How are these compared to cheaper Yongnuo YN-622N transceivers? Looks like they have same functions at cheaper price?
593215
I don't know about Yonguno. I just know that I have Pocket Wizards in my arsenal that are over 20 years old.
593216
I have used the Yongnuo transceivers. The batteries drain faster than the PocketWizard. They have a shorter range. And the connectors are not very reliable. The PocketWizard is a much better build and has features that the Yongnuo does not have. If you want to go cheap, you get what you pay for.
593217
I've had several different types, but the ones I now use exclusively and can always depend on are the pocket wizards. If you are on a budget, not worried about the job and can reshoot if necessary, try the Yongnuo .. otherwise I would spend the $$ and get the pocket wizards.
593218
These are not comparable to Yongnuo's. You can go with a cheaper brand, but they won't be as reliable, don't have the distance, and won't last as long. I have over 10 pocket wizards and a Lightmeter that also connects to my pocket wizards. Never had a misfire. Yongnuo's would be a good start up brand, but then you'll want to work your way up to a more professional level wireless system you'll want something much more durable and trustworthy.
593219
I have Yongnuo flash. I use this as an extra flash. It is ok. Quality is fair. Having said that stick with Pocket Wizard. Little expensive but reliable. I have four of these and never had a problem.
593220
I have not used the Yongnuos so i dont know how their functionality stacks up against the pwpiiiis
593221
Haven't tried the YN-622N. I went PW for the high frame rate, which it delivers (8 fps)
593222
I've never used any Yongnuo... I don't do cheap ..I tell you this, I've been shooting for over 36 years and Pocketwizards are cream of the crop. I'm a professional photographer. If you have a budget go with that, but as my golden rule is...INVEST IN THEY SELF...You get what you pay for.
2140547
When I bought this, I wondered the same thing. After searching for a while on Google, everything I was finding was saying they have the same specs so I ordered it. I can't say for sure that this is the right answer, but I am very happy with this receiver.
1158139
Yeah. In fact, I ordered both, and the CowboyStudio NPT-04 trigger and receiver is the identical item for twice the price. Literally identical. They both have the same model number NPT-04, only they have different brand names stamped on the devices. I think these things are just all mass produced in some factory in China and different companies buy it from that factory and put their own label on it and charge whatever high price they think people will pay. The sad part for everyone (including myself because I bought the CowboyStudio thing before I discovered this) is that the CowboyStudio item is at a higher sales rank, even though it's the exact same thing for twice the price!!!
810047
It looks the same to me. I have the Baofeng and happy with them so far. Pretty good bang for the buck.
1970916
I currently have them plugged into the Sony STR-DE697 no problems. I was looking to upgrade to Onkyo or Yamaha, but the new Sony network receivers look great at the price.
165358
I had two different friends pickup CX-300's on my recommendation. Both opted for the < $20 retailers, and both ended up with fakes.Generally speaking, if you bought them off eBay you can bet that it's a counterfeit, which I've begun calling "Fakeheisers". These are good knockoffs; unless you had a pair of real Sennheisers to compare them with it'd be hard to tell the difference in appearance without disassembly. The sound though, is far, *far* inferior to the real thing. If you want Sennheiser quality, buy from a reputable dealer. If you try to get the lowball deal, you might as well go for any old generic Chinese phones instead. I had two different friends pickup CX-300's on my recommendation. Both opted for the < $20 retailers, and both ended up with fakes.Generally speaking, if you bought them off eBay you can bet that it's a counterfeit, which I've begun calling "Fakeheisers". These are good knockoffs; unless you had a pair of real Sennheisers to compare them with it'd be hard to tell the difference in appearance without disassembly. The sound though, is far, *far* inferior to the real thing. If you want Sennheiser quality, buy from a reputable dealer. If you try to get the lowball deal,... » Read More I had two different friends pickup CX-300's on my recommendation. Both opted for the < $20 retailers, and both ended up with fakes.Generally speaking, if you bought them off eBay you can bet that it's a counterfeit, which I've begun calling "Fakeheisers". These are good knockoffs; unless you had a pair of real Sennheisers to compare them with it'd be hard to tell the difference in appearance without disassembly. The sound though, is far, *far* inferior to the real thing. If you want Sennheiser quality, buy from a reputable dealer. If you try to get the lowball deal, you might as well go for any old generic Chinese phones instead. « Show Less
1977087
Glad to say that after 2.5 years these things are still good as new. The Onkyo receiver is getting a bit glitchy though. Auto switching between settings for inputs is abrupt and not optimized, so I have to adjust settings more than I'd like. And pass thru doesn't work anymore. I'm not up to speed on specific models these days but I'd start at $500 and go up from there. Harmon Kardon is well respected, I imagine they'll get a hard look next time around. 7.2 should be standard on most units in that range. Also Wi-Fi, etc could be cool. I'm not lacking for good speakers these days, but I would prefer simplicity which my onkyo lacks ($400 in 2009). Start with the negative reviews and go up from there keeping in mind a small allowance for factory defects, and if possible try it in store, or a similar version. Brands normally keep similar interfaces until big money comes into play. But I am still digging these speakers, money well spent. Hope that helps!
1259789
This set comes with a wireless transmitter and two receivers. If you already have some wireless triggers, it should work fine with that too. I have used this both with the set that it comes with and YN-622C transceivers with no issues. Hope this helps! :-)
852256
Margaret, I have used this cord with the Yongnuo RF603 unit, but I don't see any reason it shouldn't with the YN 622c. It's just a simple PC to 3.5mm or 6.35mm cord and the YN 622c has a PC connection on it. My only concern would be the YC 622c being able to handle the sync voltage of the strobe you are usinf. However, I have used this cord with a 25 year old Bowens Monolite without problems. Can't guarantee it being OK, but if it were me, I'd give iot a shot. Hope this helps, Dave
657303
The simple answer is Yes. But note that these units do not have TTL capabilities. As such you must go to each external flash and set it for the amount of output it gives. With TTL this adjustment is done automatically by the camera which then tells the external flashes how bright to be. If you want or need TTL I recommend the Yongnuo 622. A set of these runs around $75. 622c for canon and 622n for nikon. I have 2 sets of the 622c and one of the 603. What I use them for is very different. Both are excellent.
362609
Don't know, but be sure to order a dozen of the 12v MN21/23 batteries for the transmitter. It burns through those rapidly and will frequently die during shoots.I highly recommend the Yongnuo YN-622 transceiver over the Fotodiox triggers. The Yongnuos have high speed sync, a focus grid, and they use AA batteries. I'm using eneloop rechargables.The Fotodiox is in my junk drawer now.
838114
Sorry, but I have the Yongnuo YN560-III which work off of the actual flash and not a radio signal. These only work of off the flash itself and must be somewhat in line of site with the master. These serve my purpose just fine.
421542
The comments about the 622 are correct. However, there is an additional option: the 622C-TX. This transmitter (only) unit is designed to be an alternative to the ST-E3-RT. I don't own an ST-E3-RT, but shot with someone that had one. The ST-E3-RT and the 622C-TX are functionally very similar. You can control the flash units through the camera menus, and you can also control the flash groups and multiple settings on the 622C-TX unit directly.
1220270
Thanks for the info. I ordered the unit and have owned it for about a week now. Appears to be a very good receiver.
316640
Larry.......... It is a tough question. Both of them work on the 2.4GhZ range and both have 16 selectable channel. The APUTURE also has a 433 MhZ encrypted. I can honestly say with a 50%-50% certainty assurance........... "YES" Just to be sure give them a call to both manufacturers to ask for more specifications/compatibility with other products/range. The RFN is a great product and does not beet to be in the line of sight to be able to work. Francisco
995671
My cousin, to my dismayed surprise, has the Soundbot SB240 upon showing off my 66 Audio. They look the same, they feel the same, they sound the same, they ARE the same. Unless you think the extra pouch is worth it, no the extra cash is not justified.
535025
Check the LNB rotation. Also, I noticed that for some transponders, changing the LNB frequency gets the quality going.