but it's so-so at best. I wouldn't call reading it a waste of ...
581918
I took a shot at this, but it's so-so at best.  I wouldn't call reading it a waste of time, but it's definitely in the same vein as books by Napoleon Hill, Dale Carnegie, and Anthony Robbins.  If you like reading them, you will like this book.  If they all seem a bit 'thin' you'll be disappointed here too.
3448527
It was okay, but I wasn't particularly impressed with it.  Not one of those stories that you "can't put down".
3794599
Unless the other parts of these book (which you have to buy) is better it just an Ok read at best.
4640007
I think the book was okay. It wasn't the best but it wasn't the worst. It just wasn't that exciting.
2081197
I wouldn't say it's the best of the series, but it's well worth reading.
1849346
Not the best either. I liked some aspects of it, but the absurdity of the time space felt uncomfortable. I don't feel like I wasted my time reading it as it had some interesting parts and I liked the character exploration somewhat but awkwardly fighting fate and the dirty feel of it didn't absorb my attention. For a quick read it was a-ight
2072505
Although I read it in high school, I found it too wordy  for my present self.  It wasn't the worst of reads, but it wasn' t the best either
191917
Meh... it wasn't terrible, but it wasn't exceptionally good either. It was a quick read.
2813529
It's a textbook so I guess it's ok... It's not like I'm leisurely reading it
815145
It was alright.  There wasn't really very much interaction between the two main characters.  I wouldn't really recommend it but as I said it was o.k.
2945515
I read this book as a result of some online hype (on Facebook as I recall).
It is not something I'm shattered to have "wasted" my time on, but it is also not something I'm ecstatic about having read.
It just didn't really do it for me.
2803931
I really wasn't all that thrilled. I realize that this wasn't meant to be a book so is therefore not written as such but still this story just seems thrown together.
4615064
Amateurish, sometimes fun to read, but essentially something you can skip.
3568422
So-so. It is a fun read but you are not missing out on much if you don't pick it up.
2095482
I started reading this for kicks and giggles because it was free (through Kindle First or Samsung Kindle Deals.) and because I thought it would be a quick and easy read. Silly me.

I found the book really slow, almost excruciatingly so. It isn't until two or three chapters before the end that you find out Jacquelina's back story, dragging out the main plot for too long. While I am a fan of changing perspective points, I feel that Corbett didn't know when to stop. There were quite a few character perspectives that were not entirely pertinent to the main story at hand, only proving more distracting.

What went over well for me was the ending, whether it was because I was happy it was over or that it was an actual decent ending, it's hard to tell. Over all, the book was okay but not something I will re-read, nor have any interest in any other books by the author.
3156888
With a storyline that seems engineered solely to incorporate multiple, explicit accounts of intercourse, I'd hardly call this book a fantastic story; though it is pleasant enough in its own way. The literary equivalent of a chick flick, it's neither thought provoking nor particularly engaging, but provides light entertainment, and is in that capacity a book I could well recommend.
2944807
As a trashy novel, this isn't half-bad. No, it's not social satire on the level of Tom Wolfe, but as long as you understand that and accept it for the mind candy that it is, you might enjoy it. No, it has no discernible plot. No, it's not particularly well-written. Yes, the dialogue is rather pedestrian. Let's face it, it probably wouldn't have been published if it weren't based on a real-life person, but that's half the fun of reading it and it's an entertaining read, a guilty pleasure like a fast-food meal that you allow yourself to indulge in once in awhile but that would get nauseating if you ate all the time. It's totally disposable.

And I thought the ending was perfectly fine, I have certainly read far worse endings than that (um, the Da Vinci Code?).