is 1.0 or 2.0 work better?? i.e. makes lungs work harder ?
1067062
Well, I've not tried the 2.0, but I did some research on YouTube which helped me make up my mind. Basically, I bought the 1.0 because it's design seems to be more legit. Having experience with chem gear, I figured the 1.0 would seal better to my face. Reviews on the 2.0 revealed that it loops around the ears... I didn't think that was a sound design when running. The 1.0 does what it supposed to do, if what you desire is making your lungs work harder. It's got three setting attachments that will test your lung capacity and drive you delirious with enough effort. I almost passed out while sprinting with it when I first received it. I hope this helps. Happy to answer any other questions. Well, I've not tried the 2.0, but I did some research on YouTube which helped me make up my mind. Basically, I bought the 1.0 because it's design seems to be more legit. Having experience with chem gear, I figured the 1.0 would seal better to my face. Reviews on the 2.0 revealed that it loops around the ears... I didn't think that was a sound design when running. The 1.0 does what it supposed to do, if what you desire is making your lungs work harder. It's got three setting attachments that will test your lung capacity and drive you delirious with enough effort. I almost passed out while... » Read More Well, I've not tried the 2.0, but I did some research on YouTube which helped me make up my mind. Basically, I bought the 1.0 because it's design seems to be more legit. Having experience with chem gear, I figured the 1.0 would seal better to my face. Reviews on the 2.0 revealed that it loops around the ears... I didn't think that was a sound design when running. The 1.0 does what it supposed to do, if what you desire is making your lungs work harder. It's got three setting attachments that will test your lung capacity and drive you delirious with enough effort. I almost passed out while sprinting with it when I first received it. I hope this helps. Happy to answer any other questions. « Show Less
1067063
I am never owned the 2.0 but I known those who have, and they all preferred mine, which was the 1.0. Hope this helps.
1067064
Yes it does, worth the money. And you can switch the valves in case its too difficult.
1626366
Yes they do work with the raw 1.25. I dont use papers but my brother does, and he says the organic are sightly less harsh on the lungs.
2075410
I have found that the 3m ones seem to last longer and provide more filter action, even though they are rated the same. I get the 3m ones, because I deal with spray paint in my art and it's very bad if you inhale it. The difference is not big between these two, but safety is important.
41418
That is a very broad question. Everyone has different sensitivity. I can personally say I bought the .5 instead of 1.0 because I read it is best to work up to 1.0 because it is powerful. If you don't have sensitive skin then try 1.0. I did what was best for me when I purchased it. When I run out of .5 May up it to 1.0.
889618
bro, I have no clue. :( it's pretty small. I mean if anything just meet in the middle and make 2.0?
1240735
It's both or either. There is a an option to select the .5 or the 2.0, which you must choose before you can add it to your cart.
85293
2.2 GPM with both on. with one on I would speculate it is more than 1.1 as it increases the water output of the single device. I would guess maybe between 1.4 and 1.7 with just 1 on.
524765
I don't know what a 2.0 is either but I have an individual Keurig and they work fine. My daughter has a big Keurig and works in it so
1501770
single stage vs 2 stage comes down to efficiency. 2 stage will draw down faster. I do auto a/c work using this pump; if you have a tight system it draws down plenty fast enough.
42755
not completely true, i have 1.1 usb and mine works fine, but 1.0 usb i dunno. everytime i plug it in it tells me "the device can perform faster" with a usb 2.0....
11579
I've never done a 0.7, but it should. It has spaces as follows; 0.1-0.5, 0.5-1.0, 1.0-2.0 and 2.2
989414
I cannot give you a definitive answer, but I can tell you I have been trying to use a 4 w/o success. I happened upon this discussion while researching 2.0' s. It seems to be all that works.
1496413
It's really up you what you like better. I bought a double breast pump thinking that at work every day, this would be faster. The one I bought had attachments to turn it into a hand pump in case of no electricity. I tried both ways and decided that I like the hand pump (single breast) better and I can use the other hand to continue working. The single pumps are usually cheaper but if this isn't an issue and getting it done faster is more appealing, then buy a double. This is the one I bought. Philips Avent ISIS iQ Duo Twin Electric Breast Pump, BPA Free - White
1294862
The only difference between version 1 & 2 is the battery style. Version 1 has a slide in type battery that is kind of hard to insert, and version 2 has a type that pretty much looks the same, except there is a plug-in on the front so it's easier to insert. I love these little heli's, they are tough and would be great for stepping up from a co-axle, or as your first time. So if you plan on buying one get version 2, it's just easier to deal with the batteries.
484656
1.5 is fine and 2.0 is course. These did not match my trucks existing lugnuts so I just got new lugnuts
412284
I don't think it makes a difference honestly. But if the filter isn't snug inside, I wouldn't get it again. I am using a carbon filter right now that is not True Air, fits good and works fine.
1155798
I don't realize. What I can comment is better having auto start time than auto time off. By the time we are at home the air is clean. The cons of boost air is the particle flow the air travel in high speed like a jet and it can cause entering the lung. I am still coughing. Thanks.