As of 5/2/15, Picture shows 60L bag, and print shows 30L bag. Which is it?
907713
The 2bags I received were 60l compressed. This was in April 2015. I have always been receiving 60l bags.
907714
I ordered--and PAID for--the 60-L but only received 30-L. According to the seller, my order said 30-L. That is fine, except that I paid for 60-L. Seller personally insulted me, and then only offered a partial refund if I return the bag. I would be expected to pay $8.95 for seller's original shipping plus my own costs to ship and insure. Seller refused my offer to just refund me the difference in price as-of my purchase date. This is May 2015.
658566
I noticed this too. The description says 3.2 oz bags suitable for tablets but the photo of the product is a 7.2 oz bag for capsules. Maybe the SELLER can update this and make corrections. Which is it?
343315
Hello Lauren....you may need to ask these questions to the company...as there is no information about that on the bag
2095677
Doesn't it say 35 L embroidered on the bottom pocket, or is the picture a misrepresentation? 35 L means 35 liters.
1173555
The M/L is actually 55 liters. The S/M is only 52. As such the S/M is somewhat smaller and lighter. I think this needs to be better advertised; I would not have realized this if my boyfriend and I had not each ordered the bag in different sizes.
1027626
I purchased Espoma Lawn Food in Fall 2014. The bag I received, same as the one in your picture, is 18-0-3.
440304
When I added this to my cart, it displayed this: "Shopping Cart Items Diadora Team Bag (25"x11"x11 1/2", Royal)- Diadora $9.97" Those dimensions are actually associated with a "Medium" Diadora Team bag at other sites, for instance &lt;http://www.foxsoccershop.com/198330-ro.html&gt;. Btw, I'd tried first on a Google over to the manufacturer's site, but it was just flashkrap with no accessible info. I've decided this isn't a killer buy, despite the markdown -- unless one is specifically a Diadora team fan. It is not that big of a bag, and doesn't have much going on with extra pockets.
1744675
I don't know why it says that. I think it must be a misprint. The bag I ordered does not have that on it.
1465279
You are correct in my limited sample of just two bags shipped: One 30 years ago (and it still looks new), and one 6 months ago.
1819939
I'm sorry, my previous answer may be incorrect. This was the bag I purchased and ended up sending back. My answer before was for the bag I actually purchased which looks similar to this one but is larger.
1561535
It's filled. I believe they used to sell it in filled and that's why you're seeing those reviews. Get the bag, it's good quality. I love mine!
1956033
The bag I ordered was Topeak MTX Trunk Bag EXP Bicycle Trunk Bag with Rigid Molded Panels [Sports]
1174789
The bags I have purchased have all been 50 pounds (I buy it every year on Amazon.) Unless they have changed the bag size since the last time I bought it (last spring) it has always been 50 pounds; the price is about right for the 50 pound bag.
1486411
I just posted a picture of the used bag on a digital scale and it still weighs 2lb 0.9oz. Considering the amount I used, I'm convinced the 2.2lb weight indicated was correct before the bag was opened and used.
949356
Hi Dave, the camo bag is actually the EX-250 and was mistakenly pictured with the EX-350 bags. I will go ahead and fix that posting and I apologize for the confusion.
657820
I don't where it is printed on the package EXP, or use before, but there is a series of number located on the back, bottom of the package. I believe the first series of numbers is the lot, followed by what could be an expiration date. For instance, my first bag has 1115, then the two bags I just received state 1215. I take that as meaning 11-01-2015 and 12-01-2015, respectively.
957377
It's a medium sized diaper bag. I could fit 2 bags of 30 count diapers inside if that gives you am idea of size. I love this bag!