Whoever reprinted this must have been illiterate
581693
Whoever reprinted this must have been illiterate.  There are numerous typo errors, missing text sections, no page numbers, misspellings not in the original, etc.  Even the printer's name is blocked out.  Is this even legal?  lol  Great book, garbage printer.  I had to return it.
182725
It seems that whoever wrote this has an education barely beyond Lucas, but that's what I've encountered on Kindle. Huge misspellings and sentence structure anomalies that don't seem organic to the actual author.
2872303
This guy needed and editor to go through his copy...almost a ripoff
4967110
The copy and reprint of this book is worse than any I have ever seen. It seems to be poorly scanned???
most words are mis-printed typos like an optical scanner was not able to interpret them?

Could I have possibly received a mistake publication??
1736064
I ordered a reprint from Kessinger Publishing of "The Madman" and find that it is not reprinted like the original.  Instead, some juvenile editor arranged the sequence of chapters and lines to fit the warped ideas found in his mind.  That gives him or her a boost up by assuming that he or she has a mind.  Kessinger should be ashamed to call this a "Legacy Reprint."  I ordered the book from Barnes and Noble and will return it for a refund.

Lew R. Cook
Phoenix, AZ
3560847
Being intimately familiar with the original publication of this trilogy, I can say with utmost disdain that whoever was responsible for taking the liberties of rewriting what was very nearly perfection must have a great fondness for soap operas and should stick with romance novels instead. Not only are there additional passages inserted that were never written by Conrad Richter, there are also altered meanings of existing passages that totally change the flavor and the original intent. There are so many instances in all three volumes that I don't even know where to begin with examples. This is by far the most appalling reprint of an award-winning piece of historical fiction I have ever witnessed. You would do better to find a used copy from the original publisher, Alfred A. Knopf, Inc.
2595145
The book's formatting appears to have been crudely done through the use of MS Word.  It's abundantly apparent that this text is no more than a copy and paste from internet sources with no actual authentication at any level being conducted.  Now, with that harsh sentence, may I add another: yes, it appears Forgotten Books did indeed find several editions of the The Key of Solomon the King through various online sources.  These pdf and text documents were likely cross-examined and compared with one another.  However, just by reading this work, it is obvious it does not come from King Solomon or was it placed under the scrutiny that I would expect when purchasing a book entitled, "The Key of Solomon the King".

The text is horribly inconsistent, shoddy, and unlike the other translated works of MacGregor Mathers.  Please DO check out other books about the work and even the practices of King Solomon.  I am sure you will find them horribly informative and interesting.  I even recommend "Abramelin the Mage" if you want a very decent perspective into those particular workings.  But please, DO NOT encourage these sorts of pedantic plagiarism as have been evidenced by Forgotten Books' printing of the Key of Solomon the King.  WHOMEVER they stole their source material from, they should properly source vice claiming origin.
3549390
The review by "Anna O" is spot on.  Unlike my previous "Dummies" purchases, this book is printed on cheap recycled paper, rough and flimsy.  The print is impossibly small, with the tabs nearly illegible.  Odd, given that the margins are excessively wide around the staff lines.  So they could easily have made the print larger without adding any more pages.

Whether the exercises are of any value remains to be seen.  But if the text can't be read, who would ever know?
730773
This has obviously been translated by a program from Spanish to English, and no proofreading was done. Had I paid money for this, I'd be getting it back from Amazon pronto, as this is a lousy excuse for an ebook. As it is, it happened to be free today, so no money was wasted, but I WILL be deleting it from my collection.
1568110
Impossible to read tiny print. Directions must have been written by a non-English speaking person.
3149089
The text is very clumsy, and reads like it is translated from a foreign language.  For example, about 19% in, it reads, "With intermittent fasting, your body works differently when you fasting to when you are feasting".  Shouldn't that be "...when you ARE fasting COMPARED to...."?  This book has the most typos and missing words I've ever seen in a commercial offering.  The content may be good, but this is very shoddy.  If the author is this lazy, can I really trust what he says?
887980
I think all these instruction manuals are written by people who have no common sense or have no ability to explain in plain English.
3070768
I was hoping to see the benefits of reading as to listening. With mild dyslexia, this book was a disgustingly missrepresented. Confusing, annoying, pedantic and insulted the readers intelligence. Well I suppose I deserve it for not reviewing it before I read it.
2715325
Who gave this book five stars?? Honestly, I might have rated it higher if I'd been able to read it. The list of ingredients is printed in a tiny pale grey CURSIVE font that is impossible to read without a magnifying glass and a super power high beam. Wasn't there an editor? Didn't anybody proof the galley?
2101578
The world of self publishing is great. However folks really need to utilize spell and grammar check. I only read a portion of the sample offered and decided not to even bother with the rest. Really Amazon... this is what you sell to the public?
1134891
This is a reprint of F. Storr's 1912 translation of a number of works. It wasn't clear to me that it was a 1912 reprint, so perhaps it's my own fault for ordering it. That said, I can't recommend it to anyone. The language is too dated to give contemporary readers a genuine sense of any of the writers. Even at $0.00 it is not worth having.
707951
The print is ridiculously tiny and skewed relative to the page; it has the appearance of being photocopied. There is neither information about the publisher nor the copyright information that you'd normally expect to find in the front of a book. The only clue about the publisher is a notice on the final page: "Made in the USA, San Bernardino, CA, 13 March 2014" (the date is after the date of my order, so the book was clearly printed on demand). Is there a reason the publisher is hiding his identity? I'm grateful that Amazon is giving me a refund without requiring me to return the book; it's going straight into my recycle bin.