what is the difference from ut strengh chews 60 count and the stat in the bottle90 count a lot cheaper?
1059668
The chews are for daily maintenance if you have a dog predisposed to have urinary tract problems like crystals in the urine. The UT STAT is not a daily maintenance but is for using for a few days to try to get rid of a suspected problem that appears to be cropping up. It is not a substitute for a vet visit but if I see behavior that suggests the beginning of an issue I'll hop right on it with a few days of UT STAT. If the dog doesn't change the behavior (such as licking himself a lot when they don't tend to do that, or paying a lot of attention to that part of his anatomy), then after several days of UT STAT I will take him to the vet for a workup. UT STAT is not meant to be used continuously. The chew can be used continuously safely. The chew will not stop something that is already in progress like UT STAT but is supposed to be good as a maintenance product. I tried the chews but had better success using UT STAT as needed or for three days once a month. My vet is aware of this and okay with it. She knows I am diligent. I record when I use it and also keep a daily schedule of food, medications, activities, etc. for each dog. so that anything out of the ordinary will have a history.
432180
You should check the milligrams of the active ingredients so that they are the same strengths. If they are the same strengths, then it would only be the number of tablets or chews for the different types prices.
1770189
I just researched the 60 count bottle, it says they have two pics, somewhere they show the new label...
2104261
Good question. The first time I got two 90s. The second order I got 180 bottle. It's the same horse pill either way.
162125
To start this one is a cream formula, which I think makes the price different, the other one seems to be like a spray. The amount is very different as well, 3 ounces is 85 grams and according to your question the other is 48 gr.
466992
I have ordered 3 times and the first 2 were 60 the last one was 75 but you know I thought the 60 worked better they are sealed and exp date on bottom of bottle last one was 6/15
382172
48 count is @ 67 cents per unit - MODERATE absorbency; 80 count is @ 44cents per unit - LIGHT absorbency. Price reflects difference to meet your specific need in absorption property.
428594
I have not seen a 60 count. The highest I have seen is 30. If there is a sixty dose pack, might have a higher cost because it is usually not sold that way.
1770190
I also believe that this is legitimate but have different labels for the 60 and for the 90 cap bottles. Am doing well with the probiotic.
392825
Having tried both in the last two months, I can confirm that there are differences. My kids like the taste of both equally, but the standard Animal Parade vitamins taste a little better to me. (But I prefer the Xylitol of the Gold, nutritionally.) More importantly, the Gold vitamins are definitely firmer, less "crumbly," and tougher to chew. I had no worries about my three-year-old's ability to chew the standard Animal Parade, but she definitely has trouble with the Gold version, so these won't work for her.
41804
Further to my last comments. There are different strength available. The one I originally received from my dentist was the overnight formula. The one I purchased afterwards was stronger, thus the two-hour directive.
346945
130mg is better. It has a seven year exp date instead of 5 year for the 65mg tablet. Plus, it's actually cheaper per tablet.
554445
Looks like the difference is more protein in the complete. I see this is for people to get some weight on them. I really like the milk chocolate one . It has the same vitamins as the complete. It is good for a lunch substitute when you can't or don't want a big meal.
1922214
I believe quality is about the same, but powder is cheaper than the pills. If there's 60 100mg pills, that is only 6 grams of powder and it'll probably run you $10-15, or for $12 or so for the liftmode powder you get 50 grams. Overall just a much better deal. I love theanine, great relaxer, sleep helper.
389455
I believe the major difference is the width of the 60 - it's wider to accomodate more line. Go to Penn's website and you can probably compare them side-by-side.
178861
The original extreme 60 is what I have used for years and it works great. More protein with less additives than the competing brands. As far as I can tell the ripped has a thermogenic in it and other traces of fat burners. As for taste it is pretty much the same, maybe very subtle differences.
946076
Not sure about the one with "new look" logo, but I noticed that the only difference between this one and the blue bottle that says "advanced triple strength" is that the Uniflex Proprietary Extract here is 216 mg while the blue one has 250 mg. The blue one sells foe 28.40 plus shipping, while the red bottle on this page costs 14.99!! I don't think this slight difference in a none essential ingredient justifies doubling the price! Check the blue triple strength bottle here: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00DNHE242?ie=UTF8&at=&force-full-site=1&ref_=aw_bottom_links. it has the ingredient label at the end of the page. Hope this helps you decide!