Observation Results-Biophilic Design Attributes in the Selected Offices is moved to be Section 2.3.2. It is because the 2.3.1 is the selection of office, and the Section 2.3.2 provides observation details of the selected offices. After re-construction, Section 3. Questionnaire Results focus on illustrating the questionnaire results. Hence, all the means (SD) are replaced as medians (IQR). And the corresponding figures (Figure 1 in Page 13 Line 359-361 and Figure 4 in Page 16-17 of the original manuscript) are removed in the revised version. Revision in Page 13 Line 381-394: The Cronbach’s α coefficient value of the main scale is 0.72, while those of the subscales GH, NR, and BDE in order are obtained as 0.68, 0.79, and 0.63, indicating that the questionnaire is reliable (i.e., an acceptable reliability: Cronbach's α>0.6) [57, 58] (Table 8). According to the quantitative results presented in Table 8, the medians (Interquartile Range, IQR) of the assessment show moderately high opinions toward the health and wellbeing of biophilic offices (HWBO), at 71.00 (8.00) (the score range from min. 20 to max. 100). Concerning the self-related evaluation scales GH and NR, the score range of GH and HR are minimum 4 to maximum 20, and the obtained results illustrate moderately high opinions, the values of 15.00 (2.00) and 14.00 (3.00) for GH and NR. The median (IQR) value of the POE scale BDE is evaluated as 42.00 (5.00) (range of total value: min. 12 to max. 60). Table 8. Medians, Interquartile Range (IQR), Mean, standard deviation, and α coefficient values of workers’ evaluation based on HWBO, GH, NR, and BDE. Comparison of independent variables (Gender, Age, Educational Levels, Weekly Work Hours, Daily Sedentary Time, Work Desk Locations, Working Years, Office Locations) on self-reported GH, NR, and BDE. Thanks for your suggestion. The figures and pictures have been adjusted in the revised manuscript. The Section 3 Questionnaire Results and Section 4 are rewritten in the revised version: a) the statistical analysis is modified; b) to reduce elaboration in the text. Please kindly refer the following revisions: 1) The original Section 3.1. 2) In the revised version, the formulars in Section 3.3 2. Quantitative Results of Impacts of Biophilic Design for Workplace are removed due to the statistical analysis is modified: The means (SD) are only applied when the assumption of normality applies for the datasets. Revision in Page 18 Table 9: Table 9. *p<.05, The significance level is .05.3) Elaboration for the Figure 2. Stacked graph with percentage responses for individually arranged items (from the bottom with a high percentage of disagreement to the top with high percentage of agreement) is reduced, because the illustrations are obvious in the figure. Revision in Page 15-17 Line 399-433: The analysis of individual items provides more details into the works' responses. As can be seen in percentage responses for individual items (Figure 2 in revision), most of the responses are distributed in the items "Neutral" and "Agree". The questionnaire results reveal that the employees from the understudy companies hold a relatively positive opinion on wellbeing, nature-relatedness, indoor environmental quality, and biophilic design for their health promotion. According to the arrangement, at the top of this, stacked graph are the evaluation of satisfaction of the work capacities and relationships in the workplace. About 73.2% of respondents agree that the workers of the companies under investigation are satisfied with their work capacity (GH3-Q10) and relationships (GH4-Q11). In the subscale nature relatedness, 62.2% and 61.7% of workers responded (agree/strongly agree) that their actions affect the environment (NR2-Q13), and they take notice of the wildlife in their daily lives (NR3-Q14). Nevertheless, only 47.8% of them selected agreed/strongly agree regarding the statements that their ideal spot for vacation would be a wilderness area (NR1-Q12). Regarding the POE results in the subscale BDE, 63.2% of workers agree/strongly agree that the natural light is an essential biophilic attribute and their offices are bright (BDE2-Q17). Furthermore, 60.7 % of the workers agreed that introducing natural colors in the office benefits workplace health and wellbeing (BDE11-Q26). More than 60 percent (approximately 60.7%) of respondents believe that greenery is a biophilic design that benefits office wellbeing (BDE6-Q21). Their feedback would be valuable for designers to note that application of the biophilic design attributes in the office design can enhance the experiences and evaluations of workers. The quantitative results of the questionnaire survey demonstrate that the workers agree that the biophilic design attributes in the office have positive effects on their subjective wellbeing. Stacked graph with percentage responses for individually arranged items (from the bottom with a high percentage of disagreement to the top with high percentage of agreement).
Quantitative Results of Impacts of Biophilic Design for Workplace are removed due to the statistical analysis is modified: The means (SD) are only applied when the assumption of normality applies for the datasets.