arguing against a hypothesis by showing that the hypothesis cannot account for the behavior of everyone arguing that since two groups are disanalogous in important respects, there must be different explanations for their similar behavior explaining the susceptibility of medical professionals to the fraudulent claims of those marketing certain medical products by casting doubt on the expertise of the professionals showing by analogy that medical professionals should not be susceptible to the fraudulent claims of those who market certain medical products
Tamika: Many people have been duped by the claims of those who market certain questionable medical products. Their susceptibility is easy to explain: most people yearn for easy solutions to complex medical problems but don' t have the medical knowledge necessary to see through the sellers' fraudulent claims. However, the same explanation cannot be given for a recent trend among medical professionals toward a susceptibility to fraudulent claims. They, of course, have no lack of medical knowledge.
Tamika's argument proceeds by