It appears that the Feasting on the Word series is not what is used to be... read all the description and choose carefully.
359332
I will admit that I bought this one because it was for children's sermons and it was a "Feasting on the Word" resource and that was enough for me. Unfortunately, much like their new Advent Companion book I was once again surprised and disappointed.

Only pages 69-107 are actually devoted to actual examples of 22 children's sermons. If you are needing a quick and easy resource to draw a lectionary based children's message from at the last minute this book may not be your best choice. If the children in your congregation are used to objects or visual illustrations then this book will definitely be a disappointment as none are offered in the book--these are short sermons aimed a children with anything beyond words apparently being considered to be gimmicks.

As with their Advent Companion book there is no CD or link to an online file to cut and paste the sermons in a pinch. If you want that capability you may want to consider the eBook instead although it looks like it is only in paperback at the moment. I am disappointed that the lack of a CD was not presented more clearly as I had just assumed this product would be like their other excellent worship resources.

If you are looking for a book about writing children's sermons then this may be a good choice. Or if you are looking for a book that presents "subject-based" messages instead of "lectionary-based" messages then this book offers 22 to choose from. Unfortunately, I expected more from something that is supposed to be a part of the Feasting on the Word series. I get the feeling that this book is just an average book on children's sermons that they may have decided to market as a Feasting on the Word product. Could it be that just maybe they knew it was not up to the standard of the series and that is why it is only available in paperback? Please read the description carefully and make a more informed purchase than I did.
1100634
This series was recommended by a good friend (who had not read the series yet).  I was shocked to see some of the items discussed in this book, examples below:

- death and reincarnation are a central theme
- drinking liquor (schnapps) (yes it actually says this and explains that schnapps is a form of liquor)
- smoking cigars
- one of the quotes actually states "take a leak on the sofa".

I realize the intention was to be funny, but my 2nd grader doesn't need to be exposed to this information yet.  I have only read this book, so I'm not sure about the rest of the series, but will read every one of the books before my children do.
1210629
Beef Broth instead of Beef Bone Broth.  It tastes good, but isn't what it claims to be.
2568161
I specifically ordered this product because it stated that it was packaged in foil packs and ready to place right on the grill.  When it came the product was packed in a plastic container with all the product in that single container.  I purchased this product for an elderly relative that won't eat four tails in one sitting.  It was $10 more than others I found on the web.  When I questioned this they stated they changed the packaging.  I responded back with my displeasure and the changed the description on Amazon and then responded that it never described it that way.  The product may be GREAT but the service and apparent deception leaves a bad taste in my mouth!
4542475
Maybe it would be helpful to have a glossary of more explanation of terms. I did go to the internet for explanation of enclosure ,poor law, and levels of service. The author has done much research.  I truly love the other series,but it's getting too expensive.  I will wait for holidays and birthdays for gifts of reading them.
3403337
The potential buyer should be made aware that this book was first published over a century ago.  This is not a criticism of the book itself, but of the misleading way it is presented for sale here.
1197471
The manufacturer has changed this product, and not for the better! The package I received now has the word "New" before the name, but otherwise is identical (except for the small ingredients list on the back). All the sweeteners have been removed, so it now is bland and tasteless. It previously had brown sugar and other ingredients that made it an excellent snack to enjoy as an indigence. Now it is just boring. I try to eat healthy and gluten free, so sometimes it is challenging to find easy snacks that can satisfy cravings for something sweet, without going too far afield. Put this one in the loss column. It previously was a wonderful treat, but now will just go in the trash.
1469142
I was well aware that the ingredients had been changed a few years ago. The ingredients list on this item is misleading, because it makes it look like it is the old formula.  It is still a good soap, but I am disappointing in the listing.  The reviews that say the soap smells awful are incorrect in my opinion.  I think it is a nice clean smell.
2029007
I agree with the commenters who said the stories are too wordy and the pictures need improvement, but my greatest concern relates to the sloppy paraphrasing of our Lord's words.  In many cases, the changes are significant and change the meaning of the original text.

For example, the Great Commission: "Then Jesus came to them and said, "All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you. ..." Matthew 28:18-20a (NIV)

Compare that to the paraphrase from the Jesus Storybook Bible: "Go everywhere and tell everyone the happy news!"

By leaving baptism out of the paraphrase, the author removes one of the clearest references of our Lord instituting the sacrament of Holy Baptism.  To reduce the Great Commission from preaching and baptizing to preaching alone is unacceptable.

Another example of this occurs when our Lord institutes Holy Communion.

From Matthew: "While they were eating, Jesus took bread, gave thanks and broke it, and gave it to his disciples, saying, "Take and eat; this is my body." Then he took the cup, gave thanks and offered it to them, saying, "Drink from it, all of you. This is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins."  Matthew 26:26-28 (NIV)

or from Luke: "And he took bread, gave thanks and broke it, and gave it to them, saying, "This is my body given for you; do this in remembrance of me."  In the same way, after the supper he took the cup, saying, "This cup is the new covenant in my blood, which is poured out for you." Luke 22:19-20 (NIV)

Compare that with the paraphrase from the Jesus Storybook Bible: "My body is like this bread.  It will break." Jesus told them.  "This cup of wine is like my blood.  It will pour out."

In none of the gospel accounts does our Lord say his body is "like" the bread.  He say "this is my body."  Nor does he say the wine is "like" his blood.  Again, this loose paraphrase changes the meaning in significant ways.

There are more examples of this.  I have cited two that seemed particularly troubling to me.

I recommend instead&nbsp;<a data-hook="product-link-linked" class="a-link-normal" href="/The-Big-Picture-Story-Bible/dp/1581342772/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_rvw_txt?ie=UTF8">The Big Picture Story Bible</a>.  I bought both.  I will be returning the Jesus Storybook Bible and keeping the Big Picture Storybook Bible.
1326796
I normally don't write reviews such as this but am going to make an exception this time.  This book, `Death of a Greedy Woman," was actually published back in 1993 under the title "Death of a Glutton."  Now this is a very fine book and is actually one of my favorites in a series that is one of my favorite.  I have nothing against the story, the writing or anything like that.  What does bend my nose out of shape though is that the publishers have reissued this older book, `Death of a Glutton," under the new title we see here and have given us NO WARNING!  This book was bought as a present and presented to me as my wife knew I was a big Hamish fan.  She did this in good faith.  Alas, she was taken advantage of.  I have absolute no problem with reissuing a book under a new title.  This is done all the time.  But normally the customer is given warning.  There was and is NO WARNING on this book.  That folks, is not a good thing.

I am giving this three stars because it is a very fine story.  I am taking two stars away because of the lack of respect the publishing company ((I hope the author had nothing to do with this) has for its customers, i.e. those of us who pay for their living.

Now keep in mind...if you have not read `Death of a Glutton," then by all means read this new title...it is a wonderful book and a great read.  On the other hand, if you have read it, then beware!

Don Blankenship
The Ozarks
3547517
It appears that the company has changed the recipe in the marinade. They do not taste the same as they used to. They are good, but not as good as years past. The retail price and the shipping no longer justifies me ordering these in the future.
1620553
This is "health food" as interpreted back in the day. More sugar than presently reccommended (there is an alternative),
Reccommended preperation requires hours of soaking,; so planning is reccomended.
689207
The book is a very interesting book with some thought provoking information to act as a catalyst to discussion. It is being used by a bible study group here, BUT! The ads show it as a published version from 2000, but neglect to mention that the current version is 2007, and includes a lot more information. The old one therefore is not suitable for use in the bible study group because others are discussing information you don't have. I think older versions should include "Not the current version". I am out the amount I spent for this book (not much, proving that you get what you pay for) and the shipping and tax. This was not a good deal and is it not fair to sell obsolete material without disclosing the fact it is not current!
117466
Beware of higher ratings on here that are older reviews and refer to the old recipe (pre 2015) . The manufacture put a label on the packaging saying "New Tastes better recipe" that started in 2015. Well it tastes awful now. They doubled the salt content and added fish (so it is now no longer vegan or vegetarian). Really awful food. Used to be good. What were they thinking? Looks like they did it to all the Annie Chun soups. I will be avoiding them from now on. I suspect these changes were to save a nickel, turns out they ruined the brand.
1105901
It does not look like rice, it does not taste like rice and the nutrition analysis is not like rice. Here is a combination of cost, news and reward that is strangely wonderful. I will be back for more before this runs out!
3137458
My son loved the original recipe Chick Chick but Happy Baby has now changed the recipe.  My son retched upon the first bite of the new meal.  Why do companies try to "improve" upon something that already works.  I'm guessing to cut corners somehow (ie. cheaper ingredients).  It's a shame.  I now have a case of the new recipe that won't be eaten.
2076735
It does not seem relevant today.  Our tastes, ingredients and equipment have all changed vastly.  The first page of the table of contents conveys to the reader immediately that this is from a different world:
ODD SCRAPS FOR THE ECONOMICAL. 8
SOAP. 22
SIMPLE REMEDIES. 24
GRUEL. 30
EGG GRUEL. 31
ARROW-ROOT JELLY. 31
CALF'S FOOT JELLY. 31
TAPIOCA JELLY. 31
SAGO JELLY. 32
BEEF TEA. 32
WINE WHEY. 32
APPLE WATER. 32
MILK PORRIDGE. 32
STEWED PRUNES. 33

You appreciate how self-sufficient our ancestors were.  There were no canned, processed or packaged foods.  Everything was simple and in bulk.  There are recipes for making your own pickles and beer.  No sauerkraut, however.  Leave that to the Germans.

I cannot imagine coaxing my kids to eat many of these recipes.  Not because they would not be tasty and nutritious, but because they are quite different from what they have been used to.  Perhaps a good use of the book would be to let kids themselves try the recipes when they are studying colonial America in school.  Finding the right equipment and ingredients would make a fine scavenger hunt, and they just might eat what they cooked themselves.