Should I get these or mtx terminator tne212d? Taking performance and looks into consideration.
2037307
I would go with this item, the sound is great and it has a unique look. Guaranteed to be a conversation starter. I hope this helps.
2037308
I bought the duals about 6 months ago and they are some of the best I've ever had! I love them and will have them for a long time!
2037309
TERMINATORS are better Bass and all but the Duals look amazing the only real question is how often do you look into your trunk to look at your sub box if you have a hachback the duals would be my personal choice (I did) but if you want better LOUDER Bass go for the MTX
1539070
This all depends on motherboard manufacturers.PCI is definitely on its way out, so if you are worried, I would get the STX version.
683145
Coconut, I'm facing the same decision. Have you learned anything yet that you could share?I'm leaning toward the smaller printer just because it seems less cumbersome, but I'd be happy to put up with the larger bulk of the 5370 if I thought it was better in some significant way. Would love to hear any info about differences in quality or reliability.
1028910
Hi Darian - I don't ever talk to anyone on a blog or respond to anything when asked, but I am now for you. I am not familiar with the M-8DX. However, the Furman PL-Plus C is actually even better and more sophisticated, in terms of protection, than I initially realized. I can recommend two things for you to do to get the most accurate information. It is what I have done myself. You can go to the Furman website (furmansound.com) and read everything you want to know about the Furman PL-Plus C, as well as any of their other products. You can also call Furman's extraordinary Tech Support. The number is on their website. The tech support person is heckin brilliant. He told (taught) me a lot, including just how excellent the PL-Plus C is. He made me feel impressed with my choice. Based on my conversation with him, whatever is plugged into that strip is totally protected in a very big way. He had me plug everything into them. I have two, one for my home theater gear and one for my music production and recording gear. If you have a modem as part of your equipment, plug it into the Furman too. If you have a coaxial cable that is in any way part of your setup, that must also be protected. You will need another small piece of equipment for that, which is also sold on Amazon and I purchased it just today. Panamax is a sister company to Furman. You can access it from Furman's website or go direct to panamax.com. Amazon sells Panamax products too. Amazon has the best prices on both companies. I know because I hunted around quite a bit to get the best deal. I joined Amazon Prime recently. You get free shipping on almost everything and guaranteed 2 days delivery! It's fantastic. If you have any more questions I can help you with, feel free to get back to me if it's possible on this system. There's probably a lot more I can help you out with and maybe you can help me out too. It's great to have someone to talk to about all this stuff. It can be pretty intense. Good luck with everything.
2177571
I don't have the mcpx but from what I've heard I think the nano cpx is a lot more twitchy. If you've had some experience with fixed or collective pitch then the nano cpx would be a good choice. If you're looking to get into fixed/collective pitch then go with the mcpx
1699315
Technology Guy, Thanks very much for your input. Given that the EF-530 costs less and has more features than the 430EX II, would you be inclined to purchase this, or is the sturdiness of the 430EX II most important from your vantage point, even if it means slightly less capability? I doubt that I will utilize all that the EF-530 offers given my amateur status, but if it costs less, this makes it more attractive ... unless lower cost is paired with poorer reliability and performance. Does my question make sense? I'm just trying to get inside your head on this one since this truly is my dilemma. Thanks again. Technology Guy, Thanks very much for your input. Given that the EF-530 costs less and has more features than the 430EX II, would you be inclined to purchase this, or is the sturdiness of the 430EX II most important from your vantage point, even if it means slightly less capability? I doubt that I will utilize all that the EF-530 offers given my amateur status, but if it costs less, this makes it more attractive ... unless lower cost is paired with poorer reliability and performance. Does my question make sense? I'm just trying to get inside your head on this one since this truly is my... » Read More Technology Guy, Thanks very much for your input. Given that the EF-530 costs less and has more features than the 430EX II, would you be inclined to purchase this, or is the sturdiness of the 430EX II most important from your vantage point, even if it means slightly less capability? I doubt that I will utilize all that the EF-530 offers given my amateur status, but if it costs less, this makes it more attractive ... unless lower cost is paired with poorer reliability and performance. Does my question make sense? I'm just trying to get inside your head on this one since this truly is my dilemma. Thanks again. « Show Less
176157
Absolutely. The 8060STs are GIANT ...Really too big for the room. You will be psyched with the 8040STs and save a lit of money in the process!
1945109
Nothing really. It's rated at like 5.6 teraflops which is great for things like mining Bitcoin and to has a lot of direct compute power. If you are in the graphics industry you really should be looking at a Quadro or a FireMV card. I Titan is also a good choice because if it dual point floating precision. Also on a side not this card is so loud you would need to shout over it.
400249
I also wanted to add you might also want to look at the rohs tt560 speedlite. Same price range but a bit more user friendly in my opinion.
1000174
As long as correct architecture only difference I can see is 1.5 to 2x price multiplier. I bought these for an old optiplex I made into a server and worked fine but took out and put in parents dimmention. It needed it more. No problems. Like a shot of b12 to the old desktop
748133
Go with the Micca MB42x series and you will be much happier. I got these Dayton's a month or so ago and quality was terrible. Much happier With my Miccas.
1842433
In terms of price to bang for the buck, this is better. The "new" Proteus is more programmable. The best mind machine I have ever had is made by Excalibur, called the 'activator' - wow that was a rollercoaster ride. I use the Proteus in USR mode most often, and kick it to the Schumann resonance for my planetary peace meditations. The chopra device is also great, and so is the John David equipment. It is such a niche market that there is no crap out there except for one machine which I forget the name of that was like Zany Zappers in reverse. If the proteus is too pricey look for a 'Procyon' on sale. Very similar for basic work, minus programmability. I have communicated briefly with the inventor of this machine and he is a gifted and earnest liberator of the spirit. I have shared a few interesting ideas with him and hope to see them soon, including a "Schumann" meditation with a ferquency increase. Be well.
1854489
They are very similar except that the MX is designed to handle more weight. The specs for the MX on the Ergotron website say it will handle up to 30 lbs. As other answers indicate, the LX is spec'd at about 20lbs. I use it for a 21" monitor that is well beneath 20lbs, so I just have the LX. If you are getting anywhere near the max capacity, a good safety measure is to over spec your installment for safety sake and go for the MX. Otherwise the LX will be adequate. If you or a child is prone to grabbing the monitor and moving it quickly, or if it is moved often in use, etc., go for the MX. Whichever one you choose, it is mandatory that it will be well mounted on a very strong wall that will support the weight and the torque that will be imposed on the unit and mount. Plasterboard or anything flexible most likely won't offer that kind of surface with re-inforceement in back. My reinforcement is the studs in the wall. The mount system is only as strong as the weakest segment within the unit and mounting surface construction. It's not a big deal if you do it right. It is a big deal if the wall mount is under spec'd or not not sufficiently mounted. Mount it right and enjoy it.
805696
Yup. That's how I'm running mine right now and no issue at all. I don't really care about matching though, so it's your personal preference on buying one or getting the set.
640381
I have both and I notice a big difference in both transfer speed as well as loading speeds. Get the 1000x
2202177
They are a little small for a 65 if you are going to be keeping SPS or LPS corals. If just softies, you may be good, but I would go a bit bigger unless you are putting several of the Hydros in there. Say 2 on each side and possibly 2 on the back. I know they are a bit more expressive, but if you are trying to save money go with the jabos, or if you are willing to invest, I cannot stress enough, tons tons tons better, the Vortechs. I use Vortechs 2 MP40 controlled with my apex; I know they are very expressive but they are worth every penny in comparison, especially if you have the apex controller with the wxm. This is how I have mine set up and the difference is night and day. I went from the large jabos to two Vortechs. My corals responded almost instantly. They love them. The Jabos push the water hard while the Vortechs create an undertow and are gentle so you don't blast you corals. This allows for less trash from settling on the sand bed. I can tell the most when feeding; the food never touches the sand bed, it stays floating the whole time and that is without using the feed mode. They all work different and it is to much to get into, but if you are going to build a reef tank you want to go as natural as possible and the Vortechs are the only way to go IMHO. You can sometimes find them for a good price used on ebay, and remember all ecotech equipment are able to be upgraded with a simple plug and play. 1 MP40 should do you for now and just add another later as a slave and run it at a max of 75%. If you need additional info I am happy to help.
825721
They are both well regarded at this price level but only your ears will tell you how they compare. I have heard it said that if your cartridge suits the PP2 loading then its not bad at all. Technically the 651 is a much better design with better overload margin. Audition both and see what you think.