besides having a 8 panel design, what are the main differences between the attack shorts vs. quest?
90314
Per specs, they both have same inseam, the Attack is 88%Nylon/12% Spandex; the Quest is 86%/14%. I purchased the Attack prior to a Century ride-the TUC in Humboldt County- I have also been on many 30, 50, 60 mile rides and will say the Attack is a very comfortable short.
90315
The Race 3D chamois on the Attack is slightly thicker than the Tour 3D chamois on the Quest. I find this adds a little more comfort. The Attack's fabric feels somewhat softer, and the flatlock seams which hold the eight panels together add an extra level of comfort too, IMO. This is my preferred pair of shorts for longer rides. I highly recommend the Attack.
1220114
I believe the old style gives a faster shave, but it is possible to cut your skin easier. The newer screen slows me down some and I get a few more ingrown hairs. L
379856
There appears to be no difference. The tactical one was more expensive at the time that I bought mine that's why I didn't get it. Get it before the price goes back up.
193619
Sorry my friend. I didn't make any comparisons. I just took a leap and am happy with the purchase.
498838
The only differences I know of are color and material. Size is not an issue to my knowledge.
1390009
from what I can reasonably tell, resolution is the major difference. reference these two pages for further details,http://www.casio-projectors.eu/uk/products/xja256/andhttp://www.casio-projectors.eu/uk/products/xja155/
195111
hi J F W, If you read Pamphlet thoroughly you will find that the stow on the go feature is NO. 8 on the Talon 33& No. 10 on the Talon 44 Talon 22 & Talon 11 don't have said feature. Happy hiking running whatever Bud
188675
This sword is shorter and lighter. It is a better looking sword (though fantasy themed) and a little better balanced. I prefer it to the cold steel waster but I suppose it depends what you want it for.
1339903
I was not as happy with the RS10SC-1A0, it lacked the padding that my other Black Rapid for about $60 cost. I should have know ed .
1254747
The deluxe version comes with the three screens and the standard version has only one. If you like to make jelly and jam, I would recommend the deluxe or ordering the screen kits with the three screens.
2059580
A co-worker had the earlier model, but based on the description, I purchased this one. The differences are minor but significant enough for me - 1) Slightly better image, 2) More robust built-in stand, 3) Nomex carrying sleeve is included (older model did not). Both models are light in weight and auto-switch from landscape to portrait and back depending on orientation.
1706290
The only difference is a few extra cards, it's just the newest version of the original. If you were thinking about getting a new fluxx game i would suggest getting one of the specialty games like pirate fluxx or Monty Python fluxx. That way you could play them separately or mix the decks together.
1966750
8 series, i believe has a single panel... producing a much less distorted picture over the 6 series.
83942
I own the 880 and from what I can tell so far, the only difference is the touch screen. However, I am not sold on the touch screen yet. It appears that the LCD display on the 880 is just as big, but it has buttons along the side of the screen that allows you to select the option on the screen instead of actually pressing the screen. The advantage to that is that you can have more options on one screen. There are 8 buttons (4 on each side) for the 880. When I look at pictures of the Advance One, it looks like you are limited to 4 options on a single screen due to the fact that you need room to actually press the option on the screen with your finger. Some may like that, but it could be a slight disadvantage. The 880 does not have RF capability, but the 890 does. In case you don't know, the 890 is the same as the 880 except for the added RF capability to communicate with devices that are not in your line of sight. I would be interested to know if the Advance Once does have RF. If it does, then that is also an advantage over the 880. Other than that, the 880 is very easy to use and comes with the same software. It is also very ergonomic and easy to hold.
1182991
Don't know the physical differences. Price on BLACK origami was less, as I recall. I had also seen my sister's on her Kindle HD Fire
2018550
It's the same, with the addition of the branding. It also comes with a mousepad, but it's been folded in the box for a very long time. I've had mine for a few months, and it's still not flat. Still, it's ~$30 cheaper than the unbranded model, who cares if it comes with a bent mousepad that the more expensive model doesn't even have. Throw it away and you're still way ahead of the game. I don't play Modern Warfare and didn't care one way or the other about the markings, I just liked saving $30. Plus, the Modern Warfare markings look pretty good, even if I don't play.
24860
My arrows came with the straight Blazer vanes (the short ones), nothing like the Quick Spins which I've used in the past but came back to Blazers. The quickspins have drag and reduce your fps. They were supposed to be more accurate, But I couldn't really notice any difference. You always get some spin, but these vanes are not what contributes to that.