B+W 77mm MRC vs 77mm non MRC: I'd like to give my thoughts on B+W 77mm MRC vs 77mm non MRC.
502285
I erroniouslly purchased the non coated version for my wife. She is a sunrise/sunset photographer. The non coated version allowed significant lense flare when pointed into the sun. While on vacation, we met another photographer who had the coated UVA filter. She had the same problem we did, only bought the MRC and hasn't had a problem since. I have since purchased a B+W UVA MRC filter for her, among other stupidly expensive filters, but I have wasted enough money buying items "on the cheap" for her hobby to know that you get what you pay for. I buy B+W exclusively for her 5D Mk ii and L series lenses.
1781805
btw...my tasco world class3-9x40mm loses clarity with sundown or lower light. I forgot to note this point in earlier comment. it's a damn good build and buy for the money (51.99) but, more demanding purposes will require a much better scope. p.s. this would not be my combat scope on an ar15 either.
667420
The only thing I'm not high on in your Costco package is the 55-300mm. I'm selling mine because it's just not up to standards. I've heard good things about the 18-55 and, of course, the 5200. Check out the Amazon package of JUST the 18-55 and the camera body for 749, then think about something like the 70-200 or the 80-400 - both excellent pieces of glass. Good hunting!
506595
you got it. looks like we need to edit this. on our amazon store we don't offer the 7mm because it would just be too confusing. thanks for catching our mistake.
1386587
Thanks for the link, T.! Looking at the wide bezels on those babies, I bet they won't fit the cabinet I've got (which the TH-42PX60U will just fit). Guess I'll wait for the markdowns and hope they don't run out of units before I snag one. And the silver doesn't bother me like it seems to bother others.
2004640
Which one did you finish up with? I'm interested because you said that you shoot mainly lanscapes, so why would you part with the 17-40mm? If your option had been for the 16-35mm f2.8L, I could have understood the reason, but a 24mm lens on any new camera (assuming it's not a film body, 5D or 1Ds) is only going to give you 31mm (1D) or 38mm (the rest). Not much good for landscape work.BTW, the 24-70mm eats the 24-105mm alive when it comes to contrast and sharpness, IS or not!
1705896
Have you measured the lens? Usually the lens are standard sizes so the 67mm could be a typo and you really have a 68mm.
1107745
Yes, completely. I would however also consider the 28mm 1.8g for a third the cost. :)
331845
Thank you very much, after reading both reviews, I was wondering the exact same thing. Since essentially they are the same, i will purchase the less expensive. Thanks again
1346891
i have both, i prefer the image quiality of the 85 F1.4, the 50mm is a little bit overexposed.Both have similar construction quality and USM autofocus system, but after 4 year of normal use the barrel system of the autofocus mechanims in the 50mm got deformed and stop to work.
1357471
my old work has the 28-70 2.8... personally I took it out of my bag n use the old 35-70 2.8... that is much sharper then the 28-70 <-- might be the worst 2.8 ever... but they got it right with 24-70 sharp n wide... oh n weight less then the 28-70...
187072
I was not sure when I first looked, then I realized the different models had different temperature capabilities, and if I recall some of them had different focus ratio as well.Keeping this in mind, Read descriptions carefully, the differences will be more apparent!
241395
Hi Karla, I don't personaly use one but several of my staff does you want the 65mm I belive based on feed back from my people, hope this helps
296834
Well, when I selected 700, I got the 28mm, because that is the size I was replacing. That is 700x28c, where the 'c' is inconsequential, as far as I know.
181720
Just the front clear cover difference ! As no cover block, NC-229WF has better image quality and night vision . Dear Antonio, We are wondering why you are not happy with NC-227WF. Any problems ? if yes, please contact our service and technical support : info@trivisiontech.comwarm regards,Pingan
2248401
Not much point in waiting. The 42.5/1.7 is a smaller lens that is lighter and slower(smaller max aperture). The image quality is also higher on this 42.5/1.2. The premium for fast glass that is higher quality is quite large so if you're looking for the best quality, this lens is currently the top performer for M43. If you're asking about if it's worth the price to you, that's a personal decision you will have to make yourself.
1340449
Michael: Thanks for the excellent comparison. Until I read your comments, I had about decided to go with the 700. I'm ordering the 750 instead. Bob F.