43 This is due to the fact that the MSL presents geographical and time-dependent variations, 44 Citation: Lastname, F.; Lastname, F.; Lastname, F. Title.
Generally it is a good paper and it was interesting to me. However, comparing with the conclusions (I mean, the computed potential value) the paper is a bit too long. I can accept it, because it is a good explanatory text, however some partially offtopic or superfluous parts (e.g. point 2.1.2 (keeping the Table 1 only), the unified topo data in lines 181-191, the „textbook equations” of the gravity of a prism in page 7 and the textbook adjustment equations in page 8). It is rather an editorial question. The paper is good and acceptable without them, too.