Sony Alpha a33 vs. Sony NEX-5? I've been seriously considering the Sony NEX-5 but then learned about the a33/a55. How do these cameras compare? Another one I'm considering is the Nikon D3100. The most important things to me are: 1) large sensor and great image quality 2) great 1080P HD video with auto-focus and automatic aperture adjustment while shooting 3) small and lightweight 4) not more than $800 or $850. And this will be my first DSLR-type camera after using only point-and-shoots. So an optical viewfinder is not necessarily important to me since I'm only used to framing shots with an LCD. Sony Alpha a33 vs. Sony NEX-5? I've been seriously considering the Sony NEX-5 but then learned about the a33/a55. How do these cameras compare? Another one I'm considering is the Nikon... » Read More Sony Alpha a33 vs. Sony NEX-5? I've been seriously considering the Sony NEX-5 but then learned about the a33/a55. How do these cameras compare? Another one I'm considering is the Nikon D3100. The most important things to me are: 1) large sensor and great image quality 2) great 1080P HD video with auto-focus and automatic aperture adjustment while shooting 3) small and lightweight 4) not more than $800 or $850. And this will be my first DSLR-type camera after using only point-and-shoots. So an optical viewfinder is not necessarily important to me since I'm only used to framing shots with an LCD. « Show Less
1070318
I'm an armature photographer.. but have explored both d3100 and a33..1) similar image quality..2) both do 1080p HD video with auto focus but sony gets a bit warm (hot for some) while video recording.. although I've yet to record for this long3) sony is a tiny bit smaller..check out their detailed reviews at dpreview.com.. they helped me make my decision..
1070319
All the NEX models have NO built in image stabilization. Stabilization is built into the E-mount lenses.
1070320
I would hold out for the a35, potentially coming out early June. Not sure of the specs, but I think it will have a lot of improvements, including longer battery life.The Nex-5 also uses digital image stabilization as opposed to optical image stabilization, which some people tend to dislike with a passion.
578164
I couldn't get a response from anyone on this topic so I just went ahead and bought the sel55210 lens a couple weeks ago. Like you said, it attaches with no problems, however, with my nex-3 it seems to work just fine. I can't say that I have used the camera all that much with the new lens so there could be some subtle problems that I haven't encountered yet but mine definitely does take pictures. It also doesn't seem to have any problems using any of the default shoot modes and it auto focuses just fine. Have you tried updating your camera's software? There might be something with the initial release of the software that doesn't allow this lens to work. I couldn't get a response from anyone on this topic so I just went ahead and bought the sel55210 lens a couple weeks ago. Like you said, it attaches with no problems, however, with my nex-3 it seems to work just fine. I can't say that I have used the camera all that much with the new lens so there could be some subtle problems that I haven't encountered yet but mine definitely does take pictures. It also doesn't seem to have any problems using any of the default shoot modes and it auto focuses just fine. Have you tried updating your camera's software? There might be something with the... » Read More I couldn't get a response from anyone on this topic so I just went ahead and bought the sel55210 lens a couple weeks ago. Like you said, it attaches with no problems, however, with my nex-3 it seems to work just fine. I can't say that I have used the camera all that much with the new lens so there could be some subtle problems that I haven't encountered yet but mine definitely does take pictures. It also doesn't seem to have any problems using any of the default shoot modes and it auto focuses just fine. Have you tried updating your camera's software? There might be something with the initial release of the software that doesn't allow this lens to work. « Show Less
178995
It doesn't shoot in 1080p but good luck downloading and editing that content. And 1080p uses up twice as much memory on your flash drive. The TM700 is nice but it has that annoying fan noise problem and it's not nearly as good in low light as the Sony. The CX300 has an Effective Picture Resolution of: 2650K Pixels (16:9), 3540K Pixels (4:3) & the CX550 has an Effective Picture Resolution of: 4500K Pixels (16:9), 6000K Pixels (4:3). It's way better in low light too with the bigger sensor. It has a viewfinder and a high resolution (3X that of the 300) 3.5" LCD. The 550 also has the manual control wheel. BTW, the price difference is $360 and anyway, the 350 with 32 more GB is only $40 more than the 300. You won't see 32 GB's in class 4 SD cards for $40 for a few years at least. They're all good camcorders though, but I think the 550 is well worth the extra money.......unless you're married and your wife will kill you........;-)
1296628
Compare them and when you do, bear in mind that the Nikon was 50% more.http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/en/Camera-Sensor/Compare-sensors/%28appareil1%29/675|0/%28appareil2%29/680|0/%28onglet%29/0/%28brand%29/Sony/%28brand2%29/Nikon
542770
Both are nice cameras. I own a700 and a900, bought the a99, difficult to get used to. Totally different beast. If you get one, do not get rid of the 700 until you are convinced. Joe
483786
Hi Charles I purchased this lens in addition to standard kit lens that comes with Sony nex3 or nex5. Reason to buy this lens is are: 1. its sharp 2. It has 2.8 aperture , which is about a stop better than the kit lens at this focal length of 30mm.this one better stop let's you give two things 1 . Better blurred backgrounds in portraits. 2. You can keep your iso low, that means less noise and grains in your pictures To answer your question if telephoto is better, ask yourself or your wife which focal length you take your pictures, if more of them are at telephoto then you have the answer. Hope this helps.
514855
I recently bought a Sony STL-A55V camera and shot a number of high school play cast members portraits using a Sigma 90mm f2.8 fixed lens and did not have any problems at all. I really liked the results. I have some Sigma zoom lenses and I will try those and see if a problem occurs with them. I upgraded from a Sony A300 and think that the A55 is far better camera. I sold the A300 which I enjoyed for two years but I was never happy with its low light performance. The features on the A55 are a lot of fun.
660621
The D4 is a very good camera. The D4s is slightly better at high ISOs. Its seem to track focus on moving subjects a bit faster. Go to DXO website and they do a great comparison on cameras and you can compare the two cameras. The picture quality is the same I think over all again with some improvement at high ISOs. I do not know what you shoot or how you photograph so it is very hard to give advice on upgrading. If I had to do it again, I think I would stay with the D4 and which I still use right along with the D4s and wait for the next big change in camera bodies.
1154248
Hi H.E., this Sony Alpha a6000 is a good camera for low light situation. It has an ISO range of 100-25600 giving less noise due to its Exmor CMOS sensor and BIONZ X processor. As for the lens, any wide angle Sony lens will do. -Ely
974224
I too am looking for a new cyber-shot. I am looking to buy the dsc-w290 but I have heard great things about the WX1, such as the new panoramic sweep mode and cmos sensor. Not to mention zoomable HD video is amazing.Why you should wait however, is that this is the first batch of cameras with the new sensor. It also uses a smaller LCD than the 3.0 inch they started using such as the dsc-w290 and is only 10.1 mp which if you shoot in 16:9 mode, will be even less.Sony will come out with new cameras being announced in January at the CES 2010 show and then you should decide. If nothing substantial is announced, the price for this will have dropped greatly. I too am looking for a new cyber-shot. I am looking to buy the dsc-w290 but I have heard great things about the WX1, such as the new panoramic sweep mode and cmos sensor. Not to mention zoomable HD video is amazing.Why you should wait however, is that this is the first batch of cameras with the new sensor. It also uses a smaller LCD than the 3.0 inch they started using such as the dsc-w290 and is only 10.1 mp which if you shoot in 16:9 mode, will be even less.Sony will come out with new cameras being announced in January at the CES 2010 show and then you should... » Read More I too am looking for a new cyber-shot. I am looking to buy the dsc-w290 but I have heard great things about the WX1, such as the new panoramic sweep mode and cmos sensor. Not to mention zoomable HD video is amazing.Why you should wait however, is that this is the first batch of cameras with the new sensor. It also uses a smaller LCD than the 3.0 inch they started using such as the dsc-w290 and is only 10.1 mp which if you shoot in 16:9 mode, will be even less.Sony will come out with new cameras being announced in January at the CES 2010 show and then you should decide. If nothing substantial is announced, the price for this will have dropped greatly. « Show Less
1935412
Hello Kathy I love the sony camera. It is a great value for an intro camera. The ability to interchange the lens is great and will be where a lot of the money will go in terms of accessories. Sony also offers carl zeiss lenses which is amazing. And they are very affordable at $100-300 a piece Although sony does lack a lot of the lens options that nikon and canon offers, it is more than enough for a novice like myself. If you are looking to step up, this camera will not give you that ability. You will need to change camera body and maybe lenses. I am not too familiar with the nikon but from a cursory review online it doesnt seem people are very enamored with it. But i am biased since i love my camera. I have used a wide angle lens to take pictures of nature (flowers). With blurred background as well as pictures of my newborn daughter. Blowing them up to poster size (20" x 30") the resolution is more than enough to take great photos. And the body and lenses are small enough to be travel friendly. Hope that helps. Congrats on this (future) purchase and have fun. Wil
578159
Hello Paul, I have the Sony nex 5 camera and I need a lense with a higher zoom, which do you recommed??the 350 dollar one or the 800 dollar one?? and what is the difference between the too??Thanks
514856
The A33 isn't much of an upgrade to the A350. The A55 is, but do you *really* need the extra features? I doubt it. You might be better saving for the A77 which is due to be announced in the New Year.As far as lenses is concerned, if you have any Sigma lenses then these will need to go back to Sigma for re-chipping. All current Sigma lenses are incompatible with the A33/55 (and probably A77). If buying new Sigma lenses, then the box has a new sticker showing that is has been updated.Any other lens that works on the A350, works on the A33/55.
79947
First, I have the NEX-7; an older generation of the A6000, but very similar being a 24mp camera. I love this Lens. I believe it's the best of the lenses for any of Sony's APS-C Cameras. If you're willing to ante up for a priceyLens, you will not be disappointed. The Optics are Professional grade with a nice wide f/1.8 aperture delivering really nice Bokeh. Excellent corner to corner sharpness. Being Zeiss, the build quality is superb. Nice quiet operation for both photos and video. I have to believe you'll be as happy with this Lens on your A6000 as I am on my NEX-7. If money is not a consideration, Go For It !!!! First, I have the NEX-7; an older generation of the A6000, but very similar being a 24mp camera. I love this Lens. I believe it's the best of the lenses for any of Sony's APS-C Cameras. If you're willing to ante up for a priceyLens, you will not be disappointed. The Optics are Professional grade with a nice wide f/1.8 aperture delivering really nice Bokeh. Excellent corner to corner sharpness. Being Zeiss, the build quality is superb. Nice quiet operation for both photos and video. I have to believe you'll be as happy with this Lens on your A6000 as I am on my NEX-7. If money is not a... » Read More First, I have the NEX-7; an older generation of the A6000, but very similar being a 24mp camera. I love this Lens. I believe it's the best of the lenses for any of Sony's APS-C Cameras. If you're willing to ante up for a priceyLens, you will not be disappointed. The Optics are Professional grade with a nice wide f/1.8 aperture delivering really nice Bokeh. Excellent corner to corner sharpness. Being Zeiss, the build quality is superb. Nice quiet operation for both photos and video. I have to believe you'll be as happy with this Lens on your A6000 as I am on my NEX-7. If money is not a consideration, Go For It !!!! « Show Less
132028
When it comes to actually making great photos, there simply is no comparison. Don't get me wrong- the 5R is a great camera. But without a viewfinder and the ability to optimally brace your elbows against your body as you watch your subject through the viewfinder and s-q-u-e-e-z-e the shutter, it is difficult to get good shots. The NEX-6 with the 16-50mm zoom is the closest you will get to the quality of image you would get from a DSLR - but in a package you can stuff into a jacket pocket. There are many people who buy the 5R, and then realize it's difficult seeing the LCD screen in bright daylight. They then have to invest in the optional EVF, which drives the whole package higher than if they just bought the NEX-6 to begin with.
309280
I have an a33. It works very well, especially in low light settings. I think it should work with the alpha 330 but am not sure if auto focus will. Thanks!
199903
i own both D3300 and D5300. they both have the same sensor but the d5300 comes with the optical low pass filter (sharper pics), gps and built in wifi. The d5300 also is bundled with a superior lens. you wouldnt waste your money on a D3300 but the added features of 5300 are very useful.