What are the differences between the LX-3000 and the LX-6000?
606289
I have the LX 6000 and my room mate has the LX 3000. I like where the mute button is on the 6000 better and I think it is lighter. It sounds better also. I have used both of them and I prefer the 6000
395136
According to Cnet, another difference is the 69 does not have side connections and the 71 does. My guess is that this is only an issue for those looking to flush mount the tv on their wall. I am in the market for a bedroom television and I was set on buying the LNT4071, but since I wont be flush mounting, I prefer a matte screen, and I do not think contrast difference will be noticable, I think I'm going to pick up the 4069 instead and save some cash.
1503517
That significantly had an effect on the sound quality. The X-230 sounds a lot better in comparison. I get a more surround sound feel with the X-230, but I can't say the same about the X-240's. Easily X-230 > X-240.
26666
If you look on The zxox web page you will see the technical differences. However, practically, the simple answer is it is bigger. With the larger tv's it provides a stable base with absolutely incredible sound and clarity. Try it, you will be impressed. Trust me.
1355122
30x....these cameras are the same..one US version the other International (why? .....for reasons unknown).....
1384654
I don't see any difference between the two but we bought the SS-Lgx and it worked fine.
1901592
My guess it is because the 200 has a Leica lens. Actually I believe that the Leica lens is much better than the one in the 270 but I enjoy having the 60 x optical zoom. I have an older Panasonic with the Leica lens and I believe the pictures are much sharper. If you don't need the distance, I would choose the 200 for its better lens and clarity.
2145502
As far as I know, the differences are minimal....Both are excellent; save the $20,go with the 190XB. I love mine.
2055851
According to the specs from Amazon, the 3000 is longer yet lighter in weight. The color also appears to vary.
1509567
The LXDT06 is also a little bit more powerful, has a 3 bar battery indicator unlike the low battery indicator on the LXDT01. There are slight cosmetic differences and the LXDT06 is a bit smaller in the head section. Also as previous person answered it has quick shift mode. I have owned both ans still own the LXDT06 both are great guns, but the flourescent bumpers get loose and lost...
1182300
I have used both. The biggest difference is the Price! Both of the products do the exact same thing. The TRX is made of higher quality materials, but not enough for it to cost so much more. I am now using the Woss 3000, but I am using the workout guides from the TRX since they are more advanced.
1504713
I've owned both. I would say it is worth it. The steady shot appears to be more stable, it has better low light sensitivity for some reason, it zooms faster, it has a built in gps, it has mic and headphone jacks, better ergonomics and hand strap, it has nightshot, it has a viewfinder, six bladed iris, a huge higher resolution screen and manual focus control. Also, i personally think it is far more sexy than cx-300. one thing to note is that the built in mic on the cx-550v doesn't have good channel separation. The build quality is also much more durable for the CX-550V. The video quality isn't noticeably different tho. I've owned both. I would say it is worth it. The steady shot appears to be more stable, it has better low light sensitivity for some reason, it zooms faster, it has a built in gps, it has mic and headphone jacks, better ergonomics and hand strap, it has nightshot, it has a viewfinder, six bladed iris, a huge higher resolution screen and manual focus control. Also, i personally think it is far more sexy than cx-300. one thing to note is that the built in mic on the cx-550v doesn't have good channel separation. The build quality is also much more durable for the CX-550V. The video quality... » Read More I've owned both. I would say it is worth it. The steady shot appears to be more stable, it has better low light sensitivity for some reason, it zooms faster, it has a built in gps, it has mic and headphone jacks, better ergonomics and hand strap, it has nightshot, it has a viewfinder, six bladed iris, a huge higher resolution screen and manual focus control. Also, i personally think it is far more sexy than cx-300. one thing to note is that the built in mic on the cx-550v doesn't have good channel separation. The build quality is also much more durable for the CX-550V. The video quality isn't noticeably different tho. « Show Less
1634370
I have them both in front of me for comparison: The 2000 has a slightly rougher surface than the 1000, which is probably what the "precision control" is referring to. The 2000 has a stitched edge, while the 1000 has a cut edge. If I tug at the corner of the pads, the 1000 seems to stretch more than the 2000. The 2000 has an extra "DX-2000" logo in the upper left corner, while the 1000 only has the Perixx logo in the lower right. The Perixx logo on the 2000 is a much brighter white and the logos seem to be layered on top of the fabric (if I rub my finger across the logo I can just barely feel the lettering, which has a rubbery texture), while the logo on the 1000 seems to be inked into the fabric.
275207
i can't tell you about the 6000 because i didn't test it. i like the 9000 especially for music. nice full sound without all the wires etc. easy set up and easy for the family to use. have to get used to the way it works with tv remote, but i am very happy with the unit.
1451690
Yeah it is.. Even the 7000Series is cheaper than the 6000!!! What is up with that!?
1804919
The PX-150 has fewer sounds than the 330 and it can not save user settings such as layerd sounds (often I layer a Pad sound or String sound under the Piano sound). There is no LCD on the 150, and really no need for it. The sounds between the two are virtually the same and the action is the same, with the 330 stacked with more sound choices.
2055853
They are different types of mounting poles. The 3000 is more of a straight pipe with and offset for wall or gable mounting, it is alos longer than the 2000. The 2000 is more of a pole mount type with a heavy offset.