Stones aren't very standout, but cute ring
591852
Wow, the stones on this ring really ARE tiny. Somehow you really just don't see the separation between the stones on this ring the way you do in the picture. However, for the price, can you really go wrong? It's still a very cute ring.
3338824
Love how dainty and thin it is, but sadly doesn't really sparkle. Stones are dull and grayish, but amazon told me I couldn't exchange it for a new one since I read some people received really shiny ones and other stuff like mine. Bummer, I'll still wear it for $89 but not in love with it. :(
757436
I bought this ring just to use the two bands to go with my engagement ring. Pretty. Big diamond in the middle looks fake. But a lot smaller than I expected. Thought it would be big and gaudy. Regardless, I won't be wearing the engagement ring only the bands- and it serves it's purpose
3652221
The stones are not as brown as they appear in the picture.  In reality, they are more grey.  The surface of the diamonds are not uniform and have irregularities and unpolished areas.  From a distance the ring looks nice but looking closely, the diamonds are not as nice as shown.
3891443
I am sorry to say this, but the setting of the ring is really cheap looking.  The stone is beautiful though!
4906582
I do not care for the stone. It is not as bright and sparkly as another ring I bought from Berricle. I will be returning it and purchasing another style. My first ring from Berricle was fantastic. Everyone is allowed an off day at the factory:)!
1600305
I thought the ring would be bigger based on pic, it is pretty, but smaller than you think.  The stone is actually smaller so sometimes it lookslike it fell out, that is how dull the color is, otherwise my daughter is happy with the overall design
1195333
Brought it afor my girlfriend as a Christmas present and she loves it but to me to me to stones are dull and the rose gold band isn't anywhere near as impressive as the picture shows but again she loves it so i guess thats all that matters.
3080024
be aware that the ring is relatively small, at least on my average sized finger, it's narrower than the finger. i'm talking about the size of the stone... still looks nice, but just a bit too small... i thought it would be wider.
2139685
This is a pretty ring and I like it very much.  The setting is not exactly as shown online, which was a disappointment, but I still like it enough to keep it.
3081094
Very pretty ring, however the stone is lifted up by just thin silver bars that aren't encased and it looks pretty cheap in that sense. I was disappointed when I received it and saw that's how the stone was raised up considering there were no photos showing that.
1108331
The  stone is very sparkly, but the silver part is not very well constructed.
For the price, It is a good deal anyway.
2328150
Hello,
  I purchased this ring because it's my birth stone & I'm some what pleased with my purchase. The center stone is faceted nicely it sparkles in outside lighting. The side stones are clear but.... the white sapphire in this ring are very, very small and hard to see. The size is true to size and it feels nice on the finger. In some way though this ring kind of looks like I could have gotten it from a gum ball machine. Lets see how well it holds up. I gave it 3 stars because it is pretty but also looks cheesy. Looks like I got just what I paid for. Hope my review helped some one.
1507066
The faux gem stones with the design do not look quite as nice in person. But overall, seems like a good product for the price.  I am just not a big fan of this particular model.
906188
Its a nice band design and the size is accurite but the stone in the ring wasn't that nice, looks more like plastic than turquoise.
3365611
This ring is pretty but just not my type of ring.  For the price I knew the diamonds on it were going to be small, but there just isn't a lot of sparkle in the diamonds and I like a ring that has a little bit of height to it, if anybody understands that.  But this one lays very flat on my finger and just isn't for me.
3468348
Nice ring but tiny. Compared to other rings with the same design, this one does not appear as substantial. Stones are nice but don't sparkle enough. In comparison to other rings with the same design, this one is much thinner/lower on the part where the stones are set. The gold setting just doesn't elevate to the same degree, and the stones sit much closer on the finger, which means less light comes through from underneath to make the stones really sparkle. It just can't compare to other rings with similar price range.