Question: What are the steps for using a mining calculator to determine profitable crypto coins to mine?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What are the steps for using a mining calculator to determine profitable crypto coins to mine?

Got a gaming PC? Why not make some profit out of it when you are not actually gaming. Yes, you heard it right! You can use your computers GPU power and start mining crypto coins today. Whether it’s a gaming PC or a dedicated mining rig setup with 6 and 8 GPUs. It’s always profitable mining crypto currencies. Yes, even in 2018. However you must first determine what to mine and which coins are more profitable mining with your GPU.
It doesn’t matter whether you have a low end GPU or high end GPU, NVIDIA or AMD. There are thousands of Alt coins and each coins hold different technology and so their algorithms are. Each GPU models are good at mining certain algorithm. For example AMD RX 480 is good at mining Ethash which is the algorithm for Ethereum, Ethereum Classic, Pirl, Musicoin and much more. GTX 1060 is good at mining Equihash algorithm and the coins based on this algorithm are Zcash, Zclassic, Zencash and much more. You know your GPU model so now how do you decide and let it mine the most profitable coin. This is when whattomine.com comes in to help you get started with crypto mining.
There are certain factors you must consider first before getting in to mining crypto currencies such as electricity cost and difficulty. You should first be knowing the price of electricity in your state in KWH which you can search in Google. Next you should know the difficulty of the coin which you cannot Google as the difficulty keeps constantly changing from time to time. However whattomine.com website has this information and it gets updated every now and then.
Go to whattomine.com and the very first thing that you’ll notice is several fields for most commonly used graphic card models. Top row is for AMD cards and bottom row is for NVIDIA cards. If your GPU model is listed there then all you have to do is just enter the number of GPU. For ex: enter 3 in 1060 field if you have 3 GTX1060 and click on 1060. Make sure it is in Green and all the other fields are turned off. Remember that AMD cards are highlighted in Red and NVIDIA cards are highlighted in Green. If you have a combination of different GPU models (mining rig) then enter its number and highlight them.
When you enter your card details you should see the hash rate of the card filling automatically for the particular algorithm. Now scroll down and enter your electricity cost. By default it is set to 0.1 $/KWH which is common in most states. Once you set this click on calculate. Based on your input it should now display the list of coins and algorithms that are profitable to mine in comparison with Ethereum.
The table displayed shows Name of the coin and its algorithm. Difficulty net hashrate of the coin. Est Rewards in 24 hours that is the amount of coins that you can obtain in 24 hrs using your GPU. Current exchange rate, Revenue in BTC (Bitcoin), Revenue in USD and profitability in %.
Note that the values displayed may or may not be accurate as the mining profitability varies greatly by minute due to the coin price and difficulty. We suggest you to only take this as a reference.
The site cannot list all the GPU models that are currently available at the market. However you can easily do some research online and decide which cards will be close enough to your GPU. For example NVIDIA GTX 970 is close to 1050TI and 1060 so you can consider those hash rates for GTX 970 and do a calculation.
Also if you own several mining rig with different model GPUs you can use the add new dataset feature at the top right corner. Instead of entering the GPU details each and every time you can just have a tabs set for all your mining rigs.
If you have previously mined a coin in any specific pool and know the hashrate of your GPU and pool fee you can use that to calculate the current estimate rewards. Please note that calculations are based on mean values, therefore your final result may vary.
Hope this guide has helped you in understanding and using What To Mine calculator. If so then do share it and stay tuned. We’ll be continuously publishing more articles about Crypto Mining.
I must thank you for the efforts you have put in writing this post. Since the market is down I have no idea on what to mine using my GPUs. Looking for some new alt-coins that has huge profitability.
There are also other good calculators on the market. Personally I like this calculator https://crypt0.zone/calculator. Its better than What to Mine.


Question: Respond in 2 sentences. Describe the professional career of Florian Harald Prohart.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Respond in 2 sentences. Describe the professional career of Florian Harald Prohart.

Florian Harald Prohart (born 12 January 1999) is an Austrian football player. He plays for SV Lafnitz.


Question: Hi there, I'm Phil Silver, an aspiring author looking to self-publish my books. I'm interested in learning more about publishing and would like guidance on the process. Is there anything you can do to help me?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Hi there, I'm Phil Silver, an aspiring author looking to self-publish my books. I'm interested in learning more about publishing and would like guidance on the process. Is there anything you can do to help me?

1,340 authors earning $100,000/year or more. Half of Them Are Indies.
We had to share the following figures and statements from AuthorEarnings.com. The figures below and summary is from their May 2016 report. There is some incredible facts and insights in there. We have pulled out some of those that surprised us the most and the data that is most relevant to indie authors. That’s what they term self-published. The key takeaway is more self-published authors are earning over 100,000 than traditionally published and small publishers. INCREDIBLE! We wouldn’t believe it either but the data proves this.
The fact above is incredible and reinforces our stance that you don’t need to secure a traditional publisher. It is not the guarantee of success many authors believe it to be. Even if after all the strife you finally secure a traditional publishing deal there are indie authors who self-published and are earning more than you.
Okay you say clearly if I self-publish I can outsell many traditionally published authors digitally. They must be making up the shortfall through all those print sales. WRONG. The chart below shows that even with a very generous 2X multiple applied (taking their digital sales and multiplying by 2 to cover potential print sales) Indie authors are still coming out on top. The 2 columns on the right are key.
The “Receive A Copy” button does not appear to be working so I’ll give you the same information here; Name: Phil Silver, Email Address: pnsilver@gmail.com.
Can you advice on how you can help in the publishing of my books.


Question: Have you heard of the new game Observer from Bloober Team Studios?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Have you heard of the new game Observer from Bloober Team Studios?

While Polish studio Bloober Team doesn’t have the most intimidating name in the world, their horror game released earlier this year, Layers of Fear, showed that they had a particular appetite for dread. Loaded as it was with Edgar Allan Poe clichés, Layers of Fear still hinted a certain mastery of perspective. The game’s strongest moments were when paintings and pedestrian items began to feel like instruments of a malicious trickster, a game where it felt like something was right behind you or crawling between the walls. Fear and its perceptions seem to be the driving force in their new and radically different looking game, Observer, announced during the PC Gaming Show at E3.
With the tagline “What would you do if your fears got hacked and used against you?” Observer seems like a game in a William Gibson world with cynicism exchanged for horror. A dark and sweaty apartment complex has its mouth full of cords and computer monitors, a black-and-white human eye gazing here and there having an unmistakable Gen-X, MTV vibe. Dazed and confused, the protagonist stumbles around the complex as, similar to Layers of Fear, the world transforms wildly around him.
Now instead of the work of disgruntled spirits, it feels like Observer’s hero is at the bane of a more postmodern and electric fiend. In its short demo footage, Observer also features what can only be described as the most impressive sad sack of disco lights I’ve ever seen in a videogame, a dead funk room I can imagine Thom Yorke excusing himself from.
The demo ends with the discovery of someone in nothing but gym clothes and a kind of cyber helmet, the main character calmly extending a wire from their arm into their head, suggesting we’ll be playing as someone who knows more than we will. In fact, they’re a member of a special police unit that hacks minds and memories.
Layers of Fear illustrated that Bloober Team enjoyed literary atmospheres much more than they may were able to craft a new one. Transferring some of that gothic loathing into a more sci-fi avenue could prove rewarding, so while there’s still little info on it, this makes Observer a game worth, uh, observing.


Question: Describe the Swedisch Tank Special in World of Tanks.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the Swedisch Tank Special in World of Tanks.

The latest addition to the national roster of World of Tanks, Sweden rolls some very interesting vehicles out to the battlefield - powerful autoloaders and sneaky tank destroyers, featuring the unique Siege Mode mechanic!
Join the vikings this weekend and enjoy some nice discounts and engaging missions for the Swedish tanks!
*Important: the missions in this package can only be completed on the Strv S1 after the First Victory of the Day bonus is used up, and will expire on 30 July.
This special will be active from 22 April at 07:00 until 25 April at 07:00 CEST (UTC +2).


Question: What can you tell me about the murder of Jo Cox? Respond in 25 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What can you tell me about the murder of Jo Cox? Respond in 25 sentences.

Thomas Mair has given his name as “death to traitors, freedom for Britain” during his appearance in court charged with the murder of Labour MP Jo Cox.
Mair, 52, from Birstall, was formally charged at Westminster magistrates court on Saturday with the murder of Joanne Cox, grievous bodily harm, possession of a firearm with intent to commit an indictable offence and possession of an offensive weapon.
Asked to confirm his name, Mair said: “My name is death to traitors, freedom for Britain.” The judge then asked the defendant’s lawyers to confirm that his name was Thomas Mair, which they did.
Mair was not required to enter a plea and his lawyer Keith Allen said there was no indication of what plea would be given. He also told the court that legal aid had been applied for.
Cox was killed on Thursday lunchtime outside Birstall public library, where she had been planning to run a constituency surgery. The 41-year-old MP for Batley and Spen was declared dead at 1.48pm after being shot several times and stabbed.
Prosecutor David Cawthorne, from the counter-terrorism division of the Crown Prosecution Service, told the court that Cox had visited a primary school and care home on Thursday morning, before heading to the library with colleagues for a pre-arranged surgery with her constituents. She was stabbed and fell to the ground, where she was shot and stabbed further.
Bernard Kenny, 77, was waiting for his wife in his car outside the library, Cawthorne said.
Kenny had recognised Cox and saw a man approach and stab her. He intervened and was stabbed in the abdomen and retreated into a nearby sandwich shop, the court heard.
No indication was given as to how Mair would plead and he was remanded in custody until a bail application hearing on Monday. The prosecution later confirmed that, because of the nature of the offence and the victim, the protocol was to hear the case in London.
Vigils for Cox were held in her constituency and around the country on Friday as tributes were paid across the political spectrum.
Her party leader, Jeremy Corbyn, said the MP had been killed by a “well of hatred”, and the prime minister, David Cameron, insisted society must redouble its efforts to embrace the values of tolerance and community that Cox triumphed.
Parliament has been recalled on Monday to allow MPs to pay tribute, and the Conservatives, Liberal Democrats and Ukip have all said they will not contest Cox’s vacant seat of Batley and Spen at a byelection.
The EU referendum campaign was paused for a second day on Saturday, with both sides agreeing not to hold events until Sunday at the earliest.
An appeal in Cox’s name raised more than £260,000 in less than 24 hours to support charities working to counter loneliness, challenge extremism, and fund search and rescue workers in Syria.
Doreen Lawrence, the Labour peer whose son Stephen was killed in 1993, said there were no words that could express what it feels like to have a young person whose “life is still full of possibility, brutally snatched away from you”. Writing in the Guardian, she said the hopes and dreams of Cox’s family had been “shredded in one foul afternoon”.
Lady Lawrence warned that a message of hatred against foreigners or people with different religions had been getting louder in the UK and US, citing the Republican presidential candidate, Donald Trump. She criticised comments by Boris Johnson about Obama’s ancestry and said a poster unveiled by Nigel Farage on Thursday was reminiscent of Nazi propaganda.
The Vote Leave campaign has cancelled events, including a rally in Birmingham where Johnson was due to speak, while Britain Stronger In Europe said it was scrapping more than 2,000 events, including street stalls and a speech by Corbyn in Manchester. When the campaign did resume, it was unlikely to be fought at the same intensity as before, sources said.


Question: What is "Stenaria"?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What is "Stenaria"?

Stenaria is a genus of flowering plants in the family Rubiaceae. It is a small genus, consisting of around six species native to the United States, Mexico, and The Bahamas. All species of "Stenaria" are restricted to Mexico and the southwestern United States, except for the wide-ranging "Stenaria nigricans" which extends northward and eastward.


Question: Describe the species "Solanum lanuginosum"

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the species "Solanum lanuginosum"

"Solanum lanuginosum" is a flowering plant species in the nightshade family (Solanaceae). It probably belongs to those species formerly in "Solanum" but nowadays placed in "Lycianthes", though its exact identity and name remain undetermined.
It is endemic to Ecuador, but may be almost extinct due to habitat loss.


Question: What is the population and location of Aq Dagh-e Olya?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What is the population and location of Aq Dagh-e Olya?

Aq Dagh-e Olya (, also Romanized as Āq Dāgh-e ‘Olyā; also known as Āgh Dāgh Kūh, Āqdāgh-e Bālā and Āqdāgh Rūd) is a village in Qaranqu Rural District, in the Central District of Hashtrud County, East Azerbaijan Province, Iran. At the 2006 census, its population was 109, in 21 families.


Question: What did Leonardo da Vinci know about 3D imaging?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What did Leonardo da Vinci know about 3D imaging?

A copy of the Mona Lisa in the Prado Museum (left) is painted from a slightly different perspective than the original in the Louvre (right). Together, the paintings make a stereoscopic image — whether da Vinci knew that or not.
Leonardo da Vinci was, to put it mildly, a smart guy. He was an inventor and scientist as well as an artist, and he took a special interest in finding ways to realistically render three-dimensional forms on a flat canvas. And now, a pair of researchers say that in the early 1500s he might have created the world’s first 3-D image.
Even more surprising: It’s the Mona Lisa.
Or to be more exact, it’s both the Mona Lisa you know, in the Louvre, and a copy housed in the Prado Museum in Madrid. Researchers in Germany argue that the Prado version was painted in da Vinci’s studio at the same time, from a slightly different position. The distance between the two perspectives is very close to the distance between a person’s eyes, creating a stereoscopic 3-D effect when the two are combined.
The team has followed up with further study of the paintings, to be published in the journal Leonardo, that uses the perspective shift to suggest that the paintings’ mountainous background was painted on a flat canvas and hung behind the subject, like a background in a modern portrait studio.
The Prado painting was long considered unremarkable, just one of many anonymous copies later made of the original Mona Lisa, known as La Joconde in French and La Gioconda in Italian. Da Vinci painted the original portrait of Lisa Gherardini, wife of Francesco del Giocondo, in the early 1500s. The Prado copy’s background was black, and it was coated in heavy varnish. In 2012, the Louvre requested the copy for display at an exhibition and asked a Prado researcher if it had ever been studied. The researcher looked at the painting under an infrared camera and discovered that underneath the black paint was the same background as in the original, a hilly landscape. The black paint has now been removed, and further imaging has revealed layers with the same changes and corrections made to the original. It appears that the two paintings may have been painted at the same time, in the same place, both artists tweaking the work in the same ways.
If true, differences in the two paintings indicate the Prado version was probably painted by a student, a practice fairly common in Leonardo’s studio.
The re-creation has da Vinci standing to the right of the other artist, and a little farther from the subject. “They did not stand just side to side. This would have changed the perspective dramatically, because a body is about 60 centimeters wide,” Carbon says. “So the first person stands a little to the side but also a little bit more ahead of the other,” Carbon says. This setup would have minimized the perspective distance between the artists.
One way to see the 3-D effect is to look at two stereoscopic images side by side with the field of view of each eye crossed in front of you. You might remember the kids’ books that have two images that you hold right in front of your eyes and then slowly pull back while practicing a thousand-yard stare until, pop! The two images merge into one 3-D picture.
To see the two Mona Lisas in 3-D, the same principle would apply. The paintings would be viewed side-by-side with the viewer’s eyes converged in front of them (or with the eyes looking farther apart, a similar technique called parallel viewing).
The two images can also be tinted red and cyan and then viewed through old-school red-and-blue 3-D glasses to get the same effect. The researchers tinted electronic versions of the two paintings, and voila. Dig out some 3-D glasses for this one (plus see more here on Carbon’s website).
“It is ‘wow,’” Carbon says. “And this is 330 years before the first stereogram was invented,” says Carbon. In 1838, British scientist Charles Wheatstone invented a stereoscope that used mirrors to combine the left-eye and right-eye views of a drawing into a 3-D scene.
DaVinci did write about monocular and binocular vision, and studied aspects of optics including eye anatomy and light reflection, and he even experimented with colored light sources. But it’s not clear whether he put all the pieces together to understand how to create a stereoscopic image. The paintings don’t quite make a perfect stereo pair, the researchers say, but a good one for being 500-year-old paintings.
To begin with, not all experts accept that the Prado painting was made simultaneously alongside the original, and da Vinci’s writings don’t explicitly describe a stereoscopy experiment like that suggested by Carbon and Hesslinger. “Any study should be founded historically on Leonardo's knowledge of parallax and his discussions of binocular vision in relation to representation,” says Martin Kemp, an Oxford University expert on da Vinci who has written extensively about artists’ historical use of perspective.


Question: Describe the Universal Vare Charter School. Respond in 6 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the Universal Vare Charter School. Respond in 6 sentences.

Universal Vare Charter School, formerly the Edwin H. Vare Junior High School, is a historic junior high school building located in the Wilson Park neighborhood of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. It is currently a charter school run by Universal Family of Schools. The building was designed by Irwin T. Catharine and built in 1922–1924. It is a three-story, 17 bay, brick building on a raised basement in the Colonial Revival-style. It is in the shape of a shallow "W." It features an entrance pavilions with arched openings, pilasters, and a brick parapet.
The building was added to the National Register of Historic Places in 1988.


Question: Who is Giorgos Koltzos?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Who is Giorgos Koltzos?

Giorgos Koltzos (; born 13 September 1976) is a footballer. He currently plays left back for Levadiakos F.C..


Question: Describe the efforts of Eviation to develop electric aircraft for regional travel. Respond in detail.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the efforts of Eviation to develop electric aircraft for regional travel. Respond in detail.

Venture capital-backed Eviation is looking to develop small electric aircraft.
The firm sees regional travel as underserved by aviation.
A test flight of its electric plane is scheduled for 2019.
An Israeli start-up has claimed an electric plane it is building will revolutionize commuter travel and it's getting ready to ask the public to help finish the project.
Eviation is developing a nine-passenger aircraft designed to fly up to 650 miles at around 240 knots (276 miles per hour). A commercial jet would cruise around 500 miles per hour. The electric plane is designed for the sort of distances usually conducted by train.
The company's chief executive, Omer Bar-Yohay, told CNBC Thursday that there is a global need for short regional flights that current commercial aviation can't fill.
"If you want to travel 100 or 200 miles and there is a high-speed rail connection then you are lucky. If not you are sitting in the car and stuck in traffic as general aviation offers no solution," he said.
The company boss said if Eviation can build a cheap and safe plane then he expected existing operators would buy it in order to seize on the "underserved" regional market.
A rendered image of the Eviation Alice. An electric aircraft designed to take 9 passengers up to 650 miles at 240 knots.
Bar-Yohay said his full-scale prototype aircraft, named "Alice Commuter", should be ready for a test flight in early 2019. He said the next step would be ramping up to commercial production and explained that Eviation was founded inside a shell company in the U.S. in order to draw on public cash.
"The reason we did it this way is because we understood that we will have a great prototype and a really good story, way before we have a product," he said.
"And the kind of millions that is needed to build this is significant so we are looking at the public equity markets as a sort of crowdfunding on steroids."
Bar-Yohay said the firm had not yet asked the public for investor cash but that day was "coming soon". This would be done through an initial public offering (IPO).
Airbus has also shown its hand in attempting to develop electric flight technology with its Efan project. Eviation's CEO predicted that the European aerospace giant would likely display a "very interesting hybrid" at next year's Paris Airshow and welcomed the competition.
"Efan has pushed at the door of what can be certified and that has allowed the groundwork to be done for our aircraft to be built. We will not need waivers or changes for our own certification," he said.
Bar-Yohay also pointed to lightweight materials developed for the Boeing 787 and Airbus 350 that were helping his own project get off the drawing board and into the air.
South Korea's Kokam was signed up as a battery supplier in February. Eviation has said the battery, distributed through the plane, will account for as much as 60 percent of the maximum takeoff weight.
"If you take state or art lightweight material and best batteries and accept that you are traveling slower, lower and for shorter distances, you can do it," said Bar-Yohay .
The Eviation CEO said obvious markets for short regional air travel existed in the United States and the United Kingdom where a high number of small airfields were already in place.


Question: How can I test how my title tag will look in Google search results?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 How can I test how my title tag will look in Google search results?

Just discovered this the other day and wanted to share. Want to be extra sure that your title tag is going to look right in Google results? Try this quick hack that only requires a browser (a real browser, not Edge).
Notice how, in the gif below, that Google will truncate and add ellipses dynamically if the title tag changes in the DOM. Obviously this is not the tool to use for a large number of titles, but if you have a few really important URLs you want to test, this is probably the most accurate way.


Question: Describe the exchange between Prime Minister Netanyahu and President Erdogan in response to the riots in Gaza.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the exchange between Prime Minister Netanyahu and President Erdogan in response to the riots in Gaza.

Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu responded to Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s charge that his hands are “stained with Palestinian blood” following the deadly riots on the Gaza Strip Monday.
“A man who sends thousands of Turkish soldiers to hold the occupation of northern Cyprus and invades Syria will not preach to us when we defend ourselves from an attempted infiltration by Hamas,” Netanyahu told Erdogan.
“A man whose hands are stained with the blood of countless Kurdish citizens in Turkey and Syria is the last one who can preach to us about combat ethics,” Netanyahu added.
“He has the blood of Palestinians on his hands and can’t cover up crimes by attacking Turkey,” Erdogan added.
In a tweet, the president said Palestinians are not terrorists and Hamas is only defending the Palestinian homeland against Israel as an occupying power.
Erdoğan had called Netanyahu “the PM of an apartheid state that has occupied a defenseless people’s lands for 60 more years in violation of U.N. resolutions.
“He has the blood of Palestinians on his hands and can’t cover up crimes by attacking Turkey,” Erdoğan said in an English-language Twitter post in response to earlier remarks made by Netanyahu.


Question: Respond in 77 words. What do people think about states opting out of federally mandated programs if the federal government doesn’t help pay for them?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Respond in 77 words. What do people think about states opting out of federally mandated programs if the federal government doesn’t help pay for them?

Most voters continue to believe states should be able to ignore federal programs they don’t like, especially if the federal government doesn’t help pay for them.
Support for states’ rights jumps higher when the question involves federally mandated programs with no checks attached. Sixty-three percent (63%) of voters think states should have the right to opt out of such programs if the federal government doesn’t help pay for them. Twenty-one percent (21%) disagree and 16% are undecided.


Question: Describe the current situation of Gaston Cazares and why he was deported.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the current situation of Gaston Cazares and why he was deported.

Gaston Cazares, a 45-year-old father of two U.S citizens and spouse of 22 years to another U.S citizen, was deported by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials on Thursday under the new administration's policies.
Cazares moved to California illegally from a small town in Mexico when he was 16. He said where he lived the only job available was to work in the mines, "I thought to myself I need to do something better for me, my future and my family." He had heard people say that "America was the land of opportunity," so he moved to San Diego a in search of a better life.
Since living in the U.S, he's worked, paid taxes and become a pillar in his community.
“I've paid taxes since the first year I moved to the United States. I've tried to do everything the best," said Cazares. "I always dreamed of being legal in this country and I know the only way is by the doing the right things."
He's worked for the same company the last 15 years. His boss called him one the best employees they has ever had and said losing him would be a huge blow to the business.
"He’s a really hard worker. One of the best workers here. He wouldn't be here 15 years or any company 15 years if he wasn’t," he said in an interview with UndocuMedia. "He’s been very responsible. He works five six seven days, whatever it takes. We've had a good relationship, Gaston and I over those 15 years. He works at all facets in this business and we really need him here."
In 2011, he was arrested during a raid at his workplace and spent two months in a federal jail. He was granted humanitarian discretion and allowed to stay in the county under the condition that he would present himself to the ICE office whenever requested, typically once a year. He has never missed a check-in since.
"I did it every year until January of this year," he said. "It was only four days since Trump was sworn in as president when I came to the routine visit at the ICE office downtown. I was surprised when they said they were going to deport me, because there was a new law that made me deportable."
In April, his attorney submitted a petition for humanitarian discretion along with a petition from Congressman Juan Vargas requesting ICE provide discretion to Cazares' case. "The boy is emotionally dependent on his father, who helps him get by," the lawyer said. "I do not have the slightest doubt that being a person with autism will pay the consequences," he added.
Three months later, Cazares got a letter telling him to report back to ICE on Sept. 28, 2017 for deportation.
"I ask, please let me stay here with my family, they need me." That was the last thing Cazares said before immigration officials ruled to deport him and it was carried out the same day.
Less than an hour after he entered federal offices, and despite his legal team being asked to apply the law in a humane manner, the authorities proceeded to deport him and transported him to Tijuana.
His lawyer went outside to inform his family. He wasn't even granted a moment to say goodbye.
Cazares told reporters before his hearing Thursday that he was heartbroken at the thought of leaving his wife of 23 years and both his teenage children, all of whom are American citizens. He said he was worried for his family and his priority was to find a job in Tijuana so he could continue to support them as he has for the last 23 years.
His daughter is graduating from high school this spring and said she cannot imagine her father, who drove her to school every morning since kindergarten, not being there.
His son Ivan has autism. His well-being and progress heavily relies on the consistency and guidance of his father.
The activist organization UndocuMedia started the campaign #weareallgaston and created a donation page to raise money for Gaston and his family while they figure out how to move forward. Click here to find out what you can do to help.


Question: Provide information about Brazos Island. Respond in 2 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Provide information about Brazos Island. Respond in 2 sentences.

Brazos Island, also known as Brazos Santiago Island, is a barrier island on the Gulf Coast of Texas in the United States, south of the town of South Padre Island. The island is located in Cameron County.


Question: What are your thoughts on Meghan Markle joining the royal family?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What are your thoughts on Meghan Markle joining the royal family?

So, Britain has a black princess (or a “biracial” one, as the princess herself would have it). Along with anticipation of the dress and gossip about her extended family has come a debate about how much Meghan Markle will transform both the royal family and perceptions of blackness and Britishness. It’s a debate as dysfunctional as the Windsors themselves.
According to the 2011 census, 2.3 million people in Britain are either married to, or living with, someone of a different ethnicity. The excitement and, for some, apprehension at Harry doing the same is a reflection not of how much the monarchy is being modernised, but of how anachronistic it really is.
In today’s celebrity culture, Meghan may actually be the most authentic royal of them all. In the past, the mystique of the royals derived from the distance between their lives and those of their subjects and from the secrecy with which they surrounded their affairs. Now, the royals capture the imagination for exactly the opposite reason: they’ve become a soap opera in which their every sneeze is splashed across the gossip pages. Welcome to Meghan’s world.
Nor can I work out why adding a few more black dukes and duchesses, or even kings and queens, should be a step forward. Equality does not mean making inherited privilege more “diverse”. It requires us to get rid of the whole shebang. Adding a splash of colour to a feudal relic is not my idea of social progress.


Question: Describe the LGBT Legacy Wall program at Illinois Wesleyan University.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the LGBT Legacy Wall program at Illinois Wesleyan University.

Many students, community members, faculty and staff attended the LGBT Legacy Wall exhibit.
BLOOMINGTON, Ill.— Illinois Wesleyan University has received another NASPA award for excellence in student programming.
NASPA’s Gender and Sexuality Knowledge Community will award Illinois Wesleyan with an Exemplary Program Award for the University’s Queer Lives series of programs from the 2015-16 academic year. The award will be presented March 14 at the national conference of NASPA, the professional organization of student affairs administrators in higher education.
In their nominating materials, organizers noted that one of the obstacles for LGBTQ+ student persistence is the lack of visible and available role models through which students with marginalized sexual identities can see their future potential and successes embodied.
Alumnus Jason Dennis '00 spoke at the Pride Alumni Community Homecoming brunch in 2015.
The series provided opportunities for all students, but especially for LGBTQ+ students, faculty and staff to connect with role models whose lives model ignited passion, democratic citizenship and social justice activism, according to Vice President for Student Affairs and Dean of Students Karla Carney-Hall.
In Illinois Wesleyan’s application for the award, Carney-Hall noted that she believes the Queer Lives Series is deserving of the award because it was “empowering, collaborative, and impactful” for Illinois Wesleyan’s campus climate.
The six programs included a documentary film God Loves Uganda; an appearance by spoken word poet Katie Wirsing; Pride Alumni Community speaker Jason Dennis ’00; selections from the Off-Broadway musical Witness Uganda, which were presented live at Illinois Wesleyan; a presentation on middle sexualities; and a two-week display of the LGBT Legacy Wall. Organizers said the LGBT Legacy Wall, an exhibit depicting dozens of queer individuals from history representing disciplines from the sciences to religious figures, was one of most well-received programs in the series.
In November, Illinois Wesleyan received the NASPA Region IV-East Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Award, which is presented to a college or university office, department or division demonstrating achievement in creating an inclusive campus environment.


Question: What can you tell me about Portree High School?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What can you tell me about Portree High School?

Portree High School (Gaelic: ) is a state co-educational comprehensive school in Portree, Isle of Skye in Scotland. , the school enrols 520 pupils and employs 55 teachers. The school's catchment area draws from 15 primary schools across Skye and neighbouring Raasay. The school also has a hostel with boarding provisions for a small number of pupils who live in more remote areas of the island.
A school has existed at Portree since the 17th century. However it closed in 1825 due to the difficulty in finding a new qualified schoolmaster. Construction on the Portree High School buildings began in 1872. In 1905 it became a Higher Grade school. Margaret Carnegie Hostel for girls being opened in 1924, followed in 1933 by the Elgin Hostel for boys. Elgin Hostel is now a Category B listed building.


Question: Do you think Tarell Basham will be successful in the Colts' new defensive scheme?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Do you think Tarell Basham will be successful in the Colts' new defensive scheme?

INDIANAPOLIS – The thing about Tarell Basham’s rookie season: No one ever seemed to sugarcoat it. No coachspeak from up top, no spin from the coordinator, no let’s-just-give-him-time from the general manager, and certainly no excuses from the third-round pick who drifted into irrelevance for much of the year before a hard dose of humility stirred him back to life.
The NFL will do that to you. Does it to most rookies. Did it to Tarell Basham.
For a while, the coaches wouldn’t play him. At one juncture, the GM called him out on the radio. “We need more out of Basham,” Chris Ballard said midseason, comments he didn’t regret then and doesn’t regret now. “We need him to grow up and continue to show us he can be the pass-rusher we saw in college and, right now, he’s not there.” Even Basham himself called it like it was: “I’m probably not where they need me to be,” he confessed at one point.
There are no shortcuts in this league. He had to learn that. Took him six months, but he did.
The flashes did come, finally – his would-be-clinching sack in Cincinnati, a recovered punt late in the loss at Baltimore, repeated bursts on special teams – but only after Basham began to understand games aren’t won on Sundays but Tuesdays, Wednesdays, Thursdays. In college he’d coast through workouts and ball out on game day. In the pros, if he coasted in practice, he’d end up on the inactives list.
Now the page flips, and everything changes.
Enter: A new defensive system.
Enter: A fresh chance to flourish.
Perhaps no player on this roster will benefit more from the Indianapolis Colts’ defensive shift from three down linemen to four. Basham was admittedly lost last season, trying to acclimate himself to the rigors of the NFL, trying to learn the outside linebacker spot – a position he never once played in college – and trying to find a way onto the field. By midseason he was coming in on his off days, soaking in as much of the scheme as he could. Progress came. Came slowly, but it came.
The coaching staff overhaul this spring and subsequent move to new coordinator Matt Eberflus’ 4-3 front – “the system I was raised in,” Basham says, smiling – could prove the catalyst that unleashes the Colts’ next great pass rusher.
Doyel: Andrew Luck isn't throwing. The Colts are calm.
Central to the new scheme’s success are the defensive ends’ ability to get home – to get to the quarterback. The Colts haven’t had a pass rusher good enough to keep offensive coordinators up at night since Robert Mathis in 2013. This year, they need it more than ever. At least three former outside linebackers from the 3-4 system – Basham, Jabaal Sheard and John Simon – are moving to the line, their game-day duties changing dramatically. Instead of standing up and playing read-and-react football, the scheme has been simplified: Hand-in-dirt, go get the ball. Then do it again. And again. And again.
That’s just it: If the line doesn’t do its job, the defense won’t have a chance. This is how the Colts’ unit from the 2000s was constructed, bookended by two lethal QB-seekers. The whole thing worked because of Nos. 93 and 98.
Problem is, there’s no Dwight Freeney on this roster. No Robert Mathis, either, unless you’re scanning the coaching staff. The onus is on this new-look defensive line to make a substantial jump, and to relieve the pressure on a shaky and unsettled linebacking core. Plenty of that rests on the shoulders of Basham, the third-round pick from 2017 who needs to prove, if not this season then certainly the next, that he was worth the investment.
Good. Because it certainly is.
Early indications, incomplete and a little impetuous at this point – it’s still June, after all – are encouraging. For the first time in his career, Basham has been regularly running with the first-team defense during OTAs, opposite Sheard as the other starting defensive end, and ahead of Simon. Basham likes it.
But running with the ones in June and doing so in September are two very different things. Coaches routinely point out how drastically things can change once the pads go on in training camp, and how much shuffling the depth chart can see. Remember: Every spot on this defense remains up for grabs. Every single one.
Aiding Basham, seven weeks ahead of his second NFL training camp: A slimmed-down figure, 15 pounds of fat lost in favor of more explosion, more flexibility and more bend on the edge. He’ll need strength at his new position, sure. He’ll also need endurance. So many of Freeney and Mathis’ fourth-quarter sacks came on more persistence than power.
Maybe this is what a second-year player is supposed to say in the middle of summer, the grind of camp and the stress of the season still months away.
Maybe Basham’s really ready to make the jump.
Maybe the scheme change is exactly what he needs.
In any regard, his rookie season is over. Time to produce. And not just in flashes. Time to produce every single Sunday.
Like he said: Gotta love it when the stress is on.


Question: Describe the relationship between DHL and Formula 1. Respond in 4 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the relationship between DHL and Formula 1. Respond in 4 sentences.

At the beginning of the Formula 1 2018 season, DHL and Formula 1 are announcing an extension of their global partnership, which has existed since 2004. Within the framework of the agreement, DHL remains the Official Logistics Partner and becomes the first official partner of the F1 eSports Series.
Other joint initiatives are also planned, including fan festivals in core and growth markets of Formula 1, as well as new digital formats. Furthermore, DHL will continue to present the DHL Fastest Lap Award and the DHL Fastest Pit Stop Award, two prizes for exceptional performances by racing drivers and teams.


Question: Describe the game Kingsburg. Respond in 6 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the game Kingsburg. Respond in 6 sentences.

War is brewing as monstrous invaders gather on the far edges of the kingdom. Take command of a province on the border and make a name for yourself with Kingsburg, a game of city-building and courtly influence. In Kingsburg, you must influence the King`s advisors and the royal family, itself, to gain the resources you need to build structures, improve your province, and defend it from ruthless invaders. To prosper, you must outmaneuver your rival governors to gain the king`s favor. Only one governor will ascend to the Royal Council, so gather your resources, construct your buildings, and prepare your province - the future of Kingsburg is in your hands! This updated edition of Kingsburg features all the modules from the To Forge a Realm expansion, as well as the brand-new `Alternate Advisor Rewards` module, which adds more options for developing your province.


Question: Have you heard of Danney Williams' efforts to get a DNA test from Bill Clinton?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Have you heard of Danney Williams' efforts to get a DNA test from Bill Clinton?

Earlier this year, Williams called upon incumbent President Barack Obama as well as Clinton’s former mistress Monica Lewinsky to help him get DNA samples from the former US president.
In a Facebook post on Wednesday, Williams thanked everyone who has followed his journey in 2016 to uncover the truth about President Bill Clinton being his father.
“I held two press conferences (i.e. in Las Vegas and Washington, D.C) and partook in a lot of interviews across the country in attempt to reach out to my father. At this time, my attorney and I have not heard anything from President Clinton, ” he said.
On November 23, he tweeted, “I’m preparing to take @billclinton to court for a paternity suit. I need the help of my supporters” along with a link to his GoFundMe page.
In October this year, Williams uploaded a mini-documentary video to YouTube in which which he says he regularly tells his children that Clinton is his father.
“Recently I have been telling my kids that their grandfather was the president of the United States and they’re amazed by it, they’re like ‘No. Is it for real?’ I tell them yes, he is my father and I will make sure you get to meet him one day,” he says in the video.
He also says that growing up, his family would receive ‘seven $100 bills’ each month by mail as well as Christmas presents delivered by Arkansas state troopers, but it all stopped when Clinton became president in 1993.
Williams has long claimed that his poverty-stricken prostitute mother met Clinton when she was working on the streets of Little Rock, Arkansas. He claims she told him Clinton slept with her back in the 1980’s on at least 13 occasions while he was still governor of Arkansas.
Williams has been asking for a DNA test from Bill Clinton for decades. The Clintons claimed there was a DNA test conducted in 1999 which disproved Bill was the father, but it was later reported that such a test was never conducted.
“The so called DNA test allegedly conducted by the STAR tabloid in 1999 which supposedly proved that Danney Williams is not Bill Clinton’s son is a FRAUD,” Williams said in an October Facebook post.
After the STAR tabloid was sold, D.C. insider Roger Stone went to the new owners to see the documentation on the test, but they admitted there is no test.
Caleb has written for and has articles published on world renowned websites such as World Net Daily, The Huffington Post, Intellihub, Natural News.com and Rense.com.


Question: Describe the studio album "The Way I'm Livin'" by Lee Ann Womack. Respond in 3 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the studio album "The Way I'm Livin'" by Lee Ann Womack. Respond in 3 sentences.

The Way I'm Livin' is the eighth studio album by American country music recording artist Lee Ann Womack. The album was released via Sugar Hill Records on September 23, 2014. Her first album in six years, following 2008's "Call Me Crazy", this album sees Womack embrace roots music and americana alongside neotraditional country rather than the country pop sound that was prevalent in several previous releases.


Question: Respond in 226 words. Describe the differences between Obama's transparency pledges and non-transparency pledges.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Respond in 226 words. Describe the differences between Obama's transparency pledges and non-transparency pledges.

PolitiFact is doing some great work fact-checking politicians, pundits, prognosticators and the other individuals that inhabit the Federal District. The Obameter, which tracks how successful Obama is in enacting the 500+ campaign pledges he made as a candidate, is one of my favorite features of the website.
The President's track record on his 35 transparency-related pledges is unimpressive: 21 have had no progress at all, seven are in the works, three were passed but in a compromised form, two were kept and two were broken.
For comparison, here is a graphical representation of Obama's 480 non-transparency pledges. 283 have had no progress, 120 are "In the Works,"14 are stalled, five have been broken, 11 pledges were kept but compromised and 47 have been kept.
The data clearly shows that President Obama has done a better job enacting non-transparency campaign pledges than transparency ones. He has kept more non-transparency pledges (9.79%) than transparency pledges (5.71%). He has compromised more on transparency pledges (8.57%) than non-transparency pledges (2.29%). Most disheartening, he has broken transparency pledges 5.5 times as often as non-transparency pledges (5.71% of transparency pledges are broken vs. 1.04% of regular pledges).
Nine months past inauguration the excuses have run out. Obama's people are in place and they have established their routines. With 60 percent of his transparency pledges unfulfilled, Obama has shown his disdain for transparency.


Question: Explain why Bill Browder was arrested in Spain.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Explain why Bill Browder was arrested in Spain.

Bill Browder, a prominent critic of Vladimir Putin, has been released following his arrest in Spain on Wednesday morning under a Russian warrant.
The anti-corruption campaigner wrote on Twitter that he was freed from custody in Madrid after the Interpol general secretary in Lyon had advised them not to honour the Russian arrest warrant. He said it was the sixth time Russia had “abused” Interpol in his case.
As head of the Hermitage Capital Management investment fund, Browder led a campaign to expose corruption and punish Russian officials he blames for the 2009 death of Sergei Magnitsky, whom he employed as a lawyer.
He had earlier on Wednesday tweeted his arrest and posted a photo from the back of the police car.
He subsequently tweeted a picture of the arrest warrant, which said he was detained on suspicion of fraud.
Magnitsky was imprisoned on charges widely considered to be false, and died amid claims he was tortured.
His death prompted Browder, once the largest foreign portfolio investor in Russia, to work with the US Congress to pass the Magnitsky Act, which levied targeted sanctions against powerful players in Russia and has infuriated Putin.
The Magnitsky Act returned to the headlines in 2017 after it emerged that a lawyer supporting the Russian government’s position had met senior figures in Donald Trump’s US presidential campaign, including Trump’s son and son-in-law.
Russia placed Browder on the Interpol wanted list last year, apparently exploiting a loophole that lets countries unilaterally place individuals on the database used to request an arrest.
Browder said at the time that he had been alerted to the move by an email from the US Department of Homeland Security saying his “global entry status” had been revoked. Further calls confirmed he had been added to Interpol’s list via an arrest demand, known as a “diffusion”.
In what many western governments consider to be a vendetta against Browder, Moscow tried three times between 2012 and 2015 to get Interpol to issue arrest orders against him, but failed to convince the organisation that its motives were not political.
In 2016, the Council of Europe criticised Russia’s attempts to seek Browder’s arrest through Interpol, calling the efforts “abuses” of the system.
Russian state investigators last year separately named Browder as the suspect responsible for the mysterious deaths of three men linked to a massive £174m tax-fraud scheme discovered by Magnitsky and believed to have involved Russian officials.
Browder said the reason he was in Madrid was to give evidence to the senior Spanish anti-Russian mafia prosecutor Jose Grinda about what he described as the “huge amount of money from the Magnitsky case that flowed to Spain”.


Question: Who was David Price? Respond in 1 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Who was David Price? Respond in 1 sentences.

David Price (1762 – 16 December 1835) was a Welsh orientalist and officer in the East India Company.


Question: Discuss the concept of corporate greed in relation to the current political climate.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Discuss the concept of corporate greed in relation to the current political climate.

It was during the French Revolution – as the story goes – upon discovery that the starving peasants were out of bread, Queen Marie Antoinette made the profound announcement “let them eat cake,” Both debated, however, rather she said it and if so, what was meant by it. Was she so removed from her people and the struggles of the kingdom she ruled, that her words were cavalier as she noted all the cake in the room? Or did she look around at all she had, and the mounds of cake leftover from the decadent affair for the ruling class, and ordered it to be delivered to her subjects so they would have food to eat?
In the end, it doesn’t matter. Let them eat cake has come to symbolize the emotionless greed of the oligarchs in charged. And after the sweeping tax cuts heralded by Trump and rammed through by the GOP, I doubt very seriously if those greedy, cowardly ‘leaders’ on the hilly swamp would even throw their subjects bread.
I feel for other people when they have less but I don,t let anybody take advantage of me.
Relevant links like this one enhance the conversation, but please, at a minimum say “Hi.” Dropping off a link without a word, is unwelcoming at best. Nonetheless, thank you for sharing with The Neighborhood.
In the age of globalization where capital can flow freely across borders, it is a “race to the bottom” for corporate taxes. It’s not fair, but it is the reality. Capital goes where tax rates are the lowest and regulations are the weakest. That is the nature of corporate greed.
To be fair though, the Republicans did give every income group a tax cut. It wasn’t just the rich. The middle class will have more money in their pocket, not just the rich.


Question: "Who do you think should be Rookie of the Year?"

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 "Who do you think should be Rookie of the Year?"

Who has been the best rookie this season -- Ben Simmons or Donovan Mitchell?
Which rookie postseason star is the real ROY?
This year's NBA Rookie of the Year debate, one of the most fiercely contested in some time, has continued raging well after awards ballots were due two and a half weeks ago.
While most rookies either play small roles for contending teams or put up bigger per-game numbers on lottery-bound ones, Donovan Mitchell of the Utah Jazz and Ben Simmons of the Philadelphia 76ers have been driving forces in their teams' advancing to the second round of the playoffs.
As Mitchell and Simmons continue to shine on a bigger stage, let's revisit the question: Who has been this year's most valuable rookie?
The case for Mitchell as Rookie of the Year centered largely on his leading role in the Jazz's offense. Utah's 48 wins during the regular season were the most by a team led in scoring by a rookie since the 1989-90 San Antonio Spurs, who won 56 games behind rookie David Robinson (who was 24 at the time, having spent four years in college and two more serving in the Navy).
A focus on scoring does a disservice to Simmons' involvement in the 76ers' attack. While both Joel Embiid (22.9 ppg) and JJ Redick (17.1 ppg) scored more points than Simmons (15.8 ppg), Simmons ranked fifth in the league with 8.2 assists per game -- more than double Mitchell's 3.7 assist average.
Last season, I introduced the stat "combined usage" to quantify a player's role in the offense as both a scorer and a passer, adding the percentage of the team's plays that he finished with a shot, trip to the free throw line or turnover (traditional usage rate) to those on which he handed out an assist. While Mitchell still comes out slightly ahead, both players played historically large roles for rookies on winning teams.
Although Mitchell and Simmons operated in very different styles -- Mitchell creating primarily for himself, Simmons primarily for others -- their overall offensive value as rookies was similar. Basketball-Reference.com's box plus-minus metric (BPM) gives Mitchell the slight edge (plus-1.3 offensive BPM to Simmons' 1.0), as does ESPN's real plus-minus (plus-1.7 for Mitchell, plus-1.5 for Simmons).
Although Mitchell might deserve the nod as offensive Rookie of the Year, Simmons distinguishes himself at the defensive end of the court. Mitchell entered the league advertised as a strong defender -- that was probably considered his better skill as a prospect -- and lived up to expectations as part of the NBA's second-best defense during the regular season.
Nonetheless, Simmons was the more valuable defender. Part of that is simply about size and positional value. The 6-foot-3 Mitchell naturally matched up almost exclusively against perimeter players, whereas the 6-foot-10 Simmons was one of the league's most versatile defenders. He defended both guard spots and both forward spots at least 20 percent of the time and none more than 30 percent, per Second Spectrum matchup data, which tracks a player's defensive assignment for the majority of a given play.
Then there were Simmons' box-score contributions on defense. He rebounded nearly 20 percent of opponents' missed shots, making him above average for a power forward. Simmons was one of 16 regular players (minimum 1,000 minutes) in the league to average at least two steals per 100 team plays on defense and block at least 2 percent of opponent 2-point attempts.
In an era when few rookies are immediately productive, Simmons, in particular, stood as an exception. His 10.1 wins above replacement player (WARP) by my metric ranked fourth among all rookies in the one-and-done era.
By this metric, Mitchell -- 24th in the one-and-done era with 5.2 WARP -- was less exceptional. But switching to RPM supports the notion that this was one of the strongest Rookie of the Year battles in recent memory. Both Simmons and Mitchell rank among the top 10 rookies of the past 18 seasons by RPM wins above replacement (WAR), which dates to 2000-01 -- as does Jayson Tatum of the Boston Celtics, the likely third-place finisher in Rookie of the Year voting.
Given how effective they were during the regular season, it's all the more remarkable that Mitchell and Simmons have both been even better in the playoffs.
Just as it has become rare for rookies to contribute as much to winning teams as Mitchell and Simmons have, so too has it been out of the ordinary for them to be such big factors in the postseason. Back through 2000, this year's duo ranks among the top six rookies in WARP per game in a playoff run of at least six games.
Mitchell's playoff run has been compared to that of Dwyane Wade leading the Miami Heat to the second round in 2004, and that holds up in terms of advanced statistics. While Wade didn't shoulder as heavy an offensive load as Mitchell, who is finishing an incredible 32 percent of the Jazz's plays in the postseason, Wade handed out 6.9 assists per 100 team plays -- more than double Mitchell's playoff mark. As such, they were similarly valuable in the playoffs.
With Embiid sidelined the first two games, Simmons was Philadelphia's best player in a comfortable 4-1 series win over the Heat. Even after a seven-turnover performance in the 76ers' Game 1 loss to the Boston Celtics, Simmons is posting the most WARP per game by a rookie in an extended playoff run since Tim Duncan in 1998.
In three of the past four seasons, Mitchell would have been an easy choice for Rookie of the Year, and in 2015-16, his strong RPM would have given him a reasonable case over Towns' superior box score stats. It's to Mitchell's slight misfortune that he happens to be putting together a strong rookie campaign at the same time Simmons has posted one of the best in recent memory.
Fortunately, while only one can win Rookie of the Year, there's plenty of room for both Mitchell and Simmons to emerge as stars in this postseason and beyond.