How does the image quality from this camera compare to the image quality of photos taken with the NEX6? I'm concerned over the R10's smaller sensor.
1864518
No. But it's close. The nex6 uses an AP-C size sensor where the 10 only uses the 1 inch sensor. Bigger sensor will always out shine a smaller sensor in image quality. But again, not by much in this case. Now, the RX10 has many more things going for it though. If you don't care about it being bigger I would recommend rx10 in a heartbeat!
1864519
Instead of the RX10, at $400 less with 400mm zoom verses 200mm with the RX10, and 4k video in which you can play back and get 8mp photos from, I would consider the Panasonic FZ1000 camera instead. It is coming out at the end of July and can be pre-ordered now.
1058502
It has an APS-C size sensor, so if you are comparing it to a small point-and-shoot, it is much, much better at low light. The ISO can be cranked up pretty high, though I try not to use anything over 6400. With the kit lens at f/3.5 (or f/5.6 full tele), low light performance is decent, though a faster lens like the SMCP-DA 50mm f/1.8 would increase the performance even more.
356706
Wait for the D610. You will not have the dirty sensor problem. I love my D600 but I have problems with the dirty sensor.
526621
HiThere does not appear to be any lag. Hit the shutter button and you have it. By the way, I am a professional photographer and I owned the original RX100. Did not like it as I felt the lens and/or sensor was simply not sharp enough for my needs. I sold it after 3 months. The Mark 3 is fabulous and Sony has fixed the problems PLUS added an EVF. This camera lens/sensor combo is really sharp and I am delighted with it. It is my "carry around" always camera.Good luck and well wishes!- Phil Johannes
1542165
I bought this camera right after Christmas of last year, and it performs very well. In terms of low light, the body can expand to 3200 ISO. Low light conditions is also dependent on the lens you are using and not just the camera body.
785160
I have both NEX7 and A7R. I bought the 10-18 for the NEX7. After buying the A7R I tried the 10-18. It works fine, but there is a little bit of vignetting at 10mm, so you have to move the focal length up to about 12mm to eliminate the vig. Of course, you can crop the 10mm pic. or use the A7R in crop mode, too. I read that others had the same experience. The 10-18 is a very good lens on either camera, and your mileage may vary...
682413
I have not used the other cameras, so I cannot compare. I will say that I am very happy with what I have shot so far. I have no regrets buying this camera.
8231
NexC3. Larger sensor is the reason. Otherwise from afar, both camera's look very very similar.
2178177
Ben, the images out of the SX200 are not blurry at all, even in low light conditions due to the wonderful stabilizer.I was worried at first, then I printed out some pics 8 X10 and WOWWWWWWWI do not miss the Superfine anymore. In addition to that, now I am able to email full resolution pics :)I am still an S80 owner. The SX200 is much faster in everything even zooming at max and in low light conditions.
861885
Hello Jack, I have not done that comparison I'm afraid. But I had the LUMIX FZ200, which does compare to the RX10, and I can say that i like the SONY better.
1669763
Wish I could help you but the Nex-6 is my first Nex camera and I don't know much about the others. Sorry
940337
S120 ;) (sorry don't know anything about the Nikons so I really have nothing objective here, but, I love this camera, love it). This camera is worth it's weight in my pocket for what it does when I need it to. Unreal quality and speed, and the video is on par with my 6D if not better in the same conditions.
1185538
I cannot ascertain picture quality. I am pleased with my 4 and the pictures are good. They cannot be compared, unfortunately, with the latter version of 6 or Android (greater crispness, and low light resolution).
434663
Sorry I have limited use of the NEX-6 so far. The range and depth of this lens has been very sufficient for the subjects I have encountered up to the present
2179928
It is observable by real people like me. I have canon SX10, which is super zoom 20X. You can't even compare this more or less recent camera to my old horse DSLR Nikon D50. Quality of the image isn't simply there. DSLR is always producing better images than super zoom compact, always.
682412
It is very hard to separate the sensor and the EXR modes. Even in some of the "manual" modes under certain settings, the EXR functions will kick in. I will say the x10 is a bit quirky but you can get some very nice images out of it. The Sony has a larger sensor and does have more lines of resolution on Popular Photography's resolution test at its base ISO. Sony has 2270 lines of resolution and the Fuji has 2130. The Fuji earns a low noise rating up to ISO 800 while the Sony only holds onto the low noise rating only through ISO 400. Very similar cameras with similar audiences. I can't really speak to the Panasonic as I have never owned or used one. Popular Photography has a website and has a full review of both cameras. They are very good reviews. May be helpful to you.
1073949
No it will be a little lower on the D610. The D610 has 33% more pixels on the same sized sensor. That said at up to iso 6400 when you compare them at the same size side by side, as in looking at the D4 at 100% and the D610 at 80% you wold be hard pushed to see the difference. The D4 will shine over the D610 in other areas being a 'pro' camera rather than a prosumer as the D610. I have the D610 and it is a cracking camera I do not really bother what ISO I am shooting at and have it set to a max of 3200. There is of course a huge difference in price.RegardsGW