Has anyone owned both the X-T1 and X100s? How does focus speed compare?
1054608
I've not owned the x-100 but the x-t1 is supposed to be lots faster ....Look in dpreview.com
1057267
Yeah, I also came across X10 in my research, seems like a good option. I love the retro design and the manual controls. X100 is a bit too pricy in my opinion.
1394320
While the TCL-100X will get you improved framing for portaits. It won't be the same as a X-T1 with this lens though. Through a quirk in optics, the adaptor won't gain any extra narrowing in the depth of field beyond what the 35mm equivalent gets you already on the X100S. So you'll have the depth of field of a 23mm f/2 on a APS-C frame camera with a field of view of a 50mm. The 56mm f/1.2 will result in closer to a 90mm full frame crop on an X-T1 giving much different framing than the tele adaptor on the X100S and less depth of field. The tele would be much closer to the Fuji XF 35mm f/1.4 on the X-T1 in terms of framing. While the TCL-100X will get you improved framing for portaits. It won't be the same as a X-T1 with this lens though. Through a quirk in optics, the adaptor won't gain any extra narrowing in the depth of field beyond what the 35mm equivalent gets you already on the X100S. So you'll have the depth of field of a 23mm f/2 on a APS-C frame camera with a field of view of a 50mm. The 56mm f/1.2 will result in closer to a 90mm full frame crop on an X-T1 giving much different framing than the tele adaptor on the X100S and less depth of field. The tele would be much closer to the Fuji XF 35mm f/1.4... » Read More While the TCL-100X will get you improved framing for portaits. It won't be the same as a X-T1 with this lens though. Through a quirk in optics, the adaptor won't gain any extra narrowing in the depth of field beyond what the 35mm equivalent gets you already on the X100S. So you'll have the depth of field of a 23mm f/2 on a APS-C frame camera with a field of view of a 50mm. The 56mm f/1.2 will result in closer to a 90mm full frame crop on an X-T1 giving much different framing than the tele adaptor on the X100S and less depth of field. The tele would be much closer to the Fuji XF 35mm f/1.4 on the X-T1 in terms of framing. « Show Less
1624330
I have both and I wouldn't change the D600 for the X-T1 for serious, payed or critical work. Although it's my opinion for the photography I do... maybe for you is different. I would suggest renting one for a week or so, try it extensively and come to a decision. Cheers.
923250
I have the 45-175 and I'm pretty happy with it. It is very quick to focus and has power zoom; zooming can be slowed down, but not as much I would like. I like to contrast of the images it produces. And it is quiet enough.
1613732
I have the X100S,so, I don't know, but isn't the X100 the previous model of the X100S? Check that.
390677
I'm sorry I am unable to answer the question. I don't know anything about X-T1.
1583707
Definitely. You answered your own question by referring to the sensor size. The quality of the image with a 1" sensor versus the one in the QX10 is the difference between a serious photographer and a point-and-shooter. The QX10 is basically comparable to a point and shoot camera with a great 10x zoom. The QX100 is comparable to Sony's own RX100, a $750 camera that has received critical acclaim for its image quality. I guess to be fair, it depends upon your intentions. If you want a nice zoom lens that provides better image quality than the smartphone's camera (and is primarily going to be used to share photos on the web and via Facebook), the QX10 is great. If you want to achieve the highest possible quality (large print quality), then the QX100 is for you.
1199011
My opinion goes against some other comments. I use a Sigma 150-500 and Sigma 70-300 (the newer version) on my D7100, shooting motorsports, where the speeds reached are quite a bit higher than kids playing football, and the focusing speed is very good, especially on the 120-300. I've never lost a shot due to slow focus, even when panning as the cars go by at 150mph+. I've used the 20-700 Sigma, and it's even a bit faster.
2109068
I prefer my XE-2 although I also own a Nikon D610 with 28-300 mm. The Fuji focuses faster, sharper better color.
1274515
I sold my canon 7d and two very good canon lenses so I could buy the X-T1 - that was 3 months ago. In that time I have used it nearly every day, including a 3 week hiking trip in Utah. I haven't regretted that decision for one second. The xt1 has better image quality, is a joy to use and half the weight of the canon. I often left the canon in the car when I went hiking because of its weight and size. The xt1 by comparison is a constant hiking companion. Make the move you won't regret it.
1771703
I don't know if worth the difference, but I have the QX100 and the sensor quality is amazing. I decided for QX100 just because the sensor size and quality.
1586489
The X-E1 has interchangeable lenses and an eye level electronic view finder in addition to the lcd screen on the back, really important when viewing the scene in bright sunlight. The XM-1 lacks this feature. The X-100s has an optical as well as an electronic view finder, but you can only use the lens that comes with the camera. The X-E1 is not a good point and shoot camera.
1309663
the T 5 i has better speed when using the movie function and it has more monitoring capabilities for better viewing of shoot then older versions! Lenses are different as well!
1358219
I have been going back and forth with the same question. I have read all the reviews and opinions I can find on both. After going to the local store and playing with the TZ5 and the 100 (since the 110 is not out yet) I did not find many major difference from the point of view of a novice user. The two main difference I noted were 1) the TZ5 is more compact and I really liked that, however 2) when I zoomed in with the canon on a small sign the image was crystal clear, when I did the same with the TZ% the same sign was very blurry, not even close to readable. This decided it for me. I went with canon. I have been going back and forth with the same question. I have read all the reviews and opinions I can find on both. After going to the local store and playing with the TZ5 and the 100 (since the 110 is not out yet) I did not find many major difference from the point of view of a novice user. The two main difference I noted were 1) the TZ5 is more compact and I really liked that, however 2) when I zoomed in with the canon on a small sign the image was crystal clear, when I did the same with the TZ% the same sign was very blurry, not even close to readable. This decided it for me. I went... » Read More I have been going back and forth with the same question. I have read all the reviews and opinions I can find on both. After going to the local store and playing with the TZ5 and the 100 (since the 110 is not out yet) I did not find many major difference from the point of view of a novice user. The two main difference I noted were 1) the TZ5 is more compact and I really liked that, however 2) when I zoomed in with the canon on a small sign the image was crystal clear, when I did the same with the TZ% the same sign was very blurry, not even close to readable. This decided it for me. I went with canon. « Show Less
1127915
The X100 and X100S, and now X100T, are all fixed-lens cameras. So the question is, will it fit all the different lenses for the XPro1. I do not know in fact, but it seems very doubtful. Most, if not all, the lenses probably come with a hood of their own anyway. I have this hood and use it on my X100S and it is a great hood.
69007
I personally am getting the T1i for my first DSLR. I have a film SLR and an advanced P&S; type camera that I use now. I consider myself and advanced amateur and understand how to manipulate the manual settings. The XSi and the T1i are not vastly different as far as how the menu's or controls are set up. The T1i is more advanced as far as sensor, megapixels, LCD screen resolution, and the fact that it can do video if you want it to. For the extra money, I want the T1i's extra features.