DMC-TZ5 vs. DMC-FX35: Which to choose?
1173623
The wider field of view and the small camera size of the DMC-FX35 are things I like. The FX35 can be purchased today too while the TZ5 cannot. But, I am leaning toward the TZ5 because I also value the features of continuous autofocus and 10x optical zoom and its field of view is also wider than most cameras. This Panasonic page shows the differences between different fields of view. http://panasonic.co.jp/pavc/global/lumix/popup/wide_angle/index.html This Panasonic page shows feature differences between the two cameras. http://www2.panasonic.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/vModelComparisonResults?storeId=15001&catalogId=13401&catGroupId=75047&surfCategory=Lumix%20Digital%20Cameras&cacheProgram=11002&cachePartner=7000000000000005702&items=214163|214166|213677|
2177575
FX is full frame 35mm sensor. DX is an APS C size 24mm sensor. Think of DX like taking a small rectangular section from within a larger rectangular section (the larger section being an FX sensor).
1732305
Side by side these two perform about the same. When the 1090t came out it was expensive as hell. You could probably get two FX8320 for that cost. You probably wouldn't see a real difference. Don't waste your money replacing your 1090t. If you're building a new system I would definitly go with the Fx. It has newer architecture, more cores, it is faster, and you can overclock the heck out of it stable. I have mine at 4.5ghz with the stock fan. Hope this helps
363233
Apples and Oranges, the M9 is very versatile, yet the ods and dist are not that good, on this one there are less Fxs nevertheless the analog dist and ods are pretty decent, love the layout but not the user interface, hope this helps...
2236556
I currently own the FZ35, last week I received the FZ100 and within two days sent it back..yesterday, I received the FZ40 and have spend some time compairing the pictures side by side and I have to say the FZ40 is better..the pictures are more sharper and detail is very good. I enjoy the 3" screen and the video is excellent. Since I take mostly pictures of my dogs, this camera responds very well..Hope this helps
1247175
FX(D800/D610/D600...) is full frame and DX (D7100/D7000/...) is crop. Full frames have larger sensor, hence lower signal to noise ratio which can result in better quality at same resolution. Usually FX family has better lens, body and over all feature set and made for semi pro who are looking for quality in RAW images, while DX are more for photography enthusiasts who think camera should be packed with features they may never use. D7100 is packed with many features but AF is not working properly (Read my review).
1943435
Thank you both (Goodrich and Miller) for those answers. Just what I needed to know! I'll be buying the FZ35...
2189648
It depends of your entire equipment, but yes, the ZxR sounds better than the HD. I did that upgrade.
1043214
Para la DMC FZ40: Adaptador: DMW LA5 Lentes: DMW LT55 (tele 1.7x), DMW LC55 (close-up)
2096573
I have the 18-200 and have enjoyed it. If you are absolutely sure you will never go FX, the 18-200 is a good choice. For less money, I would prefer the 28-300 instead of 18-300, if you ever want to move to FX.
1957841
Right, the DMC-ZS8. I'm still trying to find an answer to that question. Also, has anyone heard anything good about the DMC ZS9?
1046325
I agree with the other poster that it is enhanced. I have not seen a reference to the Standard OS in the TZ 105/205 line. I do recommend buying support so you can access firmware updates. 1-year 8x5 support part # 01-SSC-4811 or 1-year 24x7 part # 01-SSC-4817. This is just support without extra security subscriptions for the TZ 205.
1746412
Late to respond, but my previous camera was a Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ18, a point and shoot camera which I thought took outstanding pictures...until I bought the DMC-FZ150. Holy cow! What a jump in performance that even an unsavvy enthusiast like myself can actually use. I am, however, shocked by the price increase. I had to buy it online because it wasn't available locally but with the reviews and my past experience with Panasonic, I took a deep breath and did it, purchasing it through Amazon for $439 in early April 2012. I consider it top echelon of the "amateur" use cameras.
2130397
Yes, an adapter is needed to use the T-Con 1.7 with the FZ 18/28/35 models. The Panasonic #DMW-LA3 is the correct model and is proven to place the converter in the correct relationship to the lense. While some of the "generic" versions may work, they may also create interference and position problems. This combination has produced excellent images with the FZ18 and FZ28 with in-camera "tweaking" of contrast/saturation/sharpening and noise reduction. The FZ35 appears to respond somewhat differently to these adjustments and has yet to be proven equal using the teleconverter. Also be aware that there will be severe vignetting at the wide end. Hope this helps/Good Luck.
1356198
I am using the Line 6 FBV Express MkII (Amazon Price $93.66) with the AMPLIFi 150 (Same as 75 but with more power). The only feature I don't have with that controller is ability to switch banks from the pedal. For the ability to switch banks from the pedal you will need a Line 6 FBV Shortboard MkII (Amazon Price $199). The FX100 would not be a good choice for the AMPLIFi 75 because, like you said, it would be redundant and they are not intended to be used together.
2059604
Thanks a lot for your kind answer. I know the ZS3 looks better on the spec sheet, but here in Brazil it is absurdly expensive. 80% more than the SX200, God knows why. I am ok with the H264 because it works fine on IMovie and Vimeo. Not so sure about AVCHD, even though I know it is a more modern codec.
1216960
Evelyn, I am confident this will be compatible with your camera since it is described as for 'TZ1 series" cameras. I went by the part number, CGA-S007A, which is the battery in my DMC-TZ5, and it is a genuine Panasonic part. You should be fine with it, but check the number on your old battery or look in your owners' manual if in doubt. Chuck