There are sizes listed below size 18 that have no numbers only-x-long, long, short, etc. does that mean they are larger than a size 18?
58106
All I see is a 22W larger than a size 18 and they are marked with the length! I CAN say these are the BEST pants I could have purchased for my safari. They are wonderful, the material is very nice and they do stretch! Good Luck
58107
No. The long, short are the length of the leg. The x, it seems, means nothing. I ordered a 10x and it fit just as any 10 size pant would fit me. It seems only the long, regular and short have impact on the actual length of the pant.
1307187
From me? No size. I am a buyer like you. I have repeatedly bought size XL and they work for mens feet sized up to 14. Beyond that, they would not stretch. For shoe of lesser size and width, the size XL still "works" with the cover fitting more loosely as the size and width decreases. I personally wear a size 10-1/2 to 11 W shoe and these covers fit me just fine. Hope this helps.
528994
Dani I am 5'6" and weigh 198. I bought the Xl Short Plus and I love them. As far as the shoe size I too wear and 8 1/2 but they told me all the shoe sizes are the same you just pull them up on your heel and put them in your boot. I was not real sure about that but it works fine. I think I ordered a size 9 boot. I have worn silk underwear under mine and I have worn light thermals with Columbia fishing pants over the thermals and have plenty of room in them. Hope this helps and if you do decide to order hope you enjoy them as much as I have. One other thing we called and ordered ours and the lady we talked to was very helpful. Dani I am 5'6" and weigh 198. I bought the Xl Short Plus and I love them. As far as the shoe size I too wear and 8 1/2 but they told me all the shoe sizes are the same you just pull them up on your heel and put them in your boot. I was not real sure about that but it works fine. I think I ordered a size 9 boot. I have worn silk underwear under mine and I have worn light thermals with Columbia fishing pants over the thermals and have plenty of room in them. Hope this helps and if you do decide to order hope you enjoy them as much as I have. One other thing we called and ordered ours and... » Read More Dani I am 5'6" and weigh 198. I bought the Xl Short Plus and I love them. As far as the shoe size I too wear and 8 1/2 but they told me all the shoe sizes are the same you just pull them up on your heel and put them in your boot. I was not real sure about that but it works fine. I think I ordered a size 9 boot. I have worn silk underwear under mine and I have worn light thermals with Columbia fishing pants over the thermals and have plenty of room in them. Hope this helps and if you do decide to order hope you enjoy them as much as I have. One other thing we called and ordered ours and the lady we talked to was very helpful. « Show Less
395687
So ... ??? What's the issue ? - if the size is usually not mentioned; expect it. And why didn't YOU post the actual size. Failed question.
198807
They are quite large. Mine have all been used, but I would guess they are somewhat larger than 18 x 12 inches. I plan on buying them again.
2204624
18 inches may be too big. Try the next size down. You can always return it. :)
1087316
They have a size #. It must be the same. I made the mistake or reordering the larger ones. Usuall the dipenser comes with several and states size #
26614
I googled under armour size charts. A med. is a 10-12, a large is 14-16 and extra large is 18-20. http://www.underarmour.com/shop/us/en/size-charts
454986
Length is confusing cause if you don't select a size the description of the shortest one they label as "Medium" is 66" (other bigger sizes are "Regular" & "Large"). When you try to select size there is no "Medium" choice in drop down menu and the smallest size is "small" and the length says 47". Can anyone clarify or is this a mistake in the listing?
34144
That's correct. I believe 9 to 11.5 is considered "Large". With other brands you might consider going a size down to ensure a snug fit, but my experience has been that you don't need to do that with these socks. They fit pretty snug by themselves.
1696964
They are 12" wide ... their depth? Hmmm. I know they accommodate legal size sheets (14" long") but I don't know about 18". If they specify that in the ads, fine.
1219914
When I ordered these, there was not a choice for regular or oversized. I looked at mine and there is no label that indicates a size. So I don't think I can be of any assistance. I kind of assume mine are regular...they are not huge. Both my husband and I have used these and really like the mitts.
411031
The sizes are marked on the packaging. When I bought them I was given a code on the web site, a, b, c, etc., that corresponded to specific sizes. And by the way, I never go anyplace without them -- they really work. After wearing them for several years, I have a more pronounced arch. I theorize they are similar to bracers in that you should plan to wear them, pretty much, indefinitely. I never get any "stitch" in my arch when I run since I began wearing them.
1634553
I have a bichon and I ordered the xsmall like I always do and found that the foot part with the suede was much larger than the original ones I ordered. So I ordered the xxsmall with the suede part length measuring less than 2.75". I had some xxxsmall and the suede part measures 1.75" and those worked also. I haven't received the xxsmall yet. Hope this helps!
1212223
I'd like to know the answer to that too. I decided to try the choose-a-size but they are not equal to these. Are you listening Amazon? We'd all like to know.
918429
No, they don't. Plus they are pretty big for corresponding sizes. I ordered M, but they look like XL. So be careful and check size chart (if they have one).
1484590
As I recall 8 1/2 is size large. So I think there X-large would be for size 9 or larger. Being an 8 1/2 I ordered medium & they were way too tight.