Does this work with Cisco receiver? My AT&T Uverse remote controllers says "S10-S3" on it, not S10-S1
1684225
I have Cisco dvr from ATT and my replacement remote says att on it and a tag says S10-S2. The only problem was to find the correct code to operate the system and my TV together. It took over 100 tries to get it set. Otherwise it works just like the original.
1684226
Yes, I have 2 boxes and other receiver says s10-s3 and I use this controller on 2nd box...identical use for me. Good luck.
734990
To my knowledge yes it does work with Cisco receivers. I only have four receivers and it works with mine. I had only one problem and it was that the code I put it doesn't let any shows pause. I am okay with that simply because I don't want to go through all the codes to find the right one that will work. I think the S-1 and S-3 are different because one is point anywhere and the other is point at receiver. I hope this was helpful.
1684227
If you're referring to Cisco wireless set-top box (receiver), then yes, it does.
302985
It doesn't work with uverse. I have one that I recently bought and it says on the outside of the box that it doesn't work with uverse and only works with cable or verizon fios.
38216
After some experimentation, I have determined they actually ARE compatible, however, the software isn't. You will need to use V2 software to see the V2 units on your network, and V1 software (which for some reson is much better) to track your V1 units. Also, make sure that you use the V2 unit as the unit that is the "sending unit", ie., the one that is connected to your router. It doesn't work well the other way around. Hope this helps!
31170
This item is compatible with Any item that uses infrared (IR) to transmit remote signals. Most all remotes use IR, and I'm willing to bet your uverse receiver does as well. If you see a "window" on the top of your remote it uses IR and will work with this repeater.
184183
I don't know! I don't have this unit, I returned because of remote compatibility.
783652
Probably ought to contact Cisco to ask the question as mine is on a PC and works perfectly. Sorry that I can't give you a positive response.
528672
Im mot sure because I'm still not using it but it did came with instructions and since its ATT i guess you can program it with your Uverse. I will check and post back here again.
129115
Carlos, I would highly recommend you NOT buy this system. The system has a number of inherent faults right out of the box. Tech support is helpful, but to be honest, the help leads more to what it CANNOT do, than what it SHOULD do....Recommend you look at one of the CISCO systems.
524811
I don't have UVerse but what I know is that the Harmony mimics what your old remote can do. So if your old remote doesn't have a dedicated button then the Harmony won't either.
423506
Mine does not say cisco on it - or if it does, it is so hidden I didn't see it when I looked in the car to answer your question.
247043
Sorry I can't help you. I bought for use with AT&T; Uverse. All I can say is that it was half the cost of what u-verse wanted for a replacement.
328511
Most likely, it worked perfectly fine with my brighthouse box and I know UVerse is a more popular national brand. It supports over 300,000 devices and you can even program each individual button to match your remotes just by pointing them at eachother
674372
Bryan, I tried this with ATT Uverse - no go. I ended up going with Cox cable internet (only internet) and bought a recommended Cisco modem from Cox. The Cox cable comes in on RG# and the modem converted it to Cat#. I am in the Northeast Ohio Area. The balun is for moving video from RG# to ethernet back to RG#. I still have my balun - 20$ deglakewood@ameritech.net if you need anything. Good Luck - David
2004589
i have 2 older Harmony's (676). they work well with Uverse and i would have to believe the newer models do as well, so i can quite confidently say "YES"
1287377
I Have no idea. I have purchased two functioning remotes like this and can not get them to work with my IT188B. No one has been able tell me why either.
2282014
I do not know specifically. My 500 model is much closer to my router which very old and is Cisco's least expensive. However, I do have some 310 models which are more than 30 and 50 feet away and are on the send floor while the router is at the extreme other side of the first floor. The speakers are on my network even though my iPhone can not get a strong enough signal to connect at the same locations. Sony appears to have a better signal receiver that Apple.
340366
Worked perfectly with Cisco Explorer 8652HDC. Would expect to work with 8642 as well. It is so cheap why not try it?