What does the "x50" or "X44" mean? Is that field of view and is bigger better in that case?
1077157
It means 50 mm lens or 44 mm lens it does affect your field of view. I do like the 44mm lens it's just about perfect for long or short range.
1077158
The "50 or 44" is the size in millimeters of the objective lens basically the diameter of the front lens group. Bigger will give you a better view.
1077159
The number after the "X" is the size of the objective lens, i.e., the downrange lens. A larger objective lens gathers more light and generally gives better resolution.
1077160
The last number is the size of the objective lense in millimeters. Bigger objectives gather more light, but can result in a large scope. 50mm is about 2 inches.
1671832
The first number always means the magnification. In this case the object will appear 8x bigger than with the naked eye. Sometimes you will see two numbers here, like 10-17 x 50. In this case it means it has adjustable zoom ranging from 10x - 17x. That sounds like it might be better, and often is, but when considering adjustable zoom you should know that the sharpness of the image will always be sacrificed for the moving parts so choose wisely based on your needs. The second number in the spec, in this case 42, is the diameter of the outer lens. The larger the lens, the more light it lets in. A smaller lens, like 25, means more compact but you will have a hard time seeing anything in darker conditions. A 50 would give you good visibility even at night. These being a 42 would give you good imaging in most cases except for deep night, I would think. Sadly there is no such thing as the perfect combination, it is always a compromise between image quality and size, but if you know what you will use them for most often you can find the right combination to suit your needs.
621421
Dear M. L. Jackson, thanks for taking the time to respond. Is your XBR4 a 40, 46, or 52 inch? This is a real enigma: I've seen a few posts that complained about the fan noise on the xbr4. Perhaps it is specific to a certain size screen. Thanks, Bob Dorsett
1394322
I had the X100 and now own the XT1 and 56mm f1.2. While it's not exactly what you're looking for I'll say that I am 100% happy w/ the 56mm and find the XT1 a huge upgrade from the X100. Not just in terms of image quality and bokeh but flexibility as well since you can change out the lenses.
1614178
The X5 is better sounding. Also better menu structure. Its a terrific device.
172513
Each has a (fairly) wide FOV, about 120-140 degrees, (typical for a small aperture) which does make viewed objects seem rather small. All16 feeds (in the 16 channel model) are visible in the 4x4 display, and a single mouse click goes full screen (or 2x2 or 3x3). Same functionality for the 8 channel...maxes at 3x3.
208233
No, this is not something wider, but brighter and compact. f/2.8 gives a brighter view and as a prime lens it has a lower distorsion characteristics than 16-50.
1263424
I also have the X-M1. The IQ is about the same, but the 18-55 is a bit better. Focus speed is also about same between the two cameras.
814094
Ed - From my Owner's Manual...the 16 x 50 XCF has a field of view at 1000 yards of 183 feet. For the 12 x 50 xcf that increases to 294 feet and for the 10 x 50 XCF the field of view at 1000 yards is 342 feet.
196650
The speed of the memory. The X is 17000. The plain is 12800. Faster is better.
992621
Any focal length is always that focal lengh. its like how tall you are does not change whether you are in a Fiat or a 2 decker bus. Field of view changes as you change cameras with different size sensors. The 17.5 on M43 has the field of view of a 35mm on full frame 35mm. Best, Stephen CameraQuest
1394321
Not really. In fact, not even close. The field of view on the X100, even with the adapter, is still considerably wider, resulting in less compression of the image, for starters. Also, f2, on a wider lens will be a less OOF/creamy than 1.2 no matter what. The X100 will throw everything outside the focal plane out rather pleasingly for shots of objects fairly close, but anything in terms of a 1/2 body or full body portrait or the equivalent distance won't be anything like shooting with a tighter focal length with such a markedly faster aperture.
1735324
40x is a magnification high enough that steady hands and immobile rest are critical for a good view. 40x is tricky to visually "navigate" but excellent clarity once focused. 20 x (pictured) is decent as well . It is like a small magnifying glass with a tiny led light. good for larger items . Both work well.
1726283
Check the Bushnell golf website. The x is lighter, more courses, course odometer and more hazard distances it appears.
2161243
Others have already answered. I was going to suggest comparing dimensions of x10 and x20
1030637
Standing in the same position, you'll capture a wider image with this lens than without. I'm not convinced that it's 50% more, though. There is some noticeable blurring around the edges and even the center of the image is not quite as sharp as without this lens attached, if you zoom in to the picture in post-processing.
1590090
The 52" XBR4/5 has the "floating glass" bezel and side speakers, which not only makes it wider than the 52" W3000, but also gives it a more elegant look. If you have limited space, then the W3000 is your best bet. However, if space is not an issue, go with the XBR4/5 with the 120Hz Motion Enhancer. It makes the picture "pop-out", like 3D. Really amazing picture clarity and color. I have the 52" XBR4 with PS3 setup.