What's difference between TAC-6G-SF and TAC-6G? Thanks.
513648
Model SF is indirect cooking which does not require pouring water outside the rice container. Regular 6G requires water outside the rice container to cook. Other than this, no functional difference between the two models
513649
Hi Julia K.,TAC-6G-SF: Pot Cover, Inner Pot, Inner Cover and Steam Plate are all Stainless Steel.TAC-6G: The Inner Pot is Stainless Steel only. The Pot Cover, Inner Cover and Steam Plate are Aluminum.
513650
Hi Julia K., TAC-6G-SF: Pot Cover, Inner Pot, Inner Cover and Steam Plate are all Stainless Steel. TAC-6G: The Inner Pot is Stainless Steel only. The Pot Cover, Inner Cover and Steam Plate are Aluminum.
190058
I asked myself the same question and could not find a difference. I found that most computer component suppliers carry just the G25 for which you can get the full specifications on performance. I could not find that information on the FFP, and it may just mean that it is pre-formatted for use. I would select the one that is carried by Newegg and the Microcenter. Other wise, let the price guide you for I think they are equivalent.
2029391
As far as individual units , and specs-wise , no difference at all . Apparently ,only difference between the 2 sets is the carrying case on the TS model, which seems to quite convenient and accomodating .
1024597
I am sorry I can not tell you the difference, however, I can tell you that the T-fal C1192474 is an excellent product. It is the correct size for me, a family of one. The clean up is one, two, three done.
610253
It has the T05 (0.177cal). The T06 is on the 0.22cal rifles. Great rifle, excellent manufacturing (genuine German product) and VERY accurate with tremendous power!. Recommended ammo, Beeman Kodiak 10.65gr or equivalent. It has some kick and you need to get used to it before achieving the maximum accuracy. Shot two rabbits and lots of squirrels; poor things didn't have time to know what happen.... Regards
2036766
The difference between this rice cooker and others that I have used is that you have an inner pot and an outer pot. You put water in both, so they act like a double boiler. I don't know how it compares to the TAC-06KN. I also find that the rice in this cooker does not keep well warm for many hours-- gets mushy on top and dried on the bottom. But I may not be using it with the right amount of liquid in the outside pot-- tried to follow directions.
1059348
I am not 100% sure since I do not own both systems, but when I was looking I bought the military one for the price just in case it fell apart on me right away. I also noticed, I think, the width of the strap and the trap color. Other than that I do not really believe there are too many differences. I enjoy mine and use it three times a week and it still looks like I took it out of the box.
1602703
There is no difference, they are the same cooker. The CFS-B12U is an older listing of this cooker that we do not have the ability to edit.
1842583
I think you mean SB6180. The SB6180 is supposed to be sold only by ISP's. That is one difference.Performance is much different:SB6121: 172Mbps download / 131Mbps upload.SB6180: 300-343Mbps download / 131Mbps Upload.The speed capabilities of the modem's are quite different.I would purchase the SB6180 again without a second thought.
1506993
I agree with Brent's answer if I recall correctly on the function, tough I have resold this light in favor of replacing it with another light. The InForce was a great little tac-light. My only concern was one of cosmetics, as it is listed when I bought it as FDE but was not the same as a standard Magpul(like) Flat Dark Earth in color. It was quite a bit lighter in color (more like a light tan) and did not exactly match the custom FDE AR-15 I was building. I believe they list it as tan now. I seem to remember the function as: 1 tap constant, 2 taps strobe, 1 long tap gets you momentary... I really did like the little size of it, shape & mounting. Very cool! I agree with Brent's answer if I recall correctly on the function, tough I have resold this light in favor of replacing it with another light. The InForce was a great little tac-light. My only concern was one of cosmetics, as it is listed when I bought it as FDE but was not the same as a standard Magpul(like) Flat Dark Earth in color. It was quite a bit lighter in color (more like a light tan) and did not exactly match the custom FDE AR-15 I was building. I believe they list it as tan now. I seem to remember the function as: 1 tap constant, 2 taps strobe, 1 long tap gets you momentary... I... » Read More I agree with Brent's answer if I recall correctly on the function, tough I have resold this light in favor of replacing it with another light. The InForce was a great little tac-light. My only concern was one of cosmetics, as it is listed when I bought it as FDE but was not the same as a standard Magpul(like) Flat Dark Earth in color. It was quite a bit lighter in color (more like a light tan) and did not exactly match the custom FDE AR-15 I was building. I believe they list it as tan now. I seem to remember the function as: 1 tap constant, 2 taps strobe, 1 long tap gets you momentary... I really did like the little size of it, shape & mounting. Very cool! « Show Less
729387
http://www.amazon.com/Tatung-Tac-11kn-Stainless-Steel-Cooker/dp/B004FWL3UA/ref=cm_cd_al_qh_dp_t is a stainless steel cooker,the other Tac10g(sf)10 cup is aluminum products.
551419
There is no difference. 6E0001N is the code Senco assign to the FN55AX F-18.
1338250
The Tactical Tomahawk is bigger than the Fasthawk in both length and blade size. TT: 15.75" long, 2.75" blade lengthFH: 12.5" long, 2" blade lengthThe spike is also proportionally shorter. For a good comparison, see http://www.sogknives.com/catalog/product_compare/index/uenc/aHR0cDovL3d3dy5zb2drbml2ZXMuY29tL3RhY3RpY2FsL2dlYXIuaHRtbA,,/
2255575
I own both, and yes, the SFQ-01 sounds much better than the SFQ-06. The sound quality of the SFQ-01 was surprisingly good, considering the price. I do not feel this way about the SFQ-06.
1471530
There are subtle differences. If you look at images of both, you'll see that the tactical model has a "resettable zero" on the stalks. That way you can dial your scope in, and then set the stalk numbers to "0", and adjust for windage or elevation in the field. The Standard model of these two does not have this option. You dial your scope in and that is your set "0". It doesn't give you the option to dial it according to changing conditions. You'll need to do a "hold over" for the standard model.
674062
The performance of the SB6180 and SB6141 are virtually identical if you compare their spec sheets; both modems support 8 downstream channels and 4 upstream channels. The SB6141 supports AES, GigE, Auto MDIX, and has a "1 GHz Low Pass Filter at tuners input," same as the SB6180. The only technical difference I can find is the "Downstream Capture Window," with the SB6141 utilizing "Dual 96 MHz Capture Windows," and the SB6180 using "Two independent 32 MHz Wideband Tuners." All that said, I think what it comes down to is that the SB6141 is targeted towards retail consumers, while the SB6180 is targeted towards businesses or OEM use. The performance of the SB6180 and SB6141 are virtually identical if you compare their spec sheets; both modems support 8 downstream channels and 4 upstream channels. The SB6141 supports AES, GigE, Auto MDIX, and has a "1 GHz Low Pass Filter at tuners input," same as the SB6180. The only technical difference I can find is the "Downstream Capture Window," with the SB6141 utilizing "Dual 96 MHz Capture Windows," and the SB6180 using "Two independent 32 MHz Wideband Tuners." All that said, I think what it comes down to is that the SB6141 is targeted... » Read More The performance of the SB6180 and SB6141 are virtually identical if you compare their spec sheets; both modems support 8 downstream channels and 4 upstream channels. The SB6141 supports AES, GigE, Auto MDIX, and has a "1 GHz Low Pass Filter at tuners input," same as the SB6180. The only technical difference I can find is the "Downstream Capture Window," with the SB6141 utilizing "Dual 96 MHz Capture Windows," and the SB6180 using "Two independent 32 MHz Wideband Tuners." All that said, I think what it comes down to is that the SB6141 is targeted towards retail consumers, while the SB6180 is targeted towards businesses or OEM use. « Show Less
2034848
I'm not sure what the LF feels like, however the SF is a light rubber coating. It isn't slick like most cases. It's more of a preference. I love it, because it provides more of a grip IMO.