compare to XT-1, is there any difference for picture quality?...
1874912
No. the images of both cameras are very very good, and both use the same sensor. I've had both cameras, and I chose to move to the XT-1 because of all the features,new dials,intervalometer and the incredible EVF. Some prefer the rangefinder look and feel of the XE2, I like the ergonomics and feel of the XT better. It comes down to personal preference.
1874913
Same sensor. More about what you can afford. If you can spend $300 more dollars I would!
883523
I own the FZ200 and returned the X-S1. Even though the X-S1 has a larger sensor which should result in better image quality, unfortunately the X-S1's auto focus is unreliable, image stabilization almost seems non-existent , and the lens has about the same slow and dark specs as a DSLR kit lens, which results in blurry pics more often them not. To get around that, you can up the ISO a bit, but that won't help focus issues and reduces the mirage quality. I get much better pics out of my Panasonic FZ200 and I suspect you would get the same out of the FZ70.
548186
My subjective opinion is based on a pretty simple observation. I've looked at and compared both sets at Sears and at Best Buy and the Samsung had the best picture quality by far. In fact at as little as 5 feet away I had a difficult time seeing any difference between the model in question and several other 1080p models hanging next to it. I know a lot depends upon the quality of video feed the stores are using for the demo models on display. This is only my opinion and I know that can vary greatly for the person to person. So, take it for what its worth. Hopefully others can add their observations to the discussion.
1117275
For me, the zoom feature alone makes the camera worth the extra bucks. Wide angle shots warp the size and vertical lines of a shot, and make the speed of objects coming toward you suddenly get faster as the two of you get very close. Withoug the zoom, subjects more than a dozen feet away appear VERY small in the playback. Add in the capability of the XA-2 to shoot slow motion and higher resolution stills and it really is very clear that the XA-2 is worth the extra money. I don't have first hand experience with the XA-1, but the exposures from my XA-2 are very good, much better than a couple of other cameras I have owned. For me, the zoom feature alone makes the camera worth the extra bucks. Wide angle shots warp the size and vertical lines of a shot, and make the speed of objects coming toward you suddenly get faster as the two of you get very close. Withoug the zoom, subjects more than a dozen feet away appear VERY small in the playback. Add in the capability of the XA-2 to shoot slow motion and higher resolution stills and it really is very clear that the XA-2 is worth the extra money. I don't have first hand experience with the XA-1, but the exposures from my XA-2 are very good, much better than a couple... » Read More For me, the zoom feature alone makes the camera worth the extra bucks. Wide angle shots warp the size and vertical lines of a shot, and make the speed of objects coming toward you suddenly get faster as the two of you get very close. Withoug the zoom, subjects more than a dozen feet away appear VERY small in the playback. Add in the capability of the XA-2 to shoot slow motion and higher resolution stills and it really is very clear that the XA-2 is worth the extra money. I don't have first hand experience with the XA-1, but the exposures from my XA-2 are very good, much better than a couple of other cameras I have owned. « Show Less
1290450
I feel like Sony is more better than samsung compared to picture quality and sound. So I would prefer Sony. Please check the review on Cnet
2221316
I have a GF1 and GH1 and the XR520v and CX520v. Panasonic has better manual control for stills, but the Sony stabilization and AVCHD codec implementation are *much* stronger.
2218322
Like others have said here, much better ISO performance and the lens lineup is not even close. I've been using my XE1 more than my 5Dmk3 lately and cannot wait to use something that has improved AF.
1825564
its way more clearer than LG and Sharp!!!Sharp come close, but Sony is just way BETTER!!!!!!!!!!i remember watching a Sharp 52" vs. Sony Bravia 52" in in the store and the Bravia is just way better and have better image than the Sharp, period, no question ask, Sony beat Sharp!
57698
I forgot to mention; I have a separate sound system, so I'm mostly concerned with the picture. How would you compare the picture quality of the two TVs?
1850459
The af speed depends on the camera being used. The speed was ok with the xe-1 under normal conditions. I would believe better with xe-2 and xt. F2.8 isn't that fast for indoors.
1054608
I've not owned the x-100 but the x-t1 is supposed to be lots faster ....Look in dpreview.com
1009946
I just purchased the T500 and I'm very happy with it. If you don't see yourself taking any video, then the T700 is more feature rich. But, if you'll use the video feature the T500 is significantly better. The T500's HD video in decent lighting is impressive for such a small camera. The T500 screen resolution may not be as good as the T700, but I've found it more than acceptable. A friend of mine has a camera with "Smile Shutter" and he says he never uses it, more of a hassle then it's worth. I could see if you had kids who are reluctant to smile, it might be a nice feature. -Good Luck I just purchased the T500 and I'm very happy with it. If you don't see yourself taking any video, then the T700 is more feature rich. But, if you'll use the video feature the T500 is significantly better. The T500's HD video in decent lighting is impressive for such a small camera. The T500 screen resolution may not be as good as the T700, but I've found it more than acceptable. A friend of mine has a camera with "Smile Shutter" and he says he never uses it, more of a hassle then it's worth. I could see if you had kids who are reluctant to smile, it might be a nice feature. -Good... » Read More I just purchased the T500 and I'm very happy with it. If you don't see yourself taking any video, then the T700 is more feature rich. But, if you'll use the video feature the T500 is significantly better. The T500's HD video in decent lighting is impressive for such a small camera. The T500 screen resolution may not be as good as the T700, but I've found it more than acceptable. A friend of mine has a camera with "Smile Shutter" and he says he never uses it, more of a hassle then it's worth. I could see if you had kids who are reluctant to smile, it might be a nice feature. -Good Luck « Show Less
462704
More bang for your buck will be the XTi, since it is cheaper and you honestly won't get much better photos from the 40D. However, if you can swing the money, I wholeheartedly recommend the 40D. I recently upgraded from the XT to the 40D. The additional controls make it so much easier to change settings, the larger size feels more balanced, etc etc. However, the XTi is a great camera, and don't feel bad about buying that either! It's a nice upgrade from my XT, which I loved for 2 years. You honestly can't go wrong with either one. Go to a store and handle each and see if one feels better in your hands than the other. More bang for your buck will be the XTi, since it is cheaper and you honestly won't get much better photos from the 40D. However, if you can swing the money, I wholeheartedly recommend the 40D. I recently upgraded from the XT to the 40D. The additional controls make it so much easier to change settings, the larger size feels more balanced, etc etc. However, the XTi is a great camera, and don't feel bad about buying that either! It's a nice upgrade from my XT, which I loved for 2 years. You honestly can't go wrong with either one. Go to a store and handle each and see if one feels better in... » Read More More bang for your buck will be the XTi, since it is cheaper and you honestly won't get much better photos from the 40D. However, if you can swing the money, I wholeheartedly recommend the 40D. I recently upgraded from the XT to the 40D. The additional controls make it so much easier to change settings, the larger size feels more balanced, etc etc. However, the XTi is a great camera, and don't feel bad about buying that either! It's a nice upgrade from my XT, which I loved for 2 years. You honestly can't go wrong with either one. Go to a store and handle each and see if one feels better in your hands than the other. « Show Less
1525447
I only have the XT1 at home... My guess would be that the CT370/600 with separate subwoofer would sound be better. The main reason is that if you can separate the sound frequency ranges and have dedicated speakers (i.e. subwoofer), the the sound quality is likely to be better. Also separate subwoofers have their own amplifiers which would give more "thump" to the low sound frequencies. It all depends on what you are looking for. I bought the XT1 for convenience and aesthetically pleasing --my wife did not want separate speakers and wires showing in our living room TV. I have an amplifier and 5 speakers in basement TV and they sound much better than XT1. But the basement is my territory and I have more space -it's dedicated to watch movies, while the living room for casual TV watching while making dinner, before breakfast, etc. It all depends on what you want and how much you are willing to spend. I hope this helps you.
1134719
Oddly enough, I ended up going with neither of these. I compared these to the Sony CX130. Picked them up in the stores and found the image of the Sony to be more brilliant. The Sony form factor was smaller as well which will be good for traveling. Best part is that it's only $350. It uses SD cards (no internal memory), but that didn't bother me since SD cards are so cheap now.
2218323
As an owner of a XE1, the biggest draw to the system has been the lenses. They are simply great performers. The upcoming lenses are even better. The other is the larger sensor and it's design. It's ability to take great pictures at high ISO just opens up a welcomed flexibility to many shooting situations. Also, larger viewfinders allow the photographer to become more immersed in the shot. It's a big plus that I mistakenly forgot when purchasing the XE1. To top it all off, the X line has a solid, made in Japan feel to (like the older Nikon SP rangefinders. I anticipate the X-T1 to feel just as robust. As an owner of a XE1, the biggest draw to the system has been the lenses. They are simply great performers. The upcoming lenses are even better. The other is the larger sensor and it's design. It's ability to take great pictures at high ISO just opens up a welcomed flexibility to many shooting situations. Also, larger viewfinders allow the photographer to become more immersed in the shot. It's a big plus that I mistakenly forgot when purchasing the XE1. To top it all off, the X line has a solid, made in Japan feel to (like the older Nikon SP rangefinders. I anticipate the X-T1 to feel just... » Read More As an owner of a XE1, the biggest draw to the system has been the lenses. They are simply great performers. The upcoming lenses are even better. The other is the larger sensor and it's design. It's ability to take great pictures at high ISO just opens up a welcomed flexibility to many shooting situations. Also, larger viewfinders allow the photographer to become more immersed in the shot. It's a big plus that I mistakenly forgot when purchasing the XE1. To top it all off, the X line has a solid, made in Japan feel to (like the older Nikon SP rangefinders. I anticipate the X-T1 to feel just as robust. « Show Less
2145502
As far as I know, the differences are minimal....Both are excellent; save the $20,go with the 190XB. I love mine.