what the pro and con and difference between the creatopia and the xyron 1200?
913842
I find the Xyron Creatopia is set up better for putting through larger pieces at once on a flat surface, because it has a plate at the front that comes down to help it through ; )
352601
I assume you're asking for a comparison, or opinions on the two? My mother has the 1200 so I am very familiar with it. I bought the 2600 because it improves on the 1200 in two areas. One is that it's easier to see the water level as you're pouring. With the 1200, there are notches inside the water reservoir, but it's a very small opening and hard to see into it while pouring. The second one, and most important, is that the 2600 eliminates the 'backwash' effect of opening the lid. On the 1200, water condenses and sticks to the lid. When you then open the lid, water often dribbles down the back of the maker and onto the counter. The 2600 fixed this design so that the water drains back into the reservoir. Other than that, as far as I can tell, the two are relatively equal.
221028
i think the more expensive one is imported, buy the cheap one! in case anyone else is wondering: the ko-1 kaossilator is the original square shaped one, in yellow or pink. the kaossilator 2 is the newer, more of a rectangular shape and has a small LCD display and lighted buttons. it's a significant upgrade that now includes a mic, and an sd card so you can record loops with it. the kaossilator pro is much larger, and has a green lighted touchpad, the kaossilator pro+ is the updated version of the kaossilator pro, look closely at the buttons, the older model's are black. it's confusing, but they're not good at naming things at korg.
925851
they both work. The only difference is the XR which means extended run time. The regular ones usually come with the tool, but the XR is preferable. They really do last longer and have more power. My favorite cordless drill is discontinued, and have worn out multiple batteries over the years, but drill is still going.
2023902
I'll be able to do a direct comparison soon, as I've got a PX312 coming in, after purchasing the VN-302PC. The specs and features are very nearly clones of each other, but I've found that the Olympus lacks some rather basic abilities that the Sony covers, such as a means of moving files between the 5 folders for organization. Also, the files recorded on the internal memory can't be moved over to the external memory card through the recorder; though it's easy enough to do when connected to a PC. It shows up as two separate drives on the PC, and the files remain uniquely named whether recorded on internal or external memory, so it's a simple matter to just copy them over. (If they reused file numbers on int vs ext memory then there would be an added complication of renaming before copying). I'd rather that the file names included the timestamp, like some other recorders do, but neither of these do that. Record quality of the Olympus is fine, so if the Sony does just as well, the Sony has more comprehensive features. The file erase process is better on the Sony as well, because it plays back the recording you're about to erase for confirmation before recording. With the Olympus you have to stop the playback on the target file first and be careful that it didn't advance to the next file, and watch the screen for the sequence of prompts to follow through with the delete process. I think the Sony method for deleting is better because it can be initiated while the target file is playing, and the playback of the recording as confirmation has less potential for inadvertently deleting the wrong recording. I believe the Sony also retains the time for at least a minute during battery changes, while the Olympus loses an hour or two and needs to be reset. It's not very significant since the batteries last so long, but so far, all the pros have been on the Sony side. When I get the Sony in hand I'll see if it actually performs as well as the Olympus
1057267
Yeah, I also came across X10 in my research, seems like a good option. I love the retro design and the manual controls. X100 is a bit too pricy in my opinion.
85767
I'm pretty sure they are the same...the X2 "Shorty" Barlow...def worth it. The XT8 is a GREAT telescope.
1637436
Thanks for the explaination of the difference. Here is my question: For the differences you mention, it is worth the extra $450 (approx 33% incr) in price to step up to the XBR9 from the XBR7. Musch appreciated.
2052971
I had a similar decision to make. The EF-X20 is a much more balanced device for the X100 series. Plenty of extra power. However, I specifically wanted to rotate the flash toward a side wall for creative portrait shots - the EFX20 only rotates up toward the ceiling. So, generally, I find the built-in flash is more than adequate, but when doing indoor portraits with controlled shadows and lighting, I deal with the top-heavy EF-42 combination, sometimes with a tripod. Hope this helps.
820701
I believe the $2000 model you are referring to is the TR1200-DT7. The difference is, the 1200-DT7 has an electronically adjustable desktop, while the 1200-DT5 has a manual adjustable desktop. Having multiple users may merit the upgrade to the 1200-DT7, where height adjustments are frequent.
305384
I own them both, and have been using them in my portriat studio for a while now. i'll say this, theres really not much difference in the two cameras, a few minor upgrades in the xti, what it boils down to is image quality, and from what i've seen they are equal. Just as fyi, I have been able to get prints as large as 20x30 from both cameras with excellent results.
309556
I am buying the creative W. From looking at a competitor's website, it appears the the archos has less choices for download possibilities. In other words, the creative W has more choices. I am buying for the image viewing and mp3, but I want the capability of watching videos in the future
105227
They both have beautiful color reproduction and both have a nice glossy finish. For durability of finish I don't know if there's a difference. I've had good success with both as far as data burning! I would probably go with the cheapest one ehin I repurchase!
970186
No, they're very different. The 1200 was meant for professional use and has a better tonearm, and is, as you state, fully manual. The motor is also higher torque, to allow for quicker startups when using the turntable for DJ'ing. If you search Google for Technics turntables, you can see a picture of the 1300mk2, and you'll see there is very little resemblance. The 1300 is intended for home use. But the 1200 is an excellent turntable for home use, too.
1624330
I have both and I wouldn't change the D600 for the X-T1 for serious, payed or critical work. Although it's my opinion for the photography I do... maybe for you is different. I would suggest renting one for a week or so, try it extensively and come to a decision. Cheers.
2145502
As far as I know, the differences are minimal....Both are excellent; save the $20,go with the 190XB. I love mine.
375754
Fortunately I have access to both and did a pretty thorough review of them on my blog site at http://www.blendblog.net/Default.aspx?tabid=36&EntryID=64. Hope this helps, I like both devices but they are different and which one to get really depends on what you are looking for which I breakdown in my review. Sean