What are the differences between the AF105A and the AF100A in terms of functions, capabilities, etc.?
1888502
I think the 105 is for Japan, the 100 is for America and the 101 is for Europe. I don't know about the menu language in the 105.
1253598
Can't answer directly, but I have used this lens with a 6D, and have gotten pin sharp images with typically spectacular Canon color rendition. The AF is almost instantaneous. The image quality, IS, and a more substantial look and feel would make me choose this lens over the older version every time.
313571
doesn't AF with D3200, yes AF with D7100. the cameraneeds to have the af motor built in. D3200 doesn't have that. D7100 does.
411603
I do not have an AG-AF100A I have a Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3CT that is used with this lens. If you go to this website: http://pro-av.panasonic.net/en/sales_o/02products/products/ag-af100a/lens_compatibility.html they list it as being compatible with 2 sub notes. Sub note 5 states that it is designed for still shots and slower autofocus than other lens. Sub note 6 says that it is bundled with a Lumix camera only which I don't believe because I bought the lens from Amazon separate from my camera.
1952749
It totally depends on the most used features of the 5D Mark III that you used. The AF is much more basic on the 6D. The build isn't as solid feeling, the sensor is a hairs smaller, and the buffer is smaller. Other than that, the sensitivity of the sensor and the processor speed great. Are you doing a lot of HDR raw? 6D doesn't do HDR Raw. Are you monitoring any filming of your kid wi headphones? The 6D doesn't have an additional monitoring jack. I got a 6D and haven't looked back and would have not qualms about shooing a client with it. I hope this helps. If needed, go to a local camera store and get your hands on one for the feel. Good Luck.
851176
If you do a search on Google for a model #FB12100, no A, you will find several sources. I don't believe that the 'A' makes any difference. Hope this helps.
257393
The answer Janice Buckley gave is exactly what Actron's website gives for the difference between models.The additional features served me well already and I believe are definetly worth having. Dale Graefnitz
2073936
I just read your posting and it has been a month since you put it up so I don't know if your still interested in a comparison, so I will keep it brief. I got the X100 in July and the S95 a year ago but by coincidence I just took some test shots in the back yard this morning to compare the two as I will be using both at a BBQ on Sunday. The S95 looks good until you see it next to the x100. The X100 is the first digital camera I have owned where the photos look a bit more real than the other digital cameras I have used. I also have a Nikon D7000 and did some test shots while on vacation using it and the Nikon 12-24mm lens ( set at 23mm) and the X100 looks better, sharper than the $1000 Nikon12-24 lens. There are some down sides as is mentioned on many websites, but you can get used to them, or at least I did. On the video, I like the S95 by far as it is easier to get usable footage. The X100 is sharper and cleaner by a little bit, but the focus is not as good as the S95. The X100 is a great camera for what it is, and I really like mine.
23163
Mr. Scholten,Since you represent the mfr, may I suggest you work with Amazon to present this information on the listings for each product. I thought that the 110 might be a replacement for the 100. Your comment explained the single difference.
674678
One isn't beat up at all because I use a wrap case around it. My mother had a point and shoot with an af error. It just had some sand in it from going to the beach and I fixed it by banging it on the table until the sand came loose. Canon had a recall on the S100 about the af issue. Do a google search for "Canon S100 recall" and you should find out how to make a claim.
1116907
I too came from the MK II and can say, as others have pointed out, that the AF has been greatly improved in the MK III and there is a noticeable difference from MK II to MK III. The AF is responsive, snappy, and consistent. MK III's AF performs very well in low light, which is one area I found the MK II had trouble at times.
605683
A5+ has more power but both are very similar. A5 is great for the price difference.
1238302
The quiet edition fans are still a bit too loud for my tastes. It really is about silence or more air ventilation. Which the AF does better IMO.
2183095
The AF-100 is a single line. The DF-065-BKP is dual line. DF-065-BKP is Designed for use with the GH700 Black & Decker auto feed string trimmer. Double check your trimmer model. The GH 700 is a dual line trimmer. Dual line means it has two lines that come out from either side of the spool as opposed to just one line.
163596
AJB, you are correct that they are not the same, they are indeed quite different. You hit on almost all of the differences, here are the other two: - the 1005PE-MU17 has 802.11 b/g/n whereas the 1001P-PU17 has 802.11 b/g - the 1001P-PU17 has Bluetooth and the 1005PE-MU17 does not
768615
The 5000AF has a refresh rate of 120 Hz while the 5000 has a rate of 60hz. If you are planning on playing games the higher refresh rate with give you a smoother transition and better motion. If you do not plan on playing games then don't spend the extra money, unless you think you will notice the difference while watching sports.
1426268
I have both. The S95 is more of a photography toy to me, in a good way. I like tinkering with all the settings to try (keyword try) to take photos that are above and beyond amateur. Six months ago when the S95 was still $399, I would've recommended the S8100 because it'd have been cheaper and would've taken very decent pictures. Plus, the S8100 has better zoom and is faster (CMOS sensor). But, given the S95 and S8100 are about the same price now, I'd go with the S95. If you're taking sports photos outside, the faster CMOS of the S8100 sensor doesn't have much on the S95, especially since you can adjust the S95's shutter speed to make it faster. But, keep in mind the S95 does not have continuous shooting speeds the S8100 does. The S8100 has a continuous mode that can capture several photos in one second. The S95 simply cannot do this. As for low-light indoor shots, both are good. The S95 has a bright f/2 lens so it definitely helps with low light shots. And the S8100 was designed to do well in low-light situations. I have a HD camcorder so the 1080p video on the S8100 wasn't a selling point. However, if you don't like carrying around a camcorder and a camera, the S8100 doubles as a great camcorder. As for the quality of the video, neither the S95's 720p nor the S8100's 1080p has anything on the true 1080p quality videos of a real HD camcorder. I guess in the end, the tie breaker would be how much fun you could have with the S95, especially if you like manipulating camera settings to get the perfect shot. The S8100 is more of a pick up and shoot camera. I have both and I definitely use the S95 more. My significant other holds on to the S8100 because I gave it to him (if that's any further indication of which one I'd pick).