what are the differences between a Canon SX500 IS and the Canon SX510 HS.?? And does the Canon SX500 has a build in wifi or is it just the Canon SX510 HS?
1047411
Thank you for your interest in our bundle! For a compare-and-contrast inquiry such as this, we advise speaking with someone in our sales department. They can be reached at 800-991-3350 EST.
829841
well i do not own an sx20 but what i know is that the sx series of the compact cameras is that the external design is the same. what differentiate the most is the internal.
1820224
The Nikon Coolpix p500 also has impressive zoom, 35x, the burst shooting works differently, but that might not be an issue for you. At $349, it's running about $50 less than the Canon sx40 right now.
2207298
The Sx510HS does not come with a memory card. It will accept SD, SDHC, SDXC cards. it will take cards conforming to the SD standards. However not all memory cards have been verified to work with this camera I am using a SanDisk 16GB memory card. and it works fine. Hope this helps.
2204728
Ok so this is what I'm going off of. The Cannon SX10IS is the same price as the P90 but the P90 has 24x zoom and 12.1 MP... The price differential came from somewhere. I'm putting my bets on the image processor. I personally own the SX10IS and I could not be happier. My friend who owns the Cannon Rebel XSi tries to say how his buy is much more justified. So far the only things I have found better is his white balance, optional remote trigger, and the capability to shoot in RAW. Otherwise our cameras are very similar.
184182
As of yet, there isn't one. There were no new models in the HS series line announced this year. It's a shame, really, because I LOVE the manual zoom on this camera line. Currently Fuji is touting the FinePix S1 (which has the "standard" zoom mechanism, via rocker switch) but most of the other specs match the HS50's - albeit it is water/dust resistant. Fuji is also pushing their XT1 "prosumer" line, so I fear that the HS50 may be the end of its series.
1540763
I contacted canon and you can send to their repair center. I slammed my camera on the floor and the screen went dead. Still took great pics, but unfortunately couldn't see what I was shooting since there is no viewfinder. To repair and shipping it was $110 so I opted not to because the Canon 1100 is now $140. I love my camera. Always took the best pictures. I bought the SX110 and had to return that. Way too professional. I haven't tested it out in the store but does anyone know if the 1100 is the same size as the 750?
2197807
The sx280 is the newer camera and yes it has the wifi. But I have read from other reviews that it has a problem with the battery charging indicator in the camera and it hasn't been fixed yet. You will get an indication that the battery is low and need to be recharged and then the camera turns off. The battery still has a charge but won't work because of the indicator telling the camera that the battery is dead. I would really check this problem out and make sure it is fixed before I bought the sx280. I was going to buy it, but changed my mind and got the sx260 and I love it.
309946
The SX120 at ISO 800 and 1600 is way better than the SX110, this is the biggest difference I've seen. Search for some reviews that have the same shots at ISO1600 for both cameras and compare the two side by side and it'll jump out at you. I'm not so sure the slightly smaller sensor has much difference, sensor technology improves very slowly too, so maybe it has better signal to noise ratio even though it's more MP on a slightly smaller surface area.I don't like the SX200 for a bunch of reasons, the always up flash is annoying. It has a slower lens than the SX110/120, and it's way more expensive. The SX120 at ISO 800 and 1600 is way better than the SX110, this is the biggest difference I've seen. Search for some reviews that have the same shots at ISO1600 for both cameras and compare the two side by side and it'll jump out at you. I'm not so sure the slightly smaller sensor has much difference, sensor technology improves very slowly too, so maybe it has better signal to noise ratio even though it's more MP on a slightly smaller surface area.I don't like the SX200 for a bunch of reasons, the always up flash is annoying. It has a slower lens than the SX110/120, and it's... » Read More The SX120 at ISO 800 and 1600 is way better than the SX110, this is the biggest difference I've seen. Search for some reviews that have the same shots at ISO1600 for both cameras and compare the two side by side and it'll jump out at you. I'm not so sure the slightly smaller sensor has much difference, sensor technology improves very slowly too, so maybe it has better signal to noise ratio even though it's more MP on a slightly smaller surface area.I don't like the SX200 for a bunch of reasons, the always up flash is annoying. It has a slower lens than the SX110/120, and it's way more expensive. « Show Less
829215
I have no direct experience with the SX40, but looked at it as an option when I purchased the SX50. The faster shutter speed, ability to shoot in RAW, and most significantly, the substantial difference in optical zoom, made the SX50 the best investment for me. I had been shooting with a 30 optical zoom camera before, and there really is a big difference with the 50 Optical Zoom of the SX50 HS.
825084
CX150 has been dead for a long time. Its replacement was the CX200, I prefer the CX300 of course. They just go up in quality and price. CX200 is the cheapo model and the CX400 is the reasonably expensive one. They have a lot more that just increase in price and quality. I prefer the CX300 because they are sub $50 and are great. The CX400 is ok, kinda overpriced for what they are, really just nicer looking CX300s. They with a holder, case, and a bunch of other stuff,
948242
Brewsky: I believe the SX10IS will be better for photos (for my use) because of the noise level. If you look at the compared photos between SX10IS and SX1IS the noise is much worse on the SX1IS photos. I guess it depends on what is most important to you and what your primary use is. If you want the HD video and higher fps, go for the SX1IS. Personally, I'm still on the fence... :-)
1338311
I second the TL500. I've owned the S90, LX3, and LX5. The LX3 & LX5 have color & WB issues (they don't even have a florescent WB setting). The S90 was great except for the previously mentioned blown highlights & 28mm. All these cameras look great on their own, but if you can compare them to a good DSLR and you'll see all their strengths and weaknesses. Good luck.
2276994
This camera does not have built in wifi so you have to first transfer the pictures to another device (computer, iphone, iPad) to be able to send it to Facebook. I'm told (but haven't checked) that the newer model, the SX280 HS, does have built in wifi. I don't know whether that would direct posting to Facebook but would hope that this is a function. You might want to check the Canon site if you're thinking of the 280 for that purpose.
1969856
I purchased the WB850F and returned. . It has great features like wifi etc... but it sucks as a camera.. I just purchased a Cannon Powershot SX50HS which so far has impressed me with its pictures.. Afterall a camera is for taking pictures and not wifi!..Jack Megrabyan
309944
I just realized that you're comparing the older SX100 - not the newer SX110 - to the SX120. So my points above is worthless. It only compares the 110 to the 120.You are correct, I only tried that on Canon's. Canon cameras that use their own proprietary battery has a battery meter, and the ones using AA does not.Another upgrade from the SX110 is that you can see more thumbnails at a time.
948237
I recently bought the SX10IS and it's a nice camera, zoom is kind of noisy for the price, so I am sending it back and waiting on the SX1IS to come in. I want the faster burst rate, the HD movie quality and the remote control features.