How do the ADATA SX900 and SX910 differ?
937044
Performance wise, there is no noticeable difference. The SX910 has a 5 yr warranty vs the SX900's 3 yr which is due to them "cherry picking" or "binning" the best NAND chips for the 910.
937045
ADATA unveiled its newest performance-segment consumer SSD, the XPG SX910. The new product appears to be a slightly improved version of the XPG SX900 the company launched back in February. So, supposedly, it's faster than the older sx900. ADATA unveiled its newest performance-segment consumer SSD, the XPG SX910. The new product appears to be a slightly improved version of the XPG SX900 the company launched back in February, 2012. ADATA Releases XPG SX910 SSD According to the company, the NAND flash chips used in the XPG SX910 are put through an improved screening process, picking the best performing ones out for building these drives. In industry jargon, the process is known as binning. It's likely that this change enhanced the product warranty. The XPG SX910 comes with a longer product warranty of 5 years, compared to 3 years of the XPG SX900. Despite improved NAND flash chips, the rated sequential transfer rates advertised for the XPG SX910 haven't changed from those of the XPG SX900. The drive reads at speeds of up to 550 MB/s, and writes at speeds of up to 530 MB/s. Its maximum 4K random read/write performance is rated at 50,000 and 85,000 IOPS, respectively. Perhaps the improved flash chips result in improved "performance yields" (the performance you actually end up with). This answer was lifted from another article. J. Fullilove's answer is very concise and accurate too.
903754
The 920 uses a compression called H264 which in part of the webcam itself while the C910 does not compress but rather allows the CPU to do all the work. The result is the C910 puts a heavy load on the CPU while being used (this would only impact you if you're using an older computer that isn't QuadCore or similar). The C920 is supposedly capable of 1080p while the C910 is capable of 720p. Both models have Right Light. The last difference is the C910 uses 5 megapixels while the C920 uses 3 megapixels. Both work great so it's really a matter of personal preference and maybe cost. Hope that helps.
1527058
I was wondering the same thing. I am thinking about buying the the 1019 and now I came accross the VSX-9049 and right now the difference is only around $20 in Amazon.
51630
#6148.01 Canon SX10 IS & SX20 IS ...... $840 US Market MSRP http://www.ikelite.com/web_two/can_sx10.html
148607
9600 is new model. I don't think there is much difference. You would have to go through every spec to see if there is any. I would start with the pioneer website. I love my 9500 I wouldn't change anything about it. If the price is close obviously go with the new one.
2204728
Ok so this is what I'm going off of. The Cannon SX10IS is the same price as the P90 but the P90 has 24x zoom and 12.1 MP... The price differential came from somewhere. I'm putting my bets on the image processor. I personally own the SX10IS and I could not be happier. My friend who owns the Cannon Rebel XSi tries to say how his buy is much more justified. So far the only things I have found better is his white balance, optional remote trigger, and the capability to shoot in RAW. Otherwise our cameras are very similar.
601011
You are correct, the photo shows the new version, but the description likely refers to the original version of the 900. The NSX version was supposed to be released officially in December. I would check with Amazon to confirm which version they are selling before buying.
2171074
I've used the SB 900 on a D800 for years without problem. I'm sure the SB910 will too
1077275
They share the same sensor size (not type), and look similar; however, there have been a number of updates since 2010. The processor and wide angle lens might be a couple of the more dramatic differences. S95 vs S120 Max resolution: 3648 x 2736 vs 4000 x 3000 Effective pixels: 10 megapixels vs 12 megapixels Sensor photo detectors: 10 megapixels vs 13 megapixels Sensor type: CCD vs BSI-CMOS Processor: Digic 4 vs Digic 6 ISO: Auto, 80 - 3200 vs Auto, 80 - 12800 Focal length (equiv.): 28-105 mm vs 24-120 mm Optical zoom: 3.8 vs 5 Macro focus range: 5 cm (1.97&#8243;) vs 3 cm (1.18&#8243;) Screen dots: 461,000 vs 922,00 Touch screen: No vs TFT PureColor II G Touch screen Maximum aperture: F2.0 - F4.9 vs F1.8 - F5.7 Maximum shutter speed: 1/1600 sec vs 1/2000 sec Flash range: 6.50 m vs 7.00 m Exposure compensation: 2 (at 1/3 EV steps) vs 3 (at 1/3 EV steps) Video Resolution: 1280 x 720 (24 fps) vs 1920 x 1080 (60 or 30 fps) Wireless: Eye-Fi Connected vs Wireless LAN (IEEE802.11 b/g/n) Weight (inc. batteries): 195 g (0.43 lb / 6.88 oz) vs 217 g (0.48 lb / 7.65 oz) Dimensions: 100 x 58 x 30 mm (3.94 x 2.28 x 1.18&#8243;) vs 100 x 59 x 29 mm (3.94 x 2.32 x 1.14&#8243;) GPS: None vs via mobile (linked to compatible smartphone)
1830868
As far as i can tell, this one is just the older version that's been discontinued. The 931014 is newer, maybe has a few small visual changes but all the bits are the same.
2069878
David, I have no idea what the difference is, I never heard of the model 900. After reading the specifications on both and reading the reviews from customers it appears as though the model 900 is a newer version but has exactly the same features. I suppose, based on my research that purchasing the model 900 is probably the better choice.
2211443
If a99 has standard shoe you will need the adapter as with the a58 where it works in TTL, if a99 has minolta so will work without adapter and in TTL also as with my old a55
1312576
The S95 is closer to pro quality. Better for young photographers who might upgrade later, or who prefer more manual control. Moreover, the S95 is likely to produce better pictures simply because it doesn't have some of the distracting gadgetry--big zoom, smile detection, etc.--that's found on the SX230. The idea is to focus your attention on the subject, not on the gadgetry on your camera. For some years the S95 was thre "gold standard" among point and shots, viewed as an acceptable 2nd camera for pros, or as a "transitional" camera for young photographers about to step up to an SLR when they could afford it. The S95 is closer to pro quality. Better for young photographers who might upgrade later, or who prefer more manual control. Moreover, the S95 is likely to produce better pictures simply because it doesn't have some of the distracting gadgetry--big zoom, smile detection, etc.--that's found on the SX230. The idea is to focus your attention on the subject, not on the gadgetry on your camera. For some years the S95 was thre "gold standard" among point and shots, viewed as an acceptable 2nd camera for pros, or as a "transitional" camera for young photographers about to step... » Read More The S95 is closer to pro quality. Better for young photographers who might upgrade later, or who prefer more manual control. Moreover, the S95 is likely to produce better pictures simply because it doesn't have some of the distracting gadgetry--big zoom, smile detection, etc.--that's found on the SX230. The idea is to focus your attention on the subject, not on the gadgetry on your camera. For some years the S95 was thre "gold standard" among point and shots, viewed as an acceptable 2nd camera for pros, or as a "transitional" camera for young photographers about to step up to an SLR when they could afford it. « Show Less
85339
The biggest difference is the new X-Trans sensor which removes the optical low pass filter (OLPF)... making pics much sharper than they were in the x10. Here's more from dpreview's review (http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/fujifilm-x20/): At first glance, the X20 looks just like its predecessor (the X10), although it's now available in a very pretty silver-and-black finish, alongside the conventional all-black. But inside it offers a couple of very significant differences. The first is a brand-new sensor, a 2/3" type 'X-Trans CMOS' design that uses the same novel color filter array as Fujifilm's recent APS-C cameras. This sensor also has phase detect autofocus built right into it - not new to Fuji cameras, but a change from the X10. The second big change is an updated 'Advanced Optical Viewfinder' that includes a detailed information overlay, showing key exposure data and focus confirmation. This isn't the same as the hybrid viewfinder found in the company's X100/X100S and X-Pro1 models - there's no electronic viewfinder - but it's never been done before on a compact camera. The X20 is available in silver/black and all-black bodies Aside from this, the X20 retains most of the same features that made the X10 so appealing. It uses the same fast zoom lens, with a 28-112mm equivalent angle of view and F2.0-2.8 maximum aperture, which is operated by a mechanically-coupled zoom ring that also retracts the lens and turns the camera on and off. It has plenty of external controls, including an exposure compensation dial and two rear dials, and a hot shoe for external flash. One feature notable by its absence is a direct movie record button - the X20 is clearly designed for still photography first, and video second.
1348383
you are going to need this --&gt;AND&lt;-- ADP-MAC for both the ax100 and cx900....... rip off I know.
901083
They've just been introduced! Although the SX1 is being offered overseas, it's only as a preorder. One good reason to pick the SX10 over the SX1: the $300 price difference...
489802
I think the SX40 may be better than SX30 but there is no RAW output. Maybe time for a T3i!