It's a no brainer: You could buy the camera ...
359451
It's a no brainer:  You could buy the camera alone for $2,500.00 or you could buy the camera PLUS a lot of necessities and accessories for $2,500.00.  Thank you, Cameta Camera (800 991-3350, cameta.com):  You Rock, Roll, and Rule.
1920103
It's been a month since I bought the camera, and so far it has proven to be a smart buy. I bought the camera for [amt] from one of the internet photo stores. The 7 "scene modes" do a good job for automatically setting aperture and exposure settings. However, those willing to be experiment will be rewarded with a pleasant surprises. What's really interesting with the scene modes is that they have uses beyond the names of the situations that they target. Try Sunset during the day, for example, for a more Golden Hour look. Try Beach/Snow on a back-lit subject for a different, moodier sort of lighting. You can really experiment with this little Nikon.
The colors are wonderfully accurate, even with the auto setting. There is a manual white balance in addition to the 5 "preset white balance settings." Just place a white piece of object in front of the camera, and it will automatically adjust the color balance of the shot. This is really great when you have multiple sources of lights and/or if you know you have sufficient light and don't want to use the flash. Contrary to what another reviewer has said in here that may be misleading, I haven't yuet found a single instance where there are red/blue/breen banding on pictures taken with sufficient light. He is probably talking about the amount of noise in the picture when a scene is taken without sufficient lighting (very low light conditions). I still have to experience the "sunspots" he was referring to when taking photos with the speedlight (Nikon's word for flash).
Some of the photos do not come as sharp as I'd like them to be (at least on screen), but when I printed them out on a 6-color Epson photo printer, they look amazingly like normal 35-mm prints. This camera (like those from Sony, Epson, Casio, etc.) saves additional info in its JPEG files called "Print Image Matching (PIM)" that when printed on PIM-enabled photo printers, the colors are richer and hues truer to what you actually saw when you took the photo.
All the above plus the 3x-zoom and the ultra-compact and go anywhere light weight makes this camera a smart buy. Simple interfaces and modes for casual point and shooters while giving amateur photoenthusiasts a lot of options for experimentation even if it doesn't truly have a manual mode like the more expensive cameras. Plus the batteries and recharger are included!
1707152
Bought it for my wife as a starter camera since she wanted to go into photography as a hobby. picture quality doesn't end up too bad if you are patient and acknowledge the cameras limitations (slower flash charging some issues with moving photo subjects). I like the fact that you flip the flash up when you need to use it as well. In regards to its battery life, a decent charger and some  NiMH 2800mAh Rechargable Batteries for 12 dollars altogether eliminated that issue for the most part, we can get pictures for a whole weekend of fun when we go on trips without having to change the batteries but maybe once near the end. Altogether, for the 50 dollars I ended up spending on the camera I have no complaints really. Timely delivery no issues
2103260
Thanks Goya, for making affordible camera products. I have yet to try my purchase but will in the very near future. I will buy more products from you guys in the near future.
606580
This is a good camera. It's small enough to fit in a shirt pocket yet easy in hand.  All cameras have some disadvantages but so far I haven't found anything serious enough to say I wouldn't have bought if I'd known about .......  Would I buy it again? At this point yes.  I don't think I'll find anything to change my mind even though I haven't owned it that long.  The only thing that could be a negative is the use of the rechargeable battery pack.  That is slightly less convenient than just going to the store for regular batteries.
2693355
I bought this camera primarily for shooting YouTube videos of tricking and parkour.  After years of salivating over DSLRs, and reading dozens of reviews, and trying to understand the technical specs, I chose the 60D for several reasons.

1) Price.  It is affordable, and becoming more so.  As I write this review, it's dropped ~$70 since I bought it a couple weeks ago.  I'm still happy with my purchase.  Not only is the 60D a good value, but the EF lenses that cropped-sensor DSLRs use are also generally more affordable than their full-frame counterparts.

2) Durability.  The "build quality" of the 60D is what separates it from the T3i and other Rebel models, for me.  This was truly the selling point.  There is less plastic and more metal on this camera.  Deathklok would be proud.  I know that I'm going to take this on cross-country flights, road trips, hiking trips, beach adventures, and more.  It's not bullet proof, but a little extra resistance to moisture and the elements is worth it for how I'm going to use it.

3) Versatility.  I'm going to use this camera to make YouTube videos to share my progress in my sport, and to promote my gym.  The fact that it's a high quality camera means I can also use it for snapshots of friends, marketing photos for the website, action shots of events at the gym, head shots of my employees, etc.  Using different lenses I can get into all kinds of fun stuff: wildlife photography, macro photography, perhaps even astrophotography (though the 60Da is better for that).  I can add microphones, separate flashes, mount it on a Glidecam, or a tripod, etc.  It is upgradeable and useful in a variety of situations.

4) It's an "industry standard."  After talking to a lot of people who make awesome parkour and tricking videos, Canon DSLRs in general are the cameras of choice.  If you're looking for a camera for wedding photography, vacation photos, or whatever else, ask people who do that what camera they like.  Fifty million Elvis fans can't be wrong.  If they're all using Nikons, and have good reasons why, then get a Nikon, or a Pentax, or whatever.

Okay, that said, I have only been using it for a few weeks.  It is definitely going to take me awhile to learn how to use this camera to it's fullest.  I have however taken a few pictures and videos already that I am very happy with.  The resolution is clear, the autofocus in photo mode is great, and the controls are easy to use once I have learned them.  I am pretty much a noob, so if I can do it, you can do it.

In summation:
1) Get this camera
2) Do backflips
3) PROFIT!
1728026
When buying the camera, the bundle is the only way to go.  It's got everything needed to get started, even a mini-tripod and a DVD for the uninitiated.  Photos are sharp.
3355749
Buying a camera for the resolution is like buying a book based on how many pages it has.
I suspect that many of the cameras which purport to offer higher theoretical resolution are in fact limited by lens resolution. The small size of compact digital sensors in comparison with film makes severe demands on lens quality, but the dedicated digital E-10 and E-20 lenses are definitely up to the task.
Pixel quality, rather than quantity, is definitely an area where this and the E-10 shine- the rendition and gradation of colours is better than most. Particularly good with greens, golds and blacks.
The other outstanding thing about this camera is the way it handles. The user interface (by the standard of DLSR cameras) is elegant, and satisfying. This is particularly the case if you regularly tweak the settings: the interface is aimed at making such tweaks while composing the shot, rather than having to step through menus prior to the shot, although this means you need to get to know where each button is by feel, and stay familiar with what it does. You also need to get into the habit of doing a quick "cockpit check" prior to shooting, in case of an inappropriate setting left from the previous session.
I'm a big fan of spinning a rotary switch rather than repeatedly pressing a pushbutton, and the designers of this camera clearly share that preference. In a nice amalgamation of the best of both worlds, you typically hold a button down with one finger to identify which parameter to tweak, while spinning whichever of two rotary knobs comes most conveniently under another digit in order to change that parameter or select from a number of options. The buttons are nicely spread around the available areas, so that you can find them by feel. Many are differentiated in some tactile way which confirms their identity. In some cases (eg manual vs autofocus) Olympus have opted for a dedicated rotary lever even though there are only two choices. This means your finger tells you what the mode is, eliminating the need for yet another confusing light in the viewfinder.
The balance and feel of the camera is very pleasing, and the buttons and dials fall nicely under the fingers. This is a "Real" metal-body camera, no expense spared in the case design and production, and it feels like it.
Personally I think the E-10 is an even better camera than the E-20, unless resolution is your paramount concern - the E20 has some speed issues, and extra options which may distract rather than adding value, depending on your priorities. The E10, considering how much control you get, has a minimum of fiddly "smart" bells and whistles- a great camera if capturing short movie clips with sound holds no fascination for you.
I have one major gripe: while there is a facility for hooking the camera up to an external (TV) monitor, to preview the image in real time (as it falls on the sensor)- and the camera comes with an infra-red cordless remote shutter release - yet, for some *entirely* unfathomable reason, you cannot use both these facilities at once, which reduces the remote to not much more than a gimmick. You have to shell out for an expensive extension cable release, and this is of limited length.
Minor gripes are mainly connected with the autofocus- you do have to pander to it in ways which are not necessary in the case of a wet-film SLR, and it is definitely slower. However if I had to choose between a better autofocus and the superb (for a DSLR) manual focus and zoom (both via lens rings), it would be no contest.
It used to bother me that the LCD down-angle is insufficient for high overhead shots, until I realised that I could angle the panel to "maximum up" and turn the camera upside down to take the photo. The image will still look "right way up" to you, although not to the camera.
All things considered, if you like to have lots of control of the parameters, and you use your camera regularly, this is a very good choice.
3647335
The Nikon D3100 14.2MP Digital SLR camera is awesome! A bit of a learning curve, so make sure to invest in a book, like I did, that thoroughly teaches you how to effectively use your camera. Picture quality is beautiful. Menu options are so numerous, I don't have room to describe here. Also shoots high-def video so you will only need to carry one camera, a super plus. Make sure to buy a high-quality, fast memory card for this, you will be glad you did. Processes photos & videos much faster. Get at least 16GB-32GB, camers does support SXDC.

No need to buy higher end cameras if you are a casual photographer/videographer, no need for overkill or the added expense. Great investment and will last a long time.
3125944
I've loved this camera for some time, for all the reasons everyone else does...great signal quality in good light, external audio input (a must-have if you're any kind of a pro), and best of all the price.

These refurb units (I've purchased FOUR of them) are pristine...just exactly like buying it new.  You can't go wrong with this camera.  It's great for what it is.
1810542
I did some research and found that this camera comes with high recommendations so I purchased it.  I made the right decision and bought it for a great price.
306286
So I picked up this camera for just over a hundred dollars... I've been very impressed with all that I've seen and read about it, but I have yet to manage anything spectacular with it myself. (Most likely a user issue, and not a product issue.) I was easily able to locate a cheap memory card for it that had no compatibility issues. I hope after our upcoming trip to Mexico that I can submit some great photos I hope I am able and capable of taking!
2244321
Extra stuff that comes is good. On other cameras they don't offer that much. Just buy one, you will not regret it.
404886
I think capitalism is a fine thing. Everyone deserves their fair profit.
I read the PC World "Editor's Choice" review and bought the camera for less than $500...and still got $50 back on the rebate. That's a net of $450. I also did a lot of other homework. Many side-by-side comparisons. I read the Consumer Reports Digital Camera issue which didn't rate this camera because it was too new.
Today you will be hard pressed to find the camera for less than $599. Although it is still worth every penny.
I am surprised at the speed with which online retailers responded to the demand. Maybe the camera is in short supply. It should be!
Pentax has developed a great product. Even if the price has gone up 25% in two weeks, you will still get a wonderful camera (others have outlined its features so I do not have to) and after your $50 rebate (Hurry)you will have many chances to share the love ;-)
Get a 256MB SD card right away. The little 16MB that comes with it is good for about 16 high quality (or 50 lower quality) stills. I took about 300 photos in two days. There was still battery power left and the color was as good as my 35mm SLR.
Just outstanding!
2360476
This camera is likely more than the casual user needs, in fact I think even some professional photographers could do most everything they need to with this camera. About a year and a half ago I saw this camera with the kit lens, a&nbsp;<a data-hook="product-link-linked" class="a-link-normal" href="/Canon-EF-75-300mm-f-4-5-6-III-Telephoto-Zoom-Lens-for-Canon-SLR-Cameras/dp/B00004THD0/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_rvw_txt?ie=UTF8">Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III Telephoto Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras</a>, a&nbsp;<a data-hook="product-link-linked" class="a-link-normal" href="/Canon-EF-S-55-250mm-f-4-0-5-6-IS-II-Telephoto-Zoom-Lens-for-Canon-Digital-SLR-Cameras/dp/B0011NVMO8/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_rvw_txt?ie=UTF8">Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4.0-5.6 IS II Telephoto Zoom Lens for Canon Digital SLR Cameras</a>, a&nbsp;<a data-hook="product-link-linked" class="a-link-normal" href="/Canon-Mark-II-Inkjet-Photo-Printer-PIXMA-Pro9000/dp/B005KOC0TA/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_rvw_txt?ie=UTF8">Canon Mark II Inkjet Photo Printer PIXMA Pro9000</a>, and a couple of tiffen filters for around $550 after some rebates. I was looking into cameras, and this deal was too good to pass up, so I made first entry into the DSLR market. I have been very impressed with the camera, it takes over 300 pictures on its battery, has good low light performance, and there are a bunch of generic accessories available for the photographer on a budget.

The camera itself feels a little unsubstantial. I have held super zoom cameras that seem more sturdy, and the grip is slippery. The auto-focus is also a little slow. These are really only cosmetic issues, sure the body is plastic and not magnesium, thus it has less resistance to the elements, but that will be the case for any camera under a thousand dollars. The sensor works well and there are more adjustments available than you will likely know what to do with.

While 12.2 MP seems low it is not really a bad thing to have fewer pixels on an entry level camera. Although pixel technology in sensors have decreased in size incredibly rapidly, the sensors themselves have not improved proportionally. This means that as the number of pixels increase, the amount of light received per pixel decreases and can result in less vibrant images, although they may be more detailed. 12.2 MP is also just not that low of a pixel count. A 1080p HDTV has only 2 MP, and a movie theater has about 8 MP. I think that you'll find 12.2 MP more than adequate.

While this camera takes fine pictures, its video performance could be better. The video is limited to a resolution of 720p and 30fps, additionally it has no input for an external microphone. As such this is not the camera for the video enthusiast. the 5d and 7d are some of the best options for video, in fact they have been used in feature films such as The Avengers and Black Swan, However those cameras cost several times as much as this one, so a video shooting option is nice.

The screen is fine, It has a fairly high pixel density and is large enough to do see the interface in decent detail. Where this camera and all cameras like it excel is in the ability to zoom into an area on the screen in live view mode and fine tune the focus to razor sharpness.

Overall I'm happy with this camera, it takes beautiful pictures, and is a pretty good bargain. While this camera lacks the features of its more expensive siblings, it has more than enough options to satisfy the casual photographer, and might even make a nice backup for the professional. This makes a good first DSLR, and in the very least allows for the amateur to experiment without the costs associated with film.
1704647
Great camera, but there are newer ones coming out.  However, the new ones have the same basic features, so this is a chance to get the camera for less money as they make room for new models.
2420588
I bought this camera a few weeks back when it had a good sale on it, it was 100% worth it..it's still even worth it not on sale for anyone looking for a nice handheld action camera for the upcoming summer. The app that you can download with it is a neat little add on so you can watch live through your smartphone to see what your camera sees, and then save it automatically to the phone if you want to. The image stability is a great option this has over competitors and works really well. I own both this, and go-pros and being stubborn all camera years thinking go-pro was the only good choice on the market, I see that I've been wrong, and this is a great addition to the collection.