What is the difference between Fuji Super HQ 200 and Fuji Film 200 ?
1852265
I don't know because I'm not that sophisticated about film and cameras. I hardly use that camera any more. Much easier to use iPhone these days.
1852266
The Fuji Film 200 is a good, all-around film and I have used it in the past. The HQ version is slightly better in that it handles flash better than the standard 200. When I have shot both, I usually set my ISO at 160.
359952
Look up "Imaging Resource" website. There is a very cool "Comparometer" (look on the left side, "Compare Sample Images). I, too, am trying to decide between the ZS7 and the HX5V. My biggest beef (in particular, with the Fuji F80, which I returned), is with over-processed images wiping out facial tone. I'm worried the Sony does that a bit, but it seems to retain some of the Fuji's low light magic. It's a shame the ZS7 went up on megapixels and therefore lost resolution in processing out noise. (Compare the house photos between the two on the Comparometer. The ZS3 clearly wins. Look up "Imaging Resource" website. There is a very cool "Comparometer" (look on the left side, "Compare Sample Images). I, too, am trying to decide between the ZS7 and the HX5V. My biggest beef (in particular, with the Fuji F80, which I returned), is with over-processed images wiping out facial tone. I'm worried the Sony does that a bit, but it seems to retain some of the Fuji's low light magic. It's a shame the ZS7 went up on megapixels and therefore lost resolution in processing out noise. (Compare the house photos between the two on the Comparometer. The ZS3... » Read More Look up "Imaging Resource" website. There is a very cool "Comparometer" (look on the left side, "Compare Sample Images). I, too, am trying to decide between the ZS7 and the HX5V. My biggest beef (in particular, with the Fuji F80, which I returned), is with over-processed images wiping out facial tone. I'm worried the Sony does that a bit, but it seems to retain some of the Fuji's low light magic. It's a shame the ZS7 went up on megapixels and therefore lost resolution in processing out noise. (Compare the house photos between the two on the Comparometer. The ZS3 clearly wins. « Show Less
2200821
I am so sorry, I purchase this Machine for my brother as a gift and for best answer i would check with the Fuji website to get the true accurate answer. Meanwhile i will forward this question to my brother to see if he can help you with the answer.
949927
Everyone has a good point. The 200 lum is brighter sharper.. But doesn't have rechargeable battery. The 100 lum has rechargeable battery but lower in brightness and sharpness and projection size.
466983
I don't have the 200mm, so can't compare. I have no complaints on this lens, if that helps.
1660346
I'm assuming you mean the RX100. Both cameras will do a great job; you'll get better lowlight results with Sony but save money with the Fuji. The thing is to take that vacation and shoot, shoot, shoot. Whatever you choose get to know the camera so it "disappears" and you're not thinking about the camera and just shooting. Happy Shopping!
1418334
i would say the major difference in price is because of the build quality..i have used this dslr kit and i was really happy with everything..and the canon 70-200 should fitas you have a lot of space to move your camera body back and forth.
147248
I have a PX-110 and it worked great for me. Don't know why it wouldn't work on the 200, but I don't know for sure.
215379
Any FujiFilm Instax film that says WIDE will work great in the 210. (: oh and you'll love it I guarantee it!
697513
I believe the 200 DG is a bit bigger. I'm happy with the 300 DG. It holds my 6D with lens, 435 flash, extra battery and charger, etc. and is not too heavy.
567814
I'm guessing you meant the 18-200 DC OS II? I don't think a 18-250 DC OS II exists yet. The main differences are longer zoom in the 250, while the 200 uses a new lens layout and materials. Overall quality is negligible and the extra cost is all about whether or not that extra 50mm is worth it to you.
2091073
HG21 has a better sensor(1/3.2") than the HF20/200 (1/4"). Also, it still has the flash card option to record video, in addition to the hard drive. Not to mention, the HG21 also includes a viewfinder, which is missing in the HF20/200. I would definitely pick the HG21.
895347
NO WAY. I own both cameras, the 110 and the 200. The batteries are different sizes. I'm looking at them as I type this.
2277825
I really do not know-but the fujifim i have is a wonderful camera and I can do so much with it. it is the 114 megal pixal model s and zoom lens and it is great!
305384
I own them both, and have been using them in my portriat studio for a while now. i'll say this, theres really not much difference in the two cameras, a few minor upgrades in the xti, what it boils down to is image quality, and from what i've seen they are equal. Just as fyi, I have been able to get prints as large as 20x30 from both cameras with excellent results.
1380156
Both the Canon A610 and A620 have smaller screens. They also have the drawback of ISO only to 400. The Canon A540 pushes the ISO to 800 which is important for getting the photo in lower lght levels with less chance of camera "shake". The movable screen on the A620 intriqued me but them I really did not see a pressing need for it. The 620 has a longer zoom range, but again the more compact size of the A540 won the day. The A620 takes 4 AA batteries and that adds to the bulk and weight. Again, the A540 won the day because I wanted a high function, pocketable camera. I hope this helps you.
1362387
200 is more versatile. Nothing at all wrong with thee 100, but the 200 does provide more options.