Question: Respond in 6 sentences. Write a statement about Arizona's new treatement of gold and silver as money.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Respond in 6 sentences. Write a statement about Arizona's new treatement of gold and silver as money.

BIG NEWS: Gold & Silver Now Treated As Money In Arizona!
Undermining the Federal Reserve received a major boost yesterday. Arizona Governor Doug Ducey signed into law a bill that eliminates capital gains taxes on gold and silver, thus allowing Arizona residents to use precious metals as currency instead of Federal Reserve notes.
Currency competition against the monopolist Fed is starting to unfold. Let's hope that other states follow in Arizona's heroic footsteps. There's no reason to wait for another severe financial crisis to act.


Question: Describe Brian Robertson's career.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe Brian Robertson's career.

Brian Robertson (born 9 August 1959 in Scotland) is a Scottish former rugby union player and coach. He formerly played for the professional provincial side now known as Glasgow Warriors. Robertson played for Glasgow in the 1996-97 season. His usual position was at tighthead prop.


Question: What are practical steps that people can take in response to missile fire in Israel?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What are practical steps that people can take in response to missile fire in Israel?

Q: What can I do in order to help continue the amazing unity among Am Yisrael that began during the time of the teens' kidnapping?
A: Speak with others, telling them that what binds us together is greater than what seperates us. By the way, there is a place which has even greater unity: Tzahal!
Q: Is Hamas an agent of Hashem, causing us to atone for our transgressions? And if not, why doesn't Hashem destroy them and make it easier for Am Yisrael?
A: For the same reason that since the time of Kayin there are evil people and murderers in the world (see Ha-Rav's book "Ve-Gavar Yisrael" which discusses the problem of evil in the world and why bad things happen to good people).
Q: What should a person do if he is in the middle of the Shemoneh Esrei and hears a warning siren for an incoming missile?
A: He should run to the bomb shelter and continue to Daven the Shemoneh Esrei there. This is based on two factors: 1. It is a case of a life-threatening situation. 2. Walking in the middle of the Shemoneh Esrei without speaking is not considered an interruption. For example, if I am Davening the Shemoneh Esrei and a child is bothering me to the point that I cannot concentrate, I can move to another place. Or if I am Davening by heart and I cannot remember "Ya'ale Ve-Yavo," I can go and get a Siddur. Speaking is forbidden, but there is no problem of moving if there is a need (Mishnah Berurah 104:2). Therefore, if I am in the middle of the Shemoneh Esrei and I hear a warning siren for an incoming missile, I should go to the bomb shelter without talking and continue to Daven where I left off (Piskei Teshuvot, Orach Chaim 104. Shut Be'er Moshe 3:13. Nes Lehitnoses by Ha-Rav Yoel Schwartz at the end, in the Q&A of Ha-Rav Yitzchak Zilberstein during the Gulf War #39).
Q: A Rabbi said that missiles will not fall in a particular city. Is it permissible to rely on him and not enter the bomb shelter?
A: In general, one should obey the directives of the Home Front Command. But you should ask the Rabbi directly (These were the words of Ha-Rav Chaim Kanievsky regarding Bnei Brak, based on the promise of the Chazon Ish. However, I heard that Rav Kanievsky said that one should go into the bomb shelter in order to feel distress with the rest of Am Yisrael. See Rashi on Shemot 17:12).
Q: If I learn Torah in order to protect myself from the missiles, is it considered a violation of "One who makes unworthy use of the crown [of Torah] shall pass away" (Pirkei Avot 1:13)?
A: No. It is considered learning Torah not for its own sake (see Nefesh Ha-Chaim, Sha'ar #4. Shut Yechaveh Daat 3:73).
Q: Does one who goes out of his house during missile fire, violate "Guard your soul very carefully" (Devarim 4:10).
A: One is always obligated to follow directives of the Home Front Command and not try to outsmart them.
Q: During this time, should we be frightened, recite Tehillim and Daven, based on the idea that we should cry out to Hashem during a time of distress, or should we not get excited and continue in our routine in order to show that we will not bow to terror and will not be scare us?
A: Continue on with strength and courage during our state of war, which began with the establishment of the State of Israel. But a courageous person also Davens to Hashem, as we see with Yaakov Avinu before his meeting with Esav: He sent gifts, Davened and prepared for war (Rashi on Bereshit 32:9).
Q: What can I do in order to help Tzahal be victorious?
A: Repent, Daven and give Tzedakah. It is already certain, however, that Tzahal will be victorious, but you can help make the process faster and less costly.
Q: It is permissible for me to sleep in a bomb shelter with my husband if other men are also there?
A: Yes, in a corner.
Q: In light of the situation, should we add prayers to the Davening?
A: There is no need. This is the normal state of war with our enemies, which has been going on since the establishment of the State of Israel.
Q: I live in Northern Israel. Is it permissible to travel to the Kotel for a Bar Mitzvah when missiles are currently falling in Yerushalayim and the south?
A: It is a negligible risk. You may travel unless the Home Front Command says otherwise (see Piskei Teshuvah, Yoreh Deah 157).


Question: Could you tell me a bit about Eric Cornel's hockey career?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Could you tell me a bit about Eric Cornel's hockey career?

2010-11: Eric Cornel played in four minor midget AAA games for the Upper Canada Cyclones and had 61 points in 30 games for the club’s bantam AAA team. He scored 1 goal with 3 assists in four midget games.
2011-12: Cornel appeared in four junior A games with the Kemptville 73’s in Ontario and was a team captain for the Upper Canada Cyclones’ midget minor AAA team as a 15-year-old. He scored 1 goal with 3 assists in CCHL play with Kemptville. Cornel scored 18 goals with 32 assists and had 14 penalty minutes in 25 regular season games for the Cyclones and had 5 assists with 4 penalty minutes in five playoff games. Cornel was an assistant captain for Canada’s U16 team at the 2012 Youth Olympic Games; scoring 4 goals with 5 assists and finishing +11 in six games. He was the third player selected when he was taken by Peterborough in the first round of the 2012 OHL Priority Selection.
2012-13: Cornel appeared in 63 of 68 games for Peterborough in his first OHL season and played for Canada Ontario in the 2013 U17 World Hockey Challenge. He scored 4 goals with 12 assists and was -2 with 13 penalty minutes playing for the Petes — who missed the playoffs after finishing with the league’s third-worst record. Cornel had 3 assists in five games for Canada Ontario at the WHC.
2013-14: Cornel moved into a prominent scoring role for the much-improved Petes in his second OHL season. He scored 25 goals with 37 assists and was +2 with 25 penalty minutes in 68 regular season games. Peterborough finished third in the East Division and reached the second round in the playoffs. Cornel was selected to play for Team Orr in the 2014 CHL/NHL Top Prospects Game. He was ranked 25th amongst North American skaters in the Central Scouting final rankings and was selected by Buffalo in the second round (44th overall) in the 2014 NHL Draft.
2014-15: Cornel made his professional hockey debut with Sabres’ AHL affiliate Rochester following his junior season with Peterborough. In six games with the Americans he had 1 assist and was -2 with no penalties. Cornel was the third-leading scorer for Peterborough in what was a frustrating regular season for the Petes. He scored 14 goals with a team-high 38 assists and was -24 with 35 penalty minutes in 66 regular season games. Peterborough claimed the Eastern Conference’s final playoff spot despite finishing last in the East Division, falling to Memorial Cup champion Oshawa in a first-round series. Cornel had 1 assist and was -2 with 2 penalty minutes in five playoff games.
Cornel is a big, talented forward who is still figuring out whether he will be a playmaking forward with size or a power forward with scoring ability, He has been inconsistent at times — putting up points in bunches but then going several games at a time without registering a point. He competes hard on a nightly basis but is still a work in progress when it comes to handling his defensive responsibilities and playing a two-way game.
Cornel has enjoyed a breakout season in his fourth season with the Peterborough Petes. Second in scoring to overage forward Hunter Garlent in 2015-16, Cornel is one of the team leaders for a Petes' team that is battling with the Ottawa 67's for second-place in the East Division. Yet to sign an entry-level contract with Buffalo, he would re-enter the 2016 NHL Draft if not signed before then. Cornel's scoring and consistent two-way play suggest he can be an effective second or third line center in the NHL in the future.


Question: What's the latest news on Mikey Ambrose's injury?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What's the latest news on Mikey Ambrose's injury?

ATLANTA — Atlanta United FC’s depth at fullback just took another hit.
Mikey Ambrose had surgery on his right knee to repair a torn meniscus recently and will miss three to four months of playing time, the club announced Monday.
Ambrose, 24, was seen on crutches last week at events for the 2018 MLS All-Star Game. The announcing of his injury comes just days after the club announced fellow outside back Sal Zizzo will miss three to four months after undergoing surgery for a similar injury.
The club is already without starting fullback and 2017 All-Star Greg Garza, who had surgery to repair his shoulder in June. At the time of his surgery, the club said he would be back within four to six months, making October the earliest he would return.
On Saturday, the Five Stripes 2-2 draw against Toronto FC, manager Gerardo “Tata” Martino included 16-year-old George Bello on the 18-man gameday roster. Bello has played fullback with ATL UTD 2, the club’s United Soccer League affiliate, but has never seen action in an MLS game.
Because of the injuries and Franco Escobar’s suspension — due to his yellow card accumulation —Martino played Jeff Larentowicz at right centerback on Saturday in a 3-5-2 formation. The 35-year-old typically plays as a central defensive midfielder.
When Garza went down it came at a time when Chris McCann was also banged up. Martino called on Ambrose to fill in. He played well and started six straight matches. The Five Stripes went 3-1-2 in that stretch. In all, Ambrose has played in nine MLS games this season and tallied two assists.
Ambrose got hurt playing for ATL UTD 2 on July 25 against Nashville SC. The University of Maryland product has played in six games with the USL side, all starts, and notched two goals, nine clearances, 15 interceptions and eight key passes.
A native of El Paso, Texas, Ambrose came to Atlanta United in 2016 when Orlando City SC left him unprotected in the expansion draft. He is one of Atlanta’s lowest-paid regular contributors, making an annual salary of $68,906.
Atlanta United is 14-4-6 this season, sitting at the top of the Eastern Conference and in first place for the Supporter’s Shield race with 48 points. The Five Stripes are off until Aug. 19 when they host the Columbus Crew.


Question: "Can you provide a short review for the game Syndicate?"

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 "Can you provide a short review for the game Syndicate?"

Syndicate is an old dos game, published in 1993 by Bullfrog Prod.. Main genre of this old game is strategy. We gave this game stunning rating of 89 and you can download it for free right here.
We are really sorry, there is no english short review for Syndicate yet. We are working really hard to review this game for you, but you can help us to make it faster. Send your review to my email and I will publish it here.


Question: Who is Henry Charles McLaren, 4th Baron Aberconway?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Who is Henry Charles McLaren, 4th Baron Aberconway?

Henry Charles McLaren, 4th Baron Aberconway (born 26 May 1948) is a British peer. He is the son of Charles McLaren, 3rd Baron Aberconway, and Deirdre Knewstub.


Question: What happenend when the Turkish fighter jet launched a missile at a Russian bomber on Tuesday?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What happenend when the Turkish fighter jet launched a missile at a Russian bomber on Tuesday?

A Turkish fighter jet launched a missile at a Russian bomber on Tuesday well ahead of the Su-24 approaching the Turkish border, the chief of Russia’s Air Force said. The bomber remained on Turkish radars for 34 minutes and never received any warnings.
The commander shared with the media previously unknown details of what happened on Tuesday.
On November 24, a pair of Russian Sukhoi Su-24 tactical bombers took off from Khmeimim airbase in Latakia at 06:15 GMT, with an assignment to carry out airstrikes in the vicinity of the settlements of Kepir, Mortlu and Zahia, all in the north of Syria. Each bomber was carrying four OFAB-250 high-explosive fragmentation bombs.
Ten minutes later, the bombers entered the range of Turkish radars and took positions in the target area, patrolling airspace at predetermined heights of 5,800 meters and 5,650 meters respectively.
Both aircraft remained in the area for 34 minutes. During this time there was no contact between the crews of the Russian bombers and the Turkish military authorities or warplanes.
Some 20 minutes after arriving at the designated area, the crews received the coordinates of groups of terrorists in the region. After making a first run, the bombers performed a maneuver and then delivered a second strike.
Immediately after that, the bomber crewed by Lieutenant-Colonel Oleg Peshkov and Captain Konstantin Murakhtin was attacked by a Turkish F-16 fighter jet operating from the Diyarbakır airfield in Turkey.
To attack the Russian bomber with a close-range air-to-air missile, the Turkish fighter jet had to enter Syrian airspace, where it remained for about 40 seconds. Having launched its missile from a distance of 5-7 kilometers, the F-16 immediately turned towards the Turkish border, simultaneously dropping its altitude sharply, thus disappearing from the range of Russian radars at the Khmeimim airbase.
The Turkish fighter moved two kilometers into Syrian airspace while the Russian bomber at no stage violated Turkish airspace, Bondarev stressed.
The crew of the second Su-24M had a clear view of the moment the missile was fired from the Turkish F-16, and reported this to base.
Commander Bondarev noted that a pair of Turkish F-16Cs had been in the area close to the attack zone for more than an hour prior to the attack, which explains their presence in the area. The time needed to get the aircraft ready at the Diyarbakır airfield and travel to the attack zone is an estimated 46 minutes.
One of Turkish F-16Cs stopped its maneuvers and began to approach the Su-24M bomber about 100 seconds before the Russian aircraft came closest to the Turkish border, which also confirms the attack was pre-planned, Commander Bondarev stressed.
The chief of Russia’s Air Force also called attention to the readiness of the Turkish media, which released a professionally-made video of the incident recorded from an area controlled by extremists a mere 1.5 hours after the Su-24 was downed.
Commander Bondarev also mentioned the memorandum of understanding regarding the campaign in Syria, signed by Moscow and Washington on October 26. In accordance with this agreement, the Russian side informed its American counterparts about the mission of the two bombers in the north of Syria on November 24, including the zones and heights of operation.
Taking this into account, the Turkish authorities' statement on not knowing which aircraft were operating in the area raises eyebrows, Bondarev said.
The Turkish military not only violated all international laws on protecting national borders, but never delivered an apology for the incident or offered any help in the search and rescue operation for the Su-24 crew.
The Su-24’s pilot, Lieutenant-Colonel Oleg Peshkov, was shot dead by militants while parachuting to the ground, having ejected from the stricken aircraft. His partner, navigator Captain Konstantin Murakhtin, survived being shot at while parachuting and managed to stay alive on the ground in an area full of terrorists.
The rescue operation took several hours and eventually recovered Murakhtin, although one Russian Marine in the team was killed when the rescue helicopter was destroyed by a US-made tank missile launched by the extremists – an incident they filmed and published online.
Commander Bondarev specifically stressed that the Russian pilot who survived the attack was actively looked for not only by the jihadists, but also by a number of unidentified and technically well-equipped groups.
After Captain Murakhtin was rescued, the Russian Air Force delivered “more than massive, devastating” airstrikes against the militants in the region where the operation had been taking place, Bondarev reported.


Question: Provide an explanation of the municipality of Radibor. Respond briefly.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Provide an explanation of the municipality of Radibor. Respond briefly.

Radibor, in Sorbian Radwor, is a municipality in Saxony in Germany. It is situated in Upper Lusatia about 10 km north of Bautzen, which is also the main city of the District of Bautzen to which Radibor belongs.


Question: Explain ocular dominance columns.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Explain ocular dominance columns.

Ocular dominance columns are stripes of neurons in the visual cortex of certain mammals (including humans) that respond preferentially to input from one eye or the other. The columns span multiple cortical layers, and are laid out in a striped pattern across the surface of the striate cortex (V1). The stripes lie perpendicular to the orientation columns.
Ocular dominance columns were important in early studies of cortical plasticity, as it was found that monocular deprivation causes the columns to degrade, with the non-deprived eye assuming control of more of the cortical cells.


Question: Describe the Col des Planches mountain pass.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the Col des Planches mountain pass.

Col des Planches (el. 1411 m.) is a high mountain pass in the Alps in the canton of Valais in Switzerland. The road to the Col runs from Martigny at 471m with an average gradient of about 9%, over Col des Planches then down to Sembrancher at 717m with an average gradient of 7%


Question: Explain the features of Firefox for Android.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Explain the features of Firefox for Android.

We’re always working to give you more choice, customization and control over how you browse the Web. The new Firefox for Android Home screen helps you navigate the Web quickly and gives you easy access to all your browsing history in a single tap.
The new Home screen appears when you start up Firefox for Android, open a new tab or tap on the URL bar. You’ll instantly see your Top Sites, History, Bookmarks, and Reading List in a swipeable menu, to give you a streamlined and speedier browsing experience on-the-go, when you need it most. Firefox helps you get to any page you’ve visited, saved, or search for, so you can swiftly handle any browsing, shopping, email, work, social media or anything you need on your mobile phone or tablet.
Firefox for Android adds Bing and Yahoo! to give you more choice and control over how you search the Web on your mobile phone or tablet. You can easily change your default search options in the ‘Customize’ section of your browser settings.
Today, Firefox for Android is available on smartphones that run the Intel x86 processor chips, bringing an intuitive, powerful and personalized experience to millions of devices worldwide.


Question: Provide a brief biography of Deanna Doig. Respond in 1 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Provide a brief biography of Deanna Doig. Respond in 1 sentences.

Deanna Doig (born March 13, 1972 in Bethune, Saskatchewan) is a Canadian curler from Emerald Park, Saskatchewan.


Question: Provide a description of the Hamhung Grand Theatre in North Korea.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Provide a description of the Hamhung Grand Theatre in North Korea.

The Hamhung Grand Theatre (함흥대극장, 咸興大劇場) is a theatre located in Hamhung, North Korea. It is the largest theatre building in the country.
The building is used for major live theatrical productions by the revolutionary opera troupe. The foyer inside features a large mural of the current leader Kim Jong-un and his father Kim Jong-Il.


Question: Explain the current state of the MV Agusta F4 superbike.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Explain the current state of the MV Agusta F4 superbike.

The crux of the situation comes from the mandate for Euro4 homologation, as the current MV Agusta F4 superbike does not meet. Operating on an emissions waiver right now, MV Agusta will have to stop selling the F4 at the end of the year, which creates a difficult situation.
Combine that issue with the decline in superbike sales, coupled with the delays made by MV Agusta’s financial troubles, and a new F4 superbike gets shuffled to the back of the pack, which also means that its model revision will not come before its emissions waiver lapses.
With one new model per year, this means that the next MV Agusta F4 superbike will come as a 2021 model, likely debuting at the 2020 EICMA show in Milan, Italy.
“Strategic-wise, after we phase out the product, it’s going to take time-to-market for like a couple years. There will be a 2019 and 2020 without a superbike. But, it is our decision…just because we want to make something different,” explained Castiglioni.
Because of this, MV Agusta will also be leaving the World Superbike Championship, with the current season possibly the last for the foreseeable future. The 2019 season seems up in the air for MV Agusta, but the 2020 season is definitely out.
MV Agusta will likely continue racing in the World Supersport Championship however, with the MV Agusta F3 675 showing strong results last season with American PJ Jacobsen at the helm (6th overall, with three podiums).
It is possible that we won’t see MV Agusta return to the World Superbike Championship, though that takes some explaining to understand.
As hinted, it is not all bad news for superbike fans, however. MV Agusta CEO Giovanni Castiglioni revealed to us his plan for the future F4 models, and it is certainly an interesting proposition.
Looking to build superbikes that are not constrained by arbitrary rules for production racing, MV Agusta will pivot its superbike offering into a more halo bike category, with the next-generation of the F4 being more of a one-liter hyperbike than a one-liter superbike.
This means that MV Agusta can play with new technologies and materials that would have been unviable or illegal under current superbike regulations.
“It’s not that we don’t believe in that market. We believe we can do something different,” he finished.
While Castiglioni is reluctant to get behind an electric sport bike model, the Italian sees a future for hybrid powerplants, which could use electric motors in supplementary way to augment power delivery.
This could mean seeing MV Agusta using electric drivetrain technology in performance hybrid application, like the “push-to-pass” or KERS technology that we have seen used successfully in Formula One.
“Hybrid, that is combustion and goes 350hp with a push of a button…that’s cool, like KERS,” exclaimed Giovanni.
The idea of a “superbike” that could have 300hp at the push of a button is certainly intriguing, and perhaps it is the shot in the arm that has been missing from the sport bike category, as of late.
Using the newest technology, and the most exotic materials, the next-generation MV Agusta F4 will certainly not be cheap, but it has an opportunity to be one of the more lusted after models from this historic Italian brand.
As we have seen from bikes like the Ducati 1299 Superleggera and Kawasaki Ninja H2/H2R – there certainly is a market for these ultra-premium, ultra high-tech machines.
“We will sell the F4 with a ‘last bike’ edition – it’s very, very limited. It’s basically Leon Camier’s bike for the street, and it’s a tribute to my dad, because that’s the bike he did,” explained Giovanni Castiglioni, giving a nod to the history of the original F4, which ended with a “Claudio Castiglioni” edition.
A WorldSBK-spec race bike with lights, Giovanni Castiglioni would later tell us that the F4 “Claudio” will have carbon fiber wheels, and a bevy of other top-of-the-line pieces, as an honor to his father, the late Claudio Castiglioni.
As such, we expect pricing to be stratospheric, and quantities to be minuscule, just like the original MV Agusta F4 CC, which also bore the elder Castiglioni’s name.
A swan song for the current F4, we will have a considerable wait for its encore, which should only make the “Claudio” edition more sought after by collectors.


Question: What can you tell me about Crotona Park? Respond in 8 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What can you tell me about Crotona Park? Respond in 8 sentences.

Crotona Park is a public park in the South Bronx section of the Bronx, New York City, covering . The park is bounded by streets of the same name on its northern, eastern, southern, and western borders. It is divided into four portions by Claremont Parkway and Crotona Avenue, which run through it.
Crotona Park formerly belonged to the Bathgate family. It was created through the New Parks Act in 1888 as part of a boroughwide network of parks connected by parkways. The Crotona Play Center was added in 1936. Crotona Park was formerly , but the northern portion was cut off by the Cross Bronx Expressway in 1945, becoming what is now known as Tremont Park. After a period of deterioration in the late 20th century, several improvement projects were commenced starting in the 1990s.


Question: What is this new Big Brother-style tracker all about?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What is this new Big Brother-style tracker all about?

BOSSES are spying on staff using a Big Brother-style tracker to monitor their every move.
The high-tech device records sleep patterns, fitness, productivity and can even analyse emotions.
It is already being trialled by four British outfits — including accounting giant Deloitte, parts of the NHS, a high street bank and a retailer.
Supporters claim the credit-card sized tracker, which is worn round the neck, will increase productivity.
But campaigners last night blasted the move and insisted it was yet another invasion of privacy.
Renate Samson, chief executive of Big Brother Watch, said the device risked turning humans into robots.
The tracker is worn for 24-hours and the results are combined with data gathered from emails and phone calls to establish how much work is being done.
The device has a built-in microphone for voice analysis to assess stress and coping levels and a Bluetooth sensor to monitor body language around colleagues.
GPS sensors track employees around the workplace, monitoring how much they talk to colleagues and overall physical output.
It can even detect if an employee is drunk.
Ben Waber, chief executive of Humanyze, which makes the badges, said they would revolutionize working practices.
He said: “It’s looking at the amount of time you talk, who you talk to, your tone of voice, activity levels, dynamics like how often you interrupt.
He said the tone of conversations was logged - not the content - and bosses would only get an overview of activity.
Individuals must consent to wearing the badges and 90 per cent did, he added.
The firms believed to be using the badge include consultants Deloitte and parts of the NHS.
A leading UK retailer is also using the badges.


Question: Write an essay comparing and contrasting Rothko Chapel in Houston and Tending, (Blue) in Dallas.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Write an essay comparing and contrasting Rothko Chapel in Houston and Tending, (Blue) in Dallas.

I can think of two spaces in Texas that put me at risk of hypothermia: Rothko Chapel in Houston, and Tending, (Blue) in Dallas.
I’ve visited both. I’ve sat silently inside their cold mouths and, in both spaces, felt a pang of gratitude for finally being spit out into warm air.
But these spaces aren’t cold in the same way that climate-controlled homes of suburbia are cold. In fact, Tending, (Blue) is open-aired. James Turrell, the artist, considered it a skyspace.
James Turrell intended this piece to be slowly digested. He has a problem with the idea that people spend a few seconds in front of a masterpiece hanging in a museum and then move on to another work. Turrell wants his art to be lived.
And, to that extent, he succeeded magnificently in Tending, (Blue). I sat on that stone bench longer than I’ve looked at most art. And I had some deep thoughts.
DEEP THOUGHTS: What happens when it rains or snows in Dallas? How often do they clean this place? What would my scream sound like beyond the aperture? If the walls were narrower, there would be a time of day when the sun would shine directly onto the floor, mercilessly. Isn’t there a form of torture where people are forced to sit under the venomous sun in a confined space, without respite, until their skin boils? It would be nice to be here at night with my girl. Is the angle right? Have they ever had concerts in here? I imagine a violin would sound pretty. Or are the acoustics not that great? Me and my girl and a cherry violin.
But not even the company of this last thought could keep my brain from feeling deep isolation. Melancholy flooded the chamber. I looked around at all of the bare rock and didn’t like the way I couldn’t breathe. There was something unclear about Turrell’s art. Something like a big fat WHY?
This place felt cultish. This place felt too extreme for balance. I teetered. I rubbed my arms to kindle warmth.
Then I got up and got on with the rest of my life.
His colors gave me color. I don’t think I ever got much out of his artwork other than a sense of color and emotion and how the two are inextricably linked and can clash like warm and cold fronts in the weather system.
This is Mark Rothko’s idea of non-denominational art. Massive black canvases with a muted color hue. I applaud the eyes who can see anything other than depression in this dreadfully cold space.
I forced myself to sit down on one of the benches. I tried to give the space a chance to communicate. I looked up at the oculus and had some deep thoughts.
DEEP THOUGHTS: The use of natural light is pretty neat. I like the way it’s splayed into 8 beams. An octagon: the shape of a stop sign. It’s as if this hunk of concrete were saying, Light, stop! But Light won’t listen. Light does what it wants. Light is protean. It is shapeshifting. It is divine. And what about that gigantic black painting in front of me? And what about that other gigantic black painting? And what about that gigantic black painting over there? Is Rothko trying to tell me something? Do all people who come here to meditate or pray or worship before these canvases realize that true Light comes from the sun and not manmade creations? Is Rothko forcing me to follow the only true Light there is instead of some manmade religion or art?
Then I got terribly cold. I rubbed my arms to kindle warmth. I tied my shoelace and hurried outside.
The Russian abstract painter died a year before the completion of Rothko Chapel. He committed suicide in his kitchen. A response to deep-seeded depression.


Question: Describe the agreement between the City of Milwaukee and Bird scooter company.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the agreement between the City of Milwaukee and Bird scooter company.

The City of Milwaukee and Bird are working together to set up motorized scooter-sharing programs, city officials announced Monday.
Bird scooters have flown the coop but are expected to return.
After weeks of battling with city officials, the company agreed to remove its scooters from the streets of Milwaukee as both sides work to make the popular vehicles a permanent and legal fixture in the city.
The city and company announced the development Monday in a news release, which also said they are working together to create scooter-sharing programs set to launch once e-scooters are officially legal under state law.
"They understand that there are state challenges here, and we are certainly willing and eager to work with them and any other interested parties to see what we need to do to make it clear that these scooters could be part of our transportation arsenal," Mayor Tom Barrett told the Journal Sentinel.
Scooter legalization in Wisconsin requires either clarification on the status of e-scooters from state officials or action from the Legislature and Gov. Scott Walker removing restrictions on e-scooters. Because the Legislature does not reconvene until January, Bird scooters could be off the streets for another five months or more.
"I wanted them to know that I like scooters, but I also am compelled to follow the state law as interpreted by our city attorney," Barrett said.
The agreement came as city officials were expected to start seizing and impounding Bird scooters.
Bird has ruffled feathers in other cities, including San Francisco, Nashville, Tennessee, Miami and Denver. Officials in both Cambridge and Somerville, Massachusetts, deemed the scooters illegal and Somerville started seizing Bird scooters last week.
Despite Bird's rough landing in Milwaukee, the company praised the city in its statement.
"Following a few weeks of productive conversations with city officials, our teams are joining forces so that Bird can be an affordable and environmentally friendly transportation option for the people of Milwaukee," said David Estrada, Bird's head of public affairs and chief legal officer.
"We are thankful to have the opportunity to work with Milwaukee city leaders and look forward to bringing Birds back to residents who have already come to enjoy and benefit from this new mode of transportation," he added.
Bird has also agreed to provide rider education and hold regular safety events in Milwaukee.
In the near future, Bird will also provide its "One Bird" and "Red, White and Bird" programs in Milwaukee.
"One Bird" eliminates the $1 base fee per ride for anyone currently enrolled in or eligible for a state or federal assistance program — thus "providing a way for everyone to ride Birds in their city," the website states.
"Red, White and Bird" eliminates the $1 base fee for members of the military and veterans.
The deal announced Monday comes on the heels of a heated dispute between the city and Bird.
Deputy City Attorney Adam Stephens declared the electric scooters illegal in a letter to the startup in late June. And on July 6, Milwaukee filed a lawsuit against Bird Rides Inc. and its founder, Travis Vanderzanden.
As both parties seem to have reached an agreement, it's not clear how the city's lawsuit against Bird will proceed.
Stephens could not be reached for comment Monday.


Question: What behaviors can indicate difficulty forming and maintaining healthy relationships? Respond in 55 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What behaviors can indicate difficulty forming and maintaining healthy relationships? Respond in 55 sentences.

• have difficulty identifying what they are feeling.
• minimize, alter, or deny how they truly feel.
• perceive themselves as completely unselfish and dedicated to the well-being of others.
• lack empathy for the feelings and needs of others.
• label others with their negative traits.
• think they can take care of themselves without any help from others.
• mask pain in various ways such as anger, humor, or isolation.
• express negativity or aggression in indirect and passive ways.
• do not recognize the unavailability of those people to whom they are attracted.
• have difficulty making decisions.
• judge what they think, say, or do harshly, as never good enough.
• are embarrassed to receive recognition, praise, or gifts.
• value others’ approval of their thinking, feelings, and behavior over their own.
• do not perceive themselves as lovable or worthwhile persons.
• seek recognition and praise to overcome feeling less than.
• have difficulty admitting a mistake.
• need to appear to be right in the eyes of others and may even lie to look good.
• are unable to identify or ask for what they need and want.
• perceive themselves as superior to others.
• look to others to provide their sense of safety.
• have difficulty getting started, meeting deadlines, and completing projects.
• have trouble setting healthy priorities and boundaries.
• are extremely loyal, remaining in harmful situations too long.
• compromise their own values and integrity to avoid rejection or anger.
• put aside their own interests in order to do what others want.
• are hypervigilant regarding the feelings of others and take on those feelings.
• are afraid to express their beliefs, opinions, and feelings when they differ from those of others.
• accept sexual attention when they want love.
• make decisions without regard to the consequences.
• give up their truth to gain the approval of others or to avoid change.
• believe people are incapable of taking care of themselves.
• attempt to convince others what to think, do, or feel.
• freely offer advice and direction without being asked.
• become resentful when others decline their help or reject their advice.
• lavish gifts and favors on those they want to influence.
• use sexual attention to gain approval and acceptance.
• have to feel needed in order to have a relationship with others.
• demand that their needs be met by others.
• use charm and charisma to convince others of their capacity to be caring and compassionate.
• use blame and shame to exploit others emotionally.
• refuse to cooperate, compromise, or negotiate.
• adopt an attitude of indifference, helplessness, authority, or rage to manipulate outcomes.
• use recovery jargon in an attempt to control the behavior of others.
• pretend to agree with others to get what they want.
• act in ways that invite others to reject, shame, or express anger toward them.
• judge harshly what others think, say, or do.
• avoid emotional, physical, or sexual intimacy as a way to maintain distance.
• allow addictions to people, places, and things to distract them from achieving intimacy in relationships.
• use indirect or evasive communication to avoid conflict or confrontation.
• diminish their capacity to have healthy relationships by declining to use the tools of recovery.
• suppress their feelings or needs to avoid feeling vulnerable.
• pull people toward them, but when others get close, push them away.
• refuse to give up their self-will to avoid surrendering to a power greater than themselves.
• believe displays of emotion are a sign of weakness.
• withhold expressions of appreciation.


Question: What is the Pythagenpat formula?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What is the Pythagenpat formula?

Pythagenpat is a baseball statistic created by David Smyth and "U.S. Patriot" that is used in the calculation of adjusted standings. It attempts to find the optimal exponent for the Pythagorean expectation formula, which compares a team's actual win-loss record to the expected win-loss record based on the team's number of runs scored versus number of runs allowed. There are two versions of the formula, each developed independently. One version is rpg0.29, developed by Patriot, and the other is rpg0.287, developed by David Smyth. It has been suggested that .28 might work better as an exponent, but it is unclear whether this is actually so.
The formula's name is derived from Baseball Prospectus' Clay Davenport's Pythagenport formula, which attempts to perform the same function. Davenport has endorsed the Smyth/Patriot or pythagenpat formula as "a better fit to the data."


Question: Explain the dangers of driving for teenagers during the "100 Deadliest Days" and how parents can help prevent accidents.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Explain the dangers of driving for teenagers during the "100 Deadliest Days" and how parents can help prevent accidents.

For teenagers who recently got their driver’s licenses, summers can mean seemingly-endless months of newfound freedom. However, all of that new independence comes at a cost – a sometimes deadly cost. Teen drivers are more inexperienced than adult drivers, making them much more likely to cause or be involved in serious accidents. That increased likelihood comes to a head each summer when teens get out of school and hit the road. The result? A deadly period of time each year known as the “100 Deadliest Days” when crashes involving teen drivers spike by a shocking amount. What can be done about this spike in teen accidents?
AAA calls the period between Memorial Day and Labor Day the “100 Deadliest Days” of the year. During this period, the average number of fatal automobile accidents involving teen drivers increases by 15 percent compared to the rest of the year. On average, around 1,022 people lose their lives each year in accidents involving inexperienced teen drivers during this deadly period. Last year, AAA revealed that between 2010 to 2014, during the 100 days following Memorial Day, more than 5,000 people died in crashes involving teenage drivers.
AAA attributes these deadly crashes to three common factors: distraction, not wearing seat belts, and speeding. Not only are teens drivers distracted by their phones, but during the summer, they’re also likelier to have friends riding along as passengers which can lead to further distractions and encourage unsafe driving behaviors. In fact, nearly 60% of teen crashes involve distracted drivers, with top causes being talking or attending to other passengers, talking or texting on the phone, and looking at or attending to something inside the vehicle (e.g. adjusting the radio, eating, etc.).
It’s important that parents and teens take the time to talk about safe driving and to develop a plan to minimize the risk of accidents, especially during these 100 deadly days. Parents can help set rules to limit the number of passengers allowed in their teen’s car, limit cell phone use, and keep tabs on where their kids are going. Of course, it’s also up to parents to lead by example and to make certain they are following safe driving habits themselves when they are behind the wheel.


Question: Explain why Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is committed to getting the Trans Mountain pipeline built, even though it could cost him politically.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Explain why Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is committed to getting the Trans Mountain pipeline built, even though it could cost him politically.

Trudeau more concerned about doing the right thing around Trans Mountain pipeline than holding seats in B.C.
If the cost of getting the controversial Trans Mountain pipeline built costs the Liberals support in the upcoming election, so be it.
In an interview with Global National’s Dawna Friesen on Tuesday, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said while he no longer views federal legislation as a compelling means of pushing forward progress on the pipeline, he remains determined to get the project built and is not balking at the possibility that protests expected to continue in earnest against the project could carry a political cost to the party in 2019.
“When one is serving one’s country and when you’re trying to do the right thing for future generations, building a protected environment and growing a strong economy at the same time is something that’s more important than winning a few extra seats here or there,” he said.
The pipeline itself, however, will not have oil running through it until some time after Liberal fortunes are tested in the upcoming campaign.
Last week, the federal government announced it will help Kinder Morgan try to find a buyer for the proposed expansion of the existing pipeline.
The Texas oil company is backing out of plans to triple the capacity of the system after years of political uncertainty.
If a buyer cannot be found roughly by July 22, the government will buy the pipeline from Kinder Morgan for $4.5 billion.
WATCH BELOW: Will the pipeline struggle hurt Trudeau’s popularity?
That cost includes the existing pipeline resources, the terminal in Burnaby, B.C., as well as Kinder Morgan Canada staff assigned to the project.
The $4.5-billion price tag does not include the billions it will likely cost to actually build the expansion and increase the flow of oil through the pipeline.
Kinder Morgan had pegged the cost of the expansion project at $7.4 billion last year.
Trudeau told Global News that the timeline for construction of the pipeline has not changed from the projections put out by Kinder Morgan.
When it comes to how far he is willing to go to deal with opponents to the project, he said the government is working to try to allay concerns but that he will not be swayed by whoever shouts the loudest.
“It’s really important for me and for Canadians that people who disagree with policies or issues be able to protest, be able to voice their opinions but it’s also important that they do so safely and in a way to respect the law,” he said when asked about how he plans to deal with protesters once construction begins.
The project is facing multiple court challenges from environmental interest groups, First Nations along the proposed route as well as the B.C. government.
B.C Premier John Horgan has vowed to continue doing everything in his power to stop the pipeline from proceeding.
Trudeau did not say whether he thinks he will be able to get Horgan onside with the project but said he expects the challenges before the courts will echo the government’s argument that proceeding with the pipeline falls within federal jurisdiction.


Question: Describe the Macedonian referendum, its result, and the reactions to it. Respond in 381 words.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the Macedonian referendum, its result, and the reactions to it. Respond in 381 words.

SKOPJE -- A referendum on changing Macedonia's name as part of a deal to end a decades-old dispute with neighboring Greece won overwhelming support on September 30 but failed to secure turnout of 50 percent required to make the nonbinding vote valid.
Early on October 1, with ballots from more than 98.6 percent of polling stations counted, the official results showed 91.5 percent of voters approving the deal to change the country's name to the Republic of North Macedonia.
But in the face of a boycott called by opponents of the name change, turnout stood at just 36.9 percent of Macedonia's 1.8 million eligible voters -- far from the massive support that Prime Minister Zoran Zaev's government had hoped for.
"On this referendum, it is clear that the decision has not been made," State Election Commission chief Oliver Derkoski told reporters in Skopje late on September 30.
Despite the low turnout, Zaev said a “vast majority” of voters supported the name-change deal.
But analysts say the deal will face more difficulty in parliament than if turnout for the nonbinding referendum had topped 50 percent.
"The fact is that the name agreement did not get the green light, but a stop [sign] from the people," Hristijan Mickoski said.
Greece's Foreign Ministry noted the "contradictory" results from the vote and said its outcome will require careful moves to "preserve the positive potential" of the deal between Athens and Skopje.
In June, Athens and Skopje hammered out a tentative compromise to end decades of squabbling if Macedonia adopted the name Republic of North Macedonia.
Prime Minister Zoran Zaev speaks to the press after the vote: "The will of those who voted must be converted into political action in parliament."
Not everyone agreed, however, including President Gjorge Ivanov, who called the name change a "criminal act" that violates the Balkan country's constitution.
Ivanov staunchly declared that he would not vote in the referendum, and in a speech to Macedonia's diaspora in the U.S. city of Detroit on September 22 tried to tamp down expectations that a "yes" vote would guarantee EU and NATO accession.
Government officials had said they have 71 deputies ready to approve a constitutional amendment accepting the name change, short of the two-thirds majority, or 80 deputies, needed to amend the constitution.


Question: What are the risks associated with mobile app security? Respond in 15 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What are the risks associated with mobile app security? Respond in 15 sentences.

The majority of mobile apps contain cybersecurity flaws in data storage, communication, or authentication practices, according to a WhiteHat report. Here are three tips to remedy the issues.
Cybercriminals are increasingly targeting mobile apps for attacks, due in part to lax security standards, according to a Thursday report from WhiteHat Security. The majority of mobile apps—85%—violate one or more of the Open Web Application Security Project (OWASP) Mobile Top 10, meaning they contain at least one common security vulnerability that can be exploited, the report found.
Half of the 15,000 applications analyzed in the report violated the OWASP standard for insecure data storage—the most common risk found. This means they may include data leakage in local files and system logs, client-side injection, and weak server-side controls. Android apps had a higher rate of violations in this area than iOS apps, the report found: 52% of Android apps included the world writable executable vulnerability, which could put data at risk—especially concerning for businesses, as GDPR is now in effect.
Close to half of all mobile apps tested also violated the OWASP standard for insecure communication, leaving those apps vulnerable to man-in-the-middle attacks. Some 30% of iOS apps still use insecure HTTP (compared to HTTPs), and more than 50% of iOS apps do not use the recommended Application Transport Security (ATS) method for secure encrypted communications, the report found.
On the other side of the spectrum, apps fared the best in authentication and authorization practices, according to the report. Very few mobile apps tested had CVSS-scored vulnerabilities, the report found, meaning developers are better at implementing access control and protection in mobile apps.
"Businesses are transitioning from traditional applications and legacy systems, to web and mobile applications that are purpose-built to serve up superior customer experiences," WhiteHat Security CEO Craig Hinkley said in a press release. "However, the downside of changing the software lifecycle to speed up the process is the inherent introduction of risk. Therefore, any organization that fails to build security into its app development process is willfully being left exposed to those ever-present threats."
For more tips on how developers can build secure mobile apps, click here.


Question: Hey, I'm interested in sponsoring a square at the Chalk It Up Festival. What does that involve? Respond in 6 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Hey, I'm interested in sponsoring a square at the Chalk It Up Festival. What does that involve? Respond in 6 sentences.

Put your business, organization or family in the forefront as a patron of local art, music, and arts education!
The main attraction of the Chalk It Up Festival is the hundreds of sidewalk chalk art pieces created over the weekend. Supported by our generous sponsors, and brought to life by our talented volunteer artists, these squares turn from gray concrete paths to beautiful expressions of artistic vision.
As a Chalk It Up Square Sponsor, your company’s name will be prominently displayed on your sponsored sidewalk square, accompanied by art designed and created by either an artist of your choice or by one of our volunteer artists, and seen by the over 60,000 attendees that visit the annual festival.
For questions regarding sponsorship email sponsors@chalkitup.org.
If you are interested in sponsoring a square for the upcoming festival click here.


Question: Provide a brief description of the artist Marco Maggi.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Provide a brief description of the artist Marco Maggi.

Marco Maggi (born 1957 in Montevideo, Uruguay) is a New York- and Uruguay-based artist whose work incorporates common materials such as office paper, aluminum foil, graphite, and apples to create micro drawings, sculptures, and macro installations.


Question: Have you heard about marijuana legalization in the US?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Have you heard about marijuana legalization in the US?

For the first time in nearly 50 years of Gallup polling on the question, a majority of American Republicans say they support marijuana legalization.
Nationwide support for legalization first hit 50 percent in 2011, just ahead of historic votes in Colorado and Washington state to legalize recreational use of the drug in 2012. Since then, voters in six more states and the District of Columbia have approved recreational marijuana laws.
More than 20 percent of the U.S. population now lives in a state where marijuana use is fully legal, and even strong opponents of legalization concede that norms around marijuana use are shifting.
To be sure, legalization has also brought some challenges. The popularity of potent edible products proved to be a surprise, prompting lawmakers to scramble to regulate them. Drug-impaired driving will continue to be a concern, as will medical issues among people who overdo it.


Question: "Why did Berkeley de-platform Richard Dawkins?"

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 "Why did Berkeley de-platform Richard Dawkins?"

While it may be ironic that Berkeley de-platformed Richard Dawkins, it is perfectly predictable.
Why, indeed. The answer is a bit surprising. That’s what secular liberals have been doing for hundreds of years. It’s an ingrained habit, and hence part of a long-standing historical pattern.
This strange attitude of the secular Left has its origins in the Radical Enlightenment of the 1600s and 1700s. The Radical Enlightenment was self-consciously secular, but it was a revolution that took place within a Christianized culture, i.e., specifically against Christianity. Even though in principle it attacked all religions as superstitious, Christianity was its main, defined, cultural enemy, and it had no qualms about praising Islam to demote Christianity, or even championing Islam as theologically and morally superior. Anything to de-throne Christianity from its cultural dominance.
If I might offer some particulars, this positive view of Islam by the secular Left was early on championed in Frenchman Pierre Bayle’s generally positive account of Muhammad and Islam in his very widely read Historical and Critical Dictionary (1697). But soon to follow, the French nobleman Henri de Boulainvilliers more brashly and openly asserted the intellectual and moral superiority of Islam over Christianity in his Life of Mohammad, which was published in 1730. The same approach was taken by (among others) the Irish freethinker John Toland (1670-1722), the Italian freethinker Alberto Radicati (1698-1737), the freethinking Huguenot Jean-Frédéric Bernard (168-1744), the French materialist Nicholas Fréret (1688-1749), the French philosopher Jean-Baptiste de Boyer, Marquis d’Argens (1704-1771), radical political philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-1778), and even the greatest and loudest of the Enlightenment philosophes, the great enemy of Christianity, the Frenchman Voltaire (1694-1778).
The superiority of Islam consisted in great part—so these authors claimed —in Islam being more tolerant than Christianity. Their continual chant was that Islam was essentially peaceful as contrasted with the warlike nature of Judaism and Christianity. The Radical Enlightenment was especially firm on this historical point: Islam had spread so quickly, not by the sword (as ignoble Christians maintained), but by the fact that it was so tolerant, rational, and benevolent. It was simply a better deal, the radicals reported, to be ruled by Muslims than by Christians. So much so that even Christian populations ran to embrace the Islamic advance!
Unsurprisingly, the Crusades, in this radical revisionist view, were not an attempt to protect Christianity from invasion by an ever-encroaching, expanding Islam, but a typical warmongering attack upon peaceful Muslims by morally inferior Christians.
All of this is all too familiar as the position of the Left today. But that is precisely my point. It’s the position of the secular Left today because it was the position of the secular Left three centuries ago. Political correctness has a much longer pedigree than we may have thought, but that means that these ideas are also far more deeply embedded in the liberal psyche than we may have supposed.
The secular revolution that began in late 17th century was both anti-Christian, and, ironically, Muslim-friendly. This allows us to understand the strange paradoxical attitude of the secular Left to Islam today, and why it continues to welcome Islam as an ally against Christianity, sanitizing the former while demonizing the latter.
So sorry, Mr. Dawkins. While it may be ironic that Berkeley de-platformed you, it is perfectly predictable.


Question: Can you tell me more about the video game storytelling of With a Terrible Fate?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Can you tell me more about the video game storytelling of With a Terrible Fate?

The following is an episode of The Drawing Board, a podcast by With a Terrible Fate that highlights the unstructured conversations about video games from which our analytical content is derived.
Welcome to Episode 10 of The Drawing Board, a podcast by With a Terrible Fate.
Terms like “immersion” might seem like a great way to have productive conversations about video games—but they’re actually holding us back. In this episode, I sat down with Dan, the head of our Video Game Canon series, to consider the two reasons why this is the case.
One of the foundational principles that underpin all the video-game studies we conduct on With a Terrible Fate is analytical rigor: above all, we strive to clearly define the terms that we use in our arguments and make it crystal-clear to our audience (and to ourselves!) how we’ve come to draw our particular conclusions about video games.
This can put our analysts in an awkward position at times because it leads me to dismiss widespread video-game terms—terms like ‘immersion’—as nonsense. If an analyst sends me an article draft that says something like “this particular gameplay sequence is extremely immersive,” I will highlight that sentence and tell them that I don’t know what it means.
That’s a fairly counterintuitive perspective: as people who want to encourage thoughtful discourse about the storytelling of video games, shouldn’t we embrace the terminology that people everywhere commonly use to discuss that storytelling?
Well, no, and this is why: terms like ‘immersion’ are ambiguous and can refer to a range of distinct concepts. When we let our discussion of video-game stories begin and end with these buzzwords, we ignore those subtler concepts that give us the chance to understand and appreciate video games in a richer, more sophisticated way.
There’s another reason why immersion specifically is damaging nowadays: nebulous as the term is, many gamers, developers, and publications see it as directly related to a game’s quality. The more “immersive” a game is, these people contend, the better its storytelling is; the less “immersive” a game is, the worse its storytelling is.
Much of our work on With a Terrible Fate demonstrates that this notion is completely misguided.
We’re unfairly primed to write off the value of such stories if the vague notion of “immersion” is held up as the paragon to which gaming aspires.
Why are terms like ‘immersion’ misleading at best and analytically impotent at worst? How can we strive to do better in our everyday conversations about gaming?
Listen in, and find out.
Aaron Suduiko is the founder of With a Terrible Fate and studies the philosophy of video game storytelling. He specializes in the impact of player-avatar relations on game stories. Learn more here.
In an industry that still doesn't seem to have fully cracked the code on story adaptation, one 2005 game has lessons worth learning.


Question: Have you heard of the incredible photography of Greg Du Toit?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Have you heard of the incredible photography of Greg Du Toit?

Wildlife photographer Greg Du Toit has captured powerful images of silhouetted animals in southern and eastern Africa to show "the mystery and intrigue of Africa."
Mr Du Toit told Media Drum news agency: "I simply want to convey the incredible diversity, mystery and wonder that I feel for my wild subjects.
"What the camera has the power to do, through silhouette photography, is to simply de-clutter our world."
In his work, Du Toit specialises in lowlight imagery, spending hours to get the perfect timings for his photos.
Two dramatic photos from his Dusk to Dawn series show an injured wildebeest evading a fire that swept across the grass plains of Serengeti, which cover southern and eastern Africa.
He said: "We noticed one wildebeest not running away [from the fire], on closer inspection we discovered that it had a broken front left leg.
"I watched in horror as the flames almost engulfed the animal before it finally ran away."


Question: Could you tell me about Sharon Creelman?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Could you tell me about Sharon Creelman?

Sharon Creelman (born April 27, 1964 in Windsor, Ontario) is a former field hockey player from Canada. Between 1982 and 1994, Creelman held 139 caps at the Women's Senior National Team.
Creelman captained the national side from 1987 to 1994, and played in three Olympic Games (1984, 1988 and 1992) and in four World Cups (1983, 1986, 1990 and 1994). After her career Creelman became a coach in the sport of field hockey; she was the head coach of Canada's Junior Team in the late 1990s. She then became a physical education teacher at Appleby College located in Oakville, Ontario.