wich camra do you think is better. the eos 6d or the eos 70d
1811452
I like my 70d very well. I have not had an an opportunity to use a 6d. So all I can speak from is my experience with the 70d. It is a very user friendly camera and has several wonderful features to get the pictures and performance that I wanted in a DSLR.
1251311
While the 75-300mm will +function+ on a Canon 6D and will cover the entire sensor with an image, the 75-300 is one of Canon's cheapest and lowest performing lenses available. I assume one of the reasons you have a 6D is for the extremely high-end image quality but this lens will degrade your image quality to a very significant degree (much like putting worn out $15 tires on a $150,000 Porsche 911). I would recommend saving your money for a high quality telephoto which will help bring out the potential of this camera rather than limiting it. At the very least, perhaps the Canon 70-300mm IS lens which at least has image stabilization, otherwise, you're also going to need a tripod.
1933660
Did you mean a Canon 7D ? Or possibly a 70 D ? It should fit both as both are EOS cameras
26446
Assuming price isn't a primary constraint.. Canon 7D more pro, more durable and will last you even and when you go pro. That said the Rebel is a lotta Camera for the cash.
2037230
It performs great on my 6D. I can only imagine it would be as good on your 70D.You may also want to review its performance in live view. The 70D has the new live view AF and I can't speak for that. Good luck!
1936972
It depends on what is more important to you and how you shoot? The 7D has lots more AF points. Would you be using them? Do you currently rely on a crop sensor to get that extra focal length in your EF lenses? How used were you to shooting 35mm? Personally I can see the merits of having both. I love my 6D and full frame, but there are times absolute real estate of the sensor size isn't necessary and I'm looking to replace my aging, but solid, 40D. The 7d has a larger buffer, more processing power by 100%, dual slots, but a smaller sensor size for MP size. Are you shooting more video than stills? The 1st 7D excelled at that. I personally will always steer towards sensor size. I have images from a 11MP 1Ds that beat 15MP crop sensor cameras (not to mention 1 2/3" sensor 15MP cameras) simply because the MP weren't constrained to a small sensor size. I realize this really doesn't help answer your question and only asks more. But the camera is a tool, and it's very rare that a camera comes along that is that swiss army of cameras that does everything better than all the rest. Good luck in your decision.
2106054
Canon vs Nikon is a personal choice. I would say that it's like using windows vs Mac OS. In terms of quality, they take pretty much the same. This canon is as good as it looks, and you'll probably be pleasantly surprised what you can do with it. In the hands of a good photographer you can get amazing results. I personally would go with canon as I feel that there is more literature written about it. More community support, etc. I would be more apt to research if I was going into the higher end cameras, but make no mistake... Professionals use this camera and write a ton about how they were able to pull of their shots. There is a great book for the T5i by Jeff revell which you can purchase for amazon. I think the new book for the T5i comes out this month, but the one for the t4i is essentially the same in terms of operating the camera. On a final note about your question as to the more advanced camera... The 60d and the t5i are essentially the same camera. The 60d leans more toward strictly photography, while the t5i is more of an all in one package. I've heard from most reviews that the 60d has a slightly better picture, but most of these stats are on paper only and not necessarily anything you'd be able to see a difference in from one photo to the next. I would say what you're looking for is the t5i. The other great thing about buying a t5i is... If you maxed out your technique and were dying to upgrade in the future... Your lenses, filters, accessories will carry over. And you'll only need to upgrade to a better body. I think this is hands down the camera to get. Even if you want a better one in the future... Spend the time juicing this one for all it's worth... So that your eye picks up to the subtleties of the differences between this and the next body up. That's just something that's harder to gauge the higher up you get. Like anything in life, the higher up you move, the more subtle the difference between(save the price.) I hope this helps.
59304
I'm also on the fence on deciding between with these 2 cameras. Any input would be appreciated, thanks.
1247702
I think you are going to be happy with the 6d. If you can afford the 5d, indulge!! You are going to get a much better focusing system, a better build and a faster camera overall. This is assuming you don't need the wifi nor the GPS system.I love how fast the focusing system works on the 5d. It responds very well in dim light, is blazing fast and very accurate. This I believe is the main difference with the 6d
1913608
The 6D has a high iSO range and is a great performer in low lighting situations. Together with the IS on the 70-200, you should have no problems.
1313106
The AF is excellent in still image mode and superb in video or live view mode. About the same as a 7D in still mode since it uses the same technology. Beats anything else on the market for realtime video tracking.
1152346
Depends on if you want video or not. If you don't care about video, the 50D is a much superior camera for taking photographs. Magnesium body, better weather sealing, gapless microlenses, micro focus adjustment, faster frame rate, etc.
358313
It depends on what your purpose and budget is. By the lens you have chosen, I get that you want to take wide angle panoramic shots.If money is no problem - Buy the EOS 5D Mark III and you will get peace of mind till your shutter mechanism dies on you (that is lets say about a decade or two :) )If budget is a constraint - Then you should look at the EOS 6D or the EOS 7D which are pretty good. Personally, I would go for the EOS-6D because it has a PART-magnesium body but then the 7D comes at ~1600$ which is a great camera for that kind of money. Note, the 7D might get an upgrade soon (5 yrs old model, launched in 2009) so you could get a great deal on the existing model.Go take your pick :)Cheers,Sai It depends on what your purpose and budget is. By the lens you have chosen, I get that you want to take wide angle panoramic shots.If money is no problem - Buy the EOS 5D Mark III and you will get peace of mind till your shutter mechanism dies on you (that is lets say about a decade or two :) )If budget is a constraint - Then you should look at the EOS 6D or the EOS 7D which are pretty good. Personally, I would go for the EOS-6D because it has a PART-magnesium body but then the 7D comes at ~1600$ which is a great camera for that kind of money. Note, the... » Read More It depends on what your purpose and budget is. By the lens you have chosen, I get that you want to take wide angle panoramic shots.If money is no problem - Buy the EOS 5D Mark III and you will get peace of mind till your shutter mechanism dies on you (that is lets say about a decade or two :) )If budget is a constraint - Then you should look at the EOS 6D or the EOS 7D which are pretty good. Personally, I would go for the EOS-6D because it has a PART-magnesium body but then the 7D comes at ~1600$ which is a great camera for that kind of money. Note, the 7D might get an upgrade soon (5 yrs old model, launched in 2009) so you could get a great deal on the existing model.Go take your pick :)Cheers,Sai « Show Less
1247703
Scooter,The 6D is more than fine. The 5D3 is a professional's camera and it may be overkill.On a broader note, why do you think you need full frame?
646895
Actually it's the exact same sensor...the only difference there is that the 7D uses dual Digic IV processors where as the T2i only uses a single one (which affects the burst FPS). The sensor and processor are identical. It might not be *quite* as good at low-light only because using a single processor instead of 2 means there's not as much in-camera PP but it's not a huge difference (pictures looked very similar taken between the 7D and T2i).
331381
I was deciding between these two myself last week. I ended up going with the 780is because of the high def video as well as the inclusion of the viewfinder - which is small, but useful when you're running low on battery and still need to take pics. I just got the camera on Friday and have been taking tons of photos and they are brilliantl! I love it!
1748281
D10 all the way. Its stats are similar to the Olympus with it taking better pictures. I have heard good things about the Lumix, but it is only Wp to 10 feet.