How does this tv handle motion, being 60 htz and large screen?
1680507
Have used it for 3 weeks seen no motion blur. In fact 60hz is preferred if you don't want that soap opera look that can be seen in the new Hobbit film.
1680508
It handle great while watching a football and basketball game, on regular coaxial cable line connection, but only problem I had believe it was my cable company had hiccups through the box signal
1680509
I really can not say. It is a Christmas gift and still in the box. I hope it will be awesome.
1680510
I just got this set. I have not noticed any issues with motion. However, when the set is placed in "vivid" mode, the picture looks very grainy when viewing things like: grass on a football field. In standard mode, it is really great.
1680511
It looks acceptable, the better the source, the less noticeable it is. Has a fairly fast pixel response.I can see the difference between it and my Panasonic plasma, but its ok.Have not watched any fast moving sports on it yet.
1680512
When I looked at a bunch of TVs on display, the motion on this one looks better than other 120 htz TVs.
1822093
I purchased the 650 2 months ago and I love it. The 120Hz refresh rate is not a problem because i only receive a 60Hz refresh rate signal from DTV. My DVD player (which is not a Blue Ray player) doesn't even put out a 120Hz signal. The first week of watching the TV is strange because of the clarity. It takes some getting used to but once used to it you do you will never go back. The only downside to the 650 is the glossy black finish framing the LCD screen. Minor dents on the frame appear with the right light and can be annoying. I highly recommend the 650 to anyone looking for a new LCD.
1891921
I ask the same question at Best Buy on the 40" model; They responded, a slightly better contrast (dynamic contrast ratio)... Anyone can compare models at Samsungs website... The 40" model was unavailable in 240 hz & I never found hertz listed in specs on samsungs site to know if that is true about the 50" model, the CMR (clear motion rate) is listed at 240 on both models...
1369217
I dont think the tv has bad motion blur at all. At least not for a LCD. As a matter of fact its the best I've ever seen. But at all LCDs have motion blur its part of the tech. But its the best at handle motion blur I've ever seen. I dont think you will even notice it. As for inout lag, i am not sensitive to tv input lag, so i cant tell.
2073373
No, it's Native 60Hz. From LG's FAQ page: "The 47LB6300 HDTV does not have the Trumotion feature. That is a feature that is featured in all the LG HDTVs with a 120Hz refresh rate and since the 47LB6300 is not a 120Hz refresh rate and is a 60Hz refresh rate, it does not have the feature..." http://answers.lg.com/answers/7676/product/MD05098569/lg-electronics-47lb6300-questions-answers/questions.htm
2040
I own it and it is mostly fine. After a move a few years ago, a yellow line runs down the middle that is only really noticeable on blue backgrounds. It runs hot and is an energy hog (200w) compared to current LCD tvs. Also the contrast and resolution is not as sharp as current tvs even at 720p. The remote only works if you point it at the lower right corner of the TV, where the sensor is. 40" tvs are $300 new (with better specs), so I hope you get a good deal.
2138083
No clue. I bought the 46" version and it is 60Hz only. The 55" apparently is 120Hz, at least according to the specs. I doubt the refresh rate is selectable
2037155
I was going to buy it for PC gaming but wont if Hz cant adjust. Isnt it true that all new LED TVs can auto set to whatever the games fps (60 or 120Hz) is?
2073371
I spoke online with an LG rep yesterday who told me that the native refresh rate is 60hz. The TV contains software and other features that mimic a refresh rate of 120hz, but this is not the same thing as a native refresh rate of 120hz. This is in keeping with the trend over the last several years of manufacturers artificially bulking up the refresh rate to try to convince you the picture is better.
348309
I have the 42" and have not had any such problems. I do not believe that there is a "60"hz mode. Since the tv is a 120 hz, there are two options. Display the same image twice, which gives a slightly laggy effect, or try to predict the next frame and display it roughly. Which gives the soap feel. 120 hz are kind of off sometimes.
1475234
I see lots of motion blur on my set. This is very subjective; some people can't see it while for others it is very noticeable, so ymmv. My girlfriend doesn't notice it at all. If I had to do it all over again I would get an lcd with 120hz refresh or a plasma, but I don't watch a lot of sports, so I'll hold on to this set. This is the only negative point I have found.
871894
Its the refresh rate. I own this TV and the TV I used to have was 120hz. I was weary about getting the 60hz but the price was unbeatable for this one and I see absolutly no difference from 120hz
1467599
I use this TV for gaming on PS3 and 4. I haven't had any issues with latency, refresh rate or other visuals.
197664
It's flawless watching sports. The 120 Hz handles fast frame rates exceptionally well. I've had it for a few months now and it has spoiled me as my friends' TVs just don't stack up despite being much larger and far more expensive
2189601
The refresh rate. For TVs, the refresh rate means nothing. A high refresh rate TV does not guarantee it to be motion blur free. Even for console gaming, there is no advantage to a 120Hz+ TV because the console video games are capped at 60 fps anyway.
1712858
The refresh rate is 120 Hz. The "240 CMR" is part of an arbitrary measurement ("Clear Motion Rate") that Samsung applies to their current line of HDTVs.
2105987
This isn't a silly question at all! It's actually one of the best questions I've seen on here. The answer is no because you can only input a 60hz signal into the TV (just confirmed this - When I connected my laptop to my UN65H7150, it defaulted to 59hz and the highest option for me to put it at was 60hz). The software on the TV tries to figure out what should be between each frame inputted to it. Googled it and confirmed it: "Unfortunately televisions function differently than monitors. The 240hz is not the refresh rate, but the amount of frames that the television can produce after using a built in interpolation algorithm. It's base refresh and likely highest available for you to use with a computer is 60Hz and then the interpolation software in the television adds more frames in between frames from your input and outputs 240 frames. This makes it look smoother." For a movie, it'd look smoother, but for gaming it'd probably do more harm than good. Seems like what I found on google checks out. Grab a 120hz monitor made for a computer, not a TV for your son.