What is the differnce in the S25C Hinged Base and the Rotating Black BiPods? I'll be varmit calling and shooting from a seated position most of the time. Which is best for ths?
946189
This size works very well for me from a "turkey seat." The S in the code indicates that the bipod head will Swivel from side to side as the previous answer indicated.
946190
This is a very high pod. Excellent for sitting and shooting.The hinge swivels form side to side. You can adjust the tension so its stiffer for smaller targets and also less tension so it can move freely for moving targets. Its very solid and well made ... I have used cheap bipods only for them to fail when I need them.
946191
This is a very high pod. Excellent for sitting and shooting. The hinge swivels form side to side. You can adjust the tension so its stiffer for smaller targets and also less tension so it can move freely for moving targets. Its very solid and well made ... I have used cheap bipods only for them to fail when I need them.
1609774
PD,Thanks for a really informative review. I'm in the process of trying to make this decision. I'm getting a 70-200. I just don't know which one. On your 2.8 w/o IS, and adding a 1.4 teleconverter, do you miss the IS? I know you said you use a tripod or monopod a lot. Is that how you overcome that? Or do you find yourself still able to shoot hand-held? I'd love to get that combination of the 200 + 1.4tc.Thanks!
2064379
Gotta file stock where it meets the stock tang. id go ahead an try par arms this isnt any cheaper an its heavyier just my 2 cents. The hinge part makes no sense im pretty darn sure most akms have a rear sight block for the rear sight leaf... is simple kalishnakov knowledge comrad!
24841
I do believe that this is the M16 BCG; I bought mine from Brownells but by going from the picture and the Part Number (NIBXBCG-0002) this is indeed the beefier M16 BCG. Also, if you use this heavier BCG then you are going to need to run a heavier Action Return Spring (Sprinco's "Blue" Spring should do the job, and their "Machine Gunner's Lube" is fantastic) as well as a heavier Buffer (ST-2T, H2, DPMS Extra Heavy Buffer, etcetera). You really need these parts to get the most out of the "meatier" M16 BCG and for it to function reliably. And while you're in there, I recommend disposing of the standard, more fragile Charging Handle and swapping it for a design that DOESN'T put all the energy of charging the rifle onto a single steel roll pin. The Rainier Arms "Raptor" or Bravo Company "Gunfighter" series are all good choices, depending on your setup. Trust me, you won't regret any of these upgrades, but the Spring and Weight are actually rather necessary. Safe Shootin' and Keep 'em in the Ten Ring. EDIT: Here is a handy reference photograph to go by: http://ar15barrels.com/tech/ar15carriers.jpg
2150391
It's super lightweight, very durable, able to switch out the feet(with spikes for example), ability to add extended leg lengths, ability to set the rearward and forward angle of the legs, etc. I have a couple of them, and would put them over a Harris any day. I usually shoot with the legs angled forward one or two spots, depending on terrain, thus eliminating the need to pre-load the bipod as much every shot.
564062
I use it with a Harris BiPod on a Sig 516 with little complaint. The only issue I found is that the mount was slightly loose (wiggley) when cammed all the way down. A piece of vinyl electrical tape along the inside of the mount was enough to fix the shimmy.
1785021
Sure is. I use a 30 round magazine without issue. Also for better stability, mount the Bipod so the legs fold forward, not backwards. You'll find it more comfortable and functional.
1806634
I'm guessing the site is measuring muzzle height. Regardless, this bipod is awesome for all manner of shooting. I put it on my Weatherby Vanguard 30-06 and I love it. It's actually the second one I've had. I reluctantly let the first one go with a rifle sale.
196517
No it does not effect how sturdy the bipod is. If you understand how a bipod mounts to a swivel stud you will see that it being able to rotate has no effect on the bipod
1267128
Its similar in design. The Miculek version's ports are at a sideways angle which helps in 3 gun matches when they shoot sideways. These ports are just vertical and horizontal.
1578628
I no longer own a Trail NP, but, going off my memory, no, mounting a bi-pod would probably interfere with the cocking mechanism. Most people I have seen use shooting sticks.
311511
I have two of these. One mounted on a S&W; M&P; 10 (.308) that I've swapped the flash suppressor out for a muzzle brake. Has 18" barrel. Normally shoot Sierra 168 grain HPBTs in hand loads. Last outing I was getting sub-moa results. Have the other mounted on Armalite AR-31 (.308) with 24" barrel. Have shot better than 1/2 moa with the same hand loads. I never worry about the BDC feature since that is pretty dependent on using specific factory ammo. I can wing it on longer shots pretty easily. Great scopes.
2272849
The one i bought actually swivels, not rotates. It helps with leveling the scope when shooting on uneven terrain. If you want the swivel option you'll have to buy an attachment like i did for my AR15. But it's worth it the Harris bipods are the best.
728433
Hey! I got the TSR100 for my 10/22. I like them allot and they shrunk my groups like crazy.Getting to the point, I like the simplicity of the TSR100, but the downside is the rear tsr100 is the rear sight almost perminant. The TSR 200 on the other hand goes on the little pic rail that comes with the modern 10/22 and you can put a little red dot such as an aim point micro in front of the tsr200. An upside of the TSR 200 is that the rear sight is adjustable for elevation AND from left to right. Imagine that! Totally your call.Good shooting!
1022809
I don't know your set up, but I used it on my moss berg 30-06 I installed a 4 inch picatinny rail attaching it with two screws on the synthetic stock with out glue. Neat and clean and the bipod is sturdy and functions great.it made my 30-06 look mean and tactical. I had to install it that way because moss berg has no swivel sling attachment. I think it will be OK on yours, the price will fool you it is just as good as high end bipod. It was truly worth my money good look.
1022812
To be honist with you I really don't know I purchased this for my Son as a gift I have looked it over but I really dont know much at all about this bipod I'm sorry I don't have an answer for you
1917257
You could articulate sling attachment by using side of the stock at the front end, bipod is a streatch due to the fact that this is break barrel rifle, you could attach Picatinny rail on to the barrel and use quick detach bipod, very unpractical. Your permanent mount option may be stock underside just behind slot that accommodates cocking mechanism, this is too far back for conventional bipod mount, added weight will be a nuisance and I don't see the benefit, I use Coldwell front and rear sandbags for bench shooting and cleaning, much more practical.