I still have problems reading these US sizes. But for a normal pair of jeans I am anything from 34-36, so what size to go for here? I am bit confused at the moment. In some pants I am also an 52... What to do?
812485
My son is a 32 waist but against my husband's suggestion I purchased small. A large would have been suitable as there was no medium. Maybe go with the XL.
482936
Hi Regina..sorry for not responding sooner! If you fit well into a 44-64 in another brand~I must say that when I got my reg size of large in a Depends they fit a little loose..Tena runs smaller as it is a streamlined fit that goes with your body as you move. I first picked a sm-med because my waist size was within the Tena sm-med. I was shocked that the legs were really tight! I now get Tena size large even though it says a much larger waist than I have. If you fit tight in a 44-64 I would get Tena XXL 55-66 If you fit a little loose in 44-64~try Tena XL 48-64. I saw Tena women's extra absorbent underwear for Amazon Prime in XXL in an all blue package(I think they can be shipped in lrg quantities) The important tip is that they run smaller than others I've used~so even if a size 64 fit you just right~it most likely will be tight esp in the leg area. To be safe try first Tena XXL 55-66..Good Luck! Leila
429294
I also have a 34 at 5.9 and the pair I got are very long. Barring any manufacturing irregularities they should fit you just fine.. The waist is a bit tight though but that could be because of layering..?I got the Large but the XL would have been better around the waist.
621088
I bought a size smaller than I usually wear because of the reviews saying they ran big. Mine fit like a glove, so I can't wear them comfortably over jeans. I would guess that if you bought them in your normal size, wearing them over snug jeans would work fine.
255268
I have waist 33 and Size Medium fits me best..... I did the mistake once to purchase a Large, because I believed that my pants were a bit 'too' tight.... Big mistake! the Large pants don't compress as well as the Medium size; I am convinced that compression pants should fit very tight otherwise it will detriment its value. Go for Medium mate.
60987
Probably defect... My husband wears a 32 waist in jeans, and he's had two pairs of these pants in a 32 waist that both fit the same... Just a bit roomier than a 32 jean. (He tried to go down to a 30, but that was much too snug.)
1181906
I'd recommend you go a size larger than you'd normally buy in underpants. I have a 29 inch waist and the small was a little snug. Not to the point where I couldn't wear it but it would've been more comfortable if I had gotten a medium.
888516
You should order a "34." I checked two different name brands in my husband's closet (Savane and Levis); they were both 38's which is what I ordered in the convertible pants.
759092
I would suggest a size 6...I'm 5'5'' @120lbs and wear a size 4 comfortably. There's extra elastic stretch in waist also. They ship unhemmed, which is a great thing, so you have them hemmed for your liking! These pants are wonderful!!
289960
Hi Paul, I where a 32-33 and purchase a 34 size. They fit great and have a draw string inside. If I got the 32 I was concerned that they would fit to snug. I'm happy with the 34. I purchased two pair. They also give real nicely with crossfit moves. Hope this helps Kind regards Bart
118604
42/44 looks to be anywhere between a L and XL. These shorts seemed to run a little (or lot) small. Unfortunately, the X+ sizes seem to be designed to cover knees. These shorts look like they should fit midway between hip and thigh, but what I got looked like a totally different "clown" style of down past the knee. Every pair I ordered (Rothco) camo, green, tan, all the same. It just looks like someone determined that heavy people want to hide their knees. BUT, the vendors are good on returns, though I did get charged for return shipping. Good luck!
191454
Hello! If you usually wear a medium then I believe it´s safe to order a medium in these pants, too. Like I said in my review, I wear a size 4 / small in pants and even though these Zumba pants look tiny, the fit perfectly because the waistband is very stretchy.
587068
Perhaps measure your waist or check your pant size, Joseph? The different brands of jeans and khakis I wear say that I am 32-34, but these fit great! They aren't a swimmers' jockstrap but they're nicely low-slung and cradle my nutsac and penis comfortably.
1004932
Yes, I think that would probably be the best option. Review the size chart to see what they say. Typically, "XXL" means 40-42" (US). At the time I purchased them, I was probably a 41" ;-) Still, XXL should have fit; I was definitely not in the 38" realm but, for those, I needed to be at least 2-3" thinner... Hope that helps!
1025377
I only like the L/XL Real Fit - I wear size 42 jeans. I tried everything else & these are the best! You should order S/M. Hope that helps. Merry Christmas!
432290
Hi George - Oh the days when I had a 30 inch waist! I agree with the other posters here. I'd opt for small. I will also say that I've wear my pants at least three or four days a week. I've hiked in them, done yoga in them and they are really resilient. I have a small ember burn on one leg, but outsaide of that they are fairly indestructible.
208047
I am an 8 in pants normally and my mom measured me off of their measuring chart(different website, different pants, same brand) and thought I was a 34, got them and were SO big on me. Sent them back and from these comments it looks like I would be a 30.Got full refund and will be getting a 30, even though they were super baggy, they were sosososo comfy.