Very nice, good deal considering what most prints cost
349374
Print is as advertised. Very nice, good deal considering what most prints cost.
1607660
I had some concern about what the quality of this ink would be because of the low price.  I'm happy to say that after printing out several pieces, including some photos, that I am very pleased.  I got more than my money's worth.
1030584
For the price you can't beat this paper.  It is 24lb, which is a good bit heavier compared to a standard 20lb sheet, this is very handy for double sided copies because the paper thickness is greater meaning the sheet is more opaque.  The sheet brightness is also rated at 97, which gives the colors a nice pop especially if you are using a quality color press, keep in mind most sheets are a 92 brightness and have a significantly duller appearance when compared side by side with a 97 brightness sheet.

Also considering you can print two 8.5"x11" pages on this 11"x117" sheet you could potentially be saving money on your copy charges if you pay per impression/click.  At about $50 per case this is about the same cost as a case of 20lb 92 brightness 8.5"x11" paper, which is absolutely amazing.  If you have a cutter I highly recommend ordering this paper and cutting it in half if you run a lot of 8.5"x11" "high quality" paper which costs sometimes double a "standard" sheet, you will not be disappointed.
3722883
Pleasantly surprised with the print quality. I was so happy, I went out and spent $500 on a fancy frame. (This was a gift.)
793979
Great paper, great price for regular printing
3576587
Have printed thus far about 70 4x6 prints from my 3 mp camera. Prints came out with very bright and pleasant quality. They really look as good as ones from photo lab with advantage we can crop ,edit and adjust what we want before printing. Because resolution is very good, we are combining 2 pictures in one 4x6 with good results.

Had to print couple of prints first to get feel of adjustments needed to intensity and saturation so we could get best results. usign canon paper. the glossy plus is fine enough.

Scanner was good and performed well scanning negatives at 2400 dpi. We also scanned some book pages into pdf and found software and hardware very convenient for our home enthusiast needs.

Recommend it.
440848
Wanting a multifunction printer that was reasonally priced with photo quality features at the hundred dollar budget price cap I had at the time, led me to the 1210. Having done a web search on this printer yielded very little info to make a confident purchase decision, I went ahead and bought it at retail sale price. I was not dissapointed at the print quality, which is quite good when print is at best setting, with glossy type photo paper used. Although print speed at these settings could reach about 3 minutes for a full page printout, I can tolerate this but others may not. Now for the really good stuff. I have had this baby for about a year now, having already replaced the black print cartridge once but still using the tri-color cart. Sure the thoughtful software kindly reminded me 6 months ago that I should replace it, but ignored it and it still is going.

I mostly print out playlists,and regularly printout full color images that don't always take more than half page, and for most non photo printouts I engage FASTDRAFT mode, which is fast and uses a lot less color ink. Being dilligent about using FASTMODE I believe is the reason the ink has lasted so long because the printer defaults to NORMAL print mode after every print job. I think it is amazing the tricolor ink cart has lasted me this long, although I sense it going out any day now. Other than not having any photocard slots, this is a very nice second printer. And lastly, use your own judgement as to when to replace the ink.
3385537
I did a ridiculous amount of research on photo printers before purchasing my Epson PictureMate Personal Photo Printer and contrary to what at least one other poster has stated, the archival quality of these prints (when the Epson ink/paper refills specifically made for this printer are used) are better than lab prints.  (Wilhelm Imaging Research is a good place to begin if you want to research this issue.)

My first complaint is something that is apparently fixable.  When printing from a desktop, the printer crops your photo slightly.  It does this even if you've already edited your photo to the appropriate 4x6 size.  However, after reading Alfy's review (see below), it seems there is a solution to this problem (thank you Alfy).

My second complaint is that the only paper option Epson gives you for this printer is glossy paper.  I'd really like to see a matte option.

Regardless, this printer produces such amazing prints at such a low cost that I'm giving it 5 stars anyway.
2491649
I bought it for $70 and it's never given me any trouble and the photo quality (especially) is surprisingly good. This is a great value in printers.
3448195
I'm very happy with this purchase. I don't miss printing color at all nor do I miss the cost associated with inkjet printers. For the cost it's hard to beat. I have a couple of caveats:

1. This is definitely not a high quality printer. It does not print B&W graphics well at all. It also struggles to print small text. I like to print text two to a page, but I can't do that with this printer because the text is too fuzzy.

2. I've had intermittent, problems with the wireless printing. It seems to go into a deep sleep after a few days, and I have to go an manually wake it up. This is no big deal, but then once you wake it up it takes several minutes to re-establish a connection with a computer, and when this occurs it doesn't work to plug in via a USB port either. You just have to wait for the printer to figure it out.
2574393
As my title suggests I was pleasantly surprised in the quality of the print. I know what a poor (low resolution) art print looks like on canvas and it's not nice by any means.

This print met my expectations, if I need to purchases any other prints I know where to turn.

Packaged in a box, and guarded with plastic (bag) and cardboard on the corners. (See photo if need be) Delivery was speedy, but maybe cause I'm a prime member though.

Anyways thumbs way up.
4860046
A good product, prints clearly, well priced.
4498478
Portable, good enough for making digital artwork at professional level. Great value!
2435889
Amazing! 400 Canon pictures for only $24? Yes please. So far it's working out well for me. The only issue is the back doesn't have any logo or pictures. Not that it's a big deal but you have to pay attention a bit when installing the paper into your printer or it'll print on the wrong side. Both sides are simply pure white with the 'up' side being slightly glossy/shiny.
376121
The package arrived on time in excellent condition. Setup instructions were straight forward. Helpful "solutions " software included. Online help well done. Videos from Canon site helpful. Printer looks professional in my office. Takes up about 1.5 square feet more counter space than usual sized inkjets. Well constructed, heavy with assist wheels to move if necessary. Have used Matt, Semigloss, Pro platinum II papers, and heavyweight Fine Art Photo Rag, in all sizes from 4 X 6 to 19 X 13. Makes noise when approaching paper and then is quieter than the regular inkjets. I must admit, I was stunned and very, very satisfied with the print productions. I paint oils on canvas and scan the original painting in the computer with true 6400dpi resolution on an Epson V600 and then print it out. BEAUTIFUL is all I can say! With many printers in the range of $250 plus, there is no contest with the results. The photos are better than most shops can print. Make sure you are buying th 9000 Mark II and not the last model Pro 9000. Here is a review site that I highly regard for photography and printing - Imaging Resource
Good luck,
TPW
1246640
There are many excellent reviews here already that dig into the details far better than I would do. What I wanted to mention, now that I've used mine for a couple of weeks and printed several 13 x 19 and a dozen or so 5 x 7 photos, is that I have not experienced the glutton-ish ink consumption that some other folks seem to have been disappointed with. I didn't notice any drop at all, nothing, after the printer was set up, and after the printing I've done, the gray and chroma tanks have diminished some, but not in surprising amounts. I was ready for something rather shocking, and I guess, if anything, I'm pleasantly shocked after some of the cautionary comments, (which must be accurate, but don't reflect my experience). Other than the 2 tanks mentioned, the rest are still saying full.

My second observation, made just a few minutes ago, is that the cost of ink isn't bad either. A full set is around $135. I think when the printer first came out, the cost of a full set was $300+. I didn't look that closely at the time as I figured I'd just deal with it if I wanted the printer, which I decided I did, but that aspect doesn't concern me any more either. The current cost seems like a very reasonable price considering the quality of the prints. Which are excellent. The 5 star rating I give is for the print, and printer, quality.

Last, the printer is heavy. It's a serious tool and a well made machine and it feels robust and sturdy. Some folks seem to mention the significant weight as a shortcoming, but what's it supposed to weigh? It weighs a lot less than a retail print shop, and the prints are of that quality. I do have a dedicated metal cart with sturdy casters and that is an excellent support for this set up. It's footprint and general dimensions are almost exactly the same as the Pro9000 I replaced. But that Pro9000 was a machine that I scowled and frowned at a lot even with profiling and my best efforts to work with it to make good prints. At this point, the Pro-10 is renewing my enthusiasm for making prints. I'm looking forward to continuing to use it.

I'm seeing very nice results using Canon Pro-Luster and Ilford Galerie Smooth Pearl. I'll soon be experimenting with more exotic textures and finishes. And maybe the types of paper I've used so far contribute to the low ink usage. But they are pretty standard paper types and wouldn't seem to represent an outlier printing scenario.
788711
This is an awesome deal for the price. First of all, I was very impressed by the speedy delivery. I ordered it, and it litterally took a day. I was amazed, because I didn't choose any kind of speedy delivery. We needed something basic, as our children are getting older and need the use of a printer and copier more often with reports due every month or so. We also needed something to print out our resumes with the current economy. So, after several people trying to donate printers to us that were either too out of date for compatibility or just plain old or broken, I finally gave in. I searched for a new printer keeping our needs in mind. My husband was very pleased with my find. The first test has been a report that our 12 year old has due on heritage. We have been copying photos for his project, and the picture quality is excellent in comparison with the original photo. We have also printed out several photos pertaining to the project online, and the picture quality is again excellent. The reason I gave this product 4 stars instead of 5 is for the simple fact that I think it needs a different tray for the printed material/papers. The printed material goes right back into the paper tray. Other than that I highly recommend this product. It is a great bang for your buck in a dwindling economy. Two days after having this product we went to a local store looking for other items needed for the family. I decided to look at what they had to offer for printers. I found that this printer was far better than what they had to offer as far as price, brand, selection and options.