How is this different from this http://www.amazon.com/Elite-Tactical-Riflescope-3-5-21x-Reticle/dp/B004XXH8W8/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1418882279&sr=8-2
274839
No difference from what i can tell, both have the G2 retical, wich is great by the way, only thing different is one of them have the sun shade mounted.
1678648
This is not a scout scope. It is equivalent to a VX 2 scope but with a different crosshair.
1517609
Haven't used mine to give you an honest answer on this one Mike, however, since buying mine and reading numerous comments about it I would encourage you to just take it to an establishment such as Scheels or Cabella's or any major sporting store and have them bore sight it for you. Most places will bore sight your rifle/scope combo if you have bought either of them from them at no cost to you. If per chance they charge for this service, it shouldn't be much different than that spent on this device, especially if it turns out to be worthless to you. Food for thought. Good luck guy.
1781805
btw...my tasco world class3-9x40mm loses clarity with sundown or lower light. I forgot to note this point in earlier comment. it's a damn good build and buy for the money (51.99) but, more demanding purposes will require a much better scope. p.s. this would not be my combat scope on an ar15 either.
160527
Yes. You can get the next version of it with drop compensation as well. I prefer this reticle/optic for close to mid range engagements but if you wish to engage past 300 meters get the one with drop comp
609847
I have two of the Primary Arms 1-6 scopes and I really like the layout of the reticle. It gives you a lot of information in a very intuitive way. I don't find that the clarity is lacking at all as far out as I've taken shots with mine so far. I have a shoot coming up this weekend with targets out to 480 yds, so I will get a real test of the scope with those. But I would recommend it from my experience so far.
1781811
the bushnell is a much better scope. I consider the tasco to be if I drop it and break it, its cheap to replace. but if u got a mosin u should consider a 4-16x44? I mainly bought the tasco for my magnum pellet rifle, but have fire it on my ar15 as well. but ar 15 recoils much less than the mosin. I know we are all tryin to spend less but sometimes u gotta be happy with ur purchase. its better if u get 1 good scope that u could use on many different rifles than buy several scopes thus in the end spending more. happy shopping!
593067
Paul...me again, look up 4 plex. that is what the reticles look like on this scope. hope that helps.
924102
this sight only has 1 reticle and the others that have multiple are for short and medium range. every dot represents a specific distance but i don't care for that. too confusing and too busy. i can hit 200 yards by just putting the 1 reticle dot above target
206377
Ditto... "Extended Range". It's slightly slanted so as to give you more scope movement for longer ranges. I have one installed on a custom AR-15 with a M223 Nikon and it's great.
805141
No, second. The newer models, with Horus reticles are, but 50%+ more in price. This scope will serve as a good varmint scope, or an AR optic.
39794
I believe the clarity is better. I like the quick throw lever and the scope looks better on an ar than the mtac in my opinion. Ironically i bought this scope to replace a burris mtac. As far as the main benefit goes, the ffp reticle, do your own research to determine if its the thing for you. From a tactical perspective ffp is the way to go. Bottom line, I love it, and would def recommend.
1350
In the listing I believe you have an option to choose which "size" you want. But really the different "sizes" are the different reticles. When you select a size option you should see the choice show up with the type reticle described next to it. It threw me off when I was purchasing also. I think this is what you are asking?
2136515
I have this scope mounted on a heavy barrel .22 . As well 2 other brand 2x7 scopes on 2 other .22 rifles . Most of my shots are 50yds or less . I use the 2x power mostly . I read the reply about parallax , parallax is kind of an optical illusion , it does not appear in my of my scopes , it is true this scope has a 100 yd parallax setting , 50 yds is more ideal for a .22 . Maximum error could be as much as 1/4 inch according to the charts [ this is maximum ] I am satisfied with mine , but , Why not buy one of the Nikon Prostaff Rimfire scopes now available ? I just looked on Amazon , they are $10 more for a 3x9 I have this scope mounted on a heavy barrel .22 . As well 2 other brand 2x7 scopes on 2 other .22 rifles . Most of my shots are 50yds or less . I use the 2x power mostly . I read the reply about parallax , parallax is kind of an optical illusion , it does not appear in my of my scopes , it is true this scope has a 100 yd parallax setting , 50 yds is more ideal for a .22 . Maximum error could be as much as 1/4 inch according to the charts [ this is maximum ] I am satisfied with mine , but , Why not buy one of the Nikon Prostaff Rimfire scopes now available ? I just looked on Amazon , they... » Read More I have this scope mounted on a heavy barrel .22 . As well 2 other brand 2x7 scopes on 2 other .22 rifles . Most of my shots are 50yds or less . I use the 2x power mostly . I read the reply about parallax , parallax is kind of an optical illusion , it does not appear in my of my scopes , it is true this scope has a 100 yd parallax setting , 50 yds is more ideal for a .22 . Maximum error could be as much as 1/4 inch according to the charts [ this is maximum ] I am satisfied with mine , but , Why not buy one of the Nikon Prostaff Rimfire scopes now available ? I just looked on Amazon , they are $10 more for a 3x9 « Show Less
1471529
I do not know the difference. I suggest that Bradley go to the Mueller web site and pick out one model of each type of scope and compare the Features list and the Specifications list.
720901
i would go with this one. either this one or go up one level (littmann ranks its scopes by sensitivity). use their website to determine which one you want, and then amazon to find the best price
1471531
Differences are Tactical has 30mm tube vs. 1 in tube, Resettable Zero, Mill Dot reticle. Worth the price difference if you use features, But weighs 6 oz. more, Both fine scopes for the money. I have standard and wish I bought tactical but still satisfied.