weel it is cheap but other XOXO watches look better than this
353372
too big, looks cheap, weel it is cheap but other XOXO watches look better than this one
1283278
This is the style of watch I have been looking for, but the band seems inexpensive and will not last long.
4038890
Got a decent deal so going to keep but the band seems cheaply and the watch needs to be constantly wound
3298488
Ehhhhhhh its fine but id rather spend the money for a better one than this the leather its real its just like weirdly soft like it almost feels like PU.The wood is perfectly fine,in my opinion though its just a ugly watch with the silver on the bezel. And the back plate was screwed in off centered.
3926809
The watch and band feels cheap as hell. I guess it is inexpensive, but the photo makes it look a little nicer. Dont be fooled.
1533047
The strap on the watch is terribly hideous.  It not even tan and looks close to my skin tonethe watch itself looks really good and its such a shame they put really cheap strap in it. For 50 dollars its ok and that is why I put 3 stars in it. but if you paid 250 bucks for it then I feel so sorry but the watch will disappoint you. I wish it would look like the pictureConsider the Rudiger Siegen models. I bought two of those for around 120-140 dollars and the quality and design is just overwhelming for the pricedefinitely a lot better.
2318667
so so. I would have been better off if I purchased a sturdier quality item like XOXO.  This is not it but can serve as a cheap temporary replacement
1657902
The intro says it all.  The watch was inexpensive so I didn't expect much.  Nothing but the time works.....the dials are not operable as advertised.  The watch is cheap looking, large and chunky so I don't wear much but it's kind of fun in the summer months to wear with casual clothes when you want a white watch.  I'll keep it but wear it rarely.
4648844
I was not too impressed by the look and feel of this watch. Looks very generic and cheap. I was hoping for a better quality from Seiko - kinda disappointed. But thankful for Amazon's easy return policy - I was able to return it and get a full refund.

The dial of the watch is very small. I usually wear a 42mm diameter watches but these are much smaller then the 42mm diameter watches that I have.

Sorry Seiko, maybe next time.
2326953
It was lighter than I expected. It actually does not look like an expensive watch. What bothers me the most is that the second's arm is not accurately moving/positioned on the minutes/second dials, which is something expected from expensive watches. When it counts 5 seconds the arm is between the 5/6 and so on, very annoying for me. The belt is a little flimsy and cheap looking. The glass is not as clear as you see in this pic, it has a reflective red-tint, most of the time you have to position it at a certain angle so you can see the dials.  What I liked the most about the whole thing is the box that came with the watch, it is really well made. Also, the watch is huge. If you are a small person with thin arms, this watch is not for you.

UPDATE:
After wearing the watch 3-4 times the black paint on the chain began to wear off. I am very disappointed. Certainly not worth $260, but rather $100.  I returned the watch and removed two stars. Save your money.
3892106
Its looks really good; however, it feels cheap.

The dials move if you shake your hands. The seconds movement is not alligned with the lines.
1034076
This watch looks like a $30 casio you'd find at walmart. The band feels and looks cheap, the side buttons are sticky. The top button that should reset the 3rd hand to 12 is offset - the 3rd hand goes to about 11:58 instead of 12. I returned the watch.
4703640
It's a cute watch although the strap is pretty cheap. It's showing wear fast.
1390291
The watch face is nice, but the strap color looks cheap. The strap does not look like genuine leather.
86740
Come on! for this price, I could have gotten an original Seiko band! it looked cool online - in reality its a cheap piece of plastic. no way I am putting it on my Citizen Eco drive or even on my cheaper watches. perhaps it will look OK on a plastic watch... Sorry guys this is not worth more than $15 IMO. who are the silly people who put this on a Luminex? have you no shame?!! the Swiss founder is flipping in his grave :)
4939157
I understand that the color isn't going to be exactly the same, but the band is alot l8ghter with more white in it and the inside of the band I received  was black not tan (as shown in pictures) also is isn't water resistant as described.  The watch face clearly shows it online but not on the actual merchandise. Very unhappy with this watch. Looks cheap in real life
156689
The product is made of rather cheap material, with a one page instruction sheet that has 4 languages.  This is not a very nice watch, and a cheap casio will outperform this watch any day.  But if you want something unique, kind of ugly (in my opinion up close) and with a cheap feel to it, then I say buy this.  It works, but is totally a chinease PoS.