which one is better 66lmt or 2555 lmt?
1881980
66lmt is 6 inch screen 2555 is 5 inch screen it depend which you like mostly they are but I line bigger screen
1881981
For me the 66LMT, as i like the larger screen. I'm not familiar with the 2555lmt other than a quick check. If screen size is not a deal breaker than open up two windows and go line by line on features either here on Amazon or Garmin's site and decide what is most important to you.
1881982
The 66LMT is definitely better, both because it has a larger screen, but more importantly because it was released in 2014, 2.5 years later than the 2555 LMT, and it thus has a faster processor and improved features (e.g., it has figured out that I drive home from work via the same route every day, so it now says "13 minutes to home" when I leave my workplace, even though I didn't say "find a route to home"). The one advantage the 2555 has (and any of the 5" models) is longer battery life.
517092
This is good as I am also trying to decide between the two of these models. Bluetooth means nothing to me, But I do like having the lanes shown better so that leans me more towards the 1490LMT. But again, I am also concerned that the 1490 LMT has worse reviews than 1450LMT..maybe because of Bluetooth??
917375
My read of the customer reviews supports the notion that the 255W is a terrific unit. Thanks for your reply.
592909
105L and 105 work on the same printer, but the L is the longer-lasting version. In my experience is lasts 2-3 times longer than the regular, and it is worth the difference in price.
477069
2597LMT has the all features, it looks like, selling for $149.99, brand new. The 2557LMT doesn't include BT. I would buy the most cheapest used. As long as it's in very good condition and has all accessories. This is pretty much what I've done and it works for me.
2041013
I took a look at the Samsung site and it is touting MLC (V-NAND) as having higher endurance (MTBF), but that doesn't jive with some papers like this :http://www.oempcworld.com/support/SLC_vs_MLC.htmMLC definitely gives you higher densities, but I'm still not sure which disks are more reliable.
1494764
I bought the 260 and can recommend it (although later Garmin changed the interface to the 2x5 series ... which may or may not be a positive). My new 765t doesn't route me any better than my 260 did (it just has a few bells and whistles that I liked and needed ... lane assist for one).I've never owned a TomTom, so I cannot compare the two.
917370
This is the exact question I have now. I am leaning toward the 1300LM mainly cause of the lifetime updates of maps. any advice? Thanks!
1853793
I purchased it for the L655. I would make sure the numbers match your current battery.
908529
The 1005G is in a plastic case and the 105 is in a metal case. That is about the only difference I can see. But I would got for the 8 port switch, 1008G, because it's only a few bucks difference.
1181631
The difference is the M525 is a laser mouse. I think the M325 is an optical mouse. The M525 will work on almost all surfaces.
1003785
I would see 25H3P as the superior model as it got both rain and shock protection and disk is fully covered by the shock proof material body. This suggestion with security of handling the devices, but it will weigh a little extra since it has that hard cover. I have not used 25M3P but have seen with one of my friends. Portability wise both are similar. Good luck :)
1393576
The ML2525 works, I also try the the MLT_D105 my works I have no problem. I will tel you tha i prefere the MLT-D105S last much more close to 400 sheets.
5312
LT245/75-17~ LT235/80-17~LT265/70-17265/60-18 ~ 245/75-19.5~ 265/70-17~245/70-17.5~255/70-18
1400776
It is compatible. The 2555LMT, may have a built in traffic receiver. You can verify this buy selecting settings, device, about. If you have traffic info, it is built in, if not the external cable will be needed.
837275
Hey MelissaS, I've been researching the Garmin GPS's for a couple of weeks and can tell you the differences I've seen. The 255W has a few of "new" features in their 2x5 line but the two that I've seen people the most happy with in the reviews I've read are the satellite "hotfix" and the faster processor. The "hotfix" is supposed to speed up satellite acquisition immensely by having the unit remember where it was turned off last so it can calculate where the satellites should be when you turn it back on and from what I've read it works like a charm. The faster processor will speed up things like map drawing and looking up points of interest which people have really seemed to also notice in their reviews. The big drawback of the 255 and 255w is the text to speech voice quality (this is the voice that pronounces street names). Apparently the voice quality isn't as good on the 255 line as it is in the previous products due to the voice engine Garmin has used in this model...most people I've read say they can live with it but some bring it back due to the quality. I would goto a store and try both side by side to see if you can live with the quality. I did that today and was able to understand what the 255w was saying even in a busy store but still think I'll wait for the 265WT in October. Hope that helps!
293610
I bought the 260 and can recommend it (although later Garmin changed the interface to the 2x5 series ... which may or may not be a positive). My new 765t doesn't route me any better than my 260 did (it just has a few bells and whistles that I liked and needed ... lane assist for one). I've never owned a TomTom, so I cannot compare the two.