It's attractive, useful, easy to use, and efficient... BUT it could be better.
351329
LOOKS... It' modern design will either appeal to you or turn you off, but it's anything other than boring. The base is made of a plastic however that attracts dust, so the black lamp looses some of it appeal when it hasn't been dusted.
VERSATILITY... The rubberized gooseneck design is very functional, easy to move but stays securely in place. This keeps the light right where you need it. I find no faults with it, it's very well made.
EASE OF USE... The touch sensitive area is a little dimple in the base, which keeps the accidental hit from happening, while keeping another level of light just a tap away. While it works, I would have preferred it to have a larger or secondary target area to be able turn it off in one tap or maybe an up/down in brightness rather than cycling through all the levels.
EFFICIENCY... This much brightness (although localized to your work area) from just 3 watts of power it's a marvel and a big power savings from the 40 watt bulb lamp it's replacing. Plus not needing to replace bulbs is it's own time/cost savings.

So other than it's attraction to dust and the one touch point that cycles through each power level, I really like and recommend this lamp.
3656768
it's easy to clean up, good to use.
but there are two flaws:
1, the holder is broken.
2, there is a defacement at the edge.
1276941
The good:

Catches most of the trimmings, greatly reducing sink cleanup effort.

Very precise length adjustment.

Clean cuts. (On my hair, your mileage may vary.)

Convenient to use. Good ergonomics and I like the charge indicator.

The bad:

Slightly noisier than other electric trimmers, due to the vacuum. Overall the volume is not worse than the 8-year old trimmer it replaced though.

The batteries are NiCd. I generally prefer NiMH for environmental reasons.

You've got to be careful when you install the comb (say after cleaning) to make sure it goes on right.

It doesn't catch ALL the hair. (I know, this is nitpicking.)
1320905
A nice utility tool, but It can be a little cumbersome to have it in your pocket, at times.
I won't dissuade you from buying it - it  really does all that it is advertised to do, but perhaps the layout could have been a little more user-friendly.
1930404
Yes  I agree with the consumer reports the product needs to have some revamping to make it more efficient the concept is ok but needs more attention to customers expectations. I hope you address these notes from the reviews they,only want you to make a better product to be proud of.
3954483
I like this product.  However, I think it has somewhat of a limited use.  I think it makes sense for one or two people, but beyond that not so much.

The product has a fairly innovative filling and filtering system.  To fill, you remove the cap, fill an inner compartment and then the water filters through a disc into the outer compartment.  You can replace the disc at any time and begin pouring without worrying about the unfiltered water contaminating the filtered water.  Filtration happens pretty quickly, and I actually enjoy watching the 2 separate water compartments reach equilibrium (yeah, I know).  Changing the filter is easy too.  You just wet the filter disc to activate and then discard the first filtration.

There are some issues of course.  For one, it's not entirely obvious where the water will pour from, making it easy to spill.  It can pour from 2 sides, but you kind of need to examine the orientation quickly before pouring.  It's not a big deal, but is certainly something that can be annoying in the dark.  The second issue is that you only really can fill up 2 glasses with a full container.  The third issue is that it's really tall and not ideal for some tighter fridges.

Overall, despite the issues, I think this is a decent product.  I certainly use it a lot and we have some ideas about using it as a water infuser.
1867669
Clever design.  Attractive appearance.  Functions well in a small space.  We hope this will leave things more sanitary than the bamboo one we had before.
The tray underneath is not as sturdy as the rack itself - we reused our existing heavy-duty sloping tray.
The versatility of the setup is useful.  The knife slots also.
4950639
I ordered this coffee maker as a replacement to a basic Mr. Coffee coffeemaker. It has pros and cons.

The Pros:
 The coffee tastes great!
 The carafe is well-insulated and keeps the coffee hot even though the maker doesnt have a warming plate in the base.
 The coffee maker can be programmed remotely using a smart phone and the WeMo application.
 The removable water reservoir is convenient in that it can be removed, filled with water, and then snapped back into place in the coffeemaker.
 The coffee maker is attractive.
The Cons:
 The carafe holds 10 5-oz cups which is insufficient for our familys needs.
 The basket where the coffee is added is inconvenient compared to the previous models Ive used. In addition, the filter disk often pops out and ends up in the coffee grounds
 The programming doesnt always work and the coffee maker sometimes has to be started manually.
 The WeMo app is not the most user friendly.
Bottom line: The Mr. Coffee Smart Wifi-Enabled WeMo 10-Cup Optimal Brew Coffeemaker makes good coffee and keeps it warm. These are probably the most important of the comments that I made below but I feel that a good coffeemaker should be more convenient to set up. The wifi programming seems like more of a gimic than a useful feature . Finally, the price seems a bit high for what we get.
1990406
It's attractive and easy to use. Price was right. Not powerful at all though - takes twice the amount of time to cook food. I suppose since it takes 3 minutes instead of 1 1/2 or two, that's not so bad.
2569986
Does what it's supposed to well enough, however, the design means theres always a little stub of plant matter in whichever end. Not really a problem with functionality but still. if you're a stickler for design efficiency it will reduce your opinion of it.
654962
This flashlight could be better. There's some room for improvement. However, it does work fine, and it's got some things going for it.

It has a rechargeable battery built-in, which is charged up by the photovoltaic panel also built-in. It also has a small handle for cranking the internal dynamo. So, it's got two ways of charging it up.

It is completely off-grid, since there's no charging port for an adapter to plug-in. It would be nice if it had that, so you could make sure it's already fully charged on your first night out camping. The upside is that it's great if you have no access to wall outlets. Of course, that's the point of a survival flashlight.

It is very lightweight, which is also great for camping or survival. Plus it has its own carabiner built-in, which is another thoughtful feature. I have it clipped conveniently to a D-ring on one shoulder strap of my backpack so I don't have to rummage for it, and so during the day the sunlight can help charge it up.

Aside from the lack of a plug-in charging feature in this flashlight, another weakness is that it's not very bright and you cannot focus the beam. Also the battery does not last very long. I tested it using the AndroSensor app on my phone, which has a feature displaying the lux units of light. I left this flashlight out all day, propping it up to aim the photovoltaic panel at the sun and several times adjusting its position to optimize sunlight exposure. That night I brought it in and measured it's light intensity at 21:00 (9:00 PM), my sensor read about 30 lux at arm's length from the flashlight. By 0:00 (midnight) it was down to just 1 lux (quite dim) at arm's length.

It seems to me that with minimal impact on weight and size the battery capacity and discharge potency could both be increase quite a bit. Moreover, the flashlight could be redesigned to include a focusing feature and could do with more powerful or more, or both, LEDs.

For comparison, I have an aluminum body, small flashlight (roughly the same size as this one, albeit heavier) which runs on 3 AAA batteries and has 9 LEDs. This flashlight has only 3 LEDs. My other flashlight is very much brighter and the beam is more tightly focused than this one. The downside to my other flashlight is the area in which this survival flashlight excels -- the other one will last several nights of heavy use, but without a fresh supply of batteries it will become just dead weight.
4144413
It's fast, easy to use, and remarkably small.  However, the feeder is temperamental - it will occasionally fail to grip the pages, and will sometimes skew the page being scanned - you just have to take some extra time to make sure the pages are lined up.  Other than that, it's great.
3087726
It's pretty neat. It works. I always leave my phone charging elsewhere, while my speakers are connected wirelessly, and all my singing in the shower habits are made easier. Pretty good volume. I guess it could be louder, but I haven't experienced that being a problem, except with really quiet songs.

The only ways I would want this improved is being able to see how much battery it has without looking at my phone, and easier volume controls that would likely allow more precision.
1576079
I like the way it looks, it is a nice system.
3707313
This is a handy desk, and I am using it now for my laptop to sit over my recliner as I work from home and it helps me to sit comfortably with a muli-computer set-up.  I have a few complaints about the design, which would have made this much more useful.  They say it is easily switchable from left to right mouse, which it is not.  The main table has 3-4 places where you can 'click' it into place for the angle, but it doesn't really click easily. I always have to mess with it to get it to really align correctly.  I also wish they had made the top a swivel so that I could easily swing the table out of my way when I get up from my chair because I had to leave the wheels off in order for it to truly go under my couch, making it a permanent fixture where it sits, which means sliding out and around the table to get up and if it had a swivel ball to simply turn the top it would be the PERFECT table - but it does not.  I would love to see that added to this.  It is helpful as I can now have one laptop off on my desk to my left, and another on the desk, and I use the 'mouse pad' for my iPad and notebook since really it would not be comfortable to use a mouse up that high anyhow.  It works - just not as intended.  I'd love to see more options for the work-at-home furniture since this is becoming a trend and more people need things to accommodate comfort and ergonomically correct workstations so hopefully work will be done to improve upon this and provide more customizability.  It would sell like crazy since the market is there and options are few.
2127379
The machine has good and bad features as compared to the Neat. First the downside which the company needs to improve. It can't process two jobs at the same time, one at a time, unlike Neat that can process several batches of scan one after another.  Secondly, when it opens the menu to look for the file where you want to scan this to, the window (pane) is very small and it is difficult to navigate through. This is indeed better in the Neat scanner.  The upside; it is much much faster than Neat and can scan larger load at one time.  It is smart and can detect one or 2-sided sheets. The software seems more robust than the NEAT machine.
2225417
I like this grinder, but but have some qualms with it. First I will mention what I like about it:

Finish:
I really like the finish; the top print is beautiful, and the grey finish throughout is very nice and it arrived with no scratches.
The middle and bottom chambers have a large capacity for a grinder of this size, which is related to one of the "cons" below. The design on the top is in the form of a decal (expected at this price level).

Action / Use:

Action on this grinder is excellent! Unlike some other grinders the machining provides sufficient clearance that it doesn't need a nylon bushing to maintain clearance between the teeth; in fact it doesn't even come with a bushing/washer!  It glides very smoothly, and it shreds herbs very well. There is some fine knurling on both the top and bottom chambers to assist with grip, which is a nice touch, and the magnet holds the lid on surprisingly well.  It does a great job grinding the herb, although there is a flaw... see below.

The threads engage smoothly with no problems, with no tendency to cross-thread, nor is there any feeling of "galling" that you encounter with poorly-machined threads. The case is slightly taller than some other same-diameter 4-piece grinders, but it is not heavier and it has a larger capacity so that's a win.

Cons:

First, the holes in the top chamber between the grinding chamber and the herb chamber could stand to be a little smaller. I had ordered this particular grinder for its greater number of teeth, thinking it would work as a finishing grinder.  It does grind very well, but the holes between the grinding and middle chamber could stand to be smaller; to grind herb really fine you need to turn the grinder upside down to keep the herb from falling into the chamber, and grind away with the grinder upside down. It does work well but it is a minor annoyance; I had expected that with a large number of grinding teeth that the holes would be a bit smaller to retain the herb until it is finely ground. This does bother me but the workaround is something I'm used to with other grinders (including space case), so it's no big deal. I would like to see them address this though, and I feel compelled to dock a star over this oversight between this and the too-fine screen issue. :(

Pollen screen: the screen on this grinder is far too fine. Of course I put a nickle in the herb chamber to help shake pollen through the screen, but it could stand to be a bit more coarse. I forsee having to clean the screen more often than I would have to with other grinders.

Lastly, and this is related to the large capacity; the metal is a much thinner gauge than you might expect. This does not negatively impact its function in any way, but when you pick it up and open it, it "sounds" cheap, not entirely unlike sounds you hear from a cheap early 1980s econobox.  This does lend to a larger capacity in both the pollen and herb chambers, so it's simultaneously an advantage as well, but if a superficial cheap "feel" matters to you, you might find this bothersome. I find the light weight and increased capacity to be advantages which outweigh a superficial quibble. I'm not docking any stars for this one as this is a purely subjective issue and frankly it doesn't bother me but I felt it worth mentioning to help those who do care about that sort of thing.

Conclusion:

It grinds well, which is what is important, and can be used as a finishing grinder if you hold it upside down to grind the herb longer, and is very good for the price.  The holes between the grinder and herb chamber could stand to be made smaller, and the pollen screen could stand to be more coarse, but for the price... it's quite good. I would not hesitate to buy another if I needed another one.