do you know how the epson compares to the canon selphy cp900 ?
2037655
Hi Debra, If you are using it for personal need the Selphy is good and ink is inexpensive. We run a photo booth with our Epson Picture Mate, so print time and photo quality was of the upmost importance. We do have a selphy that we use at home for over two years. Photo quality is not completely comparable to the Epson but I would recommend it. Hope this helps. A
2037656
Not really, but at the time I bought the Epson, I did a lot of on line research and it had the beat reviews and Consumer Reports liked it the best of the "picture printing only" copiers. I have had mine two or three years with no problems and still like it. Hope this helps.
1028587
I went with the 8800 v th Epson v500. It has the LED lightbar - same. That's the major upgrade from the 8600 as far as I can tell. The deciding factor was poor software reviews for the Epson bundle. My profession is end-user software development. There's no way I want to deal with someone's poor UI or feature set or compatibility issues. I just want to scan my family photos. I own the full Photoshop CS so I can basically clean up anything. My guess is for the average user there should be no marked difference between the scratch and dust removal capabilities or the scan densities or lightbar output. Ease of use pays off every time you start the thing up. Hope this helps. I went with the 8800 v th Epson v500. It has the LED lightbar - same. That's the major upgrade from the 8600 as far as I can tell. The deciding factor was poor software reviews for the Epson bundle. My profession is end-user software development. There's no way I want to deal with someone's poor UI or feature set or compatibility issues. I just want to scan my family photos. I own the full Photoshop CS so I can basically clean up anything. My guess is for the average user there should be no marked difference between the scratch and dust removal capabilities or the scan densities or lightbar... » Read More I went with the 8800 v th Epson v500. It has the LED lightbar - same. That's the major upgrade from the 8600 as far as I can tell. The deciding factor was poor software reviews for the Epson bundle. My profession is end-user software development. There's no way I want to deal with someone's poor UI or feature set or compatibility issues. I just want to scan my family photos. I own the full Photoshop CS so I can basically clean up anything. My guess is for the average user there should be no marked difference between the scratch and dust removal capabilities or the scan densities or lightbar output. Ease of use pays off every time you start the thing up. Hope this helps. « Show Less
1655703
I have an Epson...not sure which model..but it normally takes #98 or 99...And this one works great...much much cheaper than buying at store
1156778
i have three of them it is a professional printer...it is great...buy a scanner they are cheap ......you don't want all of that stuff on a printer..you would get better results with a epson scanner....the scanner has more features...
1790998
Yes you can, after you've loaded the Canon Selphy softare to add it to your computer. Just click on the photo, then click on "print" and find the Selphy CP800 in your list of printers. Then follow the directions for your computer.
1028585
I am interested in what yoiu decide. I am looking at the same two scanners, primarily to scan family slides. The reviews for the Canon seem more consistently favorable. Those for Epson seem to reflect either love or hate.
2233239
Hi I'm not sure about the CP910model. I have the CP900 Black and I can only speak about that model. I have used it for a function to print out 4x6 prints and every one came out with professional quality prints. Everyone was amazed and I made some money that night. If the CP910 is an upgrade to the CP900 than it can only be a better thing for you. Hope this was helpful. Have a blessed day! J.C.Foster
1527298
Hello and good day. The 3210 was a capable printer. WHEN IT WORKED. For I did had soft ware issues, I had to delete everything an reinstall. But for me was the feed mechanism. Over an over an over, paper jams. So got tired an got EPSON 837. An EPSON WAY OUT PERFORMED HP.... just the issue is inks are EXPENSIVE.
95887
I did not purchase this exact item because I think this is an updated version of the one I originally purchased. I returned it. It was extremely difficult to work with in scanning slides, very slow and the color resolution was awful. I eventually purchased a Canon CanoScan 8800F flatbed scanner from Amazon (probably five years ago) and love it! I scanned almost 15,000 slides and it is still going strong. Easy to work with, great for scanning slides, negatives, photos or documents. I have Windows XP and it is compatible. Remember, I purchased it years ago so I am sure there is an updated version of the one I have. I cannot say enough good about it. Not to mention customer service for Canon products is located in the U.S. I have contacted them twice and always received knowledgeable, understandable and quick resolution to my questions. I think I paid right at $200 for the Canon, but it would be worth it at twice the price. I would strongly encourage you to NOT purchase the Pacific Image unit.
1712223
blows away my old canon pixma- i think it has to do with the claria inks and the epson print head.before i gave away my old printer i printed a picture to compare with this new one- just looks better.
2240791
I have a 3520 (which I think is essentially the same printer) and it does work, but you might not get all of the features since the entire epson software suite is not installed. It actually works well (2530 and 3520) and finds the printer on the network...you can scan and print easily. What I think you lose are features like scan to PDF...not sure if you can do duplex (scanning and printing), use the ADF, things like that. But, for both basic print and scan I think this will work fine (assuming it is the same as the 3520).
1147827
I really don't know. Mine improved a little but I took it in to be fixed and they said that they can't on Ebson. If you don't use it regular, it will plug up and not much you can do. They recommend a Canon and said I should not have a problem with that printer. I liked purchasing the colors separately on the Epson, but I don't use a printer much anymore and this Canon is fine with me. I really questions the products ability to do the job.
138445
No Unfortunately. I now have a new HP paperweight and am going to go Epson for my large formats.
1958248
Biltz, I was so disapointed with Epson, that I will never buy a epson product again. they do not stand behind their product!.. I replace it with a Vivitek H1180HD bougth at Amazon (http://www.amazon.com/Vivitek-H1180HD-Blu-Ray-Theater-Projector/dp/B00FJ1Q5SQ/ref=sr_1_12?ie=UTF8&qid;=1421444429&sr;=8-12&k;eywords=vivitek+projector&pebp;=1421444439818&peasin;=B00FJ1Q5SQ). Same or better specs as far screen size , throw, distance, etc.. with much more vivid colors and 3D capabilities.. Price about the same... I am very happy with the Vivtek.
679846
I certainly believe it is. The quality for photos is excellent, but then I also have an Epson Artisan 710 printer. The last one I purchased was not on Amazon because they no longer carried it at the time. My last purchase was through Staples. The packaging looks correct, however.
1019725
Amazon asked me to respond but I found the machine too be cheap and I was told to throw it out, and I got my $ back.I bought a Canon MX922 and the print quality is far superior (and no constant paper jamming)!
1913
James,I am trying to decide between the canon 830 AiO and the epson artisian 800. If you look at the negative comments both printers receive high marks for being ink pigs!have you tried more pages with the epson? is it still using as much ink? I wish thw=ere was some way to tell which printer is worse.