Is there a difference between the A33 and the treck a44. they look the same and someone commented that the sound is the same?
519942
I think it allows you to answer a call and has longer battery life. Although I don't get the advertised (8 hrs) battery life but if you keep the volume down and use a direct cable audio it does last longer. I like the sound and the blue-tooth works real good. It can connect to NFC enabled devices.
519943
I hope your seeking difference between A33 and A34 ( not A44). They look almost the same, but there are some noticeable difference between the two.1. Connect your device by tapping your device. (via NFC)2. Conrol buttons like play/pause, next, previous track.3. Better battery life, though it could have been better.
519944
I don't know about sound. The main difference is that the A34 allows for skipping (forward/backward) and play/pausing right on the speaker itself without going to the Bluetooth device to change the track. Although they look the same, the A34 is a little bigger and a bit heavier than the A33. I'd assume that because it's bigger, it may have slightly bigger speakers, giving it bigger/better sound. And supposedly there it has a long battery life (~8 hours).
519945
The A34 offers some improvement in sound quality over the A33 (see David Carnoy's review of the A34 TREK Max on CNET).
519946
Regarding the sound difference: The A34 sounds "brighter" in the mids and highs while the A33 sounds more "warm" and laid back like a tube amp. I have both and it's really difficult to decide which I like more. In addition to what other people have said about the buttons and battery, the A33 also has a kickstand to steady bass-heavy songs and point it more at an angle.
1369104
More same than different. The new UE model (this one) is 1.5 inches taller and half an inch deeper. The handle makes up the bulk of the extra height which the old one didn't have. The driver configuration is almost identical, 2 tweeters, 2 3inch woofers, and slightly bigger 2.5" passive radiators (old one had 2" radiators). The sound is near identical except the new one has more bass because of the larger radiators. The price went up quite a bit from $150 to $250 MSRP. I own the old one and still very satisfied with its low/mid/high balance. If you don't mind the lack of a handle and buying used, the old fine is a great deal. More same than different. The new UE model (this one) is 1.5 inches taller and half an inch deeper. The handle makes up the bulk of the extra height which the old one didn't have. The driver configuration is almost identical, 2 tweeters, 2 3inch woofers, and slightly bigger 2.5" passive radiators (old one had 2" radiators). The sound is near identical except the new one has more bass because of the larger radiators. The price went up quite a bit from $150 to $250 MSRP. I own the old one and still very satisfied with its low/mid/high balance. If you don't... » Read More More same than different. The new UE model (this one) is 1.5 inches taller and half an inch deeper. The handle makes up the bulk of the extra height which the old one didn't have. The driver configuration is almost identical, 2 tweeters, 2 3inch woofers, and slightly bigger 2.5" passive radiators (old one had 2" radiators). The sound is near identical except the new one has more bass because of the larger radiators. The price went up quite a bit from $150 to $250 MSRP. I own the old one and still very satisfied with its low/mid/high balance. If you don't mind the lack of a handle and buying used, the old fine is a great deal. « Show Less
1947425
yes and no. How serious is your in home movie theatre. The difference is in the sound specs. The A35 allows for HDMI pass through to a top of the line 7.1 channel receiver without any modification to the sound by the hd dvd unit. In the A30 the sound tracks are 'dealt with' for lack of a better term and thus not a pure for use in serious high end audio home equipment--This is a very loose explaination (broad)...just go read the audio specs of the A35 and A30 and you will see ..picture quality-no difference. I'm not using high end audio stuff so I bought the 30. In time I'll convert a spare room over to a full blown theatre..at that time I'll just up grade to whatever model line has long passed the A35. yes and no. How serious is your in home movie theatre. The difference is in the sound specs. The A35 allows for HDMI pass through to a top of the line 7.1 channel receiver without any modification to the sound by the hd dvd unit. In the A30 the sound tracks are 'dealt with' for lack of a better term and thus not a pure for use in serious high end audio home equipment--This is a very loose explaination (broad)...just go read the audio specs of the A35 and A30 and you will see ..picture quality-no difference. I'm not using high end audio stuff so I bought the 30. In time I'll convert a spare... » Read More yes and no. How serious is your in home movie theatre. The difference is in the sound specs. The A35 allows for HDMI pass through to a top of the line 7.1 channel receiver without any modification to the sound by the hd dvd unit. In the A30 the sound tracks are 'dealt with' for lack of a better term and thus not a pure for use in serious high end audio home equipment--This is a very loose explaination (broad)...just go read the audio specs of the A35 and A30 and you will see ..picture quality-no difference. I'm not using high end audio stuff so I bought the 30. In time I'll convert a spare room over to a full blown theatre..at that time I'll just up grade to whatever model line has long passed the A35. « Show Less
1994977
According to a website I found online: "ATH-ANC33iS is a highly similar but noticeably superior sequel, now with 13mm drivers, a slightly less fancy housing, and a one-button remote and microphone unit." Here is the link: http://www.ilounge.com/index.php/reviews/entry/audio-technica-ath-anc33is-quietpoint-active-noise-cancelling-in-ear-headph/
1152931
When auditioning the A7 also took a Marantz Consolette for comparison. While the Consolette looked great with that shiny walnut back it didn't match up in overall musicality. The A7's bass is a bit more pronounced and cleaner sounding, the overall experience of the A7 a bit more musically rewarding. I went A7.
726202
I'm an armature photographer.. but have explored both d3100 and a33.. 1) similar image quality.. 2) both do 1080p HD video with auto focus but sony gets a bit warm (hot for some) while video recording.. although I've yet to record for this long 3) sony is a tiny bit smaller.. check out their detailed reviews at dpreview.com.. they helped me make my decision..
1700501
the 330 got much better reviews than the 340- I was going to buy the 340 but instead bought the 330 which I love so much I bought a second one as a spare- pics are awesome!
580220
It fit my a300 fine and to my knowledge the 330 & tbe 300 is the same body just different internal components. Fyi ... this is not a true sony product. They advertise it as such and it is not. This is an Chinese copy but it still works. I sent them an email bitching about false advertising and they refunded me 40%
722419
I think the internals are exactly the same (but I haven't verified). I think the only difference is the DA34X is metal and the DA34 is plastic.
2015593
When I have had the problem it is because the A33 is already paired with another device (when turned on, it seems to pair with the last device that it was paired with). Make sure that bluetooth is turned off on all of the other devices in the area.
513301
I bought one for use on the a33 and it worked perfectly. It is a great lens.
961818
I happen to own both models... They both sound tlhe same at reference levels, however the egged one is better for music.
1963275
I have a 2006 A4 with Audi symphony and after ordering was told it wouldn't work but a more expensive version would. I'd be cautious! Note: if I buy I'll purchase from Otto navi.
474309
The biggest difference is A35's capability to output uncompressed HD audio (DolbyHD and DTS HD) over HDMI connection. A30 and others decodes it on the player itself and outputs the decoded audio stream. This allows you to take advantage of your AV receiver's (if you have it, that is - such receivers just started coming into market) capability to decode HD audio.
424645
Overall, the sonic and tonal quality is similar, but there are going to be subtle differences between the RX-A830 and RX-A1030 depending on the speakers and source connection. The RX-A1030 (and up) use different Digital to Analog Converters (DACs) than the RX-A830, and can offer a bit more clarity and detail in some situations (with digital inputs as opposed to Analog). Much depends on the capabilities and requirements of the speakers - Since the amplifier power output of these two receivers is fairly similar, there will not be a dramatic sonic difference with typical "mainstream" speakers that are reasonably easy to drive, particularly from analog sources. But, the ESS DACs in the RX-A1030 can offer that slight improvement, and for some it's enough improvement to pay the difference.
1505274
Hello Subhakar, the difference between this two senheiser, well both are the same, both sound amazing, great bass response. Check the senheiser webpage, you will find the details. For me, both models are the same in sound. try the cx 300b mk ii. Take care, rock on.
1527824
Thanks for your question. This will not replace the LR44--You may look for its alternate which is referred to as A76. I hope this helps!