The question is what do they rule
596080
I listened and found this dvd lacked any type of enthusiasm. I believe the band will be better if they got rid of natalie, her performance on this video was weak and for the ringo starr of the dixie chicks. She is lucky that the rest of the band makes up for her lack of talent.
The approach to this video was one where ego trumped talent, knowing that it will sell no matter what was on it.
I played once and dumped it
1569454
The questions seem to deal with the more obscure components of the rules.  For my purposes it would have been more useful to retain the rigor, but with a more balanced approach.
3679965
Required reading for those who control funding for the United States Veterans Administration and military.  And for those who send the military to war.  This lets you know what those soldiers, sailors, airmen and marines endure.
1145150
Well written and sourced. It is a Attkinson tour de force! Tells you who the players are on both sides and tells you the rules that govern the game. Because both sides are playing against the American public and you need to know who wants you to believe what in today's climate of BS and outright lies.
1456399
It provides good information how decision are made at the executive level.  It is not the kind of book that I could not put down, but when I had time i enjoyed it.
2161680
Haven't completed the read but it is an interesting narrative of power and influence. I had often wondered where President came up with positions that were previously had opposed.
4097125
It is a book that make one think. It runs counter to what we are told and think we know. That is what makes the text interesting. Recommend reading it.
283805
The Judge tells it like it is on government intrusion into almost everything it can get it's hands on. Using the excuse that, "you need us to do this for you", the judge reviews why the government tries to create winners and losers. He also breaks down how the over-reach of government is in many cases against the law taking the power from the states and transferring that power unconstitutionally to the Federal government. A GREAT READ very well laid out and factually based on previous cases decided in the courts.
4952755
A coherent look at the role of government and effective regulation in a ROI driven world. Building on the authors earlier work, Nudge, the book takes you into the challenges and approaches used by the Obama Administration to evaluate rule making and regulatory decisions. It shows what is possible, and the pitfalls of policy. A good read.
1756942
How the author tells the truth,it is up to the reader to own up to it and do something about it.
3036489
How do you determine who started a conflict when all your family members can travel through time and to alternate timelines, and when one rival clan can read and influence and erase minds, and another rival clan can foretell the future well enough to anticipate and re-do their future mistakes? Instead of asking who is at fault, is it not better to ask and answer larger questions? I will definitely be re-reading this novel again in search of enlightenment.
315120
With a ruling from the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in California outlawing our Pledge of Allegiance because it contains the words, "one nation under God," and the case of Lawrence v. Texas in which a constitutionally protected 'right' to sodomy was discovered, there couldn't be a more informative and timely book or a better author on the subject of law, precedent, and the role of the judiciary in America.  Robert Bork presents factual evidence of worldwide judicial tyranny.
  While the 11th Circuit puts the 10 Commandments in the closet in Alabama and the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals finds that a 4-year-old had no right to give out pencils that said "Jesus loves the little children" as Easter presents to classmates, we must ask ourselves: are we ruled by Law or by Men?  To quote the author from one interview, "The nations in the West are increasingly governed not by law or elected representatives, but by unelected, unrepresentative, unaccountable committees of lawyers applying the law in accordance with nothing other than their own will."
  How will you decide this issue of judicial activism?  Will you champion various court decisions because they align with your worldview, despite the consequences to our unique constitutional form of government in America and the delicate balance of power and culture between nations?  U.S. Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy cited *foreign* court rulings as a basis (in part) for his decision in Lawrence v. Texas, and Ruth Bater Ginsberg was later quoted affirming and defending that practice.  The New York Times has reported openly and approvingly that judges are engaging in a "worldwide constitutional conversation."

  Research through the pages of this book what in the world is going on with the judiciary.  Become informed about why the unique foundations of American law and jurisprudence are vital to the freedoms we all hold dear and to civilization as we know it.
692138
Another stephaniereads.com choice. Gives you two stories : one at a time when women were deemed legally powerless by their government - and two generations later when they continued to be thought of as secondary in their rights; this proves that strong women always knew that, whatever they were dealt in life,  they could control their own destiny. It also gives a great history of why French perfumes are thought of as the best.
4172184
One of the greatest things about this book is the selective inclusion of case studies. Rather than have a book full of opinions, the authors stick to leading court cases where the opinions are the rule. It is these ruling of the high courts that shape the practices of criminal law, because they set the standard for how we interpret the US Constitution.

The Constitution of the USA includes rules governing criminal procedure, such as the 5th and 6th amendments, all the way to more recent ones regarding the salaries of Senators. This book specifically shows how the Supreme Court interprets the Constitutions effects on criminal trials. In the third chapter, on the subject of arrest, search, and seizure, we use the case of Herring v. United States (2009). The majority opinion was that the Exclusionary Rule (again, an interpretation of the law) didn't bar evidence found during an arrest, even if the arrest was based on an invalid warrant. Any high school student who recently took US Government will probably say but hang on, in Mapp v. Ohio, didn't the court say that..? Given, the case of Mapp set up rules for searching houses, but Judge Roberts wrote that an arrest of a known criminal (Herring was well-known to the police) based on a mistaken warrant wasn't unreasonable. Some examples are rather humorous, such as California v. Greenwood, which ruled that bags of garbage can be taken by the police and searched without a warrant. According to Judge Byron White, trash bags on the curb aren't protected by privacy.

Further chapters include Supreme Court cases regarding pretrial confinement, confessions, interrogations, and even conflicts of interest in criminal defense attorneys. The book contains carefully selected Supreme Court cases, each one specific to the interpretation of part of the Bill of Rights. Anyone studying criminal law must use this book, because it goes to great lengths to explain how the courts interpret the law.
473283
Great summary of the role of elders in the church. I read this with my elders this past week. If anything he over plays his hand about this being the only way - but at least he is confident in his opinion.
2344066
gr8 rules to live by on a daily routine. they give 1 a guide to follow which we all need @ times. good read.
887951
The material of this book is pretty decent, but the wording of the questions can be relatively unclear at times, making you wonder, what exactly are they asking sometimes.