have went or have gone?
231241
Went is the past tense of go. Gone is the past participle of go. If you aren't sure whether to use gone or went, remember that gone always needs an auxiliary verb before it (has, have, had, is, am, are, was, were, be), but went doesn't. I could have gone to the store yesterday.
934885
The two passive forms "was moved" and "has been moved" are good. We can also say "has moved", and although this is technically active, it has the same passive meaning as the above two. Do not use "is moved". You can use "is", but without "moved".
1345693
By itself, went can be an action word. If it means “said” or “moved,” then it does indicate an action. (By the way, people don't go words, and they are not like words or reactions.
1185460
Had is the past tense, as in I had a book; but, have and has are present tense, as in, I have a book and He has a book. Forms of the primary auxiliary verb 'to be' are: is, am, are, was, were, being and been.
1356210
“Has been” and “have been” are both present perfect tense, which you use when you describe something that started in the past but continues up to the present. Example: She has been working at the same restaurant for five years now. Example: We have been working on the project for five days so far.
690028
Personally, there is a slight difference in meaning. By using 'had said' it gives me the feeling of a reference to a specific utterance slightly further in the past. Whereas, 'have said' is something that was uttered more recently.
629934
Use “has been” when something (singular) is still happening. Use “have been” when some things (plural) are still happening. Use “had been” when some thing (singular) or things (plural) were happening before something else happened.
788652
“Had ran” is the past perfect tense. “Ran” is the simple past tense. The past tense is used when referring to an action completed in the past.
750889
Short answer is that both are correct in a particular context. Have recieved focuses on the completion of the action of recieving - it is the past perfect tense. So if someone asks if you recieved something, you emphasise the reciept by adding the have.
450735
To have done an action is used in the present perfect tense, which means that the action has been completed in the past. ... On the other hand, to have been is used in the present perfect continuous tense, which conveys an action which began in the past and is still continuing in the present.
945621
To answer the original question: they are indeed both correct, depending on context. "He is gone" emphasizes the state/location of the person in question (that is, "he is not here"), whereas "he has gone" emphasizes the action ("he went").
570626
Where have you been? is asking where one was at a recent time in the past, over an undefined period. ... It does imply that the querent expected the respondent to be somewhere at a specific time, but the respondent was not at the appointed place at the appointed time.
1452799
The past participle of the verb to come is come, so you should say “I have come to a place where…”. came is the past tense (or preterite), so you would say “I came to a place where…”.
277438
Present Tense Uses of Have and Has. Both words are present tense forms of the verb to have. The past-tense form is had, and the present progressive tense (or continuous tense) is having.
501517
['To be: am, is, are, was, were, be, been.', 'To have: have, has, had.', 'To do: do, does, did.']
392281
so have had is used in the present perfect tense. The same thing goes for has had. It is also used in present perfect tense. If we use first person and second person in singular or plural form (I/we/you/you) in the sentence, then we should use have had.
997970
A passive verb needs to have [to be] before the main verb (which should be in past participle form). 'has been' and 'was' are both forms of [to be], thus both sentences are grammatically correct. The difference is the tense: 'has been named' is present perfect.