Re: inappropriate Product Description by Martin Keller
358652
Re:  the Product Description  by Martin Keller
I have NEVER seen a product description that trashed the product before!!!  The purpose of a product description is to describe the product without personal bias ... This one did nothing but degrade the album, Reba, and country music, and is nothing more than Mr Keller's distasteful opinion of country music.
1180632
Two Problems:  First, the Main Description at the top of the web page says it is "Three Hole Punched" when the product probably does not have that.  Also, in the detailed description down at the bottom of the web page, it gives the wrong dimensions for the product, dimensions that are way, way off the mark.  Thirdly, whoever is writing up the Amazon descriptions is, also, way 'off' as well.
215242
The description of the product is inadequate.  It does not, for example, note that this is an edited version of the original.  I am attempting to determine how to return it now.
2771888
I want to make a claim
I received the product does not conform to what is shown in the ad nor the box illustration.
if this is not considered cheating.
engine mounts are NOT what is shown in the illustrations nor in the product photo
what comes in the box are carriers of low quality, very simple pieces of carbon fiber (one single piece), the holes will not coionciden of TMOTORS engines .. that should be universal,
what you have in the box is by far NOT the end pieces of the arms that should be made with two parts that are assembled,
I demand that I send the extremes shown in all illustrations and in the same box, the product,
complete pieces, very different from you guys. have been sent, pay attention, the ends that support the engines are very bad in quality,
not conform to the standards of holes,
They are just a flat piece of carbon fiber, by two simple rings,
The drawings, which are indicated in the box are very different, are composed of two parts, which are assembled and are well finished,
this is a hoax, pay attention, would not buy any products these people.
4545491
I wish that Amazon would have provided better description of this product, such as the package description.  I purchased this product because it's an organic version of the black/forbidden rice.  This product is beautifully packaged.  The product itself may have been of good quality, but I stopped short of trying it for now.  Why?  On the package, it's being described as Product of China.  !@#$#%^&*)_+~!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I'm utterly dissapointed.  One would assume that after the melamine tainted baby formula case few years back, having products that are Made In China would be closely monitored and disclosed.  Have I had this information at hands at the time of purchase, I would not have gone through with it.  So buyers beware!!!
892162
This case was advertised as a micro ATX (mATX) case and only upon arrival I realised it clearly was not micro, but a mid-tower. I find this quite irritating since I wanted a micro case and in searching Amazon.com I filtered for micro cases and this came up, among others. Sellers, please don't include any description of an item that isn't what you are claiming, its deceptive and I dare say dishonest. Amazon, please screen the description of items listed on your site to help unsuspecting customers whose trust in you brings them there to shop. To add insult to injury, upon opening the box I saw a mud smear on the styrofoam surrounding the top of the case, and I wonder now where this product has been before it got to me.
337894
My apologies! There was misinformation passed to me. Both items are there and are fine. Thank you!
4737906
I ordered this product specifically because the Product Description read as follows: "ASB coordinating wall sets, shower bases, and bathtubs install direct-to-stud for a strong secure fit." When I received the product 10 days after ordering it using Prime Shipping, it was an adhesive installation not a direct-to-stud installation. I should have done more research before purchasing this exact product on Amazon, but Amazon should have stated it was an adhesive install. Hopefully they fix the description. Additionally, I have no idea about the actual quality of the product because I returned it. Do more homework then I did?
741825
My rating for the product is not for its quality but for the wrong description posted regarding the installation of the product.

The primary reason I bought this online instead of going to a shop is because the product listing has this written in Capital Letters: "KIT INCLUDES ALL HARDWARE NEEDED FOR EASY INSTALL"
However, the seller (Daytona Toyota) sends me an email with the installation instructions which mentions that I need to drill holes in the bumper of the car. The front 2 guards were easy to install. However, I couldn't install the rear ones as I don't have the drill needed to punch holes in the bumper and then fit it. Also, I don't have the necessary tools to tighten the screws once the guards are placed as there is very little space between the tires and the bumper where the guard is needed to be installed. So now I have to go to an auto shop and get it installed. If this was clearly mentioned in the Amazon page, I wouldn't have bought and I think that is the reason why it was not mentioned so as to not discourage buyers. However, writing a false statement that all hardware is provided and its easy to install is a dishonest practice of misguiding buyers.

Right now I have 2 rear guards not installed until I visit an auto shop and get it done. Don't know how much will I be charged for that.

I am very disappointed with the dishonest listing by the seller and that it is allowed here in Amazon. This is the first time I have purchased a product from Amazon that I feel I was cheated.
2359171
Product dimensions were not stated correctly on product descriptions.
3161637
The item, the book, that I purchased was not as described.  The item was described as being "New" - and in truth the book was a factory defect, not fit to give as a gift.  'Simon Books' did, to their credit, refund my money and shipping.  But I'm left with a disturbing notion, not just by this seller but others as well, of exactly what constitutes the title of 'New'.  Things can be completely ruined and unacceptable and still be defined as being "New".  I'm now totally distrustful of this definition "New".
4304922
This product may indeed be delicious but the product name is at the very least misleading, at worst deceptive. Anyone with celiac disease or other wheat intolerance needs to know that this product, though free of wheat, is made with multiple grains, including barley flour, and so is unsuitable for their use. Rightfully, the product should be named Multigrain Fig Bars as that is what they are. I don't see why anyone would specifically choose a wheat-free product over one containing wheat unless one is wheat intolerant (and therefore intolerant to all wheat-related grains). What possible legitimate reason could there be then to name this product "Wheat Free"? My rating of the product is based not on the product per se but on the unfortunate and misleading name Barbara's Bakery has chosen to give it. Please note also that a representative of Barbara's Bakery in a private communication to me in response to my objection to the name of this product stated there was no claim made that the product was gluten free then added that the few products Barbara's Bakery makes which it does claim to be gluten free are made in non-dedicated facilities which also process wheat. This is absurd as those products are subject to contamination with wheat and cannot legitimately be considered gluten free. It all comes down to a matter of truth in advertising. Where there is no truth in advertising what trust can there be in any of the products the company produces?
3372431
I'm so disappointed that you do not provide an accurate description about the ingredients! You only mention 3, when in fact there's quite a few highly processed ingredients. You can see if you can manage getting a decent view of the back of the label. That totally turned me off because I thought for a moment your product was pretty clean and minimal in the ingredients but again inspecting the picture of the package proved me wrong. Please do change the description to the correct list of ingredients. Unfortunately because of the ingredients you actually do use I cannot purchase it. Glad I saw that before making the purchase. People, make sure you pay attention at that if you care about ingredients!
2175152
The part number shown is for a 5/16 inch square key, not 1/4 inch.  Mistaken advertisement.  Please fix your headline... This is the third bad review.
3341675
Misleading product listing.  Seller error cost me time and money.
199856
The "full disclaimer" on Amazon for this product reads in part "Actual product packaging and materials may contain more and/or different information than that shown on our Web site. We recommend that you do not solely rely on the information presented and that you always read labels, warnings, and directions before using or consuming a product." which here excuses the supplier's liability for a multitude of ills. When the actual product is in hand, one may, if one looks hard, find a line of faint, tiny green print on the label, partly overprinted by less important information in black, which reveals that the contents of this package of 'organic' seeds are processed in a facility which handles, and thus may include, tree nuts, peanuts, soy, wheat and milk. Nowhere on the Amazon website description does this information appear, and an attempt to return the product garners a robo-response with a printable label and the information that the buyer must pay return postage. Enough said?
2694516
I gave this book five stars because I was required to even though I have not read it. I just want prospective readers to know that the product description of this book is totally inaccurate.  Here is the description from Continuum, its publisher:

Description

The book examines the origins of language and grammar and also looks at the nature of being human. As a species, we have a long history of trying to find aspects of ourselves that are exclusively human.  Some of the features of humanity thought to be solely the realm of the spiritual - for example cognition and emotion - are increasingly being explained in terms of physical effects. Exclusive physical functions are now questioned too - bipedality, dexterity, socialisation, delayed gratification.  Could the differences between the human and animal kingdom be a matter of degrees rather than absolutes?  Language, and language grammar, is one territory that might provide an answer.

Martin Edwardes builds a story examining the evolutionary sources of our self-recognition, of human culture and social institutions and of the cognitive forms that lie behind our linguistic grammatical forms. He covers the current thinking in the field of language origins and goes on to develop an essential new theory of the origins of grammar.