How can I write a paper that will convince the reviewers that the results are non-trivial?
6182
Are there any good strategies for conveying the true significance of the results that look obvious post factum?
5334
How can I correct a reviewer's opinion?
114109
Is there a way to disagree with the review systems "recommendation"
78761
How do I approach existing questions to which I believe the answers are inadequate?
58926
Have researchers any incentive to publish negative or confirmatory results?
69227
How can I be a good reviewer?
47929
How can I tell whether a mathematics journal seems reputable?
25252
How common is it for submitted papers to have minor errors?
105303
'Obvious' theorems that are actually false
104495
A paper I received to review has (independently) duplicated work that we are writing up. How to proceed in light of peer-review confidentiality?
15373
Is it a bad idea to send an article under review as a writing sample? (faculty job application)
15873
What fallacy dismisses a conclusion because supporters give invalid arguments for it?
117506
Shouldn't reviews be done a bit more carefully?
26269
How to ask for experiences instead of hard facts
39803
What is the easiest way to check for plagiarism in student essay papers?
8960
Encouraging people to explain downvotes
158097
The manuscript does not reach the required quality standard of this journal