Better than the iriginal
351394
Why did I wait so long? I had two cracked mirrors held together by zip ties. I looked at the Amazon review: Kool-Vue was the winner! I ordered this product - better than the originial; it has signal lights and heated elements. Both lights took less than an hour to put in with YouTube a nd a friend. A Plus!
3685286
Personally, I like this one better than the original.
1892659
Comparative review: R11 i8+ vs iPazzPort:
I like comparative reviews so thought I would post a brief one.  Hope it helps out. Quite simply the Rii is much better in my opinion.

What I liked about the iPazzPort that the Rii didn't have -
- Removable replaceable rechargeable battery and option to use 2 AAA batteries as well.  The R11 has an internally installed not replaceable rechargeable battery with no other options.  In thinking about this, most  smartphones these days don't have a replaceable battery and those costs hundreds of dollars, so doubt this is a big deal.  I have no idea how long the Rii battery will last before failure and haven't had the devices long enough to determine how long the battery lasts on a charge

Other stuff -
-Like the Rii backlight better. the white backlight is easier on the eyes than the coloured backlights of the iPazzPort.  It also offers 2 level brightness which is nice
-The touchpad? - very erratic performance with the iPazzPort in spite of adjusting the settings.  Often it was necessary to repeatedly 'nudge' the mouse a bit at a time to transverse the screen.  The Rii touchpad worked consistently well and smoothly
-Build quality and feel.  The Rii had a much nicer feel to it for me.  Everything just comfortably worked and I found it easier (for me) to type on. The key layouts are nearly identical on the two devices other than the buttons on either side of the touchpad.  The two devices really are identical in size, and I;m guessing the iPazzPort is a knockoff of the Rii.  For a small few dollars more, I really believe the Rii to be the far better choice.

My complaints about the Rii are really minour and quite few, so not really worthy of mention. I returned the ipazzPort because the AAA batteries wouldnt fit as there were no contacts installed at the factory.  Also returned because of the very poor performance of the touchpad
1226881
My other sharkie died after two years.. I like this one better..Lighter weight and the cleaning pads are much thicker.  Glad I bought it..
4585730
I own both the icarrier and the igeek, but this is the battery I carry around most often. It has better styling and feels more durable (survived an accidental drop test of 4 feet and doesn't have a scratch on it)  the dimensions are very similar to the icarrier but this one slides in and out of my pocket easier.

 The best feature of this model is that it charges via micro usb. The other models have ac adapters that are unique to the device so i I have to remember to charge it before heading out, whereas with this one I can plug in midday on any usb charger I find.

Oh, and if you are asking why on earth do I need so many high capacity external batteries, you must not play ingress!
4435904
Overall, this is a nice product and the case is more sturdy than I thought.

I almost bought the Boulder 30 from Goal Zero and glad I didn't. The Renogy has a better output than three Boulders and costs much less. The Renology is 100 watts and more than the Yeti's max 60 watt input (not a problem according to Goal Zero's Q&A section on the web), but the additional wattage will keep from limiting my options in the future.

I wanted something to charge my Yeti 150 and be able to expand to larger Yeti's or other 12 volt batteries and I am not disappointed. The hardest part was deciding which version to purchase. All of the Goal Zero Yetis come with a built in charge controller and would not charge right hooked directly to the solar panel. As such, I had three options. I could buy the version w/o a charge controller, disconnect the charge controller and connect the yeti M4 adapter directly to the panels, or remove the lid to the Yeti and connect directly to the yeti battery.

I didn't like the idea of buying w/o the charge controller since I like the option of being able to charge any 12v battery, not just my Yeti. Instead, I bought the M4 adapter for the Yeti and now have the option of connecting to my Yeti by either disconnecting the charger or removing the Yeti lid (not sure if that is problem, but I think it is the best option since the internal charge control in the Yeti is limited to 60 watts.) Both options are done with one simple tool and take 1-2 minutes tops and the Renology charges the Yeti super fast. I might post specifics later, but it just charged mine from half to full in 30 minutes.

If you do not want to mess with connecting and disconnecting, just buy the one without a charge controller. Either way, Renogy is a much cheaper and effective alternative to Gaol Zero panels.
1114440
I bought this after abandoning my Jabra Tour. It is far better, starting with the clarity of the voice communication with the device. Also, it loses its signal when you get out of the vehicle so you don't have to turn it on and off all the time. With the Jabra, the signal was so strong that it would unnecessarily pick up calls if I forgot to turn it off.
2565624
This is much better made than the last aftermarket suction cup I purchased and in fact much superior than the one that came with my Garnin 1350. The reasons why;
1 It has a larger suction cup so better grip
2 the suction cup is clear neoprene rather than rubber, so better grip and clear edge
3 the locking mechanism is stronger
4 it has an adjustable and lockable arm
5 nice tight fit on the Garmin bracket

Just a far better product all round. Ian really pleased with it. Buy with confidence.
847453
This one is ok but I like the Mica better and it is worth the extra ten dollars they charge on account it has a superior remote! This one is hard to use in the dark where as the buttons on the Mica are placed so I don't need to look at it!
3318740
This is my second IR repeater and this one has pluses and minuses versus the other unit I own.  First the constuction quality on this unit is superior.  The main repeater unit is metal not plastic and the IR reciever is less obtrusive and attaches more easily to the exterior of a media cabinet.  On the down side the unit has a limted range.  The range may be appropriate for most installations but without the repeater and my media cabinet doors open I can normally stand in my dining room and control my ampllifier and CD player with a remote over 25' away.  Using the repeater (and with the cabinet doors closed) I must be within about 12' to do the same.  Also note that in the users guide for the unit the manufacturer calls out that this unit may not be compatible with plasma TVs (my other unit is).  Finally although the manual suggests that the IR emitters can be placed above and slightly in front of the unit to be controlled I found that the emitters had to be placed directly in front of the IR recievers on my components to work.  If none of these restrictions are a problem for you then this is a great unit and you'll likely be very happy with it.
1803086
I like this one much better than the lower quality and less cheaper nitecore.  When placing the battery it seems to be better quality and easier to insert the batteries.
1958051
High quality, better than the plastic one that it replaced.
3524115
Before buying this I tried the Adventure 74, which is just slightly smaller and slightly less expensive.  Ultimately I returned that and upgraded to this, the Adventure 75.  Besides the size, there are two major improvements with this model.  1) There is a drawstring over the zipper for the main compartment.  This helps keep water out if you get caught in the rain.  2) This has two accessory pockets inside the main compartment and the Adventure 74 only has one.  With two compartments, you can keep bigger, bulkier items (like batteries) separate from more fragile items (like filters, lens cleaning paper, etc.).  To be honest, I didn't really need the extra room in the 75, but having these two features made it worth the extra cost for the upgrade.  Besides, now I have room to upgrade!
404971
So far so good - and SO much better than the fre! I had a lot of issues with the fre, and never totally trusted the materials and the seals. The front of this case looks and feels much more like the OtterBox Defender for iP5. It is a much stronger, durable hard plastic and has an actual button for the home button, making it much easier to press. This case has a screen protector included in the package, which is wonderful. The phone is definitely suctioned to the front and seems SO much more secure. It is hard to really get the phone into the case (as compared to the fre) - you have to press the phone down pretty hard and press the back on very firmly to get it to click into place, but this is the pressure required to create the suction seal on the screen. I still am not sure how I feel about the clear back, I think it looks a little cheap - but it as well is far more durable and trustworthy than the fre case, since it is one single piece. There's no window to give another option for leakage, and it's not flimsy floppy like the fre case. It is a solid, durable single piece of plastic.
Lastly (for now!) I love that the headphone plug is now tethered to the case - it won't go bouncing out of your hands onto the floor, it is attached to the phone and not going anywhere.
I still wish this case had an option for a little tether handle thingy- but really no big deal.
Call quality is still great, and there is less issue with the screen turning on during calls now that there's no screen protector over it. The speaker is a bit more tinny than in the fre case, but overall - this case is wonderful. WONDERFUL.
I will be purchasing for my mother and sister for little holiday treats.
1094075
Lots of people have said that the smaller/older version tastes a tiny bit better.  Maybe a little.  But this one is:
1) FAR better built: Design, size and structure aside, this one is built in Switzerland, the other China
2) It has a lot more room for water and used pods
3) It makes drinks about FIVE times the older (even when you put the older on "larger" size).  The older makes "shots", this one makes large cups.
4) It makes quite a bit less noise
5) It's much easier to open and close
6) The instructions on the older was written by chimpanzees.  Following their directions I made a big pool of water under all my plugged to power devices in the kitchen (no it wasn't broken, a replacement did the same, I just don't read chimpanzee).
7) This works a bit faster

The pods are more expensive and you have far fewer choices, but realistically, most of the pods tastes quite similar.  Having bought 2 of their older models and this one, I'd recommend the newer/this one.
290987
The iRiver Offers much more in a sleeker package and a Better LCD Remote and a Better Navigation..
The only thing the iRiver doesn't have is a FM Transmitter but I don't need it, since I will get a AUX IN for my car, and I can Always buy a FM Transmitter.
The iRiver has a Better looking interface, a lot more options, and lot more cool stuff.  You can still use Napster and iTunes to buy music, it don't make a difference.
2252796
I purchased a Moshi iVisor a couple of years ago for my iphone and love it (still in perfect condition), but was afraid it would take away from the crispness of my iPad.  After a year of looking through fingerprints no matter how much I cleaned it, I decided to get the iVisor for the iPad.  What in the world did I wait so long for!?  Image is much better than looking through smears and fingerprints.  A little pricey, but well worth it.