What are the differences between the 500 and the 500xs? Besides age! Thank You!
497246
You are correct! It is the ATH-A500 that is closed-back. Audio Technica's model numbers for these headphones are so similar, I got them mixed up. As far as what major differences there are between the AD500 and the AD500X, there I can't help you much. They are both relatively inexpensive, so I would just buy the one that you can get the best deal on and eventually get the other one and compare them, then sell the one that is less good. I've done this many times myself.
497247
The ATH-AD500 are closed-back. The ATH-AD500X are open-back. Closed-back headphones tend to have a stronger bass response and isolation from ambient noise but sound more 'closed in'. Open-back headphones tend to have a weaker bass response, have no sound isolation and are very audible by other people that may be sitting near you, but have a more 'open and spacious' sound quality. Most of the high-end audiophile headphones tend to be open-back.
1888532
Just went through this debate myself. In the store, my husband noticed how different the screens were. The 500 series was much brighter than the 300 and sure enough, it states so on the garmin comparison page. Here's your link, hope it helps. http://www.garmin.com/garmin/cms/us/ontheroad/streetpilotcseries
1225985
I have the SX, the difference between the SX and CX is the blade (SX has combo blade) and the CX has the Carbon Fiber frame. I carry it every day and have the replaceable bit set to go along with it. It's like having a small toolbox in my pocket.
1230857
The pedals on the t500 are WAY better, but the wheel deck is probably a little better on the t300. Not much. I would take the T500 all day long.
2078344
I own both. Bought one of first 18-200s made in Japan to go with my first dslr: D50 that I got for a trip to the Bahamas. Have wonderful images I still enjoy. Now have lightweight D5000 and super D7000. Bought 18-140 for light weight to hike w/D5000. Use 28-200 w/D7000 otherwise. Both focus quickly, iq is similar. Both have VR but 200 has active mode for shooting while moving, which I love. So 140 wins on weight, price, while 200 adds focal length and versatile VR.
1064894
I would suggest reading the reviews on CNET.com & AMAZON.com for in-depth information from users. Personally I love it! But there is a learning curve to the X500, but that's due to the plethora of features & options for each shot. You can get as close as 2" away, if there's enough light, for great micro-shots. Compare them feature for feature, & whichever matches your photography style best will be your choice. I generally keep mine in auto mode & have it at the ready. It hasn't let me down yet... I am also building a recipe book & the food picts looks mighty tasty! For the features, 16MP & the price I would choose the GE again! I would suggest reading the reviews on CNET.com & AMAZON.com for in-depth information from users. Personally I love it! But there is a learning curve to the X500, but that's due to the plethora of features & options for each shot. You can get as close as 2" away, if there's enough light, for great micro-shots. Compare them feature for feature, & whichever matches your photography style best will be your choice. I generally keep mine in auto mode & have it at the ready. It hasn't let me down yet... I am also building a recipe book & the food picts looks mighty tasty! For the features,... » Read More I would suggest reading the reviews on CNET.com & AMAZON.com for in-depth information from users. Personally I love it! But there is a learning curve to the X500, but that's due to the plethora of features & options for each shot. You can get as close as 2" away, if there's enough light, for great micro-shots. Compare them feature for feature, & whichever matches your photography style best will be your choice. I generally keep mine in auto mode & have it at the ready. It hasn't let me down yet... I am also building a recipe book & the food picts looks mighty tasty! For the features, 16MP & the price I would choose the GE again! « Show Less
335910
Hey bro, the new T500RS is very good, really strong and very quiet. You can trust!
1059674
Both are pretty good. When I was in the market, I got a deal where I could 5005 for the price of 3005 so just bought them.
1334835
You'd be better off with the razor series probably the 500 or 650. It's battery powered less expensive and easier to ride and maintain
1678424
Can't seem to find any difference between the two. Both come with 2011/136x/115x part. Both look visually the same, both have the same pump. Perhaps just a different naming code from the factory? I would buy the $50 one. I have it, and it runs like a beaut.
1881677
HI, I'm not sure what the difference is between the two models, even after looking at them on the prodecotech.com website. All I can say is that I'm VERY pleased with the bike I bought, Genesis 500, and my wife is over the moon about her bike the Strider 250. I suggest you call the company and ask them about the difference between the Genesis 500 and the Storm 500?
509390
this is either the 500 or 500xt. i believe the difference is the load stops either not included(500) or included(500xt). when i bought mine the load stops were NOT included. best bet is to ask the seller.
2188986
First off, the 4960x came out in September 2013, and the 3970x was released in Nov 2012! They are both unlocked, so on that level they are the same. The 4960x is a 3.6Ghz (Turbo 4GHz), the 3970x is a 3.5Ghz (turbo 4GHz), so the 4960x is a LITTLE faster Ghz wise on standard setting, not turbo mode. The 3970x can be overclocked a little more than 4960x. 4960x Overclock Speed (4.75GHz) vs. 3970x Overclock Speed (4.99GHz). HOWEVER, The 4960x single core & multi core performance is better than the 3970x. The 4960x uses slightly less power (105.63w) vs the 3970x (121.88w). When all is said and done, the 4960x is slightly better than the 3960x. IF you have the money, I'd go with the 4960x as it is slightly better on MOST benchmarking programs. As you can see they are VERY, VERY SIMILAR. The 4960x is better, but only slightly! I know its a lot of money, but I'd go with the 4960x if you have the money to spend... If not, then I'd stick with the 3970x! I hope this is useful and helps! Thanks, Andrew PS. The first time I answered the question I thought you said 1960x, so I had to redo the answer - sorry about that. Hope that didn't create a problem for you. If you have any other questions, you are more than welcome to go to my website and ask me a question there: cuttingedgellc dot biz. Go to the contact portion of the site and I'm happy to give you the tech spec's sheet that I have on those 2 proc's and a lot more info if needed! Again, sorry for the trouble!
1993735
I agree with Mr. Viernes response - the main difference between the two is the RAM and HHD. And of course the screen size. But you can never have enough RAM so I'd upgrade to at least 6GB, or even 8 if your budget allows. The i5 processor seems to be standard on the 400, as it is on my 500, and it's plenty fast. You do have the option of upgrading to the i7, which is great if you're running multiple graphics. Otherwise the i5 should be fine. Of course the 400 has a smaller screen than the 500 but that may be a good thing if you travel often and space is a problem. The 500 isn't heavy, and it's very slim, but it fits tight in a standard sized computer bag.
1414870
I own both, the problem I have with the 600 Pro is that it does not turn off completely, the nice digital info remains on when the radio is turned off, which drains the battery if storied for any length of time. That is the only problem I have with this one. The 500 remains ready to even if storied for a time.
955766
No I think the mx650 is just the right size. The mx500 is small and doesn't have enough power. We got the 650 for our son when he was 8 and it was perfect. Keep in mind it's not super fast but we did start him out on the grass before letting him take it on the street. Our son graduated to a pit bike at 11 and now has a yamaha at 14.
431406
It's actually all about the thickness of the thread. Your 1200 could be a very thin thread about equal to the thicker thread in the 500. It's really confusing and you have to check the details to determine what you're getting for your money