Do the modulation effects sound better compared to the G1N, or it´s about the same, but only with more resources?
454312
Don't know to be honest as I've never tried the G1N. Looking at the specs side by side though the G3 is miles ahead. A worth while investment I would say.
454313
Good question, but I haven't use the G1N, that I can recall. I have use analog, and digital effects and a combination of those for years. The G3 has enabled to retire those things. In fact with a little Crate Power block, I can basically leave my amp at home or the recording studio. I now have a powerful combo, easy to carry and sounds great a little quieter with all the options I had before and only have to use two patch cords.
454314
I don't know for sure. I don't own a G1n, but If I were to guess, I would say that a single slot (screen) sounds like a g1n but combining more screens gives you possibilities that the G1n cant. I would guess that Zoom has a single-chip effects engine, and they combine them in 1 chip, 3 chip and 5 chip devices. Just a guess, but that's what makes sense from a manufacturer's standpoint.
1148758
G7 is an old model (2005), and it's 10 MP. Maybe you're looking at comments about a newer model, which I assume would have a different name like G16 or something.
90442
There's actually a difference. The treble around 10k Hz was reworked to not be so piercing, and the low bass got some work as well. Nothing major, but as far as sound goes, there are tiny changes based on previous feedback by customers.
24375
Well they're pretty much the same volume level. The remote sounds better though, replicating the sfx on the show. The remote's emitter needs to be extended to achieve that same volume level too. When it's retracted it sounds even quieter. But i wouldn't get it if you're planning on going mobile with it. Its a good chunk of change to risk breaking on the move or cosplaying , etc.
275679
G1n has no looper, G1n is older so the effects probably dont sound as good, and it has less effects and is larger more cumbersome. Might be better if you dont like fiddling with screens since it just has basic knobs on it, but no looper really makes it less valuable in my opinion
1794233
The bass sound is quite similar, perhaps a bit richer with this model, but the main advantages of the DGX650 are mainly found in the higher degree of bells and whistles, i.e. more sounds, more programs, better pedals, etc.
1644593
The S1 delivers a more full bodied sound, whereas the punchy sound of the M2 make it better for genres like rock and metal. If you listen to a wide genre of music then the S1 may be better.
745226
G2 is the newest flagship model made by super flowerB1 = FSP RaiderB2 = Cost down version of the Super Flower Golden GreenG1 = FSP Aurum Gold (with the exception of the 1000w G1 which should be a modified FSP Aurum Pro)G2 = Super Flower Leadex. From best to worst: G2 > B2 > G1 > B1, as such, I would recommend the G2 or the B2 depending on the price. Which the B2 is priced very well atm for around $49.99 or so - making it an excellent value (probably the best at this price range atmLong story short, G2 is about as good as you can get for the money if you want the best. Johnny Guru gave the G2 his highest scores and the B2 also got extremely great scores. G2 is the newest flagship model made by super flowerB1 = FSP RaiderB2 = Cost down version of the Super Flower Golden GreenG1 = FSP Aurum Gold (with the exception of the 1000w G1 which should be a modified FSP Aurum Pro)G2 = Super Flower Leadex. From best to worst: G2 > B2 > G1 > B1, as such, I would recommend the G2 or the B2 depending on the price. Which the B2 is priced very well atm for around $49.99 or so - making it an excellent value (probably the best at this price range atmLong story short, G2 is about as good as you can... » Read More G2 is the newest flagship model made by super flowerB1 = FSP RaiderB2 = Cost down version of the Super Flower Golden GreenG1 = FSP Aurum Gold (with the exception of the 1000w G1 which should be a modified FSP Aurum Pro)G2 = Super Flower Leadex. From best to worst: G2 > B2 > G1 > B1, as such, I would recommend the G2 or the B2 depending on the price. Which the B2 is priced very well atm for around $49.99 or so - making it an excellent value (probably the best at this price range atmLong story short, G2 is about as good as you can get for the money if you want the best. Johnny Guru gave the G2 his highest scores and the B2 also got extremely great scores. « Show Less
222955
They definitely do sound better. It's like a richer and fuller sound. The difference in the lower frequencies can be heard most significantly. For sound quality, I recommend highly.
1362947
I don't own a multi effects pedal, but I do have a large pedalboard. The only tone problem I've experienced is with the modulation delays, which isn't really that bad.
1319160
Keeley is a boutique compressor (hence its price tag), so it would be hard to compare anything to it. The G1XN manual says: "This is a MXR Dynacomp type compressor", so you'd be better off testing a MXR first. The G1XN offers 9 preset levels to choose from. When combined with a mild drive setting (like the Fender '65 Twin Reverb) it boosts the signal with very pleasant results. With heavier drive options (Like the Peavey 5150) a very strong sustain can be achieved.
333897
I personally find the RAT a lot less noisy in my chain and I like the nuances I get from the filter knob and hence the different kinds of distortion I get from it. But then again I guess it's a matter of personal preference and taste. I personally would pick the RAT over the Big Muff anytime but I'm sure there are others out there who think otherwise. Also, if you play on-stage live I really appreciate the clear light on this RAT especially when it's dark on stage. It's a lot easier to change the battery too if you are not connected to a power source. I realise these are not sonic features but as I stated above I am hesitant to say one sounds better than another because it really depends on your taste. I'd recommend you try out a few candidates at the store first to figure out the sound you wanna get and go from there.
702911
I haven't tried UE boom, but I have tried Big Jambox. There isn't much difference in sound quality. Battery life is more in Jambox though. But the price difference isn't justifiable. TDK won't disappoint
1232155
Although I have a bass, I have never tried it through the G5...but I was thnking about it just last week. It is possible to get bass like sounds out of a guitar, but its not ideal. I was considering using a real bass to just layer in something with the looper function then switch back to 6 string for overdubs. I see no reason why the effects, EQs, compressors etc wouldn't work fine. I doubt you'd get much mileage out of the amp models and distortion stomps though - or the tube booster circuit. I guess it could be quite creative (with the z-pedal!), or it could be a reasonable tool for tailoring a sound...can't vouch for it just yet though I'm afraid.
1503517
That significantly had an effect on the sound quality. The X-230 sounds a lot better in comparison. I get a more surround sound feel with the X-230, but I can't say the same about the X-240's. Easily X-230 > X-240.
1124511
I've never listened to the G10. Reviews for the G10 look good though. Either one you get, you'll be happy. If you place a value on listening to music, it's easily worth the money.
1331055
I own the 880, G10, and also the 990. The G10 and 990's images seem to have more clarity than the 880, and I had virtually unnoticable noise in my night light shots of Las Vegas. Both the G10 and 990 have more megapixels (almost 15), but they also have the same larger sensor to accomodate the pixel increase. If you want one a bit larger with more control, buy the G10. If you love the G10, want basically the same image quality, but want something more compact, you might want to consider the "baby sister", the 990 .