how they compared to Panasonic RPHJE120K In-Ear Headphone?
467770
I actually own both and they are very similar, these just have a mic. Either way you go, you can't lose.
103384
The question above is the critical one - you can alwys spend more and get better. BUT let me add this: for an immediate, and mind-blowing upgrade at less than 15 bucks, go out and get yourself a pair of Koss KSC75s. They are light on the ears, small, and easy to transport. However, they sound incredible not only "at this price range" but in their own right. Get that purchase over with and then you can think about whether you want to spend more or not. But trust me on this, for most folks the Koss's are fantastic. You won't be disappointed. No I don't work for Koss, but I'd be willing to. Koss KSC75 Portable Stereophone Headphones
31669
I would say no. These sound good, but are not comfortable long term. They appear comparable to the HA-V570 based on the specs and price. May I suggest upgrading to the JVC's HA-RX700 series? They are in the $30 to $35 range and are my regular headphones.
297316
I had previously bought a pair of Sennheiser HD-280 PRO headphones and really liked them -- they are good "monitor" head phones in that they don't exaggerate any frequency, at least to my ears. But sonically I wanted a few more frills for pure listening, and not just trying to get a recording to sound just right. That's what lead me to the Creative Aurvana. I may have read a review in a magazine about these too... These are great head phones. When deciding to buy the Aurvavas I compared the distribution of the "star bars" -- you'll see these phones are similar to the Sennheiser HD-280 PRO, though the Sennheisers have a larger sample set.So I tend to consider/compare various purchase possibilities based on numerics. I had previously bought a pair of Sennheiser HD-280 PRO headphones and really liked them -- they are good "monitor" head phones in that they don't exaggerate any frequency, at least to my ears. But sonically I wanted a few more frills for pure listening, and not just trying to get a recording to sound just right. That's what lead me to the Creative Aurvana. I may have read a review in a magazine about these too... These are great head phones. When deciding to buy the Aurvavas I compared the distribution of the "star bars" -- you'll see these phones are... » Read More I had previously bought a pair of Sennheiser HD-280 PRO headphones and really liked them -- they are good "monitor" head phones in that they don't exaggerate any frequency, at least to my ears. But sonically I wanted a few more frills for pure listening, and not just trying to get a recording to sound just right. That's what lead me to the Creative Aurvana. I may have read a review in a magazine about these too... These are great head phones. When deciding to buy the Aurvavas I compared the distribution of the "star bars" -- you'll see these phones are similar to the Sennheiser HD-280 PRO, though the Sennheisers have a larger sample set.So I tend to consider/compare various purchase possibilities based on numerics. « Show Less
1103496
I find them very comfortable and lighter than I expected, really not much different than Sony or Panasonic headphones. I found the Panasonics, for example, to be uncomfortable: not tight, put pressure at some points.
894157
The Ks have a much better soundstage and crystal clear midrange, the Qs not as clean, equalized for more mass-market appeal. Have owned both (sold the Q) and for my money it's no contest.
126808
I can't say that I think they are a ton better than others, but the unique design helps them stay in my ear better than any other in-ear headphone. I normally listen to TuneIn Radio so I'm not sure if the streaming quality is good enough to notice a big difference. I would probably buy them again.
243428
I can't compare it to the R6i because I have no reference to that model, but I can tell you that I don't like using S4i while working out because they do slip out and won't stay in my ears. The water resistants I have no idea. I've never gotten mine wet. The sound to my opinion is great.
1186621
I no longer have this pair if headphones, however I didn't notice any difference between this pair, and any other pair I've owned in the past. They do have very good sound quality though
2019601
I've owned both and they are both good headphones. The Inspiration are on the heavier side compared to the extremely light weight Momentum. I was happy with the sound with both headphones but the Momentum are definitely better at everything.
1069327
I've worn both of these actually. And I've found the M50X's to be amazingly good for the price. They're extremely comfortable, and they're a good choice overall. Nonetheless, the P5's get the edge. The sound is neutral on both of them, but the P5's sound is a bit more nuanced, and true to the source material. (And if you're looking for something with thumping bass, neither of these are your friend - I'd look at beats for that). The P5's are also much more "luxurious". The padding, the presentation, and the details - everything is a step up, albeit at a heftier price tag. I would definitely recommend trying both out at a store if you can - it's a close one.
1684291
The bass response, while it will be audibly heard in extended lows will NOT be felt. It's more of a sounded punch than one you could feel compared to ATH-M50'S. That is an unfair comparison though because of the open design and closed difference on the m50's. These are the most comfortable headphones i've ever worn, though.
2243721
Thanks for your question. The 840 is a significantly better sounding headphone with richer tone. They are wonderful sounding phones
2244504
As a musician I'd say" so so" much like mostly all headphones that are bundled with a player . I very strongly recommend Sennheiser HD28 phones which sound really great , are lightweight and can be bought refurbished or used { or new } for a very low price considering the quality of sound .
600394
I have a large head and they are very tight on me. But they should be good for someone with a small head. Also they aren't as durable as you might expect. However, they do sound very nice and balanced. If you want some smaller headphones, I'd check out the Sennheiser 219, 229, and the 239. They are smaller yet still sound fantastic. I'd also recommend the Panasonic rp-htx7. The are nice, light, low profile, and have a fun sound signature.
649461
They're both really great and I doubt you'll be disappointed with either one of em. Both the headphone's sound quality appeal to your sense of music. I think your decision will have to rely on the physical body of the headphones. If you're looking for a lightweight headphone on-the-go type of style, I'd recommend the momentum 2.0. If you want heavier, tighter, more durable type with better passive noise cancellation get these. Of the two, the momentum is more comfortable. But I really love the noise cancellation of these.
1285891
If all you want is the highest quality regardless of price, Bose is usually the way to go. That said, these are very good in their own right and when you factor in the price difference you'll probably soon not really notice the difference unless you are constantly switching between the two. I bought these as a gift for my father who had these second to the Bose on his wish list due to the spec sheet (better high freq. suppression in Bose) - until I pointed out to him that according to his doctor's hearing tests for the past decade neither he nor his hearing aid are able to hear/replicate those frequencies - so the quality difference for him really is NOT noticeable. I have never used Beats nor know any who has, but reviews still rate the Bose higher - and for the money that the Beats cost - I'd probably stick with the Bose.