What's the difference between this and the Alpine HCE-C115?
465305
Providing great visibility in day or night, the HCE-C117D and HCE-C115 rear camera systems incorporate a 1.5 LUX camera with a 128-degree horizontal viewing angle. Both models provide a clear overview of what's behind the vehicle. The HCE-C117D Direct Rear Camera System is designed specifically for Alpine's INA-W910 or INA-W900BT audio/video/navigation (AVN) system (sold separately). It connects directly to the back of either AVN system, so no additional wiring is required. The HCE-C115 Universal Rear Camera System works with any in-dash video unit with an RCA rear camera input.
465306
The HCE-C117D is made for only Alpine head units. The HCE-C115 is compatible with any A/V unit
465307
The C117D uses a direct connection to certain Alpine Head Units. It plugs into the harness wiring without AV RCA plugs. The C115 comes with a converter box. From the converter box it plugs into the head Unit using a AV RCA plug. Please visit Alpine-USA.com to look at the difference.
1917218
I have not seen any difference other than a little different styling. A different year perhaps? It sounds the same and it has the same on/off switch, volume controls, etc.
391534
All you need to do is go to the polk website and compare the specs. In my opinion I don't believe there is much if any of a sound difference between the two. At least that's how it looks on paper. I can't be 100% sure on that, as i haven't heard the C-15 for my self. As i stated in my review, the polk C-S 10 seems to blend in with my polk monitor 60 series II nicely, so that's all i was concerned about before i purchased the it. Hope this was helpful. Good luck.
784695
I have both so I show how both compare in a video I uploaded, hope this helps eveyone:
432466
Yes and no...there is an Alpine factory install in one that is on youtube and crutchfield's site that shows an install in a HSE...looks amazing, but a little custom work was needed.
1960319
I did not look up that Alpine unit, but that is the reason why I bought this cable. My headunit in my pickup only had an Ipod Male, so I use this cord to play Pandora through my Android phone. It works well and is better quality than the other cord i previously bought.*edit: Make sure the Alpine unit can play AUX connections though. I had to change the settings in my headunit's menu from iPod to AUX to play through the cord.
1790892
The alpine 12 is alright. It's a great speaker but it's rms handling isn't very high. I bought two of these. Dual 4 ohm . They hit hard but not hard enough. Remember, you get what you pay for. I have one orion hcca 12 that blows both of these out.
945881
the c is updated and is the tranlucent model while the a is solid black on one side and white on the other they are both amplified far as performance i do not know i think they both have the same technology here is a review site you can check out http://winegardfl5500a.com/
2122352
I am an Alpine dealer so I used Alpine products! Remember to purchase from an Authorized dealer!
880065
I've used both and they both work great. I can't really tell the difference between them.
274881
the only difference is how tall the base unit is. the HS is 5" shorter. Both models are exactly the same in depth, width, and the mounting plate. I used the H inside the RV and the HS in the basement.
1367406
The main difference is that the ht-e6500w is the older model. The newer one appears to have a bit more versatile TV and internet connectivity. I would suggest that if you can still find the older model, new and in the box, you might be able to get a much lower prize. I don't use min often but I do enjoy it when I do. I did a wiring mod whereby if have my old JBL Athena's hooked up as the front and the systems front and rears wired is series for the back. Works pretty good. Hope I've helped a bit.
1765220
Im not sure eithr Nic, maybe call a local alpine dealer wud b Ur best bet K ( ;
524797
Probably the higher one, but difference is negligible. If you want the loudest, most noticeable sound, get both of them.
2209806
One difference is the battery location. The battery charger is different. Other than that any other differences are so minimal that it is not even worth mentioning. If you have used the wg150 model you will be happy with the wg152 model.
1141786
the difference between these two is one is 1600.1 and the other is 1500.1 and they are both great amps, CEA compliant if you feed them the power they want they will put out their rated RMS and some. I say go for the 1600.1 it has 100 watts more
2239807
No idea, sorry. I ditched the unit by selling off and getting an Alpine which is great.