Are scanned photos quite clear?
1851244
I get yellow stripes in my photos. I do not know if I am using it incorrectly but I have yet to get a clear picture. I have used it for a while now and if I had to buy it again I probably would not.
1851245
they are legible. But I wouldn't recommend it... It stops working after the initial install. I have disconnected it. I don't know why - same result on several systems.
1851246
I'm reasonably satisfied with scanned photos. To get a good copy photo must be on a flat surface. If anything 'lifts' the scanner off the surface the process breaks up. Color rendition is also acceptable but the editing program for improving contrast and color balance is very basic. I don't know whether a better editing program can be incorporated. Hope this helps you out.
2205856
I have scanned all different sizes of photos and it scans just the size of the photo.
1511541
Yes they are clear, however we put bck to back photos in them but the backside of a postcard would certainly be visible.
1046458
The scanning quality is good, depending on your setting. Scanning for "professional printing" is a little vague because you didn't mention size or the type of artwork. I have not been unhappy with any of the functions.
2234191
For me this unit has scanned photos very well, better than the lager Fujitsu scanners. I have found no white lines. If there are any lines you might have to wipe down the scanner head. I have scanned may hundreds of old photos.
456346
We have used it a few times and our pictures have been clear and printable. Hope this helps!
434686
I scanned quite few old photos and it worked out fine. I was able to then edit them and remove scratches and make other changes to them on my computer.
2204444
At an estimated 200 dpi and up (it doesn't actually let you know how high it goes, another limitation as far as I'm concerned), it actually scans at a moderate rate, not too fast and not too slow. Trouble is, I've relied on it for for crisp scans at 200 dpi and up, and it just doesn't do it very well. It wouldn't bother me if the sources were not the greatest resolution to start with, but they are, and the scanner just doesn't do them justice even at the highest resolution.
1347102
Yes it is. I have only used it to scan old photos and have had no problems. I know this machine can do so much more.
1247068
It did not work good on any photos. I found that the ScanSnap 300 by Fujitsu works excellent on all... plus it is good for documents.
486892
Yes, the image is very clear. The camera you select will also influence image quality.
881640
I select photo + jpg (or tif) for signatures and even cash register receipts. Files zoom up and print clearly (8-pt type is readable). It also offers document + pdf (or tif) choices for incorporating into other apps- as it gives me that many more options. Yes, much easier to get good results than any other scanner I owned.
1193375
I've had no problems with poor quality scanned photos. The default is set to 300dpi, have you tried increasing it to 600dpi? That's what I always use and that works for me. I believe the max is 1200dpi. You may want to play around with that setting and see. Also don't be fooled by the scan preview, it's not an exact representation of what the scanned photo/doc will look. Hope that helps.
1406505
Scans come out just fine for our purposes. Then again, this was not bought strictly for its scanning abilities. Ours is used in a small business office setting. Hope that helps.
576527
The photograph quality is very good, altough you must consider that this is not a professional scanner.
2137044
So far, I have only scanned 35mm slides, but it is my understanding that the answer to your question is "yes."
1550462
Yes it is, but I am still testing it as I find either the sensor's or light source is not even on the image scanned. It was alright at first but getting poor with usage. The 22 MP setting did not show good results either. Hope someone else can verify.