Instruct: Classify Amazon reviews into positive or negative sentiment
Query: Sigh...

Peterson has good intentions -- uphold the authority of scripture with Science. Unfortanutely he is using outdated and fallacious arguments to do. This book only gives many evolutionist a reason to reinforce their thoughts concerning creationism. (i.e. it isn't science, no respectable scientist believes in it, etc..)Examples: The Second Law of Thermodynamics began with the original sin. There are no beneficial mutations. God created starlight to *appear* millions of lightyears away.To Creationists: Do NOT use this as a source for debating with evolutionists. Instead, read and use peer-reviewed literature from organizations such as Answers In Genesis or the Institute for Creation Research.To Evolutionists: Don't use this as an example of "typical creationist beliefs." To do so would be ignorant and dishonest.