Instruct: Classify Amazon reviews into positive or negative sentiment
Query: Hogwash? The Facts Say Yes!

This updated version of his earlier book provides nothing that wasn't already nonsense before. Gish continues his long-standing tactic of misquoting out of date books and simply ignoring or even distorting the actual data regarding the fossil record. Even hard-core creationists are unlikely to find much worth saying about this book since it simply repeats the standard creationist dogma ("no transitional fossils....no transitional fossils"...repeat until your audience is bored) without even trying to force more recent evidence to fit into his twisted version of pseudo-science. It seems that he merely removed parts of the original version of the book which were so astoundingly false that even he was unable to defend them with a straight face. I might classify this table leg-leveler as humor if it weren't taken as real science by so many naive and uninformed members of the public. Suffice to say that science isn't the least bit worried. Save your pennies.