Is farkle fiesta played differently or with different rules from Farkle?
1666535
Sorry I can't answer - was sent as a gift to grandchildren and they haven't reported other than thanking me.
655777
No with Farkel everytime you roll three of a kind you will score the face value i.e. three 3's equal 300, three 5's 500 and so on. If you keep throwing three of a kind you will continue to get face value until you decide to stop rolling the dice or Farkle. I hope that helped :)
1379016
I don't know what the rules say but we play with 6 people, men against the women, and we have 1 set of chips we don't use, so I'm guessing it depends on how you set it up - individual or teams.
1895605
No, it is specifically designed in its current state for two players only. There will be multi-player rules coming out in the near future according to FFG.
2246376
I agree with others, this game plays much better with a greater number of players, but have played this with my wife according to the two-player rules a few times. Not awful, but not as fun as four or six players!
2255386
I don't know. This is the second Scrabble I have and they are both different
923231
It is a game. We have a different spot it game and bought this one for a Christmas gift. The other one is great fun for kids especially but adults can play it also.
1270728
Yes, this card uses the same play rules, itonly changes the way you score in the end. The scoring is not the same as the National League.
60342
The blocks are the Kubbs; the dowels or batons are the castspinnar; and the the King is the Kung. (I am not sure if I spelled the Swedish correctly.) You can play with one person on each team or up to six people on a team. Check the U. S. Kubb Championship Rules online. You must throw the baton/castspinnar in an underhand motion by holding the end of the baton/castspinnar. No sidearm, helicopter, or overhand throws are allowed. Check out the rules and variations of the game online. Check the one I mentioned and also look up Kubb Rules.
2244572
Debra, the big difference in the game that I had been introduced to is this -rather than the board, being traditional, this one has a board that is more ofa canvas which can be rolled up for storage. The chips are printed with white onone side, so it is MUCH easier to see the "completed sequence". SJL
1879259
It's the R&R; version, however I have played it and each color is given an artistically distinct firework design, as well as an associated symbol (presumably the kanji character for the color), so it is possible to play colorblind folks.
454258
We have played it with adults, children, and a mix. You can change it up pretty easily, depending on how involved you want the game to be. It's fast playing and chaotic. More luck than skill so you don't have to really concentrate to play the game - definitely not bridge!
1732499
The game changes significantly from the 1st play through the 15th play. The first few plays will be very similar to "vanilla" risk. As you play more games, the game play will keep changing. Decisions players make in earlier rounds will definitely change the way the game is played later on.
1991264
I don't believe there is a difference, not one that I am aware of at least. It's a fun game though I can tell you that!
1686135
I've played with 3 people and I've played with 7 people. Both were fun times, but I think the more the merrier! Add your own rules for extra kicks!
2221190
Well, I've played Rollick, and I've seen Reverse Charades. They are essentially the same game. We like Rollick better, as there area a LOT more words to play with, so you won't run out very quickly. Also Rollick has a bunch of twists so it can be adapted for larger teams and or children. You should have fun with either, but if you haven't purchased yet, I'd go with Rollick. And sorry it took so long to answer. For some reason, Gmail buried it in the promotions section of my email.
2280173
yes. my wife and i play it as 2 players all the time. it is more tense; back and forth; very strategic. because you only have one opponent, everything you do is directed at him/her (and of course to benefit yourself). in the two player mode, there is a dummy player between the two of you. on the first turn, player A plays for himself, and plays for the dummy player simultaneously. on the next turn, person B players for himself and the dummy player. and so on. but you can play for the dummy player in such a way to benefit yourself or hurt your opponent. it's real fun. in some ways the argument can be made that playing with 2 players is better. yes. my wife and i play it as 2 players all the time. it is more tense; back and forth; very strategic. because you only have one opponent, everything you do is directed at him/her (and of course to benefit yourself). in the two player mode, there is a dummy player between the two of you. on the first turn, player A plays for himself, and plays for the dummy player simultaneously. on the next turn, person B players for himself and the dummy player. and so on. but you can play for the dummy player in such a way to benefit yourself or hurt your opponent. it's real fun. in some ways the... » Read More yes. my wife and i play it as 2 players all the time. it is more tense; back and forth; very strategic. because you only have one opponent, everything you do is directed at him/her (and of course to benefit yourself). in the two player mode, there is a dummy player between the two of you. on the first turn, player A plays for himself, and plays for the dummy player simultaneously. on the next turn, person B players for himself and the dummy player. and so on. but you can play for the dummy player in such a way to benefit yourself or hurt your opponent. it's real fun. in some ways the argument can be made that playing with 2 players is better. « Show Less