These or the popular Polk DB651s? I'm not a big bass fan, so lack of bass not an issue for me.
1106070
If you are just using them for high-mid range and you're not looking to get that much bass out of it, I would suggest to go with the Pioneers very rich in sound and definitely does the job especially if you have an Equalizer. Check out the Clarion EQS746 Improves any type of music 110% hands down/ very useful if you have an amp or more than one in my case. I'm running 3 amps off this bad boy and very satisfied with the results!
1106071
I am very happy with the Pioneer speakers. Bass is not an issue for me as well. I like more treble. I listen to Rock/hard rock.
1106072
I've never used Polk. These speakers don't have a lot of bass. It also matters were there installed.
1106073
My wife has those in her truck and i don't notice enough difference for the price.
2155204
Then at this point in time bluetooth is not for you, there average. Nothing wrong with them but nothing that stands out, all the praise is from how good they are as bluetooth headphones, unless you have 150 bucks laying around and just want them for woring out these aren't for you, and if that's all you need the JBL bluetooth headphones are the way to go for half the price. If your an audio file these are not for you.
764846
Not as much bass as monitors but an expected amount for their size. They were not loud or quiet imo. They don't get fuzzy or muddy at max volume though which is great. Again, though...get the monitors not these unless you are absolutely in love with these for some reason.
2151852
Well, to be perfectly honest, I am a serious audiophile, but I do like bass extension (I have Genesis subwoofer towers in my home system). While there is a "bloated" bass quality to the Beat Pros I really like the exaggeration in the Beats for casual listening whilst walking around or in the gym. However, for a more "sonically neutral" perspective, the 650's would definitely get the nod. So I would say it depends on the application and listening preferences.
1039283
I have the TSI100 Polks for fronts and got a BIC DV-52CLRS for a center. I did not need a lot of bass since I have a subwoofer crossed at 80HZ. Also the Polks produce enough low end ... For movies or music the BIC performs evenly and blends into a good sounding system. It is brighter than SONY without excessive mid-bass and It is smaller than Polks CS-10. Choice Depends on your taste/budget..good luck.
1182987
These aren't that way. You're right most (beats or whatever) just have a ton of low quality bass. These are a good all around headphone. ++ to RHA
580943
I've tried both. A sign of warning it is a weird style of ear bud, well both are. These feel more comfortable and for the price they can't be beat. There bass is better but the highs may be a little undefined but nothing to noticeable. Hope I helped.
1329398
I own the Polk T15 and BIC America DV62si speakers. The BIC speakers are bigger, heavier and have wider frequency response/higher sensitivity than the Polk T15's. I would recommend the BIC speakers over the Polks. I've seen the Polks on sale for for around fifty dollars, but have never seen a new pair of BIC America DV62si's offered for less than a hundred.I would also consider Micca's MB42 speakers. They sound similar to the Polk T15, but cost less.
1001247
I've never heard the jbl, but I'm pleased with the sound of the Polk audio...if u want the small crossover go with jbl
637244
Personally I rank them a bit higher, others will say these don't have enough bass (I would strongly disagree) however to be honest I haven't used these in ~9months, I gave them to my fiance and bought some ATH-A900X's which are the same driver but with aluminium housing and sound a few notches above both.Both are fantastic headphones, but the M50's have a much flatter soundstage compared to the ATH-A700X's, I would also say that they are not as comfortable. Slightly more portable.
1184797
The only one worth buying is Objective 2 amp or the amp/dac version. That said, I've never felt I needed one and an amp doesn't fix the bass problem these have.
2261802
with adequate power to the speakers, they put out great full range sound with good midbass. I am a bit of a basshead, I will probably add the sub if it is still available this summer. I am not sure if it has a crossover built into the unit.
464915
Here is my two cents, Klipsch RF82 might has deeper bass performance due to its larger driver (dual 8") to handle the lower end, but Polk has a more even performance cross whole sound range and it handled the bass very well as well. Polk M-70 has a very similar SPEC and performance as their current running model of TSI500 which cost about $800/pair (which I am using). Polk M-70 ($400/pair) is a much better value (Cost/Performance) compare to Klipsch RF82 which cost about $1200/pair.
603551
If you have an equalizer program for sound tweaking installed on your system, then you'll love them. Normal settings are not useful for these speakers, but with tweaking, they rock! You'll find the bass quite adequate.
1042714
I've developed a distrust for name brands, so on that sentiment alone, I'd go with the Audioengines. I can say from experience, though, that the A2+'s are amazing. They lack a little bit of bass, but that's to be expected, and I'm sure the Bose's would suck in that regard as well. Go with the Audioengines.
2092795
I think these have better bass than Sony XB700. I really like this headphone.
2221138
They have minimal bass. I got them specifically for video (dialogue) which they're fine for. My daughter worked out with them in a gym and didn't complain. Noise reduction is good, but not as good as my Koss ProDJ100s.