Does the EF 75-300zoom lens have image stanilization?
586199
No. This is a solid lens, but you will need to use a tripod for low light, and a higher shutter speed if you are hand holding while zooming.
689822
Nope. The "S" in "EF-S" tells you it's for APSC cameras only not full frame. It's for SL-1, The Rebels, 7D, and the XXd series like the 70D. The STM version of this lens is very nice, quite sharp. Its silent operation is what you want for video.
2175502
yes indeed, the lens has a full frame compatible image circle. also, the d300 has an onboard AF motor
207492
Yes and no. The EF 75-300mm IS USM is a much better quality lens. You get what you pay for. If you intend to use the lens without a tripod then you would absolutely need the image stabilization. That said, I would look at refurbished lenses on the Canon website. You can get this lens for $519.99. I purchased one from there and I am totally happy with the purchase. Hope this helps.
842336
I haven't but I can tell you this lens is very wide and appears to be coming from a very far distance. it might be a bit too wide & distant to really capture what you want but try it out and let us know how it comes out!
629121
The image quality is good, particularly for the price. Its sharper & brighter than my Nikon binoculars and not quite as good as my pricier Zeiss monocular. For objects at 300 yards, you probably want something with a higher magnification.
1424952
Yes, but only the EF-S 18-55mm IS II Lens has it the other lens (Canon EF 75-300mm III Lens) doesnt have
1357948
No, you need to spend a few hundred more dollars for something like the Metabones Speed Booster and I haven't noticed any light loss in really use. But, I don't pixel peak or run complicated lens tests to check.
1316305
Yes. They are about the same although you lose a stop of aperture with the 70-300. The maximum aperture is f/5.6 instead of f/4. The 70-300 lens is only f/4 near the 70mm end. Otherwise, optically in terms of sharpness, it's about the same.
781336
It does, however, it has to go to higher ISO which makes images a bit grainy. Not too bad though.
802562
Since you aren't being specific about which 75-300, I'll just assume it's because they don't have image stabilization (IS). Cheaper Canon 75-300mm lenses don't usually have this feature. The UD lenses have fluorite (I think) elements. At any rate, the "UD" tag in the lens name = ultra low dispersion (which means more $$). You can tell the features of a particular lens by the numbers and abbreviations in the lens name. Example: EF (type of lens mount), 70-300mm (this one is obvious), f/4-5.6 (aperture range from 70-300), IS (image stabilization), USM (type of motor that drives the autofocus, in this case, Ultra Sonic). All of these features can add to or take away from the price of a lens. You might also see a I, II, or III thrown in there somewhere, this is the revision or the iteration of a particular lens series. I hope this helps.
869668
This is not a stm or usm lens, so you would expect some level of noise. However, Not as bad as some of the older ef lens. It is still pretty decent.
1627785
C'mon, the macro glass you have is already amazing - an electron microscope the Raynox aint. It would only degrade the image of your awesome lens.
1529155
Hi Penelope. I am a bird photographer. This converter will bring the image closer. However, I prefer the 2.2x lens which screws on top of the 75-300 lens because the clarity is superior and the focusing faster. You can call us anytime for this information or email us. Cheers
392694
No, it does not, but it does provide infinity focus and a glass element is unnecessary and would degrade the image anyway.
1071779
Here are some reviews of both. http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/100HS/100HSA.HTMhttp://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/300HS/300HSA.HTMI recently had to make the same decision, and tried out both the 300HS and 100HS. The image with the 100HS was sharper every time. Colors were pretty much the same, both seemed slightly saturated (easy fix with settings), but fairly accurate IMO.I wouldn't spend the extra $50 for a bit more zoom, especially at the cost of image quality.
38404
I believe that the 75-300mm lens is non-USM. I do not see the letters anywhere on the lens. The neat thing about the lens is that is can be either manual or auto focus. There is so much to this camera, probably too much for my poor brain, that I am taking a camera class to figure out exactly what this thing does. Good Luck.