which is a better cable the M1000HD-HDMI 17.8 gbps,or the ISF 125O HDMI 17.8 gbps both are monster cables
510289
Save your money and purchase an Amazon HDMI cable. I use them and they are perfect in every way.
510290
Save your money and buy a cheaper cable. You will not notice a difference. Also Monster does not honour their so called warranty. I am saying this from experience.
510291
Neither one. Save $100+ and order an Amazon, Monoprice, Blue Jeans Cable, etc brand cable. They all do the EXACT SAME THING as the Monster cables but cost a fraction of the price.
510292
Cables don't make any noticeable difference, especially digital cables. Save your $$ and buy the cheapest cable. If you have money to burn, give them to me : ) and I'll help you put them to better use.
510293
The isf cable is newer. I bought the m1000 right as the isf came out. I'm satisfied with my m1000 though. If you want the best and newest, go with the isf. If you don't mind last years newest and best then go with the m1000. M1000 is probably cheaper though.
159894
Honestly, my cable actually looks different. Mine says "new higher performance" and mine is labeled 17.8 gbps. The one u are looking at must be 15.8 gbps. I See it also says it on the box. I would try to get the one that I have, it does look different, it's new higher performance model. Chances are unless your tv is above 240hz than I wouldn't worry too much.
637467
I have no knowledge of the other cable. I bought the best value at the time. I would guess that the difference would be the thickness of the outer cover or the density of the wires themselves. Hope this helps you make your decisipn
969782
I believe these cables are HDMI 2.0 certified and thus will support bandwidth of up to 18 Gbps
2222073
I use the gold plated DVI-D dual link cable with Ferrites, and I have great Quality High Definition picture, speed and graphics.
1296556
Get a couple of these from Monoprice Monoprice Ultra Slim Series 15ft 10.2Gbps High Performance HDMI® Cable w/ RedMere® Technology Supports Ethernet, 3D, 4K and Audio Return - White
194705
LOOK for the WORDS in " RETAIL PACKAGING " Etc. !!! I have Bought & RETURNED , many " Monster HDMI " (???) in ZIP LOCKS & Boxes but, NOT " NEW " !!! There are MANY 17.8 Gbps HDMI Cables on SALE due to the NEW 18 Gbps !!! I got 0NE for $30.00 and 2 for $20.00 a month later :o))
1480991
Yes. I prefer the VideoSecu MF608B. Sturdier and comes with a 10ft HDMI for about the same cost.
403846
the Belkin high speed HDMI cable is 2.0/4K compatible if that helps and on Amazon you can get one for around $12-$13
15502
If you have digital cable service that includes HD channels, or a HD source such as a Blue-Ray player or a HD DVD player, you will need to purchase some HDMI cables. Remember, you have to have the HDMI cables to get the full effect of high definition. They sell them here for cheap. You can find HDMI cables here for about $2-10, which is an absolute steal. Don't let anyone tell you that you have to get Monster cables. They are a complete rip off!
170565
Not sure of the exact specs on this cable,but I get no bottleneck,even on 3D.The Mediabridge Ultra(red/black) IS speced out to provide 10.2 Gbps.I would suggest you look at that one.I hope this helps,the cost of the Ultra is negligable as compared to the Flex.
390137
I was soo close to getting the 4081, but then the 750 series came around, and had the usb & lan inputs, plus the 750 has a better viewing angle 178* as opposed to 4081's 170* hdmi ports didn't make any difference to me. I saw the lan input as a possible upgrading futureproofing option (downloading new firmware and such).
1856515
My son has an iPad and I have used it with the M115HD. The connector I use is the Apple Digital AV Adapter (MD098ZM/A) which converts it from Apple Thunderbolt (Apple's micro-HDMI derivative) to HDMI. You will need to purchase an HDMI cable to interface between the adapter and the TV or M115HD Projector. The adapter and HDMI cable can be ordered from Amazon, Apple, or an electronic store. I hope this helps.
370611
No you won't I've been using this cable for about a 3 weeks now for a 3d projector. No complaints at all. A friend of mine said there would be a difference in quality, so I connected a $130 cable to compare and he couldn't tell a difference between the 2. Hope this helps.
9158
I purchased 1.3a category 2 certified 28AWG 6 ft hdmi cables through monoprice that work equally well with the Steren gold-tipped video cables provided by my cable company. The cable guy told me they are equivalent, and I would agree with that after having compared them myself. However the cable guy did also tell me that optical audio cables would be needed to match the quality that hdmi cables would provide. I do not have a surround sound system so can't judge the difference on that. Ultimately I went with the hdmi cables because there is only one plug on each end and so simpler to disconnect and reconnect if need be. PS I also compared top of the line Monster Cable HDMI (over $100 each!) to the monoprice $5 cables and couldn't tell any difference. This is on a Sony 1080p xbr4 120hz tv with a Playstation 3 for Blu Ray/dvd player. I say if component cables work better for you, go with them.
653801
i've had really great results with the "cables to go" hdmi cable. $10 a piece here at amazon. they work just as well as the $70 monster cable i also have. if i still had the box for the monster cable, i would return it and get another "cables to go" cable.
311969
The only difference is the length of the cable. As for performance wise it really would not make any difference. It is a very good cable, excellent to say the least. Great construction on the cable and it performs very well. And yes there is a difference on the video end or tv display. It is solid copper, not copper clad cable. I have used monster cables for quite a while, mainly for my tv & home theater set-up. From HDMI Cables & fiber optic cables. And also the monster cable < cat 6 > for my internet to my pc & as i have AT&T; U-verse i have the monter cat 6 from the moden to the u-verse set top box. And the picture & audio is excellent. Go ahead and use monster cable, as you will not regret it... The only difference is the length of the cable. As for performance wise it really would not make any difference. It is a very good cable, excellent to say the least. Great construction on the cable and it performs very well. And yes there is a difference on the video end or tv display. It is solid copper, not copper clad cable. I have used monster cables for quite a while, mainly for my tv & home theater set-up. From HDMI Cables & fiber optic cables. And also the monster cable < cat 6 > for my internet to my pc & as i have AT&T; U-verse i have the monter cat 6 from the moden to the... » Read More The only difference is the length of the cable. As for performance wise it really would not make any difference. It is a very good cable, excellent to say the least. Great construction on the cable and it performs very well. And yes there is a difference on the video end or tv display. It is solid copper, not copper clad cable. I have used monster cables for quite a while, mainly for my tv & home theater set-up. From HDMI Cables & fiber optic cables. And also the monster cable < cat 6 > for my internet to my pc & as i have AT&T; U-verse i have the monter cat 6 from the moden to the u-verse set top box. And the picture & audio is excellent. Go ahead and use monster cable, as you will not regret it... « Show Less