whats the difference between "OS" "NA" and "One Size"?
480492
There is no difference. Not sure why Amazon has this goggle listed like this, because the Women's Vanquisher only comes in one size. We will contact them to hopefully get it fixed. In the meantime, selecting any of those sizes won't affect your order, so please choose whatever color you wish!
480493
OS means one size and NA means not available. All speedo vanquishers come in one size and they are adjustable. Or you can purchase an adjustable biggie cord which is much more durable and comfortable on your head
480494
Na is not available OS is one size and One size is one size fits most. They are all basically the same it is just the saying used by different vendors.
480495
Hi, Lucia. To answer your question, "OS", "N/A", "One Size" all mean the same thing. "OS" stands for one size and "NA" stands for not applicable. The Women
480496
I think OS means one size and NA means not applicable? They come with different nose bridge pieces to adjust the fit and the straps are adjustable as well.
219187
it has both version as follow:1-Win 8.1 Pro. 64-bit (one DVD)2- Win 8.1 Pro. 32-bit (one DVD)
148427
Most drive manufacturers quote their product's capacity along the lines of "One megabyte equals 1,000 bytes times 1,000 bytes." However, all operating systems (that I am aware of) consider a megabyte to be 1,024 bytes times 1,024 bytes. A TB according to the drive manufacturer is therefore 1,000 x 1,000 x 1,000 x 1,000 (1,000,000,000,000 bytes) but your OS is thinking 1,024 x 1,024 x 1,024 x 1,024 (1,099,511,627,776 bytes). The 99,511,627,776 difference is in large part why your OS is reporting the drive to be smaller than the manufacturer's claim. There are, depending on manufacturer and OS, also losses due to formatting differences, allocation tables, utilities included on the disc itself, etc. Hope this helps.
117880
No, file size does not matter, but you only have 10gb on the nixplay cloud unless you want to pay a monthly fee to have more storage.
1158101
There is a single monitor model. The work fit single LD and the single HD. HD = heavy duty. LD = light duty
562549
I don't know what OS means, but I am an adult, and I and my adult sister have used it. It has an adjustable strap, and fits perfectly on our faces, keeping it pretty much air tight.
685102
The size issue isn't a "formatting issue" like most people believe. It's actually due to the discrepancy between what storage manufacturers define as a byte VS what actually *IS* a byte. Storage manufacturers consider a kilobyte as "1000 bytes" when it is actually 1024 bytes (due to the binary system working in exponents of 2). So if you extrapolate out 32*1000*1000*1000 (32 Gigabytes, as defined by Sandisk) then divide that by 1024*1024*1024 it puts you at 29.8 GB. The .09 GB remainder could certainly be filesystem information, I suppose.So, yeah, basically all data storage manufacturers are lying to you, and as you increase your storage size the discrepancy percentage increases. The size issue isn't a "formatting issue" like most people believe. It's actually due to the discrepancy between what storage manufacturers define as a byte VS what actually *IS* a byte. Storage manufacturers consider a kilobyte as "1000 bytes" when it is actually 1024 bytes (due to the binary system working in exponents of 2). So if you extrapolate out 32*1000*1000*1000 (32 Gigabytes, as defined by Sandisk) then divide that by 1024*1024*1024 it puts you at 29.8 GB. The .09 GB remainder could certainly be filesystem information, I suppose.So, yeah, basically... » Read More The size issue isn't a "formatting issue" like most people believe. It's actually due to the discrepancy between what storage manufacturers define as a byte VS what actually *IS* a byte. Storage manufacturers consider a kilobyte as "1000 bytes" when it is actually 1024 bytes (due to the binary system working in exponents of 2). So if you extrapolate out 32*1000*1000*1000 (32 Gigabytes, as defined by Sandisk) then divide that by 1024*1024*1024 it puts you at 29.8 GB. The .09 GB remainder could certainly be filesystem information, I suppose.So, yeah, basically all data storage manufacturers are lying to you, and as you increase your storage size the discrepancy percentage increases. « Show Less
660480
There is no difference both the same size just one has a hyphen in between the measurements
104981
I did not use the item, had other problems with size. I saved it for a new computer I will build soon.
2121119
I have no idea what are you asking for. This is just a housing that you can build your computer. It does not matter if it's a mac or pc. It's purpose to house computer parts. When you install the O.S is when it determines your computer is a PC or Mac. Other than that... this is just the case for desktop.
567689
In my opinion. Nothing and to size and format. I've used both with no noticeable difference. Tho 41 is more common where I live and goes on sale more... So that's my difference,
1574855
It is showing up as 345MB for the core program installation. Unfortunately, FaceFilter didn't include the size within the uninstaller. But I have estimated it to be around 100MB by going through my X86 folder. I believe the others who answered are going based on the RUN specs of it and/or have custom directories within their install folder. They may also have downloaded additional brushes, tubes, fonts, etc.
839454
Small is like a single espresso shot. The large is almost a normal size cup. The small is stronger.
342169
If it didn't accept a size that was bigger that would mean that it came formatted to FAT32, and it would need to be formatted to NTFS, the only downside of NTFS being that if you pull it out without safely removing, there is a bigger chance of corruption. To reformat it to NTFS just look up some guide on google.
1202378
The smaller one has a finer mesh size. the other two sizes have a larger mesh size which is the same for both.
983874
It is an one size fits all. But do not buy from this seller because when I received my item it was in horrible condition I couldn't even use it once. It literally fell apart.
1405933
Simple Answer: To sum it up the detail answer. Companies use SI units to compute their hard drive size, 500 gigabyte is 500,000,000,000, while the computer itself uses binary to compute hard drive size, 500 gigabyte is 536,870,912,000. So if you do the math, 1 - ( 500,000,000,000 / 536,870,912,000) = 7% difference. So 500 - ( 500 * 7%(0.07) ) = 465. So the actual hard drive size would be 465 gigabyte(GB). Therefore the bigger the hard drive, the more it seems like you are losing hard drive space. Detail Answer: Most operating-system tools report capacity using the same abbreviations but actually use binary prefixes. For instance, the prefix mega-, which normally means 106 (1,000,000), in the context of data storage can mean 220 (1,048,576), which is nearly 5% more. Similar usage has been applied to prefixes of greater magnitude. This results in a discrepancy between the disk manufacturer's stated capacity and the apparent capacity of the drive when examined through most operating-system tools. The difference becomes even more noticeable for a gigabyte (7%), and again for a terabyte (9%). For a petabyte there is a 11% difference between the SI (10005) and binary (10245) definitions. For example, Microsoft Windows reports disk capacity both in decimal-based units to 12 or more significant digits and with binary-based units to three significant digits. Thus a disk specified by a disk manufacturer as a 30 GB disk might have its capacity reported by Windows 2000 both as "30,065,098,568 bytes" and "28.0 GB". The disk manufacturer used the SI definition of "giga", 109 to arrive at 30 GB; however, because Microsoft Windows, Mac OS and some Linux distributions use "gigabyte" for 1,073,741,824 bytes (230 bytes), the operating system reports capacity of the disk drive as (only) 28.0 GB. Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hard_disk_drive Another source to help out: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gigabyte#Consumer_confusion