I'm getting a little frustrated at all these dishes &amp; pans that advertise themselves as extra deep, high sides, etc. 3 inches??? For lasagna??
462192
I love this pan. It is deeper than my previous lasagna pans, but I never actually measured it. I'm guessing it's about 2.5" deep. And it cleans up so easily. It's very sturdy, and I highly recommend it. It's a winner.
1368302
It was an incorrect order and we return them for full sheet pans. The depth seems to be about a half an inch.
1179047
I havent measured the depth of the pan but IMO it is pleanty deep enough for a "deep dish" pizza.. very good and sturdy pan!
712849
Very sadly, I just realized that the initial post was in 2008, the one reply was in 2009, it's now 2012 and still neither Amazon nor Cuisinart have come forward with better information! I just bought the 8 quart Multiclad and can firmly say that the diameter is about 10" and the height/depth is 8". It's a pretty flat pot - like a dutch oven. It was too small for my needs, so I'll be trying out the 12 quart.
894079
The pan is only 3" deep but if you are using it for a turkey or a roast, that is plenty of room. If you are using it for some specialized product, well it just isn't 4" deep. I cook for one or two and turkeys and roasts; it works fine for me.
1694188
The pan it's self is 2 1/2 to 2 3/4 inches deep.It is a very nice pan very happy with it.You can not find this type og pan in the stores in my area.
2067033
lol did not even realize the sizes are marked on the pans lol, here they are, the small pan 1.2QT next pan up 2.4QT next pan up 3.3QT then the skillet is 3.2QT the big pan is a 5QT, hope this helps dear, Happy shopping =)
2171260
Measured from the INSIDE of the dish, mine measured 2 7/16''. I think the other measurements are taken from the OUTSIDE of the dish which makes it sound much deeper. I think pyrex is measured from the outside also, but because this dish is so thick on the outside, it adds a lot of measurement that is NOT on the inside depth. I can get 4 layers of lasagna into this baby, and use it for large casseroles easily.
1291637
tough question. I would say that it is 80-90% of a traditional 13 x 9. that being said, last weekend my wife made lasagna for 8 with the pan without problem.
1786532
This is the widest ceramic dish I own. I haven't seen many others. It measures 5 inches at the top. There are ceramic dishes available without sides if you are using it for wet food. I found those at Pet Supplies Plus.
1401155
This varies from individual to individual. I don't know about you, but I have tried this a few times with the one that I bought and not had any success. My guess is that, for most people, a somewhat deeper pan is required, and it wouldn't hurt for it to be a bit larger in its lateral dimensions.
1094447
Cephalon makes a 9" by 13" deep sided pan that fits like a glove. High quality pan, too. Got mine cheap at Ross and only paid half-price....
314809
It's not your cabinets, it's the plates. I am a kitchen designer and ALL stock upper cabinets are only 12 inches deep on the OUTSIDE. Stupid to design plates that don't fit in them.
1227769
So, the LCS3 (which is currently priced at 22 and some change) is only a 10 inch diameter and has sloped sides measuring only at 1 3/4 in (might be 1 1/4 in I'm going off memory). The LK8S3 is 10.25 diameter and the sides are not sloped they are straight and measure 2 inches high. I just used the LK8S3 this morning for a fritata with eggs, red bell peppers, baby bellas, chopped kale, and sharp cheddar on top. I have a five person family and it is big enough to produce a yummy fritata that will feed us all. I start the meal on the stove top and finish in the oven. I like the high/straight sides of this dish because you could even bake a cake in it or a pot pie etc. I have a pan comparable to the LCS3 but it is smaller in diameter (I think an 8 or 9 in). Pans with a sloped side are great for sauting and performing cooking tasks that require moving the pan around to flip the food about. The LK8S3 is quite heavy so I could only assume the LCS3 "chef's" series skillet might be more pricey because it might be lighter weight for performing tasks that require flicking of the wrists and flipping without compromising the length of the diameter and the quality of the cast iron. Don't quote me on that, the last part is only an assumption. If you want an exact explanation I'm sure someone at Lodge would be happy to assist you. They probably have a contact link on their website. Hopefully I helped, I tried my best. Have a lovely day!
1196836
Did you mean the diameter, height etc? If so, they are provided in the product description section. For example, the casserole dish (0615-4) measures 13.2x11.5x3.8" at 5Qts. My own measurements are almost identical, varying by less than 0.25". I measured all of my pots and dishes again, and they are almost identical to what the manufacturer claims in their product dimension data set. The differences between mine and theirs is minimal, that is 0.25" are less. I hope this answers your question. Please let me know.
2114383
It's 14 1/2 inches long on an inside measurement, and around 15 1/2 inches outside, if you include the handles. It's 10 1/2 inches wide inside measurement, and almost 11 inches across including the "lip" at the top. It's a nice, sturdy pan. I like it for vegan lasagna dishes using zucchini and eggplant slices for the "noodle" part. The veggie noodles make the recipe too thick for regular lasagna pans, but this dish is roomy enough to stack everything high and cook it down slowly over time without bubbling over. If you're trying to cut carbs using veggie lasagna "noodles", this dish is a good investment. It's 14 1/2 inches long on an inside measurement, and around 15 1/2 inches outside, if you include the handles. It's 10 1/2 inches wide inside measurement, and almost 11 inches across including the "lip" at the top. It's a nice, sturdy pan. I like it for vegan lasagna dishes using zucchini and eggplant slices for the "noodle" part. The veggie noodles make the recipe too thick for regular lasagna pans, but this dish is roomy enough to stack everything high and cook it down slowly over time without bubbling over. If you're trying to cut carbs using veggie lasagna... » Read More It's 14 1/2 inches long on an inside measurement, and around 15 1/2 inches outside, if you include the handles. It's 10 1/2 inches wide inside measurement, and almost 11 inches across including the "lip" at the top. It's a nice, sturdy pan. I like it for vegan lasagna dishes using zucchini and eggplant slices for the "noodle" part. The veggie noodles make the recipe too thick for regular lasagna pans, but this dish is roomy enough to stack everything high and cook it down slowly over time without bubbling over. If you're trying to cut carbs using veggie lasagna "noodles", this dish is a good investment. « Show Less
1162572
The pan is about 2 1/2" deep on the sides and 3" deep at the midpoint. I love this pan and use it often! It's large enough for skillet lasagna and cleans up so easily.