Is this a good first lens for the nikon d90? I plan on using it both at night and during the day.
521136
Yes it is a good lense. I have the 35mm as we'll. if you are going to be taking more picture inside than out, I would go with the 35mm. If more outside then the 50mm. Both do an excellent job.
1408822
This isn't a wide angle lens. If you want to take daylight shots at a wide angle, your best bet is the kit lens (the 10-30mm) all the way bumped out, or looking for a lens with a focal length of less than 10mm (as printed on the Nikon 1 lens). I've read that the kit lens is very good for outdoor, daylight photography like this (however I'm no expert) This lens is "fast" (f/1.8) compared to other Nikon 1 lenses, and is useful for taking photos in lower light conditions, and situations where you want a blurred background (subject oriented shots, like portraits).
2120239
It will do well for portraits and close-up macro photography with enough light. I do like this lens for what it delivers for its price. It does hunt in low-light though, but if you know its application it is fine.
1579277
IR and nightvison are two different things for most people. Which are you asking for? This is an IR (infrared)filter that blocks most of the visible light in order to use IR to make the exposure. So using this filter at night would be tough since in the dark you will lose all autofocusing. You would need an IR source to use it at all and it would need to be fairly strong and/or pretty close to the subject. Depending on the camera, you may or may not get decent false coloring. But no matter what you will need to process the image after shooting it to be either B/W or false color. It will be seriously red. You will give up some clarity so dont be surprised. I have a sample of this lens on a D700 on my G+ page. https://plus.google.com/u/0/photos/101688838116518955904/albums/5803489596685783889
199946
I would look through customer reviews and see if anyone has had good results with a D90. I use this lens on my D3100 & D3200 with great results and most of the lenses for those models are compatible with a D90. Also, check the Sigma website for camera compatibility.
1329390
This lens would be a disaster for action at night. It's manual focus, the maximum aperture is f/8, there's no vibration reduction. As a matter of fact, it would barely be usable for action in full daylight. Sorry... if you want to shoot action at night, you're going to need a fast lens and a camera body that will do high ISO.
827133
It's a good lens for my needs. I have found the 18-300mm type lenses just don't do all that well, I think too much range to cover but this does well and being a f/2.8 it's better for darker shots. Heavier than a kit lens but worth it in my opinion.
558459
This lens is second to none. It has great contrast and clarity even at f/2.8. It has low distortion, focuses quickly, accepts filters, and works on full-frame cameras as well as "cropped sensor" DX ones. And if you hit someone with it, they'll probably go down. If you have a DX camera, you can save money by compromising on some of those features. Tokina's 16-50 f/2.8 DX lens is well-regarded and perhaps the closest to the Nikon 17-35. It's supposedly sharp and has good contrast both wide open and stopped down. It's solidly built. Landscape shooters like it. $600 Nikon's 12-24 f/4G DX lens is also very good. It might be too wide for you. $1000 Nikon's 16-85 f/3.5-5.6 DX is good, though not in the same class. $675 Note that I have experience only with the 17-35 (bought used). The rest is based on conversations with people who own those lenses.
1455747
Yes, and it is a great lens! You will be amazed at how well it works in low light, as well!
1408821
This isn't a wide angle lens. If you want to take daylight shots at a wide angle, your best bet is the kit lens (the 10-30mm) all the way bumped out, or looking for a lens with a focal length of less than 10mm (as printed on the Nikon 1 lens). I've read that the kit lens is very good for outdoor, daylight photography like this (however I'm no expert)This lens is "fast" (f/1.8) compared to other Nikon 1 lenses, and is useful for taking photos in lower light conditions, and situations where you want a blurred background (subject oriented shots, like portraits).
1476725
I'm using this lens for long range stills... like a shot of a full moon I have it mounted on a Nikon D3100 with a doubler 2X making it a 1000mm Zoom lens. The first thing I noticed was that I couldn't hold it still enough to take a picture without some sort of stabilizer (recommend a tripod), the second thing is the light was really low, which for my purpose was perfect. I haven't tried it for any moving objects.
309663
Yes, it will work on the D90. Just make sure you order it for a Nikon, so they send the correct T-mount. Remember that this lens is a fully manual item, that means you have to focus manually and set ISO and Shutter speed yourself.
1784426
The lens is great for all around use. Tack sharp and worth every penny. If you plan on moving full frame it's worth it. On a DX body it will act like a 36-105. It's a bit on the weighty side but not over bearing. I have found the images have a certain pop to them that most other lenses can't provide unless they have the nano coating. Your other option is the great 17-55 which is designed for DX cameras. Look online there are some great reviews. If money isn't an issue go for it.
782910
If you are going to shoot where there will be plenty of light, then yes this lens will be okay. Here I hope these videos helps you, since I am still experimenting with this lens. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ap0NQfWuKKEhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N5wZAvUmPUA
1709380
It's a solid lens with good range. If you plan on using it outside, then the lighting should be ample to take the type of shots you're seeking. I have found that indoor shooting is not its strength. But the shots I've gotten are clear and I've been pleased with it. The additional range has come in handy.
1390409
Yes. That was the lens on my D50 until it was stolen (by a NYC cabbie, BTW). Very light, and surprisingly competent lens but slow. Nice color saturation, decent contrast and given its small max aperture, decently sharp too. The D50 is not a good high ISO camera (none of these early CCD cameras created decent images beyond ISO 400) and this lens' maximum aperture of f/5.6 at 55mm doesn't help matters in dim or failing light.
1125760
No, its not "THE" best, but it is one of the best. It is a sharp, quick lens, quite good for low lighting or for a fabulous bokeh. It should be part of your arsenal for sure; I know its part of mine. Cheers