Got watch in and it was poor quality so I requested a return and was only ...
344246
Got watch in and it was poor quality so I requested a return and was only given about half a refund! Not only was the watch terrible quality but if you are going to return it, you will have to pay for a portion of it anyway!
3219831
I am extremely disappointed in the quality of this watch. I went return the watch and Amazon and they said I couldn't return it because I was JUST BARELY out of warranty. The watch was delivered on July 8th and today is October 25th. I took good care of this watch and my picture is attached to show it's completely unusable now. I should of tried to return it 3 weeks ago when it started to glitch constantly and was still under warranty. That's pretty shady that they won't let me return it when it so close to the cut off date and that it started messing up 3 weeks ago. This is such crap you pay decent amount of money for this watch and it only last just barely past the warranty cut off date. BUYER BEWARE
366188
I got the watch band on time .  But the quality of the watchbands crap
1754526
The watch was impressive but the leather band squeaked with the slightest movement whether or not it was on one's wrist! This was so annoying that within 20 minutes of receiving the watch I initiated the return process.

Comparing the band with that of other Sturhling watches, I own, it appeared to have less depth and to be too wide where it attached to the watch. Thus any motion that produced rotation at the point of attachment produced squeaking sounds!

I chose to return the watch rather than request a different watch; I didn't want to take a chance on a replacement that had the same problem. The return process was very smooth and the refund swift!

I am giving the watch a rating of four stars to indicate that I really liked the watch, and the band wasn't worthy of the watch.
4153345
Recieved this watch in march-April and it didn't work. So I attempted to return it and they have been nothing but rude about refunding my money and won't refund it and now are to the point of not responding to my messages. I suggest finding a better watch, I have went with a new Samsung gear it's the same price and is a reputable brand!
2517505
The band was so cheap i took it to my jeweler for a new one.  He looked the watch over and told me it wasn't even a real Seiko, it's whats called a Knock-off, a fake  how do i return this fake Seiko? I'm suprized Amazon sells fake junk like this!
639315
I received the watch promptly. It had obviously been returned as it was running and off the stand inside the package. I decided to keep the watch as it appeared Ok and was working. Now a month and a half later the stem fell off and it doesn't run. I wish I had returned it while I could.
4092682
I picked this up because it looked a little different and I needed an inexpensive watch.

It arrived quickly but it was pretty obvious that it was not mounted correctly. (the zero at the 12 o'clock position was askew maybe 10 degrees)

it was easy enough to open the back of the watch - maybe too easy for a water resistant watch. inside two large sandwiched plastic disks mount the watchs' movement. the mechanics are extremely tiny and seem barely be able to move the second hand after correctly orienting the watches face.

you can rotate the front dial with one of the two small plastic holes. unfortunately I don't have a case press - well I will in two days from amazon.

That being said I will never pick up another watch from this company - poor build quality, poorly mounted but definitely unique looking.
2790004
First the watch arrived ticking. That tells me that I will not get a long battery life. Second, there was rust on the stainless steal band. My guess is that it was worn and returned. Also, it was VERY cheaply made. I realize that it IS a low priced item but I thought it would be a little bit better quality. The eyelets used for the buckle holes scratched my skin. The brackets holding the band to the watch face were really thin and cheap. I returned this item. The one nice thing about this watch was the watch face. It was very pretty.
2516011
While the watch is attractive, the band is of poor quality and came apart after 3 months of use. The return period expired after 6 weeks of purchase. It would be nice if amazon would contact the seller regarding the quality of this product.
2206942
poor quality, 20 dollars is the right price for this items but don't expect original watches...you can find this type of watches even in the stall!!
2247688
Purchased two watches because they looked good but I am glad I returned the other one. I wore this one occasionally and 6 months after purchase the seconds arm came loose. Low quality, even at $80 it is not worth the price.
2344645
The watch looked cool, and I thought what could possibly go wrong? The buttons on the side do absolutely nothing except are there for looks. The compass will not work, however the two clocks have so far have held time. It is heavy yet not as heavy as it looks and feels extremely cheap. The band is sturdy and the only redeeming quality, but it doesn't matter, because I will never wear the watch again. You also of course can't return the watch because you have to pay the shipping which is the cost of the watch.
415365
I returned because the person who received it as a gift said it was of poor quality and didn't fit her bracelet.
4630302
I know I didn't pay much for this watch but it seems to be of extremely poor quality.  I will not buy this brand again!
1055575
Previously all my watches were with quartz movement. I like to have accurate time at all time. However, coming across review on this watch on ShopNBC, I decided to give it a try to see what automatic can do.
The watch looks nice and solid. But not a bracelet, its quality is very poor. It broke in three pieces even though it was not even adjusted 4 days after I started to wear it.
So instead of sending watch to Invicta to repair this flaw (it would cost you to ship it to them and insure it, plus $20 for shipping it back to you), I went to local Walmart and got nice stainless steel bracelet (not much different from Invicta, except without its logo) for $10 including tax.
What surprises me is that I have Invicta 9225 and it has similar bracelet but I am very happy with it and wear it at least once in a week for the last 5 months.
So far, I own this watch to 10 days and it keeps good time. In one week it gain less than a minute. I expect that watch will slow down in a month. From what I heard and read, this watch should be accurate to 1 min per month. I will keep on checking it.
4069474
Synopsis:

1) The watch's reliability is suspect (not appropriate for the LSAT, or for the price).
2) Customer Service is pathetic (NOT Amazon)

I strongly recommend not purchasing this watch. The watch arrived with a smaller face than expected (the measurements are included), and with a cheap feel for something priced at 70 USD. Functionally, the extended minute marks at eight minutes are too small to be useful (i.e. breakdown for passages in Reading Comprehension and Analytical Reasoning (a.k.a. Logic Games)). I recognize these are preferential observations. Moving onto meatier topics.

The watch arrived with the "minute" hand not set at zero. This isn't a deal-breaker because the watch includes instructions with a troubleshooting section. However, this was my first clue to the quality of the watch. The instructions read in bold "Do not pull out the crown". It cites possible malfunction as a reason. However, below in the troubleshooting section it reveals that pulling out the crown is exactly the thing required to bring the minute hand back to zero. I followed the instructions to bring the hand back to zero. I used the watch for two months with more or less no problems.

Later, I noticed when resetting the watch (in preparation for the next 35 minute section) the minute hand would often not land on the mark (return to zero). I would resolve this by following the aforementioned troubleshooting instructions. Eventually, after pushing the crown back in (or pulling it out) the hand would begin moving inexplicably without pushing the "reset" or "start" button. Finally, the watch's functionality degraded to a point where it was completely inappropriate for LSAT use. At this point, I contacted the manufacturer (with less than a week before the December 2016 LSAT). I received no response. This is unacceptable.

Amazon handled the problem wonderfully and refunded the entire purchase price. I purchased the Mastermind Watch as replacement. I contacted their customer service because of the limited time before the exam. I was contacted within twelve hours. The watch shipped and arrived promptly. It felt superior right out of the box. It worked wonderfully and I highly recommend it over the 180Watch.