which is the maximum writing speed and reading configuring a raid 0 with 8 drives sas 600 gb 15000 rpm and speed 6 gb / s
466449
This isn't a fantastically robust controller. If you are concerned about performance, go with a higher end RAID controller. I've been able to crash this controller with 24 disks in a raid6. I know that's not a great use case, but it's a good representation of what you can expect on this controller.
466450
I have 8 4tb drives running a raid 5 for my media server with no issues. Transfer rate is 6gb/s. Read and write would be a combination of your drives and controller but more your drives then the controller. But flashpoint is right. If you need performance then you will need to go high endon the controller. But I honestly can't picture the need for something better
2041731
Probably because it doesn't really matter. SATA 6 Gb/s is just marketing for a mechanical drive. No mechanical HDD can even saturate the SATA 3 Gb/s spec.
1668786
Yes, This drive will run fine in a RAID 0,1,5 setups. I have tested in all three formats and currently run 1 setup in a RAID 1 and a 2 setups in RAID 5's.
1251178
I am far from an expert on such things and do not know what you are trying to accomplish. Several things you should think about. This is an older 3GB/sec drive not the newer 6GB/sec drive. It takes 4 hard drives to do RAID 10. Does your motherboard support RAID 10? Does your mother board support 6GB/sec drives? The reason to use RAID 10 is speed and redundancy. If your motherboard supports 6GB/sec drives, these drives would not be your best choice. These drives are listed for RAID 0 & 1. I would guess that they should work fine in RAID 10. I use two in RAID 0 with no problems and have had two 320GB blue drives in RAID 0 for several years.
1267034
It has 10 SATA and 8 SAS/SATA but you have to add the PIKE card to get the SAS/SATA to activate. There are several PIKE cards availalbe, be aware that the PIKE 2008 only does RAID 1E. Research the PIKE cards carefully to be sure to get the one that will work with this board and also has the RAID config you want. I used the PIKE 2108 for RAID 5.
1161100
The hot swap functionality should be located in the raid controller not the drives, aside from possibilly energy feature on drive. I think you have drive optimized for network storage.
1965736
Depends on the configuration... If you don't change the RAID setup, it should be faster than a single 4 TB drive because it distributes the writing and reading across the two drives.
249525
i din not really know the write speed but it is faster than circular seek swite disk. i am happy with it.
130193
Not 100% sure but SATA III (revision 3.x) interface, formally known as SATA 6Gb/s, is a third generation SATA interface running at 6.0Gb/s. The bandwidth throughput, which is supported by the interface, is up to 600MB/s. This interface is backwards compatible with SATA 3 Gb/s interface. This particular device claims a transfer rate up to 480Mbps, leading me to believe its a III
1096139
8 Total - 2 Types: 6 Intel for all SATA hardware (supports RAID configuration) 2 ASMedia (Data hard drives in AHCI mode only) For more info go to: http://www.asus.com/Motherboards/Z87EXPERT/#specifications
74517
Although I am using two 1TB drives in RAID 1 mode, the manual says "2 x 2.5" SATA HDD, total capacity up to 6TB".
475286
it's just a spec:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serial_ATA#SATA_revision_3.0_-_6_Gbit.2Fs_-_600_MB.2Fsread on...
1960039
This particular drive is USB2. You'll get about 16 megabytes per second write, 20 to 30 read, depending on file size, fragmentation, etc.
1647110
The drive is compatible with both. Sata 6 is twice as fast for data transfer but it depends on whether your computer has the faster interface.
1103976
The drive is capable of 6. Works fine at 3. May see increase in speed over 3 only drive due to buffering
911535
I don't know the maximum. I'm just using it for JBOD and not RAID. I needed more SATA ports.
697989
Doesn't matter both have similar specs. I have these and WD black drives in my system, I run them both in raid 0 and both arrays perform about the same.