What is different between Sharp LC-70LE757 70-inch Aquos Quattron 1080p 240Hz and the 70LE755 and 857??
944474
its the DYNAMIC CONTRAST RATIO. the 757 is 10 million to 1, the 857 is 12 million to 1, and the 755 is 4 million to one. if you can afford it the 757 with 10 million to one will give you a far better picture then the 755 at 4 million.
1185244
There are only a few notable differences, with the UN46F7500 you gain:- Quad-core processor for better multitasking- Builtin webcam (works w/ Skype)- Gesture-based interaction a la webcam- Micro Dimming Pro (vs Micro Dimming) backlighting technology- Clear Motion Rate 960 (vs Clear Motion Rate 720) which is Samsung's benchmark of refresh rateInterestingly, you lose the swivel ability in the stand with the UN46F7500.There are other differences, you can find out about them all here:UN46F7100 Specs: http://www.samsung.com/us/video/tvs/UN46F7100AFXZA-specsUN46F7500 Specs: http://www.samsung.com/us/video/tvs/UN46F7500AFXZA-specs There are only a few notable differences, with the UN46F7500 you gain:- Quad-core processor for better multitasking- Builtin webcam (works w/ Skype)- Gesture-based interaction a la webcam- Micro Dimming Pro (vs Micro Dimming) backlighting technology- Clear Motion Rate 960 (vs Clear Motion Rate 720) which is Samsung's benchmark of refresh rateInterestingly, you lose the swivel ability in the stand with the UN46F7500.There are other differences, you can find out about them all here:UN46F7100 Specs:... » Read More There are only a few notable differences, with the UN46F7500 you gain:- Quad-core processor for better multitasking- Builtin webcam (works w/ Skype)- Gesture-based interaction a la webcam- Micro Dimming Pro (vs Micro Dimming) backlighting technology- Clear Motion Rate 960 (vs Clear Motion Rate 720) which is Samsung's benchmark of refresh rateInterestingly, you lose the swivel ability in the stand with the UN46F7500.There are other differences, you can find out about them all here:UN46F7100 Specs: http://www.samsung.com/us/video/tvs/UN46F7100AFXZA-specsUN46F7500 Specs: http://www.samsung.com/us/video/tvs/UN46F7500AFXZA-specs « Show Less
1185243
There are only a few notable differences, with the UN46F7500 you gain: - Quad-core processor for better multitasking - Builtin webcam (works w/ Skype) - Gesture-based interaction a la webcam - Micro Dimming Pro (vs Micro Dimming) backlighting technology - Clear Motion Rate 960 (vs Clear Motion Rate 720) which is Samsung's benchmark of refresh rate Interestingly, you lose the swivel ability in the stand with the UN46F7500. There are other differences, you can find out about them all here: UN46F7100 Specs: http://www.samsung.com/us/video/tvs/UN46F7100AFXZA-specs UN46F7500 Specs: http://www.samsung.com/us/video/tvs/UN46F7500AFXZA-specs
285076
Pioneer Elite LED is a different technology although Sharp owns them. Elite uses full local dimming LED vs Sharp uses full LED but not local dimming. Full local dimming LED is much more expensive but offers a better blacks and generally better picture for 2D. Sony is only other mftr offering this on their top end LED TVs. Their 65" retails for $5500 and the Elite 70 is around $7000, so a significant cost difference compared to a 240hz Sharp 3d 70" at $4000. If you check out the Elite in Best buy you can see the difference in picture quality. Sharp is excellent, but the Elite is better. if you have the money, Elite is the best out there. I have heard other reviewers note that the Elite has more glare than the Sharp, so if you watch in a bright room, you might want to get the Sharp.
1179376
should be a no brainer , A30=1080i A35=1080p, your sharp aquos = 1080p, worry bout sound later, when you get the A35, connect it to internet, do the update, then go to settings, display, clik on 1080p24
1492945
I can only comment on the M3D550KD because that's what I own. The price difference is very close, so I consider the price as not a factor. The 240MHZ refresh rate was a big deal for me and I still think it's worth having. The picture is very smooth on DVD's and Blue Ray. HDTV is really nice as well. Standard definition is noticably worse, but I guess that's why they went to HD. The 3D is really cool. I didn't buy the TV for 3D, but it's one of my favorite features now. I've owned it for several months with no problems. Bottom line, if it was stolen off my wall, I'd buy another one to replace it. I can only comment on the M3D550KD because that's what I own. The price difference is very close, so I consider the price as not a factor. The 240MHZ refresh rate was a big deal for me and I still think it's worth having. The picture is very smooth on DVD's and Blue Ray. HDTV is really nice as well. Standard definition is noticably worse, but I guess that's why they went to HD. The 3D is really cool. I didn't buy the TV for 3D, but it's one of my favorite features now. I've owned it for several months with no problems. Bottom line, if it was stolen off my wall, I'd buy another one to... » Read More I can only comment on the M3D550KD because that's what I own. The price difference is very close, so I consider the price as not a factor. The 240MHZ refresh rate was a big deal for me and I still think it's worth having. The picture is very smooth on DVD's and Blue Ray. HDTV is really nice as well. Standard definition is noticably worse, but I guess that's why they went to HD. The 3D is really cool. I didn't buy the TV for 3D, but it's one of my favorite features now. I've owned it for several months with no problems. Bottom line, if it was stolen off my wall, I'd buy another one to replace it. « Show Less
1386591
Thanks, T., that's good information. I wish I had the space (and cash) for one of those, especially the 42PZ700, but I'll still probably grab a 42PX60U. I did see a couple of sites with specs on the 75U models that showed them slightly wider than the 42PX60U (and a bit too wide for me.)I wonder about all the sites which are advertising these TVs (the 75U in particular) and claiming to have them in stock.
1671695
The 273 has speakers (through the HDMI), 272 does not. Also, dynamic contrast ratio is greater in the 273....brightness slightly brighter in the 273...10 more degrees of viewing angle in the 272. The 273 weighs another 1.4 pounds than the 272
959337
Hello Antwoine. This is an excellent question, and one we respond to quite often. Being the Flagship in the line the F8000 series must be special in some way, and it is. The key differences are as follows: - Better Image Processing - CMR (Clear Motion Rate) of 1200 as opposed to 960 for the F7500 - Improved Black Level - Micro Dimming Ultimate w/Local Dimming, as opposed to standard Micro Dimming Pro on the F7500 As you can see this is an "All Performance" upgrade as the feature set of the F8000 mimics the F7500. Thank you very much for your inquiry! Tom Thehighdefinitionstore.com 516-931-6800
157339
Thanks for your reply!I made my purchase a month ago and I decided to go with the Sharp LC42-D85U which is 120hz.24p is just for blu ray but I wanted the smooth action that it offers. I only really noticed it on my old set with Star Wars. There was one scene with a black background and alot of action and it was noticably choppy. I have yet to play the same movie and compare.
1895230
I looked at both and bought the 750....for the price (and difference) you are really looking at how important a super thin TV is to you, if saving $2 a month on your energy bill makes that big of a difference, or if you are that nuts about LED, for $800 I wasn't. 200,000 to 1 as a Dynamic contrast ratio is more than enough (you can't really tell much more of a difference). If you really wanna get the LED and are willing to spend that kind of money get the 8000 (even thinner and edge lit led). Because of the models above and below it, and price differences I don't see the 7000 making much sense unless you find a unique deal that only has that set on sale.
1920901
I got the 46" 630 model and I absolutely LOVE it. Sharp incredible picture and there is hardly ANY glare whatsoever. You won't be able to say the same thing with the 650 or 750 model. With those models, you'll be frustrated whenever you want to watch TV during the daytime if there is any window in the room or at night if any inside lights are on, because those models' screens are so reflective and cause so much glare. The 630 model also comes on a swivel stand as well.
2251811
Have had thw A750 for 1 month. Everything about it is great. Best picture I've ever seen. Halo Effect is negligable and the screen is not glossy enough to use as a mirror. I do have one question: When the TV come on, the screen says resolution of 1980 x 1080i @60hz. Why does it say 60 hz when the 120 hz is set to its highest?
1101410
N.D.,Your statement isn't entirely correct. If you look @ both spec sheets, you'll notice they both have 6000:1 contrast ratios. The only difference that I see is one has a cable card slot (96D) where the 95D doesn't.
141614
I am looking at the same two televisions. Unfortunately I can't help you with your question because it's mine too! Have you made a decision yet? I am going to check with Sharp, I will post the info for you if I get anywhere. Good Luck.
2079708
5 vs. 4 wavelength backlight means better color reproduction. 120hz refresh rate means less judder/smoother motion on fast moving action scenes. 15,000 vs. 10,000 Dynamic contrast ratio means deeper blacks (ie, see more picture detail in dark areas of image). I think those are the main differences and justify the higher selling price (but perhaps not to the tune of $1,000-$2,000....$500 difference would be more realistic)
981061
Gamble, The other BIG difference is that the 65's HDMI inputs actually ACCEPT 1080p vs. being 1080p COMPATIBLE and scaling down to 1080i only to reformat it back to "P" like the 61. Go for the 65...I was in the same boat as you until I found that out reading my Crutchfield catalog. Only makes sense for HD-DVD (now a dead format) and Blu-Ray