Anyone know the primary difference(s) between this gun and the senco 25xp? This one seems better overall? But the 25xp is almost 2x more money..?
1661879
The specs show that the 18MG is about half the weight of the 25XP and there is an adjustment on the 25XP to increase the power at the tool rather than return to a compressor to adjust the pressure, about a 30% increase is stated. For a DIYer I don't think the additional expense is necessary. I have the 18MG and it works fine. A pro would probably prefer the 25MG, especially for the lighter weight and repetitive use. But I personally have never seen the 25MG. I am a DIYer myself.
1661880
Looks like the 25xp has "turbo power" for harder woods. I have the 18mg, and use it mostly for pine trim into fir. I haven't experienced any power issues yet, it sinks well into the tightest knots. I think the 25xp might be the choice for someone who works with a lot of harder woods frequently....Hope this helps
1661881
The XP25 is lighter weight but has a few more features, like the air connector swivels 360 degrees, and a power adjuster for more power, but the one draw back it is not oil free
2246862
Great question. I would like more input on that as well. I am perplexed why these are half the price of the P311's? What makes the P311's worth twice as much?
1324053
This pistol is very worth it. the only other pistol you should think of is the Tiberius new model, those are the only pistols worth buying at the moment. if you want a better comparison those are much more expensive. tpix is the best out on the market at the moment. When it Comes to a fire fight durable and reliable and can come out on top and can compete with the best of the best against paintball rifle and pistols.
1341866
Agree with others. We bought 7 different cheap pistols most made of metal. This is the only one still working. Its Plastic , durable,& fun for airsoft wars with kids ( all under 15 yrs old) it doesn't hurt as bad as higher fps. Also my son says the grip on this gun is Serrated/notched which makes it more stable for pulling slide fast and not losing your grip from sweaty hands. Great choice of gun for price! Good luck.
425510
It has a green laser that is about 50x's brighter than the cheaper one. Has more barrel adaptors and I believe it is magnetic where the other isn't to make a more secure mount. What they don't mention is the ability to download a simple ballistics program too that let's you print test targets.I think all versions get this but I am sure this one does. Also, the tipping factor for me is this one is the civilian version of the one that the USMC uses.So far so good. Sighted in 3 of my rifles without leaving the house and when I hit the range it took me only 3-4 shots to complete the zero. It has a green laser that is about 50x's brighter than the cheaper one. Has more barrel adaptors and I believe it is magnetic where the other isn't to make a more secure mount. What they don't mention is the ability to download a simple ballistics program too that let's you print test targets.I think all versions get this but I am sure this one does. Also, the tipping factor for me is this one is the civilian version of the one that the USMC uses.So far so good. Sighted in 3 of my rifles without leaving the house and when I hit the range it took me only 3-4 shots to... » Read More It has a green laser that is about 50x's brighter than the cheaper one. Has more barrel adaptors and I believe it is magnetic where the other isn't to make a more secure mount. What they don't mention is the ability to download a simple ballistics program too that let's you print test targets.I think all versions get this but I am sure this one does. Also, the tipping factor for me is this one is the civilian version of the one that the USMC uses.So far so good. Sighted in 3 of my rifles without leaving the house and when I hit the range it took me only 3-4 shots to complete the zero. « Show Less
1297918
My advise, purchase the 620-PISTOLGRPQR, as opposed to the 620-CPG. The quality of the plate is the difference, while the price difference is negligible. Hope this helps, be blessed
1693258
I could never tell the difference from product descriptions and even an online chat session with a CS rep. I ended up buying the 895 since it was a but less expensive than the 870 and it has a charging station and travel case that the 870 doesn't have. I have been happy with it so far.
1638746
Don't forget about the layout of the controls and how that affects thumb placement for one hand shooting. I have handled both and the 870 was very frustrating to figure out where to place my thumb without blocking the corner of the screen or bumping into the touch sensitive wheel. This frustration factor alone is driving me away from the 870.
1851153
I really haven't shot it all that much. My son and grandson was over a few weeks ago and a new co2 we only shot a full clip (16) and then I just dry fired the rest of the co2. Didn't seem to last much longer? I do like my P25, feels great and fun to shoot. In my city it's illegal to shoot outside :(
1536208
I'm sorry, I can't answer your question directly, but I felt that I needed to respond anyway. I own the EFX20. It is fine, but here is the MAJOR drawback. It uses two AAA batteries. They are exhausted after very little shooting. I think that the refresh time is very slow at 5-6 seconds. Unless you need a small occasional flash, I would not purchase the EX-X20. The EF-20 uses 2 AA batteries. It has a swivel and tilt head. It is a slightly cheaper build from what I understand. If you want maximum flash and recycle times, I would look at the Fuji 42. The EF X20 is made for the X-1, but I just am disappointed with the lack of power. Hope this helps. DKR I'm sorry, I can't answer your question directly, but I felt that I needed to respond anyway. I own the EFX20. It is fine, but here is the MAJOR drawback. It uses two AAA batteries. They are exhausted after very little shooting. I think that the refresh time is very slow at 5-6 seconds. Unless you need a small occasional flash, I would not purchase the EX-X20. The EF-20 uses 2 AA batteries. It has a swivel and tilt head. It is a slightly cheaper build from what I understand. If you want maximum flash and recycle times, I would look at the Fuji 42. The EF X20 is made for the X-1, but I just... » Read More I'm sorry, I can't answer your question directly, but I felt that I needed to respond anyway. I own the EFX20. It is fine, but here is the MAJOR drawback. It uses two AAA batteries. They are exhausted after very little shooting. I think that the refresh time is very slow at 5-6 seconds. Unless you need a small occasional flash, I would not purchase the EX-X20. The EF-20 uses 2 AA batteries. It has a swivel and tilt head. It is a slightly cheaper build from what I understand. If you want maximum flash and recycle times, I would look at the Fuji 42. The EF X20 is made for the X-1, but I just am disappointed with the lack of power. Hope this helps. DKR « Show Less
771597
I would highly suggest not buying this gun. I own it, and after using it for 4 months I can tell you that it is defiantly a better use of your money to buy a different gun.
35174
The big selling point is size. But it also has about double the battery life and NVG compatible. If those things are not important then go with the PRO. I have both and they are both bomb proof optics.
1772312
functionally, not much at all (I'm not a rep, but slept at a Holiday Inn Express last night ;) I got the GXP a year ago, (A) because they were out of stock on the cheaper XPro & gave me a *great* deal, and (B) the foot print of the GXP is smaller (depth by 6+ inches & height by a couple (IIRC)). For me, it was going in a 10x10 den. Better looks, 2x doubling cable & the cable arms... plus it fit... The GXP was and still is perfect.
85341
The X20 has a slightly different sensor that is suppose to be slightly sharper but the differences are very small, as to be virtually undetectable. Some people like the X10 better then the 20 because it has a more sophisticated and feature rich Contrast Control setting. The lens is exactly the same. I was dissapointed that there wasn't more of a difference. Oh ... the X20 displays some of your exposure settings in the optical view finder. But a lot of folks don't even use the optical view finder and instead just use the excellent monitor. It was pretty much of a waste for me to "upgrade" from the 10 to the 20 ... but my son enjoys inheriting the 10. :-) The X20 has a slightly different sensor that is suppose to be slightly sharper but the differences are very small, as to be virtually undetectable. Some people like the X10 better then the 20 because it has a more sophisticated and feature rich Contrast Control setting. The lens is exactly the same. I was dissapointed that there wasn't more of a difference. Oh ... the X20 displays some of your exposure settings in the optical view finder. But a lot of folks don't even use the optical view finder and instead just use the excellent monitor. It was pretty much of a waste for me to... » Read More The X20 has a slightly different sensor that is suppose to be slightly sharper but the differences are very small, as to be virtually undetectable. Some people like the X10 better then the 20 because it has a more sophisticated and feature rich Contrast Control setting. The lens is exactly the same. I was dissapointed that there wasn't more of a difference. Oh ... the X20 displays some of your exposure settings in the optical view finder. But a lot of folks don't even use the optical view finder and instead just use the excellent monitor. It was pretty much of a waste for me to "upgrade" from the 10 to the 20 ... but my son enjoys inheriting the 10. :-) « Show Less
518565
imo the torrent sx and mk 177 by crosman are both better than a 760 and a 664 gt and all 4 are by crosman and the same price range.i would say the 760 is the worst performance wise out of the 4 but its also the cheapist.
1071230
Not much difference, I like thumb hole to pistol grip. It is what ever your preference is. If you look closely you will see that the axiom is just a tad bit longer than the ibex. I am 6'4" and found out the ibex could be just a bit longer. No problem you can get extenders. So choose either one, both will be one of the best purchases you have made. Oh one more thing buy the bolt cutter broad heads. People get all caught up in Fps, just practice and shoot, and you are good. 280fps or 330 Fps, at 30 yards the animal is dead in just over one second. I have shot deer for 50 years with gun, bow, muzzle loader, and it is human error, not how fast or how powerful. Practice!
1893354
Hello Amy. I see that you've not gotten a reply yet for a few days. I own the Canon SX130is camera that is nearly identical to that of the next version, the SX150is. I even owned the previous model of mine now, SX120is. THe only reason for the upgrade was to get HD video and stereo sound. Other than that, I loved that camera too. I've not studied the others you are deciding on but just looked them over. THere's not a "night & day" major difference between them. Differences of 2x zoom power is not major IMHO. Frames per second in burst mode shooting is. Size may be a factor too. But I can tell you why I like my camera. A manual flip up flash allows unmistakeable control over the flash and keeps the camera from waisting power charging for a flash that you didn't need for that shot. The option of complete manual settings is a must. And the advantage of using AA batteries gives you limitless flexibility of power. Don't let the negative reviews tell you that you cannot take lots of photos with this camera. If you get some high capacity rechargable batteries and enough for an extra set, you'll be good. Several here have recommended Sanyo Eneloop brand cells. That they come precharged and hold that charge for extended periods of storage time. A friend of mine used them and swears by them. I use Ansmann 2850 mAh batteries (which are higher capacity) and they give me nearly 200 more shots in my Canon SX20is than what is rated in the camera manual.