is this better than the 1395 mini card
597780
Hello: "The answer to your question is yes, I replaced two of the 1395 mini card's in my Dell 1525's when, I found out by doing some research, and they work extremely well in my network. To get the most after the installation I updated driver's for free I went to c-Net and downloaded a free driver software called SlimDrivers and that way I can keep all my drivers up to date, and the Intel 4965 AGN Next generation Wireless definitely improved the speed and response time no doubt in my laptop's no doubt." It was well worth the money invested."Work's well with Intel CPU Chip's." Hello: "The answer to your question is yes, I replaced two of the 1395 mini card's in my Dell 1525's when, I found out by doing some research, and they work extremely well in my network. To get the most after the installation I updated driver's for free I went to c-Net and downloaded a free driver software called SlimDrivers and that way I can keep all my drivers up to date, and the Intel 4965 AGN Next generation Wireless definitely improved the speed and response time no doubt in my laptop's no doubt." It was well worth the money invested."Work's well with Intel CPU... » Read More Hello: "The answer to your question is yes, I replaced two of the 1395 mini card's in my Dell 1525's when, I found out by doing some research, and they work extremely well in my network. To get the most after the installation I updated driver's for free I went to c-Net and downloaded a free driver software called SlimDrivers and that way I can keep all my drivers up to date, and the Intel 4965 AGN Next generation Wireless definitely improved the speed and response time no doubt in my laptop's no doubt." It was well worth the money invested."Work's well with Intel CPU Chip's." « Show Less
597781
My opinion, yes. Purchased it to utilize speed of N-wireless router. Made a huge difference on connectivity and consistency. Changed memory cards at the same time (doubled capacity) so could exaggerate results....
2076565
I use a 16GB class 10 card in my XP200, but not sure if its overkill for my typical useage as I very rarely record video. If you're into video its probably a good investment. The class 10 likely helps save single pix faster too though.
1906856
Yes--mine has one that was just kicking around the house. The higher "class" micro sd cards do write/read quicker, I think, so if you're buying one, that's worth considering.
1063132
I haven't test it; but I think there's no problem if you reformat it.The only issue could be related to the physical size of the card, please verify it before buying
95896
Both cards are the same reference design but I would just go with the cheapest option. Either card is fine, I've put every recent game to the test and it holds up well with them all.
1468303
I have both the Kodak Z915 and the Z950 cameras and they each have advantages and disadvantages. The 950 has a slightly better lens (only slightly) and more Megapixels. Having more MP is both good and bad- higher resolution in good light but more "noise" in lower light, plus somewhat longer download time to the card. I like the versatility of the 915 for power- I can use rechargable NiMH batteries or Lithium (NOT Lithium-ION). The Z915 does not have HD video, but the VGA video is just fine. The Z950 has a pointless illuminated "HD" logo on the top which is very dorky and takes away from the cameras otherwise pro-like look. Comparing price to performance, you get much more bang for your buck with the Z915. I have both the Kodak Z915 and the Z950 cameras and they each have advantages and disadvantages. The 950 has a slightly better lens (only slightly) and more Megapixels. Having more MP is both good and bad- higher resolution in good light but more "noise" in lower light, plus somewhat longer download time to the card. I like the versatility of the 915 for power- I can use rechargable NiMH batteries or Lithium (NOT Lithium-ION). The Z915 does not have HD video, but the VGA video is just fine. The Z950 has a pointless illuminated "HD" logo on the top which is very dorky and... » Read More I have both the Kodak Z915 and the Z950 cameras and they each have advantages and disadvantages. The 950 has a slightly better lens (only slightly) and more Megapixels. Having more MP is both good and bad- higher resolution in good light but more "noise" in lower light, plus somewhat longer download time to the card. I like the versatility of the 915 for power- I can use rechargable NiMH batteries or Lithium (NOT Lithium-ION). The Z915 does not have HD video, but the VGA video is just fine. The Z950 has a pointless illuminated "HD" logo on the top which is very dorky and takes away from the cameras otherwise pro-like look. Comparing price to performance, you get much more bang for your buck with the Z915. « Show Less
480816
No, you need the smaller version Micro SD. You can get the same specs (speed and memory). Get an Extreme Micro SD card, the faster the better, the #1 in upper left side of card notes very good speed. (#10 would be slowest)
1452456
Go with a class 10 card. The faster the better for both writing and transfer.
1861807
Your getting a 4GB instead of 2GB. The last time a spent a little more for this type of update I never regretted it. Other 4GB cards are a lot more spendy than this one.
600176
I wouldn't recommend it. This is CL10 memory and at 1.5v. Ideally I think the mac mini wants 1.35v at CL11. I've actually tried CL9 before and the mac mini was not happy. CL10 is cutting it close.
379121
The "Brand " of the card makes no difference at all. It is the speed of access to the cards data that is important. A class 10 card is what you are looking for. I am sure that the cards "Brand" varies as to best price. If you are having issues with the brand named in your question please see this link.http://www.raspberrypi.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=91&t;=83220&p;=588601#p588601
1370720
Read and download times are twice as fast on the new cards. That's only important if you are a professional Photographer downloading hundreds of images, or you shoot a lot of high speed sequence shots...like sports action. Orherwise save the money without losing capacity,
2129026
the adapter the micro card fits into is just a shell it provides connections in a larger housing. all it does is allow the smaller card to fit into a larger card slot they are all the same. what makes this a better micro SD card is a higher transfer rate. that is why they are more expensive than another with the same capacity.
783578
Yes. The only difference in the 1396 and the 1395 is the addition of the 3G (GSM) so there would be additional antenna wires to be careful about when taking it apart.
208435
I just bourght a standard PNY. The sales person suggested getting a faster card so that the time between photos is shortened.
713266
Depends what you want! The mini is more nicer, and lighter, so is more easy to take it to work in my bag! But they sound exactly the same. It's just a matter of size.
1422216
Sandisk is remarkably bad for info. I know that the Titanium series is faster than the regular Micro, coming in at 15MB/s read speed & 9MB/s write speed. I seem to recall that the Micro is closer to 10MB read and 6MB write.