Thank you for this advice. We have trimmed the paper to focus on two of the five elements of sexual subjectivity - only those that were expected to be most relevant to partnered sexual partner: entitlement to sexual partner pleasure and efficacy in achieving pleasure. This has substantially limited the analyses conducted. We provide a rationale for this (see the first paragraph on p.4) and have thoroughly revised the entire paper.
my main concern with the study is that there were too many analyses presented to interpret in a meaningful way. The authors should revise the paper providing more theoretical background and accompanying analyses. With better theoretical framing and a more limited set of analyses, the value of the study results should be more clear.