Instruct: Classify the given comments as either toxic or not toxic
Query: The experts are telling us at this point that Trudeau's carbon tax plan will do nothing to reduce GHG's.

Google "national-carbon-price-poses-fundamental-dilemma-for-environment-ministers"

SFU's energy guru Mark Jaccard tells us we'd need 7 times the tax Trudeau is proposing or $200 a ton 50 cents a litre to make any difference. No kidding - in 2014, the Saudi's introduced a $200/ton reduction in carbon tax taking oil from $100 a bbl to $43. It resulted in a 2% increase in consumption in the US normalized to GDP growth.

Trudeau's proposed $40B over 10 years would work as it would at least replace Canadian coal if it was spent on Canada's best in the world Terrestrial Energy, penny a kwh, AGW stomping, "thorium" nuke, brewing zero net carbon synthetic diesel at 25 cents a litre, proudly joining the US as its DOE looks to send $1.2B in cash its way.

Google "terrestrial-energy-applying-for-800m-to.html"

Unfortunately the word "nuclear" has not once slipped past Trudeau's lips.