are these hip huggers with a lower waist?
383781
They fit right below the natural waist. They allow you to walk bend and sit without dropping low. I'm in my sixties and find them both comfortable and modest.
383782
Lower but not hip hugger no.... Below the belly button but not at the hips... LOVE these pants
383783
No, they fit right below natural waistline. I love these pants/shorts, although I did listen to previous reviews and ordered 2 sizes up.
383784
No, I wouldn't consider them hip huggers. These cover up to my belly button, if not a little over it.
327089
Mine are a little shorter than I usually like. They stop right at the knees and I would like them to go just a little past. But since they are really meant to be tactical it makes sense that they would allow for better running and such. I think the length is proportional to the waist number.
845236
Well, if you have wide thighs they might be tight. I have wide thighs and a large still felt tight. If you're thinner with smaller hips you should be alright
10113
Mid-rise I believe. TErminology might be different. I think of them as having a bit of a low waist. Fit a little below waist. Very comfortable for me.
2237892
They are indeed tight, and narrow, but not over the calf. They are lower than that.
18996
They have Velcro strips at the bottom of each of the four contact points. So yes they are. I prefer using the suspenders myself, it keeps the support right where I want it.
455645
I think so. They have the little nubbies on the back which keeps them from sliding around.
1134310
Yes, they fit quit nicely around the butt area and the waist is where it should be however I have to pull the drawstring pretty tight to keep them stationary.
195849
Probably. I've noticed that these diapers seem "short" - they don't go as high on the waist as they should.
415204
They are kinda in between, I would have to say, according to the feedback from my mother. She loves the fact that they do not "squeeze" her legs while providing just the right amount of pressure and comfort.
20306
Hi there, I would say they fit/sit just marginally below the waist... very comfortable shorts.
1064769
for me they were a little closer to the lg size. they fit well, but still a tad bit big enough as to not cut off your circulation.
29819
They are a little "stretchy" but no traditional elastic waist band. Hope this helps.
3429
yes. They are not the tight muscle shirts that UA makes. they are regular and fit fairly loose.
1996939
I think so. We don't sit in them long enough for them to be uncomfortable. They are contoured.
122746
They are a relaxed fit, but not at the point where they are baggy!! They were a perfect relaxed fit for me.
731596
They are longer and more fitted as they hug the leg about 4" above the knee. Yes I would say they are more conservative. I use them for jet skiing and love them. They eliminate sliding around on the seat and protect the thighs from pinching when riding over waves. Hope this helps.