but more like tights than leggings
584136
Very cute, but more like tights than leggings. Very see-through. Needs to be worn under a dress or long shirt.
4534968
Got the coral and they are see through. definitely more like tights than leggings
2559852
They are more footless tights than leggings. Fit and material aren't like leggings. Waistband is thin, not wide and rolls down.
920502
I'm not sure why these are getting such high reviews. These are not leggings they are more like tights. I am not plus sized but tall so I thought they might work. They are see through and they were way to baggy in the crotch area.
2070488
These should not be considered leggings. They are thick, opaque tights, and not something I would ever be comfortable wearing unless my rear end was completely covered. I returned them because I was looking for leggings.
4507003
They are made out of thin black nylon tights material.  The photograph makes them look a lot more opaque than they are.  You would need to wear them over something else to look that solid.
1721290
I thought they would be thicker than they turned out to be. Just normal tights but decent price!!! So not at a complete loss.
2545062
They were more like panty hose....very thin not like tights, also, mine came defective, but the company was reliable and refunded the whole purchase price including shipping.
2280124
These are footless tights, not leggings. You cannot wear these as pants. They are comfortable but don't serve the intended purpose.
4269204
The tights we got are not " Body wrappers " . We were looking for this particular brand which we tried before . They are not even made the same way.
3597753
These tights are not one size fits all. The don't stretch out much. Are made for thin girls, not curvy girls unless you like your stuff super tight. The color is super shinning. Delivery took kind of long. Disappointed after going by reviews. Kept them cause I manage to get in them day two and felt bit better. Don't want to waste money on shipping them back.
3160709
I was concerned about the material but they are more like socks than thigh highs.
1974821
these are NOT plus-sized and they are not thick enough to be classified as "leggings" - they are more like tights
3080458
more of a really shiny spandex vs leggings. kept it in my closet for awhile but then ended up throwing it in the donation pile.
138161
Not what I was looking for. I wanted thick tights like my toddler girls have to keep my legs warm during the winter. These are like footless  control-top nylons that mimic the pattern of a cable knit sweater. Granted, looking over the description, it says they are 90% nylon and 10% spandex. As far as fit, I am 5'9" and weigh 140 lbs and they feel tight around my thighs (21.5 inches). Based on my feelings, I'd probably only give them 3 stars but for what they are, they do seem pretty nice. They are long and I can even stretch them over my heel if I want to and they don't sag in the crotch area. I paid almost seventeen dollars for them so I was expecting a little more as far as thickness. Also, you can definitely see through them. This is something you'd wear on a spring day with a dress. I ran them through the wash and they came out fine.
4098718
They are not what I thought they would be. They are more see through. They would be great under the long tunics or short dresses. Not a good workout legging. They remind me more of tights without feet. Other then that they seem to be good quality. They also run a little snall.
4544090
Looks more like footless tights especially for older kids. The top of the leggings look like tights with the stitching. Also, you can see my kids panties when they do somersaults.