What is the difference between 3M Scotchprint® Wrap Film 1080-CF12 and this 3M DI-NOC Architectural Finish CA-1170?
523012
I havent used CA-1170 but I copied your question into google and got this- http://www.e90post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=648294
523013
Daniel :DFound this on a corvette forum hope this helps :PThis person spoke to a rep from 3m :D Scotchprint 1080 CF has the same durability as the Di Noc. Di Noc is indoor AND outdoor use. Both have the same warranty 1yr horizontal 3yr vertical, both products are too new to have a better warranty (ie limited testing time period).The 1080 CF looks more like CF than the Di Noc as it is not as perfectly symmetrical as the Di Noc design.1080 is the newest product line and easier to work with than the Di Noc for larger areas.
596068
On the other side of the 12"x12" single sided Copper PC Board is a fairly smooth, light "Olive" color film type coating. In between the Copper clad side and the olive color side is definitely a fiberglass resin type material. The opposite side is a smooth light olive coating to seal the fiberglass inbetween. I hope this answers your question.
1920900
I believe the 650 is 12bit color processing and the 750 is 16bit color processing as well. Lately the 750 is CHEAPER than the 650 currently on here by about $25, but when I got my 750 at hhgregg last week it was $300 cheaper than the 650 O_o
1783859
Hi K; The transparent film with the adhesive is .003" (3 mil) thick. The transparent cover sheet is .006" (6 mil) thick. These measurements are for LS84G Scotch Laminating Sheets. I would suggest you be careful when adding something to be laminated, the adhesive is non-forgiving. You might make the adhesive and cover sheet larger than needed and cut to size after mating. Yes, it does use more plastic than needed but you won't have to do it over and also prevent loss of whatever you are trying to protect. I tried many samples prior to doing the final assembly which was quite helpful. Hope this helps.Charlie Hi K; The transparent film with the adhesive is .003" (3 mil) thick. The transparent cover sheet is .006" (6 mil) thick. These measurements are for LS84G Scotch Laminating Sheets. I would suggest you be careful when adding something to be laminated, the adhesive is non-forgiving. You might make the adhesive and cover sheet larger than needed and cut to size after mating. Yes, it does use more plastic than needed but you won't have to do it over and also prevent loss of whatever you are trying to protect. I tried many samples prior to doing the final... » Read More Hi K; The transparent film with the adhesive is .003" (3 mil) thick. The transparent cover sheet is .006" (6 mil) thick. These measurements are for LS84G Scotch Laminating Sheets. I would suggest you be careful when adding something to be laminated, the adhesive is non-forgiving. You might make the adhesive and cover sheet larger than needed and cut to size after mating. Yes, it does use more plastic than needed but you won't have to do it over and also prevent loss of whatever you are trying to protect. I tried many samples prior to doing the final assembly which was quite helpful. Hope this helps.Charlie « Show Less
342586
I don't know the answer to either question. There is nothing on the product to indicate this information. I would suggest you research MICROCORE products.
1414996
I looked around for an answer to this, but was unable to find a difference. Maybe shoot the company an email. If you do, let me know what you hear!
1016218
The CAS latency is different. One is CL7 and the other is CL9 meaning the slightly more expensive CL7 model with be a bit quicker on the draw. In reality however you most likely won't notice a difference. Gaming? Not at all. An adobe product most likely not. A benchmarking program Like 3D mark or Prime 95? That would be the only place you would be able to see the difference. For the few extra dollars I would opt for the Cl7 model. As far as compatibility is concerned the cas latency is a moot point. You need to be concerned with the Voltages(1.5 or 1.6V), speed(1066,1333,1600 etc) DDR3 and any other variable your MOBO suggests. You will most likely need to enter your BIOS(setup/press delete or F1 at boot) after you install these and set the appropriate timings. 7 7 7 21 for the CL7(BRH) or 9 9 9 24(BRL) for the CL9 model. You may need to perform a CMOS reset which entails pressing a reset CMOS button on most newer mobos or removing the CMOS battery in older systems. You can Google CMOS or Jumper(maintenance mode) reset for more information. In short the BRH model is better.
1650558
I would assume the Rev. 3.0 boards are the more advanced ones in their line(more worth a purchase), but I have no clue. I did some Googling, had trouble finding much info on it. :<
788551
I was wondering the same thing so did some digging and found this in one of the reviews "The main difference of the MP640 over the MP560 is a larger 3" LCD, Ethernet connection and print speed."
1471439
I have just checked on this by ordering both. The first difference is that I received a paper with a product key for an image restoration software with the regular one. The other difference is in the packaging. The AFFP arrived in a small amazon envelope, whereas the regular one arrives in a SanDisk box. Also, one of the photos shows these cards with a rating of "U1" and one with "U3". When I ordered mine they both arrived as "U3" cards.
1941200
I'm sure this is too late for the OP, but wanted to chime in if I may. From what I found/feel, the PA249Q is the true successor of the PA246Q. The most notable difference is that the 248 is not wide gamut, nor 10-bit capable. I'm sure the 248 is nice, as about everything from ASUS is. However to many professionals, this is likely a deal breaker.
782477
I can't find any difference at all besides on the top banner after Coreldraw X6 it says "Not for Commercial Use" ... otherwise it is exactly the same for all intensive purposes.
1280650
It only makes sense that if a Brother MFC can scan a 11x17 (A3) than the tray/printing can handle 11x17 (A3) as well
1292357
Hello and thank you for your question. Hello, 3M Scotchgard film is 8mil (mil not mm) thick. It is technically 6mil with 2mil adhesive for a total of 8mil. Please let us know if you have any further questions. Thank you!
1340448
The scanner hardware for both of the scanners is almost identical. While Epson touts the 750's coating, I have yet to see a test that shows there is a significant difference fromt the coating. The 750 does include the fluid mounting tray system but you can find an alternative at betterscanning.com. The additional software may or may not be worth add value. The Monaco software is not the best and it really isn't being supported by Xrite anymore. Silverfast is a nice piece of software IF IF it fits with your working right brain/left brain workflow. Most people either love it or hate it. Vuescan is an alternative. If I were doing it again, I would buy the v700 instead of the v750. The scanner hardware for both of the scanners is almost identical. While Epson touts the 750's coating, I have yet to see a test that shows there is a significant difference fromt the coating. The 750 does include the fluid mounting tray system but you can find an alternative at betterscanning.com. The additional software may or may not be worth add value. The Monaco software is not the best and it really isn't being supported by Xrite anymore. Silverfast is a nice piece of software IF IF it fits with your working right brain/left brain workflow. Most people either love it or hate it.... » Read More The scanner hardware for both of the scanners is almost identical. While Epson touts the 750's coating, I have yet to see a test that shows there is a significant difference fromt the coating. The 750 does include the fluid mounting tray system but you can find an alternative at betterscanning.com. The additional software may or may not be worth add value. The Monaco software is not the best and it really isn't being supported by Xrite anymore. Silverfast is a nice piece of software IF IF it fits with your working right brain/left brain workflow. Most people either love it or hate it. Vuescan is an alternative. If I were doing it again, I would buy the v700 instead of the v750. « Show Less
1936700
The biggest difference is the extra cooling fan, which allows the card to work harder while still staying at a safe temperature. I personally think this is worth the extra $15
2109080
They are not the same card. This is the fully factory over clocked running at a clock of 1080Mhz and men at 5600Mhz. The other card has slower clocks. The clocks are higher because the chokes are better, and the chips were binned higher on this card. Check the serials if you want to confirm this. The OC potential is thus higher on this card.