how is it compared to the Sony?
1859963
Sony is a well known brand. Even though the Sony is more expensive, I think the brand supports the quality of the MP3. I have bought four items of this brand and they stop working after a relatively small period of time. I am sure that if I had bought the Sony item in the first place, I will have save a lot of money
1859964
Excellent sound! If you use the 'swimming' buds, the outside world is so effectively silenced. All/most of what you hear, is the comparable, as in (finicky about fidelity) to Sony units (I've had 4) lack the ability to do yard work (lots of perspiring) and not fail!!! You would, IMHO, not be disappointed, not to mention how much $ you'd save.
236024
Yes, the TV sound is normal for anyone else watching. Having said this, I still think the Sony is far better.
1952496
Sony costs more than the Sharp. May be a little better in black levels but, worse in other aspects, IMHO, not worth the difference in price.
296807
I just compared the Sony XBR4 with the Samsung 71F. I found that the Samsung had deeper blacks, but to the point of hiding details in shadows or low light areas of the picture. With the Sony, the blacks were not as deep but it was possible to distinguish more detail in low light images. Overall, I found the Sony's picture to be better.
1684348
I can't answer for Nikon but if it's anything like the Canon DSLR, the Sony is far superior in low light shooting. The quality of the still shots are excellent and the high definition video is spectacular. I hope this helps.
780441
I'm also curious about this camera as it compares to the Sony SD1200 and the Sony SD780. Any comments from the group?
722138
Hi all,A quick update. I am an engineer and I pay attention to Specs but when it comes to the SR100 vs SR300, I hands down tried both. The quality of the SR100 is far far much better. Yes it is that much diffrent. The colors are more vivid, smooth I dont see any boxyness. Also it is grainy. The only advantage is the still pictures are better then the SR100 but as far as video, there is no comparision. The SR100 is much better in low light...I dont see grains but the SR300 is obvious. I dont belive the specs about the SR300. If Sony does not come with a replacement, I may just sell this on ebay and buy a SR100 for video and use my digital camera for stills. Frank KalkattawiParis, France(Moved) Hi all,A quick update. I am an engineer and I pay attention to Specs but when it comes to the SR100 vs SR300, I hands down tried both. The quality of the SR100 is far far much better. Yes it is that much diffrent. The colors are more vivid, smooth I dont see any boxyness. Also it is grainy. The only advantage is the still pictures are better then the SR100 but as far as video, there is no comparision. The SR100 is much better in low light...I dont see grains but the SR300 is obvious. I dont belive the specs about the SR300. If Sony does not come with a replacement, I may just sell... » Read More Hi all,A quick update. I am an engineer and I pay attention to Specs but when it comes to the SR100 vs SR300, I hands down tried both. The quality of the SR100 is far far much better. Yes it is that much diffrent. The colors are more vivid, smooth I dont see any boxyness. Also it is grainy. The only advantage is the still pictures are better then the SR100 but as far as video, there is no comparision. The SR100 is much better in low light...I dont see grains but the SR300 is obvious. I dont belive the specs about the SR300. If Sony does not come with a replacement, I may just sell this on ebay and buy a SR100 for video and use my digital camera for stills. Frank KalkattawiParis, France(Moved) « Show Less
681707
I don't think I considered the Olympus at all, but the Sony one had 334 reviews and still had good ratings compared to 80 reviews for the Olympus. So far, the Sony PX312 has been great. I use it to record lectures and it is able to pick up student responses even though I place it in the front of the classroom.
1134719
Oddly enough, I ended up going with neither of these. I compared these to the Sony CX130. Picked them up in the stores and found the image of the Sony to be more brilliant. The Sony form factor was smaller as well which will be good for traveling. Best part is that it's only $350. It uses SD cards (no internal memory), but that didn't bother me since SD cards are so cheap now.
1935411
dear friendfrom my experience Nikon d3100 is much better than sony a390 I have the both camera and I am more satisfied with nikon
1290446
Depends on your preference. I'm a Sony person when it comes to most products and Bravia is one of the best.
1825564
its way more clearer than LG and Sharp!!!Sharp come close, but Sony is just way BETTER!!!!!!!!!!i remember watching a Sharp 52" vs. Sony Bravia 52" in in the store and the Bravia is just way better and have better image than the Sharp, period, no question ask, Sony beat Sharp!
1448710
A friend of mine just bought a Sony the latest model and if I did'nt have a 5.1 system, that's the one I'd go with,especially if you're strapped for space. The Sony, sounds like a 5.1,by the way I love the Samsung.
163823
Like you, I wanted a good camera for a fair price. I found a site that does side by side comparisons, you just bring up the ones you want from the list. I went for the Sony, for a couple of reasons: Long battery Life ( a friend of mine has one and he told me of that) and the other is the Zeiss lenses in it. http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sidebyside.asp
84901
I have the same question! I'm having the same experience with the Sonys and that's why I'm thinking of purchasing these. Did you find out anything?
570514
Input lag is better with sony with 19.7ms . Samasung f8000 is slower with 46.8. I imagine this is not noticeable to the average user, but for gamers, sport watcher sony is better.
1553128
Hello, This is my 1st Sony camera. I am not sure what the difference is. But, I can say the Sony A77 has been wonderful. Very glad with my purchase.