Wanna retro Adidas track jacket? This is it! ... but the price sucks
354652
I'm 6'5" and 240lbs and the XXL fit perfect. Love the old school retro adidas look. Just wish it was cheaper.
2631873
Don't be fooled by the price.  This comes out of a wholesaler called bnfusa.com who do drop-shipping.  The same trench coat is $10-20 on ebay, plus another $20 for shipping.
4668743
It's okay. I got the 60/40 Cotton/Poly jacket. Massive in the sleeves, slightly small in the waist, very thin, scratchy, stiff, and noisy (VERY noisy) material, and not actually Propper brand (unless Genuine Gear Collection is Propper's budget line, which I suppose is possible). I don't think I'd buy it if I found it in a store, and definitely not for $25. The camo pattern, cut, pockets, buttons, etc. are correct and all seams appear to be well stitched, it's just very clearly lower quality fabric than my issue M81 jacket of the same pattern (50/50 cotton/nylon). It would make a really great costume jacket, but if you plan to work/shoot in it, a brick and mortar surplus store is probably better.
2730798
I know, what the hell is one to expect when purchasing shoes for $33. Yeah, that's right. When I purchased these shoes they were listed for $33 and when I just checked they were re-listed for $100! A hundred bucks for these shoes is a travesty. As Jerry Seinfeld would say, "That's outrageous!" OK, so you're probably wondering what I think about the shoes, so let's see if I can summarize:

Quality: They are pretty cheaply-made shoes and they're made in China from cheap materials. A single layer of cheap leather for the main construction, a single piece of red foam rubber for the soles, and no padding to speak of on the insole. Actually, now that I think about it, if I paid any more than $33 I would probably feel quite badly about my purchase.

Comfort: Did I mention that these shoes are cheap? Well, that cheapness flows right into the quality department, too. Not comfortable at all. That's how I'd describe them. And since they run about a half size larger than what you typically wear I'd suggest you order accordingly. Due to the aforementioned lack of padding, it's like walking on a piece of wood with practically zero arch support.

Style: :Let's cut to the chase here, folks. Why else would someone purchase a pair of shoes with a bright red sole unless it was for style points. That's the single, solitary reason I give these shoes three stars. They look boss, right? I've gotten several compliments when I've worn them, mostly from other guys (go figure) and they do get attention. Style points. That's where two of those stars come from.

Price: I don't know what happened between when I purchased them and today, but here's what I have to say about the price. They're worth the $33 I paid for them. They are, not in this universe or any other universe, worth $100.
2793012
A cool stylish jacket designed for men with a light feel. This nike jacket comes in all sizes from small to 2X-Large with a variety of colors ranging from black and grey to blue and green. The product is set at $100 which is mid to high range for a product of this type. The product is 100% polyester with a hood and full zipper. The sleeves cuff to produce extra comfort. Pockets on the side to provide storage for the wearer.
Pros:
1. Stylish/cool sleek design
2. Great Brand recognition
3. Not too pricey for a jacket
4. various colors
5. Great comfort/Durable
Cons:
1. Depending on personal size could be a little tight
2. Lightweight design makes it not strong enough for cold weather
Adidas woven jacket similar in price range offers the same cool sleek style. Offers the same brand recognition as nike, the jacket compared to the nike version keeps the wind and the rain from the wearer. Doesn't necessarily offer the same durability, airflow, warmth as the Nike jacket.
Nike jacket offers cool look and style. A slim jacket that is lightweight and provides durability. I would recommend purchasing this product over its competitors. I would be mindful of potentially going into the store rather than online because the product comes in a size smaller and is a little tight. This jacket can be worn with any outfit which presents a cool look.
2258930
$55.55??? Are you kidding me? For an iPod Touch sized nylon sleeve? Really? Is this thing lined with gold? B.c i just bought the same thing, different color for $3.00...... Price check on Amazon... Price check on Amazon!~
942774
First let me say that I am a huge Brooks fan.  I love their shoes and 4/5 times I buy new running shoes they are Brooks.  So it is with a heavy heart that I post a negative review about an item they make.  But I have had very little luck with their clothing and outerwear.  I will recommend two other jackets at the end of this review.

First of all the positive.  The idea behind this light water resistant shell is genius.  It is super light and collapses small enough to fit into a pocket.  The problem here is that 99% of my running clothing (and a lot of the running clothing on the market) do not have pockets.  I typically wear Asics 5" running shorts and they only have an inside key pocket.  My shirts are mostly Under Armour and they have no pockets.  The only non outerwear article that I have with a pocket is my North Face 1/2 zip.  Since this jacket is so thin, it is really not useful on cold days with rain, when I would pull out something a little more substantial.  On less chilly days it would be useful, but then I would have to wrap it around my waist.

A bit more problematic is the fit.  I wear a small, and many brands fit nicely, whereas Brooks gear tends to not fit well.  The shoulders sit fine, but the chest and the waist balloon out, much more than I would think to even accommodate fitting over a jacket.  We're talking fast food couch potato belly room in the midriff.  Also I would have loved thumb holes.  The elastic sleeve is not snug and the sleeves tend to pull up towards the elbows.  The lower waist elastic tends to cause the jacket to bunch up even higher above the hips, increasing the ballooning midriff effect.  With all the extra material, my elbows and upper arms rub on the body material creating unnecessary friction.  Sometimes the elbows get caught on the extra material when pulling them back.  The other issue is that the hood is sometimes funky and doesn't stay down in wind, even tightening it.

All in all a good idea but one that fails in execution.  With properly placed thumb holes (an issue with other Brooks outerwear that have thumb holes is an odd placement causing the sleeves to rotate and the seam to twist oddly), this would be an improvement.  The other two jackets I use do not have hoods, but they fit superbly without any extra fabric:
<a data-hook="product-link-linked" class="a-link-normal" href="/Nike-Shifter-Convertible-Running-Jacket/dp/B0051FER94/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_rvw_txt?ie=UTF8">Nike Shifter Convertible Running Jacket</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a data-hook="product-link-linked" class="a-link-normal" href="/Salomon-Men-s-Fast-Wing-III-Jacket/dp/B007FQOTKE/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_rvw_txt?ie=UTF8">Salomon Men's Fast Wing III Jacket</a>.
The Nike is thinner material, light weight, and has removable sleeves.  And I usually hate Nike gear, but it is an amazing jacket.  The Salomon is a little warmer, but fits like a glove.  It repels water very well and sits lightly despite being a little heavier than the Nike.
4814975
The price just ruins it for me. I'm always open to paying more for a real quality product but this is just too much for a good hoodie. Key word good and there isn't anythng to justify the price tag.
608658
Good shoe, but horribly overpriced. Thankfully, I had $70 worth of gift cards to bring the total cost down to $25. I like the versatility of the shoe. It goes with pretty much anything I can think of off the top of my head. I can pull it off easy with jeans and khakis, and any color top. Everybody almost universally likes these shoes and will notice you if these are your first pair. HOWEVER, the sole of the shoe only covers half the area, meaning constant wear will peel the glued-down sole off. Also, I've owned these shoes for a month and a half, and the leather looks like I've owned it for many years (I've worn these in the rain many times because where I live, it rains A LOT). I tend to slip the shoe on and off, and the leather surrounding the heel has completely broken down. I don't know if this makes a difference, but the shoe is made in China, which I assume means lower quality. I own another pair of Sperry chukkas that were made in Indonesia and the leather has held up very well. If you absolutely want these shoes, by all means get them. ALSO, the shoe runs VERY small. I'm a size 12 in most shoes. My New Balance shoes are a 12. I got a size 10.5 when buying these. Part of the reason I gave these sperrys such a hard review is because they did not hold up despite their $95 price tag. If you are only wearing them indoors or plan not to abuse them like I did, these are a good buy. I would suggest Cole Haan or Johnston and Murphy tan leather slip ons if you are looking for higher quality alternatives that serve a similar purpose in a wardrobe.
740549
The price hooked me, but I paid dearly for it.

I ordered three items from Alain Dupetit - a suit, a tuxedo, and a sportjacket.  Here's my evaluation:

I was generally disappointed in my purchases.

First, price.  The low price is quite deceptive, because the shipping is expensive, and non-refundable.  Also, you pay your own shipping for returns, so you bear the risk of a poorly-fitting suit (highly likely, given the price).  Plus, the pants come unhemmed, which is probably an extra $15 off the bat, and any other tailoring you'll need to do (in my case, a lot to make these suits not look like parkas) will add $70+ (in my case, over $100).

Second, quality.  These are not standard quality clothes.  I'm not exactly the connoisseur of menswear, but I could tell that the fabric was different than a standard suit and feels like it's not going to last very long.  In fact, when I took the tux to the tailor for alterations, he recommended that I send it back - he could tell it wasn't particularly high quality.  I was just looking for a 'throwaway' backup tux, so I kept it anyway, but you get my point.  The only item I had which was passable quality in my opinion was the sportcoat, because I have lower expectations for those I guess.

Third, the fulfillment/customer service is AWFUL.  First, they sent me the wrong color sport jacket, and I'm actually a little nervous that I'm not going to be able to return it without stomaching the shipping both ways (I don't know for sure, because of my next point).  Customer service is practically nonexistant.  There is nobody available early mornings, nights, and the weekend person was unable to help me.  Even during business hours, it seems to take more than 2 days to get a response to anything via e-mail and I can't seem to get through to someone who can help on the phone.

Fourth, sizing.  The sizing is definitely off, and I followed their online sizing chart to the letter.  These have no semblance of 'slim fit' as the web site claims... it almost seems to get wider around the waist than the shoulders.  The jackets seem to run long, so perhaps get a S if you're usually an R.  This all wouldn't be a huge deal except that the return policy is so strict with the shipping... it'll essentially cost you $20-$30 or more to change the size.

That said, all this I suppose is the cost of an extremely cheap suit, which is the reason I'm still giving this 2 stars instead of 1.  It's not a high risk purchase, but I'm a little upset that I wasted money.  If you're looking for a throwaway or one/two-time use garment, go for it.  If not, I recommend paying a little more and looking elsewhere (IndoChino seems to often have sales for premium custom-made suits for $380, which when you factor in the shipping costs, risk of return, tailoring, etc. is actually only about $100-$150 different, for a suit you'll probably wear a lot).
2621042
Well, you can't beat the price.  I didn't even realize that I had ordered two of these, lol.  I wear a Large, ordered XL, and it still fits too tight.  I expected for this to be made out of a sweatshirt material...you know...kind of soft on the outside, fleece on the inside.  If you've ever seen those Under Armour neon sweatshirts...that's what these are like.  It's like a poly/nylon/shiny-type material on the outside and an artificial fleece on the inside.  Don't get me wrong, I'm not upset with what I got...I like these jacket things.  Definitely worth the price.  If you get it, I just want you to know what you're getting.
4420247
I had been looking at Carhartt work jackets for a while. My old faithful one disappeared off a jobsite, and I really wanted to replace it. I noticed an odd discrepancy in the listing of this jacket. All the colors/sizes listed were what seemed the normal price, somewhere between $80 and $120 depending on the size and color. But for some unknown reason, the army green one in my size, 3X tall was only $38.19. I immediately ordered one. Perfect jacket, super price, couldn't be happier. Next time I checked, the same jacket was $90. Someone goofed-up, my condolences.
2404386
This is a cute jacket, light weight, as I wanted.  London Fog  has always been a quality product, but  is now cheaping out, just like all the rest of the manufacturers.  The jacket has cute little yellow and green dinosaurs on a navy background, so instead of a matching navy zipper or a zipper to match the dinosaurs, London Fog puts in a big white zipper that just stands out.  I can only assume they get a ton of white zippers cheap and that's cheaper than buying colors.  Also, they did not even put one bit of elastic on the sleeves, which is odd on a children's jacket.  Even our Circo jackets have elastic in the sleeves, and that is a cheaper product, They have not lowered the price of their product. with the lowered quality as this jacket is twice as high as some of the others. So two stars off for the white zipper and no elastic in the sleeves.  Shame on you London Fog for lowering your quality.
2658424
Again, wee have the pattern cut under the arms. If i had ordered it larger it would be hanging off my shoulders and covering my hands. This is twice now that i have found this issue in ordering jackets from Amazon. Its a great jacket for the price. I'm going to update the buttons from the plastic ones and wear it on  a limited basis. If the cut under the arms was made correctly so i could touch my face whilst wearing it i would do so much more often.  Depressing that the cool stuff that i can afford is made so poorly. I would consider dropping a big money on a much better made item but... If that don't fit right i would b e VERY VERY upset.  Make sure you order MUCH larger then needed or you won't move your arms at all. Well, theirs my rant then. Thanks for listening.
892206
This jacket is very soft, but the red leather has more of a distressed look than I expected and the shoulders are padded and sat high on me, giving it sort of a Michael Jackson jacket feel, which wasn't the look I was after.  I debated for a while, because it was almost what I wanted, but I wound up sending it back.  However, not only did I have to pay for the shipping to me, I had to pay for shipping it back too!  It cost me $40+ to find out it was  a jacket I didn't really want.  If you're not 100% certain that you want this jacket, I would think twice before ordering it from them unless they switch to Amazon Prime or begin covering their own shipping.
2662337
After seeing the pictures & reading the reviews I asked for & received this shirt jacket for Christmas. I've got mixed feelings at best about it. It does look great & the craftsmanship seems top notch, nice materials. It fits well enough. My major issue is that for something that bills itself as a shirt jacket & looks like it would be warm, it's actually incredibly lightweight, not warm at all. I intended for this to replace my cheap but faithful old Dickies shirt jacket, flannel with a quilted lining, plenty warm enough for fall & milder winter days all by itself. This thing is only suitable as another layer between my shirt & a coat. Considering the drastic price difference, it's really disappointing, not that I'd say this to my wife who was nice enough to drop $70 on this thing. I guess depending on your intended use you may like it fine, plenty of other customers clearly do. Just didn't do it for me. I guess I won't be retiring the old Dickeis just yet.
4230794
I have a love/hate relationship with Stuart Weitzman shoes. I love to look at them, but wearing them is agony. I once bought a pair of Stuart Weiztman dress shoes near full priced that looked gorgeous (black soft patent with almond toe, elastic straps and 3 inch heels - see I still remember!) but ultimately killed my feet to the point that I needed to rest them for 3 weeks after wearing the shoes at a wedding for several hours. Mind you I was running around acting as the wedding coordinator. I approached these espadrilles with caution and I truly wanted to love them because they do look like what a "classic" espadrille would be (hemp cord underneath, straps, etc...and even in the right cognac colour!). I tried these on and they are not typical Stuart Weitzman - first these are not narrow (they actually fit my wide feet with no pinching), the shoes are stable (probably because of the wedge), and the bottoms are not slippery (they are rubber). I like these sandals but the price I got them for $115 is still too much for what amounts to a strappy sandal with very little material worth the over $200 asking (regular) price! It is a bit underwhelming - the fit and quality of these sandals vs the price.

I normally wear size 8.5 to 9 and in these the size 9 fits just right.