Judges are qualified to decide upon the reasonableness of a government minister's administrative decision. Judges should be given a greater part in administrative decision making. There is nothing much wrong with the legal system. If something were badly wrong with the legal system, judges would be ill-equipped to determine whether a government minister's decisions are reasonable.
A distinguished British judge, Justice Upton, said that whether some administrative decision by a government minister is reasonable "is a question that judges, by their training and experience, should be well-equipped to answer, or else there would be something badly wrong with the legal system, and there is little reason to suppose that there is. "
Which one of the following most accurately expresses the conclusion of Justice Upton's argument?