Avoid this one and pay $5 more for the next best option - you'll be thankful you did.
591382
I would NOT recommend this product to anyone. Not only did it not make it to installation before it broke, it's of an incredibly low materials and build quality. The first thing that happened after I pulled it out of the package to test fit it was that the lever that holds it in position on the wall mounted holder stopped working because the spring popped off the guts of the action. Once I got the spring back on, the post that works as the fulcrum of said lever broke off. This should not be happening on a brand new wall mount. The design of the mount is actually pretty basic and simple and with a few minor adjustments it would be near perfect, but the implementation and choice of weak materials just makes it a total bust.
3163183
It is hard to find much good to say about this one. I don't know if I got a lemon or if they are just making, how you say, crap.
As others point out, there is zero help from the 'manual' - and the various problems that arose with mine all had the same suggestions in the manual - they want you to go online and research it. Well - if the problem is that you can't bloody well GET online, then telling you to go online for a solution is worse than stupid.
For the three weeks that it worked, the coverage was decent throughout the house. But when it stopped working and I continually tried to find a fix, it was just a big steaming pile of frustration. I will try to return it for at least a partial credit and will avoid taking another chance with this "D Link"  company. If you wish to try them I wish you good luck; apparently some people managed OK. I just didn't happen to be one of the lucky ones, so it IS a - pardon the expression - crapshoot.
675563
First I have to say that it is my own fault for thinking I could get, for $30, a product that might actually trim weeds. I bought it at a local chain home-store, tried it for under 5-minutes, and immediately returned it for full credit.

I have never given a review less than 3-stars before this. I own another Earthwise product, an&nbsp;<a data-hook="product-link-linked" class="a-link-normal" href="/11-8-5-Amp-Electric-Tiller-Cultivator-TC70001/dp/B009XPCF2O/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_rvw_txt?ie=UTF8">11" 8.5 Amp Electric Tiller/Cultivator-TC70001</a>&nbsp;that I think is great and to which I gave 5-stars. That said, I'm surprised they even put this piece of .... on the market.

To begin with, the manual is so bad you simply need to figure out yourself how to assemble it (which is not difficult). The "bump-type" advance doesn't work well, the power is insufficient, and the trimmer is so short that if you're over 5'6", you'll have to bend over to have it reach the ground. This is more like a toy than a garden tool. It is the ultimate version of "You get what you pay for".

In short, don't even bother. You'll just end up making a return. This is ONE time I'm glad I didn't purchase through Amazon; it made the return easier and gave me same-day credit. Shame on you, Earthwise.
2016902
I would return it, but I'm out of the amazon 30 day window.  I needed to use it while I waited on my other order.  I purchased the Jelly Comb Mechanical NumPad instead and it is MILES ahead of this keypad.  See the photos I've uploaded for a comparison.  Notice the height/throw on the Mechanical one (on the left) and the key spacing.  It just oozes quality compared to this product (the one on the right).  The keys are concaved for a much better feeling, the cord is braided for durability and comes with a velcro cord tie.  It also has bracket, equals, and tab keys, pretty crucial for accounting.

This pad's haptics are trash and the key spacing is really tight
.  Mushy and sticky keys makes for a bad user experience..  Whenever the "00" key is pressed I can never tell how many zeros it will actually input.  Sometimes it's three or for or six, sometimes it's two.  Might be a manufacture defect, I'm not sure.  The cable is thin and cheap compared to the braided cable of the mechanical one.

If you are a professional, or spend any appreciable amount of time using a number pad, spend the money and get the Jelly Comb mechanical.  You will save yourself frustration, time, and money in the long run.  This one is going in the trash, for me.

If you are only going to use this once or twice a year for a very limited amount of time, this one will work for you as long as you don't use the double zero key.  I wouldn't expect this number pad to last very long just going by feel.

As a last note, both of these keypads are rebranded china products that you can buy straight from china for cheaper (but you're gonna wait for a month).  See here for the mechanical version (ebay dot com/itm/282414026096).  Jelly Comb doesn't make either of these keypads and I don't think the manufactures of these products are related at all.  The mechanical one is actually made by "Seenda".
463947
Lost my capo while staying in a hostel in Europe so I decided to go for a cheap alternative....not a good decision.  This capo has trouble pressing down all strings at once leaving you with a sound akin to nails on a chalkboard.  Do yourself a favor and go for a nice, $20 capo that will last for years and bypass the $5 P.O.S. that you'll ultimately break yourself out of sheer frustration.

Update (five minutes after my initial review):seriously, this capo is terrible.  It's think, hard to maneuver while trying to move it to a different position, the spring makes an annoying noise, and you literally need to be EXACTLY precise where you place it on the fret board, otherwise you'll just mute either the low E or high E.
39060
I've used Pendaflex "Reinforced" File Jackets for more than 25 years as a means of color coding important records.  My recent purchase (mid March 2012)surprised me.  I found them to be so flimsy that I am angry that I ordered it, especially 3 packs.  You can find better for significantly less by shopping at a discount store though rarely do they stock colored folders.
Now, I know that we have harvested so much of the lumber to sell to build Asia, particularly Chinese markets but this is ridiculous.  While other paper products have gone up and price and lower in count/number per item.  This jumped in price by 15% and the quality is decreased at least 50%. I could use this for toilet paper, it is so thin.  I compared it to one that I had sitting out purchased a few years ago and they are as different as night and day.  Go out and buy the off-white folder version of another brand and use a colored marker and various colored labels to set your folders apart.

At the same time, I purchased Smead folders which were significantly more money and only slightly more thick.  I also compared it to my few years old Pendaflex folder and it too was pretty wafer thin.

I was a a dullard making my purchase after reading the other reviews here; if you want to feel taken just go to a movie and spend $12 on a bowl of popcorn and a drink.  It will be more satisfying.
4352239
Looks just like the higher priced Bluetooth headsets, but quality of sound is "just" OK. Signal dropped on occasion, but not sure if it was the device or environment.  Function OK at first, then after about 3-4 days, the device just didn't seem to stay charged very long.  Then after about a week of frequent use, it just wouldn't turn on at all.  Check my cables and AC/DC adapters and they still worked when charging other devices, but headset would charge up again.  Now after reading some of the more recent reviews I believe this device would be a bad choice if you're thinking about purchasing it.  Spend the extra $10 - $20 and save yourself the frustration and aggravation.
1530571
I picked this camera up from Best Buy and used it for a week. I love the idea and ergonomics, but was ultimately very disappointed with the experience.  For the price, there are better options out there - I ultimately settled on the Git2 (gitup.com), and am very happy with my choice.

Pros:
* Small
* Cute

Cons:
* Poor performance under low light (small sensor size)
* Cannot turn of wifi after capture has started
* No onscreen display (would be less of an issue if wifi could be turned off from within app)
* Random lock-ups: inserting an empty SD card would sometimes result in the device displaying "Busy", and getting stuck there.  I had to power-cycle / remove and reinsert card to un-freeze the device.
* Pressing buttons lead to inconsistent behavior: this is one of my biggest pet peeves, and is reported by others.  A long press "should" start a "time lapse" capture, but sometimes it starts a video (should be short-press), and sometimes turns the camera off.  I need a camera that does what I ask it to, the first time, without questions.  The Session failed spectacularly at this.
* Inability to take simple pictures - since short-press starts a movie, it's not really possible to take snap-shots with this camera.  Which is annoying.

Given all the glowing reviews, I was seriously disappointed in this device.  There are other, cheaper, better devices available.  They are marginally less cute, but significantly more capable.
2030478
Sixty bucks  --  poof!  I lost mine in short order. The attachment clip isn't a secure solution.  It needs an additional,  molded-in eye for a lanyard.  Also, it's awkward to operate, it should give audio tones to signal shutdown & startup.
I couldn't find a way to archive files onboard without renaming them.  Lastly, SYRYN did a proforma quality followup for the purchase itself.  It was an email with a spooky cloaked email address.  I don't open obviously cloaked email.

Almost forgot:  It needs a micro-USB port as an alternative for file loading.  If you lose the supplied hybrid umbilical, rotsa-ruck trying to find one at the corner store.  And Murphy says that it will happen when you desperately need it.  And I'm afraid to contemplate what they charge to replace the $2 "custom" headphones that have a shortened supply cord.
4250929
This device would actually score much higher if it was priced in half or less.  It simply costs too much money for what it does.  Top demerits are its image quality and sneakernet operation.

Image quality is important because you actually want to make out faces you can identify, perhaps even submit for court evidence.  This device really doesn't perform well in this function, with very cheap optics.  It's about the quality of a $10 webcam you can purchase at a discount store.  Again, this would be fine if the overall cost of the product was significantly less.  But that's not the case here.

With this price, I thought there would be a wireless web server at least, to access the images and streams.  Nope, not available.  Instead, one has the old sneakernet option - manually take out the card and review on your computer.  Who wants to do this on a regular basis?  I certainly do not.  I much rather have instant access to a network connected DVR.  Again, not a problem if this was a significantly less expensive item.

Finally, overall construction looks cheap and not commensurate with a quality made product.  I just don't see this as a useful item with its poor quality and no connectivity option.  Someone who sees this thing often will figure out what it does and can plan to swipe out the memory card, leaving all traces of evidence behind.  Useless.
611972
Summary:

This is a cheap device. If you can get it at a discount and aren't discriminating it may meet your needs, but if you care about quality I think it's worth shelling out more for other brands like Anker, RAVPower, or Lepow. You get what you pay for here.

Full review:

I bought this product at a very steep discount during a pre-Christmas sale, intending to give it as a stocking stuffer. Before giving it away, I decided to try it out myself.

I immediately noticed that it just feels cheap physically. The plastic looks flimsy; compare this to Anker or Ravpower and it's just obviously not as well manufactured. This is really not a functional problem, but you're definitely not going to impress anybody when you whip out this thing.

First impressions aside, I plugged in my Nexus 5 to give it a test run. My unit came 75% charged already, and it was ready to go out of the box. It worked with the Nexus 5, but only at a meager .5 amps - the lowly "USB" mode as Android describes it, which is what you get when using the Nexus 5 with generic chargers or those designed for Apple products. I hoped perhaps the other port might fare better, but both resulted in the same slow charge rate.

In this day and age, this is a real negative; you'd expect auto-sensing ports which can negotiate a higher throughput with a wide range of devices. The Nexus 5 isn't an exotic piece of hardware, and I think my experiences should be a warning to other Android users.

The next thing I tested was charging. Many such power banks, like the Lepow Moonstone, will both charge and discharge at the same time; this allows you to top up the power bank without interrupting its output to your device. I actually use this a good bit when traveling, using my power bank as a poor man's extension cord, and thus avoiding the need for more than one wall outlet.

No luck with the SlimJet. When plugged into the wall, the output stops. Bummer.

I charged mine up to full, which took about an hour. One thing I'd love to verify is the "9800 mAh" claim, which I sadly did not get a chance to fully test. False advertising of total capacity is rampant with this sort of product, and based on its overall mediocre impression I am somewhat skeptical of the capacity claims.

Depending on the price paid, this thing might be a decent value, but don't expect a high end product here. If you're going to rely on a power bank, in my opinion it's worth buying better.
2427142
I have tried several brands of these cameras.  They are all pretty cheap and unreliable.  On the Moultrie and another brand, I have had the cheap, plastic tabs which hold the batteries in place bend and snap, rendering the camera useless.  Customer support is frustrating. The user interface and setup/use logic is a real kludge.  No structured thought behind the design at all.  Lenses are cheap plastic and image quality is reminiscent of the crappy 'spy cameras' that were sold in magazine ads in the 1960's.

If there is someone out there with design and manufacturing ability to produce a quality alternative, you could charge five-times what these toy camera vendors charge.  Until then, there really are no good, reliable alternatives.  Save your money.
2665233
I returned this item after trying it out for a few days. The high end lived up the the advertising hype, but the bass and "sound isolation" were unacceptable. Both my stock iPod headphones from Apple and my $10 set of Koss headphones did better at both tasks.
Although Shure SE210's are advertised as "sound isolating" - don't believe it. They do no better at "sound isolating" than any other earphones with foam earpieces - earpieces made with the sort of foam used in those squishy earplugs. Shure gives you a whole bunch of different earpieces, but only the foam ones seemed to work at all. The thin silicon-rubber ones with flanges were useless and kept coming out of my ears, and the ones that looked like little white christmas trees were the worst.
The earphones came with a short cord that was just too short to comfortable allow my iPod to sit in my shirt pocket. That meant I had to use the extension cord and coil it up.
This would be an acceptable bargain for an under $50 earphone, and at that price, I'd give them 2, maybe 3 stars. But at $150, they are a poor value, and don't rate more than one star.
3235402
As soon as you pick up these headphones, you will realize that they were a mistake.  They have the structural Integrity you would expect from a $5 pair of Headphones.  The cups are awkwardly sized to the point where they do not seal large ears and put pressure on small ears.  Their sound quality is comparable to Grado/Sennheiser/Beyer phones in the $50 range, not the $150 range.  In the $150 range, you have MANY better choices.  Avoid these phones like the plague.
643124
CON:
1) Comes with battery installed.  Mine had dropped to 1.3V from 1.55V, so consider you'll have to spend $5 to get a good battery (if you do, it uses L1131/LR54, NOT "LR44").
2) Visible only at certain tilted angles.  No way to improve by putting something behind it.
3) suction cup useless and doesn't come off.
4) Pictures are misleading - it's much bigger than shown.

PRO:
1) a button changes between C and F
2) Came 10 days ahead of best-case date (to New England)

I'd return it but not worth the bother.
3992617
Just borderline ok. I kind of want to give it 2 stars, but for your use, maybe it's ok.

Pro:
price point
cost
great design

Con:
Meh sound; too "tinny"
Pairing two without the cable -- was supposed to work which may have led me to keep it, but after 1/2 hour, no go

My two bits:
Save up to spend more on a superior device such as the bose mini. Or, just get one you'll take with you out in nowhere. Honestly, I had purchased a smaller device (didn't pair with another but then....neither do these), with FAR SUPERIOR quality at $40.

Seriosly, this $40 unit kicked this products butt.
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B01D5BM7OM/ref=oh_aui_search_detailpage?ie=UTF8&psc=1
834610
There isn't any innovation or improvement here. Search with it's original name- about $5