I currently use a MedRx with great resolution and haven't been particularly happy with the DinoLite USD. Any other comparisons?
1833129
MEDRX not know, and could not compare which is better, I get pictures I put on the network and you could see them
802936
I don't know but I imagine you might find it in researching it; typically, unless the price difference is huge I go with the latest technology; this may not be a situation where it's significant but might be worth looking into; good luck; it's a great little unit; I've been extremely pleased!
2056141
I did a lot of research and this is the one I decided to get. Try checking it out at www.dpreview.com. They have excellent reviews and you can do side-by-side comparisons.
776564
Lol no, this dino runs XP, great tough lil research laptop tho, it was worth the gamble for me
105685
I used XTi for 3 weeks and exchanged with 30D. with no hesitation buy 30D.1. 30D is way better than XTi2. Does well in low light3. Feels good in hand, where as XTI is small, to many controls in too little space4. 30D build quality is good, worth the price5. Quality of the pic is also good6. Don't worry about 10MP of XTi7. I love 5frames per sec and quality of each pic in burst mode8. At room light, 30D did very good, kit lens did better than XTI w/ 17-85 IS
1985455
I am definitely looking toward the x10. Viewfinder, manual zoom, unique sensor geometry. It's almost perfect on paper and the sample images look great.
106608
Dollar for dollar the PA 249Q can't be beat. If you have deep pockets there are NEC's that go into the five figure range. I have an Apple iMac 5K next to the PA 249Q and Even though the iMac is sharper the Asus's 1 billion color gamut is noticeably wider and more vibrant. However, you need a colorimeter like X-Rite to calibrate or you'll be wildly inaccurate.
1981387
Max resolution Aaxa delivers at 16:9 aspect ratio is 1280*720 i.e. HD Ready, at 16:10 ratio resolution is 1280*800. Same goes for Vivitek Qumi Q2 lite. Both are able to play fullHD i.e. 1920*1080 (maximum resolution), but will not display more than 720p (native resolution) vivitek contrast ratio is far better. 10,000:1 compared to Aaxa 2000:1 Lamp life for vivitek 30,000 hrs, Aaxa 15000 hrs. (Approx) Aaxa has a major advantage in terms of true portability ie it can also ne powered on its battery only...not sure of duration though. Prices are comparable. I cant say about how Aaxa actually measures up against Vivitek because haven't used it. I'm happy with Vivitek though, delivers crisp pictures and i use it for tv and movies.
490817
I bit the bullet and went with the Sony. Mainly because Circuit City was offering it for $329. Also because it had a better fps and ISO capabilities, if I remember correctly. The 4 gigs of memory set me back $59 though and the case was another $20, so that put me at $415 after tax. I must say that this thing takes awesome pics. I got it mainly for my kids sports. The 2.2 fps and sports mode are nice. The image stabilization seems to do a good job to on other pics. I have not used the remote control yet, but plan on usnig it to try and get some close ups of birds or squirrels, etc on a day when I have nothing else to do. I bit the bullet and went with the Sony. Mainly because Circuit City was offering it for $329. Also because it had a better fps and ISO capabilities, if I remember correctly. The 4 gigs of memory set me back $59 though and the case was another $20, so that put me at $415 after tax. I must say that this thing takes awesome pics. I got it mainly for my kids sports. The 2.2 fps and sports mode are nice. The image stabilization seems to do a good job to on other pics. I have not used the remote control yet, but plan on usnig it to try and get some close ups of birds or squirrels, etc on a day... » Read More I bit the bullet and went with the Sony. Mainly because Circuit City was offering it for $329. Also because it had a better fps and ISO capabilities, if I remember correctly. The 4 gigs of memory set me back $59 though and the case was another $20, so that put me at $415 after tax. I must say that this thing takes awesome pics. I got it mainly for my kids sports. The 2.2 fps and sports mode are nice. The image stabilization seems to do a good job to on other pics. I have not used the remote control yet, but plan on usnig it to try and get some close ups of birds or squirrels, etc on a day when I have nothing else to do. « Show Less
1059675
I'm a big fan of Paradigm. Especially the reference series, but the Monitor series is fantastic for the money.
2217015
the PG 240 XL would give you a more sharp resolution, would recommend it! (:
1071779
Here are some reviews of both. http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/100HS/100HSA.HTMhttp://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/300HS/300HSA.HTMI recently had to make the same decision, and tried out both the 300HS and 100HS. The image with the 100HS was sharper every time. Colors were pretty much the same, both seemed slightly saturated (easy fix with settings), but fairly accurate IMO.I wouldn't spend the extra $50 for a bit more zoom, especially at the cost of image quality.
363233
Apples and Oranges, the M9 is very versatile, yet the ods and dist are not that good, on this one there are less Fxs nevertheless the analog dist and ods are pretty decent, love the layout but not the user interface, hope this helps...
1285135
Amit, I only have the MagLite and so cannot compare the two. I can say that the MagLite is pretty impressive and i'm very happy with it.
1199466
No comparison-the Fujitsu has it beat hands down both in ease of use and quality of the scans. Get the Fujitsu!
1192969
Initially, I was also thinking of purchasing XSi earlier but now zeroed in on T1i (or 50D - wallet permitting) because (1) higher Effective Pixels in T1i / 50D - 15.1 M as against 12.2 M. ( I agree not a big factor for casual / normal photography) (2) HD Video in T1i (though one of my last considerations , but still it's a cool feature to have - managing a DSLR & Camcorder during an event / ceremony is difficult for me ) (3) DIGIC 4 Image Processing engine in T1i / 50D is better than Digic III in XSi (4) Lower ISO Rating / range in case of XSi (100-1600) as compared to T1i / 50D (100-3200 expandable to 6400,12800) meaning better performance in low light for T1i / 50D. (5) Number of LCD dots (in the LCD screen) is much higher in T1i / 50D (920,000) as against XSi (230,000) meaning better LCD visibility in bright sunlight. (6) Last but not the least , XSi was launched in January'08 as against March'09 for T1i - so you have already lost ~1.5 years out of 5 year life!! However , in case of Pixel density and price XSi scores over T1i/50D. Btw, cost difference is not much for T1i with and without the kit lens - better go for T1i kit. Canon 28-135mm zoom lens is ok but I like Tamron AF 18-270mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC LD Aspherical IF Macro Zoom Lens. Hope this will be helpful for you.
974043
I did a side by side comparison at Best Buy in their calibrated Magnolia center. They also had Samsung's flagship LED HDTV from 2013 right beside it (the one I originally intended to purchase.). There was no comparison, the VT just looked better in the dark room. Blacks were truly black with no noticeable light bleed like there was from the LED. The F8500 looked good as well, but the VT won me over. The white level is fine in my living room where I have it wall mounted. It's not in direct sunlight, but the overall picture quality is nice even in moderate lighting.