What is the difference between the orginal scratch lounger and the scratch lounger ii?
2041926
I haven't tried the scratch lounger ii, but the product description says that it is thinner, and that the cardboard "floor" is not reversible. Hope this was helpful!
2041927
I got the original scratch lounger and my cats love it. It looks like the 2nd one is thinner on both sides and bottom. My cats love to lay in it and sleep in it so I would prefer the thicker one - it will last longer.
913720
From what I know it is just a little different fabric and design. My 2 year old used it all the time and it didn't bother her in the least. Also why pay more for almost the same exact thing??
1873487
I believe the only difference is the retractable cord and color, otherwise seems the same. I bought the one with folding handle as it is smaller.
676693
I have no idea of the difference. We bought the pink one is all that I know and it has been great for my grandsons room.
1133244
Dear Nilli,Thank you for your inquiry.The only difference is that the first was solid in color and the II has the gradient pattern where it starts off darker at the bottom and get lighter towards the top. Thank you for allowing us to be of service to you.Sincerely,Tonia D.
849053
There is no difference I can see in the 2, all I know is they help me sleep. There are always different prices for same product online, that I have noticed since I started shopping online. It can be same seller or a different seller and more than one different price. If you're looking to sleep, this product works. That's all I can tell you. Have a good evening.
1369105
More same than different. The new UE model (this one) is 1.5 inches taller and half an inch deeper. The handle makes up the bulk of the extra height which the old one didn't have. The driver configuration is almost identical, 2 tweeters, 2 3inch woofers, and slightly bigger 2.5" passive radiators (old one had 2" radiators). The sound is near identical except the new one has more bass because of the larger radiators. The price went up quite a bit from $150 to $250 MSRP. I own the old one and still very satisfied with its low/mid/high balance. If you don't mind the lack of a handle and buying used, the old fine is a great deal.
419670
no clue the one I bought last year was different mine is bigger but when I googled the two your asking about doesn't seem to be a difference besides price! sry couldn't be of more help! :)
685353
It appears to be the same one. I have purchased and used other fabric shavers, and in my opinion, i liked this one. I like the adjustable head, and if you know how to use it, it does a good job. You need to gently go over the fabric several times. My only "con" remark is that the fuzz reservoir is small and needs to be cleaned and emptied often.
1688045
Honestly I don't remember. But I'll tell you this, it is the BEST one I've EVER purchased, strong and reliable. I think that IF it were to ever break, it would have to be due to misuse (thrown or snapped in half on purchase), because I can't see any reason that this scratcher would not outlast any warranty. It comes with sand paper to file down the ends if they are too scrap, but I love them this way, because it works great THROUGH clothing! You won't be disappointed.
1373180
These new ones have separate arms, they do not connect in the back. I purchased one of the ones that was a whole unit over a year ago. But these are made different because it is easy to set back and have these arms spread out and that causes the whole lounger tilts backwards.. These new ones also seem to be made from a thinner plastic than the one I bought over a year ago
1071300
sure...usually only use 2 channel mixers for scratching but this will do the trick...I like the mixer but only complaint is the small cue buttons...
2236417
I don't know. It was about $7 when I bought it. The wide scratchers are always more expensive. My cat likes the wide ones for sleeping on. Maybe that's it. Twice as much real estate.
1457812
I do not personally know the answer but I recall a review that said the two different branded items were identical except for a couple of computer programs as I recall. I love this thing quite frankly. Works great and it can be increased in intensity to the point that it can actually hurt. Hurt me more is what I used to tell my therapist.
956237
This is a cheaper model. It is smaller and not as soft as the other one. We bought this one first trying to save a buck and ended up buying the original as well. Once word of caution with these seats. You will need to adjust you seat down or your legs may fall asleep. Both the wife and I have to either lower the seat of put a pillow under our feet if we are on an extended ride. Hope this helps.
1896297
I have used both and had the more expensive one first. It did not heat the lotion as well and if you used more than a few pumps it was cold. It quit working about a year after purchase which prompted me to purchase the lower priced model when I replaced. The lower priced one seems to be much better and keeps all the lotion nice and warm. It is easier to clean and overall I like it better. I use mine in my massage therapy practice so it gets a good workout each day. Overall I am happier with the less expensive model.
1785889
I cannot see any difference between the two models. My SoftHeat Ultra Back Wrap actually has the words "Kaz UL Listed" stamped on one side of it. I don't know why there's a difference in price because it looks like they both come from Kaz. Hope this helps. ;-)