We understand from the reviewer’s comments that the sentence “The higher effects seen in the presence of CQ reveal that the observed phenomenon is due to increased autophagic flux, rather than decreased autolysosome degradation” is not clear enough. We have hence rephrased the sentence to be more accurate and better deliver the message: “CQ is an inhibitor of lysosome degradation, commonly used to decipher whether the elevation of LC3 is due to upregulation of the autophagy process or reduced autophagosome turnover [30]. The higher TTFields-induced elevation of LC3 seen in the presence of CQ suggest that the observed phenomenon is due to increased autophagic flux, rather than decreased autolysosome degradation.” Point 11: Typos: Line 111, ‘invitro’ spelling is not correct.
Line 337 seems over statement since the data are not shown in the manuscript.