What's the difference between a pg240xl and a pg240xxl
1876275
Its supposed to have more ink. So far it does but dont know how long it will last.
1876276
As far as I know it is the amount of ink in the cartridge. One will print more pages than the other so might be a better buy.
1876277
xxl has a lot more ink. I highly recommend purchasing the xxl. It is very much worth the extra money.
1876278
It is how many pages the ink will print before it runs out. PG240xxl will print more than the PG240xl. I've had both inks, and I have to say that PG240xxl does really print more.
1876279
Per Canon website, the page yield for the three PG-240 cartridge: PG-240 = 180 pages, PG-240XL = 300 pages, PG-240XXL = 600 pages.
1876280
The xxl has a lot more ink and lasts for at least 600 pages. Even when my printer tells me to change the cartridge, I can go at least another month!
1876281
Per Canon website, the page yield for the three PG-240 cartridge:PG-240 = 180 pages, PG-240XL = 300 pages, PG-240XXL = 600 pages.
1390006
The most major difference I see is the resolution, reference these two pages side by side to note the other differences.http://www.casio-projectors.eu/uk/products/xja155/andhttp://www.casio-projectors.eu/uk/products/xja256/
1112181
HiThank you for your interest.The difference is pixel policy.Please check the pixel policy of each description.This monitor is Perfect Pixel(0 defective pixel) monitor.Thank you.
1175311
The 8600 has a dual core processor (the 7600 has a single core). The 9600 has adds local dimming with nano pixel tech. If I could afford another TV right now, I would purchase a 9600 TODAY! It isn't perfect (wait for the OLED) but it is one of the pinnacles of LCD/LED tech and a joy to behold! LG keeps getting better and better! (I currently own the 6200, 7600 and THE NEW LG Google TV 55G2!! Even the 6200 can be calibrated into near greatness IF you watch in a slightly darkened room) Cheers Marty G
1624902
The short and sweet is the A is a 120 Hz screen and the B is 240 Hz. As with most newer models the B has better contrast and response time. You can compare both on Samsung.com to get all the details.
136445
One is 1080 and other is 4k which you can grab a decent print size quality jpeg from a frame in video.
1634370
I have them both in front of me for comparison: The 2000 has a slightly rougher surface than the 1000, which is probably what the "precision control" is referring to. The 2000 has a stitched edge, while the 1000 has a cut edge. If I tug at the corner of the pads, the 1000 seems to stretch more than the 2000. The 2000 has an extra "DX-2000" logo in the upper left corner, while the 1000 only has the Perixx logo in the lower right. The Perixx logo on the 2000 is a much brighter white and the logos seem to be layered on top of the fabric (if I rub my finger across the logo I can just barely feel the lettering, which has a rubbery texture), while the logo on the 1000 seems to be inked into the fabric.
1028587
I went with the 8800 v th Epson v500. It has the LED lightbar - same. That's the major upgrade from the 8600 as far as I can tell. The deciding factor was poor software reviews for the Epson bundle. My profession is end-user software development. There's no way I want to deal with someone's poor UI or feature set or compatibility issues. I just want to scan my family photos. I own the full Photoshop CS so I can basically clean up anything. My guess is for the average user there should be no marked difference between the scratch and dust removal capabilities or the scan densities or lightbar output. Ease of use pays off every time you start the thing up. Hope this helps. I went with the 8800 v th Epson v500. It has the LED lightbar - same. That's the major upgrade from the 8600 as far as I can tell. The deciding factor was poor software reviews for the Epson bundle. My profession is end-user software development. There's no way I want to deal with someone's poor UI or feature set or compatibility issues. I just want to scan my family photos. I own the full Photoshop CS so I can basically clean up anything. My guess is for the average user there should be no marked difference between the scratch and dust removal capabilities or the scan densities or lightbar... » Read More I went with the 8800 v th Epson v500. It has the LED lightbar - same. That's the major upgrade from the 8600 as far as I can tell. The deciding factor was poor software reviews for the Epson bundle. My profession is end-user software development. There's no way I want to deal with someone's poor UI or feature set or compatibility issues. I just want to scan my family photos. I own the full Photoshop CS so I can basically clean up anything. My guess is for the average user there should be no marked difference between the scratch and dust removal capabilities or the scan densities or lightbar output. Ease of use pays off every time you start the thing up. Hope this helps. « Show Less
183314
so is the difference only a usb port, same contrast ratio? panel, specs etc etc ?
1997971
It appears to me that the XL 200 has a longer print time compared to 200 cartridge. I haven't used the Epson for a long period of time compared toLexmark or HP printers but there is a difference.
1545756
Cool. Thanks for the reply. I'm thinking I might wait and see how much the T240HD is when it gets released now, since it will have the actual resolution to display 1080p.
1334498
I was told by a sales person at a "big box" store that they are the same, that different retailers use slightly different model numbers. My advice is to write down the the tech specs such as dpi, hz, etc., (and watch for different wording like "Clear Motion Rate" is not the same as "refresh rate") and then compare the different models that way.
629290
Here is the comparison page from Oppo's website:http://www.oppodigital.com/dv981hd/dv981hd_comp.htmlThe main advantage of the 981 is the Faroudja chip, which delivers better-quality upscaling on non-DLP displays. The 981 also offers better-quality PAL->NTSC conversion than Oppo's other two models. Otherwise, as you pointed out, the other two models offer a lot of additional features (I wish my 981 had a memory-stick or USB input!). However, since you have a DLP, you probably want to get the 980 anyway (as the chart indicates). The Faroudja has a notorious "macroblocking" problem when used in conjunction with a lot of DLP displays. Here is the comparison page from Oppo's website:http://www.oppodigital.com/dv981hd/dv981hd_comp.htmlThe main advantage of the 981 is the Faroudja chip, which delivers better-quality upscaling on non-DLP displays. The 981 also offers better-quality PAL->NTSC conversion than Oppo's other two models. Otherwise, as you pointed out, the other two models offer a lot of additional features (I wish my 981 had a memory-stick or USB input!). However, since you have a DLP, you probably want to get the 980 anyway (as the chart indicates). The Faroudja has a... » Read More Here is the comparison page from Oppo's website:http://www.oppodigital.com/dv981hd/dv981hd_comp.htmlThe main advantage of the 981 is the Faroudja chip, which delivers better-quality upscaling on non-DLP displays. The 981 also offers better-quality PAL->NTSC conversion than Oppo's other two models. Otherwise, as you pointed out, the other two models offer a lot of additional features (I wish my 981 had a memory-stick or USB input!). However, since you have a DLP, you probably want to get the 980 anyway (as the chart indicates). The Faroudja has a notorious "macroblocking" problem when used in conjunction with a lot of DLP displays. « Show Less
1773513
I believe the optical zoom is the only difference. It is 24x vs. 30x optical zoom.
1049476
Looking at the system requirement specs at Sapphire the only difference I could see was the 11222-06-20g supported CrossFireX and could not find any reference for the 11222-22--20g. This could be why the 122222-06 dimensions are larger than the 11222-22.
591865
Picture screen size and the presence or absence of a TV tuner are probably the big differences. I have a DM2752D-PN which has a 27-inch screen and is a TV/monitor. My DM2343P-BN has a 23-inch screen and is only a monitor. I am not familiar with a D2443P-BN (assuming you listed the correct model number), but it probably has a 24-inch screen. I like both of my monitors for 3D uses.
1360613
I'm not an expert on sewing machines so I can't answer if there's any type of major difference such as certain sewing patterns or button holes that one has that the other doesn't. I used youtube as my research guide and the DZ2400 beat out the XR9500PRW no problem. I'm not saying the DZ2400 was the top one all together but it was the one I liked best of the top 5 of 2014