Is this worth the extra $100 dollars over the PreSonus 24/96 or should I stick to my budget and use the extra money elsewhere?
460595
Well, taking a quick look to the PreSonus FireStudio Project, the only difference (just talking about IO) is that the Saffire PRO40 offers you an expandable option with the Optical input and output. Depending on your needs you could take the right choice. I can't talk about quality, because I've only tested the Saffire. But I can tell PreSonus has nothing to envy to Focusrite. Personally, I like this expandable option. You can take an OctoPre and then you have 8 additional inputs. Or if I buy, let's say, an UA Apollo, I can take mi Saffire as additional inputs to that system. I hope this informantion helps you to make a choice. Well, taking a quick look to the PreSonus FireStudio Project, the only difference (just talking about IO) is that the Saffire PRO40 offers you an expandable option with the Optical input and output. Depending on your needs you could take the right choice. I can't talk about quality, because I've only tested the Saffire. But I can tell PreSonus has nothing to envy to Focusrite. Personally, I like this expandable option. You can take an OctoPre and then you have 8 additional inputs. Or if I buy, let's say, an UA Apollo, I can take mi Saffire as additional inputs to that system. I hope this... » Read More Well, taking a quick look to the PreSonus FireStudio Project, the only difference (just talking about IO) is that the Saffire PRO40 offers you an expandable option with the Optical input and output. Depending on your needs you could take the right choice. I can't talk about quality, because I've only tested the Saffire. But I can tell PreSonus has nothing to envy to Focusrite. Personally, I like this expandable option. You can take an OctoPre and then you have 8 additional inputs. Or if I buy, let's say, an UA Apollo, I can take mi Saffire as additional inputs to that system. I hope this informantion helps you to make a choice. « Show Less
460596
It is very much wroth the extra $100. The Pro 40 has some great preamps and you'll get two headphone out's. One for you and another for your vocalist.
460597
Dan, keep looking and you will find the Saffire for less than the PreSonus 24/96. Personally, I was focused on getting the Saffire Pro 40 and was monitoring the price every day here in Amazon. Found an awesome deal, pulled the trigger and never looked back. This is my current interface and my next upgrade is to pair it with an OctoPre from Focusrite. Can't go wrong with Focusrite.
460598
If you are going with a Firewire unit I would go with the Saffire Pro 40 over the Presonus. I've tried several new Presonus Firewire interface units and they all had hardware problems. However, you should also consider USB connected devices. The best Latency I could get with my Saffire Pro 40 was 11ms. I now have a Roland Octa-Capture (USB) and I can get 6ms Latency with solid results.
460599
Hi, I've never used the presonus but i do own the focusrite saffire pro 40 and I can tell you that it's pretty good! The preamps are very clean and have enough gain to power any mic. I went with the focusrite because it is a repected company and also because I saw equipment from them on every studio I've visited, but at the end it's your decision. :)
460600
It's your money - but I dumped my entire mixing board and use 2 of these and have no problems. But do what everyone else does, read all the reviews you can on both units until your eyes bleed and then make a decision that sits best with you...
341540
I've only had this one, so no personal experience. But there are several youtube videos comparing different models. Here's one that compares 13.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UCz2nUjlwCIIf you haven't had one before, I'd go cheaper to start and then decide if I wanted to make that much of an investment. I got mine because I wouldn't spend $200 on a Keytar without "trying" it. And I am very pleased with this. I was playing a solo intro with the band recently and when it was over had several people standing there asking what the instrument was...and complimenting me on my "talent." Which I don't claim to possess. I can mostly hit the right notes... I've only had this one, so no personal experience. But there are several youtube videos comparing different models. Here's one that compares 13.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UCz2nUjlwCIIf you haven't had one before, I'd go cheaper to start and then decide if I wanted to make that much of an investment. I got mine because I wouldn't spend $200 on a Keytar without "trying" it. And I am very pleased with this. I was playing a solo intro with the band recently and when it was over had several people standing there asking what the instrument was...and complimenting me... » Read More I've only had this one, so no personal experience. But there are several youtube videos comparing different models. Here's one that compares 13.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UCz2nUjlwCIIf you haven't had one before, I'd go cheaper to start and then decide if I wanted to make that much of an investment. I got mine because I wouldn't spend $200 on a Keytar without "trying" it. And I am very pleased with this. I was playing a solo intro with the band recently and when it was over had several people standing there asking what the instrument was...and complimenting me on my "talent." Which I don't claim to possess. I can mostly hit the right notes... « Show Less
575795
It does boost the signal (and has some tone adjustment that I like). We use it to preamp the transducer pickup attached to the sound board of an orchestral harp so it can be heard in an electric band. If we plug the transducer straight into the board we have to run the channel volume around 9 to keep up. With the AD121 we can run the board volume around 4 with MUCH better sound. The ground loop lift is a nice plus. I'm not familiar with the pb-100 so I can't compare the two. We do use a battery eliminator power supply so I don't know how long batteries last.
1344961
I personally would go with the 1,000. It has an amazing deep full sound. If you want the full movie theater style audio then the 1,000 is where it's at.
294265
Yes it is a little better. however Behringer have a terrible build and there customer support is awful. Go for a Numark or better.. The BCD3000 will break your heart...
1308675
The tuner and pre-amp are excellent. Oddly enough, floor standing speakers are generally more efficient than bookshelf sized speakers, so depending on your definition of "reasonable levels", I'd say this is probably a good choice, but they do make a 3490 with half again as much power. I have one of each and recommend them both highly.
902625
I tried this one and the 12 version and both were awful. For a few dollars more , the front firing 475 watt 12 in is way better. I ended up with that and the acoustech pl 200 is amazing for the money. Do yourself a favor and cough up the extra $175 and get pl 200. Its really worth it. The Polk is better of the two you asked about but no where in the same league as the pl 200.
1308674
The HK 3390 has "decent" Phono and Tuner sections. Having a Phono preamp at all is valuable. Both are mid-Fi and listenable. The real value in this large, heavy hardware is the clean, robust power amp section, which will crank any size speakers. A great value IMHO.
2054010
Although I have heard the 7506 a few times, from what I heard the 7506 is much brighter that the V6. The V6 to some May sound a bit rolled off, but I think the highs are very detailed and accentuated just above acceptable levels for me. I also have a pair of AKG k702 and I prefer the V6 for female Jazz vocals like Dinah Washington and Billie Holiday. But these are my impressions, so you would need to listen to the cans yourself. Buy both and return one that you don't like.
1298085
Probably not. It's a good sound system for the price, but for what it sounds like you want to do, you might want to spend a little extra and get something from the tier above this one.
3145
Just ordered the Lanzar, will let you know in a couple of weeks. If it feels right try it.Price, as long as your not looking to hear it two blocks away, as long as it compliments your music, and you are happy it's right.
1317587
Better audio, higher price. Take a look at SoundBlaster Roar. You will not regret spending a few minutes on it.
1074325
That is a great price but you have to compare apples to apples. There are different series that have different components like "glass aramid fiber" compared to "kevlar" for the subwoofer cones. Also, the amps are different and (believe it or not) the higher end speakers are HEAVIER so that they do not transfer sound waves through their bases or surrounding materials. I highly recommend that you also consider http://www.amazon.com/IsoAcoustics-ISO-L8R200-Large/dp/B009NWX2WO/ref=sr_1_2?s=musical-instruments&ie=UTF8&qid=1378099542&sr=1-2&keywords=isoacoustics Isopacoustic monitor stands. I had "MoPads" and thought that they were good. It is downright amazing how well all of these components work. If you have the room, buy the 8's. I have the attenuators only up "3 detents" for normal use as nearfield monitors. Only if you have a very large studio and want serious thump, go for the 10's. In any amplifier, you always want to have more power than you need to use. The amps are cleaner, run cooler and last longer. Also, invest in good acoustics for your studio as well otherwise you will never get an accurate representation of your music. You may even want to visit one of my webpages at: http://aperfectdj.com/dj-corner. I am a singer, songwriter, guitarist, producer, engineer, live sound engineer and DJ. (My studio uses the KRK Rokit 8 G2's) BTW: The G2's mean "generation 2." Hope this helps.
1773401
If you're determined to stay under $100, the ART DJPRE II and Pro-Ject Phono Box MM would both be decent choices. If you're willing to go a bit over budget, you might want to look at the NAD PP2i or Music Hall PA1.2 - both of those are under $200.
275210
Honestly, I can not compare as I have not tried the other. Obviously, it has lots more power. As a previous audiophile, I can tell you that although "sound bars" are convenient they do not compare with real amplifiers and reals speakers. I can tell you I am happy with the sound, and the digital input works well with my 60 inch 1080p 3D TV. My only complaint is when you use digital input you have to use the rinky dink remote that came with the sound bar to control the volume. My advise is don't skimp on sound it is just as important as the picture when it comes to watching movies. Honestly, I can not compare as I have not tried the other. Obviously, it has lots more power. As a previous audiophile, I can tell you that although "sound bars" are convenient they do not compare with real amplifiers and reals speakers. I can tell you I am happy with the sound, and the digital input works well with my 60 inch 1080p 3D TV. My only complaint is when you use digital input you have to use the rinky dink remote that came with the sound bar to control the volume. My advise is don't skimp on sound it is just as important as the picture when it comes to watching movies.
449191
I don't have any experience with the dragonfly, but I can tell you that for zoned sound, SONOS is terrific. I have been using their stuff for almost 3 years, and will continue to change out older technology for their product as older equipment fails. The clarity of both the amplified signal, as well as the preamp-only version is very good. If you are looking for audiophile/serious listening with, say $5000 invested in a pair of speakers, then this is not what you want. For everything else, SONOS is a very high-quality solution.
856563
The 6 is excellent...so is the 10. I've heard both as well. I think the real magic is happening in the bass module. I think it's the same for both the 6 and 10. If money is not a factor I would let the size of your entertainment space dictate your choice. You won't regret either choice.