Is this a good choice for: wearing under heavy backpacking pack, inconspicuous travel in foreign countries, use w/full size DSLR & zoom lens?
1811582
Yes, I love it! Its good for a heavy camera. Make sure all equipment is attached correctly.
1811583
My camera came off after the second or third time I started using this strap. Also, the strap ripped apart. Overall, I don't recommend purchasing this strap.
1811584
I think it would be fine under the pack. It is not any bulkier than a regular strap, really. I use it with a full size DSLR and zoom and have no problems. I like how it slides on the strap. Enjoy!
1811585
Strap is sturdy and extra long. Camera connects to the strap via a metal connector which screws into the tripod mount. A big DSLR and a zoom would be as awkward as it would be with any other strap. I use it most when I hike with a bulky fixed lens digital. I find that it hangs comfortably in the back on top of my day pack or in front, if I shorten up the strap. Having backpacked in the past [but never with this strap] I would imagine you would want to shorten it up and hang it on your chest. I think it would be versatile enough for that.
1144620
Unfortunately, the way it holds the camera, I wouldn't recommend it for that. It holds the top of the camera against you and the camera tends to swing a lot.
1811586
I have been using it domestically with plans to use it on international travels. So far I really like the design; I can fit my tripod mount under the strap to the screw and no worry about losing it.
1811587
With the heavy DSLR I tend to protect the camera by keeping a hand on it - it's just too risky to let it hang. It's comfortable, and I haven't had any issues with breakage, etc. The connection to the tripod screw is good and the metal is heavy. Honestly, I put my camera into my backpack until I think I'll need it. A heavy DSLR just looks expensive.
1872895
This is a full frame camera. I'd pick a lens which opens wide. ... preferably F 2.8 or 1.8...You'll get a good foreground isolation / background blur with these lenses. For example, the 24-70mm F2.8 or the 50 mm F/1.4. Then again, if you intend to use this for travel etc., Any of the lenses you have here are good. My personal preference would be the 28-300.. Just because of the range.
1243633
I have used mine for several hours loaded with a DSLR, spare lens & flash with no issues or discomfort.Depending on your definition of "kid gear" you may want to upsize since this is a fairly compact bag.
672479
It all depends on what you do. We find it versatile and will probably pack this one for all trips as it can take the whole range from 18mm to 300mm. It is a heavier lens so plan on a monopod or tripod. We have been using a monopod as better for packing on trips and lighter but get a sturdy one. This is mainly when shooting wildlife at 300mm zoom range. We would have preferred to get a lens all the way to 400mm for wildlife but it is much more pricey....So, there is no simple answer - we looked at the Nikon site when selecting as they show a lot of technical data and pictures as well. Then you may want to look at reviews or get on some forums where people ask questions and get extra answers. It all depends on what you do. We find it versatile and will probably pack this one for all trips as it can take the whole range from 18mm to 300mm. It is a heavier lens so plan on a monopod or tripod. We have been using a monopod as better for packing on trips and lighter but get a sturdy one. This is mainly when shooting wildlife at 300mm zoom range. We would have preferred to get a lens all the way to 400mm for wildlife but it is much more pricey....So, there is no simple answer - we looked at the Nikon site when selecting as they show a lot of technical data and pictures as well. Then... » Read More It all depends on what you do. We find it versatile and will probably pack this one for all trips as it can take the whole range from 18mm to 300mm. It is a heavier lens so plan on a monopod or tripod. We have been using a monopod as better for packing on trips and lighter but get a sturdy one. This is mainly when shooting wildlife at 300mm zoom range. We would have preferred to get a lens all the way to 400mm for wildlife but it is much more pricey....So, there is no simple answer - we looked at the Nikon site when selecting as they show a lot of technical data and pictures as well. Then you may want to look at reviews or get on some forums where people ask questions and get extra answers. « Show Less
2055073
I think it will be quite secure. I've usedit with a D7100 ans the 18-200 lens. Not as heavy but should still work fine with your outfit.
1386166
I have a Sigma 18-200 Sigma lens with a filter affixed to my Canon Rebel. The camera with attachments fits loosely in the pack. I have used the pack primarily for hiking in Moab,Utah and Kawai. It's been bumped around a little bit, but there has been no discernible damage to the camera. MAKE SURE WHEN YOU TAKE IT OUT OF THE CAR FOR QUICK PHOTOS, YOU PAUSE TO MAKE SURE YOU ARE GRABBING THE CAMERA STRAPS, AND NOT THE PACK STRAPS!!
610638
It all depends on your equipment and how much space you take up. Personally I don't recommend mixing water and food with expensive Camera's. It might be wiser to take a proper hiking back pack and a smaller bag for your camera and lens that will fit in that bag verus taking this one.
635441
Depends on how tightly you stuff it, but basically YES. Just came back from trip to Borneo. Aside from international major carriers to get there, about a half dozen local flights to get to various locations. Was able to pack 2 DSLR Bodies, 100-400 zoom plus standard zoom (18-135) 5 batteries; and still have room for the usual non photo necessities /personal items that you need to keep in carry on rather than checked. Worked great and fit well in all overhead compartments.
810392
Hi David, the insert is really good if you plan to carry you're DSLR in a backpack or any bag wide enough to fit it, it is quite compact actually compared to getting one of the canon bags and fitting the bag into a backpack. I carry my camera with the kit lens, two extra lenses, a lens hood and my charger comfortably in this. Hope this helps. Raja
435063
Short answer .. no, it is not a poor choice as a rugged startup lens under budget. It's a good value. It does require good light or flash (watch for lens shadow). Since IS only battles camera shake, put a tripod in the bag and you've got your IS. Later on you will sell the 18-200 in favor of a copy with IS and somewhat sharper results, but you'll come back from your trip with some very nice photos, none-the-less. Enjoy the experience.
1861341
My dslr fits (lens down) along with two medium size lenses and a flash. But it won't hold much more. The side zip pockets arsn't big enough for a lens or flash. I use them to hold cords and battery charger. The front zip pocket, alsi good for holding filters, extra lens cap, a rsmots, etc. Won't hold anything bulky. Sounds like you'll be crowded with everything you listed. That said, it's an excellent bag and wdll worth thr money. I keep extra lenses, camera body and accessories that I don't use much in a large padded duffel which I'll take with me when I need it.
1360073
I am using for my Canons; 5DmkIII and 60d. In addition to three lenses and all the miscellaneous odds and ends one must carry about. Protection is good and you can still pack a pad or macbook. However, now I have mounted battery grips on both bodies and there is not enough room.
11425
My 24-105mm F4.0 IS L stays on my camera when traveling abroad. It's heavy, but it does take fantastic pictures. Check into the Crumpler straps. I own this strap (http://www.amazon.com/Crumpler-The-Industry-Disgrace-Brown/dp/B001JQ4QCW/ref=sr_1_10?ie=UTF8&qid;=1321633955&sr;=8-10) and it lets me carry my 70-200mm F2.8 IS L around all day without fatigue.
301037
My choice would be the 20mm F1.7. A superb prime lens ideal for taking landscapes and would take up the minimum space in your backpack!
702276
Its not as huge as a backpack. Will be a good size for your equipment. I have a D3100 with 2 lenses and have space for one more.
242169
IMHO, this pack would be too small to comfortably fit your MBP and DSLR and stuff. I find my bag a little too narrow to fit anything bulky. I carry my 13" MBP, accessories and a few small/medium books on a regular basis, and the pack is stuffed. FYI, I did buy my wife a Lowepro Passport Sling camera bag which offers easy access and padded compartment specifically for her camera, and she loves it.
1051045
Yes, I have taken 2 overseas trips, one to Asia and one to Europe taking only one lens that that lens served me well. I recognize that single lens do have lower F-stops and better resolution is some cases, but I did not want to be fumbling around. As a back-up, I took a Panasonic TS25 in my pocket which is drop and water resistant.