Plastic or glass lens version? I can't make up my mind -- just go with the regular "N" version of the Holga or spend a little more an get the glass version.Obviously, I don't want the lens to be SO GOOD that it doesn't give the cool distortions that are the whole point of Holga photography. What are the advantages of glass vs. plastic lenses?Thanks! Plastic or glass lens version? I can't make up my mind -- just go with the regular "N" version of the Holga or spend a little more an get the glass version.Obviously, I... » Read More Plastic or glass lens version? I can't make up my mind -- just go with the regular "N" version of the Holga or spend a little more an get the glass version.Obviously, I don't want the lens to be SO GOOD that it doesn't give the cool distortions that are the whole point of Holga photography. What are the advantages of glass vs. plastic lenses?Thanks! « Show Less
776494
Glass is sharper, and the sharpness is broader in the middle Vs. the plastic one only being very sharp almost completely in the center. The glass lens also has less of the barrel distortion. I'ts simply about preference, typically people purchase the holga cameras for the distortion ability...
1092998
I've been curious about this as well. I'd like to see a side-by-side comparison of shots from each.
1463261
Did you ever get a lens? I'm making the same decision now. If so, what did you buy? Are you happy with your decision? Is there anything else you would add that would help me make a decision. Thanks!
845608
I just saw that the new model (pzd) is just 20 dollars more and its lighter. The old version is a great all around lens. I highly recommend it. Recently i bought the 17-50 2.8 VC which way sharper and brighter, but the zoom range of this one is amazing. Good luck
79348
I have used a 70-300mm EF and a 55-300mm AF lens with my D5100. Though the 70-300mm EF is a higher grade lens, I think that upon looking back at my results, the 55-300mm AF lens option gave me clearer images than the 70-300mm lens does. You will, however, be happy with either one. My 55-300mm lens was stolen last summer and I replaced it with a refurbished 70-300mm EF lens. If I were going to do it again, I'd probably get another 55-300mm lens. But on the other hand, the 70-300mm lens has a larger lens aperture and so it works better under lower light conditions than the 55-300mm AF lens. Life always seems to be about choices and trade-offs doesn't it.I hope this was helpful. I have used a 70-300mm EF and a 55-300mm AF lens with my D5100. Though the 70-300mm EF is a higher grade lens, I think that upon looking back at my results, the 55-300mm AF lens option gave me clearer images than the 70-300mm lens does. You will, however, be happy with either one. My 55-300mm lens was stolen last summer and I replaced it with a refurbished 70-300mm EF lens. If I were going to do it again, I'd probably get another 55-300mm lens. But on the other hand, the 70-300mm lens has a larger lens aperture and so it works better under lower light conditions than the 55-300mm AF lens.... » Read More I have used a 70-300mm EF and a 55-300mm AF lens with my D5100. Though the 70-300mm EF is a higher grade lens, I think that upon looking back at my results, the 55-300mm AF lens option gave me clearer images than the 70-300mm lens does. You will, however, be happy with either one. My 55-300mm lens was stolen last summer and I replaced it with a refurbished 70-300mm EF lens. If I were going to do it again, I'd probably get another 55-300mm lens. But on the other hand, the 70-300mm lens has a larger lens aperture and so it works better under lower light conditions than the 55-300mm AF lens. Life always seems to be about choices and trade-offs doesn't it.I hope this was helpful. « Show Less
624550
I have the 2.8L lens, and I love it, but I wish it had IS. In my opinion, the only real advantage of the 2.8 is its greater light gathering power, to shoot inside or in deep shadows. The f4 with the IS can do most everything you want, especially if you have a camera with a high ISO. I don't know of any differences in the glass.
1687599
Michael - Thank you! Thank you! Thank you! I just educated myself on the 10-22 mm and decided that is the lens for me! Now to save up... :)
528654
I ended up with the 20mm and love it. I used it for 2 weeks before getting the additional 14-45mm lens. Why did I get the 14-45mm? Well, as Gary D. Wright stated above, the 20mm is great for family photos and photos that get you interacting with what you're taking pictures of. However, a major family event was coming up where I needed to get the zoom. the 14-45mm, although much bulkier, fit the bill to get photos (in this case I was taking pictures from a pew of family members on the alter). As for image stabilization, I haven't noticed a difference between the two since the 20mm isn't being used in 'zoom' as I would be for the 14-45mm. I used the camera much more when I have the 20mm on it. I ended up with the 20mm and love it. I used it for 2 weeks before getting the additional 14-45mm lens. Why did I get the 14-45mm? Well, as Gary D. Wright stated above, the 20mm is great for family photos and photos that get you interacting with what you're taking pictures of. However, a major family event was coming up where I needed to get the zoom. the 14-45mm, although much bulkier, fit the bill to get photos (in this case I was taking pictures from a pew of family members on the alter). As for image stabilization, I haven't noticed a difference between the two since the 20mm isn't... » Read More I ended up with the 20mm and love it. I used it for 2 weeks before getting the additional 14-45mm lens. Why did I get the 14-45mm? Well, as Gary D. Wright stated above, the 20mm is great for family photos and photos that get you interacting with what you're taking pictures of. However, a major family event was coming up where I needed to get the zoom. the 14-45mm, although much bulkier, fit the bill to get photos (in this case I was taking pictures from a pew of family members on the alter). As for image stabilization, I haven't noticed a difference between the two since the 20mm isn't being used in 'zoom' as I would be for the 14-45mm. I used the camera much more when I have the 20mm on it. « Show Less
82895
I bought this accessory kit a few months ago when I first started off in photography.. I was looking for something inexpensive to go with my kit lenses that would boost what they could capture.. When they arrived, I connected them and found out that they were nothing more than pieces of glass.. There is no magnification or anything.. I'd recommend that you don't buy any of these.. Save your money and buy Nikon lenses.. I just bought a 50mm 1.8G from Best Buy for $199 and it is amazing.. I did tell the seller that they were nothing but glad and they refunded my purchase with no hesitation so I'm assuming they knew they were glass.. Hope this helps..
8522
Hardy,Thanks for the info about getting better lenses. I just "bit the bullet" and bought the 24-105mm L lens. I have heard this same wise advice from other photographers, and I am looking forward to getting sharper photos with the new lens, and I will try to get only L lenses from now on. In the end, you truly get what you pay for.
26491
Nikon Glass is superior to Canon. Anyone using both systems as i do will tell you the same.
1246623
I shot with the plastic ring in and out and must say if you not too worried by the look, having that plastic piece out is so much better. If you still getting this funny cloudy shot try turning on your light before you shoot. I have noticed a significant improvement with the subject already light up than the burst of flash. remember these devices are not designed to shoot so well in low light. Hope this helped.
1077308
As far as I know, the glass is multicoated, which is similar to have a high quality UV filter (like b+w). I have the first version and a b+w filter, which is better, if by some reason it gets scratched, it's something disposable, not like a lens. But who knows maybe they corrected some CA or barreling which would be a wise move, if so, then it would be worth the extra money.
1254979
N8TE - Thanks for the advice. I will look into the AF-S (especially the 70-300 VR) but it's good to know my old lens is still an option.
1699818
The lowest end body with an L glass will produce better pictures than the highest end body with a crappy lens. Invest in lenses, they last longer than bodies.
1044998
I just went through the same decision process, in fact I literally bought the D60+ lens kit and returned it (package unopened) for the D80 (body only) + the fabulous 18-200 VR lens. Why? 1) I wanted the additional metering controls vs. the D60 and in fact used all of them on my recent trip to the Hoh rain forest. 2) Keeping to my budget, I opted to spend the money on the 18-200mm VR, and yes, I used its FULL RANGE without having to change lenses. A great way to go when outdoors and taking advantage of opportunities as they present themselves (e.g. deer twins walking right towards us while on the trail!). 3) Quickly realizing the super-zoom wasn't going to get me a FAST lens, I was able to pick up the 50mm f/1.4 right before my travels (which would NOT have AF working with the D40 or D60). If I had the $$$ I might have opted for a D300 and picked up the D40/60 for a lightweight second body, but as the only Digital SLR that I'll be using for the next couple of years, and the small price difference, I am extremely happy with my purchase.
163447
They may be referring to the size of the plastic lens vs the larger size being the plastic outer frame. There is also another dimension for the metal chamber that goes up into the attic. Probably best to get the "specs" from the manufacturer on-line.
1945333
Please don't take this the wrong way but based on your question, I would highly recommend you take a photography class. At least check out an online tutorial on photography.This is a great camera. I would recommend it if you have exhausted all features of the one you currently have and it is limiting what you are trying to accomplish.The more important piece of your equipment is always going to be your glass. That's why quality lenses cost a small fortune. Good luck.