what the difference between MX680, MX680i, OMX680, and PMX680?
1066224
I have only the PMX680 which is a neckband version. 'i' designation meant to work well with apple products and with mike, OMX is ear clip style, MX is earbud style. They look similar to the 685 models shown on the Sennheiser site under sport.
261161
I'm currently using a Cannon MX892 with my Gateway ZX6980. The only thing I had to do to make this work, was I had to go on line to Cannon.com and download the Printer driver.Now my printer works great with this computer.
2257583
Sorry, this chip resetter will not work with the cartridges in the MX712. It is designed to work with 5 and 8 series cartridges while the MX712 uses 225 and 226 series cartridges.
2249054
Thanks, Michele. I'm surprised, too by your comments about the colours. After being advised that the cartridges for the MX860 were very expensive and that the MX850 had problems connecting wirelessly, I ended up buying an Epson TX800FW. The few photos I've printed look ok to me. (I'm not a pro). It's been great to have a fax. One if its drawbacks is only one full-sized paper tray. I've yet to fully test out the machine.
959161
they are both mono input only units. the MA 400 mixes two mono sources (one mic level and one line level) to a stereo headphone out. the MX400 mixes 4 mono line sources to a mono line out; i do suppose you could run the left/right sides of stereo output into two separate inputs and combine to the mono output. is that what you're asking?and the ma400 boosts the signal enough to push a pair of headphones- so the purposes of the two units are very different.
1615787
The mx1200xtx has a variable speed knob. If you will be making peanut butter or anything that is low moisture, you will want the model with the variable speed knob.
1118514
I'm a bit confused by this post. I just compared the costs of the MX850 ink to the MX860 ink (here on Amazon and on Canon's website) and I found the MX860 ink to actually be less expensive. The Pigment Black, Standard Black, and Color cartridges for the MX860 were $2-3 less expensive than the MX850 equivalents. Could this have been a recent change?Also, could you tell us where you found the volume measurements for the cartridges. I wasn't able to find those anywhere.
90228
I found the FX info in another manual - see p12/13 of http://www.behringer.com/assets/PMP1000_PMP4000_PMP6000_M_EN.pdf
1121978
The main differences I can see:M3D550KD:240 Hz5ms responseSmart dimming: yesSmooth motion: yesM3D550KDE:120 Hz6ms response timeSmart dimming: noSmooth motion: no
893129
I don't know to tell you the truth. But I popped it into mx860 and it works..
1871756
&gt;For some low end printers, it's almost cheaper to buy a new printer than to buy replacement cartridges. Exactly, I just bought the MX860 and will test it against HP C7280 (both brand new still in box). Problem is that I can't find third-party toner for the MX860. Those CLI-221 are availible only without chips and I am worried that to some design and patent scheme that will not change. I am guessing that replacing a full set of toner twice will be more than the initial printer cost. For HP I can find descent (according to some reviews) third-party toner. Yet I am guessing the MX860 is a better machine...I'll have some decisions to make.
1118511
TM said "The MX860 only has 2400 x 4800 dpi and the MX850 has 4800 x 9600 dpi"If you do get the MX850, try scanning at full resolution and report the result. In my experience a scan attempt at 4800 dpi will make an average systems crawl. That's a huge image, requires a good amount of ram, the swap will be terrible otherwise and is very slow. I can't imagine what a 9600 dpi scan will do.I would worry more about the scan quality rather than DPI, focusing on details and color reproduction. Unless you're a graphic/multimedia design I can't possibly see a use for a 9600dpi, but that's just my 5 cents. TM said "The MX860 only has 2400 x 4800 dpi and the MX850 has 4800 x 9600 dpi"If you do get the MX850, try scanning at full resolution and report the result. In my experience a scan attempt at 4800 dpi will make an average systems crawl. That's a huge image, requires a good amount of ram, the swap will be terrible otherwise and is very slow. I can't imagine what a 9600 dpi scan will do.I would worry more about the scan quality rather than DPI, focusing on details and color reproduction. Unless you're a graphic/multimedia design I can't possibly see a use... » Read More TM said "The MX860 only has 2400 x 4800 dpi and the MX850 has 4800 x 9600 dpi"If you do get the MX850, try scanning at full resolution and report the result. In my experience a scan attempt at 4800 dpi will make an average systems crawl. That's a huge image, requires a good amount of ram, the swap will be terrible otherwise and is very slow. I can't imagine what a 9600 dpi scan will do.I would worry more about the scan quality rather than DPI, focusing on details and color reproduction. Unless you're a graphic/multimedia design I can't possibly see a use for a 9600dpi, but that's just my 5 cents. « Show Less
1842587
SB6182 is a Docis 3.0 and it is a newer model. I would go with the 6182. Hope that helps
575315
Indeed I did not see any MX500 on Crucial's website. There is the M500, the M550, and the latest MX100. The are subtle differences between them, and even in the same model, for example, writing speeds vary according to capacity... With so many subtle "differences", it's hard to say which is best. There is also the matter of the price to take into account. I suggest you read this review by TechReport, which also has reviews for the other two SSDs. Loads of tech info to weave through.http://techreport.com/review/26532/crucial-mx100-solid-state-drive-reviewed
2008538
They are the same. The 3686 was gray and has been discontinued. The 3686e is the new dark blue one. It still has the same amazing power with the 12 amp motor.
1910320
In addition to not having a fax, the mp980 doesn't seem to have the ADF for scanning document batches.MX860 is a better small office/home office printer to do it all. The mp980 is more of a home multifunction.
959160
they are both mono input only units. the MA 400 mixes two mono sources (one mic level and one line level) to a stereo headphone out. the MX400 mixes 4 mono line sources to a mono line out; i do suppose you could run the left/right sides of stereo output into two separate inputs and combine to the mono output. is that what you're asking? and the ma400 boosts the signal enough to push a pair of headphones- so the purposes of the two units are very different.