Not satisfied with performance.
597373
I hoped it would work better, but it fails to cut the lid free. May be out of round cans or something else, but leaves sections of lid still attached.
2250372
First of all, this is not really a docking station.  To be truthful, I am not sure what it is.  I plugged in my wireless mouse, keyboard into this whatever it is and plugged my monitor into the HDMI port.  The theory is you just need to connect to this unit with a USB 3.0 port.  OK fine.  The problem is the performance stinks.  The wireless mouse is very sluggish.  It works much better when the wireless dongle is plugged directly into my laptop.  The video kind of works.  Sometimes it works great.  Other times it doesn't work at all.  In that case you either have to power cycle the unit, re--install the driver, or sprinkle it with pixie dust and cross your fingers.  Very disappointed with this. Don't waste your money on this.
1736024
Not happy with the performance - i'd go with a different brand
3944603
I had high hopes but this device doesn't work well for me. It killed my Linux partition (permanently--the drivers led to kernel panics, etc.) and drowns out nearby devices in the room. Connection speeds are not what I expected.
1901428
Ordered on Amazon.  This product did not perform as I had hoped so I returned it.
4528968
After reading all the positive reviews where people state they were getting about 180+ MB/s Read and 80+ MBs Write I purchased this product. After benchmarking this device on multiple machines I have determined I am about 1/3 of that performance.  See attached screen shot.  Definitely can't recommend this product with these speed results.
1629875
I'm a little disappointed in the performance of the unit, it probably has some great applications and I'm certain I will find a good use for it.  Some crackling during normal use.
296255
I bought two of these units for my and my wife's computers.  Work fine for storage array but they have several issues that make it so I would not recommend this to others.
1) The fans run 100% of the time at over 60dB if the unit is connected to the computer.  Even with no HDDs installed.  If you want quiet, desktop storage, this ain't it.
2) Performance: Drobo mini connected by 10Gbps Thunderbolt cable with 4 6Gbps SATA3 HDDs and 1 SATA3 mSATA flash drive yields only about 180MB/s write and 256MB/s readd (for a 4GB file).  When I called Drobo that was the expected number.  Maybe I'm expecting too much but that seems WAY too low performance.
3) The Thunderbolt port does not daisy-chain properly the power-signal from the computer does not get relayed to the monitor properly when the computer puts the monitor in energy-saver mode.  My dvi-based monitor connected by apple-brand adapter would never go to sleep.  This leads into
4) Drobo support SUCKS.  After more than a month of back and forth they finally could no longer blame anything but their device.  As soon as we got to that point they stopped responding to emails, stopped taking my calls, etc.  It has been a further month of trying to get a response and my monitor still won't work when connected to the Drobo.
1822861
It did not work properly.  The OTG port would not connect to my PC.  I expected better performance from this product.
4288073
I brought this NAS drive with lot of excitement. I am disappointed with the performance and annoyed with the vibration it creates.
The transfer rate to the NAS drive is way too slow.
2954028
Didn't perform well for me. Under load, wifi hangs for several seconds. For many things this is okay, for gaming or anything sensitive to latency (like video conferencing), it's very problematic.
1689717
Can't believe I'm posting a 1 star, but the performance on this card is intolerable for me. After using this card for 2 weeks, I've found my fps is consistently very low in comparison to other reviews. I've went as far as running a clean install of Windows 7 with only the most current Nvidia driver installed, and I am still suffering from the same poor performance (25-35fps on Far Cry 4 at very high). After benchmarking on Unigine Heaven 4.0 (Extreme Preset), I received a score of 1058, while others report a score of ~1700. I've submitted an online inquiry to ASUS but have yet to receive a response after 3 days. I really hope I can gain some attention here from either ASUS or Amazon as I'm very upset over a card which should've blown my previous GPU out of the water, but that doesn't seem to be the case.

My Specs:
OS
Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit SP1
PSU
Antec Earthwatts 650W
CPU
Intel Core i5 4690 @ 3.50GHz 42 C
Haswell 22nm Technology
RAM
8.00GB Single-Channel DDR3 @ 799MHz (10-10-10-27)
Motherboard
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Z97-A (SOCKET 1150) 28 C
Graphics
ASUS VN247 (1920x1080@60Hz)
4095MB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 (ASUStek Computer Inc) 62 C
Storage
465GB Western Digital WDC WD5000AAKS-00A7B2 ATA Device (SATA) 35 C
Optical Drives
HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GH24NSB0 ATA Device
Audio
High Definition Audio Device
229251
I was lazy and decided to get this processor instead of upgrading my entire rig (still have a 939 socket mobo) and now I really regret it.

After listening to claims that this processor is still able to "run through almost anything I throw at it" and "gets the job done, even now" from different people I decided to buy this since I did not want to buy a new mobo and ram. Needless to say, i'm not impressed with this processor after upgrading from the 4200+. I expected to over clock this thing to 3ghz on a high end fan but after a day of tweaking and testing, I can't go any higher than 2.8ghz stable. I feel sorry for all the people that bought this thing when it was $600-$800 as the performance is hardly better than my 4200+ overclocked to 2.55ghz.

Long story short. Go buy newer (better) processors that are much cheaper than this primitive cpu, don't be lazy and just upgrade everything. But I'm sure most of you already knew that.

Other than that, it got here fast enough and matched the description.
4493469
Owned Linksys products for 20 years.  This is the first time a Linksys product has failed me.  I am going back to my E4200, which is much more stable.

The performance of the AC3200 is very disappointing.  I run a 300MB internet connection with TWC.  When I first installed the AC3200, I was getting very inconsistent wired Ethernet connections ranging from 50MB/sec to 190MB/sec.  I checked to make sure that it was not TWC by connecting my server directly to the TWC modem.  Connections were fine.  As for the wireless capabilities of the AC3200, they suck.  They were inconsistent as well.  I keep having problems with connecting phones and tables.  I am returning this device.

The one good thing, The install was easy.  I did like the new web based control panel.
3922497
Now I was not expecting this laptop to move mountains, but I still am extremely disappointed with its performance.  I have owned this computer for about 2 weeks so I do not even have many programs on it, yet when I boot it up and open the task manager I just watch the flat line of 100% CPU usage.  I cannot even stream simple online videos without it skipping.

I am less than impressed with my purchase.
1036388
The switch is easy to use.  There is nothing to configure.  You just plug in all the cables and go.
Its performance is not good and inconsistent.  Data transfer speed is slower than expected.  As the switch gets older, its performance seems to degrade.  The switch's lockup becomes more frequent, and it is not heat related.  It does it on a cold day as readily as on a hot day.  I am going to junk me rather than waste more resources on RMA the device.
3343293
Very disappointed in the watch's performance. Bluetooth dropped frequently and took several tries to load text messages. In addition, very difficult to toggle from watch face to menu.