SD4000 jpeg size: Might this be a problem when I go to print some blow-ups, or is this the way of world now?
968293
I noticed that too. They might have just really enhanced the compression practices of JPEG files. I wouldn't mind bigger file sizes myself if the image quality were improved....
890213
My black and white negatives were pretty big when converted. I used Windows photo manager (edit button gives you several options for improving your pictures) to compress the file size. Worked great for me!
1163203
I just bought a digital frame and have the same question. Supposedly it's 480x220 but just like you - that leaves space top and bottom. I tried various other dimensions but have yet to fill the frame. 450x240 is close but not quite there and the frame is probably doing some unwanted manipulation to the picture.Have you gotten any clues from elsewhere?
933797
You need the software to process the photos and export them to a jpg format. At that point they could be printed, but they are admittedly very low resolution (aprox. 1MP square.)
630171
I won't be much help. We didn't like the pics we got on dry land do returned it immediately. Pics were too pixilated to ever print. Hope that helps
1703898
I'm mystified by the print section of Aftershot. So much so, that I got in the habit of opening images in another program to print. Sorry that I can't help.
547992
I assume you mean a print image. Haven't done that. Can't tell you for certain. However, it will create a 7200 dpi image and creates very large .tiff files. If I recall they're around 20M+.
1927829
Have to follow-on to my previous answer... my wife got a new phone (S4) this summer, and we just tried using it for the first time with this printer to do some back-to-school pictures. Ran into two problems that hadn't occurred in the past. First, the S4 has a nice camera... well, too large for bluetooth on this printer. Max printer BT image size is 2.5 MB; the full-quality photos from the S4 exceed this (so had to copy to card to print). The other is instagram photos which are square - they were lower quality so would print, but the photo print is rectangular and cut off the edges. So it would seem that the printer is now old enough that the newest phones are going to have problems. Have to follow-on to my previous answer... my wife got a new phone (S4) this summer, and we just tried using it for the first time with this printer to do some back-to-school pictures. Ran into two problems that hadn't occurred in the past. First, the S4 has a nice camera... well, too large for bluetooth on this printer. Max printer BT image size is 2.5 MB; the full-quality photos from the S4 exceed this (so had to copy to card to print). The other is instagram photos which are square - they were lower quality so would print, but the photo print is rectangular and cut off the edges. So it... » Read More Have to follow-on to my previous answer... my wife got a new phone (S4) this summer, and we just tried using it for the first time with this printer to do some back-to-school pictures. Ran into two problems that hadn't occurred in the past. First, the S4 has a nice camera... well, too large for bluetooth on this printer. Max printer BT image size is 2.5 MB; the full-quality photos from the S4 exceed this (so had to copy to card to print). The other is instagram photos which are square - they were lower quality so would print, but the photo print is rectangular and cut off the edges. So it would seem that the printer is now old enough that the newest phones are going to have problems. « Show Less
1032834
You will need to set your scan for the maximum DPI possible and make sure that both the photo being scanned and the scanner glass is as free of dust / lint etc as possible. The only issue I see here is the graininess of the original photo. The larger the grain in the original the less desirable the 36 x 36 print will be.
40459
I guess for different scenes, the compression ratio is different. A smooth scene needs less GBs then a busy one.
2089309
I believe you set the resolution (dpi) when you are ready to print the photo through the program you chose to use. When I take a photo, I usually set the Quality at 18M 5184x3456 since that is the highest. Then you can zoom in on an area of the photo without losing quality. I am able to crop quite a bit without major "pixelization" (not sure if that's a word.) Good luck!
1084174
I am surprised that Some users report capacity-related issues. I purchased a Transcend SDHC Class 10 32G card that I had to format using the camera build-in menu for a correct initialization. It has been working fine since, save a reformatting from time to time when it is not recognized anymore. I would advise to avoid low capacity cards as the same disk Sectors will be Constantly written over, thus faster degrading the card.
23485
I have a 16 GB Transcend SDHC Class 10 card in mine. Works fine and will accommodate approx 2400 Large Fine jpegs or 1150 raw.
1591569
I just bought a digital frame and have the same question. Supposedly it's 480x220 but just like you - that leaves space top and bottom. I tried various other dimensions but have yet to fill the frame. 450x240 is close but not quite there and the frame is probably doing some unwanted manipulation to the picture. Have you gotten any clues from elsewhere?
1945101
I'm not really sure and I've had mine for a year, but maybe try to make image smaller and make sure the photos are under JPEG cause if there not they wont work! Cause I know none of mine were JPEG and so it wouldn't work!
497743
Since I am tech challanged I need to ask, about how many jpegs will this hold?
322539
You will only get the advertised resolution at the native aspect ratio. Unfortunately I am not sure what ratio is native to the 40D, but it may also have had a reduced resolution for the 16:9 aspect.The difference in 12 to 10 megapixels should not have a big effect on your prints, you can also crop from the 4:3 images to get what you would like - with of course the the same loss of pixels, but you may feel more in control of what you lose this way.