Does this switch (for which the image is not available) have the same status display as this one with the same model #: SG100D-08?http://www.amazon.com/Cisco-SD2008T-Desktop-Gigabit-Switch/dp/B003BVK7NU/ref=sr_1_6?ie=UTF8&qid=1400540264&sr=8-6&keywords=Cisco+SG100D-08 Does this switch (for which the image is not available) have the same status display as this one with the same model #: SG100D-08?http://www.amazon.com/Cisco-SD2008T-Desktop-Gigabit-Switch/dp... » Read More Does this switch (for which the image is not available) have the same status display as this one with the same model #: SG100D-08?http://www.amazon.com/Cisco-SD2008T-Desktop-Gigabit-Switch/dp/B003BVK7NU/ref=sr_1_6?ie=UTF8&qid=1400540264&sr=8-6&keywords=Cisco+SG100D-08 « Show Less
1061556
So this is more of a corporate unmanaged switch than the one you've listed. The status lights are on the front by the Ethernet cables and the power is on the rear. The layout is exactly the same as this, though without the PoE functionality. Cisco SYSTEMS 8-Port Gigabit (SG100D-08P-NA) If you're looking for a reliable unmanaged switch, this is a good option. It's been very stable for me so far.
1061557
believe Cisco SD2008T is showing EOL (end of Life) on Cisco site (Last Date of Support: HW August 31, 2015)Google searches for "Cisco SD2008T" finds other sites with images of the product & descriptions - indicates LEDs: System, 1 through 8
451198
Check out the website for this switch. Google it. I believe it documents all the specs.
1775209
i got a refurblished one from amazon. it could not be connected to operation interface by CD. it also could not be entered operation interface by 192.168.1.1 via IE. to the cloud-cisco i did not do it.
528760
For that application, the NETGEAR GS108NA ProSafe 8-Port Gigabit Ethernet Desktop Switch amazon number ASIN: B00006RVPW would be more likely to survive. Sidebar: When using the NETGEAR 8-Port Gigabit Ethernet Switch (GS608NA) it is important to mount the unit horizontally not vertically (do not do wall-mount). B00006RVPW is good vertically or horizontally.
987800
No. The picture looks like a similar generic switch I picked up from walmart. I installed it and it didn't work. Checking the electricals I found out why&gt; Generic switch rotation is Off, L -1, L-2, L-3. The LS-102 rotation is Off, L-3+2+1, L-3+2, L-3+1. The reason is that 1 & 2 connect to a dual-tap capacitor, with line 2 being a higher uF rating than one. So all three lines are high, two lines with high uF is medium, and two lines with low uF is low. You will need to get OEM switch to work correctly.
1930016
Hi Mark, Please refer to the following link for a response:http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/lan/catalyst3550/software/release/12-1_13_ea1/configuration/guide/3550scg/swdhcp82.html
1075476
The short answer is either one will work since both are faster than your internet connection anyway. The long (correct) answer is that it depends on the amount of traffic on your network. For a handful of simultaneous users, 10/100 is fine. For more than a half dozen or so, you'll notice an improvement with Gigabit. Since Gigabit device prices are falling, you're probably better off buying one now and having plenty of room to grow. Of course, your devices will also need to have Gigabit-capable NICs to benefit from the speed boost, but the switch will still work more efficiently.
939166
The updated are only for V2 of this piece of garbage. NO information from Cisco about all of the earlier models, which they appear to have dropped support for soon after selling them. The last firmware for the earlier versions is from 2009, and there is nothing on there site about any trouble with them... search the model, and you find the vast majority of users looking for some firmware fix. None available from Cisco, and none of the open source alternatives support this model. There are a few comments about going back to OLDER firmware, but Cisco does not have it available, and after much searching I have found only broken links. This thing has sucked up way too much time ion troubleshooting for what it cost.
1712
Cisco model numbers will have a "p" in the model if it is Poe capable. This one is not. Try sg100d-08p-na.
826639
I went for the dn1000 instead of the 810, because of the GUI. Other than that I really didnt see much of a difference in spec wise. My friend has the 810 and I will be receiving mine next week.
2283541
The label must have changed. Mine had +/- Load. I hooked up the +from the P/S to the +, the - from P/S and LED light (load) both connect to the - on the switch. The + from the LED to the Load. My assumption would be Line/Negative/Load. You should contact the seller to be sure. Good luck!
1706267
I have not purchased from this vendor however the one in the picture is NOT the v2 model. There is another one listed on Amazon that states it is the "af" model and as you will see in the image both ports are labeled with PoE.
168555
That is the generic model description of the switch. Go to the HP site and look at the actual model no. using the matrix for the same switch, it will give you another part # that you can use in order to identify the correct unit according to the total power output.
1136613
I don't see manual inside the box and the box doesn't say which CAT it supports, but I have no problem using it with my gigabit router and getting same speed as before. Overall I"m very happy with this simple device. Very well built and it works wonderfully. Been looking for such a device for years. Sure you can use firewall to block/unblock internet traffic, but with this switch, when turned off, only GOD can get in your computer. :)
2177281
It is 1GB port switch. I have 3 Desktop connected to this switch and all shows link speed 1.0G with full duplex. This switch is connected to 1Gb main access switch in server room.
134380
The initial production model had 2.0 ports. It was then updated to have 3.0 ports though remained with the same model name. Possible to get either one.
1130254
After checked with our technician, these two models have the same feature with different design. The model of B00GNUID0K is thicker than this model.