panasonic 50" 3d---VT vs GT The GT 25 is $500 less than the VT 25 but seem to have same specs---can some one tell me the difference ? thanks---
481515
gt 25 better deal if you can get a deal on the vt series go for it, higher reviews but i will not spend 500.00 more wait till end of january 2011 prices will drop and there will be alot of promotions free glasses and also blue ray players. i recently purchased a toshiba 46 wx 800 led 3 d tv from amazon for my bedroom, free glasses 3 d and blue ray player 1,200.00 excellent tv toshiba are under rated too me there piture is same as samsung lg sony god bless vito
481516
The difference is now $1000 between the TV's, so the GT is a much better value.
481517
The VT25 has True 25p cinema display for blurays, whereas the GT25 doesn't and has 3:2 pull down.
481518
If you click on a VT or GT for info, there is a comparison chart just below the specs. The Difference listed between the VT and GT is the VT has a feature for contrast called "Infinite Black Pro" while the GT is called "Infinite Black". The VT has 3 speakers driven by 30 watts. The GT has only 2 speakers driven by 20 watts. And finally, the VT has a total of 4 HDMI hookups and the GT has total of 3.
481519
you will not see the differce in picture blue ray dvd 24p or pulldown, save your money gt is good, shop the web gt 50 ich is going for 998.00 god bless vito
481520
I think the 2D to 3D conversion is a big selling point as well as the $500 you mention. I went with the GT25 myself. Great picture.
481521
What is true 25p display for bluerays and why is that significant? Also not sure what 3:2 pull down is. And is that significant?Or more to the point is it $500- significant.
481522
I'm pretty much wondering the same is there a drastic difference between the two sets? Will the Blacks be deeper on the VT25 series? I'm really not a movie buff I mostly game and with the 2D-3D conversion the GT25 has to offer I'm really torn between the two. The conversion may not be as great but it is a feature that the GT25 have over the VT25 and it's cheaper and if you can't tell the difference between PQ I would rather go with the GT25.
974043
I did a side by side comparison at Best Buy in their calibrated Magnolia center. They also had Samsung's flagship LED HDTV from 2013 right beside it (the one I originally intended to purchase.). There was no comparison, the VT just looked better in the dark room. Blacks were truly black with no noticeable light bleed like there was from the LED. The F8500 looked good as well, but the VT won me over. The white level is fine in my living room where I have it wall mounted. It's not in direct sunlight, but the overall picture quality is nice even in moderate lighting.
2180156
Just spent a few hours figuring this out. The A and VT refer to two different type of video card setups. The VT is the Nvidia cards with the GraphiX Boost switchable graphics. This means that there are actually 2 video cards in that model. The idea is you only use the more powerful board when using intensive graphics like in gaming, which helps save battery life. If having better battery life is important you you, the VT would be best, but it will raise the price a good bit. The A is a single integrated videoboard, so is more ecomical. The -a2, -c1, x5 parts I haven't figured out 100%, but seems to be things like case color, OS, battery size or something else like that. Be aware some come with higher capacity batteries. The speakers are on the bottom of the laptop, so it might sound best if on a hard surface, but I haven't tested that & am just guessing there. Hope this helps!!
974046
I did. I was debating between 8500 and VT60 and decided for the latter. They are both excellent TVs. I think for some reason Samsung appeared to be a bit more colorful and brighter than Panasonic. I think its because of their calibration and proprietary enhancer..However, I heard some quality issues with other Samsung models, especially with LCDs on other forums and went with the VT60 instead. It was a 50-49 decision making..However, for a bright room, I regret buying the Plasma because of the reflections. Given the specs, quad core etc. and browsing experience, I should've gone for Samsung but again Panasonic is king for plasma and my other Panasonic is still with no issues after 8 years.. I did. I was debating between 8500 and VT60 and decided for the latter. They are both excellent TVs. I think for some reason Samsung appeared to be a bit more colorful and brighter than Panasonic. I think its because of their calibration and proprietary enhancer..However, I heard some quality issues with other Samsung models, especially with LCDs on other forums and went with the VT60 instead. It was a 50-49 decision making..However, for a bright room, I regret buying the Plasma because of the reflections. Given the specs, quad core etc. and browsing experience, I should've gone for Samsung... » Read More I did. I was debating between 8500 and VT60 and decided for the latter. They are both excellent TVs. I think for some reason Samsung appeared to be a bit more colorful and brighter than Panasonic. I think its because of their calibration and proprietary enhancer..However, I heard some quality issues with other Samsung models, especially with LCDs on other forums and went with the VT60 instead. It was a 50-49 decision making..However, for a bright room, I regret buying the Plasma because of the reflections. Given the specs, quad core etc. and browsing experience, I should've gone for Samsung but again Panasonic is king for plasma and my other Panasonic is still with no issues after 8 years.. « Show Less
1790368
I have the non-VR version of both, and I personally prefer the 70-300. I got the gray market version of the 70-300 for $110...that's a deal right there. You can get that AND the 55-200mm VR and come out paying the same as you would for just the 70-300mm VR. Also, the focal range covered (55-200mm = 82.5-300mm) and (70-300=105-450mm) is much greater with the 70-300 on a DX. VR is important, yes, but with my D90 and its battery grip, I don't have much trouble getting sharp shots at 300mm and 200mm at 1/60 with either of them, respectively. The size difference is considerable in your bag as well. The 70-300 is rather large. I have the non-VR version of both, and I personally prefer the 70-300. I got the gray market version of the 70-300 for $110...that's a deal right there. You can get that AND the 55-200mm VR and come out paying the same as you would for just the 70-300mm VR. Also, the focal range covered (55-200mm = 82.5-300mm) and (70-300=105-450mm) is much greater with the 70-300 on a DX. VR is important, yes, but with my D90 and its battery grip, I don't have much trouble getting sharp shots at 300mm and 200mm at 1/60 with either of them, respectively. The size difference is considerable... » Read More I have the non-VR version of both, and I personally prefer the 70-300. I got the gray market version of the 70-300 for $110...that's a deal right there. You can get that AND the 55-200mm VR and come out paying the same as you would for just the 70-300mm VR. Also, the focal range covered (55-200mm = 82.5-300mm) and (70-300=105-450mm) is much greater with the 70-300 on a DX. VR is important, yes, but with my D90 and its battery grip, I don't have much trouble getting sharp shots at 300mm and 200mm at 1/60 with either of them, respectively. The size difference is considerable in your bag as well. The 70-300 is rather large. « Show Less
510214
I Just bought the panasonic last week and therefore may be biased. I have watched the plasma market for five years now and I belive panasonic is the true leader. In general I would choose overall quality versus the number of "features"---or perhaps novelties. but if they are truly features you want and will use then that may be what you need.
918266
Hi! I have been reading up on both tv's and it looks like the panasonic V10 is by far the best of the both. I just purchased the sammy b860 and also trying to find a good deal with the panny V10 (since it cost more). Both tv's can display the 24p at 96hz(24hzx4=96hz), so since the panny G10 can only do the 24p at 48hz(ficker problem). That's why tto me the sammy B860 is bump to second best, but this sammy has a buzzing sound if you live high above sea level. Remember this is just my opinion. hope this help someone......:)
310246
I agree. Dropping that much on a TV may be ok with you if your a millionaire and 10,000 plus for the TV and surround system isn't a problem for you but for the average joe the money saved buying the VT50 will allow you to get a kick ass surround system and even some blurays to complete the ultimate home theater and you'll still pay less than just gettin the Elite
1190819
I saw both the samsung and panasonic and must say the panasonic is by far the better TV for 3D, the image actually came out of the TV as opposed to just being "deep" like the samsung, although i guess it depends on the content u are watching. Overall the picture was clearer and more brilliant in color, plasmas are superior to LCDs in picture quality in 2D so I am not surprised they also are in the 3rd dimension.
110746
Best price I have seen for the Panasonic TC-P58V10 is through BING cashback and CentralDigital.com in NY. $2065.30 with free shipping!!!http://www.bing.com/shopping/Panasonic-Viera-TC-P58V10-58-Plasma-TV/search?q=Panasonic%20tc%20p58v10&p1;=%5bCommerceService%20scenario%3d%22o%22%20docid%3d%22D979B7ED19EC89566DDE%22%20cashback%3d%221%22%5d&wf=Commerce&scope;=cashback&FORM;=ENCA0
918270
I am in your same boat...trying to choose between a samsung pn58b650 vs. panasonic tc-54v10. Panasonic is 58" and now several hundred cheaper (with coupon code). I keep going back and forth...any help out there? Is panasonic better than samsung...as is generally stated? thanx in advance for any feedback.
1462574
I have the VT30 65 inch and I never had a problem or issue with it. As for the warranty. Panasonic has a very pricey extended warranty you can purchase. If you recently purchased your set within the last 90 days, you might want to check out how much an extended warranty will run you with Square Trade. It is usually offered with purchases through Amazon or other online products. Their prices are very reasonable for all the coverage you receive. I recently learned, you don't have to buy your product on the internet to receive the coverage as long as you purchase a contract within 90 days. Had I known that when I purchased my HDTV, I would have purchased a warranty through them. It will save you a bundle.
1773159
Panasonic VIERA TC-P50VT25 50-inch 1080p 3D Plasma HDTV, Black It says it's 3D and these were introduced in 2010. Read the reviews, they talk about the 3D quality. The 2010 top of the line VT20/VT25 models were the very first to introduce 3D. http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-10466702-1.html?tag=contentMain;contentBody;2n http://ces.cnet.com/8301-31045_1-10427983-269.html Looks like you're good to go! Of course, as I'm sure you know you need 3D glasses that work with a Panasonic HDTV and any model of 3D Blu-ray player.
327662
Thanks for the tips. I ordered the VRDMC5 then went to ebay and searched for the DVS. Found five for sale-only three were new. I purchased on wiht Buy it Now option for $34.95. Am anxious to try both in combination.
918264
I was at my local Big Box store today trying to compare the 3 mentioned TV's and the samsung is a B860 not 850, and I ruled it out because the edge of the TV (all the way around) is clear and it creates a very distracting reflection. And they now no longer carry the V10 in a 50" but have it in a 54", and offers it up to me for $1888., Out the Door!!! I think that deal is gonna be hard to beat ! Is there anything such as "to big" ?
2166310
Amazon seems to have lumped the reviews and maybe the question/answers for the VT02 and VT04 together, so potential customers need to pay close attention as these are not the same product. The usable distance depends on the size of the object you are viewing. I have the VT04 and it produces usable images of a house from across the street when checking for heat loss. The VT02 has much less resolution, so it's usable distance would be less.
510213
The Samsung has buzzing issues, while the Panasonics (this one at least) has not demonstrated this problem. Everything else being even would lean me towards the GT25 (which is what I bought).