Instruct: Classify Amazon reviews into positive or negative sentiment
Query: Correct analysis, but poor execution

The problem with this book is really a simple one: the authors of way too many of the invited chapters assume too much knowledge on the part of the reader. Sometimes the knowledge assumed is familiarity with the writings of Intelligent Design proponents (e.g., Dembski or Behe). At other times, it is that the reader will be familiar with certain concepts, diagramatic conventions, or nomenclature of a specific scientific field. Either way, more discussion and review would have been worthwhile. As it is, many thinking people will be lost as they read this book. I know I was -- depite the fact that my Ph.D. diploma hanging in my university office where I am employed as a basic scientist suggests I should not have been! Oh well, the introductory and final chapters were worth reading.