Question: Explain why some are concerned with geoengineering experiments.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Explain why some are concerned with geoengineering experiments.

Sometime in 2018, Harvard engineers David Keith and Frank Keutsch hope to test spraying from a high-altitude balloon over Arizona, in order to assess the risks and benefits of deployment on a larger scale.
Keith cancelled a similar planned experiment in New Mexico in 2012, but announced he was ready for field testing at a geoengineering forum in Washington on Friday.
“The context for discussing solar geoengineering research has changed substantially since we planned and funded this forum nearly one year ago,” a forum briefing paper noted.
While geoengineering received little favour under Obama, high-level officials within the Trump administration have been long-time advocates for planetary-scale manipulation of Earth systems.
David Schnare, an architect of Trump’s Environmental Protection Agency transition, has lobbied the US government and testified to Senate in favour of federal support for geoengineering.
He has called for a multi-phase plan to fund research and conduct real-world testing within 18 months, deploy massive stratospheric spraying three years after, and continue spraying for a century, a duration geoengineers believe would be necessary to dial back the planet’s temperature.
Geoengineers argue that such methods would be an inexpensive way to reduce global warming, but scientists have warned it could have catastrophic consequences for the Earth’s weather systems.
Scientific modelling has shown that stratospheric spraying could drastically curtail rainfall throughout Asia, Africa and South America, causing severe droughts and threatening food supply for billions of people.
A White House report on climate change research submitted to Congress in January called for the first time ever for research into geoengineering.
Within Republican ranks, former House speaker and Trump confidant Newt Gingrich was one of the first to start publicly advocating for geoengineering.
US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson has also appeared to support geoengineering, describing climate change as an “engineering problem.” ExxonMobil’s funding of the climate denial industry is under investigation by attorney generals in the United States, but it’s less well known that ExxonMobil scientists under Tillerson’s reign as CEO were leading developers of geo-engineering technologies like carbon dioxide removal.
Critics like Riberio point out that those who don’t believe in human-induced climate change may still support geoengineering, which can be presented as a method to deal with the consequences of a warming planet without stopping the burning of fossil fuels.
The Harvard experiment may fly in the face of a moratorium on geoengineering adopted in 2010 by the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity, which was reaffirmed in December in Mexico. The United States is one of the few countries to not ratify the UN convention, creating a potential loophole for experiments.
The experiment’s site in Tucson, Arizona may also invoke issues of jurisdictional controversy with Mexico – stratospheric winds can blow up to 200 miles per hour, and the border is only 75 miles away.
Other geoengineering experiments like cloud whitening may go ahead in the United States, as well as experiments supported by the governments of China and Russia, though both are signatories to the UN moratorium.


Question: What are the implications of the U.S.-China trade dispute for Iowa farmers?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What are the implications of the U.S.-China trade dispute for Iowa farmers?

The escalating U.S.-China trade dispute erupted Friday; Trump has said the back-and-forth stems from "China's theft of intellectual property and technology."
Perhaps Iowa farmers' biggest fear is becoming a harsh reality: The escalating U.S.-China trade dispute erupted Friday, with each country vowing to levy 25 percent tariffs on $50 billion in goods.
U.S. and Iowa agriculture is caught in the crossfire, with farmers selling $14 billion in soybeans to China last year, its top export market.
Soybeans are among hundreds of U.S. products China has singled out for tariffs. The U.S. has an equally long list that includes taxing X-ray machines and other Chinese goods.
Iowa farmers could lose up to $624 million, depending on how long the tariffs are in place and the speed producers can find new markets for their soybeans, said Chad Hart, an Iowa State University economist.
U.S. soybean prices have fallen about 12 percent since March, when the U.S.-China trade dispute began.
"Any tariff or tax put in place will have a significant impact, not only to the U.S. soybean market but to Iowa's, because we're such a large producer," Hart said Friday.
Iowa is the nation's second-largest soybean grower, producing 562 million bushels last year worth $5.2 billion.
"It will slow down the market. Even with the tariffs in place, we will ship a lot of soybeans to China," Hart said. "It just won't be nearly the amount we did before.
"It's likely to still be our largest market even with these tariffs in place."
On Friday, President Donald Trump said the U.S. will place 25 percent tariffs on $50 billion of Chinese goods. China quickly vowed to match Trump's action.
The U.S. tariffs are a response to "China’s theft of intellectual property and technology," Trump said in a statement.
Trump also is looking for tariffs on another $100 billion of Chinese products. And U.S. tariffs on steel and aluminum imports have sparked retaliatory tariffs.
Those moves could cost Iowa pork producers $360 million over the year, an ISU economist estimates, less than initially calculated, thanks to some pork price recovery.
Mexico is weighing tariffs on $4 billion of U.S. corn and soybeans, Reuters reported Friday, while the European Union and Canada are considering tariffs on a range of U.S. products.
Escalating trade disputes come as farm income has tumbled with falling commodity prices: U.S. farm income has been cut in half over the past five years, while Iowa farmers' income shrank nearly 75 percent.
"This is not the news farmers wanted to see, especially with the struggles we've had … over the past four or five years," Hart said.
Grant Kimberley, director of market development at the Iowa Soybean Association, said farmers are holding out hope that trade disputes are resolved before the July deadline — or are short-lived if they go into place.
Like others, Kimberley, who farms with his family in Polk County, believes China is as reluctant as the U.S. to lose soybean trade.
China, with a population of more than 1.4 billion, imports 62 percent of the world's soybean production. About 40 percent of China’s soybean imports come from the U.S.
Tariffs could slash U.S. soybean exports to China by about 65 percent, as other countries' soybeans become a better buy, a Purdue University study said.
It shows losses for U.S. farmers could range from $1.7 billion to $3.3 billion with tariffs up to 30 percent.
"You can't make business decisions with this kind of uncertainty. … it will be difficult not just for farmers, but ag lenders, equipment manufacturers, seed companies," Kimberley said. "It impacts everybody."
Secretary Sonny Perdue said Friday the U.S. Department of Agriculture is assessing the tariffs' impact on farmers, given "the president’s promise not to make farmers bear the brunt of these trade disruptions."
Perdue said the Commodity Credit Corp., USDA agency that has broad authority to support farm prices and incomes, is among "the tools available" but provided no details.
"It’s way too early" to determine the financial hit, said Perdue, who met Friday with Minister Lawrence MacAulay, Canada's agriculture minister on Prince Edward Island.
"We’ll look and see what the market damage is from the trade disruptions. And then we’ll make a calculation and a determination in conjunction with the White House and Congress," said the former Georgia governor.
Hart said reduced China demand and lower prices for soybeans will help drive increased demand from other global markets.
"The product that used to go to China will go to Europe, will go to North Africa, as we find those other markets," he said.
But, Kimberley said, "nothing can replace China."
And U.S. farm competitors will swoop in to capture as much of the Chinese soybean market as possible.
"It will be South America — Brazil and Argentina — and parts of western Europe — Russia and the Ukraine — that win," Kimberley said.
"U.S. or China won't win," he said. "And the U.S. and Canada and Mexico won't win if those tariffs go in place long-term."
March 12, 2019, 1:15 p.m.


Question: How do you feel about the Washington Wizards and John Wall?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 How do you feel about the Washington Wizards and John Wall?

John Wall is simply on the wrong team. Nene is always out and Bradley Beal is desperately needed. I had high hopes for this team, but they simply play too wishy-washy for me.
Very well said Johnny bravo, no pun intended it, your saying all of the right things.
As far as the contract best case scenario Wizards make a move to bring another piece in the upcoming Offseson madness. Ultimately giving a Wall enough talent to lead the team to a playoff team year in and year out.
Worst case scenario we get Hibachi’d again like the Gilbert Arenas deal. Enough said for that.
Wall I actually view as one of the better PG in the league. Glad he’s on my team only thing his lack of jump shot worries me but he more than males up for it in other aspects of the game. My Zards going to the promise land. Ok not really all that just going to the playoffs.
I wouldn’t say their record is terrible, they could easily make the East playoffs. They’re a battling team though.
walls come a long way i hope things work out for him.


Question: Describe the significance of the American College of Sports Medicine's American Fitness Index ranking of Indianapolis.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the significance of the American College of Sports Medicine's American Fitness Index ranking of Indianapolis.

However unhealthy you think we are in Indianapolis, a new American Fitness Index says it's worse. Munch, much worse.
Between bites of my morning McGriddle and sips of my Red Bull, I was made aware of a new study that pointed out that Indianapolis comes in 99 out of 100 when ranking the nation's fittest cities.
So let me begin by apologizing for pulling down that average. Now pass me a glazed donut as I kick off "second breakfast" here at my desk.
If my lack of shock and outrage alarms you, it's only because the Circle City has occupied this bottom rung position every time the American College of Sports Medicine releases its annual American Fitness Index.
The American College of Sports Medicine is not an outsider throwing stones at Hoosiers. ACSM's offices are in Downtown Indianapolis.
From 2014 to 2017, back when the list only included 50 cities, Indy's last four rankings were 46, 50, 50 and 48.
This is the first year that the list has grown to include 100 locales. But instead of giving us a new crop of cities it outperform, it just shoved us further down into the depths of fried tenderloin batter and high calorie craft beer.
Arlington, Va. took the top spot, powered by the lowest smoking rate in the country, a wealth of farmers markets and a system of well-established parks.
The only city we beat was Oklahoma City, Okla. This is the first time a second Indiana city is represented on the list with Fort Wayne coming in at 84.
The ACSM explains that the rankings are based off cities’ overall scores, which include data on fitness, nutrition, chronic disease, smoking, mental health, access to parks and public transportation.
With those factors, it shows that where a city ends up on this list doesn't fall solely on the shoulders of the population's eating, smoking or exercise habits. For example, Indianapolis got dinged for once again only having 0.5 dog parks per 100,000 people.
We also took a hit for having a park expenditure of $56 per resident, well below the national average of $102. For comparison's sake, St. Louis was the top ranked city in that category with an expenditure of $590 per person.
And we still don't get credit for the 18.6-mile Monon Trail, or the 8-mile Cultural Trail.
One takeaway is that all of us could spend more time in the gym. While some cities passed national averages for fitness, the report shows that most Americans don't meet the Centers for Disease Control recommendations of 150 minutes of moderate activity each week and twice-weekly strength training.
And while more than 75 percent of Americans reported being physically active within the last month, only about half of American adults meet aerobic activity guidelines. And less than a quarter meet both aerobic and strength guidelines.
“Encouraging exercise such as community walking programs and bicycling programs can help communities stem the rising tide of obesity,” Barbara Ainsworth, chair of ACSM and professor at Arizona State University, said in a statement.
Food choices is also a problem area for all Americans. The CDC recommends that adults eat about 2 cups of fruit and 3 cups of vegetables daily, but the fitness index report found that just 30 percent of adults eat enough fruit, and a 18 percent eat enough vegetables.
But in defense of all Indianapolis residents, some of our local grub is too good to think about portion control. In fact, if this ranking gets you down, ease the pain by reading all the times Indy has been named one of the hottest food cities.


Question: What is Deportivo Guaymallén? Respond in 52 words.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What is Deportivo Guaymallén? Respond in 52 words.

Deportivo Guaymallén is an Argentine sports club, which home town is located in Rodeo de La Cruz, Mendoza Province. Although many sports are practised in the club, Guaymallén is mostly known for its football team, which currently plays in the Torneo Argentino B, the regionalised 4th division of Argentine football league system.


Question: Can you tell me about Mar Ignatius Peter VII Jarweh?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Can you tell me about Mar Ignatius Peter VII Jarweh?

Mar Ignatius Peter VII Jarweh (or "Butrus Javré", "Jaroueh", "Garweh", "Djarweh", "Giarvé", 1777–1851) was Patriarch of the Syriac Catholic Church from 1820 to 1851.


Question: Sign a petition to ban Musical.ly

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Sign a petition to ban Musical.ly

Why should we ban "Musical.ly" ?
Musical.ly has been proven to cause Cancer, Autism, Depression and Aids (Less common). Autism is the most common, and 1/3 Musical.ly users become autistic. 30% of Musically users were diagnosed with Pancreatic cancer in 2016. We are putting the health of our youth at risk. Sign this petition today to help the cause.
Aside from becoming depressed, many Musical.ly users are bullied at school. Many commit suicide, due to the depression and constant harassment. Most female Musical.ly users become brats, and the majority of male Musical.ly users become gay. This is also increasing the amount of teens put up for adoption by 500%. To stop this from happening, sign today.
Breezy Official needs your help with “Musical.ly inc: Ban Musical.ly”. Join Breezy and 718 supporters today.


Question: Describe the findings of the study that show a disproportionate rate of crime among migrants compared to native populations.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the findings of the study that show a disproportionate rate of crime among migrants compared to native populations.

According to Synøve Andersen, researcher at Statistics Norway, “People with backgrounds from Africa, parts of Asia and Latin America are most drastically overrepresented” in crime cases.
Andersen commented on a study that shows that migrants are more frequently suspect of a crime. The results of the study also show that the number of crimes differ sharply by migrant group. Crime rates among refugees were the highest and were lower for labour migrants.
A proportion of 4.5% of people without a migrant background are suspected of crimes. For migrants this number is 6.7% and for children of migrants this is even 11.3%.
For criminal cases on violence and abuse the differences were even bigger. While only 6.3 per mille of the native population were suspects, 11.2 per mille of migrants were and 22.9 of their children.


Question: Respond in 44 sentences. Describe the reaction of Mike Aresco and other officials to the College Football Playoff selection committee rankings.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Respond in 44 sentences. Describe the reaction of Mike Aresco and other officials to the College Football Playoff selection committee rankings.

American Athletic Conference commissioner Mike Aresco said Wednesday that No. 15 UCF "isn't getting a fair shake" from the College Football Playoff selection committee because it is ranked behind three-loss No. 14 Mississippi State this week, and he's also "very, very upset" that USF isn't ranked at all, he told ESPN.com.
"I just don't think our league is garnering the respect it deserves, period," he said. "I feel strongly about it. The evidence is in."
Aresco, one of the 10 FBS commissioners who compose the College Football Playoff's management committee along with Notre Dame athletic director Jack Swarbrick, pointed to Houston's wins over Oklahoma and Louisville last year, as well as the Memphis wins over Ole Miss (2015) and UCLA this year and a 30-6 regular-season record against other Group of 5 opponents over the past three seasons, as examples.
"Those kinds of performances have to count for something," he said. "We've tried to prove for five years how good our conference is. What do we have to do is my question, to prove that we're a really good league, especially at the top? I just don't like the notion that, well, strength of schedule, I don't like to see UCF behind three- and two-loss teams, and I think they can play with anyone. I just don't know what more we can do."
Aresco said UCF should be "somewhere in the top 10, I'm not sure where," and he questioned any two-loss teams ahead of the school that have convincing losses, such as Ohio State. Selection committee chairman Kirby Hocutt has said repeatedly that UCF's strength of schedule is holding it back, and he reiterated that in his weekly Tuesday teleconference.
"We have gone through in great detail the schedule that Central Florida has played," Hocutt said. "In comparing it this week, we put it side-by-side with the schedule that Mississippi State has played, because Mississippi State holding that No. 14 position, and I just mentioned on the previous question, the three losses that Mississippi State has are to Alabama, Georgia and Auburn, teams 1, 6 and 7 this week. In the selection committee's conversations, we're not sure any team in the country would be undefeated if they had to play teams No. 1, 6 and 7 in this week's ranking."
Aresco said the conference commissioners aren't allowed to talk to the 13 committee members during the season outside of their periodic calls with the two people who are assigned to monitor their conference, and those calls aren't supposed to be lobbying opportunities. Instead, they're for the committee members to gather as much relevant information as possible. Robert Morris University president Chris Howard, who played at Air Force, and former coach Tyrone Willingham are the AAC's point people this fall.
"We gave them a lot of information and they were great and they asked us to send it to them," Aresco said. "We put our best foot forward; we talk about what our league's been doing."
South Florida is No. 22 in the Associated Press poll this week and No. 19 in the coaches' poll, but the committee members typically aren't influenced by those. Hocutt has said in the past he doesn't even look at them.
"What is USF supposed to do?" Aresco said. "Their schedule is their schedule and they've dominated it. ... The fact that they're not ranked really, really troubles me because they are ranked in all the other polls. It really troubles me. They are a very good team. You've got Charlie strong coaching them. They lost one game to a good Houston team with 11 seconds left in heartbreaking fashion. What are you going to do?"
Aresco said he plans to raise these issues again at the CFP's annual spring meetings. Until then, he said he plans to continue to make his case through the media. The AAC will have the national spotlight -- and the committee's full attention -- on Friday night when UCF and USF play to determine the AAC's East Division winner.
"Central Florida is having a fine season and certainly has the committee's respect," CFP executive director Bill Hancock said. "The committee evaluates each team fully and deliberately each week. Two weekends of great football remain, and the committee will continue to closely observe each team's performances."


Question: Provide a brief biography of Jesse Boykins III. Respond in 18 words.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Provide a brief biography of Jesse Boykins III. Respond in 18 words.

Jesse Boykins III (born February 20, 1985) is a Jamaican-American singer, songwriter, and record producer from Chicago, Illinois.


Question: Describe the establishment of Nile Crocodiles in Florida. Respond in 10 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the establishment of Nile Crocodiles in Florida. Respond in 10 sentences.

Florida is often considered the US 'poster child' for invasive species. From Burmese pythons to Australian melaleuca trees to Asian lionfish, the State's ecosystems are constantly threatened by something new becoming established there. Now research from the University of Florida and Everglades National Park have determined that Nile crocodiles (Crocodylus niloticus) have become the latest species to arrive from elsewhere.
According their article in Herpetological Conservation and Biology, Florida has more introduced amphibians that any other region on Earth. The Florida researchers used DNA typing to determine species identification and native range. The analyses showed that two of the crocodiles they collected were most closely related to Nile crocdiles thus representing the first documented successful establishment of the animals into Florida.
Over the last decade, crocodiles have been imported into Florida for zoological displays and the pet trade. It's hard to imagine keeping a Nile crocodile as a pet but that is the most likely route of release for the individuals identified in the Everglades. The individuals observed by the field researchers likely represent only a small number of extant individuals as crocodiles reproduce well in marshy environments like the Everglades.
A video shows that crocs have a nasty disposition so fishing or swimming in their new territory would be ill-advised.


Question: Describe the results of a clinical trial on the efficacy of cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) for reducing persecutory delusions in psychiatric patients.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the results of a clinical trial on the efficacy of cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) for reducing persecutory delusions in psychiatric patients.

Just six sessions of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) can substantially reduce psychiatric patients' levels of worrying, reducing the severity of delusions of persecution.
These findings from a new clinical trial suggest that CBT could potentially help to prevent mental illnesses before they happen in at-risk people.
The study, published in the journal The Lancet Psychiatry, was funded by the UK’s Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation (EME) Programme, an MRC and NIHR partnership. It was carried out by researchers at the Universities of Oxford, Southampton, and Manchester.
Persecutory delusions are unrealistic beliefs that others are intentionally trying to harm the person.
This severe paranoia is a key problem in many mental health conditions, such as schizophrenia.
The 150 NHS patients in the trial had been diagnosed with schizophrenia or a related mental health problem. They all had severe paranoia, which had persisted despite medication.
Six sessions of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) focused upon reducing worry reduced the severity of persecutory delusions, the researchers found.
The patients were much happier and less fearful of other people after therapy. These effects lasted at least six months.
A study participant commented, 'The breakthrough was that I was able to, with the help of my psychologist, come up with a strategy – that is, when worry is gripping me I would say 'Excuse me worry, I need to interrupt you because…'. I sometime worry about people trying to harm me but now I can interrupt my worry and do something else'.
The researchers are now combining the worry reduction intervention with the targeting of factors such as sleep deprivation and low self-esteem. They aim to come up with an intervention that helps many patients recover from persistent persecutory delusions.
A report of the research, entitled 'Effects of cognitive behaviour therapy for worry on persecutory delusions in patients with psychosis (WIT): a parallel, single-blind, randomised controlled trial with a mediation analysis', is published in The Lancet Psychiatry.


Question: Explain why Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is committed to getting the Trans Mountain pipeline built, even though it could cost him politically.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Explain why Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is committed to getting the Trans Mountain pipeline built, even though it could cost him politically.

Trudeau more concerned about doing the right thing around Trans Mountain pipeline than holding seats in B.C.
If the cost of getting the controversial Trans Mountain pipeline built costs the Liberals support in the upcoming election, so be it.
In an interview with Global National’s Dawna Friesen on Tuesday, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said while he no longer views federal legislation as a compelling means of pushing forward progress on the pipeline, he remains determined to get the project built and is not balking at the possibility that protests expected to continue in earnest against the project could carry a political cost to the party in 2019.
“When one is serving one’s country and when you’re trying to do the right thing for future generations, building a protected environment and growing a strong economy at the same time is something that’s more important than winning a few extra seats here or there,” he said.
The pipeline itself, however, will not have oil running through it until some time after Liberal fortunes are tested in the upcoming campaign.
Last week, the federal government announced it will help Kinder Morgan try to find a buyer for the proposed expansion of the existing pipeline.
The Texas oil company is backing out of plans to triple the capacity of the system after years of political uncertainty.
If a buyer cannot be found roughly by July 22, the government will buy the pipeline from Kinder Morgan for $4.5 billion.
WATCH BELOW: Will the pipeline struggle hurt Trudeau’s popularity?
That cost includes the existing pipeline resources, the terminal in Burnaby, B.C., as well as Kinder Morgan Canada staff assigned to the project.
The $4.5-billion price tag does not include the billions it will likely cost to actually build the expansion and increase the flow of oil through the pipeline.
Kinder Morgan had pegged the cost of the expansion project at $7.4 billion last year.
Trudeau told Global News that the timeline for construction of the pipeline has not changed from the projections put out by Kinder Morgan.
When it comes to how far he is willing to go to deal with opponents to the project, he said the government is working to try to allay concerns but that he will not be swayed by whoever shouts the loudest.
“It’s really important for me and for Canadians that people who disagree with policies or issues be able to protest, be able to voice their opinions but it’s also important that they do so safely and in a way to respect the law,” he said when asked about how he plans to deal with protesters once construction begins.
The project is facing multiple court challenges from environmental interest groups, First Nations along the proposed route as well as the B.C. government.
B.C Premier John Horgan has vowed to continue doing everything in his power to stop the pipeline from proceeding.
Trudeau did not say whether he thinks he will be able to get Horgan onside with the project but said he expects the challenges before the courts will echo the government’s argument that proceeding with the pipeline falls within federal jurisdiction.


Question: "It seems like conservatives think that prayer is the answer to mass shootings."

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 "It seems like conservatives think that prayer is the answer to mass shootings."

Who wants to talk about it when so many mass shootings occur that the hip-shooter response from both sides is just exasperated cultural resentment?
Once again, conservative gun zealots shield themselves with their pavlovian worship of the right to potentially rise up in armed-rebellion against the government, and then refuse to believe that individual mass shootings are indicative of a larger societal failing. They announce immediately they will pray for the city just attacked with the carnage of a war zone—a military-grade machine gun is typically the mass shooting weapon of choice—and then announce that liberals are disrespectful to the victims and survivors by suggesting that these mass shootings could be stopped with sensible gun legislation.
But the problem is not that Conservatives haven’t picked a solution—they have. They picked prayer. They always say they will pray for America.
Buuuut they very evidently aren’t praying hard enough are they? I don’t believe they have committed themselves to praying long enough or hard enough to convince God to actually stop allowing these mass murders to happen. Conservatives are really letting America down.
And why would God alter his Grand Plan® just because conservatives asked him a lot? That doesn’t show any personal responsibility or moral growth on their part does it? It’s very obvious that God is only allowing mass shootings to happen because conservatives blatantly obstruct the sensible gun laws that our safe-from-domestic-mass-shootings European friends all swear by. God could not make it any more obvious for us what he wants us to do.
So, every mass murder that happens while the conservative movement neglects to responsibly legislate shall henceforth reflect on conservatives’ prayer abilities. I suspect that no conservative actually spends all day and night praying for the end of mass shootings. They no doubt waste a lot of free time they could spend praying watching TV and stuck in social media. Perhaps, conservatives merely throw in the mass shooting bit once in a short, minute-long casual prayer as they fall asleep.
Whatever conservatives’ routines in mass shooting-related prayers are, they’re conspicuously not enough. They should probably begin praying night and day. They should no doubt quit their social activities to pray more. Every second their prayers fail to bring about the end of this mass shooting era we find ourselves in is a second longer that God is enabled to murder more innocent people based on conservatism’s gun-political malpractice.
I’m sorry, I stopped reading this garbage at “—a military-grade machine gun is typically the mass shooting weapon of choice—”. Name one instance where this is true?
How do you define the AR-15 then?
AR-15 doesn’t mean assault rifle it stands for ARMALITE. It’s defined as a semi-auto rifle, a civilian variant of a military weapon but is not “—a military-grade machine gun—”.
The Vegas shooter used bump stocks to convert semi-automatic assault rifles to fire nearly as quickly as a full auto. A machine gun is fully automatic.
I can fire almost as fast with jist my finger.
And here come the semantics arguments that get us nowhere.The right jokes that the media doesn’t understand guns, so their entire opinion should be invalid. While the right may understand gun terminology, they don’t understand irony. Maybe the media should just using the term “weapons of mass destruction”?
Oh my god, the semantics. Where would you see an AR-15 typically bud? Definitely not for your casual Sunday deer hunt.
You’re absolutely right, you wouldn’t see one for a deer hunt, because the caliber is barely large enough for legally hunting deer, so most folks shoot a larger caliber. You know where you would see one of these guns on a regular basis? Shooting coyotes, raccoons, prairie dogs, or just shooting targets on a casual Sunday. How many times does a 9mm handgun kill someone in a city? A heck of a lot more than an Armalite – 15, and you know what? Those 9mm pistols are semi-automatic too!
Thank you DC Mather for bringing specificity to the conversation. It’s the only to create gun legislation which will actually work.
I’m as staunch an atheist as Christopher Hitchens, and as conservative of the second amendment as it gets. Like the person above said. A military grade machine gun is a fully automatic weapon and civilians are already not allowed to own modern machine guns manufactured after 1986. The guns being used are modern sporting rifles. They are semi-automatic just like pretty much every other modern firearm manufactured today.
If your argument is based on the semantics of the words used to describe the gun rather than the horror of 26 people being shot to death in a church, along with the impact on the families of the dead, you’re a lot closed to being part of the problem than the solution.
The answer almost certainly lies in hyperbolic descriptions of weapons that aren’t really accurate, with a nice shield of sarcasm and finger pointing to hide your ignorance. This article will only ever be poorly composed, poorly conceived, and biased. Mass generalizations about ‘conservatives’ don’t solve any problems. I’m not conservative, I don’t pray, I think bump stocks should be illegal, and you aren’t getting my guns either.
Is this the halfway post because you only give serious topics half the attention and effort they deserve?
I thought this was satire, honestly.. am I wrong?
It isn’t even CLOSE to my argument for allowing lawful civilians to own guns to protect their life and liberty. It was just myself merely stating facts and showing the ignorance of the person who wrote the article and his generalizations. Do you think it is a good idea to base arguments or laws that affect many different types of people on generalizations and ignorance? If that is the case you’re MUCH closer to being part of the problem than the solution.
Can we please return to the topic at hand, which is the power of prayer and how it’s the solution most often sought? Let’s discussion how effective that is.
Your Crane prayer style is no match against my Dragon prayer style!


Question: What kind of mission was Voyager?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What kind of mission was Voyager?

When you think of legendary voyages of discovery you probably think of Columbus and Magellan, or Neil Armstrong walking on the moon. But what may be the greatest journey of exploration mankind has ever undertaken is happening right now. It began in 1977 when NASA launched two spacecraft named Voyager 1 & 2. The mission was only supposed to last four years, but now, 40 years later, against all odds, the two little spacecraft are still out there, traveling beyond the most distant planets in our solar system, reporting back on what they find. They're the outer-space equivalents of the Little Engine that Could. Nothing man-made has ever traveled so long and so far, and wherever they go, they carry with them a message from earth for any other lifeforms that may find them.
Ed Stone is the chief project scientist for Voyager. He's 81 now, but he was 36 when he first took the job at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in California where the Voyagers were built. Each part was carefully designed and tested. But with the launch date fast-approaching, project manager John Casani and his team learned that the conditions near Jupiter might be much harsher than they expected. They needed extra protection for Voyagers' cables -- they needed a quick fix. Casani says they used aluminum foil.


Question: What do you think about dreaming?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What do you think about dreaming?

For most of human history, dreaming has been seen as a second “reality” in which altered forms of perception provide insights into ourselves and others, our fears, fantasies and motivations or even the future.
What Freud referred to as the “royal road to the unconscious” served as a source of wonderment and prophecy. So what do we think about it now?
What is dreaming? What does science say? And what mysteries remain?
In the developed world, the cultural importance of dreaming has diminished significantly over the last 100 years. In part, this reflects the increasing dominance of science in the way we understand human experience.
With the rise of neuroscience and empirical psychologies, the dream has become increasingly irrelevant to our current understanding of brain function.
Ironically, the initial shift to a modernist interpretation of dreams started with Freud, their modern champion.
Animist cultures such as in Shintoism and Native American spirituality often used dreams to partition the mundane aspects of our lives from the spiritual.
The dream was a vehicle on which they could access the animal “spirits” often associated with the totemic affiliations and custodianship required by tribe or family group.
In theist cultures, which believe in one or more gods, the dream was more likely to be viewed as a form of divination and a medium through which god(s) could, albeit symbolically, communicate their knowledge of culture, purpose or the future.
With the decline of psychoanalysis as a cultural trope, the dream was increasingly subject to the harsh light of science.
In the late 1950s, doctors Aserinsky and Dement first identified the characteristic rapid eye movements (REM) and brain waves that enabled us to tell when an individual was dreaming.
For the next 20 years there was an incredible flourishing of dreaming research.
Medical and psychological researchers were able to wake people while dreaming (or not) and ask them about the thoughts, feelings and ideas associated with the dream state.
Such studies confirmed many long-held beliefs about dreaming. Dreams were very similar to waking, at least in terms of the brain waves recorded on electroencephalogram (EEG) machines, which measure and record the electrical activity from different parts of the brain.
And yet dreaming consciousness was very different to waking. It was more visual; and ideation (the creation of ideas) was more bizarre and often illogically connected.
Dreaming consciousness often mixed mundane aspects of our previous waking life with strange and symbolic mental activity.
People woken from dreaming reported feelings and emotions that were quite different to those reported when in deep sleep.
People who were in deep sleep used fewer words, were less coherent in their speech patterns and were less “conscious” than those who were awakened from dreaming sleep.
From the late 70s until the early 2000s, dream research shrivelled to a small field populated by practitioners. It was regarded by many as a quaint anachronism marking the transition between psychoanalytic and neuroscientific conceptions of mind.
But in recent years the role of dreams in cognition has been reinvigorated by the discovery that the two basic modes of sleep - dream (REM) sleep and Slow Wave Sleep (SWS) – play quite different roles in how we recover from the trials and tribulations of wakefulness.
In simplistic terms, SWS regulates physical recovery and REM mental recovery.
Starting with rodent studies, depriving animals of REM sleep was associated with impaired learning. The way in which memories are laid down and learning consolidated is profoundly linked to brain activity during dreaming sleep.
More recently, the same phenomena have been observed in human studies – and these have spawned a whole new field of REM sleep research linking the quality and quantity of dream sleep to memory and learning.
Ironically, the story may yet come full circle. While the first generation of “scientific” dream research did not find a simple link between the reported content of the dream and psychological health, the next generation of dream research may well uncover a link, however subtle.
Many of the drugs we use to treat depression have profound effects on REM or dreaming sleep. We know the ways in which depressed patients learn and recall memories is very different to people who are not depressed.
Depressed people are more likely to recall negative events, experiences and emotions, and more likely to forget positive ones. We know that people who do not get enough sleep, especially REM sleep, do not learn as effectively.
The next 20 years promise a very new and exciting period for research into REM sleep.
But if we stand aside from the immediacy of the new technologies of sleep and the “science” of recent dream research we can see some broader patterns repeating in the human history of dreaming.
We are still looking at dreams as a different state of consciousness that merges aspects of sleep and wakefulness. We still see dreams as an aspect of mind and brain that can influence how we see and interpret the world.
We now have sufficient knowledge of genetics to see that our brains carry the seeds of the past and that the ways our brains operate do reflect the collective unconscious – an idea posited by Freud’s famous student, Carl Jung.
We still see dreams as a source of inspiration and a canvas upon which we can create new and different possibilities, new futures.
One can only wonder on how we might understand and use our dreams in another thousand years.


Question: How long does it take to manufacture Dune Case?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 How long does it take to manufacture Dune Case?

We spent a year working with end-users and designers working through ideas and prototypes. Now, Dune Case is ready to be tooled and manufactured with anticipated delivery 120 days from funding.
Our production team includes a professional designer and quality manufacturing partner capable of delivering unit volumes and meeting global fulfillment requirements.


Question: Name a song released by David Guetta featuring Anne-Marie. Respond in 1 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Name a song released by David Guetta featuring Anne-Marie. Respond in 1 sentences.

"Don't Leave Me Alone" is a 2018 song by David Guetta featuring Anne-Marie.


Question: Describe the role of the 53rd Weather Reconnaissance Squadron in the 2018 hurricane season.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the role of the 53rd Weather Reconnaissance Squadron in the 2018 hurricane season.

The Air Force Reserve's 53rd Weather Reconnaissance Squadron based here is flying missions over the Atlantic Ocean this week to monitor Hurricane Florence.
The 53rd WRS is the only Defense Department unit that flies reconnaissance missions into severe tropical weather during the hurricane season, June 1 through Nov. 30, to gather data for the National Hurricane Center to improve the center's forecasts and storm warnings.
The Hurricane Hunters' first mission into Florence was Monday evening. The Hurricane Hunters departed here Sept. 9 to operate out of Savannah/Hilton Head International Airport, Georgia, for Florence reconnaissance. Florence became a hurricane Sept. 9 and will impact the Carolinas and Virginia late Thursday and into Friday, according to the NHC.
The Hurricane Hunters have completed two missions into Florence, now a Category 4 storm -- including one today -- with three more missions already tasked and two more possible, said Air Force Lt. Col. Thomas Moffatt, a navigator for the 53rd WRS.
Oceans are data-sparse environments, due to the lack of radar and weather balloons over those areas. And satellite data can be incomplete, so the data the Hurricane Hunters provide is vital, potentially saving lives and property, said Air Force Maj. Jeremy DeHart, 53rd WRS aerial reconnaissance weather officer.
During a hurricane, crews fly through the storms at 5,000 to 10,000 feet above sea level, flying through the eye of a storm four to six times to locate the low-pressure center and circulation. During each pass through the center, they release a dropsonde, an expendable weather reconnaissance device that collects weather data such as surface winds and pressure on its descent to the ocean surface.
Each crew has a loadmaster that drops an average of 8 to 12 dropsondes while in flight, depending on how many times the mission flies through the center of the storm, said Air Force 1st Lt. Garrett Black, 53rd WRS aerial reconnaissance weather officer. Ten devices were dropped on the most recent flight. It takes about 10 minutes for the collected data to travel from the dropsonde to the plane to the NHC being 10 minutes.
Working alongside the Navy, which is gathering data showing the relationship of the ocean temperature and how it can affect storms, are members of the U.S. Coast Guard Reserve. These members are releasing buoys called Airborne/Air Expendable Bathytherographs, or AXBTs, which collect data such as water temperature, said Coast Guard Reserve Chief Petty Officer Steve Jayne, a maintenance engineer.
Providing this data to the NHC will keep the squadron busy, especially since September is the peak of the annual hurricane season. Last year was the 10th busiest season on record, and this month looks to be a busy one as well.
In addition to monitoring Hurricane Florence, members of the unit deployed to Hawaii this month to fly reconnaissance missions into Hurricane Olivia, and today they are tasked to fly a low-level investigation mission into a disturbance approaching the Gulf of Mexico. Tropical Storm Isaac and Hurricane Helene are also in the Atlantic, but the squadron is not tasked to fly those storms.


Question: Provide information about a new The Hobbit movie featurette.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Provide information about a new The Hobbit movie featurette.

In addition to the featurette posted earlier – showing Orlando Bloom practicing a Laketown fight scene – Warner Brothers UK has posted another sneak peek at the upcoming Blu-ray and DVD releases of The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug.
This clip examines the design of Beorn, with interviews from actor Mikael Persbrandt and Hair/Make-up Designer Peter King.
The Blu-ray/DVD of The Desolation of Smaug will be released this coming Tuesday, April 8.


Question: "What is Oyler High School?" Respond briefly.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 "What is Oyler High School?" Respond briefly.

Oyler High School is a public high school in Cincinnati, Ohio and one of many schools that make up the Cincinnati Public School District. While undergoing renovations at its location on Hatmaker Street, Oyler was temporarily housed in the former Roberts School at 1700 Grand Avenue.


Question: Provide a summary of the incident involving the US destroyer USS Benfold and a Japanese tug boat in the Sagami Sea.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Provide a summary of the incident involving the US destroyer USS Benfold and a Japanese tug boat in the Sagami Sea.

YOKOSUKA, Japan (Nov. 18, 2017) The guided-missile destroyer USS Benfold (DDG 65) was participating in a scheduled towing exercise in Sagami Wan Nov. 18, when the tug boat lost propulsion and drifted into the ship.
No one was injured on either vessel and Benfold sustained minimal damage, including scrapes on its side, pending a full damage assessment. Benfold remains at sea under her own power. The Japanese commercial tug is being towed by another vessel to a port in Yokosuka. The incident will be investigated.
Benfold is forward deployed to the U.S. 7th Fleet area of operations in support of security and stability in the Indo-Asia- Pacific.
This work, Japanese Tug Loses Propulsion, Drifts into USS Benfold, by U.S. 7th Fleet Public Affairs, identified by DVIDS, must comply with the restrictions shown on https://www.dvidshub.net/about/copyright.


Question: What can you tell me about the Napanee Comets? Respond in 3 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What can you tell me about the Napanee Comets? Respond in 3 sentences.

The Napanee Comets were an ice hockey franchise based in the Eastern Ontario town of Napanee, Ontario, located in Lennox and Addington County, approximately 40 kilometres west of Kingston, Ontario, Canada. The Comets played in a number of OHA leagues in the 1950s, 1960s and 1970s. Their home games were played in the Napanee & District Community Arena, 170 York St, Napanee.


Question: What is located on Anzac Parade?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What is located on Anzac Parade?

The Australian Army Memorial on Anzac Parade commemorates the service of Australian soldiers.


Question: What is Isleworth Ait?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What is Isleworth Ait?

Isleworth Ait, also known as Isleworth Eyot, is a between and teardrop-shaped island in the River Thames in England. The long ait is on the Tideway facing Old Isleworth and the towpath alongside Kew Gardens. These places are in the London Boroughs of Hounslow and Richmond upon Thames. The island faces Heron's Place and a number of commercial buildings.


Question: Respond in 3 sentences. Describe the work of W.O. Mitchell.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Respond in 3 sentences. Describe the work of W.O. Mitchell.

William Ormond Mitchell, better known as W. O. Mitchell (March 13, 1914 – February 25, 1998) was a Canadian writer and broadcaster. His "best-loved" novel is "Who Has Seen the Wind" (1947), which portrays life on the Canadian Prairies and sold almost a million copies in Canada. As a broadcaster, he is known for his radio series Jake and the Kid, which aired on CBC Radio between 1950 and 1956 and was also about life on the Prairies.


Question: Describe the recent dispute between St. Petersburg deputy mayor, Kanika Tomalin and a small-business owner Sara Stonecipher over the issue of racial profiling. Respond in 70 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the recent dispute between St. Petersburg deputy mayor, Kanika Tomalin and a small-business owner Sara Stonecipher over the issue of racial profiling. Respond in 70 sentences.

Deputy mayor says she was racially profiled. Store owner says she wasn't.
St. Petersburg official Kanika Tomalin used her Facebook page this weekend to call out a local clothing store. She said MISRED Outfitters asked her and a cousin to prove they were eligible for a discount that another customer received without question. The store’s owner says that she is convinced no one was racially profiled and wishes Tomalin had talked to her before going public with her grievances.
ST. PETERSBURG — The city's African-American deputy mayor, Kanika Tomalin, turned to Facebook over the weekend to call out a local clothing store for what she says was blatant racial profiling.
Tomalin said she was shopping at the Central Avenue boutique MISRED Outfitters on Saturday when a clerk asked her and her cousin to prove they were eligible for the store's "Healthcare Appreciation Day Discount." The clerk, Tomalin said, had not asked the white woman in line ahead of them to prove she was a health care worker.
"Was I really just blatantly racially profiled while shopping on the 600 block of our beloved 'Burg? Wow. #misreadinmisred."
Store owner Sara Stonecipher wasn't there when the incident took place, but after talking to her clerk, she's convinced that no one was racially profiled. She said she wished that Tomalin, a frequent customer whom Stonecipher said she has a good relationship with, had talked to her first before taking the dispute to social media. MISRED's Facebook page has been bombarded with critical comments.
There's a political tinge to this dispute: Stonecipher and her husband, Nathan, are supporters of former Mayor Rick Baker, who is locked in a bitter election fight with Tomalin's boss, incumbent Mayor Rick Kriseman.
Tomalin has since removed her Facebook post but has not said why. She wrote in the post that she wasn't encouraging any kind of retributive action against the store.
Tomalin told the Tampa Bay Times that she has no regrets about posting it. She remains convinced that she and her cousin, who are both African-American, were treated differently from a white customer. She was shocked that Stonecipher was upset that she had not personally contacted her.
"Why is it my obligation to protect her?" Tomalin said.
For "Health Care Appreciation Day," MISRED Outfitters offered a $5 gift card for every purchase of $25 or more. "Just Show Your Badge!" the ad said. It was displayed 12 times inside the store, Stonecipher said, as well as on social media.
Tomalin said the white customer ahead of her at the register was asked by the clerk if she was a health care professional. That customer was given the deal, Tomalin said, without having to show proof that she worked in health care.
Tomalin said that when her cousin was at the register, she asked for the same discount. Tomalin said her cousin works for the BlueCross BlueShield insurance company. Then Tomalin said the clerk asked her cousin for proof.
When they pointed out the difference in the way they were treated compared to the white customer, Tomalin said, the clerk was "flippant and dismissive."
Stonecipher offered a different version of events from the store clerk, who she said was an 18-year-old Latina. The clerk said the customer did show her identification to prove she was a nurse. But the clerk said she overheard Tomalin and the cousin in line say they didn't qualify, so she didn't offer them the discount.
The owner said they weren't eligible for the deal anyway: They spent $21.60.
"That's really the crux of it," Stonecipher said. "We've always treated everyone professionally and respectfully. Honestly, it's mind-blowing to me."
Tomalin said the dispute wasn't about the deal. She was upset that they were treated very differently, that a white customer was not asked to produce identification and they were.
"The discount was never a variable in our discussions," Tomalin said, "and it's disingenuous to suggest that."
The Stoneciphers are themselves prominent residents. Nathan Stonecipher is a co-owner of Green Bench Brewing Co. and chairman of the board of trustees at St. Petersburg College. They're listed as hosts for Baker's fundraiser in the Warehouse Arts District on Friday.
Sara Stonecipher said she hoped politics played no role in the dispute.
"I really hope that would not be the case," she said. "I'm very scared right now. I'm a small-business owner."
Given Tomalin's high profile, the store owner said it was unfair of the deputy mayor to subject her shop to online criticism before reaching out to her.
"Kanika has a lot of followers and is very influential because she is the deputy mayor," Stonecipher said. "I'm trying to be what St. Pete is all about. There was no need for this to happen."
Last week, Kriseman urged residents to buy from locally owned small businesses that had been hurt by Hurricane Irma. Stonecipher fears Tomalin's Facebook post will hurt business even more.
Tomalin said any suggestion that her Facebook post was politically motivated was "ridiculous."
"If it was political, I would not have been shopping in that store in the first place," Tomalin said. "It was not politically motivated. I would not ever, under any circumstances, subject anyone in the city to that for political advancement."
Tomalin left a voicemail for Sara Stonecipher, who responded with an email. But as of Wednesday, they had not spoken to each other. The incident has left bruised feelings all around.
"She has a lot of people who look up to her," Stonecipher said. "At the end of the day, nobody racially profiled them. She's got the upper hand in this. I'm just a small-business owner. I don't understand why she did this."
Tomalin said she feels no obligation to stay quiet when she was the one who was racially profiled.
"To be treated in a discriminatory manner while being serviced," Tomalin said. "That is what I experienced."


Question: Respond in 3 sentences. What is the background information for Too Dark Park by Skinny Puppy?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Respond in 3 sentences. What is the background information for Too Dark Park by Skinny Puppy?

Too Dark Park is the sixth studio album by the industrial music group Skinny Puppy. The album cover features the debut appearance of the band's "SP" logo. The cover art was created by Vancouver based artist Jim Cummins.


Question: Please describe the documentary film "The Young Turks".

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Please describe the documentary film "The Young Turks".

This acclaimed film documents the tumultuous, at times hilarious, and altogether astonishing trajectory of Cenk Uygur, The Young Turks' main host and founder, as he traverses from unknown Public Access TV host to internet sensation by way of YouTube.
When he ventures into national television by landing the 6 PM timeslot on MSNBC, Cenk's uncensored brand of journalism is compromised as he becomes a thorn in the side of traditional news media; his unwavering dedication to speaking the truth puts him at the very nexus of the battle between new and old media.
Winner of the Conscious Media Award at Hot Docs Canadian International Documentary Festival. Winner of the Festival Award for Best Documentary Film at the Northeast Film Festival.
An inspiring and interesting doc about the history of the largest online news show in the world. Though Cenk can be a big personality and a bit overbearing at times, I think the fact that employees have stuck with him for 15+ years really says a lot. I love their commitment to delivering news without corporate interests involved and that they can freely critique politicians and other powerful figures.


Question: What can you tell me about the title of the upcoming Avengers 4 movie?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What can you tell me about the title of the upcoming Avengers 4 movie?

That means the movie is not called “Fallen Heroes”. Or “Heroes Forever”, “Forever Heroes”, “Time Break”, “Fallen Son”, “Eternal”, or any other blurry picture someone on Twitter is trying to pass off as a title to you.
When Marvel announces the Avengers 4 title, it will be everywhere. It’s not going to be in some secret room where someone will take a crooked and blurry cellphone picture of it.


Question: Describe the 2010 Alderney general election. Respond in 3 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the 2010 Alderney general election. Respond in 3 sentences.

General elections were held in Alderney on 27 November 2010 in accordance with the rules governing elections in Alderney. Five of the ten seats in the States were up for election. There were 12 candidates.


Question: What can you tell me about Domeikavos Gimnazija? Respond in 23 words.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What can you tell me about Domeikavos Gimnazija? Respond in 23 words.

Domeikavos Gimnazija is a school located in Domeikava, Kaunas, Lithuania. It was founded in the early 1920s. Its current headmaster is Dalius Vibrantis.


Question: "Can you tell me about a story I heard about a mom who was arrested for leaving her children in a car for 9 hours?"

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 "Can you tell me about a story I heard about a mom who was arrested for leaving her children in a car for 9 hours?"

Richmond, Virginia | A mother was arrested yesterday after she left her four children aged between one and seven years old in her car for more than nine hours while she was eating alone in a restaurant.
According to the Richmond Police Department, 34-year-old Raquel Hernandez decided to leave her kids in the car while treating herself to an all-you-can-eat meal at the Golden Corral Buffet & Grill.
The 400-lbs woman arrived around 11 AM and was still eating when the police arrived on the site at 8:20 PM.
29-year-old Sarah Ferguson, the waitress who warned the police, says she noticed the kids in the car when she arrived for her shift and saw them again when she finished her work.
Ms. Ferguson called the police, who immediately freed the children from the vehicle and went looking for the mother.
The young waitress says she was shocked to find out that the mother of the children was a customer she had served during her entire shift.
Sarah Ferguson decided to call the police after noticing the children in the car both before and after her 8-hour shift.
The single mother of four will now face four charges of child abandonment and four charges of child neglect.
If found guilty on all charges, Ms. Hernandez could lose custody of her children and spend up to 20 years in prison.
She was freed from jail this morning on a $12,500 bail, but her children will remain under the care of social services until the end of her trial.
3 Comments on "Mother arrested for leaving children in the car for 9 hours while at all-you-can-eat buffet"
Unfortunely we see these cases happen all the time. This is a very sad situation. The children are very lucky that someone cared enough to call the law. I’m so happy that all the children was ok and well.
Thats sick. Did she stop to think the kids could be hungry. Pt ge under the jail. Selfish B.