Is it suitable for medium frames?
1825874
The medium frames will fall out the bottom if you don modify the holder that is the 6 5/8 frame
1825875
Yes it is. But you get as much as you pay for. The cage in which you put the frames has too big holes. After extracting about 30 frames, I want to have some wire mess in the cage so that the frames do not stick out if it and hit the foundation. Also its worth while to go for a motorized version if you plan to extract more than 50 frames a year. Hope it helps.
898392
Yes. It can accommodate at least a 60 x 40 frame; that comes to 200 inches.
897907
Yeah, it might be a little small, but it should work fine for you. It's actually a 21-22 inch frame. I have no idea where they got the 18 inch from.
1329391
no, i would recommend something around a 70 -200 f/2.8 yuor choice on what you want to spend. i can tell i have a tamron in this and i love ,a little heavy but smoking fast glass , shot my kids sporting events for years , great pics
1794757
I do not know what the frame is rated for but I am pleased with the quality and stability so far.
526464
Yes it's fine but please understand that you cannot expect this to be as stable as a gitzo. This can take a normal sized dslr and an amateur lens, not pro bodies and lenses. The legs are a bit flimsy in my opinion. Overall for the money it's an awesome tripod. Please don't expect this to carry A 300mm lens and aD4.
1852629
I have mine cross fired with my APU. Runs 60 at high and 35 on ultra. If you have this alone try medium you may get that 60 frames you are looking for.
1271326
I have a smaller Canon and it handles it easily. I think that as long as you do not have an extremely long and heavy lens, this will work for you.
239182
when I bought this bike, I figured I would need small to medium frame(50cm to 54cm)because I have 28" inseam..With my feet on the ground,I barely clear the top bar..a ebay listing shows the frame to be classed medium(17.5" to 18")
1247617
I don't have an 8x25, so I'm not sure about that, but I have to say, I've had little trouble holding my 10x25 steady. If it was a camera, I might want a tripod, but for viewing, it's fine. I use it mostly for bird watching. I do occasionally brace my arm against a handy tree if I'm looking for details on something quite close, since the field of vision is so small then. I'm really happy with it.
998318
NO! Definitely not sturdy enough for that. Great for a tripod but not for action shots.
213604
Unfortunately, no. And, they're good glasses for shooting, but if you wear glasses, your frame can't be too big.
994585
It could be a great fit for that, depending on how much room you have and what angles you're using for the shot. The hand crank can move the camera up and down about a full foot, so that is nice for fine tuning the height without having to adjust the legs. The locks for both axis work well, too, so it will stay wherever you place it for a solid shot.
1391012
Is 17.5 medium frame for peopple btw 5' to 5'10"If u going to pay over 300 find something alse is basic bike , better than Walmart bikes but not the best if you going to hit the trails or the mountain !
1678390
Hi, not sure on this.........guess it depends how large your frames are.........small frames I believe will work, but if you have large frames............kinda have my doubts...guess this wasn't alot of help here.....they are nice though and well worth the price.....
248648
Also i bought this frame in a 58 and it felt a bit tall for me. I do like smaller frames though.
1551098
It'll definitely give you a wider frame. Closer to what a full frame 50mm would give you.