Would you recommend PRO or M4s?
468899
My brother has Pro i have 2 CompM4's , i like all of them. biggest difference is battery life.
468900
Never tried the PRO. Spoke to the guy at the range who is law enforcement and they use the PRO. I went with the M4s since it works with a AA battery. I have been to the range a couple of times and it works great. Just a few easy adjustments produce very accurate and reproducible shots.
468901
Pro is best value, but m4 is best technically. Average shooter will do very well with Pro!
468902
I would recommend this product. I bought it about a year ago and have been very happy with it!
468903
M4 the best on the market, Excellent all wx all lighting cond. The best!!!! ... AA batts
468904
Ive never used PRO, but love my M4s. Used it during two combat tours in Iraq with 82nd Airborne. The M4s are nearly indestructible. Jumping out of airplanes, falls, drops... never once did it lose its zero. I stayed with the M4s for its proven reliability and durability.
106956
i think s95 is compelling if u want better pictures and control. since s95 has the bigger sensor (better pictures) and the PASM (better control). but really, the 4000 is a true P&S wif some kick-ass hardware baked in.
1306540
The noise reduction with these is better than the tactical sport version. I have compared them side by side as a friend has the TS model. I regularly shoot at an indoor pistol range and the Pro model works very well. My friend "doubles up" using foam ear plugs in addition to the TS model shooting indoors.I think the extra cost is worth the additional protection.
906070
I went with the pro for battery life, and I'm used to a plain dot. Been through small unit infantry tactics training in winter conditions using the pro and can attest it is a first class device. I have a severe astigmatism, this sight works just fine. I am 100% pleased with every aspect of it.
814902
Ok so not being that savvy (and just starting my search), which one is better in your opinion? What are the options that matter most? Thanks
1956797
I love the quality and accuracy of my meprolight. Would choose it over eotech any day but not sure bout mako. Haven't seen those.
855456
My roommate uses the M60 Ive got the M65. Ive used both and hardly notice any difference in acceleration. I have ZERO complaints about the M65 and would recommend it for gaming any day.
853452
Depends on what you need it for, if you are a professional who needs a high frames per second rate to shoot sports, etc., or you need a rugged camera you should go with the 7D, if you are an amateur who just shoots for their own memories, or sharing images, the T4i is great. It has the same sensor as the 7D, but the next generation processor, a really helpful tilt/swivel LCD, and lots easy to use automatic modes if you are just in a hurry. It has excellent image quality (I would recommend the 18-135 lens) and the video is great (although even my S95 has great video). I bought one for my wife and she is very happy with it. If you are sometimes not so sure about what aperture/shutter speed to use, I would 100% recommend the T4i because of all the presets that can help you out in a pinch. Hope this helps.
906072
Aimpoint. Thats my opinion though. EO's are nice enough too. But for the money id buy this again.
92569
i have the koass 1 (seen to your left) and the kpro. i don't own the kaoss 2. but based on vids on youtube, 2 is easier to use.
1762538
unsure what they've done with the 2014 model, but the older models have very glitchy trackpads. I would still hold off on the pro. Get the 2014 14in. Notice that the 14 inch is getting rad reviews by critics, but no one is saying much about the pro. That switchblade/trackpad is no good.
427678
genereally think of ProStaff as compact size scope...wheresas the Buckmaster is full sized...that said be careful you are not getting the "rimfire" versionof the pro staff....otherwise I have both and like them...that said...price is generally the indicator...on that basis I go for the Monarh line the top of the lineand the quality is the same as Swarovski or Zeiss...which I also have used and no longer have having switched to Nikon exclusively...love em..
271391
if you require it for a regular finance class, the Plus version will do just fine ... the Pro has a couple of added functions, like: Net Future Value (NFV) and Modified Internal Rate of Return (MIRR) ... the price difference between the two is about $10 ... I'd go for the Pro ... good luck with your finance class
2077570
I have m50s as well. In comparison the m-100's have a significantly better sound on the low end. The bass respond you get with these are really good. The highs are also better than the m50s. To me, they do not "pierce" the ears as much when I turn it up a bit. Finally, the mids are about the same in quality, however since the vmodas have those two other strengths, you will probably notice the mids to be better with m50.
1757205
I don't have the M4 1S, but I would imagine that these are heavier than most headphones. They are absolutely amazing to listen to, but can only be worn for about 60-90 minutes at a time.
1176085
V-Moda M100 all day.I own the M80 and the SL-150 there is a huge difference. The V-Moda is much clearer in highs and mids. SL-150s leak like crazy also. The good side of the SL-150 is that they are super cheap right now and you can grab a a pair for $70, downside is that the sound is okay, bass heavy but if you have an adjustable EQ you can compensate for this and make the adjustments necessary. But if you play them flat the V-Modas will sound better all the time.
1533878
If I had money, I would get the Combat+ for looks. I haven't tried the Combat+ But I do not believe they are twice as good. I would get the Transform. These are great!!!