What is the advantages or differences between the older Nikon EN-EL14 and this model the Nikon 27126 EN-EL14a?
572691
This has a slightly higher output voltage, and can deliver a usable charge over a slightly longer period of time versus the EN-EL14. In practical terms - it's about 50 minutes of recording vs 40 minutes, and 600 single image shots vs 500 over the older model battery.
1468647
I was ordering the EN-EL-5 product.Was the 14 supposed to work as WELL?I did not try them as I tho't this would damage the camera, not using the correct battery.Thanksi
1324618
Yeah, I'd say their elements are in the same class. Both use ultra-low dispersion glass and produce superb images. I think the main difference is that the 17-55 has to use larger elements. Which increases the relative aperture and the price tag.
233940
It looks like the "#883-101" is a newer version for the same model. You may not be able to buy "#880-101". I did a comparison of these two versions and here are differences [values for #883-101], (values for #880-101): 1. Angle View: [69.3 - 5.7], (76.5 - 6.5) 2. Minimum Focus Distance: [13.8" (35.05 cm)], (1.48' (45 cm)) 3. Elements/Groups: [13/16], (18/14) 4. Filter Thread: [62 mm], (72 mm) 5. Dimensions (DxL): [Approx. 2.9x3.5" (7.37x8.89 cm)], (Approx. 3.1x4.0" (7.87x10.16 cm)) 6. Weight: [1.04 lb. (470g)], (1.39 lb. (630g)) - Most of other features are the same. I hope this will be helpful.
1205691
Read the nikon Battery from your camera.... Mine in my D3200 says it is a en el-14. so you can tell if the EL-14 is for your camera's battery.
392835
I use one (EN-EL14A) on my D3200 and it performs well. I have been using it a couple of months, maybe charged 10 times. I would guess that I get about 40% more pictures with this battery compared to the stock Nikon battery (EN-EL14). It depends if I am using the internal flash a lot or not. As for charging it, when the camera warns me that I have a low battery, I just put it in the stock Nikon charger until the charger until it indicates charge. I would recommend it and the price is goof too.
733385
owning both of them i can tell you that the difference between both is HUGE, if you are a pro and really make your living out of photography i say go for it-the controls are a bit different since now you have a wheel to move thru the menus but you will love it once you get used to, it comes with its own stofen-like diffuser and color gel holder since the latest nikon cameras can detect the color of the gel used and then modify the white balance
2205121
I am very sorry I gave u wrong info before---didn't read ur question carefully. The answer was based on the Nikon 8397! I actually returned the Simmons for inconsistent readings! The Nikon 8397 is far superior, and for me the price difference was worth it!
551057
Nikon produced both a "D" version and a non "D". (The non "D" were produced between 1990 and 1995). The "D" version is obviously an additional value, so do make sure that's what you're getting. (for the record, according to Ken Rockwell [aka the Nikon lens god] apparently they've produced about 15,000 of each series of the lens)
1077310
The difference between this lens and the previous version:============================================The main update to this lens is in the Nikon mount, the AT-X 116 PRO DX-II has an internal silent focusing motor to allow the lens to AF on Nikon bodies that do not have an AF drive gear and motor. There have also been some adjustments made to the coating for slightly improved optical performance. Other than the optical coating change there are no changes to the Canon mount. The AT-X 116 PRO DX-II for Canon uses the same AF motor and AF drive system as the the previous model. The difference between this lens and the previous version:============================================The main update to this lens is in the Nikon mount, the AT-X 116 PRO DX-II has an internal silent focusing motor to allow the lens to AF on Nikon bodies that do not have an AF drive gear and motor. There have also been some adjustments made to the coating for slightly improved optical performance. Other than the optical coating change there are no changes to the Canon mount. The AT-X 116 PRO DX-II for Canon uses the same AF motor and AF drive system... » Read More The difference between this lens and the previous version:============================================The main update to this lens is in the Nikon mount, the AT-X 116 PRO DX-II has an internal silent focusing motor to allow the lens to AF on Nikon bodies that do not have an AF drive gear and motor. There have also been some adjustments made to the coating for slightly improved optical performance. Other than the optical coating change there are no changes to the Canon mount. The AT-X 116 PRO DX-II for Canon uses the same AF motor and AF drive system as the the previous model. « Show Less
1754448
I think the difference is that the new model probably has better internal components. Improvements to models are usually never stated, only new features if any.
2004942
According to the Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikon_D3100), yes, that Nikon camera uses the EN-EL14 battery.
1187076
I don't own either of these models so I don't know for certain. When I Google "battery for nikon ___" it shows that the EN-EL15 is the standard battery for these models. It works fine with my D7000.
914060
This lens is the later version. It is much lighter to carry and is both faster and not nearly as heavy. Mine is near new but I am going to sell it only to buy a new prime lens that I want.
1380698
I called Nikon, and they guided me to their site where you could do a compare on both lens (http://www.nikonusa.com/en/Nikon-Products/Camera-Lenses/Sports-and-Action/index.page). Turns out the old one is heavier, has more elements, and takes sharper pictures. This one is very ideal for me and takes great pictures. The lighter the better. Hope I answered your question.
40482
Hello, between both editions is no difference in functinality. The difference is in the number of cameras and lenses which are supported in either edition. If you camera is on the list of supported optical modules in the Standard edition, you should be fine with it. To make sure that your equipment is supported, please check in advance on the DxO website: http://www.dxo.com/intl/photography/dxo-optics-pro/supported-equipment With kind regards, Heike Precht Support Team DxO Labs
477656
I think the 83250 is just a newer model. I did not see any difference between them,except for the price. I bought the cheaper one.