uid,text,target,num_keyphrases
4662,"2008/451/EC: Council Decision of 16 June 2008 adjusting the allowances provided for in Decision 2003/479/EC and Decision 2007/829/EC concerning the rules applicable to national experts and military staff on secondment to the General Secretariat of the Council. ,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Union, and in particular Article 28(1) thereof,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 207(2) thereof,Having regard to Decision 2003/479/EC (1), and in particular Article 15(7) thereof,Having regard to Decision 2007/829/EC (2), and in particular Article 15(6) thereof,Whereas:(1) Article 15(7) of Decision 2003/479/EC and Article 15(6) of Decision 2007/829/EC provide that the daily and monthly allowances shall be adjusted each year without retroactive effect on the basis of the adaptation of the basic salaries of Community officials in Brussels and Luxembourg.(2) The Council, through Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 420/2008 of 14 May 2008 adjusting with effect from 1 July 2007 the remuneration and pensions of officials and other servants of the European Communities (3) and the correction coefficients applied thereto, adopted an adjustment of 1,4 % to the remuneration and pensions of Community officials,. 1.   In Article 15(1) of Decision 2003/479/EC and Article 15(1) of Decision 2007/829/EC, the amounts EUR 29,44 and EUR 117,74 shall be replaced by EUR 29,85 and EUR 119,39 respectively.2.   In Article 15(2) of Decision 2003/479/EC and in Article 15(2) of Decision 2007/829/EC the table shall be replaced by the following:‘Distance between place of recruitment and place of secondment Amount in EUR0-150 0,00> 150 76,74> 300 136,42> 500 221,71> 800 358,14> 1 300 562,80> 2 000 673,67’3.   In Article 15(4) of Decision 2003/479/EC the amount EUR 29,44 shall be replaced by EUR 29,85. This Decision shall take effect on the first day of the month following that of its adoption.. Done at Luxembourg, 16 June 2008.For the CouncilThe PresidentD. RUPEL(1)  Council Decision 2003/479/EC of 16 June 2003 concerning the rules applicable to national experts and military staff on secondment to the General Secretariat of the Council (OJ L 160, 28.6.2003, p. 72). Decision as repealed by Decision 2007/829/EC.(2)  Council Decision 2007/829/EC of 5 December 2007 concerning the rules applicable to national experts and military staff on secondment to the General Secretariat of the Council (OJ L 327, 13.12.2007, p. 10).(3)  OJ L 127, 15.5.2008, p. 1.
",Council of the European Union;Council of European Ministers;Council of the European Communities;Council of the Union;EC Council;EU Council;European Union Council;self-employed person;adviser;consultant;expert;free-lance;independent;self-employed worker;allowances and expenses;mission expenses;transfer bonus;travel expenses;military personnel;secretariat of an Institution;public administration;general government;staff regulations (EU);personnel regulations (EU);staff regulations for EU officials;staff regulations for officials of the European Union,26
340,"73/274/EEC: Commission Decision of 25 July 1973 on Article 20 of Italian Law No 1101 of 1 December 1971 on the restructuring, reorganization and conversion of the textile industry (Only the Italian text is authentic). ,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 93 (2) and (3) thereof;Having regard to the comments of those concerned;IWhereas in the letter from its Permanent Representative of 24 April 1969 the Italian Government notified the Commission of a draft law on the restructuring, reorganization and conversion of the textile industry ; whereas this draft became Law No 1101 of 1 December 1971;Whereas Article 20 of that law contains a new provision for aid which was not included in the text of the draft communicated to the Commission;Whereas the aid consists of a reduction in the social charges pertaining to family allowances for the benefit of the textile and garment-making industry and small crafts for a period of 3 years ; whereas the reduction in the rate of contributions is from 15 % to 10 %;Whereas the aid referred to has been repeatedly examined by the representatives of the Member States and has also been the subject of bilateral examination by the Commission and the representatives of Italy;Whereas in view of the serious likelihood that certain of the proposed provisions of the draft law might be incompatible with the common market, the Commission had initiated on 3 December 1969 in relation to the draft law as a whole the examination procedure laid down in the first subparagraph of Article 93 (2) of the EEC Treaty ; whereas under this procedure the Commission took a partial decision on 27 May 1970, whilst reserving its right to take further action upon receiving all the information necessary for assessing the merits of the proposed provisions;Whereas the Commission has therefore kept open the procedure which it initiated under Article 93 (2) for the purpose of examining the aid measure provided for in Article 20 of Law No 1101, and whereas, in accordance with that procedure, it has given notice to all interested parties to submit their comments;Whereas a reduction in one sector of certain social charges constitutes an aid within the meaning of Article 92 (1) of the EEC Treaty;IIWhereas aids to promote the restructuring and the modernization of Italian textile undertakings cannot be considered compatible with the common market unless they are intended as aids ""to facilitate the development of certain economic activities"" within the meaning of Article 92 (3) (c) of the EEC Treaty and  unless they ""do not adversely affect trading conditions to an extent contrary to the common interest"";Whereas the Italian authorities have pointed out in support of the measures that its purpose is to offset the large gap between contributions and allowances in the industry in question, because of the large number of married women employed in that industry ; that the measure is also intended to lighten the financial burden of the undertakings benefiting from it, during the period of restructuring the effects of which on the capital position would only be felt gradually ; that the measure is also intended to reduce social charges, which are considerably higher in Italy than in the other Member States;Whereas, even if the general conditions under which undertakings carry out their activities do vary from one country of the Community to the other, a Member State cannot, however, isolate one particular factor such as social charges from these general conditions, and compensate through aids for the additional costs which, because of this factor, its undertakings have to incur by comparison with their competitors in other Member States;Whereas aids of this kind which take the form of a partial reduction of social charges constitute an aid of a conservative nature which is not such as to facilitate the ""development"" within the meaning of Article 92 (3) (c) of the EEC Treaty of the undertakings benefiting from it since it will not induce those undertakings which have difficulties of a structural nature to carry out the structural changes which would enable them to solve those problems;Whereas, moreover, the aid is granted to all undertakings in the textile industry without distinguishing between those which have structural difficulties and those which do not;Whereas, in addition, the aid is such as to jeopardize the principles notified by the Commission to Member States on 30 July 1971 whereby aids to the textile industry are to be granted within a Community framework;Whereas the aid is such as to affect competition and trade directly, because it has a direct effect on manufacturing costs and, consequently, on the competitiveness of the undertakings, and whereas the very strong competition and the large volume of trade in textiles within the Community, as well as the difficulties of adaptation now facing the whole of the Community textile industry, are factors which do not allow aid of this kind to be tolerated;Whereas, consequently, the Commission has no grounds for exempting the measure in question from the provisions relating to the incompatibility of aids laid down in Article 92 (1) of the EEC Treaty by allowing it to benefit from the exception provided for in Article 92 (3) (c) of the EEC Treaty ; whereas, in addition, this measure cannot be covered by the exception provided in Article 92 (3) (b) of the EEC Treaty ; whereas this measure is envisaged for a period as long as three years, and only concerns the textile and garment making industries ; whereas, moreover, various interventions and aids of a general nature are at present available in Italy to remedy short-term economic problems;Whereas a decision concerning the particular point of the reduction of social charges as laid down in Article 20 of Law 1101, does not conclude the Commission's examination of that law under Article 93 (3) of the EEC Treaty, since the Commission has not yet been informed of the actual criteria of selection which the inter-Ministerial Committee set up under Article 5 of the law will adopt for the purpose of granting the other advantages provided for in the law, and which must be notified to the Commission according to the aforementioned Article of the Treaty;Whereas this Decision cannot be considered a final decision within the meaning of the last sentence of Article 93 (3) of the EEC Treaty, as would allow a Member State to put into effect such of the proposed aid measures as are not covered by this Decision;. The Italian Republic shall abolish the temporary and partial reduction of social charges pertaining to family allowances provided for in Article 20 of Law No 1101 of 1 December 1971 for the benefit of all textile industrial and small craft undertakings. This decision is addressed to the Italian Republic.. Done at Brussels, 25 July 1973.For the CommissionThe PresidentFranรงois-Xavier ORTOLI
",textile industry;embroidery;knitting;sewing;spinning;textile production;weaving;Italy;Italian Republic;social-security contribution;employee's contribution;employer's contribution;family benefit;accommodation allowance;child benefit;family allowance;family income support;head-of-household allowance;household allowance;rent allowance;single parent allowance;industrial conversion;industrial reconversion;reconversion of industry;reconversion of undertakings;aid for restructuring,26
43960,"Commission Regulation (EU) No 338/2014 of 28 March 2014 establishing a prohibition of fishing for tusk in Union and international waters of V, VI and VII by vessels flying the flag of Spain. ,Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,Whereas:(1) Council Regulation (EU) No 43/2014 of 20 January 2014 fixing for 2014 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks, applicable in Union waters and, to Union vessels, in certain non-Union waters (2), lays down quotas for 2014.(2) According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for 2014.(3) It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,. Quota exhaustionThe fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein for 2014 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex. ProhibitionsFishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date. Entry into forceThis Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.. Done at Brussels, 28 March 2014.For the Commission,On behalf of the President,Lowri EVANSDirector-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.(2)  OJ L 24, 28.1.2014, p. 1.ANNEXNo 01/TQ43Member State SpainStock USK/567EI.Species Tusk (Brosme brosme)Zone Union and international waters of V, VI and VIIClosing date 27.2.2014
",Atlantic Ocean;Atlantic;Atlantic Region;Gulf Stream;ship's flag;nationality of ships;sea fishing;sea fish;catch quota;catch plan;fishing plan;fishing area;fishing limits;catch by species;fishing rights;catch limits;fishing ban;fishing restriction;EU waters;Community waters;European Union waters;international waters;high seas;maritime waters;Spain;Kingdom of Spain,26
37989,"2010/560/EU: Commission Decision of 16 September 2010 amending Decisions 2008/603/EC, 2008/691/EC and 2008/751/EC as regards extension of the temporary derogations from the rules of origin laid down in Annex II to Council Regulation (EC) No 1528/2007 to take account of the special situation of Mauritius, Seychelles and Madagascar with regard to tuna and tuna loins (notified under document C(2010) 6259). ,Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1528/2007 of 20 December 2007 applying the arrangements for products originating in certain states which are part of the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) Group of States provided for in agreements establishing, or leading to the establishment of, Economic Partnership Agreements (1), and in particular Article 36(4) of Annex II thereof,Whereas:(1) On 17 July 2008 Commission Decision 2008/603/EC (2) was adopted granting a temporary derogation from the rules of origin laid down in Annex II to Council Regulation (EC) No 1528/2007 to take account of the special situation of Mauritius with regard to preserved tuna and tuna loins. On 15 June 2009 Commission Decision 2009/471/EC (3) was adopted granting an extension of that temporary derogation. On 21 December 2009 Mauritius requested in accordance with Article 36 of Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1528/2007 a new derogation from the rules of origin set out in that Annex. According to the information received from Mauritius the catches of raw tuna remain unusually low even compared to the normal seasonal variations. Given that the abnormal situation in 2009 remains unchanged for 2010 a new derogation should be granted with effect from 1 January 2010.(2) On 14 August 2008 Commission Decision 2008/691/EC (4) was adopted granting a temporary derogation from the rules of origin laid down in Annex II to Council Regulation (EC) No 1528/2007 to take account of the special situation of Seychelles with regard to preserved tuna. By Decision 2009/471/EC an extension of that temporary derogation was granted. On 25 January 2010 Seychelles requested in accordance with Article 36 of Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1528/2007 a new derogation from the rules of origin set out in that Annex. According to the information provided by Seychelles the catches of raw tuna remain very low even compared to the normal seasonal variations. Given that the abnormal situation in 2009 remains unchanged for 2010 a new derogation should be granted with effect from 1 January 2010.(3) On 18 September 2008 Commission Decision 2008/751/EC (5) was adopted granting a temporary derogation from the rules of origin laid down in Annex II to Council Regulation (EC) No 1528/2007 to take account of the special situation of Madagascar with regard to preserved tuna and tuna loins. By Decision 2009/471/EC an extension of that temporary derogation was granted. On 22 May 2010 Madagascar requested in accordance with Article 36 of Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1528/2007 a new derogation from the rules of origin set out in that Annex. On 8 June 2010 Madagascar provided additional information. According to the information provided by Madagascar sourcing of raw originating tuna remains difficult due to their unavailability. Given that the abnormal situation in 2009 remains unchanged for 2010 a new derogation should be granted with effect from 1 January 2010.(4) Decisions 2008/603/EC, 2008/691/EC and 2008/751/EC applied until 31 December 2009 because the Interim Economic Partnership Agreement between the Eastern and Southern Africa States on the one part and the European Community and its Member States on the other part (ESA-EU Interim Partnership Agreement) did not enter into force or was not provisionally applied before that date.(5) In accordance with Article 4(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1528/2007 the rules of origin set out in Annex II to that Regulation and the derogations to them are to be superseded by the rules of the ESA-EU Interim Partnership Agreement of which the entry into force or the provisional application is foreseen to take place in 2010.(6) It is necessary to ensure continuity of importations from the ACP countries to the Union as well as a smooth transition to the Interim Economic Partnership Agreement. Decisions 2008/603/EC, 2008/691/EC and 2008/751/EC should therefore be prolonged with effect from 1 January 2010.(7) Mauritius, Seychelles and Madagascar will benefit from an automatic derogation from the rules of origin for tuna of HS heading 1604 pursuant to the relevant provisions of the Origin Protocol attached to the ESA-EU Interim Partnership Agreement signed by them, when this Agreement enters into force or is provisionally applied. It would be inappropriate to grant by this Decision derogations in accordance with Article 36 of Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1528/2007 which exceed the annual quota granted to the ESA region under the ESA-EU Interim Partnership Agreement. The ESA signatories to the Agreement have therefore signed a unilateral political declaration concerning the derogations for tuna granted in 2010 whereby these countries renounce to the global annual quantity of the automatic derogation for 2010 in case that the Agreement will either be provisionally applied or enter into force during this year. Consequently the quota amounts for 2010 should be set at the same level as for 2009.(8) Decisions 2008/603/EC, 2008/691/EC and 2008/751/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.(9) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Customs Code Committee,. Decision 2008/603/EC is amended as follows:1. Article 2 is replaced by the following:2. In Article 6, the second paragraph is replaced by the following:3. The Annex is replaced by the text set out in Annex I to this Decision. Decision 2008/691/EC is amended as follows:1. Article 2 is replaced by the following:2. In Article 6, the second paragraph is replaced by the following:3. The Annex is replaced by the text set out in Annex II to this Decision. Decision 2008/751/EC is amended as follows:1. Article 2 is replaced by the following:2. In Article 6, the second paragraph is replaced by the following:3. The Annex is replaced by the text set out in Annex III to this Decision. This Decision shall apply from 1 January 2010. This Decision is addressed to the Member States.. Done at Brussels, 16 September 2010.For the CommissionAlgirdas ŠEMETAMember of the Commission(1)  OJ L 348, 31.12.2007, p. 1.(2)  OJ L 194, 23.7.2008, p. 9.(3)  OJ L 155, 18.6.2009, p. 46.(4)  OJ L 225, 23.8.2008, p. 17.(5)  OJ L 255, 23.9.2008, p. 31.ANNEX I‘ANNEXOrder No CN code Description of goods Periods Quantities09.1668 1604 14 11, 1604 14 18, 1604 20 70 Preserved tuna (1) 1.1.2008 to 31.12.2008 3 000 tonnes1.1.2009 to 31.12.2009 3 000 tonnes1.1.2010 to 31.12.2010 3 000 tonnes09.1669 1604 14 16 Tuna loins 1.1.2008 to 31.12.2008 600 tonnes1.1.2009 to 31.12.2009 600 tonnes1.1.2010 to 31.12.2010 600 tonnes(1)  In any form of packaging whereby the product is considered as preserved within the meaning of HS heading ex ex 1604.’ANNEX II‘ANNEXOrder No CN code Description of goods Periods Quantity09.1666 1604 14 11, Preserved tuna (1) 1.1.2008 to 31.12.2008 3 000 tonnes1604 14 18, 1.1.2009 to 31.12.2009 3 000 tonnes1604 20 70 1.1.2010 to 31.12.2010 3 000 tonnes(1)  In any form of packaging whereby the product is considered as preserved within the meaning of HS heading ex ex 1604.’ANNEX III‘ANNEXOrder No CN code Description of goods Periods Quantities09.1645 ex 1604 14 11, ex 1604 14 18, ex 1604 20 70 Preserved tuna (1) 1.1.2008 to 31.12.2008 2 000 tonnes1.1.2009 to 31.12.2009 2 000 tonnes1.1.2010 to 31.12.2010 2 000 tonnes09.1646 1604 14 16 Tuna loins 1.1.2008 to 31.12.2008 500 tonnes1.1.2009 to 31.12.2009 500 tonnes1.1.2010 to 31.12.2010 500 tonnes(1)  In any form of packaging whereby the product is considered as preserved within the meaning of HS heading ex ex 1604.’
",Madagascar;Malagasy Republic;Republic of Madagascar;Mauritius;Island of Mauritius;Republic of Mauritius;sea fish;originating product;origin of goods;product origin;rule of origin;preserved product;preserved food;tinned food;Seychelles;Republic of Seychelles;Seychelle Islands;catch of fish;amount of catch;quantity of catch;volume of catch;movement certificate;customs permit;derogation from EU law;derogation from Community law;derogation from European Union law,26
2251,"Council Regulation (ECSC, EEC, Euratom) No 2152/82 of 28 July 1982 amending Regulation (Euratom, ECSC, EEC) No 549/69 determining the categories of officials and other servants of the European Communities to whom the provisions of Article 12, the second paragraph of Article 13 and Article 14 of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the Communities apply. ,Having regard to the Treaty establishing a single Council and a single Commission of the European Communities, and in particular the first paragraph of Article 28 thereof,Having regard to the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities, and in particular Articles 16 and 22 thereof,Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (1),Whereas Regulation (Euratom, ECSC, EEC) No 549/69 (2), as last amended by Regulation (ECSC, EEC Euratom) No 1545/73 (3), should be amended in order to take account of Council Regulation (ECSC, EEC, Euratom) No 2150/82 of 28 July 1982 introducing special and temporary measures to terminate the service of officials of the European Communities consequent upon the accession of the Hellenic Republic (4),. The following subparagraph (h) shall be added to Article 2 of Regulation (Euratom, ECSC, EEC) No 549/69:‘(h) those entitled to the allowance provided for in the event of termination of service under Article 2 of Regulation (ECSC, EEC, Euratom) No 2150/82.’ This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.It shall apply from the time when Regulation (ECSC, EEC, Euratom) No 2150/82 enters into force.This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.. Done at Brussels, 28 July 1982.For the CouncilThe PresidentO. MØLLER(1)  OJ No C 182, 19. 7. 1982, p. 127.(2)  OJ No L 74, 27. 3. 1969, p. 1.(3)  OJ No L 155, 11. 6. 1973, p. 7.(4)  See page 1 of this Official Journal.
",allowances and expenses;mission expenses;transfer bonus;travel expenses;Protocol (EU);Community privilege;EC Protocol;EU protocol;privileges and immunities of the EU;privileges and immunities of the European Union;protocol of the EU;protocol of the European Union;regulations for civil servants;servant (EU);EC auxiliary staff;EC local staff;EC scientific staff;EC servants;EU temporary staff;contract agent (EU);servant of the European Union;servants of the European Communities;temporary agent (EU);temporary servant (EU);cessation of trading;business closure,26
1989,"82/289/EEC: Commission Decision of 13 April 1982 establishing that the apparatus described as 'Perkin Elmer - Gas Chromatography System, model Sigma 1, with Lab Data System, model Sigma 10', may not be imported free of Common Customs Tariff duties. ,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1798/75 of 10 July 1975 on the importation free of Common Customs Tariff duties of educational, scientific and cultural materials (1), as amended by Regulation (EEC) No 1027/79 (2),Having regard to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2784/79 of 12 December 1979 laying down provisions for the implementation of Regulation (EEC) No 1798/75 (3), and in particular Article 7 thereof,Whereas, by letter dated 7 October 1981, the Italian Republic has requested the Commission to invoke the procedure provided for in Article 7 of Regulation (EEC) No 2784/79 in order to determine whether or not the apparatus described as 'Perkin Elmer - Gas Chromatography System, model Sigma 1, with Lab Data System, model Sigma 10', to be used for the analysis of oils, fats, sterol fractions and pesticides, for toxicological analysis, identification of drug metabolites, recognition of organic synthesis intermediates, extraction products and essential oils, should be considered to be a scientific apparatus and, where the reply is in the affirmative, whether apparatus of equivalent scientific value is currently being manufactured in the Community;Whereas, in accordance with the provisions of Article 7 (5) of Regulation (EEC) No 2784/79, a group of experts composed of representatives of all the Member States met, on 22 March 1982, within the framework of the Committee on Duty-Free Arrangements to examine the matter;Whereas this examination showed that the apparatus in question is a gas chromatograph;Whereas its objective technical characteristics such as the precision of the analysis and the use to which it is put make it specially suited to scientific research; whereas, moreover, apparatus of the same kind are principally used for scientific activities; whereas it must therefore be considered to be a scientific apparatus;Whereas, however, on the basis of information received from Member States, apparatus of scientific value equivalent to the said apparatus, capable of being used for the same purposes, are currently being manufactured in the Community; whereas this applies, in particular, to the apparatus '429' and '430', manufactured by Packard-Becker BV, Vulcanusweg 259, NL-Delft, to the apparatus 'series 131', manufactured by Intersmat, boîte postale 25, F-77181 Courtry, to the apparatus '6800 CR-1A', in combination with 'Processor 1803', manufactured by Dani SpA, via Rovani 10, I-20052 Monza,. The apparatus described as 'Perkin Elmer - Gas Chromatography System, model Sigma 1, with Lab Data System, model Sigma 10', which is the subject of an application by the Italian Republic of 7 October 1981, may not be imported free of Common Customs Tariff duties. This Decision is addressed to the Member States.. Done at Brussels, 13 April 1982.For the CommissionÉtienne DAVIGNONVice-President(1) OJ No L 184, 15. 7. 1975, p. 1.(2) OJ No L 134, 31. 5. 1979, p. 1.(3) OJ No L 318, 13. 12. 1979, p. 32.
",exemption from customs duties;customs franchise;duty-free admission;duty-free entry;exemption from duty;exemption from import duty;travellers' allowance;travellers' tax-free allowance;scientific apparatus;laboratory equipment;microscope;research equipment;scientific instrument;scientific material;common customs tariff;CCT;admission to the CCT;analytical chemistry;centrifuging;chemical analysis;chemical testing;chromatography;conductometry;electrolytic analysis;photometry;volumetric analysis,26
5835,"2014/873/EU: Commission Implementing Decision of 3 December 2014 repealing Decision 2002/249/EC concerning certain protective measures with regard to certain fishery and aquaculture products intended for human consumption and imported from Myanmar (notified under document C(2014) 9057)  Text with EEA relevance. ,Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 laying down the general principles and requirements of food law, establishing the European Food Safety Authority and laying down procedures in matters of food safety (1), and in particular Article 53(1) thereof,Having regard to Council Directive 97/78/EC of 18 December 1997 laying down the principles governing the organisation of veterinary checks on products entering the Community from third countries (2), and in particular Article 22(1) thereof,Whereas:(1) Commission Decision 2002/249/EC (3) introduces certain protective measures with regard to certain fishery and aquaculture products intended for human consumption and imported from Myanmar and specifies tests to be carried out by the Member States on shrimps.(2) Decision 2002/249/EC provides that that Decision is to be reviewed in the light of the guarantees offered by the competent authorities of Myanmar and on the basis of the results of the tests carried out by the Member States.(3) It is not authorised to import aquaculture products from Myanmar into the EU.(4) All uses of chloramphenicol and nitrofurans in fishery and aquaculture products are banned in Myanmar since 16 November 2011 by Burmese Directive 6/2011.(5) The competent authorities in Myanmar have conducted monitoring tests on fishery products since the entry into force of the ban which were negative for the presence of chloramphenicol and nitrofurans.(6) No test by Member States as referred to in Article 2 of Decision 2002/249/EC on shrimps imported from Myanmar has had a non-satisfactory result since June 2009. It is therefore no longer necessary to test each consignment, in particular, with a view to detecting the presence of chloramphenicol.(7) Decision 2002/249/EC should therefore be repealed accordingly.(8) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,. Decision 2002/249/EC is hereby repealed. This Decision is addressed to the Member States.. Done at Brussels, 3 December 2014.For the CommissionVytenis ANDRIUKAITISMember of the Commission(1)  OJ L 31, 1.2.2002, p. 1.(2)  OJ L 24, 30.1.1998, p. 9.(3)  Commission Decision 2002/249/EC of 27 March 2002 concerning certain protective measures with regard to certain fishery and aquaculture products intended for human consumption and imported from Myanmar (OJ L 84, 28.3.2002, p. 73).
",food inspection;control of foodstuffs;food analysis;food control;food test;aquaculture;fishery product;foodstuff;agri-foodstuffs product;crustacean;crab;crawfish;crayfish;lobster;prawn;shrimp;import (EU);Community import;Burma/Myanmar;Burma;Myanmar;Republic of the Union of Myanmar;veterinary drug;veterinary medicines;surveillance concerning imports;Community surveillance,26
31669,"2006/687/EC: Commission Decision of 12 October 2006 on programmes which qualify for a Community financial contribution in 2007 for the eradication and monitoring of certain animal diseases, for the prevention of zoonoses, for the monitoring of TSEs as well as programmes for the eradication of BSE and scrapie (notified under document number C(2006) 4784). ,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Decision 90/424/EEC of 26 June 1990 on expenditure in the veterinary field (1), and in particular Article 24(5) and Article 32 thereof,Whereas:(1) Certain Member States have submitted programmes to the Commission for which they wish to receive a Community financial contribution. Those programmes concern the eradication and control of certain animal diseases, programmes of checks aimed at the prevention of zoonoses, programmes for the control of certain transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs) and also programmes for the eradication of bovine spongiform encephalopathies (BSE) and scrapie.(2) In accordance with Article 3(2)(a) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 of 21 June 2005 on the financing of the common agricultural policy (2), animal disease eradication and control programmes (veterinary measures) are to be financed from the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund. For financial control purposes, Articles 9, 36 and 37 of that Regulation are to apply.(3) Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 laying down rules for the prevention, control and eradication of certain transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (3), lays down rules for monitoring and eradication of TSEs in bovine, ovine and caprine animals.(4) In drawing up the lists of programmes for the eradication and monitoring of animal diseases, the list of programmes of checks aimed at the prevention of zoonoses and the list of programmes for the eradication and the monitoring of certain TSEs qualifying for a financial contribution from the Community for 2007, and the proposed rate and maximum amount of the contribution for each programme, the interest of each measure in the programmes for the Community, its compliance with the technical provisions of relevant Community veterinary legislation and the volume of available appropriations must be taken into account.(5) The Member States have supplied the Commission with information enabling it to assess the interest for the Community of providing a financial contribution to the programmes for 2007.(6) The Commission has considered each of the programmes submitted from both the veterinary and the financial point of view and is satisfied that those programmes should be included in the lists of programmes qualifying for a financial contribution from the Community in 2007.(7) In view of the importance of those programmes for the protection of public and animal health, as well as the obligatory application in all Member States in the case of the TSE programmes, the most appropriate level of financial assistance from the Community should be ensured.(8) It is therefore appropriate to adopt the list of programmes qualifying for a financial contribution from the Community in 2007 and to set the proposed rates and the maximum amount of those contributions.(9) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,. 1.   The programmes for the eradication and monitoring of the animal diseases listed in Annex I shall qualify for a financial contribution from the Community in 2007.2.   For each programme as referred to in paragraph 1, the proposed rate and maximum amount of the financial contribution from the Community shall be as set out in Annex I. 1.   The programmes of checks aimed at the prevention of zoonoses listed in Annex II shall qualify for a financial contribution from the Community in 2007.2.   For each programme as referred to in paragraph 1, the proposed rate and maximum amount of the financial contribution from the Community shall be as set out in Annex II. 1.   The programmes for the monitoring of TSE (BSE and scrapie) listed in Annex III shall qualify for a financial contribution from the Community in 2007.2.   For each programme as referred to in paragraph 1, the proposed rate and maximum amount of the financial contribution from the Community shall be as set out in Annex III. 1.   The programmes for the eradication of BSE listed in Annex IV shall qualify for a financial contribution from the Community in 2007.2.   For each programme as referred to in paragraph 1, the proposed rate and maximum amount of the financial contribution from the Community shall be as set out in Annex IV. 1.   The programmes for the eradication of scrapie listed in Annex V shall qualify for a financial contribution from the Community in 2007.2.   For each programme as referred to in paragraph 1, the proposed rate and maximum amount of the financial contribution from the Community shall be as set out in Annex V. This Decision is addressed to the Member States.. Done at Brussels, 12 October 2006.For the CommissionMarkos KYPRIANOUMember of the Commission(1)  OJ L 224, 18.8.1990, p. 19. Decision as last amended by Decision 2006/53/EC (OJ L 29, 2.2.2006, p. 37).(2)  OJ L 209, 11.8.2005, p. 1. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 320/2006 (OJ L 58, 28.2.2006, p. 42).(3)  OJ L 147, 31.5.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1041/2006 (OJ L 187, 8.7.2006, p. 10).ANNEX IList of programmes for the eradication and monitoring of animal diseases as referred to in Article 1(1)Rate and maximum amount of the Community financial contributionDisease Member State Rate Maximum amountAujeszky’s disease Belgium 50 % 250 000Spain 50 % 350 000Bluetongue Spain 50 % 4 900 000France 50 % 160 000Italy 50 % 1 300 000Portugal 50 % 600 000Bovine brucellosis Spain 50 % 3 500 000Ireland 50 % 1 100 000Italy 50 % 2 000 000Cyprus 50 % 95 000Poland 50 % 300 000Portugal 50 % 1 600 000United Kingdom (1) 50 % 1 100 000Bovine tuberculosis Spain 50 % 3 000 000Italy 50 % 2 500 000Poland 50 % 1 100 000Portugal 50 % 450 000Classical swine fever Germany 50 % 800 000France 50 % 500 000Luxembourg 50 % 35 000Slovenia 50 % 25 000Slovakia 50 % 400 000Enzootic bovine leucosis Estonia 50 % 20 000Italy 50 % 400 000Latvia 50 % 35 000Lithuania 50 % 135 000Poland 50 % 2 300 000Portugal 50 % 225 000Ovine and caprine brucellosis (B melitensis) Greece 50 % 650 000Spain 50 % 5 000 000France 50 % 200 000Italy 50 % 4 000 000Cyprus 50 % 120 000Portugal 50 % 1 600 000Poseidom (2) France (3) 50 % 50 000Rabies Czech Republic 50 % 490 000Germany 50 % 850 000Estonia 50 % 925 000Latvia 50 % 1 200 000Lithuania 50 % own territory; 100 % border areas 600 000Hungary 50 % 1 850 000Austria 50 % 185 000Poland 50 % 4 850 000Slovenia 50 % 375 000Slovakia 50 % 500 000Finland 50 % 112 000African swine fever/Classical swine fever Italy 50 % 140 000Swine vesicular disease Italy 50 % 120 000Avian influenza Belgium 50 % 66 000Czech Republic 50 % 74 000Denmark 50 % 160 000Germany 50 % 243 000Estonia 50 % 40 000Greece 50 % 42 000Spain 50 % 82 000France 50 % 280 000Ireland 50 % 59 000Italy 50 % 510 000Cyprus 50 % 15 000Latvia 50 % 15 000Lithuania 50 % 12 000Luxembourg 50 % 10 000Hungary 50 % 110 000Malta 50 % 5 000Netherlands 50 % 126 000Austria 50 % 42 000Poland 50 % 87 000Portugal 50 % 121 000Slovenia 50 % 32 000Slovakia 50 % 21 000Finland 50 % 27 000Sweden 50 % 130 000United Kingdom 50 % 275 000Total 55 581 000(1)  United Kingdom only as regards Northern Ireland.(2)  Heartwater, babesiosis and anaplasmosis transmitted by vector insects in the French overseas departments.(3)  France only as regards Guadeloupe, Martinique and Réunion.ANNEX IIList of programmes of checks aimed at the prevention of zoonoses as referred to in Article 2(1)Rate and maximum amount of the Community financial contributionZoonosis Member State Rate Maximum amountSalmonella Belgium 50 % 660 000Czech Republic 50 % 330 000Denmark 50 % 250 000Germany 50 % 175 000Estonia 50 % 27 000Greece 50 % 60 000Spain 50 % 2 000 000France 50 % 875 000Ireland 50 % 175 000Italy 50 % 320 000Cyprus 50 % 40 000Latvia 50 % 60 000Hungary 50 % 60 000Netherlands 50 % 1 350 000Austria 50 % 80 000Poland 50 % 2 000 000Portugal 50 % 450 000Slovakia 50 % 205 000Total 9 117 000ANNEX IIIList of programmes for the monitoring of TSEs as referred to in Article 3(1)Rate and maximum amount of the Community financial contributionDisease Member State Rate rapid tests and discriminatory tests performed Maximum amountTSEs Belgium 100 % 2 084 000Czech Republic 100 % 1 059 000Denmark 100 % 1 680 000Germany 100 % 11 307 000Estonia 100 % 233 000Greece 100 % 1 827 000Spain 100 % 10 237 000France 100 % 24 815 000Ireland 100 % 6 755 000Italy 100 % 3 375 000Cyprus 100 % 348 000Latvia 100 % 312 000Lithuania 100 % 645 000Luxembourg 100 % 146 000Hungary 100 % 784 000Malta 100 % 90 000Netherlands 100 % 5 112 000Austria 100 % 1 759 000Poland 100 % 3 744 000Portugal 100 % 2 115 000Slovenia 100 % 308 000Slovakia 100 % 1 088 000Finland 100 % 839 000Sweden 100 % 2 020 000United Kingdom 100 % 6 781 000Total 89 463 000ANNEX IVList of programmes for the eradication of BSE as referred to in Article 4(1)Rate and maximum amount of the Community financial contributionDisease Member State Rate Maximum amountBSE Belgium 50 % culling 50 000Czech Republic 50 % culling 750 000Denmark 50 % culling 51 000Germany 50 % culling 500 000Estonia 50 % culling 98 000Greece 50 % culling 750 000Spain 50 % culling 713 000France 50 % culling 50 000Ireland 50 % culling 800 000Italy 50 % culling 150 000Luxembourg 50 % culling 100 000Netherlands 50 % culling 60 000Austria 50 % culling 48 000Poland 50 % culling 328 000Portugal 50 % culling 305 000Slovenia 50 % culling 25 000Slovakia 50 % culling 250 000Finland 50 % culling 25 000United Kingdom 50 % culling 347 000Total 5 400 000ANNEX VList of programmes for the eradication of scrapie as referred to in Article 5(1)Rate and amount of the Community financial contributionDisease Member State Rate Maximum amountScrapie Belgium 50 % culling; 50 % genotyping 99 000Czech Republic 50 % culling; 50 % genotyping 107 000Germany 50 % culling; 50 % genotyping 927 000Estonia 50 % culling; 50 % genotyping 13 000Greece 50 % culling; 50 % genotyping 1 306 000Spain 50 % culling; 50 % genotyping 5 374 000France 50 % culling; 50 % genotyping 8 862 000Ireland 50 % culling; 50 % genotyping 629 000Italy 50 % culling; 50 % genotyping 3 076 000Cyprus 50 % culling; 50 % genotyping 2 200 000Luxembourg 50 % culling; 50 % genotyping 28 000Hungary 50 % culling; 50 % genotyping 332 000Netherlands 50 % culling; 50 % genotyping 543 000Austria 50 % culling; 50 % genotyping 14 000Portugal 50 % culling; 50 % genotyping 716 000Slovenia 50 % culling; 50 % genotyping 83 000Slovakia 50 % culling; 50 % genotyping 279 000Finland 50 % culling; 50 % genotyping 11 000Sweden 50 % culling; 50 % genotyping 6 000United Kingdom 50 % culling; 50 % genotyping 9 178 000Total 33 783 000
",veterinary inspection;veterinary control;animal disease;animal pathology;epizootic disease;epizooty;disease prevention;prevention of disease;prevention of illness;preventive medicine;prophylaxis;screening for disease;screening for illness;health control;biosafety;health inspection;health inspectorate;health watch;action programme;framework programme;plan of action;work programme;distribution of EU funding;distribution of Community funding;distribution of European Union funding;zoonosis,26
33518,"2007/434/EC: Commission Decision of 21 June 2007 amending Decision 2006/415/EC concerning certain protection measures in relation to highly pathogenic avian influenza of the subtype H5 in poultry in the Czech Republic (notified under document number C(2007) 3120)   (Text with EEA relevance). ,Having regard to Council Directive 89/662/EEC of 11 December 1989 concerning veterinary checks in intra-Community trade with a view to the completion of the internal market (1), and in particular Article 9(3) thereof,Having regard to Council Directive 90/425/EEC of 26 June 1990 concerning veterinary and zootechnical checks applicable in intra-Community trade in certain live animals and products with a view to the completion of the internal market (2), and in particular Article 10(3) thereof,Whereas:(1) Commission Decision 2006/415/EC of 14 June 2006 concerning certain protection measures in relation to highly pathogenic avian influenza of the subtype H5N1 in poultry in the Community and repealing Decision 2006/135/EC (3) lays down certain protection measures to prevent the spread of the avian influenza into the disease-free parts of the Community through the movement of birds as well as products thereof.(2) The Czech Republic has notified an outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza H5 in poultry on its territory and has taken the appropriate measures in the framework of Decision 2006/415/EC, including the establishment of Areas A and B as provided for in Article 4 of that Decision.(3) The Commission is satisfied that the boundaries of Areas A and B established by the competent authority of the Czech Republic are at a sufficient distance from the actual location of the outbreak. Areas A and B in the Czech Republic can therefore be confirmed and the duration of that regionalisation fixed.(4) It is therefore necessary to amend Decision 2006/415/EC accordingly.(5) The measures provided for in this Decision should be reviewed at the next meeting of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,. The Annex to Decision 2006/415/EC is amended in accordance with the text in the Annex to this Decision. This Decision is addressed to the Member States.. Done at Brussels, 21 June 2007.For the CommissionMarkos KYPRIANOUMember of the Commission(1)  OJ L 395, 30.12.1989, p. 13. Directive as last amended by Directive 2004/41/EC (OJ L 157, 30.4.2004, p. 33); corrected version (OJ L 195, 2.6.2004, p. 12).(2)  OJ L 224, 18.8.1990, p. 29. Directive as last amended by Directive 2002/33/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 315, 19.11.2002, p. 14).(3)  OJ L 164, 16.6.2006, p. 51. Decision as amended by Decision 2007/128/EC (OJ L 53, 22.2.2007, p. 26).ANNEXThe Annex to Decision 2006/415/EC is amended as follows:1. The following text is added to Part A:‘ISO Country Code Member State Area A Date until applicable Article 4(4)(b)(iii)Code NameCZ CZECH REPUBLIC   30.6.2007Protection zone  BOHUŇOVICESurveillance zone  LEŠTINA (partly)2. The following text is added to Part B:‘ISO Country Code Member State Area B Date until applicable Article 4(4)(b)(iii)Code NameCZ CZECH REPUBLIC 00053 PARDUBICKÝ KRAJ: 30.6.200700052 KRÁLOVEHRADECKÝ KRAJ:
",veterinary inspection;veterinary control;animal disease;animal pathology;epizootic disease;epizooty;disease prevention;prevention of disease;prevention of illness;preventive medicine;prophylaxis;screening for disease;screening for illness;trade restriction;obstacle to trade;restriction on trade;trade barrier;poultry;chicken;cock;duck;goose;hen;ostrich;table poultry;Czech Republic,26
41083,"Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 210/2012 of 9 March 2012 fixing the allocation coefficient to be applied to applications for import licences for olive oil lodged from 5 to 6 March 2012 under the Tunisian tariff quota and suspending the issue of import licences for the month of March 2012. ,Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1301/2006 of 31 August 2006 laying down common rules for the administration of import tariff quotas for agricultural products managed by a system of import licences (2), and in particular Article 7(2) thereof,Whereas:(1) Article 3(1) and (2) of Protocol No 1 (3) to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Tunisia, of the other part (4), opens a tariff quota at a zero rate of duty for imports of untreated olive oil falling within CN codes 1509 10 10 and 1509 10 90, wholly obtained in Tunisia and transported direct from that country to the European Union, up to the limit laid down for each year.(2) Article 2(2) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1918/2006 of 20 December 2006 opening and providing for the administration of tariff quota for olive oil originating in Tunisia (5) lays down monthly quantitative limits for the issue of import licences.(3) Import licence applications have been submitted to the competent authorities under Article 3(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1918/2006 in respect of a total quantity exceeding the limit laid down for the month of March in Article 2(2) of that Regulation.(4) In these circumstances, the Commission must set an allocation coefficient allowing import licences to be issued in proportion to the quantity available.(5) Since the limit for the month of March has been reached, no more import licences can be issued for that month,. The quantities for which import licence applications were lodged for 5 and 6 March 2012 under Article 3(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1918/2006 shall be multiplied by an allocation coefficient of 57,099350 %.The issue of import licences in respect of amounts applied for as from 12 March 2012 shall be suspended for March 2012. This Regulation shall enter into force on 10 March 2012.This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.. Done at Brussels, 9 March 2012.For the Commission, On behalf of the President,José Manuel SILVA RODRÍGUEZDirector-General for Agriculture and Rural Development(1)  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.(2)  OJ L 238, 1.9.2006, p. 13.(3)  OJ L 97, 30.3.1998, p. 57.(4)  OJ L 97, 30.3.1998, p. 2.(5)  OJ L 365, 21.12.2006, p. 84.
",olive oil;tariff quota;administration of tariff quota;allocation of tariff quota;opening of tariff quota;quota at a reduced level of duty;zero-duty quota;import licence;import authorisation;import certificate;import permit;common organisation of markets;CMO;Single CMO;common market organisation;common organization of markets;single common market organisation;originating product;origin of goods;product origin;rule of origin;import (EU);Community import;Tunisia;Republic of Tunisia;Tunisian Republic,26
1669,"81/570/EEC: Commission Decision of 6 July 1981 establishing that the apparatus described as 'Dionex auto ion TM system 12 S analyzer' may be imported free of Common Customs Tariff duties. ,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1798/75 of 10 July 1975 on the importation free of Common Customs Tariff duties of educational, scientific and cultural materials (1), as amended by Regulation (EEC) No 1027/79 (2),Having regard to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2784/79 of 12 December 1979 laying down provisions for the implementation of Regulation (EEC) No 1798/75 (3), and in particular Article 7 thereof,Whereas, by letter dated 21 January 1981, the United Kingdom has requested the Commission to invoke the procedure provided for in Article 7 of Regulation (EEC) No 2784/79 in order to determine whether or not the apparatus described as ""Dionex auto ion TM system 12 S analyzer"", to be used for research into the chemical structure of temperate ice cores and into the environmental chemistry, should be considered to be a scientific apparatus and, where the reply is in the affirmative, whether apparatus of equivalent scientific value is currently being manufactured in the Community;Whereas, in accordance with the provisions of Article 7 (5) of Regulation (EEC) No 2784/79, a group of experts composed of representatives of all the Member States met on 28 April 1981 within the framework of the Committee on Duty-Free Arrangements to examine the matter;Whereas this examination showed that the apparatus in question is an analyzer ; whereas its objective technical characteristics such as the precision and the sensitivity of the ionic analysis and the use to which it is put make it specially suited to scientific research ; whereas, moreover, apparatus of the same kind are principally used for scientific activities ; whereas it must therefore be considered to be a scientific apparatus;Whereas, on the basis of information received from Member States, apparatus of equivalent scientific value capable of use for the same purpose is not currently manufactured in the Community ; whereas, therefore, duty-free admission of this apparatus is justified,. The apparatus described as ""Dionex auto ion TM system 12 S analyzer"" which is the subject of an application by the United Kingdom of 21 January 1981 may be imported free of Common Customs Tariff duties. This Decision is addressed to the Member States.. Done at Brussels, 6 July 1981.For the CommissionKarl-Heinz NARJESMember of the Commission  (1) OJ No L 184, 15.7.1975, p. 1. (2) OJ No L 134, 31.5.1979, p. 1. (3) OJ No L 318, 13.12.1979, p. 32.
",exemption from customs duties;customs franchise;duty-free admission;duty-free entry;exemption from duty;exemption from import duty;travellers' allowance;travellers' tax-free allowance;scientific apparatus;laboratory equipment;microscope;research equipment;scientific instrument;scientific material;common customs tariff;CCT;admission to the CCT;analytical chemistry;centrifuging;chemical analysis;chemical testing;chromatography;conductometry;electrolytic analysis;photometry;volumetric analysis,26
36188,"Commission Regulation (EC) No 1116/2008 of 11 November 2008 entering certain names in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Bœuf de Bazas (PGI), Kainuun rönttönen (PGI)). ,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,Whereas:(1) Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) and in accordance with Article 17(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, France’s application to register the name ‘Bœuf de Bazas’ and Finland’s application to register the name ‘Kainuun rönttönen’ were published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).(2) As no objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, these names should be entered in the register,. The names contained in the Annex to this Regulation are hereby entered in the register. This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.. Done at Brussels, 11 November 2008.For the CommissionMariann FISCHER BOELMember of the Commission(1)  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.(2)  OJ C 73, 19.3.2008, p. 26 (Bœuf de Bazas), OJ C 74, 20.3.2008, p. 72 (Kainuun rönttönen).ANNEX1. Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the TreatyClass 1.1. Fresh meat (and offal)2. Foodstuffs listed in Annex I to the RegulationClass 2.4. Bread, pastry, cakes, confectionery, biscuits and other baker’s wares
",Finland;Republic of Finland;France;French Republic;location of production;location of agricultural production;pastry-making;industrial pastry-making;designation of origin;PDO;PGI;certificate of designation of origin;protected designation of origin;protected geographical indication;registered designation of origin;cattle;bovine species;breed of cattle;buffalo;full-grown cattle;ruminant;product designation;product description;product identification;product naming;substance identification,26
8017,"90/462/EEC: Commission Decision of 6 August 1990 concerning applications for refund of anti-dumping duties collected on the import of vinyl acetate monomer originating in the United States of America (Guzman, SA). ,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2423/88 of 11 July 1988 on protection against dumped or subsidized imports from countries not members of the European Economic Community (1), and in particular Article 16 thereof,Whereas:A.  PROCEDURE(1)By Regulation (EEC) No 2357/87 (2), the Council amended Regulation (EEC) No 1282/81, imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of vinyl acetate monomer originating in the United Statesof America (3). Anti-dumping duty of 5,9 % wasapplied to the American company US Industrial Chemicals Co., later to become Quantum Chemical Corporation, to which the 5,9 % duty was declaredto be applicable by Council Regulation (EEC)No 2166/89 (4).(2)Since June 1988 Guzman, SA, Valencia, Spain, has been submitting periodic applications for refund of anti-dumping duties paid on the purchase of vinyl acetate monomer exported by the American company Quantum Chemical Corporation and sold by its  subsidiary Quantum Chemical Europe BV, a Dutch company.The Commission, with the agreement of the applicant, decided to treat the applications as recurring applications within the meaning ofpoint 1.4 of the Commission notice concerning the reimbursement of anti-dumping duties (hereinafter referred to as 'the notice' (5). Accordingly, theapplicant has submitted successive applications, within the three-month time limit set out underArticle 16(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 2423/88. The information required to assess the merits of the applications has been provided at six-monthly intervals.(3)In November 1988 the Commission received a request lodged by Quantum Chemical Corporation, a US producer/exporter, for a review of the anti-dumping measures applicable to imports of vinyl acetate monomer originating in the United States of America. On  25 April 1989 the Commission opened the review proceeding covering the period October 1988 to March 1989 inclusive (6). In accordance with point 1.5 of the notice, it was decided that the proceeding regarding the application for reimbursement wouldbe suspended until termination of the review. However, the applicant continued to submit periodic applications. Council Regulation (EEC) No 490/90 repealed Regulation (EEC) No 2357/87 and terminated the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of  vinyl acetate monomer originating inthe United States (7). Thus, since 2 March 1990, anti-dumping duty can no longer be imposed on imports of vinyl acetate monomer.(4)So as not to delay the decision on refunds, it was decided to process immediately the applications concerning imports made up to March 1989. These applications were examined during the review and are covered by this Decision. Recurring applications  submitted after this date, or which might still be submitted, covering periods up to 1 March 1990 - when the duty ceased to be applicable - will be covered by a further Decision.(5)The total amount of refunds requested was Pta (. . .) (8), which represents all the duty paid during the reference period in question.(6)The applicant was informed of the results of this examination and had the opportunity to submit its comments.(7)Pursuant to Article 16 (2) of Regulation (EEC)No 2423/88, the Commission informed the Member States and gave its opinion on the applications' admissibility and merits. No Member State raised any objection.B.  ARGUMENT OF THE APPLICANT(8)The applicant argued that the imports in question were not dumped.C.  ADMISSIBILITY(9)The applicant submitted its first request for refund on 1 June 1988 in respect of duties determined in December 1987 and March 1988. Pursuant to Article 16 of Regulation (EEC) No 2423/88, applications for refund of anti-dumping duties are admissible if  they are submitted within three months of the date on which the anti-dumping duties were duly determined. The first application by Guzman, SA is, therefore, inadmissible only in part and should be rejected in so far as it relates to duties determined in  December 1987, in respect of which the amount of Pta (. . .) should be deducted from the total amount of refund requested.The remaining recurring applications are admissible in that they were lodged in conformity with the relevant provisions of the Community's anti-dumping legislation, in particular with regard to time limits.D.  MERITS OF THE CLAIM(10)All the applications examined, covering the period March 1988 to March 1989, are well founded. Indeed, the applicant, in accordance with the provisions of Article 16 of Regulation (EEC) No 2423/88, supplied evidence that the actual dumping margin had  been eliminated by the time the importsin question were made. The Commission was ableto verify all the information supplied and found that the dumping margin was nil. This development was due to substantial modifications in export prices resulting from significant changes in market conditions worldwide for the product imported.Accordingly, the applications for refund of anti-dumping duties submitted by Guzman, SA for the period March 1988 to March 1989 inclusive should be granted in full.E.  AMOUNT TO BE REIMBURSED(11)A total of Pta (. . .) is therefore to be reimbursed to Guzman, SA,. The application for refund of anti-dumping duties submitted by Guzman, SA, Valencia, Spain, on 1 June 1988 is inadmissible in part and is hereby rejected in respect of an amount totalling Pta (. . .). The applications for refund of anti-dumping duties submitted by Guzman, SA, Valencia, Spain, covering the period March 1988 to March 1989 inclusive are hereby granted for Pta (. . .). The amount in Spanish pesetas set out in Article 2 shall be refunded by the Spanish authorities. This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Spain and Guzman, SA, Valencia, Spain.. Done at Brussels, 6 August 1990.For the CommissionFrans ANDRIESSENVice-President(1) OJ No L 209, 2. 8. 1988, p. 1.(2) OJ No L 213, 4. 8. 1987, p. 32.(3) OJ No L 129, 15. 5. 1981, p. 1.(4) OJ No L 208, 20. 7. 1989, p. 2.(5) OJ No C 266, 22. 10. 1986, p. 2.(6) OJ No C 105, 25. 4. 1989, p. 3.(7) OJ No L 53, 1. 3. 1990, p. 1.(8) In accordance with Article 8 of Regulation (EEC) No 2423/88, which deals with the non-disclosure of business secrets, certain figures have been omitted from the published version of this Decision.
",anti-dumping legislation;anti-dumping code;anti-dumping proceeding;redemption;repayment terms;organic acid;acetate;acetic acid;acrylic acid;alcohol acid;aromatic acid;citric acid;ester;fatty acid;formic acid;oxalic acid;phthalic acid;salicylic acid;anti-dumping duty;final anti-dumping duty;temporary anti-dumping duty;Spain;Kingdom of Spain;United States;USA;United States of America,26
33401,"2007/202/EC: Commission Decision of 27 March 2007 amending Appendix B to Annex XII to the 2003 Act of Accession as regards certain establishments in the meat, fish and milk sectors in Poland (notified under document number C(2007) 1305) (Text with EEA relevance ). ,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to the Act of Accession of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia, and in particular Annex XII, Chapter 6, Section B, Subsection I(1), paragraph (e) thereto,Whereas:(1) Poland has been granted transitional periods for certain establishments listed in Appendix B (1) to Annex XII to the 2003 Act of Accession.(2) Appendix B to Annex XII to the 2003 Act of Accession has been amended by Commission Decisions 2004/458/EC (2), 2004/471/EC (3), 2004/474/EC (4), 2005/271/EC (5), 2005/591/EC (6), 2005/854/EC (7), 2006/14/EC (8), 2006/196/EC (9), 2006/404/EC (10), 2006/555/EC (11) and 2006/935/EC (12).(3) According to an official declaration from the Polish competent authority certain establishments in the meat, fish and milk sectors have completed their upgrading process and are now in full compliance with Community legislation. Certain establishments have ceased activities for which they have obtained a transitional period. Those establishments should therefore be deleted from the list of establishments in transition.(4) Appendix B to Annex XII to the 2003 Act of Accession should therefore be amended accordingly.(5) The Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health has been informed of the measures provided for in this Decision,. The establishments listed in the Annex to this Decision are deleted from Appendix B to Annex XII to the 2003 Act of Accession. This Decision is addressed to the Member States.. Done at Brussels, 27 March 2007.For the CommissionMarkos KYPRIANOUMember of the Commission(1)  OJ L 236, 23.9.2003, p. 33.(2)  OJ L 156, 30.4.2004, p. 53; corrected version in OJ L 202, 7.6.2004, p. 39.(3)  OJ L 160, 30.4.2004, p. 56; corrected version in OJ L 212, 12.6.2004, p. 31.(4)  OJ L 160, 30.4.2004, p. 73; corrected version in OJ L 212, 12.6.2004, p. 44.(5)  OJ L 86, 5.4.2005, p. 13.(6)  OJ L 200, 30.7.2005, p. 96.(7)  OJ L 316, 2.12.2005, p. 17.(8)  OJ L 10, 14.1.2006, p. 66.(9)  OJ L 70, 9.3.2006, p. 80.(10)  OJ L 156, 9.6.2006, p. 16.(11)  OJ L 218, 9.8.2006, p. 17.(12)  OJ L 355, 15.12.2006, p. 105.ANNEXList of establishments to be deleted from Appendix B to Annex XII to the 2003 Act of AccessionMeat establishmentsInitial listNo Veterinary No Name of establishment63 12070108 Zakład Uboju Zwierząt Rzeźnych91 14170305 Zakład Garmażeryjny sp.j.105 14250310 Zakład Masarski ‘Sadełko’ – Czapla-Świniarski sp.j.197 30020201 Gminna Spółdzielnia ‘SCH’ Masarnia OsuchMeat establishments low capacityInitial listNo Veterinary No Name of establishment4  FHU ‘Pierożki-smakoszki’, ul. Parkowa 15, 30-014 KrakówMeat establishmentsSupplementary listNo Veterinary No Name of establishment12 06080302 IMPERIAL sp. z o.o.14 10010205 Zakład Przetwórstwa Mięsnego J.S.A.J. Mielczarek, sp.j.15 10030201 Zakład Przetwórstwa Mięsnego Krzysztof Bartos17 10030204 Zakład Mięsny Wacław Szaflik26 10184001 Zakład Produkcji Konserw ‘Marko-Pek’ sp. z o.o.27 10190201 Gminna Spółdzielnia Samopomoc Chłopska28 10190204 ZPHU Ubojnia Masarnia, J. Karczmarek30 10200322 Przedsiębiorstwo Produkcyjno-Handlowe ALFA, Jan Chrzęst, Ignacy Karolak sp.j.31 12070104 Bogdan Grabiec i Wspólnicy sp.j.35 12100103 Ubojnia Zwierząt Kazimierz Mółka36 12100104 Zakład Usługowo-Handlowy Zakup Żywca, Ubój i Sprzedaż Mięsa, Mieczysław Gawlik37 12100105 Obrót Zwierzętami Rzeźnymi Skup i Ubój oraz Sprzedaż Mięsa, Ireneusz Bieniek43 12120131 Ubój Zwierząt Rzeźnych, Skup, Sprzedaż Żywca i Mięsa, Stanisław Ogonek44 12120218 Z.P.M. Edmund Barczyk49 14230102 Rzeźnia Ubojnia, ZUH Jan Tomczyk51 14250104 Zakład Masarski ‘SADEŁKO’ sp.j.52 14250205 Przedsiębiorstwo Produkcyjno-Usługowo-Handlowe ‘DURO’ sp. z o.o.60 18030105 Zakład Handlowo-Produkcyjno-Przetwórczy A. Leja i Wspólnicy sp.j. w Jodłowej62 18060302 Zakład Uboju i Przetwórstwa Mięsnego ‘Radikal’67 20070205 APIS sp.j.70 22020201 Zakład Rzeźnicko-Wędliniarski, W. Gierszewski71 22070301 Zakład Przetwórstwa Mięsnego W. Zieliński i Spółka, sp.j.74 24060212 ZPU Ubój i Przetwórstwo Mięsa, Jan Matyja87 28030202 ZPHU sp.j., R.S.M. Kamińscy88 28030203 Zakład Przetwórstwa Mięsnego Karscy sp.j., Filia Uzdowo90 28070202 Masarnia Matis, sp. z o.o.92 28120102 GOLDMAS sp.j. Szafarnia93 28140313 BIO-LEGIZ SA, ul. Głowackiego 28, 10-448 Olsztyn, Zakład w Jezioranach103 06080302 Zakład Przetwórstwa Mięsnego w Kamionce firmy ‘IMPERIAL’ SA, 20-211 Lublin, ul. Gospodarcza 27105 08030201 Rzeźnictwo i Wędliniarstwo Szczerba Augustyn, 66-300 Międzyrzecz, ul. Polna 1106 12060220 Firma ‘Świerczek’ Zakład Uboju, Rozbioru i Przetwórstwa Mięsa, 32-043 Skała, ul. Rzeźnicza 1108 24050201 ZPU Tadeusz Marciniszyn, Pniew, ul. Pyskowicka 2, 42-120 Pyskowice113 24100202 PPH ‘HIT’ sp. z o.o., 43-229 Ćwiklice, ul. Spokojna 48114 30220201 Ubojnia Masarnia Folmas sp. z o.o., Rawicz, Folwark 49116 0203806 ‘Agro-Tusz’ sp.j., A. Okaj, R. Kręgulewski, J. Głodowski, 55-106 Zawonia, Tarnowiec 92a128 14340309 ‘Wisapis’ Zakład Mięsny – Andrzej Jurzyk, 05-200 Zielonka, ul. Bankowa 2132 22050303 Zakład Przetwórstwa Mięsnego ‘BALERONIK’ Ziegert Henryk, 83-300 Kartuzy, ul. Mściwoja II134 22060201 Zakłady Mięsne Kościerzyna sp. z o.o., 83-400 Kościerzyna, ul. Strzelecka 30B135 22060203 Zakład Mięsny Gminna Spółdzielnia ‘Samopomoc Chłopska’ w Karsinie, ul. Długa 184, 83-440 Karsin136 22123801 Zakład Mięsny ‘Wiklino’ Dorota Jaworska, Andrzej Jaworski, spółka jawna, 76-200 Słupsk, Wiklino 2137 22140301 ‘PiA’ sp. z o.o., 83-130 Pelplin, ul. Podgórna 8138 24010317 Prywatny Zakład Mięsny ‘GAIK’, sp. z o.o. 42-460 Najdziszów, ul. Topolowa 14142 24650301 Zakład Mięsny ‘ANTOSIK’, 41-300 Dąbrowa Górnicza, ul. Łącząca 39143 24040206 Zakład Produkcyjno-Handlowy ‘Admar’, ul. Częstochowska 34, 42-253 Siedlec gm. Janów144 24040203 PHP ‘YABRA’ sp. z o.o., 42-297 Poraj, ul. Wschodnia 15 Zakład Przetwórstwa Mięsnego i Produkcji Konserw w Kamienicy Polskiej, ul. Konopnickiej 404, 42-260 Kamienica Polska145 24640307 PPHU ‘ROMAN’ Eksport-Import sp. z o.o. 42-200 Częstochowa, ul. Ks. Kordeckiego 85/87147 24090304 Zakłady Mięsne ‘PORAJ’ Marian Pucek, 42-360 Poraj, ul. Nadrzeczna 11148 24100201 Warsztat Rzeźniczo-Wędliniarski, F. Szostok, 43-211 Czarków, ul. Boczna 1149 24120102 Zakład Wędliniarski Andrzej Stania, 44-266 Świerklany, ul. Zygmunta Starego 14, Zakład Uboju Zwierząt w Jankowicach, ul. Sportowa 2, 44-264 Jankowice151 24130301 Zakłady Mięsne Ryszard Wojtacha, 42-600 Tarnowskie Góry, ul. Nakielska 9/11158 24080305 Rzeźnictwo-Wędliniarstwo Grzegorz Zdrzałek, 43-178 Ornontowice, ul. Leśna 2159 28010103 Zakład Mięsny Bekon, ul. Prusa 2, 11-210 Sępopol161 30050202 Zakład Mięsno-Wedliniarski Paweł Matysiak, 62-067 Rakoniew, Garbary 2a165 30280102 PPH ‘ROMEX’ Pachela, Łęgowo, Rzeźnia Wągrowiec, 62-100 Wągrowiec, ul. Skocka 14Poultry meatInitial listNo Veterinary No Name of establishment5 08010505 ‘Ekpols’ sp. z o.o6 08010504 PHPU ‘DROSAN’ sp. z o.o11 10080801 Rabbits SlaughterhousePoultry meatSupplementary listNo Veterinary No Name of establishment173 14323901 Ejko – E. Kolczyńska, J. Kolczyński w Radonicach176 20110501 Spółdzielnia Producentów Drobiu ‘Eko-Gril’ w Sokółce179 28070503 Zakład Drobiarski ‘Lech Drób’ w Zalewie181 10010501 PPHU ‘Kusy’, Przetwórstwo Mięsne, spółka jawna, 97-400 Bełchatów, Korczew 6a184 10160404 Specjalistyczne Gospodarstwo Rolne Mariola Tonder, 97-217 Lubochnia, Dąbrowa 54187 22120501 PUH – Ubojnia Drobiu ‘Hubart’, Piotr i Maria Powęzka, 76-206 Słupsk 8, Bruskowo Wielkie 24191 28090401 Zbigniew Jaworski Przedsiębiorstwo Wielobranżowe HASPO193 30193901 Rzeźnia Drobiu Krystyna Skowrońska, Chrustowo 43, Ujście195 30210504 Ubojnia Drobiu Krystyna Hamrol, Dębienko, StęszewCold storesInitial listNo Veterinary No Name of establishment7 30641101 Przedsiębiorstwo Przemysłu ChłodniczegoFish sectorInitial listNo Veterinary No Name of establishment3 06611802 Zakład Przetwórstwa Ryb4 10031801 PHU ‘Słodmor’7 14191801 ZPR ‘Fileryb’ s.c.18 22621802 ‘Syrena’ Royal sp. z o.o20 24021802 PHU ‘Komers-Mag’ s.j.26 28051802 PW ‘Doryb’30 30221801 PHU ‘Panix’ P. Niziołek31 32031801 ZPUH Z. Stebnicki32 32071804 PPH ‘Mors’ M. Wdzięczny34 32081808 HPU ‘Tuka’ M. Pozorski, J. Szyszko, s.j.Fish sectorSupplementary listNo Veterinary No Name of establishment3 14251802 PPH ‘MARK’ M.K. Szczęsny10 02641801 ‘REX’ PPHiU Przetwórnia Artykułów Spożywczych i Ryb, Roman Boniewski, 52-311 Wrocław, ul. Łanowa 215 22111820 Zakład Rybny ‘ARPOL’, 84-120 Władysławowo, ul. Portowa 516 22111844 Przetwórstwo Ryb oraz Handel Obwoźny Halina Szymańska, 84-120 Władysławowo, ul. Róży Wiatrów 2418 22151804 ‘REDRYB’ mgr Helena Truszkowska, 84-240 Reda, ul. Spółdzielcza 13Milk sectorInitial listNo Veterinary No Name of establishment1 02011601 OSM Bolesławiec4 02111601 OSM Lubin5 02111602 OSM Lubin, Oddz. w Ścinawie9 04621601 Grudziądzka SM10 04021601 MPPH ‘Bromilk’ sp. z o.o15 06111601 SM Łuków22 08051601 ‘Osmos’ sp. z o.o w upadłości25 08061601 Strzelecka SM27 10081602 ZM ‘Zarębski’34 12061601 OSM Skała35 12081601 Oddz. Produkcyjny w Charsznicy OSM Miechów40 12111601 SM Nowy Targ45 14221603 SM ‘Mazowsze’48 16011601 OSM Brzeg54 18181601 OSM w Stalowej Woli60 22151604 ZM ‘Śnieżka’ Perlino65 24041601 PPH ‘Pak’ A.P. Kwiatkowscy69 24071601 OSM Lubliniec-Dobrodzień72 24151601 OSM Bełsznica82 26091601 OSM w Sandomierzu88 28071603 OSM Susz94 30111602 OSM Śrem97 30121602 OSM Kalisz, Zakład Produkcyjny w Koźminie Wlkp.99 30131602 PPH ‘Emma’ E106 30221601 OSM w RawiczuMilk sectorSupplementary listNo Veterinary No Name of establishment10 14021601 Ciechanowska Spółdzielnia Mleczarska w Ciechanowie28 22011601 Zakład Produkcyjno-Handlowy ‘SER-MILK’ J. Kazubska, S. Kazubski, 77-235 Trzebielino, Zieliń 134 06141601 Spółdzielnia Mleczarska ‘Kurów’, 24-170 Kurów, ul. I. Armii Wojska Polskiego 6635 14361601 Rolnicza Spółdzielnia Mleczarska ‘Rolmlecz’ w Radomiu, Zakład Mleczarski w Zwoleniu, 26-700 Zwoleń, ul. Puławska 88
",accession to the European Union;EU accession;accession to the Community;act of accession;application for accession;consequence of accession;request for accession;meat processing industry;cutting premises;cutting-up premises;slaughterhouse;dairy industry;dairy;health legislation;health regulations;health standard;transitional period (EU);EC limited period;EC transitional measures;EC transitional period;transition period (EU);fish;piscicultural species;species of fish;Poland;Republic of Poland,26
7026,"89/280/EEC, Euratom, ECSC: Commission Decision of 3 April 1989 adjusting the weightings applicable from 1 February 1989 to the remuneration of officials of the European Communities serving in non-member countries. ,Having regard to the Treaty establishing a Single Council and a Single Commission of the European Communities,Having regard to the Staff Regulations of the officials of the European Communities laid down by Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/68 (1), as last amended by Regulation (ECSC, EEC, Euratom) No 3982/88 (2), and in particular the second paragraph of Article 13 of Annex X thereto,Whereas pursuant to the first paragraph of Article 13 of Annex X to the Staff Regulations, Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 702/89 (3) laid down the weightings to be applied from 1 January 1989 to the remuneration of officials serving in non-member countries payable in the currency of their country of employment;Whereas, some of these weightings should be adjusted with effect from 1 February 1989 given that the statistics available to the Commission show that in certain non-member countries the variation in the cost of living measured on the basis of the weighting and the corresponding exchange rate has exceeded 5 % since weightings were last laid down,. With effect from 1 February 1989 the weightings applicable to the remuneration of officials serving in non-member countries payable in the currency of their country of employment are adjusted as shown in the Annex.The exchange rates for the payment of such remuneration shall be those used for implementation of the budget of the European Communities during the month preceding the date on which this Decision takes effect.. Done at Brussels, 3 April 1989.For the CommissionAntรณnio CARDOSO E CUNHAMember of the Commission(1) OJ No L 56, 4. 3. 1968, p. 1.(2) OJ No L 354, 22. 12. 1988, p. 1.(3) OJ No L 78, 21. 3. 1989, p. 1.ANNEX1.2 //  //  // Country of employment  // Weighting   //  //   // Brazil   // 60,29   // Egypt   // 50,86   // Israel  // 96,68   // Lebanon   // 19,30   // Uganda   // 99,63  // Sierra Leone   // 110,14   // Somalia   // 50,26   // Sudan   // 102,13   // Syria   // 163,66   // Uruguay   // 55,47  // Yugoslavia   // 35,46   // Zaire   // 87,50   //    //
",European official;EC basic post;EC staff;EU official;official of the EU;official of the European Union;staff of the EC;labour mobility;manpower mobility;staff mobility;worker exchange;third country;ratio;remuneration of work;income derived from work;servant (EU);EC auxiliary staff;EC local staff;EC scientific staff;EC servants;EU temporary staff;contract agent (EU);servant of the European Union;servants of the European Communities;temporary agent (EU);temporary servant (EU),26
30369,"Commission Regulation (EC) No 825/2005 of 30 May 2005 fixing certain indicative quantities and individual ceilings for the issue of licences for the import of bananas into the Community in the third quarter of 2005 under tariff quotas A/B and C. ,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 404/93 of 13 February 1993 on the common organisation of the market in bananas (1), and in particular Article 20 thereof,Whereas:(1) Article 14(1) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 896/2001 of 7 May 2001 laying down detailed rules for applying Council Regulation (EEC) No 404/93 as regards the arrangements for importing bananas into the Community (2) provides that an indicative quantity expressed as the same percentage of available quantities from each of the tariff quotas A/B and C provided for in Article 18(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 404/93 may be fixed for the purposes of issuing import licences for each of the first three quarters of the year.(2) The data concerning, firstly, the quantities of bananas marketed in the Community in 2004, and in particular the actual imports, especially during the third quarter, and secondly, the supply and consumption prospects on the Community market during the same third quarter for 2005, result in indicative quantities being fixed for tariff quotas A/B and C so as to ensure adequate supplies for the Community, and the continuation of trade flows between the production and marketing sectors.(3) On the basis of the same data, in accordance with Article 14(2) of Regulation (EC) No 896/2001, the maximum quantity for which each operator may submit licence applications for the third quarter of 2005 should be fixed.(4) In view of the fact that this Regulation must apply before the start of the period for the submission of licence applications for the third quarter of 2005, provision should be made for this Regulation to enter into force immediately.(5) This Regulation must apply to operators established in the Community as constituted on 30 April 2004 since Commission Regulation (EC) No 1892/2004 (3) adopted transitional measures for 2005 for imports of bananas into the Community by reason of the accession of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia.(6) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Bananas,. The indicative quantity referred to in Article 14(1) of Regulation (EC) No 896/2001 for the issue of import licences for bananas under the tariff quotas provided for in Article 18(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 404/93 is fixed, for the third quarter of 2005, at:(a) 23 % of the quantities available for traditional operators and non-traditional operators established in the Community as constituted on 30 April 2004 under tariff quotas A/B;(b) 23 % of the quantities available for traditional operators and non-traditional operators established in the Community as constituted on 30 April 2004 under tariff quota C. For the third quarter of 2005, the maximum authorised quantity referred to in Article 14(2) of Regulation (EC) No 896/2001, for licence applications for the import of bananas under the tariff quotas provided for in Article 18(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 404/93 is fixed at:(a) 23 % of the reference quantity established and notified in accordance with Articles 4 and 5 of Regulation (EC) No 896/2001 for the traditional operators established in the Community as constituted on 30 April 2004 under tariff quotas A/B;(b) 23 % of the quantity established and notified, in accordance with Article 9(3) of Regulation (EC) No 896/2001 for the non-traditional operators established in the Community as constituted on 30 April 2004 under tariff quotas A/B;(c) 23 % of the reference quantity established and notified in accordance with Articles 4 and 5 of Regulation (EC) No 896/2001 for the traditional operators established in the Community as constituted on 30 April 2004 under tariff quota C;(d) 23 % of the quantity established and notified, in accordance with Article 9(3) of Regulation (EC) No 896/2001 for the non-traditional operators established in the Community as constituted on 30 April 2004 under tariff quota C. This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.. Done at Brussels, 30 May 2005.For the CommissionMariann FISCHER BOELMember of the Commission(1)  OJ L 47, 25.2.1993, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by the 2003 Act of Accession.(2)  OJ L 126, 8.5.2001, p. 6. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 838/2004 (OJ L 127, 29.4.2004, p. 52).(3)  OJ L 328, 30.10.2004, p. 50.
",tropical fruit;avocado;banana;date;guava;kiwifruit;mango;papaw;pineapple;tariff quota;administration of tariff quota;allocation of tariff quota;opening of tariff quota;quota at a reduced level of duty;zero-duty quota;import licence;import authorisation;import certificate;import permit;quantitative restriction;quantitative ceiling;quota;CCT duties;autonomous customs duties;common customs tariff duties;conventional customs duties,26
39248,"2011/436/EU: Commission Implementing Decision of 19 July 2011 on the recognition of the ‘Abengoa RED Bioenergy Sustainability Assurance’ scheme for demonstrating compliance with the sustainability criteria under Directives 2009/28/EC and 2009/30/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. ,Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,Having regard to Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC (1), and in particular Article 18(6) thereof,Having regard to Directive 98/70/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 1998 relating to the quality of petrol and diesel fuels (2) as amended by Directive 2009/30/EC (3), and in particular Article 7c(6) thereof,After consulting the Advisory Committee established by Article 25, paragraph 2 of Directive 2009/28/EC,Whereas:(1) Directives 2009/28/EC and 2009/30/EC both lay down sustainability criteria for biofuels. When reference is made to the provisions of Articles 17 and 18 of, and Annex V to, Directive 2009/28/EC this should be construed as the reference also to the similar provisions of Articles 7a, 7b and 7c of, and Annex IV to, Directive 2009/30/EC.(2) Where biofuels and bioliquids are to be taken into account for the purposes referred to in Article 17(1)(a), (b) and (c), Member States shall require economic operators to show the compliance of biofuels and bioliquids with the sustainability criteria set out in Article 17(2) to (5) of Directive 2009/28/EC.(3) Recital 76 of Directive 2009/28/EC states that the imposition of an unreasonable burden on industry should be avoided and voluntary schemes can help creating efficient solutions for proving compliance with these sustainability criteria.(4) The Commission may decide that a voluntary national or international scheme demonstrates that consignments of biofuels comply with the sustainability criteria set out in Article 17(3) to (5) of Directive 2009/28/EC or that a voluntary national or international scheme to measure greenhouse gas emission savings contains accurate data for the purposes of Article 17(2) of this Directive.(5) The Commission may recognise such a voluntary scheme for a period of 5 years.(6) When an economic operator provides proof or data obtained in accordance with a scheme that has been recognised by the Commission, to the extent covered by that recognition decision, a Member State shall not require the supplier to provide further evidence of compliance with the sustainability criteria.(7) The ‘Abengoa RED Bioenergy Sustainability Assurance’ (hereinafter ‘RBSA’) scheme was submitted on 8 April 2011 to the Commission with the request for recognition. The scheme covers a wide range of products and applies to all geographic locations. The recognised scheme will be made available at the transparency platform established under Directive 2009/28/EC. The Commission will take into account considerations of commercial sensitivity and may decide to only partially publish the scheme.(8) Assessment of the RBSA scheme found it to adequately cover the sustainability criteria of Directive 2009/28/EC, as well as applying a mass balance methodology in line with the requirements of Article 18(1) of Directive 2009/28/EC.(9) The evaluation of the RBSA scheme found that it meets adequate standards of reliability, transparency and independent auditing and also complies with the methodological requirements in Annex V to Directive 2009/28/EC.(10) Any additional sustainability elements covered by the ‘RBSA’ scheme are not part of the consideration of this Decision. These additional sustainability criteria are not mandatory to show compliance with sustainability requirements set up in Directive 2009/28/EC. The Commission may at a later stage take a view on whether the scheme also contains accurate data for the purpose of information on measures taken for issues referred to in the second paragraph, second sentence of Article 18(4) of Directive 2009/28/EC,. The voluntary scheme ‘RBSA’ for which the request for recognition was submitted to the Commission on 8 April 2011 demonstrates that consignments of biofuels comply with the sustainability criteria as laid down in Article 17(3)(a), (b) and (c) and Article 17(4) and (5) of Directive 2009/28/EC and Article 7b(3)(a), (b) and (c) and Article 7b(4) and (5) of Directive 98/70/EC. The scheme also contains accurate data for purposes of Article 17(2) of Directive 2009/28/EC and Article 7b(2) of Directive 98/70/EC.Furthermore, it may be used for demonstrating compliance with Article 18(1) of Directive 2009/28/EC and Article 7c(1) of Directive 98/70/EC. 1.   The Decision is valid for a period of 5 years after it enters into force. If the scheme, after adoption of Commission decision, undergoes changes to its contents in a way that might affect the basis of this Decision, such changes shall be notified to the Commission without delay. The Commission will assess the notified changes with a view to establish whether the scheme is still adequately covering the sustainability criteria for which it is recognised.2.   If it has been clearly demonstrated that the scheme has not implemented elements considered to be decisive for this Decision and if severe and structural breach of those elements has taken place, the Commission reserves the right to revoke its Decision. This Decision enters into force 20 days after its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.. Done at Brussels, 19 July 2011.For the CommissionThe PresidentJosé Manuel BARROSO(1)  OJ L 140, 5.6.2009, p. 16.(2)  OJ L 350, 28.12.1998, p. 58.(3)  OJ L 140, 5.6.2009, p. 88.
",approval;COC;certificate of compliance;certificate of conformity;quality certificate;quality certification;bio-industry;bio-based industry;biotechnology industry;biotechnology-based industry;environmental standard;environmental quality standard;standard relating to the environment;evaluation method;evaluation;reduction of gas emissions;climate change mitigation;gas emission reduction;mitigation measure;mitigation of climate change;mitigation policy;biofuel;biodiesel;bioethanol;biomass fuel;green fuel,26
452,"85/169/EEC: Commission Decision of 14 February 1985 repealing Commission Decision 82/649/EEC and establishing that the apparatus described as 'Apollo - Tunable CO2 Laser, model 560' may be imported free of import duties. ,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 918/83 of 28 March 1983 setting up a Community of reliefs from customs duty (1),Having regard to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2290/83 of 29 July 1983 laying down provisions for the implementation of Articles 50 to 59 of Regulation (EEC) No 918/83 (2), and in particular Article 7 thereof,Whereas, by Decision 82/649/EEC (3), the Commission decided that the apparatus described as 'Apollo - Tunable CO2 Laser, model 560' could not be imported free of Common Customs Tariff duties on the grounds that apparatus of scientific value equivalent to the said apparatus, capable of being used for the same purposes, were currently being manufactured in the Community; whereas this applied, in particular, to the apparatus 'Serie 6000' manufactured by Fairlight Technische en Wetenschappelijke Apparaten BV, Jan Luykenstraat 23, NL-1007 AA Amsterdam, Holland;Whereas that Decision was adopted after consultation of the Group of Experts, as provided for under Community rules; whereas, in the light of new information brought to the notice of this group, it is clear that, at the time of ordering of the abovementioned 'Apollo - Tunable CO2 Laser, model 560', no apparatus capable of being used for the same purposes, notably the 'Serie 6000' manufactured by the abovementioned company Fairlight Technische en Wetenschappelijke Apparaten BV, were as yet being manufactured in the Community; whereas the 'Serie 6000' did not in fact become available until January 1980; whereas the duty-free admission of the apparatus described as 'Apollo - Tunable CO2 Laser, model 560' was therefore justified;Whereas Decision 82/649/EEC should therefore be repealed,. The apparatus described as 'Apollo - Tunable CO2 Laser, model 560', which is the subject of an application by the Federal Republic of Germany of 26 February 1982, may be imported free of import duties. Decision 82/649/EEC is hereby repealed. This Decision is addressed to the Member States.. Done at Brussels, 14 February 1985.For the CommissionCOCKFIELDVice-President(1) OJ No L 105, 23. 4. 1983, p. 1.(2) OJ No L 220, 11. 8. 1983, p. 20.(3) OJ No L 272, 22. 9. 1982, p. 22.
",exemption from customs duties;customs franchise;duty-free admission;duty-free entry;exemption from duty;exemption from import duty;travellers' allowance;travellers' tax-free allowance;scientific apparatus;laboratory equipment;microscope;research equipment;scientific instrument;scientific material;apparatus based on the use of rays;laser;common customs tariff;CCT;admission to the CCT;ionising radiation;X-rays;alpha particles;beta particles;cosmic radiation;gamma rays;ionizing radiation,26
31692,"Council Decision 2006/729/CFSP/JHA of 16 October 2006 on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, of an Agreement between the European Union and the United States of America on the processing and transfer of passenger name record (PNR) data by air carriers to the United States Department of Homeland Security. ,Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Articles 24 and 38 thereof,Whereas:(1) On 27 June 2006 the Council decided to authorise the Presidency, assisted by the Commission, to open negotiations for an Agreement with the United States of America on the processing and transfer of passenger name record (PNR) data by air carriers to the United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS).(2) In view of the Undertakings issued on 11 May 2004 by DHS, Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (1), the United States can be considered as ensuring an adequate level of protection for PNR data transferred from the European Union concerning passenger flights to or from the United States.(3) The competent authorities in Member States may exercise their existing powers to suspend data flows to DHS in order to protect individuals with regard to the processing of their personal data if they consider that the processing of PNR data is not in accordance with the standards of protection provided for in the Undertakings given by DHS, or where a competent United States authority has determined that DHS is in breach of those standards, until compliance with those standards is assured.(4) The Agreement should be signed, subject to its conclusion at a later date.(5) The provisions of the Agreement should be applied on a provisional basis pending its entry into force,. The signing of the Agreement between the European Union and the United States of America on the processing and transfer of Passenger Name Record (PNR) data by air carriers to the United States Department of Homeland Security, is hereby approved on behalf of the European Union, subject to the conclusion of the said Agreement.The text of the Agreement is attached to this Decision. The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the person(s) empowered to sign the Agreement on behalf of the European Union, subject to its conclusion. In accordance with point 7 of the Agreement, the provisions of the Agreement shall be applied on a provisional basis as of the date of its signature, pending its entry into force. 1.   Without prejudice to their powers to take action to ensure compliance with national provisions, the competent authorities in Member States may exercise their existing powers to suspend data flows to DHS in order to protect individuals with regard to the processing of their personal data in the following cases:(a) where a competent United States authority has determined that DHS is in breach of the applicable standards of protection; or(b) where there is a substantial likelihood that the applicable standards of protection are being infringed, there are reasonable grounds for believing that DHS is not taking or will not take adequate and timely steps to settle the case at issue, the continuing transfer would create an imminent risk of grave harm to data subjects, and the competent authorities in the Member States concerned have made reasonable efforts in the circumstances to provide DHS with notice and an opportunity to respond.2.   Suspension shall cease as soon as the standards of protection are assured and the competent authorities of the Member States concerned are notified thereof. 1.   Member States shall inform the Council and the Commission without delay when measures are adopted pursuant to Article 4.2.   The Member States and the Commission shall inform each other within the Council of any changes in the standards of protection and of cases where the action of bodies responsible for ensuring compliance with the applicable standards of protection by DHS fails to secure such compliance.3.   If the Council considers that the information collected pursuant to Article 4 and pursuant to paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Article provides evidence that the basic principles necessary for an adequate level of protection for natural persons are no longer being complied with, or that any body responsible for ensuring compliance with the applicable standards of protection by DHS is not effectively fulfilling its role, DHS shall be informed thereof and the Council shall take the necessary action with a view to suspending or terminating the Agreement.. Done at Luxembourg, 16 October 2006.For the CouncilThe PresidentE. TUOMIOJA(1)  OJ L 235, 6.7.2004, p. 15.27.10.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 298/29Note to the reader: ‘the language versions of the Agreement, other than the English language version, have not yet been approved by the Parties. Once these other language versions have been approved, they will be equally authentic’.AGREEMENTbetween the European Union and the United States of America on the processing and transfer of passenger name record (PNR) data by air carriers to the United States Department of Homeland SecurityTHE EUROPEAN UNIONandTHE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,DESIRING to prevent and combat terrorism and transnational crime effectively as a means of protecting their respective democratic societies and common values,RECOGNISING that, in order to safeguard public security and for law enforcement purposes, rules should be laid down on the transfer of Passenger Name Record (PNR) data by air carriers to the Department of Homeland Security (hereinafter DHS). For the purposes of this Agreement, DHS means the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the Office of the Secretary and the entities that directly support it, but does not include other components of DHS such as the Citizenship and Immigration Services, Transportation Security Administration, United States Secret Service, the United States Coast Guard, and the Federal Emergency Management Agency,RECOGNISING the importance of preventing and combating terrorism and related crimes, and other serious crimes that are transnational in nature, including organised crime, while respecting fundamental rights and freedoms, notably privacy,HAVING REGARD to US statutes and regulations requiring each air carrier operating passenger flights in foreign air transportation to or from the United States to provide DHS with electronic access to PNR data to the extent that they are collected and contained in the air carrier's automated reservation/departure control systems (hereinafter ‘reservation systems’),HAVING REGARD to Article 6(2) of the Treaty on European Union on respect for fundamental rights, and in particular to the related right to the protection of personal data,HAVING REGARD to relevant provisions of the Aviation Transportation Security Act of 2001, the Homeland Security Act of 2002, the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 and Executive Order 13388 regarding cooperation between agencies of the United States Government in combating terrorism,HAVING REGARD to the Undertakings as published in the US Federal Register (1) and implemented by DHS,NOTING that the European Union should ensure that air carriers with reservation systems located within the European Union arrange for transmission of PNR data to DHS as soon as this is technically feasible but that, until then, the US authorities should be allowed to access the data directly, in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement,AFFIRMING that this Agreement does not constitute a precedent for any future discussions or negotiations between the United States and the European Union, or between either of the Parties and any State regarding the processing and transfer of PNR or any other form of data,HAVING REGARD to the commitment of both sides to work together to reach an appropriate and mutually satisfactory solution, without delay, on the processing of Advance Passenger Information (API) data from the European Union to the United States,NOTING that in reliance on this Agreement, the EU confirms that it will not hinder the transfer of PNR data between Canada and the United States and that the same principle will be applied in any similar agreement on the processing and transfer of PNR data,HAVE AGREED AS FOLLOWS:(1) In reliance upon DHS's continued implementation of the aforementioned Undertakings as interpreted in the light of subsequent events, the European Union shall ensure that air carriers operating passenger flights in foreign air transportation to or from the United States of America process PNR data contained in their reservation systems as required by DHS.(2) Accordingly, DHS will electronically access the PNR data from air carriers' reservation systems located within the territory of the Member States of the European Union until there is a satisfactory system in place allowing for transmission of such data by the air carriers.(3) DHS shall process PNR data received and treat data subjects concerned by such processing in accordance with applicable US laws and constitutional requirements, without unlawful discrimination, in particular on the basis of nationality and country of residence.(4) The implementation of this Agreement shall be jointly and regularly reviewed.(5) In the event that an airline passenger information system is implemented in the European Union or in one or more of its Member States that requires air carriers to provide authorities with access to PNR data for persons whose travel itinerary includes a flight to or from the European Union, DHS shall, in so far as practicable and strictly on the basis of reciprocity, actively promote the cooperation of airlines within its jurisdiction.(6) For the purpose of applying this Agreement, DHS is deemed to ensure an adequate level of protection for PNR data transferred from the European Union concerning passenger flights in foreign air transportation to or from the United States.(7) This Agreement shall enter into force on the first day of the month after the date on which the Parties have exchanged notifications indicating that they have completed their internal procedures for this purpose. This Agreement shall apply provisionally as of the date of signature. Either Party may terminate or suspend this Agreement at any time by notification through diplomatic channels. Termination shall take effect thirty (30) days from the date of notification thereof to the other Party. This Agreement shall expire upon the date of application of any superseding agreement and in any event no later than 31 July 2007, unless extended by mutual written agreement.This Agreement is not intended to derogate from or amend legislation of the United States of America or the European Union or its Member States. This Agreement does not create or confer any right or benefit on any other person or entity, private or public.This Agreement shall be drawn up in duplicate in the English language. It shall also be drawn up in the Czech, Danish, Dutch, Estonian, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hungarian, Italian, Latvian, Lithuanian, Maltese, Polish, Portuguese, Slovak, Slovenian, Spanish and Swedish languages, and the Parties shall approve these language versions. Once approved, the versions in these languages shall be equally authentic.Done at Luxembourg on 16 October 2006 and at Washington D.C. on 19 October 2006.For the European UnionE. TUOMIOJAMinister for Foreign AffairsPresident of the Council of the European UnionFor the United States of AmericaSecretary Michael CHERTOFFDepartment of Homeland Security(1)  Volume 69, No 131, p. 41543.
",agreement (EU);EC agreement;EC third country convention;EU-third country agreement;European Union agreement;international agreement (EU);signature of an agreement;public safety;national security;safety of individuals;European Union;Union law;data processing;automatic data processing;electronic data processing;data transmission;data flow;interactive transmission;air transport;aeronautics;air service;aviation;personal data;United States;USA;United States of America,26
44469,"Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1164/2014 of 31 October 2014 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 411/2014 opening and providing for the administration of a Union import tariff quota for fresh and frozen beef and veal originating in Ukraine. ,Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (1), and in particular points (a), (c) and (d) of Article 187 thereof,Whereas:(1) Regulation (EU) No 374/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council (2) provides for preferential arrangements for 2014 as regards customs duties for imports of certain goods originating in Ukraine. In accordance with Article 3 of that Regulation the agricultural products listed in Annex III thereto are to be admitted for import into the Union within the limits of the tariff quotas as set out in that Annex.(2) Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 411/2014 (3) opened and provided for administration of Union tariff import quota for beef and veal originating in Ukraine until 31 October 2014.(3) Regulation (EU) No 374/2014 has been amended by Regulation (EU) 1150/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council (4). The amendment primarily provides for the extension of the application of Regulation (EU) No 374/2014 until 31 December 2015 and for fixing the quantities of the quotas for 2015. It is therefore appropriate to amend Implementing Regulation (EU) No 411/2014.(4) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets,. Amendment of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 411/2014Implementing Regulation (EU) No 411/2014 is amended as follows:(1) Article 2 is replaced by the following:(a) 25 % from 1 January to 31 March;(b) 25 % from 1 April to 30 June;(c) 25 % from 1 July to 30 September;(d) 25 % from 1 October to 31 December.’(2) Article 3 is amended as follows:(a) the title is replaced by the following:(b) in paragraph 8, the date ‘31 October 2014’ is replaced by the date ‘31 December 2014’.(3) The following Article 3a is inserted:(4) Article 4 is amended as follows:(a) the title is replaced by the following:(b) in paragraph 8, the date ‘31 October 2014’ is replaced by the date ‘31 December 2014’.(5) The following Article 4a is inserted:(a) in box 8, the name “Ukraine” as country of origin and the box “yes” marked by a cross;(b) in box 20, one of the entries listed in Annex II.(6) Article 5 is replaced by the following:(a) no later than 10 January 2015, of the quantities of products, including nil returns, for which import licences were issued during the quota period;(b) no later than 30 April 2015, of the quantities of products, including nil returns, covered by unused or partly used import licences and corresponding to the difference between the quantities entered on the back of the import licences and the quantities for which they were issued.(7) The following Article 5a is inserted:(a) together with the notifications referred to in Article 3a(5) of this Regulation regarding the applications submitted for the last subperiod of the import tariff quota period 2015;(b) for quantities not yet notified at the time of the first notification provided for in point (a), by 30 April 2016 at the latest.(8) Annex I is replaced by the text in the Annex to this Regulation. Entry into force and applicationThis Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.It shall apply as of 2 November 2014.This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.. Done at Brussels, 31 October 2014.For the CommissionThe PresidentJosé Manuel BARROSO(1)  OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.(2)  Regulation (EU) No 374/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on the reduction or elimination of customs duties on goods originating in Ukraine (OJ L 118, 22.4.2014, p. 1).(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 411/2014 of 23 April 2014 opening and providing for the administration of a Union import tariff quota for fresh and frozen beef and veal originating in Ukraine (OJ L 121, 24.4.2014, p. 27).(4)  Regulation (EU) No 1150/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 October 2014 amending Regulation (EU) No 374/2014 on the reduction or elimination of customs duties on goods originating in Ukraine (OJ L 313, 31.10.2014, p. 1).ANNEX‘ANNEX INotwithstanding the rules on the interpretation of the Combined Nomenclature, the wording of the description of products shall be regarded as merely indicative, since the applicability of the preferential arrangements is determined, within the context of this Annex, by the scope of the CN codes.Order number CN codes Description Import period Quantity in tonnes (net weight) Duty applicable09.4270 0201 10 00 Meat of bovine animals, fresh, chilled or frozen Year 2014 12 000 0’
",tariff quota;administration of tariff quota;allocation of tariff quota;opening of tariff quota;quota at a reduced level of duty;zero-duty quota;import licence;import authorisation;import certificate;import permit;frozen product;frozen food;frozen foodstuff;originating product;origin of goods;product origin;rule of origin;import (EU);Community import;tariff preference;preferential tariff;tariff advantage;tariff concession;beef;fresh meat;Ukraine,26
17279,"98/62/EC: Commission Decision of 3 December 1997 on financial contributions from the Community for the eradication of Newcastle disease in the United Kingdom (Only the English text is authentic). ,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Decision 90/424/EEC of 26 June 1990 on expenditure in the veterinary field (1), as last amended by Decision 94/370/EC (2) and in particular Article 3 (3) thereof,Whereas outbreaks of Newcastle disease occurred in the United Kingdom in 1996 and 1997; whereas the appearance of this disease is a serious danger to the Community's poultry and, in order to help eradicate the disease as rapidly as possible, the Community has the possibility of compensating for the losses suffered;Whereas, as soon as the presence of Newcastle disease was officially confirmed the national authorities took appropriate measures which included the measures as listed in Article 3 (2) of Decision 90/424/EEC; whereas such measures were notified by the United Kingdom;Whereas the conditions for Community financial assistance have been met;Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,. The United Kingdom may obtain Community financial assistance for outbreaks of Newcastle disease which occurred during 1996 and 1997. The financial contribution from the Community shall be:- 50 % of the costs incurred by the United Kingdom in compensating the owner for the slaughter, destruction of poultry and poultry products as appropriate,- 50 % of the costs incurred by the United Kingdom for the cleaning and disinfection of holdings and equipment,- 50 % of the costs incurred by the United Kingdom in compensating the owner for the destruction of contaminated feedingstuffs and contaminated equipment. 1. The Community financial contribution shall be granted after the supporting documents have been submitted and under the condition that Community veterinary legislation has been respected.2. The documents referred to in paragraph 1 shall include:(a) an epidemiological report covering each holding on which poultry has been slaughtered. The report shall contain information on the subjects given below:(i) infected holdings:- location and address,- date and suspicion of disease and date of confirmation,- number and date of poultry slaughtered and destroyed,- method of killing and destruction,- type and number of samples collected and examined at the time of suspicion of the disease. Results of examinations performed,- type and number of samples collected and examined at the time of depopulation of the infected poultry holding. Results of examination performed,- source of infection as assumed on the basis of a completed epidemiological investigation;(ii) contact holdings:- as listed under (i), indents 1, 3, 4 and 6,- infected holding (outbreak) with which contact has been confirmed or assumed; nature of contact;(b) financial report including list of the beneficiaries and their location, number of animals slaughtered, date of slaughter and amount paid. The United Kingdom shall forward the supporting documents referred to in Article 2 not later than six months after the notification of this Decision. This Decision is addressed to the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.. Done at Brussels, 3 December 1997.For the CommissionFranz FISCHLERMember of the Commission(1) OJ L 224, 18. 8. 1990, p. 19.(2) OJ L 168, 2. 7. 1994, p. 31.
",EU financing;Community financing;European Union financing;animal disease;animal pathology;epizootic disease;epizooty;slaughter of animals;slaughter of livestock;stunning of animals;United Kingdom;United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland;poultry;chicken;cock;duck;goose;hen;ostrich;table poultry;EU aid;Community aid;Community support;European Union aid;aid from the EU;aid from the European Union,26
129,"Regulation (Euratom, ECSC, EEC) No 549/69 of the Council of 25 March 1969 determining the categories of officials and other servants of the European Communities to whom the provisions of Article 12, the second paragraph of Article 13 and Article 14 of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the Communities apply. ,Having regard to the Treaty establishing a Single Council and a Single Commission of the European Communities, and in particular the first paragraph of Article 28 thereof;Having regard to the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities, and in particular Articles 16 and 22 thereof;Having regard to the proposal from the Commission;Having regard to the Opinion of the European Parliament (1);Having regard to the Opinion of the Court of Justice of the European Communities;Whereas the privileges, immunities and facilities conferred on officials and other servants of the Communities by the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities are granted solely in the interest of the Communities;Whereas it is therefore important to ensure that officials and other servants, in view of their duties and responsibilities and of their particular situation, benefit from such privileges, immunities and facilities as are necessary for the proper functioning of the Communities;. The provisions of Article 12 of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the Communities shall apply to the following categories:(a) officials coming under the Staff Regulations of Officials of the Communities, with the exception of officials placed on non-active status, to whom only Article 12 (a) and, in respect of allowances paid by the Communities, Article 12 (c) shall apply;(b) staff coming under the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the Communities, with the exception of:1. Local staff, to whom only Article 12 (a) shall apply;2. part-time auxiliary staff, to whom only Article 12 (a) and (b) and, in respect of remuneration paid by the Communities, Article 12 (c) shall apply. The provisions of the second paragraph of Article 13 of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the Communities shall apply to the following categories:(a) persons coming under the Staff Regulations of Officials or the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the Communities, including those who receive the compensation provided for in the case of retirement in the interests of the service, with the exception of local staff;(b) persons receiving disability, retirement or survivors' pensions paid by the Communities;(c) persons receiving the compensation provided for in Article 5 of Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/68 (2) in the case of termination of service. The provisions of Article 14 of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the Communities shall apply to the following categories:(a) officials coming under the Staff Regulations of Officials of the Communities;(b) staff coming under the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the Communities, with the exception of local staff. Without prejudice to the provisions of the first paragraph of Article 22 of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Community concerning members of the organs of the European Investment Bank, the privileges and immunities provided for in Article 12, in the second paragraph of Article 13 and in Article 14 of the Protocol shall apply under the same conditions and within the same limits as those laid down in Articles 1, 2 and 3 of this Regulation to:— staff of the European Investment Bank;— persons receiving disability, retirement or survivors' pensions paid by the European Investment Bank. Regulation No 8/63 Euratom, 127/63/EEC (3) is hereby repealed.This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.. Done at Brussels, 25 March 1969.For the CouncilThe PresidentG. THORN(1)  OJ No C 135,14.12.1968, p. 31.(2)  OJ No L 56, 4.3.1968, p. 1.(3)  OJ No 181, 11.12.1963, p. 2880/63.
",European official;EC basic post;EC staff;EU official;official of the EU;official of the European Union;staff of the EC;Protocol (EU);Community privilege;EC Protocol;EU protocol;privileges and immunities of the EU;privileges and immunities of the European Union;protocol of the EU;protocol of the European Union;servant (EU);EC auxiliary staff;EC local staff;EC scientific staff;EC servants;EU temporary staff;contract agent (EU);servant of the European Union;servants of the European Communities;temporary agent (EU);temporary servant (EU),26
42931,"Commission Regulation (EU) No 1043/2013 of 24 October 2013 establishing a prohibition of fishing for ling in EU and international waters of V by vessels flying the flag of France. ,Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,Whereas:(1) Council Regulation (EU) No 40/2013 of 21 January 2013 fixing for 2013 the fishing opportunities available in EU waters and, to EU vessels, in certain non-EU waters for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks which are subject to international negotiations or agreements (2), lays down quotas for 2013.(2) According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for 2013.(3) It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,. Quota exhaustionThe fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein for 2013 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex. ProhibitionsFishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date. Entry into forceThis Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.. Done at Brussels, 24 October 2013.For the Commission, On behalf of the President,Lowri EVANSDirector-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.(2)  OJ L 23, 25.1.2013, p. 54.ANNEXNo 58/TQ40Member State FranceStock LIN/05EI.Species Ling (Molva molva)Zone EU and international waters of VDate 29.9.2013
",France;French Republic;Faroe Islands;Faroes;Iceland;Republic of Iceland;ship's flag;nationality of ships;sea fishing;sea fish;catch quota;catch plan;fishing plan;fishing area;fishing limits;catch by species;fishing rights;catch limits;fishing ban;fishing restriction;EU waters;Community waters;European Union waters;international waters;high seas;maritime waters,26
5190,"Council Decision 2011/106/CFSP of 15 February 2011 on adapting and extending the period of application of the measures in Decision 2002/148/EC concluding consultations with Zimbabwe under Article 96 of the ACP-EC Partnership Agreement. ,Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 217 thereof,Having regard to the Partnership Agreement between the members of the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States, of the one part, and the European Community and its Member States, of the other part, signed in Cotonou on 23 June 2000 (1) and revised in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso, on 23 June 2010 (2) (hereinafter referred to as ‘the ACP-EU Partnership Agreement’), and in particular Article 96 thereof,Having regard to the Internal Agreement between the representatives of the governments of the Member States, meeting within the Council, on measures to be taken and procedures to be followed for the implementation of the ACP-EC Partnership Agreement (3), and in particular Article 3 thereof,Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,Whereas:(1) By Council Decision 2002/148/EC (4), the consultations with the Republic of Zimbabwe under Article 96(2)(c) of the ACP-EU Partnership Agreement were concluded and appropriate measures, as specified in the Annex to that Decision, were taken.(2) Pursuant to Council Decision 2010/97/CFSP (5), the measures referred to in the Annex to Decision 2002/148/EC were adapted and their period of application was extended for 12 months until 20 February 2011.(3) The creation of the Government of National Unity (GNU) in Zimbabwe was recognised as an opportunity to re-establish a constructive relationship between the European Union and Zimbabwe and to support the implementation of Zimbabwe’s reform programme.(4) However, this is being undermined by the lack of progress by the GNU to implement certain essential elements of the ACP-EU Partnership Agreement, to which the GNU had committed itself in the Global Political Agreement (GPA).(5) The period of application of the measures referred to in Decision 2002/148/EC should therefore be extended. The measures should constantly be reviewed in light of concrete progress on the ground.. The measures referred to in the letter annexed to this Decision are hereby extended as appropriate measures within the meaning of Article 96(2)(c) of the ACP-EU Partnership Agreement.These measures shall apply until 20 February 2012. They shall be kept under constant review. The letter annexed to this Decision shall be addressed to President Mugabe of Zimbabwe and copied to Prime Minister Tsvangirai and Deputy Prime Minister Mutambara. This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption. This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.. Done at Brussels, 15 February 2011.For the CouncilThe PresidentMATOLCSY Gy.(1)  OJ L 317, 15.12.2000, p. 3.(2)  OJ L 287, 4.11.2010, p. 3.(3)  OJ L 317, 15.12.2000, p. 376.(4)  OJ L 50, 21.2.2002, p. 64.(5)  OJ L 44, 16.2.2010, p. 20.ANNEXLETTER TO THE PRESIDENT OF ZIMBABWEThe European Union attaches the utmost importance to the provisions of Article 9 of the ACP-EU Partnership Agreement. As essential elements of that Agreement, respect for human rights, democratic institutions and the rule of law form the basis of our relations.By letter dated 19 February 2002, the European Union informed you of its decision to conclude the consultations held under Article 96 of the ACP-EU Partnership Agreement and to take appropriate measures within the meaning of Article 96(2)(c) of that Agreement.By letter dated 15 February 2010, the European Union informed you of its decision not to revoke the appropriate measures and to extend their period of application until 20 February 2011.Since the establishment of the Government of National Unity (GNU) in 2009, the progress achieved based on the Global Political Agreement (GPA) has been welcomed by the European Union. The European Union reiterates the great importance it attaches to the political dialogue, provided for in Article 8 of the ACP-EU Partnership Agreement, and officially launched at the request of the Government of Zimbabwe at the EU-Zimbabwe Ministerial Troika on 18-19 June 2009 in Brussels. At the most recent Ministerial Meeting of 2 July 2010, an inclusive Zimbabwean Delegation headed by Minister Mangoma, handed over an updated version of the GPA Commitment Plan. The European Union took note of the progress made so far in the implementation of the GPA and informed the Government of Zimbabwe by letter dated 29 September 2010 of the 10th EDF indicative allocation (EUR 130 million to become available upon lifting of Article 96 and signing of a Country Strategy Paper). The European Union remains committed to further intensifying the Article 8 political dialogue.The European Union supports the ongoing efforts of the GNU to implement the GPA, and welcomes the achievements made in stabilising the economy and restoring basic social services. However, the European Union regrets the lack of progress on key political agreements of the GPA.The European Union encourages all parties forming the GNU to remain committed to the implementation of the democratic reforms as set out in the GPA. The European Union considers progress in this area, such as an understanding between all parties to the GNU on concrete steps towards creating an environment for peaceful and credible elections, to be of great importance.In this context, the European Union welcomes intensified regional diplomacy and the efforts of the Southern African Development Community (SADC) and its Member States to create an environment conducive to elections.In light of the above, the European Union has decided to extend until 20 February 2012 the period of application of the appropriate measures set out in Council Decision 2002/148/EC and adapted in Council Decision 2010/97/CFSP. The European Union would like to assure Zimbabwe of its continued willingness to engage itself and to review at any time the restrictions on development cooperation. We would hope that concrete progress on the ground could be made to allow for full cooperation to resume. In this context, the European Union will closely follow the steps made by the Government of Zimbabwe towards ensuring credible elections.Yours faithfully,For the European Union
",democracy;democratic equality;political pluralism;association agreement (EU);EC association agreement;political violence;guerrilla;revolution;Zimbabwe;Republic of Zimbabwe;Southern Rhodesia;ACP countries;rule of law;human rights;attack on human rights;human rights violation;protection of human rights;EU aid;Community aid;Community support;European Union aid;aid from the EU;aid from the European Union;financial aid;capital grant;financial grant,26
3296,"2003/325/EC: Commission Decision of 12 May 2003 on transitional measures under Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the separation of category 1, 2 and 3 processing plants (Text with EEA relevance) (notified under document number C(2003) 1498). ,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 October 2002 laying down health rules concerning animal by-products not intended for human consumption(1), and in particular Article 32(1) thereof,Whereas:(1) Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 provides for a complete revision of Community rules concerning animal by-products not intended for human consumption, including the introduction of a number of strict requirements. In addition, it provides that appropriate transitional measures may be adopted.(2) In view of the strict nature of those requirements, it is necessary to provide for transitional measures for France and Finland in order to allow industry sufficient time to adjust. In addition, alternative collection, transport, storage, handling, processing and uses for animal by-products need to be further developed as well as disposal methods for those by-products.(3) Accordingly, as a temporary measure a derogation should be granted to France and Finland to enable them to authorise operators to continue to apply national rules to the separation of category 1, 2 and 3 processing plants.(4) In order to prevent a risk to animal and public health, appropriate control systems should be maintained in France and Finland for the period of the transitional measures.(5) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,. Derogation regarding the complete separation of category 1, 2 and 3 processing plantsPursuant to Article 32(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 and by way of derogation from paragraph 1 of Chapter I of Annex VI or paragraph 1 of Chapter I of Annex VII to that Regulation, France and Finland may continue to grant individual approvals until 30 April 2004 in the case of France and until 31 October 2005 in the case of Finland at the latest to operators of premises and facilities in conformity with national rules, to apply such rules for the complete separation of category 1, 2 and 3 processing plants, provided that the national rules:(a) ensure prevention of cross-contamination between the categories of materials;(b) are only applied in premises and facilities that applied those rules on 1 November 2002;(c) comply with the rest of the specific requirements set out in paragraphs 2 to 9 of Chapter I of Annex VI and in paragraphs 2 to 10 of Chapter I of Annex VII to Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002. Control measuresThe competent authority shall take the necessary measures to control compliance by authorised operators of premises and facilities with the conditions set out in Article 1. Withdrawal of approvals and disposal of material not complying with this Decision1. Individual approvals by the competent authority for the complete separation of category 1, 2 and 3 processing plants shall be immediately and permanently withdrawn in respect of any operator, premises or facilities if the conditions set out in this Decision are no longer fulfilled.2. The competent authority shall withdraw any approvals granted under Article 1 at the latest by 30 April 2004 in the case of France, and 31 October 2005 in the case of Finland.The competent authority shall not grant a final approval under Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 unless on the basis of its inspections it is satisfied that the premises and facilities referred to in Article 1 meet all the requirements of that Regulation.3. Any material that does not comply with the requirements of this Decision shall be disposed of in accordance with the instructions of the competent authority. Compliance with this Decision by the concerned Member StatesFrance and Finland shall immediately take the necessary measures to comply with this Decision and shall publish those measures. They shall immediately inform the Commission thereof. Applicability1. This Decision shall apply from 1 May 2003 to 30 April 2004 in the case of France.2. This Decision shall apply from 1 May 2003 to 31 October 2005 in the case of Finland. AddresseesThis Decision is addressed to the French Republic and the Republic of Finland.. Done at Brussels, 12 May 2003.For the CommissionDavid ByrneMember of the Commission(1) OJ L 273, 10.10.2002, p. 1.
",waste management;landfill site;rubbish dump;waste treatment;health legislation;health regulations;health standard;health control;biosafety;health inspection;health inspectorate;health watch;animal product;livestock product;product of animal origin;waste recycling;conversion of waste;recovery of waste;recycling of materials;recycling of waste;reprocessing of waste;reuse of waste;selective waste collection;separate waste collection;use of waste;by-product,26
14553,"Commission Regulation (EC) No 2626/95 of 10 November 1995 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1014/90 laying down detailed implementing rules on the definition, description and presentation of spirit drinks. ,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1576/89 of 29 May 1989 laying down general rules on  the definition, description and presentation of spirit drinks  (1), as last amended by the Act of  Accession of Austria, Finland and Sweden, and in particular Articles 1 (4) (i) (1) (b) and 15  thereof,Whereas Article 6 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1014/90 of 24 April 1990 laying down detailed  implementing rules on the definition, description and presentation of spirit drinks  (2), as last  amended by Regulation (EC) No 1712/95  (3), raised the maximum methyl alcohol content of certain  fruit spirits to 1  500 grams per hectolitre of alcohol at 100  % volume, subject to an evaluation  of the application of this provision by the Commission on the basis of an in-depth study on whether  the maximum methyl alcohol content can be reduced;Whereas the study carried out by the Commission demonstrates that it is possible to reduce the  maximum methyl alcohol content to levels similar to those laid down for fruit spirits in Regulation  (EEC) No 1576/89 although such a reduction would be difficult, particularly for small distilleries  which do not have adequate technical and financial resources to comply quickly with a maximum limit  fixed at a lower level; whereas it would be advisable for health reasons to reduce the methyl  alcohol content of all fruit spirits to the lowest possible levels; whereas it is therefore  proposed to introduce gradually and in stages a new maximum limit for the methyl alcohol content of  the fruit spirits listed in Article 6 of Regulation (EEC) No 1014/90;Whereas transitional measures are necessary in order to permit the sale of products bottled before  the entry into force of the new maximum methyl alcohol content;Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the  Implementation Committee for Spirit Drinks,. Article 6 of Regulation (EEC) No 1014/90 is amended as follows:1.  Paragraph 2 is replaced by the following:'2.  The maximum methyl alcohol content of fruit spirits derived from the fruits listed in  paragraph 1 shall be:-  1  350 grams per hectolitre of alcohol at 100  % volume, from 1 January 1998, and -  1  200 grams per hectolitre of alcohol at 100  % volume from 1 January 2000, with the exception  of that derived from Williams pears (Pyrus communis Williams).` 2.  The following paragraph 3 is added:'3.  Community and imported products referred to in paragraph 1, bottled, as the case may be,  before 1 January 1998 or 1 January 2000, which comply with the rules on methyl alcohol content in  force before those dates may be held for sale, released into circulation and exported.` This Regulation shall enter into force on the seventh day following its publication in  the Official Journal of the European Communities.This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all  Member States.. Done at Brussels, 10 November 1995.For the Commission Franz FISCHLER Member of the Commission
",methanol;methyl alcohol;marketing standard;grading;alcoholic beverage;fermented beverage;spirituous beverage;product designation;product description;product identification;product naming;substance identification;spirits;Armagnac;Cognac;brandy;gin;grappa;marc;rum;schnapps;spirits from distilling cereals;spirits from distilling fruit;spirits from distilling wine;vodka;whisky,26
38689,"Commission Regulation (EU) No 783/2010 of 3 September 2010 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Queso de Flor de Guía/Queso de Media Flor de Guía/Queso de Guía (PDO)]. ,Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,Whereas:(1) Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Spain’s application to register the name ‘Queso de Flor de Guía/Queso de Media Flor de Guía/Queso de Guía’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).(2) As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,. The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register. This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.. Done at Brussels, 3 September 2010.For the CommissionThe PresidentJosé Manuel BARROSO(1)  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.(2)  OJ C 315, 23.12.2009, p. 18.ANNEXAgricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:Class 1.3.   CheesesSPAINQueso de Flor de Guía/Queso de Media Flor de Guía/Queso de Guía (PDO)
",soft cheese;Brie;Camembert;Chaource;Coulommiers;Livarot;Munster cheese;Neufchâtel;Pont-l'Evêque;Saint Marcellin;location of production;location of agricultural production;designation of origin;PDO;PGI;certificate of designation of origin;protected designation of origin;protected geographical indication;registered designation of origin;product designation;product description;product identification;product naming;substance identification;Spain;Kingdom of Spain,26