Instruct: Classify Amazon reviews into positive or negative sentiment
Query: Confused ramblings

A shoddily assembled platform for Nash to propagate his confused worldview. The work isn't short on logically questionable bias. Most of his critical arguments take the form of exaggerating an opposing view to the point of absurdity. This would serve as a great political trick, but has no place in philosophy. Nash is also a bastion of arrogance in almost every chapter. I was particularly taken aback when he called Aristotle's god "religiously unsatisfying".He also argues that in the face of overwhelming evidence, atheists have no argumentative standing. He of course fails to present the "overwhelming evidence". In my opinion, his worldview is so old and out of date, the evidence probably consists of him actually attending the crucifixion of Jesus