How fine are the crosshairs on this scope? I like very thin (hair thin) crosshairs that do not cover targets down range.
593065
I would say they are about average for a duplex style reticle, when compared to leopold and nikon. It is more of a hunting style reticle.
593066
this scope has the thicker crosshairs but close to the crossing point they are very thin. I like these because it makes it easier to get on target.
593067
Paul...me again, look up 4 plex. that is what the reticles look like on this scope. hope that helps.
2082861
I have one on my CMMG 16" 300 Blackout upper, and I love it...can't beat it for the money. My only caution is that it is heavy compared to other scopes, so if you want lightweight, look for a Nikon or Bushnell.
1190670
I found the gun to be very accurate at about 23'. However the fixed sights were terrible. In my case, it caused the gun to shoot &gt;6" low at the 23'.I added a red dot sight, and quarter size groups are now typical through 2 1/2 clips (~40 shots). I am shooting RWS Superdomes (preferred) and RWS Diablo Basic.
1422068
Jerry, I would say something like 85%-90% as bright but very clear. Not exactly the same but very clear and bright just the same. You will notice a slight spherical aberration just at the very fringes of the lens but only when you sweep it which is typical in my experience for these types of scopes. If I didn't dislike the Burris reticle so much I would have likely gone that direction but these scope are very nice for about half the price. I don't think you will be disappointed in comparison to Burris or other similar levels of scopes. I have several Burris hunting scopes and have looked through MTAC which is definitely brighter but not hugely different. Jerry, I would say something like 85%-90% as bright but very clear. Not exactly the same but very clear and bright just the same. You will notice a slight spherical aberration just at the very fringes of the lens but only when you sweep it which is typical in my experience for these types of scopes. If I didn't dislike the Burris reticle so much I would have likely gone that direction but these scope are very nice for about half the price. I don't think you will be disappointed in comparison to Burris or other similar levels of scopes. I have several Burris hunting scopes and have looked... » Read More Jerry, I would say something like 85%-90% as bright but very clear. Not exactly the same but very clear and bright just the same. You will notice a slight spherical aberration just at the very fringes of the lens but only when you sweep it which is typical in my experience for these types of scopes. If I didn't dislike the Burris reticle so much I would have likely gone that direction but these scope are very nice for about half the price. I don't think you will be disappointed in comparison to Burris or other similar levels of scopes. I have several Burris hunting scopes and have looked through MTAC which is definitely brighter but not hugely different. « Show Less
1190673
I found the gun to be very accurate at about 23'. However the fixed sights were terrible. In my case, it caused the gun to shoot >6" low at the 23'.I added a red dot sight, and quarter size groups are now typical through 2 1/2 clips (~40 shots). I am shooting RWS Superdomes (preferred) and RWS Diablo Basic.
604186
about average...i have a leuopold thats thicker in all but the center of the crosshairs...a few utg in which are the same...and a crosman which is the same
378516
All I can say is this, with mine so far so good. Not sure if there is a wide range I quality control there is mixed reviews on this scope. Mine actually works perfect a d so far has handled the recoil just gone
495383
The scope actually has crosshairs and 4 dots. The good thing about it is that you don't have to waste the battery of the scope because the crosshairs and dot are always on there, you only have to turn it on is in early morning or evening hunts. Hope I helped.
1781808
I have the Tasco World Class on a modded SKS and I dont think you can beat it for the money. I have not looked through the Bushnell but some scopes with mil dot recticle have a wide cross hair that blocks out a bulls eye at ranges over a 100yds.
943626
I use the scope for target shooting. Low power vey clear at 25 yards, but gets a little blurry as you increase power at that range. At 100 yards all powers are very clear for general sighting. Have't tried on small objects past 25 yards tho.
2150378
I wish I knew, my cross hairs are at a 30* angle after about 100 rounds. Has all the features of a great scope, just not the support.
613126
They are standard, you can choose crosshairs with dot in middle, eotech style, plain dot, or circle and crosshairs. If you have an astigmatism they may be blurry, like they are to me, but still no problems here. If you need the moa of the sights, the sightmark website states them. I used the crosshairs with dot in middle and it's easily accurate to 100+ yards
1572478
Yes, the optics on the scope are excellent. I think the main thing youwould be concerned with is having the right mounting for the scope.
1357846
Ron, I just bought one of these. Wondered if you found a scope, red dot, etc. that you liked. Thanks.
378742
i use this to spot my targets at the range. it takes a little getting use to but i can spot targets at 200 yards. it's not the best compact scope but it works fine for me.
1916544
I believe it would be fine for hunting within a certain yardage. I personally wouldn't shoot at anything but paper from more than 100 just to be on the safe side of taking ethical shots. no magnification + not the sharpest dot make it a little hairy if your hunting anything but varmints. I'm not a great shooter though so your experience could lend more utility from the red dot world of sights
199419
This is a good scope for the money and is clear. The only issue is with eye alignment at 32x. Any movement and it becomes blacked out. I personally bought a Bushnell Tactical for my .308 and was the best decision. My Mueller 8-32x is on my .22lr Izhmash CM-2.