How does this compare to the Xiser which is a lot more expensive
481547
So far I haven't found a huge difference in the basic structure of this type of unit from high to low, most of the extras are in the electronics. I decided to go with the cheap one since they all seem to wear out
481548
The last one lasted for a year and about 4 months, I used it every week 3 times or so per week for 20-30 min per sesson, so worked it pretty hard. What happened to it was the metal fatigued at the base and broke. I like how it works so I bought another one, figure $35 a year is cheaper than a gym membership
543705
No the one that cost a hundred dollars more is, I wondered the same thing. This computer is very nice and well worth the money.
2027609
I really can't give a specific answer for the X 55. but I have the X 52 Pro and am well pleased with the sensitivity. Also you can get a paid version of the FS4UIPC and that opens up a lot of options in FSX for all controllers.Sorry I cant be more specific, but if it is as good as the X 52 Pro, and has dual throttle functions, may be worth the price difference. Also the X 55 requires 2 free usb ports while the X 52 requires only one. The x 52 Stick connects to the throttle and the throttle connects to usb.
2227361
I have the 7xrs model and am happy with its overall performance.Having said that, the 7491rs appears to be a impressive improvement over the xrs but with that comes a cost.
632025
I can tell you that Win 8.1 Pro with 8GB RAM runs well, and XBMC runs well on it as an app. Kind of a pushy, take-over-everything sort of an app, actually. Windows is expensive at $140 for the builder's version, but I like Microsoft and Windows. I had XBMC as an OS on my Raspberry Pi, but it was underpowered and prone to crashing. This NUC is its replacement, and I love it. Excellent graphics. I'm a computer enthusiast with two overclocked desktops, yada yada, with graphics cards and a $180 ASUS 24" LED monitor (nice and bright with 300 candlepower, but obviously not a super-quality monitor), and the color on the NUC/plasma is remarkably better than the computer/monitor. The great thing about plasma TVs is color, and the NUC takes full advantage of it.
472153
The fl8se may be a little better, but it costs more also. VX-1 Pro does everything I need.
472152
I think the fl8se is somewhat better. my husband's friend has tht one. they are both a great machine tho
1643488
I got the 200... It had better features and a very nice design. This unit is great for the price, you get the same features of units that cost in the 800 to 1000.00 range. It's worth getting. The units very lite, designed well, (looks cool) and has been extremely actuate for me, the gps function is also very handy in finding your way back to a good spot.
1435868
I use mine occasionally. There are now DOZENS of competitors on the market. I have not compared mine with less expensive options. The foxLV2 does remain a very well constructed unit.
1640392
Definitely worth it It uses the same sound chip that is used by the HT Omega Claro (a $175 sound card recognized as one of the best); I have both the Omega and the Xonar in my household, and it's impossible to tell the difference in clarity between the two. But I will tell you that I would take the Xonar over the Omega anytime simply for its full EAX support and compatibility with games ... after hearing mine my oldest daughter actually replaced her Omega card with this one last year, and couldn't be happier. As for drivers, I do not use the official Asus drivers (I use the community made Unixonar package, which looks identical on the surface but fixes a number of driver issues that have not as yet been fixed by Asus). Note that whichever driver set you use, avoid fiddling with any of the DSP modes in the control panel, and you'll be fine--I have found that accidentally leaving the wrong one activated will sometimes crash some games.
2039901
If you mean the old model is more expensive, I believe 1.) it is harder to find for sale 2.) There are a lot of notes indicating the older model may have come from a time when the quality of the units were actually better. 3.) I am going to purchase an older model because I do not need high resolution, I want quality, and I am connecting to XP.
1901601
I have purchased both for gifts. I paid $49 and $110. The more expensive machine is more metal and less plastic, looks better, and it is heavier. From what I can tell, the less expensive machine requires a little more pressure to process the frozen fruit. The higher priced machine appears to get the job done a little easier, and seems like it might last longer. Both make equally delicious frozen desserts!
1520355
There is no comparison; hands down the Bamix blows it out of the water. It's smoother and a lot more powerful and dint fall apart the second time I used it.
305384
I own them both, and have been using them in my portriat studio for a while now. i'll say this, theres really not much difference in the two cameras, a few minor upgrades in the xti, what it boils down to is image quality, and from what i've seen they are equal. Just as fyi, I have been able to get prints as large as 20x30 from both cameras with excellent results.
2016825
they're both the same. just different prices. go for the less expensive. i have this one and paid only $262.00.
1057267
Yeah, I also came across X10 in my research, seems like a good option. I love the retro design and the manual controls. X100 is a bit too pricy in my opinion.
1959757
The Zyxel device just like many other cameras has firmware that has been written to communicate better with a single browser configuration as the preferred viewing platform. Since each browser responds differently a manufacturer must "rewrite" the periphery of their firmware to communicate correctly with each browser platform and this naturally escalates costs. Since this camera is in the high value market segment of course escalated costs are avoided to maintain the price point. Many people I know have Internet Explorer, Firefox, Chrome and Safari all installed simply due to the odd quirks of the devices and web sites they use every day. Some devices and sites simply work better with a single browser. Also, since browsers are free and can be installed for only the time spent I encourage people to test each with their devices and websites to find which browser works best for their installation and needs.