Is Nikon coming out with a new s model more advanced then the s9700 soon
1649908
I'll be honest, I don't recommend this camera. You could find a canon for similar price, better quality. This camera is outdated.
1471662
Samsung has the UN65c8000 scheduled to be released in July, usually available online a few weeks before they hit the stores.I think the 55 might be to small for 3D in a larger room, waiting for it too
1365207
Yes... I'm very happy with the sp570 that I'm using right now, which includes RAW and RAW+JPEG shooting, as well as a hot shoe. I was hoping Olympus would include a rotating LCD after Canon's new model. That would have been nice. I'm upgrading to an SLR shortly, but the specs on this are worth a second glance. 26x... wow. The Bird-Watching mode also appeals to me as a wildlife photographer, although I'm not sure how exactly it would work. I know the smile shot option on the 570 is utterly useless. But the predecessor, although much maligned, is a fantastic camera, so I guess we'll have to see.
654030
I recently had a very long talk with a rep from Nikon. He said that there is no new replacement for the D80 yet in the pipeline. Can not verify that this is the truth, but he usually is honest about this sort of thing.
116455
This simply means that there's a slightly upgraded model of the D7000 which is D7100 :=)
2079453
I just replaced my SD870IS with a Canon S100 - a move up in price and features. I am still using my 870 for some work ( it's display has some dead spots).Thanks for the discussion.
660622
The main difference is speed and light sensitivity. The wait is shorter with the D4s. Quality seems the same
15749
By the way, the S100 has been released that improves on just about every aspect of the S95. And it has 1080p video as well.
1114916
I believe the 77mm lense is the most recently released Nikon lense which has the most up to date technology. Check on Nikon USA website to confirm.
1512724
Kind of depends on what your looking for. I personally think in power a few other features that it's comparable to the sb900 in power output and features which I personally wanted but the sb700 also has some nice features. You might want to check out this site. http://speedlights.net/2010/09/16/nikon-sb-700-flash-specs-vs-sb-600-and-sb-900/ to get a better idea.
1077279
I've read the S95 and S100 had significant lens error defects. That was the main reason I waited for this new version to come out which had supposedly fixed those problems.
394540
They don't. Both have different use. If you prefer a point-and-shoot, go with the S9500. But if you prefer to be patient with the DP3, you'll be rewarded with amazing image quality for its size.
1065194
The introduction date of the Nikon D700 was late 2007. At that time video was not as dominant in the DSLR families as it is today. The camera was never upgraded to handle video. The D700 is still superior to most DSLRs in the current market place, hence the continued demand, although Nikon shut down production of it in 2012. In my opinion, it is still the best full frame camera on the market for the average photographer not engaged in sports or fast paced photojournalism. Hope this helps . . . bgs.
1077897
Not sure about the newer model. I got the SX500 and absolutely love it. Pictures are great, very clear and camera is easy to use.
347548
In terms of a price drop.....who knows. If the current economy has any part in their thinking, maybe they will. I hear the video is not the D90's strong point. I'd rather have my still camera do what it is supposed to do well. The video option doesn't really interest me!
1649318
Has anyone seen any actual reviews of this camera as opposed to marketing spec lists? Sometimes I've seen pre-production models of cameras that get reviewed prior to actual release. It is the low light ability claims of the Nikon that I'll need to see put to the test. That's probably the biggest Achilles heel of all these superzooms. It may have a CMOS sensor (which explains the burst speed of this camera) but it is still the same small size sensor as all the superzooms so I'm dubious about any huge improvement in low light. All of the previous versions of this new crop of superzooms (Nikon, Sony, Fuji) only got a flat four star rating in Amazon while the Panasonic FZ35 and FZ40 both are at 4.6. This new group has longer zooms than the Pansonics but I need to know if the picture quality is improved in any way.
1283832
http://snapsort.com/compare/Nikon_Coolpix_S8000-vs-Nikon_Coolpix_S8100 http://www.imaging-resource.com/NEWS/1283918475.html http://www.infosyncworld.com/reviews/digital-cameras/nikon-coolpix-s8100/11326.html Seems the major upgrade is to the sensor, allowing for improved low-light pictures. I'm looking forward to getting this one as well.