Fuji J28 just try to register the J28 .... or ask questions of Fuji on the web about the J28. This model isn't listed anywhere. Image stabilization "available" according to the manual -- I guess it kicks in automatically by increasing ISO? Fuji J28 just try to register the J28 .... or ask questions of Fuji on the web about the J28. This model isn't listed anywhere. Image stabilization "available" according to the manual... » Read More Fuji J28 just try to register the J28 .... or ask questions of Fuji on the web about the J28. This model isn't listed anywhere. Image stabilization "available" according to the manual -- I guess it kicks in automatically by increasing ISO? « Show Less
593495
Image stabilization is in the menu. The J28 was made by Fuji just for Amazon only. Basically, it's the same camera as the J20, but with a different finish (brushed as compared to shiny). I had no trouble registering my J28.
593496
My mum has just bought the fuji j28 for my son for Xmas am wondering what this camera is like (pic quality etc?
1253797
It should have new firmware. If it doesnt have version 1.3 you should download it from Fuji, it's supposed to function much better with that new firmware.
1366888
I bought my unit here on amazon. Just like the other posters the lens in not marked with any specific mfg logo. The instruction manual in the specification section does not mention the mfg of the lens either. We have to remember that we are not buying this for perfect still photos. We are buying this for its high definition video, auto focus, and image stabilization. This is my third video recorder and it is truly amazing.
435058
No, not really. Cameras for years have not had image stabilization. And they worked just fine. Honestly all you need to do is boost the ISO and increase the shutter speed to compensate for hand jitter. Or place the camera on a sturdy tripod.
1491524
I just noticed this thread. MA, the GF2 does *not* have in-camera image stabilization. The camera menu is used to control the lens image stabilization. Turn OIS on using both the menu and the lens switch and you will be fine.
2079524
Most of the DC's I've owned have that option, though it's painfully slow and so I've never used on any of them. There's always the chance that I can't find it in the manual (didn't look until you asked) or that it's undocumented, but I'd guess you can't -- and you already know I won't.That being said, I find the camera's results sufficiently wonderful enough to endure Fuji's annoying solution. After almost a year, I still can't believe how good this cam's images are. If you could compute a performance/cost ratio, this thing would be an even bigger stunner.
124785
Are you folks comparing your flash shots in IA or PASM modes. In IA, the camera settings are all set to the configuration of the flash mode. In the PASM modes, the flash is independent, where it can be seperately adjusted and the result is dictated by the menu adjustments you have set or are locked in at that time. Even what appears to be identical data displayed on review won't necessarily provide the same results. Be sure to set the white balance to the flash setting to start in PASM. If you're having trouble indoors using IA, you may be using more zoom than is necessary and the flash is not strong enough and the default flash mode settings are at a narrow aperture and fast shutter speed, which would cause a very dark photo. You should get good results in IA up to the 5x (130mm) point easily, at least within 10-15 feet. In the PASM mode, you need a good working knowledge of exposure as well as how to manipulate the flash exposure settings to get good results. This would be used as "fill flash", highlighting a subject or making the background "black out", etc. Aperture, ISO, White Balance, all have a major effect here. The FZ40/100 have a different menu/flash system than the FZ28 I'm familiar with. You may want to check and see if it's set incorrectly or possibly open the main menu and "reset" the entire system back to default. If someone can describe a particular situation, I may be able to help. "Overexposure" is the usual complaint with an FZ in IA.
1371818
The Fuji Film on-line store has changed the availability date of this camera to "April". It previously said it will be available on March 24. Now they have until April 30th to ship it out, unless they change the date again. I am sure a lot of people will be disappointed with this news!http://www.shopfujifilm.com/detail/FUJ+16018645Folks.... I think we are in for a long wait!!!!!!
856737
There are alot of "gray market" cameras out there. Ask the seller to provide a serial number so you can see if it's a good camera. If they can't or if Nikon's website says they don't show it as "certified" then don't buy it. If you ever need the camera serviced, Nikon will refuse to do it if it's not certified for your country or obviously a knock-off.
891107
In practice, it means your ISO needs to be a bit higher than it would with a stabilized lens in some cases. It's certainly not a deal breaker for me.I find that the stabilization with the EM5 is helpful at times, but it doesn't do anything to help with motion blur from moving subjects for example. The gm1 is the camera I reach for most often and the lack of stabilization isn't really even a consideration for me.
359952
Look up "Imaging Resource" website. There is a very cool "Comparometer" (look on the left side, "Compare Sample Images). I, too, am trying to decide between the ZS7 and the HX5V. My biggest beef (in particular, with the Fuji F80, which I returned), is with over-processed images wiping out facial tone. I'm worried the Sony does that a bit, but it seems to retain some of the Fuji's low light magic. It's a shame the ZS7 went up on megapixels and therefore lost resolution in processing out noise. (Compare the house photos between the two on the Comparometer. The ZS3 clearly wins. Look up "Imaging Resource" website. There is a very cool "Comparometer" (look on the left side, "Compare Sample Images). I, too, am trying to decide between the ZS7 and the HX5V. My biggest beef (in particular, with the Fuji F80, which I returned), is with over-processed images wiping out facial tone. I'm worried the Sony does that a bit, but it seems to retain some of the Fuji's low light magic. It's a shame the ZS7 went up on megapixels and therefore lost resolution in processing out noise. (Compare the house photos between the two on the Comparometer. The ZS3... » Read More Look up "Imaging Resource" website. There is a very cool "Comparometer" (look on the left side, "Compare Sample Images). I, too, am trying to decide between the ZS7 and the HX5V. My biggest beef (in particular, with the Fuji F80, which I returned), is with over-processed images wiping out facial tone. I'm worried the Sony does that a bit, but it seems to retain some of the Fuji's low light magic. It's a shame the ZS7 went up on megapixels and therefore lost resolution in processing out noise. (Compare the house photos between the two on the Comparometer. The ZS3 clearly wins. « Show Less
1697311
Jeff:Thanks for responding! I'm glad you like it so much. I think I'll give it a try. I did read a review that said that Fuji didn't think people buying a camera in this category wouldn't want HD video. I guess that makes sense, although it sure doesn't make any difference to me. Thanks again for a nice response.Steve
646120
Hello,On EXR and Auto mode I've found my images in low light to be sub par without using the flash - which then can unfortunately cause it's own set of problems. However, as I learn the camera I find adjusting the settings and really depending on the manual as a reference guide, along with youtube tutorial videos that my low and dim light photos are improving. I'm an Amateur at this stage of course but more advanced photographers would have an effortless time taking great shots in low light conditions. If you're shopping around check out the Panasonic FZ200 and the Sony DDSC-HX300 both have won tremendous accolades for low light performance. Hope this helps! Hello,On EXR and Auto mode I've found my images in low light to be sub par without using the flash - which then can unfortunately cause it's own set of problems. However, as I learn the camera I find adjusting the settings and really depending on the manual as a reference guide, along with youtube tutorial videos that my low and dim light photos are improving. I'm an Amateur at this stage of course but more advanced photographers would have an effortless time taking great shots in low light conditions. If you're shopping around check out the Panasonic FZ200 and the Sony... » Read More Hello,On EXR and Auto mode I've found my images in low light to be sub par without using the flash - which then can unfortunately cause it's own set of problems. However, as I learn the camera I find adjusting the settings and really depending on the manual as a reference guide, along with youtube tutorial videos that my low and dim light photos are improving. I'm an Amateur at this stage of course but more advanced photographers would have an effortless time taking great shots in low light conditions. If you're shopping around check out the Panasonic FZ200 and the Sony DDSC-HX300 both have won tremendous accolades for low light performance. Hope this helps! « Show Less
928347
Any comments on the SteadyShot® image stabilization w/ Active mode as compared to the Optical SteadyShot™ image stabilization w/ Active mode (Wide to Tele) as found on the HDR-CX300? I am concerned that the stabilization on the CX150 will not be adequate...any comments?
90947
I got that too. I kept trying to insert and reset. Finally it said "formatting" and that was the last she wrote, i.e., the camera froze there. Packed it up and returned it the next day. I bought a (slightly) used Flip on eBay. I know opinions differ, but I had used (and loved) a Flip for years, had broken the lens and was looking to replace with something newer... hence the Kodak, which I found was shabbily made. Now back to another Flip. Even though Cisco dumped them, the Flip videos import as mP4's, and for my purposes, that works great and couldn't be happier with my new (used) Flip. Good luck! I got that too. I kept trying to insert and reset. Finally it said "formatting" and that was the last she wrote, i.e., the camera froze there. Packed it up and returned it the next day. I bought a (slightly) used Flip on eBay. I know opinions differ, but I had used (and loved) a Flip for years, had broken the lens and was looking to replace with something newer... hence the Kodak, which I found was shabbily made. Now back to another Flip. Even though Cisco dumped them, the Flip videos import as mP4's, and for my purposes, that works great and couldn't be happier with my new (used)... » Read More I got that too. I kept trying to insert and reset. Finally it said "formatting" and that was the last she wrote, i.e., the camera froze there. Packed it up and returned it the next day. I bought a (slightly) used Flip on eBay. I know opinions differ, but I had used (and loved) a Flip for years, had broken the lens and was looking to replace with something newer... hence the Kodak, which I found was shabbily made. Now back to another Flip. Even though Cisco dumped them, the Flip videos import as mP4's, and for my purposes, that works great and couldn't be happier with my new (used) Flip. Good luck! « Show Less
1906270
Yes. The alpha6000 does not have built-in "sensor-shifting" image stabilization. This means if you want image stabilization it must be included in the lens. I think the Sony advertises this as Optical SteadyShot or having OSS technology.As an aside, it is more difficult to implement built-in image stabilization into cameras with large sensors without greatly increasing the body size, because the distance the sensor would need to travel for the stabilization effect increases with its size. I think this is why Sony is choosing to keep stabilization in the lens.
190583
This camera with the 20mm pancake lens is out of stock EVERYWHERE as far as I can tell. Panasonic's own web site lists it that way, as do every online store I've checked.... except, as you note, for the ones who are taking advantage of the temporary scarcity to charge hundreds of dollars more. I understand it's supply and demand, but I still think it's slimy, and I refuse to deal with those companies. Panasonic pretty clearly underestimated the demand for this model. I think everyone who reacted to the Olympus E-P1 with "Oh, cool idea, pity the auto-focus sucks so badly and they used such a low-res LCD display" wants a GF1 now. Best of luck on getting your camera before Christmas, but my guess is it's a long shot.