A Very Good Movie But Not Surpassing The 1978 Or The 2010 Versions.
359764
I Spit on Your Grave 3 is a very good movie with some outstanding actors but it doesn't quite live up to "I Spit On You Grave" (2010) starring Sarah Butler or the Original  " I Spit  On Your Grave" (1978) starring Camille Keaton.  Still worth watcbing.
3088186
I like the second version of this movie the first version was very nice this one difference in some aspects but still a good movie and decent actors
2080984
I saw this wonderful series in Spain in the early eighties. It's even better than I remember.

The image quality of the first two parts (almost five hours long) are very good but the rest just average. It looks like they did not restore them.
1364553
After reading an number of reviews I realized my biggest beef with other viewers is how frequently they refer to the "original" film, by which I assume they mean the 1959 film starring Charlton Heston. While that film is a classic, and for good reason, it is not the only film before this one, and there may be future versions to follow. I love the 1959 version. It's so well done that when I watched in while in high school in the 90s, I thought it was amazing, even though it was outdated. All of this to say that I knew I would need to view the 2016 version with a different lens, knowing that it would be too short to feel like an epic tale. Because I did so, I was able to enjoy it for what it is. The movie has some historical flaws and some extreme deviations from the novel, but it was intended to be a re-imagining of the story, and as such, was entertaining to watch. No, it did not have me on the edge of my seat the way Charlton Heston's chariot race did, but it was still exciting. No, it did not have the full character development a longer film would allow. But in the end, I was glad I gave it a chance. It is a movie marketed to those who will not or cannot sit through a three hour movie that is so old it has an intermission. It retained the faith element while re-creating it a bit, allowing for reconciliation instead of revenge. I would give it four stars if they'd made it just a little longer to fill in some of the gaps in the story line (and if that time was used well).
3265912
This movie is great,only there is a version of this movie with a few added scenes that this one hasn't,overall the movie is good.
2719284
This is a worthy sequal, full of the laughs, humor, and emotion of the original.  However it still lacks in other areas, such as a poor, sudden, conclusion; and a slow start.
The storyline of this movie is fairly close to that of the original.  One of the last mainstays of Americana, the corner barbershop, is being threatened by big developers who want to put a chain store across the street.  Barbershop 2, however, is less about the story and more about the characters.  And the characters are truly larger then life.  You will fall in love with each of them and their idiosyncracies.  They all return from the original, and that's the main reason this move gets an above average review.
It started slow but quickly picked up steam.  I was suprised by the sudden ending, however, and would have preferred that it continue for at least another ten minutes.  Overall, though, a good movie well worth seeing.
4089403
Slater, Tomei, and Perez are all very good in their roles, and the film's slow (but never boring) pace works very nicely. It's nothing amazing, but it's reminiscent of some of the older, classic Hollywood love stories from the 40s and 50s which I like very much. The only thing I really didn't like about the film was the occasional violence and profanity. I think it would have been more pleasant had there not been any of that. Otherwise, a pretty good movie.
1412077
Story, acting and camera work still hold up. The soundtrack however is unpardonably 80s and makes it seem a bit dated. Still, a classic.
366533
I gave this modern version a 4 out of 5, but the original (as far as I know, there could be earlier versions) from 1962 gets a 5 out of 5.  I have watched it several times on Hulu.

The actor from the original Zatoichi, I believe is better. The same actor from the original, made a lesser known prior movie where he plays a scoundrel. Very good also.
657918
I bought this movie because it was one of my favorite movies as a child.  I must admit I couldn't tell much of a difference in the remaster.  The movie is still very enjoyable.  The items included with the DVD didn't seem worth the extra money - there was some character art and and some storyboards, but they weren't really that interesting to me.  Maybe I'm just not the target audience intended for a "Collector's Edition".
2956565
SO..this film is a classic within itself. Let's not take away from that.

However I was a bit disappointed with the new trend Disney is doing with their releases to blue ray. instead of giving bonus content that is new from this release, they are recycling bonus content from when it was released on DVD. I have the film on DVD and was surprised that they only chose to add 5 bonus features/documentaries. I have to say I was expecting a bit more out of the special edition.

The film was cleaned up and colors are more vibrant than ever.
129114
I saw this movie years ago when it was first released in theaters. At that time, I really enjoyed it. I just watched it again on this DVD and for some reason, it wasn't as good as back then. Yes, it is enjoyable, but the zest was gone.
Overall, it's okay. You'll have to be the judge whether you like it or not.
3726779
One of my favorite old movies. Though a remake has been done, it just doesn't compare to the original; a must see.
3587089
I loved this movie when I first saw it about a decade ago on cable. I still enjoy it, but it doesnt have the same pizazz it had back then. I don't know why, but I find it hard to sit through entirely now.
2361310
I saw this movie with my kids when it first came out in 1984 and loved it. I remember feeling like it stirred the imagination and might prompt children to explore the wonderful world of books. I particularly liked the Rock Monster and his lament about how his "good, strong hands" no longer did the job. Viewing it now as a senior in 2012, the movie seems dated and a little clumsy. Some of the magic wore off, maybe from me. It's still a good story, but not quite in the category I want for DVD's that I buy: something that will be enjoyable in repeated viewings. "E.T." belongs in that category, but "The Sandlot" (which I also loved when it first came out) and "The NeverEnding Story" don't quite measure up. Also, this DVD has no video special features, just some written notes.
4127570
This is a wonderful old classic movie and one of MGMs finest.  It is well acted and well written, but alas, it is not as good as the modern version with Wynona Ryder (in my humble opinion).
3531861
The experience of the movie is a little different than other reviews would have you believe.  On the extras the director says the movie could be made today, that it hasn't dated at all.  I was always lead to believe it had dated as soon as it was released.  I agree that it isn't all that dated.  It's not a bad movie, it's a bit like a later Woody Allen movie in its details.  Natalie Wood looks as good in this as in anything else she has done, perhaps better.  The promotions of this movie have always been a bit misleading.  Much of the movie is really about the relationship between the 4 named characters who all have their own personal and sexual issues.  Nothing is really daring to see in it, but it titillates throughout.  The movie is presented in 16:9 anamorphic, taking up the whole 16:9.  The picture quality is okay but could have been better.  And the commentary includes the director and the surviving main cast members which impressed me.