SH S200 or wait for the HF m400?
441169
Any luck? I am in the same boat as you... I notified Canon regarding the s200 and the HF M400. Here is the reply I got: The VIXIA HF M400 is scheduled to be available in late March for an estimated retail price of $649.99. This is not a replacement for the VIXIA HF S200, but for the VIXIA M-series, HF M300. The VIXIA HF S30 is the only successor at this time for the VIXIA HF S200. The VIXIA HF M400 is a lower class model compared to the VIXIA HF S200. So what does lower class mean? Cheaper lens??? Just when I was set to click on the buy now
1792204
MRAS400 is a inner ear style. And the AS200 is a clip on on style in ear. Not inner ear type. Typically the inner ear type will have better sound because of the separation from outside noise.
373211
I think the new model is the HTS-S360, which appears as "coming soon" on sonystyle.com. This new one looks cooler, in my opinion, and there are also a couple of improvements, obviously. I've been dying to get a component HT system to complement my PS3 & Bravia set up, and I was almost ready to purchase the 2300 when I decided (luckily) to check Sony's website. Since the new model is advertised to be only $350, I guess I'd recommend to wait for it, I know I will.
106956
i think s95 is compelling if u want better pictures and control. since s95 has the bigger sensor (better pictures) and the PASM (better control). but really, the 4000 is a true P&S wif some kick-ass hardware baked in.
1669727
I've never used a 320s-4, so I can't comment. Just don't waste your money on a weak-kneed 190s... I LIKE a single shaving screen. It just has an underpowered motor that bogs on whiskers that doesn't even slow down the Panasonic that replaced it. Braun should be ashamed! I, too, will be giving mine away... to someone I don't know, anonymously, so they won't angrily hunt me down & hurt me... :)
1052531
Barbara I would not recommend this monopod for that type of gear, but if you stepped it up to the s6 head and monopod combo I would highly recommend it. The s6 head also has many of the fine tune adjustments and a lighted bubble level like the Manfrotto head. Also, the head rotates at the column and the feet rotate as well, unlike the Manfrotto monopods. I love this feature as it gives me even more control of my gear. Also, the s4 head and s6 heads share the same size plates, whereas the s2 head has a much smaller plate suitable for a mirrorless system. Again, this is just my opinion and the 2 cents in my pocket. I hope it helps!!! Barbara I would not recommend this monopod for that type of gear, but if you stepped it up to the s6 head and monopod combo I would highly recommend it. The s6 head also has many of the fine tune adjustments and a lighted bubble level like the Manfrotto head. Also, the head rotates at the column and the feet rotate as well, unlike the Manfrotto monopods. I love this feature as it gives me even more control of my gear. Also, the s4 head and s6 heads share the same size plates, whereas the s2 head has a much smaller plate suitable for a mirrorless system. Again, this is just my opinion and... » Read More Barbara I would not recommend this monopod for that type of gear, but if you stepped it up to the s6 head and monopod combo I would highly recommend it. The s6 head also has many of the fine tune adjustments and a lighted bubble level like the Manfrotto head. Also, the head rotates at the column and the feet rotate as well, unlike the Manfrotto monopods. I love this feature as it gives me even more control of my gear. Also, the s4 head and s6 heads share the same size plates, whereas the s2 head has a much smaller plate suitable for a mirrorless system. Again, this is just my opinion and the 2 cents in my pocket. I hope it helps!!! « Show Less
1886592
Despite what amazon wrote, the Canon VIXIA HF R100 Dual Flash Memory Camcorder is not the newer version of the Canon VIXIA HF200 HD Flash Memory Camcorder with 15x Optical Zoom, the Canon VIXIA HF M300 Flash Memory Camcorder is. The HF200 is a 2009 model with a list price of $749.99 and the HF R100 is a 2010 model with a list price of $499.99, which makes it the lowest-cost (or bottom of the line) Vixia model. The HF200 was also the lowest cost of the 2009 line-up, but the 2010 line-up has a lower bottom. There are several differences. The HF R100 has a 20X optical zoom, vs. 15X optical for the HF200. That appears to be the only advantage the HF R100 has over the HF200. However, unless you use the HF R100 on a tripod, that extra zoom will be useless because it has worse image stabilization than the HF200 and you can't handhold a camcorder at that magnification and shoot acceptable footage (it will be bouncing all over the place). So, that extra zoom is mainly a marketing ploy rather than a true advantage. The HF200 has a larger image sensor (for better low-light performance), higher resolution image sensor (for sharper video and still images), higher resolution LCD screen (for sharper images and icons), Multi-Angle Vivid LCD screen (apparently for wider viewing angles), optical image stabilization (for sharper images; the HF R100 has no optical image stabilization but uses electronic image shifting instead), and a higher maximum recording bit rate (for sharper images with fewer compression artifacts, a.k.a. pixelation). Since the HF200 is a 2009 model, it is available at about 1/3 off the list price bringing it down to the same street price as the still new 2010 HF R100 model. The HF200 is a much better camcorder than the HF R100 and they sell for the same price right now.
2079453
I just replaced my SD870IS with a Canon S100 - a move up in price and features. I am still using my 870 for some work ( it's display has some dead spots).Thanks for the discussion.
2194469
I looked at Price History in Price Grabber. Trying to draw a parallel to the price movement, I believe the HF S200 will go down about $100 this year from its current price and then another $200 between the end of this year and first half of next year (assuming Cannon has another new version next spring). Essentially, the longer we wait, the cheaper it becomes.
1359333
The pl-200 is just an upgraded version. 250w rms amp compared to the bic f12s 150w rms. I own the f12 and an very impressed. If your budget allows the pl-200, go for it, but for 95% of people the f12 does a fantastic job.
203743
Do you like the 240? I'm trying to decide if I should go with it or the 230.
1217377
I chose the Sony HDR CX500V over the HF S100 based on low light performance and stabilization during side by side testing. The low light performance of the S100 showed notable noise artifacts while the CX500V was totally clean and smooth. The stabilization of the CX500V was also head and shoulder above the Cannon. I will miss manual controls and inputs of the Cannon, but in grab and go, day to day shooting of the family, the Sony fits my intended use better in long run.
1109623
Why don't you read the specs?I have the 320s-4 and it's perfect unless you want to shave in the shower. I think that's the only difference.
2010986
The msrx is much quicker than the 120sr... definitely will entertain you and improve your reflexes. You could also consider a nano cpx, which is similarly quick and has the added benefits of a collective heli. I have a 120sr bnf, msrx rtf, and nano cpx bnf. I'm still practicing good coordinated turns, no inverted stuff yet, but I like the way the nano flys the best.
412030
Haven't bought a 320 yet, don't know. Great on P220, 226, 229 equinoxes and 227sas though.
2234811
Yeah the biggest complaint for the SX200IS was the automatic flash every time. I'm gonna wait to see if that has been fixed in the SX210IS before I go ahead an order. Looks like a great improvement in every other area!I'm glad I held out on getting my super-zoom point and shoot! Within the last few weeks Nikon, Fujifilm, Canon, and Panasonic all announced their Spring 2010 models. There are some real good options out there!
876663
Brad - I don't think you can go wrong with either camera. Add to for your consideration the Sony HX5 - it's on a par with these two.I looked long and hard at all 3 of these, researching specs and comments, as well as trying them out in camera stores, etc. I finally chose the S8100, although only coming out in September the amount of reviews is sparse - but even compared to the S8000 earlier model the improved S8100 proves to be a great camera. One thing I really like is the heft and feel of the camera, as well as the professional and high quality look and detail of the camera. It's a joy to take photos with this camera. The photos from it are stunning. Brad - I don't think you can go wrong with either camera. Add to for your consideration the Sony HX5 - it's on a par with these two.I looked long and hard at all 3 of these, researching specs and comments, as well as trying them out in camera stores, etc. I finally chose the S8100, although only coming out in September the amount of reviews is sparse - but even compared to the S8000 earlier model the improved S8100 proves to be a great camera. One thing I really like is the heft and feel of the camera, as well as the professional and high quality look and detail of the camera.... » Read More Brad - I don't think you can go wrong with either camera. Add to for your consideration the Sony HX5 - it's on a par with these two.I looked long and hard at all 3 of these, researching specs and comments, as well as trying them out in camera stores, etc. I finally chose the S8100, although only coming out in September the amount of reviews is sparse - but even compared to the S8000 earlier model the improved S8100 proves to be a great camera. One thing I really like is the heft and feel of the camera, as well as the professional and high quality look and detail of the camera. It's a joy to take photos with this camera. The photos from it are stunning. « Show Less