a5 vs a5+ what its the difference and wich one is better?
605682
Sorry, I don't know the difference. What I CAN say is that these are fine sounding, accurate responding units. Bk
605683
A5+ has more power but both are very similar. A5 is great for the price difference.
605684
Sonically, I would think they are the same. The A5+ is the updated version of the A5 with a remote and more computer compatible with mini audio plug rather than aux plugs.
605685
The A5+ is a newer model with certain improvements over the older and now discontinued A5. It's probably "better" because of the improvements, so if the price difference is not a factor to you, definitely go with it. Otherwise, the A5 is still very good.
745283
I have both cameras, the A77 is definitely worth the price. It's bigger but it has better build quality. You'll get two control dials (this is extremely useful), really convenient LCD screen (you can tilt it to more direction than the A65), more accurate AF system, built-in AF fine-tune, IR light, and you'll also get a top LCD panel (somehow it makes you feel like a pro). By the way, they use same APS-C sized sensor, not a full frame one.
1799041
The 5th generation has a better display when compared to the specs of the 4th - I find the 4th to have a great display though. The 5th generation has a faster processor (A5 chip-this is not as fast as the most current A6 processor) and RAM (512mb) whereas the 4th generation has a slower chip/processor (A4) and 256mb of RAM. The size is a difference as well as the 5th generation has a 4 inch display making it slightly larger (longer) than the 4th generation. The cameras on the 5th generation are 5 megapixel (rear) and 1.7 megapixel (front facing) while the 4th generation cameras are &lt;1 megapixel (rear) and VGA (front facing). Hope that cleared things up a bit for you! And I hope I got all the differences right :D
2116708
In my opinion A8-4500M is better. It has 4 MB of L2 cache which doubles the 2 MB of the A4-6210. And the graphics card are faster. You can see it here: http://www.cpu-world.com/Compare/896/AMD_A4-Series_for_Notebooks_A4-6210_vs_AMD_A8-Series_for_Notebooks_A8-4500M.html
1900006
Yes the A1 has better sound, if you don't need the battery then go with the A1, but the A3 still has great sound
1617977
The differences are The A65 has a plastic body vs a magnesium alloy plastic combo on the A77, The A77 shoots at 12fps vs 10 for the A65. A77 has a Max shutter speed of 1/8000th vs 1/4000th on the A65. The major differences are mostly cosmetic. If you go to www.dpreview.com/reviews/sonyslta65 you will find a listing of the differences. As far as a recommendation I think either camera is a good choice. Choosing will depend on budget and the features you need the most.
744347
All I can say is that we have had both and my 9 year old loves the A3. Both are fine, but if you can afford the extra $$ go with the A3.
1133214
There are substantial differences between the two. I suggest you look at the Silicon Power web site for the list. I chose the A30 based on what I needed it for and the sale price.
1355667
Size is a big difference for me. The A710IS is a bit larger. Also, the top ISO for the A710IS is only 800. Also, I believe the A570IS has video capability while the A710IS does not.I was debating between the A570IS, A710IS, and SD750, and finally settled on buying the A570IS because of it's size, performance, relative ease of use, cost, and batteries.
478990
Previous reviewers have answered the technical questions. I own the E4 and love it. I'm buying the E5 as a Christmas gift, and as it's pretty much at the same price point, I would suggest going with it over the E4 at this point. But the difference between the two is not so great that I would go rushing to upgrade from the E4 to the E5.
1553124
The a65 has less features, not as many mega pixels, and is not as heavy duty f a camera. I upgraded from an a65 to this one and am much much more happy with this one as it looks and feels more professional. The picture quality is much better. Te digital view finder I was hesitant about but love it and couldn't imagine it any other way.
769121
I have both, and the 5800 is better for what I do. It has more memory. Higher level language. More functionality overall.
1644826
The difference is the lens. You will have a gap of 20mm that you can't make up unless you buy the 55-250. That is why I bought this package. But keep in mind that even though the other one is cheaper, you eventually find that you will need the 55-250mm lens.
1452222
The A77 and the A3000 both record the same 1080 24p video. You might also consider the A58, the A77 is weather resistant. the extra pixel count is in the still photographs, not the video . Biggest difference in A77 and A3000 is in build quality, things it can do, the focus system, and size. Stop by a camera store, if you can, and get a feel for the camera. If you only need video buy a dedicated video camera.
1433289
Hello, the A7 uses your WIFI network, and it has a better sound quality. Not sure if the price difference is worth it buy they are both great products, cheers!
1947425
yes and no. How serious is your in home movie theatre. The difference is in the sound specs. The A35 allows for HDMI pass through to a top of the line 7.1 channel receiver without any modification to the sound by the hd dvd unit. In the A30 the sound tracks are 'dealt with' for lack of a better term and thus not a pure for use in serious high end audio home equipment--This is a very loose explaination (broad)...just go read the audio specs of the A35 and A30 and you will see ..picture quality-no difference. I'm not using high end audio stuff so I bought the 30. In time I'll convert a spare room over to a full blown theatre..at that time I'll just up grade to whatever model line has long passed the A35. yes and no. How serious is your in home movie theatre. The difference is in the sound specs. The A35 allows for HDMI pass through to a top of the line 7.1 channel receiver without any modification to the sound by the hd dvd unit. In the A30 the sound tracks are 'dealt with' for lack of a better term and thus not a pure for use in serious high end audio home equipment--This is a very loose explaination (broad)...just go read the audio specs of the A35 and A30 and you will see ..picture quality-no difference. I'm not using high end audio stuff so I bought the 30. In time I'll convert a spare... » Read More yes and no. How serious is your in home movie theatre. The difference is in the sound specs. The A35 allows for HDMI pass through to a top of the line 7.1 channel receiver without any modification to the sound by the hd dvd unit. In the A30 the sound tracks are 'dealt with' for lack of a better term and thus not a pure for use in serious high end audio home equipment--This is a very loose explaination (broad)...just go read the audio specs of the A35 and A30 and you will see ..picture quality-no difference. I'm not using high end audio stuff so I bought the 30. In time I'll convert a spare room over to a full blown theatre..at that time I'll just up grade to whatever model line has long passed the A35. « Show Less
1758607
Im debating between those 2 as well, I always loved canon lenses, image quality in my opinion always outranked Sony. But recently my father bought the Sony a55 and image quality is amazing, my 12 year old sister took some pictures with it, and they look like done by a pro. Any help from experienced pros please!!!!, thanks in advance, I appreciate it!!