How does this compare weight wise with the Lifetime and Meco brand tables?
1665595
I think they are about the same. This one has a handle made with seatbelt like material that makes it easy to carry.
1665596
I honestly don't know the answer to this question. I only had this table a short time and only remember that it seemed heavier than I thought it would be. It's still a lot lighter than another portable table that I own that has a pressboard top. Hope this helps.
1665597
I haven't used the other brands this was my first purchase of a folding one. But it is pretty easy to carry the handle is very useful. I am about to purchase another
1665598
i have no idea. I only own this one. I can't answer that question for you. Maybe someone else out there has the answer.
1665599
The shipping weight was 40 pounds and packaging was very thin. I had no trouble moving it from the porch to the crafting room where it will stay. No idea about the other two products you mentioned.
1665600
Sorry, I have experience with the Palm Springs table. It seems appropriately heavy, but not unduly so. I wanted something stable.
573344
I have never, ever seen load bearing statistics for any household use table anywhere, and I'm reasonably confident that the manufacturer does not have a spec for load on this product. This is a patio table....not a plant stand, or workbench. Having said that, I feel comfortable with 3 or 4 bottles of beer, a bowl of dip, and a bag of chips on this table. Forty-five pounds??? Not!
1836844
I have not tested this myself, but the manufacturer's website reads that this table can support up to 1500lbs (680.38kg) if evenly distributed. Source: http://www.buylifetime.com/products/blt/pid-25011.aspx
565119
I think I have the answer for you. Because the PO1012-ssc 5.3 makes out with the thicker metal and the bar is bigger. That makes it weighs more than the bigger one. You can go to Homedepot they have the same one but it cost more tham amazon. You will know what I'm talking about. I like the items on amazon. Good luck
173848
Not sure, I work with my table higher than most. I've had a couple of these tables and they've both cracked and broke, my second one broke on the 4th day of use and the person wasn't seriously over weight. I think the face cradle that is cut out jeopardizes the integrity of its strength. Either that or inferior wood used. I recommend going with Ironman Astoria it is much more sturdy and will be able to hold clients who are over weight with no problem.
1346977
I do not know the weight but it is freaking heavy. I am 6 ft, muscular build and had trouble lifting the box, so much so that I just pushed the box instead of lifting. No brand listed and I am very happy with mine. Dont get caught up in brand names, just order it, let it air out and enjoy.
275765
You are right. I think it's more reliable to use calibration weight. However, I did not use it since I am not a professional baker.
749055
That is capacity statement is likely conservative... as a matter of safety coverage. I have had a over 300lb client without any problem. But I should also note that my energy work does not require any additional body work pressure which would add weight stress beyond the physical body of the client. This is a very heavy table in itself because of the section that is adjustable.
215097
I can not speak to the quality of other manufactured products. I have used some "home made" variants and was concerned about placing a significant amount of weight on them. This product will handle body weight and will withstand adverse conditions of sand, heat, and abuse. I am happy with mine.
588865
I returned mine due to inaccuracy, but I remember reading about the switch in the user's manual. I think it selects whether the weight displayed is the instantaneous weight or the maximum weight over a period of time. Check the manual if you've got it.
364671
We ordered the Ultraship 75 (even though some of the pictures show the 55), and we got the 75. I think if you look at all the pictures for the Ultraship 35, 55 and 75, they all have some of the wrong pictures shown. But they all look the same. We use the 75 a lot and it is a beast, it can take very heavy weights and it is still quite acurate down at the less than ounce weights. Actually, we have two of the Ultraship 75 units. I am pretty sure if you order the 35, you will get the 35. If you order the 55, you will get the 55 and if you order the 75, you will get the 75.
1697118
It's always faster to measure than I am. But I'm using it to weight for postage. For a quick tap, I dont know and suspect you are looking at the wrong scale. It's meant for packages. Even if it read the quick tap and your software grabed only the max entry, not sure how accurate it would be. Do know that as you press on the scale, you can see the weight change on the PC. I'm using Shipworks.Hope that helps you out.
338710
I believe the quality is better, and though I don't know exactly which model you're referring to at Amazon, this model has wheels, and can be moved around easily. My husband is a large man, and I wouldn't have felt he was safe using a lesser quality model long term. Hope this helps.
290781
They are very similar to Home Depot in weight. I would recommend these as you of not lose anything in weight or feel and they are a lot less expensive.
564061
It looks exactly the same except for the fancy colors. Looking at the basic specs: Both hold the same weight. Tripol weight: practically the same; Packed dims: practically the same; Extended dims: practically the same. It works for me. Dont use it much, but it makes me feel good that I saved a bunch!
2129122
I think they've updated the design now. Mine has a much larger weighing platform, as shown in the current photo. It also came with the weighing tray as well. This is much more useful in my opinion. An excellent update over what is shown in some of the older reviews and videos. That older design would be kind of a pain to use.
178861
The original extreme 60 is what I have used for years and it works great. More protein with less additives than the competing brands. As far as I can tell the ripped has a thermogenic in it and other traces of fat burners. As for taste it is pretty much the same, maybe very subtle differences.