How can this be True Gigabit if the "total throughput" is only 300MB?
1880425
The short answer is marketing. The channels are bonded to produce more than 300 MB/s. This exceeds the amount of data transmission capability of 100 base t thereby allowing Cisco to market it as 1 Gig. 1000 base t is UP TO 1000 MB/s, but could be less. This is the case with 100 base t and 10 base t.
883641
Oh I didnt notice that when i bought it, but it's 16GB i recommend this item. maybe it mean 4 Gb (Gigabits) which is it's "processing speed" a gigabit equals 128 MB so it can copy up to 512MB of info a second if you computer can do the same, but i could be wrong. but i know for a fact its 16 GB
782786
Something is not right there. On a wired 1Gbps connection with a single copy I would expect at least 400Mbps, with speeds over 700Mbps on faster switches (efficient internal packet forwarding). That is from testing when I first received the unit (tested with 4 x 5200 RPM Toshiba 160GB in RAID 5, prior to 4 x 7200 RPM Seagate 750GB in SHR I have had in it since then - but I haven't tried that on a fast switch, my home switch seems to max about 500Mbps). For comparison, I've seen speeds close to single line speed (~900Mbps) on a DS713+/DX513 combo. If you are on WiFi, I would run hardwired tests for comparison. Then start troubleshooting your WiFi.
2121148
You can do some link aggregation and double your data throughput or you can use it as a redundancy port if one fails the second comes aliveRegards
1005438
As long as you have a signal you wlll not be using any GB. Your GB are used up when you are only on 3g.
979017
Thanks for the post.My speeds have slightly improved since I upgraded my network to gigabit and upgraded my system to quad 64 bit. My router, NICs, switch, and of course the NAS are all gigabit now. Still, I only get up to 10MB/s. Seems faster than what windows reports though. The only thing I didnt upgrade was the cables, from what I was told cables shouldnt make a difference. Thanks for the reply.
288874
Hi Chris. It's supposed to give you 300 Mbps wireless connectivity. The speed will also depend on your router's signal though, as well as wireless interference in the network
948879
According to Arris it should handle better than 300Mbps. No cable providers that I know of provide that speed unless you pony up extra $$$. Of course you'll need a good router that can handle that kind of speed if you are wireless. After a lot of research I grabbed the ASUS RT-AC66U Dual-Band Wireless-AC1750 Gigabit Router. They seem to work happily together feeding 9 wireless devices.
1790225
My devices are hooked up through a gigabit switch, however, the switch is reporting 10/100 speed on those ports. So to answer your question, it downgrades gigabit to 10/100.
1537129
Yes, if you are paying for 50 megs, why are you only getting 6 megs. I think you should talk to your ISP first and find out if the problem is not with them. If you hardware is older, then this would be a good upgrade.
1737221
You would have to consult with Microtel about that. Mine is Gigabit, but it looks different than this pic. Every comp they make is custom and different, so you would need to ask them about the one you want.
723718
Judging by the maximum throughput listed under specs, it is the 1.2 version. There is a 1.3 version coming later this year (good for 8K).
1263026
According to the Specs "The E1200 features four Fast Ethernet ports". To my understanding that is 10/100 not the Gigabit speed.
1136614
I'm not sure there's any way to know without opening it up (IIRC, it didn't include any paperwork). Although I never tested it for max speed, I used it on a gigabit link and regularly transferred data at well above 100Mbps without issue.
851988
Viking here: according to Netgear, the N 300 can handle up to 400 MBPS. This is the modem/router I use in my network.
866824
What info I have learned is 32 gig is max. Suggest go to Afunta web and ask
2100640
I don't know. All I can find is this: Max. 5Gbps (USB 3.0), Max. 480Mbps (USB 2.0) & SATA 3Gbps