ANyone knows the difference between this and Benq XL2420z?
1878116
No difference,.. Both 24" with 144Hz refresh rates (Highest on the planet). I'm typing this on the BenQ XL2420 now.. it is a little pricey, but SO worth the investment, even if you don't game. The reduction in eye strain alone is worth it. I HIGHLY recommend it. You'll find the build quality is second to none as well.
923771
I went today to look at HDtv's. I saw both the 46XBR4 and the 3000W and another 3000? Sony. All I can say is that by far the XBR4 was crisper and brighter, it looked more like reality. They had ESPN-HD feed on from Direct-TV. Is the difference worth the price, that's something you have to decide. Go look at them, I saw them at CC. I actually spent a good hour in a recliner they had setup and just watched the 46XBR4 comparing it to the sets around it. This is the one I'm getting, it was simply the best picture constantly, even better than models bigger in size with 1080p. It really stood out in the finer details when next to the other sets. I went today to look at HDtv's. I saw both the 46XBR4 and the 3000W and another 3000? Sony. All I can say is that by far the XBR4 was crisper and brighter, it looked more like reality. They had ESPN-HD feed on from Direct-TV. Is the difference worth the price, that's something you have to decide. Go look at them, I saw them at CC. I actually spent a good hour in a recliner they had setup and just watched the 46XBR4 comparing it to the sets around it. This is the one I'm getting, it was simply the best picture constantly, even better than models bigger in size with 1080p. It really stood out... » Read More I went today to look at HDtv's. I saw both the 46XBR4 and the 3000W and another 3000? Sony. All I can say is that by far the XBR4 was crisper and brighter, it looked more like reality. They had ESPN-HD feed on from Direct-TV. Is the difference worth the price, that's something you have to decide. Go look at them, I saw them at CC. I actually spent a good hour in a recliner they had setup and just watched the 46XBR4 comparing it to the sets around it. This is the one I'm getting, it was simply the best picture constantly, even better than models bigger in size with 1080p. It really stood out in the finer details when next to the other sets. « Show Less
1708417
I don't know. I haven't used the other monitors. It is an excellent monitor for the price paid, the reviews were overall positive, AND my daughter has used two of them for over a year and is very pleased with their performance which is why I bought it.
1053260
Renato, The BenQXL2720T is in fact an LCD monitor. I have had mine for approximately 5 months. I use mine for software development, gaming (BF3 & lately BF4 Beta), and genalogy.....looking at lots of old photos, old documents, and newspaper....... very solid with great visual clarity and excellent features....... Will eventually get a second one.....Best regards D.W.
124642
I will be purchasing the same tv soon, but the only difference I see is the 2014 model has the new Hdmi 2.0 ports. I want to buy something that represents where a company is going instead of where it's been.
203571
hi mike i have a benq w1070 projector and it work very good I'm not sure for the XL2420te
1732098
The 3211350 has the same resolution but double the refresh rate of the 3214200. This means a clearer picture even with the same resolution. It looks 100% better if you have HD video or streaming.
1015514
Replace the DisplayPort cable, it sucks.Buy another, much thicker one,one that's rated for 2160 x 3840 pixels, 60 Hz, IPS, DisplayPort 1.2 . Seriously.With a bad/poor cable, like the one that comeswith the $700 Dell UltraSharp UP2414Q,you might be forced into 29 Hz, low-res mode...and/or the cable will just plain break, causing garbage to appear on the screen.It's worse if you swing it portrait, and/or move it around a lot.The original cable had bent pins and the like... really bad.Why did Dell give me such a -crappy- cable ? ?Dell's cable is half the thickness of the $9 one I boughtto replace it ( same day shipping, from/to Seattle, Amazon ). Replace the DisplayPort cable, it sucks.Buy another, much thicker one,one that's rated for 2160 x 3840 pixels, 60 Hz, IPS, DisplayPort 1.2 . Seriously.With a bad/poor cable, like the one that comeswith the $700 Dell UltraSharp UP2414Q,you might be forced into 29 Hz, low-res mode...and/or the cable will just plain break, causing garbage to appear on the screen.It's worse if you swing it portrait, and/or move it around a lot.The original cable had bent pins and the like... really bad.Why did Dell give me... » Read More Replace the DisplayPort cable, it sucks.Buy another, much thicker one,one that's rated for 2160 x 3840 pixels, 60 Hz, IPS, DisplayPort 1.2 . Seriously.With a bad/poor cable, like the one that comeswith the $700 Dell UltraSharp UP2414Q,you might be forced into 29 Hz, low-res mode...and/or the cable will just plain break, causing garbage to appear on the screen.It's worse if you swing it portrait, and/or move it around a lot.The original cable had bent pins and the like... really bad.Why did Dell give me such a -crappy- cable ? ?Dell's cable is half the thickness of the $9 one I boughtto replace it ( same day shipping, from/to Seattle, Amazon ). « Show Less
3349
I had the exact same monitors I was debating between xD lol the RL is specially designed for consoles and has 2 HDMI ports. Whereas the GL was designed moreso for PC's and only has 1 HDMI port. The only thing honestly holding me back was the HDMI thing. But I would honestly suggest getting the GL because it's $40 cheaper (at least when I bought it), the bezils are thinner, and it overall just looks a lot cleaner. The 1ms difference isn't even noticible honestly, and you save yourself $40 to sacrifice an HDMI port. In all honesty I'm going to get 2 more of these later down the line. They work FLAWLESSLY on the Xbox One and 360 and you don't truly realize how much input lag you had until it's gone lol
923265
I don't see much difference, to be perfectly honest. I can say that the Phillips monitor has been an absolute glorious experience with a picture that is better than most televisions that I've seen. It works perfectly for large computer projects and for watching shows/movies even from a good ten feet away.
754510
I do not know about the comparison. I have never seen a plasma that I cared for the picture. This Sony was not good as it came from the factory. I had lots of problems setting the color, but it is very good now.
2110537
I got this as a secondary monitor but it's actually very good. I also have the 120mhz BenQ. Side by side they are very similar although I can see the smoothness of the 120 mhz. Colors need to be adjusted out of the box.
200929
The benq has decent warranty, however, my w7000 has been return twice and is being replaced with a different model. The item is also dicontinued due to internal issues.
705071
Honestly, I have no way to make a comparison between the two and I'm not using this monitor beside another. Sorry, I can't help you.
1862139
I had this issue and discovered that it's sold as the S in some Asian markets. My box and the front of my monitor say GW2760S but the badge on the back with serial number and so on has the model listed as the HS. I contacted BenQ and they confirmed what a few professional reviews indicated, that they are teh same product.
748000
Difference appears to be more design than anything. The TSX series is current--the Monitor 65's are discontinued. Eric C
2110539
I would say no as its a 60 hz monitor. I've had this monitor for a while and it just is straight up not as smooth as u would want if u want to play competitively. If you want a good monitor for FPS games, I just got the BenQ XL2420TE which is a 144 hz monitor and it was a huge change from 60. Much smoother and just a better experience.