I'm using the 300 f2.8 IS II with 2xIII extender for sports. Results are mixed. Will I get better results with a 1DX?
2023704
The 1.4x will work better than the doubler, but my gut feeling is that the 1DX works better with such a setup than a 1Div, 1Diii, and 5D.
2023705
The results will be better, but I am unsure how much speed and quality is lost when using the dx. Rent one ajd give it a try!
2023706
It will work fine with your teleconverter, but your max aperture will then be f/5.6....... with the 1.4 extender your max aperture will be f/4.0
1945195
2X Converters basically will all provide a little "noise", but buying the Canon version, would be the better, less expensive alternate to extending the capability of your lens for your Canon XTi.
1542166
I love the camera it was a good step up from the older Rebel. I shoot allot of action sports photography and it works great when I shoot in a gym that is poorly lit and you can't use a flash during the game. I use a 70-200 f2.8 lens and I get good Basketball photos. I want to upgrade to the 1D mark4 as soon as I can afford it!!
1884586
Yes I did. I believe my shots are in the customer photos. I did not use an extender, just maxed out at 400mm though I didn't calibrate the sweet spot for the aperture for maximum clarity. I shot both handheld and tripod and I was very amazed by the handheld quality. I was very happy with the results.
381162
Shutter a bit slow for action, not instantaneous. I purchased the DV300F for its dual view, wi-fi and quality video. Action sequences were not my priority. The dual view resulted in much better 'couple' photos with landmarks and sights in the background. Wi-Fi was terrrific for sending photos from Europe to the U.S. without any other devices. K Tyson
1277776
No, there is room for 1DX, the internal space is 155 mm high by 205 mm wide already with the extenders.
1497819
I bought the Nikon-FX version for non-AI lenses, works fine on X-Pro1. Since the sensor is not FF I don't see why you should have any problem with DX lenses - just tested a Tamron 28-75DX, not problem. This model is for lenses that have an adjustable aperture ring. Later Nikkors do not so that is the crucial issue depending on what lenses you have.
1116909
The AF on the 5DIII is better then the the 5DII. The III has the same system as the 1DX.
1530822
I don't miss the IS. Uses are pretty much any time you have to slow shutter speed to the point that camera shake is evident. I shoot portraits without IS and I'm very happy. Maybe I have a steady hand but more likely I have adequate settings and lighting. If you don't do any flash photography, or plan to shoot frequently in mostly dimly lit areas, perhaps you will need the IS. Personally, I'm glad I saved the money. I know nothing of the 2x extenders.
1588428
In my case AF speed is very important, also with the 2x the max apperture is 5.6 which will not blur too much the background, is slower and will lead to higher ISO's... But that's my requirements I have a baby boy and love to take pictures in low light as well as sports... If you are into bird photography or will always shoot with good light 2x is still a fine tool.
1908361
works great on both! I have both a full frame and DX. On a DX camera the focal length is approximately 127mm
1192969
Initially, I was also thinking of purchasing XSi earlier but now zeroed in on T1i (or 50D - wallet permitting) because (1) higher Effective Pixels in T1i / 50D - 15.1 M as against 12.2 M. ( I agree not a big factor for casual / normal photography) (2) HD Video in T1i (though one of my last considerations , but still it's a cool feature to have - managing a DSLR & Camcorder during an event / ceremony is difficult for me ) (3) DIGIC 4 Image Processing engine in T1i / 50D is better than Digic III in XSi (4) Lower ISO Rating / range in case of XSi (100-1600) as compared to T1i / 50D (100-3200 expandable to 6400,12800) meaning better performance in low light for T1i / 50D. (5) Number of LCD dots (in the LCD screen) is much higher in T1i / 50D (920,000) as against XSi (230,000) meaning better LCD visibility in bright sunlight. (6) Last but not the least , XSi was launched in January'08 as against March'09 for T1i - so you have already lost ~1.5 years out of 5 year life!! However , in case of Pixel density and price XSi scores over T1i/50D. Btw, cost difference is not much for T1i with and without the kit lens - better go for T1i kit. Canon 28-135mm zoom lens is ok but I like Tamron AF 18-270mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC LD Aspherical IF Macro Zoom Lens. Hope this will be helpful for you.
1330717
I do not know if you can stack 2.0 with 1.4 extender will work even with Manual Exposure, since you will loss at least 3 stops. Not with any of the Auto and Semi Auto Exposures.
98550
The DX II was made to be compatible with older models like the T1i. If your using a body newer than that, the DX I should work fine. There are no defining differences between the two other than that.
2148233
I've taken some nice shots of football players with this lense, but they were day games. It's a bit dark when fully extended (300mm), but if your camera handles ISO's of 400 - 800 well, it can be used. IMHO, it's as good as any in this price range. Idealy you would want a faster lense for sports, and that speed will cost you.
744851
I have tested the Canon 1.4x teleconverter and it works well. AF is also listed as possible even for the Canon 2x teleconverter. Listed here: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/FrameWork/charts/canon1_4xExtender.html http://www.bhphotovideo.com/FrameWork/charts/canon2xExtender.html Here is the list for the Kenko Pro 300 teleconverter which is a highly rated teleconverter and it is compatible with the the lens as well for both the 1.4 and 2.0: http://www.kenkoglobal.com/pdf/TELEPLUS_DGX_series_CompatibilityList.pdf. Obviously, things will be more challenging with a 2.0 teleconverter but not impossible. It will all depend on how steady you are with the camera(tripod), you ability to focus manually, and the amount of available light etc.
660354
My experience with using Canon Speedilite 270EX II... the pictures are always Overexposed. To the point where they're completely white-out.