Does anyone know the difference between the 120 and the 130?
661369
The sharpening disks for the 130 are different. For the 130: 100% diamond stage in stage 1; super hardened miniature steel in stage 2; and flexible stropping disks in stage 3.The disks are different on the 120. The grit is diamond for stages 1 and 2, and a "patented" material for disk 3. It's great for thin kitchen knives. I have the 120.
661370
i think the 120 has a more agressive (more coarse) 1st sharpening wheel. i don't remember whick exactly, but unless you use your knives to cut concrete or metal, the 120's not the way to go. sharpening knives (good knives, that is) isn't a ham fisted procedure and i don't think i've used the 1st wheel more than once or twice even on our 130.. but again, i take care of my knives, and TRY to get my wife to do the same..... then about every 2 weeks its a 10 min job to get them all back ready to slice and dice.
661371
The 120 has coarse diamond, medium diamond, and flexible honing stations. The 130 has medium diamond, steel, and flexible honing stations.
661372
The sharpening disks for the 130 are different. For the 130: 100% diamond stage in stage 1; super hardened miniature steel in stage 2; and flexible stropping disks in stage 3. The disks are different on the 120. The grit is diamond for stages 1 and 2, and a "patented" material for disk 3. It's great for thin kitchen knives. I have the 120.
2260124
It is about the same to a little less. I think it is more efficient than the 2610xi which is similar all in one machine and my wife copies a lot of articles and recipes on the new printer so it is very effective in producing images from a wide variety of sources. I am not sure what printer you are comparing to but the two others we have used were using more ink than the Envy 120.
258605
based on the reviews here, the 650 looks more solid. better sat reception, quicker response time, fewer glitches. but the 750 has the newer/better interface and does multipoint routing. i'm getting the 750, and if the glitches are too much of a pain, i'll exchange it for a 650.
1659652
I actually called Sharp to ask that very same question. The sales rep told me that 120RX was discontinued and was replaced by 125RX. He didn't have an answer regarding any differences and just read off the spec sheet just like anyone else can do on Sharp's website. Overall, customer service at Sharp isn't very helpful or knowledgeable.
140382
Not sure about the 120, but my 80 will hold a charge for 20-22 hours of music (less if I'm watching videos or something that requires the backlight to be on). It doesn't take long to charge (about an hour with the wall or car charger). I'd assume the 120 would be similar.
1035744
Sorry, but I dont know. All I know is that where I use it right now is 120 and it works fine.
768727
My take on the UL20A vs. the 1201N is as follows;If you want to pay $80 less, less battery life, less weight, but be able to play 1080P media and games, then get the 1201N.Otherwise, get the UL20A. The battery life on the 1201N isn't that bad, I can get 4.5 hours or so with medium usage, maybe 2-3 if I play 1080P media continuously. It's pretty decent for its capabilities.
2065296
I own (and love) my 200 but never used 135. Nevertheless, if I had to shop all over again, I would get the 135 instead. I think the 200 is bit less versatile. From online reviews 135 also has a bit of an edge in terms of optical quality. Though I have to say the my 200 lacks nothing in IQ.
2246120
I do not know . The TV works great , who cares what the number is. I asked a saleman in Frys Electronics. He told me there is no difference between 120 and 240. I have another TV which is 240, I do not see difference
1998344
Smaller. The 100 is a 1.0 litre (600ml effective), meaning you can really only boil 0.6L. The 120 is 1.2 litre (800ml effective). So basically, the 100 is a 0.6L, and the 120 is a 0.8L. Totally straight-forward, right? ;) Anyhow, hope this helps!
1642032
I have no idea. I have the 130. I do know is that it is the best sharpener I have ever used.
1134960
The 150 vs 120 is the amp hours or in laymans terms the length of time it holds a charge. the two batteries are the same size and voltage the 12150 just has longer run time. Many people buying these use them to retrofit the 12120 batteries in their peg perego ride on toys so this should work fine for you.
970186
No, they're very different. The 1200 was meant for professional use and has a better tonearm, and is, as you state, fully manual. The motor is also higher torque, to allow for quicker startups when using the turntable for DJ'ing. If you search Google for Technics turntables, you can see a picture of the 1300mk2, and you'll see there is very little resemblance. The 1300 is intended for home use. But the 1200 is an excellent turntable for home use, too.
785276
According to the manufacturer's website the 750 has a built-in subwoofer whereas the 650 does not. This seems to be the biggest difference. Has anyone listened to both? Any thoughts?
1880664
Yes but the 120 rtf model also brings the same transmitter. Get the 120 bnf.
1184217
The 180 has 2 nozzles. The 120 just has one. I think I'd go with the 180. It doesn't cost much more.
1556539
I use both the 120 and the 130 headsets. The 130 has more features and also has slightly more base. Since I have high frequency hearing loss, I prefer the 120. I am able to let my wife use the 130 while I use the 120. One of the charging /transmitters is not plugged into the audio jacks and is simply used for a charging base. We do not specifically charge either headset on one base or the other, but instead use which base happens to be closest or empty. I also know that transmitting works for either, but as stated before the 130 has more features. (which I don't use) These are the best headsets I have ever used. I have purchased three 120's and one 130 over time.