how does this one differ from the avr590? THe AVR 590 is $50 cheaper - what is the difference?
451482
Now, half a year later, "high-end" 1610 here at Amazon costs $260, and "consumer version" 590 (supposed to be identical to 1610) costs $360. Funny, hah?
451483
Thank so much for this very detailed post. This helps my ongoing research with trying to decide on a purchase.
1414975
After a Google search on your GoldenEAR speakers, very nice by the way, the A500 can drive them easily. Your AVR has "Pre-Out" connections, so you can tell us which sound better- the internal or the Behringer external amp. If heat is a problem(in a closed cabinet), than the A500 with it's massive heat sinks and efficient Torrid would be worry free(provided there's space).
275210
Honestly, I can not compare as I have not tried the other. Obviously, it has lots more power. As a previous audiophile, I can tell you that although "sound bars" are convenient they do not compare with real amplifiers and reals speakers. I can tell you I am happy with the sound, and the digital input works well with my 60 inch 1080p 3D TV. My only complaint is when you use digital input you have to use the rinky dink remote that came with the sound bar to control the volume. My advise is don't skimp on sound it is just as important as the picture when it comes to watching movies. Honestly, I can not compare as I have not tried the other. Obviously, it has lots more power. As a previous audiophile, I can tell you that although "sound bars" are convenient they do not compare with real amplifiers and reals speakers. I can tell you I am happy with the sound, and the digital input works well with my 60 inch 1080p 3D TV. My only complaint is when you use digital input you have to use the rinky dink remote that came with the sound bar to control the volume. My advise is don't skimp on sound it is just as important as the picture when it comes to watching movies.
2252376
By your question I can't tell what the 'cheaper one listed by you at this link' actually is...there is no link to it...just a link to Amazon. If you could let me know what that other one was I might be able to explain what differences there are. With that in mind...I bought this one because of the durability of this particular unit. I did some research and this one had a much lower failure rate and is supposed to last much longer than most of the others.
1763058
Thanks for the info. The VSX-9040 is only $6 more. Let us know how you like it if you get it. I haven't decided yet.
2020085
With the sale price on the Denon at $375, it's a no-brainer for me. I've alway been impressed with Denon's quality and features althought the remotes and manuals leave much to be desired. If you have the least bit of experience with AV electronics go with the Denon. It's simply a better built piece of equipment.
1527058
I was wondering the same thing. I am thinking about buying the the 1019 and now I came accross the VSX-9049 and right now the difference is only around $20 in Amazon.
694848
The essential difference is that the 570 has two speed settings and the 590 has an adjustable dial for additional speeds.
1874079
Depends on the impedance the channels are driven; the number of channels that are driven; the total harmonic distortion that is allowed; and other factors. TBH, the WPC (watts per channel) is not nearly as important as the sensitivity of the speakers that will be driven by the amp. Suffice it to say, that the SC-1523 is essentially the SC-75 in Pioneer's Elite Class receivers. It is truly an exceptional AVR with more than enough power to drive most audiophile speakers at reference level and has most of the best features of the industry. I could go on about it's DAC's and network capabilities, but you asked about power. The AVR DOES have pre-amp outs for bi-amping your speakers if you choose to do so. So buying this AVR is a no brainer. I have a perfectly good (very good) Pioneer VSX-AH1018-K AVR that is in storage for one of my sons when they get their own place. When the SC-1523 came out and I saw it was equivalent to the SC-75 at less than half the price, I ordered it on the spot. This unit is also capable of 9.2 channel setups or zone setups. Forget about the watts and just savor the sound.
2185025
Thank you, I too am wonderng at the difference between the two. I've got an older Denon receiver(3803) and would rather not have to replace it. This model seems to fit the bill for me.
1400183
Thank you, I was getting annoyed at my 5982. It stutters while playing avi movies that were burned on DVDs. Using both component and hdmi cables, turning progressive scan on and off, movies still stutters. Only small kbps movies like anime didn't stutter.
483746
hey all saw your post about the Denon AVR4310CI and thought I would let you all know electronics expo has a very good deal on this receiver. They are selling it for an unbelievable $1263.50 using coupon code WS901X8108. Check it out!
454610
This is supply and demand but who in the right mind will pay $600? I waited too long and also cannot find one in the entire Atlanta market. At one point the 35 was on sale for something like $140 at Sears... but now it is $359! By the way, the 55 is not available direct from Panasonic and I understand that this player has been discontinued. Good Luck All
696475
If you state to steer away from $50 mics, why did you mention ATR55? That's a $50 mic on Amazon.
1030546
1. As stated by Mr. Hanson, it is an older package. 2. The satellite speakers on the 600 have a mid/range radiator on top. Evidently their bookshelf answer to their bi-polar drivers of the BP series.3. Subwoofer on the 600 has a 250 watt amp where as the 60.6 only has a 150 watt.That being said, I own the 60.6 and I am extremely happy. I use them with a Denon AVR-2310. If you have a larger than 400 sq ft theater space I would consider a second or more powerful sub. But at the current $219 (which is hilarious as the sub itself sells for $299) I see the set going for, its kind of hard to go wrong. 1. As stated by Mr. Hanson, it is an older package. 2. The satellite speakers on the 600 have a mid/range radiator on top. Evidently their bookshelf answer to their bi-polar drivers of the BP series.3. Subwoofer on the 600 has a 250 watt amp where as the 60.6 only has a 150 watt.That being said, I own the 60.6 and I am extremely happy. I use them with a Denon AVR-2310. If you have a larger than 400 sq ft theater space I would consider a second or more powerful sub. But at the current $219 (which is hilarious as the sub itself sells for $299) I see the set going for,... » Read More 1. As stated by Mr. Hanson, it is an older package. 2. The satellite speakers on the 600 have a mid/range radiator on top. Evidently their bookshelf answer to their bi-polar drivers of the BP series.3. Subwoofer on the 600 has a 250 watt amp where as the 60.6 only has a 150 watt.That being said, I own the 60.6 and I am extremely happy. I use them with a Denon AVR-2310. If you have a larger than 400 sq ft theater space I would consider a second or more powerful sub. But at the current $219 (which is hilarious as the sub itself sells for $299) I see the set going for, its kind of hard to go wrong. « Show Less
517271
Hmm,, I looked at both. I liked the 630 more. I was able to keep the price within $99 of the 530 when I got mine at Circuit City. It was just prior to them announcing they were shutting down. I think they were willing to deal on certain items. They matched the Amazon price in December and I was very happy with the deal. Although I always forget Amazon has the edge after taxes, but I got it the day I looked at it so to me it was worth the extra $. The 120HZ is a constant on the LN52A630. It's not to be confused with the Auto Motion Plus feature. The AMP is great for sports and documentary type programs or anything in a live format like news and such. For movies I'd turn it off. Both were nice sets, but for NOT much more $$ at the time I bought, I'd say the 630 was the better value.
1711317
TeeVoo thanks for the explanation. I just picked up the a950 at best buy for $3600 and no interest for 3 years. My Best Buy was even giving premium home delivery and setup for free on it as well. I compared the two tvs. There is just something about the a950's picture that makes you go "wow." The only wow factor I received from the new LEDs was how thin they were. At the end of the day, I watch what's on the screen and not how thin the actual tv set is so I went with the a950.