Question: Hey, what's happening this weekend?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Hey, what's happening this weekend?

People will be celebrating black love this weekend in the San Francisco Bay Area. The inaugural Black Love Festival—which is taking place this Saturday, July 18th at 12 p.m.—has been organized by China Pharr, Leigh Davenport and Etecia Brown. “It's a "Black-centered" event, meaning we're celebrating and loving Black people and culture, but everybody is encouraged to attend and enjoy the event,” the organizers said on their Facebook page.
Black Love Festival: gofundme.com/blacklovefest from Leigh Davenport-deBoer on Vimeo.
The free event, which is led by volunteers, is meant to serve as an example of love being used as a tool to organize, build bridges, provide resources and highlight safe and healthy spaces for and by black people.
“Black Love Festival has made a commitment to sustainable community building and innovative organizing practices to preserve the diversity and cultural balance of the local environment. We aim to create a space for students and residents of the Bay Area and beyond to transform art into a discussion about leveraging social capital to affect positive change, peace and unity.
The event is proud to be sponsored by the Port of San Francisco, SF Pacific Gas & Electric, SF Department of Public Health, Stanford University Cancer Institute and Nexgenegirls. With this support, the organizers are still raising funds to make sure the event is a success—consider contributing today. And if you’re in the bay, make your way there this weekend.
You can find more info about the event on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and Tumblr.


Question: Describe the violence that occurred in Birmingham this past weekend and the response of law enforcement to this violence.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the violence that occurred in Birmingham this past weekend and the response of law enforcement to this violence.

BIRMINGHAM, AL (WBRC) - Birmingham police say one of eight people injured after a teen party outside of Workplay late Sunday night is in custody.
The shooting happened as the party was ending in the 2300 block of 5th Ave. South. Seven people were shot and one person has a knee injury.
Initially one of the victims’ injury was believed to be life-threatening, but that victim’s condition was upgraded and all victims are expected to recover from their injuries.
Seven of the injured persons are in their teens and one is 20-years-old.
"This past weekend, Birmingham was stricken by violence against young people.
The death of William Edwards in North East Lake and the seven young people injured by violence at WorkPlay are a devastating blow to our community.
Our law enforcement officers have been dedicated in their response, but as a city we must realize that this goes deeper than arrests.
We as a city must wrap our arms around our children.
We must double down on conflict resolution efforts for our youth. If they won’t come to us, we must go to them. Relationships matter.
We must all take responsibility for being the source of wisdom, guidance, restraint and compassion that our children need. Accountability is what will heal our city.
Lives were changed this past weekend, and those lives are too valuable – too precious – to be labeled as statistics.
No longer can we grieve and then go about our days – not when the lives of our neighbors have been changed forever. Know that your mayor and law enforcement are working fervently for a safer Birmingham, but we cannot do it alone. I ask that you – parents, family members, mentors, community leaders and friends – connect with the young people in your lives.
Listen to them. Help them. Let them know that their life matters."
Police say formal charges are pending against the suspect.


Question: How to interact with people who have visible medical devices or disabilities

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 How to interact with people who have visible medical devices or disabilities

I’d like to take this time to go over some simple guidelines to help make this difficult social situation easier for everyone. To begin, let me give you a little background.
My name is Ilana. I’m 27-years-old, an author, I have a dog, I’m married, I hate eggplant and I’m very good at braiding hair.
My central line (also called a port) is accessed (or bandaged and connected to a tube) 24/7. I do daily infusions for my disease which help to keep me functional and independent. I have a disease called Dysautonomia. If you don’t have it, you’ve probably never even heard of it. It’s complex and difficult to explain to most people.
Sometimes, my doctors let me venture out into the real world to do things like go to the grocery store, scour the clearance section at TJ Maxx, or walk my dog. I know this is hard for many people to understand how I can both be sick, alive and living my life all at the same time. But crazy enough—it can be done!
Even stranger? Most days I barely notice I have a tube in my chest because I’m so busy working a full-time job, paying my bills, taking care of my family, and yes— dealing with the symptoms and management of a disease I have always had, will always have, and can never be cured of. Like millions of Americans—I am not yet dead, but actually living with a chronic disease.
People often make comments about my port either over confusion, concern, or curiosity. And it’s okay to be curious! Heck, I’m even a professional patient advocate and spend most of my days diligently educating others on how to help patients lead their best lives.
Because although I am a patient with a chronic illness—I am also a person. A person who, like you, has interests, relationships, goals, and dignity.
So now that we have some context—let’s zip back to today’s lesson: what NOT to say to patients with a visible medical device or disability.
Here are actual things people have said to me about my port and here’s what I wish they would have said.
Do you know where the Apple store is?
Do you go to FAU?
God it smells like farts in here.
Do you think it’s going to rain?
I hope this helps you manage some of those awkward social interactions with people who, like you— are still not dead.


Question: What is the background of the band Andur? Respond briefly.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What is the background of the band Andur? Respond briefly.

Ans. Andur is an Estonian indie rock band formed in 2002 in the city of Paide.


Question: Explain the findings of the 2017 Ig Nobel Prize winners.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Explain the findings of the 2017 Ig Nobel Prize winners.

The winners of the 2017 Ig Nobel Prize, the science awards given to "achievements that first make people laugh then make them think" have been announced, based around this year's theme of uncertainty. The Ig Nobel's 27th year saw the announcement of ten winners in subjects ranging from physics to biology. WIRED picks its favourites.
The Ig Nobel Prize for physics went to Marc-Antoine Fardin's paper, On the Rheology of Cats, which looked into the fluid dynamics of cats in order to determine whether cats can flow like liquids. Fardin observed that: "The wetting and general tribology of cats has not progressed enough to give a definitive answer to the capillary dependence of the feline relaxation time. Fig. 2b gives an example of a lotus effect of Felis catus, suggesting that the substrate is superfelidaphobic. This behavior is usually distinguished from the yield stress that cats can also display, as shown in Fig. 2c, where the kitten cannot flow because it is below its yield stress, like ketchup in its bottle. It is still unclear what physical and chemical properties generate superfelidaphobicity, but a Cassie-Baxter-like model seems plausible."
Korea's Jiwon Han also made use of fluid dynamics in A Study on the Coffee Spilling Phenomena in the Low Impulse Regime, written while he was still a high school student and looking into what happens when someone walks backwards carrying a cup of coffee. The Fluid Dynamics prize winning paper reveals that they're much less likely to spill their coffee than when walking forwards, but warns that: "walking backwards, much more than suppressing resonance, drastically increases the chances of tripping on a stone or crashing into a passing by colleague who may also be walking backwards (this would most definitely lead to spillage)".
The Cognition Prize went to the intriguing finding by a team of Italian researchers that many identical twins can't actually tell themselves apart from their twin in pictures. In Is That Me or My Twin? Lack of Self-Face Recognition Advantage in Identical Twins, the researchers showed monozygotic twins photos of themselves and their twin in a variety of orientations, finding that twins who suffered a greater degree of anxiety and social phobia were also more likely to mistake their co-twin for themselves, suggesting that the confusion may be most likely to affect twins with insecure attachment styles.
The Medicine Prize was won, stereotypically enough, by researchers from the Sorbonne in Paris and the Université de Lyon in France, who used fMRI brain scans to determine which parts of the brain contributed to a sense of disgust in the presence of cheese. In The Neural Bases of Disgust for Cheese: An fMRI Study, the team examined the neural responses associated with food aversions, which can occur both naturally and as a side-effect of illness or other medical conditions.
The study surveyed both the prevalence of disgust for cheese among the French population, compared to 74 other foods, with a sample group comprising 145 men and 187 women. The researchers then put people who were both cheese-averse (the Anti group) and enthusiastic eaters of the dairy product (the Pro) group into a functional magnetic resonance imaging scanner while exposing them to pictures and scents of cheese.
Their results showed that: "the proportion of individuals disliking cheese was higher compared with other food categories. Twenty out of the 332 tested individuals (6 per cent) rated cheese with a score of 0 or 1. The scores from 0 to 3, which can be considered to represent disgust, were observed in 38 individuals (11.5 per cent)".
In the fMRI, it became clear that "the internal and external globus pallidus and the substantia nigra belonging to the basal ganglia are more activated in participants who dislike or diswant to eat cheese (Anti) than in other participants who like to eat cheese".


Question: Describe the upcoming season of Bloodshot USA. Respond in 12 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the upcoming season of Bloodshot USA. Respond in 12 sentences.

Bloodshot is cybernetic super soldier, a product of the Project Rising Star weapons development program, he is in fact considered to be their greatest accomplishment. His ventures have been explored in Valiant Comics since 1992. The nanotechnology enhanced veteran has experienced his share of hazardous missions in his new occupation as an operative for the H.A.R.D. Corps.
In this new Bloodshot USA stand alone season, Project Rising Star are once more thick in the action. Continuing with their research to find the perfect weapon, they have invented a new advanced technology, an air borne nanite pathogen that is capable of reconfiguring DNA and physically morphing humans. The end result will be nanotech infused humans similar to Bloodshot. Unfortunately, the prototype pathogen has escaped into the population of New York, Bloodshot is locked in a race against time to prevent the virus from taking hold of the city.
Jeff Lemire is scripting the season, he turned his hand to Bloodshot Reborn and is well known for his work on Justice League and All New Hawkeye. The art work is provided by Doug Brathwaite (Armor Hunters) and Kano (Ninjak, Superman). Both have previously illustrated Bloodshot comics.
The first episode will be available on October 26th.


Question: What do I have to do to participate in the Global Bike To Work Day challenge?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What do I have to do to participate in the Global Bike To Work Day challenge?

Show the world that #CommutesCount on this first-ever commuting challenge.
Strava Metro is proud to host the first Global Bike to Work Day. Upload a ride on May 10th that starts in one place and ends in another and you’ll complete the challenge. Not only will you enjoy a healthy way to travel and make the world just a little better, but by uploading your commute to Strava, you’ll make a difference. Metro anonymizes and aggregates the millions of human-powered commutes uploaded to Strava every week, then partners with urban planners to improve city infrastructure for cyclists and pedestrians.
Some countries have a “bike to work day” and some don’t – now there’s at least one for every cyclist, and it’s the same day no matter where you live. Enjoy your ride and don’t forget to share your story on other social networks with #CommutesCount.
Find out more about Strava Metro and watch our #CommutesCount animation here.
The leaderboard will not filter out rides that do not fit this description. Please respect the spirit of the challenge and show your support by logging a commute on May 10th.
No prizes for this one. Just the satisfaction of knowing that you've made your commute count and a unique digital finishers badge in your Trophy Case.
Simply bike to work on Tuesday 10th May.
Q: When do I have to complete the Bike To Work Challenge?
A: You can ride any time during May 10th, but you have to make sure the moving time of your ride is over 5 minutes and under 24 hours.
A: No, simply complete your ride at your own pace.


Question: What are the north and south celestial poles? Respond in 3 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What are the north and south celestial poles? Respond in 3 sentences.

The north and south celestial poles are the two imaginary points in the sky where the Earth's axis of rotation, indefinitely extended, intersects the celestial sphere. The north and south celestial poles appear permanently directly overhead to observers at the Earth's North Pole and South Pole, respectively. As the Earth spins on its axis, the two celestial poles remain fixed in the sky, and all other points appear to rotate around them, completing one circuit per day (strictly, per sidereal day).


Question: Describe the Sudnobudivna station in the Kiev Metro. Respond in 6 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the Sudnobudivna station in the Kiev Metro. Respond in 6 sentences.

Sudnobudivna () (proposed, Havan'; ) is a station currently under construction on the Kiev Metro's Podilsko-Vyhurivska Line. The station is part of the first segment of the Podilsko-Vyhurivska Line, which is scheduled to be completed after 2017.
The station is located on the Rybalskyi Peninsula in the Podil district of Kiev. The station is named after the Kuznya na Rybalskomu ship building company which is located in the vicinity. It is being built concurrently with the Podilskyi Metro Bridge, under which it is located. It will be located in between the Podilska and Trukhaniv Ostriv stations, the latter of which will be built according to the same architectural principles as the Sudnobudivna station.


Question: Tell me something interesting about wolves in Yellowstone National Park. Respond in detail.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Tell me something interesting about wolves in Yellowstone National Park. Respond in detail.

In 1926, there were no longer wolves in Yellowstone, once the natural habitat of this species. Between 1977 and the re-introduction in 1995, we have reliable reports of wolves being seen throughout the park. Most of them were either lone wolves or pairs, probably only transiting. Finally, in 1995, grey wolf packs were reintroduced in the Lamar Valley of Yellowstone National Park and Idaho.
Before the extermination, the wolves living within the park belonged to the subspecies Northern Rocky Mountains wolf, Canis lupus irremotus. The reintroduced species of 1995 belong to the subspecies Mackenzie Valley wolf, Canis lupus occidentalis.
The reintroduction of the wolves produced a more significant impact on the biodiversity of the Yellowstone than anticipated.
The wolves’ predation on the elk population, until then unchallenged, produced a significant increase of new-growth in various plants. Aspen and willow trees, previously grazed by the elks more or less at will, got suddenly a chance to grow. With the presence of the wolves, the elks stopped venturing into deeper, and for them dangerous, thickets where they could easily be surprised. They began to avoid areas of low visibility, which would increase the chances of wolf attacks.
The elks began avoiding open regions such as valley bottoms, open meadows, and gorges, where they would be at a disadvantage in case of an attack from a wolf pack. William J. Ripple and Robert L. Bestcha dubbed this process top-down control. In ecology, top-down control denotes that top predators regulate the lower sections of the trophic pyramid. In other words: a top predator controls the structure or population dynamics of a particular ecosystem.
With new vegetation growing and expanding came subtle changes in the waterways running through the park. That had an impact on other species as well. Various bird species came back to Yellowstone national park with the increased number of trees. The beaver, previously extinct in the region, returned to the park. Their dams across the rivers attracted otters, muskrats, and reptiles.
Probably due to the wolves keeping the coyote populations at bay, the red fox got suddenly a chance to survive because the number of rabbits and mice grew considerably. The raven, always the wolf follower, came back to the park as well, now able to feed on the leftovers of the wolves.
The wolves changed the rivers in as much as they readdressed the lost balance within the region, one we had created when we exterminated them. With a better balance between predator and prey, top meat eaters and top grazers, came the possibility for other species to thrive. With the increased vegetation growth, erosion decreased, and the river banks stabilized.
Every time we produce drastic changes in nature, we interfere deeply with the whole eco-system.
Nature is indeed a beautiful act of balance.
Chase, Alton (1986). Playing God in Yellowstone—The Destruction of America’s First National Park. Boston, MA: The Atlantic Monthly Press.
Murie, Adolph (1940). Fauna of the National Parks of the United States-Ecology of the Coyote in the Yellowstone National Park (Report). U.S. Department of the Interior.
Ripple, W; Beschta R: “Wolves and the Ecology of Fear: Can Predation Risk Structure”, page 761, “Bioscience”, 2004 Vol. 54 No. 8.
Urbigkit, Cat (2008). Yellowstone Wolves: A Chronicle of the Animal, the People, and the Politics. Blacksburg, VI: McDonald & Woodward Publishing.
The Reintroduction of Gray Wolves to Yellowstone National Park and Central Idaho-Final Environmental Impact Statement (PDF) (Report). Denver, CO: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1994.
“Technical Publications on Wolves, 1995–2004” (PDF). Yellowstone Science 13 (1): 42–43. Winter 2005.
Featured image: The wolves changed the rivers of the Yellowstone. Picture by photographer Ronan Donovan, NG.


Question: "Why aren't liberals fun anymore?" Respond in 43 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 "Why aren't liberals fun anymore?" Respond in 43 sentences.

Why aren't liberals fun anymore?
The point of this story is that liberals just don’t have a sense of humor anymore. The rage that the left feels now about President Trump Donald John TrumpThorny part of obstruction of justice is proving intent, that's a job for Congress Obama condemns attacks in Sri Lanka as 'an attack on humanity' Schiff rips Conway's 'display of alternative facts' on Russian election interference MORE, tax cuts, conservatives, Brett Kavanaugh and more has become so all consuming that it has made many liberals miserable to be around.
Consider the statement by Sen. Mazie Hirono Mazie Keiko HironoHillicon Valley: Washington preps for Mueller report | Barr to hold Thursday presser | Lawmakers dive into AI ethics | FCC chair moves to block China Mobile | Dem bill targets 'digital divide' | Microsoft denies request for facial recognition tech Dems introduce bill to tackle 'digital divide' Overnight Energy: Collins receives more donations from Texas oil, gas industry than from Maine residents | Interior chief left meetings off schedule | Omar controversy jeopardizes Ocasio-Cortez trip to coal mine MORE (D-Hawaii), who lashed out last week at her Republican colleagues regarding the sexual assault allegation against Kavanaugh: “Guess who is perpetrating all of these kinds of actions? It’s the men in this country. I just want to say to the men in this country: Just shut up and step up.” It’s not just that she said it, but she now wears this nastiness as a badge of honor. She even received a standing ovation in the Capitol the other day from abortion activists.
Similarly, the ugly incident when White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders was kicked out of a restaurant weeks ago wasn’t an aberration. Liberals are so filled with a sense of moral superiority and rage that they literally don’t want to sit in the same dining room with us.
Last week, I gave a talk at the Computer History Museum in Silicon Valley to some 250 technology executives and the venture capitalists who fund them. I asked at the start of my speech how many of them have a positive opinion of Trump. Now, mind you, if any group has been transformed into gazillionaires because of Trump policies, it was this crowd. Out of the 250 attendees, about three people dared to raise their hands. I knew that liberalism is transcendent in the Bay Area, but I didn’t realize groupthink was this lopsided.
After the speech, about 20 to 30 of the attendees came up and said they enjoyed my talk. Several whispered that they really like what Trump is doing. Huh? Why didn’t they raise their hands? The answers: “I have clients here and I will lose them if they know I support Trump;" "I will be ostracized if my friends know my real feelings;" "I didn’t want to get into an argument with people;” and so on.
The sad irony is that it is liberals who are running the sanctimonious and moralistic crusades to end bullying in America. Yet, apparently, there are just some views that aren’t worth tolerating. A conservative friend of mine always uses a line about liberals hating Trump more than they love America. It would be one thing to hate Trump if his policies were failing, as liberals unanimously believed would happen. But, lo, we now are nearing the end of 2018 as one of the most prosperous periods in modern times, and that has only further infuriated Trump haters.
Perhaps it is just human nature to hate the one who keeps proving you wrong. Some are like comedian and talk show host Bill Maher, who admits he wants millions of Americans to lose their jobs, so that we can get rid of Trump. Yes, that’s just what this country needs now, a little more misery.
The economic boom is now palpable to nearly all Americans. It transcends spin. Polls are showing that Trump is unpopular, but Americans are upbeat about the economy. Consumers are spending like there’s no tomorrow. That is what is so disconcerting about liberal rage. They are bitterly unhappy at the very moment that the American economy is as prosperous as at anytime in modern history, and when median family incomes just hit an all time high, when black and Hispanic unemployment have hit record lows. What’s so bad about feeling good?
What a difference a generation makes. It used to be conservatives who were the stuffy ones. Liberals were the fun ones to be around. Now the ones who are so uptight are the liberals like actor Jeff Bridges, who once was funny but now is so embarrassed by modern day America that he seems to want to be anywhere on this planet, except here. OK, then, just go! Liberals are making it clearer with each passing day that they don’t want to associate with conservatives any longer. As a conservative, I hate to say it, but more and more the feeling is mutual.
Stephen Moore is an economic consultant with Freedom Works and served as an economic adviser to the 2016 Trump presidential campaign. He and Arthur Laffer are authors of the forthcoming book, “Trumponomics: Inside the America First Plan to Revive Our Economy,” to be published this fall.


Question: Describe the features of Atlanta Celebrates Photography. Respond in 57 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the features of Atlanta Celebrates Photography. Respond in 57 sentences.

Now that most people carry cameras in their pockets and can publish pictures of their cat, their lunch or themselves online with abandon, it is easy to assume we’ve got this photography thing on lock. That is one of the beauties of photography. Everyone in possession of a camera has the power to create.
But fine art photography is not so simple. Like all art forms, it requires technical skill and an engaging aesthetic that pleases, provokes or challenges the viewer. And that is what Atlanta Celebrates Photography (ACP) sets out to do every October: please, provoke and challenge the public with its monthlong programming of photography exhibits, lectures, screenings, and book fairs throughout the metro area and beyond.
A nonprofit organization established in 1998, ACP was founded by a handful of artists dedicated to increasing visibility and support for photography in Atlanta. The first festival was held in 1999 and featured about 30 events. Since then, it has grown in size and prestige, bringing in distinguished artists such as John Waters, Gregory Crewdson and Bruce Davidson, and hosting up to 140 events a year.
Here are some highlights on tap this year.
Work by Zanele Muholi is on view at Spelman College Museum of Fine Arts through Dec. 8. Contributed by ©Zanele Muholi / Stevenson, Cape Town/Johannesburg and Yancey Richardson, New York.
The South African artist and activist, who doesn’t identify as male or female and prefers the pronouns “they” or “them,” created a self-portrait every day for a year to explores issues of racial and gender inequality in history and contemporary times. Images from the project are featured in the touring exhibition, “Zanele Muholi: Somnyama Ngonyama, Hail the Dark Lioness,” on view at Spelman College.
Info: Through Dec. 8. Free. Spelman College Museum of Fine Art, 350 Spelman Lane, Atlanta. 404-270-5607, museum.spelman.edu.
Atlanta is one of eight cities to simultaneously exhibit this large-scale, public art show featuring the work of 40 photographers from around the world. Focused on themes of people, places, animals and nature, the 700-foot-long exhibit will be displayed at Piedmont Park through the run of the festival. It will also be exhibited in Santa Fe, N.M.; Denver; Boston; Durham, N.C.; Sarasota, Fla.; Calgary, Alberta; and Brooklyn, where The Fence originated in 2012.
Info: Through Nov. 1. Free. Piedmont Park Dog Park, beneath Park Drive Bridge. 404-875-7275, piedmontpark.org.
An influential street photographer during the ‘60s and ‘70s, Garry Winogrand died at age 56 in 1984, leaving behind thousands of rolls of undeveloped film. He is the subject of a documentary, “Garry Winogrand: All Things Are Photographable,” that screens in conjunction with the festival.
The director, Sasha Waters Freyer, will introduce the film and participate in a talkback session afterward.
Info: 7 p.m. Oct. 9. Free, but online reservations required. Landmark Midtown Art Cinema, 931 Monroe Drive, Atlanta. 404-879-0160, landmarktheatres.com.
Info: Through Oct. 31. Free. Opening reception 6 p.m. Oct. 1. $20. Proceeds benefit Poncey-Highland Neighborhood Association. Hotel Clermont, 789 Ponce de Leon Ave., Atlanta. 678-794-2002, hotelclermont.com.
Many of the iconic photographs from movies (think Marilyn Monroe standing over the subway grate in “The Seven Year Itch” or Jack Nicholson’s maniacal mug poking through a busted door in “The Shining”) were shot by unit photographers, whose job it is to photograph pictures on movie sets for promotional purposes, as well as capture behind-the-scene moments of the filmmaking process. Their work is featured in “The Art of Motion Picture Still Photography” at the Westside Cultural Arts Center. Photographs from films including “Driving Miss Daisy,” “The Graduate,” “Mad Max: Fury Road,” “Blade Runner” and “Ed Wood,” among others, will be featured.
Info: Oct. 2-27. Artists’ reception 7 p.m. Oct. 20. Free. Westside Cultural Arts Center, 760 10th St., Atlanta. 404-594-6412, westsideartscenter.com.
Monthlong festival of photography exhibits, lectures and events throughout October. Most events are free; some require reservations. Various venues. acpinfo.org.
Embracing the democratic nature of photography, the annual ACP Open Exhibition pinup show invites anyone and everyone to hang one or two unframed, 8½-by-11-inch or smaller photographs on the wall between noon and 4 p.m. Sept. 29 and compete for prizes in three age groups.
Info: Sept. 30-Oct. 27. Artists’ reception noon Oct. 27. Free. Binders Art Supplies and Frames, Ponce City Market, 650 North Ave., Atlanta. 404-682-6999, bindersart.com.


Question: What can you tell me about holy water? Respond in 29 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What can you tell me about holy water? Respond in 29 sentences.

It used to be said that the priest “made” holy water; he did not simply bless it. The rite is still in the Roman Ritual. The priest makes holy water by adding exorcized salt to exorcized water.
Holy water, in this rite, is understood as a pure creature directly conveying the power of God. Hence, both salt and water must first be exorcized, on the grounds that the Fall reverberated throughout all of material creation, giving Satan a dominion even over lifeless elements.
The holy water in churches today, I believe, is typically blessed not made, the priest saying a prayer of blessing and making a sign of the cross over it, often in the context of Mass.
Surely not on the minimalist grounds that the grace of Christ is sufficient, because then the argument for having holy water at all would be taken away. Moreover, Christ is a mediator, after all, who in his life on earth showed a strong liking for working through mediating matter, such as spittle and dirt.
Rather, from experience I know that blessed water works very effectively against the devil.
Many friends have told me the same thing. They were troubled at night by twisted dreams, for instance – and after they began sprinkling holy water on the bed each night, and said a Hail Mary or three, the problem vanished and never returned. Something my own life experiences tend to corroborate.
Many of the friends I’ve mentioned, naturally enough, do not omit holy water when tucking in their children. But this leads to another reason for praising it, beyond its utility, namely, how attractive it is to children and child-like adults.
As children we marvel at bells, smoke, fire. The Church is right to appeal to our senses in this way. But consider that water, like fire, is not “supposed” to be within buildings. So even a small votive candle – that little point of brilliant fire, guarded by the wax but dangerous if it were to break out – can signify something transcendent, prayer ascending to God and light descending.
For a similar reason, we lean forward to get sprinkled with Holy Water on Easter Sunday, and we like to dip our fingers in the holy water font. As the water is not where it is “supposed” to be, it easily signifies inflowing grace from God, while it should lead us to consider our own baptism and the purifying efficacy of sacramental confession.
The family is a domestic church, not on its own, but as participating in the life of the Church. That little bottle of holy water in the household, then, testifies to the reality of Holy Orders and the power of the Church in the sacraments.
As holy water is held to be precious, and it comes solely from the priest, the priesthood is honored by it. As we get holy water freely – we need only bring a bottle to the church and fill it – it teaches that the most precious things in life have no price. They are freely given by God, if we simply look for them in the right place.
Finally, as water is an element, and holy water is a blessed element, it testifies to the goodness of creation, how grace completes nature, and the logic of the Incarnation.
There is a catechism contained in holy water. Alternatively, we can say that the true Church would, of course, have devised it. Alternatively, as truth is overdetermined by evidence, we can also say that the existence and use of holy water, like forty other things, is almost on its own a reason to become a Catholic.


Question: Why do girls like the bad boys?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Why do girls like the bad boys?

Every girl says she likes the assh*le because he’s the challenge -- the one she must break, train and force to be more than just a douchebag. Have you ever thought, however, maybe you were the girl in need of learning what it means to actually feel again?
In fact, the assh*le has a charm about him; it’s the charm you justify your pursuit with. You say, “There’s just something about him.” However, it's probably the same quality that ended up hurting you in the past.
What you don’t know is that someone else is out there, and she won’t be as foolish you. When you realize all you really want is the nice guy who cares about you too much, it’s going to be too late. Some other girl will be able to see how great he is, and she won't waste a minute.


Question: Describe a prank Bert Kreischer likes to play on hotel maids when he checks out. Respond in 9 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe a prank Bert Kreischer likes to play on hotel maids when he checks out. Respond in 9 sentences.

Standup comedian Bert Kreischer is a frequent traveler. He often has to check into hotels during his travels. Being a comedian, Bert has a terrific sense of humor that makes him pull a prank on the hotel maids. Whenever Bert is checking out, he remembers to leave the hotel maid a present.
Source: All of these images were tweeted by Bert Kreischer himself.
Check out pictures of Bert’s presents below.
1 year of taking lighters at parties.
Do You Want To Build A Mutant?
Yesterday I Met My Goldendoodle Pup, Boo.


Question: Could you tell me about the Battle of Forts Clinton and Montgomery? Respond in 196 words.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Could you tell me about the Battle of Forts Clinton and Montgomery? Respond in 196 words.

The Battle of Forts Clinton and Montgomery was an American Revolutionary War battle fought in the highlands of the Hudson River valley, not far from West Point, on October 6, 1777. British forces under the command of General Sir Henry Clinton captured Fort Clinton and Fort Montgomery, and then dismantled the Hudson River Chain. The purpose of the attack was to create a diversion to draw American troops from the army of General Horatio Gates, whose army was opposing British General John Burgoyne's attempt to gain control of the Hudson.
The forts were garrisoned by about 600 Continental Army troops under the command of two brothers, General (and Governor of New York) George Clinton, and General James Clinton, while General Israel Putnam led additional troops at nearby Peekskill, New York. (This battle is also sometimes called the "battle of the Clintons" due to the number of participants with that name. The brothers were probably not related to Sir Henry.) Using a series of feints, Henry Clinton fooled Putnam into withdrawing most of his troops to the east, and then he landed over 2,000 troops on the west side of the Hudson to assault the two forts.


Question: What has been the reaction to Ted Osius' resignation from the Trump administration and his actions as the Former U.S. Ambassador to Vietnam?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What has been the reaction to Ted Osius' resignation from the Trump administration and his actions as the Former U.S. Ambassador to Vietnam?

Former U.S. Ambassador to Vietnam Ted Osius said he resigned from his post last year after the Trump administration asked him to pressure the Vietnamese government to receive more than 8,000 Vietnamese refugees marked in the U.S. for deportation.
The vast majority of the people targeted for deportation — sometimes for minor crimes — were war refugees who had established lives in the U.S. after fleeing the Vietnam War more than 40 years ago, Osius wrote in an essay this month for the American Foreign Service Association.
“And they were to be ‘returned’ decades later to a nation ruled by a communist regime with which they had never reconciled. I feared many would become human rights cases, and our government would be culpable,” he wrote.
The State Department declined to comment Friday. The Department of Homeland Security did not immediately reply to a request for comment. Osius, now vice president of Fulbright University Vietnam, a private, nonprofit institution in Saigon, described his three-year tour as U.S. ambassador in Hanoi as “the high point of my 30-year career in the Foreign Service and the honor of a lifetime.” Efforts to reach him through the university and the foreign service association Friday were unsuccessful.
Osius’s admission took on significant resonance in San Jose, which is home to more than 100,000 Vietnamese Americans, one of the largest populations of Vietnamese-born people outside of Vietnam.
It comes months after Vietnamese activists across the country, including many in the Bay Area, raised concerns that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement was rounding up undocumented immigrants from Vietnam in unprecedented numbers that left communities shocked and fearful. They estimated more than 100 Vietnamese were detained across the country in October alone.
The surge in ICE activity appeared to spring in part from the Trump administration’s aggressive efforts to deport immigrants with criminal records, even in circumstances where their home countries haven’t traditionally cooperated with U.S. removal orders. In the past, immigrants in that situation have been allowed to stay in the U.S., but the Trump administration has been pressing Cambodia and Vietnam, in particular, to take back their deportees.
The result is that immigrants who have established roots and lives in the U.S. in spite of their eligibility for deportation are suddenly being detained and shipped out.
Vietnamese and U.S. officials in 2008 signed a repatriation memorandum that in part said Vietnamese immigrants who arrived in America before 1995 would not be subject to deportation. Activists, however, say some of the individuals being detained arrived before 1995, leaving them to wonder whether some of these deportations are illegal. Several organizations filed a lawsuit against the federal government in February for violating its repatriation agreement with Vietnam.
In his essay, Osius said he feared “this repulsive policy” would destroy any chances Trump had in fulfilling other goals for relations with Vietnam, among them reducing trade deficit, strengthening military relations and coping with regional threats, such as those from North Korea.
“I voiced my objections, was instructed to remain silent, and decided there was an ethical line that I could not cross if I wished to retain my integrity. I concluded that I could better serve my country from outside government, by helping to build a new, innovative university in Vietnam,” he wrote.
Phi Nguyen, litigation director at Asian Americans Advancing Justice in Atlanta, said she’s happy the former diplomat spoke out.
Nguyen said many of the Vietnamese immigrants with deportation orders came to the U.S. after the Vietnam War and no longer have ties to their home country.
“They are people who came here as refugees and who don’t really recognize the Vietnam that exists today as their country anymore,” she said.


Question: Describe the threat of poison gas grenades in Belgian waters.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the threat of poison gas grenades in Belgian waters.

For almost 100 years 35,000 tonnes of poison gas grenades, abandoned by the fleeing Germans around first world war battlefields, have lain in steel barrels on the seabed less than a kilometre from the Belgian coastline.
A convoy of small boats dumped the cargo into the North Sea over a period of six months in 1919 when unloading it into the world’s oceans was thought to be the best way to protect people from exposure to the toxic material.
The site was soon forgotten, only to be rediscovered under three metres of sand and silt by divers in 1971 during the expansion of the port of Zeebrugge. Building over the barrels was considered given the danger of gas leakage but the costs were thought to be too high. Monitoring was chosen over action.
Yet now, with plans being devised to protect the Belgian coast from rising sea levels through the building of an artificial island off the coast of the seaside resort of Knokke, scientists are starting to explore again whether the construction of a bulwark against the tide could serve two purposes by also keeping the poison gas secure.
Similar toxic dumps exist elsewhere in the world, containing larger amounts of toxic chemicals, but the shallow depth of the site on the Paardenmarkt sandbar, just five to 10 metres below the waterline, is thought to be unique to Belgian waters. Fishing and the dropping of an anchor in the Paardenmarkt is forbidden.
The proximity to Zeebrugge port, one of the busiest in Europe, and major shipping routes, pipelines and gas terminals, is also a factor in the need for a long-term solution.
Seys said there was a danger of leakage from the grenades but also in the possibility of impact with a ship given the heavy traffic in the North Sea shipping lanes.
Plans for the artificial island of Knokke are part of a 2020-2026 plan for Belgian waters. Further geomorphological surveys of the state of the seabed and the ammunition dump are to be launched over the next year.


Question: Describe the events leading up to the murder of Laura Wallen. Respond in 14 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the events leading up to the murder of Laura Wallen. Respond in 14 sentences.

The boyfriend of a pregnant Maryland teacher was charged with murder after her body was found in a shallow grave following a nine-day search, police said.
Laura Wallen, a high school social studies teacher from Olney, Maryland, was four months pregnant. Montgomery Police Chief Tom Manger said her body was discovered around noon Wednesday by a search and rescue team.
Montgomery County police said Thursday evening that an autopsy found Wallen was shot in the back of the head.
The victim’s boyfriend, Tyler Tessier, was arrested hours after her body was found and is charged with first degree murder. Tessier is believed to be the father of Wallen’s baby, police said.
Tessier had just days earlier delivered a heartfelt plea to find his missing girlfriend at a press conference.
Police said Tessier was the last person to see her alive. They were spotted together on Sept. 2 on surveillance footage at a grocery store near victim’s home, Manger said.
Wallen's family reported her missing two days later, according to the Montgomery County Police Department.
According to police, various events led them to classify Tessier as a suspect. He allegedly admitted to driving Wallen’s car to Columbia and removing the front tags. He also allegedly admitted to disposing of the victim’s driver license and iPhone.
The break in the case occurred when investigators determined Tessier visited the area where Wallen was found, Manger said, and the search team found tire tracks leading to the site.


Question: Describe Yanis Varoufakis's plan for a parallel payment system using AFMs.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe Yanis Varoufakis's plan for a parallel payment system using AFMs.

Former Finance Minister Yanis Varoufakis has claimed that he was authorized by Alexis Tsipras last December to look into a parallel payment system that would operate using wiretapped tax registration numbers (AFMs) and could eventually work as a parallel banking system, Kathimerini has learned.
In a teleconference call with members of international hedge funds that was allegedly coordinated by former British Chancellor of the Exchequer Norman Lamont, Varoufakis claimed to have been given the okay by Tsipras last December – a month before general elections that brought SYRIZA to power – to plan a payment system that could operate in euros but which could be changed into drachmas “overnight” if necessary, Kathimerini understands.
Varoufakis worked with a small team to prepare the plan, which would have required a staff of 1,000 to implement but did not get the final go-ahead from Tsipras to proceed, he said.
The call took place on July 16, more than a week after Varoufakis left his post as finance minister.
The plan would involve hijacking the AFMs of taxpayers and corporations by hacking into General Secretariat of Public Revenues website, Varoufakis told his interlocutors. This would allow the creation of a parallel system that could operate if banks were forced to close and which would allow payments to be made between third parties and the state and could eventually lead to the creation of a parallel banking system, he said.
You can find extracts from the conversation below. Varoufakis was advised that the call was being recorded when it began.
Varoufakis: "I have to admit we did not have a mandate for bringing Greece out of the euro. What we had a mandate to do was to negotiate for a kind of arrangement with the Eurogroup and the ECB that would render Greece sustainable within the eurozone. The mandate went a bit further, at least in my estimation. I think the Greek people had authorised us to pursue energetically and vigorously that negotiation to the point of saying that if we can’t have a viable agreement, then we should consider getting out."
"We don't have a currency which we can devalue vis a vis the euro, we have the euro"
Normal Lamont interrupts: "There are certainly others listening but they will not tell it to their friends."
"Schaeuble has a plan. The way he described it to me is very simple. He believes that the eurozone is not sustainable as it is. He believes there has to be some fiscal transfers, some degree of political union. He believes that for that political union to work without federation, without the legitimacy that a properly elected federal parliament can render, can bestow upon an executive, it will have to be done in a very disciplinary way. And he said explicitly to me that a Grexit is going to equip him with sufficient bargaining, sufficient terrorising power in order to impose upon the French that which Paris has been resisting. And what is that? A degree of transfer of budget making powers from Paris to Brussels."


Question: Hi, I think I may have been removed from your Assisted Home Ownership Waiting List - what should I do?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Hi, I think I may have been removed from your Assisted Home Ownership Waiting List - what should I do?

You have probably heard that new data protection rules were introduced on the 25th May 2018 giving individuals greater protection and control with the data that organisations hold about them.
We recently contacted all applicants registered on our Assisted Home Ownership Waiting List to ask them to review their consent and if they wish to remain on our database. If you are registered on our list, but have not responded by the deadline, then your details will have automatically been removed in compliance with the new regulations. .
If you think this is the case, please email LCHO@cardiff.gov.uk to check and re-register onto the scheme, if required.
Our new Registration Disclaimer will be applicable from 25th May 2018 (69kb PDF)External link opens in a new window .
Information on the Assisted Home Ownership scheme including shared equity and shared ownership.
Find out if you are eligible to join the scheme.
Complete the registration form and return it to us and we will be in touch.
A guide to help you work out the costs of buying a home and ongoing expenses.
View details of properties available on new and existing housing developments.


Question: Describe the information Cindy Laporta revealed during her testimony in the trial of Paul Manafort.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the information Cindy Laporta revealed during her testimony in the trial of Paul Manafort.

One of Paul Manafort's accountants admitted Friday she may have committed a crime by filing tax returns for him that she thought contained false information, Politico reports.
Why it matters: The information Cindy Laporta was suspicious about on the tax returns is related to the former Trump campaign chairman’s international consulting business. Laporta is the first witness who has immunity to testify in the trial — and her testimony could be critical to the effort to prosecute Manafort on charges of tax and bank fraud.
She doubted that $2.4 million worth of funds Manafort said he received as a loan from international businesses was actually a loan. The funds were coming from Manafort’s customers, which she found suspect.
When Laporta asked for documentation of the loans, she did not receive the usual extensive documentation in a stack of papers with fine print terms, and instead received one or two pages. She said she found that unusual.
She also revealed it was Manafort's own signature on the loan documents, not Gates', which is important since Manafort's defense has been trying to peg Gates as the interlocutor in the financial wrongdoing, per The Washington Post.


Question: What are the rules and prizes for the Trick Taking Game Design Contest?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What are the rules and prizes for the Trick Taking Game Design Contest?

This contest is complete, and the winner has been chosen.
We want you to design a completely unique trick taking game. Trick taking is an ancient style of card game. We want you to turn this age-old mechanic and turn it on its head.
Andrew Smith, winner of the 2015 Gamehole Board Game Challenge, will be personally judging all entries.
Your game must be a trick taking card game with a twist.
You are welcome to use any printables or game pieces available in our shop to create your game.
The cost of your game cannot exceed $19.99.
A rules document must be downloadable from your game's shop page and also included in the game itself. Can be in booklet or document form.
The game must be publish ready, meaning it has a logo, backdrop, shop ad, action shots, description, and cool factors. It must also have all images proofed, and have packaging.
This must be a new game created for this contest. It cannot have existed on TGC prior to the start of the contest.
All artwork must be your own, commissioned by you, licensed to you, or in the public domain.
All entries must be submitted through TGC's game editor (by clicking on the "Contests" button) no later than Noon UTC (6am US Central time) on March 6, 2017.
Contestants may submit multiple entries to this contest. Each entry will be judged separately.
You retain all rights to your game and are welcome to sell it in our shop during and after the contest, regardless of the outcome of the contest.
The first round of judging is handled by a community voting process. The final two rounds are handled by the judge. See complete details.
Automatic Showcase status on thegamecrafter.com.
$50 of shop credit on thegamecrafter.com.
Induction into The Game Crafter Hall of Fame.
The possibility of judging a future contest.


Question: Create an informational summary of the SEGA video game Wild Woody.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Create an informational summary of the SEGA video game Wild Woody.

This time on Hit Reset, we take a look at a long forgotten footnote in SEGA’s history, a mascot platformer by the name of Wild Woody. Barely remembered at its release and even less remembered now, Wild Woody is generally considered to be one of the worst platformers ever made during the era.
Thanks to Joesph Kerska (the real, original voice of Woody), Bumblefoot (the game’s composer), and everyone else who helped make this video far better then it had any right to be.
Like this video? Subscribe to the SEGAbits YouTube channel, and make sure to check out more of my videos!


Question: Respond in 55 words. What are aloers?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Respond in 55 words. What are aloers?

Aloers (the word is originally Catalan) were independent peasant proprietors of "alous" in what is now Catalonia, especially during the years between the Carolingian reconquest of the Hispanic Marches from the Moors in the late 9th century and the consolidation of feudalism in that region in the 11th century. They generally practised family-based subsistence farming.


Question: What laser controllers does LightBurn support?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What laser controllers does LightBurn support?

LightBurn is a native application written for Windows, OSX, and Linux.
LightBurn talks directly to your laser, without the use of additional software.
We currently support most GCode and Ruida based controllers. GCode controllers, including Grbl, Smoothie, and Grbl-LPC, Marlin, and Ruida controllers, including the RDC6442G/S, RDC6445G, RDC6332G, RDLC-320A, and the R5-DSP are among those supported. The Trocen AWC708C, AWC608 are supported as well. More controllers will be added soon, so if you don't see yours listed, send us a message - maybe we're already working on it!
If your controller is GCode, Ruida, or Trocen based, even if it's not listed it might be supported already - Download the free trial and try it for yourself. If it doesn't work, it often only takes a day or two to make the required changes to support a new board in these families.
Please note that LightBurn does not support the stock M2-Nano board in the popular K40 laser. This board does not offer control of power through software- we recommend upgrading the board to take full advantage of LightBurn.


Question: Explain why providing subsidies to homebuyers or renters is counter-productive to addressing the housing affordability crisis.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Explain why providing subsidies to homebuyers or renters is counter-productive to addressing the housing affordability crisis.

Rising rents and home prices are becoming unbearable–or at least politically unpalatable–in cities around North America. Over the past year, two Pacific Northwest cities, Portland and Vancouver, have seen some of the biggest rent and home price increases anywhere. Portland’s reported double digit rent increases in early 2016 were among the highest in the nation. By one reckoning, Vancouver’s home prices were up 24 percent over the previous year, although, as we’ve noted, there’s been a good deal of noise in home price estimates there. The political pressure that rising prices and rents have produced is generating some novel policy suggestions.
In Vancouver, the British Columbia provincial government has announced that it will match the down-payment that first-time homebuyers make to purchase a new residence. The program, announced by Premier Christy Clark–whose ruling Liberal government faces the voters in the new year–would give first time home buyers up to $37,500 to match their down payments. Up to 40,000 households might qualify for the credit.
Portland just adopted a poorly designed inclusionary housing requirement, and now state legislators are looking at repealing the state’s ban on city-imposed rent control programs. In response, a local landlords group has proposed that the state instead enact a rental subsidy, roughly modeled on the federal Section 8 voucher program. The proposal is that the state would allocate something on the order of about $20 million per year to provide rent subsidies of around $100 per month to as many as 20,000 low and moderate income households.
Both of these proposals intervene on the demand side of the marketplace, giving some homebuyers (Vancouver) or renters (Portland) more buying power to help them better afford new homes or apartments. While its hard to argue that such subsidies won’t be of some benefit to their direct recipients (households that get subsidies will be able to more easily afford housing than otherwise), the economics of these proposals are clear and ugly. By giving more households more money to bid for housing, these measures amp up demand, but do nothing–at least not directly or in the short term–to raise supply. Greater demand in the face of fixed supply means one thing: even higher prices and rents.
“It’s a pretty bad idea. It is counter-productive and if you give people more purchasing power, they will be able to bid up the prices of the homes that they’re looking at, and that price increase will eat up any benefit from the subsidy. The same people who were going to compete for a home at $500,000 are still going to be competing for that same unit, but at a higher price. They’re just going to compete away the benefit. The only people who gain are existing homeowners or developers who benefit from these higher prices. . . . it’s not going to increase supply and it’s supposed to increase demand, so how is it not going to increase prices? . . . There’s no way there was any serious economic analysis.
The same problem holds for the Oregon rental voucher program. Giving thousands of renters more buying power in the face of an already tight market and a constrained supply of rental units is likely to accelerate rent increases. In both Oregon and British Columbia, the necessary solution is on the supply side: building more housing. And the money that would be spent on homebuyer or renter subsidies would be better spent on measures to add to the housing stock, especially for low income households.
As we’ve said, the housing affordability crisis ought to be a teachable moment for economists. At its root, the problem cities are experiencing are about supply and demand. The only way to craft effective solutions is to apply some fundamental economic analysis to the problem. Rent and home purchase subsidies may help out a few individuals, but only at the cost of making the affordability problem worse for everyone else.


Question: Have you heard about the recent Tiffany vs. Costco court case?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Have you heard about the recent Tiffany vs. Costco court case?

NEW YORK — Tiffany has beaten Costco to the tune of at least $19.4 million in a trademark infringement battle over alleged knock-off rings that pitted the luxury jeweler against the membership warehouse giant.
Costco must pay the financial damages for its years-long practice of selling rings with signs that said "Tiffany" without any modifiers to indicate the items were not made by the world-famed New York City jewelry company, a judge ruled Monday.
In all, Costco owes Tiffany $11.1 million, three times the estimated profit the Issaquah, Wa.-based company made on sales of the rings, U.S. District Court Judge Laura Taylor Swain wrote in a 17-page decision. She also ordered Costco to pay $8.25 million in legal damages and issued a permanent injunction that bars the company from using the Tiffany name.
Swain's decision evoked the scene of Costco members somehow discovering Tiffany rings at improbably low discount prices in Costco's cavernous warehouse centers.
"Costco's salespeople described such rings as "Tiffany" rings in response to customer inquiries, and were not perturbed when customers who then realized that the rings were not actually manufactured by Tiffany expressed anger or upset," wrote Swain.
"Costco's upper management ... displayed, at best, a cavalier attitude toward Costco's use of the Tiffany name in conjunction with ring sales and marketing," the judge added.
Tiffany declared victory, saying the decision validated the strength of the company's trademark and sent a clear warning to competitors that infringe on it with false advertising or signs. Although the legal battle focused on a few thousand rings, Tiffany contended the case was important to protect its famed corporate identity.
"Tiffany is much more than a name," the company said in a statement. "It stands for responsible sourcing, exacting standards and exceptional craftsmanship."
Costco vowed to appeal, contending that the decision was "a product of multiple errors" by the judge.
"The diamond ring in question had a pronged setting style that is commonly known as a 'Tiffany' setting," Costco said. "Costco intended that the word Tiffany in its signs convey only that the rings had this style of setting — not that the rings were Tiffany & Co. brand rings."
Tiffany initially sued Costco in a Valentines Day 2013 trademark infringement and counterfeiting lawsuit. The lawsuit charged that a consumer shopping in Costco's Huntington Beach, Calif., warehouse complained that "Costco was offering for sale what were promoted on in-store signs as Tiffany diamond engagement rings."
A Manhattan federal court jury ruled in Tiffany's favor in Oct. 2016. The jurors awarded Tiffany $5.5 million in Costco profits, but Swain's ruling reduced that amount to $3.7 million.
In an unsuccessful bid to dismiss the case before trial, Costco argued that the rings in question "were, in truth and in fact, unbranded rings having Tiffany settings and accurately described as such on in store signs."
Swain, however, ruled that Costco's evidence in the case was "insufficient" to establish that the company's use of the Tiffany name "was not an intentionally deceptive marketing ploy."
The decision also dismissed Costco's argument that the financial award to Tiffany was legally excessive.
"Costco is a large corporation" that in 2014 reported "annual sales of over $113 billion" and "$2.4 billion in profits," the judge wrote.


Question: Respond in 3 sentences. What's the story behind the band Wormstein?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Respond in 3 sentences. What's the story behind the band Wormstein?

Wormstein is a 5-man band who released their first single on 23 April 2015. It was believed that the members consisted of those from pop-punk band 5 Seconds of Summer. This was not confirmed until an article was released in Rolling Stone magazine where Luke Hemmings confirmed that Wormstein consisted of the 5SOS members.


Question: Do you know when the first FINA Synchronised Swimming World Cup was held?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Do you know when the first FINA Synchronised Swimming World Cup was held?

The 3rd FINA Synchronised Swimming World Cup was held 1987 in Cairo, Egypt. It featured swimmers from 10 nations, swimming in three events: Solo, Duet and Team.


Question: What was the career of Sir Daniel Harvey? Respond in 27 words.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What was the career of Sir Daniel Harvey? Respond in 27 words.

Sir Daniel Harvey (10 November 1631 – August 1672) was a British merchant and diplomat who was English Ambassador to the Ottoman Empire from 1668 to 1672.