what is the difference between this and the VIZIO E320-B0E 32-Inch 720p 60Hz LED TV model
521182
The only thing I can tell is that one is a little bit thinner than the other.
1511858
The VBR338 is no longer available according to the VIZIO site. From what I can see there are no major differences between a VBR337 and a VBR338. Sorry I can not be more help.
75369
I watched the 554sv from every angle at Costco. The reflection of the overhead lights was crystal clear on this unit (as were most of the other 55" lcds) - i.e. very reflective. The 553 was slightly more matte finish so somewhat more "blurry" reflection of the overhead lights. The only one that was really matte (including Sony and Samsung as well) was the cheapest Vizio (can't recall the model number but was sub $1000 price) but it's over all picture was pixelized on motion so unacceptable to me. I'm still looking.
522291
1. They are both Vizio they should be lol.2. I have mine connected to a 55" Sony.3. Turn up volume to TV all the way and use sound bar as permanent audio source.4. You're gonna love it.
1876459
I have found two other differences - 6350 comes with quad stand and WiFi ready; 5500 - square stand and WiFi capable. Coming to difference in refresh rate, as long as you buy the TV less than 39" 60Hz is absolutely fine, 120 is just a hype for 32" version. 5500 is VFM. 6350 is bit of luxury. Hope that answers your question.
1608273
As best I can determine, this is a proprietary model specifically made for BestBuy so that they can price it lower than the standard 32LN5300 LED TV's offered at other locations. Thereby they can say that it is not the same model sold elsewhere. This way they can monopolize the market.
1774272
Am currently using a VIZIO 32" and it works fine. You get a better picture with HDMI or DVI cable but this comp has VGA out. The output is good and for the cost it works fine for us.
836254
The 554 is NOT currently available per Vizio's own website you lying troll."This item is Coming Soon." http://www.vizio.com/led-lcd-hdtvs/xvt3d554sv.html
188834
The contrast ratio on the Panasonic is 4 million to 1 and its refresh rate is 600hz the vizio at best has a contrast ratio of 1 million to one and 120hz refresh rate so there really is no comparing the 2. In my opinion the Panasonic is twice the tv.
898836
hey guys the 32 650 is 15,000:1 and 5ms if you want the 50,000:1 and 4ms and the 120hz one of the same tv you have to buy the bigger size one of the same model
63499
15" x 7.5" (Vizio E320-A1 32-inch 720p 60Hz LED HDTV Model) Interesting that there are so many different measurements - perhaps Vizio doesn't have a standard size base for this TV. I bought mine at Target 12/18/2012. Even on the Vizio website it does not give the base measurment just the overall measurement of the TV w/ & without the base.7.5" does seem to be the base depth on all but unknown what the base width standard is. I remeasured mine & it's still 15" x 7.5" :)
1267107
I'm not sure, I picked one up for my e601i-a3 and it worked great. My TV was on the list of compatible models though, I do not see the e320i listed on the store page.
573289
The 7200 is faster. when hooked up directly to the TV when using a cable input - it takes around 20 seconds for the 7200 to actuate automatically. There are a lot of features for this modelI believe you would be please with it
621278
They're the same thing. Led is just the type of backlighting the TV has. It's still an LCD.
130320
The difference is in the TV's refresh rate. The 32l4200u is at 60Hz while the 32l1350 is at 120Hz. The difference between these refresh rates dictate how much you can see in a set amount of time. So, if there is movement on the screen, the 120Hz TV will show the motion a little more smoothly (a little less blurry) than the 60Hz TV. Hope that helps.
1647950
I was wondering the same thing. Im gonna call sammy to find out. It seems like such a huge discrepancy to be in this many places. There is more than a small difference between 50,000:1 and 15:000:1. If you find out please let me know ***EDIT*** After calling Sammy's CS they informed me that it was infact a 15,000:1 ratio'd tv. Not bad, but nowhere near the 50,000:1 that has been advertised all over the net. Thanks **EDIT #2** This TV is great. I love it. I would go into detail about the performance and quality, but its one of those things that you really need to see in a display next to a lesser tv. I have this 32 incher right next to a Sharp Aquos 32gp1u and it out shines in almost every way except for the ease of adjusting the picture. Apart from the minor menu quibble this tv is as close to perfect as you are going to find in a 32 inch model. Hands down and without a doubt worth the money if you want a quality 32 flat panel tv with lots of inputs.
1128941
I looked at both and bought the 750....for the price (and difference) you are really looking at how important a super thin TV is to you, if saving $2 a month on your energy bill makes that big of a difference, or if you are that nuts about LED, for $800 I wasn't. 200,000 to 1 as a Dynamic contrast ratio is more than enough (you can't really tell much more of a difference). If you really wanna get the LED and are willing to spend that kind of money get the 8000 (even thinner and edge lit led). Because of the models above and below it, and price differences I don't see the 7000 making much sense unless you find a unique deal that only has that set on sale. I looked at both and bought the 750....for the price (and difference) you are really looking at how important a super thin TV is to you, if saving $2 a month on your energy bill makes that big of a difference, or if you are that nuts about LED, for $800 I wasn't. 200,000 to 1 as a Dynamic contrast ratio is more than enough (you can't really tell much more of a difference). If you really wanna get the LED and are willing to spend that kind of money get the 8000 (even thinner and edge lit led). Because of the models above and below it, and price differences I don't see the 7000... » Read More I looked at both and bought the 750....for the price (and difference) you are really looking at how important a super thin TV is to you, if saving $2 a month on your energy bill makes that big of a difference, or if you are that nuts about LED, for $800 I wasn't. 200,000 to 1 as a Dynamic contrast ratio is more than enough (you can't really tell much more of a difference). If you really wanna get the LED and are willing to spend that kind of money get the 8000 (even thinner and edge lit led). Because of the models above and below it, and price differences I don't see the 7000 making much sense unless you find a unique deal that only has that set on sale. « Show Less