Whats the difference between this and the Aquarius Aq 15005 5 rounded tank?
603648
The Glofish version allows the "glowing" effect of the fish in the tank. It has three backgrounds or environments and Glofish is one of them. Although the 15005 5 rounded tank shows the same pictures as the Glofish version, they don't actually offer the Glofish environment. They offer three different kinds of environments and Glofish isn't one. I know it seems confusing because both show the same pictures. All you have to do is read the details in the description and you will see the three different environments each aquarium offers. I hope this helps.
603649
I don't think there is any difference. I checked both tanks and they look the same. The tank I have is rounded in the front which wraps around to the mid sides of the tank where it is then flat. Only difference may be the model number.
157849
I would def say the Aqueon. The ability to add light strips, plus the option to go with white or their 'color enhancing' gives more flexibility. I have 1 white and 2 color and it makes a huge difference om my tank. I have all (nearly 50 now) schooling tropicals of varying color and they really pop with the enhancing bulbs.
157850
I had them both but once I upgraded to 180 gallon the marineland wasn't enough. I like that the aqueon could use 3 bulb and it makes it a little brighter than the marineland.
283869
I have both of these humidifiers. They are essentially the same except for a slightly different design. I like the U-31001 better because it's easier to fill. In order to fill them, you have to take the tank off of the unit and turn the tank upside down. With the U-31002, it doesn't lie flat when you do this, so you have to hold/balance the tank with one hand while you fill it with the other. With the U-31001, you just set the tank down because it lies flat to fill it - so it's easier to fill. The U-31001 also has a more adjustable nozzle, so you have more control over where to aim the mist. Other than that, they are pretty identical in form and function.
751178
I have a darter tank that has about 25 gallons of water in it. I just replaced a 500 GPH water pump with the 850 GPH circulation pump. The water pump really blasted quite a jet of water across my tank. The Hydor is much gentler, with a broader spread, but still seems to make for a nice stream simulation. While the 500 GPH was about the maximum my tank could handle, the 850 GPH circulation pump is just adequate for a stream simulation. My main reason for switching was the circulation pump only uses about 5 watts of electricity, while a 500 GPH water pump uses about 35. I'm hoping to see my water temperature drop. If you are simulating a swamp, however, I would not recommend this product at all. I have a darter tank that has about 25 gallons of water in it. I just replaced a 500 GPH water pump with the 850 GPH circulation pump. The water pump really blasted quite a jet of water across my tank. The Hydor is much gentler, with a broader spread, but still seems to make for a nice stream simulation. While the 500 GPH was about the maximum my tank could handle, the 850 GPH circulation pump is just adequate for a stream simulation. My main reason for switching was the circulation pump only uses about 5 watts of electricity, while a 500 GPH water pump uses about 35. I'm hoping to see my... » Read More I have a darter tank that has about 25 gallons of water in it. I just replaced a 500 GPH water pump with the 850 GPH circulation pump. The water pump really blasted quite a jet of water across my tank. The Hydor is much gentler, with a broader spread, but still seems to make for a nice stream simulation. While the 500 GPH was about the maximum my tank could handle, the 850 GPH circulation pump is just adequate for a stream simulation. My main reason for switching was the circulation pump only uses about 5 watts of electricity, while a 500 GPH water pump uses about 35. I'm hoping to see my water temperature drop. If you are simulating a swamp, however, I would not recommend this product at all. « Show Less
2056429
Check the reviews on Amazon, according to those, the Rheem is the one to go for, by 2stars !!Also, it isn't rocket science, its a lined insulated tank ... the real problem is how careful is it delivered and installed, a bit of manhandling then will destine your wh to an early recycling. I got my rheem in feb this year and its great
886488
If you want a more specific answer, go to the Omega website. I believe the major difference is in the motor. I researched them all at the time I purchased mine, and decided the difference wasn't significant enough for the higher cost, for what I wanted to use it for, which is juicing leaves. Sorry I can't be more specific, but I do remember I asked the same question on the Omega website, and received a very satisfactory answer.
1287793
I don't know, but my electric bill is about the same. I also added an aqua clear 110 which use to be known as the aqua clear "500" I bought on amazon for $67, works great using this combo on my 55 gal. African cichlid tank
1317564
Simply gallon per hour of filtration or gph. The higher the model number the more filtration per hour. 1500 does around 300 gph. If you have a large tank...then the aquarium environment needs a filter capable of maintaining it and more gph of filtration.
627368
I originally ordered the wrong model and it was really easy to return and get the correct model. It was a few months ago so I can't tell you exactly how it went but I don't have any complaints about the process. Additionally, the tankless water heater is kick butt! My bill went down 10 bucks a month and I have a ton of room in the closet on my balcony now. The extra space is so worth it!
1566801
The 17.5 has concentrated juice. The 55 pound is straight juice and no water needed. Better quality.
358173
The difference is in the length of the power cord and the location of the float switch. The manufacturer specs say bout the RS: *Manual pump with RS-5 diaphragm switch included to convert to automatic operation." Here is a link to the specs: http://www.franklin-electric.com/media/documents/995201.pdf
1451216
Hi. the difference is that the 1575 model has the diamond shape pitcher. I don't think that there is much difference with the wattage. thanks
47389
Don't have the tank in front of me for the hydro date, but the tank I received was good to 4,500psi. I placed my order in July of 2012 so maybe the new ones are lower quality. One thing to be noted on the regulators is that they have two different pressure relief valves on them. One high pressure one low pressure. They are NOT the same as the regulator rating. That might have been confusing people.
1131896
The only difference I see is the75458 has a scratch resistant lens. Both are great lights. I use mine on tank inspections and people are amazed.
172769
I believe the one of the differences is in the quality of construction for climates that are more harsh. The apollo 8 also says it's for underground irrigation or drip whereas the dripmaster is any way you want whether above or under ur landscape. The Dripmaster has a master control in the center for water flow (psi) and Apollo does not. Have that. They both have filters but I can't compare that.' I can tell you that if I do not remove the Apollo in colder months I usually will have a leak within 2 years that required replacement. I haven't tried the dripmaster so it's hard to judge. I'm curious if we contacted orbit themselves, what would they say? I'll buy one for my next replacement and update this post if Amazon allows. I liked the apollo just fine though!
421518
The hoses and valves are different from the 1500GPH to the 1000GPH. If you upgrade (which I recommend), make sure you get the hoses and valves with it