What the difference between this 1482001 and the 1432001 other than $50 price?
590871
The 148 has the "Touch n Go gas ignition to light the charcoal whereas the 143 you will have to use lighter fluid/electric wand or the newspaper chimney to get the coals fired up. We love our grill!!!!! Tom Ferngren Mora, Mn
590872
The electronic touch and go starting system is well worth the price difference. You will make up for it in lighter fluid and match-light charcoal as they are no longer needed. You also skip that lighter fluid taste. The copper finish is very nice and doesn't change color. LOVE this grill!
590873
The difference is that the 1482001 has the electonic ignition, what they call the "Electronic Touch-N-Go gas ignition system". It's very nice and handy, tho if you use the stainless chimneys to light your coals it is completely unnecessary.
590874
The propane fire assist is what makes this grill worth the extra price. It's quick and easy.
590875
The propane fire assist. Which is a HUGE help in getting your charcoal going. No need for lighter fluid anymore. Uses a standard small tank, same as your camp stove.
590876
The performer platinum has a gas ignition system for lighting the charcoal. The performer gold does not.
590877
The 1432001 doesn't come with the "electronic touch and go" starting system. Well worth the extra cost
261091
I really don't now the differents between the two. I read about the model #52244only and bought it. Sorry Iccan't help you.
1516117
970 (I had to look) I have the original that's 1000. It's been fabulous though --I wasn't sure which one was even the new one until I looked for you -- they are interchangeable. I bought a knock off brand once and it was terrible. It had maybe 1/4 of the life. This one, as I said I couldn't even tell the difference.
629290
Here is the comparison page from Oppo's website:http://www.oppodigital.com/dv981hd/dv981hd_comp.htmlThe main advantage of the 981 is the Faroudja chip, which delivers better-quality upscaling on non-DLP displays. The 981 also offers better-quality PAL->NTSC conversion than Oppo's other two models. Otherwise, as you pointed out, the other two models offer a lot of additional features (I wish my 981 had a memory-stick or USB input!). However, since you have a DLP, you probably want to get the 980 anyway (as the chart indicates). The Faroudja has a notorious "macroblocking" problem when used in conjunction with a lot of DLP displays. Here is the comparison page from Oppo's website:http://www.oppodigital.com/dv981hd/dv981hd_comp.htmlThe main advantage of the 981 is the Faroudja chip, which delivers better-quality upscaling on non-DLP displays. The 981 also offers better-quality PAL->NTSC conversion than Oppo's other two models. Otherwise, as you pointed out, the other two models offer a lot of additional features (I wish my 981 had a memory-stick or USB input!). However, since you have a DLP, you probably want to get the 980 anyway (as the chart indicates). The Faroudja has a... » Read More Here is the comparison page from Oppo's website:http://www.oppodigital.com/dv981hd/dv981hd_comp.htmlThe main advantage of the 981 is the Faroudja chip, which delivers better-quality upscaling on non-DLP displays. The 981 also offers better-quality PAL->NTSC conversion than Oppo's other two models. Otherwise, as you pointed out, the other two models offer a lot of additional features (I wish my 981 had a memory-stick or USB input!). However, since you have a DLP, you probably want to get the 980 anyway (as the chart indicates). The Faroudja has a notorious "macroblocking" problem when used in conjunction with a lot of DLP displays. « Show Less
2249226
Hi, the U6439 is, about twice the price. So is the U6485900, only about $50 more, but doesn't look like its as much of a machine.
1430591
I believe it's just an older model number. I haven't found anything with any difference between the two of them.
2188723
It looks like 6194-1 has a picture on it. That seems to be the only difference..and the price of course. We are very content with the 6316-1 model. Does the job just fine.
712873
I recall when I bought my 9001 a newer version was also available. The newer one didn't seem to be any better than mine other than it was a slightly better looking unit. I don't remember other details other than aesthetics. I love my 9001.
810607
I am in the same boat. I found that the 1200 is the "newest" model of it... And don't like it. The 1400 looks slick, but doesn't have too good of reviews. Did you find anything since then? I see you posted in Jan. :)
977630
I'm in the same boat. I'm trying to decide between the 7411 & the 5914. I've seen the reviews, both seem to be good. It's my assumption that the 7411 is a newer model and it's only $20 more. Is it worth the extra or will the 5914 be just as good?
347612
I purchased the 531418 model. Both models have similar capabilities and the fittings and installation are essentially the same. The only difference that I can see is that model 531418 has filters that twist on and off and model 531411 has filters that push on. A button on the housing is pressed to release the filters when it is time to change them. It seemed to me that the push button set up on model 531411 was more complicated and therefore had more moving parts that could fail over time. I believe model 531418 is the newer model. I am not sure why this company chooses to manufacture and market two different systems that are so similar.
1864455
It was the Craftsman 21400. I quickly upgraded to a Jet 14" and I've been happy.
438557
1400 has a smaller grilling surface. The Q2400 is bigger than we wanted, but perfect for cooking for 4-6 people...we should have purchased the 1400 because we just needed it for two-3 people. Either way they are both good products. Our neighbor has the 1400 and loves it.
185971
The 861 is an improved model over the 860. It adjusts more easily for depth and placement, resulting in better alignment of dovetails.It is a better product than the 860... if you were to buy the 860, you will soon wish that you had paid extra for the 861, unless you're a very experienced router guy.
644315
I just spoke with TeeterTV to cancel an order that I'd set up, but went comparing reviews before committing to my purchase. Unlike other reviews, they readily acknowledged the "problem with their system," and agreed to cancel. That's a good on them, as I was leaning toward the 950. However, my rep informed me that the 950 is more like the 550 (no acupressure bumps or lumbar attachment) & there is a new 960 that's a beefed up 560. She said when you order the 560 through teetertv, you're given the option of upgrading to the 960 for $80. Not sure if Amazon has that.
618846
The differences I see in their write-ups are size and speed control. The 7323 is single speed and smaller.
441292
They're very similar -- they just have minor hardware revisions. I wouldn't recommend this one, as I've had nothing but problems with it.