I wonder why there seems to be the same monitor being sold by another company on ebay but for almost $100 cheaper. What is the difference?
1112179
Hi Thank you for your interest. The difference is pixel policy. Please check the pixel policy of each description. This monitor is Perfect Pixel(0 defective pixel) monitor. Thank you.
1112180
What I understand, as learned from other tech forums and user feedback, that there are two (or more) levels of quality control. The more carefully tested parts have a much higher odds of first power-on function, and fewer bad pixels, etc. With the lower tier Q.C. you save some money, but runner a higher risk of a faulty device.
1112181
HiThank you for your interest.The difference is pixel policy.Please check the pixel policy of each description.This monitor is Perfect Pixel(0 defective pixel) monitor.Thank you.
1112182
I am not entirely sure about the exact reasons, but my guess is that the panel used is not the A+ perfect pixel quality used by Qnix and maybe the warranty isn't as good. The other thing might be the company you send the item back to might be the Korean company itself and you would have you pay the full shipping price to send it back for repair or replacement
1112183
I dont know the exact reason why it is cheaper on ebay, but i can tell you the reason why they are so cheap. This products are from Korea that has not meet "quality standards" so cannot be sold so they are being sold here in the US (similar like how things are sold in the US as refurnished products). That being said they are not bad monitors. They "might" have dead pixels but that is about it. But this is a "perfect pixel" so they are guaranteeing a limit on the dead pixels while the ebay one might not, which is why there might be is a $100 difference.
1300230
3rd party re-sellers are once again price gouging on the sales price for this monitor. This really is an awesome monitor, but is NOT worth paying 35% over the MSRP. Just have patience and wait for Amazon to get them back in stock. The second order will definitely have a higher number since Amazon is now aware this is a high demand product :-)
1981325
As a mater of fact, I talked to the company today. You can find the comparison on the Sharp sight but there is more to it. First the Dynamic contrast is 15000:1 for the 92 and 10000:1 for the 64, making the 92 much better. The 92 came out Feb 07 while the 64 came out Aug 07. Sure the 64 is newer, but the 92 has the contrast. The 92 has another level of backlight (the ambilight function) kind of like a table light with a pull cord, full once more and get a brighter light. You get the picture. 92 has detachable speakers 64 does not. DVI-I conection (for a computer) on the 92 where the 64 has RGB. and lastly, all connections for the 92 are in back while 64 has some on the side. As I said, there is a comparison chart found on the Sharp site. I'll be buying the 92, sure it's about $700 more but it's worth it!
547857
and yet as of 12/22/2014 this hasn't been corrected. The closest one is the LG 29UM95, which apparently isn't even sold in the USA. The picture description is showing TWO different LG monitors.
721869
I bought a dell monitor at Amazon for 149.95 and it came without the base and they did nothing to help make it right.Nothing but the run around.I recomend not doing business with them.
2007454
The 3rd party imported version of this monitor has June 11th listed as the release date. See http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00IJUFGDE/ref=s9_simh_gw_p147_s1_d0_i2?pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf;_rd_s=center-2&pf;_rd_r=02ZDXDK09SAVBK94Q58Q&pf;_rd_t=101&pf;_rd_p=1688200382&pf;_rd_i=507846Edit: Newegg got a few in stock on the 11th, but they were out by the end of the day. So at least some shipments are getting through.
131418
Yes it is. A person who knows alot about computers/monitors told me to get it, as I don't know much. He said it was a great monitor. It's actually better than what he said. Wish I bought this monitor a long time ago. Well worth the price and no nonsense, e.g. installing programs, drivers etc. Just plug it in and go.
609461
Why on Earth would you subject yourself to an expensive and clunky dual-DVI converter instead of just using a Displayport cable??? I see this advice all the time and it dismays me.Oh, wait. It looks like this turkey actually doesn't have a DP input?? The mind boggles. That alone disqualifies it for me, a few more bucks gets a 2713HM.
1107803
Personally I would not buy it. When I received mine it did not work, I had to send it back to them at my cost about $25.00 with insurance and then about 2 weeks later I got my Monitor. If I wanted a refurbished one I could have bought it for less money and got the same thing.
1036705
I believe that one of the reasons this monitor is lower in price is that it badly needs calibration upon arrival. I spent about an hour and a half calibrating it to match what you are asking. So, the answer is yes, but not without some effort in calibration. Some of the calibration I was able to do with the monitor itself, but the rest I had to do with my video card to compensate. After being calibrated, however, it has performed perfectly.
923265
I don't see much difference, to be perfectly honest. I can say that the Phillips monitor has been an absolute glorious experience with a picture that is better than most televisions that I've seen. It works perfectly for large computer projects and for watching shows/movies even from a good ten feet away.
1708417
I don't know. I haven't used the other monitors. It is an excellent monitor for the price paid, the reviews were overall positive, AND my daughter has used two of them for over a year and is very pleased with their performance which is why I bought it.
1441007
AmazonAddict is right, this monitor is a TFT display- I was looking at a different model with my earlier answer. We should all be glad for his tact and ever-so-helpful advice when he spots an error here. :-)
1262351
All this monitor has is a VGA port. Thats as muh as I can help you, research what ports you have and if you can convert them to a VGA. But t may be worth the extra money just getting a nicer monitor.
1101410
N.D.,Your statement isn't entirely correct. If you look @ both spec sheets, you'll notice they both have 6000:1 contrast ratios. The only difference that I see is one has a cable card slot (96D) where the 95D doesn't.
2088025
There is no difference, people are selling this on eBay for $399.00 b/c they know that parents are desperate to get one for Xmas. These sellers are greedy!
1993083
Agreed- they're the same. Companies - especially electronics brands - add these numbers to most of their products, in order to allow stores to be the "exclusive seller" of that model, and/or offer the "guaranteed lowest price" on that model (since they're the only one that sells it).