Other than the physical dimensions, what is the difference between this one and the "Ideal co-sleeper" model?
1060829
I wondered the same thing when I started researching this bassinet for my twins.. I honestly think they just updated the design, and there's really no difference other than that.. I think it was just to make it look nicer and more like a crib.
1060830
The names start to get a little fuzzy. I think it is the same. But, I would check the Arm's Reach website and see if it helps. It's not a great website, but it does list the full names of the different models.
1060831
This product has identical item number to the "Ideal co-sleeper" listed on their website, 9111-N
1200957
It looks like the same one we used which was probably a 2012 or 13. We loved it and the baby slept extremely well for about 5 1/2 months on it. We actually put it a top of our co-sleeper which was right next to my side of bed/mattress. Our little one was actually sleeping 8 plus hours straight starting at 2 weeks old. No joke. At first I thought something was wrong with him because he wasn't waking to eat but the Dr said, Let him sleep. If he's hungry or irritated, he will wake." So, who knows if it had anything to do with the lifenest but I will certainly be using it again if we have another. Good luck. It looks like the same one we used which was probably a 2012 or 13. We loved it and the baby slept extremely well for about 5 1/2 months on it. We actually put it a top of our co-sleeper which was right next to my side of bed/mattress. Our little one was actually sleeping 8 plus hours straight starting at 2 weeks old. No joke. At first I thought something was wrong with him because he wasn't waking to eat but the Dr said, Let him sleep. If he's hungry or irritated, he will wake." So, who knows if it had anything to do with the lifenest but I will certainly be using it again if we... » Read More It looks like the same one we used which was probably a 2012 or 13. We loved it and the baby slept extremely well for about 5 1/2 months on it. We actually put it a top of our co-sleeper which was right next to my side of bed/mattress. Our little one was actually sleeping 8 plus hours straight starting at 2 weeks old. No joke. At first I thought something was wrong with him because he wasn't waking to eat but the Dr said, Let him sleep. If he's hungry or irritated, he will wake." So, who knows if it had anything to do with the lifenest but I will certainly be using it again if we have another. Good luck. « Show Less
357040
It's smaller than a twin. It's more like a single person air mattress size. I can't speak for if there are different sizes but I will say it is more comfortable than it looks.
1536004
The deluxe model includes a fitted sleeping bag with removable pillow. The standard version is a cot with fitted sheet. I have two of the standards that I use with my children's favorite blankets.
2025720
I'm wondering the same thing because the measurements in the descriptions say they're the same size but the mattress cover is more expensive. I'm sitting here debating if I should save some money and get two box spring covers or just get one of each to be safe. Wish you could have gotten a real answer instead of a smartass one :/
229871
The Cambria Co-Sleeper requires a mini co-sleeper mattress. I made this mistake but luckily the Arm's Reach Original Co-Sleeper fits the Pack n play I have so I didn't return it. The websites are vague about the mattress size for the cambria. You have to go by the actual measurements given and compare to be absolutely sure you get what you want.Good luck.
836876
yes, this one is smaller which is what I wanted, the standard sized memory foam pillows are too large and firm for me. I prefer this type which is smaller and more flexible,
2010904
I went with the original because of the size and it can be used as a regular play yard when not in use as a sleeper so it was dual purpose. I didn't see any value in getting the mini. My baby was big and the mini wouldn't have been any bigger than a bassinet which we found to be too small.
1283609
I have the 12" for my bed and the 8" for guests. My mother is a side sleeper, and she slept great on this bed! Since it conforms to your body, it gives great support. You will not need two pillows!
1849548
I do not know what the difference is. The one I bought was a waste of money! I bought it to be used in our second home should we have more guests than beds, but it did not work, your body sinks down to the carpeted floor. I was very disappointed for I something similar at this home and it works wonderfully!
1337643
I do not actually own one. I just saw the advertisement and noticed that it was considerable longer and wider than the cot that I had previously purchased. It looked like a better choice than the one I purchased. Sorry I can't help.
1696588
I would say it is the same maybe they used different ppl to test it ive noticed thats different theres really not any dimensions to compare. but we do have this night therapy in a queen adn have had it for a couple weeks now and are very happy with it.. absolutely almost no motion transfer my hubby is 6'1 2230 lbs and he jumped into the bed and i pretty much did not even move. seems good supporting too.. as im a side sleeper and he is mostly a back sleeper... aside from the obvious 50 d0llar price differance betwene the 2 i cant say to much about the differences as there is no real technical info on the king with the sleep master at that size.. now comparing the queen sizes there is dimension differences so its quiet possibly that would apply to the king as well ...btu the night therapy in queen has done us good so i would def recommend it adn save ya self 50 bucks
1468083
I didn't use the mattress that came with a co-sleeper. It was super thin and had a horrible chemical smell. I ended up getting a different organic mattress on amazon and baby is still sleeping in the co-sleeper at 9 months. Also, FYI I discovered that the changing pad covers fit the mattress perfectly and I've been using them instead the sheets that came in with the co-sleeper. Hope it helps.
848726
The foam mattress will transfer less movement/motion. It is superior to isolating movement to a localized area than a conventional spring based bend. The plush Lucid model may be even less responsive to movement and localize motion into one specific area than a firmer Lucid model because it is more likely to change shape due to external forces.
229870
We bought the Arm's Reach ideal arc concepts co-sleeper which measures 39" x 25 x 32.5 and this mattress doesn't fit. The Cambrian actually measures 34" x 20" x 31" much smaller and sure it won't fit.I have been using it as a floor pad for my baby's play gym (bright starts).I guess the original co-sleeper is the appropriate size 40" x 28" x 31" for this mattress but it was long replaced by the Ideal Concepts.
704466
I've not gotten either yet, but in my research, these are the differences:Neither is designed for the playard position to be used as a primary sleeping area, but people have used both playards as a crib until the child was 18 months. Both can be wheeled around.Pack n play: lighter and therefore easier for travelingthe bassinet holds up to 15 poundsyou will have to get out of bed to use itcheaperCo-sleeper:portable, but heavier and not as easy to packthe bassinet holds up to 30 poundsdesigned so that you don't have to get out of bed to use the bassinetAnother discussion thread about this choice: http://www.windsorpeak.com/dcforum/DCForumID5/564.html I've not gotten either yet, but in my research, these are the differences:Neither is designed for the playard position to be used as a primary sleeping area, but people have used both playards as a crib until the child was 18 months. Both can be wheeled around.Pack n play: lighter and therefore easier for travelingthe bassinet holds up to 15 poundsyou will have to get out of bed to use itcheaperCo-sleeper:portable, but heavier and not as easy to packthe bassinet holds up to 30 poundsdesigned so that you don't have... » Read More I've not gotten either yet, but in my research, these are the differences:Neither is designed for the playard position to be used as a primary sleeping area, but people have used both playards as a crib until the child was 18 months. Both can be wheeled around.Pack n play: lighter and therefore easier for travelingthe bassinet holds up to 15 poundsyou will have to get out of bed to use itcheaperCo-sleeper:portable, but heavier and not as easy to packthe bassinet holds up to 30 poundsdesigned so that you don't have to get out of bed to use the bassinetAnother discussion thread about this choice: http://www.windsorpeak.com/dcforum/DCForumID5/564.html « Show Less
1748458
Dear Lana & Peter K, the dimensions listed are apparently those of the shipping box. The height of the baby in the co-sleeper is at 20 inches. The height of our mattress is 26 inches and it worked just fine. Yours should line up even better. By the way, we found the co-sleeper a very helpful product.