Compare all Sangean models? I'm wondering about the comparative quality for (1) reception and (2) sound. They make so many models. I bought a DT-400W, loved the reception and the features, found the sound smooth but dull, lacking top end. Returned it and bought a Sony SRF-M37W, perfect sound, worse reception. I read a review that compared the two Sangeans 400 and 210, said exactly what I wanted to hear, that the 400 is dull and the 210 has the top end I want. Anyone concur or disagree? Thanks in advance.Alan Compare all Sangean models? I'm wondering about the comparative quality for (1) reception and (2) sound. They make so many models. I bought a DT-400W, loved the reception and the features,... » Read More Compare all Sangean models? I'm wondering about the comparative quality for (1) reception and (2) sound. They make so many models. I bought a DT-400W, loved the reception and the features, found the sound smooth but dull, lacking top end. Returned it and bought a Sony SRF-M37W, perfect sound, worse reception. I read a review that compared the two Sangeans 400 and 210, said exactly what I wanted to hear, that the 400 is dull and the 210 has the top end I want. Anyone concur or disagree? Thanks in advance.Alan « Show Less
711053
I was the one that posted the comparison of sound between the 400 and the 210. The 210 is easily superior in sound. I am quite surprised no one else has brought this up. Doesn't anyone care about good stereo sound quality through their ear plugs?
914365
Yeah but try to describe it, beyond saying it's "better". ThanksP.S. Interestingly, I just talked to their company this morning. It seems that they left the belt-clip out of my box, they're going to mail me one. A couple of months ago I went there to swap my old 400 for a newer 400 when its FM went out. Had I heard from you before that, I would have asked them if I could give the 210 another listen. Several months ago they let me sit and compare ALL the models.P.P.S. Surprisingly, today they told me that this is actually the manufacturer here (in El Monte CA). Yeah but try to describe it, beyond saying it's "better". ThanksP.S. Interestingly, I just talked to their company this morning. It seems that they left the belt-clip out of my box, they're going to mail me one. A couple of months ago I went there to swap my old 400 for a newer 400 when its FM went out. Had I heard from you before that, I would have asked them if I could give the 210 another listen. Several months ago they let me sit and compare ALL the models.P.P.S. Surprisingly, today they told me that this is actually the manufacturer here (in El Monte CA).
914366
Hi M., sorry I didn't get right back to you...Yes, I'm surprised that people aren't commenting. Sound is not an insignificant element! Soooo... Does the 210 sound more "lively" and "present"... more Sony-like!? :-) If so, I certainly should have bought THAT one recently when I went to Sangean (El Monte, CA) distribution and swapped 400's, after I lost FM reception on my old one!Thanks,Alan
914367
Hi Alan,Sorry for my belated reply. There was a significant difference in sound quality improvment with D210 over DT400 using the same ear buds. To me, it was not that close in comparison. As I stated to another comment post, if you're simply looking for AM and weather band, the DT400 is a great choice. But if FM sound is high on your list of importance, then the DT210 is definitely the better choice. I guess that's the trade off then. No weather band. I simply go onto internet site with my Blackberry hand held to get my weather updates. :<)
526144
I bought this player with the intention to use the 7.1 analog output. However, after experimenting with the player I found the standard DTS signal decoded by my receiver to be superior to the HD DTS decoded by the player. In particular, the signal to the subwoofer was very low volume and nothing I did (especially after contacting the ignorant Sony Tech analyst) could make it louder. I would definitely recommend getting the 350 and using the digital optical or coaxial port.
802207
For "middle of the road" units (very subjective anyway), these are generally considered to sound better than the Sonys. But really, everyone's ears are different - try to listen to both if you can arrange it. Also, don't expect amazing bass out of either, but that can be overrated depending on what you're listening to. I'd much rather have the Pioneers than a system w/subwoofer that was not natural sounding, had unrealistically boosted bass, etc...
1743623
Hello, I bought both radio models from Amazon and can tell you that the WR-11 is definitely a better radio for reception AND sound quality, especially in FM. There is literally no comparison. WR-11 gives you a nice round sound that fills a room without sounding distorted or 'tinny.' I would especially recommend it if you listen to music. Hope that helps!
1913097
I have not personally listened to this pairing, but i'll comment on how the vali did with my he-400 and dt770, which i feel are both a tad bright at times. the vali did indeed tame the highs every so slightly, which is perfect, as I found both headphones only every so slightly bright at times. the warmer sound signature of the vali mellowed the highs, smoothing them out and taking that random harshness from them. i think you'd be very happy with the vali and the 701s. you can also email schiit directly, they're incredibly responsive and honest. for example, when i wanted to try tube amps, i emailed them and told them which headphones i have, my dac (modi), and what i was looking for in sound. i asked them if the best starting point was the Valhalla or lyr, assuming the vali wasn't going to be able to drive my he-400 and 250ohm dt770. nick from schiit replied within 30 minutes saying get the vali, even after i had opened the door for him to suggest the higher end (more expensive) amps. that's one of the reason's I'm so supportive of schiit, they seem to honestly care. ok shameless schiit plug over now...
981229
I recently bought the ANC7b after losing my ANC7 headphones (my dumb fault). Although I expected the newer model to have better sound quality, I was disappointed. Mids and highs are more muted, though bass seems more prevalent in the "B" model. I am planning to return the ANC7b model to Amazon, and have found a seller on eBay that has the original ANC7 model for sale.Just my 2 cents...
1447560
I have the Dragonfly, and also better DAC/amps. I recommend something better than the Dragonfly with these headphones. They are good enough that you will be able to appreciate the difference a better dac/amp can make. I have the Resonessence Concero HP. It's quite awesome, and starkly better than my Dragonfly, but a lot more expensive. For a bit more than the price of the DF, you'd probably get a lot more quality if you get the Meridian Explorer, or the Audioengine D3, or the iFi. I haven't tried these three, but based on my Resonessence vs DF experience, I do know the HP50s are good enough to reveal the difference, so don't miss out by getting a low-tier DAC. I have the Dragonfly, and also better DAC/amps. I recommend something better than the Dragonfly with these headphones. They are good enough that you will be able to appreciate the difference a better dac/amp can make. I have the Resonessence Concero HP. It's quite awesome, and starkly better than my Dragonfly, but a lot more expensive. For a bit more than the price of the DF, you'd probably get a lot more quality if you get the Meridian Explorer, or the Audioengine D3, or the iFi. I haven't tried these three, but based on my Resonessence vs DF experience, I do know the HP50s are good enough... » Read More I have the Dragonfly, and also better DAC/amps. I recommend something better than the Dragonfly with these headphones. They are good enough that you will be able to appreciate the difference a better dac/amp can make. I have the Resonessence Concero HP. It's quite awesome, and starkly better than my Dragonfly, but a lot more expensive. For a bit more than the price of the DF, you'd probably get a lot more quality if you get the Meridian Explorer, or the Audioengine D3, or the iFi. I haven't tried these three, but based on my Resonessence vs DF experience, I do know the HP50s are good enough to reveal the difference, so don't miss out by getting a low-tier DAC. « Show Less
1214637
Hi CritiKiL, one main difference between the two receivers is that DA5800ES is a 9.2-channel with 130 watts per channel while the DA2800ES 7.2 ch surround sound at 100 watts per channel. For further info, you may check on this link: http://store.sony.com/gsi/webstore/WFS/SNYNA-SNYUS-Site/en_US/-/USD/ViewProductCompareService-Show?CategoryID=UOgKMoRhfTcAAAFIMacTi0aF -Ely
118264
I enjoy them both. At present the Sony MDRZX300/BLK is slightly more expensive than the Panasonic RPDJS400W DJ, though not by much. I haven't used my Panasonic as much as the Sony; my general impression is that the Sony's audio quality may be a cut above. The "feel factor"--comfort in wearing headphones--is so subjective that any comment might mislead. I find the size and design of the Sony more convenient for storage: with their earpieces swiveled inwards, you can store them flat. The Panasonic are bulkier.
1179949
Hi John, Any ear-phones or ear-pieces will work with Sangean SR-35 pocket radio, regardless if they are mono or stereo. I bought three SR-35 radios because the electronic components inside are very good and they have extremely low internal electronic noise. In other words, you will be able to amplify weak signals stations without amplifying the noise. The reception is very clear across all the sound-levels. During the night time I use a small ear piece (Radio Shack) of $5 which works just fine. I have some great headphones (bought long ago with cca. $100) and the sound is so good with them that there is no difference between SR-35 and a $300 stereo receiver. Now, the SR-35 does not have a stereo sound on FM, only mono sound. Sangean used good quality electronic components to obtain a great sound so they have to cut costs by renouncing at stereo sound (which very few people need it anyway). The beauty is that our mono SR-35 accepts stereo earphones and you can hear the sound on both sides. On all other mono radios, if you are using stereo earphones, the sound comes in one earphone only. To listen to both earphones you have to buy an additional splitter. That's not the case with SR-35. I recommend buying this radio with confidence, it is easy on batteries too. Good luck and enjoy it. Vio 7/10/2013
1195686
Yes! I live in NH and with my other radio's (basic cheaper tabletops, run of the mill variety) I couldn't listen to many of my favorite more distant stations unless I was in a particular room of my place, and even then it was often not worth listening to as there was too much static interfering with my listening pleasure. With the new Sangean I get all the stations I wanted and they come in GREAT! Really good sound! I am thinking of getting one for my Dad for Christmas as he listens to radio all night as do I.
1451410
I have not compared the sangean wr fi with lower priced sangean radios but I did compare with a I home unit costing over 100.00 and my sangean hi-fi radio is much better than the I home. the sangean is very close to Bose table radio. I hope this helps Ray Hostetler
1804505
i own them both. the cc pocket is far superior to the sangean dt-200x and any other radio of this type. i own many radios both new and vintage,the cc pocket competes favourably with any of them.
961818
I happen to own both models... They both sound tlhe same at reference levels, however the egged one is better for music.
2061357
thanks for the info. Do you think the sound quality is as good on the 325 as the 350? Obviously the size of the unit is bigger on the 325 but I was wondering if this is the only difference?
904533
as a 40 year shortwave listener to world band radio. having a table top that cost over $1,000 and several portable shortwave radios, you truly get what you pay for. the sony is rated top in it's class, and i agree with this. sounds good, work great if you want to put head phones and tune in fm. i have grundigs, but they were made in germanyand cost $500. get on the net and type in "best shortwave radio" and you will find the sony icf-sw7600gr at the top of most list.doc russ
1156503
I don't know -and I don't understand how that might apply. My understanding is that the difference between these types (and others), applies to the ID codes sent with transmitting radios, such as push-to-talk types. The Sangean is a receiver only.