Difference between WD-60737 and WD-60C9? Does anybody know what the difference is between the WD-60737 and the WD-60C9?
481598
In my opinion DLP is just dying out as LCD gets better and cheaper. Blacks and motion have been greatly improved, they are making them bigger now and the price is dropping. The only drawbacks to DLP are changing the bulb and glare in bright rooms. For me, I don't care about the bulbs because they last quite a while now and they are not that expensive. I hate the way any TV looks in a bright room so glare isn't an issue as I have blinds and curtains. Here is why I am still going with DLP. The price of three replacement bulbs is still cheaper than the price difference of similar quality LCD. Now later on when LCD gets cheaper, that is what I would go with. Now on a TV that is smaller, like forty something inches or less, it's LCD all the way. I have a 42 inch LCD that's awesome. It's a great TV, I am going to end up putting it in the bedroom. With the smaller TVs you also don't have to worry about whether or not it is 1080p. It doesn't matter because the TV has to be bigger for the human eye to see the difference. There may be some other features that might make it look nicer, since a 720p/1080i is going to be pretty basic now, but not the resolution. Unless you have abnormally good vision of course. So that's my thoughts on it. For now I think the DLP is the better buy. Next year though, LCD is probably going to be within a couple hundred dollars. So if I was going to buy a TV a year from now, it would be LCD. Now if you are sure you are going to keep this TV for 10+ years and not upgrade, or you will have it on all day, then the LCD is going to be less than the cost of the bulbs. So in that case LCD would even be better right now, if that describes what you plan to do with it.
516400
Check this ... http://www.synology.com/products/compare_spec.php?lang=enu&compare_list%5B%5D=DS713%2B&compare_list%5B%5D=DS213 The main diff I see is Max. 713 has an Expansion Unit plus other obvious enhancements being a recent model
1825656
Go here to read from WD's site.http://www.wdc.com/wdproducts/library/SpecSheet/ENG/2879-771434.pdf
1277502
One is pre-formatted for HFS+ (Mac) while the 900 is, I believe, NTFS (Windows) but has the Mac drivers so you can write to the NTFS disk. It doesn't really matter which one you get, you can just format them to the file system that you like.
2181555
These were the two WD drives that had been verified for use for my Synology NAS disk arrays. They are both enterprise rated hard drives. The FYYZ is rated at 1.2 million hours while the F9YZ is rated at 0.8 million hours. I had really thought about getting the FYYZ at the time I made the purchase but the available supply was not there, I needed 12 drives and the most that I could purchase at that time was 3 or 4, so essentially that forced my decision toward the F9YZ drives. See this link http://www.wdc.com/wdproducts/library/OVR/hires/ENG/2178-771210.pdf One drive is in the scalabilty section and one drive is in the durability section.
869119
Sorry but I'm not know exactly the difference. I had this model and it works very well.
928061
Like the others, I'm not certain, but the feature set seems very similar except for dual flush volumes on the 970 model. I can't account for the apparent cost difference between them from what I see here. We love this model (950) and have had it for about 1 1/2 years without any problems.
1962489
No, these are the latest models, you can tell by the actual model designation number. I think it ends in something like EFRX..... One of mine would not format initially, and WD overnighted me a new one... even before they sent me the RMA (Returm Material Authorization) !
1101413
According to Samsung's site, they both have 6000:1 contrast ratios. This, from the site, are the differences:"The LN-S4695D and LN-S4696D are identical in all respects except that the LN-S4696D:Is Digital Cable Ready (DCR) Has an IEEE1394 (Firewire) jack which lets you network together, exchange content between, and control up to 10 IEEE1394 equipped devices (for example, VCRs, DVD players, and Set-Top-Boxes). Has a USB 1.1 jack which lets you view photo (JPEG) files and listen to audio (MP3) files saved on a USB Mass Storage Class (MSC) device on your TV. The LN-S4695D does not have these features." According to Samsung's site, they both have 6000:1 contrast ratios. This, from the site, are the differences:"The LN-S4695D and LN-S4696D are identical in all respects except that the LN-S4696D:Is Digital Cable Ready (DCR) Has an IEEE1394 (Firewire) jack which lets you network together, exchange content between, and control up to 10 IEEE1394 equipped devices (for example, VCRs, DVD players, and Set-Top-Boxes). Has a USB 1.1 jack which lets you view photo (JPEG) files and listen to audio (MP3) files saved on a USB Mass Storage Class (MSC) device on... » Read More According to Samsung's site, they both have 6000:1 contrast ratios. This, from the site, are the differences:"The LN-S4695D and LN-S4696D are identical in all respects except that the LN-S4696D:Is Digital Cable Ready (DCR) Has an IEEE1394 (Firewire) jack which lets you network together, exchange content between, and control up to 10 IEEE1394 equipped devices (for example, VCRs, DVD players, and Set-Top-Boxes). Has a USB 1.1 jack which lets you view photo (JPEG) files and listen to audio (MP3) files saved on a USB Mass Storage Class (MSC) device on your TV. The LN-S4695D does not have these features." « Show Less
1642170
I really don't know the difference, but what I bought works fine, and I have not had any problems. If ever there is added software, just delete the installation program after you have it running, but keep the disc in case of any failures or having to reinstall.
155121
If you buy the WNDR37AV from Amazon, you will receive the WNDR3700v2 in the box which is inferior at the moment because the firmware is old. It's having issues loading web pages at the moment. That issue was fixed with the 3700 and 37AV but the firmware doesn't work for the 3700v2.
1304221
You can check out the differences here. http://store.sony.com/gsi/webstore/WFS/SNYNA-SNYUS-Site/en_US/-/USD/ViewProductCompareService-Show?CategoryID=0AQKmUBwIA8AAAFAUJUihoTfThe size difference has different storage capacities.
2181556
These were the two WD drives that had been verified for use for my Synology NAS disk arrays. They are both enterprise rated hard drives. The FYYZ is rated at 1.2 million hours while the F9YZ is rated at 0.8 million hours. I had really thought about getting the FYYZ at the time I made the purchase but the available supply was not there, I needed 12 drives and the most that I could purchase at that time was 3 or 4, so essentially that forced my decision toward the F9YZ drives. See this link http://www.wdc.com/wdproducts/library/OVR/hires/ENG/2178-771210.pdf One drive is in the scalabilty section and one drive is in the durability section. These were the two WD drives that had been verified for use for my Synology NAS disk arrays. They are both enterprise rated hard drives. The FYYZ is rated at 1.2 million hours while the F9YZ is rated at 0.8 million hours. I had really thought about getting the FYYZ at the time I made the purchase but the available supply was not there, I needed 12 drives and the most that I could purchase at that time was 3 or 4, so essentially that forced my decision toward the F9YZ drives. See this link http://www.wdc.com/wdproducts/library/OVR/hires/ENG/2178-771210.pdf One drive is in the scalabilty... » Read More These were the two WD drives that had been verified for use for my Synology NAS disk arrays. They are both enterprise rated hard drives. The FYYZ is rated at 1.2 million hours while the F9YZ is rated at 0.8 million hours. I had really thought about getting the FYYZ at the time I made the purchase but the available supply was not there, I needed 12 drives and the most that I could purchase at that time was 3 or 4, so essentially that forced my decision toward the F9YZ drives. See this link http://www.wdc.com/wdproducts/library/OVR/hires/ENG/2178-771210.pdf One drive is in the scalabilty section and one drive is in the durability section. « Show Less
2047903
5990 and 5992 are not the same, according to Philips website.http://www.consumer.philips.com/consumer/en/us/consumer/cc/_categoryid_DVD_AND_HOME_THEATER_GR_US_CONSUMER/
732129
I'd like to add a little additional information to the excellent explanation from Jaygyver. I have both drives, an older WD1002FAEX and a newer WD1003FZEX. When I purchased the WD1002 model it was priced about the same as the newer model is today. I believe the current price disparity is due to two factors: the differences in suppliers as described by Jaygver, and also a design change. I noticed that my WD1002 was slightly heavier than the WD1003, and after some research discovered that was due to the WD1002 having two magnetic platters while the WD1003 was a newer single platter design. Evidently the WD engineers were able to simplify and hopefully improve the design. For me, both drives perform excellently and I'm equally pleased with both. However, I have seen discussions on certain tech forums in which intense gaming purists believe the older two platter design is better, and that WD changed the design simply to cut manufacturing costs. Thus the high prices for the WD1002 is due to it's scarcity (since it's now discontinued) and their belief that it's slightly better in both performance and ruggedness. As I said above, however, both perform equally well for me, and they're both Western Digital Black Series with 5 year warranties, so it's a no brainer to go with the best deal price wise.
1327857
I don't know the difference between the two--only that one is a newer model than the other. You should research the model numbers.
274579
I asked the same question and was told there the same units, the difference was the manuals. The one approved has more warnings in the manual. To be sure download each manual and compare the difference.