Question: Describe the upcoming fanart event "Project Crown".

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the upcoming fanart event "Project Crown".

Artist exhibition, cosplay contest organized to honor the current ruling monarch of the fanart kingdom.
As part of a recent preview for its upcoming New Super Mario Bros. U Deluxe, Nintendo showed off one of the game’s new power-ups. Called the Super Crown, the item allows stocky mushroom girl Toadette to transform into a form similar to that of Princess Peach.
But fan artists theorized that perhaps the Super Crown doesn’t just make its wearer look more regal, but specifically like a princess. And so was born Bowsette, an amply endowed female version of reptilian Super Mario franchise antagonist Bowser/King Koopa.
Since the very first Bowsette illustration was posted to Twitter on September 20, over 1,400 additional drawings have been shared. Witnessing the emergence of a new genre of visual art, Japanese Twitter user @sumihii sprang into action and has organized an event dedicated exclusively to celebrating Bowsette/Princess Koopa fandom.
The gathering has been christened Project Crown (Oukan Keikaku in Japanese), and will take place one month from today, on October 27 (the October 28 date shown in @sumihii’s tweeted photo is a typo). The Kawasaki Municipal Industrial Promotion Hall conference facility, just south of Tokyo in the city of Kawasaki, will serve as the event’s venue, with both art exhibitors and Bowsette admirers alike invited to take part.
▼ The Project Crown logo even has a bit of a Mario game vibe going, with its cartoony font and bright primary colors.
Meanwhile, Twitter user haniwa (@ayyk92), the artist who drew the very first Bowsette illustration, seems overwhelmed by the character’s explosive popularity.
Nintendo really is sort of stuck between a rock and a hard place here. On the one hand, the game developer has a long-standing tradition of handling its creative processes in-house, and isn’t really the sort of company to publicly endorse or otherwise legitimize fan-created original characters. On the other hand, it’s readily apparent that, right now, nothing anyone says is going to slow down the Bowsette hype train, and so keeping quiet it really about the only option Nintendo has.


Question: Who is Tereza Kučerová? Respond in 1 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Who is Tereza Kučerová? Respond in 1 sentences.

Tereza Kučerová (born May 5, 1964) is a Czech artist.


Question: Describe The Boring Company’s plan to build a rapid transit tunnel between Baltimore and Washington, D.C.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe The Boring Company’s plan to build a rapid transit tunnel between Baltimore and Washington, D.C.

One of billionaire Elon Musk’s lesser-known ventures is taking the spotlight with word that The Boring Company is planning to dig a rapid-transit tunnel between Baltimore and Washington, D.C.
That’s not all: Musk says the company is putting the finishing touches on a second tunneling machine, which will be nicknamed Line-Storm as a tribute to a Robert Frost poem. The first machine is named Godot, after the Samuel Beckett play. It’s being employed to dig a tunnel in Hawthorne, Calif., where Musk’s SpaceX rocket venture is headquartered.
Musk is even selling Boring Company hats. More than 6,400 of them, at last report.
In June, the CEO of SpaceX and Tesla estimated that he spent only about 2 percent of his working time on The Boring Company, which focuses on lowering the cost of tunneling to facilitate high-speed underground transit. He must have saved up a lot of that time for this week.
The Baltimore-Washington project is the most intriguing development: This week, a Reddit user posted pictures showing a fenced-off area south of Baltimore, with The Boring Company’s logo emblazoned on the fence.
Electrek picked up on the pictures and passed them along, even though they were deleted from the Reddit forum. They appear to show a staging site for a tunnel entrance.
“Get ready,” Hogan said on video.
News reports indicate that Maryland’s Department of Transportation has given The Boring Company conditional utility approval to dig a 10-mile-long tunnel under the state-owned portion of the Baltimore-Washington Parkway, starting from a spot near Fort Meade. That section accounts for about a third of the parkway’s total mileage.
Aides to Hogan told The Baltimore Sun that the state doesn’t plan to contribute significantly to the expense of the project.
The plan follows through on a vision that Musk laid out in July for building a Hyperloop transit system between New York and Washington. The system could make use of the tube network that’s been part of Musk’s Hyperloop concept since 2013.
For some time now, Maryland state and local officials have been discussing options for a high-speed link to Washington. One scenario calls for spending as much as $10 billion on a transit tunnel through which high-speed maglev trains would travel.
The goal for a privately backed project known as Baltimore-Washington Rapid Rail is to cut Baltimore-D.C. travel time to 15 minutes. Eventually, the project’s organizers want to extend the route to allow for one-hour trips between New York and Washington.
The plan has received $28 million in federal funds for planning and engineering analysis, with Gov. Hogan’s blessing. But the idea has run into community opposition, due to concerns about cost as well as about noise and disruption.
Can Hyperloop technology offer a faster, cheaper, better route for rapid transit? That’s a question that The Boring Company will aim to answer over the months and years ahead.
Update for 12:15 p.m. PT Oct. 21: We’ve updated this report with additional information from Baltimore and D.C. news media about the plan for the tunnel.


Question: Describe the planned meeting between US President Donald Trump and DPRK leader Kim Jong Un.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the planned meeting between US President Donald Trump and DPRK leader Kim Jong Un.

President Trump says he will try to make meeting a "special moment for World Peace"
A planned first meeting between DPRK leader Kim Jong Un and U.S. President Donald Trump will take place in Singapore on June 12, Trump announced on social media on Thursday.
The news follows months of speculation on the potential date and time of what will represent the first-ever meeting between a North Korean leader and a sitting U.S. President.
President Trump first accepted Kim Jong Un’s invitation to talk in March, following a meeting with South Korean officials at the White House.
Two visits by Secretary of State Mike Pompeo to Pyongyang since then have been seen as further laying the groundwork for the summit, with the second taking place this week and ending in the release of three U.S. citizens previously held captive in the North.
During his return trip from North Korea, Pompeo added that the summit is likely to last one day, though could stretch into two days if required.
North Korea had until this week remained silent on its leader’s plans to meet with Trump.
“[Kim] said that the coming DPRK-U.S. summit would be a historic meeting for the excellent first step toward promotion of the positive situation development in the Korean peninsula and building of a good future,” KCNA said, in coverage of a Wednesday meeting between the DPRK leader and Pompeo.


Question: What does Christianity mean to us today?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What does Christianity mean to us today?

Despite the skeptical attacks and denigrations of Jesus during this holy season, Easter is no less brilliant. The glorious truth for the ages is that Jesus Christ has risen and conquered death.
At the first Palm Sunday, the crowds who cheered “Hosannah!” later cried, “crucify him!” Today, we confess that we believe in Jesus Christ as our Lord who died for our sins on the cross.
In the face of a culture rife with anti-Christian bigotry, we’re boldly proclaiming the central and foundational truths of Christianity held in common by billions of believers in Jesus Christ.
There is a great war in our culture today. It is a war for the minds and souls and lives of every American. Ultimately, it is a battle for God or against Him.
What is the cost of the rising tide of atheism and secularism? All our rights and freedoms are at risk when our Biblical foundations are undermined.
It is time to reclaim the lost legacy of the Biblical basis of our founding and our Christian heritage, which secularists have worked feverishly to obliterate.
From the seeds of evolution has sprouted a pernicious and deadly harvest in America today where the “quality of life” ethic threatens to replace the sanctity of life ethic.
God’s word shines a light on the systematic and burgeoning effort to devalue human life. Babies, the elderly, the infirm—all are frontline victims in the current war on humanity.
While socialism is growing in popularity and influence in America, we counter this dangerous philosophy, that threatens our freedoms, with Biblical truth.
Why is it foolish to trust in socialism? For starters, it is often premised on atheism. And wherever it has been put into practice, it fails miserably.
Now that America has elected several socialists to Congress, we take a look at how all government schemes of redistributing wealth are wasteful and unbiblical.
Surely we are made in the image of God for His purposes and glory, yet, those who defend life in this culture of death stand boldly against opposition.
On the anniversary of Roe v. Wade, actress Jennifer O’Neill shares her testimony of the devastation of abortion and her road to healing through Jesus Christ.
It is time for an update on the Distinguished Christian Statesman Award and the training at the D. James Kennedy Center for Christian Leadership.
Where is our nation headed? The utter failure of every attempt at Socialism is no deterrent to proponents of the system, some now elected to Congress.
What if Jesus had never been born? We take a look at the impact of the greatest man who ever lived.
Tech companies are controlling the flow of information and censoring Christians and conservatives.
Click here to find out where you can watch our programs in your area.
That Jesus Christ will return visibly, bodily and gloriously is an essential truth of Christianity. Yet, what is it that we are truly anticipating as we wait for the second coming of the Christ?
America was settled and founded by Christians on Christian principles. But Christians in America are now facing hostilities in a culture that is becoming more like Babylon.
We who have spiritual sight can expect to be mocked by those who don’t. Nevertheless, we are called to proclaim God’s truth to the world, and His Word does not return void.
What About These Other Gods?
The Judeo-Christian tradition has been a blessing to civilization. But other worldviews, with other views of God, sometimes produce unpleasant and dangerous environments.


Question: Describe the message Forward-ME is sending to the Science Media Centre regarding their factsheet on CFS/ME.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the message Forward-ME is sending to the Science Media Centre regarding their factsheet on CFS/ME.

“Re: Science Media Centre Factsheet – CFS/ME – The illness and the controversy.
On behalf of Forward-ME I write to ask you to retract and replace your factsheet on CFS/ME, published on 21 March 2018, following the publication of a paper by Dr Carolyn Wilshire of the University of Wellington, New Zealand, which found that the findings of the Principal Investigators of the PACE trial were ‘not robust’ and showed ‘no long-term benefits’.
The factsheet includes numerous inaccuracies and distortions; it denigrates patients and some doctors; it fails to reflect the numerous peer reviewed papers, published since the release of some of the raw data from the trial following legal action, which demonstrate serious defects in the PACE trial, and it fails to take into account the extensive research from the USA published since 2014. This will all have been available to you.
These claims are patently inaccurate. The mainstream medical community in the USA concluded that the “campaigners” have actually been correct about the nature of the condition, stating that “ME/CFS is a serious, chronic, complex systemic disease” (Academy of Medicine), that it is not a primary psychological disease in aetiology” (National Institutes of Health). They state that guidance for managing ME/CFS should include a “declaration that the disease is not the result of fear-based avoidance of activity”, and a clear indication that the disease is not a psychiatric or somatoform disorder” (Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Advisory Committee of the Department of Health and Human Services). There certainly is controversy and disagreement at this time, but that disagreement is not between professionals and “campaigners”. It is between professionals in the UK and professionals elsewhere.
The factsheet claims that: “After sustained pressure from activists the CDC has removed mention of CBT and GET from its website”. This, too, is patently inaccurate and even a cursory investigation of the facts would make that clear. The CDC changed its recommendations at the urging of the Academy of Medicine, the National Institutes of Health, the Department of Health and Human Services, and the Agency for Healthcare Quality and Research, all of whom emphatically agree that the CDC’s former recommendations – that is, the current NICE recommendations – lack evidence based support.
The author of the factsheet states that existing evidence in favour of CBT and GET is “cited by the scientific community”, as if there are no reputable members of the scientific community, and no reputable health policy authorities who disagree. They go on to state that “those who disagree …. cite review articles and reanalyses of trial data published in low impact factor journals such as The Journal of Health Psychology and Fatigue: Biomedicine, Health and Behaviour”.
It is concerning that a reputable resource like the Science Media Centre would publish such a grossly inaccurate claim, one that can be so readily overturned. Those who disagree with the evidence for CBT and GET cite the extensive investigations of the US governmental health authorities. In particular they cite the Agency for Healthcare and Research Quality Publication No. 15-E001-EF, “Diagnosis and Treatment of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/ Chronic Fatigue Syndrome”. That document is readily available online and a quick investigation will reveal that it offers a very long and detailed list of unscientific practices and biases in the research that claims to support CBT and GET. There are a great many such reports by US governmental health organisations. It is unacceptable for the Science Media Centre to write as if these investigations did not take place; as if these documents do not exist – and it is unacceptable not to note that, by comparison, the professional reputations of these organisations far outstrip those of the PACE trial researchers.
The reality is that at this time there are no US governmental health authorities who agree that the PACE trial is “good quality”. It is absurd for any “Factsheet” on ME/CFS to overlook this fact.
Your Trustees’ Report for the year ended 31 March 2016 gives among the SMC objectives its overall goal to help to achieve the aim of the House of Lords Science and Technology Committee which sought to renew public trust in science “by working to promote more balanced, accurate and rational coverage of the important science, health and environment stories that appear in the media.” In the case of the promotion of the science relating to CFS/ME the Science Media Centre have singularly failed in its objectives over many years.
If you are not prepared to retract this factsheet I regret that we have no option but to report our concerns to the Charity Commission.
By way of background information, the Science Media Centre (a registered charity) has as its stated mission “To provide, for the benefit of the public and policymakers, accurate and evidence-based information about science and engineering through the media, particularly on controversial and headline news stories when most confusion and misinformation occurs.” It states that it provides “journalists with what they need in the timeframe they need it, from interviews with leading experts to timely press briefings on topical issues. We provide journalists with information about science and its related disciplines, making it easier for them to get access to the best evidence and expertise. Given our focus on science in the headlines, the SMC works mainly with science and news journalists in the UK’s national news outlets.” The Centre sends out quotes from experts, statistical analyses of scientific studies and Factsheets, in addition to running regular press briefings on the latest hot topic.


Question: Describe the significance of the upcoming Trump-Putin Summit.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the significance of the upcoming Trump-Putin Summit.

US National Security Adviser John Bolton says Trump and Putin will use the summit to find 'constructive solutions'.
"This meeting has been planned for a long time," Ushakov told reporters. "It has enormous importance for Russia and America, but it [also] has huge importance for the whole international situation. I think it will be the main international event of the summer."
"Your visit here to Moscow inspires hope that we will be able to take first steps to restore full-fledged relations between Russia and the United States," Putin told Bolton.
For his part, Bolton said that "direct contact between Trump and Putin is in the US national interest."
It is also likely to go down badly among foreign and domestic critics who question Trump's commitment to NATO and fret over his desire to rebuild relations with Moscow even as Washington tightens sanctions.
The Trump administration has been long accused of colluding with Russia during the president's 2016 election campaign.


Question: What can you tell me about Jonathan Paul Arscott? Respond in 6 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What can you tell me about Jonathan Paul Arscott? Respond in 6 sentences.

Jonathan Paul Arscott (born 4 July 1970) is an English former cricketer who played for Cambridge University and the combined Oxford and Cambridge Universities between 1990 and 1993. He was born in Tooting and attended Tonbridge School and Magdalene College, Cambridge. He appeared in 31 first-class matches as a right handed batsman and wicketkeeper. He scored 678 runs with a highest score of 79. He held 30 catches and completed nine stumpings. Whilst at Cambridge he also won Blues for Hockey.


Question: Provide information about Ing. Fernando Espinoza Gutiérrez Airport. Respond in 5 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Provide information about Ing. Fernando Espinoza Gutiérrez Airport. Respond in 5 sentences.

Ing. Fernando Espinoza Gutiérrez Airport was located in Santiago de Querétaro, Querétaro, Mexico. This airport was inaugurated in 1955. Due to the construction of the new Querétaro International Airport in 2004, the airport is no longer used. The buildings and land that formed the airport are now government buildings, and were donated to the Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro.


Question: What is the Brooklyn Bridge Park?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What is the Brooklyn Bridge Park?

Michael Van Valkenburgh Association, Inc.
The Brooklyn Bridge Park is an 85-acre sustainable waterfront park that revitalized 1.3 acres of Brooklyn, New York’s post-industrial East River shoreline. Stretching from Atlantic Avenue in the south passing under the Brooklyn Bridge to Jay Street north of the Manhattan Bridge, the long, narrow site offers sweeping views of New York Harbor and lower Manhattan. The park’s six piers offer diverse recreational opportunities including soccer fields, basketball courts, playgrounds, lawns, and a greenway for walking and biking. The park embraces the river as its reason for existence and incorporates pebbled beaches, a salt marsh, a boating ramp, and calm waters for kayaking and canoes.
The founding organizations are a part of the Brooklyn Bridge Park’s life, feeding its free programming with everything from kayak instruction and sport events, to movies, theatre productions, opera, and concerts.
Designed to be both financially and ecologically sustainable, the $16 million project is “the ultimate recycled park.” The benches throughout the park, for example, were made from wood salvaged from a demolished warehouse and constructed in Brooklyn woodshops. Half a million visitors or more attend the park’s many free programs, from movies and live performances to dance classes and history lectures. The project succeeds in transforming a derelict space into a truly democratic and sustainable playground.


Question: Describe the crime committed by Austin Ehihu Spearman.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the crime committed by Austin Ehihu Spearman.

A man who stabbed his roommate and murdered his roommate’s fiancée because he didn’t want to move out was sentenced in King County Superior Court on Friday to more than 28 years in prison.
According to police and prosecutors, victim Kevin Bell had allowed his childhood friend, Austin Ehihu Spearman, 53, to move into his North Seattle condominium in the summer of 2010. By the end of 2011, however, Bell was engaged and asked Spearman to move out, court documents say.
On Dec. 2, 2011, Bell posted eviction notices on the front door of his condo and on the door of Spearman’s bedroom, according to charging documents. Prosecutors say Spearman did not comment on the eviction notices when he came home that night.
But later, after Bell and his fiancée, Kristy Boyd, went to bed, Spearman rushed into their bedroom and began attacking Bell, court documents say.
Bell, who said he didn’t realize until later that he was being stabbed, ran out of the condo with Spearman chasing him and “still hitting him in the back and shoulder as he ran out,” court documents say.
When Spearman went back inside, the outside door shut behind him, locking Bell out of the building, prosecutors said.
Locked out, Bell could hear Boyd screaming from inside their bedroom and he “attempted to stop the assault by throwing a large rock through the bedroom window,” court documents say, but the screaming stopped before police arrived.
Boyd, 47, was stabbed at least 20 times with a large knife, court documents say.


Question: Describe how procedural modeling has been used in relation to spaceship design, and explain the steps you took in the creation of a prototype system to procedurally generate the surface details of a large scale spaceship. Respond in 9 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe how procedural modeling has been used in relation to spaceship design, and explain the steps you took in the creation of a prototype system to procedurally generate the surface details of a large scale spaceship. Respond in 9 sentences.

In this thesis, we present a detailed analysis of the conventions that appear in fictional spaceship design, including a discussion of their origins, their uses in emulating certain traits, and reasons these conventions might be followed or ignored. We uncover these conventions by examining and comparing popular spaceship designs from the past sixty years, which we present in a detailed survey. We also examine an aesthetic interpretation of information theory, which can be used to describe the balance of uniformity amidst variety, and discuss specific strategies for incorporating these principles into the creation of spaceship surface details. Procedural modeling describes a set of techniques used to allow computers to generate digital content such as 3D digital models automatically. However, procedural modeling to date has focused on very specific areas: natural scenery such as trees and terrain, or cityscapes such as road maps and buildings. While these types of models are important and useful, they focus on a specific subset of the procedural modeling problem. Though procedural generation can be an invaluable tool for providing viable and dynamic content, it is troubling that so few types of objects have been studied in this area. Using the aesthetic and spaceship principles we define, we have developed a prototype system to procedurally generate the surface details of a large scale spaceship. Given a surface representing the frame of a spaceship, we apply geometry automatically in a coherent manner to achieve the appearance of a spaceship by emulating important traits.


Question: Describe your reaction to the ABC conjecture controversy and Mochizuki's behavior.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe your reaction to the ABC conjecture controversy and Mochizuki's behavior.

– in august 2012, Shinichi Mochizuki finishes the fourth of his papers on ‘inter-universal Teichmuller theory’ (IUTeich for the aficianados), claiming to contain a proof of the ABC-conjecture.
– at the time i found these reactions premature. It often happens that the first version of a proof is not the most elegant or shortest, and i was hoping that Mochizuki would soon come up with a streamlined version, more accessible to people working in arithmetic geometry. I spend a couple of weeks going through “The geometry of Frobenioids 1” and recorded my stumbling progress (being a non-expert) on Google+.
In recent (comments to) Google+ posts, there seems to be a growing polarisation between believers and non-believers.
If you are a professional mathematician, you know all too well that the verification of a proof is a shared responsability of the author and the mathematical community. We all received a referee report once complaining that a certain proof was ‘unclear’ or even ‘opaque’?
The usual response to this is to rewrite the proof, make it crystal-clear, and resubmit it.
Few people would suggest the referee to spend a couple of years reading up on all their previous papers, and at the same time, complain to the editor that the referee is unqualified to deliver a verdict before (s)he has done so.
Mochizuki is one of these people.
His latest Progress Report reads more like a sectarian newsletter.
There’s no shortage of extremely clever people working in arithmetic geometry. Mochizuki should reach out to them and provide explanations in a language they are used to.
As far as i understand it, ‘Frobenioids 1’ is all about a categorification of Arakelov line bundles, not just over one particular number ring, but also over all its extensions, and the corresponding reconstruction result recovering the number ring from this category.
Such a one-line synopsis may help experts to either believe the result on the spot or to construct a counter-example. They do not have to wade through all of the 178 new definitions given in that paper.
Is it just me, or is Mochizuki really sticking up his middle finger to the mathematical community.
RIMS is quickly becoming Mochizuki’s Lasserre.


Question: Respond in 35 sentences. Explain the upcoming light heavyweight championship sweepstakes at Madison Square Garden.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Respond in 35 sentences. Explain the upcoming light heavyweight championship sweepstakes at Madison Square Garden.

On Saturday evening, Madison Square Garden will host a light heavyweight championship sweepstakes (aired on HBO World Championship Boxing at 10:05 PM). In the main event, Sergey “Krusher” Kovalev (31-2-1, 27 KOs) will defend his belt against fellow Russian, Igor Mikhalkin (21-1, 9 KOs) and undefeated Dmitry Bivol (12-0, 10 KOs) will face the formidable and exciting Sullivan Barrera (21-1, 14 KOs).
In November 2016 the Krusher lost his titles in a hotly disputed decision to Andre Ward. Eight months later in a rematch, Ward worked Kovalev’s body to score a shocking eighth round TKO. But even the second tussle was not without its share of question marks about low blows and the ref possibly calling an early halt to the contest.
Make no mistake about it, Kovalev is a boxer with heavyweight ambitions of fistic greatness. Much to his chagrin, there will be no redemption from the embarrassing loss to Ward, since the S.O.G. announced his retirement a few months after their second fight. Far from being crushed, the Krusher, who is still ranked fifth on Ring’s pound-for pound list, seems to have learned something from that defeat.
This past November, Kovalev rebounded to reclaim his WBO belt with a spectacular second round stoppage of the Ukrainian power puncher, Vyacheslav Shabranskyy. On that night, Kovalev looked better than ever; his footwork was fluid and he mixed his punches up and jabbed to the body to set up his thermonuclear straight right.
A native of Russia now fighting out of Germany, Mikhalkin is ranked fifth by the WBO and is surfing a ten-fight win streak against less than stellar opposition. The most significant victory on his résumé is over Doudou Ngumbu, whom he has beaten not once but thrice. Mikhalkin is a southpaw. He has a snapping jab, good balance, and solid technique. He does not, however, pack a lot of pop. Worse yet, Mikhalken’s lack of head movement and his something less than flash-dance footwork does not make it difficult to find his inbox. The challenger has durable neural circuitry but it has never been tested by jolts from the likes of Kovalev, one of the hardest punching 175-pounders since Bob Foster.
In a bygone era, a boxer would not have dreamed of becoming a world champion in his twelfth bout, but that is precisely what Dmitry Bivol accomplished in November when he became the WBA light heavyweight champion with a first-round knockout of the unheralded Trent Broadhurst. The WBA has mandated that Bivol defend his title against number one contender Cuban-born Sullivan Barrera .
Both Bivol and Barrera boast long and celebrated amateur careers. Born in Kyrgyzstan but now residing in Saint Petersburg, Russia, Bivol began boxing at six and is a veteran of almost 300 amateur fights. Barrera, who defected to the US in 2009 and lives in Miami, was a world class amateur with a ledger of 285-27. He made his professional debut the same year he arrived in the U.S.
Like Kovalev, whom he much admires, Bivol packs a double barrel of a straight right, which he sets up nicely with a jab and then follows with a left uppercut or left hook. He has fast hands and is a focused finisher who will let fly gales of straight punches when he has his opponent hurt.
No doubt thanks to their extensive amateur experience, Bivol and Barrera are masters of the jab. Both brawl with science, making frequent use of a hard jab to the body. Bivol has a tendency to bring his left back low after he jabs, but the menace of his right hand might cause his opponent to hesitate to capitalize on that flaw.
The 27-year-old Russian champ is adept at cutting off the ring; however, that won’t be necessary with Barrera. Barrera attacked Ward and he will not be shy about exercising the same aggression against Bivol.
Though he has an orthodox style and is combination puncher who remains in the pocket, Barrera is also a gambler who will take his chances with wide left lead hooks. Sometimes his attempted surprise attack works. Sometimes not. Barrera moves his punches up and down but has been known to step back after a combo and drop his paws.
Ward had him down twice, and Barrera kissed the canvas in the first frames of his last two fights.


Question: What were the KV100 series of Kawasaki motorcycles? Respond in 18 words.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What were the KV100 series of Kawasaki motorcycles? Respond in 18 words.

The KV100 'A' (A7-A13) series and 'B' (B1-B14) series were 99.7cc Kawasaki motorcycles made from 1976 through 1988.


Question: Describe the situation involving Stormy Daniels and President Donald Trump.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the situation involving Stormy Daniels and President Donald Trump.

The adult film star says she's free to discuss her alleged affair with the president, even though she was paid $130,000 as part of a 2016 settlement.
Stormy Daniels claims President Donald Trump never signed their settlement agreement and she's free to discuss their alleged affair at will, according to a lawsuit filed Tuesday in Los Angeles County Superior Court.
Suing under her legal name, Stephanie Clifford, the adult film star claims even if Trump's missing signature didn't invalidate their agreement, her obligation to keep quiet ended when his attorney Michael Cohen publicly discussed it.
Both Clifford and Trump used pseudonyms in the contract, according to the complaint: Hers was Peggy Peterson and his was David Dennison.
Clifford claims she and Trump began an affair in 2006 after meeting in Lake Tahoe, Nevada, and their relationship continued through 2007. When the now-infamous Access Hollywood tape created a a scandal for then-candidate Trump, Clifford says she thought about revealing their relationship — but Cohen caught wind of her plans, which resulted in a settlement and non-disparagement agreement.
"On or about October 28, 2016, only days before the election, two of the parties signed the Hush Agreement — Ms. Clifford and Mr. Cohen," writes attorney Michael Avenatti. "Mr. Trump, however, did not sign the agreement, thus rendering it legally null and void and of no consequence."
Clifford believes Trump purposely didn't sign it so he could "publicly disavow" any knowledge of the agreement.
"Despite Mr. Trump's failure to sign the Hush Agreement, Mr. Cohen proceeded to cause $130,000 to be wired to the trust account of Ms. Clifford's attorney," writes Avenatti. "He did so even though there was no legal agreement and thus no written nondisclosure agreement whereby Ms. Clifford was restricted from disclosing the truth about Mr. Trump."
After details of the agreement surfaced in January, Clifford claims Cohen coerced her into signing a false statement in which she said reports of her relationship with Trump were untrue. She also notes that, while Cohen claims he paid her and the Trump campaign wasn't involved, the attorney never publicly denied that the affair happened.
Clifford also claims Cohen filed "an improper and procedurally defective arbitration proceeding" against her in February. She is asking the court to declare the "Hush Agreement" doesn't exist because the contract was unsigned, or, alternatively, to hold that it is unconscionable and therefore unenforceable.
Avenatti on Tuesday shared the suit on Twitter. Trump's camp could not immediately be reached for comment.


Question: Hey, what kind of game ideas do you have?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Hey, what kind of game ideas do you have?

You are a sheep, with guns!
Do you have what it takes to find your way off the... Unknown Planet?
Mega Man - ish, MetroidVania, 2D Exploration Platforming Shooter.
Semi-random, derivative ARPG with focus on dungeon crawling.
What did the pumpkin say to the pumpkin carver? "Cut it out!"
Print t-shirts and keep your customers satisfied. See how many you can print in a day to keep your business growing.
Help Boby find his body!
A simple twitch game where you Bounce and Die... A LOT !!!
An old-school beat em up!
Use your beak to carve sculptures!
Build a Path for your Hero using Tetris Blocks and escape this dungeon!
Survive through an asteroid belt with a time controlling shield.
Perform dental operations inside the mouth of a giant monster.
Help Abby get back the candies for her Halloween party!
Can Rad defeat the evil robots and get to a tasty snack?
Simon is in a pique.
Save Eurydice! Run away from the Hades with her, using your music to fight monsters!
An ant's struggle for survival!
Badger must stick his nose where it doesn't belong if he hopes to discover where he does belong.
Biotic Limit is a Gameboy game made for GBJAM, a simple shoot-em-up with two weapons and a raft of enemies and bosses!
Zoom through waves of blocky levels in this Gameboy style speedy game.
A casino slots game that involves actual gameplay.
A short adventure of a little witch.
Animal Crossing style game with Game Boy sensibilities!
A game about VolleyBall and Powning your friends, Made with the awesome "SuperPowers"
Puzzler about painting yourself into a corner.
A metroidvania with an artstyle based of the NES classic: Gradius!
A Gameboy themed twitch plays Rogue-like for livestreams.
A puzzle game, made for GBJam 5.
Collect cat power to take down the dog wizard!
A Juicy Tale of Vengeance!
A spin on the worst weapon-type in gaming history.
A farming game made in Gameboy style for gbjam.
Try to get all the gems in this platform inspired by Tomb Raider.
Be snow girl. Shoot crystals. Ascend.
A cute SHMUP about a magical ninja on a flying leaf.
Little platformer where you navigate levels by altering shape of the environment.
Save the Cat! "I threw the stick at the cat." In this game you need to save the cat!
Slice your foes from the sky for GBJAM5!
A neat little gb-style puzzle platformer.
A simple rhythm game for the GBJam game jam.
Splinter Snake? Solid Sneak? Who knows? Its a snake game with a twist!
Play as a cat with a bad attitude. Let humans give chase but don't let them pet you!
Simple side shooting game with score attack.
My First Breakout - Gameboy style!
Welcome to the war of the handhelds!
game boy classic shoot em up.
Crazy Otto and friends must escape the haunted castle!
Help Mort get home before it gets dark!
Blast your way through waves of aliens in this GB Jam 5 shooter.
Can you find the treasure that lies beneath the puzzles?
Destroy the Cidadels across 3 areas in a top-down/side-scroller space shooter hybrid.
Magic based shooter roguelike for shifty warlocks.
Shoot stuff and go super fast!
A simple box puzzle platformer game.
A Breakout clone for submission to GB Jam 5.
Go through many difficult obstacles to get back to your brother!
Let's make some apple pie!
Get the fish but don't forget about the stars!
A physics game similar to Flappy Bird, with a box instead of a bird!
Funny rapid circular shooting Game!, Ratio!
A game about breaking blocks with a ball.
A classic platforming experience. Overcome your fears and say bomb to your hearts content.
Survive 2 minutes in this GBJAM5 shooter submission!
Shoot down enemies in order to get the high-score!
Drop bombs. Explode baddies. Get the coins.
Defend your house with candy.
Get the scoop no matter what!
Do you like hard platformers with a gameboy aesthetic? If you do, go for it.
Grab the controls with your paws and defeat the galaxy.
A Game & Watch inspired barista minigame.
"Pogo to the stars and back!"
PROTIP: Avoid things to not die.
Destroy the fire of the volcan to not destroy the earth.
Retro platformer playable on 3 superposed layers.
have fun kicking a ball, there's also some ninja guys but they're pretty cool don't worry.
Be a ninja with this practice exercise!
Time to spoop some cats!
Explore the ocean in a three-colour submarine!
For GBJAM 5 - Play as an alien avoiding bombs on its home world.
Find all the triangles to re-build the ICOsahedron.
Take on the role of a ring leader with the heart of a lion. Soar through the infinite rings.
Cure the sick guardian of this weird world !
For GBJam5 - A platform puzzle game.
Can you pass all the levels, and escape?
Fantasy Zone demade for the GB for GBJAM 5.
Fast Pong experience with music rhythm sync.


Question: What is the history of The Football League? Respond in 12 words.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What is the history of The Football League? Respond in 12 words.

The 1985–86 season was the 87th completed season of The Football League.


Question: Who is Lydia Blume? Respond in 25 words.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Who is Lydia Blume? Respond in 25 words.

Lydia Blume is an American politician from Maine. Blume, a Democrat from York, Maine, has served in the Maine House of Representatives since December 2014.


Question: Describe the strengths and weaknesses of cornerback Xavier Sanchez.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the strengths and weaknesses of cornerback Xavier Sanchez.

A two-time first-team All-Big 12 pick from Fort Worth, Texas, Sanchez has been a stalwart for the Sooners since taking the starting job as a redshirt freshman in 2013. He started 37 games over the past three years, missing two games this fall with a right leg injury. His slight frame worries scouts, and some questioned Sanchez's decision to leave early for the NFL, but there's no doubting his ability to play the ball (15 interceptions, 28 pass break-ups over the past three seasons). Sanchez received 2015 second team All-American notice from multiple outlets, as he not only picked off seven passes, but had 45 tackles, 3.5 for loss, and seven pass breakups.
Three-year starter. Outstanding ball production has been his calling card. Grabbed 15 interceptions during three-year career. Always looking to take the ball reading the quarterback's eyes and taking sharp angles on the throw. Has the hands and athleticism to make difficult interceptions. Great spatial feel in zone shifting from receiver to receiver and squeezing throwing windows. Mirror and match footwork combined with route recognition from man-off gives him playmaking opportunities. Carries long speed to challenge vertical targets.
Short and rail thin for an outside cornerback. Inconsistent tackler due to size. May not have enough sand to hold up against physical receivers. Reckless habit of diving head first on slant looks only to be burned by "sluggo" (slant and go) routes. Doesn't play as fast as his forty time. Allowed 12 touchdowns over last three years and that number should have been higher (drops/overthrows). Can be turned around by clever routes. Average closing burst out of backpedal.
Experienced cornerback who has cover experience against current and future NFL receivers. Sanchez is a feast or famine cover man whose instincts run him into interceptions but also into aggressive mistakes that can cost his own team. His lack of size will work against him on draft day, but his ball production will be heavily weighed by teams looking for coverage help from a third cornerback.


Question: What is the outlook for Derrick Pouliot and Ben Hutton of the Vancouver Canucks?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What is the outlook for Derrick Pouliot and Ben Hutton of the Vancouver Canucks?

With or without Quinn Hughes, the Vancouver Canucks have a couple defencemen who have been put on watch.
The NHL team is looking for a lot of progress this summer from Derrick Pouliot and Ben Hutton, puck-moving defencemen who could either make significant strides or be left in the dust.
Pouliot, 24, and Hutton, 25, should top anyone’s list of the Canucks who have the potential to show up most improved this fall. They were each challenged at the end of last season to improve their conditioning in a major way. The Hughes draft pick only stiffened the challenge.
But is there room in Vancouver for both Hutton and Pouliot, whose battles for playing time will grow exponentially if Hughes signs? And if you were to move one of them, who would it be?
The irony is Pouliot and Hutton probably shouldn’t be bubble players. Among the regular defencemen, they had the most positive impact on puck possession, finishing one-two in controlling unblocked shot-attempt differential among blue-liners who were in at least 60 games.
That’s good but their playing time didn’t reflect it. As the season went on, the less they were deployed. Pouliot was clearly ahead of Hutton by the end of the season and his 22 points in 71 games were a career high.
That’s actually promising and you can’t help but wonder what a motivated, in-shape Pouliot could achieve under head coach Travis Green. He has a much better chance at playing time and success with the Canucks than Hutton does, but he’d also be a much more valuable trade chip if the team is looking to clear out room for Hughes.
Hutton hasn’t hit 20 points since his rookie season when he reached 25. His numbers have trended down since, and this past season he had no goals and six assists.
That’s not good, especially for a player who had his conditioning called out all season and one who is not overly physical.
Hutton is often viewed as a player the Canucks would like to move to upset the logjam they have on the blue-line. But he’s not even among the top six defenders right now, so does trading him really clear out any room for Hughes?
Hutton also has a $2.8-million cap hit. There aren’t many teams chasing $2.8-million puck-moving defencemen fresh off a season in which they didn’t score a goal. The Canucks could retain salary. But there is another issue with Hutton. He’s a pending restricted free agent and will need to be qualified at his 2018-19 base salary, which is $2.4 million.
He’d need to have a vastly improved season to make it worth it. If he’s not qualified, he’d have the chance to become an unrestricted free agent.
Some in the market have given up on Hutton, but his underlying data were strong last season and he is a much better defenceman than the six points suggest.
Green hasn’t given up on Hutton, by the way. The past seven months is the first string of adversity Hutton faced as an NHL player. How he comes out of it could still be a game changer.
Green has put a lot of work into reshaping Hutton as a player and person. He’s eager to see how it translates this September at training camp.
If he comes back with a chip on his shoulder and in better shape, can Hutton find his way back into the Canucks’ top four?
The answer to that one becomes a lot more complicated if the Canucks ended up signing Hughes.


Question: What do you know about Archbishop of York? Respond in 1 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What do you know about Archbishop of York? Respond in 1 sentences.

Hrotheweard (or Lodeward) was Archbishop of York starting some time between 904 and 928 and ending with his death in 931.


Question: What can you tell me about the "Baltic Ace"?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What can you tell me about the "Baltic Ace"?

MV "Baltic Ace" was a Bahamian-flagged car carrier that sank in the North Sea on 5 December 2012 after a collision with the Cyprus-registered container ship "Corvus J". Built by Stocznia Gdynia in Poland, the ship had been in service since 2007.
"Baltic Ace" was a car carrier, a roll-on/roll-off ship designed to transport vehicles in a large, fully enclosed garage-like superstructure running the entire length and width of the vessel. She had eight cargo decks with a minimum free height of . Two decks (3 and 5) could be hoisted up to increase the clearance of the decks below to for large vehicles. Her car capacity, measured in RT43 units, was 2,132. For loading and unloading cargo, "Baltic Ace" had a stern ramp for normal ro-ro berths and a stern quarter ramp for harbours with no specialized cargo handling facilities.


Question: What is the hyponychium?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What is the hyponychium?

The hyponychium is the area of epithelium, particularly the thickened portion, underlying the free edge of the nail plate on the nail. Its proximal border is immediately distal to distal limit of nail bed—a.k.a. the onychodermal band (the line along the interface of the nail bed and the nail plate). Its distal border the free edge of the nail plate—or where that edge would project downwards onto the epidermis.


Question: Have you heard of a substance called "charcoal" being used to clean swords? Is there an equivalent word for this in French?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Have you heard of a substance called "charcoal" being used to clean swords? Is there an equivalent word for this in French?

Today, when cleaning up our swords we can enjoy a variety of products from sandpaper to gentle polishing pastes. But how were soldiers taking care of their swords before the advent of Metal glo, mineral oil or Nevr-dull? I found this interesting excerpt in a French officer memorandum from 1813 which describes some of the options of the time.
Cleaning weapons: To derust portable weapons, we use emery and olive oil, and to scrub them we use soft wood and rough brushes. We clean angles and sinuosities with curettes and spatulas.
If no emery is available, we can also use pulverized sandstone which is sifted and dampened with olive oil to get rid of the biggest stains, and burnt brick, well crushed and also dampened with olive oil for smaller stains.
Every pieces, after having been cleaned, must be wiped with a rag so that no emery, sandstone or brick is left, only a certain oiliness.
Saber blades must only be put back in the scabbard once they have been coated with a fatty agent.
We prefer oil to grease for this step; olive oil and tallow molten together (the mix will be even better if, instead of tallow, we use pure wax) in the proportion of 244 gr (half a pound) of oil to 978 gr (2 pounds) of tallow.
Here is a process to purify olive oil. We pour liquefied lead into cold olive oil to a proportion of roughly 245 gr (8 ounces) of lead to 979 gr (2 pounds) of oil. This will evaporate the aqueous substances they may contain, and the crude parts or other foreign bodies will attach to the lead, so that by repeating 2 or 3 times this operation you obtain well purified oil that will aggregate much less than other fatty substances of this nature, and which preserves iron much better.
This process necessitates no other precautions than to put the liquor in a steel pot so that it does not break when lead is poured in, and to let it rest after the operation by exposing it to the sun or an artificial source of heat for some days.
The memorandum also mentions that if rust is well inlaid a polishing stone must be used to remove it. It seems like this method was used all throughout the 19th century.
Source: Mémorial de l’officier d’infanterie. By Étienne-Alexandre Baron Bardin, second edition, Paris, 1813, p. 421.
Another French manual, this one from 1754 has a few variations on the care of the sword.
To preserve the polish and shine of the blade, and prevent it from rusting, you must once in a while soak a small rag in oil and scrub the blade with it.
To clean the blade and remove oil for inspections, you must take fire ashes on a small rag with which you must scrub the blade well until all the oil is gone. You then wipe it with another white towel. After the inspection you scrub the blade with the oil covered rag.
If you haven’t cleaned the blade in a long time, the old oil might create yellow stains. you must then take no ashes, sandstone or sand, but only new oil and scrub the blade well until the old oil is removed. you then take a little ash and scrub the blade until it comes back to its original luster.
Source: Institutions militaires pour la cavalerie et les dragons. By M. de la Porterie, Paris, 1754, p. 342.
Update: Apparently the wax and olive oil mixture is still being used today for black powder guns and is called “Bore butter”. It can be conveniently bought in ready made tubes, saving you the trouble of brewing oil and molten lead in the sun for days. Be warned that it creates a greasier surface than modern mineral oil. Thanks to Ted Glenn for the find.
Thanks for spotting this. It would indeed be charcoal. You are right that there is no equivalence to this word in French, we would rather say “charbon de bois” (wood coal) but of course the distinction wasn’t quite relevant in 1754.


Question: Can you provide information on SMP-FT in vSAN stretched clusters?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Can you provide information on SMP-FT in vSAN stretched clusters?

During one of our many discussions at VMworld 2017, I was asked about supporting Fault Tolerance on vSAN Stretched Clusters, more specifically SMP-FT. Now to be clear, we can support SMP-FT on vSAN since version 6.1. The difficulty with supporting SMP-FT on vSAN stretched cluster has always been the possible latency between the data sites, which could be up to as much as 5ms. This is far too high to support SMP-FT on a VM that has data replicating between data sites, and for that reason, we stated categorically that we could not support SMP-FT on VMs deployed on vSAN stretched cluster. However, new enhancements to version 6.6 of vSAN has meant that we can now revisit this support statement.
In vSAN 6.6, a number of new enhancements were made to the vSAN stretched cluster implementation. From a policy perspective, we now have the ability to configure both a PFTT (primary failures to tolerate) across sites and an SFTT (secondary failures to tolerate) within sites. These new policies also allow us to set a PFTT of 0, which means a VM with this policy is not replicated/protected, and resides completely on one site only with no dependency on the other site. Through another policy setting (site affinity), an admin can choose which of the data sites to place the VM on.
This raises an interesting point for SMP-FT. If we use the PFTT=0, which basically instantiate a VM on a single site, any VM with this policy setting will not incur the latency from the cross site link. In other words, all of the objects or components that make up that VM will all reside on the same site. So this would be just like deploying a VM on a standard vSAN cluster rather than a vSAN stretched cluster. After discussing this with our PM and engineering team, we are now in a position to support SMP-FT on VMs with a PFTT=0 policy in vSAN stretched cluster.
Just to be clear, this is supporting SMP-FT on a VM on a vSAN stretched cluster only as long as the VM is “pinned” to a single site using PFTT=0. There is still no support for SMP-FT VMs deployed across a vSAN stretched cluster using a PFTT=1 setting. Of course, you will still need to have your DRS VM-to-Host affinity groups setup to keep the SMP-FT VM compute and memory (for primary and secondary) tied to the same set of hosts within a site. And in our testing, the secondary FT VM’s objects and components also gets the same policy as the primary FT VM, e.g. PFTT=0 and site affinity, so that also ensures that storage is tied to the same site as well.
Caution: It should also be noted that there are no guard-rails in place to stop you changing the policy of the SMP-FT VM to a from a PFTT value = 0 to a PFTT value = 1. However, due to the latency involved when replicating the VM across sites, you may find that SMP-FT will no longer able to protect the VM. It is up to the admin to ensure that the policy of the SMP-FT VM is not changed from PFTT = 0.
We will shortly update the vSAN stretched cluster documentation to reflect this new support statement.
← How many hosts are needed to implement SFTT in vSAN Stretched Cluster?
Thanks for your input Roy.
thanks Cormac. I have an other question? Do traditional stretch storage such as Netapp MetroCluster or IBM SVC Hyperswap support vSMP-FT ?
I’m afraid I don’t know. From KB 2007545, it looks like it is supported on VPLEX, but I guess you would need to ask NetApp or IBM for their respective environments.
Hi Cormac, is the limitation purely on the latency? What if the latency between the data sites is only 1ms when using stretched clusters?
Not supported Johann – latency is certainly one limitation, but there may be others that I am unaware of.


Question: Have you heard about the fraud at IDBI Bank?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Have you heard about the fraud at IDBI Bank?

(Reuters) - IDBI Bank Ltd said on Tuesday fraudulent loans of 7.72 billion rupees ($118.8 million) were issued from five of its branches in Andhra Pradesh and Telangana, sending its shares lower on Wednesday.
The company found major lapses in processing and disbursing the loans by two of its officials. The lender dismissed one of the officials, while the other official had already retired, it said.
The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), has registered cases for two of the five complaints, relating to branches at Basheerbagh and Guntur, the company said.
The bank said earlier on Tuesday it initiated a quality assurance audit, expected to be completed by April.
IDBI shares fell as much as 3.5 percent to 73.6 rupees by 0512 GMT, while the index for public sector lenders Nifty PSU Bank index dropped as much as 1.8 percent.


Question: What do the latest tensions in the Middle East tell us about the situation?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What do the latest tensions in the Middle East tell us about the situation?

With the calm of global capital markets shattered in the past two weeks, the ongoing military conflict in the Middle East has taken an understandable back seat to monetary matters. And yet, tensions involving Syria, Iran and Israel continue to escalate, most notably with this weekend's outright attack by Israel on Syria, allegedly in retaliation for an Iranian drone launch from a Syrian army base, and which led to the first downing of an Israeli F-16 jet in decades.
Yet what has so far prevented the proxy way from spinning out of control, was that Putin - as guarantor of the Syria-Iran axis on one hand, and Netanyahu as his nemesis on the other, had expressed restraint. For now.
While Russia’s Defense Ministry said at the time that pro-government militias involved in the incident had been carrying out reconnaissance "and no Russian servicemen had been in the area", the story changed on Monday when it emerged that at least two Russian men fighting informally with pro-government forces were killed in the incident in Deir al-Zor province, their associates told Reuters.


Question: Describe the findings of a research study investigating the effect of enzymatically modified isoquercitrin (EMIQ) on skeletal muscle hypertrophy in mice.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the findings of a research study investigating the effect of enzymatically modified isoquercitrin (EMIQ) on skeletal muscle hypertrophy in mice.

J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2017 Sep 2;14:32. doi: 10.1186/s12970-017-0190-y. eCollection 2017.
Enzymatically modified isoquercitrin supplementation intensifies plantaris muscle fiber hypertrophy in functionally overloaded mice.
Kohara A1, Machida M2, Setoguchi Y1, Ito R1, Sugitani M1, Maruki-Uchida H1, Inagaki H1, Ito T1, Omi N3, Takemasa T3.
Healthcare division, Morinaga & Co., Ltd., Yokohama, Kanagawa 230-8504 Japan.
Organization of General Education, Saga University, Saga, Japan.
Health and Sport Sciences, Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Enzymatically modified isoquercitrin (EMIQ) is produced from rutin using enzymatic hydrolysis followed by treatment with glycosyltransferase in the presence of dextrin to add glucose residues. EMIQ is absorbed in the same way as quercetin, a powerful antioxidant reported to prevent disused muscle atrophy by targeting mitochondria and to have ergogenic effects. The present study investigated the effect of EMIQ on skeletal muscle hypertrophy induced by functional overload.
In Study 1, 6-week-old ICR male mice were divided into 4 groups: sham-operated control, sham-operated EMIQ, overload-operated control, and overload-operated EMIQ groups. In Study 2, mice were divided into 3 groups: overload-operated whey control, overload-operated whey/EMIQ (low dose), and overload-operated whey/EMIQ (high dose) groups. The functional overload of the plantaris muscle was induced by ablation of the synergist (gastrocnemius and soleus) muscles. EMIQ and whey protein were administered with food. Three weeks after the operation, the cross-sectional area and minimal fiber diameter of the plantaris muscle fibers were measured.
In Study 1, functional overload increased the cross-sectional area and minimal fiber diameter of the plantaris muscle. EMIQ supplementation significantly increased the cross-sectional area and minimal fiber diameter of the plantaris muscle in both the sham-operated and overload-operated groups. In Study 2, EMIQ supplementation combined with whey protein administration significantly increased the cross-sectional area and minimal fiber diameter of the plantaris muscle.
EMIQ, even when administered as an addition to whey protein supplementation, significantly intensified the fiber hypertrophy of the plantaris muscle in functionally overloaded mice. EMIQ supplementation also induced fiber hypertrophy of the plantaris in sham-operated mice.
J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2017;14:32.


Question: What is the background of Ken Blackwell? Respond in 74 words.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What is the background of Ken Blackwell? Respond in 74 words.

Blackwell served as a conduit between the Trump administration and Religious Right activists when he joined the president’s transition team, where he focused on domestic policy.
He has also defended Attorney General Jeff Sessions from accusations of racial bias, arguing that Sessions is the real victim of bias because he is a white Southerner. Like Sessions, Blackwell also has a history of undermining voting rights.
Blackwell unsuccessfully ran for governor of Ohio in 2006.


Question: Have you heard of self-healing roads?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Have you heard of self-healing roads?

Roads of tomorrow will rejuvenate themselves.
Christopher Schlangen, a PhD student at Deflt University, has shown that if asphalt that contains these steel fibers is heated using an induction machine, the bitumin melts and therefore cracks and potholes rejoin. This could double their lifespan. Although he uses a microwave rather than an induction machine in the TED Talk below, its enough to show you the premise.
The potential to heal roads has a multitude of positive consequences. Firstly, there are the economic impacts: Schlangen estimates that the Dutch government could save 9 million by implementing his roads, despite the 25% more money they require to install.
In addition to this, self-healing roads would mean fewer loose stones to flick up and chip windscreens, fewer potholes to damage axles or wheels, and fewer roads being closed for repair.
These discoveries are similar to recent developments made in self-healing concrete by Cardiff University. Their project involves using bacteria to create self-healing concrete, according to the same principles as bone remineralization.