Is this better than the AT810 model
458026
All I can tell you is that I decided in favor of this one after researching the other models. I felt this to be the best value for the price, because I don't want to buy another for ten more years.
458027
Maria: I'm sorry, but I'm not familiar with the AT810 model so I can't compare the two shavers.
48643
The One is a newer better design in my opinion, but other than design differences the only true functional difference is that the 890 has RF.
2213772
A big difference for me was that the 8620 has duplex scanning. The 8610 does NOT have duplex scanning
1150528
I'm also looking at these two models, and would appreciate any comments as well. The DH810 is newer and will upconvert video to 1080p, while the DN1000 only upconverts to 1080i. Is this a big difference? The DH810 also supports Audio Return Channel, so you only need one HDMI cable to your tv and your tv can send audio back to the receiver Also no on-screen menu on the DH810 I'm still on the fence on this one, especially since the price of the DN1000 will continue to drop.
2055507
I bought both of these camera's the G7 for myself and the A710 for my father. On paper they are almost the same camera however out of the box there is a big difference. The A710 is a great high-end point and shoot camera, it takes normal AA batteries which can simplify the daily use of the camera i.e. on holiday no need to worry if you packed the charger or not, etc. The G7 has a better image quality. Also there are some mega high level configuration settings for the photographer enthusiast, 1st person and 2nd person flash etc. The A710 is lighter and more portable while the G7 is quite a bit larger and has a significant weight to it. Hope this helps. I bought both of these camera's the G7 for myself and the A710 for my father. On paper they are almost the same camera however out of the box there is a big difference. The A710 is a great high-end point and shoot camera, it takes normal AA batteries which can simplify the daily use of the camera i.e. on holiday no need to worry if you packed the charger or not, etc. The G7 has a better image quality. Also there are some mega high level configuration settings for the photographer enthusiast, 1st person and 2nd person flash etc. The A710 is lighter and more portable while the G7 is quite a... » Read More I bought both of these camera's the G7 for myself and the A710 for my father. On paper they are almost the same camera however out of the box there is a big difference. The A710 is a great high-end point and shoot camera, it takes normal AA batteries which can simplify the daily use of the camera i.e. on holiday no need to worry if you packed the charger or not, etc. The G7 has a better image quality. Also there are some mega high level configuration settings for the photographer enthusiast, 1st person and 2nd person flash etc. The A710 is lighter and more portable while the G7 is quite a bit larger and has a significant weight to it. Hope this helps. « Show Less
504974
They are pretty much the same razor - both offer a shave wet or dry and they both use the same heads. That being said, the shaving heads on the AT830 pivot while rotating, conforming to the face. The heads on the AT810 are totally stationary - they rotate only and DO NOT pivot. Worthwhile to trade up to the AT830 for the few extra bucks in order to get that close, comfortable shave. Gave the AT830 to my future son-in-law for Christmas 2012 and he LOVES it....no problems whatsoever.
1693257
I really can't tell you. I never used the AT875 as it was used when we received it so I returned it & ordered the AT895.I really like the AT895. It has a close shave & recharges quickly.
185971
The 861 is an improved model over the 860. It adjusts more easily for depth and placement, resulting in better alignment of dovetails.It is a better product than the 860... if you were to buy the 860, you will soon wish that you had paid extra for the 861, unless you're a very experienced router guy.
2068828
The one I just bought has the Aus8a. Still a great steel, if you want the new steel type, I'd wait a couple months.
810659
I prefer the more powerful ones like the 9280. I bought my daughter one also. It is well worth the money..
2214764
I've used the 1200 MK2's and the Audio Technica. The AT is built like a tank and very high quality. I use it with my tube amplifier and have a phono amp between the two. If you don't have a tube amp it's likely that the usual phono amp is sufficient.
1433289
Hello, the A7 uses your WIFI network, and it has a better sound quality. Not sure if the price difference is worth it buy they are both great products, cheers!
758058
Simple answer, the A10 is a better CPU/APU. The A8 however gives you a lot of bang for your buck. Consider the price difference and look at what your needs are. The A8 is a fine processor for most uses.
1344960
I would have to say, yes. The 800 is very nice but you get more sound with the 1000. Being 100watt over 80 watt gives you more power and 10 inch over 8 inch has more thump. The 1000 is more powerful all around. Smart buy over 800.
2132918
Dear Carlos, Thanks for your inquiry. The main addition to the AVR1610 is Bluetooth, which many people prefer over airplay. The AVR1700 is last year's model and the AVR1610 is newer, which many people prefer as well. The AVR1710 has replaced the AVR1700 in the Harman Kardon line. Please let me know if I can be of any additional assistance. Regards, Eric Cohen World Wide Stereo
1936131
Well the hs80m is the older model... the hs8s are newer.. pretty much the same.. I find the hs8s have a bit more hi's but other than that no difference... I still like the hs80m better IMO.
234743
They both essentially do the same thing but from all the reviews i read prior to buying, the AFN setup works better and was a better price as well. Therr was a lot more helpful info on the internet fir it too. I have fiund t to be a reliable easy to use item.