I have (and like) the Casio Men's SGW300HB-3AVCF...any thoughts on how this watch compares?
1070202
I cannot even set it. The instructions are too complicated so it is totally worthless to me.
1070203
Other than the color and a different type band, the only thing I notice is the led screen layout is a little different but still seems to have the same functions. Mine has a black rubber band.
1070204
I think there's some futures not present on 300 model, but for sure, you can see on the Casio's Web page.
1877937
Hey, I looked up the specs for the Cartier MC Tank watch and in my opinion you have nothing to worry about. Now you may have some issues winding two big watches similar to Cartier MC Tank at the same time
1303549
It's cheaper since it's the latest offering from Casio and they're trying to encourage current owners to update and prospective buyers to get the model that looks more "current".In some Asian countries you can still find the FX-991MS selling for $30 USD, but any newer models are around the $20 mark. In case you were wondering, the natural textbook display can be turned off and the calculator operates exactly like the FX-991MS. I use all of my Casio units in non-textbook mode for speedy entry.
1167682
I don't use any kind of case as the whole idea behind the Casio G'zOne is it's ruggedness. I beat my phone up pretty hard & it holds up. Sorry I couldn't be any help
451743
Get the Nikon, I just got this Casio not too long ago, and the only thing I use it for, after many testings, is the slow motion video feature. In terms of shooting HD video clips, the Nikon does this good, the Casio seems a bit noisy in low light situation. However, when shooting stills, sure the Casio offers 40fps so you don't miss the best shot when an action takes place, but then it must be well lit, under sun light. Then you get a pretty good chance to have the best shot recorded. However, in terms of picture quality, it is very clear and obvious that the Nikon wins, big time! I set the Casio to shoot outdoor, under well lit lighting condition, at ISO 100, with the quality setting set to FINE in JPG at 9.1 megapixel, everything is set to the max, the stills would still come out not as sharp, not as detailed, and still unbelievably noisy, it is SO much noisier than the Nikon, in fact, it is the noisiest camera that I'd used so far. The Casio also suffers very poor purple fringing, and it is so bad that even a cheap point-shoot Canon can beat it. I just cannot use the Casio for pictures, period. But to use it for shooting slow-motion video and occasional HD clips, its the perfect camera for it. If you are into shooting more still photos, get the Nikon. If you don't care about shooting stills much but just want to check out the slow-motion video features that the Casio offers, then you may find yourself falling in love with it.
1820287
I agree with Ian-Paul. Before buying this HRM i checked it out at Sigma`s homepage. There you can see all the models and their options. I am very sattisfied with this model. At first it seemed a little too big for me, but I got used to it
1736407
Ordered the watch for grandson who lives in CA...we live in OR. I've never seen the watch but he enjoys it. I know how important "swingy" things are to boys. Sorry I couldn't be of more help. Gary
540834
You need to be more specific with your questions. Your best bet is to find and download the user's manual. It will give you specific instructions. However, I wouldn't recommend this watch - at least not based on my experience. Its performance (as a heart monitor) is inconsistent - sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't.
658789
I prefer the SP280. I did own the PX350 but returned it for the following reasons: Although the key action was nice; some of the keys were unevenly spaced and the sound of the speakers was not loud enough and not as loud as my other Casio the PX-130. The SP280 has a natural sounding piano sample and excellent speakers. The action is not as good as the PX350 to be honest but it sounds better and more realistic.
1944205
Both are fine calculators with similar price points and similar features. The difference is the Casio has the added touchscreen, which I personally have found very useful. I am glad I went with this and not the TiN CAS.
1391425
Sorry I can't tell you but if you look at the Casio site and find the replacement part number and see if it is the same.
492010
Sure. I've had female clients use the mens watch and vise versa. It's for fitness, so it shouldn't be a problem. The problem with this watch (sport line) is it can beeps sporadically and sometimes doesn't give accurate bpm. Anytime the watch gets wet; particularly from sweating, it'll just beep every 30 secs. I've purchased a bunch of these for my fitness clients and it has happened to everyone of them. So, be careful when purchasing. If that beep doesn't bother you, then go for it.
143842
I have black with green numbers, its just hard to see unless theres good light. you can use the the watches light.it is a neat watch.
430604
Yes, Casio had it right with that tiny TV. However, what I'm getting is that none of these portables are working well with digital. The signal keeps getting lost. I live far from the tower so haven't much hope that anything will work like the analogue casio. Bummer!
2284825
Not at all! It feels like a regular watch with no irritation or any other issues. I really like it.
138212
I have no idea. Each new model has better and better flashes. I have used Casio for years and I think they have the best dollar to performance ratio.
92545
Well, since I only purchased the green watch, I can't really speak to the size of the black one. On the watch I got, the band was refreshingly long. With most watches I find I'm using the last hole on the band (maximum length), but with this watch, I'm fastening through the fourth or fifth hole. I hesitate to speculate about what the band length of the black watch is.