HF200 vs HF R100: Can anyone tell me what the major differences between these models is?
1886592
Despite what amazon wrote, the Canon VIXIA HF R100 Dual Flash Memory Camcorder is not the newer version of the Canon VIXIA HF200 HD Flash Memory Camcorder with 15x Optical Zoom, the Canon VIXIA HF M300 Flash Memory Camcorder is. The HF200 is a 2009 model with a list price of $749.99 and the HF R100 is a 2010 model with a list price of $499.99, which makes it the lowest-cost (or bottom of the line) Vixia model. The HF200 was also the lowest cost of the 2009 line-up, but the 2010 line-up has a lower bottom. There are several differences. The HF R100 has a 20X optical zoom, vs. 15X optical for the HF200. That appears to be the only advantage the HF R100 has over the HF200. However, unless you use the HF R100 on a tripod, that extra zoom will be useless because it has worse image stabilization than the HF200 and you can't handhold a camcorder at that magnification and shoot acceptable footage (it will be bouncing all over the place). So, that extra zoom is mainly a marketing ploy rather than a true advantage. The HF200 has a larger image sensor (for better low-light performance), higher resolution image sensor (for sharper video and still images), higher resolution LCD screen (for sharper images and icons), Multi-Angle Vivid LCD screen (apparently for wider viewing angles), optical image stabilization (for sharper images; the HF R100 has no optical image stabilization but uses electronic image shifting instead), and a higher maximum recording bit rate (for sharper images with fewer compression artifacts, a.k.a. pixelation). Since the HF200 is a 2009 model, it is available at about 1/3 off the list price bringing it down to the same street price as the still new 2010 HF R100 model. The HF200 is a much better camcorder than the HF R100 and they sell for the same price right now.
1375924
I've changed my mind, decided and ordered the HF100. HG20 seems much more expensive than it is but, after a while, for about 15-20 minutes, disc part disturbed me, first time handling seems better but after a while, HF100 excels in this category.I didn't see any quality difference from HG20's 24Mbps recording on my 40inch fullHD Toshiba LCD, seems identical..I liked both menu's, not very different.I've selected HF100, including 2 16GB SDHC Cards, one more silver 809S battery and a charger..I think I did the right choice...Best price/performance ratio including one of the best video quality... I've changed my mind, decided and ordered the HF100. HG20 seems much more expensive than it is but, after a while, for about 15-20 minutes, disc part disturbed me, first time handling seems better but after a while, HF100 excels in this category.I didn't see any quality difference from HG20's 24Mbps recording on my 40inch fullHD Toshiba LCD, seems identical..I liked both menu's, not very different.I've selected HF100, including 2 16GB SDHC Cards, one more silver 809S battery and a charger..I think I did the right choice...Best price/performance ratio... » Read More I've changed my mind, decided and ordered the HF100. HG20 seems much more expensive than it is but, after a while, for about 15-20 minutes, disc part disturbed me, first time handling seems better but after a while, HF100 excels in this category.I didn't see any quality difference from HG20's 24Mbps recording on my 40inch fullHD Toshiba LCD, seems identical..I liked both menu's, not very different.I've selected HF100, including 2 16GB SDHC Cards, one more silver 809S battery and a charger..I think I did the right choice...Best price/performance ratio including one of the best video quality... « Show Less
1678108
The difference is the mount type. The 9920 is a three bolt mounting system and the 1001 is the EZ mount system. I didn't see the 9920 listed on the Waste King site so it may have been discontinued. See: http://www.waste-king.com/
1654307
I am not sure of the differences between the two model numbers you have listed. I do know that the "Reds" are highly rated and I wouldn't put anything else into one of our servers.
1891405
No 100 deg. max here is a link to the manual.. http://www.culligan-store.com/pdfs/HF-360A_Rev_A-Manual.pdf
1375921
In fact, they are not recording the same quality, HG20 is a set ahead than HF100, 24Mbps against 17Mbps, resulting better quality. Can we see the difference? Who knows? But it's there...I aggre with you, HF100 feels cheap(in fact it's cheaper) but does not give the quality feel of HG20, it's not as ergonomic as HG20...HD part of HG20 lets you to handle it better, HF100 feels too small..But, are these enough to pay about 65-70$ more?
1155386
I never had the R200, so i cant answer that. I have a pro model the Studio Pro 3880, & occaisionally i have to do a quick print on the Artisan 50, & you can't easily tell the difference.
52958
Yes. The HWTF1000S replaced my SST-FLTR. It took up the same amount of space.
453871
There is no difference. HL10 is the product number for the lifter. Some websites just word the description differently.
1628297
I don't know all of the differences but the obvious one is the HF-5 doesn't appear to have a microphone or inline controls and the HF-2 does.
481544
According to the Canon website, this battery is compatible with the HF200. Go to website below and enter HF200 for compatible accessories. http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller?act=SNAIndexAct&fcategoryid=
2271987
The HFL has the same features except it has a 27 watt Fluorescent light while the HF unit has a 100 watt incandescent light. The HFL may be worth the extra $ as the fluorescent will last much longer and is more energy efficient
725759
Having worked for Apple I know they will first have to test the new camera to make sure of compatibility. Having said that I am pretty sure that, because Apple supports the HF100 it will support the HF200. It's the camera I am getting and all of our computers are Macs.Note: Most people don't know that Apple requires a manufacture to give them product to test before putting it on Apple Store.
275889
I do have a choice and I own them both. I take them both on field trips. The S100FS is faster in getting action shots, but the HS30EXR allows me to get closer to my subject. I usually shoot from a tripod using a cable release.
1375922
I've ordered the HF100. 549$.I couldn't see any difference between the HG20's 24Mbps recording and the HF100's 17Mbps recording on 40" fullHD Toshiba lcd.It's cheaper about 90$, about 2 16GB SDHC Cards and a 8GB SDHC card...I will use my PS3 to watch videos, no need 60Gb capacity on camcorder.
1375923
Good eye, sir. I do see where you are correct on Canon's website. I missed that detail in the comparison. Normally I'd say I wouldn't notice the difference in quality, but given I'll be putting this on my 56 inch HDTV, I bet it will be noticeable. The HF100 does feel cheaper. The extra bulk from the HDD makes the unit more managable. That plus the menu makes it less appealing.I would say the extra $65-70 is justifiable given the 60gb of included space, especially considering if you can get your hands on a 32gb SD card you'll be paying well over $100. Maybe in a year it will be <$100, but by then these camcorders will be cheaper anyway. I've made up my mind on the HG20! Good eye, sir. I do see where you are correct on Canon's website. I missed that detail in the comparison. Normally I'd say I wouldn't notice the difference in quality, but given I'll be putting this on my 56 inch HDTV, I bet it will be noticeable. The HF100 does feel cheaper. The extra bulk from the HDD makes the unit more managable. That plus the menu makes it less appealing.I would say the extra $65-70 is justifiable given the 60gb of included space, especially considering if you can get your hands on a 32gb SD card you'll be paying well over $100. Maybe in a year... » Read More Good eye, sir. I do see where you are correct on Canon's website. I missed that detail in the comparison. Normally I'd say I wouldn't notice the difference in quality, but given I'll be putting this on my 56 inch HDTV, I bet it will be noticeable. The HF100 does feel cheaper. The extra bulk from the HDD makes the unit more managable. That plus the menu makes it less appealing.I would say the extra $65-70 is justifiable given the 60gb of included space, especially considering if you can get your hands on a 32gb SD card you'll be paying well over $100. Maybe in a year it will be <$100, but by then these camcorders will be cheaper anyway. I've made up my mind on the HG20! « Show Less
1253032
I'd be curious about this as well. I bought a standard definition FS200 which had really grainy, poor video quality. I'm ready to pay extra for the HD version but would like to know how you like the video quality of of the HF200 so far.