Has anyone tried this and the Antra AT-PAA28 and can give a direct comparison?
1839191
The 36 db high Performance works then doesn't work. I had 2 of them and threw them away. A preamp close to a TV antenna works well. However, VHF channels are hard to receive at a distance.
1983879
I found this blog post that does an excellent comparison of the two models. Hope it helps others trying to make sense of things!<http://talesofamountainmama.com/review/kid-cos-new-2013-peapod-and-peapod-plus-comparison>
2213773
The auto document feeder on the 8610 does not handle double sided originals (you can do 1-->1 or 1-->2, but not 2-->1 or 2-->2); the 8620's ADF offers all 4 options. Also, the 8620 is slightly faster.
1776612
I have the RX-V671 and it works great. There are many tweaking options once you are connected, but you are in for a nice little treat.
2035170
Avoid the pantech uml 290, its junk with this device. I've been told the newer, more expensive, pantech uml 295 works well though
1993004
I'm sorry to say, neither. I tried three of these Sangean ANT-100 antennas on two different Sangean CL-100 radios and there was absolutely no signal improvement whatsoever on ANY band (AM, FM or NOAA). The signal I was receiving prior to attaching this "antenna" greatly degraded the moment I plugged it in. I also took the liberty of trying this "antenna" on several other radios in my home and unfortunately, I obtained the same result.In my opinion (and experience), this so-called "antenna" is literally worthless and Amazon should discontinue this product immediately. I'm sorry to say, neither. I tried three of these Sangean ANT-100 antennas on two different Sangean CL-100 radios and there was absolutely no signal improvement whatsoever on ANY band (AM, FM or NOAA). The signal I was receiving prior to attaching this "antenna" greatly degraded the moment I plugged it in. I also took the liberty of trying this "antenna" on several other radios in my home and unfortunately, I obtained the same result.In my opinion (and experience), this so-called "antenna" is literally worthless and Amazon should discontinue this... » Read More I'm sorry to say, neither. I tried three of these Sangean ANT-100 antennas on two different Sangean CL-100 radios and there was absolutely no signal improvement whatsoever on ANY band (AM, FM or NOAA). The signal I was receiving prior to attaching this "antenna" greatly degraded the moment I plugged it in. I also took the liberty of trying this "antenna" on several other radios in my home and unfortunately, I obtained the same result.In my opinion (and experience), this so-called "antenna" is literally worthless and Amazon should discontinue this product immediately. « Show Less
1743976
Hi Marmadog1. Have you used doTerra? Send me a private email opforfree@yahoo.com I will answer your Q. Big smilesss!!! Char
981230
I too am interested in this. The Ath-anc7 has 1,000+ rave reviews - I believe the product is at 4.5-5 stars. But the anc7b, which I would think would be a lot better, has some questionable reviews, and some serious complaints about sound leakage. Can anyone help me and Juan out?
1981094
I bet the Arcam doesn't sound ten times better (than the PAR21) and a couple of those reviews reveal some behavior I wouldn't tolerate on a high powered audio system. A quality audio cable will usually deliver the best sound but lacks the bluetooth convenience.
638024
I think the Minimate is stronger & I liked the grille on top that protected the emitter. But mine died after 12 hours, so I went to the airtamer for that reason. A year later the airtamer is going strong, & I have been in cars with very sick people while wearing & not gotten ill. Perfume isn't taken care of that well unless you put your nose right on it for a breath of "fresh" air.
741206
Having never used honeycomb, I don't have a basis for comparison. However, I love my GT p7310. Its versatile, error free and easy to use.
1704477
Maybe! It depends on the level of accuracy required by the analysis. To get a close approximation, my eTrex 20 works just fine. Given time, clear skies and an unobstructed position it provided elevations within plus or minus 2 feet.
1951947
I made a quick attempt, and I do have a Bose Wave - (model AW R1-1W) to compare antenna performance to other radios tested. (see previous review)Since a hard connection was not possible ( other than a standard 'FM-cable' jack ) I made a proximity test with disappointing results, virtually no difference to reception to that with no antenna. Overall, my portable radios appeared to benefit more from the 'Terk Indoor AM Antenna Advantage'. Currently I get very good to excellent reception when 'hard' connected to my Nexxtech Portable, model #1200903. Occasional adjustment (Terk's own tuning dial) works well. Hope this helps. I made a quick attempt, and I do have a Bose Wave - (model AW R1-1W) to compare antenna performance to other radios tested. (see previous review)Since a hard connection was not possible ( other than a standard 'FM-cable' jack ) I made a proximity test with disappointing results, virtually no difference to reception to that with no antenna. Overall, my portable radios appeared to benefit more from the 'Terk Indoor AM Antenna Advantage'. Currently I get very good to excellent reception when 'hard' connected to my Nexxtech Portable, model #1200903. Occasional adjustment (Terk's own... » Read More I made a quick attempt, and I do have a Bose Wave - (model AW R1-1W) to compare antenna performance to other radios tested. (see previous review)Since a hard connection was not possible ( other than a standard 'FM-cable' jack ) I made a proximity test with disappointing results, virtually no difference to reception to that with no antenna. Overall, my portable radios appeared to benefit more from the 'Terk Indoor AM Antenna Advantage'. Currently I get very good to excellent reception when 'hard' connected to my Nexxtech Portable, model #1200903. Occasional adjustment (Terk's own tuning dial) works well. Hope this helps. « Show Less
504976
The review that I read and helped me make my decision stated that the AT30 was a better smoother shaver for the money difference. My husband has commented several times how smooth it is and how much he likes it and he has had several shavers from mid to top of the line. Hope this helps.
1466104
I haven't tested the one you mentioned yet, so I can't give you an definitive answer, but from the specs on the page... I would surmise to say the results would be similar in comparison. I've only settled on Alfa since, they work well with my Linux/unix systems OTB. I will say that the Yagi would be more sturdy and practical than the Alfa overall, if you are outdoors more often. The Alfa is simple and cheaper for my needs. Hope that helps.
2081012
I really haven't used ADT so will not be able to answer you on this.we are more familiar with AvigilonLouis
936066
I can't answer your question, but I can add that I tried the Celestron against this model and returned the Celestron. The Celestron had some difficulty stabilizing the image. Also, the software bundled with the AM Scope camera is pretty good.