There are sizes listed below size 18 that have no numbers only-x-long, long, short, etc. does that mean they are larger than a size 18?
58106
All I see is a 22W larger than a size 18 and they are marked with the length! I CAN say these are the BEST pants I could have purchased for my safari. They are wonderful, the material is very nice and they do stretch! Good Luck
58107
No. The long, short are the length of the leg. The x, it seems, means nothing. I ordered a 10x and it fit just as any 10 size pant would fit me. It seems only the long, regular and short have impact on the actual length of the pant.
1593514
tough to answer - the sizes are based on weight, but are unisex. If you go to the companies web page, I believe there is a chart. `And, interestingly enough, they are more expensive there than at amazon (with prime account). Go Amazon!
446892
Your sizing on Amazon makes absolutely no sense in correlation to your sizing chart, each color has different sizes ranging from size 1 x-small to size 5 x-large??? Can you clarify please? It says it comes in five sizes, but if you go off the information on Amazon, there are like 25 sizes.
98749
The sizes are listed in the" about item" in the description. I don't have them in front of me so I can't tell you . But it is listed
134648
There is but it doesn't really apply to small, medium, large. It gives sizes translations ie: 28 waist is size 4... The best thing to do is to google sizes for these pants. Even on the Columbia site the reviews showed them running small. I'm a small medium and I'm talking jeans sizes... (6/28 is snug, 8/29 is loose) and they are snug. So if you're a large medium, go with the large.
496341
It seems like the sizes are listed in a format similar to that used for men's pants or jeans: instead of waist x length, it uses size x length. That's my guess...
1772303
These do come in kids sizing. This listing is actually for a girls and the girls sizing runs from 1.0 through 4.0. However, these are not available in a smaller size. Hopefully this helps!
559926
No, the 18 indicates the diameter. It's actually about 17" or so, and I don't know if there is a 30", but I know they have bigger ones. These are nice tops, and I use a lot of them.
2030098
I have no idea...I just bought reg and they fit. I didn't know there were XL.
918429
No, they don't. Plus they are pretty big for corresponding sizes. I ordered M, but they look like XL. So be careful and check size chart (if they have one).
2120039
The small, medium and large sizes do not indicate pt-sizes. But from personal experience large is about 24 pt.
319051
note that us size 8 here corresponds to size 39, while most brands 8 is 38.5. I find 38 size system true to size.
150373
Yes. According to their sizing chart, Underarmour rates their size-large sock as fitting both men 9-12.5 and women 11-13. http://www.underarmour.com/shop/us/en/size-charts
116381
The best I can tell from the sizing chart, L, L2 &L3 refer to Large Short, Large Regular & Large Long. I don't remember mine being listed this way. Mine says L/R on the tag.
1315371
I don't know, but I will say these are much smaller than what I was anticipating. I had searched for a size and Amazon linked me over to these (smaller ones) automatically and I didn't realize the difference. Just be sure this is what you really want.
1397643
You may be able to figure it out from the numbering system. I have always ordered a small, so 17005 is most likely small. It is frustrating when sizes are not stated. You can order online from Ace and pick up at a local store, and then you will know what size you are getting.
872509
Whenever I bought them, There was always some sort of chart showing you exactly what size range corresponds to which letter. I have never purchased them without finding that proportional scale. Either the store/distributor, or the manufacturer has to giver you that information.