The 30 second time period is too quick and it doesn't continually sense for movement.
345395
Bought mine for the night time bathroom run. The light is plenty bright, and comes on quickly when entering the room. But the trouble is, it turns off 30 seconds after it first turns on no matter how much movement it senses while on. Then it requires motion again to turn it back on. It does not continually stay on as long as there is sensible movement, but it will go off 30 seconds after first coming on. So in the middle of doing your bathroom business you have to wave every 30 seconds when the room goes dark to get the light to turn back on. It doesn't fit my bathroom application at all. It might be OK for a stairway or hall, but not for a location you will want to have light and occupy for more than 30 seconds.

They should have designed it to continually sense movement and not shut off until 30 seconds after the last movement, or stay on for at least 4-5 of minutes after it comes on. This was a very stupid design, and not what I consider to be an occupancy light. I can continuously wave my hand right in front of it, but the light will go off 30 seconds after it first came on. It covers both outlets so the other outlet can not be used, and the motion sensor needs be more sensitive.

Either this product description--  "When left in the occupancy sensor mode this light will only go on at night when motion is detected, and will only go off once there is no motion left in the area."--  is false or my light is defective. My light will only sense for movement when it is off, so it will turn on. It does not sense for movement to keep the light on after it has come on.

Is mine defective?

edit: emailed customer service, and the light is designed to turn off after 30 seconds whether there's movement occurring or not. It will turn right back on with more movement, but the light turning off and on every 30 seconds is very inconvenient and annoying. It's more of a "just passing through" light instead of an occupancy light.
627509
Why is the seconds hand just moving back and forward back and forward in the same spots ...might have to return
1172956
While it was great for the first few months that I had it, it now won't keep accurate time. The hands display a time one hour and fourteen minutes past the time displayed by the digital readout, which is seven minutes faster than the atomic clock's standard time. When I set the digital time manually, the watch automatically moves the hands to keep them one hour and fourteen minutes beyond the set time. I've tried everything in my power to make it work, and I don't think that any eighty dollar watch should give me this much trouble. Avoid the purchase.
3986075
Easily installed but disappointed with the record time. After detecting movement it stops recording after 40 seconds. Even though there is still movement. I have my settings at frequent as the ring customer service advised me to do. It takes two minutes for the camera to detect motion again. Two minutes is a lot of time for someone to break in your house or cause property damage. Other people who have the ring will know this and could use it as a tool to break in. I'm not happy when it comes to that. The setup was easy, the picture is really clear and you can talk with someone causing motion at any one of the cameras. I can't even say I'm impressed with the price, unless your on live view you are missing a ton of recording because of the cutoff time. This needs to be resolved.
1364012
The watch looks good, and does a great job at taking your heart rate while resting but falls short when you are trying to get an active reading.  I think if you were doing mild exercise, or if you want to measure your rate through 'resting' times it would be ideal but I bought it for use in a little more hardcore sense.

I don't know if it is because of the sweat or what, but it is near impossible to get a reading on the fly.  You can expect to stop what you are doing, press & hold the button, and then get your reading.  It is also strange that sometimes it takes a very quick reading, and sometimes it takes much longer (20 seconds of holding the button down) - the accuracy seems to be pretty good either way.  I know that I am not using the Monitor in its preferred ideal fashion, but it would be nice if it met me more 1/2 way.

To be fair, this is the 1st Heart Rate Monitor I have owned, & it is now sitting on the shelf unfortunately.  I don't have the pocketbook right now to buy another, and this one doesn't do the trick for me...
2864175
The movement tends to go too fast, at least a minute too fast per day. The watch has to be readjusted every few days to keep relatively accurate time. Although I've been quite careful with the strap, even though its genuine leather, it already began to strip within 3 days of wearing. I will definitely be seeking a refund.
1571443
No real-time pace or auto-pause when you stop moving. Battery life poor.
2494324
3 star for the design but it is very annoying as it always loses track of time. Have to constantly reset it .
3941589
this watch keeps time, approximately, within a minute or so in a day, but that isn't good enough with today's technology.  Also, the "gold tone" metal is rather more "brass tone".  The red leather band is cute and I guess that's why I bought it.  That's pretty funny when you think about it -- I should have just gotten a red bracelet.
2692958
I wish the camera had better optics and the slow transmission (lag time) of the "Real Time Video" made it impossible for me to navigate using only the camera as an indicator of direction, pitch, trim, etc.
801480
I thought I would like being able to just wear the watch without the chest strap and take my heart rate with my fingers.  I haven't used it for that once in many months.  And I have actually had quite an annoyance with that function.  When I am wearing the chest strap, the watch often goes into the instant heart rate mode, so that I can't actually view the reading that I would normally get communicated from the chest strap.  It happens VERY VERY often, and is annoying.  So that about half the time I look at the watch it's not in the mode I want.  You can turn the instant heart rate off, which you would think would fix the problem, but it doesn't; it still goes into that mode it just doesn't give you a heart rate reading.  Besides that, I like the functions.  It's hard to beat the price of this device for the functions it has.
372223
We bought this as a replacement to what came with our lights. The response time of the board is at least 3-5 seconds slower than what I do on it. If I could go back to the old one I would. don't buy this unless you want to predict when to do things. Also doesn't keep it's programmed scenes.
506222
The idea and the clipping mechanism are great. The problem is a second hand that gets stuck every 2 seconds. It clicks as if it wants to go to the next second but doesn't move. Therefore the point behind having this for vitals becomes obsolete. I am not happy with the purchase and will be needing a new solution for vitals
2904879
this is a little slower than some of the better instant response thermometers. i do not know if it is htis or the problem.  we are talking 1-2 seconds for a read compared to one second.
4829492
Too slow!!! I was excited to get a new workout DVD, but I don't have a lot of time to waste. They have breaks between workouts and even with fast-forwarding it kind of kills it for me. It seems like it would be a good workout if it were a little more fast-paced. Disappointing. Also the lady makes a weird noise during the workout. I find it annoying.
1791915
The clock looks nice and simple on the wall.
However, there must be some problem with the gear or something.  The time consistently lags by 10-15 minutes after each adjustment.
It ended up back to the warehouse...
4033326
Timer runs slower than real time. I had to manually adjust the time to the real time every now and then.