In the revised version, sentences are added to further explain that there are too few framework available, and these two frameworks are the mainstream biophilic design frameworks that are widely applied in the practical biophilic design projects. Revision in Page 3 Line 122-128: “The 24 Biophilic Design Attributes and the 14 Patterns of Biophilic Design are the two mainstream biophilic design which are widely applied in the practical biophilic design projects. Hence, these two frameworks are the most suitable to be selected as the basis of this experiment.”
If this was the case, perhaps this could be succinctly mentioned. In consideration to their response #8, I understood and agreed with why half the seven of the 14 papers were discarded, but it did not provide much insight into why the Patterns of Biophilic Design were still used. A more useful example, which may have elucidated this more, was whether are there too few frameworks available, and/or none others could have been used.