Giving 2 stars strictly on the look and feel of the watch.
587815
Giving 2 stars strictly on the look and feel of the watch. It stopped working after a weeks constant use at a desk job.
4645844
Looks just ok, the deal breaker is the fact it loses time. It gains 5 minutes every day. I've never had a watch run fast before but I've also never bought a 10$ watch. I won't ever again that's for sure.
4468671
It's definitely not a bad watch and looks great online but if just looked and felt cheap on my wrist. I paid 80 bucks (same I paid for a Nixon Corporal) and it just can't even compete. I ended up returning it and I'll eventually get the next Nixon on my list that goes under 100$.
4185704
My wife bought me this watch because I said I had to have it.  However when it arrived I noticed it looked and felt like a watch a child would own.  I'm saying it felt like a cheap plastic toy on my wrist.  It reminded me of something Lego would make for kids or Transformers, but sadly this watch doesn't transform into something cool.  I love La Crosse Technology and I'm confident the watches ability to measure nature is precise, but the shell its in is weak.

I love the watches functions, but hate the way it's made.  I hope the company re-releases this model, making it more durable to stand up to the elements it measures.
1880399
The big benefit to this watch is that it runs on battery - just what I was looking for as my desk is already covered with devices that need to be charged.  Aside from that it is supposed to do 3 things:  Keep time, track steps, and provide silent alarm.  It does all three poorly.  I have had the watch for 2 weeks and have had to calibrate the time at least twice.  I went for a 20 min run and my activity monitor barely moved.  It synches really poorly.  Lastly the silent alarm is so "gentle" it never wakes me up.  Seems like most of the vibration is felt on the watch face and not the part nearest your skin.  Plus the interface to set the time always puts it for the next day, making it hard to use the alarm during the day.

Perhaps I got a faulty device, but for the price, keep looking.
651476
This watch is yet another example of a great design concept but with rather poor implementation. The band is made from cheap, spongy feeling leather. The design around the circumference of the case was a great idea, but the tone of the gold has a cheap, overly yellow color that ruins the feel of the watch's dressy look. And this combined with the overplayed texturing of the border makes what should have been an elegant design concept into a cheap looking, wanna-be luxury timepiece.
2294116
I thought this was the perfect watch.  Exactly what I was looking for (gun metal color, rhinestones, dials with the date), plus a great deal at $19.99.  I was seriously disappointed when I received it.  The watch felt light, the metal felt cheap almost like plastic and to my greatest surprise, all of the sub dials were not real.  There's no way to set them or change them.  They stay exactly the way they look in the picture.  Plus, within 2 minutes of putting it on, the seconds hand got stuck between two numbers, which was later fixed when I pushed the dial out and in again (it hasn't stopped again, but I'm waiting).  I thought about returning it, but I've decided to hang on to it for the time being.  Honestly, the watch is purely a fashion piece.  It looks great and that's the only reason I was able to give it two stars and decided to hang on to it.  It looks surprisingly good for how cheap the metal feels...  But the fake sub dials are such a disappointment.  I supposed you get what you pay for though.
2015224
This is a nice looking watch, but just for show and tell. It doesn't keep the time and stops ticking most of the time.
3497849
Issues:
1- The watch was supposed to be scratch resistant. It did not really resist any scratches. rather It welcomes the scratches with open arms [open hands in this case :)]. Two weeks of regular use and it already has couple of scratches. and that is the dial. The band shows no resistance whatsoever.
2- It was supposed to be water-resistant. Again, not really. One time taking bath with the watch on was enough: Now I am dealing with fogging issue inside the watch. The watch keeps working, but it looks terrible.
3- The lock opens up once in a while without any reason.

And if somebody says/thinks that "you get what you pay for" for this watch, that would piss me off, as I do not think a 100$ watch should by any means be crappy in quality.

Pros: It looks good, and it does not feel cheap.
2018677
Watch was received and there were parts in the box, the white plastic/ceramic piece that is on the end of the the main dial came undone in shipping.  Immediately I was unimpressed with the construction.  The watch looks nice and bold but the construction and overall feel seemed under-par.  There is also a metal grommet that goes in-between the bracelet pin and the ceramic bracelet to keep the tolerance tight, one fell out while I was handling the watch.  Needless to say, I returned the watch immediately, it fell apart before I got it out of the box.<a data-hook="product-link-linked" class="a-link-normal" href="/Oniss-ON621-M7-Men-s-White-Ceramic-Sports-Chronograph-Watch/dp/B001P97D9G/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_rvw_txt?ie=UTF8">Oniss #ON621-M7 Men's White Ceramic Sports Chronograph Watch</a>
4846011
I want to love this watch. I love the size and "murdered out" aesthetic, but it's not useful. It is basically only good for telling time. If you try to use the timer, or check the date or do any of the other features that this offers, you have to be standing in direct bright light to see anything. The illumination is a small orange light that will only allow you to see the hands of the watch. If you need to do anything with this in low light, find something with more of a "glow" function. I still wear it everyday, but I've resigned myself to only using it to tell time.
1641916
I purchased this watch about a year ago on Amazon.  I loved the look and it was running about 5 seconds fast a day.  Almost perfect.  After about 9 months, it suddenly started running 20 seconds slow a day.  I checked to see if it had gotten magnetized - it had not.  I had it adjusted to 5 seconds a day fast again, but within a month it was running over 1 minute a day slow.  Now, no matter how it is adjusted it runs well over 2 minutes a day slow.  I have now put over $50 dollars into fixing it with no good result.

I had earlier purchased an Orient M-Force on Amazon, with different but just as disappointing results.  I have a modest collection of fine watches including a Doxa 750, Anonimo D-Date and Round Date, 2 Marcello C Tridents (GMT and Titanium), and a Boschett Reef Ranger (amazing watch for the price).  All of these have Swiss movements and all are running great - even after 8 years for some.

I am forced to conclude that these lower priced Japanese watches are pretty much junk compared to my other watches.  They are not worth trying to fix when they break and, in my experience, they seem to break a lot.  BTW, my watches are worn about once a week each and only in the house, car, or at a desk or table.  They are not abused in any way.

The Seiko is so bad that it is not sellable but I may be able to dump the Orient.  Despite their low cost, they were not worth their price to me.

I'm giving this watch 2 stars, 1 for function and 4 for style averaged down.  If you purchase one, I sincerely hope your experience is better than mine.  I'm not purchasing any more Japanese watches.

____

I sent the watch back to Seiko and they regulated it.  It now runs about 15 seconds slow a day.  That is inside their stated range, but worse than any of my watches with Swiss movements.  I have bumped my rating up one star.  I think the watch is now sell-able, but I probably would not sell it because I would be concerned that whoever purchased it would not feel that good about the watch.  It is a good looking watch, but well below the quality of my Swiss movement watches.  That is to be expected since the Swiss watches cost much more.  I am mixed about whether this watch is a good value for the money.  It is better than the Orient that I purchased in the same price range - so maybe it is.  But if I bought a Seiko again (not likely), I would probably just stick with their quartz movements.  Those keep great time and you can find Seiko quartz watches with at least as good a fit and finish as this one.

Anyone who is thinking of purchasing an automatic watch of any kind should be aware that both the Japanese and Chinese automatic movements are inferior to the Swiss automatic movements.  That is one of the reasons that watches with Swiss movements tend to cost more.
2055934
I received this watch as a gift from my wife. While the watch is excellent the two-tone band is not strong. It bends very easily. However, you can always replace the band with a better one for negligible price.

The most disappointing part of this watch is the following. The watch crystal scratches very easily. Within six months mine looked older than a vintage watch. Quality control is number one in product development. I am surprised to find a company like Citizen did not test the material they were using for a relatively expensive watch.
1485136
The date function on mine did not work when purchased.  Also, the watch band is too thin and feels very cheaply made  (the end of it is curling away from the band when worn).  Finally, not a big issue but the watch is much thicker than I expected and interfered with shirt cuffs.
293355
I guess its an ok watch? It arrived in a box with no instructions so I couldn't figure out what the buttons do until i found a similar watch on youtube. The 3 smaller windows are: day of the week, day of the month, and the time in military time(sort of). The day of the week window displays the proper day (in numbers) but its not exactly on the line. Also the button that controls the day of the week (top right) FELL OUT when I opened the box, I ended up putting a dab of glue on the button and putting it back in (giggity), I haven't tried pulling on it, but it has stayed in. THEN the botton right button that controls the day of the month was stuck in. I had to get some pliers to unstick it. After a couple of pushes it works normally. The problem with the 24 hour display is that it's not in sync with the watch time. Example with the watch shows 5:30pm the 24 hour window is almost 2 hours off. Also without an instruction book I couldn't figure out what winds the watch because it seems like the right dial winds and the ring around the face turns to wind as well. I assume its the right dial, but I shouldn't have to search a way to do it. At some points the watch stopped ticking, then with a light tap it started again, but that could have been due to the winding. The "self-winding" feature seems to work. The left dial turns the chronogragh clockwise or counter-clockwise. The writing is pretty are to read from a reasonable distance.

All in all its not really a bad chinese made watch. It could be better, but it looks nice, especially with a leather strap. If you are looking for a good looking watch to wear formally without breaking the bank this is it.

The watch didn't impress me too much, BUT its the the worst watch ever, so my conclusion is....eh?
3189259
I spent 650 on this watch. It looks cheap and unimpressive to me. I even lost it a few months later and could care less. I'm getting a Rolex.
718392
I purchased this watch because I like the unique look of the chrome-colored band on the face.

The pros:
1)  The watch does look cool!
2)  The back of the case has beveled edges, which makes bending your wrist easier;

The cons:
1)  The hands and hour markers are not luminescent;
2)  The hands have rectangular holes in them, which makes them difficult to see in certain light.

I am going to sell the watch because if I cannot tell what time it is, I don't want it.