How low those rings are (measured from the top of the base to the bottom of the scope tube)?
1842504
With my dial calipers, I get .3835 inches (9.74 mm). We used the rings to mount a 50 mm Simmons Predator Quest scope on a Savage Model 93R17 bolt action rifle using the factory scope mount. There is just barely enough room between the scope objective and the barrel to put the bikini lens covers on. Since the rifle is now sighted in, I was not willing to take the scope off, so my measurements may be off slightly.
1842505
The rings I have are about 3/16" above the rail. Meaning that they are obscenely low if you are wanting something tight to the barrel. If you have a scope with larger lenses you may want to go with a midrange height mount.
1842506
I didn't want to take my scope off, but these are the highest "low" rings I have. They are twice as high as my SWFA low rings and at least 4 times as high as my Burris Zee rings low. Hope this helps. Because they are too high for my needs.
1587593
1 inch worked perfect for me. I ordered this set and it came with adjustment rings for smaller size tube, but I didn't need to use them Millett 1-Inch to 30-mm One-Piece Scope Mount (Millett 1-Inch to 30-mm One-Piece Scope Mount)
861054
I have a Remington 597 with a 3-9X40 scope and and I have plenty of clearance for my iron sights. The bottom of the tube of the scope looks like it sits about an inch above the receiver with the mounts I have.
953337
The mounting rings that come with this scope are 1" rings. That seems to be a fairly standard size.
2120653
I bought a NCStar pistol or scout scope 3-7 and it came with rings. You will notice when you mount your scope with the brass stacker that the scope sits really high up compared to a regular scope mount, but it is fine for me. So I would go with the lowest rings you can use as it will still be up high. No need to make it any higher than it has to be.
1347234
It is a bit short of 6 inches. I have adjustable scope mounts so it doesn't bother me.
2029493
I've got a few of these sets in the shop at the moment and they measure out to .118" or just shy of a true 30mm. If your scope has a 30mm tube these are a great starter set of rings.
1399856
They are 1". I've mounted a Burris Fullfield II 4.5-15x42mm scope on my Rem 700. There isn't much space left. They won't work with larger scopes.
63721
6.7 oz for the base. Here's the address on the manufacturer's site: www.vortexoptics.com/product/cantilever-ring-mount-for-30mm-riflescope-tube-2-inch-offset
211634
According to my digital caliper, it's .601 inches from the top of the dovetail on my Marlin 60 to the bottom of my scope.
172540
I used the base on a nef ultra slug gun.the ring height is considered medium.very well made base.
326461
Compared to regular scope mounts, I would state that they are low. I have a similar one on a Ruger 10/22 that works just fine.
708394
I used Talley medium height one piece to mount to my tikka t3 lite and they fit perfectly. I believe they are 1.5" from the bore line. Make sure you get 30mm rings and not 1" rings as the scope has a 30mm tube and will not fit in 1" rings.
2131131
it a pretty short scope and i think you need 21/2" to 4" between the rings i can check tomorrow when i get home and let you know for sure.
1175412
The saddle height on my rings is 3/8 inch. That gives the front of the scope "just" enough clearance.
467174
I measure with my caliper .82. This is from the inside of where the bottom of this extender will come into contact with the receivers rail and then to the very top of the rail where the rings would be mounted. The .7 will come from the bottom of the extender to the top of the grooves between the rails.
167888
They are about 1-5/8 inches at widest point (side to side). They are made to fit the 1 inch tube of the scope. Hope that helps. :-).