how does it compare with the e1200 model, is speedboost worth the extra $20.00?
1832253
Don't know, but the e1500 has an external chip amplifier so I assume that's the extra 'speedboost'.
1832254
Joanne I am sorry I cannot compare. I can say the one I have is not good but i have yet to determine if it is the router or my Internet speed. Sorry I can't be better assistance.
1832255
Hi Joanne, Both of them are N routers. The routers differs in 2 things. The E1500 has 3 internal antennas compared to the E1200 which only has 2. That means that E1500 can boost your signal compared to the E1200. The other thing is that Tx/Rx (Transmit Traffic/Receive Traffic) with E1500 is 2x3 compared to the E1200 which has 2x2 only. You may read this link http://www6.nohold.net/Cisco2/ukp.aspx?vw=1&docid=e1bb6290d41b4ead817488c288329c3f_Product_Comparison_between_E1200__E1500__E1550__E2500__and_E.xml&pid=80&respid=0&snid=6&dispid=0&cpage=search for comparison about the products. Thanks, Cisco-Linksys Support http://homesupport.cisco.com
1832256
Hi Joanne,Both of them are N routers. The routers differs in 2 things. The E1500 has 3 internal antennas compared to the E1200 which only has 2. That means that E1500 can boost your signal compared to the E1200. The other thing is that Tx/Rx (Transmit Traffic/Receive Traffic) with E1500 is 2x3 compared to the E1200 which has 2x2 only. You may read this link http://www6.nohold.net/Cisco2/ukp.aspx?vw=1&docid;=e1bb6290d41b4ead817488c288329c3f_Product_Comparison_between_E1200__E1500__E1550__E2500__and_E.xml&pid;=80&respid;=0&snid=6&dispid;=0&cpage;=search for comparison about the products.Thanks,Cisco-Linksys Supporthttp://homesupport.cisco.com Hi Joanne,Both of them are N routers. The routers differs in 2 things. The E1500 has 3 internal antennas compared to the E1200 which only has 2. That means that E1500 can boost your signal compared to the E1200. The other thing is that Tx/Rx (Transmit Traffic/Receive Traffic) with E1500 is 2x3 compared to the E1200 which has 2x2 only. You may read this link http://www6.nohold.net/Cisco2/ukp.aspx?vw=1&docid;=e1bb6290d41b4ead817488c288329c3f_Product_Comparison_between_E1200__E1500__E1550__E2500__and_E.xml&pid;=80&respid;=0&snid=6&dispid;=0&cpage;=search for... » Read More Hi Joanne,Both of them are N routers. The routers differs in 2 things. The E1500 has 3 internal antennas compared to the E1200 which only has 2. That means that E1500 can boost your signal compared to the E1200. The other thing is that Tx/Rx (Transmit Traffic/Receive Traffic) with E1500 is 2x3 compared to the E1200 which has 2x2 only. You may read this link http://www6.nohold.net/Cisco2/ukp.aspx?vw=1&docid;=e1bb6290d41b4ead817488c288329c3f_Product_Comparison_between_E1200__E1500__E1550__E2500__and_E.xml&pid;=80&respid;=0&snid=6&dispid;=0&cpage;=search for comparison about the products.Thanks,Cisco-Linksys Supporthttp://homesupport.cisco.com « Show Less
1832257
My Linksys e1500 has had no problems, even placed in basement with computer, using wireless with 2 tv's a printer, a I-pad and a kindle, anywhere even outside. No info on other e1200
1832258
I don't recommend to buy anything from Linksys (it is not stable at all even you do upgrade firmware, wifi connection is terrible as well). You definitely should reconsider and check something from D-Link (for example D-Link DIR-655).
1832259
I don't know how it compares with the e1200 as I never had that. However, I figured for the extra $20, sounded worth the risk. All I can say is that I have a big house and the E1500 is excellent. I can get perfect reception anywhere in the house (and even outside on a patio), a problem I used to have. I am happy.
677381
A quick Google search shows that the STAE121 is the older model and potentially discontinued. I'm sure they upgraded the SATA or Thunderbolt controller, as they look the same on the outside. Having the STAE128 (Backup Plus, not GoFlex) I can tell you that it is blazing fast for an external adapter/enclosure and it's only $10 more than the older model. I tested my Crucial M500 240GB (with about 20GB of data on the drive) with Blackmagic Disk Speed Test, and got somewhere around 300MB/s sequential reads and 200MB/s sequential writes. It's perfectly adequate, more than adequate, for a boot drive. It can't match up to my 512GB internal PCI-E SSD (Late-2013 rMBP, around 700MB/s reads and 650MB/s writes) but it's still super fast. I'm running the OS X Yosemite Dev Preview 3 on it right now and it's as fast as you'd expect it to be. TL;DR: STAE121 is the older, discontinued model. Get the STAE128 for $10 more. It's definitely faster and more reliable than USB3 and performs admirably as a secondary boot drive.
1468768
Both are superb still cameras. There are only 2 advantages that the E-M5 has over the E-M10. It is weather resistant (note I did NOT say Weather PROOF), and it has the first generation 5 axis image stabilization. However, if those things aren't important to you, I would say the E-M10 is the wiser purchase. My reasons are that the 10 has a slightly better image processor. It isn't a huge improvement in image quality but it IS ever so slightly better. And while the 5 axis image stabilization is better than 3, many people feel the 5 axis IS is most useful for video rather than stills. And frankly if you are interested in video, neither is the camera for serious videography. Both, however are adequate for the sort of video snapshots I do. So for me, I think the only REAL advantage of the E-M5 is the weather resistance, and THAT will only function if you have weather resistant lenses as well. Otherwise, you are as unprotected as the E-M10 user. Only you can decide if the 5's slightly reduced image quality is worth $100. Personally, I would (and did) spend an extra $100 and buy the E-M10
546152
hi! I'm fairly certain the elite has extra gadget options (you can hook up a heart rate monitor to the elite) and tracks more via the gps. Like altitude, etc. Check there to find the differences.
1473638
The Fuze feature set is the same, it seems to be the continuation of the e200 line, the big difference is that the Fuze does pretty much everything better. The wheel is much better designed, the interface is smoother in terms of navigation, the firmware is less buggy, it uses a better video format I believe, better battery life and it has much much better sound quality (compared to the v1 e280, not sure about the v2). The only advantages of the e280 would be the easily replaceable battery and ability to load Rockbox (though this is only for the v1, not the v2).
2184707
Well, i think it is close. However, i received a fit bit strap product,charge hr, for Christmas this year and found it better. On the other hand, the tracking is much better than the spark tracker. Good luck with your walking and your health improvements !
65088
4.0 is best mover because u can control its travel speed too . Not just the stopping times at ends.. 3.5 is ok too. I used both. uf u hav e choice or a few extra bucks id go 4.0.. if u have a lota $ go for that beefed up version thats the 5.0 its a beast on a double track for mutiple lights . Twice as strong as others .. but also about 500$ bucks too...
349750
i think the e-125 and the e-150 are faster scooters,i brought the 5amp batteries,they work great
225152
Thank you so much for your response!! I ended up purchasing a Sole E35 last week based on warranty and several reviews regarding long term maintenance, but I'm not sure the stride (21") will be the most comfortable. I did try out a Spirit a year or so ago, and at the time their machines were identical to Sole's; the stride on that one was ok, but I'll have to see. I really appreciate that you took the time to reply and I am so glad your machine works well for you! If the one I bought doesn't turn out I will know just what to replace it with. Your post was so helpful! Thanks again!!
1566529
I have 3 of these InStep baskets and they serve me very well, granted I am a novice disc thrower. I have had them blow over in extreme winds twice in the last 2 years. I have 1 innova which was twice the price, or in other words you can buy two of the InStep's for the price of 1 innova. The innova is built a little sturdier and seems to me to be more of regulation size than the InStep. The Innova has 18 chains compared to the InStep's 14. If quality is #1 priorty I would reccomend the Innova. If you have a limited budget like me I might reccomend the InStep.
1195229
Yes, the PRO is way better made, more durable and comfortable: definitely worth the extra price! Mine last for months and I hike, etc in them. Just make sure to position them per the instructions (i.e., pointy end back) and experiment a little (rotate between side of instep and bottom of your foot) to find just the right point on short walks before going on a long walk. I wear mine over my socks, so they stay clean too.
2236000
If you want a touch screen vs pushing buttons. And the 620 also somehow calculates VO2 when wearing the HR monitor. So basically you are paying the extra for touch screen. So if it is worth it to you. Go for it. And if not save the extra 150 and spend it on some new shoes!
1589675
The only real difference between the Radian RXT and R120 are the headwings. I actually have 2 RXT's and 2 R120's... I originally got the RXT's because that seemed the better option but like you, I've heard that the headwings can limit the full height ability of the booster mode (I have short kids but they are also skinny so it's possible this will eventually be an issue for me)...after hearing that I decided to just go with the R120's... they are a bit cheaper and if they give me a bit longer of a booster seat life, great!
427332
The cortex is more for trucks that still have factory warranties. they offer other programmers that are cheaper, however I don't have one bad thing to say about the programmer. When it's in performance mode it's all out balls to the wall, mpg mode I gain a few mpgs if I can keep my foot out of It. I don't use the tow mode so I'm no help there but for a plug and play it's worth the money. Change trans pressures shift points del mph gov. Most of the time mine is on 93 performance mode and I also have a lil work done to the motor 2012 5.3 haven't been beet by a hemi yet
1717395
The E200 is faster. I don't think your 14 year old would be happy with the E200. I bought my 9 year old girl the E200 and my 11 year old boy the E300.
117381
I went with the E3200 I got for 99 bucks on Ebay. Its real close to this one minus a few features. I love it !
2003265
I know that the Fast Track 2-person that's priced at $1099 from Hill Stores is the current 2013 model. (http://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B005QUD68M/ref=dp_olp_new?ie=UTF8&condition=new). The picture probably hasn't been updated. If you have any other questions, please let me know. Sincerely, Dennis Hill Stores