Which one is better: Sennheiser CX 300 II, or Sennheiser CX 215 ???
933267
I do not know sorry but I have sent two pair back did not like the new design where one wire is half the length I thought it was defective at first but when the second one came that way I realized that was the way they were suppose to be.
933268
The Sennheiser CX 300 II is much much much better quality. From the number, it is different...LOL (and 300 is version "2", unlike 215 :l)If you were to buy 215 from Sennheiser, you pay 39.95If you were to buy 300 II from Sennheiser, you pay 59.95.http://en-us.sennheiser.com/earbuds-in-ear-headphones-cx-215http://en-us.sennheiser.com/noise-cancelling-earbuds-headphones-cx-300-ii-precisionOnly reason CX 300 ii is cheaper here is cause Amazon is nice :)CX 300 ii is the way to go for under 30 dollars ^^ (a bit more is Soundmagic, Klipsch, Shure and the like but ehh xD ) The Sennheiser CX 300 II is much much much better quality. From the number, it is different...LOL (and 300 is version "2", unlike 215 :l)If you were to buy 215 from Sennheiser, you pay 39.95If you were to buy 300 II from Sennheiser, you pay 59.95.http://en-us.sennheiser.com/earbuds-in-ear-headphones-cx-215http://en-us.sennheiser.com/noise-cancelling-earbuds-headphones-cx-300-ii-precisionOnly reason CX 300 ii is cheaper here is cause Amazon is nice :)CX 300 ii is the way to go for under 30 dollars ^^ (a bit more... » Read More The Sennheiser CX 300 II is much much much better quality. From the number, it is different...LOL (and 300 is version "2", unlike 215 :l)If you were to buy 215 from Sennheiser, you pay 39.95If you were to buy 300 II from Sennheiser, you pay 59.95.http://en-us.sennheiser.com/earbuds-in-ear-headphones-cx-215http://en-us.sennheiser.com/noise-cancelling-earbuds-headphones-cx-300-ii-precisionOnly reason CX 300 ii is cheaper here is cause Amazon is nice :)CX 300 ii is the way to go for under 30 dollars ^^ (a bit more is Soundmagic, Klipsch, Shure and the like but ehh xD ) « Show Less
515417
Haven't done a lot of research on sennheiser, but they probably are around the same quality of sound but id like to believe that the sync are built a lot tougher, and they do work with anything that has a 3.5mm headphone jack even a tv
494045
You should really consider the Sennheiser CX-300 or the JVC Marshmellow, both of which out perform all of the above when it comes to clear, warm, natural sound. The Marshmellows are a tiny bit abrasive but can be tweaked by removing the paper attenuator and adding in some foam off some old cheapo headphones for attenuation.
2203330
The CX 680 is ur best bet with regards to durability and longevity. I even accidently washed and dried it with my clothes and still works like brand new even after almost 2 yrs later. The sound quality and base is fantastic.
2060350
i can not give you the best answer here because i have not used the px 200 ii i but looking at a picture and the technical specs, the look like a closed ear design as opposed to my px 100 ii i which are open air design. I think the px 200 ii i might not sound as good at the higher frequencies or may sound muffled compared to the px 200 ii i, and looking at the frequency ranges of the two headphones, px 100 ii i looks like it can reach higher frequencies than the px 200 ii i. The closed design of the px 200 ii i should provide better noise isolation though
936547
CX300 sounds like the better pair here. you could also consider Creative's EP630 or 830. The EP630 is supposedly similar in sound to the CX300. The J2 might be #3 in this group, user reviews even make the first Jbuds out to be better than them! All in all, the CX300 is cheap and sounds great
2001394
I mostly use my Sony Walkman NWZ-S545, which has a 5-band equalizer. I equalize it for powerful bass and low mids. My favorite song to test sound quality is Neon Knights by Black Sabbath, as it has extremely powerful bass and percussion. I recently bought the HD 202 II, and I personally think they are the best headphones in market for that price, the sound quality and power is marvelous. I have not tested the 203, however within the 2xx series, I think it is all pretty much the same when it comes to power outcome (I think).
297317
Well, had I discovered the NVX XPT100 (search for it here on Amazon) before I bought a CAL...I wouldn't have bought the CAL. But to answer the question, I considered headphones including Sennheisers, Audio Technicas, etc.
2175461
Both are great headphones. Everyone's description is pretty head-on from what I've read. I remember buying the HD280's at target on clearance- I opened them in the car out of excitement. They had REALLY TIGHT bass. The PX100 is more sloppy, but it's a really fun headphone unlike the PX100. I enjoyed it alot for most of my music (Electronica, Rap, Metal, Trance). The bass really hits on the 280's.
1266602
The PX-100 II's are AWFUL!!!! do not buy them. Sennheiser gave them the ridiculously accentuated midbass hump they think the market wants, presumably to compete with the Dr. Dre/Monster Beats of the world, and in the process ruined a cult classic. Sorry to report this but it is based on my firsthand experience, and trust me I am not alone. If you want a replacement for your PX 100, do what I did and stock up on them, b/c they won't be around forever. As of this writing, you can find them on ebay for around $37 a pair, give or take. Also as of this writing I am sitting listening to the Academey of Ancient Music play Mozart on my PX 100s, driven from my computer by a Headrooom Total Bithead, and they sound wonderful.
2222388
They are very similar in many ways. I got the PC 360 before these but sent them back because the velvet-ey feel on the earcups weren't comfortable for me at all. They both sound very similar though. Unfortunately neither of these have active noise cancellation but but having the PC 350E's on your head are far better than the PC 360 because of its closed-back design. I can without a doubt say that both of those headphones are great and the purchase just comes down to your personal preference. Good luck!
1752363
When I sent in my px100 original for RMA at Sennheiser USA (Old Lyme, CT I think), one of the higher reps told me there's no difference except the -II looks better and is supposedly more durable. I sold the PX100-II's right after I recieved them and I miss them alot, as stupid as it sounds. Oh well, I'm using the Grado SR325's now!
1062679
The earpads on the PX200ii will cup over your ears, rather than sit flat. They are classified as "closed" headphones even though they don't fully envelop the ear. The Sennheiser PX100ii is an example of an "open" earpad headphone. IMO, you can't go wrong with either model.
1228303
One of the major differences is the ear piece. the MX685 stays outside of the ear canal while the CX685 goes into the ear canal. If you check out Sennheiser's web page they have a pdf spec sheets that shows the differences and the only slight difference other than how it sits in the ear is the "sound pressure" being a bit better on the CX685.
1505274
Hello Subhakar, the difference between this two senheiser, well both are the same, both sound amazing, great bass response. Check the senheiser webpage, you will find the details. For me, both models are the same in sound. try the cx 300b mk ii. Take care, rock on.
1947716
From what I've read the 700x is more comfortable and for me they are, but as many people have said they fit a large head. Also 700x are a updated version, with a slightly adjusted bass response. Complaints of the original 700s was that they were lacking bass. I power them with asus essence stx sound card and would rate them very highly for their price, comfort, sound quality. Maybe like a 9/10
694627
If you need passive blacking of ambient noise, in my search for headphones the best I could determine is the Sennheiser 380, pretty similar to the popular 280 but with slightly better noise blocking, which is already pretty good in the 280.