Question: Describe the world in the year 2043. Respond in 44 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the world in the year 2043. Respond in 44 sentences.

The biggest technology enabler for this is our increased mastery of synthesized artificial photosynthesis; it will allow the orbital habitat to maintain an atmosphere. While the technology is still in early stage development, it holds the key to R&D in terraforming. Some of this research will be undergoing on the moon.
We will have started building a colony with the help of contour crafting, a 3D printing technology on the moon, using concrete & some steel. The mission will be strictly for research purpose. Terraforming will be an integral piece of the puzzle to revitalize organic food production and water purification at scale, as Earth struggles to keep pace with human demands in urban areas.
By 2043, we will be eying humanoid AI mission to Europa within the decade, to explore life, and carry out the terraforming technology if necessary.
Back on earth: Singapore, West Coast & North East Corridor USA, Germany, Japan, Korea, China, Brazil, the advanced internet metropoles in these borders will have driver-less electric vehicles operating in the inner city. These cars will interact with each other and keep the average traveling speed at 50 MPH. Tesla, Google, and Toyota will lead the pact in the sharing economies; most households will not have their own cars.
Fewer people will have the need to travel for work. Most workers telecommute through a virtual reality, which will be called the Third World.
Third World will be a virtual community held dear to most citizens. This new world will be organized by and oriented through skills—in tribal units. There will be no nationality or race in Third World. The main concern on the collective’s mind: data protection.
Our intellectual, productive lives, and entertainment will exist on server farms in the Antarctic. The mass consumers will not concern themselves with the meta layers that support the look and feel of the Third World. It will be duties of the hacker community to maintain balance within the open-sourced code base. Check and balances will be relying on crowd-sourced intelligence. Phishing activities will continue to reinvent itself, and this will be a constant worry for the Third World. Hacker ethic and AI will align interests to keep phishing pirates at bay. However, common Third World citizens will have their data stowed and recoverable with standard subroutine; including their wealth and life memories.
A lineal descent of Bitcoin currency will have been established for trade in the Third World. This currency is exchangeable to the real world, but very few people will have any need for US dollars or Yen—as the Fed and the national governments become less relevant to economic cycles.
Wired telephony infrastructure will be replaced by long-range WiFi technology with IPv6-legacy capability that protect individual identity. We can access the Third World with a blink of an eye, and the embedded chips under our ears will send us through the matrix. When we are not jacked in, we consume synthesized food, 3D printed with protein supplied by a common pool operated by private companies in each region. Organic and farmed food will no longer be cost efficient for day-to-day living in mega-cities.
Less fortunate rural areas will have no access to protein pipelines. However, two decades leading up to 2043 we will have observed inverse urbanization—with the wealthy opting to move out to open rural areas; these families will be able to afford AI powered, robotic farming, and sustain themselves with organic produce, free-range poultry, and grass-fed livestock.
The oil economy will see the beginning of its decline, and intercontinental travels will be prohibitively expensive temporarily within the decade after 2043. Electricity will be cheap as most economies will have adopted nuclear fission; operated by energy collectives from the Third World, which will have bought land from national governments for the establishments.
Renewable energy, however, will never live up to its promises. Hydrogen will be abundant from synthesized artificial photosynthesis and new aerospace companies will be developing both nuclear propulsion and hydrogen combustion engines; for both intercontinental and space travel.
Artificial Intelligence will be kept at bay consciously by humans. We will be reliant but largely afraid to augment human intelligence with AI. This will be a main contention point and debates will spur around this important cross-road for humanity in 2043. Humans will need to decide if the height of pure-human humanity can sustain itself without being augmented by AI; or shall we relinquish control and allow human-AI-hybrids, and welcome singularity?
We will largely rely on innovation by like-minded folks, organized by tribes within internet economies. Physical establishments will seize cease to matter. Wealth inequality will be ever more apparent: cyberpunk inner cities contrasting upper echelon rural estates. We will be entering the beginning of space habitation and exploration. Energy source will be undergoing a transition, and we will face a choice in the next human evolution.


Question: Explain why open access to publicly funded research in California is important and worth fighting for.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Explain why open access to publicly funded research in California is important and worth fighting for.

California's landmark open access bill, the California Taxpayer Access to Publicly Funded Research Act (AB 609), has stalled in the State Senate. But take heart—it is far from dead.
Due to some procedural glitches, the Senate Governmental Organization (G.O.) Committee hasn't been able to officially sign off on the bill. At last week's hearing, the bill barely missed out on a quorum, getting five yes votes and zero no votes. (The other members abstained.) However, the bill was granted reconsideration by the Chair of the G.O. That means the Committee will pick up the bill in January 2014, exactly where it left off.
That also means our work is far form over. This kind of delay can often be the vehicle for a slow, quiet death. But we, and the bill many other supporters, won't let that happen to open access.
In particular, we'll be fighting back against the misinformation campaigns being waged by certain large publishers. Over the next six months, we will be working to make it as clear as possible that public access to taxpayer funded research is more than just smart policy, financially feasible, and economically sound—it's an obvious step in the right direction.
The momentum is there. The bill flew through the State Assembly with a 71-7 bipartisan vote, and dozens of companies, publishers, and advocacy groups have put their weight behind this important legislation. The diversity of support for this bill shows just how many folks would benefit from such legislation: Companies and startups could use and analyze research for downstream innovation; certain publishers have developed profitable business models on top of open access policies; advocacy groups and activists would receive not just the latest research, but also better understanding of how taxpayer money is being spent.
California is home to cutting edge research and ideas. We're not going to let the publishers FUD campaign keep that work locked up behind paywalls. Stay tuned for ways you can help.


Question: What happened in the Quebec City mosque shooting and what have people been saying about it?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What happened in the Quebec City mosque shooting and what have people been saying about it?

January 30 2017, 7:49 p.m.
White House press secretary Sean Spicer exploited the attack to justify President Trump’s ban on immigrants from seven Muslim-majority countries. “It’s a terrible reminder of why we must remain vigilant and why the president is taking steps to be proactive rather than reactive when it comes to our nation’s safety and security,” Spicer said at this afternoon’s briefing when speaking of the Quebec City attack.
But these assertions are utterly false. The suspect is neither Moroccan nor Muslim. The Moroccan individual, Mohamed Belkhadir, was actually one of the worshippers at the mosque and called 911 to summon the police, playing no role whatsoever in the shooting.
The actual shooting suspect is 27-year-old Alexandre Bissonnette, a white French Canadian who is, by all appearances, a rabid anti-immigrant nationalist. A leader of a local immigration rights group, François Deschamps, told a local paper he recognized his photo as an anti-immigrant far-right “troll” who has been hostile to the group online.
The Globe and Mail added that he “was known in the city’s activist circles as a right-wing troll who frequently took anti-foreigner and anti-feminist positions and stood up for U.S. President Donald Trump.” And Bissonnette’s Facebook page — now taken down but still archived — lists among its “likes” the far-right French nationalist Marine Le Pen, Islam critics Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens, the Israeli Defense Forces, and Donald J. Trump (he also “likes” the liberal Canadian Party NDP along with more neutral “likes” such as Tom Hanks, the Sopranos, and Katy Perry).
It is usually the case that there is significant confusion in the wake of attacks of this sort. And local police did apparently arrest two suspects at first: Bissonnette along with Belkhadir. And until the investigation is complete, one cannot know for certain what the motives here were. One should be careful about trying to infer too much from a hodgepodge of Facebook “likes” and, this early, even anecdotal claims about Bissonnette’s political views. As for reports that someone yelled “Allahu akbar,” it is perfectly natural that someone in a mosque would say that upon seeing a homicidal killer randomly shooting people, or it’s possible that the shooter said it mockingly.
I fully condemn the shooting in Quebec City. But remember the shooters weren't yelling "Trump" they were yelling "Allahu akbar"
The only part of any of this that’s true is that it was an act of terrorism: terrorism aimed, yet again, at Muslims by someone who has apparently been indoctrinated with a great deal of hate toward them. Media outlets and the White House led people all over the world today to believe exactly the opposite.
Top photo: Police survey the scene after a deadly shooting at a mosque in Quebec City, Canada, Jan. 29, 2017.


Question: Respond in 2 sentences. Describe the life and work of Prof John Allan Fynes Rook CBE FRSE FIB FRIC.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Respond in 2 sentences. Describe the life and work of Prof John Allan Fynes Rook CBE FRSE FIB FRIC.

Prof John Allan Fynes Rook CBE FRSE FIB FRIC (1926–1987) was a 20th-century British chemist connected to the British dairy industry. He was President of the British Society of Animal Production 1982/83.


Question: Provide a description of Fatemiyeh, Iran. Respond briefly.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Provide a description of Fatemiyeh, Iran. Respond briefly.

Fatemiyeh (, also Romanized as Fāţemīyeh) is a village in Asemanabad Rural District, in the Central District of Chardavol County, Ilam Province, Iran. At the 2006 census, its population was 505, in 103 families.


Question: Describe the new environmental regulations for PV installations in Japan.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the new environmental regulations for PV installations in Japan.

The new policy would come into force in late 2019. PV players are warning the rule exacerbates costs and slows deployment but similar policies are in place for other types of renewables, and in most markets worldwide.
Concerns over the removal of forests for PV development in Japan have prompted the government to tighten environmental restrictions on solar.
Taiwanese analyst Energytrend reports the Japanese Ministry of Environment is looking to subject large scale PV farms to the nation’s Environment Impact Assessment Act, with the policy set to come into effect by next fall.
Until now investors had to submit solar project plans to the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry for review, Energytrend says, under Japan’s Electricity Business Act.
By 2016, the scale of deforestation caused by PV installation had risen twelvefold from 2012, Japan’s Forestry Agency reported, with 2,600 hectares replaced by large scale solar farms. Such extensive PV deployment has prompted opposition from environmental groups and residents, forcing local authorities to come up with solutions to keep citizens and business happy whilst adhering to climate change targets, in a nation where the Fukushima nuclear reactor meltdown in 2011 decisively turned the tide against nuclear.
As of June, 32 prefectures and 17 cities had put in place regulations to prevent citizen disputes, however Energytrend says such moves have not always been successful. The issues arising pertain to the protection of rare bird and insect species whose habitats are destroyed through PV deployment. In Fujinomiya City, in the Shizuoka prefecture for example, residents are concerned planned solar projects could spoil the landscape of Mount Fuji. Protests have led the Ministry of Environment to revise the Natural Parks Act to include provisions requiring investors to apply to the pertinent authorities to set up PV stations in national parks.
Creating a more streamlined regulatory regime – rather than a patchwork of acts depending on the location of plants – is one goal of the new policy. Subjecting utility scale solar farms to the Environment Impact Assessment Act would make citizen dialogue easier, says Energytrend. According to the act, investors would need to conduct site assessments and establish dialogue with residents before the construction and final planning of sites.
The ministry has yet to determine the minimum size of plant the act would apply to. An initial experts’ meeting on the matter was held by the Ministry of Environment on Thursday. Delegates reportedly discussed standards regarding the space occupied by solar farms and their impacts on landscape and ecology.
Energytrend says critics, mostly from the solar industry, have pointed out implementation of the rule would incur higher costs and slow deployment, threatening Japan’s ability to meet its 2030 renewable energy target.
However there are supporters of tougher regulation. The analysts quote Mitsuru Tanaka, a sociology professor at Hosei University, as an example. The professor says renewable energy generators should be obliged to comply with environmental protection just like other industries.
Such regulation is already in place for wind, hydro, geothermal, and nuclear plants, as well as large infrastructure projects including roads, urban enlargement schemes, airports, power lines and so on. Similar environmental regimes for PV are also in place in other markets, including the EU and North America. The EU, for example, requires a two-stage review process establishing high level and citizen dialogues, as well as the actual environmental review required for all new renewable energy generation sites.
For example, the operator of a 1 MW solar farm in Salmdorf, near Munich, was required to install a chainlink fence to allow animals such as hares and pheasants unimpeded access and also created a pond to provide a spawning ground for toads, under the ‘green toad scheme’, developed with the local authority. On the same site, a managed grassland for the repopulation of rare plants including the oxeye daisy, meadow salsify, spreading bellflower and others was established.


Question: What is the scientific name and common name of the carmine skimmer dragonfly?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What is the scientific name and common name of the carmine skimmer dragonfly?

Orthemis discolor, known generally as the carmine skimmer or orange-bellied skimmer, is a species of skimmer in the dragonfly family Libellulidae.


Question: Describe a place with a large collection of classic arcade games you have recently visited

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe a place with a large collection of classic arcade games you have recently visited

One of the highlights of my annual trips to the USA, is dropping by Pinball Wizard Arcade located in Pelham, New Hampshire. A short drive North of Boston, this arcade is ostensibly on the way to Funspot further up into New Hampshire. So if you’re in the area, you must turn off the I93 and make a point of visiting this fabulous arcade.
Set up five years ago by operator Sarah St John, the arcade houses without question, THE most impressive lineup of pinballs and classic video arcade games I’ve ever seen under one roof. Aside from the selection of machines, what sets this place apart from every other arcade I’ve visited, is Sarah’s commitment to making sure that everything is in solid, playable condition. I’m an annual visitor and can honestly say I’ve rarely found a machine there that wasn’t working. It’s this focus on the customer experience that makes this place a must-visit.
Sarah’s business model is slightly different to most pay-on-entry arcades, in that she still uses the token system. Entry is free, and visitors can buy tokens in incremental amounts from vending machines located throughout the arcade, and each machine has a price per play.
The arcade is located in an unassuming strip mall located just off the main road through Pelham.
Most are grouped by age, and as you’d expect, the majority are from the eighties – Party Zone, GameShow, Funhouse, Star Wars, Theatre of Magic. In fact, it’s pointless listing the pinball titles; think of a game released any time since 1976 or thereabouts and it’s probably here.
What is particularly unique about a visit to Pinball Wizard, is the ability to be able to play games from every decade one after the other – you get a real sense of how pinball grew and changed with the addition of new features that carried across all the titles through time.
The place is a treasure trove of arcade history. You’ll find your favorite titles alongside things you’ve never seen or heard of before. Everything is in great condition, monitors are adjusted properly, and it’s hard to find anything not working.
In short, Pinball Wizard is one of the best arcades in the world – without question. Sarah’s passion for the amusement business shines through the place, and she’s always happy to stop and talk pinball, and will gladly show you round the arcade and point out particularly interesting machines. If you’re in the area, go check it out and spend some coin!
Update March 2017: word has it that because of business lease issues, Pinball Wizard may be closing imminently. This has been on the cards for some time, but specifics have been difficult to clarify as negotiations with the landlord of the property have been ongoing. As the future of the arcade is uncertain, if you’re planning a visit, make it sooner rather than later!
The staff at the Pinball Wizard Arcade in Pelham, NH would like to take this opportunity to thank all of our loyal customers for their patronage over the last 6+ years. Unfortunately the time has come; The Pinball Wizard Arcade will be closing their doors on Sunday April 30, 2017 at 8pm.
We’ve enjoyed bringing classic arcade gaming entertainment to all of our customers through birthday parties, pinball league nights, tournaments, date nights, and family visits.
This is a real shame. Many thanks to Sarah for bringing so many classics to the public under one roof.
this looks and sounds very much like the Pinball Museum in Las Vegas, so if you’re ever there, you gotta stop by. i blew an entire afternoon there. it was great!
Wow. What a place. I would live to make a US trip one day to go to these places. I hope the lease issues are either sorted out or a new venue found. Surely it can’t just close…..


Question: Have you heard about the repeal of the Seattle business tax?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Have you heard about the repeal of the Seattle business tax?

CRTV.com host Allie Stuckey, Trump 2020 senior campaign advisor Katrina Pierson and Fox News contributor Deroy Murdock on how Seattle officials repealed the controversial business tax.
The Seattle City Council on Tuesday voted 7-2 to repeal a “head tax” on the city’s largest employers, granting a surprise victory to corporate giants such as Amazon and Starbucks just weeks after the council unanimously approved the measure.
The vote took place at a special meeting called by Council President Bruce Harrell and six other members of the nine-person Seattle City Council. Seattle Mayor Jenny Durkan also supported a repeal.
The council struggled to conduct the vote at the meeting’s conclusion as protestors chanted “stop the repeal,” drowning out councilmembers as they attempted to cast their ballot. Councilwoman Kshama Sawant, who cast one of two votes opposing the repeal, said the council was “bending to big business” and referred to Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos as an “enemy” of Seattle.
Originally passed on May 14, the measure required companies with annual revenue of $20 million or more to contribute $275 per employee annually toward efforts to combat widespread homelessness in Seattle. At the time, the city council said the “head tax” would raise about $50 million per year toward the development of affordable housing, homeless shelters and other outreach efforts.
The head tax drew widespread opposition from local business advocates and several major corporations, including Amazon, Seattle’s largest employer. Critics argued the tax would discourage investment in the city and place an undue burden on companies that were already paying a fair share of taxes. The measure's supporters said large employers should pay the head tax because their presence in the city contributed to the rising cost of living.
“No Tax on Jobs,” an organization that advocated for a repeal of the tax, told GeekWire Tuesday that it had amassed more than 45,000 signatures on a petition calling for the measure to be considered in a public referendum if it was not overturned. Amazon and Starbucks, which is also headquartered in Seattle, each provided funding to the organization.
The measure would have cost Amazon an estimated $12.4 million each year. The e-commerce giant employs roughly 45,000 workers in Seattle.
Last month, Amazon and Starbucks criticized the head tax in the hours after its passage. Other large businesses in the area, including Nordstrom, Boeing and Microsoft, did not comment publicly.


Question: What varieties of bell peppers are there and how do they differ nutritionally? Respond in detail.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What varieties of bell peppers are there and how do they differ nutritionally? Respond in detail.

The most commonly used alternative name of the plant family, "chile", is of Mexican origin, from the Nahuatl word chilli or xilli. Bell peppers are botanically fruits, but are generally considered in culinary contexts to be vegetables.
than your daily quota of Vitamin A and C!
is concentrated in the red variety.
Most of the differences in bell pepper color stem from it's degree of ripening. Green peppers are bell peppers that have been harvested before being allowed to fully ripen. While green bell peppers usually turn yellow-orange and then red this is not always the case. Red, orange, and yellow bell peppers are always more ripe than green ones and therefore require more time in the ground before they can be harvested; that's why they are more expensive. Bottom line: all of the bell peppers originate from the same species of plant, and they achieve their different colors naturally, not by any artificial means.
It's interesting to note that in addition to their unique colors, each differently hued bell pepper has a unique array of nutritional benefits. Green peppers feature an abundance of chlorophyll. Yellow peppers have more of the lutein and zeaxanthin carotenoids. Orange peppers have more alpha-, beta-, and gamma-carotene. Red peppers have more lycopene and astaxanthin, two other important carotenoids.


Question: What can you tell me about Kearney Public Schools? Respond in 1 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What can you tell me about Kearney Public Schools? Respond in 1 sentences.

Kearney Public Schools is a school district serving the area of Kearney, Nebraska, United States.


Question: Respond briefly. Provide information about Wellington Luís de Sousa.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Respond briefly. Provide information about Wellington Luís de Sousa.

Wellington Luís de Sousa (born 11 February 1988), commonly known as Wellington, is a Brazilian footballer, who is currently playing for Vissel Kobe.


Question: What is Diffbot? Respond in detail.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What is Diffbot? Respond in detail.

If you’ve ever performed a Google search for a celebrity, famous landmark, or product, you’ve likely encountered the infoboxes that sometimes sit to the right of the results page. They’re filled with information from Google’s Knowledge Graph, an entities database used to enhance search results on the web and in smart speakers like Google Home. Most of the Knowledge Graph‘s more than 1.6 billion facts are crowdsourced from human teams, who regularly comb through millions of websites for answers to common questions about people, places, and things.
But if you ask Mike Tung, there’s a better way to do it.
He’s the founder of Diffbot, a Mountain View, California-based startup whose mission is to convert the web’s unstructured data into structured data — or, as Tung put it, “extracting knowledge in an automated way from documents.” Diffbot is publicly launching this week after a years-long private pilot program.
“We’re trying to build the first comprehensive map of human knowledge … by analyzing every page on the internet,” Tung told VentureBeat in a phone interview.
Above: Entities and relationships highlighted by Diffbot’s automated engine.
Data extracted by Diffbot’s crawler feeds into an enormous database called the Diffbot Knowledge Graph, or DKG, comprising more than a trillion facts and 10 billion entities. (Tung said it’s adding facts at a rate of 130 million per month.) Core categories include people (skills, employment history, education, social profile), companies, locations (mapping data, addresses, business types, zoning information), articles (every news article, dateline, byline from anywhere on the web, in any language), discussions (chats, social sharing, and conversations), and images (organized using image recognition and metadata collection).
Above: A product search performed with Diffbot.
All of this is accessible via API calls and manipulable with Diffbot DQL, the company’s custom query syntax. Clients can view results from the DKG in a list, map, or table layout in Diffbot’s web-based UI, or from within third-party content management systems or analytics platforms.
Among those clients are Microsoft, eBay, Yandex, and DuckDuckGo, which are using it to enhance the quality of their search results. Other customers include Cisco, Salesforce, Crunchbase, Hubspot, Adobe, Instapaper, and Onswipe.
In a demo, Tung showed me how it worked. Say you wanted to perform a one-off search for a brand of shoe. In Diffbot’s web dashboard, you’d type the sneaker brand into a Google-like search bar and hit enter; within milliseconds you’d get a product profile synthesized from sources around the web.
Above: An auto-generated profile courtesy Diffbot’s AI.
Looking for news articles instead? Same process: Typing in an author’s name yields every article they’ve ever published online (across languages, too). Searching for a person, on the other hand, pulls up a CV-like work history pieced together from dozens (or hundreds) of bios, articles, and publicly available profiles.
One of Diffbot’s unique strengths is its ability to quickly drill down by entity, Tung explained. It’s helpful in tasks like job recruitment — the appropriate DQL string (e.g., “type:Person employments.employer.name:’Diffbot'”) can collate every employee at a given company, along with their job title, skills, educational background, and social media profiles all in one place.
“This is the holy grail of machine learning — capturing all the world’s knowledge in one place,” Tung said.
Google’s Knowledge Graph has historically faced criticism for lacking attribution and omitting sources of conflicting information, but Tung said that Diffbot’s automated approach kills two birds with one stone. Not only is Diffbot more comprehensive than manually curated databases like Google’s Knowledge Graph, but it’s more accurate, too — Diffbot’s crawler regularly refreshes the DKG with new information, and its machine learning algorithms are smart enough to pass over sites with histories of producing “logically inconsistent” facts.
Diffbot launched in 2008 and counts 28 employees among its core staff of engineers and data scientists. It previously raised $10 million in a funding round led by VC Tencent, Felicis Ventures, and Amplify Partners.


Question: What is Gorno Jabolčište?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What is Gorno Jabolčište?

Gorno Jabolčište (, ) is a village in the municipality of Čaška, Republic of Macedonia.


Question: "Hey there! Was just catching up on this week's episode of 'Once Upon a Time' and wanted to hear your thoughts on the theory of Belle's mom being the Author. What do you think?"

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 "Hey there! Was just catching up on this week's episode of 'Once Upon a Time' and wanted to hear your thoughts on the theory of Belle's mom being the Author. What do you think?"

(S04E16) – If Rumple is everyone, everyone’s Ursula. Her tentacle strike knocks around Hook’s vertebra. She’s not just a villain. She’s the first little mermaid. Her job is sing-killing but she feels that it’s played. August returns and gets converted to timber. His growing flesh nose is so very limber. One Spice Girl down, but they still have the mole. Down to the sea in “Poor Unfortunate Soul”.
Buy DOGBOY: EYE OF THE SCARAB.
Thanks for playing my voicemail even though I was one of the late ones… I’ll try to do better!
Bill made an excellent point in this episode that I don’t think y’all fleshed out all the way (except Bobby in his comments) which is that Hook was present when Arial’s point about how villains can obtain happy endings was made. He literally saw this idea proven and demonstrated in front of his face, then turned around and drew exactly the opposite conclusion. Yet another example of terrible writing.
My objection to the Belle’s mom as Author theory is that she, just like Belle herself, is a character in these same stories we’re talking about. Since she was born and lived in a specific era in these stories, centuries after many of its earliest events begin, how could she have authored or even influenced any of the events which define the main story of the show? Her own life had itself been influenced and framed by these very events she herself is supposed by this theory to have written. It just doesn’t make any sense that a character within these stories could be the creator of all of them. Unless she somehow descended, Christlike, into the world she’d made and became a figure within it. And that strikes me as highly unlikely for Once Upon a Time.
Also, am I the only one who keeps wanting to call the Jolly Roger the “Jolly Rancher”?
Another thing I forgot to mention in my voicemail was the possibility that we will continue to see the “Queens” of Darkness get happy endings via the heroes’ help, so that eventually we’ll be left with only Emma, Regina and Rumpel working together with the rest of the heroes trying to stop the three of them. That could potentially be interesting…as long as they don’t go too Dark Phoenix with Emma’s storyline. I can buy her deciding, according to her own logic (whatever form that might take) that Rumpel’s plan is a good one, and deciding to work with him temporarily, but I don’t want to see her just become this powerful, corrupted force that everyone has to team up to defeat.


Question: What can we expect from Saturday's UFC 217 main event between Georges St-Pierre and Michael Bisping?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What can we expect from Saturday's UFC 217 main event between Georges St-Pierre and Michael Bisping?

In the main event of UFC 217, former welterweight champion Georges St-Pierre returns and challenges middleweight champion Michael Bisping for the title. St-Pierre has been out of action for nearly four years, while Bisping has lately gone on the best run of his career.
Both fighters are clearly accomplished, but there are key stylistic differences that could be determining factors Saturday night. The following is a breakdown of the statistical categories that highlight those factors.
St-Pierre has stated that Bisping is "terrified" of his wrestling. If Bisping is truly afraid, then his fears are not unreasonable. During his UFC career, St-Pierre has used his takedown game to dominate fights. The former welterweight champion holds the record for most takedowns landed in UFC history with 87, and his takedown accuracy of 73.7 percent is second-best all time. Since being knocked out by Matt Serra in 2007, St-Pierre has landed at least 50 percent of his takedown attempts in each of his past 12 fights. During that same stretch, he averaged 3.89 takedowns per 15 minutes of fight time.
The saving grace for Bisping is that he has relatively strong takedown defense. In the UFC he has stopped 65 percent of his opponents' takedown attempts, and he has only been taken down four times in his past seven fights. However, in the 17 fights in which an opponent has attempted to take him down, Bisping has only managed to avoid going to the ground in four of them. For context, Bisping has faced three fighters who average at least three takedowns per 15 minutes: Matt Hamill, CB Dollaway and Chael Sonnen. These three opponents landed 64 percent of their takedown attempts against Bisping and combined to take him down 12 times.
Certainly wrestling will be part of St-Pierre's game plan. It has been a vital element of his offensive attack since he debuted in the UFC in 2004. In order to be successful, Bisping will need to find a way to keep this fight on the feet. If St-Pierre does score takedowns, Bisping will need to avoid damage on the ground and get back to his feet.
Another element of St-Pierre's success is his ability to land meaningful strikes once he takes a fight to the floor. During his UFC career, 36 percent of GSP's significant strikes have come while on the ground, and he has outlanded opponents 449 to 43 in that position. On the other hand, Bisping prefers to do most of his striking on the feet. He has only landed nine percent of his significant strikes while on the ground. Since defeating Jason "Mayhem" Miller in 2011, Bisping has been outlanded on the ground 47 to 23.
Takedowns not only allow St-Pierre to dictate the pace and position of the fight, but they also open up a significant part of his striking offense. If Bisping is able to stop the takedowns, it will hinder his opponent's offense and put him in an advantageous position for offensive striking.
Bisping holds the record for most significant strikes landed in UFC history with 1,533. For his career, St-Pierre is not far behind with 1,254. However, on a per-minute basis, Bisping has a pretty clear advantage. He lands 4.33 significant strikes per minute, while St-Pierre only lands 3.82. Plus, in his past six fights, Bisping actually increased his rate even more and landed 4.56 per minute.
In an interesting development that could be a problem for St-Pierre, Bisping seems to have found power late in his career. Through his first 24 UFC fights, he scored five knockdowns at a rate of 0.25 per 15 minutes of fight time. In his past three fights alone, Bisping has scored three knockdowns at a rate of 0.84 per 15 minutes. St-Pierre has only been knocked down three times in his UFC career, but he did absorb 240 significant strikes in his past four fights and is coming off a nearly four-year layoff. If this power continues to show and Bisping is able to prevent takedowns, St-Pierre could struggle to say in the fight.
Thanks in part to his takedown ability, St-Pierre does not absorb very many significant strikes. During his UFC career, he has absorbed only 1.43 significant strikes per minute. However, for his past four fights that rate jumped to 2.4. The increase was due mostly to Jake Shields (3.12) and Johny Hendricks (3.4), the only two fighters to land at least three significant strikes per minute against St-Pierre in the promotion.
Bisping has allowed his opponents to land 2.62 significant strikes against him in the UFC. However, that rate has increased dramatically over the course of his past six fights. In his first 21 fights in the UFC, Bisping absorbed 2.39 significant strikes per minute. During his recent six-fight stretch, his opponents have landed 3.2 significant strikes against him on a per-minute basis. Bisping may have the offensive edge in terms of striking, but St-Pierre has proven hard to hit in his UFC run. This could turn out to be an interesting defensive wrinkle on Saturday night. In the past Bisping has needed to be a volume striker to be successful. If St-Pierre is able to prevent that, the fight could swing in his favor.


Question: Provide information about Washburn Township in Barry County, Missouri.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Provide information about Washburn Township in Barry County, Missouri.

Washburn Township is one of twenty-five townships in Barry County, Missouri, United States. As of the 2000 census, its population was 1,070.


Question: What is Oktyabrsky?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What is Oktyabrsky?

Oktyabrsky () is an urban locality (a work settlement) and the administrative center of Oktyabrsky District of Perm Krai, Russia. Population:


Question: Have you heard about police gang list profiling practices?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Have you heard about police gang list profiling practices?

It turns out that appearing in a music video, or simply associating yourself with a particular type of music online, can land you on a database purporting to show “propensity for violence”. The human rights group Amnesty International has produced a report on the Metropolitan police’s list of gang suspects, known as the gangs violence matrix. The report presents an abundance of evidence challenging the assumed relationship between serious youth violence and the policing of gangs. It provides a stark window into how flawed policy, discretionary everyday practice and unaccountable data-sharing, combine to hardwire racism into society.
The findings are damning. The study reveals how the labelling of young men, sometimes boys, almost exclusively from the black community, as “gang nominals” is often based on hunch or feeling. These uncorroborated assumptions then travel, appearing as “flags” on the case management systems of a range of agencies extending well beyond the criminal justice system. Individuals and their families become marked. The stigma leads to serious harms including criminalisation, imprisonment, exclusion from school, eviction from home, removal of children and deportation.
Amnesty’s report focuses solely on the matrix, the gangs list operated in London by the Met police. Yet research I have been involved in demonstrates that these practices exist beyond the capital. In 2012 Patrick Williams and I were asked by Manchester city council to profile those in gangs alongside those who had committed serious youth violence. The city was preparing to become one of the initial 33 local areas to implement the coalition government’s Ending Gang and Youth Violence policy.
Our analysis challenged the conflation of the policy areas. We found that while serious youth violence occurs in all communities, the distinct approach to policing gangs under the guise of fighting serious youth violence targets the black community almost exclusively. Three-quarters of those convicted of youth violence were white; nine out of 10 individuals on the Manchester gangs list were black or minority ethnic.
These facts contest the simple associations maintained in the dominant narrative about “gangs” and youth violence. Yet both national policy and local strategy, remain fixated with tying the solution to youth violence to a strategy of “fighting gangs”. This conflation is a political manoeuvre, whereby criminal justice agencies and politicians are able to both (re)define the problem of youth violence and create communities to be policed.
While singling out racialised communities for different policing practice is by no means new, the current practice of identifying and flagging young black men as gang nominals flows squarely from the government’s Ending Gang and Youth Violence policy. It is possible that all towns and cities where the policy has been implemented operate similar matrices or gang lists. That runs to 52 local authority areas in total. A public inquiry by the Information Commissioner’s Office, as recommended by Amnesty, would do well to follow the EGYV policy in seeking to examine these harmful practices.
While Amnesty concludes that the gathering and sharing of data from the matrix presents a risk of infringing human rights, such information-sharing has, in and of itself, become a key measure of the success of the EGYV policy.
Amnesty’s report exposes many of the damaging consequences of being labelled a “gang nominal”, but it is by no means exhaustive. In Manchester, we have seen the increased use of “threat to life” notices; one consequence of these can be the removal of children from the family home.
In a recent case, a local judge publicly called into question the use of police gang intelligence in a family court case where social services were looking to remove two brothers from their family on the basis of their older brothers’ reported gang association. Judge Iain Hamilton refused the request, arguing that the “court has no way of assessing how reliable or otherwise the police intelligence is”.
If only more judges were as circumspect about the use of police gang intelligence. Our national research, published in 2016, demonstrated how the racialised narrative of the “gang” becomes a central strategy for prosecution teams to secure joint enterprise convictions, even where defendants are not at the scene of a crime. A recent case in Manchester, in which 11 young black people were sentenced to 168 years in prison, bears the hallmarks of this process.
The prosecution QC called an officer from the police gang unit as an expert witness. He talked the jury through an extended version of the story of gangs in Manchester, seeking to connect the young people to Los Angeles gangs. Later in the trial, it was accepted that the majority of the young people had no convictions or intelligence connecting them to gangs. Yet the story was set, demonstrating how the racialised gang narrative can be a rich resource in the courtroom.
Rather than support an effective solution to youth violence – an urgent issue of harm in society, such policing and punishment strategies contribute to injustice and feed a lack of trust in the criminal justice system. The report highlights what those trapped in the matrix already know: that being on a gangs list marks you for different treatment.
This week E Tendayi Achiume, the UN’s special rapporteur on racism, is in the UK after human rights experts expressed serious concerns about racism rooted in the fabric of our society. By ending the use of all gang lists, we have an opportunity to start dismantling the harms done by institutional racism, beginning with those emanating from the criminal justice system.


Question: Provide an update to the Long Beach Funk Fest community regarding the 2018 event.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Provide an update to the Long Beach Funk Fest community regarding the 2018 event.

Greetings funk fans, funkateers, family, friends, and Long Beach community. We know lots of people have been wondering what’s happening with the Long Beach Funk Fest for this year.
Since 2009, we’ve brought you the best of funk for 6 years. After a couple years off to recharge and reboot, we are looking forward to coming back this year. In the meantime, we are producing some smaller local LBFF Presents events to help keep the funk alive.
What started out as a crazy idea and a strong passion and desire to bring you a true funk festival has blossomed into 6 years of uncut funk in the streets of downtown Long Beach, and for 2014 at the waterfront park of the Queen Mary. For 6 years we’ve brought you the best of our living funk legends and newer funk groups carrying the torch for funk, as well as amazing funky dj’s, artists, dancers, vendors, and more. We’ve gone through lots of growing pains and stayed as true to the vision as possible. Nobody said funkin’ was easy.
We would like to send out a sincere thanks to Summer and Music, Justin Hectus, Rand Foster, Ashley Hectus, the DLBA, the Queen Mary, Rickey Vincent, all of the performers and volunteers, the Long Beach community, the global funk community, and especially YOU. There’s so many more to thank, but we can’t fit them all.
We look forward to regrouping and bringing you what we’re known for in 2018, the best in funk! In the meantime, make sure you are on our email list and ‘like’ our page so you stay up to date for the future.
Also, keep going out and supporting the funk, our funk legends, and keeping the genre and culture alive. Sustaining our future through funk…on the 1.


Question: What do you know about Sam Smith? Respond in 1 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What do you know about Sam Smith? Respond in 1 sentences.

Sam Smith (born January 27, 1944) is an American former professional basketball player who played several seasons in the American Basketball Association (ABA).


Question: What is Korzyce? Respond in 2 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What is Korzyce? Respond in 2 sentences.

Korzyce is a village in the administrative district of Gmina Szydłowiec, within Szydłowiec County, Masovian Voivodeship, in east-central Poland. It lies approximately north of Szydłowiec and south of Warsaw.


Question: What is the Walt Grealis Special Achievement Award?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What is the Walt Grealis Special Achievement Award?

The Walt Grealis Special Achievement Award is awarded by the Canadian Academy of Recording Arts and Sciences to "individuals who have contributed to the growth and development of the Canadian music industry." It is given annually every Juno Awards ceremony and named after one of the founders of the awards.


Question: Write an essay on the current issues facing Grenfell Tower fire survivors.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Write an essay on the current issues facing Grenfell Tower fire survivors.

Six months on from the Grenfell Tower fire, the vast majority of survivors are still struggling in temporary accommodation, unable to begin the process of rebuilding their lives.
This is an inexcusable failure by the state. At a local level it reflects the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea’s unwillingness to take the kind of drastic and urgent actions available to them to assist survivors: Conservative councillors rejected out of hand the possibility of using compulsory purchase powers to reclaim local empty homes for example, and it took months for RBKC to listen to the demands from the local community to draw from their substantial reserves to support rehousing costs.
A total of 17 local Conservative councillors have either been deselected or are resigning their posts before next May’s local elections, suggesting that at least some have the humility to acknowledge the absolute failure of RBKC to deal with housing issues post-Grenfell. Hopefully new councillors will be genuinely dedicated to assisting survivors. But they will have to get up to speed quickly. As residents have pointed out, at the current rate of rehousing there will still be Grenfell families without permanent homes not just by May, but for another two years. This cannot be tolerated.
RBKC’s continual failure to keep its promises to survivors (the most recent promise had been to rehouse most survivors by Christmas) suggests it may soon be time to call in commissioners to deal with these deep inadequacies. And national government also continues to do much more to harm than to help. Despite its promises to act on the massive shortage of affordable secure housing in many parts of the UK, the government still pushes policy that supports only provision of private homes, for sale or at rent levels far higher than the vast majority of working people in London can afford.
Meanwhile the policies that have so diminished the supply of genuinely affordable homes continue to inflict their damage. The extension of right-to-buy, private developer-led “regeneration” of social housing estates, increased commercialisation of housing associations, and massive cuts to welfare, are all evidence of national government’s lack of care for families made homeless at Grenfell, and others like them.
Grenfell survivors have made it clear to ministers that housing is their utmost priority. Not just urgent rehousing for those made homeless by the fire, but also the wider issues that concern the rest of the population: the lack of genuinely affordable secure homes available to people on lower or average wages. It should be obvious that safe, secure housing is a primary need, necessary for any person to function adequately in wider society. Homeless children experience negative impacts on all aspects of their emotional, social and educational development that will continue to affect them in later life.
The people who lived through the trauma and loss at Grenfell are now experiencing a collective mental health crisis more severe than we can possibly imagine. This ongoing failure to meet their housing needs amounts to an act of further unnecessary cruelty.
That so many of them, six months on from that terrible night, are facing a Christmas without cooking facilities to make a family meal, space for their children to play, or a future with the security of a safe permanent home, is a terrible indictment of both the local authority and national government – and also of us as a society if we do not continue to apply pressure on government to resolve these families’ needs.
We must never forget about Grenfell. Each signature on a petition, every supportive tweet, every argument voiced against those who wish to turn us from the sense of human empathy we all felt in those days after the fire all contribute in some way to Grenfell survivors’ eventual recovery.
On the 14th of every month, the community and their friends march silently to show that those who died have not been forgotten. For the living, we must continue to fight for safe, well-maintained, affordable homes.


Question: Do you know who Francisco Rico Manrique is? Respond briefly.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Do you know who Francisco Rico Manrique is? Respond briefly.

Francisco Rico Manrique (born 28 April 1942, Barcelona) is a Spanish philologist.


Question: Describe the lawsuit filed by immigrants from Haiti and El Salvador against the Trump administration for terminating the protection that allowed them to remain in the US.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the lawsuit filed by immigrants from Haiti and El Salvador against the Trump administration for terminating the protection that allowed them to remain in the US.

BOSTON (Reuters) - A group of Haitian and Salvadoran immigrants on Thursday filed a lawsuit claiming that the decision by U.S. President Donald Trump’s administration to terminate the protections that allowed them to remain in the country was racially motivated.
The lawsuit filed in federal court in Boston seeks to challenge the Trump administration’s decision to terminate the temporary protective status enjoyed by thousands of immigrants from Haiti and El Salvador.
“The animus directed towards Latino and Black immigrants is a clear and unfortunate thread running throughout President Trump’s statements - and is actualized by his Administration’s policies, such as the ones challenged by this lawsuit,” the complaint said.
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security declined to comment.
Temporary protective status, or TPS, offers protection from deportation to immigrants already in the United States, including those who entered illegally, from countries affected by natural disasters, civil conflicts and other problems.
Some 200,000 Salvadorans had been allowed to live in the United States under that program in the wake of two devastating 2001 earthquakes in their home country that left hundreds of thousands living there homeless.
About 59,000 Haitian immigrants were likewise protected from deportation after a devastating 2010 earthquake. Democratic President Barack Obama’s administration extended the status several times after the initial designation.
In January, the Trump administration announced that the Salvadorans’ temporary protected status would end on Sept. 9, 2019, giving them 18 months to leave or seek lawful residency.
That move came after the administration in November ended TPS for people from Haiti, similarly giving people from that country 18 months to return to the impoverished Caribbean country or legalize their status in the United States.
In announcing the end of the designations of Haiti and El Salvador for TPS, the Department of Homeland Security said the conditions in those countries no longer supported their special statuses.
The Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights and Economic Justice filed Thursday’s lawsuit on behalf of six immigrants from El Salvador and two from Haiti as well as Centro Presente, a Massachusetts-based Latin American immigrant organization.
The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People filed a similar case in January over the decision to rescind TPS for Haitian immigrants.


Question: Where can I find the best rooftop spots in San Francisco?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Where can I find the best rooftop spots in San Francisco?

Crocker Galleria Rooftop is hidden over a bank vault.
Scattered throughout Downtown San Francisco are public plazas, atriums, and roof gardens. Privately Owned Public Open Spaces (POPOS) hide behind secret elevators, security guards, and stairs. Their elusive trait raises the question: if they are public, then why are they hidden?
In a city where land is scarce, POPOS allocate open space to prevent overdevelopment. The 1985 Downtown Plan mandates developers build and maintain 1 sq ft of public space for each 50 sq ft of commercial space. Yet, developers hide them from the public to keep cost of maintenance low.
SFPOPOS has organized a list of POPOS locals and architecture buffs will enjoy. You’ll find POPOS in a short walk within South of Market, Financial District and the Embarcadero. And, make sure you get lunch to-go.
A maze on the roof.
South of Market focuses on POPOS within walking distance south of Montgomery Station.
Financial District focuses on POPOS within walking distance north of Montgomery Station.
Embarcadero focuses on POPOS within walking distance of Embarcadero Station.
SFPOPOS.CO will always get you back home.
Pigeons coo — not tweet. But whatever.
Here’s the list to all 70 POPOS.
Instead of #selfie, why not take a #sfpopos?
Spread the love — hit the ❤ Recommend button below!
A guide to SF’s Privately Owned Public Open Spaces. #sfpopos.


Question: Provide information about Semyon Abramovich Furman.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Provide information about Semyon Abramovich Furman.

Semyon Abramovich Furman (December 1, 1920 – March 17, 1978) was a Soviet chess player and trainer. He was awarded the title of Grandmaster by FIDE in 1966. Furman is best known for developing Anatoly Karpov into a World Chess Champion, but was a formidable player himself, as well as a successful coach for several other world-class players. His name is sometimes written as Semen or Semion Furman.


Question: Describe the proposal to rename the San Francisco International Airport after Harvey Milk. Respond in detail.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the proposal to rename the San Francisco International Airport after Harvey Milk. Respond in detail.

The San Francisco International Airport will name a terminal after Harvey Milk, the iconic LGBTQ rights advocate and the state’s first openly gay elected official. The plan includes the installation of artwork commemorating him.
The idea of naming the airport itself after Milk was put forward by then-Supervisor David Campos five years ago. The proposal was met with opposition, the San Francisco Examiner notes, and an airport naming committee was formed to take up the issue. It has recommended naming the airport’s Terminal 1 after Milk.
The Board of Supervisors Budget and Finance Committee will vote on the name change today. The legislation was introduced by Supervisor Hillary Ronen, and is co-sponsored by Supervisor Jeff Sheehy. If it is approved by the committee, the full board will vote on the legislation on April 3.
The legislation requires the airport’s director to report to the board of supervisors and the mayor by December 1 “describing the steps the Airport has taken and plans to take” to name the terminal after Milk, as well as to properly publicize the move.
“We will follow the direction of the Board of Supervisors legislation if passed, and incorporate this into the design and construction of Terminal 1, which opens in phases starting mid-2019,” airport spokesman Doug Yakel said.
“In order to honor one of the nation’s great gay leaders, raise awareness of the history of the LGBT movement, and give hope to young LGBT people in cities everywhere, the Board of Supervisors finds it fitting that a terminal at the San Francisco International Airport be named in honor of Harvey Milk,” the legislation reads.
“It’s a long time coming. It’s the gateway to San Francisco, and so recognizing Harvey and making that connection to our community is appropriate. Its beautiful,” Sheehy told the paper.
Mayor Mark Farrell has said he supports renaming the terminal to honor Milk.
Milk moved to San Francisco, from New York City where he was born and raised, in 1972. He was elected to the Board of Supervisors in 1977. He was gunned down at City Hall the following year, along with Mayor George Moscone, by former Supervisor Dan White. Since his death, Milk has gained even wider notoriety as a prominent leader for the rights of LGBTQ people.


Question: Explain how Costco is building its own poultry supply chain.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Explain how Costco is building its own poultry supply chain.

Costco is building its own poultry supply chain to help hold down the price of its popular prepared food item.
Costco is on track to open a massive chicken operation about a year from now in eastern Nebraska, bringing more of the supply chain for its strategically and symbolically important $5 rotisserie chicken under its own wing.
In 2013, Costco chief financial officer Richard Galanti called the birds “the new hot dog” – a reference to the $1.50 hot dog and soda combo that is practically the retailer’s corporate symbol.
By delving deeper into the chicken supply chain, Costco is following its own playbook with the hot dog, which it gets in staggering volumes from a plant it owns in Tracy, Calif., where it also produces ground beef. That’s part of how the company has held the line on the combo price since 1983, this summer’s much-lamented demise of the polish dog option notwithstanding.
Costco has at times taken a substantial loss on the rotisserie chicken – known to ardent fans as the CRC – which entices shoppers into its stores for the purchase of more profitable items. The rotisseries are usually in the back of the giant stores, meaning a shopper has to pass by everything else to go get one.
Galanti said in 2015 the company was “willing to eat, if you will, $30 to $40 million a year in gross margin” by holding its rotisserie chicken prices at $4.99 as competitors raised prices ahead of expected wholesale price increases in the wake of the avian flu epidemic.
But the company continually looks for new ways to shave its costs and ensure a steady supply, particularly as the availability of whole chickens meeting Costco’s weight requirements has dwindled; more birds are sold as parts or otherwise processed.
Galanti said last October that the $300 million plant, which broke ground last year, will produce about 100 million chickens a year, about a quarter of the company’s annual U.S. demand.
“Costco’s plant will allow the company to target and remove costs to make the $4.99 price point sustainable over the long-term,” Will Sawyer, lead animal protein economist at CoBank, which serves industries including agribusiness, said in a new report on Costco’s chicken play.
For example, Nebraska’s vast production of corn and soybeans should give Costco an advantage on feed costs, Sawyer noted.
The operation, set to open about a year from now, will revolve around a hatchery, feed mill and processing plant in Fremont, Neb., owned by Costco. Eventually there will be hundreds of new chicken barns in Nebraska and parts of Iowa to be operated by producers under long-term contracts with Costco, according to reporting by The Fremont Tribune.
Critics in Nebraska say Costco’s version of vertical integration offloads the financial risk to the chicken farmers with whom it’s contracting and environmental risks to the broader community. But if Costco’s chickens are indeed on the level of the hot dog in importance, the company will likely be motivated to take greater care with the supply chain.


Question: Can you provide a summary of the ATREDIS-2018-0004 bug and a description of the exploiting process?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Can you provide a summary of the ATREDIS-2018-0004 bug and a description of the exploiting process?

If you aren't interested in the adventure behind this bug hunt, ATREDIS-2018-0004 is a good TL;DR and here is the Proof-of-Concept.
Feel free to try out the SystemCollector PoC yourself. Turning the PoC into a portable exploit for offensive security engagements is a task I'll leave to the reader. The NtApiDotNet library is also a PowerShell module, which should make things a bit easier.
As previously mentioned in the Cylance privilege escalation write-up, protecting against symlink attacks may seem easy, but is often times overlooked. Any time a privileged service is performing file operations on behalf of a user, proper impersonation is needed in order to prevent these types of attacks.
Upon finding this vulnerability, MSRC was contacted with the vulnerability details and PoC. MSRC quickly triaged and validated the finding and provided regular updates throughout the remediation process. The full disclosure timeline can be found in the Atredis advisory link below.