Disappointing, and returned.
352211
Unfortunately it is far from stable and i have to return it. Belowe my expectation.
1412057
I really wanted to like this tv. When I researched it it looked like what I wanted for the price. This is for the 43 inch by the way. The settings out of the box weren't good, and I spent 3 days on web sites trying to calibrate the vizio. The whites lettering just popped too much, and when I lowered the back light and the contrast the picture looked faded. Not crisp or sharp like I was expecting for a 4k. Luckily, Amazon is awesome with returns, and I'm going back to Samsung.
1934923
I didn't like the material. It seemed felt like. I returned it.
1274305
It wasn't nearly the quality I'd hoped for. It was returned the next day.
997180
I was expecting so much more.
I should have asked for a refund, but I was traveling, and got distracted.
It was a big disappointment.
3011689
Looks and feels very, very cheap, so I returned it immediately.
1421118
This book was small and low on content.  I returned it.
1669556
Looked cheapy made, so I never used it and returned it.
1296223
Returned.  Just didn't fit at all how I wanted or how other reviews stated.  Disappointed.
143500
did not connect as I had hoped.  I am going to try and return.
2575894
Very disappointed after reading all the great reviews. I was surprised how bulky the gloves were, they looked thin and elegant online. They also looked stylish, but they are more "skeletal" when you try them on. The design is confusing and looks lopsided. Stitching is uneven, suede strips were crooked. There is a LOT of bulk in the finger tips from poor workmanship (enormous seam allowances), giving you that feeling that the gloves are "never quite on." Removing them is a process too because you have to hold the lining in the finger tips or you will be hopelessly tangled the next time you want to wear them. I assumed spandex meant that they would have a broader size range, but they will not fit a small. Bad buy. Not sure why the ratings have been so high. They do have a soft lining. Not a great warmth/bulk ratio and not very comfortable though.
1805751
These boots were a disappointment.

I own other Clarks boots/shoes in size 8 but the toe box for these felt short.  I tried them with a thin sock and they were a very snug (and uncomfortable fit).  There wasn't much in terms of arch support, either.

The shaft of the boot is very rigid and the calf looks huge when viewed from the side.

Even though they didn't work for me, if you do order these, I'd suggest you'd go up half a size.

Sending these back.
4958417
I had to return this jacket. I really wanted to like it, after reading all the raving reviews (not only on amazon, but on a number of other sites). Here's what I think was good and bad about it.

Pros:
- attractive design, nice color
- quality craftsmanship (Lole makes good quality clothes), materials looked good and everything was nice to the touch
- very lightweight and thin (in a good way)

Unfortunately, this all didn't matter to me, because

Cons:
- too tight in the shoulders (I ordered one size larger and it was pretty loose-fitting in the waist and hips area, but not at the top.)
- arms were ridiculously tight (They felt fine-ish only with a t-shirt underneath, after adding a thin sweater they were feeling too tight already. No way a thick sweater would even fit in there.)
- hood absolutely not functional (This came as a surprise, because every single review I read that mentioned hood was telling how good it was. To me, it was absolutely not the case. I'd call the hood pretty aggressive: it was enveloping rather tight around my head and it had a tight non-adjustable elastic around the face opening, so it was coming right down my eyes! So the only open portion of my face was sort of a circle around my nose and mouth. I saw no way around it, since the hood opening was not adjustable in any way. Also, the pictures don't show it, but the hood had faux-fur lining inside. So it was very bangs-unfriendly, and I'd say even any hairdo-unfriendly, except maybe a tight ponytail or a tight braid - just because there wasn't much room inside, so it'd end up messing up your hair in pretty much any case.)
- sleeves were a bit short and felt really uncomfortable: there wasn't any kind of inner cuffs and the sleeve opening wasn't adjustable. So they felt like they were constantly riding up and also providing perfect gates for cold air to come up. Which, to me, is a huge design flaw on its own.
- as another review mentions, I also found the pockets too shallow
2631408
I took a chance on this low-cost product despite some poor reviews with expert jargon. I thought the reviewers were just being picky, but now I know they were not.  I was disappointed and returned the lens kit. When the center of the image was in focus, almost everything around it was blurry.  I could enlarge the regular iPhone image with better results than shooting through this lens.  I also noticed that straight lines became distractingly curved in the photos.  A square or rectangle was squeezed down in the middle.
4487952
Very disappointing, considering returning as it is not anything like I thought it would be.
3709176
This was a disappointment.  I ordered it for a trip, but it was not delivered until the day after I had departed.  I received it after I returned home, which was 3 days after the window for returns closed.  I figured I'd use it on a future trip, so I tried it out on a walk around my neighborhood.  The resulT: If I had been able to do so, I would have returned it.  It is very stiff, and quite conspicuous under ordinary clothing (unless you are wearing sweaters, jackets, etc). You might as well use an ordinary waist pack. Also, the lining makes a crackling sound that is quite noticeable, and which I found annoying. I would not buy it again, and I do not recommend it.
955951
Though it looks similar, this is NOT an ACOG.  I was hopeful, but ended up disappointed.  Nice shape and color, useful reticles, and nice control buttons, but that's about it.  The switchable reticles jsut didn't make up for the small viewing opening along with fairly heavy weight. If you want an inexpensive cool'ish looking red dot here you go. But a side-by-side comparison to a Hi-Lux or Primary Arms (Aimpoint style) red dot shows you that there is little viewing area to be gained, more blockage around the view area, and more weight and size.  I almost kept it anyhow, for my one-off 5.45x39 FGE AR rifle, but the reticle wasn't crisp and clear on any setting. It also had a small angular misalignment, when there should be none.  I'm going for a smaller, lighter option.