Comparable with the same functionality
350095
Very close in performance to the original two Shower-massage heads I purchased in 1981. The shower head is slightly smaller in diameter and the original had a Black plastic versus White plastic sprayer head.  Also the original had  a chrome adapter/attachment 7/8" nut  to the leader pipe versus a plastic knurled ring. Water flow volume and velocity not quite as good as the original. As a replacement for the original 2UC, this product is very comparable and a good value. I paid $5.85 each for my 2 originals in 1981 in Walmart and they lasted (with periodic CLR decalcification) for 33 years.  I also purchased 100 shares of Walmart stock in 1981, because I was impressed with the volume of quality merchandise at discounted prices!!  Two very good decsions by a young Lieutenant in the Army.
849718
Works as intended.  This one cost a fraction of the price and does the same job.
3216477
This is the closest product I have found that resembles the real test and test questions.
1860358
Very good product. Saw the same type on Apple website and is like 4 Times more expensive. However this product does exactly the same job.
2191384
very useful, but Wal-Mart has an identical one for half the price [honestly, I bought from Wal-Mart and there was absolutely no difference in functionality...can't tell then apart]
731129
I bought this product after reading the comparison reviews in the March issue of Smart Computing magazine. This program was ranked #1 by the reviewers (far ahead of its nearest competition, Nero 7.0). It worked as well as the reviewers said it would. Rather than wade through 100+ reviews here, it might be more time-effective to look at the professional comparison reviews out there.
4217635
This product works well, no complaints. However I found something similar (most likely of higher quality) for a cheaper price.
4045699
Great functionality, buttons are responsive. Bought this one to replace an aftermarket one that broke and I can definitely tell the difference! This one is made so much better.
3361179
Just as easy as the API solution. I use both. Seem accurate enough to let you know if something is there which to me is the most important. How much not so much. Should be zero.
3932134
Nice, like this product.  It is just as good as the top of the line.  Thanks for the quick ship and great price!
4926267
Does the job and was a more affordable alternative to some of the others I've seen. I have no complaints. Love it!
2291430
Bought as a replacement for an older (similar) model that lasted over a decade (which is the reason I bought the same brand and comparable model - it was only warranted for a year!). This one works just as well!
2468185
Same as the Kitchenaid product but cheaper...works the same.
2132092
I was looking for something similar to what we used when I was in the Army. This is as good if not better! If you are considering this, you won't be disappointed.
1688168
I replaced a Casio calculator with this one. I liked it and would have bought another like it, but after reading the ratings on Amazon, I bought this one instead. My needs are modest, but this calculator fulfills all my needs. Its keys are located a bit differently than my old calculator, but I can adjust to it. I find I like it as much as I did my old Casio.
3471635
Great in terms of the depth of what it will do, and quickly. I think it gets the edge over it's competition which is only slightly less money. In my opinion this is easier for me to use regardless of its greater number of functions. I like the feature that saves the result of a previous calculation (that may be needed for the next calculation). It really speeds up grouped calculations that need an earlier result as part of a new calculation. This saves having to write down the previous answer when scratch paper isn't handy.

But, as I and others point out, a self limited timed led powered backlight would certainly be an improvement.
AC
1801029
I've had a HP48G and a HP49G in the past. Both were good calculators and I miss the RPN mode of entering digits in them. The TI200, as most of other calclators as the "normal" mode of entering digits: 2+2 ENTER (in that order), but I got accustomed to this fairly fast. The display is a bit harder to see compared to a HP49G, specialy under low-light conditions. The thing a like the most of this calculator is it's greater flexibility and ease of use for creating programs. The interface/commands for creating these small programs is similar to structured programming I was accustomed to in school, e.g. I've created a program to add Coulomb forces in vectorial form and another to calculate probabilities in a normal curve. It has many applications available to download and, as well as the HP, it has a large user community on the web. It is also fast, compared to the old models of HP (I'm not comparing it to the newer HP50) it solves numeric and symbolic integrals in less time. It is also very configurable and robust. The downside of this calc is that it does not have a pouch like the HP's... those pouches where great at keeping the calc safe from scratches and dirt. This unit only comes with a hard case that protects one side of the calc at a time. I've found a pouch that actually was a perfect fit for the calc: see my review of&nbsp;<a data-hook="product-link-linked" class="a-link-normal" href="/Belkin-Neoprene-Kindle-Case-Fits-6-Display-Latest-Generation-Kindle/dp/B001NPDA44/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_rvw_txt?ie=UTF8">Belkin Neoprene Kindle Case (Fits 6" Display, Latest Generation Kindle)</a>