HX9V vs HX7V: Curious how these two compare besides the difference in the 16x to 10x lens?
449840
Besides the longer zoom, the lens on the "9" is also slightly faster [f 3.3 vs the f 3.5 on the "7"]. Therefore, it should [theoretically] have better IQ in low light situations.
2038040
Both have VR so the sharpening factor should not be something to worry about. I don't know how the ISO of the D610 works, but i have a Nikon D700, and in low light conditions, with ISO 8000 with a 4F works just fine. Of course you could make it better if you work in RAW. You can drastically improve the result of your photos. But, if you want the best result, always, always go for the 24-70, 2.8F. thats the best lens there is.
914061
The question is a little vague, but you are probably asking about differences between the H-VS014140 and the H-FS14140k. The FS is four years newer, 40% lighter than the VS and superior in most respects, although it is more expensive. The FS is an excellent lens.
263538
i just couldn't justify spending another $1500 MORE over the 80-200mm for 10 mm more low end range and VR .. which is just marketing hype in all but a few situations. its right up there with polarized lenses.
359952
Look up "Imaging Resource" website. There is a very cool "Comparometer" (look on the left side, "Compare Sample Images). I, too, am trying to decide between the ZS7 and the HX5V. My biggest beef (in particular, with the Fuji F80, which I returned), is with over-processed images wiping out facial tone. I'm worried the Sony does that a bit, but it seems to retain some of the Fuji's low light magic. It's a shame the ZS7 went up on megapixels and therefore lost resolution in processing out noise. (Compare the house photos between the two on the Comparometer. The ZS3 clearly wins. Look up "Imaging Resource" website. There is a very cool "Comparometer" (look on the left side, "Compare Sample Images). I, too, am trying to decide between the ZS7 and the HX5V. My biggest beef (in particular, with the Fuji F80, which I returned), is with over-processed images wiping out facial tone. I'm worried the Sony does that a bit, but it seems to retain some of the Fuji's low light magic. It's a shame the ZS7 went up on megapixels and therefore lost resolution in processing out noise. (Compare the house photos between the two on the Comparometer. The ZS3... » Read More Look up "Imaging Resource" website. There is a very cool "Comparometer" (look on the left side, "Compare Sample Images). I, too, am trying to decide between the ZS7 and the HX5V. My biggest beef (in particular, with the Fuji F80, which I returned), is with over-processed images wiping out facial tone. I'm worried the Sony does that a bit, but it seems to retain some of the Fuji's low light magic. It's a shame the ZS7 went up on megapixels and therefore lost resolution in processing out noise. (Compare the house photos between the two on the Comparometer. The ZS3 clearly wins. « Show Less
1380699
I tried both, sent this one back. There is noticeable difference in sharpness when zoomed in.
619965
The main difference is the size, the 7x is big but the 9x is huge; also another difference is the laptop compartment 9x doesn't have one; strongly recommend to go to Tamrac's site and review both bags. I have the 7X and it is really heavy when fully loaded, personally I wouldn't recommend the 9x unless you need to pack really big lenses.
440164
I had no trouble making the choice for the LX3. The only real advantage of the G10 is the zoom range, and even though my previous camera was a Panasonic DMC-TZ5, with a fantastic 10x zoom, I never used it. The f/2.0 lens and the dynamic black and white mode sold me. Now that I have it I absolutely love my LX3.
1565365
Typically i would recommend sticking with the Panny lens as they usually don't have in body stabilization in body, however in this case the GX7 does have it. Decide what you prefer, slightly and i really mean slight advantage for the Oly in resolving power or the slight improvement in light gathering and typically cheaper price for the Panny.
1892766
You're welcome! Now, if I could just figure out what camera to get for myself ... *grin* I have a limited budget and haven't bought a decent new camera since my Minolta Maxxum 7000 35mm back in 1985!! If it was still functioning, I probably would be happy to go on with it. But, the older I get the less I feel like lugging around a big bag of equipment. So, this G7 may be the answer to my prayers. Can't wait to see how it tests out.Off to read your NV7 review ... WOW that's a slick looking model, isn't it?
1030209
Nikon's P90 also had pretty weak reviews. Best from 2009 was the Sony HX1.I am seeking to get Fuji HS10 by March 20 (in time for a vacation departure).
754196
Speaking from my experience with the Rokinon 8mm, which is a little wider than your 10-22, it is noticeably less wide. At lower focal ranges the difference between a few mm's is more significant than when higher. This lens has very little to no distortion which is the reason i finally made the switch form the much wider 8mm, and honestly you get more detail when zoomed in a little more.
465321
Depends on your current and future needs. I have the 17-40 and am happy with it. I also have a full frame camera and that was why I brought this lens.The 17-40 will act as a 27-64 on the 70D while the 10-22 is a EF-S lens which will not work if you ever want to upgrade to full frame.
542766
I just upgraded to the A99 from my A65 (keeping both, and some of my prime lenses that will work on the A99 also). If you shoot a lot of low light and portrait photography (I do) or serious professional work full frame is a big improvement for noise and a better sensor. If you shoot a lot of daylight subjects and sports type photography, and don't want to carry around a much heavier (and slower) camera, or invest in a group of new lenses (the 24-70 Zeiss zoom cost as much as the camera body) you might want to look at the A77II. FYI a lot of the older Minolta lenses are compatible with the A99 and can be had for much cheaper than the full frame Sony lenses. I just upgraded to the A99 from my A65 (keeping both, and some of my prime lenses that will work on the A99 also). If you shoot a lot of low light and portrait photography (I do) or serious professional work full frame is a big improvement for noise and a better sensor. If you shoot a lot of daylight subjects and sports type photography, and don't want to carry around a much heavier (and slower) camera, or invest in a group of new lenses (the 24-70 Zeiss zoom cost as much as the camera body) you might want to look at the A77II. FYI a lot of the older Minolta lenses are compatible with the... » Read More I just upgraded to the A99 from my A65 (keeping both, and some of my prime lenses that will work on the A99 also). If you shoot a lot of low light and portrait photography (I do) or serious professional work full frame is a big improvement for noise and a better sensor. If you shoot a lot of daylight subjects and sports type photography, and don't want to carry around a much heavier (and slower) camera, or invest in a group of new lenses (the 24-70 Zeiss zoom cost as much as the camera body) you might want to look at the A77II. FYI a lot of the older Minolta lenses are compatible with the A99 and can be had for much cheaper than the full frame Sony lenses. « Show Less
863040
I actually own both, and it's obvious that the lens is amazing. I shot a wedding with this combination and my other camera is a d7000 with a 17-55mm 2.8. My experience was hit and miss, just because the ISO is horrible on the D3100. In all honesty it all depends on what kind of shooting you are doing. If you will be shooting outside and in very low ISO - 400 or less - then you won't ever complain about too much noise on your images. The VRll is a monster of a lense, I would go for an used VRl. In my opinion this lens or the VRl are a great addition to any camera. Hope this helps
1268392
Besides the focal length and the "Vibration Reduction " feature, almost nothing. A while back the price for the 10-30mm was higher for the VR. Now that they are the same, like someone said, why bother unless you just like to have a full camera bag like myself.
2151080
One is 3x-9x power/zoom, the other is 4x-12x power/zoom. There is no advantage as they are both vx-2, however, one of them zooms further than the other.