What is the difference between the WM425 and the WM1000 (aka BDST11000)? Which do you recommend?
931579
I am sorry, I can't help. I was replacing an old worn out workmate and only looked at WM425.
931580
I never actually worked with WM1000 but looking at the product specifications, it is similar WM425 in many design details. The main difference appears to be that the WM1000 is a "workbench" only, with a horizontal clasping mechanism. The WM1000 has that plus a pull-up handle in the front middle, which allows you to rotate the front plate 90 degrees up and use the clasping mechanism as a vertical vise. In principle, this should make it possible to clasp a board, for example, to rip-cut the protruding end with a saw, without using the bench dogs. I have not used this option much, because I found the clasping mechanism too weak for a serious wood-working job. Apparently, WM1000 is somewhat simpler in design and has only 2 working plates, as WM425 has a third insert plate but this may actually be an advantage.
1743416
I believe the WH16NS40 is just the bare drive, and the BH16NS40 is the retail model including software.
198021
My understanding is that the 4210 is the same basic unit as the 4212. Where the difference lies is in which interchangeable templates are supplied with the unit. The 4210 comes with only the half blind template, the 4212 with half blind and through templates and the 4214? With half blind, through and mini through templates. Obviously relevant router bits and router inserts are supplied for each template as well. I'd note that it is cheaper to simply buy the unit which contains the templates that you require as opposed to buying them afterwards. In my case I was forced into the latter due to the fact that Amazon would only ship the 4212 but not the higher model to my location.
2247456
The primary difference is that the WF-2540 has a wire ethernet interface in addition to USB and WiFi. The only other differences (according to the Epson website) are: * WF-2540 has a better LCD screen (2-line, mono text LCD for the WF-2530 vs 2.5" LCD for the WF-2540) * WF-2540 draws more energy (14 W vs 9 W for the WF-2530 - this one baffles me unless the LCD screen and Ethernet port really eat up a lot of energy... )
1472050
What is the difference between the VRDMC10 and VRDMC5? I have the older model and have no problems
2129244
DS415 is a 4 bay. I didnt need 4 disks so I went with DS713. This is one major difference, there may be others.
257545
From what I have read the BG10 has two motors and detachable power cord vs. the 86T3 which has one motor. The BG10 is a serious cleaning machine and works great with the three dogs and two kids in the house this is the deep cleaner.
1612453
10164 is a newer version. There appears to be a slight color difference. *shrug* I bought the one that was cheaper and it does the job.
1537003
The 1020 uses much cheaper parts than the 9040, as the 9040 is the same as an Elite but without the Elite branding. The 1020 is also 80 watts x2 while the 9040 is 110 x2. The 1018 is even far superior to both the 1019
866171
I have been researching this quite a bit. It appears they are the same basic vacuum cleaner. They have the same motor, same dimensions, same weight, same cord length, everything. They even have the same user manual (as per the Hoover website). I can find only two differences: 1) The U6485900 ("Blue") one on this page does have a dirt finder while the more expensive UH50000 ("Silver") turbo power one does not have that feature. 2) While both vacuums have the identical Turbine Hand Tools, the Silver one calls it "Pet Hair Tool." Sounds like a gimmick to me. The information I found is directly from the Hoover website (each page has links to download the user manual which has different numbers, but turns out to be identical in content). Blue: http://hoover.com/products/details/u6485900/anniversary-windtunnel-self-propelled-bagged-upright/ Silver: http://hoover.com/products/details/uh50000/anniversary-windtunnel-self-propelled-bagged-upright/ Personally, I'm buying the blue one.
1737661
According to Amazon Specs the P255 is 38 pounds vs 26 pounds of the P105. But IMHO these are instruments that cannot be compared. Both models feature different hammer action types. P105 is on the light side (GHS )and the P255 is in the heavier more piano-like (Regular GH) side. I think I played the p105 in a store, they are instruments in different leagues, the p105 is on the entry level side.
104653
The unit is very good. Much better than the newest model. I was so impressed with the J8005 after my 20 yr old model that I also purchased the newest vertical model. Hard to clean, stalls out and way too complex - just not good. I believe the J8006 is slightly better than the 8005 that I have and the best they ever made. It is an induction motor and you will have to spend a little over $120 for a transformer or stepdown converter for France 220 volt unless there is a cheaper way.
84544
Hello, Have reviews on both models on Amazon. Had a bunch of trouble with the standard model, and no trouble with version 2. The version 2 has a lot more metal parts in the rotor head and tail, and digital tail servo which is much more responsive. Please see both reviews. So far I would say the version 2 is worth the extra money. Good day!
836014
Actually the wg160 and the wg165 share the same manual. In the one manual in the box both trimmers are listed one model is not newer than the other they both were realesed at the same time the only difference is the wg160has a 20v battery and the wg165 has a 24v battery. Other than that they operate exactly the same way.
236625
There is a big difference. I thought the C/D would be wide enough, it wasn't. From now on I plan on getting the WW if I can find some.
2236076
2 main differences that I see: #1 the wattage is different. for the th106, you have 2000/4000 Watts for (120/240 volts) and the th104 only has 1750/3500 watts. it's not a big deal unless you have requirements on how many or how big of heaters you are controlling. For me, I have 1 medium and 2 small baseboards which totals to 2000 watts on 120 volts. #2 the programming is different. on the th106 you can specify temps for each day of the week-differently, whereas the 104's programming allows for weekend/weekday modes.
2016263
I have no idea, but i would definitely go with the 53100 since it's like 2 bucks cheaper.