Sony SR11 vs Canon HG20 I have been keeping an eye on amazon for SR11 and HG20 for a while. Both started out as 1000$+ but lately price of SR11 has been going up. It's 999$ right now as compared to 594$ for HG20. From what I've heard, these are the few differences:1. sony has a view finder and hg20 doesn't.2. low light performance of sony is a little better than canon.3. sony has 5.1 sound as compared to 2.1 of canonbecause of all these i'm leaning a little toward sony but can't justify paying 400$ more for these small things. does anyone know the reason for the price difference ? is there anything wrong with hg20 ? or do you think price jack on sony is temporary ?Appreciate the help. Sony SR11 vs Canon HG20 I have been keeping an eye on amazon for SR11 and HG20 for a while. Both started out as 1000$+ but lately price of SR11 has been going up. It's 999$ right now as... » Read More Sony SR11 vs Canon HG20 I have been keeping an eye on amazon for SR11 and HG20 for a while. Both started out as 1000$+ but lately price of SR11 has been going up. It's 999$ right now as compared to 594$ for HG20. From what I've heard, these are the few differences:1. sony has a view finder and hg20 doesn't.2. low light performance of sony is a little better than canon.3. sony has 5.1 sound as compared to 2.1 of canonbecause of all these i'm leaning a little toward sony but can't justify paying 400$ more for these small things. does anyone know the reason for the price difference ? is there anything wrong with hg20 ? or do you think price jack on sony is temporary ?Appreciate the help. « Show Less
846059
I thought I would buy a Canon HG20 because my current camcorder and camera are a Canon, but once I actually held both the Canon HG20 and the Sony SR11 in my hand, there was no doubt that the Sony SR11 was worth the price difference. The construction quality, placement of controls and the vivid LCD screen of the Sony SR11 make it a superior choice over the Canon HG20. I had my Canon camcorder for 8 years so I always look to buy a quality product that I will use for a long time. I would recommend you go to a store to compare the Sony and the Canon to see the difference in person.
2037715
Hey, I was wondering the same thing, but I found that the sr11 is available from several other places for much less, look at cnet's price comparison... This makes the sr11 my choice!
2037716
Tech Geek, appreciate your view. How is SR11 working for you ? Junior Piquito, I noticed that AbesOfMaine is selling it for 730 (plus free bag). I've been following prices on various web sites for 4-5 weeks now. At one point, Amazon.com dropped to 790. I don't know why it shot back up. I've never bought anything from AbesOfMaine before and have had a wonderful experience with Amazon.com shipping and customer service so far. I am going to wait out another week and if it doesn't drop, will buy it from the other place. I hope amazon can offer competitive price.
2037717
If you haven't purchased th Sony yet, 42nd Street Photo (NYC) offers if for $684. They are an excellent place to purchase from. I have made several purchases from them over several years.
2037718
I used the Sony SR11 during Thanksgiving vacation and for Christmas day. It has very intuitive record and playback features. I wish I could record from a VCR to the Sony SR11, but it does not have this capability.
1817748
I have the HS10 and am wondering if the 200EXR is a better buy at just $399. I have heard that they don't make this camera anymore.
176284
I think you meant to post this on the Canon Vixia HF200 camcorder. The Vixia HF20 is still showing $624.99
758150
I noticed the same thing with the Canon S3 vs the S5. $688 for the S3 when the S5 is going for $319-349 from most vendors?? Does NOT make sense. They must be trying to reel in some sucker who thinks the older model is "better" and "rare." Just not true with cameras these days.I have also noticed that the "Buy New" crossed-out prices on many cameras are just flat wrong. They are listed as selling for several hundred dollars more than the MSRP. Then the amazon price is a "save this much" price, when actually it is the SAME price as all of the other vendors charge. Almost seems like false advertising. I noticed the same thing with the Canon S3 vs the S5. $688 for the S3 when the S5 is going for $319-349 from most vendors?? Does NOT make sense. They must be trying to reel in some sucker who thinks the older model is "better" and "rare." Just not true with cameras these days.I have also noticed that the "Buy New" crossed-out prices on many cameras are just flat wrong. They are listed as selling for several hundred dollars more than the MSRP. Then the amazon price is a "save this much" price, when actually it is the SAME price as all of... » Read More I noticed the same thing with the Canon S3 vs the S5. $688 for the S3 when the S5 is going for $319-349 from most vendors?? Does NOT make sense. They must be trying to reel in some sucker who thinks the older model is "better" and "rare." Just not true with cameras these days.I have also noticed that the "Buy New" crossed-out prices on many cameras are just flat wrong. They are listed as selling for several hundred dollars more than the MSRP. Then the amazon price is a "save this much" price, when actually it is the SAME price as all of the other vendors charge. Almost seems like false advertising. « Show Less
2211235
I noticed that too, the price on the hg10 fluctuates eevry day. I decided to just buy it at 740.00 The good thing is, if in 30 days the price drops to around 600-650... amazon will refund the difference.
500335
Samuel - that was a good reply, thank you! However, did you mean to say the 1200 is your better bet for well-lighted quick succession photos? Also, you might have let your wife have the black one and settle for silver! I'm curious... what is CR rating at #1 and #2? Teresa, did they also tell you that the 780 is being phased out in favor of the SD1400IS? I've seen Amazon drop the price twice in the last month or so on the 780... those are the two models I've been trying to decide between, although Samuel makes some good points in favor of the 1200...
794982
It is cheaper because it is not yet in stock on Amazon.com and you'll have to wait 1-2 months to receive it if you purchase the 360 at the $229.50 price and by then it will probably be cheaper. If you buy it from Beachcamera.com which is linked when it is put into your cart, they'll have it in stock and purchaseable through amazon.com but for $239.99. This is only $5 more expensive currently when comparing it to the 350 which is still worth it based on the other replies to this posting. Don't worry about shipping as it is free via Beachcamera.com just as it is via amazon's free super-saver shipping. It is cheaper because it is not yet in stock on Amazon.com and you'll have to wait 1-2 months to receive it if you purchase the 360 at the $229.50 price and by then it will probably be cheaper. If you buy it from Beachcamera.com which is linked when it is put into your cart, they'll have it in stock and purchaseable through amazon.com but for $239.99. This is only $5 more expensive currently when comparing it to the 350 which is still worth it based on the other replies to this posting. Don't worry about shipping as it is free via Beachcamera.com just as it is via amazon's free super-saver... » Read More It is cheaper because it is not yet in stock on Amazon.com and you'll have to wait 1-2 months to receive it if you purchase the 360 at the $229.50 price and by then it will probably be cheaper. If you buy it from Beachcamera.com which is linked when it is put into your cart, they'll have it in stock and purchaseable through amazon.com but for $239.99. This is only $5 more expensive currently when comparing it to the 350 which is still worth it based on the other replies to this posting. Don't worry about shipping as it is free via Beachcamera.com just as it is via amazon's free super-saver shipping. « Show Less
490821
I've also done alot of research on these two cameras. I have not purchased either one because I'm still deciding. I personally have seen some BEAUTIFUL "kid" pictures with a Sony camera. The only drawback I see with that camera is the expensive battery pack (plus you need an extra back-up) and some poeple have difficulty using the connecting software. The Canon camera looks cheaper in the stores. When you decide...let me know!
928346
I am considering CX150 or CX110. Is there any difference between those two except 16GB internal memory in CX150? I have been researching camcorder for more than week and can't decide. Now boils down to one of these two - no reasons...just due to Sony brand. I know there better rated panasonic and canon out there in the similar price range...any comments???
2158210
The Sony is slightly more expensive, has newest features like CMOS type sensor, faster burst mode, improved panoramic picture mode, shoots 1080p HD video, stereo microphone. Consumer Reports has not tested it yet, but I found some information on their website. They have tested the Canon and give it high marks. Canon has a hot shoe in addition to pop-up flash. Both brands rate high on reliability. I have not bought one yet and am not an expert.
856177
Amazon.com has misrepresented the list price of the HF S20 as it also has for the HF S21. In each case, an incorrect list price is quoted and a then a $200 "discount" is mentioned, when in fact Amazon.com's final price for each camcorder is Canon's suggested retail price. This error was brought to Amazon.com's attention weeks ago, but they appear to have chosen not to correct it.
829843
I don't own the JVC, but I did take a look at it. The reviews were not all that great for the unit. I didn't like the format of the files it stored (I use Linux, the Sony files are immediately usable). I liked the 6MP still picture feature... AND I believe the build quality of the Sony is a bit better than the JVC. There are some reviews out there for the JVC. Not too many for the sr300 yet though. If I had to do all over again, I'd choose the SR300. IMHO there isn't a good (well one that I like well enough) HD HDD camera out there yet. You get the Sonnar*T lens with the SR300... that might be well worth getting it over the SR200. If there was a $400 price difference, I'd get the SR200. Camcorders retain their value, so don't expect to see too much drop in price.
1071781
I could not justify spending extra for the 300hs. I have been using the 100hs for 3 weeks now with no complaints. I do not take much video but overall I am happy with my purchase. I was able to pick up the 100HS when Amazon had the one day sale on gray for 159 out the door.
2091071
Personally, I did a lot of research before I bought the HG21 myself, and it seemed the best in the price range. I will mention though that I only looked at Canons (since I'm used to their system interface), so I'm not sure if there are other similar camcorders in other brands. Also, it didn't seem the Digic III was a huge change over the Digic II. The only extra feature Digic III really seems to offer is the face-detection, however that wasn't a huge selling point for me. For me, a better sensor mattered more, as it means better video quality.
2087727
Any luck? I am in the same boat as you... I notified Canon regarding the s200 and the HF M400. Here is the reply I got:The VIXIA HF M400 is scheduled to be available in late March for an estimated retail price of $649.99.This is not a replacement for the VIXIA HF S200, but for the VIXIA M-series, HF M300. The VIXIA HF S30 is the only successor at this time for the VIXIA HF S200.The VIXIA HF M400 is a lower class model compared to the VIXIA HF S200.So what does lower class mean? Cheaper lens??? Just when I was set to click on the buy now Any luck? I am in the same boat as you... I notified Canon regarding the s200 and the HF M400. Here is the reply I got:The VIXIA HF M400 is scheduled to be available in late March for an estimated retail price of $649.99.This is not a replacement for the VIXIA HF S200, but for the VIXIA M-series, HF M300. The VIXIA HF S30 is the only successor at this time for the VIXIA HF S200.The VIXIA HF M400 is a lower class model compared to the VIXIA HF S200.So what does lower class mean? Cheaper lens??? Just when I was set to click on... » Read More Any luck? I am in the same boat as you... I notified Canon regarding the s200 and the HF M400. Here is the reply I got:The VIXIA HF M400 is scheduled to be available in late March for an estimated retail price of $649.99.This is not a replacement for the VIXIA HF S200, but for the VIXIA M-series, HF M300. The VIXIA HF S30 is the only successor at this time for the VIXIA HF S200.The VIXIA HF M400 is a lower class model compared to the VIXIA HF S200.So what does lower class mean? Cheaper lens??? Just when I was set to click on the buy now « Show Less
275996
Have been watching this as well. Look at the ratings. I own one and its the best LCD on the market at the moment IMHO. The lowest price I have seen here at Amazon was $2940.00 USD a while back. Which is what I got it for. Since folks have been buying it, and the ratings continue to be 4.75+ stars, the price has been creeping up towards what the local BB and CC are charging for it ($3800+ in my area). I think once the 71 and 81 series hit the streets, this one will drop for sure. But until that time, this one is top dog, at least in my house. The picture maxed out in 1080P will just blow you away!! Have been watching this as well. Look at the ratings. I own one and its the best LCD on the market at the moment IMHO. The lowest price I have seen here at Amazon was $2940.00 USD a while back. Which is what I got it for. Since folks have been buying it, and the ratings continue to be 4.75+ stars, the price has been creeping up towards what the local BB and CC are charging for it ($3800+ in my area). I think once the 71 and 81 series hit the streets, this one will drop for sure. But until that time, this one is top dog, at least in my house. The picture maxed out in 1080P will just blow you... » Read More Have been watching this as well. Look at the ratings. I own one and its the best LCD on the market at the moment IMHO. The lowest price I have seen here at Amazon was $2940.00 USD a while back. Which is what I got it for. Since folks have been buying it, and the ratings continue to be 4.75+ stars, the price has been creeping up towards what the local BB and CC are charging for it ($3800+ in my area). I think once the 71 and 81 series hit the streets, this one will drop for sure. But until that time, this one is top dog, at least in my house. The picture maxed out in 1080P will just blow you away!! « Show Less
2101853
Amazon ratings are based on customer's reviews, not on professional analysis. Canon and Nikon are consistently seen as "the leaders" by the average photographer, although in my view their popular models are nothing to write home about. If you are a professional photographer and buy top of the line models, there is no doubt that Sony is not for you. But if you are like me, an enthusiast, GO FOR IT. Sony has excellent HD video performance AND autofocus in video so that I have put my camcorder to pasture. It has also some outstanding features in still camera mode, but you have to read the manual thoroughly. Viva Sony! Amazon ratings are based on customer's reviews, not on professional analysis. Canon and Nikon are consistently seen as "the leaders" by the average photographer, although in my view their popular models are nothing to write home about. If you are a professional photographer and buy top of the line models, there is no doubt that Sony is not for you. But if you are like me, an enthusiast, GO FOR IT. Sony has excellent HD video performance AND autofocus in video so that I have put my camcorder to pasture. It has also some outstanding features in still camera mode, but you have to... » Read More Amazon ratings are based on customer's reviews, not on professional analysis. Canon and Nikon are consistently seen as "the leaders" by the average photographer, although in my view their popular models are nothing to write home about. If you are a professional photographer and buy top of the line models, there is no doubt that Sony is not for you. But if you are like me, an enthusiast, GO FOR IT. Sony has excellent HD video performance AND autofocus in video so that I have put my camcorder to pasture. It has also some outstanding features in still camera mode, but you have to read the manual thoroughly. Viva Sony! « Show Less