References are rechecked and deleted or erroneous references are recited or deleted. We humbly accept the reviewer's opinion that there are many references, and we have deleted references that are deemed unnecessary. We humbly accept the reviewer's comments that there is a quality problem, and We did our best to double-check, revise, and improve the quality of our papers.
There are referencing issues with sections as well (e.g. line 213: “As mentioned in 0”) Finally, and most importantly, the format of the bibliography is highly problematic. For many references (e.g. [15], [22], [25]) it is impossible to retrieve the source. For many other sources, the local access path of the file is provided, which again prevents the reader from retrieving the source. All these issues could have been picked up by a simple check. Unfortunately, they are enough for me to recommend to reject the paper, as I consider that submitting a report of scientific quality in this form is unacceptable.