What is the diff between the 3000 Equalizer and the Elite? I'm trying to decide btwn the 2. I live in an aprtmnt w/ hollow doors. Mounting suggestns?
575054
I mount mine on hollow doors and have no problem . I weigh 250 lbs. and use them every day with no issues. Good luck.
575055
As far as I can tell, the Equalizer has the height adjustments on the straps near the handles (so the buckles can potentially rub on your arms during push ups etc), while the Elite has the adjustments at the top. I have the Equalizer and use it on an outside door with a window. I would guess that using it successfully with a hollow door would depend on your weight.
575056
The elite has 2 cam buckles to adjust the strap length for the different exercises, similar to a TRX band. The equalizer's straps are also adjustable but will move slightly if your weight is not distributed evenly. But it really isn't any big problem. I'm not even sure the elite was an option when I bought mine. I'm not sure how well hollow doors will work to support your weight pulling against the door. The over the door feature works well with a solid door, or wrapped around a tree limb. I do like the WOSS, the price is good, the quality is good, works just as well as the TRX bands without the big price tag. I hope this helps you to decide. The elite has 2 cam buckles to adjust the strap length for the different exercises, similar to a TRX band. The equalizer's straps are also adjustable but will move slightly if your weight is not distributed evenly. But it really isn't any big problem. I'm not even sure the elite was an option when I bought mine. I'm not sure how well hollow doors will work to support your weight pulling against the door. The over the door feature works well with a solid door, or wrapped around a tree limb. I do like the WOSS, the price is good, the quality is good, works just as well as the TRX bands... » Read More The elite has 2 cam buckles to adjust the strap length for the different exercises, similar to a TRX band. The equalizer's straps are also adjustable but will move slightly if your weight is not distributed evenly. But it really isn't any big problem. I'm not even sure the elite was an option when I bought mine. I'm not sure how well hollow doors will work to support your weight pulling against the door. The over the door feature works well with a solid door, or wrapped around a tree limb. I do like the WOSS, the price is good, the quality is good, works just as well as the TRX bands without the big price tag. I hope this helps you to decide. « Show Less
575057
I'm not sure what the difference is between the two styles. You might go to the Woss website. Hollow doors should not make a difference. The mounting goes over the top of the door and is secured between the door and the door frame. Make sure that when you mount the strap you are working out on the side of the door that would open away from you. It makes the mounting more secure since there is no chance of the door accidently opening while you are working out. Hope that helps.
2146449
I did short comparison before I purchase it, and previously I owned SR 80When I listen to SR 125, I can tell much different from SR 80 except the bassWhen I test SR 255i, I can hear how much the sound stage changed and the bass as wellI also tested SR 325 and I think my ear just cant hear the tiny difference vs SR 225SR 225 will be the top of the line grado that you can hook up directly without amp, so take that into consideration
1012778
I have small in wall speakers in my house. They sound great, but I also Have a zone2 with old yamaha floor speakers that sound equaly good. Get the best you can afford. I also have an Epik 2x15 empire sub. Best purchase in my life. expensive but well worth it.
36312
Hi Mark: I found that there is a bug in my 250 at least (it was refurbished) which makes the volume drop way off if I don't have all the equalizer settings in 'custom' set to EXACTLY FLAT. If you do that and OK it with the checkmark, on mine, suddenly the volume goes up. Sorry no idea what firmware I have.
1260950
Mario the Gator is 100% correct with his suggestion. I have a 2012 Special Ops edition Rubicon. I replaced my the sound bar speakers with the plug and play replacements by Chrysler. I think they are re-badged Kickers. First I did it without the polyfill and the speakers sounded a little better. Then I used polyfill and actually built a box around the speaker with Dynamat...huge difference...no vibrations and the whole thing took about 1.5 hours. I also replaced the built in Infinity sub with an 8" kicker. Because the head unit did not have enough power to push it (even with a 2ohm speaker) I added a sub dedicated JL Audio JX250 mono amp under the rear storage area (and I put a small amp powered fan on it to keep it cool). I also replaced the dash mounted tweeters with JBL tweeters (another huge difference). The whole change was inexpensive and made a dramatic difference to the entire sound system.
637366
After I installed the EQ, I did a sweep and found a wicked peak @ 80 Hz. The EQ flattened it out like a steam iron. I would advise sweeping first, then you have a better idea what you need (if anything) to correct your acoustics. I could have used much simpler equipment for EQ. Had to make a cover to hide the gaudy front panel.
1383588
Play with the audio settings. There are quite a few. Default settings sound poor (hollow,low volume) but can be adjusted to more than adequate. Cant remember orig settings, but can give you my AUDIO setup config: SRS TruSurround HD &lt;Off&gt; SRS TruVolume &lt;On&gt; Equalizer Settings &lt;OFF&gt; *important* Base &lt;75&gt; Treble &lt;50&gt; Make sure the EQ setting is not set to Rock, Pop or Disco (they sound like garbage). Setting it to OFF allows access to Base & Treble menu/adjustments. Overall the sound is above average for what you are paying. More than ample volume once you get the settings tweaked.
1617146
I have not heard the 325, so I would be speculating (nor do I know the size and configuration of your room). By all accounts the 325 should give you pretty impressive sound. Just remember that none of the Zvox models give you theater (5.1 or higher) surround sound (although there is "phasecue" circuitry to help open up the sound). Zvox claim to fame is solid sound and quality components with minimal setup. The amplifier is the same as on the 550 and so is the subwoofer (at least the size of the subwoofer). The only difference I see are the drivers: three 3.25" drivers for the 325 and five 2" drivers for the 550. The 550 does go down to 45 Hz vs 63 Hz on the 325 (meaning a bit better bass response). You can check out the reviews here on Amazon. The 5xx series is made to set your TV upon (up to 90 lbs), which is why I decided to buy it rather than their soundbars or the 3xx series.
281075
As an audio engineer, I can personally tell the difference between the two models. However, to the untrained ear of a casual listener it will be very difficult to notice any difference. This will also differ from person to person as every set of ears and every human brain are just a little bit different. Therefore not every human being is capable of hearing all of the frequencies being omitted from the speakers. That being said, the difference between models is their frequency range. Ask yourself these questions before making a decision : 1) Do you commonly notice a difference in the overall sound quality when listening to music on different speakers? 2) Does your listening pleasure diminish when you notice these differences? 3) Are you the kind of person that doesn't mind spending a little more money if you know that you will be getting a better quality product? If you answered yes to these questions, then I would recommend doing as I did and purchasing the 800 model. BTW, if you're "all about that bass" the 800 will also be more appealing as the main difference is the low end frequencies as they always improve with size. I hope this was helpful! Matt. W.
2229755
Hey Guys, I just received a 2nd, 3-tiered unit. Low and behold, again with the same 2x3" support bracket that Michael Vitale commented on on May 23. As I don't see any replies that appear to be from manufacturer's reps, I'm going to do a bit more research. If no further response from me, you can figure that I sent it back. Bummer.
1032735
(From the image) The military version is not equalizer system, ie the 2 handles are fixed to the central anchor point. In the equalizer version, the 2 handles are off a continuous strip of webbing (through a D ring for mounting) so you do need to focus on balancing/equalizing both arms/legs when working out. This supposedly activates more muscles.Additionally, the mounting options are different. The military version has an integrated over the door and noose strap whereas the equalizer version has an adjustable strap which is much longer, a separate over the door mount and a webbing with carabiner option. (From the image) The military version is not equalizer system, ie the 2 handles are fixed to the central anchor point. In the equalizer version, the 2 handles are off a continuous strip of webbing (through a D ring for mounting) so you do need to focus on balancing/equalizing both arms/legs when working out. This supposedly activates more muscles.Additionally, the mounting options are different. The military version has an integrated over the door and noose strap whereas the equalizer version has an adjustable strap which is much longer, a separate over the door mount and a... » Read More (From the image) The military version is not equalizer system, ie the 2 handles are fixed to the central anchor point. In the equalizer version, the 2 handles are off a continuous strip of webbing (through a D ring for mounting) so you do need to focus on balancing/equalizing both arms/legs when working out. This supposedly activates more muscles.Additionally, the mounting options are different. The military version has an integrated over the door and noose strap whereas the equalizer version has an adjustable strap which is much longer, a separate over the door mount and a webbing with carabiner option. « Show Less
721667
Hi James, Can you provide me with a little more information on your speaker set-up objective? If you already have a set of A5+ speakers and a subwoofer you have a pretty sweet 2.1 powered system. Two A5+ speakers, a sub and two P4 Passive speakers with a N22 creating a 5.1 system would blow the doors off. Space may or not be an issue for you, but I would go with the A2+s' and if if you're seeking overall better sound either through your speakers or headphones, add a D1 DAC. The sound differential with the DAC (running through a usb) as opposed to the internal sound card is significantly better. Not sure if this helps. If you want to drop me a note relative to your overall objective (music preferences, gaming, room size, etc.) I will respond. My initial reaction in that A2+ would be more than sufficient, give you everything you need and not consume as much space. Again, think hard about adding the DAC from Audioengine.
2220777
Here are the excerpt details of the TX-NR717 equalizer (from the manual): * Audyssey 2EQ® to correct room acoustic problems* Audyssey Dynamic EQ® for loudness correction* Audyssey Dynamic Volume® to maintain optimallistening level and dynamic range Though these adjustments are effective, depending on your own preferences for EQ control you may want more adjustability from a separate EQ component. For my needs the built-in features were OK.
1272299
The majority of surround units have the decoder your low level signal source and the power amp in one unit and there is no way to insert the equalizer in the system. If you have your channels available as line level signals then you would need at least 3 units on for the rear channels one for the front channels and one for the center channel. After you come out of the equalizer you'll have to have an amp for each channel as well. I'm thinking this is not what you were planning on doing.
2185025
Thank you, I too am wonderng at the difference between the two. I've got an older Denon receiver(3803) and would rather not have to replace it. This model seems to fit the bill for me.
1106070
If you are just using them for high-mid range and you're not looking to get that much bass out of it, I would suggest to go with the Pioneers very rich in sound and definitely does the job especially if you have an Equalizer. Check out the Clarion EQS746 Improves any type of music 110% hands down/ very useful if you have an amp or more than one in my case. I'm running 3 amps off this bad boy and very satisfied with the results!
1659286
I mounted mine in the stock locations in the vehicle. It had a 6.5 inch speaker in the door and the tweeter location on the window pillars. This required some rewiring in the vehicle to get the crossover in the proper location. The system equalization was done with an automated eq. The results were great. Much better than stock.