How does the reticule crosshair thicknes compare to other scopes? thanks.
604184
The cross hairs are basic. Not overly thick. They are not mil-dot style, if that is what you are wondering.
604185
The reticle is somewhat similar to my other scopes which include a Redfield and a Leopold-VII. Crosshair center point of sight is thinner/finer than the outer crosshair thickness. No issues with the scope view or sighting whatsoever. As stated earlier I use this scope on my pellet for small critters.
604186
about average...i have a leuopold thats thicker in all but the center of the crosshairs...a few utg in which are the same...and a crosman which is the same
74090
I used both on my rifle for about a year. Seemed to sight in just fine. I was even able to co-witness through my Vortex Strikefire. But I never took it hunting so don't know how well it does there.
248079
My reticle is a bit oblong, also. I can't answer if this is typical of this model it but doesn't bother me or my shooting.
2082861
I have one on my CMMG 16" 300 Blackout upper, and I love it...can't beat it for the money. My only caution is that it is heavy compared to other scopes, so if you want lightweight, look for a Nikon or Bushnell.
1382720
Hi-Yes- The reticle has mil-dots on the left and right horizontal and upper vertical. The lower vertical has BDC. Just to let you know that this is the only scope I have ever had that was dead on out of the box at 150 yards on an AR15 platform.. Love it
895531
Irv, I do NOT like the rangefinder. It actually gets in the way for me. The instructions are vague at best. I don't use the rangefinder part, but I DO use the duplex reticle part. This works like a conventional hunting scope. Still, this is a very decent scope; it has held zero very well on my 308 Scout and dials back repeatably for my come-ups and back down for 100yds. Great value scope. Buy it.
311511
I have two of these. One mounted on a S&W; M&P; 10 (.308) that I've swapped the flash suppressor out for a muzzle brake. Has 18" barrel. Normally shoot Sierra 168 grain HPBTs in hand loads. Last outing I was getting sub-moa results. Have the other mounted on Armalite AR-31 (.308) with 24" barrel. Have shot better than 1/2 moa with the same hand loads. I never worry about the BDC feature since that is pretty dependent on using specific factory ammo. I can wing it on longer shots pretty easily. Great scopes.
1485949
Hi, did you wind up buying this? If so, did it fit well on your scope? Is it better than the awful red-dot finder that the 114eq comes with? How much so if it is? Is it worth getting? Or is one of either the telrad or reigel reflex sights a better choice for the 114eq?
1422061
frankly i am very impressed with the vortec crossfire 11 1-4x24mm. very good quality compared scopes costing hundreds of dollars more.try this scope, you will like it, i did.
609847
I have two of the Primary Arms 1-6 scopes and I really like the layout of the reticle. It gives you a lot of information in a very intuitive way. I don't find that the clarity is lacking at all as far out as I've taken shots with mine so far. I have a shoot coming up this weekend with targets out to 480 yds, so I will get a real test of the scope with those. But I would recommend it from my experience so far.
2282446
It's a nice durable scope. I've read some people's reviews using it on their .308's and their .30-06's. I've got mine on just a .223 and the only problem I ran into was the scope mounts it came with. I had a hard time getting the fine tuning I wanted at 100yd. The mounts it comes with are see through. Two people besides myself tried to sight it in as well. With my previous scope using Winchester sliver tip ballistics I could group 3 shots the size of a dime. With this scope on none of us could get it that well dialed in. We all felt it was the mounts causing the issue. I've put new mounts on but sadly haven't been back out to try again. It's defiantly nice for the price with great zoom and view. It's a nice durable scope. I've read some people's reviews using it on their .308's and their .30-06's. I've got mine on just a .223 and the only problem I ran into was the scope mounts it came with. I had a hard time getting the fine tuning I wanted at 100yd. The mounts it comes with are see through. Two people besides myself tried to sight it in as well. With my previous scope using Winchester sliver tip ballistics I could group 3 shots the size of a dime. With this scope on none of us could get it that well dialed in. We all felt it was the mounts causing the issue. I've put new mounts... » Read More It's a nice durable scope. I've read some people's reviews using it on their .308's and their .30-06's. I've got mine on just a .223 and the only problem I ran into was the scope mounts it came with. I had a hard time getting the fine tuning I wanted at 100yd. The mounts it comes with are see through. Two people besides myself tried to sight it in as well. With my previous scope using Winchester sliver tip ballistics I could group 3 shots the size of a dime. With this scope on none of us could get it that well dialed in. We all felt it was the mounts causing the issue. I've put new mounts on but sadly haven't been back out to try again. It's defiantly nice for the price with great zoom and view. « Show Less
1634558
the one I got is mil dot reticle in blue red and green. zero doesn't hold at different distances and I am having difficulty moving my group to center of target
1804425
That is an inherent problem in ALL red dot style sights. The Lucid has other reticles to help with that, but if you are looking to go super long distance you should run a scope with crosshairs. If you're shooting a small target from long range and red dot scope may obscure the target. I use mine for 200 yards and less and haven't had a problem at all. For my long distance gun, I run a Nikon scope with crosshair reticle.
39794
I believe the clarity is better. I like the quick throw lever and the scope looks better on an ar than the mtac in my opinion. Ironically i bought this scope to replace a burris mtac. As far as the main benefit goes, the ffp reticle, do your own research to determine if its the thing for you. From a tactical perspective ffp is the way to go. Bottom line, I love it, and would def recommend.
425021
I had this scope on my AR but did not like the look. It functioned fine but for close range more than was needed and not practical. If you only use your AR for longer ranges then I would be fine. Recoil not an issue.
562174
I have this scope and its really nice, its more like a rubber textured film it very scuff and scratch resistant. Have mine on a savage .270 handles recoil just fine. Nice optic for the price.
593067
Paul...me again, look up 4 plex. that is what the reticles look like on this scope. hope that helps.