Adequate at best -- made for small legs.
341042
These clips look cool, but they don't quite do the trick.  They are uncomfortable on legs that are adult.  Fine for my kids, but don't work well for my wife and me.
1374270
These are way short on the leg. You aren't getting beneficial circulation to anything with these, but they are cute.
1840006
The fit of this is alright but not great, it just about serves the purpose. It rolls up on the legs sometimes, making it a little uncomfortable.
1861880
Not the total solution I had hoped for -- my misperception.  What I really need is longer legs.  Got any ?
68395
My son's legs are slender, and the Velcro on the strap did not allow for tight enough attachment.  Since they seem, otherwise, that they'll suit our needs, I will sew on an additional strip of Velcro.
4925908
The fan is not terribly loud and this has adequate space for a large laptop. It does not stand very high, at all. If you had hoped, as I did, to sit back on the sofa and type, be prepared to hunch forward. A couple of feet is about as much as you will get from this. The space between the legs is a bit tight to use on your lap or in bed if you have large thighs as I do (I am an amateur cyclist) so the versatility of this is limited. I would like it more if the legs had one more length and it felt a little more sturdy.
3026253
I cannot imagine how the designers determine the final product size but based upon reviews I ordered a medium instead of a large.  I have a 36" waist and a 32" inseam.  The medium is supposed to be for a 32"-34" body but was slightly loose around my waist.  My legs are a little short but the leg length is easily 3" too short.  Instead of covering the legs down to the ankles they will leave an opening from shoe top to above the top of the ankles.  They are quite loose around the hips and in the crotch.  The weight of the material is like regular cotton underwear; hardly equal to mid-weight Underarmor pants.  They are not as heavyweight as the regular cotton thermal underwear I usually get.  You get what you pay for I suppose; these were inexpensive and I got cheap stuff in return.
4722965
Sizing is smaller than anticipated and the legs are shorter than I expected, they therefore rise up the thigh a lot causing discomfort.
2876015
Not a bad fit in the waist; however, the legs were just plain baggy.  I did not want a tight fit, just not 3 inches too much in each leg and my legs are not even close to being thin.
709622
It's pretty damn small lol, This is why we check the size of it prior to purchasing (my own fault but NOT why I am 2 staring this). The 3 stars lost are for those pesky legs that collapse with the weight of my very small digital camera on top (which I did check that first at least). Overall, just spend $10 more for something a bit sturdier and taller
971080
Pros: lightweight, small and compact

Con: Barely fits 5'-9" frame
2292840
The quality of the materials and feel of these shorts is fine for the price. The problem is that the legs are way too short. I definitely bought the right size for me and they end way too high above my knees. I bought economy-priced bibs from Sponeed at a similar price and they were a perfect fit. I am 5'9'' 155 lbs and seem to have a body that easily fits into what cycling companies design for, so I was surprised to find a piece of clothing that fit so oddly for once.
2163948
I am 5'3" and 108 pounds, with flat feet.  I'd say my legs are about average in width for my height and weight category.  I bought the boots in size 6.5, black.

I wear inserts with these boots, as the arch support is terrible, though the inserts make the boots a bit tight around the foot.  Without the inserts, I can't wear these for even an hour.

The shaft of the boots hits a couple of inches below my knee, even though the description claims that the shaft is 16 inches long.  The shaft is also pretty narrow, and my calves just barely fit.

However, the boots look great, better than the picture.
1424895
Not a bad pair of slacks as far as construction is concerned, and a very light, durable fabric. However, while these are advertised as stretch fit, and they do have a tiny bit of stretch in the waist, they are also tailored to be fitted. So the waist might be looser, but the rest of the pants are tight-fitting. Overall, this just doesn't work for me, since it restricts movement in the thighs while not fitting closely at the waist. Also, while I am typically a 32" inseam, I can often get by with a 30" inseam with pants that are cut generously. These 30" inseam pants are very much not for someone who normally wears a slightly longer fit. They border on too short even for the size they're aimed at.
2082871
Good for small hands, but if you aren't a 105 lb lady, these things are difficult to get on/off.
1777857
It's nice but leg area is not long enough for anything but smallest recliner.
1280319
I have big beefy legs, and my legs fit in it just fine, but it seems that it was made for smaller feet. The straps that are supposed to go under your shoe is VERY short, but I solved that by just putting the boot covers over my socks and then putting my shoes on. It doesn't look as good as I had wished, but for the price, it's worth it.