Question: What's the best way to learn more about VMware?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What's the best way to learn more about VMware?

Homepage > General Tech > Get Your "VMware vSphere 6.5 Host Resources Deep Dive" eBook!
Get Your "VMware vSphere 6.5 Host Resources Deep Dive" eBook!
With an average 4.9 out of 5 star rating on Amazon, Frank Denneman and Niels Hagoort’s latest book, VMware vSphere 6.5 Host Resources Deep Dive, certainly lives up to the expectation.
The book covers four main topics: CPU, Memory, Storage, and Networking. The in-depth read can only be described as a serious deep dive for people who seriously want to understand what is going on under the covers of their VMware environment.
– Duncan Epping, VMware Chief Technologist and previous co-author with Frank on the Clustering Deepdive series.
At Rubrik, we put great pride in building a state-of-the-art data management solution for VMware. We’ve gone to great lengths to make sure the complexity on the back-end is presented as easily as possible on the front. But at the same time, we understand sometimes you want to keep pulling threads[sic] and figure out what lies beneath — this is your chance. It’s time to challenge assumptions about how things should work if you will, and seize the opportunity for optimization.
Rubrik partnered with Frank and Niels at both VMworld events earlier this year to give away physical copies of the book. We were blown away by the interest!
And now, because one of Rubrik’s core tenets is simplification, we are making it even simpler to obtain a copy of this great resource! You can download a PDF version of the book for free (yes, you read that correctly) by registering here.
We’re confident you will be able to elevate your VMware chops by using the knowledge that lies within and would love to hear about. Tweet your thoughts to @rubrikinc on Twitter!


Question: What is Crunchball 3000?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What is Crunchball 3000?

Added on June 24th, 2009.
Crunchball 3000 is a fast-paced futuristic sports game that will surely remind you of Amiga classic Speedball 2. Take control of a team of 10 players and bash it out on the pitch to try and score more goals than your opponents. After each match you can spend some money to upgrade your team or save it up for the end-of-season where you can hire star players. Looks excellent and plays like a dream – my only complaint being it could have done with a few in-game powerups!


Question: Explain the symbolism of the Devil Iron Knocker at the entrance to Durham Cathedral. Respond in 18 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Explain the symbolism of the Devil Iron Knocker at the entrance to Durham Cathedral. Respond in 18 sentences.

This entry was posted in Sixteenth Century, The Tudors and tagged Archbishop Parker, Bangor, Battle of Flodden, Bishop of Durham, Cardinal Wolsey, Catherine of Aragon, Conyers, Cuthbert Tunstall, Dr Legh, Duke of Northumberland, Duke of Somerset, Durham Abbey, Edward VI, Hackforth, Katherine Parr, Kimbolton Castle, Marmion, Maude Parr, Norwich, Oath of Supremacy, Queen Mary I, Sir Brian Tunstall, Sir Thomas More, Sir Thomas Parr, Sir Walter Scott, The Tower, Thomas Bilney, Thomas Cromwell, Thomas Layton by JuliaH. Bookmark the permalink.
Good read this snow filled morning. The six families echo through every page of English history books. Then and perhaps even now. I am related to some rather old families today. Contacted by a lady in Florida last month. Her Nevil claim to be my cousin failed to impress as this has always been a pest. We went through her family tree only to find her great grandmother to be the sister of my great grandmother who married a Parliament man and left for America in 1852.Smaller world than even I suspected so it is. One thing I had little prof of was Durham Cathedral mighty front doors. The Devil iron knocker as so may tales told why its exists on a holy door as entrance into Gods domain? This relative in USA seems to think it was to remind people that the Devil waits outside for us.. Could be though I think it really just a symbol that the Devil knocks at Gods door. What do you think?
I remember the occasion when someone attacked the door – weren’t they trying to let the Devil out? Can’t remember for sure. If memory serves isn’t it the case that if anyone hammers on it they could claim sanctuary – perhaps it was a reminder that claiming sanctuary wasn’t exactly a safe option and that you’d have to be truly desperate. I shall add it to my little list of things to find out more about. Always good to have something to mull over.


Question: What is the status of backyard cottages in Seattle?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What is the status of backyard cottages in Seattle?

It probably isn't over, but now is a good time to look back on the long process.
The city of Seattle has been trying to make it easier for homeowners to build basement apartments and backyard cottages for more than a decade. And at every turn, homeowners concerned about what those changes might do to their neighborhoods, have fought tooth and nail to stop them. Without question, the recent boom has transformed Seattle’s commercial and mixed-use neighborhoods. But the ongoing ADU saga makes clear that changing the city’s single family neighborhoods is no simple task.
Officials see accessory dwelling units (ADUs) as a way to help meet Seattle’s massive demand for homes and to do so in the more than two-thirds of the city in which apartments, duplexes, and other denser types of housing are banned. ADUs are already legal. But current regulations can make them prohibitively expensive — cottages can cost upwards of $250,000. The city says looser regulations that allow larger ADUs, don’t require off-street parking, allow them to be built on smaller lots, and don’t require the homeowner to live onsite will lower the cost of construction and result in twice as many ADUs getting built in the next decade.
In early October, the city released its final review of the impacts that those looser regulations would have. In short: not much. They found there would be no major impacts on neighborhood aesthetics, parking, traffic, utilities or public services, basically the same conclusion they came to two years ago when Councilmember Mike O’Brien first proposed ADU changes. But homeowners, led by Marty Kaplan of the Queen Anne Community Council, appealed the city’s initial conclusion that there wouldn’t be impacts, leading to years of deeper review by the city.
Not surprisingly, Kaplan and the QACC appealed the environmental impact statement on Oct. 18, contending that it didn't take into account alternatives to allowing more backyard cottages. The group is asking a hearing examiner to find the EIS illegal.
In the meantime, Councilmember O'Brien will likely continue to proceed with his legislation.


Question: Provide a comprehensive analysis of President-elect Donald Trump's presidency so far.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Provide a comprehensive analysis of President-elect Donald Trump's presidency so far.

ABuzzFeed analysis this week concluded that fake news stories about the election generated more engagement on Facebook than the top election stories from 19 major news outlets — combined.
Not only is fake news getting more attention than actual news, but also the leading purveyor of fake news in the United States is now the president-elect.
Now Trump is the president-elect, and it’s time to deliver on the impossible. No wonder his transition is racked with chaos and infighting. Scripture tells us you can’t serve both God and mammon. Yet Trump proposes to be served by both Reince Priebus and Stephen K. Bannon — a chief of staff who is a paragon of the establishment and a top adviser who is a leading voice for white supremacists. The array of impossible promises and false claims has all the appearances of a Ponzi scheme, with the $18 trillion U.S. economy in the balance. Bernie Madoff’s scheme lost only $50 billion.
We see the Ponzi scheme unraveling in the substance of what Trump is proposing, too. One of Trump’s surrogates, Carl Higbie, caused a furor this week by saying the infamous internment of U.S. citizens and noncitizens of Japanese descent during World War II provided a legal “precedent” for Trump’s plan to create a Muslim registry. But for all the outrage Higbie caused, the actual policy being floated — reinstatement of a George W. Bush-era policy — is far more modest than Trump’s proposed ban on Muslim immigration and threat to register American Muslims.
This is the best-case scenario — that Trump’s fake-news presidential campaign really was all a con. Preposterous promises give way to modest proposals. This would disappoint his supporters, but perhaps save the country.
Trump’s vow that Carrier would reverse its plans to move a factory to Mexico and eliminate 1,400 U.S. jobs by 2019? Carrier is continuing with its plans.
Trump’s promise to negotiate the release of all American prisoners in Iran before taking office? He’d better hurry: Iran continues to apprehend and imprison American dual nationals.
Trump’s bold threats to appoint a “killer” ambassador to Japan and to force Japan to pay for U.S. military protection? Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, after visiting Trump on Thursday, thinks otherwise; he said he has “great confidence” in Trump.
Many of Trump’s absurd promises will come due soon. Trump spoke of abolishing the Education Department and the Environmental Protection Agency, said he would rebuild American roads for one-third the current price, monitor mosques, prosecute Hillary Clinton and never take a vacation. He said he would spend no money on space exploration before infrastructure is repaired, would “bomb the s--- out of” the Islamic State, kill the relatives of terrorists, shut down parts of the Internet, reinstate waterboarding, dramatically increase tariffs, eliminate Wall Street reforms, cut the budget 20 percent and end birthright citizenship.
No surprise that the transition is chaotic. Lobbyists are in, then out. Chris Christie and Mike Rogers are in, then out. Frank Gaffney is in, or perhaps not. Jared Kushner is settling personal vendettas. Eliot Cohen withdraws his cooperation, predicting “ugly” things ahead.
The British are fuming because at least nine foreign leaders, including Egypt’s, reached Trump before theirs. Trump plays cat-and-mouse with the national press corps and continues to tweet like an Internet troll, complete with bad spelling. His advisers give contradictory accounts about personnel decisions. Qualified candidates are rejected in favor of loyalists. His choice for national security adviser is aligned with Vladimir Putin.
But surely you can’t fool all the people all the time.
Paul Waldman: How will Trump make America great again? Truthiness.
Michael Gerson: Republicans have heart disease. Democrats have a gushing head wound.
Josh Rogin: Will Trump really purge Obama’s generals?


Question: Explain the potential risks of investing in Bitcoin.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Explain the potential risks of investing in Bitcoin.

Bitcoin mania makes people lose their minds and lose everything they have, according to the head of the Russian Orthodox Church, Patriarch Kirill.
“People are losing their minds. Everyone says: What am I waiting for? I have to act, I have to buy these bitcoins. And then they are buying, pawning property, selling their homes. Then, bitcoin collapses within two weeks, and people understand that they did not win anything, but lost, they lost everything they had,” the patriarch said, speaking before Russia’s Federation Council.
The Church’s task is to educate a person in such a way that he is not enslaved by passions and strives for righteous work, which must be adequately rewarded, the head of the Russian Church said.
“In such a situation, the state is called upon to protect a person from excessive risks and even direct deception," he added.
Bitcoin is almost 50 percent off its record high of $20,000, which was recorded in December. Last week, analyst Georgy Verbitsky told RT that the bitcoin collapse was caused by a sell-off triggered by professional investors, who made a profit on common folk deciding to make a last-minute investment in the hope of making a quick buck.


Question: Describe the recent court case involving Charles Waterstreet.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the recent court case involving Charles Waterstreet.

High-profile barrister Charles Waterstreet will consider declaring himself bankrupt after he was ordered to pay more than $420,000 to the Tax Office in a long-running dispute over unpaid income tax.
Waterstreet, 67, was ordered on Wednesday to pay $420,456.21 and costs after a District Court judge found he failed to pay income tax in the financial years of 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015, and did not pay subsequent penalties issued for failure to pay on time.
In court documents, Waterstreet denied some of the allegations levelled against him by the Deputy Commissioner of Taxation and said he could "neither confirm nor deny" others.
Judge Judith Gibson said Waterstreet had not offered a "substantive" defence to the allegations, adding some of his denials were "contradictory" and "not supported by any evidence".
In contrast, she said, documents provided by the Deputy Commissioner of Taxation showed "clearly there were no payments received between those dates".
"I am satisfied that the plaintiff has made out entitlement to each of the sums claimed," Judge Gibson said.
"There will accordingly be judgment for the plaintiff."
Waterstreet owed $200,892.66 for a deficit debt on his running balance account, while his "tax-related liability" for his income was $212,451.56.
The amounts related to income tax returns, payment towards his GST, and pay as you go withholding obligations over "what appears to have been an extended period of time".
Waterstreet did not appear at the hearing, nor did any lawyer acting on his behalf.
He sent an email 12 minutes after the hearing began and said he "meant no disrespect" but had been unable to get representation after his previous legal team ceased to act for him.
"I have been advised that I am in no position to defend this action and without prejudice withdraw further defence," the email said.
"I am advised to take action under the provisions of the Bankrupcy [sic] Act and ope [sic] to do so.
"I had this matter down in diary for tomorrow and as usual the shoemaker's children are worst shod. You can show this email and contents to court by way of explanation."
A second email showed he had been informed at 9.10am that he would not be represented.
Judge Gibson said Waterstreet's lawyers notified the court on February 2 they were going to withdraw from his case, which had given him a month to prepare.
"He is a barrister by profession and is experienced in court proceedings," Judge Gibson said.
"He had not only legal representation, but his own experience to draw upon."
Arthur Moses, SC, president of the NSW Bar Association, said the association would be "reviewing this development" of potential bankruptcy.
“Apart from noting this, the Legal Profession Uniform Law (NSW) prohibits the Bar Association from disclosing, directly or indirectly, any information obtained in the execution or administration of the Law or the Uniform Rules," Mr Moses said.
The past few months have been turbulent for Waterstreet, after he was accused of sexually harassing a young law student - a claim he has denied.
In February, he was due to appear on the ABC's Q&A to discuss the "#MeToo" movement against sexual misconduct. However, he withdrew at the last minute after he was told by the Bar Association his appearance would be "neither appropriate or prudent".


Question: Describe and explain the history of Ebrachosuchus neukami. Respond in 9 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe and explain the history of Ebrachosuchus neukami. Respond in 9 sentences.

Ebrachosuchus is an extinct genus of basal phytosaur known from the Late Triassic (late Carnian stage) of Bavaria, southern Germany. It is known only from the holotype BSPG 1931 X 501, a complete skull missing both mandibles. It was collected at Ebrach Quarry, bed number 9 from the late Carnian-aged Blasensandstein Member of the Hassberge Formation. It was first named by Oskar Kuhn in 1936 and the type species is Ebrachosuchus neukami.
Hunt and Lucas (1991) mistakenly referred to "Francosuchus angustifrons" as "Ebrachosuchus angustifrons", and considered it and the other two "Francosuchus" species, "F. broilii" and "F. latus", to be synonyms of "E. neukami". Furthermore, they reassigned the species to "Paleorhinus", and synonymized "Ebrachosuchus" with the former. Subsequent researches accepted this referral. More recently, a phylogenetic analysis found "E. neukami" to be more closely related to Phytosauridae than to "Paleorhinus" and thus the genus "Ebrachosuchus" was re-validated, while "F. angustifrons" was reassigned as "P. angustifrons" as it shares unique synapomorphies with the type species of "Paleorhinus" ("P. bransoni") and was found to be its sister taxon. "F. broilii" and "F. latus" were also removed from "E. neukami", as they were found to be nomina dubia.


Question: Explain why you are left-wing on economic issues. Respond in 36 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Explain why you are left-wing on economic issues. Respond in 36 sentences.

To understand why I'm left-wing on economic issues, you first need to realize how devastating it is to be autistic in the modern workforce.
I have no idea what it was like for autistic people who tried to get and hold down jobs before the condition was diagnosed in the mid-20th century — although I imagine it wasn't easy — but it is definitely hellish now. Given that I work at my dream job as a writer and am in the process of completing my Ph.D., I consider myself incredibly lucky today. But that wasn't always the case.
When I was in high school, when a classmate heard me talk excessively and enthusiastically in response to a teacher's question (a common problem for me in those days) he cuttingly observed, "Dude, you'll never be able to hold down a job." For the rest of my teenage years and into my early 20s, he wound up being proved right: I got fired from several of my early jobs (grocery store bagger, burger flipper, convenience store clerk, that sort of thing) for offenses ranging from struggling to make eye contact and talking too much, to offenses that wound up being categorized as "abrasive" and "weird."
"One of the things we always tell employers, and I tell groups when I'm speaking to them, is that most individuals on the spectrum when they lose a job, they don't lose it because of their performance on the job," Marcia Scheiner, president and founder of Integrate (formerly Asperger Syndrome Training & Employment Partnership), told Salon. "They lose it because of social missteps at work."
It is impossible to accurately convey how traumatizing — and yes, the word "traumatizing" is not only appropriate here, but necessary — this is for individuals in the autistic community.
When you try your hardest to hold down a job but are unable to do so due to factors beyond your control, the impact is profoundly demoralizing. When I spoke with other autistic friends and acquaintances for this article, all of them told stories about how they've grown terrified of being fired — some to a degree they admit is unhealthy and neurotic — because of all the previous occasions when something they said or did, but did not understand, caused them to lose a job.
Note that I didn't say "most." I said "all."
Even worse, because our culture insists that being unable to hold down a job indicates a deeper character flaw, many autistic people develop self-loathing as a result of their experiences. I know autistic men and women who are brilliant and hard-working but constantly refer to themselves as "bums" or "losers" because society has told them that, well, their inability to hold down a job proves that those things are true about them. If they dare trying to dispel those misconceptions with the facts about their situation, they're accused of coming up with excuses.
So how prevalent is this problem?
"Unfortunately in this space there is not a lot of good hard data," Scheiner said. "There are universities and hiring programs where they are starting to collect the data, but frankly there has not been enough known programs and pools of known individuals on the spectrum in employment that anyone can really collect valid data."
Scheiner added that the solution isn't likely to come from the government.
"The biggest thing that we think makes it easier for individuals on the spectrum to retain their work is training their employers. It's not something that the individual on the spectrum needs to do, it's something the employer needs to do," Scheiner told Salon.
Fortunately, there are already individuals trying to do exactly that. Within the last month there have been stories about a mother and her autistic son opening up a bakery to employ other people on the spectrum, or a start-up that creates tech jobs for individuals with autism. There are also large corporations like Microsoft, SAP, Walgreens and Freddie Mac that have made a point to try to hire individuals with autism.
These are all steps in the right direction, but they are nowhere near enough. And this brings me back to why I connect my decade-old experiences struggling as an autistic youth in the workplace with my larger belief in economic liberalism. In the end, we are only going to make life easier for autistic individuals in the workplace when we create a more compassionate, tolerant and inclusive atmosphere for everyone in the workplace.
When you hear about someone who is unemployed, or who struggles to hold down a job, check yourself before passing judgment. Dismissing those individuals as screw-ups or layabouts isn't just cruel or intellectually lazy, it is also quite often incorrect. While libertarians and conservatives tend to blame the poor for their own plight, progressives recognize that factors beyond any one individual's control can often impose terrible socioeconomic suffering on them.
Sometimes those factors are external, like the ups and downs of the business cycle or a company's decision to impose layoffs. Others are internal, like neurological conditions that we are only beginning to understand.
Either way, because I was born autistic, I understand all too well that our current economic system is not the wisest or most just one that exists. You don't have to experience discrimination as an autistic person to recognize that. You just need to be someone who the invisible hand has, at one point or another, decided could be treated as less than human.


Question: Who is Ivan Vuksich?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Who is Ivan Vuksich?

Ivan Vuksich (born 1948) is a New Zealand association football administrator. He is the chairman of Central United Football Club (1995–present) and also of Auckland City Football Club (2004–present).


Question: Explain why Huawei decided to give up plans to develop smartphones with Windows Phone.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Explain why Huawei decided to give up plans to develop smartphones with Windows Phone.

Huawei, one of the leading Chinese manufacturers of smartphones worldwide, give up plans to develop smartphones with Windows Phone, that after the company announced earlier this year it will no longer create mobile phones equipped with operating system developed by Microsoft.
The reason of renunciation is simple – Chinese manufacturer failed to make money in the production and marketing of Windows Phone devices, note the international press. A spokesman for Huawei went even further claiming that no manufacturer has managed to make money from Windows Phone, referring most perhaps at its newest partners – Blu, Lava, Micromax, Prestigio , Yezz, and others.
“The biggest problem is that Windows is not easy to develop independently on this platform. A lot of things are defined by Windows; they [Microsoft] leave [a] very small space for vendors to develop,” he told El Reg.
Huawei is one of the most dynamic manufacturers of smartphones globally company that is struggling with rival Lenovo and Xiaomi for third place among the largest manufacturers of mobile phones globally but the decision to quit production Windows phones could be a blow to Microsoft. The largest software maker worldwide and also Windows Phone developer is trying to expand market share of the operating system using massive price cuts or promotions celebrations in events dedicated to decreasing prices.


Question: Wow, talk about inspiring! What an amazing woman and program Karen Bennett has created!

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Wow, talk about inspiring! What an amazing woman and program Karen Bennett has created!

In and around Karen Bennett’s cluttered Sherman Oaks classroom, the future filmmakers of America are finding their voice: Small crews outside operate cameras, directing close-ups along with mid and wide shots; inside, groups huddle around computers, cutting on Adobe Premiere and powering up lightsabers through the magic of After Effects. As she’s bombarded with kids’ frantic questions, Bennett is Yoda, calmly dispensing knowledge.
She founded the Cinematic Arts Academy six years ago at the Millikan Middle School Affiliated Charter and Performing Arts Magnet. Since then it has consistently outshone better-funded, better-equipped competition at festivals all over the globe, even going up against 18- to 24-year-olds.
In 2014, a student film from Millikan alum Cameron Covell was licensed by Google for a Super Bowl ad. Bennett served as a music editor on such films as Planet of the Apes and Minority Report before turning to teaching. “I was working with Steven Spielberg and John Williams, and I thought, Gosh, that was the height of what I could have hoped for in my career,” she says. “But I started to feel like I wasn’t quite where I needed to be in the world—that if this wasn’t doing it for me, I was climbing the wrong mountain.” She landed in the classroom, teaching history, English, and film elective classes before starting CAAM.
Hollywood is just over the hill, but the program’s sensibility is more Bergman than Bruckheimer. Bennett, who’s 40, gives students a healthy dose of German Expressionism alongside the nuts and bolts, from basic screenwriting to advanced postproduction techniques.
“Teaching film to anybody is hard,” she says. “But teaching film to insecure middle schoolers is a special sort of package.
As with all the class films, the project got the star treatment at CAAM’s annually spring festival at the Egyptian Theatre, a fund-raising gala where kids reveal their work to the world. They get a small taste of red carpet glitz, but judging by the concession lines, it’s hardly a match for their insatiable hunger for Red Vines.
Previous articleChicago’s Famed Harold’s Chicken Shack Is Coming to L.A.


Question: Describe the iTooLL event and give an update on the project. Respond in 201 words.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the iTooLL event and give an update on the project. Respond in 201 words.

iTooLL is happening!!! Tool Lending & Co-ownership for Indy!
It’s been a year since we won the Indy 5×5 contest and held the#Tunes4Tools fundraisers, and we are pumped to officially open to the public! Come check out our space to see the tools, sign up for memberships, and connect with your community!
[UPDATE] Enjoy tasty eats and a surprise DJ! Also, at 4:30pm there will be remarks from the author of “Collective Courage” Jessica Nembhard, as we’ve joined our reception with that of the Co-ops of Color conference.
We’re so excited to finally open our efforts to the public, and we hope to see you Thursday, October 20th to share in community, refreshments and updates on the project; if you haven’t looked at the current program-details, please take a look at our iTooLL-page, and if you like- you might also take a look at the amazing next round of tools we are ordering early next week, along with current tools, in our public Wishlist & Inventory.
Interested in supporting our work? Join us at every 3rd Sunday for iTooLL Work-Parties, donate (barely-used) tools, and become a Contributor by sharing time & effort with us! Click the button, above, or click here.


Question: What resources are available to businesses that support marriage equality?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What resources are available to businesses that support marriage equality?

Scroll below the logos to see instructions on how to join our corporate support campaign.
Feel free to use the open letter of support below or submit your own original letter of support. Australian Marriage Equality will not use your logo in any other medium than our website, without your prior written permission.
You may be interested in reading relevant positive news articles and/or watching a video of our CEO breakfast where CEO s Alan Joyce (Qantas), Ann Sherry (Carnival), Mike Ebeid (SBS) and Lisa Annese (Diversity Council Australia) speak.
We, the business, industry and sporting leaders of Australia, write to express our support for Marriage Equality.
We support diversity in the workforce and recognise the rights of our lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex (LGBTI) employees to live and work, free of prejudice and discrimination, with all the essential freedoms enjoyed by other members of our organisations and the broader community.
An equitable society, free of discrimination, also allows all employees to function at their best. Australia is a robust democracy however, we support seeing it treat all its citizens equally.
Not only is marriage equality the only truly fair option, it is also a sound economic option given, that a happy workforce is a productive one. To remain competitive and to attract top talent globally organisations – and nations – must create a fair and respectful environment for all.
How will your corporate support play out in the media? Below are links to positive news articles both in Australia and the U.S. which should put your organisation at ease.
On the 5th May 2015 Australian Marriage Equality, Diversity Council Australia and Gilbert & Tobin hosted a breakfast where Australian Marriage Equality National Director Rodney Croome, Diversity Council Australia CEO Lisa Annese, SBS CEO Michael Ebeid, Carnival Australia CEO Ann Sherry and Qantas CEO Alan Joyce spoke about why marriage equality is important for business.
Below are some links to newspaper adverts that have been been used to promote the corporate support of marriage equality.


Question: Can you tell me more about the Lantern Theater Company?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Can you tell me more about the Lantern Theater Company?

Lantern Theater Company is a not-for-profit regional theater founded in 1994 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Led by founding artistic director Charles McMahon and managing director Anne Shuff, the Lantern produces a mix of classics, modern, and original works for the stage, an audience enrichment series that provides an insider's look at each production, and "Illumination", its Barrymore Award-winning education program that engages local students and adults in the world of theater and nurtures their artistic expression through in-school residencies, student matinee performances, and teaching artist training for after school programs.


Question: Describe the prodUSER platform and its products.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the prodUSER platform and its products.

prodUSER offers cycling and making enthusiasts a tool for building unique bicycles using a set of specially designed connection parts. These connection parts are used at the junctions of the four tubes that make up a bicycle frame. The aim of this product is to involve the end user into the making of the bicycle by offering a tool for building his/her own bicycle.
prodUSER is a design platform created by Tristan Kopp. Its aim is to offer you an oppor-tunity to get more involved in the creation of objects you purchase and use.
The prodUSER approach to designing products starts with dividing the object into two categories of components. The first category is made up of components that you can easily buy in any DIY or specialized shop. The second category includes connection parts that you need to link all the components of the first category and build the end product.
We design and produce the connection parts, so that you can have complete freedom in finding and choosing the elements of the first category and creating unique objects.
.You gain a lot of control and freedom to choose most of the elements used to make the end product - depending on your personal taste and budget. Your creation will be unique and will reflect your personality.
.By building the object yourself you will be aware of how it is made and how it works, so whenever you want to change or repair it, you will know exactly how to do it.
.If one of the elements breaks, you will be able to easily replace it yourself.
The first product developed by the prodUSER platform is a set of connection parts to build your own bicycle. You can order it on the prodUSER website (coming soon) or by sending an e-mail to produser@post.com.
After your order has been processed, you will receive a box containing all the connection parts, a manual to support and guide you on your making journey, and access details for the members-only section of the prodUser website.
The manual will contain information about the additional elements you will need to buy to build your bicycle. All you will need to do is choose them depending on your personal taste. If you are looking for inspiration you can always check out our online gallery of bikes built by other members of the prodUSER community.
As a member you will also be able to post questions and ask others for advice on the prodUser members' forum.
After collecting all the necessary components you will be ready to build your bicycle. Once it's ready, we hope that you will be proud of your creation and add pictures of it to prodUSER gallery for other community members to view and comment and be inspired by it.


Question: Could you tell me more about your experience with Mizzen+Main dress shirts?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Could you tell me more about your experience with Mizzen+Main dress shirts?

The item in this review was provided for review purposes by Mizzen+Main.
Mizzen+Main has three dress shirt lines, Spinnaker, Leeward, and Blue Label. The Spinnaker is their original line, focused on comfort with their highest stretch fabric. Leeward and Blue Label are made from a dressier (but still stretch) fabric, with the Blue Label adding a placket, a pointier collar, and convertible cuffs for the most dressy look.
I was able to give the Bowie Navy & White Windowpane shirt from the Leeward line a try.
When looking for a performance dress shirt, the look of the fabric is key. The polyester/spandex blend (85%/15%) Mizzen+Main has designed does just that, it looks normal. It drapes nicely and doesn’t have that synthetic sound. Close up, it does have a slight texture but the feel and appearance are smooth. The spandex gives it a noticeable four way stretch and the lightweight nature makes it comfortable in warm weather. However, it is thin enough that I would not wear the white grounded prints without an undershirt.
With the three fits offered in this shirt, it should be fairly easy for everyone to find a good fit off the rack. I find it is one of my best fitting shirts. The back darts help to keep from having extra fabric around the waist, and it is long enough to stay tucked in.
The spread collar feels just at home with the top button open or with a tie, and removable collar stays keep the collar straight.
The only issue I have is how stiff the cuffs are. While nice on the collar, the stiffening material seems a little too much to me for the cuffs. They just hold too much of a crease to look completely normal.
When wearing this shirt, you almost forget you are wearing a dress shirt due to the four way stretch. While some shirts are so stretchy the drape looks off, the sweet spot has been found here.
Another key attribute of a good performance dress shirt is its wrinkle resistance — this shirt does a great job. There were some wrinkles out of the package, but a quick steam took care of them. Other than that, I haven’t had any wrinkling issues. After a cold wash, hanging the shirt to dry takes care of all the wrinkles — so much so that it looks as sharp as a pressed shirt. This is something that I do not get with my merino dress shirts.
I’ve worn this shirt in the heat and found it to remain comfortable. The lightweight fabric does a good job of keeping you cool while wicking moisture without feeling heavy (since it dries very quickly).
The final question — how is the odor resistance? I can get just one or two days from this shirt. Since it is 100% synthetic and has no odor resistant treatment, that should be expected. However, since the fabric dries so quickly and doesn’t seem to pick up wrinkles from washing, you can get multiple wears by hand washing and hanging to dry overnight.
I liked this shirt more than I expected. It looks nice, performs well, and is very comfortable. I see this shirt fitting in anywhere you’d normally wear a dress shirt. If you need to dress it up further, I’d take a look at the Blue Label line. While it can’t beat a merino dress shirt in odor resistance, it excels in all other categories — all while looking more formal.
I last had a Mizzen+Main shirt from this collection about 18 months ago, but my recollections echo what Steve said above. It surprisingly looks normal and the stretch was stellar. The odor resistance is not there. The collars and cuffs on mine were thicker like Steve notes and I remember that being the most odd part of the shirt. Overall it’s a very good shirt and looks very ‘normal’.


Question: Describe the options FC Cincinnati has for its proposed soccer stadium.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the options FC Cincinnati has for its proposed soccer stadium.

A strongly-worded message from FC Cincinnati Friday eliminated West End from the running for a planned soccer stadium. That leaves Oakley and Newport.
A strongly worded message from FC Cincinnati late Friday eliminated West End from the running for a planned soccer stadium. That leaves Oakley and Newport.
Team officials say they have 12 days to pick which site they will present to Major League Soccer.
Putting a stadium in West End required a complicated battle with both the school board, anti-gentrification groups inside the neighborhood and in Over-the-Rhine and possibly Cincinnati City Council.
The team didn't pull any punches when it knocked West End off the list. The school board wanted $2 million a year in payments in lieu of taxes. Team leadership said a community benefits agreement would cost another $50 million.
"As with any business, FC Cincinnati must consider the economics," the statement said. "This was a once in a lifetime development opportunity for a neighborhood that wants and needs new investment."
Not only that, the club says it's up against a deadline.
FC Cincinnati General Manager Jeff Berding said a finalized stadium plan is due March 31. It's a major piece of the puzzle that could earn the team an MLS franchise. That leaves 10 working days for the team's leadership to decide where to build a stadium that is estimated to cost between $200 million and $250 million.
It's in Cincinnati. Berding, the Lindner family, Mayor John Cranley and several Cincinnati City Council members have suggested a team with Cincinnati in its name should have its home in the city.
But it's not in Cincinnati. Berding has said MLS officials are concerned the Oakley Station site, miles from Downtown, doesn't perfectly fit the league's vision for "urban" stadiums. This preference made West End a desirable site, since Oakley Station feels distinctly suburban.
The city and county are chipping in. Cincinnati offered up a $37 million infrastructure package using money from the sale of the former Blue Ash Airport, tax district funds, money from the city portion of the hotel tax and another $2.5 million in capital funding. Hamilton County agreed to build a 1,000-space parking garage on the site.
More: Traffic study says FC Cincinnati viable for Oakley. So, where does team go now?
There are parking and traffic concerns in the neighborhood. Road widening plans are already in the works. City code specifics a 21,000-seat stadium should have 4,200 parking spaces. When the team plays at Nippert Stadium, fans have access to about 6,200 parking spaces in nine different garages, but on game days there is gridlock. In Oakley, there are about 4,500 parking spaces nearby, but those are owned by businesses and Crossroads church. What do those businesses do on game days?
The proposed site is right off the highway. The former CastFab site sits right next to Interstate 71, something that can't be said for Newport.
Cranley promised more jobs in Oakley. In his pitch to fund the roads and other infrastructure for a stadium, the mayor said the fixes also would serve the Oakley Center development. He said he was already in talks with businesses interested in being located next to the stadium. He claimed thousands of new jobs would also be created by helping develop the site with city money.
It's a 30-minute walk from Fountain Square, a 9-minute Red Bike ride. From the Morelein Lager House, 20 minutes on foot. It's less than a 10-minute walk from Newport on the Levee. The Bailey, made up of FC Cincinnati's most diehard fans, love to make a grand entrance and hike over half a mile to Nippert Stadium on game days.
The river is wider in people's mind that it is on a map. While Newport is far closer to the urban core than Oakley, it's still in another state. Cincinnati has 52 neighborhoods and an east/west divide people struggle to break. Putting the stadium in Kentucky could be a bridge too far for some casual fans.
Newport is fighting for the stadium. The Northern Kentucky Chamber of Commerce and a Newport development non-profit, ReNewport, are releasing videos, planning events and even posting catchy memes on social media in an attempt to woo FC Cincinnati. Search #BuildItHereNKY on Twitter to see the evidence. While Cincinnati's school board was digging it its heels over tax dollars, Newport fans were marching to the proposed site from a local brewery.
City and Campbell County financial support is unclear. A so-called "super TIF" tax district is already in place at the Ovation site. However, it isn't clear how much money that could contribute to the project. Kentucky law also prohibits the use of sales tax money for stadiums; the state doesn't let counties levy an additional percentage atop the state's sales tax, either. No official talks have taken place between the soccer club and Newport officials. Other than the TIF for infrastructure needs, no other incentives from the city, state or county have been made public.
The site has been waiting for development for years. Newport has been looking for a project for the Ovation site for over a decade after the Great Recession mired the original vision. While Newport of the Levee has proven itself stable enough for AMC invest millions in theater improvement, its neighbor to the west has remained vacant. The owner of the site, Corporex, has a memorandum of understanding with the team.
It could be out of Berding's comfort zone. Berding was a born and bred on the north bank of the Ohio River. He grew up in Westwood, graduated from St. Xavier High School and got a degree from Miami University. He was a Cincinnati city councilman. He worked for the Bengals for nearly two decades. He knows Cincinnati and Ohio law. Doing big projects in a different state and haggling with Kentucky politicians will be new territory for him.


Question: Describe the dispute between Chris Bosh and his mother.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the dispute between Chris Bosh and his mother.

Chris Bosh is firing back at the woman who gave him life and then filed a lawsuit against him, because he wants her to get the hell out of his house and is shooting down claims he agreed to support her for life.
According to documents obtained by The Blast, Bosh says his mother Freida is refusing to get out of his Texas home, even though he has asked her to leave the property. He claims was cool with her living in the home until last year when she was arrested for allegedly exploiting a disabled person to collect money from the government.
However, Bosh says there was never a deal in place to take care of his mother for the rest of her life, and he says it’s about time she go out and find her own place to live.
He wants his mom’s lawsuit dismissed completely and for her to get out of his house.


Question: Who is Dirk Heidemann? Respond in 2 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Who is Dirk Heidemann? Respond in 2 sentences.

Dirk Heidemann (born 18 April 1961 in Berlin) is a former professional ballroom dancer, fashion model, now author, dance sport coach and choreographer from Germany. He has several years of experience in the various fields of dancing.


Question: "Hey, I am a teacher of elementary school children and I would like some help introducing my students to philosophy. Do you have any advice or resources to help me out? Thank you!"

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 "Hey, I am a teacher of elementary school children and I would like some help introducing my students to philosophy. Do you have any advice or resources to help me out? Thank you!"

I would love to find a way to introduce my students to philosophy in some sense to give them a taste of what it is that I like to do. This has been hard for me to figure out though for multiple reasons. First, since it is a public school, I am always careful of what I say and don't want to get in trouble for anything I tell to a kid that may upset a parent. I also struggle because it is difficult for me to translate a lot of the ideas that philosophy covers into terms that can be understood by elementary aged children. I did not know if you had any suggestions of a good way to introduce philosophy to kids or if you knew of any resources that I may be able to find online that could help me? Please just let me know and I look forward to hearing back from you.
Back when I blogged at Talking Philosophy, I wrote some "philosophy for kids" posts, There was one about the little red hen and one about what we'd do if we discovered little people like The Borrowers living under our floorboards. Would we treat them as second class citizens, just because of their size?
I think using children's literature as a springboard for talking about philosophy is a cool idea. That's what happens very naturally--you read with kids, and certain books lead to good discussions. But which books have that potential? I think I recall someone publishing a story-oriented philosophy book for kids, but I can't think who that is.
Anyone have ideas about how to introduce young kids to philosophy, using fiction, or not using fiction, or using online resources? Your assistance much appreciated!
Magic tricks, optical illusions, etc are fantastic ways of getting kids to think about reality, vs appearances.
You can try to actually perform some famous thought experiments. Descartes' wax example in Meditation 2 can be recreated with gumballs (I do this with my students all the time).
You can let them read a short mystery (encyclopedia brown sort of mystery) and then go through the logic of the detective.
Pick up something like Harry Potter and philosophy, Star Wars and Philosophy, etc, for ideas on how to make popular culture they're familiar with philosophical and interesting.
Have you ever heard of Matthew Lipman?
He is recognized as the founder of Philosophy for Children. His decision to bring philosophy to young people came from his experience as a professor at Columbia University, where he witnessed underdeveloped reasoning skills in his students.
His interest was particularly on developing reasoning skills by teaching logic. The belief that children possess the ability to think abstractly from an early age, led him to the conviction that bringing logic to children's education earlier would help them to improve their reasoning skills.
Is it better to be an unhappy boy or a happy pig?
You should contact Peter Shea in Minnesota. He did this for many years in the tradition of Lipman. He has a lot of video of it.
is a website for materials to use in doing philosophy with children.
is a book for young children that seemed to get good reviews (I don't know what age group third-grade is).
The Philosophy Shop is a charity promoting philosophy in schools they may be able to offer some advice.
May be of interest thee BBC on "Teaching philosophy with Spider-Man"
"...philosophy professors are finding superheroes and comic books to be exceptionally useful tools in helping students think about the complex moral and ethical debates that have occupied philosophers for centuries. Moreover, superheroes are attracting students to a discipline often perceived as overrun by musty books, suede elbow patches and bow ties..."


Question: Describe the match between Austin Elite Rugby and the San Diego Legion. Respond in detail.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the match between Austin Elite Rugby and the San Diego Legion. Respond in detail.

Austin Elite Rugby welcomed the San Diego Legion to Texas and ran them right back out of town. San Diego never showed up to play, they just provided bodies. Austin had their way with the Legion in this match.
Timothée Guillimin put the first points of the day on the board with a penalty kick. There was a little bit of confusion for San Diego. Dylan Audsley put a clearance kick downfield but Austin got a hand on it and it fell into Cam Dolan's hands near halfway. The referee called Dolan for offsides because he didn't view Dolan as retreating quick enough.
Siaosi Finau put the first try of the day on the board. Austin went with a quick lineout to Hanco Germishuys who offloaded to Finau for the try. Germishuys added a second try for Austin. Hanco scored against a thin Legion defense who rushed up on the previous phase.
Sione Fangaiuiha looked to have a long range try for Austin, but Dylan Audsley was able to come over and make the save, as he forced a knock on right before Fangaiuiha touched down for the try. Hanco Germishuys was sent off just a few minutes before halftime after a high, swinging arm tackle on Nate Augsperger.
The first half was kind for Austin, not so much for the Legion. Austin was able to take a 17-0 advantage into halftime by taking advantage of San Diego miscues. The Legion let their scoring chances go by making small mistakes. Knock ons, offsides, and having a free kick touched dead in the in goal area were just some of the San Diego miscues.
Timothée Guillimin looked to get the scoring started early in the second half, but his 45+ meter penalty kick hit off the crossbar. Zinzan Elan-Puttick extended the Austin lead after breaking through the Legion defense. Tadhg Leader put a quick through that bounced into Puttick's hands and he went the distance for the try.
The Legion finally got on the board 60 minutes into the game. With a penalty advantage, the Legion put in a cross field kick that they recovered and offloaded into the hands of Drew Gaffney for the try. Marcus Walsh put the match out of the reach of the Legion. He used the over-commitment of the Legion defense to score the try. Guillimin converted the try to extend the Elite lead to 31-5.
JP Du Plessis had a chance to put more points on the board for the Legion, but was called for knocking on before he could dot down for the try. Austin also had an opportunity to extend their lead further near the end of the match, but the Legion forced them into touch.
Austin was this close to having the first ever shut out in Major League Rugby. After being considered one of the worst performing sides in the first half of the 2018 season, the Elite showed why they shouldn't be counted out. Their scrum overpowered the Legion's at points, but they got overpowered themselves at others. The Elite's defense performed admirably and except for just a couple little slip ups, they could've been perfect.
The Legion probably have nothing good to take away from this match. Yeah, they scored, but that could be attributed to the fatigue of Austin. They overthrew their lineout almost every time. They knocked on or just plain gave the ball away any time that had any semblance of offense. Their defense came up to fast and left them exposed. It's a tossup between whether or not this performance is worse than their match against Seattle.
Austin is back next Friday, June 1st as they host the Utah Warriors in rematch from earlier this season. The Legion have a week to recover before they travel to New Orleans to take on the Gold on Saturday, June 9th.


Question: Respond briefly. Describe the village of Aragats.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Respond briefly. Describe the village of Aragats.

Aragats (, until 1946, Khznauz) is a village in the Armavir Province of Armenia. The village's church, dedicated to Saint Stepanos, dates to 1870. There is a Urartian fortress nearby.


Question: Describe the species of Inermicosta.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the species of Inermicosta.

Inermicosta inermicosta is a species of sea snail, a marine gastropod mollusk in the family Muricidae, the murex snails or rock snails.
This species is distributed in the Western Atlantic Ocean along Gabon and Angola.


Question: What did Access Fund and RCA do to help protect Rumney's Northwest Crags? Respond in 439 words.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What did Access Fund and RCA do to help protect Rumney's Northwest Crags? Respond in 439 words.

Rumney Climber’s Association (RCA) and Access Fund are excited to announce that we have completed the second phase of protecting Rumney’s Northwest Crags (aka the Final Frontier). In just under a year, the climbing community rallied to raise over $100,000, and RCA now owns the 85-acre property. Access Fund provided RCA with two loans to cover the gap in the purchase price, which RCA will pay back after they transfer the property to White Mountain National Forest.
The Final Frontier property extends half a mile along Buffalo Road and gains 600 feet up the forested slopes of Rattlesnake Mountain. It featured the final set of privately owned climbing resources at Rumney—including Northwest Territories, Buffalo Pit, Northwest Passage, Prudential, Asylum, and the western portion of the Black Jack Boulders. This latest acquisition extends Access Fund and RCA’s legacy of land protection at Rumney, which began in 1994 when Access Fund purchased Meadows, 5.8 Crag, Monsters, and the main parking area, which we later transferred to the US Forest Service (USFS) for long term protection.
In January of 2016, Access Fund lent RCA $10,000 to secure an Option Agreement on the property, giving them one year and the sole right to purchase the property. The two organizations worked together to launch a large-scale fundraising campaign to raise $300,000 to purchase the property and make stewardship improvements. The climbing community stepped up in a big way: the Appalachian Mountain Club’s (AMC) New Hampshire Chapter & Mountaineering Committee and Boston Chapter & Mountaineering Committee collectively donated over $40,000 to match and fuel additional donations. We extend our gratitude to each and every individual, group, climbing gym, and company that donated!
Access Fund provided RCA with a second loan of $110,000 from its Climbing Conservation Loan Program to finalize the fundraising and allow RCA to apply more funds towards stewardship improvements.
Now that the purchase is complete, RCA will take advantage of its short-term ownership by constructing a new parking area, toilet, and trail system to the Northwest Crags. These improvements will help alleviate crowding at the main parking area and crags.
For the final phase of this project, Access Fund will help RCA transfer the property to the USFS within the next two years for permanent conservation. The USFS, with support from RCA and Access Fund, is seeking federal funding from the Land and Water Conservation Fund to complete the hold and transfer, match climbers’ donations, and return loan funds so that Access Fund can re-invest the Climbing Conservation Loan money to protect other important climbing areas around the country.
Thanks for the generous support and stay tuned for updates and volunteer opportunities.


Question: What happened to Reuben Foster?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What happened to Reuben Foster?

Sarah Ravani and Eric Branch Feb. 11, 2018 Updated: Feb. 11, 2018 8:20 p.m.
Reuben Foster, the 49ers’ inside linebacker, was arrested Sunday on charges of domestic violence, threats and possession of an assault weapon, police said.
A news release from the Los Gatos-Monte Sereno Police Department said Foster, 23, was arrested without incident in Los Gatos after police received a call around 9:15 a.m. about a disturbance. He was held on $75,000 bail, according to Santa Clara County Jail booking records. He was released at around 6:35 p.m., the Sacramento Bee reported.
The San Jose Mercury News reported that the accuser was a woman who was in a long-term relationship with Foster and that investigating officers found what looked like an assault rifle inside the home.
Foster, the NFL’s Defensive Rookie of the Month for November, ranked second on the team in tackles (72). The designation came after he missed five games because of a high ankle sprain and another because of back spasms.
General Manager John Lynch had previously said the 49ers were attracted to Foster for his enthusiasm and passion for the sport. The 49ers said they aided Foster with a strong support system that includes two former NFL linebackers on their coaching staff, Johnny Holland and DeMeco Ryans. Ryans, like Foster, also attended the University of Alabama.
At Alabama, Foster won the Butkus Award, which is given to the nation’s top linebacker, and was viewed as a top-10 pick in the NFL draft based on his talent. However, the 49ers traded up to select him No. 31 overall after he fell because of character and medical concerns. He underwent shoulder surgery to repair his rotator cuff after his final college season.
MMQB.com reported a team with a top-15 pick didn’t have Foster on its draft board because of his “immaturity” and “issues with life skills,” and that was before his failed drug test and altercation at the combine.
Foster is not the only athlete on the team to have faced domestic violence charges in the past year. In April, Santa Clara County prosecutors filed felony domestic violence charges against former 49ers cornerback Tramaine Brock. He was accused of trying to strangle his girlfriend multiple times, once when she was holding their 1-year-old child.
Brock was cut from the 49ers the day after he was arrested.
The charges against Brock were dropped nearly a month later due to insufficient evidence, according to prosecutors.
A week after Brock was released, Lynch was asked if he had a zero-tolerance policy with players when it came to domestic violence. He stressed the value of character and said each case would be viewed independently.
Last month, after Foster’s arrest for marijuana possession, Lynch was optimistic about his future.
Under the NFL’s domestic violence policy, players are given a six-game suspension for a first incident and a lifetime ban for a second incident.


Question: Describe the 1954 Round Australia Trial. Respond in 53 words.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the 1954 Round Australia Trial. Respond in 53 words.

The 1954 Round Australia Trial, officially the Redex Trial was the second running of the Round Australia Trial. The rally took place between the 3rd and the 20th of July 1954. The event covered 16,900 kilometres around Australia. It was won by Jack 'Gelignite' Murray and Bill Murray, driving a Ford 1948 V8.


Question: How can I get the Love Time Script font for free?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 How can I get the Love Time Script font for free?

Love Time a Beautiful Handwritten Brush Free Download.
This font is designed by Olexs Studio. You can download demo version of Love Time Script Free. This font is suitable for wedding invitation, greeting cards, T-Shirt, Logo or any design that you create.


Question: What’s happening in Winnipeg this summer?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What’s happening in Winnipeg this summer?

Ultimate. WFDF 2018 World Masters Ultimate Club Championships (WMUCC), Winnipeg, Canada. 72 Teams from 13 countries: 21 in the Mixed Division, 15 in the Women’s Division, 21in the Men’s Division and 15 in the Grand Master's Men's Division ~ Australia, Canada, Colombia, France, Germany, India, Japan, Korea, Mexico, New Zealand, Singapore, United Kingdom and the United States of America are all sending representation to Winnipeg! For more info, please visit: http://wmucc2018.com. #wmucc2018 #EuroUltiFan #Ultimate #Frisbee #Fanseat PLEASE NOTE: The Fanseat User Support may not be available at all times during this tournament. The best time to reach us is during office hours CET. The response time outside the office hours may be longer than usual. Thanks for your patience in advance.


Question: What do you know about Cesare Federici? Respond briefly.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What do you know about Cesare Federici? Respond briefly.

Cesare Federici (c. 1530 – 1600/03) was an Italian merchant and traveler.


Question: Hey, have you heard of bumper cars?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Hey, have you heard of bumper cars?

It's time to increase speed and hit your opponent, if you manage to dodge the blow you will become a master of the bumper cars. Choose a vehicle, turn on the lights and turn the disco ball, soon the fun will begin.
One of the great unknowns within the world of fairgrounds revolves around the exact origin of the bumper cars. Some claim that they were invented by Victor Levand, who came to work for General Electric, while others say that the creators were Max and Harold Stoehrer, of Massachusetts.
What is certain is that the Stoehrer brothers were the first to develop the patent for their bumper cars, created the 'Shock Company' at the beginning of the 20th century and brought to light their first model in 1920.
One of the properties of magnets is that they have the possibility of joining or repelling. If you apply it to this set, there could be two modes, a normal tracking mode, and another crazy mode, where the magnets repel each other looking for their best output.
After this small historical and technical pause, just tell you that the set includes the "Supercar circuit", 8 minifigures, a kitten, a crane and 5 bumper cars.
A set that I think ensures a lot of fun. Thank you very much for the visit, I hope I won your support.


Question: Respond in 3 sentences. Can you tell me which locomotives are used on Britain's mainline network?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Respond in 3 sentences. Can you tell me which locomotives are used on Britain's mainline network?

This page lists every locomotive allocated a TOPS classification and all modern traction (e.g. diesel, electric, gas turbine, petrol) stock used on the mainline network since 1948 (i.e. British Railways and post-privatisation).