Would this model or the 2500NV be best for long range shooting? Can't seem to see the major difference b/w the two! Thanks!!
1680384
I can only state that it gives very accurate readings right where you are holding it. For down range - I would think at least the wind could vary.
262832
I've never used the Military/Marine model but LOVE the Rallye. We use them for long distance (greater than 40 yards). They cannot be used for hunting depending on the type because in brush you cannot rotate a focus wheel to examine close objects. They are excellent for longer distances and the cool thing about either is that they are pre-focused beyond the 30-40 yards. So, depends on what you want them for. They are relatively heavy (compared to my Nikons), light gathering is great, and appear tough. So, given the proper goals and ego, the Rallye is a great binocular. We just leave them in the car and long distance viewing is a pleasure.
576210
Both of those cartridges are known for having very flat trajectories, but there would be a small difference at shorter ranges that would begin to show up more at over 200 yards or so. It you AR15 is really accurate, I would go for something more appropriate, but if it is not, it would work as a "Do-For". I would check the ballistics on Hornady or any other good site to see what to expect in terms of trajectory difference at various ranges. Good luck, JBPSI was assuming that your AR15 was chambered for the 223, but it may not be, so as Mr. Moen pointed out, there could be quite a bit of difference in trajectory. In that case, buy an appropriate scope. Both of those cartridges are known for having very flat trajectories, but there would be a small difference at shorter ranges that would begin to show up more at over 200 yards or so. It you AR15 is really accurate, I would go for something more appropriate, but if it is not, it would work as a "Do-For". I would check the ballistics on Hornady or any other good site to see what to expect in terms of trajectory difference at various ranges. Good luck, JBPSI was assuming that your AR15 was chambered for the 223, but it may not be, so as Mr. Moen pointed out, there could... » Read More Both of those cartridges are known for having very flat trajectories, but there would be a small difference at shorter ranges that would begin to show up more at over 200 yards or so. It you AR15 is really accurate, I would go for something more appropriate, but if it is not, it would work as a "Do-For". I would check the ballistics on Hornady or any other good site to see what to expect in terms of trajectory difference at various ranges. Good luck, JBPSI was assuming that your AR15 was chambered for the 223, but it may not be, so as Mr. Moen pointed out, there could be quite a bit of difference in trajectory. In that case, buy an appropriate scope. « Show Less
173508
I can't miss with mine. I hit a grouse about 80m out, and consistently hit my mark. With other guns like the Varmint Hunter, 25 Benjamin Nitro, I miss a lot. After hundreds of rounds, I realized that its due to the relationship between the triggers and the sighting. Basically the German gun is primo engineering and from the trigger pull on its great. I have all stock parts on mine and won't change a thing. Its ready for action.
259001
The Tru plex is great for a .22 caliber @ 100 yards but I don't shoot much further than that.I also went with the Centerpoint from Walmart 3x9 (mil dot). I actually got a chart to use which uses distance vs windage and drop. But, then again, I don't shoot much further than 100 yards.
1902823
I have a PSE stinger which produces a little over 300 fps and it does fine for me. I realize that isn't super fast but even breaching 300 fps the arrows only get about 8" into the target. The middle got a little soft after shooting some broad heads through it before last hunting season. It still stops arrows in the dead center though. They just stick out the back a little. I don't recommend this target for broad heads at all. Mine took about 500 field tips with absolutely no signs of wear before I shot it with broad heads. I'd actually get one of the bigger models like the 20" or 22". This one is a little small for shooting at the corner dots from longer distances. I have a PSE stinger which produces a little over 300 fps and it does fine for me. I realize that isn't super fast but even breaching 300 fps the arrows only get about 8" into the target. The middle got a little soft after shooting some broad heads through it before last hunting season. It still stops arrows in the dead center though. They just stick out the back a little. I don't recommend this target for broad heads at all. Mine took about 500 field tips with absolutely no signs of wear before I shot it with broad heads. I'd actually get one of the bigger models like the 20" or... » Read More I have a PSE stinger which produces a little over 300 fps and it does fine for me. I realize that isn't super fast but even breaching 300 fps the arrows only get about 8" into the target. The middle got a little soft after shooting some broad heads through it before last hunting season. It still stops arrows in the dead center though. They just stick out the back a little. I don't recommend this target for broad heads at all. Mine took about 500 field tips with absolutely no signs of wear before I shot it with broad heads. I'd actually get one of the bigger models like the 20" or 22". This one is a little small for shooting at the corner dots from longer distances. « Show Less
1992406
Smaller Lighter BBs have better FPS but the denser ones have less jamming, tighter grouping and hit harder. I stick with .26 and I am very happy with the results.
682677
Sorry I can't help you ... i own the 738 and love it. It may be a bit overkill. I don't think I will ever use some of the things that come with it. Just the soldier gun and heat gun. All the extra was just extra. Don't think I would ever need it. You should be fine with just the768a .. sorry I wasn't anymore help than this. Beat regards
1755194
That's all up to you as a shooter knowing your weapon and ammo. You can dope the scope to shoot 1000 yards of your gun and ammo can do it. From a realistic standpoint, I was shooting 150 fmj hand loads at 2060 fps to 300 yard without doping and only using the 3rd circle down on the reticle. I haven't taken it beyond that but it will extend way beyond 300
427675
The buckmaster will be a bit clearer, slightly wider field of undistorted view, a little better light transmission, and it will withstand more recoil over a longer life-span without losing zero. Most hunters will never "shoot out" their buckmaster with recoil. I'd be more concerned about checking zero annually on a ProStaff if I used it on a heavily recoiling rifle (300 WM or more). Otherwise, I'd focus on the visual differences.
2224801
Zeroed in on a High Point 995 TS in 4 rounds. Really liked it but after 100+ rounds started to drop out turning off. Found I had to select between numbered settings and couldn't trust it would stay on. Also took one battery to determine on / off of sight. Really thought I had a winner however unless I can figure out how to set so it holds in the on position will return to my scope and file this in the $20 loss column. Any thoughts from other users how to deal with this issue. Appears to be a recoil issue.
1972150
I own both. But if you only want one, well, a. if you value light-weight, smaller size, easier to lug around, then get the 18-200 b. if you really really want the extra zoom, and don't mind the extra mass, get the 18-300 I wanted both worlds...but I will tell you, my hand did get tired more quickly with the 18-300 mounted...and after I saw the difference in the full zoom pics, I thought to myself : "Is that all the extra I get?"....which I did want more zoom, and I am happy, but thought it would be much bigger than actual results... Holding/shooting with one hand, the 200 felt like a pleasure...the 300 felt hefty. I think hobby-ists can do without the extra zoom...try and find samples of shots at 200mm and 300mm zooms, and decide if it makes a difference to you...
13542
Hi The weather got too cold for us to try it out. I think the distance would pertain to your shooting abilities. We will not have it any closer than 25 yards. I hope this helps you. Have a nice day.
1790366
I have the 55 200 vr and the 70 300 vr. I like them both but if I had to get rid of one it would be the 55 200. There is no comparison in the build quality,, you get what you pay for. The 70 300 is heavy but I'm not even close to a pro photog and don't wag one around for long periods of time.
395122
The P223 is considered a medium range scope and the m223 is a long range scope..if you are just going to be plinking go with the P series, but if you want a good all around scope the M series is awesome..but either way you can't go wrong with a Nikon, be sure to get the Nikon scope mount as well and you will have a good setup.
2223765
It is not NV compatible. Great set up for my SW M&P15X.; I did see how the 2 dot system is not as defined as the single red dot until you view through scope. Just FYI. The non NV version simply saves a bunch of money.
1526811
The tamron is supposed to be good, but if you got the money, I'd suggest buying the canon. It is spectacular. The only thing I don't like about it is that the inner barrel is plastic, though I guess this is also true for the tamron.