What does size 8200 imply ?
1107695
I actually do not know I only know I was able to pack my total backpack into it and safely check in the bag on my international flight for free, without any damage whatsoever ....both ways
918515
The DVP-FX811 also has a matte 800x480 screen. As Rick Strobel notes, it's identical in every respect to the 820 and it's easily viewable in sunlit conditions. Take the money and run, don't walk to Sam's. :)
967794
The 4 inch model is too small. is an 8 inch model that may be the right size.
1941990
Hi they're good for three plus weeks so now is good. I think you will need 4. 3 fits an 8" well.
510354
I have no idea what an A1278 is, I just know I have MacBook Pro, circa 2010, that is 15 inches. Best of Luck
1356165
I saw a previous post that might help you. They answered sizes 804, 808, 827, 846, 864 & 898
790381
You have to ask the manufacture that question, it might have to do with sizes.
1223231
yes 1gig is correct and pretty common, these will take up to 4gig. 4mb is really old.
818049
Something like 8" * 4" but it has been a while since I've looked at the package.
519410
Well it means that you should put a hard drive in it that is no larger than 160 Gigs, however I bought this hard drive case and it works just fine with a 750 Gig hard drive in it.
867563
http://www.orcalogic.co.uk/asp/OrcaMemoryScanner.asp find a memory scan after scan it will tell you your memory the speed and type i think the 8200 is the same but not sheer most of the memory scanners are free
685102
The size issue isn't a "formatting issue" like most people believe. It's actually due to the discrepancy between what storage manufacturers define as a byte VS what actually *IS* a byte. Storage manufacturers consider a kilobyte as "1000 bytes" when it is actually 1024 bytes (due to the binary system working in exponents of 2). So if you extrapolate out 32*1000*1000*1000 (32 Gigabytes, as defined by Sandisk) then divide that by 1024*1024*1024 it puts you at 29.8 GB. The .09 GB remainder could certainly be filesystem information, I suppose.So, yeah, basically all data storage manufacturers are lying to you, and as you increase your storage size the discrepancy percentage increases. The size issue isn't a "formatting issue" like most people believe. It's actually due to the discrepancy between what storage manufacturers define as a byte VS what actually *IS* a byte. Storage manufacturers consider a kilobyte as "1000 bytes" when it is actually 1024 bytes (due to the binary system working in exponents of 2). So if you extrapolate out 32*1000*1000*1000 (32 Gigabytes, as defined by Sandisk) then divide that by 1024*1024*1024 it puts you at 29.8 GB. The .09 GB remainder could certainly be filesystem information, I suppose.So, yeah, basically... » Read More The size issue isn't a "formatting issue" like most people believe. It's actually due to the discrepancy between what storage manufacturers define as a byte VS what actually *IS* a byte. Storage manufacturers consider a kilobyte as "1000 bytes" when it is actually 1024 bytes (due to the binary system working in exponents of 2). So if you extrapolate out 32*1000*1000*1000 (32 Gigabytes, as defined by Sandisk) then divide that by 1024*1024*1024 it puts you at 29.8 GB. The .09 GB remainder could certainly be filesystem information, I suppose.So, yeah, basically all data storage manufacturers are lying to you, and as you increase your storage size the discrepancy percentage increases. « Show Less
1328698
The 820 is a 2 slice unit. The 830 is two slots but will toast 4 slices of regular bread or two long slices. Perfect for those outdoor sandwich rolls
1709374
They will take a 128 gig chip formatted with exfat. Higher than that, I do not know
1415091
Its large. I'd say that the 13 inches refers to height, but apart from it being maybe 5 inches in girth and width I'm not sure what they are referring to
595977
Of course...2.8 is merely its widest aperature. Goes all the way to F22!:-)
944177
Sorry, I am no good at that matter. Mine were XL and quite spacious. I was pleased.