What is the difference between model DWX23 and DWX20? The former model appears to be substantially less expensive.
1096030
The only difference is the color. Model series # DWX uses the last two digits to note the color. 23 is black and 20 is white. The price difference may reflect the "sale price" for black version. I noticed that the white (20) version shows list price while the black version (23) shows a sale price with a savings of 34% (at the time of this writing). I hope that this helps.
732129
I'd like to add a little additional information to the excellent explanation from Jaygyver. I have both drives, an older WD1002FAEX and a newer WD1003FZEX. When I purchased the WD1002 model it was priced about the same as the newer model is today. I believe the current price disparity is due to two factors: the differences in suppliers as described by Jaygver, and also a design change. I noticed that my WD1002 was slightly heavier than the WD1003, and after some research discovered that was due to the WD1002 having two magnetic platters while the WD1003 was a newer single platter design. Evidently the WD engineers were able to simplify and hopefully improve the design. For me, both drives perform excellently and I'm equally pleased with both. However, I have seen discussions on certain tech forums in which intense gaming purists believe the older two platter design is better, and that WD changed the design simply to cut manufacturing costs. Thus the high prices for the WD1002 is due to it's scarcity (since it's now discontinued) and their belief that it's slightly better in both performance and ruggedness. As I said above, however, both perform equally well for me, and they're both Western Digital Black Series with 5 year warranties, so it's a no brainer to go with the best deal price wise.
382734
I have no idea. It cost less when I bought it. I don't know anything about the newer model.
869119
Sorry but I'm not know exactly the difference. I had this model and it works very well.
1324683
As near as I can tell the difference between the 20x and the 15x consists of size only - The 20x is described as being a "low profile design", it looks like the collection chamber may be a smaller (1 Qt vs 3 Qt) but the motor, and input output ports seem to be the same
760443
This is from another user and it is correct. DW735X 13" vs DW734 12.5" 22 days ago There are several differences. The 734 is a lower end machine that is like the Delta, Ridgid and several other similar models. It does have three cutters versus two for the other ones, which is a plus. It has a capacity that is 1/2 longer, which is a slight plus. It has a more efficient dust removal system which includes a fan to blow out the dust. It is an overall beefier machine that is designed for more of a semi-pro environment. It also has two feed speeds, which is nice for rough work and for finish work. For me, the biggest plus, and the deciding factor, was that I could buy professional quality carbide knives for the 735. Not that I cut so much wood, but carbide lasts forever and just works so much better than the disposable steel blades. Show Less 22 days ago by Arnie Berger I think you would be happier with the 735 dhildebrand
1020784
I tried both the 230 and 240 today at the local Dick's Sporting Goods store. The only 230 they have for sale is the floor model which has been badly abused. I really liked the 240 better. Better console and graphics, better seat. It's actually cheaper for me to buy the 240 locally and pay the sales tax than order from Amazon and pay shipping with the danger of having it arrive in pieces as many other reviewers have experienced. The difference in warranty doesn't really bother me.
648126
Yes, the 52w3000 was at $2499 just a few weeks ago. Suddenly the price jumped to $2608, now I am waiting for the price to drop again...
806571
Looks pretty close but from my quick search the VX3 is model #V1950 and this one is #V1930. Beyond that, I don't see much difference.
840671
I don't know if there is a diference between models. I have it since 2012 and works great. Sorry!!
2113962
I had the same question for the distributor i bought mine from. He told me that there was no such model as the DX, that a US distributor had inadvertantly mislabeled them in an ad. There are however 2 versions of the 200X. I'm not sure what the internal differences are between the older and newer version. Externally the old version has a seperate plug for the thumb switch and footpedal, the new version has one control plug for either the thumbswitch or footpedal, plug in the one you want to use. Also the gas inlet on the back of the older one is in the center of the machine, the new one has the gas port on the left side behind the machine. I had the same question for the distributor i bought mine from. He told me that there was no such model as the DX, that a US distributor had inadvertantly mislabeled them in an ad. There are however 2 versions of the 200X. I'm not sure what the internal differences are between the older and newer version. Externally the old version has a seperate plug for the thumb switch and footpedal, the new version has one control plug for either the thumbswitch or footpedal, plug in the one you want to use. Also the gas inlet on the back of the older one is in the center of the machine, the new one has... » Read More I had the same question for the distributor i bought mine from. He told me that there was no such model as the DX, that a US distributor had inadvertantly mislabeled them in an ad. There are however 2 versions of the 200X. I'm not sure what the internal differences are between the older and newer version. Externally the old version has a seperate plug for the thumb switch and footpedal, the new version has one control plug for either the thumbswitch or footpedal, plug in the one you want to use. Also the gas inlet on the back of the older one is in the center of the machine, the new one has the gas port on the left side behind the machine. « Show Less
820701
I believe the $2000 model you are referring to is the TR1200-DT7. The difference is, the 1200-DT7 has an electronically adjustable desktop, while the 1200-DT5 has a manual adjustable desktop. Having multiple users may merit the upgrade to the 1200-DT7, where height adjustments are frequent.
663164
There may be....i am conditioned to think that 20 bucks more means something a bit additional, perhaps. Maybe the other model has a bigger sound.....however, maybe they are essentially the same. If you find any info, please let me know. Thanks!
85341
The X20 has a slightly different sensor that is suppose to be slightly sharper but the differences are very small, as to be virtually undetectable. Some people like the X10 better then the 20 because it has a more sophisticated and feature rich Contrast Control setting. The lens is exactly the same. I was dissapointed that there wasn't more of a difference. Oh ... the X20 displays some of your exposure settings in the optical view finder. But a lot of folks don't even use the optical view finder and instead just use the excellent monitor. It was pretty much of a waste for me to "upgrade" from the 10 to the 20 ... but my son enjoys inheriting the 10. :-) The X20 has a slightly different sensor that is suppose to be slightly sharper but the differences are very small, as to be virtually undetectable. Some people like the X10 better then the 20 because it has a more sophisticated and feature rich Contrast Control setting. The lens is exactly the same. I was dissapointed that there wasn't more of a difference. Oh ... the X20 displays some of your exposure settings in the optical view finder. But a lot of folks don't even use the optical view finder and instead just use the excellent monitor. It was pretty much of a waste for me to... » Read More The X20 has a slightly different sensor that is suppose to be slightly sharper but the differences are very small, as to be virtually undetectable. Some people like the X10 better then the 20 because it has a more sophisticated and feature rich Contrast Control setting. The lens is exactly the same. I was dissapointed that there wasn't more of a difference. Oh ... the X20 displays some of your exposure settings in the optical view finder. But a lot of folks don't even use the optical view finder and instead just use the excellent monitor. It was pretty much of a waste for me to "upgrade" from the 10 to the 20 ... but my son enjoys inheriting the 10. :-) « Show Less
2235088
I was just debating the SX20 vs SX30, so I was really glad to find this discussion. I assumed the 30 would be an improvement, but it sounds from this discussion and many customer reviews that 20 is a better choice for image quality.
538376
thanks for your question. The TC20 is a much better machine. It has longer treads, goes faster and has more computer settings. Essentially they both will perform the same function but the TC20 has more options and features.
85339
The biggest difference is the new X-Trans sensor which removes the optical low pass filter (OLPF)... making pics much sharper than they were in the x10. Here's more from dpreview's review (http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/fujifilm-x20/): At first glance, the X20 looks just like its predecessor (the X10), although it's now available in a very pretty silver-and-black finish, alongside the conventional all-black. But inside it offers a couple of very significant differences. The first is a brand-new sensor, a 2/3" type 'X-Trans CMOS' design that uses the same novel color filter array as Fujifilm's recent APS-C cameras. This sensor also has phase detect autofocus built right into it - not new to Fuji cameras, but a change from the X10. The second big change is an updated 'Advanced Optical Viewfinder' that includes a detailed information overlay, showing key exposure data and focus confirmation. This isn't the same as the hybrid viewfinder found in the company's X100/X100S and X-Pro1 models - there's no electronic viewfinder - but it's never been done before on a compact camera. The X20 is available in silver/black and all-black bodies Aside from this, the X20 retains most of the same features that made the X10 so appealing. It uses the same fast zoom lens, with a 28-112mm equivalent angle of view and F2.0-2.8 maximum aperture, which is operated by a mechanically-coupled zoom ring that also retracts the lens and turns the camera on and off. It has plenty of external controls, including an exposure compensation dial and two rear dials, and a hot shoe for external flash. One feature notable by its absence is a direct movie record button - the X20 is clearly designed for still photography first, and video second.