Question: Research ICO scams and share the best practices you have discovered to protect users from them. Respond in 34 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Research ICO scams and share the best practices you have discovered to protect users from them. Respond in 34 sentences.

ICO Scams and how to avoid them!
Crypto currencies have opened up a realm of new and endless possibilities for consumers/businesses alike. Initial Coin Offerings are understandably the most prominent fintech projects, garnering the bulk of all media attention dedicated to the space. A new page has been turned within the book of crypto finance, and this chapter has only just started to get exciting.
Despite the boundless potential of the industry, the success of reputable enterprise has also attracted unsavory actors to the scene, many hailing from the deeper and darker parts of the web. A plethora of scammers, con artists and merciless spammers (to name just a few) are all vying for the attention of new crypto users.
Phishing messages have become much more sophisticated, the cloning and emulation of trustworthy senders has evolved to new levels of deception. All it takes is one abrupt click to send anyone to a malicious or unsafe website address.
Blockchain based ICO’s have seen a large extent of this black-market innovation. There are three major types of scams at this point in time.
Websites that are designed to look exactly like the genuine article, in some cases they even load up more quickly, which shouldn’t be a surprise since the website server has to deal with only a fraction of the real traffic originating from the primary website.
Even the wallet address is spoofed on these sites, so funds are not sent to ICO’s multisig or wallet, but often directly to the scammers mixing pool. Recovery after this point is almost impossible, unless the whole chain is hardforked/reversed, and scammer deposits are deleted.
These untrustworthy clone sites are frequently advertised via message boards or spam emails, that upon first glance will look completely legitimate.
How to avoid: NEVER go to an ICO site linked by a PM on a slack channel. Always take the time to type in the address yourself, and don’t hesitate to recheck everything multiple times.
Most ICOs have dedicated Slack or Telegram support channels serving the community. Due to the open nature of these platforms, it is difficult to identify legitimate representatives of the actual ICO.
ICO Scammers will sign up with usernames that are similar to those of ICO officials, or even hack programs and/or client software to send personal messages, with pre-prepared messages and wallet addresses.
How to avoid: Use the following Chrome extension, it has a solid track record of protecting users from blacklisted phishing domains. Above all else, don’t trust links sent via Slack or Telegram.
In an effort to gain the trust of unsuspecting victims, phishing emails will often purport to be from some of the larger crypto sites, well known online wallets and exchanges are commonly used.
The most effective phishing emails or messages even employ similar language and wording in addition to graphics akin to the real thing.
Online con artists will also buy domain with similar sounding domains, more often than not, only one character can be different to the sites they are impersonating, an example that comes to mind is myetherwallet.com.de (don’t visit this site please, these is nothing to see!).
How to avoid: Do not click on any links in from any emails whatsoever. Instead, just go directly to the sender’s website via your browser. Always double check and recheck again the domain within the browser. DDF was one of the more recent larger ICOs targeted by scammers, a clone site is still active and for safety reasons (and as a service to the community as a whole) we prefer to omit the link. Please be aware, that the only legit site is https://www.digitaldevelopersfund.com/, avoid using wallet addresses beyond outside this site, claiming to be authentic.
Here you can find more info on crypto tokens and how to join initial coin offerings. If you already know all this, then you should head to our ICO List. Good luck!
Good evening, thanks for the wonderful reviews. What do you think about ICO of Heavencoin?


Question: Hey, interested in strength training? Respond in 5 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Hey, interested in strength training? Respond in 5 sentences.

Get an edge with science-backed training. Download the first issue of MASS free.
We'll send you a free sample issue of Monthly Applications in Strength Sport containing 9 of our favorite pieces from the 2017-2018 editions of MASS. Just enter your email below.
A peek inside the "Best Of" MASS issue you can get for free by signing up.


Question: Have you heard about Harvard's new open access policies? Respond in 21 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Have you heard about Harvard's new open access policies? Respond in 21 sentences.

University libraries have for a long time struggled with the increasingly extortionate fees placed upon them by journal publishers. Many universities can no longer afford to pay journal publishers to access the content their students require. Sadly, until now this has been a closet issue, an issue of “prestige”. In what may prove to be a watershed moment, Harvard University have sent the following memo to all faculty members (emphasis mine), outlining the university’s strategy to deal with this problem which includes gently directing researchers towards open access publishers. This announcement sets a powerful precedent that could prove to be a defining moment in the “Academic Spring”.
We write to communicate an untenable situation facing the Harvard Library. Many large journal publishers have made the scholarly communication environment fiscally unsustainable and academically restrictive. This situation is exacerbated by efforts of certain publishers (called “providers”) to acquire, bundle, and increase the pricing on journals.
The Library has never received anything close to full reimbursement for these expenditures from overhead collected by the University on grant and research funds.
4. Contact professional organizations to raise these issues (F).
5. Encourage professional associations to take control of scholarly literature in their field or shift the management of their e-journals to library-friendly organizations (F).
6. Encourage colleagues to consider and to discuss these or other options (F).
7. Sign contracts that unbundle subscriptions and concentrate on higher-use journals (L).
8. Move journals to a sustainable pay per use system, (L).
The memo coyly avoids specifying exactly who the “major providers” to be abandoned are, but I think we can make an educated guess at one of them.
YAY open access to science, i love it!


Question: What has happened recently with Guantánamo detainee Mohamedou Ould Slahi?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What has happened recently with Guantánamo detainee Mohamedou Ould Slahi?

July 20 2016, 8:22 p.m.
An interagency review board has determined that Guantánamo detainee Mohamedou Ould Slahi poses no threat to the United States and has recommended that he be released, setting the bestselling author on the path to be reunited with his family.
Slahi was arrested in his native Mauritania in 2001, and was held and tortured in secret prisons in Afghanistan and Jordan before being secreted to Guantánamo, an odyssey he recounted in a memoir, Guantánamo Diary, which became a bestseller last year. He has been imprisoned for over 14 years without being charged with a crime.
In early June, Slahi made his case to the Periodic Review Board as part of a sort of parole process instituted by the Obama administration to evaluate the cases of the remaining men at Guantánamo to determine if they might be safely transferred to another country.
Slahi has admitted to traveling to Afghanistan in the early 1990s to fight with the mujahideen against the Soviet-backed government, and the government claims he helped recruit and facilitate the travel of al Qaeda fighters. In 2010, a federal judge found that he was not a member of al Qaeda when the U.S. picked him up; the judge ordered his release, but that case stalled on appeal.
The board’s recommendation on a detainee is just a first step. The secretary of defense must arrange for a country to receive him and notify Congress of the transfer. In Slahi’s case, the government of Mauritania has already indicated that it would be willing to take him back.
One of Slahi’s lawyers, Hina Shamsi of the American Civil Liberties Union, said they were pressing the Pentagon to arrange for his actual release as soon as possible, but the exact timing is uncertain.
There are currently 76 men still held in Guantánamo. Including Slahi, 31 of them have been approved for release. Last week, the Obama administration sent a Yemeni prisoner to Italy and another Yemeni and a Tajik detainee to Serbia; those countries agreed to accept them as “humanitarian gestures.” It seems that the administration is prioritizing moving out as many people as possible from the approved list before the end of the year, as it looks increasingly unlikely that Guantánamo will actually be closed before Obama leaves office.


Question: "What types of training and employment supports are available to Canadians through the Government of Canada?"

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 "What types of training and employment supports are available to Canadians through the Government of Canada?"

SCARBOROUGH, ON, May 2, 2018 /CNW/ - By investing directly in Canada's greatest asset—its resilient, hardworking people—the Governments of Canada and Ontario are helping ensure that the economic growth we create is the kind of growth that works for everyone.
Today, the Honourable Patty Hajdu, Canada's Minister of Employment, Workforce Development and Labour, together with the Honourable Mitzie Hunter, Minister of Advanced Education and Skills Development, announced that the two governments have signed agreements that will see Canada provide Ontario with over $6 billion over six years to invest in Ontario's workers. These agreements represent an increase in funding of over $800 million over the period, compared to previous funding levels. This increase means an estimated 180,000 more Ontario workers will benefit over the six years.
Speaking at the United Association Local 46, the Ministers said that these agreements will significantly increase the jobs and skills training available to people in Ontario, including training programs, work placements, employer-sponsored training, job search assistance, career counselling and more.
Through these new agreements, the Government of Canada is ensuring more people benefit from these programs then before—including people from groups typically under‑represented in our workforce, such as people with disabilities, women and Indigenous people.
As innovation and technology continue to change how we live and work, people in Ontario and across Canada are met with new challenges and new opportunities. That is why it is more important than ever before to ensure everybody has the opportunity to benefit from an innovation-driven economy—and that means ensuring that both employed and unemployed people have opportunities to acquire the skills they will need for the jobs of today as well as the jobs of tomorrow.
The agreements announced today are the new Workforce Development Agreement (WDA) and the Labour Market Development Agreement (LMDA). In the first two years Ontario will receive approximately $1.97 billion—more than $593 million through the WDA and more than $1.37 billion through the LMDA.
Results matter. That is why these agreements include a commitment to performance measurement. That means that Canada and Ontario will be able to measure how programs are increasing people's earnings, helping them get jobs that last, and breaking down barriers for under‑represented groups like Indigenous people, people with disabilities and women. The Government of Canada will be reporting to Canadians on the impacts of these programs, so that they are transparent and so that they can be continually improved.
free adult education classes that help students improve reading, writing, math, computer and other essential skills to prepare them for education, training or better jobs.
helping employers with training costs for employees.
Many of the programs and services supported by these agreements are delivered through the Employment Ontario network of service providers, which helped approximately 1 million people in 2016–17, including over 62,300 employers across Ontario.
Every Ontarian deserves a fair and equal chance at success in the workforce. Through smart investments like the agreements announced today, we can strengthen our middle class and help more of the people working so hard to join it.
"I know that our greatest asset as a country is our people. Through investments like today's agreements with Ontario, we're ensuring our people can continue to be competitive, resilient and responsive as jobs evolve and as our economy grows. When we give people the tools to succeed, our middle class grows stronger and our workers and their families thrive."
"Ontario's economy is changing. New technologies, globalization and shifting demographics mean that the available jobs—and the types of skills needed to succeed in those roles—are different. These agreements mean we can provide programs and services that directly connect people with opportunities to get those skills, and I want to thank the federal government for being a partner in that. Together, we can make sure every person gets a share of Ontario's economic growth."
Canada is home to a well-educated and highly skilled workforce, but rapid technological change and globalization are accelerating the need to learn and develop new skills. As the demands of the workplace change, so too must the skills that workers bring to their jobs. The Government of Canada is taking action to ensure that both employers and governments are more responsive to workers' needs.
The new and amended agreements followed broad-based consultations with more than 700 stakeholders on how to expand and improve skills training and employment supports for Canadians.
The new Workforce Development Agreements (WDAs) consolidate funding from the Canada Job Fund and Labour Market Agreements for Persons with Disabilities, which together transferred $722 million annually to provinces and territories. The additional $900 million from Budget 2017 will be added to this amount over a period of six years from 2017–18 to 2022–23. The new funding will also support provincial and territorial employment programming for older workers, which was previously supported by the Targeted Initiative for Older Workers.
Through these agreements, the Government is providing Canadians with more opportunities to upgrade their skills, gain experience or get help to start their own business. The agreements also mean more support, such as employment counselling, to help Canadians plan their careers.
Labour Market Development Agreements (LMDAs) are bilateral agreements with each province and territory to design and deliver employment programming similar to Employment Benefits and Support Measures outlined in Part II of the Employment Insurance Act. LMDAs help unemployed Canadians quickly find and return to work. They also ensure a skilled labour force that meets current and emerging needs of employers.
increasing flexibility for provinces and territories to support employer-sponsored training under Labour Market Partnerships (e.g. to help employers who need to upskill or retrain their workers in order to adjust to technological or structural changes in the economy).
More recently, in Budget 2018, the Government of Canada announced an additional $80 million in 2018–19 and $150 million in 2019–20 to work with key provinces to find local solutions to help support seasonal workers in the off-season.


Question: "Who is Georgios Vamvakas?" Respond in 2 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 "Who is Georgios Vamvakas?" Respond in 2 sentences.

Georgios Vamvakas (born 1 January 1960) is a Greek hurdler. He competed in the men's 400 metres hurdles at the 1984 Summer Olympics.


Question: What do you think of Coach Tom Izzo's apologetic statement following the team's most recent loss?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What do you think of Coach Tom Izzo's apologetic statement following the team's most recent loss?

Michigan State Spartans coach Tom Izzo said he did a terrible job putting together his schedule, leaving his team little time to practice and develop, following its 73-58 loss to the No. 20 Baylor Bears in the Battle 4 Atlantis on Thursday.
The No. 24 Spartans (3-3) had already lost to Arizona in Hawaii and Kentucky in New York before Thursday's loss, and they travel to Duke next week in the ACC/Big Ten Challenge.
"I actually apologized to my team,'' he said. "And yet, I've always played a tough schedule. ... You know what? You can take it as an excuse, you can take it as the truth, I don't give a damn. I'm telling you what I did. This ain't on them. It's on me."


Question: "What do you think of Partagas cigars?"

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 "What do you think of Partagas cigars?"

Appearance (0-20): Not the prettiest stick in the world, the Cifuentes has quite a few larger veins across it. The tobacco does look well cured though, and the label is simple but conveys the name well with use of gold, white, and red. I can’t help but wonder how this is going to turn out, given its mediocre look.
Construction (0-20): The veins, of course, are a bit of a concern, and when looking at the top of the cigar, it seems some of it has become unwrapped slightly. The tobacco on the foot also sticks out slightly beyond the wrapper – not a huge deal, but odd when this isn’t a shaggy foot cigar. The initial feel is decent but there are some small pockets that feel a little less pressed than they should be. On the positive side it cut easily and with little debris, lit up well, and the ash (though slightly flaky on the end) held well despite an uneven burn.
Strength (0-20): Medium to full. Strikes nearly the perfect balance in the range, not particularly teetering either way too much.
Flavor (0-20): I think I was a little taken aback by this blend, as immediately it came off extremely smooth with some nice earthy flavors and a hint of pepper on the back end. There was some cream that mixed in at about the halfway point, with additional wood flavors. All in all… it was an enjoyable smoke.
Value (0-20): A $4.50 price isnt bad, but as you buy more (a box for example) the price comes down steadily and tops off around $3.50 per stick.
Additional Notes: Smoked on my deck and paired with a delicious Centennial IPA from the Cape May Brewing Company out of Cape May, NJ.
Overall (0-100): While the look of this would lead you to believe it’s a mediocre cigar at best, it turned out to be pretty decent. The Cifuentes has a small amount of kick to compliment the earthy and woodsy flavors and benefits heavily from being a smooth smoke. The price point of $4.50 for this isn’t bad, though it wouldn’t crack my top 10 list of great cigars for under $5. However if bought in a box at the price of $3.50 per, it might just sneak on there. If you are looking for a bargain with some decent flavors, I’d pick some of these up and give them a try. For me it amounts to the perfect second cigar – a little cheaper but with some good flavors.
I really enjoy the Partagas Cigars. My very first Cigar I ever smoked was partagas Series 5. very clean and mild.
Partagas puts out some solid stuff overall. The Series 5 is one i cant say ive ever tried, but given the quality ive seen come from partagas, i would at least give it a whirl.


Question: Describe the content discussed in this recent episode of an ultra running podcast.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the content discussed in this recent episode of an ultra running podcast.

We're getting back to the science stuff next week, but today we've got another episode for ultra geeks. Spurred by Trail Runner magazine's recent profile on Coree Woltering, teammate Rich Heffron joins the show to discuss the current state of ultrarunning media. We tackle the question of whether there is a West Coast bias in ultra coverage (7:00), whether media organizations in the sport have an obligation to cover certain events (26:00), why USATF championship races aren't a bigger deal (31:30), and the geographic distribution of Western States qualifiers (51:30). We also name-check some non-West Coast ultrarunners who deserve more respect (55:35) before we get Rich's Desert Island Picks (1:03:50).


Question: Describe your reaction to the news that the Anglican Ordinariate has been offered a home in the Diocese of Salford. Respond in 143 words.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe your reaction to the news that the Anglican Ordinariate has been offered a home in the Diocese of Salford. Respond in 143 words.

It was with great excitement that a reader of my blog thewayofbeauty.org contacted me recently, to tell me the that the Bishop of Salford, John Arnold, has very generously offered the Anglican Ordinariate a home in his diocese, which is in the north of England. I thought New Liturgical Movement readers might want to know about this too!
The main Sunday Mass will be in the Ordinariate Use, but Fr Starkie, the Ordinariate Mission Pastor, will also assume pastoral care for the diocesan Catholics of the parish and make arrangements for a Sunday Mass in the Ordinary form, and their other sacramental and pastoral needs.
I have no comment beyond this except to say that this is great news! I would like to offer Fr Starkie and his congregation very best wishes and my prayers as you establish yourselves in your new home!


Question: Describe how President Trump donated his first quarter salary to the National Park Service. Respond in 16 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe how President Trump donated his first quarter salary to the National Park Service. Respond in 16 sentences.

President Trump, who promised to work for free, donated his salary for the first quarter of the year on Monday to the National Park Service, which, like other government agencies, faces major cuts in the president’s first budget proposal.
At the daily White House briefing, Sean Spicer, the president’s press secretary, presented a check signed by Mr. Trump for $78,333.32 to Ryan Zinke, the interior secretary, who oversees the park service. “I’m thrilled,” Mr. Zinke said.
Presidents are paid $400,000 a year, not counting benefits that come with the job, including housing in a fairly spacious residence. But Mr. Trump, perhaps the wealthiest person ever to hold the presidency, made a point during the campaign of saying he did not need taxpayers to compensate him. His daughter Ivanka Trump and son-in-law, Jared Kushner, who together are worth as much as $740 million, are working on his staff without taking salaries.
Mr. Spicer did not explain on Monday why the plan had changed, but said the White House Counsel’s Office presented a series of alternatives to the president and he chose the National Park Service.
“The park service has cared for our parks since 1916, and the president is personally proud to contribute the first quarter of his salary to the important mission of the park service, which is preserving our country’s national security,” Mr. Spicer said.
But in picking a government agency, Mr. Trump chose one with a large backlog of deferred maintenance that could be deferred even longer under his budget. Mr. Trump proposed a cut of $1.5 billion, or 12 percent, from the Interior Department, which oversees the park service and other agencies. The proposal did not specify how much of that would come out of the park service budget.
He also chose an agency with which he has had a fraught relationship. Mr. Trump was angry when a park service employee using an agency Twitter account reposted information comparing the size of his Inauguration Day crowd unfavorably with that of former President Barack Obama in 2009. Mr. Trump was livid and called the acting director of the park service the day after his inauguration to complain about the post and to ask for further photographic evidence about the size of his crowd.
The trick, according to the Constitution, was that he could not refuse his pay. So he opted to donate the salary instead, much as John F. Kennedy and Herbert Hoover did.


Question: Explain the origin of the large heart-shaped nitrogen glacier on Pluto revealed by NASA's New Horizons spacecraft in 2015.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Explain the origin of the large heart-shaped nitrogen glacier on Pluto revealed by NASA's New Horizons spacecraft in 2015.

The polar cap of Sputnik Planum, in false colours, is surrounded by mountains which have been eroded and shaped by the glacial activity. The dark areas are covered by organic materials produced by the photolysis of methane by solar ultraviolet light. Image credit: © NASA/Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory/Southwest Research Institute.
What is the origin of the large heart-shaped nitrogen glacier on Pluto revealed by NASA’s New Horizons spacecraft in 2015? Two researchers from the Laboratoire de météorologie dynamique (CNRS/École polytechnique/UPMC/ENS Paris) show that Pluto’s peculiar insolation and atmosphere favour nitrogen condensation near the equator, in the lower altitude regions, leading to an accumulation of ice at the bottom of Sputnik Planum, a vast topographic basin. Through their simulations, they also explain the surface distribution and atmospheric abundance of other types of volatiles observed on Pluto. These results were just published in Nature.
Pluto is a paradise for glaciologists. Among the types of ice covering its surface, nitrogen is the most volatile: when it sublimes (at -235 °C), it forms a thin atmosphere in equilibrium with the ice reservoir at the surface. One of the most unexpected observations from New Horizons, which flew by Pluto in July 2015, showed that this reservoir of solid nitrogen is extremely massive, and mostly contained in “Sputnik Planum”, a topographic basin located within the tropics of Pluto. Methane frost also appears all over the northern hemisphere, except at the equator, while carbon monoxide ice in smaller amounts was only detected in Sputnik Planum.
Until now, the distribution of Pluto’s ice remained unexplained. To better understand the physical processes at work on Pluto, the researchers developed a numerical thermal model of the surface of the dwarf planet able to simulate the nitrogen, methane and carbon monoxide cycles over thousands of years, and compared the results with the observations made by NASA’s New Horizons spacecraft. Their model shows that the solid-gas equilibrium of nitrogen is responsible for trapping the ice in Sputnik Planum. At the bottom of the basin, the pressure of the atmosphere — and therefore of gaseous nitrogen — increases, and the corresponding frost temperature is higher than outside the basin, which allows the nitrogen to preferably condense into ice. Simulations show that the nitrogen ice inevitably accumulates in the basin, thus forming a permanent nitrogen reservoir, as observed by New Horizons.
Pluto as observed by NASA’s New Horizons spacecraft in July 2015 (left), compared to the model result to date (right). Image credit: © Laboratoire de météorologie dynamique (CNRS/École polytechnique/UPMC/ENS Paris) / NASA/Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory/Southwest Research Institute.
A speedy space probe barreled past Pluto for a one-shot flyby Tuesday, becoming the first spacecraft to ever visit the frozen, reddish world at the solar system’s distant frontier.
The first hints of dramatic cliffs, chasms and craters are showing up in new imagery of Pluto and its Texas-sized moon Charon as NASA’s New Horizons spacecraft prepares to bolt by the icy worlds Tuesday.


Question: Have you heard about the Equifax data hack? What should I do?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Have you heard about the Equifax data hack? What should I do?

It’s hard to fathom the extent of the Equifax data hack—millions of Social Security numbers were taken—and by now you’ve learned to monitor your credit and freeze your reports. Hackers don’t just have your personal info, though. They may have your credit card numbers, too.
Krebs on Security obtained a confidential alert that Visa and MasterCard sent to financial institutions, and the alert is pretty specific. Fraud alerts that go out to banks and other financial institutions after a payment data breach usually have incomplete information and can’t name specific customers, but for cards that the Equifax hackers took, the networks had more detail than that. The credit card networks know which customers’ cards were breached and shared that information with banks. They also were able to confirm the source that the numbers were taken from Equifax.
As the site points out, it’s easy to overlook this fact when we’ve had our most personal and vulnerable information stolen, but hackers may also have your credit card numbers and expiration dates, and that’s enough info to do damage.
So while you’re protecting yourself with credit monitoring, fraud alerts, and freezes, don’t forget to add “check credit card statements” to the mix and look out for any unauthorized purchases. This is something you should be doing anyway, of course, but now is as good a time as any to remind you to comb through your statements and track your spending.


Question: Describe the Marc Parrot aircraft.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the Marc Parrot aircraft.

The Marc Parrot, named after the Punta Parrot peak in the Monte Rosa Massif, was specifically designed to fly into unprepared fields and mountain landing strips. The prototype first flew in 2013 but no more had been completed by about 2015.
The Parrot is Marc-Ingegno's first aircraft. Before it they specialized in designing and building aircraft brakes for five or more major aircraft companies. To access the targeted rough and mountain fields, the Parrot needed to provide the pilot with excellent all-round vision, to be able to climb quickly, fly slowly and have an energy absorbing undercarriage with strong brakes.


Question: What happened at the FIS Freestyle Ski and Snowboarding World Championships 2015?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What happened at the FIS Freestyle Ski and Snowboarding World Championships 2015?

The men's parallel giant slalom competition of the FIS Freestyle Ski and Snowboarding World Championships 2015 was held at Kreischberg, Austria on January 23 (qualifying and finals).


Question: List some bands/artists with animal names that you would suggest for a comprehensive list.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 List some bands/artists with animal names that you would suggest for a comprehensive list.

This list was generated on a long 7 hour drive from New York City to Oil City, PA between me, my cousin Zach and my wife. Unfortunately, this was some time ago and we didn’t really write anything down until after the fact. As a result, this might not be completely exhaustive. That’s where you come in. Feel free to suggest.
However, a very simple rule applies. Bands/artists can’t be TOO obscure. There are probably thousands of bands with animal names, but unless they’ve achieved some level of notoriety they can’t be on the list. Any obscure ones that you see in the list were thought of by us in our initial brainstorm.
Reptiles > Hot Snakes … Gone but not forgotten!
Great idea! A few more that come to mind..
HOLY SMOKES THIS IS COOL. YOU ARE A BEAST.
It’s Def Leppard, not Leopard.
A dolphin isnt a fish… just so you all know.
The Kingsnakes, Little Charlie and the Nightcats, Norton Buffalo, the Nighthawks, the Iguanas, eek-a-mouse, J.B. Hutto and the Hawks, Persephones Bees.
I liked this so I bookmarked http://bradfrost.com/blog/music/animal-bands-list at reddit.com so my co-workers can read it as well. I simply used Bands and Artists with Animal Names | Brad Frost Web as the entry title in my bookmark,I figured it would be a great way to promote this great post. Email me back at Menendez4037@gmail.com if there is anything else I can do to help.
sea wolf, pepper rabbit, dinosaur feathers, dear and the headlights, the antlers, boy & bear, patrick wolf, gregory and the hawk, quiet hounds, horse feathers, swimming with sharks, the bird and the bee, bears, an horse, blackbird blackbird, hello seahorse!, swimming with dolphins, gorilla zoe, bearsuit.
and i think i saw someone else suggest noah and the whale, owl city, and iwreastededabearonce.
oh and: little birdy, basshunter, plants and animals, horse the band, pedro the lion, foals, polar bear club, the pixies.
Missing a BIG one, PANTERA….
BearVsShark should be on this list. One of the greatest bands IMO.
You are really a excellent webmaster. The website loading velocity is amazing. It kind of feels that you’re doing any unique trick. In addition, The contents are masterpiece. you have done a wonderful process on this topic!
The Detroit Cobras should be there.
Janis Joplin. She is not an animals, but very ugly.
You missed 2 hair metal bands from the ’80’s.


Question: What is Rightpedia?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What is Rightpedia?

“”Jews are generally associated with Judaism, but also with economic corruption, manipulation, shame and most of all with nepotism.
Rightpedia (en.rightpedia.info) was an extremist neo-Nazi, alt-right wiki created by ex-Metapedia sysops. Although Metapedia and Rightpedia were ideologically identical (white nationalist, pro-Hitler, racialist, anti-Semitic and Holocaust denialist), the difference was that Rightpedia doxed and contained defamatory articles on political opponents, such as liberals, socialists and members of the House of Commons. It was therefore similar to the far-right website Redwatch.
Rightpedia was taken offline by GoDaddy in November 2018, after take down requests were sent to their legal department, alleging the website hosted child abuse images.
Rightpedia was created sometime in 2015 by ex-Metapedia sysops Eleonóra Dubiczki (aka Fiala, Hu1, Vajna), Michael Coombs (a.k.a. Mikemikev) and A Wyatt Man who were banned from Metapedia. One of the reasons for the ban was the fact Dubiczki and Coombs were misusing the wiki to attack and smear political enemies. They were banned after complaints were made on the Nordisk web community portal (now offline) in November 2014 where owner of Metapedia Anders Lagerström posted (as Daniel F).
Fiala was the main editor of the Hungarian Rightpedia. The English version was more popular with 88.12% of its total traffic, 36.8% of Rightpedia's traffic was from the USA.
In 2018 the SPLC noted that the white nationalist co-founder of Rightpedia had created hundreds of sockpuppets on Wikipedia. Mikemikev confirmed those accounts belonged to him.
Rightpedia admin Michael Coombs, bragging about Rightpedia on Twitter.
“”The site [Rightpedia] is self-styled as an Alt-right Wikipedia. The content is predictably racist and intensely anti-Semitic.
The chief feature of a person of Subsaharan Africa is torturing with noise. Like with murder, any race has members of its population that do it, it just varies. However for blacks (and mestizos), 100% of their population tortures with noise guaranteed every chance they get. They do to their neighbors, even while they're all asleep by either leaving man-sized speakers going or by getting animals that make noise all night. They do it to people who hear their vehicles go by. They will amass somewhere away from home and do it to everyone near them. It is a 100% guarantee that blacks and mestizos will always torture with noise as much as they can. There is no other behavior so defining of these two races, so guaranteed of them, than this.
Disloyal, greedy, truculent, selfish, cunning, dishonest, cocky, deceitful, envious, vindictive, ungrateful, cowardly, big-mouthed, ugly, pompous, perverted, thievish, murderous, sadistic and to have many more negative traits.
Rightpedia was initially hosted by Orain, which refused to take it down due to their Terms of Service which supported freedom of speech. However, Orain was closed down in September 2015 due to being hacked, and Rightpedia moved to MW Zip before being deleted from there as well. After that, they purchased hosting from GoDaddy.
According to Google safe browsing analytics, Rightpedia was considered a dangerous domain.
Rightpedia hosted defamatory articles on anti-fascists and politicians written by Michael Coombs and Eleonora Dubiczki. Coombs also targeted people he personally disliked and used Rightpedia to harass, by doxing them and writing libel. Coombs admitted Rightpedia's aim was to create "hit pieces" on its political opponents (such as liberals) and Jewish people. Dubiczki targeted politicians such as Diane Abbott and Luciana Berger.
When hosted by Orain several of those libellous articles were removed for violating Orain's Terms of Service.
Disturbing images of dead children were put on Rightpedia's articles about anti-fascists and liberal politicians to smear them.
↑ Alt right Rightpedia website closed down by GoDaddy for disturbing content.
↑ 6.0 6.1 Rightpedia.info. Easy Counter.
↑ Wikipedia wars: inside the fight against far-right editors, vandals and sock puppets. Southern Poverty Law Center.
↑ Mikemikev. Gab. "LOL the SPLC mentioned my Wikipedia socks". Archived.
↑ 9.0 9.1 Subsaharan Africans. Rightpedia.
↑ Orain hosts white supremacist wiki. Wikipediocracy.
↑ "Downfall of Orain". Addshore.
↑ "right.mwzip.com is hosting anti-Semitic content". MW Zip Forum.
↑ "en.rightpedia.info | Who Is Hosting en.rightpedia.info?" WhoIsHostingThis.com.
↑ Dubiczki posting as "Vajna" wrote the racist articles about Diane Abbott and Luciana Berger on Rightpedia.
↑ Rightpedia Screenshot 2: "I received a libel complaint re: Richard Warman & Shane Ruttle. I have suppressed those pages until I actually have time to go through and read them to see if they do actually fall under the category of hate speech/libel or if it's actually content protected under free speech."
↑ Eg. Abe Foxman, Anetta Kahane, Leonard Zeskind.
This page was last modified on 2 April 2019, at 12:04.


Question: Describe Pleasant Hall.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe Pleasant Hall.

Pleasant Hall is a historic home located in Kempsville section of Virginia Beach, Virginia. Built in 1769, it is a two-story, five bay, double pile Georgian style brick dwelling. It is topped by a shallow gable roof and has two wide interior-end chimney stacks with corbeled caps.


Question: Respond in 11 sentences. Describe the story of Bill Nye and Blair Tindall.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Respond in 11 sentences. Describe the story of Bill Nye and Blair Tindall.

NOVEMBER 19--A late-night flower bed raid has prompted Bill Nye the Science Guy to obtain a temporary restraining order against a California woman whom the television personality appeared to have married last year.
Nye, 51, last week secured the TRO against Blair Tindall, who admits that she poured weed killer in the garden of the Los Angeles home she once shared with Nye. According to a Los Angeles Superior Court filing by Nye (a copy of which you'll find here), Tindall, dressed in black, appeared in his backyard at 11:30 PM on Labor Day, and "fled on foot when I called her name."
Tindall, Nye claimed, dropped two large bottles that had been "filled with some sort of solvent" and "may have been emptied on my garden from which I get food produce." In a second filing, Nye reported that the herbicide is "quite toxic" and claimed that he feared Tindall might have squirted him in the eyes with it had he been closer to her.
For her part, Tindall, a 47-year-old writer, describes the flower assault as a "foolish, sophomoric act of poor judgment" that came in the midst of her having a series of personal and family problems. In a November 13 declaration, Tindall strongly denies being a threat to Nye, whom she accuses of "emotional cruelty."
Nye, she stated, proposed marriage less than three months after meeting her in late-2005, and the pair appeared to have been wed last February in an impromptu ceremony officiated by Pastor Rick Warren (of "The Purpose Driven Life" fame). However, within weeks of the nuptials, Tindall noted, the newlyweds learned that "our marriage license was returned as invalid." It was then, she added, that Nye ordered her not to move into the Studio City home they had just purchased.
The "faux marriage," Tindall added, left her heartbroken and distraught and led to the "dreadful moment" in the garden of "a man who no longer loved me."


Question: Describe the efforts of Californians to control surveillance technology.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the efforts of Californians to control surveillance technology.

"Last night, the people of Oakland took a significant step in reclaiming ownership of their neighborhoods and protecting the community from secret and invasive police surveillance with the passage of a landmark surveillance ordinance by the City Council.
The new law requires that any surveillance technology be subject to review and approval by the Privacy Advisory Commission and City Council. In doing so, Oakland joins the cities of Davis, Berkeley and the County of Santa Clara in reclaiming local control over if and how these technologies – including drones, social media surveillance and license plate readers – are used by law enforcement.
Surveillance technologies, which have been increasingly acquired in secret and are used almost exclusively without a warrant, have invaded residents’ lives across the state. They are even being exploited by the federal government to fuel mass deportations, tearing California families apart. In a gross violation of privacy, ICE has acquired local date from license plate readers and other technologies that track residents without their consent.
Across California and the nation, communities are making their voice heard and demanding a seat at the table when it comes to the use of secret and intrusive surveillance technology by local law enforcement. Cities from California to Massachusetts have passed similar surveillance technology ordinances.
The movement for community control is growing. In addition to existing surveillance ordinances in Davis, Berkeley and Santa Clara County, Alameda, San Pablo, and Culver City, California also all recently said no to automatic license plate reader contracts with a company sharing data with ICE.
In Sacramento, legislators will soon be considering statewide legislation, SB 1186, to require local review and approval for all requests for surveillance technology by local law enforcement.
We are proud to have worked with community groups across the state for many years to pass these local ordinances and will continue to work with advocates to ensure that all Californians have a say and a choice when it comes to the use of intrusive surveillance technology at the local level."


Question: Hey there! Want to find some cool Star Wars T-shirts?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Hey there! Want to find some cool Star Wars T-shirts?

You don’t need to travel to a far away galaxy, or even step inside a wretched hive of scum and villainy to find the funniest Star Wars tees. They’re all right here! Non-Star Wars fans need not apply.
(via RedBubble – From $16.68 Adult Apparel.
Hope you enjoyed this round up of Funny Star Wars T-Shirts! Check out our other Star Wars Round-ups and Artist Spotlights.
Guardians of the Galaxy T-Shirts!


Question: What was the 2012 AFL Tasmania TSL premiership season? Respond in 1 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What was the 2012 AFL Tasmania TSL premiership season? Respond in 1 sentences.

The 2012 AFL Tasmania TSL premiership season is a current Australian Rules Football competition staged across Tasmania, Australian over eighteen (18) roster rounds plus one Regional round and six (6) finals series matches between 31 March and 22 September 2012.


Question: Who was Maurice Cosgrave? Respond in 1 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Who was Maurice Cosgrave? Respond in 1 sentences.

Maurice Cosgrave (1921 or 1922 – 1 September 1996) was an Irish trade union leader.


Question: Explain the potential ramifications if Tony Blair's immunity from prosecution is overturned.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Explain the potential ramifications if Tony Blair's immunity from prosecution is overturned.

Tony Blair may face formal charges over war crimes if judges overturn a controversial ruling that gave the former Primer Prime Minister, immunity from prosecution over the Iraq War.
Last year a British court blocked a private criminal prosecution against Blair by General Abdul-Wahid Shannan ar-Ribat, a former chief of staff of the Iraqi army. British judges, however ruled that the international crime of “aggression” could not be brought against Blair and granted him immunity from criminal charges.
That ruling is set to be reviewed at the Royal Courts of Justice today by one of the most senior judges in the UK. In calling for a war crimes trial in Britain and the prosecution of Blair, Michael Mansfield QC was reported by the Guardian of saying that “the offence of waging an aggressive war has effectively been assimilated into English law”.
If the immunity verdict is overturned, Tony Blair may face formal charges of war crimes over one of the worst foreign policy disasters in British history. It would also satisfy large number of campaigners who hold Blair and the US President at the time of the Iraq invasion, George Bush, personally responsible for the death of hundreds of thousands of Iraqi’s and the rise of terrorism in the region.
This opinion gained further momentum following the publication of the Chilcot report which accused the UK of aggression following Blair’s decision to invade Iraq and depose Saddam Hussain over allegations of weapons of mass destruction. Chilcot inquiry’s also concluded that the invasion of Iraq was unnecessary and undermined the United Nations.


Question: Provide a description of Erik von Holst's life and career. Respond in 51 words.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Provide a description of Erik von Holst's life and career. Respond in 51 words.

Erik von Holst (born 30 August 1894, in Vaivara Parish, Estonia - died 31 May 1962 in Eutin, West Germany) was an Estonian/German sailor and ice sailor who represented Estonia in the 1936 Summer Olympics in the men's olympic monotype class. He also designed and constructed the International Monotype-XV ice yacht.


Question: "Where is Osík?"

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 "Where is Osík?"

Osík is a village and municipality ("obec") in Svitavy District in the Pardubice Region of the Czech Republic.


Question: Have you read The Secret Lives of Colour?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Have you read The Secret Lives of Colour?

The Secret Lives of Colour is a 2016 non-fiction book by British writer Kassia St. Clair which explores the cultural and social history of colours. The book, which is based on a column St. Clair writes for British magazine "Elle Decoration", is organized in a series of chapters by color, arranged from white to black. Each chapter is composed of short, two to four page, essays on different shades of its respective color, discussing an interesting aspect of science, history, art, or culture relating to the shade. There are a total of 75 essays in the book. Each page is bordered by a stripe of the color it discusses for easy visual identification, even when the book is closed.
The book was generally well-received by critics. NPR listed it on its Best Books of 2017 list. Lily Le Brun of "The Economist" found the book's design visually appealing and helpful for referencing. Cathy Dillon of "The Irish Times" called it "perfect gift for a colour enthusiast". Laura J. Snyder of "The Wall Street Journal" wrote that it brought the history of both science and art "into vivid relief."


Question: Provide a brief biography of August Thiele. Respond in 2 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Provide a brief biography of August Thiele. Respond in 2 sentences.

August Thiele (26 August 1893 – 31 March 1981) was an admiral during World War II and commander of the heavy cruiser "Lützow". He was awarded the Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross with Oak Leaves.


Question: What is IBM API Connect? Respond in 3 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What is IBM API Connect? Respond in 3 sentences.

IBM API Management (with version 5 renamed to IBM API Connect) is an API Management platform for use in the API Economy. IBM API Connect enables users to create, assemble, manage, secure and socialize web application programming interfaces (APIs).
It runs as a Virtual appliance on a Virtual machine and uses the IBM WebSphere DataPower SOA Appliances as gateways.


Question: What can you tell me about Shawn Kuykendall?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What can you tell me about Shawn Kuykendall?

Shawn Kuykendall (February 21, 1982 – March 12, 2014) was an American professional soccer player; he competed with D.C. United and the New York Red Bulls of Major League Soccer.


Question: Provide the details of Oh Wonder's new album. Respond in 67 words.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Provide the details of Oh Wonder's new album. Respond in 67 words.

No One Else Can Wear Your Crown is the upcoming third studio album by London-based alt-pop duo Oh Wonder, scheduled to be released through Island Records on 7 February 2020. It was preceded by the release of the singles "Hallelujah", "Better Now" and "I Wish I Never Met You". The duo will embark on a world tour in support of the album in March and April 2020.


Question: What can we expect from Ilya Kovalchuk next season?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What can we expect from Ilya Kovalchuk next season?

Ilya Kovalchuk agreed to a three-year contract with the Los Angeles Kings on Saturday. Kovalchuk, who played the past five seasons in the Kontinental Hockey League after 11 seasons in the NHL, must wait until July 1 to sign the contract, one that the underlying numbers suggest is a high-risk, high-reward situation for Los Angeles.
The reward for the Kings is that Kovalchuk, a point-per-game player in the NHL (816 points in 816 games) before leaving for Russia, could score up to 72 points next season and help boost them into Stanley Cup contention. However, the risk of signing a 35-year-old forward who hasn't played an NHL game since April 27, 2013, is that his skill won't translate back to the NHL, and that he could put up 40 points or fewer next season.
The most realistic outcome is around 56 points. A variety of approaches were used to arrive at these estimates, the first of which involves converting his KHL scoring totals to an NHL equivalent using translation factors. This approach highlights his best-case scenario.
Translation factors are percents that are based on how players have performed in the NHL in the past, in this case after coming from the KHL or its predecessor, the Russian Super League. They are calculated by taking a player's points-per-game average in the NHL in one season and dividing it by how that player performed in the other league in the preceding season. Based on the 54 players to do so since 2005-06 (minimum 20 games in each league), the average player retained 72.7 percent of his scoring when going to the NHL.
That translation factor is validated by Kovalchuk's own KHL-to-NHL experience. When the 2012-13 NHL season was delayed by a lockout, he had 42 points (18 goals, 24 assists) in 36 games in the KHL, then had 31 points (11 goals, 20 assists) in 37 NHL games after play resumed. That works out to 1.17 points per game in the KHL and 0.84 in the NHL, which is 73.8 percent.
If this trend holds, Kovalchuk could top 70 points next season. In 2017-18, he led the KHL with 63 points (31 goals, 32 assists) in 53 games, an average of 1.19 points per game. When multiplied by 73.8 percent, that works out to 0.88 points per game, which would be 72 points in 82 NHL games.
That upside is further confirmed by the three players with the most similar KHL statistics who've played in the NHL recently: Alexander Radulov of the Dallas Stars, Artemi Panarin of the Columbus Blue Jackets and Evgenii Dadonov of the Florida Panthers. As a group, their average scoring rate was 1.21 points per game in their final KHL season. The three had a combined average of 0.85 points per game the following NHL season, or 70 points over 82 games.
Kovalchuk's upside makes this a potentially big move for Los Angeles, but his age and his extended absence from the NHL casts far more doubt on his performance than most free agents.
In his final three NHL seasons (2010-11 through 2012-13), Kovalchuk had 174 points (79 goals, 95 assists) in 195 games, an average of 0.89 points per game. Six years later, his scoring is bound to be a bit lower, a drop-off that can be estimated by looking at other recent forwards whose scoring rates were similar at ages 27 through 29 and who were active at age 35.
Between 2005-06 and 2011-12, the 10 players who best fit this description were Erik Cole, Marian Gaborik, Brian Gionta, Vincent Lecavalier, Patrick Marleau, Brenden Morrow, Mike Ribeiro, Brad Richards, Patrick Sharp and Alex Tanguay. As a group, the 10 had a scoring rate of 0.89 per game ages 27 through 29. Six seasons later, this group's scoring rate dropped to 0.48 points per game at age 35; that works out to about 40 points over 82 games.
Due to his unique situation, Kovalchuk's scoring could fall anywhere in an unusually wide range from 40 to 72 points. Can we narrow it down?
Playing for an average offensive team like the Kings is unlikely to significantly push his performance in either direction. He is likely to play on the top line with Anze Kopitar and Dustin Brown at even strength and work the point with Drew Doughty on the first power-play unit. In 2017-18, the Kings ranked 16th of 31 NHL teams with 237 goals and were 17th on the power play (20.4 percent).
Perhaps Kovalchuk's scoring expectations can be narrowed down by looking at the most similar free agent, Thomas Vanek. Between 2010-11 and 2012-13, Vanek had 175 points (78 goals, 97 assists) in 196 games; that's almost exactly the same as Kovalchuk, who is less than a year older. In 2017-18, Vanek had 56 points (24 goals, 32 assists) in 80 games for the Vancouver Canucks and Blue Jackets.
Not only does Vanek's scoring fall exactly halfway between the minimum and maximum estimates of 40 and 72 points, but his scoring rate of 0.70 points per game is right in line with the highest totals in Kovalchuk's peer group, Marleau and Tanguay, who averaged 0.70 and 0.69 points per game at age 35. At that rate, Kovalchuk can be expected to score 56 points for the Kings in 2018-19 -- but with the potential for far more.


Question: What happened in the 1975-76 Algerian Championnat National? Respond briefly.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What happened in the 1975-76 Algerian Championnat National? Respond briefly.

The 1975–76 Algerian Championnat National was the 14th season of the Algerian Championnat National since its establishment in 1962. A total of 16 teams contested the league, with MC Alger as the defending champions.


Question: What do you know about the University of Northern Colorado football team? Respond in 5 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What do you know about the University of Northern Colorado football team? Respond in 5 sentences.

The Northern Colorado Bears football program is the intercollegiate American football team for the University of Northern Colorado located in Greeley, Colorado. The team competes in the Big Sky Conference at the NCAA Division I Football Championship Subdivision (FCS) level. The university's first football team was fielded in 1893. The team plays its home games at the 8,533 seat Nottingham Field on campus. The Bears are coached by Ed McCaffrey.


Question: Provide a brief biography of Sammuel Lamur.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Provide a brief biography of Sammuel Lamur.

Sammuel Lamur (born June 8, 1989) is an American football quarterback who is currently a free agent. He was signed by the Tampa Bay Storm as an undrafted free agent in 2014 as a quarterback. He played college football at Kansas State University. He is the twin brother of Minnesota Vikings linebacker, Emmanuel Lamur. He was signed by the Tampa Bay Buccaneers to play linebacker on August 6, 2015. He was waived on August 11, 2015.