Is this based on the older SI config or the newer CS config?
1827517
The model I ordered was based on the older SI case. You can check their webpage for more info and cross reference the part numbers. Good luck
1827518
Leon, I have to apologize, I'm not sure what you mean. I installed it on an 85 and it was a direct replacement except for running the thicker wire to the firewall.
1827519
The newer version. But it would not be to hard to make it work with the old version either
636383
Not sure at what point you are looking at but under the File tab is an icon called configuration. Two options are presented as General MIDI and Sibelius First Sounds to choose.from on the ribbon header
399775
They are 8-8-8-24 max which is a faster latency than 9-9-9-27 so they should work fine. Generally the higher the CAS number the slower the ram runs in practical application. IF I UNDERSTAND ALL OF THIS CORRECTLY
2173462
It is most likely C, but it is hard to say. You'd be best off with a Google search and compare your port to pictures of each.
2010472
Sorry, I don't recall. (My guess would be it's 970.) In the overall scheme of things, the small differences you're asking about, would probably not be noticeable with this unit.
2248350
With the T2 and amazon. The description would say either IC core or SC1 key way. What he wants to look for is SC1. Not IC core. Be careful when it does not have either it usually is IC mainly because this is a industrial type of lock.
893851
si http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2607607 http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2607607/es
2244711
http://h10025.www1.hp.com/ewfrf/wc/document?cc=ca&dlc=en&docname=c04077065&lc=en&jumpid=reg_r1002_caen_c-001_title_r0004
2245004
I bought mine over a year ago (it appears to have been manufactured in June of 2013), have since upgraded the flash RAM (larger CF card) and have a SmartNET contract, so I've moved files around and downloaded updates and can't be absolutely sure. However, I looked at the included CD with software on it, which I never opened, and it indicates the revision 8.3(1) on it. I'm assuming models manufactured more recently would have a more current IOS, so hopefully you'll hear from a recent buyer. If you really get stuck and need more certainty, perhaps the vendor could at least supply you with a few representative serial numbers or manufacturing dates and you could get help on the Cisco site. Look for the page/doc "ASA New Features by Software Release" which indicates the dates when new versions are released along with descriptions of features. (You probably already know, but also be sure and check the 5505 against the doc "ASA Compatibility Matrix," too.) From that doc and the manufacturing date the vendor gives you perhaps you could surmise what the included version is. However, given that corporations are often slow "getting in sync" with themselves if the manufacturing date was relatively "close" to the IOS release date, I would assume the version you'd get would still be one or maybe even two back. Hope this helps in some small way. Good luck!
784296
I am using the sysystem on my home computer. Sorry I could've been more help sq
1917920
I've experienced no problems with backward compatibility in my system. (I even have a SCSI drive networked to the LaCie 3, and it works great!)
2269901
Yep, the old interface works just fine. I was just hoping to get the new hardware for the turn arrow, faster screen refresh and the zoom buttons both on the right side of the screen which is easier to use IMHO. No problems acquiring sats, I think the old hardware is just as sensitive. Thanks
1989225
I do not know? Right out of the box it was perfect for me. I've never had to change the settings. I've owned it for over a year now.
1480208
don't have that, I have w7. In theory, it should work as long as their configuration tool runs correctly in w8. The config tool is basically a one time run; unless you are planning to change IP configuration frequently.
1639198
The one I got is UVCTFSE198--the one you asked about ended as SC198. The one I got fits perfectly.
1792984
how are you connecting, one to one in bridge config. if so you need the MAC address for each programed into the other.
1735694
Mine is stamped CST 863, so I do not know what the differences are between the two.