what difference MM 550-X TRAVEL?
575278
The MM 550X has electronic noise canceling (NAS) and deep base surround sound options. The MM 500X is the same as the MM550X but without NAS and surround sound options.
575279
travel (550-x) has noise canceling feature, otherwise they should be the same.
94480
There should be no difference. Both are the figures for the size in metrics. One is just showing it with the millimeter designation(mm) after the size.
809689
I would suggest reading this review: http://www.kenrockwell.com/fuji/x-mount-lenses/18-55mm.htm as well as this one http://www.kenrockwell.com/fuji/x-mount-lenses/56mm-f12.htm and seeing what you think.
1024338
The most important difference is the lense 34X. The rest, both cameras are fine. Ral
1144694
Okay, then what is the difference between the MX200 and the M550? Both have write speeds in the 500+.
2016946
The specs, measured with a reasonably accurate tape measure, are as follows: Jaw max is 3-3/4". X axis travel is 3-1/8". Y axis travel is 4-7/16" (with one remaining thread holding).
2094707
The difference is size.There is link so you can get answer to your question http://www.batterymart.com/p-2009-10-25-f1-f2-terminal-comparison.html. I hope this help.
617202
The 600 appears to be a standard telephoto zoom (600-1300mm, f/8 - f/16) while the 500 is a reflecting telescope design (mirror) with a fixed focal length and aperture (f/8) that can be converted to 1000mm by adding the included doubler. These are both very inexpensive lenses for these focal lengths!
1121973
The main differences I can see: M3D550KD: 240 Hz 5ms response Smart dimming: yes Smooth motion: yes M3D550KDE: 120 Hz 6ms response time Smart dimming: no Smooth motion: no
2188487
No I would go with a 500mm or 700. Thats what I use for my sons races in motox.
743446
Units purchased from Amazon.com have 33" of travel. Manufacturer specs show 36" of travel. I am unclear as to why there is a difference.
1688174
I would go with the 128 mm or larger....128 mm is just over 5" long so it is still very small.
1822094
The 550 is 30000:1, The 650 is 50000:1 There is a big difference in PQ of these two sets.The 650 being better.
1806510
Its 34mm. I have it installed in my IBM T60. I believe they list both since 34mm cards fit in 54mm slots.
1144690
MX100 uses 16nm process as opposed to 20nm process used by M550. The smaller the NAND gets, the cheaper it costs for the manufacturers to fabricate the device hence the price difference, but it hurts the device reliability a little. Although normal consumer usage almost never hits those reliability limits, I would say M550 is slightly more reliable.
491140
58 to 52mm adapter is included. You would need a step down adaptor 55 to 52.
296834
Well, when I selected 700, I got the 28mm, because that is the size I was replacing. That is 700x28c, where the 'c' is inconsequential, as far as I know.