Canon A540, A630, or A710??? I'm intrigued by the a710's IS function, and it's longer zoom, but is it worth the extra cost?
928135
The IS function on the A710 will help in low light situations and the 6X. The camera has high ISO but this will cause bad outcomes in low light(noise). You can take better low light pics with IS and set the ISO to 200 or less. If you like the size of the A710 you will get more for your money in the long run. Both cameras are great and inexpensive for what you get. If the extra money is meaningful for you, just get the A540 and enjoy. Even the A530 is worth your consideration. All the A series cameras are real nice, always have been. Go to camera review sites and read the forums or ask. Many people there will be glad to share their knowledge. KenRockwell.com shows how IS will improve your pics. Article dated 9/20/06.
2087912
I am trying to decide between the a650 and the a630. I'm leaning towards the a630 because of possible reflection/glare issues I could have with the a650. How is the a630 working for you? Thanks!!
768118
I'm kind of in the same situation Hamlet. They both look great, and I can't decide which one to pull the trigger on. I have a Canon XTi DSLR that I use and love but I want something smaller for travel and one of these seems to fit the bill. Did you make a choice yet? If you have what one did you pick up? I'm also looking at the Sony HX5V.
825190
I recommend the Canon A720IS !!!!! My pet pictures are breathtaking (IMO) and I'll put a couple up to prove it! (If I can figure out how)
625216
In general, fixed focal length lenses give better resolution and less distortion than zoom lenses. They are also lighter. Dont know about the A6000 but with a Nikkor zoom, it seems like a good option if it is not too expensive.
1375619
The p7100 takes really nice shots in auto mode. However, it is a touch slower than I would like. Granted, I am comparing it do a D7000...
1940851
Thanks again. I'll be deciding by the end of the week, because I'll have to return the Canon by Saturday! Another thing re: the Panasonic is that you can attach certain lenses to it to extend the zoom and possibly some other stuff. I like that Idea. I love cameras with big wide lenses on them!Take care, and thanks for your thoughts.
559949
I have an A200 and used it for years. I found it to be a good general camera but you are asking it to do a high end cameras job. I currently use an A77 with a 4.6 Sigma 50 t0500 MM zoom lens. At 10 times the cost it is barely enough to do what you are asking. For personal snapshots you may try giving you ISO ( film speed priority and settle for a little graininess.rather than bluer.
542771
If you are looking to update and stick with the a-mount system, the A99 is the way to go. I have both and the full frame sensor on the A99 along with the added features and better low light performance makes it my go to camera. The only thing the a A77 is better at is speed, Fps. Your other option is to go mirrorless like the A7 series and use an adapter like the LEA4 to use your A - mount glass. It's an amazing camera for the money I have the A7. The only negative is the lack of in-body stabilization which is remedied by the A7 mk 2 that just came out. Hit up your local camera store and play If you are looking to update and stick with the a-mount system, the A99 is the way to go. I have both and the full frame sensor on the A99 along with the added features and better low light performance makes it my go to camera. The only thing the a A77 is better at is speed, Fps. Your other option is to go mirrorless like the A7 series and use an adapter like the LEA4 to use your A - mount glass. It's an amazing camera for the money I have the A7. The only negative is the lack of in-body stabilization which is remedied by the A7 mk 2 that just came out. Hit up your local camera store and play
1070318
I'm an armature photographer.. but have explored both d3100 and a33..1) similar image quality..2) both do 1080p HD video with auto focus but sony gets a bit warm (hot for some) while video recording.. although I've yet to record for this long3) sony is a tiny bit smaller..check out their detailed reviews at dpreview.com.. they helped me make my decision..
1617973
I really can't compare because I've never used the A65. I like the a77 and specifically like the weather sealed body. Camera takes great pictures when paired with a good lens.
1908116
It all depends on your lens. I think the processor is fine, it's just the lens f rating that helps or hurts. Most of the photographers I've spoken with would all love to have my Sony, but every one brings up the cost of the lenses. They are awesome lenses, but cost more than those for Canon or Nikon. Personally, I love the A77.
2055505
I am trying to decide between these 2 cameras too (G7 and A710). I take lots of photos of pets - both inside and out, but cats are strictly inside, so I avoid a flash with them. I am looking for great quality photos and something easy to use. I have been using a Canon G2 (3MP) for a loooong time and I need a better camera (plus the G2 has been acting up). I have also historically had trouble with black dogs and cats, so any advice regarding that dilemma and the better camera would be appreciated. Also, why is a G7 more expensive than a G9? Thanks.
841685
I have a Sony A77 (was going to get the A99, but needed a built-in flash) and use the Zeiss 24-70. I chose the Zeiss after VERY extensive research on it and the A77 and bought them at the same time. In most internet reviews the Zeiss is as good or slightly better than the best Canon and Nikon lenses. It's not cheap, but the pictures are incredible. When sharing photos, people assume they were taken by a professional. Close-up headshots in portrait or auto+ mode are amazing. You can probably get good quality with the higher end Sony lenses, but if you can handle the price, you won't regret the Zeiss.
467110
Li,What does a longer lens excel at shooting? I'm almost a complete neophyte, and can't google up the answer to this one.
1355664
I too am deciding between these two cameras. From what I have seen so far the differences are:A710 IS - 6x zoom- Digic II processorA570 IS-4x zoom-Digic III processorI have also read some stuff on the net about people stating the DIGIC III is better on power, giving you more shots per battery. I don't have a source to back that up though. I can't see why people would pay $80 more for an OLDER camera just for the 6x zoom. It's a point and shoot, not an SLR or high end camera such as one would bring on a vacation if they really needed to zoom into a wide view. Just my .02Are there any other differences? anyone? I too am deciding between these two cameras. From what I have seen so far the differences are:A710 IS - 6x zoom- Digic II processorA570 IS-4x zoom-Digic III processorI have also read some stuff on the net about people stating the DIGIC III is better on power, giving you more shots per battery. I don't have a source to back that up though. I can't see why people would pay $80 more for an OLDER camera just for the 6x zoom. It's a point and shoot, not an SLR or high end camera such as one would bring on a vacation if they... » Read More I too am deciding between these two cameras. From what I have seen so far the differences are:A710 IS - 6x zoom- Digic II processorA570 IS-4x zoom-Digic III processorI have also read some stuff on the net about people stating the DIGIC III is better on power, giving you more shots per battery. I don't have a source to back that up though. I can't see why people would pay $80 more for an OLDER camera just for the 6x zoom. It's a point and shoot, not an SLR or high end camera such as one would bring on a vacation if they really needed to zoom into a wide view. Just my .02Are there any other differences? anyone? « Show Less
1051430
Both the Canon A610 and A620 have smaller screens. They also have the drawback of ISO only to 400. The Canon A540 pushes the ISO to 800 which is important for getting the photo in lower lght levels with less chance of camera "shake". The movable screen on the A620 intriqued me but them I really did not see a pressing need for it. The 620 has a longer zoom range, but again the more compact size of the A540 won the day. The A620 takes 4 AA batteries and that adds to the bulk and weight. Again, the A540 won the day because I wanted a high function, pocketable camera. I hope this helps you. Both the Canon A610 and A620 have smaller screens. They also have the drawback of ISO only to 400. The Canon A540 pushes the ISO to 800 which is important for getting the photo in lower lght levels with less chance of camera "shake". The movable screen on the A620 intriqued me but them I really did not see a pressing need for it. The 620 has a longer zoom range, but again the more compact size of the A540 won the day. The A620 takes 4 AA batteries and that adds to the bulk and weight. Again, the A540 won the day because I wanted a high function, pocketable camera. I hope this... » Read More Both the Canon A610 and A620 have smaller screens. They also have the drawback of ISO only to 400. The Canon A540 pushes the ISO to 800 which is important for getting the photo in lower lght levels with less chance of camera "shake". The movable screen on the A620 intriqued me but them I really did not see a pressing need for it. The 620 has a longer zoom range, but again the more compact size of the A540 won the day. The A620 takes 4 AA batteries and that adds to the bulk and weight. Again, the A540 won the day because I wanted a high function, pocketable camera. I hope this helps you. « Show Less