Samsung LN52A650 vs. Samsung LN52A750 Can someone give me a list of differences between the sammy A650 and the A750?
907615
My question is the same as D.Pearce's. I need to know whether or not from first-hand experience whether or not the a750 rotates, as in does it have a swivel stand? like the a550 and a650. This makes a difference to me because my tv stand is side to side with my computer desk. I really do prefer the rotating stand so I can use the comp and turn the TV to face me at a slight angle. I heard that the a750 does not rotate aka no swivel stand because of the subwoofer that comes in the 7 series, but was not confirmed first hand. Does anyone know???????? Thanks so much for the help
907616
Hey there. Can you confirm for me that the base on the 750 does "not" tilt? From what I have read the base on the 650 does tilt. Thanks.
907617
I assume by "tilt" you mean rotate? Yes the 650 base does allow you to rotate from side to side.I've also read that the 750 does not allow rotation, which seems odd to me being its the more expensive model. I cannot confirm the 750 base since I have the 650. You may try posting over on the 750's page.
907618
750 has an additional woofer speaker for better bass, a solid state flash drive with some preloaded content - consisting of "exercise, children edutainment, cooking recipes, image gallery & games", and it is DLNA certified.Physically, the 750 is rectangular, note the curve of 650 at the bottom. The "Touch of Color" red bezel is on all four sides, not just the top and bottom. Also the clear part of the bevel is slightly thicker around the edge.Edit: Also forgot that the stand base on the 750 is rectangular, versus the oval of the 650.
1484018
Warren, I cannot decipher any difference between the 2 models listed. I think they are one in the same. That said, if the merchant told you that it is better than its predecessor, that may indeed be true--if he is comparing it the 61/71 series or the 65 series from last year's model line. But even Samsung's website doesn't mention the S2F being any sort of an upgrade or anything like that. I've been looking at the A860 for a while. The slim depth plus its couple extra features make it a bit more attractive than the 6 or 7 series lines.
1666495
I've had both TV's. The B550 replaced my A550 which was broken. The PIP was on A550 but the screen was so small it wasn't worth it. The sound on the B550 is supposed to be better but I'm unconvinced. I think it's worse. But I do admit that the accident that broke my A550 could have caused a problem on the HDMI port on my cable box. I'm not ready to blame Samsung yet. But I have also read reviews where sound was mentioned as an issue. But the picture on the B550 is a lot better.
1606327
Susan, I found a comparison at this site: http://2reviewed.com/samsung-dp700a3b-a02us-vs-samsung-dp700a3d-a01us-review/Hope this helpsGuy
1003198
Hey Elliot,Did you have the specialists at the stores calibrate the visual settings (brightness, contrast, etc.) to be the same on both the 650 and the 850? Alot of the time, the stores make the more expensive models look better in order to get you to buy the more expensive one. My advice, go bad to the stores and tell them to make the settings the same and then compare. I'd be very curious to know the result. Good luck.
2073111
At a quick glance, the 6800 is an upgraded 6400. It seems to have everything that the 6400 has, plus more I am sure. For complete list of features and specs you can view the 6800 model on Samsung's website. http://m.samsung.com/us/video/tvs/UN50F6800AFXZA
1339546
The 6300's do not use all Samsung parts and do not have a high enough picture quality/refresh rate in order to support 3D. The 6400's use all Samsung parts and have a high enough picture quality/refresh rate in order to support great 3D picture. Also the 6400's have Micro-dimming that gives you much greater contrast in the picture and allows for deeper black areas.
1891417
For a look at the spec, here is a good link, but it is the slightly older model, with the larger screen and this link does NOT have the same processor (it is an AM18XR2), but it gives you a good idea of overall specs for what is basically the same machine: http://i.walmart.com/i/rb/0088411608402.pdf
1386590
Hey T. McAnaney,Yes, when I compared specs, I too looked and said, why should I pay more for an item that has the same specs? What is so different about this new model. I even went to web sites that had incorrect information on the specs of the TH-42PX600U, and the TH-42PX75U had the specs of the TH-42PX600U. So I ended up buying the TH-42PX600U. Even from what I heard that the 75U is supposed to have 1080p, versus the 1080i, I did not believe it would be worth the additional cost.
1381744
Can someone compare Samsung LN40B650 to Panasonic L37G1? Pluses and minuses. Recommendation.
859812
Nope, no replacement LED light engine is made for the A650 models and even if you could jury rig one for the HL56A750 to fit it would be cost prohibitive and void your warranty. No need to worry about the lamp though, they last a long time and you can buy replacements for $100-150. Personally I think the lamp models have better PQ than the LEDs. If you don't believe me take a look at display units at your nearest Best Buy. Enjoy your set! BTW, you unfairly knocked off a star for this model just because it doesn't come with the LED. That has nothing to do with how the A650 performs, it's just Samsung's policy to have two models. If LED was so important to you then you really should have bit the bullet and got the HL61A750. I considered the A750 too but seeing them at Best Buy sealed the deal for me, the lamp models look better.
1711317
TeeVoo thanks for the explanation. I just picked up the a950 at best buy for $3600 and no interest for 3 years. My Best Buy was even giving premium home delivery and setup for free on it as well. I compared the two tvs. There is just something about the a950's picture that makes you go "wow." The only wow factor I received from the new LEDs was how thin they were. At the end of the day, I watch what's on the screen and not how thin the actual tv set is so I went with the a950.
1521345
Most of the specs are the same but the 860 has a few advancements. The 860 is the top of the line very thin TV. The 650 has the red touch of color and the 860 has grey. The 860 has a more advanced anti-reflective coating, although I've never read a review that mentioned it as visibly better. 860 has 15x2 watts and a subwoofer versus 10x2 watts on the 650. Finally, the 860 has picture in picture and the 650 does not. I think that does it.
301524
I asked Samsung about the 630 via e-mail and they said to call their support line. When I did, the woman couldn't tell me anything about the matte version of the 650, even after checking with someone else. She didn't even know the A630 was the matte version of the A650, no less anything about the B versions. I gave up and just ordered the B650 because I couldn't wait anymore. :) You may want to try calling Samsung support, 1-800-726-7864, 7 days a week from 9 am to 9 pm EST.
584165
I had the same problem as you. I chose the A620 yesterday and purchased it off of Amazon yesterday as well. I was reading reviews and the differences between the two and they are truly miniscule (A700 has a .5" larger NON SWIVEL screen, only uses 2 batteries, and is slightly smaller), which does not at all justify the $40 price difference (according to Amazon pricing, of course :P). According to cnet and dpreview, the picture quality difference between the two is neglible and I perfer the swivel screen included in the A620. Also 6x vs 4x zoom really doesn't matter; if you want a decent picture, you wouldn't zoom too much anyways. Had the price been the same, I *may* have chosen the A700, but if I can save $40 dollars for having a slightly larger camera than uses 4 batteries, I'd choose saving the $40. All that matters to me is picture quality and they are both equal in terms of that.
2130051
The 650 model is the exact same picture. Just a bit thicker body and a couple less features. And no buzz, if you are concerned.
305210
I owned the SD630 for a year and upgraded to the SD750 last week. One difference is that the 750 supports SDHC while the 630 does not (SDHC comes in 4-8GB). I also find the "macro" shots come out with more detail on the SD750. Low light pictures are so-so on both (and all other compact cameras as they lack the flash power). If the price difference is not too much, go with the 750; otherwise stick with the 630.