are there two cameras out there, the ag-ac-90 and the ag-ac-90A, what is the difference?
580859
Per this link http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/893072-REG/Panasonic_agac90pj_AG_AC90_AVCCAM_Handheld_Camcorder.htmlAG-AC90A is a replacement of AG-AC90.
580860
Per this link http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/893072-REG/Panasonic_agac90pj_AG_AC90_AVCCAM_Handheld_Camcorder.html AG-AC90A is a replacement of AG-AC90.
1967872
Hey Fish! Consumer Reports gives the A590 IS a "Best Buy" rating. It's the only "Best Buy" awarded out of 189 "point and shoot" cameras they've tested. I've use their "Best Buy" advice to purchase everything from batteries to BMWs. They've never given me a bum steer.
398737
I'm also thinking about those cameras and I don't know which one to get. I was leaning towards the Nikon d90 because of the HD video but I don't know.
488983
No idea. They are identical. Some folks think that silver is more "retro" and Leica looking so maybe that is it? I have a black one and it's excellent. The specs on the two cameras are exactly the same so color is the determining factor.
1302037
I would get the SD880. Mainly because it has a faster and wider lens. You can capture more of the scene in your pictures, and under lower light conditions. Also, the Digic IV processor has some neat features. The SD880 has a slightly lower zoom than the SD890. But I don't think it's much of an issue, depending on the types of pictures you like to take. Also, the SD880 doesn't have an optical view finder. If that's important to you, then you might want to consider the SD890 instead. Personally, I have never used the view finder in my previous PowerShots. I always use the LCD screen. If the price difference is only $10, why not go for something new instead of something old? Get the SD880. :-)
473884
Without looking it up, i believe the 35 ultra is smaller in size and has blackout technology or low glow technology but dont quite me on that. I have both and reccomend. The only other camera i recommend is the plotwatcher pro.
1438108
I don't think there is any difference, or any such camera. I ordered the D3 and received the D2 apparently. I hadn't noticed that until you asked. Some PT cameras pan around endlessly without having to reverse. This one does not. There is a blind spot in the rear where the camera mounts. There is no D3 listed on their website Loftek.com, but the D1 is without the IR lights.
1125276
i own two fugi camera,s i have treated them like they were eggs in a basket. a s5100 & s9000. (beware) when fugi discontinues a model they also discontinue making most parts available . there customer service is rude and beligerant. its a shame to throw away a camera you paid good money for due to the fact the battery door latch breaks do to poor design.
382703
i ordered from beach camera and got the ntsc model. american sellers will send you the american product. all the specs are the sam and if you have questions you can vist the sonystyle.com website for specific info.that being said, i hope your not planning to spend 1500 on a 3D HD camcorder for its SD capabilities.
542770
Both are nice cameras. I own a700 and a900, bought the a99, difficult to get used to. Totally different beast. If you get one, do not get rid of the 700 until you are convinced. Joe
542771
If you are looking to update and stick with the a-mount system, the A99 is the way to go. I have both and the full frame sensor on the A99 along with the added features and better low light performance makes it my go to camera. The only thing the a A77 is better at is speed, Fps. Your other option is to go mirrorless like the A7 series and use an adapter like the LEA4 to use your A - mount glass. It's an amazing camera for the money I have the A7. The only negative is the lack of in-body stabilization which is remedied by the A7 mk 2 that just came out. Hit up your local camera store and play If you are looking to update and stick with the a-mount system, the A99 is the way to go. I have both and the full frame sensor on the A99 along with the added features and better low light performance makes it my go to camera. The only thing the a A77 is better at is speed, Fps. Your other option is to go mirrorless like the A7 series and use an adapter like the LEA4 to use your A - mount glass. It's an amazing camera for the money I have the A7. The only negative is the lack of in-body stabilization which is remedied by the A7 mk 2 that just came out. Hit up your local camera store and play
102089
Yes, it has the A mount, and is a DT lents, which makes it compatible with all Sony Alpha APS-C cameras. On full frame Sony A mount like the A99 the frame would be cropped.
1791317
If you go to cnet, they have a more detailed comparison between the two. I'll try a link here... http://www.cnet.com.au/camcorders/0,239035877,339272971,00.htm
724673
2 Cameras. Please go to finevuusa dot com and see all the details and it is not PRO II HD or PRO.
1839370
Only the A200, A300 and A350. They all share the same basic chassis, later cameras are different.
2139130
I had everything done at once so I don't know if there was a difference. In looking at all the different cameras, I don't see any difference as far as the picture goes from ones that are closer in or further out. I love my system. I will say that for mine it is not a crystal clear image of let's say a person's face but enough that if anything happened it would be helpful to law enforcement, if that makes any sense.
1012158
Sorry Nancy, it's been a while since I had that camera. I really can't remember. You can probably find an answer on youtube.