EU.biz mired by complex security systems
294284
Suppliers, solutions, consoles, causing headaches European companies are becoming bogged down in their increasingly complicated IT security arrangements, according to new research.â¦
356771
While corporations are monitoring ports and using advanced security tools to fend off infection and attack, home users -- who have less technical sophistication -- are left more susceptible, sometimes
452393
It is no secret that enterprise networks are increasingly under attack from a variety of sources that are difficult to thwart. To address the problem, many are turning to outside security providers, which is driving  the rapid evolution of new safeguarding technologies, according to  research conducted by the Yankee Group.
141788
BRUSSELS, Belgium - An international conference opened Wednesday amid warnings that companies, governments and individuals are increasingly vulnerable to Internet attacks by terrorists, hackers and others that rob them of privacy, money, and secrets.
217559
IE is subject to a trio of unpatched vulnerabilities, security firm Secunia warned yesterday.
623721
Businesses need to exercise caution in this new virtual environment by understanding the complexity that virtualization introduces.
383169
Grid architecture aims to protect corporate networks from interior security threats.
607967
Two boxes bundling managed security service with SMB-level firewall/router/gateways and DSL have appeal to smaller businesses and admins managing remote users, but our testing raised questions.
728242
Software on the Seine, anyone? Backup in Budapest? VTL from Vienna? And why not. Europeans have far more experience when it comes to dealing with data regulatory issues than we do.
401192
More companies are turning to strategies that address network management and security at the same time.
287429
Sluggish pace of development and deployment has left big holes in checkpoint security, officials say.
348960
The huge losses reported by French bank Soci?t? G?n?rale, apparently caused by a rogue trader with inside knowledge of the bank's procedures, don't necessarily point to an IT systems failure but rather to poor management of those systems, analysts say.The bank has accused 31-year-old employee Jerome Kerviel of creating a fraudulent trading position in the bank's computers that ultimately caused it to lose around ?4.9 billion ($7.3 billion).Kerviel achieved this by, among other things, misappropriating computer passwords, the bank said. It has revealed few other technical details of what caused the losses.Management of passwords, including rescinding the old passwords of employees who move to different positions within the bank, or modifying the level of access those passwords allow, is often a task given to the lowest-level IT worker."It's dull and routine 99 percent of the time, but a vital backstop," said Bob McDowall, senior analyst at the TowerGroup. Senior IT managers should conduct more frequent reviews of password policies, he said.In some cases, it may not have been the security of the passwords themselves that posed a problem, but rather the access those passwords allowed, said Ian Walden, professor of information and communications law at Queen Mary, University of London.Organizations tend to think of access as being binary in nature: you get access to it all, or you don't, Walden said. In reality, there are many more levels of access. "In modern, complicated systems, the granularity has to be much more sophisticated."To make the best use of systems with advanced access controls, the IT department must have a thorough understanding of how the business works and where there is risk.IT departments and business managers have yet to find a way to wrap security into business processes so it is not an impediment, Walden said."IT in a company is not given a sufficient status," Walden said. "What's shocking is you would have thought that the financial sector was more sophisticated than this, but it still tends to be the case that security is an add-on and a block, something you've got to live with but you don't have to like, rather than being viewed as an integral part of the business structure."Workers should be able to do their job without having to share passwords when someone goes on holiday, and the IT department should not make it harder for people to perform their duties, Walden said.In one extreme example at telecommunications company BT, one employee didn't have the right to use a computer at all, but he found it helped him do his job, Walden said."By the time he was found, he had 90 passwords of different employees," Walden said.It's possible that financial institutions could use biometric systems, such as fingerprint scanners, to provider an added layer of security, McDowall said. Those systems, however, are expensive. Also, the sometimes-finicky fingerprint scanners may not be appropriate in a frantic trading environment, McDowall said.Questions remain about how Kerviel's losses could be so high given his job as relatively low-level trader. But Kerviel's career progression in 2005 from the bank's back office to the front office -- where he would have had access to client accounts -- is also troubling since he would have gained greater knowledge on the bank's inner controls, McDowall said.As an arbitrage trader, Kerviel made money off price differences between different financial products. Soci?t? G?n?rale said Kerviel balanced real and fake trades in order to avoid setting off internal alarms.Kerviel has been described in some press reports as a computer genius. However, most attackers used unsophisticated methods for exploiting systemic vulnerabilities in applications, processes and procedures, according to the 2005 "Insider Threat Study" by Carnegie Mellon Software Engineering Institute.That report notes that sophisticated tools are also used in some attacks, which would demand that internal financial systems need to be designed on a more defensive footing.Programmers should code under the assumption that a hacker or employee will use every means in order to break in, said Ben Rothke, senior security consultant at BT's International Network Services."The underlying issue is that many systems are designed to stop honest people from making mistakes, but do not take into account those with malicious intent," Rothke said.It makes insider jobs one of the toughest to defend against. The psychological profile of an insider tends to be a disgruntled employee who feels wronged by the company, according to the Insider Threat Report.That in turn can lead to a suspicious behavior such as staying late at work, which paradoxically might only signal a committed employee."It's always the insider," Rothke said. "It's often harder to steal $10,000 from a bank than $10 million."
537741
As the TJX Companies data leakage incident seeped its way further toward becoming the Exxon Valdez of corporate information spills this week, researchers reinforced the notion that businesses continue to make a mess of electronic data security because they fail to foster adequate internal communication.A new report from Ponemon Institute -- which has produced a series of studies into corporate data leakage over the last several years -- concluded that the various people in charge of collecting, protecting, and managing sensitive information inside large businesses typically don't collaborate sufficiently. Those constituencies also have widely differing views regarding their respective roles in safeguarding the content, the report contends.Echoing comments made by a number of security policy experts in recent months, the study highlights the fact that companies are likely failing to protect data based on broken business processes -- at least as much as they may be succumbing to complex technological challenges.Just as many software developers complain that their applications are left vulnerable to attack because business teams refuse to wait long enough for the programs' underlying code to be made secure, the results of Ponemon's survey of 3,600 IT security and marketing executives -- located in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany -- illustrate a distinct lack of organizational coordination in the name of protecting data.For instance, only 30 percent of the marketing workers interviewed for the study said they actually consult security teams before collecting and using sensitive information, while 80 percent of the IT security employees surveyed indicated a belief that they are typically involved in such decision-making.In addition, while only 53 percent of IT security workers surveyed said their companies have well-coordinated data protection policies, only 32 percent of those workers who handle the information said their employers are doing an adequate job. Some 45 percent of security workers don't feel that their data-handling rules get in the way of business objectives, while only 21 percent of the people using the content feel that such policies represent roadblocks to their productivity.And in yet another blow to the perceptions of security workers, only 21 percent of the marketers using sensitive information interviewed by Ponemon said that security teams play a leading role in defending the content.At the heart of the matter is the issue of poor collaboration between all the involved parties, according to the research firm. Only 29 percent of those interviewed said their companies' current policies would be adequate to handle a major breach within 24 hours of its occurrence.Based on the results, Ponemon contends that organizations with substandard data protection collaboration policies were twice as likely as to have had a data breach within the last two years.Therein lays the ultimate proof of collaboration's impact on data protection, said executives with Microsoft, which sponsored the research report."We expect the data threat environment to continue to evolve, and at the same time, clearly, there's a long way to go based on where we are today," said Brendon Lynch, director of privacy strategy at Microsoft. "There's this major issue around the degree to which marketing professionals consult with these other involved parties; they see the policies as getting in the way of business objectives, and they're not interacting with security or privacy specialists based on that, which undermines the process change that companies are already attempting to enact."As part of its connection with the study, Microsoft is pushing the notion that companies should merge their security and data privacy operations to simplify the process of interaction between the various constituencies.Some 80 percent of all respondents to the Ponemon study said that they would support further combination of those teams to improve coordination of their data defenses."We feel that most companies need to be more holistic and bring these types of roles together," said Lynch. "All of these workers are critically important to better locking down the data, so they need to look at developing appropriate-use cases, and how to better fulfill business objectives while maintaining protection."The study is just the latest expert opinion to highlight the fact that despite the ever-expanding range of security technologies available to enterprises to protect sensitive data, many organizations could be well served to start with a review of their internal policies.In addition to getting business teams to work more closely with security and privacy pros, some experts contend that organizations could improve security risks quickly by merely retrenching the settings of their network and IT systems.Many critical infrastructure systems are installed with the idea of getting an operation up and running first, with plans to bolster security after the fact, and never readdressed, said Paul Williams, chief technology officer at IT security services provider Global Security Management.Reviewing networking gear settings to ensure that they have been sufficiently obscured, along with tweaking the features of other systems crucial to protect external attack is another way that companies can significantly bolster data security with little to no capital investment, he said."Before you learn how to defend a network, you have to take a walk on the wild side and see how you can break in yourself," said Williams. "Most networks can be made more secure by simply taking the time to go back and see how things were installed and whether or not the settings were changed in a way that promotes security; people typically look to technology solutions to address these problems, but they could begin helping themselves significantly at relatively no cost."In a presentation delivered at the Gartner IT Symposium earlier this month, analyst Neil MacDonald told attendees of the show that they could save money on their security projects if they continue to push for a more thorough, process-driven approach to data protection on a high level within their organizations."This can't be about managing a set of projects, it has to be about improving process," MacDonald said. "At the end of the day, the idea of tagging every piece of data in an enterprise for the sake of protecting it is unfeasible; it sounds great on paper, but the problem is a monumental effort with new information coming in all the time, it's not a process that's sustainable."
679875
Researchers in Europe have received EU funding to develop tools for building complex open-source systems.
295662
European Union governments are pushing through contentious new plans to retain data from telephone calls and e-mails for a minimum period of 12 months as part of new anti-terrorist and cybercrime proposals.
553163
Vendor uncertainty and instability is highly correlated to perceived risk, and there are some big storage vendors out there with some large question marks hanging around their necks, including Sun, Symantec and HP.
485449
Throughout the European Union, governments are grappling with how to guard against terrorist attacks. Meanwhile, Indian IT services companies have beefed up efforts to protect data.