The camera I received had a very annoying defect that showed yellow tinting
588157
The camera I received had a very annoying defect that showed yellow tinting. I requested another and it had the exact same issue again with the replacement. Otherwise from the poor quality control, the pictures are very nice! For those who receive good copies, I doubt you'll hate the image quality!
728725
The camera worked perfectly fine but it had a scratch on the viewing screen when it arrived! The camera worked perfectly fine though! I ended up returning it and i got fully refunded!
4211713
The monitor performs ok, the only gripe I have with it is that it has a yellow tint to the picture. I have tried to change all the settings surfed the web to find fixes, but everything I have tried will not fix the issue. That is why I took off two stars, if it wasn't for that I would have gave it a 5 star rating.
3851958
Two of the cameras had a red tint to the picture right out of the box. I've seen some issues about the ir filter getting stuck and was able to get one of the camaras to function normally by tapping it on the side gently with my hand.  No such luck with the third camara.  Still has a permanent red filter on the picture
2827914
Definitely a horrible experience. I purchased this camera and found everything in the package when I received it, but as I tried to use the camera I noticed the built-in flash did not work. I contacted both Ritz Camera and Amazon to see if I could exchange the camera and both kept referring me to the other. I was also told to contact canon and send my camera there for repair but I think it is unfair that I paid the price of a new camera and instead received a refurbished one. I am very upset especially since I spent so much money on a defective product. I am sending it back for a full refund as soon as I can.
551420
I'm having the exact same problem with the camera as mentioned about where the system error comes on and makes the clicking noise.
1192796
I used this camera in Florida in semi-humid conditions.  It was a three-day shoot and at the end of the first day, the LCD and Viewfinder went black.  The camera was still sending the clean signal through the HDMI but there was no way to change settings.  I got back from my shoot and contacted Sony.  Long story short is that the camera was returned from Sony's repair place saying that it was "Beyond Economical Repair" because there was internal corrosion.  The camera was never exposed directly to liquid and all I can think is that it was the humidity.

Bottom line is that Sony is not honoring the warranty due to the corrosion.  So, after only owning the camera for a few months, I now have a brick on my hands.  Because the only thing I did was use it in normal conditions, I'm totally bummed and disappointed in Sony.

I'm guessing that at least my camera had some problem with weatherproofing, but after a little googling, I found others with my same problem.  So, I would be careful with this camera as it is susceptible to moisture.
2810931
I wanted to like this camera and have owned at least six other small Panasonic cameras in the past. Recent experiences with Panasonic and now the Z40 will keep me away from Panasonic. The big problem: the camera screen would not go on after having taken about 30 pictures prior to this problem occurring. I know how to use a camera including the button that is supposed to turn the screen on and off. Even the viewfinder was dark. I tried turning the camera off for 15 minutes and even removing and re-inserting the card and battery. Nothing worked and I was not able to take pictures. A few hours later the same day, I turned the camera on and it worked fine. I have never had a camera before that failed me during an important camera session while traveling. While I like the feel of the camera and the image quality of pictures taken in good lighting were sharp, I cannot trust that it will work properly in the future so I will be returning the camera after owning it less than a month.
3692046
The camera works really good during the day, but the night mode sucks. In night mode it seems to pick up every single molecule of dust. The dust becomes large white splotches on the image.

I contacted Amcrest and they charged me $15 to do an RMA. I got the new camera and it has the same problem, so it must be a design flaw.

I asked for a refund and they said it was past the 30 day return period so I couldn't get a refund. Since most of that time was taken up in the RMA process that is stupid.

I have other cameras from other manufacturers in the same environment and none of them have this problem.

I will never buy another Amcrest camera again.
124365
Showed up with a dead pixel that is accompanied by a faint discoloration throughout the rest of the row
1804524
The machine is good but i don't know how to adjust the colors. the capture picture is yellowish either from negative nor slides.
414682
My D600 has been in the shop twice before for spots on the sensor and they still refuse to replace it.  This time I'm sure they will "fix" it for sure.  What a shame, an otherwise great camera with a tragic fatal flaw.  Nikon should be ashamed.
4829155
I really do like this camera, as it's fun to tote around while traveling or even just for every day use; however, all of my film is coming back with considerable light leaks.  I realized (after getting my film back of course) that the back of the camera is warped, so that light is being let in through the back.  Kind of disappointing, since I paid what would be considered top dollar for this camera.  I just feel that the seller should've maybe tested the camera before saying it was in excellent condition, or at least been honest about it.
2411406
It's an old camera sorely in need of repair.  I owned one from 2003 to 2008 and absolutely loved it.  Great pictures every time in all sorts of light conditions.  This one however did not focus, would not show pictures on the flash card, showed incorrect colors on pictures and all had a purple tinge to them.  The seller was great and instantly refunded the purchase price and shipping with no questions asked.
2936064
I was so happy with my D600 for about 3 weeks, but then spots appeared on the sensor. My camerain currently "in shop" fora repair. I would stay away from this camera until Nikon has an updated version.
4532852
The picture gives the impression this is a NEW camera replacement.  In fact, the camera I received was a USED camera, COVERED in skin particles and obviously had been removed from a phone.  Eww.  Very disappointed in this false advertising.  I need to install a camera, so I guess I will install this one AFTER I clean it, will update review with functional report then.

UPDATE:  This camera has defects in the lens, introducing spots at the top of the image, it does not focus well and has WORSE low-light purpling than the original camera.  VERY disappointed.  I do not recommend buying this part, or other parts from this vendor.
665678
I bought this camera (pink colored) from a local store. When I opened the camera it didn't work correctly and instead of just trying to return it to the store I followed the instructions inside the package stating that I shouldn't return the camera to the store and instead should contact Kodak support. HUGE MISTAKE! I was directed to send the camera to a repair facility (at my own cost I might add) and told they would fix it and send it back. I received a letter from the repair facility stating that they couldn't fix the camera and that Kodak would send me a replacement camera. Kodak indeed sent me a different camera; one that was refurbished and a different color. I specifically bought the camera because it was pink as I already have a silver one. I called Kodak customer service which was another joke. I could barely hear or understand the people. In addition, I was told that they had no pink in the C813 so I was out of luck. They told me the had a cheaper model C713 in pink that they could send me instead. I asked for a refund since this isn't what I had originally purchased and they told me they couldn't do that, that only the store I had purchased it from could've provided me with a refund but since I followed their instructions (sending the camera in for repair), I no longer have the original camera to return in order to get a refund!!!! I looked on this website for a refurbished C813 in pink and what do you know, they have one!! When I pointed this out to the guy on the phone, he told me that this website and the warehouse where they were sending my replacement from were two different entities and therefore I still couldn't get the camera I wanted. So in the end, my options were to either keep the silver one that I didn't want or suck it up and take the cheaper one in pink. I really wanted a pink one, so I'm out the $10 price difference, the difference in camera features and the original cost of shipping the camera for repair. They did arrange for UPS to pick up the old camera at their expense, after I told them I wasn't paying to return a second camera. I guess the moral of my story is that if you buy a camera that doesn't work, insist that the store you bought it from take it back; DO NOT send it to Kodak for repair because who knows what you'll end up with after all is said and done!!
UPDATE: So the pink C713 I was suppose to get never arrived; instead they sent me back the Silver C813. Obviously the communication within Kodak stinks because they thought I sent the C813 in for repair! They returned the camera with a note that stated "we found your camera to be in working order...." when it was in fact suppose to be exchanged for the pink one. AGGGGGHHHH! I give up!!!!