What is the difference between Mega and Ultra Qunol?
925169
Dear Jim,Honestly, I am not too sure. I wish I could tell you. I remember there being a company phone number on the box. Perhaps they can answer your question. Have a great Sunday!Mark
925170
Mega is the reduced (oxidized) form of CoQ10 that your body turns regular CoQ10 into. It's more expensive, but some people feel strongly that it's better absorbed and utilized since your body doesn't have to convert it. As with most supplement claims, it's highly debatable. I have read that your body needs both forms and most people convert it as needed.You'd probably be fine with the Ultra version, but understand this now comes with 150 IU of synthetic Vitamin E. Many feel this is much less healthy than "natural" Vitamin E (one "alpha" type molecule) and Mixed tocopherols (three other naturally occurring forms of Vitamin E). Mega is the reduced (oxidized) form of CoQ10 that your body turns regular CoQ10 into. It's more expensive, but some people feel strongly that it's better absorbed and utilized since your body doesn't have to convert it. As with most supplement claims, it's highly debatable. I have read that your body needs both forms and most people convert it as needed.You'd probably be fine with the Ultra version, but understand this now comes with 150 IU of synthetic Vitamin E. Many feel this is much less healthy than "natural" Vitamin E (one "alpha" type molecule) and... » Read More Mega is the reduced (oxidized) form of CoQ10 that your body turns regular CoQ10 into. It's more expensive, but some people feel strongly that it's better absorbed and utilized since your body doesn't have to convert it. As with most supplement claims, it's highly debatable. I have read that your body needs both forms and most people convert it as needed.You'd probably be fine with the Ultra version, but understand this now comes with 150 IU of synthetic Vitamin E. Many feel this is much less healthy than "natural" Vitamin E (one "alpha" type molecule) and Mixed tocopherols (three other naturally occurring forms of Vitamin E). « Show Less
925171
As far as I can tell Mega contains 100 mg ubiquinol/softgel and Ultra contains 100mg uniquinone plus 150u vitamin E/softgel. The company says ubiquinol is the active form of CoQ10 and is fat & water soluble. Ultra is reported to be 300 times more soluble than regular CoQ10 (maybe due to the vit E?)I've taken the Ultra for about a year and notice significant improvement in muscle pain I was getting from taking Lipitor.
925172
Mega is the reduced (oxidized) form of CoQ10 that your body turns regular CoQ10 into. It's more expensive, but some people feel strongly that it's better absorbed and utilized since your body doesn't have to convert it. As with most supplement claims, it's highly debatable. I have read that your body needs both forms and most people convert it as needed. You'd probably be fine with the Ultra version, but understand this now comes with 150 IU of synthetic Vitamin E. Many feel this is much less healthy than "natural" Vitamin E (one "alpha" type molecule) and Mixed tocopherols (three other naturally occurring forms of Vitamin E).
537479
The ultra records video faster. Some HD equipped camera's are to fast to write to a regular 32gb chip!! Check your camera's requirements.
1579755
No, I started with Ultra and got no results, whereas with the Ultra Omega I got almost immediate results. Move Free didn't work for me either.
230040
I am not sure which is the regular Mega. I own the Mega that is offered by Metro PCS at the moment.
381105
They're both basically the same other than this one being a little cheaper price wise the the T-fal name on it and the B100 being a bit more with the krupps name on it. The main difference between these two and the higher end models is the higher ones have digital displays, but functionally they all do the same thing.
394635
That's hard to answer, Duracell doesn't provide a lot of technical information about the the Quantums, which have widely varying reviews. The "superiority" of their performance varies, but they are fundamentally still "alkaline" batteries, but engineered somewhat differently than the "regular" Coppertops. But if you're asking whether these are comparable to the Quantums rather than the Coppertops, the answer is "no." These are basically the "industrial version" of the consumer-oriented "regular" Coppertops, NOT the Quantums (which as you presumably know, are much more expensive than the Coppertops.) That's hard to answer, Duracell doesn't provide a lot of technical information about the the Quantums, which have widely varying reviews. The "superiority" of their performance varies, but they are fundamentally still "alkaline" batteries, but engineered somewhat differently than the "regular" Coppertops. But if you're asking whether these are comparable to the Quantums rather than the Coppertops, the answer is "no." These are basically the "industrial version" of the consumer-oriented "regular" Coppertops, NOT the Quantums (which... » Read More That's hard to answer, Duracell doesn't provide a lot of technical information about the the Quantums, which have widely varying reviews. The "superiority" of their performance varies, but they are fundamentally still "alkaline" batteries, but engineered somewhat differently than the "regular" Coppertops. But if you're asking whether these are comparable to the Quantums rather than the Coppertops, the answer is "no." These are basically the "industrial version" of the consumer-oriented "regular" Coppertops, NOT the Quantums (which as you presumably know, are much more expensive than the Coppertops.) « Show Less
1133930
I own both and the are essentially identical except in one aspect. They are the same size and capacity and made with the same parts and electronic controls. This difference is that the 700, that I bought 9 years ago, included a special KF antimicrobial filter in it that is not mentioned in the new 220. It obviously cut the mfr's cost but has no impact on the softening ability of the unit that I've now owned a few months, running flawlessly. Very easy to install and set-up so long as you provide the in and out plumbing.
301797
I don'r know but here is an interesting page on that - http://www.livestrong.com/article/551899-difference-between-seanol-seanol-f/
1520231
I believe it's just one company has the rights to use the word micro, so the other must call it mini. The micro clover is more expensive.
742694
They both have an excellent firewall, very customizable but somewhat complex. The differences are the GL version is 10/100/1000 with 64 mb SD ram and the 750 is 10/100 with 32 MB SD ram.
1825565
For one the Mino HD has a built-in battery. Ultra has a user replaceable battery.
742695
Almost the same thing. The GL model is gigabit on each port versus 10/100 in the non-GL. Also more RAM and higher CPU speed if I recall correctly. There are other smaller differences as well, but these are the too areas that I usually utilize the GL model over the non-GL model for.
2176839
I'm not sure since I only have Mindware Q-bits. I assume the extreme version may be more difficult . Both my boys enjoy the regular version. We play during family home evening.
458540
Hi Jun M., you may check the difference between the two on the link given below. -Ely http://store.sony.com/gsi/webstore/WFS/SNYNA-SNYUS-Site/en_US/-/USD/ViewProductCompareService-Show?CategoryID=tRYKmUBw8zEAAAFA4ZUihoTf
1705331
*facepalm*Cuz the Verison one has less megabits? Wow man.... I dunno how to answer this...
1144135
I'd swear that when I got the Ultra Pod II back in November that the "Digital" model was bigger and heavier. Now, even the Pedco website describes the 2 as identical, but the Digital is $3.00 more than the II. I just saw someone at Dpreview mention he had all "3" sizes.B&H; describes the Digital as a "slightly modified" UltraPod II. I can't tell what the difference is and I have the UltraPod II.
359848
Ultra just has more padded area. We love our GSeats especially at sports venues with metal benches.