Isn't the Numark Quad Four better than this one? It's also cheaper.
1823443
The main difference between this and the Numark Mixtrack Quad is that the Quad has four channels and the Mixtrack Pro has two.
1823444
The quad 4 is definitely better. It has 4 decks whereas the mixtracm pro 2 only has 2 decks. Go with the quad 4.
597423
Because it is a cheap machine that is all about hype and marketing. Pls avoid. It is 2-3 times more expensive than all the others and not worth $100!
2148475
One model is higher easier to get on an off the machine. This is the price difference
1292153
My guess, emphasizing guess, is that the price is cheaper because they already have the new Cobra Bio line out. I still like and use the amp cell clubs. If you get them at a highly discounted rate, more power to you, I say.
2228282
Yes, in my opinion it is far better and more portable but then this is subjective isn't it? I don't have the tools to make an informed judgement so I guess you should have a good look at the specs. G
1923684
Apple = over priced , i would never own or buy apple probuct because they suck ! Anything is better than apple ..... apple mac pro has 2.6 quad it cost 2grand , my tab s has due quad core the same amount of processing powere the price 500$ thats 1500 $ cheaper and the tabs isnt locked on apple software so you could interact better with anyother device
1216440
This one is better, because it is Quad (4x) shielded. The other is Tri (3x) shielded.
621380
Well, the neweer model of this item is the Phemon II x6 1100T, that provides only a 18-25% more than this BlackEdition Phenom II x4... I personally bought the X4, because of i can get close to the same performance of the X6, just by OverClocking the CPU, and because of in a relation benefits/costs, the most fair proccessor is the Phenom II x4 965, it is just (personal opinion) sooo much more than what you pay for.I hope my answer helps you making the right desition!Grettings.Juan Arias.
472153
The fl8se may be a little better, but it costs more also. VX-1 Pro does everything I need.
25604
In my experience, it really doesn't make that much of a difference. My Premier Ultra-Matic II was just about as fast, and much more reliable, and consistent.
329010
Hi Linda- The 495 is definitely a low-end printer, so depending on how many years you've had it, and how heavily you used it, it may have just reached it's life expectancy. Mine is still operational after three years, but for the last year it's really gotten heavy use. The ink is starting to leak and smear and the WiFi connection keeps kicking in and out. But, I just bought a replacement - an MX720 series which seems good so far. I've also had excellent service from my other Canon printer - an MX870. I like these better because of automatic two-sided copying. In general, Canon PIXMA printers have served me well, and as always you get what you pay for. Maybe time for you to upgrade.
98677
Hello Aaron. I wish I have the Glidecam to compare both units. I can tell you the Opteka works and do good videos. If you read the reviews on other brands, you'll see lot of complains on setup and quality. Well, that is not a problem with this unit. Setup is really easy and the quality is pretty decent. My "concern" is that it's heavy and after some time, you will feel the weight. I wish Opteka could replace some parts and use aluminum to make it a "perfect" unit (price v/s quality). Now, keep on mind this is for fun... I tried on some parties and all my friends got in love with the unit. BUT if you want to make some money and do it professional, then you'll need to pay more. I hope this helps....
1321813
Its ok...if you want a better game pad I would go with the Nostromo N52...it has keys that are NOT offset and its more comfortable with your hand...the only reason I bought this one over the N52 was because of the price...hindsight I would have spent the xtra money on the Nostromo
772650
Looks to me like they're pushing Nuvis. Type garmin in google and go to the manufacturer's site. You can compare 4 side by side at a time.
294263
Better. No comparison. 3000 is a solid unit, hassle free. But that unit is old,there are other options in that price range now... check out the numark. Or see if you can find a used m audio xponent. Owned that one for years.... way superior to either.
14623
The basic answer has to do with whether or not you are interested in hobbyist computing - building yourself. Sure, a Chromebax is easier out of the box, but you have no input on what went into it. Chromebox is likely to (and probably does) include cut-rate components to save cost. With the NUC you can add the highest quality memory and SSD you can afford, if you wish.
871031
I personally believe buying the BNF and the DX6i works a lot better I had issues withe the start up of the quad copter and trimming the controls. The DX6i has a monitor that you can see the trim. Also you can store 10 models in the controller. I use the DX6i with my nano QX for practice it's a lot cheaper than wrecking the 350