How strong is this cran set FC-M590
502679
For what it is worth, I weight over 200 lbs and after a year of use, I have had to do almost nothing to maintain it. If you are really worried about the durability, just get it over with and get the XT grade crank. I expect that the chain rings will go before anything else.
502680
Very strong. It's the same as the older XT Hollowtech but these ar not hollow. They are solid with intentions on the backside. I'm 240lbs and I've been using them for years with no problems.
502681
It has worked great for Me. I do not use it for mountatin use though. It is on my commuter bike. It definitely seems to be well built.
502682
It is considered a mountain bike chain-ring and I weigh 270 lbs and I stand on it while riding. The external bearings are easily replaced when needed.
595055
I have an MF80 and it works perfectly.I have 5 computers connected to it and it performs very good
1643814
FS is right! Use thin set for that! It is easy to work with and rock solid for that application.
1886088
60, It stays there very steady, +/- .2 as measured by my APC UPS. But the Xantrex "kilowatts" display is another matter, it stays at 0 until the real value reaches near 100, at least on my unit, maybe you'll have better luck. Trips around 900W not the 1000 expected, but that could have been the same 100 short that was reported on it's display, I didn't get an accurate measure when it tripped. I have been running the big house refrigerator on it for about 4 months without any problems.
1223304
If you haven't already, look up the datasheet for the chip on the board. If you're wondering about its connections to the board & the rest of the components, I have genuinely no idea. That's an interesting materials science question involving how the board was soldered, etc. Generally speaking, though, I imagine the manufacturer would tell you if the board (here the MPU-6050) is expected to handle more acceleration than the board on which it's mounted. These units are cheap enough that you can just test one, and intuitively 100G doesn't seem too bad, so you're probably OK as long as the spec sheet says the MPU-6050 will survive it. If you haven't already, look up the datasheet for the chip on the board. If you're wondering about its connections to the board & the rest of the components, I have genuinely no idea. That's an interesting materials science question involving how the board was soldered, etc. Generally speaking, though, I imagine the manufacturer would tell you if the board (here the MPU-6050) is expected to handle more acceleration than the board on which it's mounted. These units are cheap enough that you can just test one, and intuitively 100G doesn't seem too bad, so you're probably OK as long as the... » Read More If you haven't already, look up the datasheet for the chip on the board. If you're wondering about its connections to the board & the rest of the components, I have genuinely no idea. That's an interesting materials science question involving how the board was soldered, etc. Generally speaking, though, I imagine the manufacturer would tell you if the board (here the MPU-6050) is expected to handle more acceleration than the board on which it's mounted. These units are cheap enough that you can just test one, and intuitively 100G doesn't seem too bad, so you're probably OK as long as the spec sheet says the MPU-6050 will survive it. « Show Less
1519006
I have had the unit about a week and my fan does not appear that bad. I hear the fan in my server slightly more. So far, for the price I think it is a good value. It replaced a San Digital that's power supply blew after 18-24 months.
399775
They are 8-8-8-24 max which is a faster latency than 9-9-9-27 so they should work fine. Generally the higher the CAS number the slower the ram runs in practical application. IF I UNDERSTAND ALL OF THIS CORRECTLY
1919473
I had no probs with this one. It can handle 1500wts since it is 1.5 farads. It is handling my 1500 amp. Make sure you use high guage ground cable and bolt it down to metal or it will fry unlike most users who do forget that part(8guage at least).
1355731
I used a socket set (can't remember if it was US or metric) but used 3 different sockets out of the set. Sorry I couldn't be more specific on the socket set.
107307
Cant give you any numbers other than the fact that I mounted a WARN 8000S...similar specs?
1223306
If you haven't already, look up the datasheet for the chip on the board. If you're wondering about its connections to the board & the rest of the components, I have genuinely no idea. That's an interesting materials science question involving how the board was soldered, etc. Generally speaking, though, I imagine the manufacturer would tell you if the board (here the MPU-6050) is expected to handle more acceleration than the board on which it's mounted. These units are cheap enough that you can just test one, and intuitively 100G doesn't seem too bad, so you're probably OK as long as the spec sheet says the MPU-6050 will survive it.
1472545
Well, that load is within spec. I have not run mine this hard, but at this price it seems worth a try.I have had excellent performance thus far at 48V, probably 2-3 A.
241120
It worked great for me. And I'm not overclocking. Under heavy load mine goes to 54c.
490304
Sorry, Can't answer. Bought item to install and then sold house so no experience. Mfr says it is very low but no recallof value - or writing a review =G=
808970
The Honeywell moves 124cfm while the fan motor for the 180 is only rated for 97, so you should have no problem with performance. In fact, you should see a boost.
1080810
My husband is an electrician. He said it would blow it up. It works with 120. : )
322437
No RG59 is fine. My husband is a low voltage tech and says you should be good to go!