I currently own a Simmons 20-60x60 Scope. I see that this scope has better ratings. Is it worth the upgrade?
1664767
This an outstanding scope for zeroing in your rifles and viewing down range targets. We have used it up to 200 meters and the clarity is outstanding. 5 star recommend.
1664768
I am not familiar with the Smmons, but the Celestron optics as absolutely the best. I have one of their 11" models that is unbelievable.
1664769
I have not seen the Simmons. I am very pleased with my Celestron up thru 40X or maybe 45X. Above that, the optics are not as clear, and detail is not much more visible, even though the image is larger. Most of my useage is 1.5-2 miles looting at wildlife. At shorter ranges, the higher magnification would probably be adequate as well, that's just not what I use it for. Moon shots are impressive!
1664770
The primary benefit of the upgrade will be a brighter image and a modest increase in resolution. The 80mm Celestron won't give you an "oh wow" difference, but it will be an improvement. For a dramatic difference in image quality, you would have to go to one of the ED scopes like the Regal series, but at a much higher price point.I hope this helps.
1664771
In a word; probably. The Celestron is quite adequate. Way back I had a smaller B&L; which was sharper, but did not have the magnification I sought.I use the Celestron strictly for rifle shooting out to a max of 300 yards. Bright enough but seems to have a very small amber ring around the perimeter.
283852
I got the "MULTI-ADAPTER MA5-4" from this website [ http://www.desertskyastro.com/Dovetails.html ] $25 plus $6 shipping. I have the scope attached to a Celeston CG-2 mount I got for around $120 on Ebay. It's fine for just viewing but I wouldn't recommend it for photography which I am not into. I highly recommend getting the double stacking filter if you haven't gotten it already...it's very much worth it. It greatly enhances the viewing experience.
1054861
Also I think you can look up bdc conversions on Google. Its a great scope for the money. I've owned quite a few rifle and scope setups and this one on my tikka t3 has been my favorite and most useful across the board so far. Haven't found a use for the illuminated reticle yet but its cool to have.
1413313
I bought this scope for basic birdwatching, and hunting use. Landscape features a few miles away? I wouldn't expect much from it. I would go for something higher power than 16x for that. An inexpensive spotting scope? I'd look into this: Enjoydeal Multifunctional High Power MONO Multi-Coated 15-50X21 Single-tube Telescope MonocularTelescope Black
1748297
I had problems with the scope that came with the Ruger Blackhack 177 I decided to change to a better scope and it worked out fine for me, better mounts help let me get a good bulls eye shot.
609846
Any comparison ultimately comes down to you. It depends on what you want from a scope and how you are going to use it. Go to your nearest big box sporting goods store and see what you see. I hope that helps.
1714654
My scope had the same thing. I sent it back and they sent me an upgraded scope.
197475
Look at the Benjamin Titan NP. Been thru 2 factory scope with my Silent Stalker .22 and finally had to purchase an after market scope to make this work. The Titan is cheaper and has a better customer rating. Wish I would have done this myself. Just my 2 cents!
2272744
I would say this scope is a bit of overkill for the 10/22, but you could mount it with the correct rings. The magnification on this scope would be good out to at least 400yds and I rarely shoot a 22 past 100yrds. I would suggest this same scope in a 3x9x40 and stick with the Nikon because they are the best for the money.
1728210
I had it on a 7.62x39 so from my experience yes. I sold the gun it was on so don't know how long it's gonna hold up. I found it to be decent as a cheap optic when your in the bush. And it looks really nice.
403543
I really like the scope, but like several others that I have had, night vision is not equal to a daylight glass scope in magnification. If you need 4x then get the 5x. We are using them on crossbows and the 4x works just fine
1809658
I sent mine back. I didn't like the scope at all. I would look into Mueller scopes. You can get a 24x or 32 x for a few bucks more. I have these relatively inexpensive scopes on all my asault rifles Remington 700 and .22 rifles. They are great. Look into them, do a little research. Hope I helped you out. If can't get them here try optics planet.
1781806
Based on reputation (and, I don't own one), I think the the Bushnell is a better scope. I currently have a lower-priced Leupold Gold Ring scope on my Savage Model 12 varmint rifle. The Tasco is a good, emergency type temporary scope. I would carefully check all the Leupold scopes and buy the best one I could afford. I like all Leupold and Black Hills products - good, American products, and quality is generally cheaper in the long run. Good luck!
675758
Yes. Btw this is the BEST scope I've ever used, & I've used scopes WAY more expensive!! Quality is awesome & lenses are Clear beyond belief. Hope it helps :)
2004126
hi - i no longer have as i returned it within a week. i went with the vortex pst 6x24x50 ffp w ilum reticle - both are good for sure. what i do is go to the company website and identify the model i want with the options i want ex reticle, ffp or sfp, magnification etc and then shop. the model number drives all...atleast when i shop - hope this helps - drj
1407129
the scope is fine. don't get their bigger one .it wont fit and they make you buy an extra large mount. forget credit!
511020
Hi, I'm not a scope snob. I think there are decent cheap or inexpensive scopes. This isn't one of them. If you are anyone other than Stevie Wonder I urge you not to buy this scope. You will regret it.