Question: Describe how the U.S. food system is broken, and how President Trump's $12 billion bailout plan highlights and tries to rectify this issue.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe how the U.S. food system is broken, and how President Trump's $12 billion bailout plan highlights and tries to rectify this issue.

The president's $12 billion plan to help those hurt by his trade war highlights the deep-rooted dysfunction of the U.S. agriculture industry.
American farmers are furious, and President Donald Trump is trying to calm them in the only way he knows how: throw money at them.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture is trying to put a band-aid on a self-inflicted wound. The administration clobbers farmers with an unnecessary trade war then attempts to assuage them with taxpayer handouts. This bailout compounds bad policy with more bad policy.
Trump’s trade war may be new, but welfare for farmers is not. Indeed, the fact that $12 billion in aid is widely seen as a meager, temporary solution only highlights the broader problem: The American food system is broken, and has been for a long time.
There’s little doubt that Trump’s tariffs are punishing farmers. After the United States taxed imports of more than 800 Chinese products this month, Beijing responded by taxing 545 American items, including soybeans, rice, beef, nuts, pork, dairy, and produce. Much of the agricultural industry relies on exports to survive. Pork producers, for example, send about 26 percent of all production overseas, and one-third of U.S. soybeans are sent to China each year. As a result, the average hog farmer is now losing $20 to $25 per pig, Iowa Pork Producers Association President Gregg Hora told NPR, and soybeans have fallen to their lowest prices in a decade.
Thus, the government now spends an average of $16 billion annually to buy products from farmers who can’t find buyers in America or overseas. This has resulted in a massive stockpiling of food across the country. U.S. dairy producers, for example, have a 1.39 billion-pound surplus of cheese—its largest surplus on record—because they have selectively bred cows to overproduce milk, and milk is stored best as cheese. There’s also a 2.5 billion pound surplus of meat, Vox reported this week, which is partially due to Trump’s tariffs but also the waning interest in meat.
In addition to costing the government billions without adequately feeding Americans, the farm industry’s overproduction has also caused a veritable drinking water crisis in rural areas across the country. Nitrogen-based fertilizer from large-scale agriculture has a tendency to slide off of farmlands and into the nation’s freshwater systems, causing serious nitrate pollution in towns in the Mississippi River Valley. Drinking water with even small amounts of nitrates increases the risk of colon, kidney, ovarian and bladder cancers, according to the National Cancer Institute.
Trump’s bailout is supposed to be temporary. Eventually, he argues, the trade war will pay off—farmers will no longer need taxpayer help. “The farmers will be the biggest beneficiary. Watch,” he said. “We’re opening up markets. You watch what’s going to happen. Just be a little patient.” Is it possible that, with a long-running trade war, Trump can fix America’s broken food system? Sure, it’s possible. Perhaps when pigs fly.


Question: Tell me about Spaniel.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Tell me about Spaniel.

Spaniel (1828–1833) was a British Thoroughbred racehorse. In a career that lasted from July 1830 to early 1833 he ran eighteen times and won nine races. After an unsuccessful season as a two-year-old he made significant improvement in 1831 to win his first three races, culminating in The Derby. Spaniel failed to win again for over a year but then recovered to win five races on Welsh racecourses in 1832. He died after being injured on his first start as a five-year-old in 1833.


Question: Describe the effectiveness of vegan campaigns and animal welfare campaigns in raising awareness and reducing animal product consumption.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the effectiveness of vegan campaigns and animal welfare campaigns in raising awareness and reducing animal product consumption.

Do vegan campaigns work to spread a compassionate message? So far, there are no definitive studies that analyze the effectiveness of vegan campaigns in creating change. However, Veganuary, a UK-based charity that encourages people to try veganism for the month of January and throughout the year, could provide some insight into what makes a successful campaign.
Launched in 2014, the Veganuary website provides curious individuals with vegan recipes, resources, and motivation. According to the organization, the number of sign-ups for the campaign has roughly doubled each year since its conception.
In 2014, a mere 3,300 signed up to try a plant-based diet. But in 2018, the charity reported that a record-breaking 168,542 took part. The BBC picked up on the campaign’s wild success, and last February, it credited Veganuary for the nation’s surge in vegans. Recent research backs this claim: veganism has risen by 700 percent between 2015-2017, now representing 7 percent of the British population.
Riding on a successful four years of promoting veganism throughout the country, last July, Veganuary announced it is aiming for global expansion. The majority of the campaign’s participants reside in English-speaking countries, but through crowdfunding, campaign organizers hope to hire new staff and launch new websites in languages for people across the globe. An emphasis will be put on countries where meat consumption is highest, such as China, Brazil, and India and each country’s campaign website will feature plant-based recipes for traditional cultural dishes.
Additionally, Veganuary organizers will take care to address which approach works in each nation. “We want to embrace cultural differences and make sure that we’re talking to people in a way that is relevant for them. What works well in Australia might not work quite so well in Portugal, and vice versa,” the crowdfunding page states.
In Hong Kong, Green Mondays, the leading vegan campaign and social venture group in Asia, has steadily worked to increase the number of plant-based options available to the community.
Established in 2012 by founder David Yeung, who also created the Hong Kong-based vegan market and restaurant chain Green Common, Green Mondays has played a large role in giving increased visibility to both local and international brands, including food tech company JUST and plant-based meat brand, Beyond Meat. So far, the vegan Beyond Burger is a huge success with meat-eating Hong Kong consumers, whose appetites for the realistic “bleeding” patty have led sales to quadruple in just one year.
The growing interest in vegan food within Hong Kong has also allowed for the emergence of domestic brands that specialize in creating plant-based products. Last April, Yeung launched the vegan meat brand Right Treat. Its premier product, Omnipork, a high-protein vegan pork made from a proprietary blend of pea, soy, shiitake mushroom, and rice, caters to the Asian community, where pork is the most popular meat. Green Common has also launched The Kind Kitchen, a Nan Fun Place-based venue that will serve as a location for events, vegan product launches, and plant-based cooking demonstrations.
International animal rights nonprofit PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) is perhaps best-known for its use of confrontational ads in order to secure better rights for animals. In an article discussing the backlash against a series of non-graphic vegan ads launched in the Toronto subway system, author Jessica Scott-Reid gives a brief overview of PETA’s successes.
In February 1993, American automobile manufacturer General Motors ceased the use of live animals in crash tests in response to public pressure from PETA. And in February 1994, American fashion designer Calvin Klein banned fur after reflecting on “the humane treatment of animals.” Additionally, major fast-food chain McDonald’s committed to more “humane” slaughter methods for chickens after years of campaigning.
“If PETA can influence change in these mega-brands, there is no doubt it can get Toronto subway commuters thinking,” Scott-Reid wrote.
Further, combined with nonprofit campaigns, recent insight into the adverse effects that animal agriculture can have on people’s health and the planet has led many to at least consciously reduce their consumption of animal products.
Do animal welfare campaigns work? Animal rights groups and vegan campaigns are making people think with initiatives such as Veganuary.


Question: What is Specialisterne? Respond in 2 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What is Specialisterne? Respond in 2 sentences.

Specialisterne (The Specialists) is a Danish social innovator company using the characteristics of people with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) as competitive advantages in the business market.
Specialisterne provides services such as software testing, quality control and data conversion for business companies in Denmark (and Canada).


Question: What is Watch Muskegon?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What is Watch Muskegon?

Watch Muskegon is a county-wide, privately funded campaign, launched by a number of local businesses, individuals and passionate Muskegon residents.
The goal of the six-year campaign is to improve the overall image of the Muskegon area, share the positive changes that have already taken place, and educate residents on Muskegon’s assets. Watch Muskegon is focusing on three pillars to accomplish these goals: Beautification, Education and Marketing.
The positive impact of the Watch Muskegon Campaign shines through with its beautification efforts.
The education efforts begin with sharing Muskegon’s unique assets, natural beauty, and economic successes through various programs.
A significant focus of the campaign has been to push the Watch Muskegon message out locally and beyond.


Question: Explain how to use the Timeline plugin in Sketch to create animations and interactive components with states.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Explain how to use the Timeline plugin in Sketch to create animations and interactive components with states.

Drag and drop layers in each state to animate.
Transition from state to state with interactions.
For example, we have here day and night states.
Timeline is a Sketch plugin. It allows you to work end-end inside Sketch.
All your creations, from animations to interactions are saved right into your Sketch file.
For example, a click on the switch jumps between states.
Symbols, artboards & groups can all turn into interactive components. Components may contain other components, just like nesting symbols in Sketch.
For example, a screen may have multiple buttons.
Wanna make it to your live product?
or embed it in your site.
Developers can’t read GIFs, but they do speak code.
Save them hours, hand them code.
Symbols, artboards & groups can all turn into interactive components. Components can contain other components, just like nested symbols in Sketch.
For example, a screen can have multiple nested buttons.
Work faster with all states laid out, just like artboards.
Design Interactions and Export to Code, All Inside Sketch.


Question: What are your thoughts on Ralph Drollinger's Capitol Ministries?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What are your thoughts on Ralph Drollinger's Capitol Ministries?

Ralph Drollinger’s Capitol Ministries is out with its first-of-the-year Bible study for public officials. Capitol Ministries runs weekly Bible studies for members of the Trump administration Cabinet and dozens of members of Congress, and has aggressive plans to expand its already significant reach at local, state and international levels.
Drollinger pretends that his group does not push a particular policy agenda, but the Bible study guides he publishes make it clear that his particular worldview and interpretation of the Bible is directly tied to right-wing economic and social policies, such as his portrayal of social welfare programs as unbiblical and his insistence that only righteous Christians can make righteous lawmakers and judges.
It is critically important for the public servant to view the world through the eyes of Scripture: That man is fallen and that Government is meant by God to quell evil in the world. Government then is a manifestation of God’s restraining grace in a fallen world.
To view the world as basically good, and in need of my reasoning abilities — as if others will come to the conclusion to do what’s right when convinced intellectually — is naïve, unwise, and at the very least, viewing the world through rose-colored glasses. The unrest most recently in France and Syria, in Israel, Ukraine, Libya, our borders, and so many other places around the globe, only serves to illustrate the premise of this Bible study: without strong Governments intent on quelling evil, the fallen, sin nature of man will be increasingly on the rise. Governments and their leaders must send a constant message that sin will be punished. When I hear of the present administration trying to reason with terrorists who believe their deity commands them to kill us, I am reminded of Mark Twain’s saying about trying to teach a pig to sing: it wastes your time and annoys the pig.
May this be a basic conviction and understanding relative to your God-given job as a leader in Government; may your convictions be based upon a scripturally solid understanding of sin. May humanistic naiveté come to an end not only in the White House but also on the Hill.


Question: Describe the work of photographer Kris Provoost.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the work of photographer Kris Provoost.

An arched skyscraper in Suzhou, a museum in Guangzhou composed of Tetris-like blocks and a Shanghai theater with a bronze facade that moves constantly throughout the day -- these are just some of the bold Chinese buildings that have attracted attention and, for some, raised eyebrows in the past decade.
In Kris Provoost's striking images, however, China's unusual modern architecture takes on a new, surreal beauty. By digitally removing the surrounding cityscape and replacing it with a bright blue backdrop (the type rarely associated with the country's skies), the Belgian photographer hopes to portray his subjects in a fairer light.
"In reality, these buildings are probably not as pretty as they look in my photographs because of the current conditions in China," Provoost said in a phone interview from Shanghai, where he works as an architect with the firm GMP Architekten.
"And if I wanted a blue-sky day to photograph on, I'd be waiting forever," he added.
By presenting China's buildings outside the context of the cities they inhabit, Provoost encourages viewers to focus on patterns, geometry and finer details that may otherwise go unnoticed. The photos' unconventional angles and close-up composition offer a new perspective to those already familiar with the structures.
While admitting that he presents an idealized vision of architecture often ridiculed for promoting "weird" shapes and attention-grabbing designs (indeed, his photo collections go by the names "Beautified China I & II"), Provoost sees his work as a celebration of the country's modern buildings. In any case, fitting in with the surroundings is not always a priority for designers, the 30-year-old explained.
"Some (foreign architects) create proposals for one city in China and then, a year later, when it's not built, they just propose it for another city," he said. "Architects will always say it's about context, but with this kind of iconic architecture, you're building in order to stand out."
Provoost's first collection featured some of the country's most recognizable buildings, such as Beijing's CCTV Headquarters and the Guangzhou Opera House. But the follow-up series, published for the very first time on CNN, focuses on standout architecture in lesser-known cities like Nanning, Harbin and Ningbo.
"If I can shed a bit of a spotlight on the other cities, then maybe people can learn a little bit about what's going on there," he said, adding that he thinks Chinese architecture is often misunderstood. "People might think the buildings are out of scale, but maybe they haven't been to China. If you roam around the streets (of these cities), you see that the scale is completely different."
Most of the structures featured in Provoost's two series were completed in the build-up to -- or the years following -- the Beijing Olympics in 2008. This period of booming construction saw cities across China commission high-profile landmarks, many of which were designed by foreign architects.
But in the wake of a 2016 government directive calling for an end to "bizarre" and "odd-shaped" buildings, there appears to be less appetite for experimental designs. Provoost's images capture a moment in time -- one that may soon be coming to an end.
"It was a flamboyant decade that is, now, totally fading," he said. "These buildings will stand for many more years or decades, but there will be fewer and fewer of them. It has already started in the 'first-tier' cities, like Beijing and Shanghai, where they are becoming more aware that they need to respect their heritage. Instead of just wiping out (old buildings), they now restore them."
Bad news, perhaps, for future installations of the "Beatified China" series. But as an architect who has worked in China for eight years -- including stints at firms headed by "starchitects" Zaha Hadid and Ole Scheeren -- Provoost welcomes the shift in attitudes.
"I think it's great," he said. "I'm from a European city, where heritage is everything, and it can go to extremes -- they don't let you touch anything. But here (in Shanghai), there's an interesting mix of old and new that makes a nice space for people."


Question: What happened in Venezuela with Nixon in 1958?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What happened in Venezuela with Nixon in 1958?

On this day in 1958, anti-American demonstrators pelt then-Vice President Richard Nixon’s limousine with rocks in Caracas, Venezuela.
In April 1958, seeking to improve U.S. relations with Latin American countries, President Dwight Eisenhower sent Nixon on a trip to South America. The journey ended up generating more ill will than good. In Peru and Ecuador, protestors accosted Nixon over America’s policy of giving military support to political coups in Central America. The Venezuelan government and the American embassy in Caracas had warned Eisenhower earlier not to send Nixon to Venezuela, where anti-American sentiment ran particularly high—he went anyway.
In his book Six Crises, Nixon recounted that day’s frightening events. With only 12 Secret Service agents for protection, his motorcade encountered hundreds of angry protestors who spit on his car, smashed its windows and rocked it from side to side, threatening to turn it over while chanting Death to Nixon! and Nixon Go Home! The Secret Service radioed for help from the Venezuelan military, which dispatched troops to clear the protestors and escorted the motorcade to safety.
When Eisenhower received word of Nixon’s ordeal, he ordered a U.S. naval squadron to the Venezuelan coast just in case the vice president had to be evacuated by helicopter and spirited away to a waiting ship. However, Nixon was able to fly out of the Caracas airport without incident the next day. He arrived at the Washington airport to the cheers of 15,000 well-wishers, including Eisenhower and his cabinet members.


Question: What will happen if Trump scraps the Iran nuclear deal?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What will happen if Trump scraps the Iran nuclear deal?

LONDON (Reuters) - A senior Iranian official said on Tuesday that Tehran might quit a treaty designed to stop the spread of nuclear weapons if U.S. President Donald Trump scraps the nuclear accord Iran signed with world powers in 2015.
Trump has said that unless European allies fix what he has called “terrible flaws” in the accord by May 12, he will restore U.S. economic sanctions on Iran, which would be a severe blow to the pact.
The other powers that signed it - Russia, China, Germany, Britain and France - have all said they want to preserve the agreement that curbed Iran’s nuclear program in return for the lifting of most international sanctions.
In a news conference broadcast on state television, the secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, Ali Shamkhani, said the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran was ready for some “surprising actions” if the nuclear deal was scrapped.
“I am telling those in the White House that if they do not live up to their commitments...the Iranian government will firmly react,” Rouhani said in a speech.
“If anyone betrays the deal, they should know that they would face severe consequences,” he told a cheering crowd of thousands gathered in the city of Tabriz. “Iran is prepared for all possible situations,” he added.
Iran has said it will ramp up its nuclear program if the deal collapses.
The Russian Foreign Ministry’s Director General for Non-Proliferation and Arms Control, Vladimir Yermakov, told the meeting that the deal, known as the JCPOA, was fragile and any attempt to amend it would affect the global non-proliferation regime.


Question: Respond in detail. Tell me a story about a young student in love.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Respond in detail. Tell me a story about a young student in love.

'The musicians will sit in their gallery,' said the young Student, 'and play upon their stringed instruments, and my love will dance to the sound of the harp and the violin. She will dance so lightly that her feet will not touch the floor, and the courtiers in their gay dresses will throng round her. But with me she will not dance, for I have no red rose to give her;' and he flung himself down on the grass, and buried his face in his hands, and wept.
'He is weeping for a red rose,' said the Nightingale.
'She has form,' he said to himself, as he walked away through the grove - 'that cannot be denied to her; but has she got feeling? I am afraid not. In fact, she is like most artists; she is all style, without any sincerity. She would not sacrifice herself for others. She thinks merely of music, and everybody knows that the arts are selfish. Still, it must be admitted that she has some beautiful notes in her voice. What a pity it is that they do not mean anything, or do any practical good.' And he went into his room, and lay down on his little pallet-bed, and began to think of his love; and, after a time, he fell asleep.
'Well, upon my word, you are very ungrateful,' said the Student angrily; and he threw the rose into the street, where it fell into the gutter, and a cart-wheel went over it.


Question: Explain how the recent press coverage of Volafile came to be.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Explain how the recent press coverage of Volafile came to be.

I am the creator of Volafile, a filesharing site that is currently receiving a broad range of undesirable press coverage on Business Insider, Daily Mail, CNN, Sky News and more.
Disclaimer: I responded to the incident with all possible speed that was allowed by my resources. But sometimes the resources (mostly time) one can pour into planning and administration are not enough. That is what this article is about.
Volafile is just a hobby project of mine, and recent developments now have me seriously considering to just shut it down. But let’s not get distracted by that and instead focus on the events that lead up to the current situation and learn our lesson.
I’ll start with the way Volafile is organized. I obviously have the final say in most things regarding moderation of the site, but I could not manage the feat without an awesome team of moderators. Moderators on Volafile are essencially ordinary users who have earned my trust in some way. They have the power to ban, mute and moderate the list of files at their own discrestion.
To guide them and introduce some consistency (users hate getting banned for random stuff) there’s a general rulebook and some internal communication.
And that’s where the problems started. On Volafile we are already accustomed to dealing with problematic rooms, though not on the scale we experienced recently. Earlier this year I instructed moderators that unless the whole room is full of problematic content, to just remove the offending files, ban the uploader, but let the rest of the room alone. I didn’t want to ruin everyone’s experience just because there was one foul apple lurking among them.
That didn’t work out too well when the ‘The Fappening’ rooms started. Uploaders of obviously illegal content got banned and the files deleted, uploading to some rooms got disabled. But that left the chat of the rooms intact which users used to re-organize themselves in new rooms. New rooms got created faster than any moderator could identify illegal content. On top of that some of the moderators weren’t even aware of the illegality of the content. I can’t blame them for not knowing the laws of countries they don’t live in themselves.
Meanwhile I just launched head first into a part-time job and my first semester of university (Yay!) was starting. My new everyday life had me pretty much distracted. I had time for the bare minimum to keep Volafile afloat, making sure all bills were paid and enough moderators were available at every time of the day (timezones are something nasty).
By now I was also receiving e-mail from concerned users alerting me of some few rooms and I fully removed the offending rooms as they got reported, but made the mistake of treating them as isolated incidents. I didn’t quite grasp the scale of the situation until James Cook from Business Insider contacted me and asked me to comment on how I deal with ‘The Fappening’ rooms on Volafile.
I shifted from passively reacting to reports into purging mode. But even though now I was identifying and removing ‘The Fappening’ rooms on a regular basis, the leakers weren’t bothered too much by it. They changed IPs, moved to new rooms and organized everything on websites outside Volafile.
I changed my approach again and after some research I was able to find places they used to announce new rooms for sharing the celebrity pictures on Volafile. They also published a long list of backup rooms they would use once I had deleted their main room again. Which was why - in the past - they were able to switch to new rooms so fast.
This time knowing of every room they’d use in advance, it was an easy job to purge them from Volafile completely. They even tried to create new rooms for sharing their content for multiple days, but I was prepared and they had no chance to establish anything that lasted even a few hours.
But the damage to Volafile’s reputation was already done.
A lack of communication, and in my case absence, left the moderators unsure on how to treat the content. Because of my absence I didn’t get a good picture of what was actually happening on Volafile, the only ones alerting me about the content wasn’t my team of moderators, but concerned users who sent me mail. But of course a normal user can’t see the bigger picture, which is only something a moderator could do. Meanwhile the moderators weren’t sure how to treat the content, so they just applied instructions I had given much earlier for unrelated incidents which amounted to nothing in face of the new challenge.
I’m less and less convinced a filehoster is something you can run as a hobby. I lack resources in time and money to actually ensure the integrity of the site. Don’t get me wrong. I still believe Volafile did much better than most other filesharing sites that got abused in the recent incident - some still haven’t removed the content from their servers. But that doesn’t mean I’m satisfied with the speed with which I was able to respond.


Question: Can you tell me something about David Wright O’Brien? Respond in 43 words.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Can you tell me something about David Wright O’Brien? Respond in 43 words.

David Wright O’Brien (1918–1944) was an American fantasy and science fiction writer. A nephew of Farnsworth Wright, editor of Weird Tales, he was 22 years old when his first story ("Truth Is a Plague!") appeared in the February 1940 issue of Amazing Stories.


Question: What happened to Antonella Barba?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What happened to Antonella Barba?

Antonella Barba was arrested for selling or intending to sell 100 grams or more of heroin, a charge that carries a minimum of five years in prison.
Antonella Barba, the fresh-faced singer from Point Pleasant who millions watched during her 2007 run on "American Idol," is locked up in a Virginia jail this morning accused of heroin distribution.
Update: As of Monday, Barba remains in jail. Read details of her arraignment here.
The 31-year-old, now of Los Angeles, was arrested on Thursday. Her arrest was first reported Saturday by TMZ.
The Jersey Shore native made it into the final 16 of the sixth season of American Idol. That year was the show's second-highest rated during its run on Fox as one of the most successful television programs of all time.
The Norfolk (Virginia) City Jail's website shows Barba was arrested for selling or intending to sell 100 grams or more of heroin, a charge that carries a minimum of five years in prison and as much as 40, according to Virginia law. She is set to appear before a judge on Monday morning.
Heroin is one of a handful of narcotics — Fentanyl and other semi-legal opioid pain medications included — that has fueled a drug epidemic that kills thousands of Americans every year. The video at the top shows how heroin exploded in the last decade.
Barba sang three songs before she was eliminated from Idol, but rankled some during her time on the show after photographs of her — taken prior to her Idol audition — surfaced showing her in various states of undress, including a shot of Barba in a wet T-shirt in the fountain of the National World War II Memorial in Washington, D.C.
After exiting Idol, Barba released the single "Jersey Girl" in 2010 and a pair of Christmas songs in the following years, but never a complete album.
She identifies herself as a singer, violinist and pianist on her Facebook and Instagram pages and notes that she has sung the National Anthem before multiple Dodgers baseball games.
Her official website says "Coming Soon" even though it was created in 2015, the domain registration shows.
Barba's latest national television appearance was on "Jimmy Kimmel Live" on May 21 when she took part in an all-Idol contestant spoof of 1985's "We Are the World."
A message to her management in Los Angeles was not immediately returned.


Question: Describe the US military proposal to demonstrate the nation's capability to counter potential adversaries quickly and provide detail on what the proposal entails.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the US military proposal to demonstrate the nation's capability to counter potential adversaries quickly and provide detail on what the proposal entails.

As we reported on Monday, Chinese ships came to actively confronting the USS Decatur while the US ship was carrying out yet another in a series of "freedom of navigation" operations - or "freeops" - in the South China Sea. The Navy destroyer had to maneuver to avoid colliding with the Chinese destroyer Luyang that came within 45 yards of its bow while the Decatur was sailing through the Spratley Islands on Sunday in what was the closest direct confrontation between US and Chinese ships since Trump's inauguration (after which the Navy began conducting these freeops with increasing frequency).
On Tuesday, China accused the US of violating its "indisputable sovereignty" over the Spratley islands, saying in a statement "We strongly urge the U.S. side to immediately correct its mistake and stop such provocative actions to avoid undermining China-U.S. relations and regional peace and stability."
Now it's the US turn to respond, and according to CNN, the US Navy's Pacific Fleet has drawn up a classified proposal to carry out a global show of force as a warning to China and demonstrate the US is prepared to deter and counter their military actions. The draft proposal from the Navy is initially recommending the US Pacific fleet conduct a series of operations during a single week in November.
The navy's goal - whether with or without the White House's prodding - is to carry out a highly focused and concentrated set of exercises involving US warships, combat aircraft and troops to demonstrate that the US can counter potential adversaries quickly on several fronts.
The plan suggests sailing ships and flying aircraft near China's territorial waters in the South China Sea and Taiwan Strait in freedom of navigation operations, to demonstrate the right of free passage in international waters. Naturally, the proposal means US ships and aircraft would operate close to Chinese forces.
One wonders if the US Navy considered how it would react if Chinese battleships were sailing in circles in "international waters" in the Gulf of Mexico, or off the California coast for example.
There's some good news: the defense officials emphasized that there is no intention to engage in combat with the Chinese.
And while the US military carries out these types of operations throughout the year, the proposal being circulated calls for several missions to take place in just a few days, an escalation that is sure to infuriate China.
So are the US and China on the verge of a shooting war? While one official described it as "just an idea", it is said to be far enough along that there is a classified operational name attached to the proposal, which is circulating at several levels of the military. According to CNN, officials would not confirm the name of the potential operation.
The good news is that the US at least realizes that by pursuing this kind of naval action - one which would be equivalent to sending a bull in a China sea - US officials acknowledge China often see these missions as "provocations." They also acknowledge that the intelligence community would have to weigh in with any concerns about reactions from China.
And where this strategy goes off the rails is that instead of just provoking China in its back yard, the US intends to do it, well, everywhere around the world. While the proposal for now focuses on a series of operations in the Pacific, near China, they could stretch as far as the west coast of South America where China is increasing its investments. If the initial proposal is approved, the missions could be expanded to Russian territory, because the only thing smarter than provoking China is provoking China and Russia.
Defense Secretary James Mattis and General Joseph Dunford, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, will take into account the diplomatic implications of each mission, officials said. They will also have to consider the risk of suddenly moving forces to new areas away from planned deployments, and whether potential threat areas are being left uncovered by the military, especially in the Middle East.
The proposal - which was still being considered within the military - grew out of the Pentagon's National Defense Strategy which focuses on the growing military challenge posed by the Chinese and Russian militaries. Mattis has urged US commanders to come up with innovative and unexpected ways to deploy forces. Currently the aircraft carrier Harry S Truman is taking the unexpected step of operating in the North Sea - sending a signal to Russia that US military forces can extend their reach to that area. Next: several aircraft carriers parked in the South China Sea... just to send China a "signal", one which China will waste no time responding to.


Question: "What are the latest updates on the GOP bill to repeal and replace Obamacare?"

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 "What are the latest updates on the GOP bill to repeal and replace Obamacare?"

House Republicans snagged a few more votes for their Obamacare repeal-and-replace bill after promising to plump it up with an $8 billion amendment designed to help those with pre-existing conditions pay for their health care.
WASHINGTON — After wooing GOP moderates with extra money for patients with pre-existing conditions, House Republicans said they would vote Thursday on a revised bill to repeal and replace Obamacare — setting the stage for a high-stakes showdown on one of President Trump's top priorities.
House GOP leaders announced the vote Wednesday night after weeks of negotiations, hours of wooing wavering Republicans, and a last-minute sweetener added to the bill: an $8 billion amendment to help patients with pre-existing conditions pay for higher premiums and out-of-pocket costs.
Republican leaders suggested they would have enough votes to pass the bill in the House, although the vote could be a down-to-the-wire squeaker. The decision to schedule the vote will ramp up the pressure on a clutch of still-undecided lawmakers, and Republicans clearly had momentum on Wednesday evening.
"I support the bill with this amendment," said Rep. Fred Upton, R-Mich., after meeting with President Trump at the White House on Wednesday morning about his proposal to beef up funding to help individuals with pre-existing conditions. Upton is an influential player on health care policy, and he had previously opposed the bill amid concerns it would put insurance out of reach for those with chronic illnesses and other health conditions.
Another holdout, Rep. Billy Long, R-Mo., also switched from a "no" to a "yes" after meeting with Trump and working with Upton on his amendment.
The biggest sticking point so far: the provision in Obamacare that bars insurance companies from discriminating against those with pre-existing conditions. The current GOP bill would dramatically weaken that, by allowing insurance companies charge people with pre-existing conditions —anything from cancer to pregnancy — higher premiums than other consumers.
That change prompted Upton's push to add the extra $8 billion to help sicker patients pay their premiums and other health care bills. Upton and Long both sit on the House Energy and Commerce Committee, which has played a central role in drafting the GOP bill, called the American Health Care Act.
A bevy of patient advocacy groups, including the American Heart Association and the American Cancer Society, strongly opposed the bill despite the tweaks offered by Upton and others. In a letter urging lawmakers to reject the proposal, 10 health organizations said the measure would undermine key patient safeguards, lead to higher out-of-pocket expenses, and jeopardize coverage for millions of Americans.
"This bill is fundamentally harmful to patients," the letter stated.
With Democrats unified against the measure, GOP leaders can only lose about 22 Republicans and still pass the bill.The proposal has been a tug-of-war between the moderate and conservative factions inside the House Republican Conference during weeks of intense negotiations and embarrassing setbacks.
By the count of various news outlets, about 20 lawmakers said they’d vote “no” as of Wednesday afternoon and about two dozen others remained undecided. With the new money, Republicans expressed confidence that they could win passage of the bill, a message echoed by hard-line conservatives who helped tank an earlier version of the GOP measure.
"We see that as being a net plus in terms of the vote count," said Rep. Mark Meadows, R-N.C., head of the conservative House Freedom Caucus.
But critics said the Upton provision was still woefully inadequate to protect those with pre-existing conditions, and they noted that the Congressional Budget Office estimated an earlier version of the legislation would cause 24 million people to either forgo or lose their health insurance.
“Despite today’s wheeling and dealing, the GOP repeal bill still drops the coverage guarantee for people with pre-existing conditions, strips coverage from millions, and drives up costs for millions more," said Frederick Isasi, executive director of Families USA, a liberal-leaning health advocacy group. "A measly $8 billion handout isn’t going to change that."
The American Medical Association, a powerful advocacy group representing physicians, slammed the GOP bill even with the revisions.
“High-risk pools are not a new idea," AMA President Andrew W. Gurman said in a statement Wednesday. "The history of high-risk pools demonstrates that Americans with pre-existing conditions will be stuck in second-class health care coverage — if they are able to obtain coverage at all."
And some Republicans reaffirmed their opposition to the bill and blasted the latest changes as Washington at its worst.
"The AHCA is like a kidney stone — the House doesn't care what happens to it, as long as they can pass it," Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., said in a tweet on Wednesday.
The GOP bill would repeal major elements of the 2010 Affordable Care Act and allow states to opt out of other provisions, including several popular consumer protections. For example, states could seek a waiver from existing requirements that insurers must cover maternity care, substance abuse and other key health services.
States can also seek an exemption of the pre-existing condition protections, allowing insurers to charge such patients more if the state has created a high-risk pool. Such risk-sharing programs are intended to help lower patient costs, but they have had mixed results in the past.
Even if the House approves the bill on Thursday, it faces uncertain prospects in the Senate. Some Senate Republicans are lukewarm about the House bill, and Senate Democrats are fiercely opposed.
"Its chances for survival in the Senate are small," said the Senate's top Democrat, Chuck Schumer of New York, on Wednesday.
If the House does not pass the bill this week, it would be a huge blow to Trump and to House Republicans, who have both invested significant political capital into making good on this GOP campaign promise. Some lawmakers warned they would be forced to look at other options for unraveling Obamacare.
“There’s only so long that you can work a certain principal to try to get to 218 votes, and I don’t know that that improves with time," Meadows said. "If we don’t have a vote this week on it, we’ll have to do a different strategy."


Question: Provide information about Themba Makhanya. Respond in 3 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Provide information about Themba Makhanya. Respond in 3 sentences.

Themba Makhanya (25 August 1970 – 4 November 2015) is a Swazi middle-distance runner. He competed in the men's 800 metres at the 1996 Summer Olympics. He was the president of the Swaziland Athletics Federation.


Question: What can you tell me about Eldora Nature Preserve?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What can you tell me about Eldora Nature Preserve?

Facilities?: Building was not open, so unknown.
Map – Map can be found here.
Description – So back on President’s Day Weekend, we spent Sunday checking out the Eldora Nature Preserve. We had tried to hike here the previous winter, but it was closed for hunting, so we were happy to see it was open this time!
So what makes this place special? Moths. No, seriously, this isn’t one of my little jokes. There are some endangered moths that live here. So thank you moths for encouraging the saving of this land (I never thought I’d thank a moth).
Anyway, we opted to follow the exterior of the Yellow, Blue, and Red Trails to cover the perimeter of the preserve, which seemed like a great idea until I remembered that I hadn’t brought the “baby” (almost three year old?) carrier. We figured it was only 2.3 miles, so we decided to go for it anyway.
We headed up the spur of the Yellow Trail, crossed over some wet area, and arrived at the first intersection.
At the first intersection, we went left onto the Blue Trail. A short while later (and a few more boardwalks) brought us to the next intersection, where we turned left to walk out on the boardwalk to the view point over West Creek.
Someone found all the sticks. And they are all coming with us. All of them.
Trail intersection. We made the sharp left onto the boardwalk.
It is good to see that all the sticks are still with us.
After this, it was straight back down the boardwalk to the last intersection, where we headed straight (what would have originally been a right). Almost immediately, we turned left onto the Red Trail, the outermost trail of the system.
Turn left onto the Red Trail where the Preserve Chain Saw Competition was held last year apparently.
For those of you worrying, we still have all the sticks.
The official map lists the Red Trail as 1.6 miles, and another map located at the preserve (but not at the trailhead) listed it as 2.04 miles. From the total not matching of our final numbers for this trail (pretty much exactly 3 miles) and the official distance for the outside loop (2.3 miles), I’d have to say that weird mystery map might be the accurate one, and the Red Trail really is just over two miles.
Sadly, we have lost ALL THE STICKS.
Finally, we reached the end of the Red Trail and turned left onto the Blue Trail. Yay! It would be a very short distance until the Blue Trail dead ended into the Yellow Trail, where we headed left again.
Left onto the Yellow Trail.
By this point, the sun was really low. But it was 70 degrees in February, so who cares? We marched onward. The Yellow Trail came down to the road, where it then turned and headed straight back away from the road and around some emptier fields.
From the fields, the Yellow Trail reentered the woods, where it passed a small lake before intersecting with… the Yellow Trail! (huh?). We turned left onto the Yellow Trail, and at the intersection pretty much immediately after that turned left to rejoin the initial stretch of Yellow Trail that had brought us into the Preserve.
With the sun nearly gone and temperatures plummeting from 70 degrees to maybe like 68 degrees, we emerged from the woods and realized something… TREE RIDER HAD HIKED THREE WHOLE MILES!
Now, I love my children equally (at least when neither one is yelling), but Tree Rider is almost never in my pictures because, even though he is nearing three, he is still being carried around in the pack. He’s only done over a mile maybe four times in his life. I was very spoiled by The Pres, who is a total weirdo and hiked 4 1/2 miles days after he turned two.
So very proud of Tree Rider for doing such an awesome job to go THREE MILES! Good job dude.
Nearby – Belleplain State Forest with its 10,000,000 miles of trails (Note to editor: check source) is right around the corner.
Nice views of West Creek, endangered moths, and good birding.
Was closed without announcement for hunting first time we tried to visit.
This is not my favorite hike in the area, but its a solid hike with a nice view of the creek, some beautiful forest, and a touch of marsh. On a beautiful 70 degree day in February, it was perfect.
Cumberland County, Hiking, Outdoors., Private Park, South Jersey, Wildlife.


Question: "What happened on 5 December 2014?" Respond in 1 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 "What happened on 5 December 2014?" Respond in 1 sentences.

The women's 3000 metres race of the 2014–15 ISU Speed Skating World Cup 3, arranged in Sportforum Hohenschönhausen, in Berlin, Germany, was held on 5 December 2014.


Question: Describe the jackal pups rescued by the animal shelter worker.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the jackal pups rescued by the animal shelter worker.

An animal shelter worker from Croatia was shocked when the ‘puppies’ she was looking after turned out to be babies of a different kind.
The woman, identified only as Marina, only realised the four-month old animals were in fact jackals after being alerted by her followers when she posted videos of them online.
Four months ago the shelter, Faun Kutina, rescued a box of five ‘puppies’ which had been dumped in a field.
They started to raise the ‘puppies’, which they believed were Belgian shepherds.
The shelter shared pictures of the ‘puppies’ online, updating followers about their progress. But they became suspicious when people kept pointing out that they weren’t really acting like dogs, and seemed more like wild animals.
By this point, two of the ‘puppies’ had died, but Marina took the remaining three to a local organisation involved in the protection of wild animals, who confirmed that they were, actually, jackal pups.
By the time the true status of the animals was confirmed, they had already spent too much time in human company to ever be released back into the wild.
After much debate over whether they should remain with Marina or be handed over to a zoo, Marina has now become the first person in Croatia to secure permission to keep jackals as pets.
Marina says the three pups – who are all female – have their own personalities.
Alfa is the leader of the pack, and the others stay out of her way when she eats.
Rea, meanwhile, loves to explore and steal things, and can often be found in the kitchen cabinets or stealing mobile phones, slippers and toilet paper.
The last pup, Kia, likes to climb and can squeeze herself through any hole.
Marina said that the cubs still like to be petted and love to play, and have shown no opposition to domestic lives.
She claims they even answer to their own names.
She said she wanted to share their story to show people that jackals are not dangerous or vermin.


Question: Describe the case against Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton. Respond in 24 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the case against Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton. Respond in 24 sentences.

AUSTIN — The prosecutors pursuing criminal charges against Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton have asked the state's highest court to overturn a recent ruling that voided their last paycheck.
In a 62-page writ filed Tuesday, the prosecutors argued the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals should vacate a decision by the 5th Court of Appeals in Dallas that cost them more than $205,000 in back pay.
The lower court's ruling, which said a local judge overstepped his authority in guaranteeing the prosecutors $300-an-hour for their work on the case, would have a "chilling effect" on the state's ability to find competent attorneys to investigate potential wrongdoing by the state's top elected officials, they argued.
"Left unchecked, the court of appeals' decision divesting trial judges of the discretion to control their dockets will have a chilling effect on their ability to appoint competent advocates willing to take on the most complex criminal cases," prosecutor Brian Wice wrote in his writ to the court.
Now, the criminal court must either agree to take up or reject the prosecutors' request. If it opts for the latter, the lower court's ruling will stand, and the prosecutors must decide whether to continue on the case without a guarantee they'll be paid or turn over their work to a new set of attorneys.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and wife Angela wave to the crowd during the 2016 Texas Republican Convention at the Kay Bailey Hutchison Convention Center in Dallas.
Special prosecutors Nicole DeBorde, Brian Wice and Kent Schaffer leave the Collin County courthouse following a December 2015 pretrial motion hearing regarding felony fraud charges against Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton.
Wice and two other criminal defense attorneys with practices in Houston — Kent Schaffer and Nicole DeBorde — were asked to take over the Paxton case after Collin County District Attorney Greg Willis recused himself. Paxton, who was indicted on securities fraud charges in July 2015, and Willis are longtime friends and business partners.
Taxpayers in Collin County, where Paxton has lived and worked for decades, are footing the bill for the prosecution. The three special prosecutors were last paid in January 2016, when they received $254,000 for their first several months work on the case.
But their latest invoice, which tops $205,000 for more than a year's worth of work, has not been paid. The members of the Collin County Commissioners Court filed suit against the prosecutors earlier this summer, refusing to pay the bill and claiming the prosecutors' hourly rates break local and state caps on attorneys fees.
The Dallas court agreed with the commissioners last month, stating that Collin County rules that allowed judges to set their own rates in extraordinary circumstances broke state laws requiring attorneys to be paid along a prescribed fee schedule. Since that ruling, county officials have also sought to claw back the prosecutors' first paycheck.
In his appeal Tuesday, Wice argued two-thirds of Texas counties give judges the discretion to deviate from county fee schedules "in some form." By ruling that Collin County's breaks state law, he wrote, then it would logically follow the rest would also be problematic.
"The court of appeals admitted that it was 'not surprising that many Texas counties' have schedules with the same 'unusual circumstances' language," Wice wrote. "That is a fatal flaw."
He added this decision "falls at the intersection of two equally-important precepts that form the backbone of the criminal justice system:" that lawyers are paid reasonable fees and that the trial court ensures that happens.
Paxton was indicted in July 2015 on two first-degree felony fraud charges and one third-degree charge of breaking state securities laws by not registering as an investment adviser representative. He's denied the charges and said they are part of a political witch hunt by members of his own party.
Paxton's first of two trials is scheduled to kick off in mid-December, the same month he's expected to formally announce his campaign for re-election.


Question: What is Verblyuzhy? Respond in 28 words.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What is Verblyuzhy? Respond in 28 words.

Verblyuzhy () is a rural locality (a settlement) in Udachensky Selsoviet of Akhtubinsky District, Astrakhan Oblast, Russia. The population was 269 as of 2010. There are 5 streets.


Question: Respond in 99 words. Can you tell me about Hill of Down?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Respond in 99 words. Can you tell me about Hill of Down?

Hill of Down () is a townland in County Meath located on the Royal Canal. There was also a railway station on the line between Dublin and Galway/Sligo. There is a shop and post office at Hill of Down.The shop also has a pub and all of these are located next to the bridge over the canal (Trim to Kinnegad Road). St. Columba, St. Brigid of Kildare and St. Patrick are, according to legend, supposed to be buried within the hill, though this is probably a confusion with the Hill of Down near Downpatrick in the province of Ulster.


Question: Who was Bruno Kessler? Respond in 38 words.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Who was Bruno Kessler? Respond in 38 words.

Bruno Kessler (17 February 1924, in Peio – 19 March 1991, in Trento) was an Italian politician. He served as President of the Autonomous Province of Trento from 1960 to 1973. He was the father of Giovanni Kessler.


Question: "Do you know anything about the history of steampunk?"

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 "Do you know anything about the history of steampunk?"

Writing to science fiction magazine Locus in April of 1987, author K.W. Jeter responds to Faren Miller's review of his new novel, Infernal Devices, and in the process coins the term 'steampunk' to describe the sub-genre of work then-written by just a trio of authors that included, alongside himself, Tim Powers and James Blaylock. As we now know, Jeter's tongue-in-cheek twist on the word 'cyberpunk' soon caught on.
Transcript follows. Image kindly supplied by Locus Publications; reprinted with permission. To read the entire section from which Jeter's letter was cropped - including a missive from an irked Arthur C. Clarke - click hither.


Question: Describe the events leading up to Trump's State of the Union address.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the events leading up to Trump's State of the Union address.

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump was overheard Tuesday telling a Republican lawmaker he is “100 percent” in favor of releasing a classified memo on the Russia investigation that has sparked a political fight pitting Republicans against the FBI and the Justice Department.
“This is a completely separate matter from Bob Mueller’s investigation and his investigation should be allowed to take its course,” Ryan said, noting that he also supports Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein who oversees Mueller.
It also came after Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and FBI Director Christopher Wray warned White House chief of staff John Kelly that releasing the memo publicly could set a dangerous precedent, according to a person familiar with the conversation.
In response, Democrats on the panel have put together their own memo. On Monday, the committee voted to make the Democratic memo available to all House members — but not the public. Conaway said he was open to making it public after House members have a chance to review it.
Associated Press writers Eric Tucker, Jonathan Lemire, Tom LoBianco, Mary Clare Jalonick and Andy Taylor contributed to this report.
Left: President Donald Trump (R) talks with members of Congress as he departs after delivering his State of the Union address to a joint session of the U.S. Congress on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst.
What did Trump say — and not say — about foreign policy in Tuesday’s speech?


Question: Provide a brief biography of Daniel Jay Rohn. Respond in 3 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Provide a brief biography of Daniel Jay Rohn. Respond in 3 sentences.

Daniel Jay Rohn (born January 10, 1956 in Alpena, Michigan) is a former infielder in Major League Baseball. Rohn was drafted as a second baseman by the Chicago Cubs in the 4th round of the 1977 amateur draft, and made his major league debut on September 2, 1983. He was traded by the Cubs to the Cleveland Indians for Jay Baller on April 1, 1985.


Question: Provide an explanation for why Mohammed is a popular name in Austria compared to Germany.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Provide an explanation for why Mohammed is a popular name in Austria compared to Germany.

GfdS data, like many similar statistics, do not take into consideration all of the different spellings of Mohammed such as Mohamad, Mohamed, Mehmet, and others.
In Austria, the daily newspaper Kronen Zeitung compiled data using all the variants of the name and found that Mohammed soared in popularity from 5th overall to 3rd among baby boys born in Vienna.
While the current numbers in Germany are based on statistics from 2016, the numbers from 2017 will likely be released in the coming months.


Question: Who was Alfred Samuel Walker? Respond in 1 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Who was Alfred Samuel Walker? Respond in 1 sentences.

Alfred Samuel Walker (26 August 1884 – 14 September 1961) was an English footballer who played in the Football League for Wolverhampton Wanderers.


Question: Have you heard about the new Ancestry and Spotify collaboration?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Have you heard about the new Ancestry and Spotify collaboration?

Ancestry is teaming up with Spotify to create playlists based on their user's DNA. Anyone who has ever submitted one of Ancestry's at-home DNA tests can input their Ancestry results and be met with a playlist that layers Spotify's own notions of your taste on top of music that is popular or culturally significant from your ancestral homelands.
The folks over at Spotify echoed those words. The company's Global Head of Partner Solutions Danielle Lee told Quartz that the idea of the Ancestry X Spotify playlists was to “encourage [Ancestry’s] audience to explore the soundtrack of their heritage."
For folks who haven't used Ancestry before, who perhaps aren't comfortable with giving Ancestry a "perpetual, royalty-free, worldwide, transferable license to use [thier] DNA," there is a neat, new feature that will break down your listening habits in Ancestry's piecemeal style. However, if you've already handed over your DNA to Ancestry and would like to know what sort of playlists to expect, just take a look at this Jezebel writer's experience with the service.
While her picks were fairly conventional, Spotify has been doing a lot to break up routine listening lately. They've made it easier than ever for independent artists to upload their work to the platform and allowed the same artists to submit their work for consideration in career-making playlists.