Rebel XT vs XTi: Is it worth paying almost an extra $200 to get the XTi?
847183
I'm no expert, but during my research on the same question I found the following: 1) The difference between The 8MP on the XT and 10MP on the XTi is virtually undetectable until you attempt very large prints. At standard sharp resolution (300 DPI) even a 7.2 MP camera will give you an excellent 8X10 print. You really need 12MP over an 8MP camera to see results in smaller prints. Unless you think you'll print larger than 12X16, your eye likely won't detect any difference in quality between the XT and XTi. 2) The XTi has more Megapixels on the same sensor - this can add more noise at higher ISO settings and from my research it seems the XT may actually take a sharper picture in many cases. But for your own opinion - here is a head to head XTi - TX picture comparison: http://www.dimagemaker.com/article.php?articleID=732 3) Opinions on the noise levels of the XTi vary, here is a good conversation on the subject, some here own both XT and XTi: http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1031&message=20548088 4) The XTI's dust cleaning system is as yet unproven - meaning that many owners of the XTi (professional and otherwise) are not exactly convinced the dust removal feature does what its supposed to. Over all, I found that some people were rather irritated with Canon - theorizing that Canon simply put out an XTi 10-mega pixel model with a few bells and whistles to compete with the other manufacturers. In effect, canon created technologically superior camera that may take inferior photographs. The XTi is an excellent camera, but perhaps not a clear upgrade over the XT. On the upside, the XTi does have a bigger LCD screen and a 9-point auto focus. The XT has a 7-point system that some say can have issues auto focusing with faster lenses. Those faster lenses are typically very expensive and professional grade so the majority of amateur / semi-pro XT users have no complaints. After my research, I went with the XT. Hope this helps
69005
I have the Xsi and I love it. Think about whether or not it's worth $250 extra just to have video and 3 more megapixels. The Xsi has 12.1 megapixels, but that's still enough to make a good poster sized print. I think those are the two biggest differences in the two cameras, so just decide whether or not those extras are worth the extra cash. Good luck! :)
872392
I don't know... suggest googling the REbel XTi and look at the suggested accessories.. or look at the XTi user manual on-line at Canon web site... or, of course, ask Canon...
104803
I looked at shopcartusa.com, and most of the listings there seem very suspicious because: - Those offers are all from vendors I've never heard of before. - All vendors have perfect ratings (5 out of 5 starts). - Prices are ridiculously low ($200-300 for the Rebel XTi body). I can bet if you actually try to order the Rebel XTi for $200, you will be told that: 1. It does not come with US warranty 2. The price is for 'body only'. You have to pay $200 more for the rechargeable battery, charger, user manual and software. (even though those are all included in the original package) 3. You must also buy a 2GB memory for $200 to qualify for this low price. 4. Finaly, it is on back-order - unless you order the body with a 3rd-party lens and flash unit that add another $600 to your cost. So eventually, you'll end up paying over $1200 for a grey-market camera kit.
663718
The list price, on Amazon, or any other web site means nothing. I have a Canon camera that I paid $429 for new three years ago, and that had a list price of $649, but no one ever sold it for that price. The Canon EOS Rebel T3 12.2 MP for $450.00 is a far better deal than the Canon Rebel XS 10.1MP at $400.00. It has far more features, is about two years younger, and shoots video in the HD movie mode. The Canon Rebel XS does not shoot video, only still photos.
790510
Dust is an issue if you plan to change lense often. I have a XTi, despite the dust cleaning system I don't plan to remove the lens much. Dust is a real problem for digital as the camera back never gets replaced unlike film. Also, D80 is $200 more than XTi. Nikon lenses are usually more expensive. Quality wise, i think, they are fairly equivalent. Your skills will probably make more difference than the equipment.
105686
The 30D, as noted by others, is a much sturdier camera. In addition, keep in mind that it shoots at a faster rate (5 fps), has a more ergonomic set of controls, and shoots better in low light-- ranging all the way up to 3200 ISO after expansion.I wouldn't be surprised to see Canon offer a similar jump to 10.1 MP or higher in this price range soon, more to compete with Nikon's D80 and D200 than to compete with their own product.That said, I'm adding the XTi as a backup to my existing 20D.
1103918
Thanks Michael and BryanYou guy's feedback has been extremely helpful. I will probably never use IR for my work even though that is a cool feature to have, but the added XLR option, the handle and the blu-ray encoding makes the XA10 really tempting. But since both the cameras will perform equally in low light and I usually use a separate mic (Zoom H1) to capture audio don't know if my boss will think $500 extra justifies the extra features. We will see :).
916478
I was looking at the 28-135 for my Rebel xti....let me know how you like once you get a chance to try it out.
99924
Honestly, probably not...don't get me wrong, I absolutely love my XSi! But for concerts, you want something that is very light and small. Also, the standard lens on an XSi has a slight wide angle to a slight telephoto, but has a very limited range and you will need to be able to pull your subject in close unless you have awesome seats. So you will need a long zoom; probably a point and shoot with a 10X or more...If you do decide you want to use a DSLR at a concert, then get very familiar with your camera AND get yourself a longer lens. If you can spend the $$, go for an 18-200. I just ordered one for a student of mine that is a Tamron for a Canon for $170. Not bad at all. Hope that helps. Honestly, probably not...don't get me wrong, I absolutely love my XSi! But for concerts, you want something that is very light and small. Also, the standard lens on an XSi has a slight wide angle to a slight telephoto, but has a very limited range and you will need to be able to pull your subject in close unless you have awesome seats. So you will need a long zoom; probably a point and shoot with a 10X or more...If you do decide you want to use a DSLR at a concert, then get very familiar with your camera AND get yourself a longer lens. If you can spend the $$, go for an 18-200. I just... » Read More Honestly, probably not...don't get me wrong, I absolutely love my XSi! But for concerts, you want something that is very light and small. Also, the standard lens on an XSi has a slight wide angle to a slight telephoto, but has a very limited range and you will need to be able to pull your subject in close unless you have awesome seats. So you will need a long zoom; probably a point and shoot with a 10X or more...If you do decide you want to use a DSLR at a concert, then get very familiar with your camera AND get yourself a longer lens. If you can spend the $$, go for an 18-200. I just ordered one for a student of mine that is a Tamron for a Canon for $170. Not bad at all. Hope that helps. « Show Less
1321840
I think the T5i is a better choice is you are willing to spend the extra money. It's faster and more capable, plus it comes with the newer 18-55 STM kit lens, which not only has benefits for autofocus during video, but it's also noticeably sharper optically than the older 18-55 kit lens bundled with the T5. The two have the exact same 18MP sensor, however, so image quality is probably very similar. Plus, you get an articulating LCD and capacitive touch screen with the T5i and the screen has more than double the resolution of the T5's. The T5 is not a bad camera despite its use of older technology, it's just way too expensive at it's starting price. If it were to drop down to say, $400-$450, it would be a better buy.
26494
Dust is an issue if you plan to change lense often. I have a XTi, despite the dust cleaning system I don't plan to remove the lens much. Dust is a real problem for digital as the camera back never gets replaced unlike film.Also, D80 is $200 more than XTi. Nikon lenses are usually more expensive. Quality wise, i think, they are fairly equivalent. Your skills will probably make more difference than the equipment.
231215
If they're the same price then get the T5i. It has a couple of new features. The T4i has been discontinued so is no longer subject to Canon's pricing policies.
504961
Almost nothing. Put it this way: if you found them for sale at the same price then might as well get the T5i. The T5i MSRP is slightly lower than what the *original* MSRP for a similar kit was for the T4i, but we all know that you don't pay MSRP. Even here on Amazon a nice package in my cart shows the T4i to be nearly $200 cheaper than the T5i. That's because of the Canon discount that ends (this time) March 30th (it has been extended several time since November 2011). Essentially, they are clearing out the T4i and the Canon lineup will continue to have T3i and T5i, but no more T4i. Here's the opening paragraph from CNET's review, which highlights the only actual differences between the two models: "No, your eyes aren't deceiving you: the only significant difference between the now-discontinued Canon EOS Rebel T4i and its replacement, the T5i, is the price and the kit lens options. There are some small enhancements, including a new finish; 360-degree rotation mode dial plus the addition of scene mode; a return of digital zoom during movie recording (which had disappeared in the T4i "upgrade" from the T3i); and real-time preview of creative filters in Live View. But ultimately, it's the same camera." -CNET
105687
If you go to your camera store and feel both cameras you can see the reason. The 30D looks and feels like a professional camera. It is much heavier and not only looks more sturdy but in fact it is more sturdy than the xti. The xti feels rather cheap in your hand when compared to holding the 30D. The 30D is also a faster camera for shooting sports or weddings when you need to focus and shoot fast before the moment is gone. Depends what you need it for; $500 more for a more sturdy camera with 2million less pixels, although if the largest pic you are going to print is an 8X10 you probably will not be able to tell the difference. Go for the xti or wait for the new version of the 30D called the 30D Mark II If you go to your camera store and feel both cameras you can see the reason. The 30D looks and feels like a professional camera. It is much heavier and not only looks more sturdy but in fact it is more sturdy than the xti. The xti feels rather cheap in your hand when compared to holding the 30D. The 30D is also a faster camera for shooting sports or weddings when you need to focus and shoot fast before the moment is gone. Depends what you need it for; $500 more for a more sturdy camera with 2million less pixels, although if the largest pic you are going to print is an 8X10 you probably will... » Read More If you go to your camera store and feel both cameras you can see the reason. The 30D looks and feels like a professional camera. It is much heavier and not only looks more sturdy but in fact it is more sturdy than the xti. The xti feels rather cheap in your hand when compared to holding the 30D. The 30D is also a faster camera for shooting sports or weddings when you need to focus and shoot fast before the moment is gone. Depends what you need it for; $500 more for a more sturdy camera with 2million less pixels, although if the largest pic you are going to print is an 8X10 you probably will not be able to tell the difference. Go for the xti or wait for the new version of the 30D called the 30D Mark II « Show Less
462699
Get the 40D kit. The 28-135 is an excellent lens; I used it for years. The 40D is an outstanding camera; we sold the XTi after owning the 40D a week. Worth every penny-you will love it. By the way, I paid considerably more than what it is selling for now and I don't regret buying it when I did as I got that much extra use out of it.
2172668
Sad. Now that the T2i can be purchased at the same price, I'm afraid Nikon will lose out to Canon. I'd prefer the Nikon if the price was better, but at the same price, I think I'm leaning toward the T2i. I will wait a few days to make the purchase, but if it was today, I'd have to buy Canon.