What are the most common isoforms of CEACAM1?
CEACAM1-4L and CEACAM1-3L
Current prophylactic and therapeutic strategies targeting human influenza viruses include vaccines and antivirals. Given variable rates of vaccine efficacy and antiviral resistance, alternative strategies are urgently required to improve disease outcomes. Here we describe the use of HiSeq deep sequencing to analyze host gene expression in primary human alveolar epithelial type II cells infected with highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 virus. At 24 hours post-infection, 623 host genes were significantly upregulated, including the cell adhesion molecule CEACAM1. H5N1 virus infection stimulated significantly higher CEACAM1 protein expression when compared to influenza A PR8 H1N1 virus, suggesting a key role for CEACAM1 in influenza virus pathogenicity. Furthermore, silencing of endogenous CEACAM1 resulted in reduced levels of proinflammatory cytokine/chemokine production, as well as reduced levels of virus replication following H5N1 infection. H5N1 virus infection stimulated significantly higher CEACAM1 protein expression when compared to influenza A PR8 H1N1 virus, suggesting a key role for CEACAM1 in influenza virus pathogenicity. Furthermore, silencing of endogenous CEACAM1 resulted in reduced levels of proinflammatory cytokine/chemokine production, as well as reduced levels of virus replication following H5N1 infection. Our study provides evidence for the involvement of CEACAM1 in a clinically relevant model of H5N1 infection and may assist in the development of host-oriented antiviral strategies. Text: Influenza viruses cause acute and highly contagious seasonal respiratory disease in all age groups. Between 3-5 million cases of severe influenza-related illness and over 250 000 deaths are reported every year. In addition to constant seasonal outbreaks, highly pathogenic avian influenza HPAI strains, such as H5N1, remain an ongoing pandemic threat with recent WHO figures showing 454 confirmed laboratory infections and a mortality rate of 53%. Between 3-5 million cases of severe influenza-related illness and over 250 000 deaths are reported every year. In addition to constant seasonal outbreaks, highly pathogenic avian influenza HPAI strains, such as H5N1, remain an ongoing pandemic threat with recent WHO figures showing 454 confirmed laboratory infections and a mortality rate of 53%. It is important to note that humans have very little pre-existing immunity towards avian influenza virus strains. Moreover, there is no commercially available human H5N1 vaccine. Given the potential for H5N1 viruses to trigger a pandemic 1,2 , there is an urgent need to develop novel therapeutic interventions to combat known deficiencies in our ability to control outbreaks. Current seasonal influenza virus prophylactic and therapeutic strategies involve the use of vaccination and antivirals. Given the potential for H5N1 viruses to trigger a pandemic 1,2 , there is an urgent need to develop novel therapeutic interventions to combat known deficiencies in our ability to control outbreaks. Current seasonal influenza virus prophylactic and therapeutic strategies involve the use of vaccination and antivirals. Vaccine efficacy is highly variable as evidenced by a particularly severe 2017/18 epidemic, and frequent re-formulation of the vaccine is required to combat ongoing mutations in the influenza virus genome. In addition, antiviral resistance has been reported for many circulating strains, including the avian influenza H7N9 virus that emerged in 2013 3, 4 . Influenza A viruses have also been shown to target and hijack multiple host cellular pathways to promote survival and replication 5, 6 . As such, there is increasing evidence to suggest that targeting host pathways will influence virus replication, inflammation, immunity and pathology 5, 7 . Influenza A viruses have also been shown to target and hijack multiple host cellular pathways to promote survival and replication 5, 6 . As such, there is increasing evidence to suggest that targeting host pathways will influence virus replication, inflammation, immunity and pathology 5, 7 . Alternative intervention strategies based on modulation of the host response could be used to supplement the current prophylactic and therapeutic protocols. While the impact of influenza virus infection has been relatively well studied in animal models 8, 9 , human cellular responses are poorly defined due to the lack of available human autopsy material, especially from HPAI virus-infected patients. In the present study, we characterized influenza virus infection of primary human alveolar epithelial type II ATII cells isolated from normal human lung tissue donated by patients undergoing lung resection. ATII cells are a physiologically relevant infection model as they are a main target for influenza A viruses when entering the respiratory tract 10 . In the present study, we characterized influenza virus infection of primary human alveolar epithelial type II ATII cells isolated from normal human lung tissue donated by patients undergoing lung resection. ATII cells are a physiologically relevant infection model as they are a main target for influenza A viruses when entering the respiratory tract 10 . Human host gene expression following HPAI H5N1 virus A/Chicken/ Vietnam/0008/04 infection of primary ATII cells was analyzed using Illumina HiSeq deep sequencing. In order to gain a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying modulation of host immunity in an anti-inflammatory environment, we also analyzed changes in gene expression following HPAI H5N1 infection in the presence of the reactive oxygen species ROS inhibitor, apocynin, a compound known to interfere with NADPH oxidase subunit assembly 5, 6 . The HiSeq analysis described herein has focused on differentially regulated genes following H5N1 infection. Several criteria were considered when choosing a "hit" for further study. The HiSeq analysis described herein has focused on differentially regulated genes following H5N1 infection. Several criteria were considered when choosing a "hit" for further study. These included: . Novelty; has this gene been studied before in the context of influenza virus infection/pathogenesis? . Immunoregulation; does this gene have a regulatory role in host immune responses so that it has the potential to be manipulated to improve immunity? . Therapeutic reagents; are there any existing commercially available therapeutic reagents, such as specific inhibitors or inhibitory antibodies that can be utilized for in vitro and in vivo study in order to optimize therapeutic strategies? . Therapeutic reagents; are there any existing commercially available therapeutic reagents, such as specific inhibitors or inhibitory antibodies that can be utilized for in vitro and in vivo study in order to optimize therapeutic strategies? . Animal models; is there a knock-out mouse model available for in vivo influenza infection studies? Based on these criteria, carcinoembryonic-antigen CEA -related cell adhesion molecule 1 CEACAM1 was chosen as a key gene of interest. CEACAM1 also known as BGP or CD66 is expressed on epithelial and endothelial cells 11 , as well as B cells, T cells, neutrophils, NK cells, macrophages and dendritic cells DCs  . Human CEACAM1 has been shown to act as a receptor for several human bacterial and fungal pathogens, including Haemophilus influenza, Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhi and Candida albicans, but has not as yet been implicated in virus entry . CEACAM1 also known as BGP or CD66 is expressed on epithelial and endothelial cells 11 , as well as B cells, T cells, neutrophils, NK cells, macrophages and dendritic cells DCs  . Human CEACAM1 has been shown to act as a receptor for several human bacterial and fungal pathogens, including Haemophilus influenza, Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhi and Candida albicans, but has not as yet been implicated in virus entry . There is however emerging evidence to suggest that CEACAM1 is involved in host immunity as enhanced expression in lymphocytes was detected in pregnant women infected with cytomegalovirus 18 and in cervical tissue isolated from patients with papillomavirus infection 19 . Eleven CEACAM1 splice variants have been reported in humans 20 . CEACAM1 isoforms Uniprot P13688-1 to -11 can differ in the number of immunoglobulin-like domains present, in the presence or absence of a transmembrane domain and/or the length of their cytoplasmic tail i.e. L, long or S, short . CEACAM1 isoforms Uniprot P13688-1 to -11 can differ in the number of immunoglobulin-like domains present, in the presence or absence of a transmembrane domain and/or the length of their cytoplasmic tail i.e. L, long or S, short . The full-length human CEACAM1 protein CEACAM1-4L consists of four extracellular domains one extracellular immunoglobulin variable-region-like IgV-like domain and three immunoglobulin constant region 2-like IgC2-like domains , a transmembrane domain, and a long L cytoplasmic tail. The long cytoplasmic tail contains two immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motifs ITIMs that are absent in the short form 20 . The most common isoforms expressed by human immune cells are CEACAM1-4L and CEACAM1-3L 21 . CEACAM1 interacts homophilically with itself 22 or heterophilically with CEACAM5 a related CEACAM family member 23 . The most common isoforms expressed by human immune cells are CEACAM1-4L and CEACAM1-3L 21 . CEACAM1 interacts homophilically with itself 22 or heterophilically with CEACAM5 a related CEACAM family member 23 . The dimeric state allows recruitment of signaling molecules such as SRC-family kinases, including the tyrosine phosphatase SRC homology 2 SH2 -domain containing protein tyrosine phosphatase 1 SHP1 and SHP2 members to phosphorylate ITIMs 24 . As such, the presence or absence of ITIMs in CEACAM1 isoforms influences signaling properties and downstream cellular function. CEACAM1 homophilic or heterophilic interactions and ITIM phosphorylation are critical for many biological processes, including regulation of lymphocyte function, immunosurveillance, cell growth and differentiation 25, 26 and neutrophil activation and adhesion to target cells during inflammatory responses 27 . It should be noted that CEACAM1 expression has been modulated in vivo using an anti-CEACAM1 antibody MRG1 to inhibit CEACAM1-positive melanoma xenograft growth in SCID/NOD mice 28 . CEACAM1 homophilic or heterophilic interactions and ITIM phosphorylation are critical for many biological processes, including regulation of lymphocyte function, immunosurveillance, cell growth and differentiation 25, 26 and neutrophil activation and adhesion to target cells during inflammatory responses 27 . It should be noted that CEACAM1 expression has been modulated in vivo using an anti-CEACAM1 antibody MRG1 to inhibit CEACAM1-positive melanoma xenograft growth in SCID/NOD mice 28 . MRG1 blocked CEACAM1 homophilic interactions that inhibit T cell effector function, enhancing the killing of CEACAM1+ melanoma cells by T cells 28 . This highlights a potential intervention pathway that can be exploited in other disease processes, including virus infection. In addition, Ceacam1-knockout mice are available for further in vivo infection studies. Our results show that CEACAM1 mRNA and protein expression levels were highly elevated following HPAI H5N1 infection. In addition, Ceacam1-knockout mice are available for further in vivo infection studies. Our results show that CEACAM1 mRNA and protein expression levels were highly elevated following HPAI H5N1 infection. Furthermore, small interfering RNA siRNA -mediated inhibition of CEACAM1 reduced inflammatory cytokine and chemokine production, and more importantly, inhibited H5N1 virus replication in primary human ATII cells and in the continuous human type II respiratory epithelial A549 cell line. Taken together, these observations suggest that CEACAM1 is an attractive candidate for modulating influenza-specific immunity. In summary, our study has identified a novel target that may influence HPAI H5N1 immunity and serves to highlight the importance of manipulating host responses as a way of improving disease outcomes in the context of virus infection. Three experimental groups were included in the HiSeq analysis of H5N1 infection in the presence or absence of the ROS inhibitor, apocynin: i uninfected cells treated with 1% DMSO vehicle control ND , ii H5N1-infected cells treated with 1% DMSO HD and iii H5N1-infected cells treated with 1 mM apocynin dissolved in DMSO HA . In summary, our study has identified a novel target that may influence HPAI H5N1 immunity and serves to highlight the importance of manipulating host responses as a way of improving disease outcomes in the context of virus infection. Three experimental groups were included in the HiSeq analysis of H5N1 infection in the presence or absence of the ROS inhibitor, apocynin: i uninfected cells treated with 1% DMSO vehicle control ND , ii H5N1-infected cells treated with 1% DMSO HD and iii H5N1-infected cells treated with 1 mM apocynin dissolved in DMSO HA . These three groups were assessed using pairwise comparisons: ND vs. HD, ND vs. HA, and HD vs. HA. H5N1 infection and apocynin treatment induce differential expression of host genes. ATII cells isolated from human patients 29, 30 were infected with H5N1 on the apical side at a multiplicity of infection MOI of 2 for 24 hours and RNA extracted. HiSeq was performed on samples and reads mapped to the human genome where they were then assembled into transcriptomes for differential expression analysis. ATII cells isolated from human patients 29, 30 were infected with H5N1 on the apical side at a multiplicity of infection MOI of 2 for 24 hours and RNA extracted. HiSeq was performed on samples and reads mapped to the human genome where they were then assembled into transcriptomes for differential expression analysis. A total of 13,649 genes were identified with FPKM fragments per kilobase of exon per million fragments mapped > 1 in at least one of the three experimental groups. A total of 623 genes were significantly upregulated and 239 genes were significantly downregulated q value < 0.05, ≥2-fold change following H5N1 infection ND vs. HD Fig. 1A ; Table S1 . HPAI H5N1 infection of ATII cells activated an antiviral state as evidenced by the upregulation of numerous interferon-induced genes, genes associated with pathogen defense, cell proliferation, apoptosis, and metabolism Table 1; Table S2 . 1A ; Table S1 . HPAI H5N1 infection of ATII cells activated an antiviral state as evidenced by the upregulation of numerous interferon-induced genes, genes associated with pathogen defense, cell proliferation, apoptosis, and metabolism Table 1; Table S2 . In addition, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes KEGG pathway mapping showed that many of the upregulated genes in the HD group were mapped to TNF signaling hsa04668 , Toll-like receptor signaling hsa04620 , cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction hsa04060 and RIG-I-like receptor signaling hsa04622 In the H5N1-infected and apocynin-treated HA group, a large number of genes were also significantly upregulated 509 genes or downregulated 782 genes Fig. 1B ; Table S1 relative to the ND control group. Whilst a subset of genes was differentially expressed in both the HD and HA groups, either being upregulated 247 genes, Fig. 1D or downregulated 146 genes, Fig. Whilst a subset of genes was differentially expressed in both the HD and HA groups, either being upregulated 247 genes, Fig. 1D or downregulated 146 genes, Fig. 1E , a majority of genes did not in fact overlap between the HD and HA groups Fig. 1D , E . This suggests that apocynin treatment can affect gene expression independent of H5N1 infection. Gene Ontology GO enrichment analysis of genes upregulated by apocynin showed the involvement of the type I interferon signaling pathway GO:0060337 , the defense response to virus GO:0009615 , negative regulation of viral processes GO:48525 and the response to stress GO:0006950 Table S2 , "ND vs. HA Up" . This suggests that apocynin treatment can affect gene expression independent of H5N1 infection. Gene Ontology GO enrichment analysis of genes upregulated by apocynin showed the involvement of the type I interferon signaling pathway GO:0060337 , the defense response to virus GO:0009615 , negative regulation of viral processes GO:48525 and the response to stress GO:0006950 Table S2 , "ND vs. HA Up" . Genes downregulated by apocynin include those that are involved in cell adhesion GO:0007155 , regulation of cell migration GO:0030334 , regulation of cell proliferation GO:0042127 , signal transduction GO:0007165 and oxidation-reduction processes GO:0055114 Table S2 , "ND vs. HA Down" . A total of 623 genes were upregulated following H5N1 infection "ND vs. HD Up", Fig. 1F . By overlapping the two lists of genes from "ND vs. HD Up" and "HD vs. HA Down", 245 genes were shown to be downregulated in the presence of apocynin Fig. 1F . By overlapping the two lists of genes from "ND vs. HD Up" and "HD vs. HA Down", 245 genes were shown to be downregulated in the presence of apocynin Fig. 1F . By overlapping three lists of genes from "ND vs. HD Up", "HD vs. HA Down" and "ND vs. HA Up", 55 genes out of the 245 genes 190 plus 55 genes were present in all three lists Fig. 1G , indicating that these 55 genes were significantly inhibited by apocynin but to a level that was still significantly higher than that in uninfected cells. The 55 genes include those involved in influenza A immunity hsa05164; DDX58, IFIH1, IFNB1, MYD88, PML, STAT2 , Jak-STAT signaling hsa04630; IFNB1, IL15RA, IL22RA1, STAT2 , RIG-I-like receptor signaling hsa04622; DDX58, IFIH1, IFNB1 and Antigen processing and presentation hsa04612; TAP2, TAP1, HLA-DOB Tables S3 and S4 . 1G , indicating that these 55 genes were significantly inhibited by apocynin but to a level that was still significantly higher than that in uninfected cells. The 55 genes include those involved in influenza A immunity hsa05164; DDX58, IFIH1, IFNB1, MYD88, PML, STAT2 , Jak-STAT signaling hsa04630; IFNB1, IL15RA, IL22RA1, STAT2 , RIG-I-like receptor signaling hsa04622; DDX58, IFIH1, IFNB1 and Antigen processing and presentation hsa04612; TAP2, TAP1, HLA-DOB Tables S3 and S4 . Therefore, critical immune responses induced following H5N1 infection were not dampened following apocynin treatment. The remaining 190 of 245 genes were not present in the "ND vs. HA Up" list, suggesting that those genes were significantly inhibited by apocynin to a level that was similar to uninfected control cells Fig. 1G . The 190 genes include those involved in TNF signaling hsa04668; CASP10, CCL2, CCL5, CFLAR, CXCL5, END1, IL6, TRAF1, VEGFC , cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction hsa04060; VEGFC, IL6, CCL2, CXCL5, CXCL16, IL2RG, CD40, CCL5, CCL7, IL1A , NF-kappa B signaling pathway hsa04064: TRAF1, CFLAR, CARD11, TNFSF13B, TICAM1, CD40 and PI3K-Akt signaling hsa04151; CCND1, GNB4, IL2RG, IL6, ITGA2, JAK2, LAMA1, MYC, IPK3AP1, TLR2, VEGFC Tables S3 and S4 . 1G . The 190 genes include those involved in TNF signaling hsa04668; CASP10, CCL2, CCL5, CFLAR, CXCL5, END1, IL6, TRAF1, VEGFC , cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction hsa04060; VEGFC, IL6, CCL2, CXCL5, CXCL16, IL2RG, CD40, CCL5, CCL7, IL1A , NF-kappa B signaling pathway hsa04064: TRAF1, CFLAR, CARD11, TNFSF13B, TICAM1, CD40 and PI3K-Akt signaling hsa04151; CCND1, GNB4, IL2RG, IL6, ITGA2, JAK2, LAMA1, MYC, IPK3AP1, TLR2, VEGFC Tables S3 and S4 . This is consistent with the role of apocynin in reducing inflammation 31 . By overlapping the three lists of genes from "ND vs. HD Up", "HD vs. HA Down" and "ND vs. HA Down", 11 genes were found in all three comparisons Fig. 1H . This suggests that these 11 genes are upregulated following H5N1 infection and are significantly reduced by apocynin treatment to a level lower than that observed in uninfected control cells Fig. 1H . This suggests that these 11 genes are upregulated following H5N1 infection and are significantly reduced by apocynin treatment to a level lower than that observed in uninfected control cells Fig. 1H . Among these were inflammatory cytokines/chemokines genes, including CXCL5, IL1A, AXL a member of the TAM receptor family of receptor tyrosine kinases and TMEM173/STING Stimulator of IFN Genes Table S4 . Our previous study demonstrated that H5N1 infection of A549 cells in the presence of apocynin enhanced expression of negative regulators of cytokine signaling SOCS , SOCS1 and SOCS3 6 . This, in turn, resulted in a reduction of H5N1-stimulated cytokine and chemokine production IL6, IFNB1, CXCL10 and CCL5 in A549 cells , which was not attributed to lower virus replication as virus titers were not affected by apocynin treatment 6 . Our previous study demonstrated that H5N1 infection of A549 cells in the presence of apocynin enhanced expression of negative regulators of cytokine signaling SOCS , SOCS1 and SOCS3 6 . This, in turn, resulted in a reduction of H5N1-stimulated cytokine and chemokine production IL6, IFNB1, CXCL10 and CCL5 in A549 cells , which was not attributed to lower virus replication as virus titers were not affected by apocynin treatment 6 . We performed a qRT-PCR analysis on the same RNA samples submitted for HiSeq analysis to validate HiSeq results. IL6 Fig. 2A , IFNB1 Fig. 2B , CXCL10 Fig. 2C , and CCL5 Fig. IL6 Fig. 2A , IFNB1 Fig. 2B , CXCL10 Fig. 2C , and CCL5 Fig. 2D gene expression was significantly elevated in ATII cells following infection and was reduced by the addition of apocynin except for IFNB1 . Consistent with previous findings in A549 cells 6 , H5N1 infection alone induced the expression of SOCS1 as shown by HiSeq and qRT-PCR analysis Fig. 2E . Apocynin treatment further increased SOCS1 mRNA expression Fig. 2E . Although HiSeq analysis did not detect a statistically significant increase of SOCS1 following apocynin treatment, the Log2 fold-changes in SOCS1 gene expression were similar between the HD and HA groups 4.8-fold vs 4.0-fold Fig. 2E . Although HiSeq analysis did not detect a statistically significant increase of SOCS1 following apocynin treatment, the Log2 fold-changes in SOCS1 gene expression were similar between the HD and HA groups 4.8-fold vs 4.0-fold Fig. 2E . HiSeq analysis of SOCS3 transcription showed significant increase following H5N1 infection and apocynin treatment Fig. 2F . qRT-PCR analysis showed that although SOCS3 mRNA was only slightly increased following H5N1 infection, it was further significantly upregulated in the presence Table 2 . Representatives of over-represented KEGG pathways with a maximum P-value of 0.05 and the number of genes contributing to each pathway that is significantly upregulated following H5N1 infection "ND vs. HD Up" . qRT-PCR analysis showed that although SOCS3 mRNA was only slightly increased following H5N1 infection, it was further significantly upregulated in the presence Table 2 . Representatives of over-represented KEGG pathways with a maximum P-value of 0.05 and the number of genes contributing to each pathway that is significantly upregulated following H5N1 infection "ND vs. HD Up" . The full list of KEGG pathways is presented in Table S3 . of apocynin Fig. 2F . Therefore, apocynin also contributes to the reduction of H5N1-stimulated cytokine and chemokine production in ATII cells. Apocynin, a compound that inhibits production of ROS, has been shown to influence influenza-specific responses in vitro 6 and in vivo 5 . Therefore, apocynin also contributes to the reduction of H5N1-stimulated cytokine and chemokine production in ATII cells. Apocynin, a compound that inhibits production of ROS, has been shown to influence influenza-specific responses in vitro 6 and in vivo 5 . Although virus titers are not affected by apocynin treatment in vitro 6 , some anti-viral activity is observed in vivo when mice have been infected with a low pathogenic A/HongKong/X31 H3N2 virus 6 . HiSeq analysis of HPAI H5N1 virus gene transcription showed that although there was a trend for increased influenza virus gene expression following apocynin treatment, only influenza non-structural NS gene expression was significantly increased Fig. 2G . The reduced cytokine and chemokine production in H5N1-infected ATII cells Fig. 2G . The reduced cytokine and chemokine production in H5N1-infected ATII cells Fig. 2A-F is unlikely to be associated with lower virus replication. GO enrichment analysis was performed on genes that were significantly upregulated following HPAI H5N1 infection in ATII cells in the presence or absence of apocynin to identify over-presented GO terms. Many of the H5N1-upregulated genes were broadly involved in defense response GO:0006952 , response to external biotic stimulus GO:0043207 , immune system processes GO:0002376 , cytokine-mediated signaling pathway GO:0019221 and type I interferon signaling pathway GO:0060337 Table 1; Table S2 . In addition, many of the H5N1-upregulated genes mapped to metabolic pathways hsa01100 , cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction hsa04060 , Influenza A hsa05164 , TNF signaling hsa04668 or Jak-STAT signaling hsa04630 Table S3 . Many of the H5N1-upregulated genes were broadly involved in defense response GO:0006952 , response to external biotic stimulus GO:0043207 , immune system processes GO:0002376 , cytokine-mediated signaling pathway GO:0019221 and type I interferon signaling pathway GO:0060337 Table 1; Table S2 . In addition, many of the H5N1-upregulated genes mapped to metabolic pathways hsa01100 , cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction hsa04060 , Influenza A hsa05164 , TNF signaling hsa04668 or Jak-STAT signaling hsa04630 Table S3 . However, not all the H5N1-upregulated genes in these pathways were inhibited by apocynin treatment as mentioned above Fig. 1F ; Table S3 . . Fold-changes following qRT-PCR analysis were calculated using 2 −ΔΔCt method right Y axis normalized to β-actin and compared with the ND group. 1F ; Table S3 . . Fold-changes following qRT-PCR analysis were calculated using 2 −ΔΔCt method right Y axis normalized to β-actin and compared with the ND group. Data from HiSeq was calculated as Log2 fold-change left Y axis compared with the ND group. IFNB1 transcription was not detected in ND, therefore HiSeq IFNB1 data from HD and HA groups was expressed as FPKM. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 compared with ND; # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01, compared with HD. G Hiseq analysis of H5N1 influenza virus gene expression profiles with or without apocynin treatment in primary human ATII cells. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 compared with ND; # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01, compared with HD. G Hiseq analysis of H5N1 influenza virus gene expression profiles with or without apocynin treatment in primary human ATII cells. # p < 0.05, compared with HD. Upregulation of the cell adhesion molecule CEACAM1 in H5N1-infected ATII cells. The cell adhesion molecule CEACAM1 has been shown to be critical for the regulation of immune responses during infection, inflammation and cancer 20 . The CEACAM1 transcript was significantly upregulated following H5N1 infection Fig. 3A . The CEACAM1 transcript was significantly upregulated following H5N1 infection Fig. 3A . In contrast, a related member of the CEACAM family, CEACAM5, was not affected by H5N1 infection Fig. 3B . It is also worth noting that more reads were obtained for CEACAM5 >1000 FPKM Fig. 3B than CEACAM1 ~7 FPKM Fig. 3A in uninfected ATII cells, which is consistent with their normal expression patterns in human lung tissue 32 . Therefore, although CEACAM1 forms heterodimers with CEACAM5 23 , the higher basal expression of CEACAM5 in ATII cells may explain why its expression was not enhanced by H5N1 infection. Endogenous CEACAM1 protein expression was also analyzed in uninfected or influenza virus-infected A549 Fig. Therefore, although CEACAM1 forms heterodimers with CEACAM5 23 , the higher basal expression of CEACAM5 in ATII cells may explain why its expression was not enhanced by H5N1 infection. Endogenous CEACAM1 protein expression was also analyzed in uninfected or influenza virus-infected A549 Fig. 3C and ATII cells Fig. 3D . CEACAM1 protein expression was slightly, but not significantly, increased in A549 cells infected with A/Puerto Rico/8/1934 H1N1 PR8 virus for 24 or 48 hours when compared to uninfected cells Fig. 3C . No significant difference in CEACAM1 protein levels were observed at various MOIs 2, 5 or 10 or between the 24 and 48 hpi timepoints Fig. 3C . 3C . No significant difference in CEACAM1 protein levels were observed at various MOIs 2, 5 or 10 or between the 24 and 48 hpi timepoints Fig. 3C . After examing CEACAM1 protein expression following infection with PR8 virus in A549 cells, CEACAM1 protein expression was then examined in primary human ATII cells infected with HPAI H5N1 and compared to PR8 virus infection Fig. 3D . ATII cells were infected with PR8 virus at a MOI of 2, a dose that induced upregulation of cytokines and influenza Matrix M gene analyzed by qRT-PCR data not shown . Lower MOIs of 0.5, 1 and 2 of HPAI H5N1 were tested due to the strong cytopathogenic effect H5N1 causes at higher MOIs. ATII cells were infected with PR8 virus at a MOI of 2, a dose that induced upregulation of cytokines and influenza Matrix M gene analyzed by qRT-PCR data not shown . Lower MOIs of 0.5, 1 and 2 of HPAI H5N1 were tested due to the strong cytopathogenic effect H5N1 causes at higher MOIs. Endogenous CEACAM1 protein levels were significantly and similarly elevated in H5N1-infected ATII cells at the three MOIs tested. CEACAM1 protein expression in ATII cells infected with H5N1 at MOIs of 0.5 were higher at 48 hpi than those observed at 24 hpi Fig. 3D . HPAI H5N1 virus infection at MOIs of 0.5, 1 and 2 stimulated higher endogenous levels of CEACAM1 protein expression when compared to PR8 virus infection at a MOI of 2 at the corresponding time point a maximum ~9-fold increase induced by H5N1 at MOIs of 0.5 and 1 at 48 hpi when compared to PR8 at MOI of 2 , suggesting a possible role for CEACAM1 in influenza virus pathogenicity Fig. 3D . HPAI H5N1 virus infection at MOIs of 0.5, 1 and 2 stimulated higher endogenous levels of CEACAM1 protein expression when compared to PR8 virus infection at a MOI of 2 at the corresponding time point a maximum ~9-fold increase induced by H5N1 at MOIs of 0.5 and 1 at 48 hpi when compared to PR8 at MOI of 2 , suggesting a possible role for CEACAM1 in influenza virus pathogenicity Fig. 3D . In order to understand the role of CEACAM1 in influenza pathogenesis, A549 and ATII cells were transfected with siCEACAM1 to knockdown endogenous CEACAM1 protein expression. ATII and A549 cells were transfected with siCEACAM1 or siNeg negative control. The expression of four main CEACAM1 variants, CEACAM1-4L, -4S, -3L and -3S, and CEACAM1 protein were analyzed using SYBR Green qRT-PCR and Western blotting, respectively. ATII and A549 cells were transfected with siCEACAM1 or siNeg negative control. The expression of four main CEACAM1 variants, CEACAM1-4L, -4S, -3L and -3S, and CEACAM1 protein were analyzed using SYBR Green qRT-PCR and Western blotting, respectively. SYBR Green qRT-PCR analysis showed that ATII cells transfected with 15 pmol of siCEACAM1 significantly reduced the expression of CEACAM1-4L and -4S when compared to siNeg control, while the expression of CEACAM1-3L and -3S was not altered Fig. 4A . CEACAM1 protein expression was reduced by approximately 50% in both ATII and A549 cells following siCEACAM1 transfection when compared with siNeg-transfected cells Fig. 4B . 4A . CEACAM1 protein expression was reduced by approximately 50% in both ATII and A549 cells following siCEACAM1 transfection when compared with siNeg-transfected cells Fig. 4B . Increasing doses of siCEACAM1 10, 15 and 20 pmol did not further downregulate CEACAM1 protein expression in A549 cells Fig. 4B . As such, 15 pmol of siCEACAM1 was chosen for subsequent knockdown studies in both ATII and A549 cells. It is important to note that the anti-CEACAM1 antibody only detects L isoforms based on epitope information provided by Abcam. Therefore, observed reductions in CEACAM1 protein expression can be attributed mainly to the abolishment of CEACAM1-4L. It is important to note that the anti-CEACAM1 antibody only detects L isoforms based on epitope information provided by Abcam. Therefore, observed reductions in CEACAM1 protein expression can be attributed mainly to the abolishment of CEACAM1-4L. The functional consequences of CEACAM1 knockdown were then examined in ATII and A549 cells following H5N1 infection. IL6, IFNB1, CXCL10, CCL5 and TNF production was analyzed in H5N1-infected ATII and A549 cells using qRT-PCR. ATII Fig. 5A and A549 cells Fig. 5B transfected with siCEACAM1 showed significantly lower expression of IL6, CXCL10 and CCL5 when compared with siNeg-transfected cells. However, the expression of the anti-viral cytokine, IFNB1, was not affected in both cells types. 5B transfected with siCEACAM1 showed significantly lower expression of IL6, CXCL10 and CCL5 when compared with siNeg-transfected cells. However, the expression of the anti-viral cytokine, IFNB1, was not affected in both cells types. In addition, TNF expression, which can be induced by type I IFNs 33 , was significantly lower in siCEACAM1-transfected A549 cells Fig. 5B , but was not affected in siCEACAM1-transfected ATII cells Fig. 5A . Hypercytokinemia or "cytokine storm" in H5N1 and H7N9 virus-infected patients is thought to contribute to inflammatory tissue damage 34, 35 . Downregulation of CEACAM1 in the context of severe viral infection may reduce inflammation caused by H5N1 infection without dampening the antiviral response. Hypercytokinemia or "cytokine storm" in H5N1 and H7N9 virus-infected patients is thought to contribute to inflammatory tissue damage 34, 35 . Downregulation of CEACAM1 in the context of severe viral infection may reduce inflammation caused by H5N1 infection without dampening the antiviral response. Furthermore, virus replication was significantly reduced by 5.2-fold in ATII Figs. 5C and 4.8-fold in A549 cells Fig. 5D transfected with siCEACAM1 when compared with siNeg-transfected cells. Virus titers in siNeg-transfected control cells were not significantly different from those observed in mock-transfected control cells Fig. 5C,D . Influenza viruses utilize host cellular machinery to manipulate normal cell processes in order to promote replication and evade host immune responses. 5C,D . Influenza viruses utilize host cellular machinery to manipulate normal cell processes in order to promote replication and evade host immune responses. Studies in the field are increasingly focused on understanding and modifying key host factors in order to ameliorate disease. Examples include modulation of ROS to reduce inflammation 5 and inhibition of NFκB and mitogenic Raf/MEK/ERK kinase cascade activation to suppress viral replication 36, 37 . These host targeting strategies will offer an alternative to current interventions that are focused on targeting the virus. In the present study, we analyzed human host gene expression profiles following HPAI H5N1 infection and treatment with the antioxidant, apocynin. These host targeting strategies will offer an alternative to current interventions that are focused on targeting the virus. In the present study, we analyzed human host gene expression profiles following HPAI H5N1 infection and treatment with the antioxidant, apocynin. As expected, genes that were significantly upregulated following H5N1 infection were involved in biological processes, including cytokine signaling, immunity and apoptosis. In addition, H5N1-upregulated genes were also involved in regulation of protein phosphorylation, cellular metabolism and cell proliferation, which are thought to be exploited by viruses for replication 38 . Apocynin treatment had both anti-viral Tables S2-S4 5 and pro-viral impact Fig. 2G , which is not surprising as ROS are potent microbicidal agents, as well as important immune signaling molecules at different concentrations 39 . Apocynin treatment had both anti-viral Tables S2-S4 5 and pro-viral impact Fig. 2G , which is not surprising as ROS are potent microbicidal agents, as well as important immune signaling molecules at different concentrations 39 . In our hands, apocynin treatment reduced H5N1-induced inflammation, but also impacted the cellular defense response, cytokine production and cytokine-mediated signaling. Importantly, critical antiviral responses were not compromised, i.e. expression of pattern recognition receptors e.g. DDX58 RIG-I , TLRs, IFIH1 MDA5 was not downregulated Table S1 . Given the significant interference of influenza viruses on host immunity, we focused our attention on key regulators of the immune response. DDX58 RIG-I , TLRs, IFIH1 MDA5 was not downregulated Table S1 . Given the significant interference of influenza viruses on host immunity, we focused our attention on key regulators of the immune response. Through HiSeq analysis, we identified the cell adhesion molecule CEACAM1 as a critical regulator of immunity. Knockdown of endogenous CEACAM1 inhibited H5N1 virus replication and reduced H5N1-stimulated inflammatory cytokine/chemokine production. H5N1 infection resulted in significant upregulation of a number of inflammatory cytokines/chemokines genes, including AXL and STING, which were significantly reduced by apocynin treatment to a level lower than that observed in uninfected cells Table S4 . It has been previously demonstrated that anti-AXL antibody treatment of PR8-infected mice significantly reduced lung inflammation and virus titers 40 . H5N1 infection resulted in significant upregulation of a number of inflammatory cytokines/chemokines genes, including AXL and STING, which were significantly reduced by apocynin treatment to a level lower than that observed in uninfected cells Table S4 . It has been previously demonstrated that anti-AXL antibody treatment of PR8-infected mice significantly reduced lung inflammation and virus titers 40 . STING has been shown to be important for promoting anti-viral responses, as STING-knockout THP-1 cells produce less type I IFN following influenza A virus infection 41 . Reduction of STING gene expression or other anti-viral factors e.g. IFNB1, MX1, ISG15; Table S1 by apocynin, may in part, explain the slight increase in influenza gene transcription following apocynin treatment Fig. 2G . IFNB1, MX1, ISG15; Table S1 by apocynin, may in part, explain the slight increase in influenza gene transcription following apocynin treatment Fig. 2G . These results also suggest that apocynin treatment may reduce H5N1-induced inflammation and apoptosis. Indeed, the anti-inflammatory and anti-apoptotic effects of apocynin have been shown previously in a number of disease models, including diabetes mellitus 42 , myocardial infarction 43 , neuroinflammation 44 and influenza virus infection 6 . Recognition of intracellular viral RNA by pattern recognition receptors PRRs triggers the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines/chemokines that recruit innate immune cells, such as neutrophils and NK cells, to the site of infection to assist in viral clearance 45 . Neutrophils exert their cytotoxic function by first attaching to influenza-infected epithelial cells via adhesion molecules, such as CEACAM1 46 . Recognition of intracellular viral RNA by pattern recognition receptors PRRs triggers the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines/chemokines that recruit innate immune cells, such as neutrophils and NK cells, to the site of infection to assist in viral clearance 45 . Neutrophils exert their cytotoxic function by first attaching to influenza-infected epithelial cells via adhesion molecules, such as CEACAM1 46 . Moreover, studies have indicated that influenza virus infection promotes neutrophil apoptosis 47 , delaying virus elimination 48 . Phosphorylation of CEACAM1 ITIM motifs and activation of caspase-3 is critical for mediating anti-apoptotic events and for promoting survival of neutrophils 27 . This suggests that CEACAM1-mediated anti-apoptotic events may be important for the resolution of influenza virus infection in vivo, which can be further investigated through infection studies with Ceacam1-knockout mice. NK cells play a critical role in innate defense against influenza viruses by recognizing and killing infected cells. This suggests that CEACAM1-mediated anti-apoptotic events may be important for the resolution of influenza virus infection in vivo, which can be further investigated through infection studies with Ceacam1-knockout mice. NK cells play a critical role in innate defense against influenza viruses by recognizing and killing infected cells. Influenza viruses, however, employ several strategies to escape NK effector functions, including modification of influenza hemagglutinin HA glycosylation to avoid NK activating receptor binding 49 . Homo-or heterophilic CEACAM1 interactions have been shown to inhibit NK-killing 25, 26 , and are thought to contribute to tumor cell immune evasion 50 . Given these findings, one could suggest the possibility that upregulation of CEACAM1 to inhibit NK activity may be a novel and uncharacterized immune evasion strategy employed by influenza viruses. Our laboratory is now investigating the role of CEACAM1 in NK cell function. Given these findings, one could suggest the possibility that upregulation of CEACAM1 to inhibit NK activity may be a novel and uncharacterized immune evasion strategy employed by influenza viruses. Our laboratory is now investigating the role of CEACAM1 in NK cell function. Small-molecule inhibitors of protein kinases or protein phosphatases e.g. inhibitors for Src, JAK, SHP2 have been developed as therapies for cancer, inflammation, immune and metabolic diseases 51 . Modulation of CEACAM1 phosphorylation, dimerization and the downstream function with small-molecule inhibitors may assist in dissecting the contribution of CEACAM1 to NK cell activity. The molecular mechanism of CEACAM1 action following infection has also been explored in A549 cells using PR8 virus 52 . Modulation of CEACAM1 phosphorylation, dimerization and the downstream function with small-molecule inhibitors may assist in dissecting the contribution of CEACAM1 to NK cell activity. The molecular mechanism of CEACAM1 action following infection has also been explored in A549 cells using PR8 virus 52 . Vitenshtein et al. demonstrated that CEACAM1 was upregulated following recognition of viral RNA by RIG-I, and that this upregulation was interferon regulatory factor 3 IRF3 -dependent. In addition, phosphorylation of CEACAM1 by SHP2 inhibited viral replication by reducing phosphorylation of mammalian target of rapamycin mTOR to suppress global cellular protein production. In the present study, we used a more physiologically relevant infection model, primary human ATII cells, to study the role of Further studies will be required to investigate/confirm the molecular mechanisms of CEACAM1 upregulation following influenza virus infection, especially in vivo. In addition, phosphorylation of CEACAM1 by SHP2 inhibited viral replication by reducing phosphorylation of mammalian target of rapamycin mTOR to suppress global cellular protein production. In the present study, we used a more physiologically relevant infection model, primary human ATII cells, to study the role of Further studies will be required to investigate/confirm the molecular mechanisms of CEACAM1 upregulation following influenza virus infection, especially in vivo. As upregulation of CEACAM1 has been observed in other virus infections, such as cytomegalovirus 18 and papillomavirus 19 , it will be important to determine whether a common mechanism of action can be attributed to CEACAM1 in order to determine its functional significance. If this can be established, CEACAM1 could be used as a target for the development of a pan-antiviral agent. In summary, molecules on the cell surface such as CEACAM1 are particularly attractive candidates for therapeutic development, as drugs do not need to cross the cell membrane in order to be effective. Targeting of host-encoded genes in combination with current antivirals and vaccines may be a way of reducing morbidity and mortality associated with influenza virus infection. In summary, molecules on the cell surface such as CEACAM1 are particularly attractive candidates for therapeutic development, as drugs do not need to cross the cell membrane in order to be effective. Targeting of host-encoded genes in combination with current antivirals and vaccines may be a way of reducing morbidity and mortality associated with influenza virus infection. Our study clearly demonstrates that increased CEACAM1 expression is observed in primary human ATII cells infected with HPAI H5N1 influenza virus. Importantly, knockdown of CEACAM1 expression resulted in a reduction in influenza virus replication and suggests targeting of this molecule may assist in improving disease outcomes. Isolation and culture of primary human ATII cells. Human non-tumor lung tissue samples were donated by anonymous patients undergoing lung resection at University Hospital, Geelong, Australia. Isolation and culture of primary human ATII cells. Human non-tumor lung tissue samples were donated by anonymous patients undergoing lung resection at University Hospital, Geelong, Australia. The research protocols and human ethics were approved by the Human Ethics Committees of Deakin University, Barwon Health and the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation CSIRO . Informed consent was obtained from all tissue donors. All research was performed in accordance with the guidelines stated in the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research . . The sampling of normal lung tissue was confirmed by the Victorian Cancer Biobank, Australia. . The sampling of normal lung tissue was confirmed by the Victorian Cancer Biobank, Australia. Lung specimens were preserved in Hartmann's solution Baxter for 4-8 hours or O/N at 4 °C to maintain cellular integrity and viability before cells are isolated. Human alveolar epithelial type II ATII cells were isolated and cultured using a previously described method 30, 53 with minor modifications. Briefly, lung tissue with visible bronchi was removed and perfused with abundant PBS and submerged in 0.5% Trypsin-EDTA Gibco twice for 15 min at 37 °C. The partially digested tissue was sliced into sections and further digested in Hank's Balanced Salt Solution HBSS containing elastase 12.9 units/mL; Roche Diagnostics and DNase I 0.5 mg/mL; Roche Diagnostics for 60 min at 37 °C. Briefly, lung tissue with visible bronchi was removed and perfused with abundant PBS and submerged in 0.5% Trypsin-EDTA Gibco twice for 15 min at 37 °C. The partially digested tissue was sliced into sections and further digested in Hank's Balanced Salt Solution HBSS containing elastase 12.9 units/mL; Roche Diagnostics and DNase I 0.5 mg/mL; Roche Diagnostics for 60 min at 37 °C. Single cell suspensions were obtained by filtration through a 40 μm cell strainer and cells including macrophages and fibroblasts were allowed to attach to tissue-culture treated Petri dishes in a 1:1 mixture of DMEM/F12 medium Gibco and small airway growth medium SAGM medium Lonza containing 5% fetal calf serum FCS and 0.5 mg/mL DNase I for 2 hours at 37 °C. Non-adherent cells, including ATII cells, were collected and subjected to centrifugation at 300 g for 20 min on a discontinuous Percoll density gradient 1.089 and 1.040 g/mL . Purified ATII cells from the interface of two density gradients was collected, washed in HBSS, and re-suspended in SAGM medium supplemented with 1% charcoal-filtered FCS Gibco and 100 units/mL penicillin and 100 µg/mL streptomycin Gibco . ATII cells were plated on polyester Transwell inserts 0.4 μm pore; Corning coated with type IV human placenta collagen 0.05 mg/mL; Sigma at 300,000 cells/cm 2 and cultured under liquid-covered conditions in a humidified incubator 5% CO 2 , 37 °C . Purified ATII cells from the interface of two density gradients was collected, washed in HBSS, and re-suspended in SAGM medium supplemented with 1% charcoal-filtered FCS Gibco and 100 units/mL penicillin and 100 µg/mL streptomycin Gibco . ATII cells were plated on polyester Transwell inserts 0.4 μm pore; Corning coated with type IV human placenta collagen 0.05 mg/mL; Sigma at 300,000 cells/cm 2 and cultured under liquid-covered conditions in a humidified incubator 5% CO 2 , 37 °C . Growth medium was changed every 48 hours. These culture conditions suppressed fibroblasts expansion within the freshly isolated ATII cells and encouraged ATII cells to form confluent monolayers with a typical large and somewhat square morphology 54 Cell culture and media. A549 carcinomic human alveolar basal epithelial type II-like cells and Madin-Darby canine kidney MDCK cells were provided by the tissue culture facility of Australian Animal Health Laboratory AAHL , CSIRO. A549 and MDCK cells were maintained in Ham's F12K medium GIBCO and RPMI-1640 medium Invitrogen , respectively, supplemented with 10% FCS, 100 U/mL penicillin and 100 µg/mL streptomycin GIBCO and maintained at 37 °C, 5% CO 2 . A549 carcinomic human alveolar basal epithelial type II-like cells and Madin-Darby canine kidney MDCK cells were provided by the tissue culture facility of Australian Animal Health Laboratory AAHL , CSIRO. A549 and MDCK cells were maintained in Ham's F12K medium GIBCO and RPMI-1640 medium Invitrogen , respectively, supplemented with 10% FCS, 100 U/mL penicillin and 100 µg/mL streptomycin GIBCO and maintained at 37 °C, 5% CO 2 . Virus and viral infection. HPAI A/chicken/Vietnam/0008/2004 H5N1 H5N1 was obtained from AAHL, CSIRO. Viral stocks of A/Puerto Rico/8/1934 H1N1 PR8 were obtained from the University of Melbourne. Virus stocks were prepared using standard inoculation of 10-day-old embryonated eggs. Viral stocks of A/Puerto Rico/8/1934 H1N1 PR8 were obtained from the University of Melbourne. Virus stocks were prepared using standard inoculation of 10-day-old embryonated eggs. A single stock of virus was prepared for use in all assays. All H5N1 experiments were performed within biosafety level 3 laboratories BSL3 at AAHL, CSIRO. Cells were infected with influenza A viruses as previously described 6, 29 . Briefly, culture media was removed and cells were washed with warm PBS three times followed by inoculation with virus for 1 hour. Virus was then removed and cells were washed with warm PBS three times, and incubated in the appropriate fresh serum-free culture media containing 0.3% BSA at 37 °C. Briefly, culture media was removed and cells were washed with warm PBS three times followed by inoculation with virus for 1 hour. Virus was then removed and cells were washed with warm PBS three times, and incubated in the appropriate fresh serum-free culture media containing 0.3% BSA at 37 °C. Uninfected and infected cells were processed identically. For HiSeq analysis, ATII cells from three donors were infected on the apical side with H5N1 at a MOI of 2 for 24 hours in serum-free SAGM medium supplemented with 0.3% bovine serum albumin BSA containing 1 mM apocynin dissolved in DMSO or 1% DMSO vehicle control. Uninfected ATII cells incubated in media containing 1% DMSO were used as a negative control. For other subsequent virus infection studies, ATII cells from a different set of three donors different from those used in HiSeq analysis or A549 cells from at least three different passages were infected with influenza A viruses at various MOIs as indicated in the text. Uninfected ATII cells incubated in media containing 1% DMSO were used as a negative control. For other subsequent virus infection studies, ATII cells from a different set of three donors different from those used in HiSeq analysis or A549 cells from at least three different passages were infected with influenza A viruses at various MOIs as indicated in the text. For H5N1 studies following transfection with siRNA, the infectious dose was optimized to a MOI of 0.01, a dose at which significantly higher CEACAM1 protein expression was induced with minimal cell death at 24 hpi. For PR8 infection studies, a final concentration of 0.5 µg/mL L-1-Tosylamide-2-phenylethyl chloromethyl ketone TPCK -treated trypsin Worthington was included in media post-inoculation to assist replication. Virus titers were determined using standard plaque assays in MDCK cells as previously described 55 . RNA extraction, quality control QC and HiSeq analysis. Virus titers were determined using standard plaque assays in MDCK cells as previously described 55 . RNA extraction, quality control QC and HiSeq analysis. ATII cells from three donors were used for HiSeq analysis. Total RNA was extracted from cells using a RNeasy Mini kit Qiagen . Influenza-infected cells were washed with PBS three times and cells lysed with RLT buffer supplemented with β-mercaptoethanol 10 μL/mL; Gibco . Cell lysates were homogenized with QIAshredder columns followed by on-column DNA digestion with the RNase-Free DNase Set Qiagen , and RNA extracted according to manufacturer's instructions. Influenza-infected cells were washed with PBS three times and cells lysed with RLT buffer supplemented with β-mercaptoethanol 10 μL/mL; Gibco . Cell lysates were homogenized with QIAshredder columns followed by on-column DNA digestion with the RNase-Free DNase Set Qiagen , and RNA extracted according to manufacturer's instructions. Initial QC was conducted to ensure that the quantity and quality of RNA samples for HiSeq analysis met the following criteria; 1 RNA samples had OD260/280 ratios between 1.8 and 2.0 as measured with NanoDrop TM Spectrophotometer Thermo Scientific ; 2 Sample concentrations were at a minimum of 100 ng/μl; 3 RNA was analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis. RNA integrity and quality were validated by the presence of sharp clear bands of 28S and 18S ribosomal RNA, with a 28S:18S ratio of 2:1, along with the absence of genomic DNA and degraded RNA. As part of the initial QC and as an indication of consistent H5N1 infection, parallel quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase PCR qRT-PCR using the same RNA samples used for HiSeq analysis was performed in duplicate as previously described 6 to measure mRNA expression of IL6, IFNB1, CXCL10, CCL5, TNF, SOCS1 and SOCS3, all of which are known to be upregulated following HPAI H5N1 infection of A549 cells 6 Sequencing analysis and annotation. After confirming checksums and assessing raw data quality of the FASTQ files with FASTQC, RNA-Seq reads were processed according to standard Tuxedo pipeline protocols 56 , using the annotated human genome GRCh37, downloaded from Illumina iGenomes as a reference. As part of the initial QC and as an indication of consistent H5N1 infection, parallel quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase PCR qRT-PCR using the same RNA samples used for HiSeq analysis was performed in duplicate as previously described 6 to measure mRNA expression of IL6, IFNB1, CXCL10, CCL5, TNF, SOCS1 and SOCS3, all of which are known to be upregulated following HPAI H5N1 infection of A549 cells 6 Sequencing analysis and annotation. After confirming checksums and assessing raw data quality of the FASTQ files with FASTQC, RNA-Seq reads were processed according to standard Tuxedo pipeline protocols 56 , using the annotated human genome GRCh37, downloaded from Illumina iGenomes as a reference. Briefly, raw reads for each sample were mapped to the human genome using TopHat2, sorted and converted to SAM format using Samtools and then assembled into transcriptomes using Cufflinks. Cuffmerge was used to combine transcript annotations from individual samples into a single reference transcriptome, and Cuffquant was used to obtain per-sample read counts. Cuffdiff was then used to conduct differential expression analysis. All programs were run using recommended parameters. Cuffdiff was then used to conduct differential expression analysis. All programs were run using recommended parameters. It is important to note that the reference gtf file provided to cuffmerge was first edited using a custom python script to exclude lines containing features other than exon/cds, and contigs other than chromosomes 1-22, X, Y. GO term and KEGG enrichment. Official gene IDs for transcripts that were differentially modulated following HPAI H5N1 infection with or without apocynin treatment were compiled into six target lists from pairwise comparisons "ND vs. HD Up", "ND vs. HD Down", "ND vs. HA Up", "ND vs. HA Down", "HD vs. HA Up", "HD vs. HA Down" . Statistically significant differentially expressed transcripts were defined as having ≥2-fold change with a Benjamini-Hochberg adjusted P value < 0.01. Official gene IDs for transcripts that were differentially modulated following HPAI H5N1 infection with or without apocynin treatment were compiled into six target lists from pairwise comparisons "ND vs. HD Up", "ND vs. HD Down", "ND vs. HA Up", "ND vs. HA Down", "HD vs. HA Up", "HD vs. HA Down" . Statistically significant differentially expressed transcripts were defined as having ≥2-fold change with a Benjamini-Hochberg adjusted P value < 0.01. A background list of genes was compiled by retrieving all gene IDs identified from the present HiSeq analysis with FPKM > 1. Biological process GO enrichment was performed using Gorilla, comparing unranked background and target lists 57 . Redundant GO terms were removed using REVIGO 58 . Target lists were also subjected to KEGG pathway analysis using a basic KEGG pathway mapper 59 and DAVID Bioinformatics Resources Functional Annotation Tool 60,61 . Redundant GO terms were removed using REVIGO 58 . Target lists were also subjected to KEGG pathway analysis using a basic KEGG pathway mapper 59 and DAVID Bioinformatics Resources Functional Annotation Tool 60,61 . Quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction qRT-PCR . mRNA concentrations of genes of interest were assessed and analyzed using qRT-PCR performed in duplicate as previously described 6 . Briefly, after total RNA extraction from influenza-infected cells, cDNA was SCIEntIfIC RepoRtS | . 8:15468 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-33605-6 prepared using SuperScript ™ III First-Strand Synthesis SuperMix Invitrogen . Briefly, after total RNA extraction from influenza-infected cells, cDNA was SCIEntIfIC RepoRtS | . 8:15468 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-33605-6 prepared using SuperScript ™ III First-Strand Synthesis SuperMix Invitrogen . Gene expression of various cytokines was assessed using TaqMan Gene Expression Assays Applied Biosystems with commercial TaqMan primers and probes, with the exception of the influenza Matrix M gene forward primer 5′-CTTCTAACCGAGGTCGAAACGTA-3′; reverse primer 5′-GGTGACAGGATTGGTCTTGTCTTTA-3′; probe 5′-FAM-TCAGGCCCCCTCAAAGCCGAG-NFQ-3′ 62 . Specific primers 63 Table S5 were designed to estimate the expression of CEACAM1-4L, -4S, -3L and -3S in ATII and A549 cells using iTaq Universal SYBR Green Supermix Bio-Rad according to manufacturer's instruction. The absence of nonspecific amplification was confirmed by agarose gel electrophoresis of qRT-PCR products 15 μL data not shown . Gene expression was normalized to β-actin mRNA using the 2 −ΔΔCT method where expression levels were determined relative to uninfected cell controls. The absence of nonspecific amplification was confirmed by agarose gel electrophoresis of qRT-PCR products 15 μL data not shown . Gene expression was normalized to β-actin mRNA using the 2 −ΔΔCT method where expression levels were determined relative to uninfected cell controls. All assays were performed in duplicate using an Applied Biosystems ® StepOnePlus TM Real-Time PCR System. Western blot analysis. Protein expression of CEACAM1 was determined using Western blot analysis as previously described 6 . Protein concentrations in cell lysates were determined using EZQ ® Protein Quantitation Kit Molecular Probes TM , Invitrogen . Equal amounts of protein were loaded on NuPAGE 4-12% Bis-Tris gels Invitrogen , resolved by SDS/PAGE and transferred to PVDF membranes Bio-Rad . Protein concentrations in cell lysates were determined using EZQ ® Protein Quantitation Kit Molecular Probes TM , Invitrogen . Equal amounts of protein were loaded on NuPAGE 4-12% Bis-Tris gels Invitrogen , resolved by SDS/PAGE and transferred to PVDF membranes Bio-Rad . Membranes were probed with rabbit anti-human CEACAM1 monoclonal antibody EPR4049 ab108397, Abcam followed by goat anti-rabbit HRP-conjugated secondary antibody Invitrogen . Proteins were visualized by incubating membranes with Pierce enhanced chemiluminescence ECL Plus Western Blotting Substrate Thermo Scientific followed by detection on a Bio-Rad ChemiDoc ™ MP Imaging System or on Amersham ™ Hyperfilm ™ ECL GE Healthcare . To use β-actin as a loading control, the same membrane was stripped in stripping buffer 1.5% w/v glycine, 0.1% w/v SDS, 1% v/v Tween-20, pH 2.2 and re-probed with a HRP-conjugated rabbit anti-β-actin monoclonal antibody Cell Signaling . In some cases, two SDS/PAGE were performed simultaneously with equal amounts of protein loaded onto each gel for analysis of CEACAM1 and β-actin protein expression in each sample, respectively. To use β-actin as a loading control, the same membrane was stripped in stripping buffer 1.5% w/v glycine, 0.1% w/v SDS, 1% v/v Tween-20, pH 2.2 and re-probed with a HRP-conjugated rabbit anti-β-actin monoclonal antibody Cell Signaling . In some cases, two SDS/PAGE were performed simultaneously with equal amounts of protein loaded onto each gel for analysis of CEACAM1 and β-actin protein expression in each sample, respectively. Protein band density was quantified using Fiji software version 1.49J10 64 . CEACAM1 protein band density was normalized against that of β-actin and expressed as fold changes compared to controls. Knockdown of endogenous CEACAM1. ATII and A549 cells were grown to 80% confluency in 6-well plates then transfected with small interfering RNA siRNA targeting the human CEACAM1 gene siCEACAM1; s1976, Silencer ® Select Pre-designed siRNA, Ambion ® or siRNA control siNeg; Silencer ® Select Negative Control No. Knockdown of endogenous CEACAM1. ATII and A549 cells were grown to 80% confluency in 6-well plates then transfected with small interfering RNA siRNA targeting the human CEACAM1 gene siCEACAM1; s1976, Silencer ® Select Pre-designed siRNA, Ambion ® or siRNA control siNeg; Silencer ® Select Negative Control No. 1 siRNA, Ambion ® using Lipofetamine 3000 ThermoFisher Scientific according to manufacturer's instructions. Transfection and silencing efficiency were evaluated after 48 hours by Western blot analysis of CEACAM1 protein expression and by qRT-PCR analysis of CEACAM1 variants. In parallel experiments, virus replication and cytokine/chemokine production was analyzed in siCEACAM1-or siNeg-transfected cells infected with H5N1 virus MOI = 0.01 at 24 hpi. Statistical analysis. In parallel experiments, virus replication and cytokine/chemokine production was analyzed in siCEACAM1-or siNeg-transfected cells infected with H5N1 virus MOI = 0.01 at 24 hpi. Statistical analysis. Differences between two experimental groups were evaluated using a Student's unpaired, two-tailed t test. Fold-change differences of mRNA expression qRT-PCR between three experimental groups was evaluated using one-way analysis of variance ANOVA followed by a Bonferroni multiple-comparison test. Differences were considered significant with a p value of <0.05. The data are shown as means ± standard error of the mean SEM from three or four individual experiments. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism for Windows v5.02 . The data are shown as means ± standard error of the mean SEM from three or four individual experiments. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism for Windows v5.02 . All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article or the supplementary information file. The raw and processed HiSeq data has been deposited to GEO GSE119767; nlm.nih.gov/geo/ .