How is Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus transmitted?
by mosquitoes
Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus VEEV is a previously weaponized arthropod-borne virus responsible for causing acute and fatal encephalitis in animal and human hosts. The increased circulation and spread in the Americas of VEEV and other encephalitic arboviruses, such as eastern equine encephalitis virus and West Nile virus, underscore the need for research aimed at characterizing the pathogenesis of viral encephalomyelitis for the development of novel medical countermeasures. The host-pathogen dynamics of VEEV Trinidad donkey-infected human astrocytoma U87MG cells were determined by carrying out RNA sequencing RNA-Seq of poly A and mRNAs. To identify the critical alterations that take place in the host transcriptome following VEEV infection, samples were collected at 4, 8, and 16 h postinfection and RNA-Seq data were acquired using an Ion Torrent PGM platform. Differential expression of interferon response, stress response factors, and components of the unfolded protein response UPR was observed. The protein kinase RNA-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase PERK arm of the UPR was activated, as the expression of both activating transcription factor 4 ATF4 and CHOP DDIT3 , critical regulators of the pathway, was altered after infection. Differential expression of interferon response, stress response factors, and components of the unfolded protein response UPR was observed. The protein kinase RNA-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase PERK arm of the UPR was activated, as the expression of both activating transcription factor 4 ATF4 and CHOP DDIT3 , critical regulators of the pathway, was altered after infection. Expression of the transcription factor early growth response 1 EGR1 was induced in a PERK-dependent manner. EGR1 −/− mouse embryonic fibroblasts MEFs demonstrated lower susceptibility to VEEV-induced cell death than isogenic wild-type MEFs, indicating that EGR1 modulates proapoptotic pathways following VEEV infection. The influence of EGR1 is of great importance, as neuronal damage can lead to long-term sequelae in individuals who have survived VEEV infection. IMPORTANCE Alphaviruses represent a group of clinically relevant viruses transmitted by mosquitoes to humans. The influence of EGR1 is of great importance, as neuronal damage can lead to long-term sequelae in individuals who have survived VEEV infection. IMPORTANCE Alphaviruses represent a group of clinically relevant viruses transmitted by mosquitoes to humans. In severe cases, viral spread targets neuronal tissue, resulting in significant and life-threatening inflammation dependent on a combination of virus-host interactions. Currently there are no therapeutics for infections cause by encephalitic alphaviruses due to an incomplete understanding of their molecular pathogenesis. Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus VEEV is an alphavirus that is prevalent in the Americas and that is capable of infecting horses and humans. Here we utilized next-generation RNA sequencing to identify differential alterations in VEEV-infected astrocytes. Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus VEEV is an alphavirus that is prevalent in the Americas and that is capable of infecting horses and humans. Here we utilized next-generation RNA sequencing to identify differential alterations in VEEV-infected astrocytes. Our results indicated that the abundance of transcripts associated with the interferon and the unfolded protein response pathways was altered following infection and demonstrated that early growth response 1 EGR1 contributed to VEEV-induced cell death. Text: V enezuelan equine encephalitis virus VEEV is a New World alphavirus in the family Togaviridae that is endemic to the Americas. VEEV is a positive-strand RNA virus that is transmitted by mosquitoes and that is naturally present in rodent reservoirs . . VEEV is a positive-strand RNA virus that is transmitted by mosquitoes and that is naturally present in rodent reservoirs . . There are six subtypes that are categorized by their geographic range and pathology in equines and humans. The two epizootic strains, IA/B and IC, arose from mutations among the enzootic strains . . The IA/B and IC strains are of particular concern due to increased rates of morbidity and mortality and the risks associated with viral amplification and potential species spillover . . In humans, VEEV causes a febrile illness typified by fever, malaise, and vomiting. . In humans, VEEV causes a febrile illness typified by fever, malaise, and vomiting. In some cases, infection progresses to the central nervous system CNS and neurological symptoms, such as confusion, ataxia, and seizures, manifest. The mortality rate among cases with neurological symptoms can be as high as 35% in children and 10% in adults, with long-term neurological deficits often being seen in survivors . . In 1995, an outbreak of VEEV in Colombia and Venezuela resulted in over 100,000 human cases . . . In 1995, an outbreak of VEEV in Colombia and Venezuela resulted in over 100,000 human cases . . In addition to natural outbreaks, VEEV is also a concern from a bioterrorism perspective, as it can be grown to high titers, requires a low infectious dose, and contains multiple serotypes. Both the former Soviet Union and the United States previously weaponized the virus, producing large quantities for their now defunct offensive bioweapons programs . . Currently, vaccine strain TC83 is used in horses and for high-risk personnel; however, due to the low rate of seroconversion achieved with this vaccine . and its reliance on two single attenuating mutations . Currently, vaccine strain TC83 is used in horses and for high-risk personnel; however, due to the low rate of seroconversion achieved with this vaccine . and its reliance on two single attenuating mutations . , it is considered unfit for mass distribution . . To date there are no FDA-approved therapeutics for VEEV infection, and further studies are required for clarification of the mechanisms associated with the underlying pathogenesis of VEEV. Viral and host transcriptomic studies can provide a wealth of information on the underlying pathogenic mechanisms and interactions following the course of an infection. To date there are no FDA-approved therapeutics for VEEV infection, and further studies are required for clarification of the mechanisms associated with the underlying pathogenesis of VEEV. Viral and host transcriptomic studies can provide a wealth of information on the underlying pathogenic mechanisms and interactions following the course of an infection. The use of highthroughput next-generation sequencing has led to the discovery of previously uncharacterized viruses and the establishment of numerous novel experimental systems redefining virus-host interactions. To date a number of studies have examined the alterations in the host transcriptome following VEEV infection. A comparative microarray analysis between cells persistently infected with VEEV and cells able to clear VEEV resulted in the identification of PARP12L as an antiviral factor . . A comparative microarray analysis between cells persistently infected with VEEV and cells able to clear VEEV resulted in the identification of PARP12L as an antiviral factor . . A molecular comparison utilizing microarrays of host-based responses to the TC83 strain was able to identify biomarkers differentiating between vaccine responder and vaccine nonresponder groups, as well as the involvement of interferon IFN , interferon-induced pathways, Toll-like receptor TLR , and interleukin 12 IL-12 related pathways . . A study examining the role of adhesion and inflammatory factors in VEEV-infected CD-1 mice found viral modulation of the expression of extracellular matrix and adhesion genes, such as integrins Itg␣X, Itg2, 3, and 7 , cadherins 1 and 2, vascular cell adhesion molecule 1, and intracellular adhesion molecule 1 ICAM-1 , in the brains of VEEV-infected mice . . A study examining the role of adhesion and inflammatory factors in VEEV-infected CD-1 mice found viral modulation of the expression of extracellular matrix and adhesion genes, such as integrins Itg␣X, Itg2, 3, and 7 , cadherins 1 and 2, vascular cell adhesion molecule 1, and intracellular adhesion molecule 1 ICAM-1 , in the brains of VEEV-infected mice . . Follow-up experiments utilizing ICAM-1-knockout mice demonstrated reduced inflammation in the brain and a subsequent delay in the onset of neurological sequelae . . A study by Sharma et al. utilized microarrays to analyze gene expression changes in the brain tissue of VEEV-infected mice over the course of an infection, discovering numerous immune pathways involved in antigen presentation, inflammation, apoptosis, and the traditional antiviral response Cxcl10, CxCl11, Ccl5, Ifr7, Ifi27, Oas1b, Fcerg1, Mif, clusterin, and major histocompatibility complex MHC class II . A study by Sharma et al. utilized microarrays to analyze gene expression changes in the brain tissue of VEEV-infected mice over the course of an infection, discovering numerous immune pathways involved in antigen presentation, inflammation, apoptosis, and the traditional antiviral response Cxcl10, CxCl11, Ccl5, Ifr7, Ifi27, Oas1b, Fcerg1, Mif, clusterin, and major histocompatibility complex MHC class II . . A second study by the same group identified the regulation of microRNAs miRNAs in the brains of VEEV-infected mice, which enabled the correlation of the miRNA changes with earlier mRNA expression data . . These analyses suggest that VEEV may be utilizing cellular miRNAs in order to regulate downstream mRNA, which may correspond with the VEEV-induced histological changes to the nervous system . . These analyses suggest that VEEV may be utilizing cellular miRNAs in order to regulate downstream mRNA, which may correspond with the VEEV-induced histological changes to the nervous system . . In the current study, next-generation RNA sequencing RNA-Seq was used to identify clinically relevant alterations in the mRNA transcriptome of human astrocytes infected with wildtype WT VEEV strain Trinidad donkey TrD . The analysis of host mRNAs by RNA-Seq provides novel insight into how a host responds to a viral infection through the identification of a wide and dynamic range of transcripts in an unbiased manner. Selective sequencing of mRNAs, specifically, polyadenylated poly A transcripts, which account for ϳ1% of the entire transcriptome, enhances the detection of the most relevant and low-abundance transcripts . The analysis of host mRNAs by RNA-Seq provides novel insight into how a host responds to a viral infection through the identification of a wide and dynamic range of transcripts in an unbiased manner. Selective sequencing of mRNAs, specifically, polyadenylated poly A transcripts, which account for ϳ1% of the entire transcriptome, enhances the detection of the most relevant and low-abundance transcripts . . As VEEV has been shown to productively infect astrocytes both in vitro and in vivo . , we chose astrocytes as our model of interest. Astrocytes are the most abundant cell in the brain, outnumbering neurons by at least 5-fold . , providing an abundant resource for viral replication within the brain. Astrocytes are the most abundant cell in the brain, outnumbering neurons by at least 5-fold . , providing an abundant resource for viral replication within the brain. In addition to their well-described structural role in neuronal tissue, as-trocytes play critical roles in other processes, including the regulation of blood flow and of the blood-brain barrier, synapse transmission, and the response to infection . . VEEV-infected astrocytes have been shown to produce multiple cytokines, including IL-8, IL-17, interferon gamma IFN-␥ , and gamma interferon-induced protein 10, all of which were found to be associated with viral attenuation . . VEEV-infected astrocytes have been shown to produce multiple cytokines, including IL-8, IL-17, interferon gamma IFN-␥ , and gamma interferon-induced protein 10, all of which were found to be associated with viral attenuation . . In order to obtain a dynamic view of the virus-host interactome, RNA-Seq was used to monitor changes in gene expression in VEEV TrD-infected astrocytes at 4, 8, and 16 h postinfection hpi . By viewing the alterations at multiple early time points using triplicate biological replicates, a robust and dynamic range of information is generated, and this information provides an increase in both the power and the accuracy of detection of differentially expressed transcripts in a highly relevant clinical model . . Among VEEV-infected cells, an increase in interferon-regulated genes, including IFIT1, IFIT2, IFIT3, and OASL, was observed. . Among VEEV-infected cells, an increase in interferon-regulated genes, including IFIT1, IFIT2, IFIT3, and OASL, was observed. The increased expression of genes involved in the stressinduced unfolded protein response UPR pathway was also noted. Interestingly, VEEV infection resulted in an increase in early growth response protein 1 EGR1 , which may serve as a link between the two pathways. The identification of host mRNAs whose expression is altered following VEEV replication, specifically, EGR1 and its interactors up-and downstream, may provide novel host-based therapeutic targets critical for VEEV replication and a greater understanding of the underlying mechanisms underpinning alphavirus replication. Viral infections and plaque assays. VEEV TrD was obtained from BEI Resources. Viral infections and plaque assays. VEEV TrD was obtained from BEI Resources. All experiments with VEEV TrD were performed under biosafety level 3 BSL-3 conditions. All work involving select agents is registered with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and was conducted at George Mason University's Biomedical Research Laboratory, which is registered in accordance with federal select agent regulations. For infections, VEEV was added to supplemented Dulbecco modified Eagle medium DMEM to achieve a multiplicity of infection MOI of 0.05, 0.5, or 5. Cells were infected for 1 h at 37°C and rotated every 15 min to ensure adequate coverage. For infections, VEEV was added to supplemented Dulbecco modified Eagle medium DMEM to achieve a multiplicity of infection MOI of 0.05, 0.5, or 5. Cells were infected for 1 h at 37°C and rotated every 15 min to ensure adequate coverage. The cells were then washed with phosphatebuffered saline PBS , and complete growth medium was added back to the cells. Viral supernatants and cells were collected at various times postinfection for further analysis. Plaque assays were performed as previously described . . mRNA isolation and poly A library preparation. Viral supernatants and cells were collected at various times postinfection for further analysis. Plaque assays were performed as previously described . . mRNA isolation and poly A library preparation. RNA from U87MG cells was purified from both VEEV TrD-infected biosafety level 3 and mock-infected U87MG cells at 4, 8, and 16 hpi utilizing a mirVana isolation kit Life Technologies . Quality control of purified RNA was then performed using an Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer, and an RNA integrity number RIN cutoff of 8 was utilized for all samples. An External RNA Controls Consortium ERCC RNA spike-in control mix was then added to the total RNA inputs 10 g RNA before poly A selection using a Life Technologies Dynabeads mRNA Direct kit. Quality control of purified RNA was then performed using an Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer, and an RNA integrity number RIN cutoff of 8 was utilized for all samples. An External RNA Controls Consortium ERCC RNA spike-in control mix was then added to the total RNA inputs 10 g RNA before poly A selection using a Life Technologies Dynabeads mRNA Direct kit. Preparation of a whole-transcriptome RNA library from purified mRNA was then performed using an Ion Total RNA-Seq kit v2; Life Technologies . Quality control of the cDNA libraries was then performed using the Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer along with sterility testing for removal of libraries for sequencing from a BSL-3 to BSL-2 laboratory. RNA sequencing. Library template preparation was performed on a One Touch 2 platform Life Technologies . RNA sequencing. Library template preparation was performed on a One Touch 2 platform Life Technologies . Next-generation RNA sequencing was performed on an Ion Torrent PGM platform and was carried out for each sample to assess the differential gene expression of infected versus uninfected cells over time. Data filtering and RNA-Seq analysis pipeline. A total of ϳ119 million sequencing reads and an average of 6.6 million reads per sample were used as the input into our analysis pipeline. Unless otherwise noted, downstream RNA-Seq analysis was carried out using the CLC bio Genomics Workbench v7 . Raw RNA-Seq reads were trimmed to remove any residual sequencing adapter fragments that remained on the 5= or 3= ends after sequencing. Unless otherwise noted, downstream RNA-Seq analysis was carried out using the CLC bio Genomics Workbench v7 . Raw RNA-Seq reads were trimmed to remove any residual sequencing adapter fragments that remained on the 5= or 3= ends after sequencing. In addition, end trimming of reads was done using the modified Mott algorithm with a Q20 quality score, and any reads of less than 15 bp were discarded. Following read trimming, the reads were mapped to human genome hg19 with the following RNA-Seq parameters: a 10-hit limit for multiple mapped positions, a similarity fraction of 0.8, a length fraction of 0.8, a mismatch cost of 2, and an indel cost of 3. The expression level of individual genes and transcripts was calculated using the number of reads per kilobase of the exon model per million mapped reads RPKM method of Mortazavi et al. . The expression level of individual genes and transcripts was calculated using the number of reads per kilobase of the exon model per million mapped reads RPKM method of Mortazavi et al. . . In addition, unmapped reads were also mapped to the ERCC92 synthetic RNA sequence set . , as well as to the VEEV reference genome GenBank accession number L01442 . In all samples, the correlation coefficient R 2 between the expected and the mapped number of reads for the ERCC92 spike-in controls was above 0.90. A summary of the overall sequencing results is shown in Table 1 . In all samples, the correlation coefficient R 2 between the expected and the mapped number of reads for the ERCC92 spike-in controls was above 0.90. A summary of the overall sequencing results is shown in Table 1 . Postmapping filtering of all RNA-Seq data was carried out next to include only genes with at least one uniquely mapped read 26,230 genes remained across all data sets and only those with a nonzero interquartile range across the entire experiment. Principal component analysis of the resulting filtered data set 13,906 genes in total was carried out using raw counts of uniquely mapped reads see Fig. 2A . The remaining RPKM expression values for each gene included in the filtered data set were subjected to quantile normalization with a 5% cutoff. 2A . The remaining RPKM expression values for each gene included in the filtered data set were subjected to quantile normalization with a 5% cutoff. A box plot of log 2transformed RPKM values for each sample before normalization is shown in Fig. 2B . The R 2 value for pairwise sample-to-sample variation within each biological replicate set was observed to range from 0.89 to 0.99, indicating that our biological replicates were consistent and showed no strong bias data not shown . Differential gene expression analysis. Differentially expressed genes DEGs were identified using two approaches. First, the empirical analysis of differential gene expression algorithm, part of the edgeR Bioconductor package . Differentially expressed genes DEGs were identified using two approaches. First, the empirical analysis of differential gene expression algorithm, part of the edgeR Bioconductor package . , was applied to the integrated data set of all 18 experiments using the default parameters and a false discovery rate-corrected P value. At each time point, infected and mock-infected samples were compared, and genes whose expression differed by more than 2-fold with a significance with a P value of Յ0.05 were provisionally considered to be differentially expressed. In addition to the method described above, an orthogonal statistical test of differential expression was applied to the data using a statistical test developed by Baggerly et al. . In addition to the method described above, an orthogonal statistical test of differential expression was applied to the data using a statistical test developed by Baggerly et al. . to count the number of expressed sequence tags associated with individual genes, a common feature of both serial analysis of gene expression SAGE data and RNA-Seq data. When infected and mock-infected samples were compared, individual genes were provisionally considered differentially expressed when their expression differed by more than 2-fold with a significance with a P value of Յ0.05. Differentially expressed genes found to be in the intersection of the sets of genes identified by both of the methods outlined above were considered high-quality candidates and used as the starting point for further investigation. Clustering and GSEA. Differentially expressed genes found to be in the intersection of the sets of genes identified by both of the methods outlined above were considered high-quality candidates and used as the starting point for further investigation. Clustering and GSEA. Filtered, normalized expression data were subjected to k-means clustering using a Euclidian distance metric where genes were grouped by means of normalized gene expression RPKM values for each experimental condition. Clustering was fitted to 20 distinct clustering groups, and the individual gene expression profiles clustered were further tested for enrichment of gene ontology GO terms associated with individual genes. Gene annotations were obtained from Reactome, a database of biological pathway and gene functional annotations . . Gene annotations were obtained from Reactome, a database of biological pathway and gene functional annotations . . Enrichment analysis was performed using two approaches. First, a hypergeometric test on GO annotations was carried out using an implementation of the GOStats package on each of the individual clusters obtained from k-means clustering . . In addition, gene set enrichment analysis GSEA was carried out on the entire filtered data set using 100,000 permutations, while duplicates were removed and an analysis of variance was applied. A total of 1,419 categories passed a minimum feature size of 10 and were used for further investigation. Cohorts of genes with shared patterns of expression over time were identified by k-means clustering. A total of 1,419 categories passed a minimum feature size of 10 and were used for further investigation. Cohorts of genes with shared patterns of expression over time were identified by k-means clustering. Those found to be enriched for DEGs were subsequently subjected to pathway analysis using the GeneMania system . . Using an ad hoc manual approach, relevant pathways and the connections between them were identified on the basis of existing data in the literature coupled with the temporal gene expression data obtained from this study. qRT-PCR analysis. Purified mRNA was converted to cDNA using a high-capacity RNA-to-cDNA kit Life Technologies according to the manufacturer's instructions. qRT-PCR analysis. Purified mRNA was converted to cDNA using a high-capacity RNA-to-cDNA kit Life Technologies according to the manufacturer's instructions. Analysis of the viral copy numbers was performed by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR qRT-PCR as previously described . . Host expression of the following genes was assayed with TaqMan assays indicated in parentheses : activating transcription factor 3 ATF3; Hs00231069_m1 , ATF4 Hs00909569_g1 , CEBPB Hs00270923_s1 , CEBPD Hs00270931_s1 , DDIT3 Hs00358796_g1 , FOS Hs04194186_s1 , JUN Hs01103582_s1 , EGR1 Hs00152928_m1 , IFI6 Hs00242571_m1 , IFIT1 Hs01911452_s1 , IFIT2 Hs01922738_s1 , IFIT3 Hs01922738_s1 , ISG15 Hs01921425_s1 , ISG20 Hs00158122_m1 , OASL Hs00984387_m1 , BIRC5 Mm00599749_m1 , and XIAP Mm01311594_mH . Assays for 18S rRNA Hs99999901_s1 or Mm04277571_s1 were used for normalization. Host expression of the following genes was assayed with TaqMan assays indicated in parentheses : activating transcription factor 3 ATF3; Hs00231069_m1 , ATF4 Hs00909569_g1 , CEBPB Hs00270923_s1 , CEBPD Hs00270931_s1 , DDIT3 Hs00358796_g1 , FOS Hs04194186_s1 , JUN Hs01103582_s1 , EGR1 Hs00152928_m1 , IFI6 Hs00242571_m1 , IFIT1 Hs01911452_s1 , IFIT2 Hs01922738_s1 , IFIT3 Hs01922738_s1 , ISG15 Hs01921425_s1 , ISG20 Hs00158122_m1 , OASL Hs00984387_m1 , BIRC5 Mm00599749_m1 , and XIAP Mm01311594_mH . Assays for 18S rRNA Hs99999901_s1 or Mm04277571_s1 were used for normalization. Assays were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions using an ABI StepOne Plus instrument. Treatment with PERKi and collection for Western blot analysis. U87MG cells were pretreated for 2 h with 10 M the protein kinase RNAlike endoplasmic reticulum ER kinase PERK inhibitor PERKi GSK2606414 catalog number 516535; EMD Millipore or dimethyl sulfoxide DMSO in DMEM prior to infection with VEEV TrD MOI, 5 . After 1 h, the viral inoculum was removed and cells were washed with sterile PBS 1ϫ . U87MG cells were pretreated for 2 h with 10 M the protein kinase RNAlike endoplasmic reticulum ER kinase PERK inhibitor PERKi GSK2606414 catalog number 516535; EMD Millipore or dimethyl sulfoxide DMSO in DMEM prior to infection with VEEV TrD MOI, 5 . After 1 h, the viral inoculum was removed and cells were washed with sterile PBS 1ϫ . The medium was replaced with medium containing the inhibitor or DMSO. At 16 hpi, the medium was removed, and the cells were washed with PBS and then collected for Western blot analysis. Knockdown of EGR1 with siRNA. U87MG cells seeded at 6.7 ϫ 10 4 cells per well in a 12-well plate were transfected with 50 nM siGenome Protein lysate preparation and Western blot analysis. Knockdown of EGR1 with siRNA. U87MG cells seeded at 6.7 ϫ 10 4 cells per well in a 12-well plate were transfected with 50 nM siGenome Protein lysate preparation and Western blot analysis. Protein lysate preparation and Western blot analysis were performed as previously described . . Primary antibodies to the following were used: EGR1 antibody 44D5; catalog number 4154; Cell Signaling , polyclonal anti-Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus TC83 subtype IA/B capsid protein BEI Resources , CHOP antibody L63F7; catalog number 2895; Cell Signaling , phosphorylated ␣ subunit of eukaryotic initiation factor 2 p-eIF2␣; Ser51; antibody D9G8; catalog number 3398; Cell Signaling , ATF4 antibody D4B8; catalog number 11815; Cell Signaling , activated caspase 3 antibody Asp175; catalog number 9661; Cell Signaling , and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated ␤-actin catalog number ab49900-100; Abcam . Immunofluorescence analysis. Primary antibodies to the following were used: EGR1 antibody 44D5; catalog number 4154; Cell Signaling , polyclonal anti-Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus TC83 subtype IA/B capsid protein BEI Resources , CHOP antibody L63F7; catalog number 2895; Cell Signaling , phosphorylated ␣ subunit of eukaryotic initiation factor 2 p-eIF2␣; Ser51; antibody D9G8; catalog number 3398; Cell Signaling , ATF4 antibody D4B8; catalog number 11815; Cell Signaling , activated caspase 3 antibody Asp175; catalog number 9661; Cell Signaling , and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated ␤-actin catalog number ab49900-100; Abcam . Immunofluorescence analysis. U87MG cells were grown on coverslips in a 6-well plate, infected with VEEV TrD as described above, washed with PBS without Ca and Mg , and then fixed with 4% formaldehyde. Cells were permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100 in PBS for 20 min and then washed twice with PBS. The cells were blocked for 10 min at room temperature in 3% bovine serum albumin in PBS. Primary antibodies consisting of a VEEV capsid protein catalog number NR-9403; BEI Resources diluted 1:600 and an EGR1 antibody antibody 44D5; catalog number 4154; Cell Signaling diluted 1:400 were incubated in fresh blocking buffer at 37°C for 1 h and washed 3 times for 3 min each time in 300 mM NaCl with 0.1% Triton X-100. The cells were blocked for 10 min at room temperature in 3% bovine serum albumin in PBS. Primary antibodies consisting of a VEEV capsid protein catalog number NR-9403; BEI Resources diluted 1:600 and an EGR1 antibody antibody 44D5; catalog number 4154; Cell Signaling diluted 1:400 were incubated in fresh blocking buffer at 37°C for 1 h and washed 3 times for 3 min each time in 300 mM NaCl with 0.1% Triton X-100. Alexa Fluor 568 donkey anti-goat secondary antibody catalog number A11057; Invitrogen and Alexa Fluor 488 donkey anti-mouse secondary antibody catalog number A21202; Invitrogen diluted 1:400 were used as secondary antibodies and treated in the same manner as the primary antibodies. DAPI 4=,6-di- amidino-2-phenylindole diluted 1:1,000 was used to visualize the nuclei. Coverslips were mounted onto glass slides using 10 l of Fluoromount G mounting medium catalog number 0100-01; Southern Biotech . A Nikon Eclipse TE2000-U fluorescence microscope was used for fluorescence microscopy. Coverslips were mounted onto glass slides using 10 l of Fluoromount G mounting medium catalog number 0100-01; Southern Biotech . A Nikon Eclipse TE2000-U fluorescence microscope was used for fluorescence microscopy. Images were viewed using a 60ϫ objective oil immersion lens. Five images of each sample were obtained, and a representative image of each sample is shown below. All images were subjected to fourline averaging. The images were processed through Nikon NIS-Elements AR Analysis v3.2 software. CellTiter Glo and Caspase 3/7 Glo assays. Wild-type and EGR1 Ϫ/Ϫ mouse embryonic fibroblasts MEFs were infected with TrD at various MOIs for an hour and then washed with PBS, and the medium was replaced. CellTiter Glo and Caspase 3/7 Glo assays. Wild-type and EGR1 Ϫ/Ϫ mouse embryonic fibroblasts MEFs were infected with TrD at various MOIs for an hour and then washed with PBS, and the medium was replaced. Cell viability was measured at 24 h postinfection using a Promega CellTiter luminescent cell viability assay catalog number G7571 according to the manufacturer's protocol. Luminescence was read using a Beckman Coulter DTX 880 multimode detector with an integration time of 100 ms per well. Similarly, caspase activation in infected wildtype and EGR1 Ϫ/Ϫ MEFs was measured at 24 h postinfection using a Promega Caspase 3/7 Glo assay catalog number G8090 according to the manufacturer's protocol. Luminescence was read using the DTX 880 multimode detector with an integration time of 100 ms per well. Similarly, caspase activation in infected wildtype and EGR1 Ϫ/Ϫ MEFs was measured at 24 h postinfection using a Promega Caspase 3/7 Glo assay catalog number G8090 according to the manufacturer's protocol. Luminescence was read using the DTX 880 multimode detector with an integration time of 100 ms per well. Nucleotide sequence accession numbers. The raw sequencing data for all RNA-Seq runs included in this work are publically available in the NCBI BioProject database under accession number PRJNA300864 http: //.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA300864 . VEEV replication kinetics in U87MG astrocytes. VEEV replicates in vivo in monocytes, macrophages, neurons, and astrocytes . . VEEV replication kinetics in U87MG astrocytes. VEEV replicates in vivo in monocytes, macrophages, neurons, and astrocytes . . Common cell lines used to study VEEV infection include Vero and BHK cells; in this study, U87MG astrocytes were chosen as an in vitro model due to their physiological relevance and greater clinical significance. Initial experiments were performed to characterize viral replication in U87MG cells. VEEV replication kinetics in U87MG cells were measured using plaque assays and by monitoring viral protein and RNA expression levels and the cytopathic effect CPE on the infected cells Fig. 1 . VEEV replication kinetics in U87MG cells were measured using plaque assays and by monitoring viral protein and RNA expression levels and the cytopathic effect CPE on the infected cells Fig. 1 . Viral release was observed as early as 4 hpi, with ϳ4 log units of virus being observed, followed by a consistent increase in replication at 8 and 16 hpi Fig. 1A . Viral replication peaked at 16 hpi, and no additional increase in viral titers was observed at 24 hpi. Viral capsid expression followed a similar pattern, with protein being detected at 8 hpi and expression plateauing at 16 hpi Fig. 1B . Viral capsid expression followed a similar pattern, with protein being detected at 8 hpi and expression plateauing at 16 hpi Fig. 1B . Among infected U87MG cells, a significant CPE was observed by microscopy at 24 hpi, with little to no CPE being detected at 16 hpi data not shown . Consistent with these observations, increased caspase 3/7 activity was observed only at 24 hpi Fig. 1C . On the basis of these data, times of 4, 8, and 16 hpi, reflecting the early, middle, and late stages of the viral life cycle, respectively, were selected for RNA-Seq analysis in order to provide a dynamic view of the host-pathogen transcriptome profile. 1C . On the basis of these data, times of 4, 8, and 16 hpi, reflecting the early, middle, and late stages of the viral life cycle, respectively, were selected for RNA-Seq analysis in order to provide a dynamic view of the host-pathogen transcriptome profile. RNA sequencing analysis of VEEV-infected astrocytes. mRNA from triplicate sets of mock-and VEEV-infected U87MG cell cultures was isolated, purified at 4, 8, and 16 hpi, and used to prepare cDNA libraries for downstream RNA-Seq see Materials and Methods . A high-level summary of the RNA-Seq results is shown in Table 1 . VEEV RNA samples were assayed by quantitative RT-PCR at each time point as a control to demonstrate the increasing viral RNA load over time Fig. A high-level summary of the RNA-Seq results is shown in Table 1 . VEEV RNA samples were assayed by quantitative RT-PCR at each time point as a control to demonstrate the increasing viral RNA load over time Fig. 1D , consistent with the increasing number of RNA-Seq reads mapped to the VEEV genome at later time points Table 1 . For RNA-Seq analysis, individual genes were expressed as the number of reads per kilobase of the exon model per million mapped reads RPKM . . Log 2 -normalized RPKM expression values for each experimental sample are shown in Fig. 2A and can be found in Data Set S1 in the supplemental material. . Log 2 -normalized RPKM expression values for each experimental sample are shown in Fig. 2A and can be found in Data Set S1 in the supplemental material. Minimal sample-to-sample variation in expression values within biological replicates was consistently detected R 2 Ͼ 0.89 for all replicates; data not shown . In addition, intersample variation was also found to be minimal when it was tested pairwise across the entire experiment by using RPKM values for ERCC97 synthetic spike-in control RNAs R 2 Ͼ 0.90 for all comparisons; data not shown . As anticipated, two-component principal component analysis of the RNA-Seq data for mock-infected cells versus VEEV-infected cells showed a clear separation of the samples at 16 hpi from the samples at earlier time points Fig. In addition, intersample variation was also found to be minimal when it was tested pairwise across the entire experiment by using RPKM values for ERCC97 synthetic spike-in control RNAs R 2 Ͼ 0.90 for all comparisons; data not shown . As anticipated, two-component principal component analysis of the RNA-Seq data for mock-infected cells versus VEEV-infected cells showed a clear separation of the samples at 16 hpi from the samples at earlier time points Fig. 2B . However, the clustering of VEEV-infected samples with mock-infected samples at earlier time points suggested that the response to viral infection was limited to a narrow subset of early response genes, thus placing a higher burden of proof on identifying differentially expressed genes DEGs during the first few hours of infection. Along these lines, two orthogonal methods were used to identify DEGs suitable for further characterization: the edgeR method . and the method developed by Baggerly et al. Along these lines, two orthogonal methods were used to identify DEGs suitable for further characterization: the edgeR method . and the method developed by Baggerly et al. . . Genes identified by one method were provisionally considered DEGs, and those identified by both methods were candidate DEGs to be confirmed by qRT-PCR. In addition to comparing individual gene expression values for mock-infected cells and VEEV-infected cells at each time point, gene expression values were also compared serially within each time series of VEEV-infected cells for genes that did not show any statistically significant changes in expression in mock-infected cells. A schematic of the comparative analysis is shown in Fig. 2C . A schematic of the comparative analysis is shown in Fig. 2C . The number of statistically significant DEGs identified by each of these comparisons is shown in Fig. 2D . Furthermore, k-means clustering against normalized RPKM values was employed to identify gross changes in gene expression over time for cohorts of genes potentially sharing the same pathway or regulatory triggers Fig. 3 ; see also Data Set S2 in the supplemental material . Gene set enrichment analysis GSEA; see Material and Methods and Data Set S3 in the supplemental material was carried out on each kmeans cluster. 3 ; see also Data Set S2 in the supplemental material . Gene set enrichment analysis GSEA; see Material and Methods and Data Set S3 in the supplemental material was carried out on each kmeans cluster. In particular, cluster 20 Table 2 was significantly enriched for genes involved in translational control, the type I interferon-mediated signaling pathway, and the unfolded protein response UPR pathway GSEA P value Ͻ 0.01 . Although there is a well-established connection between translational control and UPR, a novel connection between UPR and the type I interferonmediated response in response to viral replication was suggested by pathway analysis see Materials and Methods , implicating early growth response 1 EGR1 as a potential bridge between these two pathways Fig. 4 . EGR1 belongs to cluster 20 and is strongly induced during VEEV infection, and several other genes associated with the interferon response belong to the same cluster: IRF1, IFIT1, IFIT2, ISG15, and ILF3. 4 . EGR1 belongs to cluster 20 and is strongly induced during VEEV infection, and several other genes associated with the interferon response belong to the same cluster: IRF1, IFIT1, IFIT2, ISG15, and ILF3. EGR1 has been associated with increases in the expression of activating transcription factor 3 ATF3 . , which is a key component of the UPR and which also belongs to cluster 20. This connection represented a potential a Biological process annotations obtained from Reactome for cluster 20. Reactome annotation identifiers are indicated for each annotation. Only traceable author submission TAS -classified annotations are considered. TAP, transporter associated with antigen processing; SRP, signal recognition particle. Only traceable author submission TAS -classified annotations are considered. TAP, transporter associated with antigen processing; SRP, signal recognition particle. b Full set, the total number of genes in the genome with an annotated biological process; subset, total number of differentially expressed genes with an annotated biological process. Network of type I interferon response-and UPR-related genes. Large circles, differentially expressed genes; small circles, genes with no significant change in expression; red circles, type I interferon response factors; yellow circles, genes regulating DNA transcription; blue circles, unfolded protein response genes; red lines, genes involved in physical protein-protein interactions; blue lines, genes involved in a common pathway. This network was seeded with k-means clusters 18 and 20, and many ribosomal protein genes were removed. Large circles, differentially expressed genes; small circles, genes with no significant change in expression; red circles, type I interferon response factors; yellow circles, genes regulating DNA transcription; blue circles, unfolded protein response genes; red lines, genes involved in physical protein-protein interactions; blue lines, genes involved in a common pathway. This network was seeded with k-means clusters 18 and 20, and many ribosomal protein genes were removed. bridge between the UPR pathway and the interferon response pathway, with EGR1 being one of the potential key transcription factors driving this connection. Consequently, 15 genes from this analysis were selected for further characterization by qRT-PCR see below : ATF3, activating transcription factor 4 ATF4 , CEBPB, CEBPD, DDIT3/CHOP, EGR1, FOS, IFI6, IFIT1, IFIT2, IFIT3, ISG15, ISG20, JUN, and OASL. The expression values of these genes, as measured by RNA-Seq, are shown in Fig. 5A and B. Confirmatory qRT-PCR analysis indicated concordant gene expression Fig. The expression values of these genes, as measured by RNA-Seq, are shown in Fig. 5A and B. Confirmatory qRT-PCR analysis indicated concordant gene expression Fig. 5C and D . The interferon response genes induced are in agreement with those detected in previously published studies . , and these genes served as an internal positive control. Moreover, the link between EGR1 and the interferon pathway has been demonstrated; EGR1 is induced by IFN-␥ in mouse fibroblasts and by IFN-␣, -␤, and -␥ in human fibroblasts . . EGR1 and the UPR pathway were selected for further analysis, as their role in VEEV infection has not been elucidated. . EGR1 and the UPR pathway were selected for further analysis, as their role in VEEV infection has not been elucidated. The RNA-Seq and pathway analysis data indicated that UPR and stress response genes were induced after VEEV infection. During an infection, host cells respond to cellular stresses resulting from increased viral protein translation and secretion by triggering the onset of the UPR pathway. The UPR pathway is an adaptive cellular response activated by endoplasmic reticulum ER stress due to protein misfolding. In order to regulate cellular homeostasis during protein folding and secretion, the UPR pathway has developed three classes of sensors to ensure proper cellular regulation: inositolrequiring enzyme 1 IRE1 , protein kinase RNA-like ER kinase PERK , and activating transcription factor 6 ATF6 . The UPR pathway is an adaptive cellular response activated by endoplasmic reticulum ER stress due to protein misfolding. In order to regulate cellular homeostasis during protein folding and secretion, the UPR pathway has developed three classes of sensors to ensure proper cellular regulation: inositolrequiring enzyme 1 IRE1 , protein kinase RNA-like ER kinase PERK , and activating transcription factor 6 ATF6 . . During VEEV infection, the PERK arm of the UPR appeared to be altered, as two critical regulators of this pathway were differentially expressed: ATF4 and CHOP DDIT3 . . To determine if DEGs altered subsequent protein expression, Western blot analysis was performed for CHOP, ATF4, and phosphorylated eIF2␣ p-eIF2␣ . . To determine if DEGs altered subsequent protein expression, Western blot analysis was performed for CHOP, ATF4, and phosphorylated eIF2␣ p-eIF2␣ . Tunicamycin, a glycosylation inhibitor and inducer of UPR . , was included as a positive control. A time course analysis of U87MG cells treated with 1 M tunicamycin indicated that 8 h of treatment provided the most robust induction of UPR proteins data not shown . VEEV-infected but not mock-infected or UV-inactivated VEEV UV-VEEV -infected cells displayed a dramatic increase in p-eIF2␣ expression and a modest but consistent increase in CHOP and ATF4 expression at 16 hpi Fig. 6A . No change in protein expression was observed at 4 hpi data not shown . 6A . No change in protein expression was observed at 4 hpi data not shown . Confocal microscopy confirmed CHOP and ATF4 up- regulation, demonstrating a more robust and nuclear staining pattern in VEEV-infected cells than in mock-infected cells Fig. 6C to E . While ATF4 protein expression levels increased, ATF4 mRNA abundances decreased following VEEV infection Fig. 5B and D . These results are consistent with the observation that ATF4 expression is regulated at the translational level upon UPR induction . . As eIF2␣ can be phosphorylated by multiple kinases PERK, protein kinase double-stranded RNA dependent PKR , general control nonderepressible-2 GCN2 , and hemeregulated inhibitor HRI . . As eIF2␣ can be phosphorylated by multiple kinases PERK, protein kinase double-stranded RNA dependent PKR , general control nonderepressible-2 GCN2 , and hemeregulated inhibitor HRI . , the PERK inhibitor PERKi GSK2606414 was used to determine if the observed phosphorylation was PERK dependent. Treatment of VEEV-infected cells with PERKi resulted in a marked decrease in eIF2␣ phosphorylation Fig. 6B . These results indicate that PERK contributes to eIF2␣ phosphorylation but that there is likely an additional kinase contributing to the phosphorylation event. Collectively, these findings indicate that the PERK arm of the UPR pathway is induced at later time points following VEEV infection. EGR1 is upregulated in infected cells and localizes to the nucleus. Collectively, these findings indicate that the PERK arm of the UPR pathway is induced at later time points following VEEV infection. EGR1 is upregulated in infected cells and localizes to the nucleus. EGR1 is a transcription factor that can be induced by numerous signals, including oxidative stress, hypoxemia, and growth factors . . It can also be activated upon infection by both DNA and RNA viruses, including Epstein-Barr virus, mouse hepatitis virus, murine coronavirus, and Japanese encephalitis virus . . . . Treatment of MEFs with the UPR activator thapsigargin has been shown to induce EGR1 expression in a PERK-dependent manner . . . . . Treatment of MEFs with the UPR activator thapsigargin has been shown to induce EGR1 expression in a PERK-dependent manner . . Given the link between EGR1 and UPR and the robust induction of EGR1 mRNA expression following VEEV infection Fig. 4 and 5 , EGR1 was chosen for further study. EGR1 protein expression after VEEV infection was analyzed by Western blot analysis. As previous studies have indicated that EGR1 can be activated by mouse hepatitis virus independently of virus replication likely due to cellular membrane disruption following entry ., a UV-inactivated virus control UV-VEEV was included. EGR1 protein levels were increased following VEEV infection compared to those in mock-infected cells and UV-VEEV-infected cells Fig. As previous studies have indicated that EGR1 can be activated by mouse hepatitis virus independently of virus replication likely due to cellular membrane disruption following entry ., a UV-inactivated virus control UV-VEEV was included. EGR1 protein levels were increased following VEEV infection compared to those in mock-infected cells and UV-VEEV-infected cells Fig. 7A; compare lanes 3, 6, and 9 . The most dramatic upregulation of EGR1 occurred at 16 hpi; this correlates with the highest levels of VEEV capsid production Fig. 1B . Following induction, EGR1 has been shown to translocate to the nucleus to induce gene expression through binding to the Egr binding sequence EBS GCG G/T GGCG . . 1B . Following induction, EGR1 has been shown to translocate to the nucleus to induce gene expression through binding to the Egr binding sequence EBS GCG G/T GGCG . . Confocal microcopy revealed high levels of EGR1 in the nuclei of infected cells, whereas only low levels of both nuclear and cytoplasmic EGR1 were detected in mock-infected cells Fig. 7B . PERKi treatment of VEEV-infected cells resulted in a complete loss of EGR1 induction Fig. 7C , indicating that EGR1 was induced in a PERK-dependent fashion. These results demonstrate that EGR1 protein levels and nuclear localization are increased following VEEV infection and that the induction of EGR1 is dependent on PERK. 7C , indicating that EGR1 was induced in a PERK-dependent fashion. These results demonstrate that EGR1 protein levels and nuclear localization are increased following VEEV infection and that the induction of EGR1 is dependent on PERK. The loss of EGR1 inhibits VEEV-induced apoptosis but does not alter VEEV replication kinetics. As EGR1 influences cell survival and apoptosis . , the impact of EGR1 on VEEV-induced cell death was assessed. Caspase 3 cleavage was observed in WT MEFs at 24 hpi when they were infected at an MOI of 0.5 and started as early as 16 hpi when they were infected at an MOI of 5 Fig. 8A . Caspase 3 cleavage was observed in WT MEFs at 24 hpi when they were infected at an MOI of 0.5 and started as early as 16 hpi when they were infected at an MOI of 5 Fig. 8A . In contrast, EGR1 Ϫ/Ϫ cells showed little to no detectable caspase cleavage following infection with VEEV. Two sets of experiments were performed to quantitatively confirm these results: CellTiter Glo assays to measure total cell viability ATP production and Caspase 3/7 Glo assays to measure caspase 3/7 activity. Both WT and EGR1 Ϫ/Ϫ MEFs displayed dose-dependent decreases in cell viability following VEEV infection, with EGR1 Ϫ/Ϫ cells having significantly more viable cells at each MOI examined Fig. 8B . Both WT and EGR1 Ϫ/Ϫ MEFs displayed dose-dependent decreases in cell viability following VEEV infection, with EGR1 Ϫ/Ϫ cells having significantly more viable cells at each MOI examined Fig. 8B . Concordantly, a dose-dependent increase in caspase 3/7 activity was observed following VEEV infection, with EGR1 Ϫ/Ϫ cells demonstrating reduced caspase 3 activity at MOIs of 0.5 and 5 Fig. 8C . These results were replicated in U87MG cells transfected with siRNA targeting EGR1 Fig. 8D . EGR1 has been shown to negatively regulate the transcription of BIRC5 survivin , an inhibitor of apoptosis IAP family member . . 8D . EGR1 has been shown to negatively regulate the transcription of BIRC5 survivin , an inhibitor of apoptosis IAP family member . . RNA-Seq data indicated that BIRC5 gene expression was decreased following VEEV infection: log 2 -transformed fold change values of normalized gene expression were Ϫ1.16, Ϫ1.18, and Ϫ1.50 at 4, 8, and 16 hpi, respectively see Table S1 in the supplemental material and NCBI BioProject accession number PRJNA300864 . WT and EGR1 Ϫ/Ϫ MEFs were used to determine if EGR1 influenced BIRC5 gene expression following VEEV infection. BIRC5 expression was significantly decreased at 16 hpi in VEEV-infected WT MEFs, but this reduction was not observed in VEEV-infected EGR1 Ϫ/Ϫ MEFs Fig. 8E . BIRC5 expression was significantly decreased at 16 hpi in VEEV-infected WT MEFs, but this reduction was not observed in VEEV-infected EGR1 Ϫ/Ϫ MEFs Fig. 8E . Ex-pression of the gene for the X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis XIAP , another IAP family member, was not significantly differentially altered after infection data not shown . Collectively, these results demonstrate that EGR1 contributes to VEEV-induced apoptosis. VEEV replication kinetics were determined for both EGR1 Ϫ/Ϫ and WT MEFs to determine the relevance of EGR1 in viral replication. Cells were infected at two different MOIs 0.5 and 5 , and viral supernatants were collected at 4, 8, 16, and 24 hpi and analyzed by plaque assay. VEEV replication kinetics were determined for both EGR1 Ϫ/Ϫ and WT MEFs to determine the relevance of EGR1 in viral replication. Cells were infected at two different MOIs 0.5 and 5 , and viral supernatants were collected at 4, 8, 16, and 24 hpi and analyzed by plaque assay. The replication kinetics were similar between EGR1 Ϫ/Ϫ and WT MEFs at both MOIs, with titers peaking at 16 hpi Fig. 9A . A lack of EGR1 expression was confirmed by Western blotting Fig. 9B . These results were replicated in U87MG cells transfected with siRNA targeting EGR1. Transfection of siRNA targeting EGR1 resulted in a Ͼ90% decrease in EGR1 protein expression Fig. 9B . These results were replicated in U87MG cells transfected with siRNA targeting EGR1. Transfection of siRNA targeting EGR1 resulted in a Ͼ90% decrease in EGR1 protein expression Fig. 9D without any significant effect on viral replication Fig. 9C . These results suggest that the decrease in apoptosis observed in EGR1 Ϫ/Ϫ MEFs was not due to altered VEEV replication kinetics. Despite being recognized as an emerging threat, relatively little is known about the virulence mechanisms of alphaviruses, largely due to a knowledge gap in the host-pathogen interactome. VEEV infection often results in fatal encephalitis and is known to inhibit both cellular transcription and translation in order to downregulate the innate immune response . . VEEV infection often results in fatal encephalitis and is known to inhibit both cellular transcription and translation in order to downregulate the innate immune response . . In contrast, in the CNS VEEV has been shown to upregulate numerous genes in both the inflammatory response and apoptotic pathways . . Specifically, numerous proinflammatory cytokines, including interleu-kin-1␤ IL-1␤ , IL-6, IL-12, glycogen synthase kinase 3␤, inducible nitric oxide synthase, and tumor necrosis factor alpha TNF-␣ , have all been shown to play a role in VEEV pathogenesis . . . . . . . . . . . The use of high-throughput next-generation sequencing technologies, such as RNA-Seq, allows an in-depth and unbiased look into the virus-host transcriptome, thus enabling changes in the expression of specific mRNAs to be connected with phenotypic outcomes. To this end, identification of critical differentially expressed transcripts among clinically relevant infected cells will help lead to a greater understanding of viral pathogenesis and may prove beneficial for the identification of therapeutic targets. In this study, network analysis/RNA-Seq data and the results of protein expression studies revealed that VEEV infection resulted in activation of the PERK arm of the UPR pathway, including the activation of ATF4, CHOP, and eIF2␣ phosphorylation. To this end, identification of critical differentially expressed transcripts among clinically relevant infected cells will help lead to a greater understanding of viral pathogenesis and may prove beneficial for the identification of therapeutic targets. In this study, network analysis/RNA-Seq data and the results of protein expression studies revealed that VEEV infection resulted in activation of the PERK arm of the UPR pathway, including the activation of ATF4, CHOP, and eIF2␣ phosphorylation. Several alphaviruses have previously been reported to hijack key components of the UPR pathway in order to promote viral replication, as the reliance of enveloped viruses on the ER for the synthesis of viral envelope-associated glycoproteins and their transport to the plasma membrane often stresses the ER due to rapid viral protein production . . Modulation of the UPR is not unique to alphaviruses; rather, it is a shared trait of many positive-sense RNA viruses. Dengue virus has been shown to suppress PERK by inhibiting continued eIF2␣ phosphorylation in order to inhibit immediate apoptosis, increasing viral protein translation and extending the length of productive viral replication . Modulation of the UPR is not unique to alphaviruses; rather, it is a shared trait of many positive-sense RNA viruses. Dengue virus has been shown to suppress PERK by inhibiting continued eIF2␣ phosphorylation in order to inhibit immediate apoptosis, increasing viral protein translation and extending the length of productive viral replication . . Studies with hepatitis E virus HEV have demonstrated that expression of HEV capsid protein open reading frame 2 ORF2 activates the expression of CHOP and ATF4 . . In HEV, ORF2 was shown to stimulate CHOP through both ER stressors and amino acid response elements AARE through interaction with ATF4 . . . In HEV, ORF2 was shown to stimulate CHOP through both ER stressors and amino acid response elements AARE through interaction with ATF4 . . The results shown here indicate that during VEEV infection, initiation of the UPR pathway and subsequent activation of EGR1 play a role in the outcome of virus-induced apoptosis. During the initial detection of ER stress, PERK is able to identify misfolded proteins in the lumen of the ER and phosphorylates eIF2␣ in order to initiate prosurvival pathways in the UPR through the general At 24 hpi caspase 3/7 activity was analyzed using the Caspase 3/7 Glo assay. The fold change values for mock-infected cells were set to a value of 1. During the initial detection of ER stress, PERK is able to identify misfolded proteins in the lumen of the ER and phosphorylates eIF2␣ in order to initiate prosurvival pathways in the UPR through the general At 24 hpi caspase 3/7 activity was analyzed using the Caspase 3/7 Glo assay. The fold change values for mock-infected cells were set to a value of 1. **, P Ͻ 0.001. E EGR1 Ϫ/Ϫ and WT MEFs were mock or VEEV infected MOI, 5 . RNA was prepared, and gene expression was determined by qRT-PCR using a TaqMan assays for BIRC5 survivin . The data shown are the values of the fold change of normalized gene expression determined by the ⌬⌬C T threshold cycle C T method. RNA was prepared, and gene expression was determined by qRT-PCR using a TaqMan assays for BIRC5 survivin . The data shown are the values of the fold change of normalized gene expression determined by the ⌬⌬C T threshold cycle C T method. *, P Ͻ 0.005 comparison of VEEV-infected WT and EGR1 Ϫ/Ϫ cells . inhibition of protein synthesis . . VEEV appears to induce the UPR and promote increased eIF2␣ phosphorylation, which results in the translational inhibition of most mRNAs, while UPR selectively increases the translation of ATF4. . VEEV appears to induce the UPR and promote increased eIF2␣ phosphorylation, which results in the translational inhibition of most mRNAs, while UPR selectively increases the translation of ATF4. ATF4 is responsible for the expression of genes that encode proteins involved in apoptosis, redox processes, amino acid metabolism, and ER chaperone recruitment and is a well-known mediator of the PERK pathway and CHOP . . CHOP activation facilitates the increased expression of cellular chaperones in order to counteract the buildup of misfolded proteins . . . CHOP activation facilitates the increased expression of cellular chaperones in order to counteract the buildup of misfolded proteins . . Failure to suppress protein misfolding in persistently stressed cells, such as during a viral infection, can then result in activation of the proapoptotic transcription factor CHOP, leading to suppression of the antiapoptotic protein B cell lymphoma-2 Bcl-2 . CHOP can also function as a prosurvival transcription factor by dephosphorylating eIF2␣ through activation of the DNA damage-inducible protein GADD34 in a self-regulating feedback look . . However, the data presented here support a model whereby VEEV infection leads CHOP to function in its proapoptotic role, as no change in GADD34 gene expression was detected by RNA-Seq analysis. . However, the data presented here support a model whereby VEEV infection leads CHOP to function in its proapoptotic role, as no change in GADD34 gene expression was detected by RNA-Seq analysis. While the UPR was induced following VEEV infection, robust activation was not observed until later time points after infection. This is somewhat surprising, as VEEV infection is expected to induce significant ER stress due to the massive production of viral proteins during the course of an acute robust infection. The structural proteins of VEEV are translated from the viral subgenomic RNA into polyproteins on the rough ER. The E1 and pE2 precur-sor glycoproteins are then assembled as heterodimers in the ER, undergoing conformational changes requiring numerous chaperones . The structural proteins of VEEV are translated from the viral subgenomic RNA into polyproteins on the rough ER. The E1 and pE2 precur-sor glycoproteins are then assembled as heterodimers in the ER, undergoing conformational changes requiring numerous chaperones . . It is possible that VEEV has developed mechanisms to subvert the induction of the UPR. In order to counteract the UPR, the nonstructural proteins nsPs of Chikungunya virus CHIKV have been shown to inhibit expression of ATF4 and other known UPR target genes, including GRP78/BiP, GRP94, and CHOP . . Through nsP activity, CHIKV has developed a means of suppressing the UPR activity resulting from viral glycoprotein-induced ER stress, thus preventing immediate autophagy and apoptotic activation. . Through nsP activity, CHIKV has developed a means of suppressing the UPR activity resulting from viral glycoprotein-induced ER stress, thus preventing immediate autophagy and apoptotic activation. The VEEV capsid is responsible for interfering with nucleocytoplasmic trafficking and inhibiting rRNA and mRNA transcription and has been implicated in the regulation of type I IFN signaling and the antiviral response through the regulation of both viral RNA and protein production . . Therefore, we hypothesize that the ability of the VEEV capsid to inhibit cellular transcription and block nucleocytoplasmic trafficking results in delayed induction of the UPR. The results of a detailed network analysis based on existing data in the literature, coupled with the temporal gene expression profiles obtained from this study, point toward EGR1 being an important node in the novel link between VEEV activation of the type I interferon response and UPR. Therefore, we hypothesize that the ability of the VEEV capsid to inhibit cellular transcription and block nucleocytoplasmic trafficking results in delayed induction of the UPR. The results of a detailed network analysis based on existing data in the literature, coupled with the temporal gene expression profiles obtained from this study, point toward EGR1 being an important node in the novel link between VEEV activation of the type I interferon response and UPR. EGR1 is known to form a DNA binding complex with C/EBPB, a critical dimerization partner of CHOP . . Previous studies have demonstrated that the nuclear localization of CHOP may act as an inducer of EGR1 and that CHOP may act as a transcriptional cofactor for regulation of C/EBPB-EGR1 target genes . . Previous studies have demonstrated that the nuclear localization of CHOP may act as an inducer of EGR1 and that CHOP may act as a transcriptional cofactor for regulation of C/EBPB-EGR1 target genes . . The results of the Western blot and microscopy analysis presented in this study support this model, as VEEV infection was found to increase both the overall levels and the nuclear distribution of CHOP along with those of EGR1. Previous studies demonstrated EGR1 mRNA induction by IFN-␥ in mouse fibroblasts and by TNF-␣, TNF-␤, IL-1, IFN-␣, IFN-␤, and IFN-␥ in human fibroblasts . . EGR1, also known as Zif268 and NGF1-A, is a zinc finger protein and mammalian transcription factor. . EGR1, also known as Zif268 and NGF1-A, is a zinc finger protein and mammalian transcription factor. It has been implicated in cellular proliferation and differentiation, but it may also have proapoptotic functions, depending on the cell type and stimulus . . Of particular interest, EGR1 directly controls proliferation when activated by the mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase pathway in mitogen-stimulated astrocytes . . Virus-induced changes in EGR1 expression have been observed in several in vitro systems. In HIV-1-infected astrocytes, EGR1 upregulation was found to be induced by Tat through transactivation of the EGR1 promoter, leading to cellular dysfunction and Tat-induced neurotoxicity . . In HIV-1-infected astrocytes, EGR1 upregulation was found to be induced by Tat through transactivation of the EGR1 promoter, leading to cellular dysfunction and Tat-induced neurotoxicity . . Increased amounts of EGR1 mRNA have also been demonstrated to act in a region-specific manner, corresponding temporally with viral RNA production in the brain tissues of rats infected with either rabies virus or Borna disease virus . . In summary, the current study demonstrates a potential link between UPR activation and EGR1. EGR1 Ϫ/Ϫ MEFs demonstrated lower levels of susceptibility to VEEV-induced cell death than wild-type MEFs, indicating that EGR1 modulates proapoptotic pathways following infection. In summary, the current study demonstrates a potential link between UPR activation and EGR1. EGR1 Ϫ/Ϫ MEFs demonstrated lower levels of susceptibility to VEEV-induced cell death than wild-type MEFs, indicating that EGR1 modulates proapoptotic pathways following infection. Studies are under way to determine if alteration of the UPR through small molecule inhibitors or siRNA interference influences VEEV replication and/or cell death. To date the mechanisms underlying VEEV pathogenesis and subsequent neuronal degeneration have been only partially elucidated. Therefore, determining the role of EGR1 and UPR may play a significant role in the development of a novel therapeutic target resulting in decreased neuronal death and the subsequent neuronal sequelae that result from infection.