I have the S95 model a couple years, is this S120 a significant upgrade?
1077274
I don't know about that but I went from the SD1300 and I am very pleased with the camera. The only downside is no USB cable. Yes I had one but for all the $ you'd think it would be included, also maybe a SD card. I still need an extra one of those
1077275
They share the same sensor size (not type), and look similar; however, there have been a number of updates since 2010. The processor and wide angle lens might be a couple of the more dramatic differences. S95 vs S120 Max resolution: 3648 x 2736 vs 4000 x 3000 Effective pixels: 10 megapixels vs 12 megapixels Sensor photo detectors: 10 megapixels vs 13 megapixels Sensor type: CCD vs BSI-CMOS Processor: Digic 4 vs Digic 6 ISO: Auto, 80 - 3200 vs Auto, 80 - 12800 Focal length (equiv.): 28-105 mm vs 24-120 mm Optical zoom: 3.8 vs 5 Macro focus range: 5 cm (1.97&#8243;) vs 3 cm (1.18&#8243;) Screen dots: 461,000 vs 922,00 Touch screen: No vs TFT PureColor II G Touch screen Maximum aperture: F2.0 - F4.9 vs F1.8 - F5.7 Maximum shutter speed: 1/1600 sec vs 1/2000 sec Flash range: 6.50 m vs 7.00 m Exposure compensation: 2 (at 1/3 EV steps) vs 3 (at 1/3 EV steps) Video Resolution: 1280 x 720 (24 fps) vs 1920 x 1080 (60 or 30 fps) Wireless: Eye-Fi Connected vs Wireless LAN (IEEE802.11 b/g/n) Weight (inc. batteries): 195 g (0.43 lb / 6.88 oz) vs 217 g (0.48 lb / 7.65 oz) Dimensions: 100 x 58 x 30 mm (3.94 x 2.28 x 1.18&#8243;) vs 100 x 59 x 29 mm (3.94 x 2.32 x 1.14&#8243;) GPS: None vs via mobile (linked to compatible smartphone)
1077276
I believe so, I had the S110 and this camera feels like a significant upgrade. The processor is much faster, so shooting is very fast and burst rate is much faster. Image quality, well it might be very similar. I didn't see an IQ upgrade from the S110. The screen has better resolution and the touch screen is quite responsive. Overall, I was very pleased with the upgrade from the S110 to the S120 so I believe the S120 is a significant upgrade.
1077277
yes. i was in the same situation. this is the third generation since the s95, which was a great camera that i took all over the world. after the s95 the industry changed from ccd to cmos sensors which are better all around - lower noise (better in low light), better color resolution and fidelity, and 12 vs 10 megapixels. the lens is faster and a little sharper and 5x vs 3x telephoto. you can shoot up to 8 frames per second for action vs about 2 on the s95. also has wifi for immediate upload to your phone, and a touch screen and the screen quality is much better. you should see a substantial improvement in photo quality. yes. i was in the same situation. this is the third generation since the s95, which was a great camera that i took all over the world. after the s95 the industry changed from ccd to cmos sensors which are better all around - lower noise (better in low light), better color resolution and fidelity, and 12 vs 10 megapixels. the lens is faster and a little sharper and 5x vs 3x telephoto. you can shoot up to 8 frames per second for action vs about 2 on the s95. also has wifi for immediate upload to your phone, and a touch screen and the screen quality is much better. you should see a substantial... » Read More yes. i was in the same situation. this is the third generation since the s95, which was a great camera that i took all over the world. after the s95 the industry changed from ccd to cmos sensors which are better all around - lower noise (better in low light), better color resolution and fidelity, and 12 vs 10 megapixels. the lens is faster and a little sharper and 5x vs 3x telephoto. you can shoot up to 8 frames per second for action vs about 2 on the s95. also has wifi for immediate upload to your phone, and a touch screen and the screen quality is much better. you should see a substantial improvement in photo quality. « Show Less
1077278
I'm not sure because this is my first canon. I typically am a Nikon customer. So far I am extremely happy with this camera. It photographs very well in low light situations which is what I wanted it for so I'm guessing the well lit pictures will also be excellent.
1077279
I've read the S95 and S100 had significant lens error defects. That was the main reason I waited for this new version to come out which had supposedly fixed those problems.
260435
Yes it works well, I have the upgraded one at home, and I like it better, has more functions.
1511862
In my opinion it is not significant of an upgrade to change. The only real differences are an increase of 5 megapixels and an slightly increased shot rate. Not enough to ditch the older model. Neal
1887675
I've owned the 1400 IS for 8 months now, and have been dissapointed. Photos are not consistent, and not crisp. In fact, I regret buying the 1400 IS and in hindsight would have opted for the S90/S95.
1312576
The S95 is closer to pro quality. Better for young photographers who might upgrade later, or who prefer more manual control. Moreover, the S95 is likely to produce better pictures simply because it doesn't have some of the distracting gadgetry--big zoom, smile detection, etc.--that's found on the SX230. The idea is to focus your attention on the subject, not on the gadgetry on your camera. For some years the S95 was thre "gold standard" among point and shots, viewed as an acceptable 2nd camera for pros, or as a "transitional" camera for young photographers about to step up to an SLR when they could afford it. The S95 is closer to pro quality. Better for young photographers who might upgrade later, or who prefer more manual control. Moreover, the S95 is likely to produce better pictures simply because it doesn't have some of the distracting gadgetry--big zoom, smile detection, etc.--that's found on the SX230. The idea is to focus your attention on the subject, not on the gadgetry on your camera. For some years the S95 was thre "gold standard" among point and shots, viewed as an acceptable 2nd camera for pros, or as a "transitional" camera for young photographers about to step... » Read More The S95 is closer to pro quality. Better for young photographers who might upgrade later, or who prefer more manual control. Moreover, the S95 is likely to produce better pictures simply because it doesn't have some of the distracting gadgetry--big zoom, smile detection, etc.--that's found on the SX230. The idea is to focus your attention on the subject, not on the gadgetry on your camera. For some years the S95 was thre "gold standard" among point and shots, viewed as an acceptable 2nd camera for pros, or as a "transitional" camera for young photographers about to step up to an SLR when they could afford it. « Show Less
1601360
Warren,I cannot decipher any difference between the 2 models listed. I think they are one in the same. That said, if the merchant told you that it is better than its predecessor, that may indeed be true--if he is comparing it the 61/71 series or the 65 series from last year's model line. But even Samsung's website doesn't mention the S2F being any sort of an upgrade or anything like that.I've been looking at the A860 for a while. The slim depth plus its couple extra features make it a bit more attractive than the 6 or 7 series lines.
148607
9600 is new model. I don't think there is much difference. You would have to go through every spec to see if there is any. I would start with the pioneer website. I love my 9500 I wouldn't change anything about it. If the price is close obviously go with the new one.
2077593
I have never upgraded from one model to another so I would not know... I suggest you call customer support direct.
69712
I think it is much better, I like the older phone itself better but like the newer features.
1418097
Thanks, Todd. I went for it and found a refurbished one for less than $75 over the cost of a new s1300. I'm sure it will be worth it.
1754448
I think the difference is that the new model probably has better internal components. Improvements to models are usually never stated, only new features if any.
1815699
It'll make a bit of difference..not major. The improved battery life is also an added bonus over the old one.
1002182
These two cameras are both good at what they do but are different in the needs they are designed to address. Your needs (atleast mine) would direct me towards one or the other. You say absolutely nothing about your needs or intended uses so there little else I could add. The zoom range, video resulotion, flexibility, and size differetiate the two. The S95 has a marginal image quality and low light advantage at the expense of lower video resolution and a much shorter telephoto.
673014
yes. The visible difference between the different S2 models is in the front which is not affected by this case.
2210067
Yes you should upgrade. I bought the magic jack 2014 and have been using it for about two months. Works great for me. jack 2014
1815999
I upgraded from the D90, haven't used the D3100. I'd expect it's a good upgrade as the D3100 has been upgraded twice. I think waiting at least ntil the second upgrade makes sense as the next upgrade is more incremental than revolutionary. I think you'll like the D7100. I find it easier to operate and use thatn my D90 even though I had it 3 years. Have fun shooting with whatever you choose.
1813533
http://snapsort.com/compare/Nikon_Coolpix_S8000-vs-Nikon_Coolpix_S8100http://www.imaging-resource.com/NEWS/1283918475.htmlhttp://www.infosyncworld.com/reviews/digital-cameras/nikon-coolpix-s8100/11326.htmlSeems the major upgrade is to the sensor, allowing for improved low-light pictures. I'm looking forward to getting this one as well.