is not beyond a reasonable doubt?
602869
Proof beyond a reasonable doubt does not involve proof to an absolute certainty. It is not proof beyond any doubt, nor is it an imaginary or frivolous doubt. More is required than proof that the accused is probably guilty. A jury which concludes only that the accused is probably guilty must acquit.
1142946
The subjective standard requires the prosecutor to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that this accused intended his or her actions while the objective standard requires the prosecutor to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that a reasonable person would have not acted as the accused did in the circumstances of the case.
1416731
The best description of this fallacy (assuming you did not call actually call the other a liar) would be a Red Herring. ... If you think the accusation was merely outrage at being disagreed, then the closest fallacy to that would be argument from authority.
1375044
A charge does not constitute a finding that your organization engaged in discrimination. The EEOC has authority to investigate whether there is reasonable cause to believe discrimination occurred. In many cases, the organization may choose to resolve a charge through mediation or settlement.
600011
​If you plead not guilty, you are disagreeing that you committed the offence that you have been charged with or that you agree that you committed the offence, but you believe you have a valid defence. It is important to get legal advice to ensure that your defence is a valid one.
510695
The basis of our system of criminal justice is that a person, although charged with an offence, is considered innocent until proved guilty of the offence. The magistrate, judge or jury, as the case may be, must be satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that the person is guilty.
318387
Other arguments against majority verdicts include that they compromise the criminal standard of proof of "beyond a reasonable doubt", given that at least one juror has a doubt; create a greater risk of convicting the innocent, leading to miscarriages of justice; and reduce public confidence in jury verdicts.
1172495
The accuracy of inductive reasoning is questionable. Because inductive reasoning uses specific premises to build a conclusion, the conclusion is probable but not absolutely true. Deductive reasoning can lead to an absolutely true conclusion if and only if the premises that lead to that conclusion are also true.
1184076
Yes, all cognizable offenses are said to be non-bailable, but bail could be granted on reasonable grounds. ... Even the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 speaks for the grant of bail because BAIL and not JAIL is what the aim of the Law is.
135547
Proponents of reform argue that the "not proven" verdict is widely regarded as an acquittal used when the judge or jury does not have enough evidence to convict but is not sufficiently convinced of the accused person's innocence to bring in a "not guilty" verdict.
1463736
Reasonable and probable grounds is the “the point where credibly-based probability replaces suspicion". It is the reasonable belief that "an event not unlikely to occur for reasons that rise above mere suspicion". "Reasonableness" concerns the legitimate expectations in the existence of certain facts.
1100348
There are different standards in different circumstances. For example, in criminal cases, the burden of proving the defendant's guilt is on the prosecution, and they must establish that fact beyond a reasonable doubt. In civil cases, the plaintiff has the burden of proving his case by a preponderance of the evidence.
94313
As held by the Apex Court in the case of Bitot Das (supra), unless the foundation for producing the secondary evidence is laid, the xerox copy is not admissible in evidence. ... But, to admit the secondary evidence, however, it is not sufficient to show merely that the original document is lost.
204032
Because inductive reasoning uses specific premises to build a conclusion, the conclusion is probable but not absolutely true. Deductive reasoning can lead to an absolutely true conclusion if and only if the premises that lead to that conclusion are also true.
1028793
An argument is valid if the conclusion must be true whenever the premises are true. In other words, an argument is valid if the truth of its premises guarantees the truth of its conclusion. ... An argument that is not valid is invalid or fallacious. If an argument is valid and its premises are true, the argument is sound.
1151537
A will is a matter of public record while a trust is not.
249959
If there is not reasonable suspicion that a crime has been committed, is being committed, or is about to be committed, an individual is not required to provide identification, even in these states. The Fourth Amendment prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures and requires warrants to be supported by probable cause.