Does any one feel like the side lens pocket is on the wrong side? When I swivel the bag in front of me on the right, the pocket is underneath.
918951
Which shoulder are you wearing it on? Are you taking it off your shoulder when you pull it around? The only way I could think to put the pocket on the bottom would be wearing on the left, which would make the bag hang oddly, or pulling it off the shoulder. It's designed to sit on the right shoulder and be pulled around from the left to right underneath your left arm. Then it's still hanging on your right shoulder and the opening is facing up.
918952
Susan, you are right - but I think the intended side to use the bag is from the left. It work fine for me during my 3 week long trip to Europe.
918953
The bag is meant to be worn on the other side, so that you swivel it on the left side of your body, then the lens pocket is on top.
918954
I would say that would be correct, but I never used that bag that way. I have always used the bag from the left. It has worked great on hiking trips, photo shoots and just out and about.
350415
I have the bag and I like the bag. But I have a Cannon and 2 lens so it may not serve your purpose as it serves mine
796
I put the lens side rearward; since it is leather, it should loosen up; I believe I remember it was tight at first, then perfect after a short while. Also, I use the strap as added protection to keep it from sliding out, and perhaps you can use the same strap, to pull it out until it loosens up.
568951
probably be a little snug...depending on what lens you have on the camera..i would almost have to say no..but..i have two of these and dont really use either...if you have a 50 or 35 mm lens maybe...it is a nice bag well made and inexpensive but its 2 compartments top and bottom..good luck
1780184
Honestly, I've not experienced this issue but it is not my primary camera bag either. I have a spare camera in it. The workmanship seems first class and I have no complaints on that score.
1944077
I am able to carry a tabletop tripod in the side pocket. But the pocket is not big enough to fit either end of a full-sized tripod. What you could *probably* do is put 1 or 2 of the legs into the side pocket and then modify the bag with a fastener to attach the top of the tripod to the side of the bag. Since my sewing skills are lacking, I will probably just buy a different (bigger) bag that's capable of carrying a tripod. For what it's worth, this bag is fantastic for its size! I can fit my camera (Canon 70D) with 2 extra lenses in the bottom. There's more than enough room in the top for flash, batteries, filters, accessories, etc.
1561359
I have a 70-300mm lens that fits in the side pocket. My lens is 6" long but when in the side pocket it has a 1" clearance. It would probably fit ok.
786318
It may hold that lens in one of the two side pockets, but it would be tight, and not as well protected. I keep my 50-200mm in the main case area, and that is a just right fit.I would say it would make a great easy carry short shoot bag, especially since it has a tripod carry on it. But, anything beyond that lens size wise, you'd probably need a larger or deeper case.
1004328
I wondered the same but had no trouble getting used to one side. Incidentally I never access gear while still on my shoulder. Feels safer to simply swing off and lay on steady surface so nothing can fall. That method is certainly safer with a couple thousand in lens and camera even if you have to kneel to the ground. Invariably I find a higher surface anyway.
1865370
The side pockets are quite big. I think that there should be plenty of room for a flash. I can fit all my cables and my battery charger in just one pocket alone! Inside, with the camera "hammock" at the highest adjustment, there is tons of room under it to store large items even with a small lens attached. All would be safe and dry with the case having a hard waterproof bottom.
223203
There are several pockets. Love this bag/backpack. The area you are referring to has the capability to hold another lens. I currently have my Nikon 55-300mm lens stored there.The area is padded so your lens is protected if the bag has to be stored on a flight or if it happens to fall small heights and still be protected.
1258625
I keep a couple of lenses in my bag. I keep a Tamron 24-70 2.8 on my camera nearly on all the time and it fits in the middle very nicely. I've posted a couple images with a ruler so you get a sense of size and capacity. Overall, I like the bag. However, it is not much good shifting it to the right shoulder. I wished there was a more universal solution. Left shoulder only! http://imgur.com/enE5F05 http://imgur.com/7FGRmKP Good luck!
2010746
Hi! CuteLunatic, You are quite "Welcome"! .. I also wanted this particular camera bag / backpack as I need to pack some documents also for my trip in August 2015. This is much more than just as camera bag. Also, it was made for ( Nikon ) cameras & lenses, so I figured their design specs must be rather rigid for the final manufactured product.Thank You for your reply,Stu
831103
No, you are not doing anything wrong. Because the case is actually a sleeve, the camera hangs just as it would without the case, with the lens angled away from your body. Your workaround to place the camera in backwards is perfectly fine. I carry the camera when in the sleeve over the neck and left shoulder so the camera rests on my left hip. When I need to take a photo I find it comfortable to lift the camera with my left hand leaving the strap positioned as it is, and taking the picture.
2201524
I mounted the bags with the little pocket to the rear. Not sure if it matters, although from the cut of the leather that lays across the rear fender, I think pocket should be to the rear.
853179
The lens needs to be detached, in my opinion - for the best fit. You may be able to close the bag with it attached but I guess it depends what else you are carrying. Hope this helps
2136546
Mine was the same way, thought I'd gotten the wrong lens. I contacted Olympus and they said it shouldn't be like that and to exchange it if I wanted. I didn't want to mess with it and it has become easier to put on and take off without making the mounting too loose for my other lens. It worked itself out.