What is the difference between these speakers and the Micca R-8C 8-Inch Reference Series?
593992
The Reference Series appears to be a better overall speaker. It handles slightly more power, seems to have a substantially larger magnet and a deeper mounting depth...which comes at a cost. I have 4 pairs of the cheaper speakers used for whole home audio. For ~$34, they are decent speakers. Depending on your ear and how the speakers are installed, you may or may not be able to tell a difference. For example, I have 2 pairs mounted in the basement ceiling whereby they have the entire truss space to act as the speaker 'box'. These sound noticeably better than the ones on the main level that have a minimal box and surrounded by attic insulation. If your ear is more 'tuned' and you plan to use the speakers for home theater, you may consider stepping up to the Reference Series. I probably would have if they were available when I installed them. But again, at $34, I have no regrets. Hope this helps.
316331
this set comes with the RM7 for some reason in the picture towards the bottom they show the RM8 but no they come with the RM7 the difference is that the RM8 has dual woofers vs the RM7 is a single woofer inside the speaker itself if you look at the picture is shows a tiny speaker on the side those are the RM8s
1238322
You're right. I bought the RM705 HTS a couple of years ago and it has the RM7 satellites in a 6 speaker config, not the RM8s.
481429
They're basically the same, except with a (built in) lower cross-over point from mid range a high range. So, these (depending on how you look at it) are either "bassier," or "have less treble." Although I believe the cross-over point isn't much different. So essentially the same speaker.
598538
I have a set of these speakers but don't understand what you are asking. Are you looking for length, height, width?
1643159
This model seems to have better sound response and seems to be more eficient. I have it as the front speakers in my living and the rc80i as the surround and it's a good combination. In my opinion. Hope this helps!!
6067
Hi, there is no difference in the speakers themselves, just the price.Thanks,Rusty
484983
My research found a few forums that that claimed the RB600 was the Canadian version of the RB 61 II and that Klipsch over produced for Canada and was selling this speaker in the States discounted to help balance inventory. I don't know if this is fact or rumor. When I took the speakers into IQ audio for a compare (not with RF 62 II) the stereo expert, mentioned that the RB 600s may use a different cross over than the RB 62 II. I had the space and went with the RF 42 II towers, no regrets, a big difference in sound for my location.
623793
sorry - I don't know, but I can tell you is that these are very clean, clear sounding, and very powerful. You can really turn these up and they have a very large dynamic and useful range, with full base lows, yet also incredibly high highs. I would buy them again, I am not dissappointed with them at all. They also sound better then they should at low power volumes for a speaker of this size. So similar sized speakers need more power to produce decent sound at low volumes, these speakers can sound good at low volumes - a testement to their dynamic range.
316330
I have the RM 7. RM 8 I think are double sides speakers and are newer. You may want to ask the seller. Hope this helped a little.
358011
I do not know the answer, this is a metric used more in construction of the speaker to my knowledge though. I can tell you that they sound great right out of the box. Then when tuning the receiver/amp they only get better.
1329398
I own the Polk T15 and BIC America DV62si speakers. The BIC speakers are bigger, heavier and have wider frequency response/higher sensitivity than the Polk T15's. I would recommend the BIC speakers over the Polks. I've seen the Polks on sale for for around fifty dollars, but have never seen a new pair of BIC America DV62si's offered for less than a hundred.I would also consider Micca's MB42 speakers. They sound similar to the Polk T15, but cost less.
281077
There is definitely a difference between the '600WH and the '800WH. The '800WH has a fuller and richer sound. For that reason I use the 2x '800WH up front and 4x '600WH as the surround speakers.
662540
I have a small room with limited space, so I got 2 small but powerful speakers. I purchased the Micca MB42 Bookshelf speakers for $60. They're super inexpensive, and I just love them and their sound.
1396022
Kobi, Your received puts out 100w per channel. This is sufficient and will make the micca speakers scream. I would suggest four of these and also get the dual 5" center channel speaker I'm pretty sure they are 5". You won't ne disappointed!!! Now that you have your answer for that lets talk about your bass cuz with out the bass the great treble and mid range isn't going to matter. I have another cheap suggestion that rocks and won't break the bank. This is the best subwoofer I have ever owned it rocks and just gets louder when you crank up the volume and doesn't flatten out or max out when you turn it up. BIC America F12 12" 475W front firing sub. You can get this bad boy for 200 and it's worth every penny. This is the system I have with a Yamaha 100w per channel receiver and it is crystal clear and pounds. The girlfriend hates it.. Lmao!! I just went off reviews and man I'm glad I did I have a great system that was inexpensive.. Glad you asked and hope this helps
1344963
I think you would prefer the 1000 as it opens up a larger amount of frequencies that cannot be achieved with the smaller 8" speaker. However, if you are just looking for a little extra something while watching TV or movies, the SUB-800 would be great. I wanted to play loud, punchy music with prominent frequencies under 80Hz so I got the SUB-1000.
748133
Go with the Micca MB42x series and you will be much happier. I got these Dayton's a month or so ago and quality was terrible. Much happier With my Miccas.