should the death penalty be allowed pros?
609915
The death penalty can provide families of victims with some closure, which may help them to deal with their suffering. Without the death penalty, some criminals would continue to commit crimes. It deters prisoners who are already serving life sentences in jail from committing more serious offenses.
914648
Capital punishment should be legal in case of murder. Argument For the family and friends of a murder victim, the suffering of losing a loved one may never end. ... It isn't the death penalty, but more likely the efficiency of the legal process, that provides closure to the victims loved ones.
354763
['It is irreversible and mistakes happen. Execution is the ultimate, irrevocable punishment: the risk of executing an innocent person can never be eliminated. ... ', 'It does not deter crime. ... ', 'It is often used within skewed justice systems. ... ', 'It is discriminatory. ... ', 'It is used as a political tool.']
769553
And here are the advantages. It deters bad people to commit heinous crimes. It is what hardened criminals deserve. Some of the crimes that are under capital punishment include murder and rape, depending on the country or state legalizing the practice.
132810
The vast preponderance of the evidence shows that the death penalty is no more effective than imprisonment in deterring murder and that it may even be an incitement to criminal violence. Death-penalty states as a group do not have lower rates of criminal homicide than non-death-penalty states.
328344
DETERRENCE The death penalty saves lives. Would-be murderers have a better reason to think twice if they know their life is on the line. Ultimately, only the most severe punishment possible will dissuade the most violent crimes.
11272
['The Constitution allows the application of the death punishment. ... ', 'The death punishment always goes about as a deterrent. ... ', 'The death punishment allows the state to appropriate torture, and lawbreakers must face the consequences of their activities.']
761980
It makes a public spectacle of an individual's death According to UN human rights experts, executions in public serve no legitimate purpose and only increase the cruel, inhuman and degrading nature of this punishment. “All executions violate the right to life.
416643
The proponents of the death penalty believe that people are not going to commit murders if the punishment for the murder was that they were going to get executed. ... This is another very important reason why the death penalty should be abolished because it is extremely expensive for the government and the people.
670022
 There's no concrete evidence showing that the death penalty actually deters crime. Various studies comparing crime and murder rates in U.S. states that have the death penalty versus those that don't found very little difference between the two.
188677
['Value of human life.', 'The right to live.', 'Execution of the innocent.', 'Retribution is wrong.', 'Deterrence.', 'It brutalises society.', "It's too expensive.", 'People not responsible for their acts.']
556070
['It deters criminals from committing serious crimes. ... ', 'It is quick, painless, and humane. ... ', 'The legal system constantly evolves to maximize justice. ... ', "It appeases the victims or victims' families. ... ", 'Without the death penalty, some criminals would continue to commit crimes. ... ', 'It is a cost-effective solution.']
1398479
It is an inhumane, ineffective punishment and is never the solution. The Philippines' attempts to reintroduce it are clearly unlawful. ... Under international law, the death penalty must be restricted to most serious crimes, and drug related crimes do not meet this threshold.
574985
There is no international consensus on whether the death penalty should be abolished. Each country has the sovereign right to decide on its own judicial system, taking into account its own circumstances. The death penalty has been effective in keeping Singapore one of the safest places in the world to work and live in.
1280642
Should India abolish the death penalty? ... His appalling crime of gunning down innocents surely qualifies as a "rarest of the rare crime", a condition for handing out the death penalty in India. But, as critics of capital punishment say, there's no evidence to show that the death penalty deters crime.
890728
Some proponents of capital punishment argue that capital punishment is beneficial even if it has no deterrent effect. ... If we fail to execute murderers, and doing so would in fact have deterred other murders, we have allowed the killing of a bunch of innocent victims.
598289
In fact making people go on living when they don't want to violates their personal freedom and human rights. It's immoral, they say to force people to continue living in suffering and pain. They add that as suicide is not a crime, euthanasia should not be a crime.