Higher Cost, Lower Quality
597857
Lacking in some of the qualities of our previous Ab Lounge which we bought many years ago,  even though this one cost more.
791247
no more or less.  average quality.  they only last so long when used daily.  we never know if its worth it to spend more or not
3486504
Not as nice as a set of full trees - but lower price.
4282737
These ones are much thinner and lower quality than some of the more expensive ones that come in the bamboo box.
4007427
As much as I would like to give high marks to this product in respect to Cost and Quality, I just can not.  I installed these about 2 months ago. For the first 500 or so pages, I thought we had a winner, but as I approached 700 pages, I started to notice some fading of the print.  At first I wasn't sure of which cartridge(s) were affected.  I took them all out - shuck them good and put them back in - it did not help.  By 1000 pages, the problem became more pronounced.  Black was fading badly and was no longer acceptable for what I consider a good business presentation.  The other colors are acceptable, but not as sharp as when they were first installed.

My bottom line evaluation - Don't Buy these - The Cost to Quality ratio just doesn't make good business sense.
166730
Thought the higher cost would yield a more high quality binocular.  They are OK but not worth the extra expense.
2197399
The quality is generally consistent, but C&E has jacked the price up 2X to 5X from when I first purchased these in several different lengths and quantities (perhaps after some favorable reviews).  They are no longer competitive and, while most are flexible and above average, some are stiff and sub-par for sure.  Pricing is seriously hit or miss and mostly miss.

UPDATE:  I dropped this to 1 star as it's been a couple years since I first purchased these.  These are no longer fully booted, and C&E just seems to be sourcing whatever cheap Chinese cables they want.  Just get some other reputable cable here on Amazon. You can get the same or better cables faster and half the price.
2076112
I still think I should've looked for a less expensive option. They're okay, but the price is high for what you're getting.
2693927
It could be brighter,better off spending more for a quality.
1080457
Quality is not as good as expected in terms of filter density and price was higher than I would expect for this caliber filter.
264221
The quality is not worth the price they are charging. Did not last more than 6 months with moderate usage before  breaking.
1353425
If ~$10, I'd give these 4 stars, but +$20, it's 3.  The comfort is ok, and to be honest at the low end of the price spectrum, that's really all I care about (that and not being worse audio-wise than what you get with your iPods).  A few weeks of use has seen my try some different tips, which seems to have found a nice comfortable (2-3 hours of use comfortable) fit.  That's the good news--well that and the Amazon frustration free packaging.  The neither good nor bad news is that they're decent enough sound wise.

Now for the bad news, they already seemed to have seen better days after a few weeks.  That kind of quality is unacceptable.  The units themselves are falling apart (ironically where the image above says "meticulous craftsmanship) and the cable seems about ready to snap.  This isn't cool even for $10.  I can be worried about these failing on the go, so they're off to die in a drawer unless I become desperate.

I could offer a more detailed review, but really it isn't necessary.  There are better cheap headphones than these.  Look elsewhere.
4250929
This device would actually score much higher if it was priced in half or less.  It simply costs too much money for what it does.  Top demerits are its image quality and sneakernet operation.

Image quality is important because you actually want to make out faces you can identify, perhaps even submit for court evidence.  This device really doesn't perform well in this function, with very cheap optics.  It's about the quality of a $10 webcam you can purchase at a discount store.  Again, this would be fine if the overall cost of the product was significantly less.  But that's not the case here.

With this price, I thought there would be a wireless web server at least, to access the images and streams.  Nope, not available.  Instead, one has the old sneakernet option - manually take out the card and review on your computer.  Who wants to do this on a regular basis?  I certainly do not.  I much rather have instant access to a network connected DVR.  Again, not a problem if this was a significantly less expensive item.

Finally, overall construction looks cheap and not commensurate with a quality made product.  I just don't see this as a useful item with its poor quality and no connectivity option.  Someone who sees this thing often will figure out what it does and can plan to swipe out the memory card, leaving all traces of evidence behind.  Useless.
1428445
I'm disappointed as these are supposed to be 3M Filtrete filters.  I'm not sure why, but these are not the same quality I can buy at the local home improvement store for almost the same cost.  The reinforcement on the furnace side is poor, so they sag badly under flow pressure (I have a down flow furnace, but that shouldn't matter).  In addition, once a month replacement during the winter is normal for us (we have lots of critters), but I find every two weeks is the limit on these before the furnace blower begins to strain.

For the few cents apiece more they run locally I'm going back to the locally available filters - I wont' be ordering these "sight unseen" again.
442527
This Klipsch speaker set replaced a set of promptly returned Logitech Z623 speakers. These aren't much better, unfortunately. I've already sent them back once for warranty replacement. First set had an intermittent issue where peaks in audio caused a loud popping sound. So quality control is strike one. Sound is muddy. If the highs were a bit more prominent it would balance the sound out. No EQ to accomplish this. Sound quality is strike two. If these were a little bit cheaper I'd give them 3 stars, but they're on the expensive end for a basic 2.1 speaker system, so price is strike three. Had I not already been through this with a couple of other brand's models, I would have probably returned these as well, but I was tired of dealing with sending stuff back so I kept these out of exhaustion more than contentment with my purchase.
2803700
This towel is soft and good for buffing, but for the price there are much better alternatives.  First, these are soft towels, but the quality is lacking for the price.  The outer edge is come kind of cotton that attracts lint, not microfiber or silk.  I also found some of the stitching around the edge was coming undone after only 2-3 uses/washes.  For the very high price, I would not buy more of these, my Pluffle microfiber towels are way better.
3850645
The reason being that Ive got to assume that much of the cost is in the actual hardware of the cartridge  these two little brightly colored green and pink rolls, at 10 feet each, are a very poor value at this writing as compared to the black on white 23 foot rolls Im used to.

Worse, with both rolls I had to deal with a bit of stickiness at the start, so that letters piled atop each other in fits and starts.  See my uploaded customer image:  its only a few inches, but when youve paid for ten feet in each color, the loss of half a foot at the start subjectively feels like a lot.  And yes, Ive had that happen with the black on white tapes now and again, but to have both rolls stick as much as they did was unfortunate.  Tightening the tape using the gear control helped a little.  I also had to pull out some length of tape with the green to lick the issue, and in both cases the tape was properly held within the guides.

Print Quality is comparable to that of my Brother PT70, using an OEM tape cartridge also in the Brother.  In both cases, theres an annoyingly long margin before and after the text, a problem that would be much less vexing if the cost-per-inch was lower.  But these Dymo refills have it all over the Brother for ease of removing the paper backing from the sticky side, as the Dymos are split all the way down horizonally along the tape.  With the Brother, you're fighting to pry up a corner of the cut label with a thumbnail, which almost inevitably leads to touching the sticky part, and leaving skin oils to affect adhesion.  I had to push down one corner of the P-Touch label in the picture I took, three times, before it would completely adhere to the paper, and of course that corner may still be vulnerable to peeling.  Point there for the Dymo.