NOT WARDROBE BOXES--YOU WILL BE DISAPPOINTED. I WAS.
340151
these are NOT wardrobe boxes--they are very short.  So all your clothes will arrive wrinkled on the bottom, which is the opposite of what you expect using wardrobe boxes.  VERY SHORT.  TERRIBLE.
1494155
TERRIBLE.  They are not boxes.  They are flat pieces of extremely pliable plastic.

Assembly is impossible.  They don't turn into boxes.  To make them become boxes, you'd have to superglue each flap into it's slot.  The flaps aren't the kind that, once inserted, hold themselves in place - they just slide right back out.  One couldn't be bent where it would need to bend.  Even if I spent the hours required to superglue each flap in place after it went through it's slot (without getting myself stuck to the plastic), what I would be left with would be an extremely flimsy, floppy box-shaped item.

The colors are adorable, as is the little metal thing with the paper in it. But I cannot make them become real boxes, no matter what I do.  I cannot even donate these things, because I'd be donating a flat piece of weirdly shaped plastic.  I've been trying to think about what I could do with them and cannot think of anything.  I'm throwing them away. :(
200261
This item is disappointing. The fabric is very cheap, not at all like the chiffon-looking skirt in the picture (I know one can't get chiffon for 20 bucks, but I want expecting this gauzy, flimsy fabric). It's a layer of translucent oil-based poly over a layer of opaque oil-based poly, both so shimmery they belong in a dance costume. I feel like one bad touch and the nylonish fabric will run like a cheap pair of panty hose. The hem may be large but it does not have the "flowy" and "billowy" qualities displayed in the project photo. The waistband is a thick band of black elastic - not exactly display-worthy so shirts can't really be tucked. And the smell of the fabric is a chemical mess. It's off-gassing so bad I had to take it out of my closet and put it in the garage. Normally I'm pretty easy to please and haven't returned a purchase in ages but this one will be going back ASAP.
2041525
These were in no way terrycloth. Not even sweatpants material like some reviewers have said. They were just normal cotton jersey shorts. They're fine for that, but not what I was looking for.
683168
I hate buying any kind of clothes online.  I want to touch it, try it on, feel the fabric, see if fasteners work.  So, I wasn't expecting much from this, and it didn't deliever.  The boning is garbage.  It doesn't even hold the shape of just the fabric without bending.  I'm pretty sure it's nylon, not silk.  The ribbon was frayed for an inch on every end.  And the size is nowhere near what I ordered.  I understand that clothes from asia will run small to very small, so I ordered a 6x instead of a Lg.  It still didn't come close to fitting and yet the bust was so large it gaped about 6 inches.  The gstring was terrible.  It feels like a piece of plastic, covered in mesh and the elastic is that wide cheap stuff I'd buy at walmart.  I can say, it Looks like the picture.
4559581
Unfortunately, this was a holiday gift last year, and the person I gave it to didn't mention anything, just quietly gave them back to me unopened a few months ago, long passed the time I could have returned it. So I figured, okay, I'll use them myself, yes? I opened the package and found they weren't what I thought I was getting based on the title and description. It is what my mother calls a TROUSER SOCK, and not anywhere near the knee if you are a 5'10" woman with size 11 feet (it might have been knee high on the 5'4" size 7 it was intended for). It loses its opacity when stretched, like hosiery. It is also thin, like compression hosiery, not even thin like cheap knee high socks, which is what I thought I was getting. They are black. That part was accurate. As far as trouser socks go, they seem nice and of decent workmanship (I'm guessing, because the only person I know who's ever used them is my mother), but make me feel 50 years old instead of 20. Why exactly am I hiding my ankles like I haven't shaved this season and why do I always get static electricity making my dress slacks cling to these socks like my wide pant legs are having an identity crisis and reinventing themselves as parachute pants?  They don't look like they could handle life as a boot sock, and aren't quite pretty enough to highlight a pump. I imagine these would get awesome friction-less slide on hardwood floors, but I suspect my relatives who work late night emergency room nurse and xray tech jobs would have something to say about the benefits of friction.

Totally not the socks' fault, but I foresee these will sit in my closet until my cat turns them into a chew toy or I donate them. On a completely unrelated note, they don't have much absorbency and work better than a Swiffer sheet on dust. I predict between the static electricity and the dust-magnet properties, you'll need to purchase a lint roller in the near future to keep your black trouser socks looking black.
2684043
If you're expecting these to be the kind you see in other retail stores - Pottery Barn, Restoration Hardware etc - they are not. I bought them for my mantle at Christmas. Unless your mantle is fairy sized or in a doll house, these are way too tiny. The "bulbs" are smaller than a droplet of water.
303859
These started out as a comfortable change from regular underwear that no longer fit. The picture, however, shows a much larger width trim than what you get will have and the thinner trim, if at all tight on you at any point, will easily 'cut' into your stomach and create a fold or pressure. They're really not adjustable, at least not the ones I received. They don't even look the same as the image in construction.
There are other products that actually are as they appear/describe on amazon for similar price.
2084057
Agreeing with at least one other reviewer that these "Skinny Navy-ju83" are not a skinny cut at all.  My kid is skinny, so I wasn't expecting a slim fit, but these are baggy - more like "relaxed fit".  They're only skinny at the ankles, so they don't fit over ankle boots, and show socks with regular shoes.  The photos make them look straight, but they must have been laid out to look that way, because these pants have hips.

They are longer than I expected, but that's fine.

The ju83 DOES have an adjustable waist.

The pants are fine, but not as described.  I bought 2 because they're a good name and were at a low price.  I thought I had found the pant to fit my needs.  If I had seen them in person and not gone by the "skinny" description, I would not have bought them.
3361632
This is a "pretty" board. If you are looking for a pretty board,  this board might be for you,  but I expected a solid wood board niwith a real wood veneer - and this is not that board.

  Even before I opened the box,  I was skeptical because of its very light weight; I could not believe that there was a chess board inside the box. Right out of the box I was dissapointed.

 It appears to me that this board is really a HOLLOW chess board shaped box made with 2mm thick "mdf."  It seems to have a checkered pattern  photo "laminated" to the top and fake wood pattern on the sides with a felt bottom.  The entire board weighs about what you would expect if it were made of dense cardboard.

  So,  it gets two stars for "pretty," but there is no way it meets my expectations - especially for the price; this is not an inexpensive board.

  Very disappointed.
1833082
Not the product I thought I'd get. If you think you're going to get base plates with the cool handles to help you lift them out, forget it. They're gone. The company has redesigned the box and taken the convenience out. CHEAPSKATES. Second, if you think you're getting removable partition panels - wrong. They now sew them into the box. If you don't want to use them, you can't remove them. You have to be happy just sort of shoving them into a wrinkled bunch, the best way you can. Forget the cool reviews you've seen. Those guys were lucky to get this before the manufacturer decided to rip you off. Decent quality. Crap design and engineering.  Even worse in terms of corporate integrity. You got me this time. Won't happen, again. Don't spend that 41 bucks in one place.
151296
There is customer satisfaction, and there is customer loyalty, and with this sewing box, Singer assured that they would get neither.

Part of my New Year's Clutter Reduction Act was to consolidate my sewing supplies and notions into one official 'sewing' box, instead of the collection of bins, baskets, needles-stuck-in-swatches, etc.  I thought of my mother, and her passion for sewing, and remembered the Singer brand.  Foolishly, I chose them on their bygone era foundational reputation.

What arrived?  Garbage. The basked is poorly glued together, with an unsubstantial snap clasp I can see wearing out in the near future.  They had the unmitigated gall to advertise "additional notions included!" but what's in there, you won't want to keep. A plastic 1/3 size seam ripper, plastic thimble, and "shears" I wouldn't use to cut the tag off a pillow.  Singer should be ashamed, in addition to which, they've now sullied my impression of all potential future products.  Should I decide to buy a sewing machine, do you think I'll now consider a Singer?  Knowing what they think should pass as a quality product?

My dear seller - you were great, but please find another product to offer, or get your supplier, Singer, to provide you with GOOD goods to sell.
4851657
There are certain things that I expect quality wise when making a purchase.  If the item is priced on the higher end of the scale then I expect the quality of said item to be higher than the norm.

I was excited to get the chance to review these boxes but was sadly very disappointed.

Do they serve their purpose?  Yes, they do.  They store things and they can hold stuff.  The lids and boxes work great and are well supported.  The boxes are strong and can support the weight of my 2 year old standing on them.

How are they appearance wise?  From afar they look nice.  The fabric is a nice color and has a tweed like texture.  The boxes can nest inside of each other when not in use.

How is the quality?  Just terrible.  When I inspected the boxes up close I noticed several flaws in construction.

The first problem I encountered was when I opened the smallest box.  The inner cardboard liner of the box just feel right off.  I could see several spots around the outside of the cardboard that were bent.  I have two options.  I can either glue the liner back on myself or I can replace it every time I open the lid for the life span of the boxes.  You should NEVER have to repair an item that is purchased new.

Near the corners of the outsides of the boxes and lids are gaps in the materials.  There are bubbles and open spaces where the cloth should be flush.  There are loose threads everywhere and crooked seams.

One of my boxes has a deep gash in the material on one side.

This quality of this item is seriously lacking.  Someone in quality control is not doing their job or they just do not care to pay attention to detail.  Please see my photos if you don't believe me.

I would not waste your money on this item.  I purchased it at a discount and if I had paid full price there would be zero chance of me keeping the item.

I take my reviewer responsibilities very seriously and you can trust that the above opinions and statements are all true based on the item that I received.
3521567
When I took the dress out of the package, I was almost sure it was not the one I ordered.  The sleeves were far smaller than they appeared, the bow was much smaller and the color was not what I had expected.  Although I knew the dress would hang differently due to the fact that it required an under-skirt, it was not until I went in to check out return policies that I saw several reviews that stated the sizing from UK - USA was not quite correct.  I did purchase the dress a size larger than I needed; however, the dress is designed for small-busted women.  I was very disappointed.  It was going to be the dress I wore for my wedding.
908346
This is a trapizodial box with a zipper top.  There is a wire frame you must push down to get it to stand up.  (Hint: place it on a hard flat surface to get the wire sides to stay in place.)  There is a zipper across the top, handles on the sides and cynch straps on each side to tighten ____ (?) (I have no idea.)

Mine arrived incorrectly assembled.  The cynch straps ran outside the handles and made the handles unusable.  I looked at the picture on the box and realized the cynch straps were supposed to go inside the handles.  You can't unthread the cynch straps, but you can unhook them from the bottom attachment and re-run them.

The "clear" panel on top is not clear at all.  Translucent maybe.  No chance you can see what is inside.

The "non-skid" base is really not very effective at all - especially because the smooth fabric from the sides wraps around the bottom edges.

I really don't understand the purpose of this.  A cardbox would do the same thing.  In fact, it might do it better.  This has a trapizodial shape which is smaller on the bottom than the top. This greatly reduces your ability to put things in the bottom.  It also only has a central zipper, so you can't even open the whole thing up to put in tall items.

There are no internal dividers, and not even any tie down points around the outside to afix it to the floor of your trunk.

Essentially, you are buying a fairly ineffective box with a THULE logo on the outside.  I, for one, am not at all impressed with this product and do not recommend it.  Two stars - not one - because the fabric, zipper and overall assembly are pretty high end.
2173449
What a disappointment! I bought a 10 Tall in Rinse and loved them. They fit perfectly, just as straight leg jeans should. I have trouble finding pants that fit because most of them are horribly baggy, especially through the thighs. The fabric is great: soft and stretchy. Beautiful jeans. Five Stars

So I ordered another pair of 10 Tall in Black...dummy here assumed they would fit like the Rinse (supposedly they have the same fabric content), so dummy removed the tags before trying them on. BIG MISTAKE. They were huge: baggy in the seat and thighs, waist too large. Awful. But now I'm stuck with them because I can't return pants with all the tags cut off (I won't do that again). The fabric is not soft and not very stretchy. I hate them. I washed them on medium and dried them on medium hoping they would shrink. They did a tiny bit but not enough. Next I'll try hot/hot and see if that helps. Otherwise, it's into the donation box. Very unhappy. I blame myself for removing the tags before trying them on, but the description at the site is wrong and I think people should reasonably expect two pairs of pants that are the same in everything but color should fit the same. Zero Stars

I looked at the tags in both pants. The Rinse pants were made in Egypt, fabric content: 79% cotton, 19% polyester, 2% Spandex. The Black pants were made in Mexico, fabric content: 83% cotton, 16% polyester, 1% polyester spandex. The site claims these two colors have the same fabric content. They do not. Even the buttons are different. Go for the Rinse (they actually fit like the photo). The Black are fine if you want loose jeans, but they are NOT trim, straight leg pants.
UPDATE: the jeans I bought in mid-December 2105 (it's early February 2016) have a broken zipper. I wore these jeans an average of twice a week, so I think I should expect better life from them! Very disappointed.
547697
not a armoire but a chest or drawers and sent in wrong color.