lumix ts1 vs new sony dsc-tx5
1055342
while waiting for a possible repair by panasonic after I tested the waterproof 'feature' of this camera, i bought the new sony tx5. pictures are much better (almost always focused), the sony IS definitely waterproof, there is a lovely panoramic mode that combines picture and a special mode for nighttime which does not require the flash and produces very decent & well contrasted pictures. IF i ever get my camera back from panasonic, I will sell it on ebay, as the sony one is miles better.
974229
Shouldn't zs3 still be under warranty since it just came out 2-3month? I own both zs3 and tx1 (wx1's brother), and zs3's sharper pictures blows both tx1/wx1 under exposed pictures out of the water! the only thing that tx1/wx1 has over zs3 is low light, high iso images (new exmor r sensor and 6 stacking pictures), and easy panorama picture taking. I keep both tx1 and zs3 for different modes. zs3 for outdoor and flash pictures, and tx1 for low light, high iso pictures.
2279768
I have been doing tons of research online regarding both. The SX20 has excellent reviews about its photo quality compared to the Sony HX1. The benefit to the Sony is that it has 1080p compared to 720p on the Canon. If you want 1080p on a Canon, it will cost an extra $200 for the Canon SX1 is. I personally prefer the Lumix (Panasonic) cameras over both. They use Leica lens which is considered the Rolls Royce of camera lenses. I have used Lumix cameras over the years. I suggest you check out the DMC-FZ35. This camera is highly rated by experts and owners. Each of these cameras has pros and cons against each other however it will all depend on what features you are looking for. If you are looking for camera with loads of manual features, great photo quality and good build, go Canon. If you want easier to use with excellent photo quality, go with the Lumix. The one thing that Canon could improve on is their menu. Many owners had made comments that the menu interface on Canon's is not user friendly. Lumix and Sony have easier to navigate menu's.
1401410
the lcd is 3.5 inches and the resolution is reported to be 4 times that of the standard lcd. That's from Sony. It would be worth it but I can't go that high on a toy. Photography is my art and my passion ( life's not living without passion ). I'm getting the T90 rather than a smarter smart phone. I've other, more cumbersome cameras ( like the Canon D20 with 3 lenses, a gift ) and my favorite Sony 717 and a couple of others. Christmas 2009: Santa left the TX1 under my tree, what a guy. A really superlative pocket camera that out does most of its bigger more cumbersome brothers. Very steep learning curve and requires a lover's touch. I don't recommend it to most because of that but it is always on my person. Check me out at Picasa and Facebook - jbivona and jimmybivona. I believe the TX7 is an improvement (wider lens, larger battery). I have 3 batteries and 2 4 gig memory sticks and keep it in a soft leather cell fone case in my left front pocket when not in use. (Look at the military wedding at Picasa - all done from the gallery or way out of the way with the TX1. All available light and one handed. A very cool camera.)
883520
I recommend the X-S1, hands down. Close ups are fantastic, it has Macro & Super Macro modes allowing for photos of subjects at a 1cm range. It's got the 26x zoom, plus the Super Intelligent Zoom feature providing. A further 1.4, and 2.0 zoom with no pixel degradation. The filter size is 62mm. Hope this helps!
1127249
The photo quality of the TX1 cannot touch the excellent photos that I get from my SD700IS. The photo's are good, plenty good, but the ability to shoot video that doesn't look like garbage on my 46" HDTV is the killer ap here.If you need the best camera buy another unit. If you can live with a very good camera (With a 10x zoom!) that can take excellent videos then this is the unit for you.
1585217
I would not recommend the X5 anymore. Do some more looking as the camera proved to be marginal in image quality.
1173623
The wider field of view and the small camera size of the DMC-FX35 are things I like. The FX35 can be purchased today too while the TZ5 cannot. But, I am leaning toward the TZ5 because I also value the features of continuous autofocus and 10x optical zoom and its field of view is also wider than most cameras. This Panasonic page shows the differences between different fields of view. http://panasonic.co.jp/pavc/global/lumix/popup/wide_angle/index.html This Panasonic page shows feature differences between the two cameras. http://www2.panasonic.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/vModelComparisonResults?storeId=15001&catalogId=13401&catGroupId=75047&surfCategory=Lumix%20Digital%20Cameras&cacheProgram=11002&cachePartner=7000000000000005702&items=214163|214166|213677|
274979
These two cameras are very similar. The advantages of the T3i: It has a flip-out screen, and a battery with a longer life than the SL1. But the SL1 is "newer" than the T3i, and therefore it has some tech advantages: (1) It is 30% lighter and smaller than the T3i (and this is a significant advantage when you carry the camera all day); (2) It provides continuous auto-focus for videos (which the T3i does not provide); (3) It has a "touch screen" for enlarging and shrinking shot playback; and (4) It offers in-camera HDR. Since technology is constantly improving the quality of cameras and sensors, I would opt for the "newer" vs. the "older" DSLR releases. These two cameras are very similar. The advantages of the T3i: It has a flip-out screen, and a battery with a longer life than the SL1. But the SL1 is "newer" than the T3i, and therefore it has some tech advantages: (1) It is 30% lighter and smaller than the T3i (and this is a significant advantage when you carry the camera all day); (2) It provides continuous auto-focus for videos (which the T3i does not provide); (3) It has a "touch screen" for enlarging and shrinking shot playback; and (4) It offers in-camera HDR. Since technology is constantly improving the quality... » Read More These two cameras are very similar. The advantages of the T3i: It has a flip-out screen, and a battery with a longer life than the SL1. But the SL1 is "newer" than the T3i, and therefore it has some tech advantages: (1) It is 30% lighter and smaller than the T3i (and this is a significant advantage when you carry the camera all day); (2) It provides continuous auto-focus for videos (which the T3i does not provide); (3) It has a "touch screen" for enlarging and shrinking shot playback; and (4) It offers in-camera HDR. Since technology is constantly improving the quality of cameras and sensors, I would opt for the "newer" vs. the "older" DSLR releases. « Show Less
1418537
So glad I found this post as I'm in the same boat and just printed out the specs on both cameras. I'm curious as to which camera you ended up getting and how you like it? My original intent was to upgrade from my Canon Powershot due to a long lag time in between being able to shoot the next picture now that my kids are in sports, but I would still like clear nice pictures. What did you get and how do you like it?
650801
I didn't like the image quality of either of them. I think the sensor is too small. The s120 is better than the s110 with faster focusing and a better sensor. I may consider spending a little more for the Sony rx100 with a bigger sensor (price dropped).
240403
Skin tones from the XT1 in my eyes seem to be right on. I cannot compare the S5s or the Nikons as I have not shot a Nikon in years nor the Fuji S5s. Coming from a Leica M8 which always rendered skin warm I can say the XT1 is very natural to my eye.
2284472
I'm running the same research and here's the comparison, WX1: in addition to the HD video, its 24mm wide angle is precious in daily shootings (indoors, group pics, ...). It also has 5x zoom. And the CMOS sensor is supposed to be a notch better than CCD. The build quality is good and it's smaller than S90 except the thickness. It's also $100+ cheaper than S90. Battery life is rated at 350 shots v. S90's 220. S90: Manual everything; RAW; F2@28mm; SDHC card; external flash. The DSLR advantages have been the interchangeability for lens and flash. S90 takes another bite on those claims while providing the convenience and accessibility. If you're going up from Point&Shoot, WX1 is the winner; If you're going down from DSLR after the form factor, you'll miss less features with S90. Either is a great camera that will take wonderful pictures in the right hands.
976815
Size is the only reason. The TT5 is a transmitter/receiver. The mini is only a transmitter. You cannot trip the shutter with the mini.
948238
Yes, back to your original post. I guess the sx1 is for those wanting the benfits of a CMOS sensor, greater zoom (over the sx200 which looks like a great pocket camera), true 1080p HD video, and standard AA battery usage (rechargable, of course, but standard in a pinch), and RAW+JPEG, all things I like very much.p.s. on that review site above the image quality of the rebel xsi is quite inferior to either the sx1 or sx10!
799322
I went with the TX-1 because of the video quality and sound. G7 takes video with mono whereas the TX takes it with stereo. And also love the 10x zoom on TX.
2073936
I just read your posting and it has been a month since you put it up so I don't know if your still interested in a comparison, so I will keep it brief. I got the X100 in July and the S95 a year ago but by coincidence I just took some test shots in the back yard this morning to compare the two as I will be using both at a BBQ on Sunday. The S95 looks good until you see it next to the x100. The X100 is the first digital camera I have owned where the photos look a bit more real than the other digital cameras I have used. I also have a Nikon D7000 and did some test shots while on vacation using it and the Nikon 12-24mm lens ( set at 23mm) and the X100 looks better, sharper than the $1000 Nikon12-24 lens. There are some down sides as is mentioned on many websites, but you can get used to them, or at least I did. On the video, I like the S95 by far as it is easier to get usable footage. The X100 is sharper and cleaner by a little bit, but the focus is not as good as the S95. The X100 is a great camera for what it is, and I really like mine.