I want to connect to my wireless-N router. The Ubiquiti would be a client bridge. Is it possible to connect to N routers? Can it connect at 150 mbps?
509074
In a short answer....yes. These nano's have different modes like bridge, or access point. However there Is alot Of factors that have to be taken into account. Like distance from your router to the nano and the amount Of trees or walls between radios. I can bridge from a cisco e4000 to a nano at about 200 yards line Of sight
509075
I never try with N routers but these device have a 150Mbps throughput so they are fast. I use the smaller version of this type for cctv camera. I view 16 camers through the unit and remember its the smaller version.
655791
sorry-I don't understand your question-this is not a router-don't know how it would do for what you ask about-I suggest a router
867865
It does not have Gb eathernet connections on the UNI or NNI sides. I hope this helped.
1734950
Not possible with my router (WNR3500 which is 2.4Ghz) . Needs to be 5Ghz. I'm returning the bridge and getting the bundle which is two of them.
1925140
Yes, a repeater or a AP/Bridge "should" solve your problem but it depends on how you connect the devices.You would have to use the repeater to bridge the Linksys Router using WiFI then connect the bridge using the CAT5 cable to you NetGear.That being said... I wouldn't use the $200 repeater where I could use a $100 WiFi Bridge.Or you could just use the repeater as a repeater and do away with one of your WiFi Routers
2232086
Your question doesn't make sense without more information Susan. A Netgear N300 can handle hundreds of clients, but if you mean that with 10 concurrently using wifi it bogs down, that is a limitation of wifi itself which would be present with any 11n wifi router. If you mean wired (ethernet) clients, again you have higher bandwidth LAN going to lower bandwidth WAN (internet) so all clients compete for available bandwidth. However, if you reflash this (or another compatible model) to DD-WRT firmware (a web search will provide info on doing so), you can set up QOS to prioritize or deprioritize certain types of traffic and/or client systems. Another thing you can do is set up more than one wifi access point, for example your Netgear plus this one, set up on different channels a few numbers apart, then split up wifi client systems between them to balance the wifi load, with some connecting to this and others connecting to the Netgear. I may be barking up the wrong tree. More information would help but generally speaking your Netgear N300 should have been able to handle 10 clients with something else whether it be wifi standards or your internet connection, being the bottleneck. Keep in mind that if your Netgear, or any consumer grade router or switch for that matter, is a few years old then it may be suffering from damage, particularly capacitor rot becomes an insidious problem as they approach 5 years old and beyond (Or shorter in hotter environments) and effective throughput will begin to decrease as lack of hardware stability starts to cause lost packets and a large # of resends. I have owned many Netgear products and find that sometimes it is the router or switch itself and other times their wall wart AC-DC adapter which becomes flaky. On those I had with a flaky adapter, it was a very common 12V, 1A with a standard polarity DC barrel jack so it wasn't hard to find a suitable replacement lying around to test whether that helped.
614338
I'm not sure. My installation is fairly simple. I have had about 10 wireless connections simultaneously with very high bandwidth and no apparent disconnects. Looking at the info it presented, it said it could support 30 connections. But it's a single UAP-Pro sustem.
2271427
You can connect as many devices as you have. The biggest question would be how many of those are using it at the same time. This is where the higher bandwidth (cable, fiber, etc..) handle it better. I personally have my Xbox, computer, Nook HD tablet, and three of our cell phones connected to this all the time and my speeds are wonderful. And I am only using the lower band. If the router is decently close to your devices make sure and connect them to the 5 Ghz band. .. you will notice the difference. All in all it has been the best router I have used yet for the money.
2165104
No. But technically, the disk station won't be handling the wireless interface, that'd be your router which would be the bottleneck. http://www.synology.com/en-us/products/spec/DS1513+ lists the 4 ports on the DS are gigabit with link aggregation/redundancy Wikipedia lists 802.11 AC max speed is .866 Gbit and N at .150 Gbit Supposedly, max bit rate for 1080p is at 12 Mbit So all in all, I don't see any issue with that if link redundancy was setup to allow for multiple access with their own dedicated lines. What's clear is that wireless in general will be your biggest set back as that cap is reached before the gigabit cap. On top of that, depending on signal loss, you may have much lower speeds but not as low as 12 MBits/s I think; perhaps a wireless repeater to remedy that?
551286
No, you can connect the unit directly to a standard router or switch - hub. This will link both network environments.
733118
Howdy J Byrd. I have not yet installed the NanoBridge M5. You'll likely want to purchase at least one Ubiquiti NanoStation M5 NSM5 5GHz 2x2 MIMO for $99 for seamless integration (note only 100Mbps NIC/LAN uplink on this unit). I bought two of these units and have one in AP and the other in BRIDGE mode and have been very happy with performance! I bought the NanoBridge M5 just in case I needed it due to range issues. Hope this helps.
2264981
The router has no feature to be configured as a wireless bridge. You might want to consider the WRT1900AC router which has the Wireless Bridge feature.
52971
Update: This thread got me wired just now...Wireless is in the works. [ndiswrapper isn't so friendly to this one for some reason - perhaps I nabbed the wrong wireless driver..]http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=7409939
2065166
It doesn't make any difference who the wireless carrier is, what you want is a signal that is wireless {N} compatible. Also the distance and obstructions must be considered. What I did was email the support group at NETGEAR. Just go to their website at www.netgear.com. They really helped me. HOPE THIS HELPS!
550849
You should not have a problem. In theory, adapters should be able to connect to any wireless network with a compatible signal (of course that's not always the case in reality). That being said, I've tested this adapter on several different networks, and I've never run into problems regardless of router. However, I have heard that some people can't pick up the 5.0ghz signal from other types of routers (non-Cisco/Linksys), but I don't have evidence supporting that claim other than a couple isolated instances. Good luck!
125752
According to Belkin's site it supports: IEEE 802.11n (up to 300Mbps*) IEEE 802.11g (up to 54Mbps*) IEEE 802.11b (up to 11Mbps*) - source: http://www.belkin.com/us/p/P-F7D7302/
867790
Personally I would switch the cisco out as well. You lose all the benefit and power of Ubiquiti software capabilities with only 1 access point. Ubiquiti is designed to be true enterprise grade that gives you the ability to add 100 of these and have them appear as 1 wireless network. Ubiquiti's strong point is the included management software used to set these up. Your devices will automatically connect to the WAP with the highest signal. You can do what you wish, and it would certainly work as you describe, but having an enterprise grade management console is pretty darn cool. I have three of these in my home .