Proof read and edit, please
591803
Probably a good read.  I saw five glaring proof reading / formatting errors in the first four pages.  I stopped at that point. Maybe it is a "reading a Kindle version on the computer thing".
1648115
You state that you personally read every review. Well I just read the Zoo crew series and I had already read 2 other of your books previously. I love your books ... obviously I do  BUT WOW do you have a huge editing problem and maybe some other issues. When I see "sense" for "since"  "reign" for "rein". I, with my background as an R.N., would like to have the sentence from Tracer explained.  "Riley bowed the top of his head."  Our heads are a unit, you cannot choose to bow the top or middle or side of it. All 6 of your books that I have read, while I have enjoyed the stories themselves greatly, I have been VERY DISTRACTED by these really basic errors.
921802
I am a grad student and purchased this book in order to prepare for my preliminary exams.  The book provides an acceptable overview of foodborne bacterial pathogenic mechanisms, but the grammatical errors are distracting from it's message.  The author frequently (on every page) omits conjunctions or confuses singular/plural combinations.  I found this to be irritating after extensive reading.  References are not provided for stated facts that are obviously controversial. This book has a wealth of information, but someone needs to edit it.
1698337
I liked the story. Interesting, New, Different.
GET AN EDITOR. I feel cheated. It was horribly frustrating, and I barely made it to the end simply because of poor/complete lack of editing can d proofreading.

Cleave. I started highlighting a and making notes. It was used as generically as the word "smurf". let's cleave. Cleave me. we should get cleaved. I want to go cleave, couples were cleaning, oh this is my cleave ....no joke. the word is used for sex, wife, marriage, screwing, making love, husband, literally- it was shutdown with cleave in some form, 4-7 times. EACH PAGE.

Note to author: when a reader stops to edit your story, just to force themselves to trudge to the end b/c they had to pay for it- you NEED AN EDITOR. I felt like I got "cleaved/ smurfed" and that I overpaid.

Good writer. Probably young with the types of errors. The storyline is very unique and interesting. Hard boo k to slog through with so many smurfs and errors though. :(
3025241
The premise and the story are good.  I enjoyed the book.  I recommend that it be edited.  I found many mistakes in the book including punctuation and grammer.  Once properly edited it will be a very good book.
499468
Ok but more than a few errors in descriptions/pictures.  Needs a careful edit.
3199013
another e book with a number of typos. I do find the lack of proofreading insulting. If I take the time to read a book, why can't it be proofed ? I start to wonder about the quality of the editing and fact checking. Anyway, we eventually find out that Geller does have some sort of power (I think) though no one seems to know what exactly what.
4056579
Congratulations on the effort...........BUT, this book so desperatly needs to be edited and MANY, MANY corrections ned to be made before any re-prints are made!!! As a 3rd Generation Italian of Kern County, the last time I checked my cousin was still alive, but that is not the case if you read what is printed in this book. As far as I can see, there are realtives of every family name listed in this book still living today in Kern County that could be reached for corrections. PLEASE, PLEASE make these corrections.
3561173
Excellent research and products, but ridiculous writing.
Sometimes it just doesn't make sense. But usually the problem IS capitalizing THE least important words, NOT TO mention italics AND underline AND bold. I imagine online THEY use lots OF  **word** stuff too.
Even when it's the IMPORTANT WORDS that are emphasized, it's a PAIN IN THE NECK!

Oh well, it used to be much worse. Things just didn't compute, so to speak.

Hey Life extension, I'm a great copy editor. I work cheap part time, and I don't need benefits!
Contact me at lifext.review@harmless.fastmail.fm

Recommend.
4800233
Some good pointers in here. I wish somebody had taken time to do a bit more editing/proofreading, there are a number of typos and grammatical mistakes.
2646956
Really needed a better  proof  reader.  It was hard to read at times.  Good story.  Hope there is a next, but hire a new proof!
1843524
A NOTE TO ALL READERS

As the author of this book, I feel a strong sense of responsibility for everything in it. Naturally, typos and other errors are an inevitable occurrence despite all attempts to achieve perfection. Writers have to overlook the occasional misspelled word or transposed letters and dismiss them as trivial. However, I discovered a number of errors in this book which should be brought to the attention of the reader and corrected. Obviously it is too late to fix any errors in this volume and all of the information in it is there to stay forever, whether it is accurate or not. So, in an effort to affect some degree of damage control, I have included this list of errata to be kept with this book in an attempt to set the record straight for all present and future readers.

* The book was incorrectly titled: "U.S. Naval Aviation Flying Clothing and Gear" by Schiffer. This was a temporary file name given to the text by someone at Schiffer. I reminded my editor to correct the title at all three stages of the editing process but they either forgot or refused to fix the problem. The title should be: "U.S. Naval Aviation Clothing and Equipment". The incorrect title is particularly unfortunate since "aviation" and "flying" are somewhat redundant.

* The U.S. Navy Mark I life vest is incorrectly referred to as "Mark II" throughout the book. This error was due to the "fuzzy logic" used by a computerized grammar correcting program. It appears that references to "Mark I" as in the "Mark I life vest" and "Mark I Willson goggles" was interpreted as a conflict with similar references using roman numerals as in "Mark II Willson goggles" and "World War II". Evidently the grammar correcting program continuously prompted the user to "correct" one or the other and at some point "Mark I" was changed to "Mark II" for all Mark I life vest references in the text.

* The back figure in the facing page photo has the top of his head cut off. The photo was cropped too short by the layout people at Schiffer. There is no excuse for this and it amounts to nothing less than sloppy editing.

* In the last paragraph of the introduction, the word "imposable" should be "impossible".

* Left and right are incorrectly transposed in the caption for the photo at the bottom right on page 126.

* The word "them" should be "the" in the caption at the bottom of page 219.

* On pages 248 and 250, Admiral John S. McCain is incorrectly described as Admiral Marc Mitscher. Both photos were incorrectly captioned at the National Archives. This error is somewhat understandable since both men were admirals, both were aviators, both were very close in age and both bore a resemblance to each other.

I sincerely offer my most humble apologies to all readers for these errors and I hope to include this list with all future sales of this volume. I have been graciously reassured by everyone who currently owns a copy that the aforementioned errors do not diminish the value or scope of work of the book. I encourage all owners of this book to copy and paste these corrections to a printable format and keep them with their copy for future reference.

Jeff Warner
4030578
I volunteer to be a proofreader for you!  It is not a good sign when I have to read a sentence twice to make sense of it or to find a book (or should I say, series of books) rife with spelling and grammatical errors. What a shame.
1903420
The storyline sounds interesting, but was there even any editing or proofreading done on this piece? In the first paragraph alone the authors skip from past tense to present tense; are missing punctuation; and have a number of misspellings. I have a hard time taking an author or his/her work seriously when he/she cannot even take the time to ensure it is grammatically correct.
3810632
but, can some please proofread and edit.  i wanted to give ascension four stars but there were too many editing misses that affected the flow, but i'm not giving up.  looking forward to book 3, hope the editing gets better.
2902614
I was a bit disappointed with all the typos in this book.  It became so frustrating that I simply stopped reading it.
It has potential, if someone would take the time to proof read and spell check it first.
Would love to go back and read it again, once that's been done.
2029772
Sorry to say, this book was in need of proofreading, and fact checking. You 'live' a lifestyle, not life it, and for the record, carrots are root vegetables, so do not grow on trees. Running into these things early in the book, I quit reading, doubting the validity of any advice given in it.