There is a choking hazard listed on this Peek a Boo Forest but I think it might be a mistake? Please advise.
593775
No choking hazards in this book..I think manufacturers are being advised to include this warning in all products whether or not there is an actualchoking hazard.
593776
I don't think anything about this book could present a choking hazard. The beak of the owl sticks out but is sewed on well and I can't imagine any infant or even toddler could pull it off. I have never been worried about my (now) 10 month old with this book.
593777
I too believe this is a mistake. If you read the product description it references things that are obviously not about a book: "Makes tummy time fun and comfortable. Mesh cover and mat are machine washable..."
593778
not at all, perfect for baby to chew on!!! my son loves it pulling the flaps, etc. def. not a choking hazard
2281086
Amazon now has a warning that this product presents a choking hazard for children under 3 YEARS of age. I could see how toddlers could chew off bits of the foam and choke. So possibly OK for infants but watch out when those teeth come through.
510605
It doesn't really say. They are not recommended for under age 3 because of choking hazard.
2194980
My daughter started playing with these toys at 18mos. I'm think the Amazon over 3 thing is an error he box says 2 and up and I don't see how any of them are a choking hazard but I always supervise my daughter with them just because she isn't yet 2
681730
I just looked over the label. The only warning was to children under three due to a choking hazard for the ribbon.
2219822
Not a choking hazard. I think they are perfectly sized for a 1-year-old, though I have to admit I don't love the selection of blocks included.
1089877
No choking hazards. Most pieces are bigger than the roll itself. The smallest piece is the triangle at the top of the house in the picture it apx 2" x 2" x 2" or slightly larger.
679781
I think that the standard for the warning is if the toy has small pieces or if small pieces could be generated upon breakage. In this case, there are no chokeable parts, but if the ring were to break, I could see how there would be chokeable parts generated. It would take more than usual baby play to break this ring, though. As an adult, I'd have to make a concerted effort to break it, and my first step would be to open the ring, which even my toddler can't do. I don't think it's reasonably a choking hazard when played with by babies/toddlers. That said, my children haven't found it to be a fun toy or a particularly good teether. If you haven't bought it yet, skip it.
94853
I don't believe that there is anything about this toy that could be construed by anyone, except maybe a lawyer, to be a choking hazard. That being said, my boy likes the toy and even at his age (now 6) cannot put it into his mouth, much less try to swallow it. There are no little parts and he cannot remove the battery. I doubt that a two-year old could do that also. It is a nice toy for little ones, and I fully believe it to be a safe toy.
468189
I just read your concern about Sophie being a choking hazard. I haven't taken the time to review all of the feedback on Sophie, but you have to take several things into account. You state that one reviewer found their child choking on Sophie's leg when they "walked into the room". Where were they and why was their infant left alone? The key to being a good parent is to supervise your child. Watch how they interact with their toys. There are many toys on the market for children under 3 that could become choking hazards under the right conditions. If you are leaving your child alone AT ALL they could quickly choke on something as benign as a blanket. My child has owned Sophie for 3 years now and I wouldn't even hesitate to buy her again. He began playing with her at 3 months of age. You have to take all of the ratings with a grain of salt......not everyone is the same type of parent. You can't shift the blame to the toy if you are not supervising your child to begin with.
147036
We had this for my littles. Baby Jesus is definetly a choking risk. Its OK for lil ones to play with, but they do need to be supervised. Personally I say go for it. Treat it as something special and keep it up when your not able to monitor.
679778
As another poster said, I would bet it has to do with the packaging, not the product itself. I've never know a baby to choke on a key teether product. I have seem other reviews that stated these are thin and flimsy, so perhaps that is what it is referring to.
1882728
The "small parts" are the locking drawstring on the storage bag and the tent's door zipper. If either of them were to break off, then they could be considered a choking hazard. However, my girls have been playing with this tent for over two summers and we've had no issues. It's a very well-made tent! We even set it up for a friend's 18 month old, and he loved it.I think your two year old would be fine.
1351931
I'm not an expert but I would say "no". The tiles that pop off would probably be classified as choking hazard size.
1362445
there are some small parts, for most children there should be low risk of choke hazards. younger children may require some help building it or putting it back together during play.
789234
We used them when my daughter was turning over because they were more padded than the wood floors- I think the borders could be considered a choking hazard?
249026
I'm sorry, I can't offer any suggestion. My little guy is only 2, was born with cleft pallet so basically we use this to encourage speech in naming the animals. We haven't actually used them to play the game as described.