Interesting....but leaves a question unanswered.
345145
I found this book at a local "Good Will". I was drawn to the title and the very benign cover. I did find it to be a very fascinating read. I do believe Marcussen is sincere in his belief and faith in God, and he should under no circumstances be condemned at any level for writing this. He does not pass judgement on those who aren't aware of what he writes. He does leave a question unanswered. Why Saturday? He says that Sunday is the "Day Of The Sun" which falls under Pagan tradition. But what does Saturday translate too, and why Saturday over any other day of the week. Nevertheless, Marcussens book makes worthy  further investigation and research on the subject. If a National Sunday Law would come to pass, I agree it should be rejected if for no other reason than many people've had it up to here with all of this "nationalization" nonsense.
3362078
The book is awesome, but not enough details of his journey and leaves many questions unanswered.  I guess he will be writing a series of books on this and that is why it not all here.
722430
Good sequel of Loving Lawson but there still remains a lot of questioned to be answered... However I do believe the book had an appropriate ending.
1711900
A good read but the ending left me hanging... you don't get to find out the details of the crime!
3012065
This book kept me engaged all the way through. I was disappointed once the author revealed what happened to her sister and who had done it... didn't seem to quite add up. Book ended with a huge question mark.
3668474
I am not going to list all the discrepancies/nonsense in the book, but I was surprised how often Reddit was mentioned - that is curious....

And of course, no videos, no further info....very puzzling!
3205169
A page turner, and very engaging, but leaves too many unanswered questions at the end which should have been answered. I would have given it five stars if the end were included. Very well written otherwise.
3066363
Interesting book, though I felt like the end left more questions unanswered, than solved. If there is to be a sequel or two, ok. Good character development throughout, and a solid plot with the inevitable twists and turns along the way. Not sure if I would have been thrilled had I paid full price for this one.
1915879
I found this to be very interesting and I didn't want to put it down. It kept me guessing the entire time. However, there were many questions left unanswered and there was so much more potential for details and character development that were left out. The ending seemed rushed and could have been more elaborate.
3955866
Story line was great, I did not like the ending only because it left too many questions left unanswered.
1228427
The author is an ex-policeman, so focuses on "evidence" of which there is little for this era. In the case of the princes, no one has any definitive information on what happened to them. I found this book interesting, although somewhat brief. There are some issues that I consider important in working out possible solutions here and he misses several of them - he did however include several important questions, such as why did Elizabeth Woodville let her children out of sanctuary. Two other questions involving her are ignored: first, why did she "reconcile" with Richard after the probable death of her sons? And secondly, why did Henry VII shut her in a nunnery a few years after he married her daughter? I thought he was a bit too brief on Henry Stafford (Buckingham), whose overt ambition is clearer than he said. And I also thought he accepted as an assumption (I.e. no smoke without fire) a sexual affair between Richard and his niece. That would have been incest and offended the church's views of consanguinity, so it was no wonder when Richard heard the rumours he set out to scotch them. On the other hand, his solution is interesting and plausible - the boys were always a greater threat to Henry than Richard. The repeal and destruction of Titus Regilius was always inexplicable and an important piece of evidence.
4451352
Seeing Angels in the Sky is a most interesting book. I could easily see the images the author presented with or without the helpful outlining that she provided. However, it left me with many questions that were not answered in the book. For example, can the manifestation of angels be seen anywhere else besides the sky, for example, in the smoke of incense at a Christian altar? If there are no clouds does that mean that angels are not present and active? Also, statements made by Robin Bremer or taken from her interview with Kat Kerr had no Biblical scripture presented with them as confirmation or to support the statements. More should have been done to help the reader. My biggest question provoked by the book is, if God allows us to see angels manifest in the sky in this way, then what does He want us to take away from that experience or do with it?
741313
Yes there are serious editing issues with spelling and grammar but still an interesting read for people into this subject. One should always keep in mind that if they were not there then they can never know for sure so they should not get invested farther then that. I think there are more questions then answers presented in this book which is also true to what is actually known. I don't know that much of it has "new" ideas. It seems to present doubt, and questions the real reasons for what happened and the extent to who and how many people were actually involved. I didn't find it to try to explain or convince the reader of anything except that one should keep an open mind to what they are told is fact having not been a participant or spectator of the actual events. People who seem to have hatred of Manson and those involved with him seem scarier to me then Manson and his "followers" do. Especially those people who have no actual connection to anything that is attributed to the "Family". I hope those people can peace in themselves. I don't condone what happened or have sympathy for those who confessed to their involvement however I find the  prosecution aspect of these events to be the most interesting aspect of this saga and this book does a great job at making one take into account that what we are told is almost never "the whole truth and nothing but the truth".
168732
The intrigues and backroom deals are left to the imagination.  Maybe they aren't available in archived material.(?)  The mystery of Dzhugashvili's rise to absolute power is not revealed here.  The book is interesting, but not as elucidating as one would wish.
2422307
i thought the book was really good i felt it needed a more detailed ending. There were some questions left unanswered so i don't know if maybe shes making a sequel and they'll be answered there or what? But expected more details...
3914088
Was intriguing and interesting but I don't think the end was what I would have thought of, this story has been good but needs an ending!!!
1223411
On the plus side, Steven Sora does a great job documenting the sources of information found in this book. While much of the information offered is not "new" per say, there were additional details offered I had not found in previous publications.

On the down side, if anyone is interested in the excavation and work done on Oak Island itself, the best references appear in the first chapter and a small section of the epilogue. In addition, I found the bouncing of time lines from chapter to chapter confusing and without any basis. Many facts are simply repeated over and over again (albeit more briefly) as if the chapter is from a different book.

In summary, the words "Oak Island" could easily have been removed from the title without compromising the book or subject matter. An  informative romp through history - yes. An insight into what has transpired on the island since it's discovery in 1795 - no.

PS: Steve - Has anyone been able to interpret what the tablet found at 90 feet says ???