Can you compare the advantages (besides weight) of the 10x25 to the 8x20 model, please?
1089668
I have never had the 8x20, so I cannot give you an accurate comparison. I can say that I really like the 10x25, and that the reason I chose it over the 8x20 is the higher power and larger viewing area of the 10x25.
1089669
8x20 are small but good enough for travel etc. for birding I use 8 x42 which gives the best of both worlds but not as compact. You may need to research further for a more accurate answer. Depends on what you intend to use the binoculars for.
1645862
Hey Robert From image itself I don't see there is much difference... I guess 8x42 having only one type so you should be good to purchase the other one @180$. I got it in 150$ while massive discounts going on Amazon and even I got 50$ rebate coupon from Vanguard so it same in 100$ .I hope I answers your question
2161243
Others have already answered. I was going to suggest comparing dimensions of x10 and x20
530015
it will depend on the clarity and quality of the original photo, if you have a great photo you get a great picture, should then be able to print to an 8x10
652717
It will be tight, I would go bigger, barn method, if an 8 by 10 will work you really need a10 by 12!
859075
TR3000i has a higher horse power so it goes faster, runs smoother, and can hold up heavier people. It also has more cushioning for your feet, a thicker deck that will last longer (1 inch vs 3/4), and it has a longer warranty for parts (5 years vs 3).Only real downside is that it's 20 pounds heavier because of the bigger engine. Also if you buy a treadmill GET A MAT. Otherwise say goodby to your floors and carpets. I use this one to protect my houseProImpact Treadmill Mat #PF36786BLG10
849472
I do not own the 8qt model and never used one; but, I do own the 7 qt model and I'm very happy with its performance. My previous model was a 5qt commercial and i still use them, but for a smaller batch of work. I bought the 7qt model because it was the ideal size for my work, not too big and not too small.
43024
Hello,Jody.i think 10x42 is better.the binoculars is good quality, and not very heavy. I use it to see bird,nice experience.
230670
I have #71020 [25 - 125X80] only and do not know how it compares to 25X100. At 25X it is super clear even if you are holding it with your hands but of course, it will tires you out quickly bcoz of its weight and size. To fully enjoy this powerful bino spend money on a high-end tripod like SLK brand or other comparable reputable brands especially if you would like to experiment zooming closer than 25X --field of view gets smaller as you increase magnification and you can do it without a tripod. I stay at 25X or maybe few notches up bcoz I get dizzy looking thru it at much higher magnification. Maybe 25X100 is plenty of power for what you need it for, anything pass 100X is practically useless. And you may even save money w/c you can spend on tripod. Just my honest opinion... enjoy it!
1645860
Hey RobertFrom image itself I don't see there is much difference... I guess 8x42 having only one type so you should be good to purchase the other one @180$. I got it in 150$ while massive discounts going on Amazon and even I got 50$ rebate coupon from Vanguard so it same in 100$ .I hope I answers your question
678607
I use the 2.8 and have never been concerned about the weight. I used this lens on my Canon 5D with the extender 1.4 for a two hour whale watch trip from a boat, hand held. I didn't find it a concern. I'm a 5' 11", 200 lb man and 70 years old. I'm saying go for the f/2.8, you won't regret it.
775942
You may be better off with the 1000X. The read/write speeds and far better. From other responses I read, the 800X provided moderate rate of return or performance.
1003996
I'm not sure of the difference in the weight, if you have storage under the bed, then the 10 inch might be better. Consider how difficult it is to raise the bed platform and then think about keeping it raised while you remove items. When we purchased our mattress, we did not have storage under the bed so the weight was not a major issue but when we purchased our new Class A, we knew we could not use a 90 lb mattress.
1247619
i have a 10x25 and i think they are the same size just lens difference. only need to steady if studying detail, otherwise they are easy to hold steady and view as a larger size.
967462
Hi: I have an Epson R2000 printer for photographs and the Ultra Premium is my favorite paper. I would buy the 8 1/2 x 11 for an 8 x 10 picture because I would be matting it to go in a frame. If you just want to put a picture in a frame without matting you could use 8 x 10. I personally wouldn't do that. I tend to do a lot of 16 x 20 frames, so then the paper I use is the Ultra 13 x 19. It gives me a great 12 x 16 picture. This is the Ultra size I use the most. I think it's always good to have a little play with the paper so that's why I recommend the 8 1/2 x 11 for the 8 x 10 picture. Hope that helps. Hi: I have an Epson R2000 printer for photographs and the Ultra Premium is my favorite paper. I would buy the 8 1/2 x 11 for an 8 x 10 picture because I would be matting it to go in a frame. If you just want to put a picture in a frame without matting you could use 8 x 10. I personally wouldn't do that. I tend to do a lot of 16 x 20 frames, so then the paper I use is the Ultra 13 x 19. It gives me a great 12 x 16 picture. This is the Ultra size I use the most. I think it's always good to have a little play with the paper so that's why I recommend the 8 1/2 x 11 for the 8 x 10 picture. Hope... » Read More Hi: I have an Epson R2000 printer for photographs and the Ultra Premium is my favorite paper. I would buy the 8 1/2 x 11 for an 8 x 10 picture because I would be matting it to go in a frame. If you just want to put a picture in a frame without matting you could use 8 x 10. I personally wouldn't do that. I tend to do a lot of 16 x 20 frames, so then the paper I use is the Ultra 13 x 19. It gives me a great 12 x 16 picture. This is the Ultra size I use the most. I think it's always good to have a little play with the paper so that's why I recommend the 8 1/2 x 11 for the 8 x 10 picture. Hope that helps. « Show Less
1136567
The 10810 weighs a full kilogram more (2.2 lbs). It is heavier construction because of this. The Heavy Duty version (10065) is lighter. They function in the same ways thereafter. I find the portability of the 10065 a bit more useful. If you have heavy music books or lots of sheet music the 10810 would be worth the weight. After that they are equally good in terms of functionality. Both excellent and very professional.
43019
In my opinion you need a better range of optics. There is very little light gathering ability difference between x40 and x42. I would recommend the 8x40 and 10x50's. I know, the 10x50 are heavier but they also are better in low light. You never know when you are going to see something that is a once-in a lifetime occurence. I think it is worth the weight.