which one sounds better? Klipsch HD Theater 1000 or energy Micro 5.1??
1651678
For what it's worth, I have not heard the Klipsh system but recently purchased the Energy Take Classic 5.1 system. The speakers are quite small and I'm sure you get better sound than the Micro system. Unless you really have a confined set-up arrangement I would go with the Take Classic's. Combined it with the Yamaha RX-V371 single zone receiver which produces 100w per side and plenty of inputs/outputs and options. Together they sound very clear with enough low end for my taste. All in the system cost $700 including additional cables. BTW, Energy is owned by Klipsch, so you probably will not go wrong with either system. Detailed audiophiles might disagree with my assessment, but everyone has their own take. Good luck and good listening.
1546780
Oh man, Im also stuck trying to make this decision. And I think Klipsch owns Energy by the way...
198150
between the Theater Solutions TS511 5.1 surround sound, VS the Acousitc Audio AA5104 Acoustic Audio AA5104 600 Watt 5.1 Home Theater Surround Sound Speaker System which one is better?
1437269
No they don't have to be the same brand. I did alot of research and I purchased Klipsch bookshelf speakers for mine. My research found Klipsch to be #1 rated and all the reviews I read were positive. I purchased mine from Hh Gregg and got them for $99 each. They are awesome for such a small speaker.
793678
Almost impossible to answer... the KEF is a dynamic bookshelf size speaker and is superb at any price. The ESL type (I have stacked Quad 57s) are also excellent. I can say that I use the KEF in my bedroom system and am totally satisfied. It is really a matter of scale, not so much sound quality.
1686238
Although most would consider these a good match...you should try to listen before you buy. Klipsch uses a horn tweeter. While most like the "bright" highs some...esp on the Music side find them too "bright". Klipsch are very efficient if not, the most efficient in the industry. Meaning less power the speakers still sound fantastic. Hope that helps.
330264
The Klipsch Quintet III system is way better than the Energy Micros. I know they are not the same as the classic, but I was offered the Energy Micros since the classic was discontinued. After comparing the two systems, there was no question that I had to return the Energy Micros and pay the associated "restocking fee."
1189246
I haven't heard the sound out of the Klipsch....but these little things ROCK. I like how the bigger one are multi directional....I have these hooked up to a 7.1 system and blow me away!
1507342
I prefer EVs. I think the quality is better and the range of the speakers. I use 2 15 and no sub for my events. My sound goes crazy.
1352599
Dear Thomas,Thanks so much for your inqiury. Speakers are such an individual choice--both the Energy and Definitive are excellent choices. Definitive satellites may be a tad larger and a little fuller sound, but everyone's ear is different! Let me know if I can be of any additional assistance. Regards,Eric CohenWorld Wide Stereo
1609144
I have a Bose 5.1 system, and the Monoprice sounds just as good. I paid 100.00 for the Monoprice a few years ago.
1863651
Try the S1 model. It's way lighter than the S2. Microphonics is hardly present on both models. Before you make a purchase, consider changing se215 eartips first.
1066828
I bought the Energy 5.1 surround sound and it sounds terrific with the Optical cable through my reciever. Not sure about soundbars
1299300
The mm6501 definately sounds better, but if your not amplifying the speakers your better off with the lower end set... No point in spending extra $ on a nice set if your not going to give it the power it needs
2252344
Well, you asked the right person, since I own and use both. While I love Klipsch generally, and regard it as overall the top value brand, (5.1 home theater, etc.) I was really blown away by the performance of the A2+. The only handicap I have in answering you is I've used the A2 with a sub controlled by an inexpensive but wonderful preamp (the gemini pa-7000) since day one. But this is revealing-- I had to reduce the crossover to only 80 cycles -- that's real speaker territory. So, I'd call the addition of a sub a nice add-on but far from necessary. If anything, I find these little guys a bit bassy if anything. Naturally, a lot depends on your environment. Mine's a kitchen -- very flattering acoustically. Bottom line is the A2+ is more the 'real deal' since you have the option juice it up, making it a 'system,' later. There's no hint of being 'just a computer speaker.' Overall, while I like my 2.1's fine, I love my A2s.
1742352
None is better than the other. Both units will rattle anything in its sonic path. I would recommend anti-vibration pads on any decor that is vertical. At his price range, you can't go wrong with either. I know from experience that Polk customer service is top notch. I haven't dealt with Klipsch customer service so far.
435256
Both are excellent speakers, but my vote has to go to theZ623s: more power; larger, stronger woofer; better warranty; treble and midrange are comparable. I own both, and I'm happy with both, but the Z623s come out on top in my opinion. And don't forget that they're ususally less expensive. I bought both of mine around Christmas of 2012 at Best Buy. Paid $89 for one, $99 for the other. Check out this review: http://www.thinkdigit.com/forum/reviews/135928-five-2-1-speaker-set-comparison.html