Nikon 10x50 EX Extreme ATB vs Nikon 10x50 regular The ATB version is $60 more than this version. You could almost buy two of these for the same price as one of the ATB. Is the waterproofing worth the price premium? Nikon 10x50 EX Extreme ATB vs Nikon 10x50 regular The ATB version is $60 more than this version. You could almost buy two of these for the same price as one of the ATB. Is the waterproofing worth... » Read More Nikon 10x50 EX Extreme ATB vs Nikon 10x50 regular The ATB version is $60 more than this version. You could almost buy two of these for the same price as one of the ATB. Is the waterproofing worth the price premium? « Show Less
482836
Obviously it depends on the conditions in which you will use the binoculars. If you never use them outdoors in wet or cold conditions, then it isn't worth it. I've owned the 10x50 Action EX for 3-4 years and love them. I don't have to worry about the binoculars getting wet or fogging up in cold weather.
482837
if you are going to use these binoculars in an area of extreme moisture like a rain forest or underwater, then the waterproofing will be a necessary feature.(don't really use them underwater, I was just making a point)
640380
I am a professional wedding photographer but am a Nikon shooter. We have never had issues with 800X. Perhaps if you were shooting sports and needed quick bursts of shoots one after the other the faster card may make a difference.
105686
The 30D, as noted by others, is a much sturdier camera. In addition, keep in mind that it shoots at a faster rate (5 fps), has a more ergonomic set of controls, and shoots better in low light-- ranging all the way up to 3200 ISO after expansion.I wouldn't be surprised to see Canon offer a similar jump to 10.1 MP or higher in this price range soon, more to compete with Nikon's D80 and D200 than to compete with their own product.That said, I'm adding the XTi as a backup to my existing 20D.
477532
We'll Develin, Nikon doesn't make a bad optic product (Even though I use Canon glass for my camera). So no matter which one you choose, I'm sure you will be happy with your decision. As far as the BDC feature, I understand why you would question the wisdom of having it on a .22. My thinking is that not having BDC is not a deal breaker but having it for only $10 more is not a bad thing either. You probably won't use it a lot but having it might be an advantage from time to time. Good luck and good shooting.
2145502
As far as I know, the differences are minimal....Both are excellent; save the $20,go with the 190XB. I love mine.
1089668
I have never had the 8x20, so I cannot give you an accurate comparison. I can say that I really like the 10x25, and that the reason I chose it over the 8x20 is the higher power and larger viewing area of the 10x25.
923249
This probably is not helpful: I'm delighted with the 45-175mm, but I got it for a steal as an Amazon lightning deal for just under $200. Buying was a no-brainer. So the only real advice I can offer is to be extremely patient and keep your eyes open for a great deal on the 45-175mm.
792322
It depends on what things you value. Image quality wise, the K-5ii and K-50 are nearly the same. The K-5ii has:- better build quality (magnesium alloy vs plastic)- Weather sealing- Faster max shutter speed (1/8000 vs 1/6000) although 1/6000 is very good for that price.- More exposure bracketing options: 5 frames vs 3- Mirror Lockup mode (but you can simulate on the K-50 using liveview mode)- Slightly faster fps (7 vs 6)- A deeper frame buffer- 100 grams heavier- A hair better sensor (14-bit vs 12-bit ADC)For me the build quality and weather sealing are probably the main differentiators. If those are not important, then the k-50 sounds like a great deal. It depends on what things you value. Image quality wise, the K-5ii and K-50 are nearly the same. The K-5ii has:- better build quality (magnesium alloy vs plastic)- Weather sealing- Faster max shutter speed (1/8000 vs 1/6000) although 1/6000 is very good for that price.- More exposure bracketing options: 5 frames vs 3- Mirror Lockup mode (but you can simulate on the K-50 using liveview mode)- Slightly faster fps (7 vs 6)- A deeper frame buffer- 100 grams heavier- A hair better sensor (14-bit vs 12-bit ADC)For me the... » Read More It depends on what things you value. Image quality wise, the K-5ii and K-50 are nearly the same. The K-5ii has:- better build quality (magnesium alloy vs plastic)- Weather sealing- Faster max shutter speed (1/8000 vs 1/6000) although 1/6000 is very good for that price.- More exposure bracketing options: 5 frames vs 3- Mirror Lockup mode (but you can simulate on the K-50 using liveview mode)- Slightly faster fps (7 vs 6)- A deeper frame buffer- 100 grams heavier- A hair better sensor (14-bit vs 12-bit ADC)For me the build quality and weather sealing are probably the main differentiators. If those are not important, then the k-50 sounds like a great deal. « Show Less
718214
No, the waterproof and fog proof model are of the Nikon Action Extreme series. See thisNikon Action 16x50 EX ATB Binocular
1611414
I have had both versions of the lens and definitely preferred the one with IS. With that said, the difference in price is significant and the non-stabilized version produces superb images. If you are shooting outdoors with plenty of light it is perfect. If light is an issue when shooting I would definitely save up for the IS version.
876280
Now you can buy both Nikon binoculars ( 7294 - 8x42 and 7295 - 10x42 ) for almost the same price at $279.95. Best price on the 7295 was at SportOptics at $268 and included free shipping. Found that price only " AFTER " I purchased mine. I had to pay almost $10 in shipping. Could have saved $20. Too, late now! Mine are in transit and are to arrive in a couple of days. http://www.sportoptics.com/nikon-monarch-atb-binoculars-10x42-green-7295.aspxTexoma...
1936610
1. 55-300 has both auto and mannual setting on it, but 70-300 has M/A and M. M/A means instant manual overwrite, M/A is pretty important feature. 70-300 is better for sports shoot.2. 70-300 has a "G" in it, which is not good : http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/nikortek.htm#g, but that is new "Norm" that Nikon decide to do.3. 55-300(309$) is 200$ cheaper than 70-300(509$) based on amazon on 07/30/2011.4. 55-300(1.2lb) is 0.4 lb lighter than 70-300(1.6lbs) due to its plastic part(mount etc)5. 55-300 is slower in focus than 70-300, and perform worse than 70-300 in 300 range, so 70-300 is better for sports shoot.6. 55-300 is DX only, while 70-300 can be used in both FX and DX camera.Owen 1. 55-300 has both auto and mannual setting on it, but 70-300 has M/A and M. M/A means instant manual overwrite, M/A is pretty important feature. 70-300 is better for sports shoot.2. 70-300 has a "G" in it, which is not good : http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/nikortek.htm#g, but that is new "Norm" that Nikon decide to do.3. 55-300(309$) is 200$ cheaper than 70-300(509$) based on amazon on 07/30/2011.4. 55-300(1.2lb) is 0.4 lb lighter than 70-300(1.6lbs) due to its plastic part(mount etc)5. 55-300 is slower in focus than 70-300, and perform... » Read More 1. 55-300 has both auto and mannual setting on it, but 70-300 has M/A and M. M/A means instant manual overwrite, M/A is pretty important feature. 70-300 is better for sports shoot.2. 70-300 has a "G" in it, which is not good : http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/nikortek.htm#g, but that is new "Norm" that Nikon decide to do.3. 55-300(309$) is 200$ cheaper than 70-300(509$) based on amazon on 07/30/2011.4. 55-300(1.2lb) is 0.4 lb lighter than 70-300(1.6lbs) due to its plastic part(mount etc)5. 55-300 is slower in focus than 70-300, and perform worse than 70-300 in 300 range, so 70-300 is better for sports shoot.6. 55-300 is DX only, while 70-300 can be used in both FX and DX camera.Owen « Show Less
1983766
Yes, my brother and I own the one sold by Ikelite and it's product number is 6210.09 and it's price is approx 250$. You can check out the specs on the Ikelite site, but we've had them at 110' with no problems at all. I will stress that the O-ring seal requires the application of silicone after 5-6 dives to ensure the seal stays water tight. The case provides access to all camera functions except the sliding switch that changes to video mode. This does not prevent you from taking video and stills on the same dive. All in all, my brother and I are very satisfied with the camera and the case. I hope this information helps. Yes, my brother and I own the one sold by Ikelite and it's product number is 6210.09 and it's price is approx 250$. You can check out the specs on the Ikelite site, but we've had them at 110' with no problems at all. I will stress that the O-ring seal requires the application of silicone after 5-6 dives to ensure the seal stays water tight. The case provides access to all camera functions except the sliding switch that changes to video mode. This does not prevent you from taking video and stills on the same dive. All in all, my brother and I are very satisfied with the camera and the case.... » Read More Yes, my brother and I own the one sold by Ikelite and it's product number is 6210.09 and it's price is approx 250$. You can check out the specs on the Ikelite site, but we've had them at 110' with no problems at all. I will stress that the O-ring seal requires the application of silicone after 5-6 dives to ensure the seal stays water tight. The case provides access to all camera functions except the sliding switch that changes to video mode. This does not prevent you from taking video and stills on the same dive. All in all, my brother and I are very satisfied with the camera and the case. I hope this information helps. « Show Less
1260997
That's a great question, The Talon Hd's run about $250-350 more than the Diamondbacks, I Currently own the Diamondback 10 x 42, I'm extremely pleased with them. I would recommend going to a local retailer, like maybe a Cabales? or a store that is very big, and tell the sales clerk you want to compare the Diamondback to the Talon Hd. Then pick something to focus on in the store as far away as possible, and switch back and forth between the two. You may be able to determine if the extra money is worth it? Vortex has a lifetime VIP warranty. If I had the extra money to upgrade to the Talon HD? I would, just because each step up with the Vortex bino's, gets better and better, but I have many different outdoor Items I purchase, so I have to set a budget on each item. Excellent Optics! Good Luck! Enjoy the outdoors
1331054
For the extra $100, the G10 has 3" LCD 460Kp vs 2.5" 230Kp and lens 28-140 vs 33-133 also full PASM modes. All would be important to me. Many post attest to how much owner enjoy G10. G10 significantly larger 109x78x46 vs 97x62x28. You can tell I am comparing these 2 also. Go for the G10.
463697
way better, shoots raw, fast autofocus, zoom lens, and so on. But many users reported leaks. I got a Nikon S2 / J4 and WP-N3 housing. cheaper and better than Nikon AW1 and less than half the price.
128547
owning both of them i can tell you that the difference between both is HUGE, if you are a pro and really make your living out of photography i say go for it- the controls are a bit different since now you have a wheel to move thru the menus but you will love it once you get used to, it comes with its own stofen-like diffuser and color gel holder since the latest nikon cameras can detect the color of the gel used and then modify the white balance