Question: Hey, can you tell me a bit about the book 'Making Games with Python & Pygame'?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Hey, can you tell me a bit about the book 'Making Games with Python & Pygame'?

Making Games with Python & Pygame covers the Pygame library with the source code for 11 games. Making Games was written as a sequel for the same age range as Invent with Python. Once you have an understanding of the basics of Python programming, you can now expand your abilities using the Pygame library to make games with graphics, animation, and sound.
The book features the source code to 11 games. The games are clones of classics such as Nibbles, Tetris, Simon, Bejeweled, Othello, Connect Four, Flood It, and others.
This work has been downloaded 1043 times via unglue.it ebook links.
312 - mobi (CC BY-NC-SA) at Internet Archive.
399 - pdf (CC BY-NC-SA) at Internet Archive.
332 - epub (CC BY-NC-SA) at Internet Archive.


Question: Describe the recent and upcoming developments for the Qtum blockchain project. Respond in 20 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the recent and upcoming developments for the Qtum blockchain project. Respond in 20 sentences.

Things have been looking good for Qtum this past month, with celebrating their 1-year anniversary and being listed on 3 exchanges, among other achievements. The Qtum development team has worked hard to get where they are, and a quick look at what they’ve been working on this September is proof they’re not resting on their laurels just yet.
In September, Qtum released Qtum Core v0.16.0 and v0.16.1. These upgrades include an upgrade of the Qtum core to Bitcoin core 0.16, offering users a segwit wallet, bech32 addresses, and HD wallets by default.
Various bugs were fixed in the Qtum core as well, including a bug where contract transactions without change would sometimes fail, and where multiple logs wouldn’t appear correctly in a Qtum wallet.
The team also updated gitian-build scripts to support Ubuntu Bionic, as they continue to merge Qtum with Bitcoin v0.17 code.
With a new official website in the works, Qtum is actively building the framework and implementing the forum design.
Meanwhile, they are also updating the framework for their mobile wallet. Currently, the Qtum mobile wallet v2 for iOS and Android is ready to release, boasting a newly optimized UI.
The Qtum web wallet has also added more QRC-20 tokens.
The Qtum team have been on a roll with other developments as well.
For example, they made quite a few improvements with the x86 Virtual Machine, by fixing bugs with gas refunds, adding -raw output mode for the x86test bench, and adding repz-ret AMD hack compatibility. For more details, you can check out their updated x86VM task list here.
The team also released a new v0.18.8 of Qtum Electrum in September. This new version includes various optimizations, such as the fixture of system crashes plus a crash reporter, automatic saving of contract information after an OP_CREATE transaction has been broadcasted, improved Chinese translations, and more.
An updated Qtum Explorer has also seen crucial bug fixes to a data display error as well as invalid QRC20/QRC721 bugs, plus new API information and more charts up on qtum.info.
While all sorts of tech upgrades were going on behind the scenes, the Qtum team were also participating in plenty of community and global events.
In addition to their anniversary, Qtum held a global hackathon and participated in the G20 Young Entrepreneurs’ Alliance (G20 YEA) in Argentina. With Qtum founder Patrick Dai making an appearance to speak with hundreds of young people and organizations, Qtum has taken a clear stand on what they understand blockchain’s role to be in fomenting innovation and social change in the new generation.
To read more about Qtum’s developments of the past month, check out their September recap.


Question: Where can I find a free introductory textbook on Kalman Filtering and Bayesian Filtering written in Python?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Where can I find a free introductory textbook on Kalman Filtering and Bayesian Filtering written in Python?

Introductory textbook for Kalman filters and Bayesian filters. All code is written in Python, and the book itself is written in IPython Notebook so that you can run and modify the code in the book in place, seeing the results inside the book. What better way to learn?
You may access this book via nbviewer at any time by using this address: Read Online Now.
The book is written as a collection of IPython Notebooks, an interactive, browser based system that allows you to combine text, Python, and math into your browser. The website http://nbviewer.org provides an IPython Notebook server that renders notebooks stored at github (or elsewhere). The rendering is done in real time when you load the book. If you read my book today, and then I make a change tomorrow, when you go back tomorrow you will see that change. Perhaps more importantly, the book uses animations to demonstrate how the algorithms perform over time. The PDF version of the book cannot show the animations.
This work has been downloaded 334 times via unglue.it ebook links.
334 - pdf (CC BY) at Internet Archive.


Question: Respond in detail. Describe the threat posed by Islamic State.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Respond in detail. Describe the threat posed by Islamic State.

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Islamic State is likely to step up "the pace and lethality" of its attacks in the months ahead as it seeks to fan the flames of international conflict, the director of the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency said on Monday.
Speaking to a security conference, Marine Corps Lieutenant General Vincent Stewart linked his warning to the militant group's establishment of "emerging branches" in Mali, Tunisia, Somalia, Bangladesh and Indonesia.
He also said he would not be surprised if Islamic State, which has created a self-proclaimed Caliphate across swaths of Syria and Iraq, extended its operations from the Sinai Peninsula deeper into Egypt.
"Last year, Daesh remained entrenched on Iraqi and Syrian battlefields and expanded globally to Libya, Sinai, Afghanistan, Nigeria, Algeria, Saudi Arabia, Yemen and the Caucasus," Stewart said, using a derisive Arabic acronym for Islamic State.
"Daesh is likely to increase the pace and lethality of its transnational attacks because it seeks to unleash violent actions and to provoke a harsh reaction from the West, thereby feeding its distorted narrative" of a Western war against Islam, he said.
Stewart's comments came a day before he and other U.S. intelligence officials are set to deliver an annual worldwide threat assessment to Congress.
The Sunni Muslim militant group seeks not only to escalate conflict with the West, but also with Islam's minority Shiite branch, just as Shiite extremist groups like Lebanon's Hezbollah are stoking tensions with Sunnis, Stewart said.
"These threats are exacerbated by the security challenges of the Middle East, which is now facing one of the most dangerous and unpredictable periods in the last decade," he said.
Islamic State has as many as 25,000 fighters in Syria and Iraq, down from a previous estimate of up to 31,000, according to a U.S. intelligence report revealed by the White House last week.
U.S. officials cited factors such as battlefield casualties and desertions to explain the roughly 20 percent decrease in fighters, and said the report showed a U.S.-led campaign to crush Islamic State was making progress.


Question: "Did you just draw the new web comic? It was so cool!" Respond in 55 words.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 "Did you just draw the new web comic? It was so cool!" Respond in 55 words.

Mongrel Designs Webcomic: Webcomic 28: Buddy Holly is a Super Villain.
Webcomic 28: Buddy Holly is a Super Villain.
I was listening to the radio and got sad. Not that I'm a big Amy Winehouse fan, mind you.
Rock on. Loving the comics. Keep it up!
Hey thanks. I will try to keep them comin'.


Question: "What is Gerry Morrissey's background?"

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 "What is Gerry Morrissey's background?"

Gerry Anthony Morrissey (born 12 April 1960) is an Irish-born British trade unionist and was the head of the BECTU sector of the Prospect union up until his retirement in 2018. He was succeeded by Philippa Childs.


Question: Respond in 2 sentences. Describe ISG Luxury Management.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Respond in 2 sentences. Describe ISG Luxury Management.

ISG Luxury Management is a private business school located in Geneva, Switzerland. It is currently the only school in Switzerland with courses exclusively devoted to Luxury, Fashion and Jewellery.


Question: What can you tell me about the future of Rick Grimes on The Walking Dead?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What can you tell me about the future of Rick Grimes on The Walking Dead?

The Grimes story may continue on beyond Andrew Lincoln's exit.
Soon, Walking Dead viewers will exist in a world without Rick Grimes — at least, one in which Andrew Lincoln is not a regular part of the series.
Whatever happens next for the zombie-killing hero, could Rick's legacy on the flagship series endure beyond the fate that awaits him this season? The latest episode of the series posits a way in which the Grimes family will live on long after his ambiguous fate comes into full circle, thanks to a tender moment between Rick and Michonne (Danai Gurira).
Early in the episode, Rick and Michonne enjoy their first real moment of stress-free bliss since the duo became an item back in season six. Michonne works on building out the charter for the people of the Alexandria Safe-Zone, as a means of creating a better future for everyone. Soon, Rick puts forth another idea for a better future beyond creating a charter: creating a child.
According to showrunner Angela Kang, the idea for Rick and Michonne's exploration of conceiving a child together occurred naturally in the writers' room.
"It arose out of conversations we were having in the writers' room about what are the ways in which they're thinking about the future," she says. "A thing that's very true in human history is there tend to be baby booms after war. People feel they've survived something, and they want to celebrate and rebuild. This felt very true to us."
As Kang has already stated, much of season nine was birthed from the notion of life after war, as writers and Lincoln alike looked at the time after World War II in how to craft the final story of Rick Grimes. The latest development for "Richonne," as the couple has come to be known within the fandom, springs directly from that research.
"This is a couple that's been through so much together," says Kang. "We're exploring through Carol (Melissa McBride) how Ezekiel (Khary Payton) proposed marriage to her. Do Rick and Michonne do the same thing, or does the way they signal their commitment to each other as a couple look a little bit different? We wanted to see how different people would approach this situation, and this felt like it was true to them."
It also pays homage to Rick's ongoing relationship with Carl — at least, the memory of his fallen son: "In the show's story, which is different from the comics' story, Carl is gone. That's a major part of what's keeping Rick going now."
In Kang's mind, Rick and Michonne exploring the possibility of parenthood not only signals "their commitment to each other, but also their hopefulness for the future."
"They've been able to raise Judith," she says, "and she's happy and healthy and safe in a world in which Lori (Sarah Wayne Callies) once stated there's no way a baby could survive the apocalypse. It's a signal as to where they believe they are in the progress of things."
It is indeed a signal of progress — but it's a signal that will come under immediate threat whenever the series deals with its plans to write Rick out for good.
Follow THR.com/WalkingDead for full coverage of season nine.


Question: Describe the current progress with regards to the project you are working on.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the current progress with regards to the project you are working on.

Keith has been working on the backend to support direct pledging on our website, without passing through IndieGoGo. Doing so will be a huge step up in properly communicating instructions to new backers and being able to play the game as soon as the pledge is registered ( there are limitations on IGG that prevent us from being as user-friendly as we’d like to be, resulting in many support e-mails ). Testing the new pledge system will take a little while but should be available within a few weeks.
Finally, on the game side, haulers path generation is now complete. Last week I mentionned that it still had to avoid third-party planets in the way ( like in the scenario where you have a gas giant and two moons: the hauler spawns on one moon, and has its destination on the second moon, which is on the other side of the gas giant ! ), this problem is now solved. I have tested the algorithm in a bunch of configuration scenarios, but due to the pseudo-randomized nature of the Battlescapes at match startup it might be possible for the generated path to be sub-optimal or even buggy. We will have to test it in real conditions and improve it over time if needed.
The next step is having the haulers follow this navigation path and enter / exit warp. Fortunately most of the AI code is already written thanks to the existing bots so this step shouldn’t take more than a day or two of implementation and testing. After that we’ll still need to implement the warp interdiction, which should go fairly quickly, and produce the new patch.
Well so impressive, passion. !


Question: Describe the new Trump administration policy on the detention of pregnant immigrants.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the new Trump administration policy on the detention of pregnant immigrants.

Federal immigration agents have generally released pregnant women on bond, but new ICE directive will keep more of them detained.
Federal immigration officials have ended a general practice of releasing pregnant women facing deportation under a policy revealed Thursday by the Trump administration.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) policy had been that pregnant undocumented immigrants being detained were allowed to be freed on bond or supervised release. But President Trump has ordered ICE to keep more undocumented immigrants in detention, arguing that too many are released and never appear for their deportation hearings.
The new policy, which was quietly signed three months ago, angered immigration advocates and human rights organizations.
“Americans should all be horrified at the thought of innocent pregnant women —many of whom fled violence and abuse in their home countries — languishing in what are essentially prisons,” said Eleanor Acer, senior director of refugee protection for Human Rights First.
Philip Miller, deputy executive associate director for ICE's enforcement and removal operations, said pregnant detainees will continue receiving close medical attention, including checkups with an outside doctor. He said 506 pregnant women have been through ICE custody in the past three months.
"Clearly this population of pregnant women have a special circumstance," Miller said Thursday during a conference call with reporters. "It’s not just an officer deciding on her physical condition. We have doctors, we have nurses, we have medical professionals with whom we consult."
Miller said the decision whether to detain pregnant women must follow a similar procedure with all other inmates.
He said undocumented immigrants are automatically detained if they have a serious criminal record, are deemed a flight risk or meet other criteria. Pregnant women who don't meet those categories were generally released under the previous policy, but now that presumption no longer stands.
Only women in their third trimester will be released from custody, because they are not allowed to fly, Miller said. Other pregnant detainees will be judged on a case-by-case basis, with their pregnancy a "special factor" to be considered as part of their entire case.
"We’re not going to carve out classes of persons" not subject to the policy, Miller said.
Human rights activists have hammered the Trump administration in recent months over its treatment of pregnant women in immigration detention. A group of organizations, including the ACLU, the American Immigration Council and the American Immigration Lawyers Association, filed a complaint in September against the Department of Homeland Security alleging that pregnant women were not receiving adequate care in ICE detention centers.
Thursday's announcement further enraged those groups, who say the decision is the latest to unfairly target immigrants.
"The Trump administration has made it clear they will stop at nothing when it comes to harming and attacking immigrants," said Pili Tobar, managing director of America's Voice, a group that advocates on behalf of immigrants. "Anti-immigrant hostility is the central and consistent theme of this administration ... and a push that is at direct odds with our basic values and best traditions in America."
The directive was signed by ICE Deputy Director Thomas Hogan on Dec. 14 but was not made public until Thursday. Miller said the agency waited to announce the decision until medical workers could help implement the plan.
Miller said all ICE staff was officially informed of the new policy Thursday.


Question: Respond in 44 words. Provide information about GEC Stephenson locomotives.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Respond in 44 words. Provide information about GEC Stephenson locomotives.

The GEC Stephenson locomotives are a type of heavy industrial shunter built in the 1970s by British industrial company GEC Traction. The locomotives were used for heavy shunting tasks in UK industrial sites for clients including British Steel Corporation and the National Coal Board.


Question: Provide information about Ronnie Wood's cancer diagnosis and upcoming tour.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Provide information about Ronnie Wood's cancer diagnosis and upcoming tour.

The Rolling Stones guitarist Ronnie Wood is officially cancer free after being diagnosed last year with lung cancer.
The happy health news comes just in time for The Rolling Stones’ European tour, which Wood will gladly partake in. The trek kicks off mid-May.


Question: What is the background behind the news of Gavin Newsom and Antonio Villaraigosa's debate?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What is the background behind the news of Gavin Newsom and Antonio Villaraigosa's debate?

The punch: Newsom criticized Villaraigosa: “You went to work for a company that was fined $200 million for predatory practices against communities of color, and you decided to do that because you wanted to monetize your public service ... And you just admitted it, because you didn’t have money, so you took the cheapest buck. It’s a question of values.” Newsom said he thinks Villaraigosa does owe the people of California an apology for “shilling” for Herbalife.
Newsom opened his first shop, PlumpJack Wines, in 1992 with the financial backing of family friend and oil fortune heir Gordon Getty. He was appointed to the San Francisco Parking and Traffic Commission in 1996; and the Board of Supervisors the following year. He was elected to the post in 1998, 2000 and 2002; and then elected mayor in 2003 and reelected in 2007. He became lieutenant governor in 2011. Over that time, PlumpJack grew into a line of restaurants, hotels and wineries managed by Newsom’s sister, Hilary.
Newsom’s tax returns show he and his wife, Jennifer Siebel Newsom, profited from selling hundreds of thousands more in investments in silver bars. In 2011, they earned nearly $500,000 trading in the precious metal.
The analysis: Villaraigosa’s point, which is that he needed the money, risks undercutting his forceful defense of Herbalife as a valued nutritional supplement. He failed to mention Newsom’s business ties to Getty oil fortunes though a family friendship. That left his impression – that Newsom’s entrepreneurial success is owed not to ingenuity and hard work, but to familial connections – lacking context.


Question: Write a detailed report about Venezuela's current crisis.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Write a detailed report about Venezuela's current crisis.

There are days when being Venezuelan hurts. Last Friday, the reason was the appointment of Maikel Moreno Pérez as the new head of the Supreme Tribunal of Justice. There’s nothing worth mentioning about Magistrate Gladys Gutiérrez’s tenure in that post, at least nothing that isn’t part of the travesty of a Judiciary dancing to the Executive Branch’s tune. “From this moment on, me and my colleagues will work day and night to end impunity and corruption in this country,” said Moreno. His first statement shows two blatant lies, because a magistrate needs to sleep, and because it’s unlikely that those who have supported those crimes will now work to clear them. Nicolás, El Aissami and Moreno, a sinister triad, a dreadful insult.
Vice-president Tareck El Aissami and the ministers will present their annual reports before the TSJ instead of the National Assembly in a new violation of the Constitution, supported by the overused excuse of the AN’s alleged contempt, repeating the arguments they used with Nicolás for his own annual report. The ruling comes a day after Parliament approved a vote of no confidence against Electric Power minister Luis Motta Domínguez, for his responsibility in the electrical crisis of 2016. Nicolás also bypassed the Constitution once again, and failed to remove him.
The same day that Venezuela loses its vote in the UN General Assembly for failing to pay a debt of $24 million to the institution, general comptroller Manuel Galindo says that corruption has dropped in the current administration due to good practices: “I don’t think that corruption in Venezuela is as pervasive as it is in those countries considered to be tax havens. We do believe that internal corruption has decreased,” adding that everything was much more chaotic en la cuarta, but leaving the Prosecutor’s Office to deal with the accusations of the U.S. Treasury Department against vice-president Tareck El Aissami.
In their presentation concerning the nation’s annual budget, NGO Transparencia Venezuela provides details revealing that the amount approved will scarcely cover April, remarking that the contribution of oil income to the budget is set to be the lowest in recent years, while the bulk of it comes from taxes on cigarettes, alcohol, Value Added Tax and Income Tax. The Executive Branch allocates 21% more money to their propaganda machine than to public services (electricity, water and transportation): more money to the military than to internal security and public order; additionally, they also reduced the resources meant for courts by 63%. Nevertheless, Nicolás wants us to cheer up because with the approval of a cooperation deal with Palestine —no doubt a place at the forefront of technology— they will allegedly build three pharmaceutical factories.
The head of the Organization of American States, Luis Almagro, said yesterday that the governments of Cuba and Venezuela have remained eerily silent about Donald Trump. He also demanded elections in Venezuela: “There must be a general election immediately (…) You need elections to transition from autocracy to democracy,” adding that the failed recall referendum was the last constitutional avenue, emphasizing that seeking constitutional solutions to the crisis is a trap, because they’ll all be blocked by the TSJ. In the end, he called for all countries in the region to pay close attention to Venezuela’s situation, explaining that civic guarantees are non-existent and that the status quo is unacceptable.
Argentina’s president Mauricio Macri said that finding a democratic solution to Venezuela’s situation is paramount and that he supports Luis Almagro’s initiative of applying the Democratic Charter in the country: “I’m here to help in any way possible. Venezuela and Spain were the countries that welcomed the highest number of my countrymen during the Argentinian military dictatorship. It seems as if there was always another level to hell in Venezuela. The situation gets worse everyday,” said Macri, remarking that they must get the votes needed to activate the Democratic Charter because many countries depend on Venezuelan oil.
The Venezuelan Committee of International Relations (COVRI) issued a statement about UNASUR’s lackluster performance in the dialogue that hasn’t happened, recommending that Samper should be replaced as head of the institution and requesting the OAS to activate the Democratic Charter. In addition to describing Nicolás’ tendency to abuse his power, the text severely questions Ernesto Samper, Yuri Chillán and Mauricio Dorfler, advising the MUD not to recognize these representatives as legitimate, saying that the three former presidents that act as mediators no longer have the strength or credibility to participate in negotiations. They also propose the creation of a group of allied countries to support the dialogue’s progress.
Regarding our diaspora, Peruvian president Pedro Pablo Kuczynski is a bit late, cautioning yesterday at the UN about the danger of a massive Venezuelan emigration to other countries in the region due to our severe crisis, and calling for a group of countries to help us.
After the White House barred CNN, The New York Times, Politico and LA Times from its press briefing, Donald Trump said to have a problem with Venezuela right before meeting with Kuczynski: “We have a problem with Venezuela, they’re doing a terrible job and so we’ll have to talk about many different issues.” The meeting only lasted 10 minutes.
The memes about skier Adrián Solano got all the attention as most people ignored the severe indictment against Santiago Guevara, professor at the University of Carabobo, for alleged treason. Read his story in El Carabobeño when you can.
Venezuela beat Argentina 1-0 in its debut in the Sub 17 South American Championship, with a beautiful goal by Sebastián Chalbaud.


Question: Explain the details of Intel's next generation of processors.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Explain the details of Intel's next generation of processors.

Rumor mill: Intel may be opting to drop Hyperthreading on future Core-i7 models and leaving the feature available only on its Core-i9 series. Although this move may not greatly impact performance, it is a slight to customers that have utilized the feature over the past several generations of processors.
As the launch of Intel's next generation of processors grows nearer, leaks are revealing more possible information quickly. The latest news comes from Chinese forum Coolaler that has been responsible for some of Intel's previous leaks. Although this information cannot be independently verified for obvious reasons, it at least seems believable.
First off, the Core i9-9900K is shown to have eight cores and 16 threads that can boost up to 4.7 GHz on all cores. For two cores, the i9-9900K may reach up to 5 GHz. Additionally, it could have 16 MB of L3 cache with a TDP of 95W. As noted in Things Intel Needs to Fix, the TDP rating may be a worthless statistic from Intel.
In translation, the first column of the table shows core count, thread count, stock clock speed, maximum boost clock, L3 cache, the boost frequency on a certain number of cores, and TDP.
Moving down into more affordable territory, the Core i7-9700K is expected to have eight cores but also only eight threads. If this turns out to be true, there will be some interesting comparisons between the six core i7-8700K with 12 threads and the 8C/8T next generation CPU. Physical cores are still worth more than Hyperthreading, but performance differences will be heavily workload dependent.
Intel is not really pushing anything too ridiculous by keeping the boost speed of the i7-9700K to 4.6 GHz on all cores and 4.9 GHz on only a single core. According to the leak, it is expected that Intel will keep the same 12 MB of cache as the i7-8700K despite gaining two more physical cores.
Lastly, the Core i5-9600K is expected to ship with six cores and six threads and badged with the same 95W TDP. A base clock of 3.7 GHz boosts up to 4.6 GHz on all cores. Cache remains at 9 MB, the same as the previous generation.


Question: What are the main methods for replacing bladder function? Respond in 31 words.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What are the main methods for replacing bladder function? Respond in 31 words.

The two main methods for replacing bladder function involve either redirecting urine flow or replacing the bladder "in situ". Replacement can be done with an artificial urinary bladder, an artificial organ.


Question: Have you heard about Goran Dragic leading Slovenia to the EuroBasket title this summer?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Have you heard about Goran Dragic leading Slovenia to the EuroBasket title this summer?

October 24, 2017 2017-18 season, Goran Dragic, Tom D'Angelo.
After leading Slovenia to the EuroBasket title this summer, Goran Dragic said he’s ‘open’ to returning to his national team if it qualifies for 2020 Olympics.
MIAMI – Goran Dragic’s career with his national team may not be over just yet.
After speaking with a coach from his Slovenian team on Monday, the Miami Heat point guard told the Palm Beach Post he would consider playing in the 2020 Summer Olympics in Tokyo, if the team qualifies.
“He was just (asking) if I would play in the Olympics,” said Dragic, who will turn 34 in 2020. “Of course, I told him I’m done playing now, but you never know what’s going to happen in three years.
Dragic added he would not play in the qualifying.
“They said we know it’s impossible to play in the qualifying because of the system and the NBA,” he said.
Slovenia has never qualified for the Olympics in basketball.
“That’s why it would be special,” Dragic said.
A total of 12 teams will participate in the Olympics through several qualifying tournaments.
Dragic said in April he would be retiring from international play following the EuroBasket last summer and reiterated that claim following the tournament in which he was the MVP.
But after leading Slovenia to an improbable championship pressure is mounting for him to play again.
Slovenia gained its independence from Yugoslavia in 1991 and it’s first Summer Olympics was 1992. In EuroBasket, the highest it ever placed prior to winning this year was fifth in 2013. Slovenia has played in the FIBA Basketball World Cup three times, never placing higher than seventh.
Dragic averaged team-highs of 22.6 points and 5.0 assists, along with 4.4 rebounds, in the EuroBasket. He scored 35 points and had seven rebounds and three assists in Slovenia’s 93-85 victory over Serbia in the Gold Medal game on Sept. 17.
The team was feted by a crowd of approximately 20,000 who welcomed them in the center of Slovenia’s capital Ljubljana, Dragic’s hometown. Dragic was serenaded with chants of “MVP, MVP, MVP.” The championship game was the most-watched event on television in the country. Dragic was told 94 percent of the country tuned in.
“He’s a champion,” Heat coach Erik Spoelstra said. “I love the fact that Goran put himself out there, made himself vulnerable and really felt all the emotions, the angst, the joy, the frustration, the sleepless nights of getting ready for important game.
The performance sent Dragic’s popularity soaring in the country of just more than two million. He received one of Slovenia’s highest civilian honors and some suggested he run for president in his homeland. Although he was not on the ballot for the election, which was held Sunday, he was told he received several write-in votes.
Dragic said he has no interest in a career in politics. Slovenia is the homeland of first lady Melania Trump.
“I want to work with children after basketball,” he said.


Question: What is Collective Consciousness Society's first album?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What is Collective Consciousness Society's first album?

C.C.S. was the first studio album of the British blues outfit Collective Consciousness Society, led by guitarist Alexis Korner. To avoid confusion with the group's second album with the same name, the album is often called "Whole Lotta Love", due to the inclusion of the Led Zeppelin song. In the UK, "Boom Boom" was issued as the A-side of the single, however "Whole Lotta Love" charted at number 13 on the UK Official Charts. In the US, the single charted at number 58 on the "Billboard" Hot 100, while the album only charted at number 197 on the "Billboard" 200.


Question: Describe the new features and improvements in Pro Evolution Soccer (PES).

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the new features and improvements in Pro Evolution Soccer (PES).

The world renowned gameplay quality has been finely tuned and refined to recreate the authenticity of the beautiful game, including a more realistic game speed.
Strategic Dribbling gives the user significantly more control in possession, with the addition of contextual shielding to protect the ball, as well as simple stick controls triggering realistic, subtle movements to wrong foot defenders.
Real Touch+ adds a new dimension to ball control, with full body touch allowing various parts of the body to control the ball based on the unpredictability of the ball movement.
Set pieces have been reworked with a new Free Kick and Penalty Kick system, alongside the option to choose the new one player kick off.
Realistic visuals recreate the authenticity of football, all the way down to the finer details thanks to Real Capture.
The benefits include true-to-life stadium lighting for day and night matches, pitch turfs and player tunnels that were recreated from more than 20,000 intricate elements of genuine data that was collected at the Camp Nou and Signal Iduna Park.
Players have been motion captured in equally realistic environments, allowing for a complete rework of the animation system, starting with core movement such as walking, turning and body posture.
Additionally, player models have been completely changed, with special attention paid to kit fitting and short size.
Players photo scanned from partner teams will receive full body tattoos.
The fan favourite RANDOM SELECTION MATCH returns with new presentation and features. Experience life as manager in MASTER LEAGUE with pre-season tournaments, an improved transfer system and new presentation elements, including pre-match interviews and locker room scenes.
Compete in PES League in new modes including myClub, Random Selection Match and Online co-op.
PC Steam version undergoes substantial enhancements in graphics and content, meeting quality standards and ensuring parity across all current gen platforms.


Question: What can you tell me about the 2018 election cycle on ActBlue?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What can you tell me about the 2018 election cycle on ActBlue?

With a calendar chock-full of primary elections, May was an especially busy month for the campaigns and organizers working to win in November. Small-dollar donors never faltered, raising $63,464,089 for a new monthly record of 7,255 Democratic campaigns, progressive organizations, and nonprofits on ActBlue. The primary season excitement was so strong that grassroots donors also surpassed the total amount of money raised on ActBlue in the entire 2016 election cycle! From January 2015 through December 2016, small-dollar donors on ActBlue raised $781 million. By midnight on May 31, 2018, they had raised $821,113,155 for the 2018 cycle! And the busiest months are still to come.
Check out all of the highlights from May below.
Grassroots donors made 1,473,522 contributions on ActBlue in May to support a record-breaking 7,255 unique groups. These are first-time candidates for office, advocacy groups working to protect immigrant rights, and nonprofits fighting for gun control, just to name a few.
We took a closer look at the composition of these groups and found that two-thirds of the campaigns and organizations that were raising money on ActBlue in May raised their first dollar on our platform during the 2018 cycle. From choosing to run for office so they can enact long-term change themselves to creating organizations that will far outlast the Trump administration, more and more people are continuing to join the resistance. And what’s even more exciting is that they are recognizing the power of small-dollar donors!
With ActBlue Express, donors can securely save their payment information with us so that in the future they can give to any campaign or organization that uses our platform with a single click. We added 71,224 ActBlue Express users in May, which means we’re now less than 200,000 users away from 5 million!
Mobile contributions continue to make up nearly half of all contributions on ActBlue. Once candidates make it out of primary season and go up against Republicans backed by mega-donors, it will be even more important for campaigns to prioritize mobile giving so grassroots supporters can easily give whenever they want (or whenever a big story breaks).
Recurring contributions made up 20.4% of the total volume on ActBlue in May. These donations helped sustain primary campaigns during get-out-the-vote efforts and will be crucial to powering a blue wave in November.
The small-dollar donor movement was stronger than ever in May as concerned citizens and new activists showed they have no problem keeping up with the unprecedented number of candidates and contested races we’re seeing now. Our people power is only going to increase the closer we get to Election Day, and we can’t wait to see what other records grassroots donors set by November! If you have questions about this blog post or want help fundraising for your favorite candidate or cause, get in touch with us at info@actblue.com.


Question: Describe the life and accomplishments of Otto Tucker.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the life and accomplishments of Otto Tucker.

Otto Tucker, (October 4, 1923 – October 6, 2015) was a Canadian heritage activist. He was a recipient of the Order of Canada for his work in heritage affairs and the Order of Newfoundland and Labrador for his efforts that have made significant contributions to both the educational and cultural sectors of the province.


Question: What does Sarah Huckabee Sanders think about Trump's changing story for firing James Comey? Respond in detail.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What does Sarah Huckabee Sanders think about Trump's changing story for firing James Comey? Respond in detail.

She doesn't think it matters. She's also not Robert Mueller.
During his train wreck of an interview on Hannity on Wednesday night, new Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani explained that the president fired then-FBI director James Comey because Comey refused to publicly announce that Trump “wasn’t a target” of the FBI’s investigation of his campaign.
There’s just one problem. Giuliani’s explanation for Comey’s firing differs from two previous ones that have already been offered by the White House — the official line, which was that Comey mishandled the Hillary Clinton email investigation; and the one Trump offered NBC’s Lester Holt, which was that he fired Comey because he was frustrated with the Russia investigation.
On Thursday, Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders was asked to reconcile team Trump’s shifting rationales for Comey’s firing. She responded with the verbal equivalent of the shrug emoji.
Despite what Sanders would have you believe, the White House’s changing story could cause problems for Trump. Part of special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation pertains to whether Trump obstructed justice when he fired Comey amid an active FBI investigation into his campaign. The answer hinges on Trump’s motivations.


Question: What is happening on the day of the Dota 2 tournament at Insomnia Festival?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What is happening on the day of the Dota 2 tournament at Insomnia Festival?

One week to go until the biggest event of the year! There’s a £2,000 prize pool on the cards for Dota 2 at the moment, rising to £2,500 if a few more teams sign up, and a whole host of other cool stuff going on at the festival, so I thought I’d better fill you in on all the important stuff.
If you’ve paid for it, you can turn up on Thursday night and get a few extra hours of LAN in. We’ll be on the i49 in-game channel and the UKDota.net guild chat, so come and say hi.
Games running all day - check out the UKDota.net guild or in-game channel i49 for in-houses and other stuff.
The Dota 2 tournament kicks off! We’ll be broadcasting all day with Pyrion Flax and Durka on the Multiplay streams - don’t miss it.
Today it gets serious for the teams who make it through groups. If you didn’t make it, you can enter our intermediate tournament to win a set of 5 tickets to Insomnia 50.
10:00: Games start for both tournaments.
Dota 2’s first appearance on the big stage at Insomnia! We know it’s Monday, but get yourselves out of bed for this one and cheer for the teams.


Question: "Hey, can you tell me what SCP-3222 is all about?" Respond in 63 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 "Hey, can you tell me what SCP-3222 is all about?" Respond in 63 sentences.

Each page of this file is transcribed below its corresponding image. If the transcripts are destroyed by SCP-3222's anomalous properties, researchers may re-transcribe them. Communication from SCP-3222-1 is transcribed in italics.
Special Containment Procedures: SCP-3222 is to be kept in a standard Safe storage locker at Site-██. Once daily, at a time in accordance with the rules outlined in Addendum 3222-b, a researcher with clearance level 2 or higher is to write using SCP-3222 for at least 30 minutes. Further rules for the proper usage of SCP-3222 are outlined in Addenda 3222-b and 3222-c.
Any personnel writing with SCP-3222 are to be screened for carpal tunnel syndrome on a weekly basis, due to the high volume of text produced using SCP-3222.
Description: SCP-3222 is a standard Ticonderoga Hard Black no. 2 pencil that is not worn out through the process of normal writing. Any information regarding SCP-3222 that is not written using the object is destroyed through unknown anomalous means within seven days of its recording.
If SCP-3222 is used according to the rules outlined in Addendum 3222-b, the writer becomes unable to write any original text; instead, an unseen force, hereafter referred to as SCP-3222-1, controls any writing generated by the subject. No test subject has expressed an inability to stop writing or leave the testing area, however.
The writings of SCP-3222-1 indicate that it is a sixteen-year-old human male named Thomas [SURNAME REDACTED] of whom no records exist. Despite multiple years of contact with the Foundation, SCP-3222-1 claims not to experience aging.
The text produced by SCP-3222-1 also indicates that it has some knowledge of events that occur shortly after each interview. Investigation of these precognitive abilities is ongoing in the hope that SCP-3222 can be used to aid in the containment of other SCP objects. SCP-3222-1 has, thus far, been cooperative with Foundation personnel.
Under the influence of SCP-3222-1, all subjects are unable to write in cursive. Researchers should therefore write all original text in cursive to aid in distinguishing any communication from SCP-3222-1.
All available resources should go to helping SCP-3222-1 neutralize his anomalous qualities and return to the real world.
This pencil is all that's keeping me alive. I am dead. I am the dying. -Document 3222-Alpha.
The student was referred to the school's psychologist and claimed to be "channeling a ghost." The psychologist reached out via email to an area specialist in disorders involving delusional behavior, and the message was intercepted by Foundation web trawlers and flagged for potential anomalous activity. Local agents confiscated SCP-3222 and administered low-grade amnestics to all civilians involved.
The time on the east coast of the United States is between 0900 and 1500, on a weekday.
SCP-3222 is used with college-ruled lined notebook paper.
That paper is kept on a desk of the same type used in classrooms in the [REDACTED] school district.
These conditions were discovered based on the original student’s claim that “the ghost only writes in classrooms.” Researchers initially used a reconstruction of the student’s classroom for the use of SCP-3222, but the writings of SCP-3222-1 indicated that only these three conditions are required.
Personnel wishing to interview SCP-3222-1 are to bring SCP-3222 and a single sheet of lined paper into a testing chamber with two desks: one that activates SCP-3222 and one that does not. The latter desk may be used for writing original text (i.e. questions for SCP-3222-1).
The following pages are notable interviews with SCP-3222-1. Interview 3222-a took place on ██/██/2013 and Interview 3222-b took place on ██/██/2014.
Hello, SCP-3222-1, my name is Dr. S█████. Can you read this?
Yes! Hi, Dr. S█████! I'm Thomas ███████, do you know where I am?
No, but my job is to help you figure that out. Could you please describe your surroundings?
Well, I'm in a classroom, which I can't leave. Basically all that's in here is me and my pencil.
Your pencil? Why is that significant?
…I guess I'd say it feels more "real" than anything here, you know? Also, what's a Hume level?
Classified, sorry. How did you know about that?
It's written at the bottom of the paper. Doesn't seem very "classified." [drawing of the All-Seeing Eye triangle] <- is this you?
[in margin] But without my pencil I think I would vanish. Keep it safe, please.
Note: SCP-3222-1 seems to have some understanding of its anomalous properties, as well as those of SCP-3222. Testing of SCP-3222 for abnormal Hume levels is proposed, as is investigation into the temporal relationship between SCP-3222-1 and the text it produces.
Note: At precisely 10:01:50, SCP-████ breached containment and proceeded to this interview chamber, where it attempted to gain entry.
Following the advice of SCP-3222-1, I sealed the door at approximately 10:01:45. Thanks to the sealed door, I suffered only minor burns, rather than being incinerated. Containment was quickly re-established with no casualties.
Don't mention it. I'm happy to help.


Question: Describe a new research study on brain biometrics.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe a new research study on brain biometrics.

Credit: Chen Song, University at Buffalo.
BUFFALO, N.Y. — To overcome password fatigue, many smartphones include facial recognition, fingerprint scans and other biometric systems.
“To the best of our knowledge, this is the first in-depth research study on a truly cancelable brain biometric system. We refer to this as ‘hard cancellation,’ meaning the original brain password can be reset without divulging the user’s identity,” says collaborator Zhanpeng Jin, PhD, associate professor of computer science and engineering at UB.
Their work is described in a study that will be presented June 11 at MobiSys 2018, a flagship mobile computing conference hosted in Germany by the Association for Computing Machinery. For a copy of the study, please email Cory Nealon at cmnealon@buffalo.edu.
The research was supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) and NSF’s Center for Identification Technology Research.


Question: Describe the recent hack of a US Navy contractor.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the recent hack of a US Navy contractor.

Hackers working for the Chinese government have compromised the systems of a US Navy contractor and stolen large amounts of highly sensitive data relating to undersea warfare which included the blueprints of a supersonic anti-ship missile which is going to be used in U.S submarines by 2020. The breaches have been noticed in the month of January and February but only reported now due to an anonymous official breaking their silence.
The US official advised that the hackers have stolen the data from an contractor who is currently working for the Naval Undersea Warfare Center, a military organization which is headquartered in Newport, Rhode Island and who is currently conducting research on submarines and underwater weaponry.
The data consisted of 614 GB of material which related to a secret project named Sea Dragon. The hackers have also stolen the signals, sensor data, submarine radio room logs and also the software for the cryptographic systems that Navy uses.
While even more sensitive information was leaked, news agencies haven’t published this because it may affect the investigation and also could harm the national security. Even though the data was in the contractors unclassified network the data is considered as classified which raises concerns about the Navy’s ability to handle their contractors particularly those dealing with cutting-edge weapons.
The hack is part of China’s long-running effort to dampen the U.S advantage in military technology to therefore take over as the preeminent power in East Asia. Trump’s administration is currently seeking to secure the Beijing’s support to persuade North Korea to give up the nuclear weapons even though tensions are high between the United States and China over many trade and defence matters. The Navy is leading the investigation into the breach along with the FBI however their officials and the agency has declined to comment on this matter.
The Pentagon’s inspector general’s office stated that Defense Secretary Jim Mattis, prompted by the news coverage of the hack has asked them to review cyber security associated with contractors systems.


Question: Respond briefly. What was Stanley Calef Wilson's political career?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Respond briefly. What was Stanley Calef Wilson's political career?

Stanley Calef Wilson (September 10, 1879 – October 5, 1967) was an American politician from Vermont. He served as the 56th Lieutenant Governor of Vermont from 1929 to 1931 and the 62nd Governor of Vermont from 1931 to 1935.


Question: Describe the Ho Thuy Tien water park. Respond in detail.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the Ho Thuy Tien water park. Respond in detail.

Opened in 2004 at a price tag of approximately three million USD, the Ho Thuy Tien water park opened its gates to the public when it was only partially completed. Bankrolled by Company Hue Tourism, debuting a half-finished dream turned out to be a bad business move; but, in an odd turn of events, ever since its closure, the park has provided Hue’s tourism industry with an off-the-books boon they never could have seen coming.
In the heyday of Ho Thuy Tien, adults and children alike were magnetically attracted to the park’s signature giant, three-story-tall dragon aquarium. Rising from the lake at the park’s center, manta rays and sharks lined the walls of the interior staircase, built to resemble a dragon’s rib cage. On all sides of the dragon’s bowels were aquarium tanks full of live fish and crocodiles. These crocs would later rival the dragon as superstars of the abandoned park, as well.
Even with an excited population of park-goers flocking to Ho Thuy Tien, drawn by the promise of cool waters and good times, something was amiss. Within just a few years, the business continued to experience problems. After it shuttered, plans to resurrect the park from its fiscal troubles by turning it into an eco-park swirled throughout Hue’s local media as recently as 2013. Instead, those revitalization plans died on the table, leaving the park to become a legendary destination for travelers to the region.
Located ten kilometers outside of town, Ho Thuy Tien now exists in a sort of purgatory between worlds. When business was booming, the park was an easy-to-find destination, listed in guidebooks; no longer the case, Ho Thuy Tien is now – justifiably or not – a sort of badge of honor among travelers, with its coordinates passed from one another by word of mouth, though it’s just as easily Google-able. Located eight kilometers out of town, the park isn’t exactly easy to get to, but once there, visitors may be surprised to find a quasi-guard posted at the gate collecting “admission” to the site. Sometimes there’s even a refreshment cart in operation inside the abandoned park.
The sight of a gigantic dragon laying claim to his lake is made more stunning for its crumbling state. The abandoned amphitheater where hundreds of spectators witnessed shows before the fun died is as eerie as expected, and the three remaining water slides rise through creeping woods, and the specter of abandoned crocodiles once kept alive by visiting backpackers still looms. Thankfully the latter, pitiable case seems to have been resolved in recent months, after repeated calls to WWF and PETA, until the Vietnamese government finally transported them to a proper wildlife park. Still, it seems best to avoid all water in the park both for reasons of sanitation and potential rogue chomping.
Best found by asking around, or locating via "dropped pin" coordinates. Be prepared to "tip" the guard at the gate for unfettered access to the park.


Question: What is the debate surrounding free speech on college campuses?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What is the debate surrounding free speech on college campuses?

Colleges and universities across the country are struggling with the question of who decides what is acceptable speech on campus. When does a controversial topic become hate speech? When should it be allowed as free speech?
Two Cornell researchers say psychological science’s extensive study of bias offers an important lens through which to view these conflicts, as we strive to understand and reduce them.
There is no alternative to free speech, say co-authors Stephen Ceci and Wendy Williams in “Who Decides What Is Acceptable Speech on Campus? Why Restricting Free Speech Is Not the Answer.” Their analysis appeared May 2 in Perspectives in Psychological Science as the lead article in the issue.
Since the 1950s, psychological science has demonstrated that many types of bias can prevent opposing sides from accepting the validity of each other’s arguments, the authors say.
Selective perception makes opponents on an issue literally see things differently. In 1954, researchers showed a film of a 1951 football game – Princeton versus Dartmouth, well-known for its competitive, rough play – to two groups: one of Princeton fans and the other of Dartmouth boosters. Each team’s supporters saw the majority of flagrant violations as having been committed by opposing players.
For people with selective bias, “it’s not just that they interpret their perceptions differently; they actually see different things,” Ceci said.
In “myside” bias, people look for evidence that supports their opinions and ignore or downgrade evidence that contradicts them. “Blind-spot bias comes from deep identification with a cause. We believe we are especially enlightened, while our opponents’ affiliation with the opposite side leads them to be biased,” Ceci said. Similarly, naïve realism makes people feel their views are grounded in reality but their opponents’ are not.
These and many other biases explain why a sizable percentage of students favor banning nearly every controversial topic, the authors said.
and 51 percent said it was OK to prevent others from hearing a speaker.
“In such a climate, the heckler’s veto reigns supreme and any expression that is offensive to any subgroup on campus would be banned,” Williams said.
College experiences should involve challenging our beliefs, even when those experiences go beyond our comfort level, and no campus group has the right to determine for the entire community what can be discussed, the authors said.
Universities can take several steps to help students avoid the biases that prevent them from valuing other points of view and to reduce extremist views and confrontations, they said.
Role-playing exercises could be woven into controversial seminars in which supporters of each side are asked to switch sides. And universities could organize civil debates on controversial topics.
Students should be made to understand they are entering a place that believes deeply in the importance of dialogue and free speech, Ceci said.


Question: Describe how Scott Pruitt’s policies have affected the EPA Board of Scientific Counselors.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe how Scott Pruitt’s policies have affected the EPA Board of Scientific Counselors.

The agency hopes to consider a more diverse group of applicants, including experts from chemical and fossil-fuel companies.
Under Administrator Scott Pruitt, the Environment Protection Agency has decided not to renew the contracts of half the scientists on its Board of Scientific Counselors, the board’s chairwoman, Deborah Swackhamer, confirmed Monday. The board’s latest three-year term expired on April 30, with members limited to serving two terms. In an unprecedented move by the agency, nine of the board’s 18 scientific experts received word via email that their appointments would not be renewed, despite being eligible to serve a second term. The first round of emails circulated on Friday and continued over the weekend.
“Today, I was Trumped,” Robert Richardson, an ecological economist and associate professor at Michigan State University, tweeted on Friday. “I have had the pleasure of serving on the EPA Board of Scientific Counselors, and my appointment was terminated today.” On Sunday, Richardson told The Washington Post he was “kind of shocked” to learn he would have to reapply for his current position. “I’ve never heard of any circumstance where someone didn’t serve two consecutive terms,” he said.
This sentiment was echoed on Monday by fellow board member Courtney Flint, a professor of natural resource sociology at Utah State University. Flint told CNN that the news of her termination “came as a surprise,” adding: “I do not think I am speculating when I say that this is a political move.” On the same day, Flint informed the Post that she was told to expect a renewal of her appointment.
The EPA’s large-scale dismissal is indeed unorthodox. According to Gretchen Goldman, a research director at the Center for Science and Democracy, it is “rare to see such a large scale dismissal even in a presidential transition.” In a statement to CNN, Goldman referred to the decision as “inserting politics into science.” Her organization “see[s] this as part of larger pattern of trying to remove science from the making of policy at EPA,” she said.
The EPA, meanwhile, stood by their decision. “No one has been fired or terminated,” said EPA spokesman J.P. Freire. “We’re not going to rubber-stamp the last administration’s appointees. Instead, they should participate in the same open competitive process as the rest of the applicant pool.” Freire also said the EPA is looking to consider a more diverse group of applicants, including experts from chemical and fossil-fuel companies, provided there are no conflicts of interest.
Prior to assuming his role as administrator, Pruitt was engaged in a lengthy battle with the EPA over the agency’s attempt to regulate mercury, smog, and other forms of pollution. According to thousands of emails obtained by The New York Times, these battles were likely influenced by Pruitt’s close ties to major oil and gas producers. Last month, Pruitt announced he would postpone the compliance deadline for an Obama-era regulation limiting power plants from dumping toxic metals into the nation’s public waterways. Under Pruitt, the EPA has also eliminated certain scientific claims pertaining to climate change from its websites.


Question: Describe the contributions of Steve Paxton to the world of experimental dance.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the contributions of Steve Paxton to the world of experimental dance.

Steve Paxton (born 1939 in Phoenix, Arizona) is an experimental dancer and choreographer. His early background was in gymnastics while his later training included three years with Merce Cunningham and a year with José Limón. As a founding member of the Judson Dance Theater, he performed works by Yvonne Rainer and Trisha Brown. He was a founding member of the experimental group Grand Union and in 1972 named and began to develop the dance form known as Contact Improvisation, a form of dance that utilizes the physical laws of friction, momentum, gravity, and inertia to explore the relationship between dancers.


Question: Do you know where Shrewsbury, New Jersey is? Respond briefly.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Do you know where Shrewsbury, New Jersey is? Respond briefly.

Shrewsbury, New Jersey most often refers to the borough of Shrewsbury in eastern Monmouth County. Other places it may refer to include:


Question: Respond in 6 sentences. Describe the USS "Theenim" (AKA-63).

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Respond in 6 sentences. Describe the USS "Theenim" (AKA-63).

USS "Theenim" (AKA-63) was an "Andromeda" class attack cargo ship said to be named after a star in the constellation "Eridanus." (Eridanus has no star of that name, but "does" have one named "Theemin"; possibly the ship's name is a misspelling.) "Theenim" was one of a handful of AKA's manned by a Coast Guard crew in World War II. She served as a commissioned ship for 16 months.
"Theenim" (AKA-63) was laid down under Maritime Commission contract (MC hull 215) on 18 July 1944 at Kearny, New Jersey, by the Federal Shipbuilding and Drydock Co., launched on 31 October 1944, sponsored by Mrs. Joseph Midder, and commissioned on 22 December 1944, Comdr. G. A. Littlefield, USCG, in command.