It's a watch, nothing more.
356120
No frills watch. Great for the price if you want to know what time it is.
3954779
You can sum this watch up in one word, cheap.  It's only $12 so that is a good thing.  Just don't expect that much.  It feels cheap and the display gets distorted when looking from an angle.  It is quite large and bigger than it needs to be.  I bought this watch to use when working outside in the yard.  It will serve that purpose.
2198297
I bought it on a deal at a discounted price of $52 The watch is okay, there is nothing that excited me in terms of quality or the design though.
2043677
Good watch for it's price. The metal band felt cheap.
1599268
It's a solid watch, just much smaller/thinner than I anticipated. The face is only about the size of a quarter and it's very thin, so it's almost flush with the skin. Looks more like a bracelet than a watch.
3157464
It's a watch. It doesn't need batteries or winding if you feed it enough light. While decent looking, it's just a basic watch. The included band is a little stiff and has no adjustments (no extra links to add) so if you have large arms, you may need a different band.
1467893
it is a simple display/travel case for your watch...
1068728
An interesting watch.  If you're planning on buying this, read a bit about it first so you aren't surprised by the "loose" crown or other design features that are uncommon among western market watches.  The bracelet isn't as bad as people make it out to be, a Rolex bracelet is certainly machined tighter, but this one is fine.  My watch is between 5 and 10 seconds off per day out of the box with no adjusting, which is acceptable.  Here it is in a nutshell:  buy this watch.  You'll like it, it's cheap, you won't regret it.
2677610
All I can say it is a cool looking watch.  Hopefully, I will keep on wearing it.  So far I am enjoying my watch.
4647944
It's a decent looking, $25 solar watch built to get bumped around a little.  It's also not oversized like a lot of watches are, in my opinion.  The only drawback is that it's supposed to be a "tough" watch, but the clasp is plastic.  It hasn't broken yet, but that part doesn't feel so tough.
1399800
I enjoy the watch. The second hand as it ticks doesnt tick directly on each number so mines a little off. Im just using this as a work watch and I still like it.
2897197
It's a watch. It's a G-Shock! What else do you expect?
20213
I want a basic watch to tell the time without having to pull my phone out of my pocket and for when I'm hiking or working outdoors and won't have my electronics with me. This is what I'm looking for. It is big enough but not so big as to get in the way. It is as thin as or thinner than just about any other watch. It is designed to take some abuse. (Only time will tell if it actually holds up, sorry, no pun intended.) This does not have the date or day of week, which I don't care about. Hopefully, this simpler mechanism has less that can fail.

Pros: For me, size (35mm), especially thinness (8.5mm). Screw down, protected crown. Sapphire crystal. It is very quiet  you cant hear it unless you put it up to your ear.

Cons: Luminescence lasts only a few minutes. The nylon band isn't heat fused so it unravels a little (it is stitched.) You can doctor it yourself or replace the band.

On mine, the dial face is rotated slightly counter-clockwise (see the photo.) For this price, Im not going to send it back, but Id still call it a defect and took off one star for it and the poor luminescence. Based on the water drop test, the crystal is, in fact, sapphire. The band is stiff to start but I find it comfortable enough. I don't like the stitching around the holes and plan to replace it anyway. This is a hack set watch meaning the second hand stops when you pull out the crown to adjust it, allowing you to synchronize the second hand. Even if the dial face were aligned properly, the second hand would not align with each second mark around the dial. It has gained about 3 seconds it the past week. The water resistance stamped on the case is 10 atmospheres, equivalent to 100 meters, which is suitable for swimming but not diving. The packaging for mine was different from the picture in another review. It came in a similar black box but inside the watch was around a pillow.

I like the minimal but rugged design and the price. It should have better luminescence and a better band, but at this price, I'm can't complain.
2832998
Not so slick looking in person.  Looks and feels more cheap.  Its not bad though.  And for only a few bucks I can't complain to much.  If it didn't have LED WATCH written on the face it would look much nicer.  Overall, its cheap,it works,and looks cooler than a cheap Wal-Mart casio watch.
3184935
It's small, as described.  Wish the watch wouldn't half fall off every day.
625714
For the price it is a nice little watch.  I don't think it will take daily wearing due to low quality of the band.  The actual watch is rather light weight and does not appear designed for long time use.  But again, for the price it is a nice little watch.
3652659
Definitely not the nicest watch in the world, but it looks nice, and it works. It is sometimes difficult to tell time as the hour hand gets lost in the skeletonized movement, but so far I like it.