Would like to know why this model is $100 less than the X576dw? Is it just the printing speed or are there other features that are different?
1884467
I can tell you it is money well spent. Our office loves it, it scans so fast, and literally shoots out the paper- that's how fast it prints. We have had over 5 printers and this is by far the best investment. There are so many features to it online as well- webmail, scan to e-mail, scan to network folder, I have added at least 6 different computers to it wirelessly. I love it.
1884468
The duty cycles are different. The x476dw has a duty cycle Up to 50,000 pages; Recommended Monthly Page Volume:500 to 2,800 pages while the x576dw has a duty cycle Up to 75,000 pages; Recommended Monthly Page Volume:1,000 to 4,200 pages. See the HP Data sheet: http://www8.hp.com/h20195/v2/GetPDF.aspx%2F4AA4-5011ENW.pdf
1884469
That's the only difference I noticed. This printer is fantastically fast. It is truly the best printer I have ever own or seen. You will love it, I am sure!
1884470
Hello. That is correct. The x476 prints 36 ppm (ISO), up to 55 ppm (general office mode), while the x576 prints 42 ppm (ISO), up to 70 ppm (general office mode). Hope this helps your choice.
693459
No Problem. THe one I had was the LP126CN. Its really designed for a commercial office with multiple users so its HEAVY and large for a home type office, but as an all around printer its worth the hassle of moving in and making room. Mine died and I couldn't find another one available that weekend so I bought the Xerox due to the document demand I had due. Its not as good as a die sublimation photo printer or one of the photo dedicated epsons and canons but it gives results that surprised me coming out of a business printer.
329010
Hi Linda- The 495 is definitely a low-end printer, so depending on how many years you've had it, and how heavily you used it, it may have just reached it's life expectancy. Mine is still operational after three years, but for the last year it's really gotten heavy use. The ink is starting to leak and smear and the WiFi connection keeps kicking in and out. But, I just bought a replacement - an MX720 series which seems good so far. I've also had excellent service from my other Canon printer - an MX870. I like these better because of automatic two-sided copying. In general, Canon PIXMA printers have served me well, and as always you get what you pay for. Maybe time for you to upgrade.
1321794
it's now $2000. crazy. I know the W5100 series is coming out very soon. do you think there is low supply for 52" W's, so they are marking it up?
893485
Just purchased HP 61xl from walmart for 29.98, I would get the XL, much more printing for the dollar.
1223806
I'm very happy with my Brother 2240D. Fast, quiet, compact. But it only does black and white.
196999
Thanks for the information. But still I have a confusion. I can see the Maximum Allowable cash back for this model in T&Cs; of 2010 is $200. So if the purchase price is 180 and the regular price is 488 , will this offer still apply to this printer since the difference is more than 200(488-180 =308 ) ? Thanks
154567
Huh. I wasn't aware the 6700D printed simultaneously on both sides. I use a PIXMA MG5420 currently which does print both sides at once, but don't think it prints as nicely as the 6700.
1355382
Wow, I'm lucky I bought mine last week for $875 before shipping. It's a great notebook! However, I've been doing some searching and looks like this might be a good contender: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16834127100.Don't get me wrong, I have no regrets. The U30JC-A1 runs my Steam games gets my portable gaming crave fixed and it runs Lightroom well.
2011113
I use the 8100 at work and 251dw at home. I haven't noticed much difference in print quality or functionality. The 251dw was extremely easy to set up for network printing. 8100 uses 4 separate ink cartridges, which can be costly. The printer won't print if one of the cartridges is low.
788551
I was wondering the same thing so did some digging and found this in one of the reviews "The main difference of the MP640 over the MP560 is a larger 3" LCD, Ethernet connection and print speed."
923266
I chose the Philips monitor - can't now recall the exact reasons, but I believe that it was due to slightly higher ratings and a little less cost. I'm happy with it. But, for my other office, I spent more and got an HP Envy 32 - slightly wider and the height is great.
1081511
Thats debatable, though they do offer a good value in b&w; laser multifunctions. Some of their software has been dodgy, but thats been the case for others as well, especially HP. Its a crap shoot with anything these days. Buy from somewhere that will take returns (not very common for printers) or wait until unbiased reviews are available.FYI, HP also has new machines just released. They are more $$ than Brother but thought you should know. Look at the higher end 3390 or the entry level 3055 or 3052 if you don't need fax.
674974
What I noticed most was the text quality. With the VGA connection, text on the 906BW had a smudged, almost shadowed look. On DVI the shadows were gone so the text looked clean and clear.
1450986
I have owned two of these printers: Epson 1400: one for three years and one for one. Why two - well here's the story. I did not have good results with the EPSON ink and printer. I tried different ICC profiles, I fiddled with photoshop and it became a problem. I shoot a lot of B/W infrared photos digitally - and I like the B/W look. But I'd print them out and sometimes they'd have a green tinge and then a purplish ting. Sometimes they'd be perfect. I long ago with this printer gave up on EPSON ink, cartridge by cartridge it was very expensive. So I got a bulk feed Lyson system - which works great. Still with the six colors (only one black). Still with the B/W print issues though. So I looked on the net, carefully and bought a B/W bulk system with six B/W inks. The link is here. https://carts.mercurycart.com/usa/files/index.html?action=add&code=QBT14004 NOW the printer produces wonderful prints to my eye. I use the ICC profiles and carefully use Photoshop because there are traps with in the printing menus - you need to let Photoshop do the color adjustment for instance (not the printer) and learn how to alter the ICC profiles correctly (I did this wrong for a while). Alas it took time and reading - but with my now six shades of B/W ink - this printer is fantastic for printing black. Seriously less expensive than the new B/W printers too. (I'd count myself as a serious amateur only here perhaps a pro would have a different view.)
1714549
Tom, I purchased the T520, 36" about a year ago. the Product and Factory # as shown on the tag of my printer is CQ893 - 64001. Mine does not have a "Model" #. The configuration is as shown on the HP website. 1 gig, stand, roll spindle and starter ink cartridges as described. Printer was delivered two days after the order was placed (free shipping). To get a project out quickly I started printing wireless via my network with the intent of cabling later. Wireless worked so well I have not bothered with the cabling. I typically do not praise products, but contrary to some other HP experiances, I have been very pleased with this printer. Speed and quality are both good and the horror stories about ink usage seem to be exagerated a bit. I typically print line drawings (large building construction plans) but have printed a few Google type maps with good results. For take-off drawings lower the print quality for ink savings. My usage averages about 20 sheets a week (size D & E). Seems to be a solid machine. Good luck...Bob
2072654
dont understand the ink cost how is it i see in reviews and then above say cost as much as printer for red? i use red a lot so i really could use up date on this i have been thru three canons in the last month on here and all have been something wrong with them companies have been great for refund but this is old on expecting shipping load and the big let down so need more info before i jump again please help