The most exhaustive Bible Commentary I've seen
359769
I own both the hard-bound book set and the CD-ROM software version.

EXTREMELY in-depth and exhaustive, I am rarely disappointed when I refer to these volumes for clarification of Bible text. Nearly every verse in the Bible is commented upon in detail, with qualifying remarks and often offering alternate explanations ... and listing them as likely correct or unlikely. I do not find the material to be Adventist-centric only, though, of course, concepts about the Sabbath and other SDA concepts like healthful living and the state of the dead are qualified here.

If you are Sevent-day Adventist, I don't see how you would not invest in these commentary. If you are another denomination, not only will you will learn a lot about Adventist belief, but you will gain insight into many other biblical concepts worth delving into for ALL Christian religions.

It is systematic commentary of the entire Bible based on the original languages of the Bible, and used archaeological research to provide a historical context for interpretation. I think it is important to note that the body of the Commentaries is not just a re-hash of E. G. White writings. These are scores of Adventist Bible Scholars from academic and theological backgrounds contributing, and a core staff of editors and graduate students proofing and making the final write consistent in literary style.

Associate editor Raymond Cottrell has said of the Commentary:

"In his instructions to the contributors, Nichol [Francis D. Nichol served as the editor-in-chief] explained the commentary was not "to crystallize once and for all a dogmatic interpretation". Where there were several notable interpretations, each major view was presented in a fair manner, but a consensus opinion of the editors was also given. It did not attempt to finalize doctrinal positions nor take stands on debatable points, but to assist readers in making their own conclusions.

In instances where our collective judgment could not conscientiously support a particular traditionally held interpretation, we sought in an inoffensive way to present the evidence and give the reader an opportunity to make up his or her own mind. At times the expression 'Seventh-day Adventists have taught that...' or its equivalent was our ironic way of expressing collective editorial judgment that the interpretation so characterized is not exegetically valid. Accurate exegesis was our primary concern.

Nichol also required that no statement in the commentary should contradict the writings of Ellen White. However the editors discovered that White sometimes interprets Scripture differently from what the original context implies, and this was for a homiletical (preaching, and/or to convince or persuade) rather than exegetical (strict interpretation) use."
4367314
This is one of the best commentaries I have ever read about the Book of Daniel, which is one of the greatest prophetic books of God's Word. Ron Rhodes has written in a simple yet profound language about God's plan for the salvation not only of the people of Israel but of the whole world as clearly revealed by The Holy Spirit in the book of Daniel. In a very powerful way while writing in a simple terms yet with the erudition of a scholar, he debunked powerfully those who call themselves critics, yet foolishly have denied the historicity of the Book of Daniel. He brilliantly refute their claims that the book of Daniel was written in the 2nd century by showing how the prophecies of Daniel go far beyond what the Jews were suffering under Antiochus Epiphanius and how the prophecies of Daniel go even beyond the Jews to include God's salvation and coming Kingdom to the whole world not just the Jews and to write that in the 2nd century B.C. when the Jews were fighting the gentiles is utter lunacy, therefore it had to have been written in the 6th century B.C. to have been able to give such minute details of the Babylonian and the Persian kingdoms in the way that Daniel did, as these empires were virtually obsolete by the 2nd century B.C. Then he brilliantly spoke about the prophecies concerning the kingdoms that were to come until the coming of the "Great Ancient of Days" Our Lord and God Jesus Christ during the time of the Roman Empire and how that his kingdom will have no end. A brilliant study that will definitely enrich all the readers spiritually and strengthens the believers in Christ in this wicked and satanic world that we live in.
43122
I occasionally preach from the book of Philippians, and I think that this is my favorite commentary on the book. Martin and Hawthorne have given us a thorough discussion of the Greek text. They show the beautiful chiastic structure of the Christ hymn in Philippians 2:5-11.

I also enjoyed the deep and revealing discussion of the key words in Philippians 1:9-11. After reading this commentary, there's almost no need to consult any of the other heavy duty commentaries, because this one covers the issues so well.

Obrien in the NIGTC series is excellent, but for preaching purposes, this is my favorite.
2118628
William Barclay, a Scottish theologian, has written an outstanding 17 volume commentary on the New Testament.  (It can be bought as a set or by separate volumes.)  He gives a passage, then proceeds with an explanation.  Often, he gives four or five interpretations, sometimes following with a statement something like, "The first interpretation probably is not what Paul meant because..., the second is certainly a possibility because...; however, I tend to favor the third explanation because..."  Essentially, I respect his work because of the depth of his scholarship, learning, and faith, but almost more because of his honesty.  If there are major conflicting views from other scholars on a passage, he gives their reasoning.  He gives support (such as translations from the Greek or facts of church history) for his stances and if it is flatly an opinion, he states that it is so.  In fact, he is sometimes so fair, that he spends almost too long giving all the possible interpretations of a passage.  Our study class has appreciated a source which gives readable scholarly background and presents dissenting views fairly.  His work sparks some of the best discussion we've had.  It isn't "a hundred pages a sitting" reading, but it is fascinating to read a chapter then discuss and reflect on the ideas he raises.  For me, this is the best Bible reference book I have ever used.
1696730
In the world of Biblical commentaries there are really three different kinds out there: (1) Technical Commentaries, (2) Devotional Commentaries, and (3) Pastoral Commentaries. There are many overlaps between these categories, with a commentary that is both technical and pastor for example, but these are three broad categories that commentaries tend to fall in.

In the field of technical commentaries would be those in the Word Biblical Commentary Series or the New International Commentary on the New Testament. An example of a devotional commentary may be Matthew Henry's commentary on the New Testament. Finally, an example of a pastoral commentary would be something like the "Preaching the Word" series edited by Kent Hughes, or the series which this book is in, the "St. Andrew's Expositional Commentary" series.

This new volume by Dr. R.C. Sproul on the Gospel of Matthew is the quintessential pastoral commentary. This volume, like all the others in the series, comes out of Dr. Sproul's many years of teaching and preaching at St. Andrew's in Sanford, FL. Because this is actually a compilation of Dr. Sproul's sermons and teachings through the Gospel of Matthew, it is incredibly helpful to the everyday pastor looking for helpful illustrations and ways of explaining a particular text to his congregation. While you will not find in this commentary detailed exegetical studies about why this Greek very is a perfect rather than an aorist, nor will you find an in-depth treatment of every word or phrase of every verse in Matthew, you will find an incredibly helpful volume that I'm sure will be of value in your preaching or teaching through this Gospel.

Dr. Sproul says himself, in the preface: "This book, like all the others in the series, will not give you the fullest possible insight into each and every verse in this biblical book. Though I sought to at least touch on each verse, I focused on the key themes and ideas that comprised the `big picture' of each passage i covered. Therefore, I urge you to use this book as an overview and introduction."

I, for one, am immensely thankful for the various ministries of Dr. Sproul throughout the years. This present volume is another addition to his already fruitful ministry, and with over 800 pages of teaching material on the Gospel of Matthew, I am confident that this book will be a very helpful addition for your studies.

In accordance with FTC regulations, I would like to thank Crossway Publishers for providing me with a free review copy of this book in exchange for a fair and honest review.
3836337
This is one of the finest commentary's on the book of Ephesians. Thielman is a first-rate scholar who attends meticulously to the structure of the Greek text and the historical and social context. His reasoning and arguments are sound, and his prose is clear. This is an extremely well-written and valuable resource for pastors, scholars, and serious students who seek to plumb the depths of this epistle.
466513
This is a brilliant commentary on one of the neglected prophetic books of the Bible. Unger writes with passion and precision, and is theologically sound. He rightly divides the Word of truth and makes proper dispensational distinctions. He also includes many great quotes from the Messianic Jewish commentator David Baron (who also wrote a great commentary on Zechariah). After reading this terrific commentary , I realize how all Scripture is profitable for godliness, and how the inspiration of the Holy Spirit is all over Zechariah. Highly recommended.
1863116
I teach an adult Sunday School class in a Methodist Church. We have decided to go through the Bible with an in-depth study. I had discovered the Genesis Commentary by Nahum and thought it was fabulous which is what led me to purchase his Exodus commentary. Thus far, I have only gotten up to chapter 6 and have already been enlightened on a number of issues that have always been puzzling to me. For those unfamiliar with the JPS series - it is designed like a Hebrew book which means it opens the opposite way regular English books do, which takes a little getting used to. The text, In Hebrew, is at the top of the page. Opposite is an English translation. The commentary on the passage is, in English, and typically takes up about 2/3 of each page. It covers quite a lot - it talks about the nuanced meaning of lots of Hebrew words, it compares the text to other ancient texts, discusses various meanings and more. I might not recommend this commentary for someone who is new to the Bible, unless they are the scholarly type, but for someone who has done a bit of study I find this to be an invaluable resource for study. I have been using it, along with Umberto Cassuto's commentary, and find they work together well. I think it has brought me to a whole new understanding of Exodus and I highly recommend it.
1507918
John I. Durham is a professor of Hebrew and Old Testament at Southeastern Baptist Seminary in North Carolina and the author of many scholarly works on Old Testament studies, including this volume in the Word Biblical Commentary Series.

Of the Volumes in the Word Commentary that I've read or consulted, Durham's treatment of Exodus ranks among the best.  One of Durham's greatest joys in preparing this commentary is the fact that he is required to make his own translation of the Hebrew text.  His skill and enjoyment in this area certainly shine through as he jumps from wooden translations, to phrases that capture the spirit of the Hebrew (as opposed to the literal translation), with all his translation decisions explained in his translation notes.  I learned more about Exodus than I expected from reading the translation and notes!

As for the commentary proper, I am pleased to find that John Durham is easily one of the most readable contributors in the Word Series--he seems to know when a point needs more explanation and when he's "beaten a dead horse."  I was also pleased to find that Durham, a respected scholar in an academic setting, was able to briefly cover "Ivory Tower" theories about certain portions of text, but then have the wisdom to put such theories in their proper place.  He often mentions an academic controversy or debate, but then does a great service to the reader by putting the debated portion of Scripture in its proper theological context.

This last point is perhaps the most valuable aspect of this commentary--the author never forgets the major theological themes and points in the book of Exodus.  Whether the text is about Ten Plagues, Ten Commandments, Tabernacle Furniture, or rebellious Israelites, Durham always puts these portions of Scripture in context--theological and historical.  He is one of a shrinking number of Old Testament authors that actually has respect for the textus receptus.

While this commentary has many strengths, it also has some disappointing weaknesses.  The first among these is the absense of any New Testament applications.  Durham begins by pointing out that Exodus is the third most quoted OT book in the New Testament (running behind Psalms and Isaiah), yet does not make the connections between the Testaments.  Whether a portion of Scripture is quoted by Jesus, Paul, etc., or whether Messianic prophesies are apparent (Passover, the table in the Tabernacle, Moses' arms being supported in a crucifix position, etc.), Durham ignores it.

A second disappointed aspect of Durham's commentary is the amount of respect and credit (and space) he gives to source-criticism and "later editors" theories.  At many points, it is very difficult to tell if Durham actually BELIEVES that some of the events recorded in Exodus actually happened.  He clearly does not believe that Moses wrote the book, but he does believe that the Lord descended onto Mount Sinai, but he's not sure if the Tabernacle and furniture actually existed.  It often seems as if Durham deliberately avoids taking a position on historical reliability and the like.  If, in the Introduction, he stated that he is simply giving an overview of others' ideas (see Beasley-Murray's commentary on John), that would be one thing.  However, Durham makes no such claim and the reader is left wondring where the author's religious convictions lie.

In all, this is a solid commentary on a difficult and diverse book of the Bible.  While there are flaws, the book's merits far outweigh them.  I recommend this book.
2779026
I am a Christian, so this is my first Tanach. I find it very helpful in comparing it to my English translation Bible. The commentaries are extremely interesting, and add a richness to my study of Gods Word, adding views from the Rabbis and history that you will not find in your traditional Christian Bible.
2295918
This commentary is not the best for a verse-by-verse analysis of the text (it's not that long) but Anderson provides an excellent overview of the Book of Job that does a good job of appreciating the unmatched nature of this monumental work. The overview also deals concisely with most of the critical controversies that have arisen. The commentary frankly acknowledges a Christian woldview, but still argues from a standard, scholarly perspective. Anderson writes well, but the writing is at a scholarly level and uses quite a few two-dollar words, so I had to make a few runs to the dictionary (not a bad thing, really). For me, this commentary has enhanced my understanding of the Book of Job as a magnificent literary achievement, while also encouraging my faith. I like it a lot.
637683
I am currently in the process of preparing a series of expository messages on 2 Corinthians.  I have been very impressed with the volumes in the New Testament Library series of commentaries, especially Matera's on 2 Corinthians.  The format does not bury you in details, has helpful summaries at important points in the text and provides you with what is essential to understand the text.  I am shocked that no one has yet reviewed this excellent commentary. If I could have given it a 4 1/2 rating that would have been my choice.  Along with Garland's excellent commentary this would be my recommendation to the lay person, pastor, or academic seeking help in this most personal of Paul's letters.
4811016
Ive been blown away by this commentary.  Im Catholic and it was recommended by a Catholic theologian.  Many of the things i wxpected her to take a protestant either/or proposition but she remained faithful to the text.  This woman has to be very spiritual, thorough, and seems to use a lot of practical wisdom.  Im very pleased with this commentary and use it as my first go to guide for these books.  Really happy i gave in and purchased it.
2124831
Just as I expected this bible has everything you need to go deepere i nto the word. I only have found that it is not so easy to locate  the related comments because it is really packed and dense, so it seems to me that there is that little one detail. Beside my previous comment I am enjoying and savioring the Lord while I go into what he has to say.
Each section and add-on is well suited for th epurspose of bible study and I strongly recommend it if you are serious about studying God's word.
4575202
For preaching through Ruth, I bought eight commentaries.  By the end, this one was one of a handful that had risen to the surface and have proved itself a really helpful guide to understanding this short book.  With Currid, Ferguson, and Block's ZECOT commentary in hand, I felt like I had what I needed to thoroughly interpret the issues in this book.

Currid breaks the text down into short sections that roughly correlate to the amount of material one would include in a sermon.  He writes in language anybody can understand and makes his case compellingly. A pastor at heart, Currid begins and ends every section with illustrations and each section has a point for personal application.  My then 12-year old daughter read this commentary and largely understood everything that was said.

This commentary is very high on God's sovereignty in all of the circumstances of the book.  For example, when Ruth chooses a field "at random" in chapter 2, this is the writer's subtle way of emphasizing the sovereignty of God in directing decisions. This shouldn't be surprising - Currid teaches at Reformed Theological Seminary and brings a very high view of God's sovereignty in all things.  Many of the key theological points arise out of this.  Why does Naomi's family suffer?  Where does Ruth get her great statement of faith in 1:16-17?  How does Ruth end up in Boaz's field?  What is going on with the genealogy at the end of the book?  All of this is showing God's sovereign hand on history, even when it is not explicitly spelled out in the text.

There are two areas I would have liked to see emphasized more in this commentary.  The first is a discussion of why in the closing genealogy we see Boaz listed as father instead of Mahlon.  After making a big deal about levirate marriage and how Boaz is fulfilling Deut 25:5-6, why then does Boaz appear in every genealogy in OT and NT?  A second area is that Currid asserts that levirate marrage is the duty of a redeemer (goel in Hebrew) but that term does not appear in Deut 25. It is common to assume that this is the role of redeemer that the book is talking about, but Currid seems to simply assume that view rather than defend it.

Overall, this was a very helpful commentary, and for those pressed for time its sections were short but filled with good stuff.  I highly recommend.
995840
As different readers will have their own private reasons for searching out a book that deals with biblical commentary, it is probably best to state up front my own reasons - this way, readers looking for substantially different results than what I had hoped for can then choose to find reviewers who better fit their needs.  In my case, I approached this translation and commentary purely from a secular standpoint; Genesis of course having had such and enormous influence on literature and culture that I thought a better grasp of the events and characters might help me to tease out parallels in more modern works.

I can't compare this version to any other recent translations - only to the parts of the King James' version I'd read before.  For my goals, there may have been any number of translations with commentary that would have worked, but I had read of this particular one in an essay by Cynthia Ozick several years ago, and based on her favorable opionion, it was the one I chose.  What I found was a very readable, densely notated, attractively formatted book that finally tied this entire narrative into a comprehensible whole for me.  Too often before, I had faltered at the KJ translation, and though I had probably heard and read Genesis piecemeal a hundred times over the years, I was still unclear on several points.

I can confidently say that Mr. Alter's version swept aside any confusion I may have had, and, incidentally, revealed a fascinating, powerful story.  In his introduction, Mr. Alter points out some of his philosophy behind translation, and the specific point I thought most interesting was his idea that many translations seek to interpret the text at the same time as translating it.  So, instead of seeking out a term that most closely approximates the Hebrew, some may choose a similar word or phrase which will (perhaps) make the point clearer to the intended audience rather than a literal substitution.  It was his stated intention to avoid this.

How well he succeeded is a question for others - I only know that I enjoyed the narrative much more than I expected.  With the copious amount of notes that accompany the text, it would seem that the author certainly had the opportunity to render a literal translation and still leave himself plenty of room for further explication.  On many pages, there are equal amount of text and accompanying notes.  This could be a problem for some readers if they find it a distraction; I overcame the issue by first reading the text portion of a chapter straight through, then flipping back to read the notes.  As each chapter is very short, this worked well for me.  I might suggest that those interested in the book take a quick peek at the look inside feature that Amazon provides in order to get a sense of the layout.

For the most part, I felt that the commentary was pertinent, though there were some notes I thought extraneous and some elements of the text that I would have liked to know more about.  But Mr. Alter's commentary is generally confined to either explanations of word choice or comments about cultural practices that are likely too obscure for modern readers.  His points do not veer in the direction of theology, or exegesis, or to comparative reading between the Old and New Testament.  In other words, regardless of its importance as a foundational text for major religions, the story here is treated more like a cultural document, which it is, among other things.  This treatment, above all, made it exactly the type of translation I was looking for.

My only nitpick here is that the text of GENESIS is also included in&nbsp;<a data-hook="product-link-linked" class="a-link-normal" href="/The-Five-Books-of-Moses-A-Translation-with-Commentary/dp/0393333930/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_rvw_txt?ie=UTF8">The Five Books of Moses: A Translation with Commentary</a>.  I can conceive of different reasons why some readers might want the first book only or together with the others - but had I been aware of the larger compilation, I would have purchased it instead.
761578
If you are not familiar with J. Vernon McGee or his style, I would suggest  that you try a single volume paperback commentary first to see if you like  it.  McGee reminds me of someone's grandfather...wise, opinionated,  down-to-earth, and even gruff at times.  If you have ever heard his radio  broadcasts (from which these commentaries are derived), you know what I  mean.  McGee has a strong and distinct style, and he is always pressing us  to seek God's will in our lives fervently.  You can't fault the honesty of  his vision or spirit!
These commentaries give you McGee's interpretation  of each chapter of that particular book of the Bible.  The thing I like  best about his commentaries are that they are fresh and interesting.  He  rarely gets tied down in seemingly obscure details or debates.  If he has  an opinion, he'll tell you exactly what it is and why without beating  around the bush like so many other bible commentaries.  Although I don't  agree with all of his opinions, I respect his perspective, and rarely do  his works leave me without something to "chew on."  This is also  the only commentary that I have that can actually leave me laughing aloud  at some point he's made.  He had a great sense of humor!
I would  recommend this series of five volumes to any student of the bible.  They  are a great commentary for the every day person, unintimidating and  understandable.