how does the sound compare to tdk a33?
1661540
Honestly I have own a number of blutooth speakers.A33 the sound clarity is not bad.Good but the bass is very boomy.Too powerful bass.Presently now I strongly recommend Creative Roar. Price at US 149.Friendly users. The clarity is good with Roar button on.It provides better sound.Run with high volume battery last better than A33.You can even mount on the bicycle with simple modifications.
1661541
The sound does not compare well. If the A33 is in your price range and the portability is something you can sacrifice, the A33 is worth it. I have both the Trek and the A33 (different purposes for both), and as you can imagine, you'll hear a much fuller sound from the A33 over the what this A26 offers. I agree with A/V Man that the sound quality is pretty thin (and I find it to be too thin for the price, to be honest), but I kept it anyway. Probably should have checked out the UE Boom, but since the A33 was so good I went for it, anyway. Live and learn.
1661542
Not sure how good the a33 was but the a26 went back. It sounded awful. Much to thin for my enjoyment. I had the q35 as well and returned it as it was too boomy (over emphasized bass). I picked up the UE Boom and am very happy. It has 15 hours battery life vs. the 6 from TDK. I got the Boom 20%off at a local wireless carrier store. I highly recommend not buying the a26. It's cheaper but the sound is pretty bad when compared to similar devices like the jawbone mini.
1317587
Better audio, higher price. Take a look at SoundBlaster Roar. You will not regret spending a few minutes on it.
1947426
I have a high end home theatre system - my receiver is 7.1 but speakers I only have a 5.1 setup. I think the toshiba is hd master audio and dolby hd quality for 5.1 just not 7.1 right. So i should just grab the a30? Thanks in advance.
635528
Several Head-Fi'ers have asked AKG representatives about the reported differences in sound response. There is officially currently none whatsoever. According to the representatives, the only difference is in badging and any differences seen in graphed results and heard in listening sessions are merely because of positioning during testing and manufacturing variation. Due to the rather large, angled earpads, the Q/K70X's sound response can experience variations of 10 decibels or more in some areas from extremely slight changes in positioning. In fact, a cited common problem among users is that many of them extend the headphones very far down and forward on their cheeks, which results in a boring, undynamic sound. Now, having said all this, this is not to say there is not a difference between the vintage, first generation crop of K701 when it first came out and the newer Q701 and K701/2 that are currently in production. As a matter of fact, many users have reported that the grit in the older K701 is there no more in the newer models.
961818
I happen to own both models... They both sound tlhe same at reference levels, however the egged one is better for music.
763405
Mousa, I'm looking at the same thing, and here's what I've found from checking out Onkyo's website. They have all the current models listed with specs, features, pics, and links to authorized vendors (Amazon included). I also recommend cnet's website for third party and customer reviews. http://www.us.onkyo.com/prod_class.cfm?class=Systems Here's a summary of what I found there: The 5300 gets stepped up to the 6300 with up-conversion on the analog inputs plus powered zone 2 (which allows for same or separate audio to be output on two channels to another location), then the 7300 adds some minor speaker upgrades with tallboy front speakers & bass reflex. For $200 more (MSRP), the 9300 gives you THX certification, upgraded optional on-screen interface, a larger subwoofer (12" ^ from 10"), and an extra Composite input, but no longer includes the optional IR iPod dock. I'm leaning toward the 7300 since the cost vs. the 6300 is minimal and the 5300 doesn't up-scale, but haven't made the purchase yet. My local fry's has them in stock and will price match so I plan on trying them out there first.
268413
Kae, I haven't heard the DT-770, but what I can tell you is the Beoplay H6 is a polar opposite of all consumer headphones on the market (beats and bose etc) they are VERY bass lite and are amazingly well balanced. They are not "clinical" or overly bright, they just sound right. It is the recordings pureness that defines the sound with these. There is no coloring or tilt to the sound. I can compare them to my custom UE-4pros and they share a very close sound signature!! I would suggest that you try them out and return them to amazon if you don't like the sound. I give these a 5/5 for sound!!! Kae, I haven't heard the DT-770, but what I can tell you is the Beoplay H6 is a polar opposite of all consumer headphones on the market (beats and bose etc) they are VERY bass lite and are amazingly well balanced. They are not "clinical" or overly bright, they just sound right. It is the recordings pureness that defines the sound with these. There is no coloring or tilt to the sound. I can compare them to my custom UE-4pros and they share a very close sound signature!! I would suggest that you try them out and return them to amazon if you don't like the sound. I give... » Read More Kae, I haven't heard the DT-770, but what I can tell you is the Beoplay H6 is a polar opposite of all consumer headphones on the market (beats and bose etc) they are VERY bass lite and are amazingly well balanced. They are not "clinical" or overly bright, they just sound right. It is the recordings pureness that defines the sound with these. There is no coloring or tilt to the sound. I can compare them to my custom UE-4pros and they share a very close sound signature!! I would suggest that you try them out and return them to amazon if you don't like the sound. I give these a 5/5 for sound!!! « Show Less
702910
Can't compare the two from personal experience -- however, for what it's worth, Consumer Reports rated the small Jambox's audio quality well below this TDK model.
1637446
I believe the sounds quality features are different as well, though I could be wrong, on Kenwood's website there is comparison thing though if I recall correctly
2198514
VNicko33 , sounds perfect like a amplifier. You can buy it without affraid.I live in appartament and is perfect to me , Because I cant use a normal amplifier , the sound is clean , and have some adjustments!Good Luck!
1433291
I own both and the A7 sounds much better and much more volume audiophile quality.
637243
I wish that I could tell you the difference, but given the fact that I've never listened to anything through the M50's, I can't comment on that headset. I can tell you that the M50's cost a lot less (at least recently given some deals on the M50's), I can tell you that there is probably a lot more quality built into the ATH-A700Xs, but whether or not you would be able to discern the difference I'm sure will come down to preference. I say spring for these (ATH-A700X) since I can comment on them and they are ridiculous. You won't be disappointed
2121882
I owned the RTI A1's for about three years and recently upgraded to the RTI A3's. There is no doubt that the A3's are a far superior speaker, especially for music. The 6.5" driver gives much better mid bass which makes the sound warmer and smoother. I always felt that I had to really turn up the A1's to be able to hear everything in the music. With the A3's I can hear everything, even when played at low volumes. The A3's are quite a bit bigger (especially in depth) but if you have room for them, I can highly recommend going with them over the A1's. The difference was substantial and immediately noticeable. I owned the RTI A1's for about three years and recently upgraded to the RTI A3's. There is no doubt that the A3's are a far superior speaker, especially for music. The 6.5" driver gives much better mid bass which makes the sound warmer and smoother. I always felt that I had to really turn up the A1's to be able to hear everything in the music. With the A3's I can hear everything, even when played at low volumes. The A3's are quite a bit bigger (especially in depth) but if you have room for them, I can highly recommend going with them over the A1's. The difference was substantial and... » Read More I owned the RTI A1's for about three years and recently upgraded to the RTI A3's. There is no doubt that the A3's are a far superior speaker, especially for music. The 6.5" driver gives much better mid bass which makes the sound warmer and smoother. I always felt that I had to really turn up the A1's to be able to hear everything in the music. With the A3's I can hear everything, even when played at low volumes. The A3's are quite a bit bigger (especially in depth) but if you have room for them, I can highly recommend going with them over the A1's. The difference was substantial and immediately noticeable. « Show Less
277153
Yes JSL, DD+, DTHD and DTS-master are much better sounding than the standard DD and DTS. Once you hear it, you won't regret spending the extra $100. It makes quite a difference with movies, but it makes a HUGE difference with concert Blu-rays. Some recommendations are Heart Alive in Seattle, U2 Rattle and Hum, Toto Live in Amsterdam and David Gilmour Remember that Night, among others. Make sure you get a nice set of RCA cables with gold plating so you don't miss any fidelity.
1804920
I don't know as I've never played a px-150, sorry. But it seems that the 150 is a later generation and the 330 has more tones. I am quite happy with the 330 still, and play it almost every day, however, I only use the piano tones, so I could have saved money by just getting the 130.
294263
Better. No comparison. 3000 is a solid unit, hassle free. But that unit is old,there are other options in that price range now... check out the numark. Or see if you can find a used m audio xponent. Owned that one for years.... way superior to either.
702911
I haven't tried UE boom, but I have tried Big Jambox. There isn't much difference in sound quality. Battery life is more in Jambox though. But the price difference isn't justifiable. TDK won't disappoint