there is another 70-300 IS USM but costs over $600, are they the same? anyone knows?
920609
Lens usually sells $650. Couldnt. believe $350 from Davismax thru Amazon. But true, brand new with USA warranty. LOVE IT. Still cant believe.
2070526
Idk what a USM is... But the lense doesn't have image stabilizer... and the bag I've heard is really cheaply made... So I bought the amazon DSLR camera bag for the extra $30. It was worth it.
1644368
Thanks. Yes I see it there, but like some other sites they are asking now more than the MSRP from Cannon. Although this is the closest I have found to the MSRP. I did find it one or two other places, but both were asking $300.All places asking the MSRP or below are out. Thanks for the info. This is almost close enough for me to purchase, depending on shipping costs.
1984226
I think there is no other way around it,the warranty it seems is only for US purchases therefore if any issues,i need to ship the item back.With that said,the item is well built and its 3M.A quality brand name,i believe their QC will not let the item fail anytime soon.
1409498
I believe the 3000 replaces the 300.They have about the same rpm range. The 3000 has a newer design, probably some features I can't really think of right not but mostly the same
904825
My thanks for your comments as well. I spent and hour looking around the web for exactly the info you've provided. Olympus sure doesn't provide anything like this on their website. What I thought was really strange was that the 300M is listed as Mac compatible on the Olympus Europe site and only Windoz on the U.S. site. Anyway, you've sold another DS-30...
1423148
My wife loves her Omron 3 because it is easy to use. She is 71 years old and not tech smart. I see the Omron 7 has more memory storage readings (200 vs 60).....5 year warranty instead of 2 years.....heartguide technology whatever that means.....and 2 user mode.....and omron 7 priced $46.99 instead of $37.30 for omron 3.....either way Omron reputation, reliability and value is why we own an Omron 3.
287279
If you take a look at where it is shipped from, the expensive one's are from JAPAN! I'd stick with the USA sellers, make sure they are NEW for any outrageous prices or stick with buying from Walmart if the price is too expensive on Amazon.
1466618
Sure looks the same except the 300 comes with a travel case and is more expensive.
503607
There is no difference. Not sure why you are seeing it as more expensive. I'd just try to get the larger one at the lowest price you can find.
758149
I noticed the same thing. I think there is one vendor that is selling the G7 over $900. If you delve further into the Amazon system you will find that the G7 actually sells about $40 less than the newer model when you calculate shipping.
1451690
Yeah it is.. Even the 7000Series is cheaper than the 6000!!! What is up with that!?
1952943
Hi,Tariff of USA of lens I think that there is no higher than that of the Eurozone. Please check with the customs.Thanks in advance.
130812
The SAL 70-300 G SSM can produce nice bokeh, but as a lens it's over-priced and slow compared to screw-drive lenses and it has poor IQ much beyond 250mm and frankly doesn't deserve a G (GOLD) rating as there are cheaper options such as the Tamron SP AF 70-300mm Di USD which is arguably better but is at least half the price, and although it's about the best if it's type in that price range, don't think that because Sony has a few G lenses in their inventory that they're up to the mark, because compared to their Minolta G cousins, they most certainly are not. My advice is to leave it well alone and buy an alternative as you'll be financially better off and arguably have a better product. The SAL 70-300 G SSM can produce nice bokeh, but as a lens it's over-priced and slow compared to screw-drive lenses and it has poor IQ much beyond 250mm and frankly doesn't deserve a G (GOLD) rating as there are cheaper options such as the Tamron SP AF 70-300mm Di USD which is arguably better but is at least half the price, and although it's about the best if it's type in that price range, don't think that because Sony has a few G lenses in their inventory that they're up to the mark, because compared to their Minolta G cousins, they most certainly are not. My advice is to leave it well... » Read More The SAL 70-300 G SSM can produce nice bokeh, but as a lens it's over-priced and slow compared to screw-drive lenses and it has poor IQ much beyond 250mm and frankly doesn't deserve a G (GOLD) rating as there are cheaper options such as the Tamron SP AF 70-300mm Di USD which is arguably better but is at least half the price, and although it's about the best if it's type in that price range, don't think that because Sony has a few G lenses in their inventory that they're up to the mark, because compared to their Minolta G cousins, they most certainly are not. My advice is to leave it well alone and buy an alternative as you'll be financially better off and arguably have a better product. « Show Less
416404
That's a good question. I never found that info, even on the ES Robbins website. I would guess that the Performance series is very close to 2 mil. The Professional series is thinner. You might give them a call. http://esrchairmats.com
911085
I don't see anything about the source. KanekaQ10 is listed a few times. It says it's USP Grade if that means anything.
1936610
1. 55-300 has both auto and mannual setting on it, but 70-300 has M/A and M. M/A means instant manual overwrite, M/A is pretty important feature. 70-300 is better for sports shoot.2. 70-300 has a "G" in it, which is not good : http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/nikortek.htm#g, but that is new "Norm" that Nikon decide to do.3. 55-300(309$) is 200$ cheaper than 70-300(509$) based on amazon on 07/30/2011.4. 55-300(1.2lb) is 0.4 lb lighter than 70-300(1.6lbs) due to its plastic part(mount etc)5. 55-300 is slower in focus than 70-300, and perform worse than 70-300 in 300 range, so 70-300 is better for sports shoot.6. 55-300 is DX only, while 70-300 can be used in both FX and DX camera.Owen 1. 55-300 has both auto and mannual setting on it, but 70-300 has M/A and M. M/A means instant manual overwrite, M/A is pretty important feature. 70-300 is better for sports shoot.2. 70-300 has a "G" in it, which is not good : http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/nikortek.htm#g, but that is new "Norm" that Nikon decide to do.3. 55-300(309$) is 200$ cheaper than 70-300(509$) based on amazon on 07/30/2011.4. 55-300(1.2lb) is 0.4 lb lighter than 70-300(1.6lbs) due to its plastic part(mount etc)5. 55-300 is slower in focus than 70-300, and perform... » Read More 1. 55-300 has both auto and mannual setting on it, but 70-300 has M/A and M. M/A means instant manual overwrite, M/A is pretty important feature. 70-300 is better for sports shoot.2. 70-300 has a "G" in it, which is not good : http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/nikortek.htm#g, but that is new "Norm" that Nikon decide to do.3. 55-300(309$) is 200$ cheaper than 70-300(509$) based on amazon on 07/30/2011.4. 55-300(1.2lb) is 0.4 lb lighter than 70-300(1.6lbs) due to its plastic part(mount etc)5. 55-300 is slower in focus than 70-300, and perform worse than 70-300 in 300 range, so 70-300 is better for sports shoot.6. 55-300 is DX only, while 70-300 can be used in both FX and DX camera.Owen « Show Less