what is the difference between this Ep-960 and the Ep-950?
1863724
You can't use the Acupressure Nodes or Lumbar bridge with the 950. Also it does not have the ComfortTrack bed, which is more flexible. You must purchase the 560 or the 960 for those features. See a comparison chart at http://inversiontablereports.com/teeter-inversion-table-ep-series-comparison-chart/
1863725
I own the 960 and the main difference I can see is the table, the 950 does not have the split table that can take the lumbar support and acupressure nubs. Also the hand rails are different, the 960 has longer rails for stretching.
1863726
Hi David, since my husband has severe back issues. I did a lot of research online and was worried about him having to reach so low to lock in the ankle adjustment. I chose the 960 for the ease and comfort for him. the 960 model also has longer handles on each side as well as other handles to grip or push for more of a stretch. which I seem to like more than he does. If you'd like more info I looked up on You Tube a side by side comparison. I'm including the link for you. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a21CTqahr4o. He is a little slow to get started if you start the video about 1:43. he will get into more of the description and will show the differences on each one. I hope this helps. J Hi David, since my husband has severe back issues. I did a lot of research online and was worried about him having to reach so low to lock in the ankle adjustment. I chose the 960 for the ease and comfort for him. the 960 model also has longer handles on each side as well as other handles to grip or push for more of a stretch. which I seem to like more than he does. If you'd like more info I looked up on You Tube a side by side comparison. I'm including the link for you. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a21CTqahr4o. He is a little slow to get started if you start the video about 1:43. he... » Read More Hi David, since my husband has severe back issues. I did a lot of research online and was worried about him having to reach so low to lock in the ankle adjustment. I chose the 960 for the ease and comfort for him. the 960 model also has longer handles on each side as well as other handles to grip or push for more of a stretch. which I seem to like more than he does. If you'd like more info I looked up on You Tube a side by side comparison. I'm including the link for you. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a21CTqahr4o. He is a little slow to get started if you start the video about 1:43. he will get into more of the description and will show the differences on each one. I hope this helps. J « Show Less
1863727
Hi David, since my husband has severe back issues. I did a lot of research online and was worried about him having to reach so low to lock in the ankle adjustment. I chose the 960 for the ease and comfort for him. the 960 model also has longer handles on each side as well as other handles to grip or push for more of a stretch. which I seem to like more than he does. If you'd like more info I looked up on You Tube a side by side comparison. I'm including the link for you. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a21CTqahr4o. He is a little slow to get started if you start the video about 1:43. he will get into more of the description and will show the differences on each one. I hope this helps. J
644316
Not too sure. I have the EP-560. I have seen a model that was about $2500.00 and it looked too like it was made for a public Gym. I suggest you type in the model you have in question and simply see or read up on the differences. I assume it is mostly cosmetic differences. These all do about the same thing. My TV version (EP560) does it all for me.
957597
Here is the comparison page from Oppo's website: http://www.oppodigital.com/dv981hd/dv981hd_comp.html The main advantage of the 981 is the Faroudja chip, which delivers better-quality upscaling on non-DLP displays. The 981 also offers better-quality PAL-&gt;NTSC conversion than Oppo's other two models. Otherwise, as you pointed out, the other two models offer a lot of additional features (I wish my 981 had a memory-stick or USB input!). However, since you have a DLP, you probably want to get the 980 anyway (as the chart indicates). The Faroudja has a notorious "macroblocking" problem when used in conjunction with a lot of DLP displays.
1160642
Sorry, I don't know. I just know that the one I got and I don't even know whether it is 9300 or 9309W is very good and I am totally satisfied.
2047906
right site for your answer90/92 are the same.5990 is black & the 5992 is silverhttp://www.videohelp.com/forum/archive/new-philips-dvp5992-dvd-player-with-usb-2-0-feature-t349792.html
1116152
The PRS-300 and the PRS-600 are both newer models. The 505 preceded the 700. The PRS-700 was originally intended as a successor for the PRS-505 (it's faster - and has that input capability that a touchscreen gives you). The PRS-505 in turn was the replacement for the PRS-500. However, the 700 (despite being in many ways quite similar to the 505) had certain specific flaws (and a couple of benefits). It, unlike the 505, has a touchscreen, and it also has a light embedded underneath the touchscreen and above the eInk screen. On the plus side that means you can read in darker places without carting a little light around with you, but on the down side it and the touchscreen combined made for a screen that wasn't quite as readable as the 505. In short, yes, basically the 700 has been replaced by the PRS-600, which is pretty similar with slightly better readability, I think also a dictionary, but no embedded light. The PRS-300 is a smaller, cheaper, but otherwise very familiar touchscreen-less PRS-505ish device, except that it contains no expansion slots, and is therefore not terribly useful if you're the sort of person who wants to carry the entire Project Gutenberg in your pocket ;) Speaking for myself I'm pretty happy with both the PRS-700 and the PRS-600 models, despite the somewhat diminished readability - I have never owned a 505 so can't comment except to say that I've seen the screens on them and they are astonishingly clear and paper-like. I would probably buy a PRS-300 if I had the cash and it had a memory expansion slot! Hope that helps...
2257165
I don't know the difference but I was not able to get this device working at all. I pitched mine in the trash after trying to get it working with the software for weeks.
145703
I have bought both and both have worked. Not sure of the technical differences.
2272667
Just looking at their web site http://www.hauppauge.com/site/products/data_hvr955q.html I would say that the 955 is functionally the same but they claim improved digital TV reception which I assume means over the air ATSC. You will note on the web page that the second picture is actually of the 950.
2071239
I think it is the small noduals for use as accu-pressure and a cd of how to use them; This is my best guess. I did go with the 960 Limited and we love it.
1968572
The primary difference is the addition of an on/off button on the front panel of the 641P. As far as I can tell they are identical otherwise.
148607
9600 is new model. I don't think there is much difference. You would have to go through every spec to see if there is any. I would start with the pioneer website. I love my 9500 I wouldn't change anything about it. If the price is close obviously go with the new one.
1795432
Hello Sergey,Is this method of russifying ( :) Sony ereader will apply for PRS-950?. I just bought it...
29669
the 960 doesn't have 1080p. and it doesn't have a port on the back, so it's not compatible with the lcd bacpac and the battery bacpac. oh and don't buy it it yet, cuz there is a price drop on the official website (from 149.99 to 239.99). im waiting for amazon to change the price.
627365
No. 920 is longer than the 900. I do think they make one now for the 920 though.
1403134
No, Both deliver video at 1080 progressive scan, so the video will be the same. I forgot to mention that the 3690 does provide Karaoke, if that is an issue,. Again not something I'd use
177921
N900 in international version and N900A is US version. That is the basic difference in these 2.