Is there a difference in picture quality between R1 and R1C1? Some people said R1C1 is required for best picture.
575825
The difference, as you probably know, is the SU 800. I have the SB-900 that I use and it seems to work fine, or I can use the built in flash on my D-800. I have never tried the SU-800 so I can not comment on the difference.
575826
The only difference is you have a controller in the kit with the R1C1 and depending on your camera if it has commander mode you may not need the R1C1 controller, but it is nice to have.
575827
No, the R1C1 is the same system with commander for the cameras that do not have the integrated infrared commander.
575828
With the R1C1 you can set the power of the tow flashs indépendently. By this way you can give to your subject shape and texture..The SU-800 is not needed for cameras with a Wireless Commander built into the camera's onboard Speedlight system, and Nikon offers the R1 system for those cameras. http://www.ppmag.com/web-exclusives/2013/07/
632462
I am thinking about getting a G2 but wanted to know a something regarding the various aspect ratios that are available which are the 4:3, 3:2, 16:9, and 1:1 aspect ratios. My question is can all of these aspect ratios be shot in RAW mode?Thanks.Mark
2231490
Yes, the biggest differences will be that you only have 8 channels instead of 16, and this recorder will be able to record at a higher resolution than the older one. H.264 is a high compression codec that has a max resolution of I think 320 X 240 whereas the D1 is a similar compression but up to 720 lines. The cameras will work fine on both.
1917616
I've learned not to mess with it. I would just stick with standard because it still looks great, then I use "game mode" for games which automatically moves it to standard, and does some other things to enhance processing and sound. I haven't played around with the modes since, but I may go back and do the Pixar settings test they have on their Blu-Ray movies to modify standard a bit for more contrast...
285016
I use a converter and get really good picture quality. Is it top end? Don't know but to the naked eye it looks great.
441927
There is no difference.Looking up the camera with the V or B separately the same camera comes up with the exact same specs for both.
1004244
Its all of the camera companies. Apparently the .mov format has better quality and compression.
1385240
No Both, and some people disagree with these miss spec very popular in these days, but for me doesn't matter, I don´t need it. This camera is a good choice for people who are lookin for an upgrade of a compact camera without spend too much money as a pro camera, but the picture and video quality are very good, specially in good light condition, and very nice in dark condition, with plenty of nice characteristic to convert this camera a very nice camera for a familiar use
40714
As far as camera quality and picture quality, etc, they are equivalent?I purchased the T700, didn't realize there was a T77 available. I am considering returning and getting the T77 because of the price.
1660345
RX100 specs&quality; are better. But XF1 is best money tradeoff with brilliant EXR mode.
1674903
I have been more than pleased with the image quality of the LF1. I have not seen the images you are evaluating. Check out Gordon Liam & Camera Labs for his review and serious sample photos.
2091812
I saw the BNC,s marked one and two but I have never explored monitor 2. I have six small pictures all on one monitor, What I do notice that the more videos running at one time causes the picture quality to drop a lot and the monitor puts out a lot of heat possibly because so much information is passing thru all at one time. For what I am doing picture quality is not important, only that all sox videos are all running. Sorry I could not help much.Garry
180823
Thanks Walker D.K. Do you think the PQ is significantly better on the G10 than the S1? I went in to BestBuy to try and compare but the two TVs were on opposite endcaps running different demos so I couldn't really compare the PQ. The BestBuy guy told me the G10 had a significantly better processor than the S1. Also, back to my original question: will an S1/BD60 combo give me full Viera cast functionality?
69007
I personally am getting the T1i for my first DSLR. I have a film SLR and an advanced P&S; type camera that I use now. I consider myself and advanced amateur and understand how to manipulate the manual settings. The XSi and the T1i are not vastly different as far as how the menu's or controls are set up. The T1i is more advanced as far as sensor, megapixels, LCD screen resolution, and the fact that it can do video if you want it to. For the extra money, I want the T1i's extra features.
887423
hd a35 has better picture because of HDMI Out with Deep Color Support am i correct? i also bought a hd dvd add on for my xbox 360 didnt receive any of the 2 yet not sure which i should keep.
2178178
I'm afraid that I agree with Ben. If we start cropping and manipulating, we'll find some loss of info owing to the more lossy compression. It probably isn't noticeable under many conditions, Mario, but I don't get the point at all. Less loss gives the photographer more room to crop, do noise reduction, adjust colors, etc. I thought that Canon photos were a bit too smooth to begin with, losing some detail, and this only makes the problem worse. I don't mind not being able to shoot in raw, I guess but losing super fine is going in exactly the wrong direction. Unless Canon are trying to steer us to the G10. And that's an entirely different discussion. I'm afraid that I agree with Ben. If we start cropping and manipulating, we'll find some loss of info owing to the more lossy compression. It probably isn't noticeable under many conditions, Mario, but I don't get the point at all. Less loss gives the photographer more room to crop, do noise reduction, adjust colors, etc. I thought that Canon photos were a bit too smooth to begin with, losing some detail, and this only makes the problem worse. I don't mind not being able to shoot in raw, I guess but losing super fine is going in exactly the wrong direction. Unless Canon are trying to steer... » Read More I'm afraid that I agree with Ben. If we start cropping and manipulating, we'll find some loss of info owing to the more lossy compression. It probably isn't noticeable under many conditions, Mario, but I don't get the point at all. Less loss gives the photographer more room to crop, do noise reduction, adjust colors, etc. I thought that Canon photos were a bit too smooth to begin with, losing some detail, and this only makes the problem worse. I don't mind not being able to shoot in raw, I guess but losing super fine is going in exactly the wrong direction. Unless Canon are trying to steer us to the G10. And that's an entirely different discussion. « Show Less
10589
The quality is pretty good, but you may have to configure it. I was unimpressed with the first pictures until I realized that there are settings for it. Select media, then push the gear at the bottom of the screen. Select "quality" and you can select from normal, fine and HD.