My second timex 30-lap. This one seems somewhat sturdier/more ...
584734
My second timex 30-lap.  This one seems somewhat sturdier/more robust than the original.
3901459
I finally decided to replace my soft-sided duffle-ish carry-on-sized bag with this one.  I have a trip scheduled, and this seemed like the time to make the upgrade.

I have not yet entrusted the suitcase to the airlines (I may well check it rather than carry it on), so I can't report on how well it endures the slings and arrows of airport luggage handing.  But I did try packing it with the stuff that I would have put in my usual bag, and leaving the stuff in it overnight.

This carry-on is a lot easier to organize and easier to pack than its predecessor.  Much more stuff fit into it as well.  AND--the big bonus--things wrinkled a lot less.

I'll see how it endures the airlines' handling of it, and what it is like to use on my trip.  But I think I'll be confirming the usefulness of this suitcase rather than qualifying the judgment.

The thing that gives me pause (and I think would give most people pause) is that this is a VERY expensive suitcase.  I feel pretty confident that one could find a suitcase as good for a lot less money.
210020
We're now on our second purchase of this.  The first one lasted us for about 2 years and after multiple washings it seemed like it wasn't as "waterproof" as it used to be, and the velcro for the seat belts didn't seem to work as well as was letting dirt get on the seats.

It seems like the new one has sturdier clips which I like, and the velcro seems a little better too (although maybe it's just because it's new).
2922761
This is my first timex.  I've owned watches from other brands, but sadly never from timex until now. The strap on this model is a bit underwhelming, but it does the job. Otherwise the style of the case is very useful without being busy for the sake of looking busy.  It very well matches leather jackets and shoes or bags.  Sufficiently waterproof for a dip in the pool and still looks nice wet.

A watch where the larger second hand doesn't move unless the chronometer is active is a concept I'll have to get used to, but the subdial for seconds seems sufficient.

All in all a wonderful and useful accessory.
1988647
Nice design.  Works well with the CoreX strap.  Metal plate is not as sturdy of construction as the original TRX plate at the gym, but has been plenty strong enough to support my 185 lbs while doing TRX whole body weight pull-ups.  The CoreX strap is very sturdy and seems to comparable to the TRX strap at the gym.
3750178
This is my second watch like this. The first was a little bigger. I like the watch over much__that is why I bought another one when I lost the first one
19896
I've only  been wearing the watch for a few weeks. I used to have one of the Timex 1440 watches (the first 1440's battery died and the strap broke when I tried to put a new one in; the second one I lost), but I thought I would try a fancier one.  It is much bigger and heavier than I expected. The website made it seem like this watch was a similar size and weight, but it is wider and heavier than I am used too. The front start/stop button is convenient, but I have a harder time hitting the buttons on the side.  I think I'm going to order another 1440 for everyday use because it is only $15, and save this one for training.
3118100
Very nice bag overall.  Good layout and pockets.  I had one like this years ago but that one seemed more polished and robust.  This one seems like a "cost-reduction" version...quality doesn't seem quite as good as the older version, but it's acceptable.  The shoulder pad doesn't seem large enough...and it's not adjustable on the strap for some bizarre reason.
2627649
I purchased this watch in January and was a little hesitant about the leather band.  I only wear it when I am wearing brown and in the office, so it doesn't get much sweat on it and seems to be holding up very well (before I got it my dad kept saying how leather banded watches are crap because you have to replace the band so often.)  The second hand is a little hard to see sometimes because of its location behind the main hands, also it is turned about 30 degrees clockwise so the 0/60 second mark is at about the 2 position.  Like someone else stated, the timer/stopwatch feature only goes to one hour (I tried starting it at the top of the hour to use the big second hand as an actual second hand.)  Overall not bad for a bottom of the line watch from a great company with great looks.  If you are wanting one that you can use to time a nuclear launch, get a digital one that shows milliseconds and is linked to Greenwich through satellites.  If you want a great looking watch that is classy and not too flashy that can tell you the date and approximate time, get this one.
339939
This is the next up from the previous Armitron i had purchased. i am so pleased with it's performance so far,i bought two more fore gifts.  I do expect to continue to get good service from the watch.. The other watch band was Velcro and it stretched out of shape where it attached to the watch band.  Trying the standard watch band now. I had been an ardent "Takes a licking and keeps on ticking" Timex wearer, but the watch bands kept breaking and there is no replacements!  Good Luck  Gary B. tdy Berlin
4540402
Watch looks good. The band feels like a lighter material than black and white version I have. Hope it is still just as sturdy.
4874602
It's not as sturdy as the band that comes with the Garmin Vivafit.
4483220
seems much sturdier than the last folio that I bought.  So time will tell.  Also it arrived weeks earlier that stated on my purchase invoice
469385
I bought this watch to replace the Timex I had been wearing every day for the past 8 years.  The crystal was so beat up you could hardly see the time. The case had dents and gouges all over it.  That watch had served me well.  This new Timex is pretty much identical to my old one.  If it holds up as well (which I am expecting) as the old one...I am a happy camper.
344986
This is a fairly large watch but the watchstrap is sleek enough to keep the watch from looking too gaudy. The watch has held up well for a couple of months now - no functional issues but I'm still struggling with the odd design features. What looks like the 'seconds' hand does not actually move - the seconds are tracked in the rightmost little circle.
1065084
Simple, cheap, sporty ... and it's a Timex!  I like it, have no complaints.  I really like the back lighting feature.  Oh one complaint would be that the date is too small, could have been bigger.

Update December 2016: unfortunately I have to report that the winder got caught on my clothing and sheared off.  I was surprised, I expected more from a Timex (takes a licking?).  It was fun while it lasted.
1237596
I had the Swiss Gear Ibex for a few years, but it wore out so I wanted a replacement that was similar, maybe a bit smaller, and this black one appeared to fit the bill. After using it for a couple months, I am ready to write a comparison-based review.

Overall, the Ibex worked better for my needs. I still like this new SA7704 (for lack of a better name), but the Ibex layout of pockets and ability to fit a large laptop are definitely superior.

Reasons why I prefer the Ibex:
I miss the top, small pocket on the Ibex. It was just quick and handy for lots of smaller items, which for me consisted of various cables and chargers.
A 15.6" ThinkPad (W520, W530, W540, W541, T530p, T540p, etc.) with extended battery technically fits in the laptop sleeve of the SA7704, but only using 2 hands and much effort - you can't just slide it in. Therefore, I put my ThinkPad in the same large compartment but outside of the laptop sleeve, meaning it doesn't have padding under it and would probably break if I dropped the backpack. I could put the smaller battery in my ThinkPad and it would slide into the sleeve, but don't really want to. The Ibex has no problem fitting the ThinkPad with extended battery - it slides right in.
The front pocket on the SA7704 has a strap and buckle holding it shut that is inconvenient. The giant buckle seems like it's just for looks, though I have held my sweatshirt in it a couple times so it does have a purpose I think, haha. You could hang something from it since it has a metal eyelet hole at the end of it.
The smaller strap with a slot and velcro that covers the smaller, bottom front pockets also seems kind of silly, though I guess it provides some protection to the stuff in those pockets. Definitely very inconvenient since you have to jam the strap back in the slot forcefully.
The 3rd largest compartment that has the organizer for pens and stuff is decent, but the organizer sits so low that you have to open the pocket way up to get to your stuff. I wish it was 3 or 4 inches higher so you could just open it a little to grab a pen or whatever.
The Ibex would sit perfectly upright with my stuff in it, but the SA7704 wants to fall forward. Probably to blame is the lower front pockets and how the bag curves up in that area.
The zippered pockets right where the bottle holder nets are don't get used because I putting stuff in those pockets would result in water bottles not fitting.
I don't use the laptop securing elastic strap on either backpack. On the Ibex, it didn't get in the way. On this SA7704, it totally got in the way so I just used packing tape to tape it down and out of the way.

Things I like about the SA7704:
The straps feel great. The airflow setup on the back feels pretty good, too.
The all-black design.
Horizontal straps to adjust how thick it can get.

In summary, I will keep the SA7704 and use it, mostly enjoying the experience. While the comparisons to the Ibex will inevitably happen in my mind, I am used to the new backpack now and don't resent it anymore (haha). Every time I throw it on my back, it feels better than the Ibex, so that helps.

A little warning: If you need to fit a 17" or 15"+extended battery laptop, you should probably get the Ibex or something similar.