Instruct: Classify Amazon reviews into positive or negative sentiment
Query: miller was no rimbaud

henry miller, although an okay writer and admirable in his rebellion against false values, has no business comparing himself to someone like arthur rimbaud. the reviewers who think this is some kind of masterpiece are pretty gullible, and it seems that miller had a talent for two things:fooling people into thinking that he was something special, and using obscure and derivative ideas lifted from other writers to deceive the pseudo-intelligentsia into believing that he discovered something original in his mostly unremarkable and notoriety-seeking life. miller may have talked a lot about empathy with outcasts and misfits, but he seems less a person who actually felt different than others so much as an avid reader who decided that he liked the fashionable and avant garde self image of the outsider, and so adopted it. ultimately, for all his muddled, fragmentary talk, miller's philosophy of life can be summed up in two words:"who cares?"