Does the product's description of "In Line" refer to the fact that it has 8 mag slots "in line" or the type of mag it will hold (single stack).
606193
Refers to the slots, not the mag type. They make pouches for both single stack ans staggered mags. See "features and details" to verify you are ordering the correct one. It will tell you the type of mags that fit. Also the "B92f/GL" in the product title refers to Beretta/Glock which use staggered mags.
606194
I think it is referring to the way the mags are held. My 30 rd magpul .223 mags fit pretty much as I expected them to, maybe a little on the snug side.
606195
Yes. This is in line mag slot holder for 8 mags. I have 2 of this, 1 for 9mm double stack 10rds and 45acp double stack 10rds. Very durable.
711442
i actually use it in my kitchen to hold my cutting boards...but my guess is that it will hold 20-30ish mags...
158974
Thank you so much for taking the time. I just bought a S&W; Shield with 6 and 8 magazines. Your solution is ingenious, congrats...unfortunately, it will not work with two mags...much appreciated.
514164
Not that I know of. When I purchased mine, the advert specifically required "standard" magazines and, sure enough, it was accurate. I carry my extended mags as extras and practice at the range with both so, in the event, I won't have muscle-memory confusion. Nice product.
2032273
2. Also there's 4 pouches for ar-15 mags. So 8 total. Although that's only the steel mags, the Pmags are too thick.
364841
The all-in-one also UNloads mags fast/easy, so when your done at the range and want to change from plinking/target ammo to defensive ammo it is very easy. I don't believe the strip type unload mags.
681764
This model is meant to be used with double stack 9mm magazines. My guess is the throat of the loader is too wide to use a single stack magazine. It might, just might work but my experience tells me you don't need a loader for a single stack mag.
1736162
No, it will hold only 2 mags. "Double stack" is referring to the magazine itself. It means that the magazine will hold 2 rows of cartridges inside of it - slightly offset (like most modern polymer guns), rather than one row of cartridges right on top of each other (like most 1911's and some smaller handguns). For instance your average full size 1911 .45 magazine will hold only 7 or 8 rounds right on top of each other from top to bottom, whereas a full size .45 Glock 21 magazine will hold 13 rounds because there are 2 rows next to each other. The drawback is that a gun with a double stack magazine generally has a larger grip to accommodate the larger magazine. No, it will hold only 2 mags. "Double stack" is referring to the magazine itself. It means that the magazine will hold 2 rows of cartridges inside of it - slightly offset (like most modern polymer guns), rather than one row of cartridges right on top of each other (like most 1911's and some smaller handguns). For instance your average full size 1911 .45 magazine will hold only 7 or 8 rounds right on top of each other from top to bottom, whereas a full size .45 Glock 21 magazine will hold 13 rounds because there are 2 rows next to each other. The drawback is that a gun with a... » Read More No, it will hold only 2 mags. "Double stack" is referring to the magazine itself. It means that the magazine will hold 2 rows of cartridges inside of it - slightly offset (like most modern polymer guns), rather than one row of cartridges right on top of each other (like most 1911's and some smaller handguns). For instance your average full size 1911 .45 magazine will hold only 7 or 8 rounds right on top of each other from top to bottom, whereas a full size .45 Glock 21 magazine will hold 13 rounds because there are 2 rows next to each other. The drawback is that a gun with a double stack magazine generally has a larger grip to accommodate the larger magazine. « Show Less
408843
RRogers. I don't think you will have a problem. I hold the magazine and loader in the same hand which keeps everything where it should be. The loader has a tab at the bottom that you can use to index the magazine, but I rarely use it. The loader has an open design so slight differences in magazines should not matter too much. I use the same loader with a 10 round Hi-Point single stack magazine without any trouble.
1886979
I own the same gun, which came with 2 single stack mags. The mags fit this loader just fine and I can easily load both mags quickly. It's a good investment in my book!
1715481
It works for my M&P; Shield 9mm single stack. Mag is 5/8 by 1 1/4. Just measured loader and inside dimensions are 7/8 by 1 3/8
2189987
hello, thanks for writing back quick,i will contact magpul in the AM and get you an answer asap.thanks, shs, ceo
258784
It works for my M&P Shield 9mm single stack. Mag is 5/8 by 1 1/4. Just measured loader and inside dimensions are 7/8 by 1 3/8
1082683
One Gun, it will depend on your Magazine holder, if it's Military I would say yes, being they are made for ease of access, but a civilian model are a little tighter, they may fit but the mag cover may pull off when extracting the mag from the pouch, I am pleased with mine, they do keep your Mags cleaner than with out and are great for long term storage, I would not recommend them left on the Mag if you know you are going to be in a situation that will require multiple Mag changes. They do fit well.
1305556
This refers to the thickness of the magazine. A single stack magazine holds cartridges stacked one directly on top of the other in a single row. A double stack magazine is thicker and holds two rows of cartridges in a staggered stack.
492213
Probably. I have am M&P; shield. I cant imagine the mags are very different.
541977
No, this is for regular size dbl stack magazine M&Ps.; The shields mags are too thin. Hope this helps!!