Within the results table (Table 2) the direction of the estimate for this result is negative. Whilst we agree that it would be more impactful worded the other way around, we worry that changing the way it is described won’t match up to the data as it was coded and reported. We haven’t changed this wording for these reasons.
P10 L307-308 Could you make this a positive statement to show highlight the impact of amount of change on SRB: Dogs whose days left alone per week increased the most…If the data support that angle, I think it’s a stronger statement than what is written.