Is this graph paper accurate? As in 1" =1"
1040448
I can't find my machinist's scale at the moment, but according to my son's plastic ruler, yes. They lined up almost perfectly over 10 1/2 inches.
1040449
Yes, it absolutely is. I am so afraid it won't be available one day that I keep 10 pads on hand. I design quilts/quilt patterns and need them for that purpose.
1040450
My calipers put it at less than 1/64 off, if any, in the direction of being too small. 1 paper inch is between 1 real inch and 63/64 real inches. Works for LSAT logic games, Dungeons & Dragons notes, and remedial Geometry, which is what I use it for, but I might not want to design NASA's next-gen orbiter on it.
1634898
Yes and yes. I use them in an RPG on 1-inch scale large graph paper to lay out encounters. I put little letters on the tops of the bases with Sharpie to differentiate them since they're all the same.
1955599
TAD = 1/4 tspDASH = 1/12 tsp <<<< not 1/8 >>>PINCH = 1/16 tspSMIDGEN = 1/32 tspDROP = 1/64 tsp
206695
yes it is. 0 is the gauge and 36 refers to the circle that the curves create.
642364
The answer is yes. It displays one, two or three decimals depending on the scale you are using. However, I am not sure about the exactness and precision of all measures. In the final balance, I would say is a very useful and effcient home tool for most needs. You really get what you pay for. Without any doubt a professional requires a more expensive meter.
1056083
Some digital personal scales costing 6 times as much advertise an accuracy of +- 1%. So if you weighted 150# the scale could read +-1.5 # or 3 pounds. Just because it has a resolution of .1# doesn't mean it' that accurates.
2052854
I get 1 9/16 by 1 3/8 by 3/16. That's as accurate as I can be with a ruler.
557180
Well it's only blue litmus paper, which will turn red in the presence of an acid, so no chart really necessary...maybe you are thinking of pH paper that changes several different colors?
701936
No it's correct, it's a three position: 1in1 1in2 and 2in2! Does that help?
1972603
Hi Guy, There's a dimension for each sheet (24x36"), that's accurate as far as I can tell. Then there's a product dimension (24x15") because the paper comes folded a bit. This doesn't affect the paper's usability.Another user David commented on the paper's thin-ness; it's pretty similar to the paper you find in a paperback novel. It can be a bit rough, so combine it with tissue paper when packing items that can get scratched easily; if you're packing large boxes (larger than 1 foot cube) and looking for spacing paper, you'll want rougher, thicker paper.
2018627
I tested the scale with 1 sheet of 8.5x11 of paper. It did not show any measurement. With two sheets it read .006kg and .2oz, with three sheets .0010kg and .3 oz, hope that helps. The scale will calibrate and zero itself every time you turn it on. I'm happy with my purchase. I measure letters and packages on it.
93320
Not sure. It reads on the wristband as one number and doesn't appear to give any detail as to regularity. On the graph print-out too it only identifies a number. It does show as a line graph with rate fluctuations over the day but I don't think it provides any additional detail.
1019796
Hi, James, Your question actually applies to graphing on paper, or graphing with any graphing calculator. You cannot graph the limit on an equation because there is no value to be graphed at that limit. For example, let's look at f(x) = 1 / x It's easy for x=1, x=2, x=3, etc. You would plot values for (1, 1); (2, 0.5); (3, 0.33...); (4, 0.25); (5, 0.2); etc. And, in fact, you can reverse each of these points: (0.5, 2); (0.33..., 3); (0.25, 4); (0.2, 5); etc. The problem is that as x approaches zero, f(x) gets larger and larger, but when we reach the limit of zero, there is no value to plot, because we cannot calculate 1 divided by zero. That value is infinity. And if we approach the limit from the OTHER direction, f(x) gets larger and larger on the negative side. So, we cannot graph the point (0, f(0)) in this specific example, because there is no value for that point. If you appreciate my answer, be sure to "Like" my answer. And if you want to follow up on this question, leave a comment to this question, and I should see it within a day. John
1611554
Each tick on the standard inch ruler is 1/16th so you can figure it out that way with a little math but it does not have a specific 1/16th side. They also have 1/8th so you could use it and double your number but that may not work for you.
576181
Here is some info from CNCZONE which I found when researching (The answer to your question is .1" per revolution): "BTW, the silver scale is calibrated with 100 dial markings per revolution (and the leadscrew appears to have 10 threads per inch, therefore each mark is apparently equivalent to .001"). However I'm not sure that I understand the reasoning behind (and usage of) the markings on the fixed scale - it doesn't seem to be acting as a vernier readout, but maybe I'm simply confused -"
1805048
Unfortunately the markings are in 1/2" increments, not 1/4". There is a ruler that shows smaller increments, down to 1/8", which helps. However I've gotten around this problem by notching a small mark with a knife in my most common 1/4" measurements (for instance 4 1/4") then rubbing in a little black paint. This has worked fine for me. I use this paper cutter extensively and think it is well worth the price. They should hire me as a spokesman :).
24697
No, it doesn't count: there is a little boss that each paper tube goes on that controls the length of that coin's stackup. When that coin reaches the top of its tube, that's your amount for that tube. It's pretty accurate.