As a travel lens: (hopefully this makes sense) has anybody used this for travel photography and would recommend it?
1037323
I'm not sure if I understand your concern of DOF issue with 1.8, but you can always change your aperture to 8~9 and it will show details of your back-ground. But If I were you I would take a 18-200mm instead. covering wide to fairly good zoom unless you are planning to do dark inside building pics. That's just my 2 cents.
516203
Hi,Is this a recommended lens for landscapes? is it a wide-angle lens?Thanks for your comments.
2054215
The best way to answer your question is to ask what you're using it for. If you are using it for portraits of family members, I prefer this over the 50mm. However, if you are looking for point and shoot lenses, this is not the one for you.
305772
The Image Quality of this lens is phenomenal. My Key Points that makes this lens Better than the 28-300:-Razor Sharp-Compact/light weight-1.8/f aperture for indoor photography-Having it a prime isn't as versatile, but creates a creative atmosphere for you to be challenged. -Good for Group shots, as well as portraits-Did I mention it has a GOLD RING on it? :D-Little distortion, but what do you expect from anything under 35mm-It is my to-go travel lens because I am most likely going to take scenic pictures and not birds-Shallow depth of field and the bokeh is awesome! with little natural Vignetting, I think it is a bit pleasing. The Image Quality of this lens is phenomenal. My Key Points that makes this lens Better than the 28-300:-Razor Sharp-Compact/light weight-1.8/f aperture for indoor photography-Having it a prime isn't as versatile, but creates a creative atmosphere for you to be challenged. -Good for Group shots, as well as portraits-Did I mention it has a GOLD RING on it? :D-Little distortion, but what do you expect from anything under 35mm-It is my to-go travel lens because I am most likely going to take scenic pictures and not birds-Shallow depth of... » Read More The Image Quality of this lens is phenomenal. My Key Points that makes this lens Better than the 28-300:-Razor Sharp-Compact/light weight-1.8/f aperture for indoor photography-Having it a prime isn't as versatile, but creates a creative atmosphere for you to be challenged. -Good for Group shots, as well as portraits-Did I mention it has a GOLD RING on it? :D-Little distortion, but what do you expect from anything under 35mm-It is my to-go travel lens because I am most likely going to take scenic pictures and not birds-Shallow depth of field and the bokeh is awesome! with little natural Vignetting, I think it is a bit pleasing. « Show Less
1402684
It's a great lens for portraits. I use it all the time! If I schedule portrait sessions -it's pretty much the only lens that stays on my camera. (I use the Nikon D600.)
858189
Hi, thanks question. I think this lens is good for portraits. My recommendation is AF-S 50mm F1.8G, AF-S 35mm F1.8G. If certain distance is short focus , would be good if necessary zoom can afford. Thanks in advance.
1173524
I've owned both, heres my opinion: the 24-105mm is best for a travel lens when you dont wanna be annoyed by changing lenses. The 24mm f/2.8 is more if you want the best sharpness and contrast with less destortion. It is in the pro league of prime lenses. The zoom lens is just a good but not great all arounder that does a lot though.
1429330
I think it would work great for that. The optics are amazing...I took it on a safari and got some amazing photos. The only concern I could potentially see you having is the stop if you are shooting indoors. They make one that opens up further, however it is nearly double the price. I don't typically shoot low light, so I can't give you any advice here. I found it to be a pretty incredible lens.
1250350
From what I've read it is good for portraits but I haven't done any portraits with this lens yet but plan on trying it out for portrait shots. I took it to Six Flags over Georgia recently and took videos and stills of action shots. Download the one still image and two video clips here: http://davidmassey.us/Sony55-200mm/The still shot was taken while I was riding the train in the opposite direction of the roller coaster you see. The photo is blurry due to the bumpy train ride and fast motion of the roller coaster. There are better (and more expensive) lenses make for fast-action scenes.I have the Sony A65V camera which I used with this lens. From what I've read it is good for portraits but I haven't done any portraits with this lens yet but plan on trying it out for portrait shots. I took it to Six Flags over Georgia recently and took videos and stills of action shots. Download the one still image and two video clips here: http://davidmassey.us/Sony55-200mm/The still shot was taken while I was riding the train in the opposite direction of the roller coaster you see. The photo is blurry due to the bumpy train ride and fast motion of the roller coaster. There are better (and more expensive) lenses make for fast-action... » Read More From what I've read it is good for portraits but I haven't done any portraits with this lens yet but plan on trying it out for portrait shots. I took it to Six Flags over Georgia recently and took videos and stills of action shots. Download the one still image and two video clips here: http://davidmassey.us/Sony55-200mm/The still shot was taken while I was riding the train in the opposite direction of the roller coaster you see. The photo is blurry due to the bumpy train ride and fast motion of the roller coaster. There are better (and more expensive) lenses make for fast-action scenes.I have the Sony A65V camera which I used with this lens. « Show Less
1247238
Yes, I would definitely recommend this lens. I have all the high end lens and shoot wedding photography. But this is still one of my favorite lens. So sharp and clean and great boca.
357724
To answer your question I think this is an excellent Lens and it would work really good as a general/every day walk around lens.
2058088
It is a lovely lens, but I cannot see it (or any lens) doing really well with low light and fast action. I use it for landscape photography, where things kindly hold still.
1239591
Yes. This is my 2nd 18-105 mm lens and I use it for 90% of my photography. I find it fits my needs from family, to nature, to action shots; and I have taken it to Disney.
1241574
I do not if this will help you. I use it for portraits, sports and landscapes. I did not have any problems with it. I use it sometimes with my outside toddler portraits. It is not my main lens for portraits. I usually use my 50mm or 28-135mm.
1129931
Yes, I bought it especially for my 70d and very happy with the lens and the pictures I have taken. It was the only lens I took on a 2 week trip to Europe and was able to capture great pictures.
1144512
The merit of this tripot is its extreme portability, whether in a medium size carry-on or backpack. Based on what I could find out about the weight of your system, which seems to be similar to mine: Lumix GH1+ up to 100-300mm lens, this tripod will work well on the road. However, for more adventurous photo projects, such over rugged terrain or under severe windy conditions, your applications will be rather limited.ps: I am using a Vanguard S50 ball head. The one came with the tripot will not hold my system steady, period.
354390
For me - I liked the smaller size and the faster general shutter speed in lower light situations. it works very well for a travel all purpose lens - great with landscapes.