Nikkor 18-70mm 1:3.5-4.5G ED and 70-300mm 1:4-5.6 G Is this Sigma APO Teleconverter compatable with the Nikkor 18-70mm 1:3.5-4.5G ED and the Nikkor 70-300mm 1:4-5.6G lenses? I'd love to be able to increase my zoom power on both of these lenses, since I can't afford a $1,000 lens. :P Nikkor 18-70mm 1:3.5-4.5G ED and 70-300mm 1:4-5.6 G Is this Sigma APO Teleconverter compatable with the Nikkor 18-70mm 1:3.5-4.5G ED and the Nikkor 70-300mm 1:4-5.6G lenses? I'd love to be... » Read More Nikkor 18-70mm 1:3.5-4.5G ED and 70-300mm 1:4-5.6 G Is this Sigma APO Teleconverter compatable with the Nikkor 18-70mm 1:3.5-4.5G ED and the Nikkor 70-300mm 1:4-5.6G lenses? I'd love to be able to increase my zoom power on both of these lenses, since I can't afford a $1,000 lens. :P « Show Less
1044470
I doubt that it would work with the 18-70, it's rear element recesses pretty far and might hit the TC, besides why would you want to add a teleconverter to a that lens.But yes this should work with you 70-300, but because it's an APO teleconverter, it's not compatible with the AF system on the 70-300, you would have to use the non-APO version to get it to work. Also it's best that you use a teleconvertor of the same brand as the lens (ie Sigma converter with a Sigma lens, and a Nikon converter with Nikon lens), it's a pain to carry, but thats the way that it works best.
57167
I just read a comparison review between the Sigma 1.4 TC and Nikon 1.4 TC, from a very reliable reviewer. According to his extensive tests, the Sigma TC only worked with Sigma lens on the Nikon, and the Nikon TC only worked with Nikon lenses on the Nikon. He strongly suggested matching the TC brand with the same brand of lens.
1044471
There are no Nikon teleconverters compatible with the Nikkor 70-300mm 4-5.6 lens. You have to use the Sigma, Kenko or Tamron 1.4x teleconverters.
103727
Rocky ... Good news! while I can't answer with certainty, the Sigma web site has a table for all their lenses including the 2X teleconverter and it's compatibility with your Sigma 70-300mm apo dg lens. I can also highly recommend calling and talking to a Sigma representative.
2029245
Hi Pablo, I have a similar camera (and lens set). I have the GF5 with the X series (compact) 14mm-42mm and I recently got the x series 45mm-175mm. After a ton of reading all the reviews and comments and factoring price and everything (for me) I decided this was the best 2nd lens for me. That said, it is no good UNLESS one is 20+ feet away from what you basically want to shoot. When I take a group shot I have to switch back. I will say the 45x175 is a superb lens, but if you were going to mount one and leave the other home, you would really want the 14-140 (IMO). When I chose the 45-175 I figured why get a lens that was already a range of one I had but in practical use I now see the 14mm-140mm There were a few other factors, one was the price was significantly higher (I got my 45-175 for one hundred ninety two using "like new" on warehouse deals) the other was I really wanted a "X" series lens and the 14-140 is a "G" series only. Two other factors were the 14-140 was almost 8 years older and twice as heavy. I have a GF5 and LOVE how with the 45-175 mounted I can hold it like a soda can in one hand when not using it. I am sure the 14-140 is a great lens, and with the GH2 being a much bigger and heavier camera, I am not sure the increase weight would be an issue. Next time I get another lens my quandary may be similar to your, but it would be the 100-300 vs the very useable 14-140. I already get "Wow" comments with the 45-175 mounted on my tiny red GF5 camera. I can only imagine the comments the humongous 100-300 (zoomed out) would get. I do like how the 45-175 it totally internal and am a tad fearful of the 'zooming/slide' tube feature of the 100-300. I know they have to do it, but it's a tad scary. Overall I really think if you are going to REPLACE (meaning sell or no longer have access the 14-42mm lens) you should opt for the 14-140. That way you ONLY change if you want CRAZY zoom potential! Take care!
1357470
I never owned 28-70 but been told that it's a great lens with excellent image quality. I have the 24-70 and it's my go-to lens for all purpose shooting on a full-frame body. Superb IQ at premium price but has no VR.I believe 28-70 is slightly heavier, shorter and fatter than 24-70; however, build quality of both 28-70 and 24-70 is excellent. Are you not satisfied with the IQ of 28-70? Do you need something wider than 28mm? Are you using DX or FX body? Like the last commenter, I too would miss 24mm wide angle if I had 28-70. If I had a 28-70, I would sell it and buy 24-70 Nikon, but that's me.http://betterfamilyphotos.blogspot.com/2012/04/nikon-28-70-28d-vs-nikon-24-70-28g.html I never owned 28-70 but been told that it's a great lens with excellent image quality. I have the 24-70 and it's my go-to lens for all purpose shooting on a full-frame body. Superb IQ at premium price but has no VR.I believe 28-70 is slightly heavier, shorter and fatter than 24-70; however, build quality of both 28-70 and 24-70 is excellent. Are you not satisfied with the IQ of 28-70? Do you need something wider than 28mm? Are you using DX or FX body? Like the last commenter, I too would miss 24mm wide angle if I had 28-70. If I had a 28-70, I would sell it and buy 24-70 Nikon, but... » Read More I never owned 28-70 but been told that it's a great lens with excellent image quality. I have the 24-70 and it's my go-to lens for all purpose shooting on a full-frame body. Superb IQ at premium price but has no VR.I believe 28-70 is slightly heavier, shorter and fatter than 24-70; however, build quality of both 28-70 and 24-70 is excellent. Are you not satisfied with the IQ of 28-70? Do you need something wider than 28mm? Are you using DX or FX body? Like the last commenter, I too would miss 24mm wide angle if I had 28-70. If I had a 28-70, I would sell it and buy 24-70 Nikon, but that's me.http://betterfamilyphotos.blogspot.com/2012/04/nikon-28-70-28d-vs-nikon-24-70-28g.html « Show Less
706525
Sorry, but it is not compatible with the lens. You generally need a 2.8 or larger (smaller number) aperature lens. You should go on the Nikon websiteand check the teleconverter compatibility chart before buying a teleconverter or lens to use with a teleconverter.
1932390
ShomonR, I do not know about with the 70D but yes with the 18-270 zoom lens. I've had no problems with it used on my 7D as far with the 18-270 lens.
1543697
Yes. I struggled with the decision to buy the 2.0 TC or the sigma 50 -500 lens to get more zoom as 200 didn't reach far enough for my needs. In the end I got the teleconverter as it was less money and mainly a way to avoid another heavy lens. It works out very well. loss of sharpness and some f/stops as others have described but you will hardly notice. faster glass and more sharpness costs thousands of dollars which i'm unwilling to spend. i'm pleased going this way.
1176976
I have a canon t3 rebel but do not have a 70- 300 lens .What i do have is a 18-55 mm canon that WILL NOT connect to the converter, also have a 35-80mm canon lens that will fit the converter. If your lens has a short mounting ring thst fits into your camera body your lens will fit the adapter. Adapter will not allow auto focus on any lens.
1927442
if you have the typical 18-55mm that comes with the camera I don´t think you loose quality and will gain significant range of use with the 18-200. I have used this lenses extensively with relevant endurance tests. It is a very resistant. Have not use the 70-300mm
537013
TVM,Thanks for the heads-up on the Sigma. A popular photo mag just this month had a review on a Sigma lens - 18mm/250mm. They gave it a big thumbs up so I'll keep checking up on Sigma for quality and suitability/cost-effectiveness for the T1i. I'll already start some reading up on the 150mm/500mm. BTW - that "500" # sounds juicy. Per Tech's comment (and I educated myself more on what he was talking about) what with a 1.4 or 1.6 mag ratio that 500mm max zoom should be more like in the 700's. I guess that means a quality tripod (read "triple digits") is in the cards too. TVM,Thanks for the heads-up on the Sigma. A popular photo mag just this month had a review on a Sigma lens - 18mm/250mm. They gave it a big thumbs up so I'll keep checking up on Sigma for quality and suitability/cost-effectiveness for the T1i. I'll already start some reading up on the 150mm/500mm. BTW - that "500" # sounds juicy. Per Tech's comment (and I educated myself more on what he was talking about) what with a 1.4 or 1.6 mag ratio that 500mm max zoom should be more like in the 700's. I guess that means a quality tripod (read "triple digits") is in the... » Read More TVM,Thanks for the heads-up on the Sigma. A popular photo mag just this month had a review on a Sigma lens - 18mm/250mm. They gave it a big thumbs up so I'll keep checking up on Sigma for quality and suitability/cost-effectiveness for the T1i. I'll already start some reading up on the 150mm/500mm. BTW - that "500" # sounds juicy. Per Tech's comment (and I educated myself more on what he was talking about) what with a 1.4 or 1.6 mag ratio that 500mm max zoom should be more like in the 700's. I guess that means a quality tripod (read "triple digits") is in the cards too. « Show Less
820537
Hi Enrique,I wish I had a clear cur answer. I use some new lenses and some 'E" series lenses made by Nikon. The adapters are different on each.The E series lenses were made in the early 1980's and are a GREAT value however their mounts are different than the 18-55. Sorry I cannot be of more help. Maybe go the B&H; photo and see if they have a close-up of your lens and compare that with the 18-55?Best,Haji Mahmood
1801002
I'm using it with my Nikor 1-300 and 18-200 lenses. Works like a charm. I'll likely sell my micro lense. Much better than teleconverters, as there is NO change to f stop.
1985600
I ordered Tamron 1.4x for my Nikon. I have not had any problems with the Teleconverter. But realize that I made sure it was for a Nikon not Canon.
1529155
Hi Penelope. I am a bird photographer. This converter will bring the image closer. However, I prefer the 2.2x lens which screws on top of the 75-300 lens because the clarity is superior and the focusing faster. You can call us anytime for this information or email us. Cheers
1524482
Teleconverters usually work better with faster glass but if you have lots of light should be no problem. Use a tripod as you take a 300 on a Cmos now your at 450 and add a 1.4 at 675
473926
I'm getting ready to order the 400mm. I already have the 70-200L 2.8 IS and if I wanted the extra reach with zoom, I could put my 1.4x teleconverter on it, making it a [roughly] 100-280 f4.0. I don't have the 100-400 to compare, but I'd guess the sharpness is about the same between the 100-400 and the 70-200 + 1.4x. I still wouldn't have the reach between 280-400 but I'd have the sharpness when I need it. I can always attempt to move my feet to frame a subject with a prime if I'm too close. Read the reviews and decide for yourself.
1566279
The 17-70 is a dx lens and will vignette on a full frame camera in fx mode. If your camera has a dx mode, you can use the lens but then the range will operate as it would on any crop sensor camera (a full frame equivalent of 26-105). So, since it is a dx lens, the short answer is no. You should think about the Nikon 24-120 f 4 if you like the range of the Sigma. 17 in fx terms is a wide angle so you will need a 14-24 or a 17-35 type lens to get the really wide angle of view.