Will the burner hold a can of soup? or are the supports too wide?
1067511
yes it will hold a can of soup,,not much room for error but they will sit on the supports,,
1067512
depends how wide is the can. However the quality of this stove is baas i no longer have because the opposite side of the knob burned out and almost caused a disaster. Buy the coleman one. i found a new one on EBay for 23 and change delivered.
1871918
The feet are an inch and a half. If your burner grills are shorter than that you should be fine.
6792
I did not measure this puppy, but I have a four burner BBQ with side burner and it is way big enough. Almost to big....
2161794
No, this meant to be used inside the canner to be able to fit a second row of jars. The temperature needed to make the canner come up to proper steam wouldn't be safe, because the rack does not fully touch the burner. There is a definite space between the rack and burner. I would suggest a coil electric burner, or a propane gas burner. A glass top or induction burner wouldn't be safe enough.
1650023
Should be able to hold trioxane stove and plenty of extra fuel. Holds an 8 oz can of gaz and a single burner pocket stove
1312729
Jazzer, you'll want to purchase the Esbit Ultralight Folding Stainless Steel Pot Stand that tightly holds the burner and allows pots to sit on top. I used mine on a multi-day backpacking trip and it worked quite well.
1073505
I think the seville classics line would be more sturdy. I use this to hold cans of food in my pantry, works well for that purpose. The one I bought can sit on your counter, and will expand to larger width. That's what I have my cast iron pans on, unexpanded.
210933
It should work fine, as long as the single burner stove is large enough to hold it.
1148222
I am sorry, but all I have used mine for is filling up my Mason jars with soup. It has a big wide mouth and fits on jars wonderfully.
746842
No, it won't hold 54. Notice in the picture that the columns are not equal size. You can assemble it how you want. My columns are equal width and it will hold 4 15.25 cans on each row for a total of 36. You can get 5 10.50 cans of soup on a row. You can pull out from any front row
790454
Most woks are very large and could easily tip over with such a small base. This stove was designed to be used with small utensils and not large. Also, the burner itself is not shaped to allow the base of the wok to fit down into it. Hope this will help you.
1764296
If you anchor it appropriately, absolutely. Mine has been holding the following for over a year without the any trouble (note: all steel is tri-ply, they are heavy pans): 8" and 12" cast iron skillets; 12" cast iron grill pan; 8" aluminum, fry pan; 8" & 10" steel fry pans; 3 qt steel saute; 1.5 qt steel saucepan; 3 , 6 & 16 qt steel stock pots, a griddle, steel steamer basket, aluminum steamer basket, a set of strainers/spatter screens, a 4lb bamboo cutting block, extra inserts from my 10 cup rice maker, an iron cookbook holder and a small roaster pan. My conservative guess would be that there's about 50lbs of stuff on it. It's hanging off heavy steel eye bolts that were piloted/drilled directly into a ceiling stud.
1302675
Yes! I am pretty sure that this can hold very large, or very heavy pots. It is VERY sturdy. I am confident that cookware size wouldn't be an issue with this awesome stove :)
1627275
Space would none a little tight. I have a direct hose feed, don't need a tank, but still find it a bit crowded for grill pans, skeet rods, etc.
807302
I am not familiar with such a canister but if you can envision the legs all folded to one side flat. The measurement is 5 3/4" at the widest point and 3" high for the burner height. They come in a black carry pouch. Hope the info helps. Dave
1304900
Yes: I believe it would support a griddle. I use it to hold very heavy metal roasting trays.
88883
If it is a 3-burner unit with shelves on each side, it will fit.Otherwise it will not fit correctly ( not for 2 or 4-burner models)