What are the important differences between the ES190 and the ProX9? They appear to be similar units.
1086925
The ES190 is rated for 1000 gallons a year and the ProX9 is rated for 150-300 I think. My 190ES performs beautifully. No thinning necessary. Cleaning and good maintenance is a must with any airless. The 190ES is a base contractor model. Hope this helps:)
1086926
The ES 190 have heavier duty tires, More of a commercial grade sprayer for everyday use,, Has a electronic pressure control. The newer models don't have this
498590
Size is main difference - Pro Y is much larger. Also the half-moon holding the peeler blades is metal on the Pro model.
1527058
I was wondering the same thing. I am thinking about buying the the 1019 and now I came accross the VSX-9049 and right now the difference is only around $20 in Amazon.
370497
It was designed for a Dremel tool - you will have to compare the two to see if they are the same. I don't have any info. on Proxxon
1569300
I found a forum that references that the only difference between the ES8249S and ES8249K models is the color. I haven't found any other place besides that one post that confirms this is the only difference. According to the person on the forum, they confirmed by calling Panasonic directly to talk about the model differences and what to do if/when the built-in battery goes bad (you must send it to Panasonic's repair center in San Fran which is $50 + shipping).It might be best to call Panasonic to re-confirm. Let us know if you follow-up with them and find anything out.
1611808
I really don't know. I am not familiar with the X-E2. I bought the pro since it has the older Fujifilm film colors as a selection, for in camera editing. That is mainly what I was interested in since I loved Fujifilm processing before they went digital. That was the only film I would purchase. Their processing in color along with black and white was exceptional. Sorry, I couldn't have provided a more knowledgeable answer.
1587855
Thanks. So if the 1120 and the VSX-31 are almost exactly the same price, it sounds like I should go for the 1120.
1611809
The main difference is the finder. While the X-E2 only has a digital image finder, the X-Pro1 has a digital finder and an optical finder, that you switch with your index right hand finger on a level at the rigth side of the lens
847077
I work at a shaver store (can't mention the name). As far as I know there is no difference. It's just the reference number (different countries/suppliers use different reference). When you scan it, it may say ES8109 or ES8109S, it's all the same). But anyhow, I wouldn't worry about it, because unless the difference is AT LEAST in last 2 digits, there is usually no difference in features.
85341
The X20 has a slightly different sensor that is suppose to be slightly sharper but the differences are very small, as to be virtually undetectable. Some people like the X10 better then the 20 because it has a more sophisticated and feature rich Contrast Control setting. The lens is exactly the same. I was dissapointed that there wasn't more of a difference. Oh ... the X20 displays some of your exposure settings in the optical view finder. But a lot of folks don't even use the optical view finder and instead just use the excellent monitor. It was pretty much of a waste for me to "upgrade" from the 10 to the 20 ... but my son enjoys inheriting the 10. :-) The X20 has a slightly different sensor that is suppose to be slightly sharper but the differences are very small, as to be virtually undetectable. Some people like the X10 better then the 20 because it has a more sophisticated and feature rich Contrast Control setting. The lens is exactly the same. I was dissapointed that there wasn't more of a difference. Oh ... the X20 displays some of your exposure settings in the optical view finder. But a lot of folks don't even use the optical view finder and instead just use the excellent monitor. It was pretty much of a waste for me to... » Read More The X20 has a slightly different sensor that is suppose to be slightly sharper but the differences are very small, as to be virtually undetectable. Some people like the X10 better then the 20 because it has a more sophisticated and feature rich Contrast Control setting. The lens is exactly the same. I was dissapointed that there wasn't more of a difference. Oh ... the X20 displays some of your exposure settings in the optical view finder. But a lot of folks don't even use the optical view finder and instead just use the excellent monitor. It was pretty much of a waste for me to "upgrade" from the 10 to the 20 ... but my son enjoys inheriting the 10. :-) « Show Less
1002478
The less expensive tool is limited to working on three (?) different vehicles while the pro lets you work on an unlimited amount. I think the pro has a longer cord between the PC and the vehicle.
1777809
Pro-3 is longer and both of them are 200w. See links below: http://images.cooksdirect.com/Manuals/Bamix_Pro_spec.pdf
1515247
I do not really know but I have found the Proxxon tools to be of high quality and easy to use. I got mine for precision work, not anything heavy duty.
1515431
I don't have the gold, but I've researched it and they both seem like top-flight machines. My Pro is fantastic and I have a blast with it. It boils down to what you're looking for and how detailed a machine you want. The Pro is very detail oriented. The Gold, from what I've seen of people using it, is a very focused, get in and go machine. Not the answer you were hoping for, I'm sure, but it's the best I've got. This is a great hobby and however you may start you will find the right machine for your needs over time.
1611806
X-E2 is the next generation after X-E1. X-E1 in its turn is the same as X-Pro1, except X-E1 is smaller, has hybrid viewfinder replaced with higher-resolution electronic-only one, added external microphone/shutter release control connector, and some other minor differences.The rest of the differences are the same as between X-E1 and X-E2 -- X-E2 has faster processor, new sensor with faster autofocus (built-in phase detection sensors as opposed to contrast detection only in X-Pro1 and X-E1) and 14-bit color depth, split image focus view and other firmware improvements. http://www.dpreview.com/previews/fujifilm-x-e2/ has more complete list. X-E2 is the next generation after X-E1. X-E1 in its turn is the same as X-Pro1, except X-E1 is smaller, has hybrid viewfinder replaced with higher-resolution electronic-only one, added external microphone/shutter release control connector, and some other minor differences.The rest of the differences are the same as between X-E1 and X-E2 -- X-E2 has faster processor, new sensor with faster autofocus (built-in phase detection sensors as opposed to contrast detection only in X-Pro1 and X-E1) and 14-bit color depth, split image focus view and other firmware improvements.... » Read More X-E2 is the next generation after X-E1. X-E1 in its turn is the same as X-Pro1, except X-E1 is smaller, has hybrid viewfinder replaced with higher-resolution electronic-only one, added external microphone/shutter release control connector, and some other minor differences.The rest of the differences are the same as between X-E1 and X-E2 -- X-E2 has faster processor, new sensor with faster autofocus (built-in phase detection sensors as opposed to contrast detection only in X-Pro1 and X-E1) and 14-bit color depth, split image focus view and other firmware improvements. http://www.dpreview.com/previews/fujifilm-x-e2/ has more complete list. « Show Less
2216273
I've used a Saitek Eclipse II for years. I've had this Perixx now for a day and it's almost exactly the same. The main difference, aside from branding, is the lack of silver detailing, no silver bar on the spacebar, and obviously (like the picture) it is black on black. The Saitek seems to have slightly smoother key response and a glossier feel to the keys, but the differences are very slight. Oh and the Windows keys are different: no circular indexing imprint on the Perixx. If you liked the Saitek Eclipse II, then you'll be happy with this one.
1536206
Output is similar with both units. The EF-20 tilts but the EF-X20 does not. However, the EF-X20 offers full manual mode control on top of the unit and can act as a slave unit whereas the EF-20 does neither.