Would this work if you used a female to female coupler to send a microphone signal to male end, then used female ends for sound on 2 different devices
1854255
I bought 2 0d these adapters and they were both a peice of junk, wiring reversed and open conducters,suggest you toss them out.
1854256
Its generic device for sound. No input e.g. microphone. Its a splitter only.
1854257
Wow !! I don't know. I connected two male devices to the two female couplings to add it to the input on my computer as shown in the picture. Maybe there is a double male connector with a female end to connect to a device. I am not sure. I just connected (seperately) two sets of coupling addapters to speakers and for microphones.
1854258
well it depends on what you mean by work. Mine did not produce a stereo output, it split the output into left and right signals in stereo. Don't know what to say?
330850
You are looking for a single female (input) to a double male (output).. This item is used to connect two inputs to one output (source)
1083935
You can use a mixer device or a "Y" cable, but it is not designed to it. If you do it, both mics will have the effect on then.
2192195
Looks like someone's already answered and he's correct. It will create a mono signal which, depending on your needs, might not work for you.
777349
It should work if the jack you are plugging it into can handle a microphone signal.
1354760
Normally you would not wire 2 output devices to a 1 input device but since the output devices are passive (I assume) mics, then they will just mix together at the computer input jack via the splitter cable. Your biggest problem will be balancing the 2 mic signals to your satisfaction since there is no control on the 2 mics.
1129766
Yes this should work. It is a combiner, not a splitter and there is a difference. I had the same problem trying to use 2 DB8 antennas. This combiner solved the problem.
168559
Yes, but... When you use a passive splitter like this, there is a drop in volume. If you daisy chain multiple splitters together, each successive splitter will drop the volume further. So the people on the first splitter (where the laptop is plugged in) will hear louder audio than the people on the 2nd splitter. If you do try to do this, connect the 2nd and 3rd splitter both to the 1st splitter (instead of daisy chaining the 1st to the 2nd, and the 2nd to the 3rd). At least that way everyone on the 2nd and 3rd splitters (10 of the people) will all hear the same volume. If the source you're listening to is sufficiently loud, then you should be able to compensate for the loss. I can't say I've ever tried to split a signal out that far though.
1121055
Keep in mind that these are 4 Pole/3-Rings, TRRS, not the common stereo 3-pole/2rings TRS plugs. That said these plugs just split or combine whatever is connected to any of the connectors. This is a clear simple split without anything to interfere with what you want to do. So I would say, yes you can use two different audio outputs into one speaker, as long as you have the correct genders.
1804177
Well, I'm not using my patch cable for that purpose; I'm using it to transmit phantom power to two DI boxes. In theory, though, it should work, since one pin would carry the L signal and the opposing pin the R signal. But it would depend on what you were plugging the male end into; if your interface was mono, all you would get would get is a mono signal coming through. But if the interface was stereo, as long as the pins stayed discrete, you should get a stereo output. The cable isn't particularly expensive, so it might be worth a try. You can always use the cable to blend two dynamic mics if it doesn't work for that purpose. Well, I'm not using my patch cable for that purpose; I'm using it to transmit phantom power to two DI boxes. In theory, though, it should work, since one pin would carry the L signal and the opposing pin the R signal. But it would depend on what you were plugging the male end into; if your interface was mono, all you would get would get is a mono signal coming through. But if the interface was stereo, as long as the pins stayed discrete, you should get a stereo output. The cable isn't particularly expensive, so it might be worth a try. You can always use the cable to blend two dynamic mics... » Read More Well, I'm not using my patch cable for that purpose; I'm using it to transmit phantom power to two DI boxes. In theory, though, it should work, since one pin would carry the L signal and the opposing pin the R signal. But it would depend on what you were plugging the male end into; if your interface was mono, all you would get would get is a mono signal coming through. But if the interface was stereo, as long as the pins stayed discrete, you should get a stereo output. The cable isn't particularly expensive, so it might be worth a try. You can always use the cable to blend two dynamic mics if it doesn't work for that purpose. « Show Less
1450131
No it will not work. The male side has 4 pins (left, right, ground, and mic/button). The female side has 3 pins (left, right, ground) You can use a TRRS (tip ring ring sleeve) extension so that the bulky end doesn't break your phone. I used this setup for a road trip, and it worked great.
1354762
I'm an electronic tech by trade. You normally would not tie together outputs but in this case I think for your application, it will work ok. If the mics were powered mics then there would be a concern but since they are passive devices, the output signals will simply be mixed together then fed to your computer mic input.
678429
No it will not work, because you only can dedicate one USB connection as your default playback device. But you can do what you want with only one unit by using a microphone splitter to attach to the (RED) hole and connect the other end to the two microphones. You can use a splitter like " RLCAB095 - Stereo Audio Input Splitter". Google it.
603503
There are 2 channels only one device per channel, 1 channel at a time. As long as the mike is the same frequency as one of them it should work.
670382
It may "function", but you'd be better off using a true co-axial cable splitter. There is a difference between ordinary audio cables [which this is] and a real co-axial cable. It may just be a matter of superior results using the correct type of cable. You won't hurt anything by trying this --- and it is so inexpensive. If you're like me, you'll find another use for it eventually if it doesn't work satisfactorily in this application.
1571673
in principle, it should work as long as you are plugging the mic into the mic connector on the unit. I think that people run in trouble with this unit when they try to use it as a traditional splitter, when it's designed to separate mic and phone for integrated mic/phone connectors.
1677837
I would think not. I would imagine that the output on your device is not capable of handling more than one. Also I think you would have to think about the impedence of the speakers combined.