Are there any major differences between the SF and LF models as far as protection goes? Is one better than the other, or is a preference?
2034848
I'm not sure what the LF feels like, however the SF is a light rubber coating. It isn't slick like most cases. It's more of a preference. I love it, because it provides more of a grip IMO.
2034849
Not much. They're both exactly the same. Protection and look wise. But material is a bit different.
1166432
I've used both. I guess its more about personal taste .. I like this case a lot better. It seems more durable. And I trust it ALOT more when my kids have it, then with the life proof case. Plus you can get more styles/color choices with this case.
1133930
I own both and the are essentially identical except in one aspect. They are the same size and capacity and made with the same parts and electronic controls. This difference is that the 700, that I bought 9 years ago, included a special KF antimicrobial filter in it that is not mentioned in the new 220. It obviously cut the mfr's cost but has no impact on the softening ability of the unit that I've now owned a few months, running flawlessly. Very easy to install and set-up so long as you provide the in and out plumbing.
1552897
The Defender is very bulky and the Commuter is all I need to keep my phone safe. It has a soft inner case and a hard outer case. It keeps the screen off flat surfaces. If you are carrying it in your pocket the Defender will take up a lot of room. The Commuter comes with a screen protective film but there are better ones out there like Zagg.
1293200
Cannon makes 3+ levels of lenses. EFS, EF and L. The EFS is the entry level, the EF the avid photographer and the L the pro level lens. The difference is mostly the optics and build quality. The L series is built for more rigorous every day use and have ultra low dispersion elements that the entry and mid level do not have. Personal opinion, unless you are going to pound with this lens day in and day out, or you have a lot of spare cash, go with the EF. I bought the EF and have been very happy with it so far.
2191088
The main difference in my opinion is that the defender is more durable. The back side of the defender is textured and the commuter is very slick. The defender in my opinion protects your phone more so than the commuter and commuter doesn't stay in a shirt pocket like the defender. Yes it does protect against cracking. I hope this helps.
725757
the hfs is more powerful and more expensive than the hf. the hfs lens and chipset if better as well. you pay more for better quality
851241
I tried both side-by-side. F/3.5 model focused noticeably faster in low light. It also has a better build. On the other hand it is larger, heavier and uses more expensive 82mm filters (F/4-5.6 uses 77mm filters). Plus at the time I purchased it, the 4-5.6 model cost $407$ at my local store and the 3.5 model cost $649, which is $250 difference. At that price difference you might as well get excellently reviewed Tokina 11-16 constant F/2.8. Some food for thought
229851
To me the are about the same. I couldn't tell the difference between the two. But if you really want the best protection buy the life proof.
1196603
Here's the deal:F8-older model==> NON wide lens, better quality photos, faster sensor resulting SLIGHTLY better pictures in low lightF18-newer model==> Wide lens, good pictures but slightly less sharper than F8 due to wider lens and more crammed pixels onto the same sensor.And the reason wht the FZ8 get better reviews than the F18 for the points mentioned above.SS
2145723
I reviewed the L70SRW and am only familiar with that model. Other than a difference in price, I'm not sure how they compare. I can only say that I am very pleased with the model I have. I suggest you carefully review the description of each model to make your decision. Sorry I am unable to offer more.
206353
I have both and I didn't notice any difference in weight, nor in size. My 320GB passport I had for over a year and never had problems, and my 500GB passport I had for about 6 months and also never had any problems. The data rate is certainly slow, the cord is only about a foot in length (a bit short if you ask me) and like other reviews they are quite glossy, so I would recommend getting a "High Quality Black Silicone Skin Snap On Cover Protective Case for Western Digital Hard Drive" to protect it a bit. However, for someone that travels a lot and only wants to power it by usb, I do recommend this product. The lacie 500GB external drive is often its competitor, because is offers firewire capabilities with usb, allowing you to transfer data faster, but of course it costs more. So if USB is good enough for you, then I would recommend this product.
270310
Great question. The version I bought was blister-packed. It also is incredibly unreliable. I'd keep searching.
1492158
I am in the process of purchasing one or the other. I am not sure what the differences are. Can someone help me out too:F. Jackson
1022336
Same materials as the defender (I have a defender) , but definitely not as substantial. I was hesitant about getting anything less than the defender initially because I've dropped mine at least a dozen times with no issue but this one is the proper size for my wife and she's willing to take the chance. The biggest difference in the two different cases I think is the lack of coverage on the front of the phone. If you're worried about the glass breaking, the defender is definitely safer. You're going to have to weigh the pros and the cons of each design. Hope this helps.
2068714
Cannot answer this.but i have both models and simply love them.me and the wife can fit all our stuff in one f or them for the week end.
467035
The Defender is bulkier, it offers a little more protection than the commuter series . The commuter is perfect for my daily needs.