Question: Discuss the recent hiring of a police officer in Achille, Oklahoma who was revealed to have Neo-Nazi ties.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Discuss the recent hiring of a police officer in Achille, Oklahoma who was revealed to have Neo-Nazi ties.

Web registries also revealed Alsbrook’s Nazi ties dating back to at least 1996, when the Dallas Morning News reported that Alsbrook had registered a gruesome “Skinheads USA” website.
Alsbrook also appeared in multiple pictures with hate groups, including a picture from Blood & Honor’s manifesto, and appears to have posed in a balaclava with a semi-automatic rifle and a T-shirt reading “terror machine” in pictures published by the SPLC.
When Alsbrook’s Nazi ties were first revealed last year, the Sherman Herald Democrat watched two mid-2000s skinhead documentaries (“White Terror” and “Skinhead Attitude”) in which Alsbrook openly described his involvement in the violent groups.
In 1995, Alsbrook was charged with attempted murder, after a fellow skinhead was stabbed 24 times. The case went nowhere after the victim refused to testify. Alsbrook maintained that the victim had falsely identified him. When KXII began digging into his past, Alsbrook blamed the website registries on identity theft, claiming skinheads stole his wallet and started using his name in the 1990s. He did not attempt to explain his appearance in the documentaries. Public records searches suggest he is the only person of that name living in the U.S.
Alsbrook resigned from the Colbert department shortly after his past was made public.
But Alsbrook’s new employer says that’s all water under the bridge. Alsbrook started a new job as a reserve officer in the police department of Achille, Oklahoma, KXII reported this week. The police chief there told KXII that he’d known of Alsbrook’s neo-Nazi past, but that he’d since moved on, and was no longer racist.
Members of hate groups can leave their organizations and become de-radicalized. Some, like Derek Black, whose father founded the oldest hate forum in America, have gone on to pursue anti-racist work. But law enforcement also has a long history of attracting members of hate groups, or people who are sympathetic to hate groups. Participation in a hate group is grounds for firing in some departments, and officers across the country have variously been fired, suspended, or have voluntarily resigned over their hate-group membership in the past month.
Achille’s city government said they’re standing behind Alsbrook.
“We don’t consider something from 20 years ago,” Achille City Clerk Laura Stanley told the Herald Democrat this week of Alsbrook’s hiring.
A decade earlier, he’d been repping Blood & Honor at the skinhead conference.


Question: Tell me 16 fascinating facts about life in North Korea.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Tell me 16 fascinating facts about life in North Korea.

North Korea has been in the news – again – recently as the target of the Seth Rogan-James Franco movie The Interview. The movie was pulled from theaters when unknown hackers threatened bombing theaters that would be showing it, which caused the studio and many theaters to think twice about releasing or showing it.
There’s some evidence of North Korea being behind the hacking, though it’s not clear cut. But North Korea would certainly love to see The Interview burned: it shows the country and its leader in what could be called a very unappealing light, including a graphic scene where Rogen and Franco blow up leader Kim Jong-un’s head.
Whether or not North Korea is, indeed, behind the cyber attacks, it’s certainly an interesting place, and one that many people don’t know much about. Here are 16 amazing facts about life in North Korea.
1.) North Korean archaeologists claim to have discovered the home and resting place of a legendary Korean unicorn, once the companion and steed of a 2,000 year old king.


Question: What do you think of the Redskins trading for Ha Ha Clinton-Dix? Respond in detail.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What do you think of the Redskins trading for Ha Ha Clinton-Dix? Respond in detail.

The Green Bay Packers have moved on from Ha Ha Clinton-Dix in the eleventh hour of the trade deadline.
The Packers traded Clinton-Dix away to the Washington Redskins for a fourth-round pick. Clinton-Dix will join D.J. Swearinger on the back-end of the Redskins defense to form the highest-graded safety tandem in the NFL and will try to help the Redskins to maintain control of the NFC East and secure a playoff berth this season.
Clinton-Dix has a grade of 83.5 and is currently the fourth-highest graded safety in the NFL, just two spots behind fellow Redskin D.J. Swearinger. His 82.7 coverage grade also ranks fifth among the active safeties who have played at least 300 snaps this season. Like Swearinger, Clinton-Dix has been an extremely valuable safety due to his ability to force turnovers, as his four turnovers forced is tied for the second-most among players at the position.
The former Alabama safety can cover the field very well. His 0.23 yards per coverage snap ranks ninth among qualifying safeties, and he has allowed just 8.1 yards per reception, which ranks 16th. On 11 targets, Clinton-Dix has allowed just seven receptions for57 yards (20 came on one play, his longest allowed of the season) and he has allowed a passer rating of 76.7 on throws into his primary coverage. He has also been effective on his 13 pass-rushing attempts, generating a sack, a hit and a hurry.
The need for a safety to provide quality production opposite D.J. Swearinger, PFF’s highest-graded safety, was painfully apparent, as Montae Nicholson was not getting the job done. Across 441 snaps this year, Nicholson has earned an overall grade of 49.2, a coverage grade of 45.6 and a putrid tackling grade of 28.5. 75 safeties have played at least 200 snaps, and in the categories mentioned above, Nicholson ranks 72nd, 73rd and 75th, respectively. He also allowed a passer rating of 129.2 on throws into his coverage, which ranks 65th among qualifying players at the position.
To say the Redskins made a tremendous upgrade to their defense would be an understatement. They go from the third lowest-graded safety to the fourth highest-graded, and this will significantly cut down on mistakes on the back end of their defense. Clinton Dix is a playmaking safety who doesn’t give up many big plays and is much sounder in both coverage and run-defense than Nicholson.
The pairing of Ha Ha Clinton-Dix with D.J. Swearinger gives the Redskins one of the most lethal safety duos in the NFL. On any given play, the two are a threat to force game-changing turnovers and will prevent big plays, allowing the Redskins to play with the lead and ride their strong running game. The aggressive move signifies that the Redskins are ready to take hold of the NFC East and make a playoff run this season.


Question: What's the new policy on transfers?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What's the new policy on transfers?

WHAT: The Leadership Council has recommended that student-athletes who are transferring due to difficult life circumstances will have another year to complete their eligibility. This option would eliminate the ability for transfers to receive waivers to play immediately.
WHEN: If approved by the Board of Directors April 24, the policy change would be effective for the 2015-16 academic year. Legislation is not required.
WHY: The altered policy will allow transfer student-athletes facing challenging personal issues the opportunity to focus on what is important and adjust to a new academic environment before enduring the pressures of competition.


Question: Tell me more about the characters in the Ramayana.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Tell me more about the characters in the Ramayana.

Rama was the son of King Dasaratha and Queen Kausalya of the Ishvaku Dynasty. The Ishvaku were a glorious dynasty that descended from the Sun God, Surya.
Mahiravana was the brother of Ravana and a powerful sorcerer who ruled over the underworld, deep beneath the earth’s surface.
Hanuman was the son of the Wind God, Vayu, and Anjana, a celestial monkey spirit. Being the son of the Wind God, Hanuman could fly at will!
Sugriva ruled over Kishkinda, alongside his brother Vali. Kishkinda was the glorious and beautiful kingdom of monkeys that flourished well under their rule. One day, a war-mongering giant bull, Dundubi, attacked Kishkinda.
While ploughing the fields for a ceremony, King Janaka found a casket in the ground with a baby girl inside it! The King was delighted and readily adopted the baby as his own daughter. He called her Sita, which means furrow or plough. The King told his people that she must be the daughter of the earth goddess Bhoomi sent to him as a gift and so Sita is also known as the daughter of Bhoomi.
Jatayu and his brother Sampati were two gigantic and formidable vultures. Jatayu lived in the Dandaka forests and was a friend of King Dasaratha, Rama’s father. When Rama, Sita and Lakshmana came to live out their exile in the forest, Jatayu promised them his protection. Jatayu gave Rama one of his bracelets as a token of friendship. Rama in turn gave this bracelet to Sita to wear.
Lakshmana was Rama’s younger brother. He was born to King Dasaratha and queen Sumitra. He was very close to Rama and accompanied Rama during his 14-year exile to the forest, to guard him and princess Sita.
Indrajit was Ravana’s eldest and most powerful son. When he was born, Ravana called him Meghnada. As a young prince, Indrajit was unequalled in his prowess in the battlefield. He was an ace archer and a powerful swordsman. He possessed various celestial weapons at his disposal.
Ravana was the son of the sage Vishrava and his asura wife Kaikeshi. As a young asura prince, Ravana gained many powerful boons from Bramha that made him invincible against the gods. Emboldened by these boons, he gathered an asura army and approached Kubera, the god of wealth, and his half-brother, who was then the ruler of Sri Lanka. Ravana forced Kubera to handover Sri Lanka to him which Kubera had to, as Ravana was too powerful.
Anjana was the mother of Hanuman. She was a beautiful celestial monkey spirit who roamed the forests freely and protected all the creatures in it. She was a great wizard who could use her magic to fend off the asuras and monsters who threatened the innocent creatures in her forest.
Buy now for up to 39% off for a limited time!


Question: Describe Adelaide Street, Fremantle.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe Adelaide Street, Fremantle.

Adelaide Street, Fremantle is a street that is a boundary for Kings Square, Fremantle in Western Australia.


Question: Respond in 155 words. "What can you tell me about the 2016 SIU Edwardsville Cougars men's soccer team?"

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Respond in 155 words. "What can you tell me about the 2016 SIU Edwardsville Cougars men's soccer team?"

The 2016 SIU Edwardsville Cougars men's soccer team represented Southern Illinois University Edwardsville during the 2016 NCAA Division I men's soccer season, the school's 50th season. The Cougars were coached by Mario Sanchez. The team played their home games on Bob Guelker Field at the Ralph Korte Stadium as an affiliate member of the Missouri Valley Conference (MVC).
Fourteen players returned from the 2015 squad that won the Missouri Valley Conference Men's Soccer regular season championship. They were joined by a redshirted starting midfielder from 2013 who missed the last two seasons with injuries. All but two of the fifteen have started games for the Cougars. The returners were joined by eleven incoming freshmen and three transfer students who all started games for their previous schools. Included among the returning players are All-MVC First Team member Austin Ledbetter; Second Team members Kyle Dal Santo, Ivan Gutierrez; and Devyn Jambga; and All-Freshman Team member Keegan McHugh.


Question: Have you heard of Bad Machinery?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Have you heard of Bad Machinery?

Didn't I say he'd be back? I read that famous rant by Verne about how Wells was full of it for making up spaceships etc without explicitly showing how they functioned and powering them with steam or coal or what have you, things that made sense in 1899.
But listen to this interview between H.G. Wells and Orson Welles. Who could EVER stay mad at someone so adorable? I ask you!
Store deadlines for Christmas shipping are fast approaching!
PS: Are you in Halifax? I'll be doing a signing at Strange Adventures on the 11th, details to come!
and also: My friends, it appears Bad Machinery is kicking it up a notch, if you haven't gotten into it yet I think now is the time.
The Halifax signing on the 11th has a facebook event now!


Question: Describe the Culver Hotel. Respond in 5 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the Culver Hotel. Respond in 5 sentences.

The Culver Hotel is a national historical landmark in downtown Culver City, California. It was built by Harry Culver, the founder of Culver City, and opened on September 4, 1924, with local headlines announcing: "City packed with visitors for opening of Culver skyscraper." Originally named Hotel Hunt, and later known as Culver City Hotel, the six-story Renaissance Revival building was designed by Curlett & Beelman, the architecture firm behind renowned Art Deco buildings throughout Los Angeles, including downtown Los Angeles' Roosevelt and Eastern Columbia buildings.
As Culver City became a movie-making mecca in the 1920s and beyond, the hotel welcomed many legendary stars, some maintaining private residences for months at a time. Culver himself kept his office there.


Question: What is the album Once in a Blue Moon by the University of Texas Jazz Orchestra?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What is the album Once in a Blue Moon by the University of Texas Jazz Orchestra?

Once in a Blue Moon is an album by the University of Texas Jazz Orchestra that was released in 2000. It features Gary Foster on saxophone.


Question: What do you think of the recent advancements and plans in the lunar exploration field?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What do you think of the recent advancements and plans in the lunar exploration field?

A lunar adventure is rising over Europe’s exploration horizon. ESA is teaming up with international partners to return humans to Earth’s natural satellite by the end of the next decade.
Moving away from one-shot orbital missions, bold ambitions foresee humans exploring the polar regions hand-in-hand with robots, in international cooperation and commercial participation.
This return to the Moon envisions a series of human missions starting in the early 2020s that would see astronauts interact with robots on the lunar surface from orbit. Robots will land first, paving the way for human explorers.
Lunar rovers, telerobotics and hybrid surface power are some of the innovative approaches that are being developed to support these early missions.
The vision is truly international. Space agencies, the private sector and industry are working towards a common of open lunar exploration.
Europe gets its first access to the lunar surface in 2020, supplying a precision-landing and hazard-avoidance system called PILOT to land the Russian Luna 27 safely near the Moon’s south pole. A drill to retrieve samples and a communication system are also in the making.
Relying on the success of the International Space Station partnership, the space community sees the Moon as a springboard to continue human exploration of the Solar System, with Mars as the next goal.
One driver of this renewed interest in the Moon is the hunt for lunar resources. Scientists and engineers are looking in particular for frozen volatiles – including water ice – known to be concealed within permanent shadows at the lunar poles.
Their distribution in different regions is not yet clear. Understanding where they are are important for a sustainable long-term strategy.
A ‘new Moon’ awaits – the extreme and unknown landscapes of the south pole, the highlands and the far side of the Moon lie along the road.
Secrets to how life began on Earth more than three billion years ago could be well-preserved in these unexplored areas – 384 thousand kilometres away.
Over 200 scientists, engineers, astronauts, and space leaders from all over the world gathered to discuss the future of lunar exploration.
They shared plans and promising ideas at ESTEC, ESA’s space technology centre in the Netherlands, as part of the symposium ‘Moon 2020-2030: A new Era of Human and Robotic Exploration’.
The major international meeting ended with the announcement of the winners of the ESA Moon Challenge, the HECATE team. Engaging more than 200 students from over 100 universities, intercontinental teams joined efforts to design plans for a lunar a space habitat and a combination of robotic and human landings.
Beautiful in its own splender! .!
But I find it a bit sad that there is no mention of Mars.
Considering that NASA is talking about going to Mars, and it is sending more probes there than in any other place, I think Mars is a more attractive target for us Europeans too. ESA/Europe should cooperate with NASA towards going to Mars. There is already cooperation on Orion. We are building a service module for Orion, which effectively guarantees that Europe will get at least one seat on a NASA mission to Mars. It is also in Europe’s strategic interests to work with the United States.


Question: What is the future of renewable energy in Australia?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What is the future of renewable energy in Australia?

Over the past few years, the share of electricity generation in Australia has seen a marked sea change, steadily moving away from the country’s traditional reliance on coal-powered generation and natural gas. States like South Australia and Victoria have begun ramping up their renewable energy capacity, but this has in turn shifted the balance away from synchronous generators towards variable energy sources like wind and solar.
As such, grid managers are beginning to focus their attention on integrating energy storage — such as the mammoth Hornsdale Power Reserve, a 129 megawatt-hour (MWh) Tesla lithium-ion energy storage facility in South Australia, which was turned on for the first time towards the end of 2017. “South Australia is now leading the world in dispatchable renewable energy,” said then-state Premier Jay Weatherill, at the official launch of the Hornsdale wind farm to which the Hornsdale Power Reserve is connected.
The Hornsdale Power Reserve is a prime example of how Australia is using the increasing share of renewable energy and combining it with grid stability services to replace the traditional services which were provided by fossil fuel-generated synchronous generation.
The new AUD$7 million (USD$5.23) in funding from Australian Renewable Energy Agency (ARENA), which was announced on Wednesday, seeks to further develop new technologies which can also provide grid stability and security services — and will support projects such as system strength provision, frequency control ancillary services (FCAS), fast frequency response (FFR), inertia provision and measurement, and other services that may enhance system security.
The Hornsdale Wind Farm in South Australia was a beneficiary of funding from ARENA to trial frequency control ancillary services (FCAS) (as was the 168 MW Musselroe Wind Farm in Tasmania which is still underway) and is now registered for six of eight FCAS markets in Australia. The project will provide valuable insights into the cost-benefit of using pre-curtailment to provide FCAS services from a new technology source.
Fortunately, it appears as if ARENA’s funding is not just Australia’s renewable energy industry tilting at windmills (so to speak). I spoke to Giles Parkinson, the Founder and Editor of Australia’s RenewEconomy, who told me there was “a very great future” for renewables providing grid stability and security services.
However, as Parkinson notes, “new rules are needed” from the Australian Government if renewables are to have the opportunity to fulfil this role.


Question: What is happening to Iran's currency?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What is happening to Iran's currency?

TEHRAN: Iran's currency is continuing its downward spiral amid a deepening economic crisis and the imminent return of full US sanctions.
The Iranian rial fell to 1,12,000 to the dollar on Sunday, from 98,000 to $1 on Saturday. The government-set exchange rate was 44,070 to the dollar, compared to 35,186 on January 1.
Wednesday's IRNA report says that Abdolnasser Hemmati was appointed CBI governor to replace Valiollah Seif, who had been head since 2013. The 61-year-old Hemmati led Iran's state central insurance company and has worked in banking.
The handling of the crisis was one of the reasons behind last week's decision by President Hassan Rouhani to replace central bank chief, Valiollah Seif.
The currency collapse was encouraged by the US announcement in May that it was pulling out of the 2015 nuclear deal, that lifted certain sanctions in exchange for curbs to Iran's atomic programme.


Question: RIP Deputy James Kirk

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 RIP Deputy James Kirk

Master Deputy James Kirk suffered a heart attack during a combat firearms training at the Lancaster County Sheriff's Office range on Reservoir Road.
He had just completed the course, which involved a simulated officer down event in which he had to engage targets while moving a 125-pound sandbag to a cover. He collapsed as he walked back to the staging area.
Deputy Kirk had served with the Lancaster County Sheriff's Office for three years after having retired from the Lancaster Police Department with 25 years of service. He is survived by his wife and four children.
God bless you for your service and sacrifice, and now give you peace!


Question: Answer the following question: What are 10 facts about the original 1984 movie The Terminator?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Answer the following question: What are 10 facts about the original 1984 movie The Terminator?

10 things you might not know about THE TERMINATOR | Warped Factor - Words in the Key of Geek.
Geek Dave serves up 10 trivia nuggets from the original 1984 classic, The Terminator.
"I wish I hadn’t sold the rights for one dollar. If I had a little time machine and I could only send back something the length of a tweet, it’d be – ‘Don’t sell.'"
Although he was paid a reported $6m to write and direct T2, he has never seen any money from any of the subsequent films, TV shows or merchandising.
2. When pitching the concept of the character in meetings, James Cameron used Lance Henriksen dressed as the Terminator for effect. Henriksen would go on to play Detective Hal Vukovich in the movie, and team up with Cameron again in 1986 for Aliens.
4. Other famous people who could've ended up in the movie include Bruce Willis and Sting, who were both considered for the role of Kyle Reese. And Geena Davis and Jennifer Jason Leigh both auditioned for the role of Sarah Connor.
5. Arnold Schwarzenegger was originally considered for the role of Kyle Reese. During the audition James Cameron stopped Schwarzenegger talking so that he could sketch a picture of him as the Terminator. The rest is history.
6. Orion, who financed the film, suggested that Kyle Reese should have a companion traveling with him from the future. This faithful friend would be a cyborg canine. James Cameron said no!
7. It was during The Terminator that Arnold Schwarzenegger first spoke his famous catchphrase "I'll be back". However in the script the line read as "I'll come back", not quite the same is it? When Cameron decided the line would flow better as "I'll be back", Schwarzenegger asked to change it to "I will be back" as he had difficulty pronouncing the word I'll properly. Cameron refused but agreed to shoot the line multiple times and use the best take. He's now said that catchphrase in at least 14 other films.
8. Arnold Schwarzenegger says just 58 words in the whole movie.
9. James Cameron makes a small cameo in The Terminator. When Sarah Connor (played by Linda Hamilton) receives a message on her answering machine from a man cancelling their date, this is Cameron's voice.
10. The Terminator was actually the most successful movie in the whole franchise for return on investment. At a budget of just $6.4 million it went on to gross $80 million worldwide, that's over 12 times the budget. Terminator 2: Judgement Day cost $100 million to make and yielded $500 million worldwide - not chump change by any means but just 5 times the investment. Goes to show that you really don't need mega bucks to produce a class action movie.
The trivia continues here with 10 things you might not know about Terminator 2: Judgement Day.


Question: Describe the development of a decentralized bank in Malta.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the development of a decentralized bank in Malta.

A foundation for decentralized bank is being developed under secrecy in small European islandic country called Malta. And the man behind the project is none other than bitcoin billionaire Zhao Changpeng, CEO of binance. Binance have placed their foot on Malta soil this year and now they are planning to develop a bank called founders bank which will be quite different than other banks as no any central company will hold full ownership of the bank. Rather it will be owned in part by anyone who will invest in equity based token called neufund.
Also this move was considered as positive development by Joseph Muscat, prime minister of Malta.
The concept sounds confusing right now, but I have no doubt that it will form the base of a new economy in the future,” Muscat said in a recent speech. Still there is some regulatory difficulty for such bank to get established because Malta also lies under Euro zone but this initiation can be considered as major breakthrough for block chain based economy.


Question: Who is Russell Scott Swan?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Who is Russell Scott Swan?

Russell Scott Swan (born March 30, 1963) is a former American football linebacker in the National Football League for the Dallas Cowboys. He played college football at the University of Virginia.


Question: What is the problem with liberalism in terms of its effects on race relations?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What is the problem with liberalism in terms of its effects on race relations?

We have seen first hand how certain people within our society react irrationally towards authority when the authorities simply do what they get paid to do, keep the peace, and deal with those who choose to do evil, instead of good. A white cop shoots a black dude because the black dude will not obey the orders given him, and runs from the police, or won't drop the weapon he was holding.
The Problem here is not that the cop was white, the problem here is that liberalism has created such a degree of racial hate, and distrust, not to mention creating an entire section of society that is utterly dependent on the Government, and does not comprehend the concept of Self-Reliance.
Race-Baiters like Al Sharpton, and Jesse Jackson only exacerbate the circumstances, and make the situation worse when they show up and spout their racist hate speech stir up the crowd to hate, and want revenge against the authority of the police, or white people, or both. If these two Reverends were doing what reverends ought to be doing, they would be preaching the truth of God's Word, and telling people to love one another, instead of instilling more fear, and hatred in the people. It's big money for these two phonies to show up, spout off, and march for false justice.
This is what liberalism does, it keeps people divided, distrusting each other, hating one another, all for their political agenda. Why? Because social control yields big money for liberals politicians, and racist leaders. Why the masses are collecting food stamps, living if fear for their lives, watching the lives around them self-destruct.
Al, Jesse, Barack, and many others are living fat and high of the hog. While they pretend to be caring, and they talk a good game about helping the black community, they are actually sucking it dry.
Liberalism always represents itself as being something that it is not. It always say's one thing and does another. It leaves the poor even poorer than before, as it brags about how compassionate, and caring they are. Through means of anger, hate, broken families, a feeling of hopelessness, abortion, and promoting reverse racism, liberals are able to control the black population in America, and profit from it at the same time.
Black America has been the victim of it's own self-destructive behavior, but liberals are the ones that programmed them to live that way by making them dependent on the Government for everything, instead of the individual being dependent on Almighty God for everything they need.
Liberalism spreads mass misery across the nation though means of subversion. It subverts the ideology of self-reliance, resulting in masses not able to do for themselves, rather they wait for Uncle Sam to drop some more bread crumbs on the floor.
What should be happening is that they tell Uncle Sam to go screw himself, and they take the bull my the horns, instead of rioting, they start cleaning up the hood, and become determined to break out of poverty through hard work, and determination. Blacks can break out of the Government Plantation, and make something of themselves, if they only could latch onto this mindset, the inner-cities would be truly transformed for the better.
Liberal Politicians, and the Black Leadership continue to reinforce in the minds of the people that they must be dependent on them, and that white people are the enemy, that violence and crime are justified when you have been wronged, that the police are the thugs, not you for rioting. The Scripture say's that "As a man thinks in his heart, so is he(Prov.23:7)". As long as black America keeps thinking and believing the lies liberals tell them, they will never break out of the prison they are in.
Blacks need to stop thinking of themselves as trapped, and hopeless, expecting the Government to give them something for free. Rather, they need to turn their backs of Big Government, embrace the idea that they can do something worthwhile, and be somebody who actually contributes too the better of society, instead of being a drain on it.
Liberalism is responsible for poverty, for the state of our inner cities. For the black cloud of hopelessness hanging over the people, making them prisoners of their own stinking thinking. Liberalism is to blame for the racial tension, racial divide, and hatred between blacks and whites. Liberalism has created this mess, and Liberalism has got to go.


Question: What can you tell me about Couling Island?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What can you tell me about Couling Island?

Couling Island is an island long, lying north of Islay in the William Scoresby Archipelago. It was discovered and named by Discovery Investigations personnel on the "William Scoresby" in February 1936.


Question: Write a poem about the current state of Ukraine.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Write a poem about the current state of Ukraine.

“The nation must be strong and pure”.
How easily millions march to the same war trumpet?
Money, media and racial malice mixed in the Devil's cauldron.
When all is said and done - what now Ukraine?
Are you freer today than a year ago?
The slaughter and autocracy that followed the previous one.
Who then will pick up the tab?


Question: Describe the state of school repairs in Ontario.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the state of school repairs in Ontario.

Ontario’s schools need $15.4 billion in repairs, newly released data from the Ministry of Education shows.
Out of the province’s 4,658 school buildings, 1,666 — over a third — are in poor condition. Another 278 are in critical condition, with the large majority of those, around 200, in the Toronto District School Board.
The information, released on Thursday, marks the first time the province is opening its books on the state of its schools, by revealing each school’s facility condition index — a rating system that assigns a number to each building. The higher the number, the worse the disrepair.
Among the province’s 72 school boards, the Toronto District School Board had the highest average FCI, at 53 per cent. The Lakehead District School Board had the second-highest average, at 45 per cent.
“The release of this data was the result of a commitment I made to ensure transparency and confidence in our public education system by releasing detailed information on the condition of each of Ontario’s schools,” Education Minister Mitzie Hunter said in a statement.
The news comes days after the Toronto board opened its own books on the state of its schools, and the amount of money it needs to repair them. Jesse Ketchum Jr. & Sr. Public School in Yorkville, for example, had an FCI of 121, and was identified as needing eight urgent repairs — including two steam boilers and the hot and cold water pipes — and 44 high-priority ones.
In its release, the TDSB said about 200 schools were in critical condition — a more precise number couldn’t be released because ongoing repairs mean the numbers can change daily.
While the TDSB’s release showed the condition of its schools, the ministry data shows how the school board stacks up against all others in the province. The fact the TDSB is highest in FCI doesn’t surprise Ryan Bird, spokesperson for the TDSB.
“As the largest school board in the country with some of the oldest schools, it’s not surprising that we’re at the top. We have close to 600 schools and a majority of those were built in the ’50s and ’60s,” Bird said.
Bird said the release of the information is important, which is why the TDSB published their portion of the ministry’s FCI numbers earlier this week, along with all the repairs that need to be done.
“While I think parents know there are billions of dollars in repairs that are still needed to the TDSB, it’s hard to imagine that on a local level,” he said.
The TDSB has a roughly $3.4-billion repair backlog.
Krista Wylie, co-founder of the Fix Our Schools campaign, said while the TDSB’s backlog is significant, the province’s numbers show that it’s not the only school board dealing with a repair backlog.
“Beyond the TDSB having the lion’s share at $3.4 billion … that still leaves almost $12 billion in disrepair in school boards outside of the TDSB,” Wylie said.
She thinks the $15.4-billion number is important to stress, as it shows the scale to which school repairs have been neglected.
“The fact that $15.4-billion in disrepair has been allowed to accumulate . . . is shameful,” she said, adding the number isn’t just the responsibility of the current provincial government.
“It’s the voters, it’s every party that’s been at Queen’s Park. It’s a collective issue,” said Wylie.
The province announced $1.1 billion in extra funding back in June that would go to school repairs over the next two years, and Wylie applauded that, as well as the transparency of releasing the FCI data.
“We believe it’s this kind of transparency that will then build the political will for them to fix the problem,” she said. “If people don’t know it’s a problem, they don’t know to ask for it to be fixed at voting time,” she said.


Question: Describe the events surrounding Julian Assange's stay in Ecuador's embassy in London.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the events surrounding Julian Assange's stay in Ecuador's embassy in London.

According to The Times, the United Kingdom and Ecuador are engaged in secret talks to banish Julian Assange from the South American state’s embassy in London, where he has been living since 2012 for fear of being extradited to the US where he would face espionage charges.
Senior foreign officials, allegedly including the Foreign Office minister Sir Alan Duncan, are discussing the world’s most famous whistleblower’s fate.
The reported high-level negotiations came weeks before Ecuadorian President Lenin Moreno’s visit to the UK. The head of the state previously described Assange, who was granted asylum under Moreno’s predecessor Rafael Correa, as a “hacker,” an “inherited problem” and a “stone in the shoe,” The Sunday Times reported.
Unnamed sources, ostensibly close to Assange, are said to believe that he cannot be deprived of political asylum, and that he’s not aware of the top-level talks.
In late June, US Vice President Mike Pence “raised the issue” of Assange in a conversation with Moreno during his trip to Ecuador. Following the meeting, Ecuadorian Foreign Minister Jose Valencia stated that it was not up to Washington to decide the fate of the Australian.
“Ecuador and the United Kingdom, and of course Mr. Assange as a person who is currently staying on asylum at our embassy. Does not therefore appear, on an agenda with the United States,” Valencia said.
In March, Assange was cut off from the outside world by the government of Ecuador; he was also banned from receiving any visitors, which is believed to be due to a series of his tweets on the Catalan independence movement in Spain.
Assange cannot leave the South American state’s embassy in London without being arrested and extradited to the United States, where he has been accused of espionage and leaking thousands of classified documents related to military operations.
According to The Guardian report, Ecuador spent some $5 million on a top-secret intelligence operation, dubbed Operation Guest, to employ international security and undercover agents to monitor the whistleblower’s visitors. The op was allegedly approved by ex-president Rafael Correa and former foreign minister Ricardo Patino.


Question: What is ECCE?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What is ECCE?

The Extensible Computational Chemistry Environment (ECCE, pronounced "etch-ā") provides a sophisticated graphical user interface, scientific visualization tools, and the underlying data management framework enabling scientists to efficiently set up calculations and store, retrieve, and analyze the rapidly growing volumes of data produced by computational chemistry studies.


Question: Describe the lawyers' attempts to discredit Michael Cohen.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the lawyers' attempts to discredit Michael Cohen.

WASHINGTON—Claiming that such an obviously corrupt and dishonest individual could not be trusted to provide accurate testimony, the president’s lawyers reportedly moved to discredit Michael Cohen Thursday by pointing out his long history of committing crimes for Donald Trump. “We’re talking about a man who has threatened and slandered multiple women that Trump slept with, so how are we supposed to believe anything he says?” said attorney Rudy Giuliani, telling reporters that Cohen’s decades-long track record of wire fraud, tax evasion, and brokering shady real estate deals at the behest of the Trump Organization suggested he would likely tell investigators anything they wanted to hear in order to save his skin. “This isn’t just someone who made a few mistakes—whether it was laundering Ukrainian money through Trump properties in the early ’90s or violating campaign finance laws to benefit Trump during the 2016 election, Cohen has proven time and again that he is an inveterate liar and scofflaw. And these are only the crimes we know that he carried out for Trump. In the weeks ahead, we expect many more illegal practices to surface, which will only confirm Michael Cohen’s complete lack of morality.” Giuliani added that Cohen’s felonious conduct was evident from his known association with high-profile criminals including Michael Flynn, Paul Manafort, Rick Gates, George Papadopoulos, Jared Kushner, Ivanka Trump, and Donald Trump Jr.


Question: Describe the research and data available in SIPRI’s Arms Transfers Database.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the research and data available in SIPRI’s Arms Transfers Database.

An important aim of SIPRI's research is to contribute to greater transparency as a means of ensuring responsible international arms transfers, thereby helping to prevent violent conflict, alleviate tensions, warn about potentially destabilizing arms accumulations and counter the misallocation of limited resources. We investigate international arms transfers in relation to international security and national foreign and defence policies; inter-state relations; states’ compliance with international commitments such as arms embargoes or the Arms Trade Treaty and national legislation on international arms transfers; and we assess arms procurement against declared defence and security policies.
The SIPRI Arms Transfers Database is a core element of this work. Freely accessible online, it aims to provide valid, reliable and consistent data about the volume and types of major weapons transferred internationally since 1950 and provides tools to identify trends and patterns in international arms transfers at the global, regional and national levels, and relationships between arms importers and exporters.


Question: What are practical steps that people can take in response to missile fire in Israel?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What are practical steps that people can take in response to missile fire in Israel?

Q: What can I do in order to help continue the amazing unity among Am Yisrael that began during the time of the teens' kidnapping?
A: Speak with others, telling them that what binds us together is greater than what seperates us. By the way, there is a place which has even greater unity: Tzahal!
Q: Is Hamas an agent of Hashem, causing us to atone for our transgressions? And if not, why doesn't Hashem destroy them and make it easier for Am Yisrael?
A: For the same reason that since the time of Kayin there are evil people and murderers in the world (see Ha-Rav's book "Ve-Gavar Yisrael" which discusses the problem of evil in the world and why bad things happen to good people).
Q: What should a person do if he is in the middle of the Shemoneh Esrei and hears a warning siren for an incoming missile?
A: He should run to the bomb shelter and continue to Daven the Shemoneh Esrei there. This is based on two factors: 1. It is a case of a life-threatening situation. 2. Walking in the middle of the Shemoneh Esrei without speaking is not considered an interruption. For example, if I am Davening the Shemoneh Esrei and a child is bothering me to the point that I cannot concentrate, I can move to another place. Or if I am Davening by heart and I cannot remember "Ya'ale Ve-Yavo," I can go and get a Siddur. Speaking is forbidden, but there is no problem of moving if there is a need (Mishnah Berurah 104:2). Therefore, if I am in the middle of the Shemoneh Esrei and I hear a warning siren for an incoming missile, I should go to the bomb shelter without talking and continue to Daven where I left off (Piskei Teshuvot, Orach Chaim 104. Shut Be'er Moshe 3:13. Nes Lehitnoses by Ha-Rav Yoel Schwartz at the end, in the Q&A of Ha-Rav Yitzchak Zilberstein during the Gulf War #39).
Q: A Rabbi said that missiles will not fall in a particular city. Is it permissible to rely on him and not enter the bomb shelter?
A: In general, one should obey the directives of the Home Front Command. But you should ask the Rabbi directly (These were the words of Ha-Rav Chaim Kanievsky regarding Bnei Brak, based on the promise of the Chazon Ish. However, I heard that Rav Kanievsky said that one should go into the bomb shelter in order to feel distress with the rest of Am Yisrael. See Rashi on Shemot 17:12).
Q: If I learn Torah in order to protect myself from the missiles, is it considered a violation of "One who makes unworthy use of the crown [of Torah] shall pass away" (Pirkei Avot 1:13)?
A: No. It is considered learning Torah not for its own sake (see Nefesh Ha-Chaim, Sha'ar #4. Shut Yechaveh Daat 3:73).
Q: Does one who goes out of his house during missile fire, violate "Guard your soul very carefully" (Devarim 4:10).
A: One is always obligated to follow directives of the Home Front Command and not try to outsmart them.
Q: During this time, should we be frightened, recite Tehillim and Daven, based on the idea that we should cry out to Hashem during a time of distress, or should we not get excited and continue in our routine in order to show that we will not bow to terror and will not be scare us?
A: Continue on with strength and courage during our state of war, which began with the establishment of the State of Israel. But a courageous person also Davens to Hashem, as we see with Yaakov Avinu before his meeting with Esav: He sent gifts, Davened and prepared for war (Rashi on Bereshit 32:9).
Q: What can I do in order to help Tzahal be victorious?
A: Repent, Daven and give Tzedakah. It is already certain, however, that Tzahal will be victorious, but you can help make the process faster and less costly.
Q: It is permissible for me to sleep in a bomb shelter with my husband if other men are also there?
A: Yes, in a corner.
Q: In light of the situation, should we add prayers to the Davening?
A: There is no need. This is the normal state of war with our enemies, which has been going on since the establishment of the State of Israel.
Q: I live in Northern Israel. Is it permissible to travel to the Kotel for a Bar Mitzvah when missiles are currently falling in Yerushalayim and the south?
A: It is a negligible risk. You may travel unless the Home Front Command says otherwise (see Piskei Teshuvah, Yoreh Deah 157).


Question: What has been the commentary on the Benghazigate scandal, and how did it all start?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What has been the commentary on the Benghazigate scandal, and how did it all start?

Let me just repeat this flat out: there is no scandal here–except for the reprehensible behavior of politicians like John McCain and Lindsey Graham who have conducted a scurrilous campaign against Ambassador Susan Rice. (Even their usually knee-jerk amigo Senator Joe Lieberman has refused to join them in this jihad). I tried to catch up on all the hoo-hah since returning from the beach and it seems to me that Rice’s talking points were accurate, if vague, in the way that talking points usually are.
So there are two questions: Did the Obama Administration make a political decision to coverup the (rather tenuous) Al-Qaeda involvement? And why was the security so lax?
Answer to question 1: Ambassador Rice’s talking points were scrubbed by Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, according to CBS. The specific names of the militias involved were removed for security reasons, apparently, so that our intelligence assets on the ground could continue to monitor the miscreants. This is a minor, silly point in any case: the President called the Benghazi attack an “act of terror” the day after it took place–which proved a rather embarrassing moment for Mitt Romney in the third debate, when Candy Crowley corrected him on the point (Romney’s information throughout the campaign was defective, having been sourced by right-wing fantasy reports). There was no coverup.
In the rush to assign blame after Stevens’s death, it was largely overlooked that Stevens, as the top-ranking diplomat in Libya by that point, was the one responsible for making final decisions about what kind of security was appropriate there, how to use it and what qualified as safe and unsafe.
Worth wasn’t blaming Stevens. He was admiring him for trying to practice the sort of hands-on diplomacy that has become more difficult in the era of terrorism and amped-security. Indeed, Worth was raising a larger and very important question–what sort of risks should we ask our diplomats to take? It is a question that hits very close to home for me since, as some of you may know, I’m the father of an American diplomat who has served in difficult places, including a year in Baghdad.
It is also the sort of question that John McCain might have asked back in the days when he was an honorable public servant. But he’s now a political caricature, severely debilitated by anger and envy. His trigger-happy foreign policy beliefs have always been questionable, but this Benghazi crusade has put in the weird circle inhabited by nutcases and conspiracy theorists like Michele Bachmann and Allen West. He should honor the memory of those who lost their lives that terrible night by putting a cork in his disgraceful behavior immediately.


Question: What can be seen from Kinnoull Hill?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What can be seen from Kinnoull Hill?

From the hill's south-facing cliff summit, views are afforded of the River Tay, the Friarton Bridge, and a stretch of the Tay Coast railway line. Further to the south, Moncreiffe Hill can be seen.
On an outcrop a few hundred yards to the east of — but visible from — the summit is Kinnoull Tower, a folly built in the eighteenth century by the Ninth Earl of Kinnoull (1710 - 1787) to resemble castles on the Rhine he had admired during his Grand Tour of Germany. Kinnoull saw great similarities between the landscape of the River Tay and parts of the Rhine. In 1829, Lord Grey of Kinfauns built the Binn Tower on his adjoining land. Grey originally used his tower as an observatory. The tower is easily accessible via a footpath.


Question: Respond briefly. What types of cases does the Flick Law Firm handle?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Respond briefly. What types of cases does the Flick Law Firm handle?

The Flick Law Firm is an American law firm with locations in Kansas City, Missouri and Overland Park, Kansas. The firm works almost exclusively on personal injury cases for people injured in traffic accidents.


Question: Describe the 1926–27 Georgetown Hoyas men's basketball team. Respond in 4 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the 1926–27 Georgetown Hoyas men's basketball team. Respond in 4 sentences.

The 1926–27 Georgetown Hoyas men's basketball team represented Georgetown University during the 1926-27 NCAA Division I college basketball season. John O'Reilly coached it in his 11th and last season as head coach. Georgetown was an independent and played its home games at Ryan Gymnasium on the Georgetown campus in Washington, D.C. It finished the season with a record of 5-4.


Question: She is so gorgeous!

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 She is so gorgeous!

Oh my god how does someone as beautiful as this exist. In fact, beautiful is an understatement. She's a goddess on earth. I would kill anyone just to be with her.
I agree. She is simply the definition of perfection. I have never seen anyone more beautiful than her.


Question: Respond briefly. Homare Sawa

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Respond briefly. Homare Sawa

is a former Japanese football player. She played for Japan national team.


Question: Explain why the selection of the 13th lead in the BBC’s Doctor Who program is of such importance.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Explain why the selection of the 13th lead in the BBC’s Doctor Who program is of such importance.

Most professional selections these days – whether of an American president or an England football manager – are described as the most important in the history of the post. However, the choice of the 13th lead in the BBC’s Doctor Who, following Peter Capaldi’s announcement of his retirement after the 2017 Christmas special, really may decide how long the time-travel fantasy continues to be a TV super-franchise.
Chris Chibnall – the new showrunner, who will supervise the choice of Capaldi’s successor – is taking over a show with average ratings for its last series of around six million. These figures are very far below the average of eight to 12 million that has become expected since Russell T Davies’s 2005 reboot, after a 16-year gap, of the children’s sci-fi show that started in 1963.
Davies turned into a global cash cow a series that had come to be ridiculed by many for cheap and creaking representations of planets and aliens. To play the two-hearted Time Lord from Gallifrey, he cast the sort of actors – Christopher Eccleston and David Tennant – who play Hamlet on stage.
For the last seven years, Davies’s successor, Steven Moffat, continued casting from the classier parts of the Equity register – Matt Smith and then Capaldi – but met increasing resistance from some viewers and critics to the scripts he gave them.
When last year’s Christmas special was screened close to the new year episode of Moffat’s other BBC hit, Sherlock, the shows often seemed to be negotiating a merger. Both have become dark, painful love stories full of meta-references for super-fans, a trend encouraged, in Doctor Who, by Capaldi’s decision to emphasise the depths of pain and death the Doctor has seen and suffered.
Chibnall’s first task may be to reboot the show again, making it lighter and more accessible to new generations who have never seen it before. Crucial to this will be his casting of the central part.
Faced with that decision, Davies opted for two actors with whom he had previously worked on big TV projects. In contrast, Moffat had experienced the work of Smith and Capaldi largely as an admiring viewer.
Chibnall has an obvious opportunity – at a time of urgent debate in British TV about diversity – to think outside the Tardis. It seems likely that Charlotte Moore, BBC TV’s director of content, will at least want a conversation about whether the gender and race of the character played by a dozen white men so far is written in stone tablets somewhere in the galaxy.
Unlike other great British multi-occupancy fictional roles (James Bond, Sherlock Holmes) shape-shifting is an established part of the narrative here. The Doctor can be anyone – and this time, to my mind, the Time Lord can and must become a Time Lady.
A compelling possibility is Cush Jumbo. The work of this young Anglo-Nigerian actor – from her solo stage show Josephine and I to a leading role in The Good Wife – has demonstrated an electrifying presence and ability to play both comedy and pain that could fascinatingly extend the Whovian succession. She also has useful franchise form, having starred in the 2009 season of the spin-off Torchwood. Jumbo’s availability, though, would depend on whether her involvement in ABC’s The Good Fight, itself a spin-off from The Good Wife, goes beyond a first season.
Another strong contender must be Noma Dumezweni, an Olivier award-winning stage performer, currently playing Hermione Granger in the West End production of Harry Potter and the Cursed Child. Dumezweni experienced detestable abuse on social media from those convinced that JK Rowling’s character was white, so she might balk at becoming the first black, female Doctor, but, like Jumbo, would make a dramatic statement of refreshing intent.
If Chibnall prefers a performer he has worked with before, then Freema Agyeman, who starred in Law & Order UK, will be in the frame. Having played Martha Jones in Doctor Who and Torchwood, she would become the first Doctor’s assistant to take control of the Tardis, a casting overlap that could be easily explained by a speech about body-borrow-regeneration or some such pseudo-sci-fi. But she would need to be released from the Netflix show Sense8.
Capaldi has been in the top tier of the Doctors so far – up there, for me, with Tennant, Patrick Troughton and Tom Baker – but his departure offers a chance to take the show to places that even a character with so many Frequent Time-Traveller Miles has never been.


Question: Respond in 9 sentences. Explain Apple's device trust score

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Respond in 9 sentences. Explain Apple's device trust score

This provision is unusual for a few reasons, perhaps the least of which is that Apple TVs don’t make phone calls or send emails. As such, it’s unclear how Apple computes the device trust score for iTunes purchases made through Apple TVs, but there’s other potential “information about how you use your device” that could be scraped and abstracted.
The latest version of Apple’s iTunes Store & Privacy support document was released yesterday, September 17. Before that, the May 24 version made no reference to either the device trust score or using user calls and emails to compute scores.
Updated September 19 at 12:48 p.m.: An Apple spokesperson reached out to confirm that the device trust score is indeed new in iOS 12, and clarified that it was designed to detect fraud in iTunes purchases, as well as to reduce false positives in fraud detection. It apparently gives Apple a better likelihood of accurately determining whether content is being bought by the actual named purchaser, an issue that notably made headlines earlier this year.
Reiterating its commitment to user privacy, Apple says that the only data it receives is the numeric score, which is computed on-device using the company’s standard privacy abstracting techniques, and retained only for a limited period, without any way to work backward from the score to user behavior. No calls, emails, or other abstractions of that data are shared with Apple. It’s still unclear how the trust score works on the Apple TV, which has neither emails nor phone calls, but presumably uses similar metrics stored on that device.