What are the differences between the Sony RDR GX257, Sony RDR GX300 and Sony RDR GX330?
2049210
Hi Cheryl J! For detailed comparison, pls check the marketing specifications of each of these devices at esupport.sony.com. Thanks. -Anthony
1355318
This just has a few updated effects, but essentially the same features. I'd recommend the RP360 if you want an upgrade. -Andy
632303
I don't know the difference. I only have the bull whisper. It is a very good air rifle.
806571
Looks pretty close but from my quick search the VX3 is model #V1950 and this one is #V1930. Beyond that, I don't see much difference.
518565
imo the torrent sx and mk 177 by crosman are both better than a 760 and a 664 gt and all 4 are by crosman and the same price range.i would say the 760 is the worst performance wise out of the 4 but its also the cheapist.
1133214
There are substantial differences between the two. I suggest you look at the Silicon Power web site for the list. I chose the A30 based on what I needed it for and the sale price.
2231641
According to Sony, the hx300 uses MS Duo and SD/SDHC compatible, while the rx100 III uses SD, SDHC and SDXC memory card; Memory Stick PRO Duo/Pro-HG Duo media. So if their web site is accurate, this memory should work in both of these cameras. BTW, they both like awesome cameras!
859073
The TR3000i has a slightly larger drive motor, a higher capacity incline motor, slightly higher top speed, a thicker deck with more suspension points, a slightly higher max. user weight, and a better warranty. I knew I would be happy with either unit but felt that the differences were worth the $500 price difference. I highly recommend the chest strap heart rate monitor and don't forget to order some silicone belt lubricant as it is not included. Hope that helps. I love mine.
181599
My son has the drifter and our neighbor has the flashmaker. There really isn't a difference. The red one sparks, other that that they seem the same to me.
519943
I hope your seeking difference between A33 and A34 ( not A44). They look almost the same, but there are some noticeable difference between the two.1. Connect your device by tapping your device. (via NFC)2. Conrol buttons like play/pause, next, previous track.3. Better battery life, though it could have been better.
941675
Sorry, I don't know. Whatever the difference, the HX50v is a small, pocketable camera that produces great pictures.
1729298
The last letter of the model number indicates the color HAFX30B (Black), HAFX30S (silver), HAFX30R (Red), etc.As for different models: 1X, 3X, 40, 22, 30, 36, etc - each has a different feature set - microphone, wire size, ear bud size and style, noise reduction, noice cancelling, overall quality, etc. You have to compare each model to see the differences.
852276
I have the Sony RX100 camera, so don't know about the Sony HX300. I assume it should work if both cameras use the same Sony battery. You need to take the chance, like I did for my camera, which it works fine.
474309
The biggest difference is A35's capability to output uncompressed HD audio (DolbyHD and DTS HD) over HDMI connection. A30 and others decodes it on the player itself and outputs the decoded audio stream. This allows you to take advantage of your AV receiver's (if you have it, that is - such receivers just started coming into market) capability to decode HD audio.
1504713
I've owned both. I would say it is worth it. The steady shot appears to be more stable, it has better low light sensitivity for some reason, it zooms faster, it has a built in gps, it has mic and headphone jacks, better ergonomics and hand strap, it has nightshot, it has a viewfinder, six bladed iris, a huge higher resolution screen and manual focus control. Also, i personally think it is far more sexy than cx-300. one thing to note is that the built in mic on the cx-550v doesn't have good channel separation. The build quality is also much more durable for the CX-550V. The video quality isn't noticeably different tho. I've owned both. I would say it is worth it. The steady shot appears to be more stable, it has better low light sensitivity for some reason, it zooms faster, it has a built in gps, it has mic and headphone jacks, better ergonomics and hand strap, it has nightshot, it has a viewfinder, six bladed iris, a huge higher resolution screen and manual focus control. Also, i personally think it is far more sexy than cx-300. one thing to note is that the built in mic on the cx-550v doesn't have good channel separation. The build quality is also much more durable for the CX-550V. The video quality... » Read More I've owned both. I would say it is worth it. The steady shot appears to be more stable, it has better low light sensitivity for some reason, it zooms faster, it has a built in gps, it has mic and headphone jacks, better ergonomics and hand strap, it has nightshot, it has a viewfinder, six bladed iris, a huge higher resolution screen and manual focus control. Also, i personally think it is far more sexy than cx-300. one thing to note is that the built in mic on the cx-550v doesn't have good channel separation. The build quality is also much more durable for the CX-550V. The video quality isn't noticeably different tho. « Show Less
1336632
Per the Sony marketing brochure, the 2007 model is definitely a 768 line 720p display (although you'll see people mistakenly posting that "the S3000 is 720 but the XBR4 is 1080"). So regardless of what resolution of source signal it is fed, it will display via upconverting or downconverting that source signal to 720p resolution. I.e., it cannot display more lines (finer resolution) than it physically has. I believe the XBR4 will accept a 1080p source and automatically downconvert it to the XBR4's native 720p resolution, but if so, I'd think you might get a better picture by setting the output of your game box to 720p to begin with to avoid the extra conversion. The Spring/Summer 2008 32" KDL-32XBR6 will be 1080p per Sony press release. Hope this helps.
1895962
Thanks. Seems like each of these makes has its quirks. I just gave away on old (4 years) Toshiba DVD recorder that did OK for its time, but the menus were very unintuitive, and the manual was in broken english. I guess I could always pick up a D-R410 at Fry's and if I don't like it, return for the Panny when it's in stock. Fry's also has a Sony RDR-GX360 for the same price as the Panasonic, and it seems to have the same ins/outs and upconversion, but I can only find one user review out there and it was bad. I hear that Sonys are picky about the DVD brand you use, plus they're the "source" for the industry restrictions on recording HD, so I don't want to support them. Thanks. Seems like each of these makes has its quirks. I just gave away on old (4 years) Toshiba DVD recorder that did OK for its time, but the menus were very unintuitive, and the manual was in broken english. I guess I could always pick up a D-R410 at Fry's and if I don't like it, return for the Panny when it's in stock. Fry's also has a Sony RDR-GX360 for the same price as the Panasonic, and it seems to have the same ins/outs and upconversion, but I can only find one user review out there and it was bad. I hear that Sonys are picky about the DVD brand you use, plus they're the... » Read More Thanks. Seems like each of these makes has its quirks. I just gave away on old (4 years) Toshiba DVD recorder that did OK for its time, but the menus were very unintuitive, and the manual was in broken english. I guess I could always pick up a D-R410 at Fry's and if I don't like it, return for the Panny when it's in stock. Fry's also has a Sony RDR-GX360 for the same price as the Panasonic, and it seems to have the same ins/outs and upconversion, but I can only find one user review out there and it was bad. I hear that Sonys are picky about the DVD brand you use, plus they're the "source" for the industry restrictions on recording HD, so I don't want to support them. « Show Less