It was better than the non-amplified one it replaced
359740
I bought a TERK amplified antenna in 2013 as a back-up in case the cable ever went out. It was better than the non-amplified one it replaced.  It picked up a few extra stations, so I kept it.  Fast forward to September of 2015 and trying to watch TV when cable was out and I realized that the TERK really doesn't pick up much at all.  Bought a Mohu leaf 50 (I know, they are expensive) and picked up everything that antennaweb.org ways I should.  Extremely happy.
4678828
It actually is better than the same model I had to replace.  It seems as though the newer model was upgraded. It is a better quality than the one I had.

I recommend this purchase.  It is a good product.
3157224
It's NOT the alpine I owned in my teens,  but it is a great replacement for the Ford Radio I had.
Bluetooth connectivity allows you to stream Pandora or Spotify to the radio, which is my main function.
(then no commercial music plays my entire trip)...

I have used the phone connection side of it, but don't talk on the phone that much..
It worked,  it wasn't on the same par as my panasonic radio in my last vehicle, but it does get the job done.
The instructions for pairing were not correct in the pamphlet so I had to look that up online to get it done.
But all in all, for a $80 radio, it is worth every penny.
1923243
this filter filters better than the no filtering filter that was filtering prior to said filters replacement.
3338123
I like this antenna, but the amplifier that came with it wasn't very good.  Bought a separate GE amplifier for $20 and it greatly improved reception.
2703582
I replaced the Divoom that shorted out. It's not as good sound quality, but the USB and audio cords are longer. There's distortion when it's loud enough to hear across the room. For the price and the size it's good.
676080
When I was shopping around for a combo amp I tried all the brands and this little guy was cheaper, sounded better, and was easier to use then the rest. It gets loud so neighbors beware.
4876885
It worked, but was louder then the original. I ended up picking one up from the junk yard and kept this one as a backup
816760
It makes less noise and operates faster than the one before.  It replaced a unit just like it.  The old unit was 4 years old.
756314
My Dad bought one of these from a local store. It does way better than the "60 mile" amplified antenna that we've used in the past.
3238007
Not as percussive as the plastic ones, but the sound is much better.
2219462
Appears to be of higher quality than the original it replaced.
617356
I took a chance ordering this even though it has some bad reviews that seemed genuine.  Apparently the original design was good, then they changed it.  The outward difference being the emitter location on the bad design was at the 6 o'clock position.  My unit has the emitter in the original location at ~4 o'clock.  The red dot does show at all points on the lens.
When comparing this unit to my old BSA, it is indeed an improvement well worth the extra cost.
3408482
I couldn't believe the difference in sound between this cable and the one it replaced. Apparently not all cables are created the same.
3609854
I shouldn't have had to replace this, but I did.  The new one appears to be built better and is reinforced in the areas that broke on the original.
3747086
I bought it a replacement for my old K7 player was too old. I like this new one better. Very good sound and enough power to me. Can't complain
2033212
Worth the extra cost compared to passive ear pro.