How does it compare to "Compare-N-Save"
1059820
I've never used Compare-N-Save. But I can say it doesn't last as long as a pre-emergent as a granular product I've used called "Freehand." However, you need to weed the area before application.
1059821
It worked but you are buying the name. There are generics available. Same formula. I bought a 2 and a half gallon container for $50 at a farm supply store.
1105747
From my experience of playig both versions, i would say this one is less buggy and glitchy. A lot of time in the regular version i would get stuck in a moutain or tight spot. It was annoying. But i never had any problems like that im this one.
1137221
It's really subjective as to whether or not the Rack-2-Filer is worth the extra money. You can certainly do everything you need to do without it, but it adds a nice visual element to your scanned files by creating a virtual bookshelf on which you can create 'binders' for various subjects (financial, home inventory, banking, bills, etc.). Without it, you still have the Scansnap folder in your Windows Explorer, and can sort your scans into any sub-folders you've created, or into your existing folders if you prefer. The only advantage of the Rack-2-Filer is that you can easily read your various scans as if they were pages in a book, turning the pages via mouse click or the central mouse wheel. As a teacher I find this especially useful for course materials, but it's also good for sequential files, like a year's worth of phone bills, for instance. Bottom line: the Rack-2-Filer software gives you a set of 'books' made from your scans, which is great for those who are more image- than text-oriented, but the simple Scansnap software is more than adequate for filing your scans the way you would any other file or scan in the Explorer environment. Hope this helps.
1268689
I've found it's a significant improvement. It doesn't prevent it completely though. I used to have to clean after every run and had errorr 2's about half the time. Now I clean every other run and have only had 1error 2 in probably 20 runs.
163572
Similar, but the Microsoft version has a better system for clicking, with your thumb. The click button the Adesso is too far forward and is awkward. I am still using the Microsoft one at work, but was unsuccessful in finding an adequate version for home use.
1318071
Mine is not working properly. when I save files over 128GB. The files disappear and I have only empty folders even though the drive shows that the space is being used. It is a waste of money.
1969186
From my experience, they both work about the same. I do not see any difference.
2023902
I'll be able to do a direct comparison soon, as I've got a PX312 coming in, after purchasing the VN-302PC. The specs and features are very nearly clones of each other, but I've found that the Olympus lacks some rather basic abilities that the Sony covers, such as a means of moving files between the 5 folders for organization. Also, the files recorded on the internal memory can't be moved over to the external memory card through the recorder; though it's easy enough to do when connected to a PC. It shows up as two separate drives on the PC, and the files remain uniquely named whether recorded on internal or external memory, so it's a simple matter to just copy them over. (If they reused file numbers on int vs ext memory then there would be an added complication of renaming before copying). I'd rather that the file names included the timestamp, like some other recorders do, but neither of these do that. Record quality of the Olympus is fine, so if the Sony does just as well, the Sony has more comprehensive features. The file erase process is better on the Sony as well, because it plays back the recording you're about to erase for confirmation before recording. With the Olympus you have to stop the playback on the target file first and be careful that it didn't advance to the next file, and watch the screen for the sequence of prompts to follow through with the delete process. I think the Sony method for deleting is better because it can be initiated while the target file is playing, and the playback of the recording as confirmation has less potential for inadvertently deleting the wrong recording. I believe the Sony also retains the time for at least a minute during battery changes, while the Olympus loses an hour or two and needs to be reset. It's not very significant since the batteries last so long, but so far, all the pros have been on the Sony side. When I get the Sony in hand I'll see if it actually performs as well as the Olympus
771714
I haven't noticed a difference for accessing files from the NAS and files stored on hard drives mounted on my PC. There probably is a difference but both are fast enough to not be a bother. When I move large numbers of jpg files it does take significant time but I usually set up that task and then go to bed.
1302054
You can most definitely use your old saves, the only difference between this game and the original release is that the DLC is included. The rest is the same. Hope this helps! :)
374336
There is no difference between the two versions. I ordered the CD because if something happens to my computer or Final Draft on my computer I could more easily reload the program.
2092692
There really isn't any comparison. The Department of Defense conducted a laboratory study on the reliability of available media to use for backing up data.It found that virtually all media can only be relied on for 5-7 years before deterioration began and data started to become lost.The exception was the M-disc which tests estimated their reliability to be approximately 1,000 years. They are not subject the separation of the coating media (such as the gold) from the plastic body of the disc, and are impervious to variations in temperature and light.There may not be anything used in 1,000 years to read an M-disc, but the data will still be there if there is. There really isn't any comparison. The Department of Defense conducted a laboratory study on the reliability of available media to use for backing up data.It found that virtually all media can only be relied on for 5-7 years before deterioration began and data started to become lost.The exception was the M-disc which tests estimated their reliability to be approximately 1,000 years. They are not subject the separation of the coating media (such as the gold) from the plastic body of the disc, and are impervious to variations in temperature and light.There... » Read More There really isn't any comparison. The Department of Defense conducted a laboratory study on the reliability of available media to use for backing up data.It found that virtually all media can only be relied on for 5-7 years before deterioration began and data started to become lost.The exception was the M-disc which tests estimated their reliability to be approximately 1,000 years. They are not subject the separation of the coating media (such as the gold) from the plastic body of the disc, and are impervious to variations in temperature and light.There may not be anything used in 1,000 years to read an M-disc, but the data will still be there if there is. « Show Less
782479
I didn't find any difference. I am using it and it is a little different from my friends full version, but nothing that I can decipher that makes a major difference in how to use the tools or publish. I hope that helps. I am using my version in a non profit and it works for how we utilize the program.
657735
Yes... I am on 7. I just use it to save critical files on. Don't fully understand the "back-up" software that is supplied with it.
137331
I had a dying desktop, so it was challenging to rescue the old files. Finally was able to offload everything to a backup hard drive (I just cherrypicked the files I wanted to save), then uploaded them to my new laptop, plus had a backup copy ready made. Took most of a weekend. I had close to a hundred GB of data, mostly music mp3's and photos, so the CD solution was not reasonable. An object lesson - it pays to keep your files backed up. You can save your Word docs without purchasing Word, but you will need to buy Word eventually. You can use a notepad program instead to read your old files, but very tedious, and much of your info will not be readable. I had a dying desktop, so it was challenging to rescue the old files. Finally was able to offload everything to a backup hard drive (I just cherrypicked the files I wanted to save), then uploaded them to my new laptop, plus had a backup copy ready made. Took most of a weekend. I had close to a hundred GB of data, mostly music mp3's and photos, so the CD solution was not reasonable. An object lesson - it pays to keep your files backed up. You can save your Word docs without purchasing Word, but you will need to buy Word eventually. You can use a notepad program instead to read your old... » Read More I had a dying desktop, so it was challenging to rescue the old files. Finally was able to offload everything to a backup hard drive (I just cherrypicked the files I wanted to save), then uploaded them to my new laptop, plus had a backup copy ready made. Took most of a weekend. I had close to a hundred GB of data, mostly music mp3's and photos, so the CD solution was not reasonable. An object lesson - it pays to keep your files backed up. You can save your Word docs without purchasing Word, but you will need to buy Word eventually. You can use a notepad program instead to read your old files, but very tedious, and much of your info will not be readable. « Show Less
1651792
I don't know. But I did not like this one, not enough hours. Once you fill up on hours it does not give you more. So two of my file are empty. It would not let you record. So I bought me another one Sony.
588652
Thanks, I'd never heard of those options! I need to write those down and check them out...I bet TONS of people don't know about those, because like I guess Gran Turismo 5 installs tens of thousands of files, and can really fragment things, but the articles I've read about that have never mentioned that options menu!