you'll be pleased. Comparing this M4 against a Riva Turbo X
588005
Oh heck yeah!  Just buy it, you'll be pleased.  Comparing this M4 against a Riva Turbo X, IdeaUSA w-206 and my home unit with a wired sub woofer, it performs great!  This bad boy delivers tons of bass without even pushing the bass button.  I prefer a more subtle tone with heavy bass lines....this speaker delivers what I want,  Buy it!
1936944
I purchased this scope to replace the CenterPoint that came on my Trail NP XL. The hard recoil of the XL destroyed the CenterPoint within 200 shots. This thing is a tank! Both in weight and durability (over 500 shots now). I was surprised by the weight compared to normal 1" ring scopes Ive had in the past. I suspect the weight gain is partly responsible for how tuff these scopes are. The included mounts are solid. The side parallax adj. knob is stiff, but I'm sure they want you to buy the "wheel". It goes from infinity down to 10 yards.  Note: This is a short scope. That means your mounting adjustment options are narrowed. Depending on your rail length, you may not get all the room for adjustment you want (eye relief). I didn't have a problem on the XL but it was close enough that I realized it could have been. Optics are crisp and clear, much better than the CP. There are 8 Mil-Dots from center on all 4 legs, much better for range estimation. To be honest I had no interest in the illuminated reticle but I found a color in the custom colors that gets me kind of excited, like a soft silver. When left off the black Mil-Dots are crisp. Spin lock, re-zero-able turrets are awesome!
111526
I own this gun which is the same as a Beretta M92. I have a friend who owns the real steel Beretta version and side by side or on the scale, these two guns are indistinguishable from 3 feet. Weight of this gun is 1061 grams and the real steel version is 970 grams.(for those that don't know, 28 grams equals 1 ounce - that's 3.25 ounces heavier than the real steel version) This gun out of the box is impressive in weight, kickback and accuracy. It chronos at 290 fps with .25g Bio- BB's. Fit and finish is second to none. I previously owned a WE M&P and while a good gun itself, it does not compare to the quality or attention to detail this KWA pistol has shown. Stock accuracy is very good. I have a pellet gun style target set up with intervals marked at 30, 60, 80 and 120 feet. I know that seems excessive for an airsoft pistol but I also use that same target for my AEG rifle. At 30 feet with stock barrel there is absolutely no problems hitting the 2" diameter targets. At 60 feet the challenge increases but again, no problems. (just have to slow down a bit with the trigger) At 80 feet stock, this gun is at its limit for consistent shooting. Keep in mind this is an airsoft not a cartridge fire gun. Although I can still hit the target which is still only 2" in diameter, the consistency of which I can hit is greatly reduced. From 120 feet, stock gun, the BB's literally have to be "dropped" into the target. Man size targets at 120 feet are still probable but the 2" target is pure luck. One thing to know upfront about KWA magazines is that the tiny "o" ring that surround the fill nozzle is not a good fit and will disappear within in minutes. They do not fall out by themselves, but rather when filling the mag with gas and the tiny bit that spritzes out when you lift the can off the mag is what causes the "o" ring to get lifted out of its position. These are not normal size "o" rings and I doubt you can find them at any hardware store or hobby shop. I purchased 4 bags direct from KWA after losing one and no local Airsoft dealer had them in stock. They are not expensive, 3.50 per bag of four plus shipping of course. Better to have more than I needed because believe it or not, this is very common with KWA magazines. While in the KWA pro-shop online, I saw a tight bore barrel. What the heck, bought that too. (52.00-it's made by EDGI) Once I received the parts I proceeded to install the barrel and tore a piece out of the original bucking. Time for another upgrade. Bought a Reaps KGP1 bucking. Huge difference from stock. Once together, the combination of the tight bore barrel and the Reaps bucking, this gun is deadly at 120 feet! Not an exaggeration, measured it twice. At 80 feet, the .25g BB travels at a near straight line. Very impressive. Don't forget when you get this gun, shoot as many rounds as you can before attempting to adjust the hop up. While there is no guideline for breaking in the pistol with a predetermined number of rounds to be shot, I would say that after 200 rounds, my pistol showed a noticed improvement. Be sure to clean your barrel before use as they tend to get very dirty inside their boxes. Dust is accuracy's worst nightmare. Love this gun and plan on buying another one of the same model. Recommend buying extra magazines as these do get cold from continued use and that makes accuracy suffer as well. BB speed loader is a must!
1046488
Mrad turrets.  I must say, quality is bar none.  Very well made scope.  Second focal plane.  Illumination is awesome for low light settings, not very good for day light. Get an eotech for that.  Substenision lines are hard to see against darker settings such as a shadowy tree or bush.  However, I really love the reticle on this model.  Mil to mil is a plus.  Plenty of MOA adjustment for hold overs to 6 mils.  .2 mrad clicks @ 100 yards (.72 inches). I went against the grain here and mounted same to a browning A- Bolt II .300 WSM.  This is my deer rifle and most of the time I'm in thick cover (northern Maine).  My thoughts were it would be ideal for 200 yards and in.  I'm very pleased with tracking.  Dailed in a couple of 600 yard shots with light wind 5-7 mph @ 270 degrees. Windage turrets work great.  Hold overs can be a pain due to the very small reticle, but very capable.  With a lifetime warranty you can't beat it.  I'd be able to run this scope in the Midwest no problems.
3717505
Beastmode!  I was pleasantly surprised by the M4.  Very accurate and easy to handle!  Would recommend it!!
1117608
I'm currently evaluating two cameras, the 6D and the D600 and had received the respective grips for review from DSTE after I had purchased their MB-D15 for the D7100 (which I've now sold).

[Please search for my in-depth review on YouTube under turboBB73]

Review is detailed & lengthy but I have a TOC up so click on the indicated times for the section you might be interested in.

HIGHLIGHTS:

- Overall aesthetics matches the 6D pretty well with the exception that the faux rubber is a bit glossier

- Happy to see that the metal plate holding down the tripod mounting screw and gears is itself held down by actual screws (see Partial tear-down section @ 16:38)

- Almost no flexing when attached; the plastic section that is inserted within the battery compartment greatly minimizes flexing and adds a lot of support unlike on the Nikon grips which don't have this part

- Ability to store battery cover on the grip itself

- Overall quality is quite good but will see how it holds up in the long run

- The main negative points for me were:
*The On/Off button (that's a misnomer as it's really a lock switch) doesn't operate smoothly
*Shutter button feel wasn't quite right; I felt it was a little too easy to fully depress to take pic instead of focusing
*The command dial is purely plastic and not rubber coated and slightly loud during operation
*Some minor glue overrun visible in certain areas
*AA battery tray is a very tight fit with NiMh cells

I was initially concerned that the plastic used for the AA battery tray would be brittle in cold weather but it functioned flawlessly in my freezing weather testing:
[Please search for my in-depth review on YouTube under turboBB73]

I did encounter one glitch after the review in that I got a message that the OEM battery wasn't recognized (although the camera still function normally otherwise). Not sure what caused this since I couldn't reproduce the issue but I resolved it by removing the grip and reinstalling it again. Will post back in the future if I figure out how to reproduce this problem.

Bottom line is that @ ~$44 USD, I feel this represents solid value and a good option for those who might not want to splurge ~$250 on the OEM one.

For full disclosure, I had purchased the MB-D15 but this one was provided by them for review.
4329347
I wanted one of these for the longest time but couldn't afford it due to all the other toys on my list. I finally got it and I'm very pleased with it. I knew what i was in for having played around with them at every gun store I've been to that sells them. Some people whine about the reticle being too big but i don't see the problem. It seems just as easy to use as any other red dot I've monkeyed with. Being an Eotech you know you're getting a quality piece and although yes it's expensive you're getting your money's worth out of it.

  I understand some people see the whole "zombie" craze as gimmicky but seeing as how they didn't sacrifice quality or functionality for the gimmick it's a weak complaint at best. Then again I've been a huge zombie fan all my life, long before the current trend set in so maybe I'm biased. I like Eotech's stuff a lot and even if this just had the bio-hazard with no mention of the word "zombie" I would still have wanted it and would still feel it was worth it. The company makes damn good stuff so it's hard to fault them for grabbing ahold of a trend like this. Now if they were selling it for hundreds more than the exact same model that didn't say zombie I would cry foul but they didn't.

  Either way the only minor complaint I might have would be the price. Yea it's expensive but you don't go to a Porsche dealership and whine about how much you're going to end up paying. If you're wanting an Eotech you know you're going to pay! The upside is you do get your money's worth out of it. You buy it once and that's it. It's good quality and shouldn't need replaced. I believe it has a lifetime warranty ( I could be wrong though but i believe Eotech offers lifetime warranties on their products). I love it and would recommend it. I honestly can't find anything to complain about.
2554068
I use it daily at work, since my MG725 let me down.  Just as much power, quieter, lighter, smoother.  I'm impressed.
334360
So i bought this xbow cuz it was rated better than the jackall and its almost 100 dollars cheaper. it came in with just some of the wrapper around the box ripped, no biggy. i open it and everything looks perfect, i assembled it in about 10-15 minutes red dot and everything. so i took it out with my hurricane h25 and set it at 10 to sight in the sights. thanks to the rope pull i was actually able to cock the bow haha. but first shot the recoil surprised the hell outta me. i just wasn't expecting it though. so i correct the sight. and after about 3 shots it was almost dead on. there will always be variance so it was in good clusters. no problems after 10-15 shots. the thing is a beast. very happy i chose this over the jackall. mainly because its cheaper. im sure the jackall is just as much a beast. great product
4118955
<div id="video-block-RFOSWCBZM2UEI" class="a-section a-spacing-small a-spacing-top-mini video-block"></div><input type="hidden" name="" value="https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/C1bvJKIuO5S.mp4" class="video-url"><input type="hidden" name="" value="https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/A1zERqlV35S.png" class="video-slate-img-url">It had to happen - the fully-automatic Nerf Rival Blaster. Having bought and enjoyed (and reviewed) the Apollo and Zeus last year I've been waiting for the next generation of Rival blasters, and this doesn't disappoint.

The Khaos holds 40 rounds, so the magazine is BIG, as is the whole blaster. 40 rounds also takes a little practise to load, but the system works well. There are 4 10-round tubes with a lock-down spring and a flip top lid. Flip the top, lock down the springs, and you can drop rounds in quickly, as quick as reloading the 12 round magazine for the other blasters. It's easier to insert and drop the magazine than with the Zeus, more like a real magazine-fed rifle.

Once the magazine is in and you pull the power trigger (with your middle finger) the motor goes into action, and by pulling the main trigger (index finger) you can unleash a steady spray of balls until the magazine is empty - i.e. fully-automatic. You can release single shots or bursts too, and that's really how you'll want to use it unless you want to spend more time reloading than shooting. The magazine feeds to a pair of flywheels with a conveyor belt, pulling rounds from the rearmost tube first. There is a jam release door on the right side of the body in case you manage to jam it.

The battery compartment works well, is easy to load and secure (you need a cross-point screwdriver), and the blaster is well balanced. It is noisy though, as with all battery & flywheel blasters. It's big too, I'm 5'10" and this blaster fits me very comfortably. I wouldn't recommend it for a child younger than 14. That said there are similar larger blasters for normal and Mega Nerf darts, so this is not breaking new ground.

The flip up sights are nice, but as always for me they're more for show than serious use, you're better off aiming from fall of shot, especially if you're going full-auto.

I hope Nerf release a spare magazine pack soon, I'd want a couple of pre-loaded magazine with me in any serious Nerf battle, and I'd b\fell better letting this baby rip if I can reload in seconds.

Addendum:  I've had this a couple of weeks now, and also got the red version. Both seem to drag the balls left, not a huge problem if you're aiming by fall of shot, but it does make the sights useless. The blue one now shows a very noticeable drop off in power after the first shot; the batteries may not have been brand new when I started, but I haven't fired a full magazine more than ten times. Battery life is certainly something to be aware of, especially if you're going to go full-auto a lot.

I also realized that there are no attachment points for a sling, which is a serious oversight. It's a heavy gun, and anything to relieve the weight or allow you to use a secondary weapon would be helpful.
791251
I didn't have any of the problems as the other two, and I actually really like mine. I researched a lot of scopes and came upon this one as the best specs for the price.  I'm able to see the holes in the white on my target on 16x at 100yards, and in the black with shoot-n-c so I'm happy.  Only disadvantage is how heavy it is, not a big deal for distance benchrest.  The lighted reticle is also dim in bright sunlight even at the highest setting, but works well in dusk or dim conditions.  Parallax adjustment is easy and tight.  Resettable elevation nobs work as advertised. Horizontal gives definite clicks, vertical not as much but still tight.  Included rings work well.  The clarity is better than another discount Barska I recently bought that was cheaper but didn't include rings.  After using this scope a few  times, I'd definitely buy it again.
3184671
I have three of the Syma X11 and three of the Hubsan X4.  I thought I would need spare parts and batteries and that it would be cheaper to buy three complete models of each.  With blade guards attached on both the X11 and the X4 they are about equal in durability and flight time (5-7 mins, depends on how aggressive you fly).  The X11 does easier, tighter flips, the X4 is better at vertical acceleration to high altitudes.  Nearly impossible to do a flip inside with the X4 but with the X11 it is easy to do a flip indoors.  The X4 is more of a sports car flyer and the X11 is more of a Cadillac gentle flyer.  The X4 can fly is higher winds because it has a more aggressive angle of attack and better power, the transmitter is also better on the X4 with more custom settings for the controls.  The X11 is easier to learn how to fly out of the box but the X4 is more for a serious mini-quad racer.  The X4 sounds like a group of angry bees.  The X11 is a nicer sound when it is flying.  The reason is the X11 props are bigger and slower, using a gear reduction drive, and the X4 props and directly mounted on the motor shaft, so they are spinning much faster.  Hope that helps.
2639740
My first Swarovski. Lives up to all of the hype.  Using a 6.5mm Creedmoor, I zeroed at 100 yds and moved to the 200 yard range where after dialing in with the ballistic turret, I was not just on paper but almost dead center on the bull.  300 and 400 yard testing will soon follow.  The glass itself is superior--an absolute pleasure.
2187455
An acquaintance of mine was an Army sniper.  He said once that in the civilian world he would not go above 4X magnification because more powerful gave no real advantage but brought in compromises.  His point is that if you cannot hit your target with 4X, your problem is either you are asking your rifle to work beyond its design limitations or poor technique and skill.  I tried a competitive product 6-24X50, and it had a narrow field of view, was slightly blurry, and I sent it back and bought this.  It is very nicely priced, you get a big bright picture with good cross hairs.  There were other options, including lighted reticules and complex range adjustments that, to me, just made the scope confusing and rather pretentious.  And I cannot see me ever believing that I would be more accurate with higher telescopic power.  I am very happy with this,
290247
Let's start with the reticle. It's very sharp and crisp. I went with the all aluminum model (ATRW). It's light weight with very clean clear glass. My only purpose for this optic is close to mid range defense. I don't do competition shooting so I will review it from a tactical standpoint.
Pro infrared night vision capabilities
Pro you can keep both eyes open while shooting, enhancing shooter awareness and fast target aqusition
Pro it's waterproof
Pro adjustment nob makes for quick adjustments
Pro it holds its zero very well making it a breeze to transition between similar weapon platform (my best example is switching from a ar15/m4 to a scar 16 or bushmaster acr basically any platform with the same height site base, or else you would obviously have to rezero).
Cons if you plan to get down and dirty with this optic dirt can obscure the diode and you won't be able to see the red dot.
Cons day time shooting strains the battery more because the open design causes the user to adjust the brightness to a high setting. If you are looking for a closed design then look into an Eotch or an aimpoint. That's one of the main reasons they have remained at the top for so long.

(2 Year update) I've owned an aim point T2 and the only thing I would change on the CMORE is that the windage and elevation nobs need to click per moa adjustments because a flat head will mar the standard nobs and make them every hard to zero. Other than that the CMORE is by far the best red dot on the market, and in my opinion even better than the aim point T2. I'm now a life time customer of cmore.
3938170
I might be jumping the gun since I just received my M65 today, but, I researched my gaming mouse options
for a while before buying the Corsair, and thus far, its performance and quality matches the superlative reviews
for it vs. Razer and other more expensive options in the same category. Mouse speed was way fast but
once you download the Corsair software which is fast and easy, from their site, it's a snap to calibrate
the mouse speed and performance and all other options. What a joy it is to have a weighted, balanced,
tactile super-accurate mouse when you're coming from using a cheap, prosaic Logitech generic mouse that
I'd been using for the past 5 years or more. Which was fine, but if you are gonna get into flight sims. and
gaming, in any way, it's much better to invest in something like the Corsair. Now I see the great advantage
of upgrading to one of these gaming mice, my first. It's also more precise and accurate for day to day
web and PC tasks as well. I wasn't sure about the wired action, but the cable is plenty long and sturdy,
and you don't have to extend it much if you don't need to. Cable is extending from top left of the mouse.
The Corsair software was fast to install and seems very easy to use, and NOT clunky which is a very good thing.
My HP PC recognized the mouse instantly, so it was usable right away even without the software app.

The lighting is impressive, attractive, and the design as far as ergonomics is fantastic. I tried it with
a popular flight sim. app., and it was fine although you'd have to assign buttons to really use it that way,
and it still wasn't as good as the Thrustmaster joystick but that's obvious, I'm sure. As an addendum
to the joystick, it's amazing.  It has a reassuring weight to it and it's large, but not overly so.
I'm not a hardcore gamer, just getting back into the gaming and sim. world, but I already feel the Corsair M65 was a sound and durable investment. For the price, I do not know how you could beat this mouse considering its quality, build, price point, and performance.
This seems like a mouse that will last a while, though I suppose if one were using it for hours a day on demanding new
games like Call of Duty or whatnot, and really beating on it, it might wear out after a year or two, but I could be wrong.
I am recommending it highly, it's just what I needed without spending $130 on a mouse not being a hardcore gamer yet,
and it's impressing me right off the bat.
1887829
I bought this to speed up replacing a blown wheel bearing/hub assembly on my SUV.  I knew I wouldn't be able to get full power out of it due to my small 3 gal, 1 hp, 2.3 cfm craftsman air compressor, which is a decent baby compressor, but not really designed for air tools.  At first I tried it with a 1/4" hose, and got next to nothing out of it (expected).  Stepped up to a 3/8" hose as suggested by IR, and that did the trick.  I'm confident that, using a higher capacity air compressor design for air tools, this gun will have all the power I'll need.  The gun is very quiet.  It is comfortable in the hand, and has much better balance than the IR 231 model.  The controls for forward/reverse are easy to push with your thumb (one handed), and there are four power settings in the forward direction, controlled by a big knob on the back.  The red and black gun looks good, too.  The front black part is either a very thin rubber coating, or a rubberized paint.  It started to get minor scratches just from normal use on my asphalt driveway.  Although it's a tool and doesn't have to stay shiny new & pretty, I didn't want the metal anvil housing to get beat up and rust, so I bought the 2131-P32 protective tool boot.  Also, this tool uses the 115-LBK1 lube kit, which is important for long life.  It only comes with a cardboard box, not a case of any type, which was a little disappointing.  You'll also need your own air fittings (1/4" npt).