Not worth the high price
357873
It works alright, but the foam was pretty weak for me. I didn't see a difference between this and the $15 foam cannons with my pressure washer at least. Additionally, the quick release attachment was a hair too large so it wouldn't fit on my pressure washer. I had to get a different quick release to connect it from Home Depot.
165477
Okay, I'm a big endorser of mountain hardware, but as of late, they company seems to be more focused on turning a large profit and less on providing durable and reliable outdoor gear at a reasonable price.
Needless to say, I'm not thrilled with this jacket. The design is modern and formfitting (I'm 5'11' and bought a large) but the material used is cheap and flimsy.  I could have bought two Columbia jackets for the same price as this wannabe.
Moral of the review: please don't waste your hard earned dollars on something that should be much more than what you're paying for.
4698403
The shoe is acceptable but I was expecting it to be somewhat higher quality for the price. Had I seen them prior to ordering, I would not have ordered. The main issue I have with them is the quality of the leather. Compared to the shoes they are replacing which I purchased 5yr ago for less money, the anchor lace oxford is much lighter. The thickness of the leather is much thinner. I would be surprised if I will get 2yrs of use out of them. I have seen these advertised for close to $100 on other websites. These are 45 or 50 dollar shoes at the most. Certainly not worth the price I paid.
1195797
First off, I got this on one of their Daily Deals for a mere twenty bucks.
Secondly, its only barely worth that much. People who paid full price were ripped off. The box clearly states its only 125 lumens on high power. Right off the bat thats false advertising from Amazon but they refused to admit the mistake and made me pay return shipping. That high setting supposedly runs for 60 hours but I barely got 24. False advertising from the company. They also state on the box that the low setting is a mere 35 lumens. I tried both and honestly they seem very similar. If you were hoping for a dim, long lasting nightlight in addition to the bright spotlight, you will be sorely disappointed. It does have a CREE LED but frankly it was one of the weakest CREE's I've ever seen in my life. Made all the more poignant by it needing 3 D cells and not lasting as long as claimed. Thanks to heat sinks on the inside it does run quite cool.
The body is nice but not particularly sturdy. Folks who paid full price for this will wonder where their money went. The handle is hollow and light but that makes it easy to stand upright and use as a flood lamp for a tent or cabin. Straps are weak and would likely break or pull loose if you were to carry this around all day.
The switch actually works quite well. You only need to tap it once to cycle through the modes you like. No holding it down, and there is a lock to keep it from accidentally switching modes or turning off.

I guess this would be a fine cheap light to keep in your car tool kit for late night engine work or if you had to chase a lost dog through a park. Would not trust my life to it though, or use it for regular nighttime work nor serious search and rescue. If you accept the idea of burning up expensive D-cells (which would end up costing more than the lamp on a long trip) then I suppose its OK. But frankly you can do much better in both the spotlight and flashlight category. Get something with either a dedicated rechargeable lithium ion pack, or one that takes a bunch of AA's and use rechargeable's. Much cheaper over the long run.

EDIT: It is now down to 14 bucks which is a MUCH better price for what you get. People who need a powerful light in their kitchen or backup for their camping trip should seriously consider this item.
3693349
I just started using my roommate's Beats Pill about a week ago. When I looked up how much it cost I was astonished. This speaker is nowhere near worth $200, it sounds like it should be sold for $20 at a gas station... While the high end to mid frequencies are present, they are lacking in quality. Low end frequencies are minimal and cause distortion when the volume is turned up to what would be an enjoyable level. There are also severe diffraction issues which cause the speakers to interfere with each other in a really strange way and make this thing really uncomfortable to listen to. Do yourself a favor and buy a Bose.
1510911
Price is too high for the quality of the toy.(Paid about $14, worth like $5), more like for kids 2-3 years old.
2597387
Not worth the high price tag. The artwork is OK at best. Some may like this more than I did. But the most you will get is a few pictures,and a few descriptions of books from the mythos. Save your money for something more substantial!
4178336
Way overpriced compared to buying in the typical 6 pack.  Not a good value, would not purchase like this again.
The product is okay with the mint flavor very faint, I like the lemon and peach flavors better.
3652641
I bought this on sale for a ten-spot. It is definitely not worth more! It is rather fiddly to use owing to the small, nubbly buttons. Print quality is only OK. Brother has different dpi machines, this one is one the low end, but it doesn't matter so much as this is a utilitarian item.
Compared to older machines, there are some nice symbols that you can use to decorify your labels. The font selection is pedestrian. However, shifting the font to "BOLD" definitely makes a difference is readability.
So, you are really better off buying a different model with a standard size tape. This one takes the small tapes, and the stock Brother tape for this machine is really poorly designed as it does not have the split backing to help you peel off the back before applying the label. You can use a box cutter or any thin blade to start a corner, but it really is a pain. Fortunately, some of the clone tapes (which are also cheaper) have the split back--ask before you buy.
Another reason to get the other models that have the TZe standard cartridges is that you have better quality tape and more selection of tape types, sizes and colors. I also bought the pt-D400 machine. It's quite a bit larger but is better in all respects (and way more expensive). You also might want to consider getting one that has the option to connect to a computer if you are going to make complex labels like barcodes.
So, not bad for the price, but look for a slightly larger model that takes standard tapes. Clone tapes work fine in both machines that I purchased.
1208233
The design was cute but it was not great quality and VERY OVERPRICED!  The quality was equal to or less than a dollar tree purchase.  I would NOT recommend these because they simply are NOT worth the price.
389975
This item is well made but the function it perform is not worth the expensive price being charged for this item. My bad for knowing better, yet spending so much money for this item. Would not recommend.
1621036
Extremely poor quality for such a high price. I doubt they will last long.
3707625
As always, LNL Publishing provides an interesting product. The game system, but the components are lacking and the price is way too high.

The counters are good, but plain. The maps are too thin, easy to rear, but pretty. The box is a disaster, too thin to carry around. Some complain that even the shrink wrap crushes the corners. Get a large baggie to hold the game.

Bottom line: 40 counters and two 8.5x11 inch thin paper maps do not equal a $30+ game. This is a sub $20 game, and at that price it should sell like hotcakes.
1960211
Poor value considering the price. Lightweight, but does not appear to be durable. locking mechanism for handle became disengaged when hitting a bump during first use. Difficult to maintain bag stability, had to keep re-positioning bag during the first round I used it. Not good for hilly courses as the upper bag brackets do not have a strap. Also the folding/unfolding is a bit convoluted. It does fold up smaller than any other unit, which is why I bought it.  Takes up very little space in the trunk. It would be good for someone who only plays a few times a year, or someone who has space limitations. I had a clickgear cart prior to this, and there is no comparison in quality.
2662009
This poncho is the first of two things I purchased this month that looked better online. The material is sheer and thin. It's a pretty material, but this isn't worth the almost $40 including shipping, I paid for it. I liked another poncho by this company and planned on purchasing it as soon as I saw how THIS one fit. But after seeing how ridiculously overpriced this was for what I received, I won't be. This is a classic case of plus sized women being charged premium prices for mediocre clothing. Not worth the price, but wearable.
2073881
Not what I expected. I thought they would be higher quality.  I don't think they are worth what they cost.
2863635
I was shocked to find this on Amazon at such a ridiculously high price for such a crappy product. My kids received one of these from my mother in law a few years back (I'm sure she bought it at Marshalls). I get their intent, but it was constructed very poorly. Don't bother with this one.