What's the difference between scanpan pro and ctx?
1812217
The major difference is that the CTX can be used for induction cooking, whereas the pro would require a conductive plate below it. Both have great nonstick surfaces that last very well as long as they are cared for as the instructions say. I have found that the scanpan classic is better for browning (e.g., sausage) than either of these, so I have all versions.
1812218
They are terrific pans. We use our scanpan primarily for eggs-it's so nice to have them slide in the pan rather than stick. Soap should never be used on these, only water
257393
The answer Janice Buckley gave is exactly what Actron's website gives for the difference between models.The additional features served me well already and I believe are definetly worth having. Dale Graefnitz
1178302
i got it on sale cheaper than the 2270. go with low price. the scanner copier are not worth paying extra for.
1545400
This is the most recent model if you are looking for the traditional install. If you are seeking the most recent version then you would need to see CT (click tight) in the description.
679444
From ScanPan's FAQ:Can SCANPAN CLASSIC & PROFESSIONAL be used with induction ranges?No. Induction ranges use magnetic fields. SCANPAN CLASSIC & PROFESSIONAL have an aluminum core which is not magnetic.Scanpan CTX, IQ and CSX can be used with induction ranges.
18052
I've not tried the CTK 3200, but when I did a comparison, it looks like it generally has more features, seems to look more attractive and approaches built-in lessons differently. I would suggest looking at these in person to get a clear idea of what you're purchasing to determine your likes/dislikes, and advantages/dis-advantages of both models.
782477
I can't find any difference at all besides on the top banner after Coreldraw X6 it says "Not for Commercial Use" ... otherwise it is exactly the same for all intensive purposes.
899264
ahh i see...but I'm still confused...because on the wacom site it said that all intuos include Nik Color Efex Pro, Wacom Brushes 3, and 2 programs from a list. (just like the list above my comment)So basically, the acad version is the same as the original? ;;
2011113
I use the 8100 at work and 251dw at home. I haven't noticed much difference in print quality or functionality. The 251dw was extremely easy to set up for network printing. 8100 uses 4 separate ink cartridges, which can be costly. The printer won't print if one of the cartridges is low.
1969414
The C331dn has the exact same print features (speed, HD Color Output) as the C330dn with the exception of the Warranty as Anthony stated in an earlier answer. OKI went through a new Energy Compliance rating, which required the new model be created to reflect those new rating. The C330dn and C331dn both do Banner printing through the MP Tray, both have Duplex and Network connectivity, both will handle cardstock through MP tray, and both can have additional paper tray added for additional media support. The C331dn will use the same supplies as the C330dn.
1049641
I don't scan, so I don't know the whole answer, but it does NOT do duplex copying. For this reason, I kept its predecessor, a DCP8065DN, which lacked fax capability and color.
1308830
We have been using an induction cooktop for two years, and have used the Scanpan CTX set, as well as some older cast iron pans. Both the induction top and the Scanpans have been superb. I won't use anything else. They are pricey to be sure, but they perform really well. You'll need to learn a couple of tricks for cleaning if one pan begins to stick. Scanpan has several options. I usually use soapy water when the pan is still hot, but Bartenders Helper also works great. I find this extra cleaning is needed every couple of months. We run a B&B;, so these pans are used every day.
1836931
I don't have the tfal pan, but the Scanpan is the best pan I've ever owned.
2202206
. Scanpan Classic has glass covers and polycarbonate handles. SCANPAN Professional uses the same production and surface technology as SCANPAN Classic, with some differences: The handles are stainless steel. The covers are also stainless steel. SCANPAN is oven safe up to 500º F. That includes glass lids and handles.
1308832
We have been using an induction cooktop for two years, and have used the Scanpan CTX set, as well as some older cast iron pans. Both the induction top and the Scanpans have been superb. I won't use anything else. They are pricey to be sure, but they perform really well. You'll need to learn a couple of tricks for cleaning if one pan begins to stick. Scanpan has several options. I usually use soapy water when the pan is still hot, but Bartenders Helper also works great. I find this extra cleaning is needed every couple of months. We run a B&B, so these pans are used every day.
948704
Both scanners are a good value and are quite similar in performance. Apart from the visual physical design differences, the DR-C130 is rated for 30 ppm vs. 25 ppm for the DR-C125. Other differences of significance are a rating of 2000 scans/day for the C130 vs. 1500 scans/day, and 50 sheet capacity vs. 30 sheets. The C130 includes Kofax VRS software which is sold as providing advanced processing to better eliminate page skew and improve OCR processing.The only problem I've had with the C130 is that light-weight paper sometimes doesn't trip the paper sensor and I've had to slide another page into the top opening or press gently with a finger near the sensor to initiate a scan. Both scanners are a good value and are quite similar in performance. Apart from the visual physical design differences, the DR-C130 is rated for 30 ppm vs. 25 ppm for the DR-C125. Other differences of significance are a rating of 2000 scans/day for the C130 vs. 1500 scans/day, and 50 sheet capacity vs. 30 sheets. The C130 includes Kofax VRS software which is sold as providing advanced processing to better eliminate page skew and improve OCR processing.The only problem I've had with the C130 is that light-weight paper sometimes doesn't trip the paper sensor and I've had to slide... » Read More Both scanners are a good value and are quite similar in performance. Apart from the visual physical design differences, the DR-C130 is rated for 30 ppm vs. 25 ppm for the DR-C125. Other differences of significance are a rating of 2000 scans/day for the C130 vs. 1500 scans/day, and 50 sheet capacity vs. 30 sheets. The C130 includes Kofax VRS software which is sold as providing advanced processing to better eliminate page skew and improve OCR processing.The only problem I've had with the C130 is that light-weight paper sometimes doesn't trip the paper sensor and I've had to slide another page into the top opening or press gently with a finger near the sensor to initiate a scan. « Show Less
423252
Sorry, don't know. I really did not like the software, so I dumped it for a Brother DS700d sheet fed scanner with Page Maker software which are far superior and costs less.