what is the differance between the dm10 and dm10x. i have studdied and cant find a big diffrence
1678364
DM10X is sturdier (doesn't move as much when you hit it), the 2 "floor toms" are 12" instead of the smaller 10", it looks better, and I think that's about it.
1678365
The only difference is the stands aren't boom stand on the X and all the heads are 12inches instead of 8.
1678366
the DM10x kit is the newest drum brain from Alesis. You can see demos on youtube. If you want specific differences, download both manuals from Alesis and see which model best meets your needs.Hope this helps,
1678367
Different rack. Snare has its own stand. Drum size on dm10x are 3 10" & 2 12" pads. Dm10 is 3 8" & 2 10" pads. Brain is same.
1678368
I can see that the 10X has a separate hi-hat with drum skin instead of rubber and two of the toms are bigger. i personally prefer the rubber for my hi-hat, but that's a matter of taste.
476649
There are 4 main New Features for the DGX 650 over the DGX 640. These include the STYLE RECOMMENDER (helps you find appropriate backing track (drums etc.) based on the rhythm of a song you are playing), AUDIO RECORDING - the ability to record audio in WAV format (not just MIDI anymore!), SPEAKER OVERRIDE (can route keyboard through sound system and keep the sound coming out of the keyboard speakers also so you can use the keyboard speakers as your monitor). This is very important to me, and AUX INPUT (play along with an MP3 player). --BB
309946
The SX120 at ISO 800 and 1600 is way better than the SX110, this is the biggest difference I've seen. Search for some reviews that have the same shots at ISO1600 for both cameras and compare the two side by side and it'll jump out at you. I'm not so sure the slightly smaller sensor has much difference, sensor technology improves very slowly too, so maybe it has better signal to noise ratio even though it's more MP on a slightly smaller surface area.I don't like the SX200 for a bunch of reasons, the always up flash is annoying. It has a slower lens than the SX110/120, and it's way more expensive. The SX120 at ISO 800 and 1600 is way better than the SX110, this is the biggest difference I've seen. Search for some reviews that have the same shots at ISO1600 for both cameras and compare the two side by side and it'll jump out at you. I'm not so sure the slightly smaller sensor has much difference, sensor technology improves very slowly too, so maybe it has better signal to noise ratio even though it's more MP on a slightly smaller surface area.I don't like the SX200 for a bunch of reasons, the always up flash is annoying. It has a slower lens than the SX110/120, and it's... » Read More The SX120 at ISO 800 and 1600 is way better than the SX110, this is the biggest difference I've seen. Search for some reviews that have the same shots at ISO1600 for both cameras and compare the two side by side and it'll jump out at you. I'm not so sure the slightly smaller sensor has much difference, sensor technology improves very slowly too, so maybe it has better signal to noise ratio even though it's more MP on a slightly smaller surface area.I don't like the SX200 for a bunch of reasons, the always up flash is annoying. It has a slower lens than the SX110/120, and it's way more expensive. « Show Less
1331057
Get SD880.G10 has the same image processing engine, the same 3" screen. The main differences are: G10 offers the ability to control aperture and shutter, and the ability shoot in RAW format. That's ALL. G10 is MUCH bigger/heavier. If you are not seriously into photography, you might be able to get better pictures with SD880, and you can put SD880 in your purse, your husbands pocket, ...., but you will need a separate bag for the G10.
742175
Sorry to say, I'm not sure of any difference. Both seem to be identical. I just know that I love mine and I'm sure you would too. Good luck!
363233
Apples and Oranges, the M9 is very versatile, yet the ods and dist are not that good, on this one there are less Fxs nevertheless the analog dist and ods are pretty decent, love the layout but not the user interface, hope this helps...
83058
The m+ has faster data transfer speed. Cameras that used the XD can use this newer version.
281075
As an audio engineer, I can personally tell the difference between the two models. However, to the untrained ear of a casual listener it will be very difficult to notice any difference. This will also differ from person to person as every set of ears and every human brain are just a little bit different. Therefore not every human being is capable of hearing all of the frequencies being omitted from the speakers. That being said, the difference between models is their frequency range. Ask yourself these questions before making a decision : 1) Do you commonly notice a difference in the overall sound quality when listening to music on different speakers? 2) Does your listening pleasure diminish when you notice these differences? 3) Are you the kind of person that doesn't mind spending a little more money if you know that you will be getting a better quality product? If you answered yes to these questions, then I would recommend doing as I did and purchasing the 800 model. BTW, if you're "all about that bass" the 800 will also be more appealing as the main difference is the low end frequencies as they always improve with size. I hope this was helpful! Matt. W.
682016
I have 2 sets of MDREX10. The pair from Thailand sounds awesome (about 2 years old). Deep bass and clear treble. The last set I got 2 weeks ago were made in China and completely lack bass and sound "distant" as if the plug were not completely inserted. I attribute the difference to the location each were made since they are otherwise identical models. Not sure if this is common with others experience or even if helpful here, but thought to share it nonetheless.
2187386
Brian, I have no idea if there is any difference, as I have only experience with the "other" model. I just really like the one I bought from Amazon.
1140119
It has been sometime since I made the side-by-side review of the two models. Suggest that you view web site: dpreview.com to compare. Except for more mpixels, the real difference will be the choice of the highest quality lens to meet your intended use.
602399
I don't know the technical aspects of the differences since I haven't tried both types with my computer. Sorry.
951093
I've read from other posts that the main difference is longer battery life. I've not used mine long enough to verify that.
103406
THE DT-210 seems to have most of the same features as the dt- 200x but it does have more preset station capability. I am very happy with the one I have but have never tried this model.
692071
the dx unless you plan on moving up to a full frame camera in the future. if you're not going to go full frame don't waste the $ on the fx lens. I have both these lenses, the dx I got first when I first started out, then recently the fx when I got a full frame camera. I've used the fx version on my d7000 (dx body) and honestly I see no real difference between the dx and fx lens on a dx body. even after pixel peeping quite a bit I was really at a loss as to which one was better, they both looked really good.
221389
Hi Monty, I would suggest DPReview www.dpreview.com I have included a link to your comparison: http://www.dpreview.com/products/compare/side-by-side?products=oly_em10&products;=sony_a6000; Additionally, individual review on Amazon are usually true-to-form. Hope this helps.
1734987
Hey Kelly, I have had a DP-008 for a while now, and it is a great device. Unfortunately I don't own a DP-02, so I can only go by what I've read and explain some key differences, which may or may not be helpful. The main difference between the devices is that the DP-008 uses SD memory cards, while the DP-02 records to an internal mechanical hard drive. With the SD cards, you can swap cards up to 32MB in and out of the unit. SD/SDHC cards are pretty standard, and you can use them in lots of different devices (digital cameras in particular. And most modern computers will have an SDHC slot, or you can get a USB-to-SDHC adapter for dirt cheap). With the DP-02, the hard drive is 40GB, and is not nearly as plug-and-play (you can hook up the device to your computer, but to say that it would be inconvenient to swap the drive in and out would be the understatement of the week). Plus the DP-008 runs on battery power for added portability. The caveat being that the power supply is sold separately, but it's not that expensive. The device works well on AA batteries, but for extended recording, invest in the adapter. Note that there is a newer TASCAM recorder -- the TASCAM DP-03 -- which is basically a DP-008 with extra bells and whistles. These include a built-in CD burner (along the lines of the DP-02), faders instead of knobs for track levels, compatibility with the TASCAM multi-function foot controller, and stereo (TRS) 1/4" inputs. (The DP-008 uses unbalanced TS connections on the 1/4" inputs, unless I am mistaken.) The DP-008 does not have a drum machine built-in. It does have a basic metronome, but that's as fancy as it gets in that respect. You can either hook up your standalone drum machine, or use computer software to lay out your rhythm and then record it using the DP. Hope this helps, and if you think of anything else you want to know, lay it on me and I'll help where I can.