What is the difference between this lens, and Panasonic Lumix G Vario 14-140mm f/3.5-5.6 Lens? They seem the same but 2 product pages on Amazon.
914060
This lens is the later version. It is much lighter to carry and is both faster and not nearly as heavy. Mine is near new but I am going to sell it only to buy a new prime lens that I want.
914061
The question is a little vague, but you are probably asking about differences between the H-VS014140 and the H-FS14140k. The FS is four years newer, 40% lighter than the VS and superior in most respects, although it is more expensive. The FS is an excellent lens.
914062
They are exactly the same, but first is delivered directly from Japan sellers, and second is available from Amazon.
621758
hi Mark my 14-140 is made in japan positivly exelent lens if its made by panasonic i wouldnt be worried where it s made noel
2228447
I use this lens with Panasonic Lumix GX1 and it works perfectly well. Pictures are sharp with no flares or other aberrations. Should work with GH3 as well.
1481628
It's 35mm thread. Some versions of the lens may different thread sizes, but the one from Rainbow is 35mm. (BTW, I'm not conflating the focal length with the filter thread size. Both happen to be 35mm.)
1946380
I would say NO, Sherrill. I bought the lens for my Olympus Mini-PM1, in the hope that at least I would get two images per frame. Yes, the lens fits on the Olympus, but the camera told me "lens not supported" - doh. Had to by another Panasonic body (Lumix GF6), as the lens was useless, otherwise. It now works (on the Panasonic body), but the results are disappointing, at best. What can one expect from the two lenses so close to each other? I would stay away from it. If you are interested in stereo photography, get a Fuji W3 Stereo camera (I have two...). They are very good, by comparison! Best, Hans I would say NO, Sherrill. I bought the lens for my Olympus Mini-PM1, in the hope that at least I would get two images per frame. Yes, the lens fits on the Olympus, but the camera told me "lens not supported" - doh. Had to by another Panasonic body (Lumix GF6), as the lens was useless, otherwise. It now works (on the Panasonic body), but the results are disappointing, at best. What can one expect from the two lenses so close to each other? I would stay away from it. If you are interested in stereo photography, get a Fuji W3 Stereo camera (I have two...). They are very good, by... » Read More I would say NO, Sherrill. I bought the lens for my Olympus Mini-PM1, in the hope that at least I would get two images per frame. Yes, the lens fits on the Olympus, but the camera told me "lens not supported" - doh. Had to by another Panasonic body (Lumix GF6), as the lens was useless, otherwise. It now works (on the Panasonic body), but the results are disappointing, at best. What can one expect from the two lenses so close to each other? I would stay away from it. If you are interested in stereo photography, get a Fuji W3 Stereo camera (I have two...). They are very good, by comparison! Best, Hans « Show Less
1371874
The 14-150 actually is the combination of 14-42 + 40-150, that means, you only have to carry one lens instead of two and also you can prevent missing the moment while you switch lens. If you shot movie, then you can enjoy the zoom from wide to tele too.Regarding image quality, the far end of 14-150 in the tele end will be come soft, so if tele photo is your shotting style, then you better keepm the two lens combine as that deliver better quality. Also your question already state the different - the two lens combo is cheaper and the saved amount can buy a prime lens already. The 14-150 actually is the combination of 14-42 + 40-150, that means, you only have to carry one lens instead of two and also you can prevent missing the moment while you switch lens. If you shot movie, then you can enjoy the zoom from wide to tele too.Regarding image quality, the far end of 14-150 in the tele end will be come soft, so if tele photo is your shotting style, then you better keepm the two lens combine as that deliver better quality. Also your question already state the different - the two lens combo is cheaper and the saved amount can buy a prime lens... » Read More The 14-150 actually is the combination of 14-42 + 40-150, that means, you only have to carry one lens instead of two and also you can prevent missing the moment while you switch lens. If you shot movie, then you can enjoy the zoom from wide to tele too.Regarding image quality, the far end of 14-150 in the tele end will be come soft, so if tele photo is your shotting style, then you better keepm the two lens combine as that deliver better quality. Also your question already state the different - the two lens combo is cheaper and the saved amount can buy a prime lens already. « Show Less
2105224
Oh yes. Perfectly. Highly esteemed, impecable 12mm lens for m4/3. I prefer instead of $ 800 the $ 125 Panasonic 14mm 2.5. I cannot see the difference in the pictures. With the difference buy the Panasonic 20mm 1.7, the sharpest lens I know and the 45mm Olympus 1.8, a really fun mid tele!
568550
Heard some negatives on the smaller lens (14-55mm). I bought this for my Panasonic GF-3 and works grand.Whilst it doesn't fit my small case and I have to carry it around in a separate bag, I don't notice any unruliness to the size or weight.
1382898
No it will now, this is made only for the 14mm prime or the Panasonic Lumix G X Vario PZ 14-42mm/F3.5-5.6 Lens Panasonic Lumix G X Vario PZ 14-42mm/F3.5-5.6 Lens for Panasonic Lumix G-Series Digital Cameras (Black)
564
There is a new one. Panasonic Lumix G H-H020AK 20mm F/1.7 II ASPH Fixed Lens for Panasonic/Olympus Micro Four Thirds Cameras (Black)New version says "A new metal finish replaces the original 20mm lenses resin body, and combines with a durable metal mount for a sophisticated premium feel." other than that the only difference is the new one is now cheaper.
723567
This tech spec from panasonic says 90, here is the link. http://www.panasonic.com/us/consumer/cameras-camcorders/lumix-lenses/dmw-gwc1.specs.html
173413
Between these two I would recommend the 14-45 for general purpose use. Micro 4/3 cameras like your GF1 have a 2x crop factor... Which means the 14-45 will be a 35mm equivalent of 28-90. The 45-150=90-300mm. So you will have more opportunities to get good photos with the 14-45, which is also a sharper lens.
1938916
Yes, you should be able to use this lens on all Lumix G series cameras. If your buying this lenses you might want to take a look at the Lumix G Vario 14-45mm lens. I have not used that lens, but all the reviews suggest that it might be a bit better.
810998
I think both are great for video and stills. I chose the Lumix because I work with a Panasonic GH3. Prime lenses are better for definition and color
1707171
Basically it's the same lens, the difference is that the cheapest deal is from a camera and lens set, comes in a box that is not the original but the lens is new, they are identical!
1476282
Very strange, but they have the same lens listed twice! I was wondering this too..but they're the same lens. Sorry for the late response!
502019
The GF1 20mm kit lists as available (ships 3-5 days, with free shipping) direct from Panasonic. I'm not sure if links to other retailers are allowed in amazon discussions so I'm hesitant to post it, but it is there. I am waiting for amazon because Panasonic charges sales tax in California and that's nearly a 10% addition to the final price -- even so, I'm tempted to order it direct as the waiting is getting old and I would really like to have the camera before Christmas, which is looking more and more unlikely.