Whats the difference between the two sizes? Im about 5'10" & 185 lbs, would this pack fit?
588137
This pack comes only in one size, I'm not sure what the 14L means. And I'm sure the pack would fit just fine.
588138
I believe its the overall volume not the size. They should fit the same but the 14 holds more junk in total. It's bulky and not so slim but fits great and works great too
1293837
I would try to get something larger. This isn't for long torso people. Average height person would be ok, but anything taller would probably be to talk for this pack.
1546425
I am 5'7" and weigh approx. 190...it will fit me so I'd think it will fit you. I bought one, then was diagnosed with Rheumatoid Arthritis so probably cannot do anymore umpiring....My pack is for sale....NEVER BEEN USED, STILL IN ORIGINAL PLASTIC PACKAGING. Asking $125. if anyone wants it. I'm in Boca Raton. email me....howard423@aol.com
108431
Hello Stephanie, I do not recommend this backpack for a petite woman. There is a smaller version of this pack, it doesn't have a ouch for your sleeping bag. But it would be better suited for someone of your stature. I'll get the name for you and provide, soon.
1058362
As far as I know the pack size is the same. The s/m/l refers to the torso fit.
2089769
Don't know if it helps but im 6.0 and 165 and i could it adjust it to fit just fine.. i would say there is plenty of length to fit someone a little taller than I.. only real quarm is this is my first hikers pack and i feel uneasy on how thin the material seems, but they all are like that. I do a lot of hunting and hiking. The pack is heavy if you are looking for real light weight but i definitely like it and hope to have it for a long time also great for the price.
1508693
I am not good with kids sizes but it fits me well and I'm 5'10" and 145 pounds. This pack holds more than it looks like it will and can get heavy very quickly. 40-50 pounds. I think it would be too big. They have some smaller packs that may be a better fit.
1977015
I would recommend the 55. My son has the 55 and he is 5'-5" and 125lbs...he loves his. These packs are great for the money! Happy trails :)
1204288
I will say - yes, this pack is too large for you, would not be comfortable. I am 5' 9", 170 pounds, regular build, and this pack feels bulky on me. I do hike with it only because it holds so much gear. The two smaller models do not easily handle long lenses.
548135
I think you'll be fine with this pack. It wasn't very big. As for space available, I used it to hike Pikes Peak in Colorado Springs. I filled the bladder and still had room for a spare bottle, extra gloves, and snacks for the day.
1067367
medium with slight adjustment capability; I didn't care for this pack, I am 5' 9" with a 44 in waist and I doubt this would fit any larger than a 36, even if you are thin, look elsewhere. I use the cheap Everest 24" pack with an internal stiffener made of foamboard wrapped in duct tape.
1452303
It depends on whether you like larger size backpacks on your back. I am 5'1" and I love larger backpacks. If not, then go with the 25L one.
767975
I have this same pncho, though i bought mine from sportsmansguide. I am 5 foot 10 inches and weigh 375lbs and it fits around me and my fully loaded large alice pack with external frame.
49034
I think it's for someone smaller. I am 5'4 and it fits me perfectly. It is adjustable, but it's a pretty small pack. Just my thoughts on it.
2017856
Large would be best. I am 5'10 and 185lb. Ordered an XL and was way too big. Returned it for a L.
23092
Older models came in S/M/L. Current year model is S/M and M/L. the risgh sized pack depends n your torso length. Check out http://www.ospreypacks.com/en/web/sizing_and_fitting. My torso length 15 right between the two sizes at 20.5 so I went with the small. It adjusts perfectly and is really comfortable on long all day hikes.
105546
I'm 6ft. 195lbs and it's seems fairly large on me. With both bags full the weight tends to move the harness a bit. I don't know if they have different sizes or not.