only supports these xeon CPU's: Gainestown Xeon W5590 - 3.33 GHz Xeon W5580 - 3.20 GHz Xeon L5530 - 2.40 GHz Xeon E5507 - 2.27 GHz Xeon E5503 - 2.00 GHz Nehalem Xeon X5550 - 2.66 GHz Xeon L5520 - 2.26 GHz Xeon L5506 - 2.13 GHz Xeon E5540 - 2.53 GHz Xeon E5530 - 2.40 GHz Xeon E5520 - 2.26 GHz Xeon E5506 - 2.13 GHz Xeon E5504 - 2.00 GHz Westmere Xeon X5690 - 3.46 GHz Xeon X5680 - 3.33 GHz Xeon X5677 - 3.46 GHz Xeon X5670 - 2.93 GHz Xeon X5667 - 3.06 GHz Xeon X5660 - 2.80 GHz Xeon X5650 - 2.66 GHz Xeon L5640 - 2.27 GHz Xeon L5638 - 2.00 GHz Xeon L5630 - 2.13 GHz Xeon E5649 - 2.53 GHz Xeon E5645 - 2.40 GHz Xeon E5640 - 2.67 GHz Xeon E5630 - 2.53 GHz Xeon E5620 - 2.40 GHz Xeon E5607 - 2.27 GHz Xeon E5606 - 2.13 GHz Xeon E5603 - 1.60 GHz
591806
Yes! Currently running OS X 10.9.1. Search for "Intel Haswell NUC Core i5 (D54250WYK)" and follow the guides. Works awesome as a home theater PC in my living room!
988090
I run a mac flashed version of this gigabyte card and a sapphire version of this card (no mac flash) in my 2009 mac pro. I have them set up in crossfire on win7. Works great. If you plan on using OS X only, then i recommend buying one that has been flashed for OS X boot screen. Otherwise yes it will work, just no boot screen during start up.
1572833
Hi Linda-I use mine with a 2 x 2.66GHz Dual-Core Intel Xeon OS 10.6 and it works great.Will
138397
Since you plan on keeping it a long time (more than 5 years), it might be best to get the i7. However the difference between them does not appear to be significant. I too am about to buy a Pro. I was gonna get the i7 but after watching countless Youtube videos and reading reviews about it I decided paying $400 more from the 2.4 ghz i5 was not worth the miniscule bump in power. From what I gather on youtube, the 2.4ghz is capable of playing all current games on high or close to high settings (not extremely high though). I've seen videos of people playing everything from Modern Warfare 2 to Mass Effect 2 to Crysis with relative ease. I've also seen a video of someone testing how capable the i5 was at multitasking by running multiple programs at the same time. He had 3 VMware windows open + itunes + email + Dreamweaver and a few others open and it ran very smoothly. If you are planing on keeping your Pro for at least 10 years (not impossible) then you may as well get the i7. If like me you predict you might upgrade in 5 years or so, then I would get the 2.4 ghz i5. The difference between that and the i7 is rather small and not worth the extra $400. Check out this video for more info: www.youtube.com/watch?v=z0-l37pgqa0 In case the link isn't working just go to Youtube and type in "2.4 GHz Core i5 or Core i7 2.66 GHz MacBook Pro". Also, according to this review, the 2.4 ghz i5 is faster than the 2.8 ghz mid 2009 macbook pro: www.macworld.com/article/150146/2010/04/15inch_macbookpro_corei5i7.html
182679
Yes, I have a Mac Pro 4,1 ( 2x2.93GHz ) running Mavericks and it was plug and play. As I had said in my review on this card a while ago, an excellent value for the price!
228698
But the description lists 2 GB RAM, 320 GB HD, and ATI X2600. All of those specs correspond to the current Mac Pro, not the previous version. The customer service guy I talked to claimed that the 1.33 Ghz FSB was a misprint (but they haven't corrected it yet). I'm really confused as to what this thing is.
1337108
1GB (two 512MB SO-DIMMs) or 2GB (two 1GB SO-DIMMs) of 667MHz DDR2 SDRAM; two SO-DIMM slots support up to 4GB this is what your Mac calls for so I would say NO since Komputerbay's is running at 266 mhz. You need to take the time to do a simple online search and that is exactly what I did. Most memory retail have memory finders including Amazon check it out.
319888
This is an old Mac running on a PowerPC chip which is not supported by Apple any more. A Mac with an Intel chipset would be a good place to look in the Apple Universe.
1482411
If the 2008 Mac Pro has SATA III not that much, you will find that these cards operate at roughly 5Gbps so a little slower than native SATA III, but if you have SATAII this will be a nice improvement. I use this card and it works rather well.
403722
Hello Peter, The Early 2009 Mac Pro only supports up to 16GB using four Unbuffered ECC 1333MHz 4GB memory modules. Part number KVR1333D3N9/8G is a Non-ECC 1333MHz 8GB module and is not compatible with that system. We no longer support the Early 2009 Mac Pro as we no longer manufacture memory that is compatible with it. You may be able to find the discontinued compatible 4GB memory module KTA-MP1333/4G from some resellers. Thank you for your interest in Kingston ValueRAM. -Jewel, Kingston US Technical Support
864223
if it has a sata connection, you should be fine. i put mine in a 2008 mac pro intel quad... problem is, it crapped out after 3 yrs. i now have the comparable Asus...
1949110
Sorry, I'm not sure. The motherboard just broked 4 months after took it. I took my money back an bought a Mac Pro.
1850333
I would not try to overclock the CPU or try to use higher than recommended RAM speed in this laptop. I can confrm that this laptop can support 16 GB of RAM. Check out the link below for more info on this and other Macs.RAM Speed and type: Speed 1333 MHz; Type: PC3-10600 DDR3http://www.everymac.com/systems/apple/macbook_pro/specs/macbook-pro-core-i7-2.0-15-early-2011-unibody-thunderbolt-specs.html