If you were going to only use this one week out of the year, would you buy this (elite) model, or the basic Yonana machine?
445646
Probably the standard Yonanas would be fine, based on how large and heavy duty this model is. I use mine about 3-4 times a week, 3 or 4 servings per use, so it gets a workout.
445647
The elites model. I have used both . The elite results in a much better textureSo happy you are coming. Sent from my iPhone.
445648
I bought the elite but my grandson said I only needed the regular. However I would still purchase the elite because it has more power.
445649
I got the elite machine for Christmas and I have to say since then I've probably used it a total of a week's time. I really enjoy the end product and I am pretty sure I will use it consistently in the summer. It's easy clean up too. I would definitely get this model again.
445650
The elites model. I have used both . The elite results in a much better texture So happy you are coming. Sent from my iPhone .
445651
I've never used the basic model so I cant compare.....I'm very happy with the elite model
296779
I think you are making a wise choice. This is a good machine and replaced my 1st ProForm, which I used 8 years and it was a cheap model..$599. It still works too but is noisy. They make a great machine.
1919284
I think this would be a perfect machine. I got it because it has the stronger motor and should last longer. My old one was pretty but through constant use it only lasted about a year and my neighbor is having the same problem. That's why this time I went with the Pro.
2093179
The concept is identical. I hope that the Grossan machine's motor is more robust given that it's designed for irrigation, but I'm not sure. My wife & I burned out a waterpik in 11 months. This has to last ~30 months to be a break even vs. annual waterpik purchases.Has anyone used the Grossan machine for 3 years or more w/o problems or breakdowns?Jon
6305
It took two of us about an hour. Having two is very helpful. Follow the directions carefully and you should have no problem. We really like this machine. It gets used 7+ tmes a week. No complaints after 8 months.
1954426
We purchased and highly recommend a Speed Queen. This is a commercial type of machine, simple and well built. You may have to search for a local dealer. It may seem to cost a little more. It is worth it.
509392
I chose the Blaze due to the wider lat tower and included lat bar. Also I wanted the additional exercises like the 'lying leg curls' along with the ability to upgrade the resistance. I also am really happier with the beefier build as is evidenced by the difference in weight of the machine, 148 lb for the PR1000 and 214 lb for the Blaze. If your like me, price is important and I got mine during black Friday sale for a little over 600, hint hint. Im sure the PR1000 would be sufficient, but I'm glad I got the beefier, upgradable version.
1952460
I've used the machine about six months without a problem. I would think at the least this would be a commercial starter for sure. It's built pretty stout. And depending on how many shaved ices you serve daily it may be fine. I believe 150-200 per day would be fine. Keep in mind that you have to freeze your own ice since you need round blocks of ice. I purchased 99 cent buckets in Home Depot's paint department that works perfect. Each bucket generates about 20 servings. I'm also considering using this machine on a limited commercial basis. Based on the price you can generate up front machine costs fairly quick. Hope this has been of help! I've used the machine about six months without a problem. I would think at the least this would be a commercial starter for sure. It's built pretty stout. And depending on how many shaved ices you serve daily it may be fine. I believe 150-200 per day would be fine. Keep in mind that you have to freeze your own ice since you need round blocks of ice. I purchased 99 cent buckets in Home Depot's paint department that works perfect. Each bucket generates about 20 servings. I'm also considering using this machine on a limited commercial basis. Based on the price you can generate up front machine... » Read More I've used the machine about six months without a problem. I would think at the least this would be a commercial starter for sure. It's built pretty stout. And depending on how many shaved ices you serve daily it may be fine. I believe 150-200 per day would be fine. Keep in mind that you have to freeze your own ice since you need round blocks of ice. I purchased 99 cent buckets in Home Depot's paint department that works perfect. Each bucket generates about 20 servings. I'm also considering using this machine on a limited commercial basis. Based on the price you can generate up front machine costs fairly quick. Hope this has been of help! « Show Less
213921
TK is a great seller. I would just contact him, and he will most likely very accommodating. It sounds like you've had this a very short time if you've only used it twice. If I remember correctly everything is covered for at least 6 months. Another tip, I would recommend the MR 2800 model for upgrade. The quality of the MR2200 is ok, but not even close the the 2800!
1565188
Last Christmas, we bought the 780-which works great. However, I have long blonde hair and it would tangle around the rollers. The 780 comes with a cleaning tool, so that you can easily cut it off...but it was kind of annoying. I ended up taking it to work and bought the new 880 for the house. We also have dogs at the house. The 880 is AWESOME. It's virtually maintenance free, with the exception of emptying out the collection tray. It also is a lot quieter than the 780. Overall, the rubber rollers seem to pick up a lot more dirt, dust, and dog hair than the 780 did...and I would compare the 780 to the effectiveness of our Dyson Ball vacuum (yes, I know, I have purchased a lot of vacuums... I am kind of OCD like that!) Overall, I would highly suggest the 880 over the 780 iRobot. It simply works better.
2078734
I don't think you could go wrong with either one. I bought the Hobart 210 only because I'm usually financially embarrassed. I had a tough enough time reaching for the 210, let alone that upper shelf 211. But, the 211 is supposed to be the better machine. And, if you're just the typical homeowner, the Hobart 140 would most likely be all that you would ever need and at half the cost.
1108173
In concur with BOTH answers! The 600 is a good starter but I prefer this one (but I still kept the 600 for travel purposes).
1248801
I would go with the rowing machine or even better a power tower instead. After having this machine, just like my total gym I gave it away as I found myself not even using it. The resistance isn't all that great. I bought a power tower, a spin bike, those two things I use at least one every day 5 times a week, where with the Ultimate body I found myself bored of it in about a week, it just wasn't a good workout. I get so much better workouts just using my power tower, spin bike, and free weights.
443886
I got the 140 this past January.. My advise to you would be to get neither.. I have nothing but problems with it from day one.. It's a very inconsistent, unreliable machine.. Spend a little extra money and get a name brand machine.. Even a Lincoln Electric would be far superior.. My main problem with the Longevity is the feeding mechanism and all it's gritty components.. From the spool, the liner, right down to the nozzle.. Absolute junk!! Read the reviews of a the various longevity models.. The same people leave the same reviews for all the machines to boost the rating.. Don't waste your money on any of their machines.. You will be very disappointed and aggravated.. I got the 140 this past January.. My advise to you would be to get neither.. I have nothing but problems with it from day one.. It's a very inconsistent, unreliable machine.. Spend a little extra money and get a name brand machine.. Even a Lincoln Electric would be far superior.. My main problem with the Longevity is the feeding mechanism and all it's gritty components.. From the spool, the liner, right down to the nozzle.. Absolute junk!! Read the reviews of a the various longevity models.. The same people leave the same reviews for all the machines to boost the rating.. Don't waste your... » Read More I got the 140 this past January.. My advise to you would be to get neither.. I have nothing but problems with it from day one.. It's a very inconsistent, unreliable machine.. Spend a little extra money and get a name brand machine.. Even a Lincoln Electric would be far superior.. My main problem with the Longevity is the feeding mechanism and all it's gritty components.. From the spool, the liner, right down to the nozzle.. Absolute junk!! Read the reviews of a the various longevity models.. The same people leave the same reviews for all the machines to boost the rating.. Don't waste your money on any of their machines.. You will be very disappointed and aggravated.. « Show Less
1285339
back in the day we always purchased black & decker (under the cabinet) coffee makers. loved them! this was our first mr. coffee model for the countertop. we've been really pleased. we make 3-pots per day on average and clean the machine once a month. even so...we still only get roughly a year from our m.c. models. my mother gets less than a year using a braun coffee maker (3x the $$ of our m.c.) seems a waste of money? best of luck! cheers, ~ tom
386408
Agree with the previous answers. Manual is sufficient and love the machine!
1454190
I've only tried the Ikon, and am satisfied with it. It makes perfectly good juice. I don't see the need to spend the extra $, although granted I've only been using it for a month (approx. every other day). I would be interested to hear from someone who has tried both. I'd like to know, for instance, if there's a higher yield with the Elite, or is the Elite expected to last longer?