besides having a 8 panel design, what are the main differences between the attack shorts vs. quest?
90314
Per specs, they both have same inseam, the Attack is 88%Nylon/12% Spandex; the Quest is 86%/14%. I purchased the Attack prior to a Century ride-the TUC in Humboldt County- I have also been on many 30, 50, 60 mile rides and will say the Attack is a very comfortable short.
90315
The Race 3D chamois on the Attack is slightly thicker than the Tour 3D chamois on the Quest. I find this adds a little more comfort. The Attack's fabric feels somewhat softer, and the flatlock seams which hold the eight panels together add an extra level of comfort too, IMO. This is my preferred pair of shorts for longer rides. I highly recommend the Attack.
40337
As I looked up this game on Amazon right now to see the versions to which you are referring, there is not difference except the price. The only thing different than the original game (which is the one you asked about) is the Telestrations 12-player party pack. As the name suggests, it includes 12 notepads, markers, erasers, etc, which makes it nice for large groups. Also, the notepads have 12 pages in them to accommodate the larger group rather than the 8 pages included in the original game. If you're getting the original 8-player game, go with the $25.
2084525
Here is a link to a comparison chart. http://edgecraft.com/tips_qrfman.html
1308233
I know of no differences. The look exactly a like and are the same dimension as the ones from Cubie. I bought two from Sunfounder and they both are running software from Cubie.org
1329607
I agree with gimp's answer below.I think the threads in the quick connect are finer threads.
1734921
I'm not familiar with the 8 or the others. Mine has been dropped at least 4 times without any marks (fumbled to tiled bar floor & sidewalk). The different shooting selections are nice & simple to go through. Battery life is long & film is better than I expected in different lighting. I'm in my 40s & didn't want to look like I was carting a toy around. The classic look was appealing, the good quality was beyond my expectations.
1149067
I would check out the AOC website for detailed specs. I like the 2ms response time and 20,000,000:1 contrast ratio. You can also view 4 screens at once if needed.
2049397
A good list of differences is on the steves-digicam.com website under the S3 review, in short the S3 is one mega pixel more, a larger screen and a couple other minor things.
1480402
Both use the same super IPS panel from LG, which by the way is the same Thunderbolt from Apple, the main difference is that the one ending in "P" has Pivot and swivel functions so that you can not just adjust height but swivel.
498838
The only differences I know of are color and material. Size is not an issue to my knowledge.
1832244
I have both and like the soft touch set more because they are flat not rounded like the armour. I guess it all depends on preference :)
1390006
The most major difference I see is the resolution, reference these two pages side by side to note the other differences.http://www.casio-projectors.eu/uk/products/xja155/andhttp://www.casio-projectors.eu/uk/products/xja256/
1327493
There really isn't a difference other than the size. However, I did just order three new 14x10 and the design has changed just slightly. There is no longer doors on both sides, only the large "screen room" side has a door now. Also there are two small vent openings at the center peak of the tent now, a great added feature. These vents can be open without letting in rain.
85339
The biggest difference is the new X-Trans sensor which removes the optical low pass filter (OLPF)... making pics much sharper than they were in the x10. Here's more from dpreview's review (http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/fujifilm-x20/): At first glance, the X20 looks just like its predecessor (the X10), although it's now available in a very pretty silver-and-black finish, alongside the conventional all-black. But inside it offers a couple of very significant differences. The first is a brand-new sensor, a 2/3" type 'X-Trans CMOS' design that uses the same novel color filter array as Fujifilm's recent APS-C cameras. This sensor also has phase detect autofocus built right into it - not new to Fuji cameras, but a change from the X10. The second big change is an updated 'Advanced Optical Viewfinder' that includes a detailed information overlay, showing key exposure data and focus confirmation. This isn't the same as the hybrid viewfinder found in the company's X100/X100S and X-Pro1 models - there's no electronic viewfinder - but it's never been done before on a compact camera. The X20 is available in silver/black and all-black bodies Aside from this, the X20 retains most of the same features that made the X10 so appealing. It uses the same fast zoom lens, with a 28-112mm equivalent angle of view and F2.0-2.8 maximum aperture, which is operated by a mechanically-coupled zoom ring that also retracts the lens and turns the camera on and off. It has plenty of external controls, including an exposure compensation dial and two rear dials, and a hot shoe for external flash. One feature notable by its absence is a direct movie record button - the X20 is clearly designed for still photography first, and video second.
1390009
from what I can reasonably tell, resolution is the major difference. reference these two pages for further details,http://www.casio-projectors.eu/uk/products/xja256/andhttp://www.casio-projectors.eu/uk/products/xja155/
1339903
I was not as happy with the RS10SC-1A0, it lacked the padding that my other Black Rapid for about $60 cost. I should have know ed .
156408
You should consider to buy the FBV SHORTBOARD MKII instead of the EXPRESS. The big issue is the impossibility for the Express to switch between banks. Moreover, the SHORTBOARD will give you controls for fx and boost and other features of the patches you can edit on your Line 6 amplifier.I use it with the spider iv 75 and it's the best controls you can get with the spider Iv series...!