Great! 2013 is better
596682
The only reason I give this a 4/5 is because I got a crack at the 2013 version. They're the same, but the 2013 layout is much smoother thus making it easier to read and study. Other than that little tid bit, this is by far the best review book for the NPTE.
878643
The last time someone reviewed this 'Holy Grail' disc, dinosaurs still ruled the earth, the global economy was in fine shape and hunting bankers with an assault rifle was still illegal. Ah, for those good old days!

After years of hunting, I finally procured a copy. So, how does it stack up in 2013? Is it all hype? Is it really worth seriously funny money? Now read on to find out...

Er... it's not hype, this is a classic disc, both sonically and musically. Sonics first - three spaced omnis, tube electronics, minimal processing and straight to high-speed 1/2 inch analogue tape. Then straight to DSD for SACD mastering. IMO this almost defines an optimal signal path, and the results do not lie. This is possibly the closest I have ever heard a digital source get to the sound of great analogue playback.

If you think it's going to sound like a 3-mike Mercury from the same period, however, you'd be dead wrong. It hasn't got the bomb-proof dynamics and pile-driving bass of the best of that breed. However, it trumps that with qualities that most Mercs can only dream of - space, air, epic staging (including scary stage depth), neutral, flowing mid-range and a delightful, liquid and airy treble.

Sonically, it just rocks.

And then there's the music. A really eclectic, varied and fun-filled program. A Villa Lobos starter that sounds like Honegger's Pacific 231 on salsa, the dark, mysterious Antill which comes at you like an Antipodean Rite of Spring, and then two tuneful, exciting Ginastera ballet suites that make you want to run out and find more music from this mysteriously neglected composer.

Oh, and then we add some fine playing by the LSO. Even in this low-profile period of the late 50s, it was then - as now - still a world-class band.

With all this going for it, plus undoubted rarity value, you can perhaps beginning to see why it changes hands for the big bucks.
1103893
I love this calendar, but the 2007 edition is a disappointment -- most of January, so far, consists of re-runs of December, 2006.  Ok, they re-run some of the cartoons periodically and some are classics, but really, are they running out of material?  It's very noticeable since the duplicates aren't even a month apart, and it's annoying and gives an impression of cheapness.
1295746
It is nice.  But I am returning it.  Wrong one for the 2013.  This is for the 2015.
2500555
I get this calendar every year.  Hate to say it, but 2011's Calendar left me underwhelmed.  Luckily they made up for it this year.  Great calendar.
260627
I chose the 2014 version (over the 2013 version) after a great deal of research. When I was buying, the prices were nearly the same.

2014 has less zipper pockets, which I'm disappointed with, organization should be a pretty big deal with a bag. The 2014 version's shoulder pad also looks cheaper.

However, the Cordura material and compression straps won me over. I'm neutral on the choice to put the buckles under the flap, it makes access more difficult, but has a cleaner look. I am very glad for the grab handles (one on front, one on back), I thought the complaints about the 2013's lack of them were unwarranted, but the handles really are nice to have when not riding/walking.

I don't really like the way the cross strap tends to pinch the width of the shoulder strap, the buckle should attach in a better way to prevent this. I'm not sure how well the old version's adjustable strap works, but I am not yet able to make it work as smoothly as advertised. It has already popped open once, I hope it doesn't happen again. The places where the shoulder strap connect to the bag are stiff and sharp from the , I can feel the material edge scrape my shoulder through thin clothing. There is hardly any padding in the bag, which keeps it light, but I'm a bit worried about keeping a computer in it, even with a slip case.

I think the 'medium' size I purchased is not only a good choice, but described accurately. So many people said the 'medium' was 'huge' I got very worried. Time to start making paper mockups of everything I buy, because it matches the measurements on Timbuk2's site perfectly. I think the medium size is perfect, and the photos of the 'Diablo' color scheme perfectly matches the bag in reality.
2239119
2013 did correct a number of issues I had with 2010, such as screen refreshes while reconciling.  The mobile app so far has worked fine.  It does seem though that Quicken makes changes from one release (how to do or access certain features) to another just for the sake of change.
3171327
I bought and used the 2005 version that had a "crowd level calender" that broke crowd levels down to the day. It was pretty much on the money.  Planning again for a 2008 visit, I bought the 2008 edition. All I found was a crappy 1/4 page graph on page 34. Extreamly dissapointed.
4783508
Good work; virtually identical to Office 2013. Of little value if you have 2013
4883419
Selections were often based on politically correct criteria rather than the 'best' stories of 2012. Get an editor with more sophistication for 2013
843116
I love Boston Terriers but I don't display last years calendar . The 2013 was not hard for me to see before ordering this one , Pictures are cute any way .
2053333
I'd go 3.5 - agree with the other review, more about layering the 2014 cars/teams onto the previous game mechanics. But you do get 2 new tracks - Red Bull ring in Austria and Sochi in Russia. Handling is modified to reflect the high torque and so demands a different style of driving. Some new scenario mode challenges for variety. AI is a bit different - can't yet say better. Supposedly tweeked to allow game controller users to enjoy more - wouldn't know as I only use a wheel - but might be a bit easier in that respect.

2013 is a better value with the F1 classics added, but if you're a hardcore fan, have the spare cash and want to follow the action, go for it.

Hopefully the 2015 edition running on the PS4 will make us all forget this year's weaker offering.
2932469
I made a mistake and bought this calendar thinking it was for 2013.  It's not.  My mistake for sure, but seriously? Why is it still available.
2059359
I like the past Doctor Calendars artwork/photos better than this year's.  It's OK.
3288550
Better than last year's. Missing the cohesive community  and emotional bonds of earlier works. Although matching the terror, beauty and ultimate grace of How the Light Gets In will probably always be a challenge.
164090
I was expecting the worst when my 2011 version would no longer accept imported bank data. I bit the bullet and reluctantly bought 2014, expecting the upgrade would corrupt all old data and be less usable than 2011. I was surprised that the conversion went smoothly and some of the more annoying quirks of 2011 had been solved. To me seems to be a much better product than 2011 despite what other reviewers say. (I just use for Bank reconcilliation).
3585503
In my opinion, the Nexus 7 (2013) is definitely an improvement over the 2012 version.  I have had my 2012 version for well over two years and have thoroughly enjoyed it.  It still looks like new and runs great, but after reviewing the specs on the 2013 version, I decided I needed to order one.  I AM NOT DISAPPOINTED!  This model is thinner, faster, better display (1920 x 1200) vs (1280 x 800), 2 GB memory - 2012 model only had 1 GB, rear camera and can be charged using a Qi wireless charger!  The Asus Nexus product line have served me well over the past couple of years and I look forward enjoying this model for the next couple of years.  And yes, I would recommend to family and friends!