ignores data that offer reasonable support for a general claim and focuses on a single example that argues against that claim rejects a claim as false on the grounds that those who make that claim could profit if that claim is accepted by others concludes that a particular premise is false when it is equally possible for that premise to be true and some other premise false makes an unwarranted assumption that what is true of each member of a group taken separately is also true of the group as a whole
The role of the Uplandian supreme court is to protect all human rights against abuses of government power. Since the constitution of Uplandia is not explicit about all human rights, the supreme court must sometimes resort to principles outside the explicit provisions of the constitution in justifying its decisions. However, human rights will be subject to the whim of whoever holds judicial power unless the supreme court is bound to adhere to a single objective standard, namely, the constitution. Ttherefore, nothing but the explicit provisions of the constitution can be used to justify the court' s decisions. Since these conclusions are inconsistent with each other, it cannot be true that the role of the Uplandian supreme court is to protect all human rights against abuses of government power.
The reasoning that leads to the conclusion that the first sentence in the passage is false is flawed because the argument