What is the difference between the S, C nan M in the Pro Series? Is the S the top of the line?
1673115
this is a Pro S and is not covered under warranty as it is not being sold by Vision. It's also much more expensive than the one being sold through Home Depot.
1350283
There is two ways of getting your S/N#: (1) On the len's focus ring, you will see "A009N-xxxxxx" (just on the left of MAKE IN JAPAN"). P.S. The xxxxxx is etched onto the lens. (2) The S/N# is on the top left corner of the original tamron box. It is kind of big. P.S. I have to cut it out from the box in order to get the current $100 rebate from Tamron. If you cannot find it, you should bug the seller on why. May be it is gray market, or second hand. Good luck.KC
2027313
I think the main difference is that the pro logic is pre seasoned. I can tell you that we love our pro logic. We use it mainly to make artisan bread. It is a perfect size and the crust is always beautiful.
210117
The Pro model has a metal case (or at least partially metal) Seems to be the updated version with pretty much the same controls and capabilities. I've been happy with my camera at the price, it's QVGA format is perfectly find for projects where the tiny size is the most important feature.
1002476
Yes, they are identical in capability. The "Pro" allows unlimited VIN's whereas the $300 version is limited to use on three (3) VIN's. The first three different vehicles you plug into will fill the three VIN slots and you'll be limited to those vehicles. The only difference is that the hobbyist would probably have no more than three vehicles in the year/model range that this works on. The "Pro" version is for a commercial business entity that would be working on hundreds of vehicles in this year/model range and required unlimited VIN capability. Essentially you're paying for "unlimited" use with the "Pro". Not to un-necessarily plug the product, but as a single vehicle owner, this device is amazing in what it is able to tap into the vehicle and do. The first time I used it was after installing a new battery and reconfigured/resetting the charging system to recognize/accept the new battery. That first use alone almost paid for itself (compared to what the BMW dealer was charging for a new battery and reset). And all in simple English, drop down menus just like most of the end-user software we all use everyday. No deciphering number/letter codes. The one question I had about a specific functionality, early on, was answered quickly and completely by their tech help. $300 doesn't grow on trees, but if you're a DIY'er with this caliber of automobile, it's well worth the money.
426106
Not a whole lot until you get to an even higher series that is guaranteed for commercial use. We bought the 1363 for the stainless steel color. ALL are guaranteed for the home use the same, so you can choose with confidence.
424544
The Pro has longer lasting memory. That is why it's warranty is five years, and the EVO's is 3. In real life use, that might not matter. Also, the Evo is about $100 cheaper for the half gig version.
2261764
Yes this is the Pro version. There are three differences between the Pro & Standard - 1. Thickness the Pro is 0.105" thick 2. It has a non-slip foam backing 3. It has a stronger magnet. This model, sold by Amazon via iFixit is the Pro version as it meets all of these requirements. I visited the iFixit website for the info on the differences and then checked mine out when it came in. Hope that helps.
1144690
MX100 uses 16nm process as opposed to 20nm process used by M550. The smaller the NAND gets, the cheaper it costs for the manufacturers to fabricate the device hence the price difference, but it hurts the device reliability a little. Although normal consumer usage almost never hits those reliability limits, I would say M550 is slightly more reliable.
163530
I have had several G series (G7 and G9) and am now working with the s90. Although these are earlier models of the ones you are looking at, the general pros/cons remain the same. The positive for the S90 is that it is great for low light (F 2.0 and in-between ISOs of 125 and 160).The bad news is that the image quality of the s90 is just not the same as the G series. Prints that are crops or over 24x30 inches have too much pixellation to be exhibited professionally. However, if you print at 8x10 inches or smaller, the s95 should be fine for you.As for me, I'm planning on returning to the G series with my next camera purchase. I have had several G series (G7 and G9) and am now working with the s90. Although these are earlier models of the ones you are looking at, the general pros/cons remain the same. The positive for the S90 is that it is great for low light (F 2.0 and in-between ISOs of 125 and 160).The bad news is that the image quality of the s90 is just not the same as the G series. Prints that are crops or over 24x30 inches have too much pixellation to be exhibited professionally. However, if you print at 8x10 inches or smaller, the s95 should be fine for you.As for me,... » Read More I have had several G series (G7 and G9) and am now working with the s90. Although these are earlier models of the ones you are looking at, the general pros/cons remain the same. The positive for the S90 is that it is great for low light (F 2.0 and in-between ISOs of 125 and 160).The bad news is that the image quality of the s90 is just not the same as the G series. Prints that are crops or over 24x30 inches have too much pixellation to be exhibited professionally. However, if you print at 8x10 inches or smaller, the s95 should be fine for you.As for me, I'm planning on returning to the G series with my next camera purchase. « Show Less
700031
Just got it today and it is s30v, and awesome well worth it. I will do a review once I get some use out of it.
2019067
I only have the regular version; however, when I compared the "pro" specs to mine the "pro" has a larger display because the button was moved to the underside of watch from the face of the watch. It appears to have a slimmer design too. The pro can calculate a gas change of up to 100% whereas I can set up to 50%. Digital downloading has been improved with an optional USB interface to both PC (Dive Organizer) ad MAC (Divers Diary) software. Otherwise, the 2008 puck has same features as "pro" and I hope to continue using mine w/Oceanic backup computer. Love my Mares Puck!
56202
As I recall, it's both. The pro has a slightly bigger mat and the max user weight is a little more. I have the 350 and have no complaints at all.
615694
More or less the Pro is a generational advancement over the XX. The Pro has a slightly higher capacity, a slightly slower rate of self discharge, slightly more consistent output, and a wider temp range. A slightly longer service life is also likely. With that said, the difference between the two are pretty minor. Like with previous generations, a good NiMH charger will charge all NiMH generations, and so chargers made while the XX was in production will work fine with the Pro. Like the XX, the Pros work great in high-drain devices, but provide poor performance with lower drain devices due to a much higher rate of self-discharge when compared to the standard eneloop 2100. More or less the Pro is a generational advancement over the XX. The Pro has a slightly higher capacity, a slightly slower rate of self discharge, slightly more consistent output, and a wider temp range. A slightly longer service life is also likely. With that said, the difference between the two are pretty minor. Like with previous generations, a good NiMH charger will charge all NiMH generations, and so chargers made while the XX was in production will work fine with the Pro. Like the XX, the Pros work great in high-drain devices, but provide poor performance with lower drain devices due... » Read More More or less the Pro is a generational advancement over the XX. The Pro has a slightly higher capacity, a slightly slower rate of self discharge, slightly more consistent output, and a wider temp range. A slightly longer service life is also likely. With that said, the difference between the two are pretty minor. Like with previous generations, a good NiMH charger will charge all NiMH generations, and so chargers made while the XX was in production will work fine with the Pro. Like the XX, the Pros work great in high-drain devices, but provide poor performance with lower drain devices due to a much higher rate of self-discharge when compared to the standard eneloop 2100. « Show Less
1642592
The PRO is cheaper but has the older AimPoint electronics than The Comp series does. Aimpoint claims 50,000 hours of runtime on a battery for the Comp series vs. 30,000 hours for the PRO. Since the main reason I pay more for an AimPoint is for battery life to me it didn't make sense to get the cheaper model with lower battery life. But, hey that's my value judgement. A lot of folks will say the PRO is fine. Either are great products.
1211085
sigma recently came out with 17-70 version which has a C mark on it. its a good walk around woiyth f2.8 to 4. IS or OS is a good thing and its a personal decision. I have always preferred them as sometimes you forget to hold your breath for that magic moment which may not be as crisp otherwise.
468901
Pro is best value, but m4 is best technically. Average shooter will do very well with Pro!