In other words, 1407/1807 (78%) of dogs were clear of SRB in February and 90.1% in October.
2. Can you address the dogs that improved between Feb and Oct? You report the number of new dogs showing SRB but can you report on dogs that went the other way? What was the actual # and %? It seems you have compared within dogs that showed SRB in baseline and other models for dogs that did not. Seems a comparison between SRB- (baseline) → SRB + (post lockdown) and SRB + (baseline) → SRB- (post lockdown) dogs is critical and missing. This comparison seems essential—if some dogs get worse but some get better, than the argument that changes due to COVID might bring about new SRB becomes weaker.