For those who own this 70-200 would you get rid of the 85 1.8? I hear people say they will never even use the 85 once they buy a 70-200
575774
Well I think 1.8 is ultra fast (vs 4), so I would use it in a particular situation if I had that lens.
575775
If you can afford it I would definitely keep both. First, the 85 1.8 gives you the wide aperture that you do not get with the 70-200 f/4. It is also much more compact and allows you to be less noticeable when shooting. The size and color of the 70-200 make stealth next to impossible. If you are indoors in low light you will definitely be reaching for the 85 1.8.
829873
From what my research has shown, the 7017 was the precursor to the 8017 model. They're technically the same. I have the 8017 and I love it. The 2 way pager is the absolute coolest. It goes off up to 1/2 mile away and is pretty loud. I wasn't able to find a difference. You can go to their website and click the 'Contact' tab. Ask the question. They're very responsive.
1884793
What about the ES8228S? Is this one an improvement on the 8168? Other than some ebay listings, I haven't found much info anywhere.
1176383
Looking at the spec's, I don't believe it can do that because it doesn't run at that speed. Have you found another product? I have 78's as well.Thanks.Ron
2032210
Get the 8500!!! You wont regret it! The 20o10 line-up pales in comparison..
232666
Hi Eric, Your D-200 and the 28-70 are made to be together, get one and get them married up. I have the 28-70 on my D-200, and it works great for me.
1936013
I think that the difference is the hard drive in the 720. If I compare the specifications from both players is that the only thing I have no experience with the 720 but own a 700 and is working fine
183315
I am in investigate mode (don't own one yet) but it seems that the 860 is thinner (1.9" compared to 4.2 on the series 7 and less) is lighter (I read 46#), has QAM which might eliminate the next for a cable box, has ATSC and NTSC which are digital tuners for over air broadcasts, and 2 USB inputs, and the 18 month warranty! Today it is 2526 including $150 shipping (Amazon).
40237
Glad I looked here before buying one. I have a 760 but was going to get the 855 for my other car. Now I will stay with the 7's.
712873
I recall when I bought my 9001 a newer version was also available. The newer one didn't seem to be any better than mine other than it was a slightly better looking unit. I don't remember other details other than aesthetics. I love my 9001.
894143
Thanks, KS, for commenting about the similarities in the specs. I'm trying to decide between an 850/860 and a 750. And I gotta tell you ... in the store today, the picture on 8's sure seemed crisper and more 3-dimensional than on the 750. The 750 was outstanding, no question! But the 8-series took what I might call depth-of-field to a much higher level. But I don't value the thinness of the 8's, and I don't care about the sound (separate amp, etc). The prices are about the same (for my purposes). I just want the best picture, and the 8's looked better. Can you help me to understand why the 8's might have looked better to me? Thanks, KS, for commenting about the similarities in the specs. I'm trying to decide between an 850/860 and a 750. And I gotta tell you ... in the store today, the picture on 8's sure seemed crisper and more 3-dimensional than on the 750. The 750 was outstanding, no question! But the 8-series took what I might call depth-of-field to a much higher level. But I don't value the thinness of the 8's, and I don't care about the sound (separate amp, etc). The prices are about the same (for my purposes). I just want the best picture, and the 8's looked better. Can you help me to understand why the... » Read More Thanks, KS, for commenting about the similarities in the specs. I'm trying to decide between an 850/860 and a 750. And I gotta tell you ... in the store today, the picture on 8's sure seemed crisper and more 3-dimensional than on the 750. The 750 was outstanding, no question! But the 8-series took what I might call depth-of-field to a much higher level. But I don't value the thinness of the 8's, and I don't care about the sound (separate amp, etc). The prices are about the same (for my purposes). I just want the best picture, and the 8's looked better. Can you help me to understand why the 8's might have looked better to me? « Show Less
2096573
I have the 18-200 and have enjoyed it. If you are absolutely sure you will never go FX, the 18-200 is a good choice. For less money, I would prefer the 28-300 instead of 18-300, if you ever want to move to FX.
6189
I think you mean the 855. It's cheaper than the 885, even when you add in the GTM20. I think that's what I'll do.
789371
Its great, but there is a newer version out. If you don't need the newer version, then this is the best for the price($700)
1407746
Thanks for your response. Yes, I still need to know why the price is more for the 880. May be, someone else can answer that.
328902
I was faced with this exact problem and chose the 700. Here are my reasons. The 700 has a longer lens but the 800 has a wider lens. For my shooting purposes, longer is definitely more useful. You should think about what kind of shots you're likely to shoot and decide based on that. The 800 has a newer sensor and higher ISO capabilities. The higher ISO enables you to shoot in dark light so if you often shoot at night, that might be something to think about. I doubt the newer sensor is worth the $80. It's not like the 700 had a terrible sensor.
826637
Anyone have ideas? I'm looking at either the newer 810 or last year's 1000 as well. Specs looks similar.Thanks.