What is the difference between this model, and the LC-70SQ15U model? the other one is better rated and $800 less.
577875
also the UQ has a 15w subwoofer that the SQ model does not have wich is fine for egular tv but if you can aford it a halfway decent soundbar would do better.
577876
I believe the main difference is the dynamic contrast ratio 8,000,000:1 vs. 12,000,000:1
577877
Hi,I have seen the many difference and also the build quality is way different then SQ model. Also UQ is certified THX . So its better in many ways. For info you can listen to conference of Sharp on Youtube.Note - On Friday I got this TV and I am still analyzing the functionality. Will update my review soon.ThanksAbhin
577878
This UQ model has a different polished edge type, THX certification, and AquoMotion 960 which is a brighter panel. Hope that helps!
280680
Hey Balaji did you get an answer I'm shopping the same recievers and I'm stuck between the two I hear the onkyo runs super hot maybe the 707 is more comparable, anyway I'm leaning towards the denon 1910 Jeff Helmlinger
1895230
I looked at both and bought the 750....for the price (and difference) you are really looking at how important a super thin TV is to you, if saving $2 a month on your energy bill makes that big of a difference, or if you are that nuts about LED, for $800 I wasn't. 200,000 to 1 as a Dynamic contrast ratio is more than enough (you can't really tell much more of a difference). If you really wanna get the LED and are willing to spend that kind of money get the 8000 (even thinner and edge lit led). Because of the models above and below it, and price differences I don't see the 7000 making much sense unless you find a unique deal that only has that set on sale.
2145723
I reviewed the L70SRW and am only familiar with that model. Other than a difference in price, I'm not sure how they compare. I can only say that I am very pleased with the model I have. I suggest you carefully review the description of each model to make your decision. Sorry I am unable to offer more.
1135547
Thanks for checking this for me! Yeah, I've been checking out the 4061 as well, but right now they are very close in price, so I thought it would be nice to bump up in CR and get the better sound (especially sine I won't be hooking up surround in this location - above fireplace in LR.) The 4066 sold by Worst Service has the exact same panel, but the sound is not as good since they ditch the side speakers to narrow it. Not worth it. I'll probably go with the 4061 since I know it'll fit and also seems to be an outstanding TV.
238642
Here check this links, http://www.manualslib.com/manual/176972/Philips-Qc5550-15.html?page=2#manual http://www.manualslib.com/manual/176973/Philips-Qc5530-40.html#manual, you can see the differences between models. I hope this help you.
2004349
When I purchased the 75T's, I had the same question. The most detailed comparisons I found said that the low frequency range was slightly larger for the 75T's and that the highs are somewhat muted. The overall consensus was that it is very difficult to hear any difference between the two speakers; both are great pieces of equipment.
1117161
I just purchased a 550 from Circuit City last week. They are one of the few stores that puts a 550 650 750 side by side. The audio on all 3 was the same, average at best. This is what I found with almost all LCD HDTV with small speakers. I bought the 550 because my eyes could see very little difference if any between the 3. Most difference was the options. The Samsung did have the best picture.
249991
Really the only difference are as such: The more expensive unit has 7.1 analog outputs, a RS-232 connection and like you stated, the extended warranty... I also think it might have another level of picture enhancement, but i am not sure about that.
1502984
Does it really matter? Ask first is if any of these two are available or in stock, which is a common Nesco problem, otherwise you wind up waiting for 1 month for your order like me. Of course they will offer you a substitute ,which is not you wanted in the first place. I got an 80P which makes a lot of noise.
1026320
where did you buy it for such a low price? whats hhgregg? my curiosity gets me when i see on the samsung website the MSRP for the 860 still at over 3k and the new c8000 at 2899. you would think the c8000 would be higher... unless they think the 860 is a better TV.
1128941
I looked at both and bought the 750....for the price (and difference) you are really looking at how important a super thin TV is to you, if saving $2 a month on your energy bill makes that big of a difference, or if you are that nuts about LED, for $800 I wasn't. 200,000 to 1 as a Dynamic contrast ratio is more than enough (you can't really tell much more of a difference). If you really wanna get the LED and are willing to spend that kind of money get the 8000 (even thinner and edge lit led). Because of the models above and below it, and price differences I don't see the 7000 making much sense unless you find a unique deal that only has that set on sale. I looked at both and bought the 750....for the price (and difference) you are really looking at how important a super thin TV is to you, if saving $2 a month on your energy bill makes that big of a difference, or if you are that nuts about LED, for $800 I wasn't. 200,000 to 1 as a Dynamic contrast ratio is more than enough (you can't really tell much more of a difference). If you really wanna get the LED and are willing to spend that kind of money get the 8000 (even thinner and edge lit led). Because of the models above and below it, and price differences I don't see the 7000... » Read More I looked at both and bought the 750....for the price (and difference) you are really looking at how important a super thin TV is to you, if saving $2 a month on your energy bill makes that big of a difference, or if you are that nuts about LED, for $800 I wasn't. 200,000 to 1 as a Dynamic contrast ratio is more than enough (you can't really tell much more of a difference). If you really wanna get the LED and are willing to spend that kind of money get the 8000 (even thinner and edge lit led). Because of the models above and below it, and price differences I don't see the 7000 making much sense unless you find a unique deal that only has that set on sale. « Show Less
1026319
I have the 58B860 and really enjoy the tv. I even encourage my dad to purchase one. I believe the only difference between the two tv's is the 3d technology. If you want 3d then I would say go with the c8000, but if you want a tv that is alot cheaper, and has great picture quality, then go for the 58b860. You may be able to find the 58b60 at a local retail store on clearance. I purchased mine for 1699.00 and my dad purchased his for 1529.00 from HHgregg. Hope this helps.
183315
I am in investigate mode (don't own one yet) but it seems that the 860 is thinner (1.9" compared to 4.2 on the series 7 and less) is lighter (I read 46#), has QAM which might eliminate the next for a cable box, has ATSC and NTSC which are digital tuners for over air broadcasts, and 2 USB inputs, and the 18 month warranty! Today it is 2526 including $150 shipping (Amazon).
1353449
Agreed. I have been looking at the 85U for about 2 weeks and this is the lowest price I have seen. Thank you Amazon. Unbelievable that the 85U is cheaper than the lesser model (80U). Plus, free shipping! I was looking at other New York outlets and they raised their prices over the past few days. Thanks again Amazon!
2077336
Both are 2014 Tvs. The Q10 has quattron, while the Q15 has quattron+ and the revelation upscaler. Q15 is the only regular HD TV that can play 4K content. The Q15 has more subpixels than the Q10 and has HDMI 2.0 also.
704050
I actually own both of these, and they couldn't be more different! the 800 has a VERY wide soundstage, the LCD3 has a much smaller, more intimate presentation. The 800 is awesomely accurate. If you want to hear the way a recording was mastered in the studio, and understand all of the nuances the artist put into the recording, the 800's will reproduce it exactly. The LCD3 has more "fun" with the sound. The low end is much more present than on the 800's, and the mid-range/voice area is simply outstanding on the LCD3, and the vocals seem more out front than on the 800's. IMO, choosing between these two cans is not an either/or proposition, because they present the music it two very different ways, and give you a very different experience comparing the same recordings. Owning both is a sizable expenditure of funds no doubt, but with these two, you can enjoy every type and range of recording to the fullest. I do find myself reaching for the 800's 80% of the time. That accurate reproduction of the sound is intoxicating to me.