For my Olympus OM-D EM-10 should I get this or Panasonic LUMIX G VARIO 14-42mm ? I don't yet have a zoom lens...
1055560
Charity, I have no real reason to criticize the Panasonic, but I have purchase 4-5 different lenses for my OMD EM-5 and have tried the Panasonic versions. I have always reverted back to the Olympus versions of the lens because of the different "color" casts I get from the Panasonic versions. Seems that the Olympus versions are slightly sharper and the color renditions are much more "spot on" when used on an Olympus Camera. I am assuming that manufacturers work to match their lens coatings to the color adjustment algorythyms in their processors and vice versa. I would opt for the Olympus lens for the Olympus EM-10. That of course is a personal preference based upon personal experience. Charity, I have no real reason to criticize the Panasonic, but I have purchase 4-5 different lenses for my OMD EM-5 and have tried the Panasonic versions. I have always reverted back to the Olympus versions of the lens because of the different "color" casts I get from the Panasonic versions. Seems that the Olympus versions are slightly sharper and the color renditions are much more "spot on" when used on an Olympus Camera. I am assuming that manufacturers work to match their lens coatings to the color adjustment algorythyms in their processors and vice versa. I would opt... » Read More Charity, I have no real reason to criticize the Panasonic, but I have purchase 4-5 different lenses for my OMD EM-5 and have tried the Panasonic versions. I have always reverted back to the Olympus versions of the lens because of the different "color" casts I get from the Panasonic versions. Seems that the Olympus versions are slightly sharper and the color renditions are much more "spot on" when used on an Olympus Camera. I am assuming that manufacturers work to match their lens coatings to the color adjustment algorythyms in their processors and vice versa. I would opt for the Olympus lens for the Olympus EM-10. That of course is a personal preference based upon personal experience. « Show Less
1055561
Optically this Olympus is a little better than the Lumix. I have observed that Lumix lenses make a faint fluttering noise when mounted on Olympus bodies. My understanding is that this has to do with the way Olynpus and Panasonic have implemented 'live view.' By the way, I also think that the Olympis looks more retro and is more in alignment with the styling of your E-M10. Hope this helps. Cheers.
2280479
Not this version, the Olympus has its own input plug, but search for Trigmaster Panasonic on Amazon and you will find a version for Lumix.
2188731
The only issue between The Panasonic and Olympus micro 4/3 lens mount cameras is the image stabilizer. Panasonic uses lenses with image stabilizing in them, like the Panasonic Leica DG Macro-Elmarit. Olympus has the image stabilizer in the camera, so you should have no problems with your camera or lens working automaticly.
136114
There is a 65mm MACRO lens that apparently lets you get to millimeters close. The two Panny lenes I have -- the 20 and the 12.5 both let you get quite close, but they aren't macro lenses. Check on the Olympus site. There are a couple of specifically macro lenses. That's my next lens. I love macro shooting. But those tow panny lenses aren't bad at all. Adorama has (I believe ALL of the lenses, both Panasonic and Olympus) for 4/3 format, so it's another place to look. Read the specs and see what they tell you. I do know the 65mm macro gets very good reviews from users.
767374
Hi. I am in the exact same conundrum. I have been trying both and haven't really noticed a significant difference in performance. I felt like the Panasonic IS was very slightly better but I didn't test it very thoroughly. In the end, I use the in-built Olympus stabilizer simply because I often switch between this lens and the pancake. I guess you could try taking some shots in a low light setting both ways and then zoom in to compare the blurriness.
523658
for my 7D I went with the 10-22mm USM IS and the 24-105mmL and I think that covers the majority of my ranges (I also got the 70-300mm USM telephoto zoom so I think I'm pretty well covered from 10-300mm ;-)
533183
Sara, I guess the question is how soon you need a camera? If you already preordered, then you should have yours Nov. 24 which is rapidly approaching. Is that soon enough for you? Do you need a powerful, high performance prosumer mirrorless camera? If so, then I suggest the wait for the GH2 will be worth it for you. As for lenses, the first and only lens I see recommended without reservation is the Panasonic LUMIX G 20mm f/1.7 Aspherical Pancake Lens for Micro Four Thirds Interchangeable Lens Cameras. It's a pancake lens with rave reviews, and makes your GH2 into a pocketable, low light capable camera. That gives you a versatile zoom (14mm - 140mm) usable for video and stills, and a lightweight compact lens (20mm) for casual, indoor, street, and impromptu shooting occasions. Start with those, and expand as you desire. Also, don't forget, with adapters, you can adapt other lenses (e.g., Canon, Nikon, Leica) to your GH2. You can also use Olympus and other MFT (Micro Four Thirds) and with adapter FT (Four Thirds) lenses. I would start with the Panny 20mm though. Good luck.
2246308
GreetingsYes the Olympus 40-150 Zoom will fit the EM10 Camera.Best regard,H and B Digital Team
2262126
All of Olympus' viewfinders work. I have the vf2. The vf1 is not much of a viewfinder as it is only for one lens and is optical, unable to adjust to different lenses. The others are electronic and show the same as the screen. Given the choice and considering what I have already spent, I would probably choose to spend the extra money for the Panasonic GX7, which has a built in viewfinder and flash and has integrated wifi while retaining the hot shoe, but I still love the pm2.
1276779
It has a very plastic feel to it. My 14-45mm does have a smoother zoom but I think a lot of that has to do with the rubber covering on the zoom ring, how much could that band have added to the production cost, pennies? I bought a collapsible Olympus 14-42mm and the feel of it's zoom mechanism is very smooth, but performance wise I think both of the Panasonics perform better on my G1s. I use the Oly on my GF3 because it is better balanced on the small camera. I thought the 14-42mm OIS Panasonic was replaced with a more recent model. Did you get the new model or the old model?
173419
I have Lumix DH3 ; I am using with it 14-45mm lens much more often than 45-200mm. I agree with others that 14-45 is a great lens, sharper than newer 14-42.
301036
If you're going backpacking, I imagine you want something light and maybe autofocus? The Panasonic 14-140mm covers a great range and is great for outdoors when the sun is shining, but it's kinda bulky. For night photography, it's not the best. If you plan on using it during the day, then that would be the most versatile. If you want to keep it smaller, you're best bet is a kit lens, like the 14-42mm. It's cheap, relatively small and takes fantastic photos in broad daylight. Again, it's a turd in the dark and the flash on the GX7 is a joke. You'll get the shadow of just about any lens in your shot when using the flash. If you're going backpacking, I imagine you want something light and maybe autofocus? The Panasonic 14-140mm covers a great range and is great for outdoors when the sun is shining, but it's kinda bulky. For night photography, it's not the best. If you plan on using it during the day, then that would be the most versatile. If you want to keep it smaller, you're best bet is a kit lens, like the 14-42mm. It's cheap, relatively small and takes fantastic photos in broad daylight. Again, it's a turd in the dark and the flash on the GX7 is a joke. You'll get the shadow of just about any lens in... » Read More If you're going backpacking, I imagine you want something light and maybe autofocus? The Panasonic 14-140mm covers a great range and is great for outdoors when the sun is shining, but it's kinda bulky. For night photography, it's not the best. If you plan on using it during the day, then that would be the most versatile. If you want to keep it smaller, you're best bet is a kit lens, like the 14-42mm. It's cheap, relatively small and takes fantastic photos in broad daylight. Again, it's a turd in the dark and the flash on the GX7 is a joke. You'll get the shadow of just about any lens in your shot when using the flash. « Show Less
978672
I chose the Olympus 25 mm over the LUMIX 20 mm because of focal length, just a little more flexibility, and price. Difference in speed was inconsequential.
173418
Hi, I was faced with the same dilemma last year. I chose 14-45. It is a sharp lens with good auto focus and stabilization. I use it mainly as a travel lens and photograph historical monuments.Prakash
220163
I would go for the middle (B) range and not even interchangeable lens if not worthed. So: apart from price, loving fidelity in colours and proportions (I hate "postcard" photos), and speed, what between:Sony Nex 5NsOlympus E-PM1Panasonic GF3 (if better than G3, otherwise please tell me)?Any non interchangeble lens as worthed as those? (Olympus XZ-1?)Eventually, thanks a loT
1222498
yes...1. if you get a good price...$200 for me2. You have a m43 system3. I had a specific use for it....to supplement my other m43 Oly Pl-1 and my Lumix bodies.4. Bought a fast Oly 45mm 1.8 at the same time.5. Currently using it with the super sharp Lumix 20mm 1.76. It is compact but the tilt screen is nice.7. I haven't test the zoom much, since I am using faster lens.
440164
I had no trouble making the choice for the LX3. The only real advantage of the G10 is the zoom range, and even though my previous camera was a Panasonic DMC-TZ5, with a fantastic 10x zoom, I never used it. The f/2.0 lens and the dynamic black and white mode sold me. Now that I have it I absolutely love my LX3.