Question: What can we do to make interruptibility work cross-platform?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What can we do to make interruptibility work cross-platform?

We’d like to have the golden touch of the IO world, instantly turning blocking IO code into nice, well-behaved, non-blocking, interruptible code.
I am going to discuss these three situations, described concisely as blocking system calls, cooperative libraries and blocking libraries. I propose that, due to the lack of a cross-platform interruption mechanism, the correct interruptibility interface is to permit user defined handlers for asynchronous exceptions.
Interruptible blocking system calls. In the past, GHC has had some bugs in which a foreign call to a blocking IO system call caused Windows to stop being interruptible. This is a long standing difference in asynchronous IO philosophy between POSIX and Windows: POSIX believes in functions that look blocking but can be interrupted by signals, while Windows believes in callbacks. Thus, calls that seem harmless enough actually break interruptibility and have to be rewritten manually into a form amenable to both the POSIX and Windows models of asynchrony.
While it is theoretically and practically possible to manually convert every blocking call (which, by the way, works perfectly fine on Linux, because you can just send it a signal) into the asynchronous version, but this is very annoying and subverts the idea that we can simply ship blocking calls onto another thread to pretend that they’re nonblocking.
Since Windows Vista, we can interrupt blocking IO calls using a handy new function CancelSynchronousIo. Notice that cancelling IO is not the same as cancelling a thread: in particular, the synchronous operation merely returns with a failure with the last error set to ERROR_OPERATION_ABORTED, so the system call needs to have been performed directly by GHC (which can then notice the aborted operation and propagate the interrupt further) or occur in C code that can handle this error condition. Unfortunately, this function does not exist on earlier versions of Windows.
Aside. Is there anything we can do for pre-Vista Windows? Not obviously: the under-the-hood changes that were made to Windows Vista were partially to make a function like CancelSynchronousIo possible. If we were to enforce extremely strong invariants on when we call TerminateThread; that is, we’d have to manually vet every function we consider for termination, and at that point, you might as well rewrite it asynchronous style.
Interruptible cooperative libraries. This is the situation where we have a C library that we have a high level of control over: it may be our own library or we may be writing a intermediate C layer between GHC and an expressive, asynchronous underlying library. What we would like to do is have GHC seamlessly convert its asynchronous exceptions into some for that our C can notice and act gracefully upon.
Signals. POSIX only, signals can be temporarily blocked with sigprocmask or pthread_sigmask and a signal handler can be installed with sigaction to cleanup and possible exit the thread or long jump.
Pthread cancellation. POSIX only, cancellation can be temporarily blocked with pthread_setcanceltype and a cancellation handler can be installed with pthread_cleanup_push.
Select/poll loop. Cancellation requests are sent over a socket which is being polled, handler can choose to ignore them.
Event objects. Windows only, threads can receive cancellation requests from the handle from OpenEvent but choose to ignore them.
IO cancellation. Windows Vista only, as described above.
Completion queue. Windows only, similar to select/poll loop.
It doesn’t make much sense to try to implement all of these mechanisms natively. Therefore, my proposal: have GHC call a user-defined function in a different thread upon receipt of an asynchronous function and let the user figure out what to do. In many ways, this is not much of a decision at all: in particular, we’ve asked the programmer to figure it out for themselves. Libraries that only worked with POSIX will still only work with POSIX. However, this is still an advance from the current state, which is that asynchronous exceptions necessarily behave differently for Haskell and FFI code.
Interruptible blocking libraries. Because blocking IO is much easier to program than non-blocking IO, blocking interfaces tend to be more prevalent and better tested. (A friend of mine who spent the summer working on Chromium had no end of complaints about the bugginess of the non-blocking interface to NSS.) It might be practical to rewrite a few system calls into asynchronous style, but when you have a blob of existing C code that you want to interface with, the maintenance cost of such a rewrite quickly becomes untenable. What is one to do?
Alas, there is no magic bullet: if the library never had any consideration for interruptibility, forcibly terminating it is more than likely to leave your program in a corrupted state. For those who would like to play it fast and loose, however, the user-defined function approach would still let you call TerminateThread if you really wanted to.
In conclusion, I propose that the interruptibility patch be extended beyond just a simple interruptible keyword to allow a user-defined asynchronous exception handler, compiled against the RTS, as well as providing a few built-in handlers which provide sensible default behaviors (both platform specific and non-platform specific, though I expect the latter to give much weaker guarantees).
Asynchronous exceptions are a usual path to madness… they were in Java but caused so many problems they were removed.. there were some proposals to put them in Python but it looked like they would cause a big mess.. maybe Haskell can deal with them more cleanly. Some formal analysis beforehand would be nice.


Question: Have you heard about the new teaser from Bandai Namco?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Have you heard about the new teaser from Bandai Namco?

So, earlier in the month Bandai Namco got tongues wagging with a creepy teaser, featuring a foreboding "live" camera focused on a very scary looking Japanese household. All the clues we had to go on was the word "Domas" and a date "August 30".
Well, turn on the lights and stop being scared. Turns out it was just a jokey teaser for an anniversary campaign for the Sword Art Online smartphone game; Memory Defrag. Huh. A new video features voice actors Yoshitsugu Matsuoka and Shimazaki Nobunaga going wild with some zombies, presumably in said spooky house.
... soooo not a new Splatterhouse, then?


Question: Describe Nick Clegg's latest book "How to Stop Brexit".

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe Nick Clegg's latest book "How to Stop Brexit".

Alongside tips on household management from Mary Berry and help with home cooking from Nigella Lawson, a different kind of guide is also due to land on bookshop shelves this Christmas: How to Stop Brexit, by the former deputy prime minister Nick Clegg.
Publisher the Bodley Head has announced that Clegg’s manual about remaining in the EU would be published on 5 October. How to Stop Brexit (And Make Britain Great Again) will, said the publisher, see the former leader of the Liberal Democrats show that there is “nothing remotely inevitable” about Brexit – and lay out how readers can help to stop it.
Clegg lost his seat in Sheffield Hallam at this summer’s general election. His 2016 memoir Politics: Between the Extremes made the Sunday Times’ bestseller charts, and saw the politician describe the EU referendum result as “one of the greatest acts of national self-immolation in modern times”, predicting that over the long term it would probably lead to “the break-up of the UK, the possible disintegration of the EU itself, significant economic and social damage to the fabric of our society, and, to all intents and purposes, the end of Britain’s role as a major world power”.
His “pragmatic” new manifesto will, said the Bodley Head, “categorically debunk the myths that have been used by a powerful elite” to justify Britain’s departure from the EU.
Knox placed How to Stop Brexit in a “new trend of resistance handbooks”, which also include historian Timothy Snyder’s On Tyranny, campaigner Matthew Bolton’s How to Resist and Rebecca Solnit’s Hope in the Dark. They are, said Knox, “short, polemical books that are punchy and portable and ideal for reading on the commute”.
Clegg’s publisher described his addition to the genre as “the indispensable handbook to saving your country from an utterly pointless calamity”.


Question: What techniques can I use when I'm in a 50/50 guard in BJJ?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What techniques can I use when I'm in a 50/50 guard in BJJ?

Once you start getting more familiar with 50/50 position, some options start to open up that seemed impossible before. Here, we'll take a look at taking the back directly, the now-classic armbar finish, and a rolling calf-slicer.
Note: This is intended to be a more advanced and comprehensive version of the Passing 50/50 guard for BJJ (and taking the back) tutorial, so if you haven't already seen that one, please take a look at your convenience. These techniques more or less build off of those.
As pointed out previously, the main idea for more than half of the techniques you can execute from 50/50 is to get your trapped (right) leg across to their opposite hip. This is easier said than done, so start by creating some distance between your partner's upper body and yours. A left-side stiff-arm does the trick. Next, hip out so that your right knee goes to the ground. If necessary, you can use your free right hand to help open your partner's knees up (you don't need much space here).
Now, keeping your right instep flush with your partner's left hip, hip out to move past their right knee (this is now going to be the main way they block you from going around to their back). Essentially, you're trying to create an arm-drag position, with your right hand on your partner's far collar, and your left hand on their sleeve. Just drag the arm across, take a temporary double underhooks back control, and secure your position as normal.
Make sure you understand the mechanics of the basic back-take maneuver and get good at it. That way, you can just view this armbar option as something that's on the way to your primary objective. There aren't a ton of new movements involved. If your partner stops you from going around to their back by grabbing your collar with their left hand, this facilitates things.
Lie back so that their arm straightens out, but keep that same collar grip you had before; you don't want to get too far away from your partner's shoulder during this final transition. From here, it's just a straight armbar with your partner's leg caught in the middle. JT Torres finished Caio Terra with such an attack, and Keenan Cornelius was well known for using this finish at brown belt. The good news for you is that it's a natural consequence of your partner attempting to stop the back take.
This is arguably the flashiest of the three techniques presented here, and it's likely to be the one you use against a partner who is knowledgeable enough in 50/50 not to let you bring your leg across at all. Still, start with the "knee down" motion like before, but exaggerate it greatly, sliding your right knee underneath your partner's right leg. Hug your partner's right hip with your left arm, and then dive your head under your partner's leg, where your knee is heading. As you roll forward, you'll end up in a calf slicer if your partner doesn't straighten their leg (make sure you know your gym's etiquette before going for any leg attacks!). If your partner straightens, you have a back- take opportunity similar to this movement from the Reverse De La Riva Guard: Taking the Back lesson. Huge credit goes to Jake MacKenzie for demonstrating this move years ago at Revolution BJJ.
As early as 1997, I started using 50/50 as a leglock attack position. It became obvious that the position wasn't ideal for attacking if your skill level and understanding of the position wasn't superior to your partner's knowledge (think: Ryan Hall, one of the best in the world at the position). However, during the mid-2000s, there was a resurgence in popularity due to some folks having success at higher levels in competition with the position. This extended to the gi, but I personally had very little success in 50/50 in the gi until after 2010, when I started understanding how to disengage properly. This key concept allowed me to start experimenting with more and more options, and now I have a much bigger wheelhouse to draw upon.
In time, your own body of techniques will grow as well, although it's bound to begin with one or two moves and often end in frustration. The good news is that you're going to end up there often, whether you want to or not, so you'll have plenty of opportunities to improve!


Question: Describe the Sony Aibo and the Cotton Camera Harness.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the Sony Aibo and the Cotton Camera Harness.

Sony released a first version of this robot dog several years ago, but due to the limitations in robotics at the time it was pretty basic by today's standards. This latest iteration of the Sony Aibo features dozens of modern advancements that include artificial intelligence in addition to robotics. The look and feel of the robot is much more friendly and welcoming and actually resembles a real dog as opposed to the clunky sci-fi pet look of its predecessor. The movements are fluid and natural thanks to the ultracompact 1 and 2 axis actuators. The internal software is what makes the major difference with the Aibo, allowing it to learn and understand your preferences as well as your home and other environments that it will be spending time with. If you're not ready for the commitment of a real pet that you requires actual food and exercise, then this little guy might be just what you're looking for.
Sometimes getting the perfect shot requires hours of standing around in extreme climates, waiting for that perfect moment. This can cause real strain and pain to the neck, shoulders and back, especially with expensive and bulky camera rigs. The Cotton Camera Harness is a revolutionary new system that attempts to solve these ails. Designed with the active outdoor photographer in mind, the harness is able to distribute the weight evenly across the body to help reduce the fatigue and stress of a long day of shooting. Features include a 'twist and lock' camera mount, removable side holsters for extra equipment and a quick release belt with speed straps for easy mount and dismounting. Available in Charcoal Grey and shipping now.


Question: "I am having trouble with my ModelBuilder approach and I can't seem to make it work properly." Respond in 189 words.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 "I am having trouble with my ModelBuilder approach and I can't seem to make it work properly." Respond in 189 words.

The way around this is to config ModelBuilder to generate the models into a separate class library, just for the ModelBuilder files. You can then reference the models in both web application and membership portal. Using a third library breaks the circular dependency issue and you can then access your strongly-typed models throughout your code base. You will no longer be limited to only using your models within your web application and you will be able to create a more loosely coupled system.
Hopefully, you understand the benefits by now. Let's get on with making it happen.
In your solution create an empty class library. You can call it whatever you want, however, I tend to call mine 'Umbraco.Web.PublishedContentModels' to match the default namespace the ModelsBuilder generates.
Within your Umbraco backend, go to the 'developer' section, click on the 'Models Builder' tab.
Within Visual Studio, select all these files, right-click and select 'Include in project'. If everything goes well you should now be able to build the project successfully. You can now reference this class library in your website project, your membership project and anywhere else you want to.


Question: "Do you know anything about Leon Hellmuth?"

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 "Do you know anything about Leon Hellmuth?"

Leon Hellmuth (14 August 1934 – 29 December 1981) was an English cricketer who played first-class cricket for Kent County Cricket Club in 1951 and 1952. He was born at Blackheath, London in 1934.


Question: Describe what you think your fellow congressional committee members should read and reference when considering scientific policy. Respond in 35 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe what you think your fellow congressional committee members should read and reference when considering scientific policy. Respond in 35 sentences.

Last week the House Science, Space, and Technology Committee tweeted a link to a widely debunked Breitbart article questioning warming due to climate change. In response, I tweeted, "I get my climate info from trusted scientists."
US Representative Eddie Bernice Johnson (@RepEBJ) is a 12-term member of Congress, representing the 30th district of Texas, and is the ranking member of the House Committee on Science, Space and Technology.
What do I think my fellow committee members should be reading? First, I hope that congresspeople will read widely and diversely, so that we are exposed to a broad range of insights and perspectives on the issues before Congress. A well-informed Congress will be a more thoughtful Congress, and that can only benefit us as we carry out our work of forging policies that affect all citizens.
Second, as ranking member of the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, I strongly believe that it is vital for my colleagues to seek out the most respected and credible sources of scientific information to help us grapple with both the opportunities and the challenges created by science and technology. In that regard, we can ill-afford to allow ourselves to be distracted by sensationalistic headlines and ideologically driven reportage.
And I don't only mean from sources such as climate-change-denying right-wing blogs, although they have been some of the most egregious offenders of late. Even mainstream science journalism has had to confront instances in which reporting has made it sound as though important scientifically unresolved questions have been resolved by a single research study, even though the basis of that reportage may be little more than a not-peer-reviewed press release.
So what are members of Congress to do? With few exceptions, lawmakers do not have scientific backgrounds or expertise that would permit them to get their information directly from peer-reviewed technical journals. So we need to rely on reputable institutions that can provide us with clear, unbiased analyses and summaries of the current state of scientific understanding relevant to the policies we consider. Organizations like the National Academies, the American Association for the Advancement of Science, the American Chemical Society, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and other equivalent bodies are examples of such trusted institutions. Why? Because they base their conclusions on peer-reviewed science rather than opinion or partisan assertions.
Is peer review a perfect system for ensuring the fidelity of the conclusions reached by scientists? No, because any system involving humans can only aspire to perfection, not guarantee it. However, for more than 200 years, peer review has been widely viewed as the most effective process for identifying and disseminating reliable scientific results, while weeding out any biases or errors introduced in a single experiment or a single laboratory. In this context, the term "peer" is not simply a fellow citizen we might encounter on a courtroom jury. A peer is also not a casual science enthusiast. A peer is, very specifically, another trained, experienced, respected scientist with expertise relevant to the results and analysis under review. Any paper being considered for publication is subject to review by at least three people. Peer review is a strong system. It is in fact an essential part of the progress of science.
Through hearings and meetings, elected officials can hear directly from the scientists and engineers whose research has passed the test of peer review. Reading their testimony and asking them questions is one of the ways that representatives can take advantage of the most up-to-date scientific research available. However, this model only works if those hearings are not packed with witnesses who are lobbyists or have a vested financial interest in the outcome. Unfortunately, there have been too many examples in recent years of hearings in which peer-reviewed science was drowned out by the assertions of non-scientists with financial or ideological agendas. This has to stop.
Members also can benefit from the reports and analyses done by federal science agencies such as the National Science Foundation, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Institute of Standards and Technology, NASA, the Department of Energy, and others conducting and funding ground-breaking research. Using climate change as an example, the work being done at NASA, NOAA, and other agencies is providing the crucial data that our nation will need to move forward on this critical issue.
I regularly implore my colleagues to listen to the scientists, to recognize the value of research, and resist efforts to defund and destroy the very scientific community that will give us answers to the science-related questions we must address. We in Congress, and in any presidential administration, have to acknowledge that we are not the experts, and that allowing partisan politics and fake or misleading news to skew our scientific understanding is short-sighted, and, by definition, ignorant. The American people deserve more from their elected officials.


Question: Describe Sean Spicer's fashion-forward footwear incident.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe Sean Spicer's fashion-forward footwear incident.

Sean Spicer: bad at crowd sizes, good at fashion-forward footwear?
We’ve all been there. Having dressed bleary-eyed and in the dark, we arrive to work in a shirt with a splodge of ketchup down the front rather than the crisp, Daz-white one we intended to wear. Or so it appeared when Donald Trump’s press secretary Sean Spicer was snapped in mismatched footwear at a White House press conference on Monday – one brown, one black. And lo, the internet exploded. Closer inspection strongly suggests that the shoe might have orthopaedic uses, although the fashion police are still investigating the matter.
In any case, had he passed it off as a DGAF move and owned his apparent mistake by adopting Theresa May’s infamous power stance rather than seemingly attempting to hide the shoe, standing behind Tom Price, the secretary of health and human services, and Mick Mulvaney, Trump’s budget director, as they discussed the Congressional Budget Office’s findings on the Republican health bill, we might not have even noticed. Because what few have realised is that Spicer has unwittingly stepped out in the trend of spring/summer 2017.
Mismatched shoes are this season’s way of showing you know what’s what when it comes to fashion. At the Oscars last month, Moonlight’s Naomie Harris wore a Calvin Klein By Appointment frock – the big deal red-carpet debut of Raf Simons for the label – and mismatched bejewelled heels. On the Paris fashion week catwalk at Céline, a label known for being impossibly chic and French, one model wore mismatched white and black strappy sandals, another one red boot and one white.
It’s a trend with highbrow endorsement: David Hockney was rumoured to encourage textile designer Celia Birtwell to go out in Paris wearing one pink boot and one blue. On the Golden Globes red carpet in 2011, Helena Bonham Carter also rounded off an extravaganza of a dress with one pink and one green shoe.
Of course, it’s a look that footballers have been sporting for years. With footwear an exception to Fifa’s otherwise restrictive uniform policy, players like to have a little fun on their feet. The mismatched boot trend reached its wonky peak at the last World Cup in Brazil, with Argentina’s Sergio Agüero, France’s Olivier Giroud and Italy’s Mario Balotelli all wearing the clashing pink and blue boots from Puma’s Tricks line. More recently, Puma has released a fuschia and yellow pair (both big colours this season).
So Spicer is in good company, although wearing a black shoe – to camouflage the clash – or going full Céline with a contrasting white one might have better boosted his style credentials. Still, it’s only a matter of time for the increasingly Trump-tango’d press man: having already been on the receiving end of a Trump-endorsed suit makeover, it’s likely that his footwear will be next.


Question: Respond in 261 words. What's going on with the Cambridge Analytica and Facebook scandal?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Respond in 261 words. What's going on with the Cambridge Analytica and Facebook scandal?

The Mozilla Foundation has expressed its discomfort at the Cambridge Analytica revelations by pulling its ads from Facebook.
While the disappearance of Mozilla's modest ad spend is hardly going to bring down The Social Network™, the organisation's decision to “pause” its Facebook advertising came after Zuckerland tried to assure Mozilla that the conditions that prevailed in 2015 (when Cambridge Analytica breached its terms of service) had long been addressed.
On March 20, Mozilla made this statement on the scandal, asking Facebook to protect privacy “by default” [Good luck with that one - Ed], and saying its app permissions leave “billions of its users vulnerable without knowing it”.
Facebook reached out to us to discuss how we characterized their settings and to tell us that our original blog post overstated the scope of data sharing with app developers. What we described is an accurate characterization of what appears in Facebook’s settings.
What Facebook told us is that what we have written below is only true generally for third-party apps prior to 2015. Again, this isn’t clear in the user-facing tools and we think this needs to be fixed.
Mozilla says it will take a “wait and see” approach: if satisfied by what Mark Zuckerberg delivers in his promise to make privacy settings “more protective”, “specifically strengthening its default privacy settings for third party apps, we’ll consider returning”.
It's feasible that Mozilla won't be the last to review its ad spend. In the UK, advertiser organisation the Incorporated Society of British Advertisers (ISBA) is demanding answers on behalf of its roughly 3,000 brands.


Question: Describe the events surrounding Julian Assange's stay in Ecuador's embassy in London.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the events surrounding Julian Assange's stay in Ecuador's embassy in London.

According to The Times, the United Kingdom and Ecuador are engaged in secret talks to banish Julian Assange from the South American state’s embassy in London, where he has been living since 2012 for fear of being extradited to the US where he would face espionage charges.
Senior foreign officials, allegedly including the Foreign Office minister Sir Alan Duncan, are discussing the world’s most famous whistleblower’s fate.
The reported high-level negotiations came weeks before Ecuadorian President Lenin Moreno’s visit to the UK. The head of the state previously described Assange, who was granted asylum under Moreno’s predecessor Rafael Correa, as a “hacker,” an “inherited problem” and a “stone in the shoe,” The Sunday Times reported.
Unnamed sources, ostensibly close to Assange, are said to believe that he cannot be deprived of political asylum, and that he’s not aware of the top-level talks.
In late June, US Vice President Mike Pence “raised the issue” of Assange in a conversation with Moreno during his trip to Ecuador. Following the meeting, Ecuadorian Foreign Minister Jose Valencia stated that it was not up to Washington to decide the fate of the Australian.
“Ecuador and the United Kingdom, and of course Mr. Assange as a person who is currently staying on asylum at our embassy. Does not therefore appear, on an agenda with the United States,” Valencia said.
In March, Assange was cut off from the outside world by the government of Ecuador; he was also banned from receiving any visitors, which is believed to be due to a series of his tweets on the Catalan independence movement in Spain.
Assange cannot leave the South American state’s embassy in London without being arrested and extradited to the United States, where he has been accused of espionage and leaking thousands of classified documents related to military operations.
According to The Guardian report, Ecuador spent some $5 million on a top-secret intelligence operation, dubbed Operation Guest, to employ international security and undercover agents to monitor the whistleblower’s visitors. The op was allegedly approved by ex-president Rafael Correa and former foreign minister Ricardo Patino.


Question: Describe Antifa's activities in the last year.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe Antifa's activities in the last year.

“In the past year, Antifa groups have become active across the United States, employing a variety of methods to disrupt demonstrations,” states the advisory, before going on to list a number of violent disruptions, including Milo Yiannopoulos’ speaking event at the University of California Berkeley on February 1st, which was cancelled after members of Antifa violently attacked free speech advocates.
The group has also staged numerous violent riots, including during the inauguration of Donald Trump, that have caused millions of dollars worth of property damage.
There have been innumerable violent attacks on Trump supporters by members of Antifa over the last six months, although the mainstream media has barely reported on them.
Back in May, Diablo Valley College professor Eric Clanton was arrested for a series of sickening assaults in which he used a metal bike lock to attack Trump supporters at a free speech rally in Berkeley.


Question: Can you provide any information about the 1981 anti-police riots in Brixton?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Can you provide any information about the 1981 anti-police riots in Brixton?

Pamphlet reflecting on the 1981 anti-police riots in Brixton by the Riot Not To Work Collective. Gratefully taken from the fabulous Red Notes.
30 years on today...Always loved this photo(the one that appears if you roll down about a third of the way - the one that shows of the methods of rolling over the economy). Anybody got other recollections (for those of us over 38)?
I tried to upload put the pamphlet in its entirety (PDF), but it's not playing so you can download the pamphlet from Red Notes here.


Question: What are people saying about Trump's behavior during the joint news conference with Putin?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What are people saying about Trump's behavior during the joint news conference with Putin?

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, Defense Secretary James Mattis, Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats and national security adviser John Bolton were among the officials who political commentators and lawmakers said should quit their posts over the president's seeming submission to Putin during a joint news conference Monday.
Even some on the right jumped into the fray, largely via social media, to suggest that Cabinet officials or other top members of Trump's team should look for the exits.
"After today the principals who think they're indispensable should draw straws and one should go," Ross Douthat, a prominent conservative columnist with The New York Times, wrote on Twitter.
There was no sign that any Trump aides would be quitting; a Pentagon spokesman said Mattis is not considering it, while a National Security Council staffer declined to comment when asked about Bolton's future. The State Department did not respond to a question on Pompeo's plans.
"If you're on the Trump national security team, and you've been out there saying how strong Trump is on Russia and how serious our commitment is to NATO, how do you not resign after the last four days?" Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) chimed in on Twitter.
"If (Dan) Coats doesn’t resign today, he has no honor," Murphy tweeted.
Aides to Coats did not respond to requests for comment on whether he'll resign, but Coats issued a statement defending the intelligence community's assessment and casting Russian interference as "ongoing" and "pervasive."
Among those calling for Pompeo and Bolton to quit was former CIA Director John Brennan, who said on MSNBC that Putin was clearly the "master puppeteer" of the man in the Oval Office.
Trump, standing next to Putin in Helsinki, refused to say he believed U.S. intelligence assessments about Russian election interference. Trump appeared to take Putin's claim that Russia was innocent at face value.
Trump's comments, as well what many deemed to be an overall timid performance next to the Russian strongman, stunned former U.S. officials, analysts and others. Some said they could not recall similar behavior by an American head of state.
"It's totally without precedent," said Thomas Wright, a scholar with the Brookings Institution. "There's no doubt now that he does have an ideological agenda that's in favor of Putin."
Sen. Jeff Flake of Arizona, a Republican critic of Trump who is not running for re-election, tweeted: "I never thought I would see the day when our American President would stand on the stage with the Russian President and place blame on the United States for Russian aggression. This is shameful."
Despite Trump's rhetoric, his administration has taken some steps to pressure Russia on a range of issues, including imposing sanctions — although some of that was a result of laws passed by Congress.
Some Trump aides may choose to stay on out of a sense of duty to country, and a hope that even if they can't rein in Trump's words, they can nonetheless influence his policies, analysts and former officials pointed out. They warned, however, that as time goes on and Trump becomes more confident, he could peel back or slow-roll the policies as well.
"It's long past due that they speak out," Wright said.
On Sunday, for instance, Pompeo tweeted out what appeared to be a warning to Russia. "A better relationship with the Russian government would benefit all, but the ball is in Russia’s court," the secretary of state wrote. "We will continue to hold Russia responsible for its malign activities."
Asked whether Pompeo had any thoughts about Trump's comments Monday in Helsinki, the State Department did not immediately respond.


Question: Respond briefly. What do you know about William Hartzell?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Respond briefly. What do you know about William Hartzell?

William Hartzell (February 20, 1837 – August 14, 1903) was a U.S. Representative from Illinois.


Question: Describe an experience hunting deer in the wild.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe an experience hunting deer in the wild.

I had the opportunity to be at Central Kentucky Outdoors for the deer season opener in 2016. It was my intentions to harvest a buck in velvet, but that didn’t happen. However, I did get a buck any hunter would be proud of.
I was using a Rage Hypodermic expandable head.
After being shot, the buck was a little confused as to where he should go. He first ran up a hill, then decided to make things easier for me, and came back towards me before crashing into a fence. Check out the video.


Question: What is Rightpedia?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What is Rightpedia?

“”Jews are generally associated with Judaism, but also with economic corruption, manipulation, shame and most of all with nepotism.
Rightpedia (en.rightpedia.info) was an extremist neo-Nazi, alt-right wiki created by ex-Metapedia sysops. Although Metapedia and Rightpedia were ideologically identical (white nationalist, pro-Hitler, racialist, anti-Semitic and Holocaust denialist), the difference was that Rightpedia doxed and contained defamatory articles on political opponents, such as liberals, socialists and members of the House of Commons. It was therefore similar to the far-right website Redwatch.
Rightpedia was taken offline by GoDaddy in November 2018, after take down requests were sent to their legal department, alleging the website hosted child abuse images.
Rightpedia was created sometime in 2015 by ex-Metapedia sysops Eleonóra Dubiczki (aka Fiala, Hu1, Vajna), Michael Coombs (a.k.a. Mikemikev) and A Wyatt Man who were banned from Metapedia. One of the reasons for the ban was the fact Dubiczki and Coombs were misusing the wiki to attack and smear political enemies. They were banned after complaints were made on the Nordisk web community portal (now offline) in November 2014 where owner of Metapedia Anders Lagerström posted (as Daniel F).
Fiala was the main editor of the Hungarian Rightpedia. The English version was more popular with 88.12% of its total traffic, 36.8% of Rightpedia's traffic was from the USA.
In 2018 the SPLC noted that the white nationalist co-founder of Rightpedia had created hundreds of sockpuppets on Wikipedia. Mikemikev confirmed those accounts belonged to him.
Rightpedia admin Michael Coombs, bragging about Rightpedia on Twitter.
“”The site [Rightpedia] is self-styled as an Alt-right Wikipedia. The content is predictably racist and intensely anti-Semitic.
The chief feature of a person of Subsaharan Africa is torturing with noise. Like with murder, any race has members of its population that do it, it just varies. However for blacks (and mestizos), 100% of their population tortures with noise guaranteed every chance they get. They do to their neighbors, even while they're all asleep by either leaving man-sized speakers going or by getting animals that make noise all night. They do it to people who hear their vehicles go by. They will amass somewhere away from home and do it to everyone near them. It is a 100% guarantee that blacks and mestizos will always torture with noise as much as they can. There is no other behavior so defining of these two races, so guaranteed of them, than this.
Disloyal, greedy, truculent, selfish, cunning, dishonest, cocky, deceitful, envious, vindictive, ungrateful, cowardly, big-mouthed, ugly, pompous, perverted, thievish, murderous, sadistic and to have many more negative traits.
Rightpedia was initially hosted by Orain, which refused to take it down due to their Terms of Service which supported freedom of speech. However, Orain was closed down in September 2015 due to being hacked, and Rightpedia moved to MW Zip before being deleted from there as well. After that, they purchased hosting from GoDaddy.
According to Google safe browsing analytics, Rightpedia was considered a dangerous domain.
Rightpedia hosted defamatory articles on anti-fascists and politicians written by Michael Coombs and Eleonora Dubiczki. Coombs also targeted people he personally disliked and used Rightpedia to harass, by doxing them and writing libel. Coombs admitted Rightpedia's aim was to create "hit pieces" on its political opponents (such as liberals) and Jewish people. Dubiczki targeted politicians such as Diane Abbott and Luciana Berger.
When hosted by Orain several of those libellous articles were removed for violating Orain's Terms of Service.
Disturbing images of dead children were put on Rightpedia's articles about anti-fascists and liberal politicians to smear them.
↑ Alt right Rightpedia website closed down by GoDaddy for disturbing content.
↑ 6.0 6.1 Rightpedia.info. Easy Counter.
↑ Wikipedia wars: inside the fight against far-right editors, vandals and sock puppets. Southern Poverty Law Center.
↑ Mikemikev. Gab. "LOL the SPLC mentioned my Wikipedia socks". Archived.
↑ 9.0 9.1 Subsaharan Africans. Rightpedia.
↑ Orain hosts white supremacist wiki. Wikipediocracy.
↑ "Downfall of Orain". Addshore.
↑ "right.mwzip.com is hosting anti-Semitic content". MW Zip Forum.
↑ "en.rightpedia.info | Who Is Hosting en.rightpedia.info?" WhoIsHostingThis.com.
↑ Dubiczki posting as "Vajna" wrote the racist articles about Diane Abbott and Luciana Berger on Rightpedia.
↑ Rightpedia Screenshot 2: "I received a libel complaint re: Richard Warman & Shane Ruttle. I have suppressed those pages until I actually have time to go through and read them to see if they do actually fall under the category of hate speech/libel or if it's actually content protected under free speech."
↑ Eg. Abe Foxman, Anetta Kahane, Leonard Zeskind.
This page was last modified on 2 April 2019, at 12:04.


Question: Explain the situation in Sweden with net surveillance and the IPRED law.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Explain the situation in Sweden with net surveillance and the IPRED law.

In our series showcasing Sweden as a country that likes to pretend it champions net freedom, but itself does the exact opposite: did you know that Sweden has given the copyright industry powers of net surveillance that even the Police don’t have?
Sweden likes to portray itself as a country that champions the importance of the net and its freedom, and is never late to criticize other countries, but is one of the worst offenders in the West when it comes to respecting this fantastic tool that upsets the old guard and the status quo.
Today, we look at the curious IPRED law in Sweden. It was introduced in silence and shadow in the summer of 2007 by the Justice Department’s Stefan Johansson, who has also been Sweden’s and the EU’s negotiator at the ACTA table, and who has frequently been seen at Sweden’s Association For Copyright.
The really insidious thing about the IPRED law is its name: it copies the name from a European directive (IPRED), but legislates things that the European directive explicitly doesn’t contain or force Sweden to do. Therefore, politicians of all colors have defended themselves saying that Sweden must implement European Union directives, whereas in reality, they are pursuing their own agenda and trying to wash their hands of responsibility.
The law concerns the copyright industry’s right to violate privacy – specifically, demanding subscriber identities of IP addresses, on allegations of violation of the copyright monopoly (typically, file sharing), and sue them in court where presumption of innocence does not apply. In Sweden, the Police may only break the privacy of identities behind IP addresses when the crime being investigated is severe enough to result in a jail sentence. But most file sharing cases have stayed at fines, and therefore, the Police does not have this power.
So Sweden has granted private corporate interests – the copyright industry – more extensive powers than the Police, in terms of cracking down on the Net and making dissent and civil disobedience dangerous.
The first IPRED case has gone as high as the European Court of Justice, and a precedent verdict was handed down a couple of days ago that confirms that the copyright industry can be given more powers than the Police.
An op-ed two days ago asked the best question regarding Swedish information policy: Why is net freedom always a matter for foreign policy, but never for domestic policy?
Next: A Comprehensive Civilian DNA Database.
Politicians are generally bright people but there is an obvious issue with the Internet in Swedish politics. If the people deciding about the future of a technology does not understand its nature, how can we trust them to make the right choice?
Umm, the post wasn’t really a response to you but rather a comment on Rick’s piece… Sorry for the potential confusion dude!
I really enjoy the insightful articles on this website and I thank all of the writers for their articles.
However the site itself is incredibly heavy and cluttered. My desktop PC has sufficient specs to run modern games and my connection is 10/1 mbps so the general lagginess isn’t caused by them (my mini laptop takes at least 1 minute to load any of this sites pages and scrolling pages is a b*tch with it).
I’m wondering if you have planned any kind of major revamp to make the site more usable.
Yes. Did you know that the Swedish government has found this unreasonable and for that reason (among others) wants to give the police increased powers of net surveillance? See page 102 of prop 2011/12:55 where this is very explicit. It even says that this has been the assumption all along. The proposal is likely to be passed into law within three weeks (10th of May).
WHAT? That’s insane… It’s Iron Curtain – but … reversed. Just some 20 years ago we were the GOOD guys over here and the baddies were on the OTHER side of that curtain… People were willing to DIE to get across that curtain. It was that terrible to live in a surveillance society like DDR.
How did we become the ones we weren’t?
Re-reading it today gives me the chills. Brrrrr.


Question: How do you make Maltesers/Whoppers at home?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 How do you make Maltesers/Whoppers at home?

Maltesers are simply malted milk balls coated in chocolate. On the U.S. side of the pond, they are known as Whoppers. While there are some subtle differences between the two, they are essentially the same sweet candy. Whether you call them Maltesers or Whoppers, you can make them at home with three ingredients.
Put the white chocolate into a microwave safe bowl.
Heat on high for 3 minutes, stirring after every 30 seconds. The white chocolate should be completely melted and smooth.
Pour the malted milk powder into the melted white chocolate until a stiff dough forms. You might need to use more malted milk powder than you used white chocolate to get the right consistency. The exact amount will depend on the humidity of your kitchen and the moisture content in the white chocolate.
Pinch off bits of the malt ball dough and roll them into 1/4- to 1/2-inch balls. Set these aside on a baking sheet lined with wax paper. Place the baking sheet in the freezer to chill the balls.
Place the chocolate for coating into another microwave safe bowl and melt on high for 3 minutes. Stop every 30 seconds to stir the chocolate. It should be smooth and completely melted.
Remove the baking sheet with the malt balls from the freezer.
Dip each of the malt balls into the melted chocolate, rolling around to coat all sides.
Lift each coated malt ball from the chocolate with the fork and place on wax paper to cool and harden. Repeat until all the malt balls have been dipped.
Serve once the chocolate has cooled and become hard. Store the leftovers in an airtight container at 75 degrees or below. If your kitchen is usually warmer, store them in the refrigerator.
For an extra chocolaty treat, use chocolate-flavored malted milk powder, such as chocolate Ovaltine.
Malted milk powder can be found next to the breakfast drink mixes or with the powdered milk. You might even find it on the international foods aisle with the British groceries.


Question: Describe the outcome of the final match of a tournament.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the outcome of the final match of a tournament.

Henrik Sundström won the tournament, beating Francisco Maciel in the final, 6–0, 7–5.


Question: What is the answer to the joke "Is Windows a virus?"

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What is the answer to the joke "Is Windows a virus?"

Aha! Jokes > Computer Jokes > Is Windows a virus?
Location: Clean Jokes > Computer Jokes > Is Windows a virus?
Viruses are well supported by their authors, are frequently updated, and tend to become more sophisticated as they mature. So there! Windows is not a virus.


Question: "#69 He asked when he could be a baby again. I told him "never"

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 "#69 He asked when he could be a baby again. I told him "never"

Women and little kids have one thing in common - crying spontaneously for the weirdest reasons ever (no offense, ladies). Remember the time you first saw Barrack Obama? Crying. The time meeting Iron Man out of this costume? Sobbing. Having to eat a plate of veggies? Bawling your eyes out. These and many other reasons are absolutely reasonable to set a kid crying, and they have been documented in a website called 'Reasons My Son Is Crying' by Greg Pembroke. He collects photos of funny babies sent from parents around the world and posts them to his website. He's even made a book on crying for no reason which you can buy on Amazon!
So whenever you have a temper tantrum about the fact that you cannot fit all the crayons in one hand, remember, that there's probably a funny kid who also feels the same. Have more examples of why do babies cry? Add your picture and quote to our list below and don't forget to vote!
The look on Obama's face.
#4 She found out that I have a name other than "Mum"
I mean, fair enough. I'd cry too.
I would cry too if I saw that video.
But the football ate his hair first!
To be fair, I cry when my dinner isn't ready. And then I eat cereal.
Seems legit, I wanted to marry my mom when I was her age. And I'm a straight girl.
#13 I said "good morning"
Frustration is possibly the worst emotion a child can have. Chin up, little one. Things get better.
Do you think she wants to slap him?
He must protect his BUSINESS!
That is going to be my kid one day, we love Halloween!
Oh man... the person holding her is SO OVER IT.
This is so hilarious! ????????????
As a parent I would not be amused. Not one bit.
Ummm, hello, who doesn't lick doormats?
I'd give him just a tiny tiny little bit, just to show him the taste and watch the reaction on his face.
I would cry too if that happened to me!
My gorsh! A right Royal hissy fit, this!
Haha....my son saw me carrying a tampon when he was younger and got mad bc I didn't give him any string cheese!
#56 I wouldn't walk across "the bridge"
If the Lego-man was bald ..
them little kid abs tho!!!!!!
#69 He asked when he could be a baby again. I told him "never"
Oh. I always wanted to do that too little darling.


Question: Describe the Misa River in Italy.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the Misa River in Italy.

The Misa () is a river in the Marche region of Italy. It runs for over 48 kilometres through the region. The source of the river lies south of Arcevia in the province of Ancona. The river flows northeast near Serra de' Conti, Ostra Vetere and Ostra. The river is joined by the Nevola before entering the Adriatic Sea near Senigallia.


Question: Describe Ford’s efforts to understand urban transportation and the relaunch of the Bay area bike share program.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe Ford’s efforts to understand urban transportation and the relaunch of the Bay area bike share program.

Ford is looking toward an urban future where people use many modes to get around–and using the data from the bike share to help inform its vision for what those future cities might look like.
If you rent a bike from the Bay Area’s newly relaunched bike share program, you’ll notice a new logo: Ford. Now known as Ford GoBike, the system–which is expanding tenfold from 700 to 7,000 bicycles–is part of the car company’s effort to remake itself as a mobility company (technically, they’re calling themselves an “auto and mobility company”).
The company doesn’t plan to stop selling cars. But as urban populations grow–half of the people in the world already live in cities, and that number may grow to 60% by 2030–the company realized that other solutions make sense on crowded, polluted city streets.
In 2015, the company launched a series of 25 “mobility experiments,” only some of which involved cars. In India, Ford worked with a partner to test car sharing among small groups of coworkers or apartment dwellers. In London and New York, it tested an on-demand shuttle. In Palo Alto, it tested sensor kits that attach to bicycles to track speed and other data that could potentially help in transportation planning.
Ford Smart Mobility, a new subsidiary designed to create and invest in new mobility services, launched in March 2016. By September, the company created its City Solutions team to work directly with cities to help make it easier for people to move. It also invested in Chariot, a shuttle service aimed at lower-income commuters (a $119 monthly pass equates to less than $3 a ride if used to and from work each day; other options include off-peak passes and individual rides with pricing that varies depending on demand).
Helping expand the bike share system, formerly known as Bay Area Bike Share, was another step in better understanding alternatives to cars and “how we could help to coordinate the inefficiencies” in cities, Robinson says.
Ford GoBike will be owned and operated by Motivate, the bike share company that previously ran Bay Area Bike Share. (Motivate also runs CitiBike in New York City, Capital Bikeshare in D.C., Divvy in Chicago, Biketown in Portland, Oregon, and four other systems.) Motivate has contracts both with the regional transportation planning authority and the five Bay Area cities where the system will operate. Ford’s investment will help the system expand. For Ford, the bikes serve as advertising, but involvement with the program is primarily a way for it to better understand urban transportation and use that knowledge to inform its work helping other cities plan for the future. The City Solutions team has been conducting user behavior studies for a variety of mobility solutions, and will likely do the same thing with GoBike. The company will also work with Motivate to help it better understand and improve the user experience.
Ford and Motivate began working with local officials and community members in 2016 to plan the new station locations for the relaunch; stations will begin to roll out on June 28. By the end of the summer, the system will have expanded from 700 to 3,500 bikes, and by 2018 it will include 7,000 bikes at 546 stations in San Francisco, San Jose, Oakland, Berkeley, and Emeryville. Of the stations installed in 2017, 35% will be placed in areas with a combination of factors including lower income, lower educational levels, and lower access to household vehicles.
Ford plans to study how the system works in different areas. “It really gives us a special chance to dig in deep in the city and focus on what that place’s specific mobility needs are, because certainly there are universal things, like congestion and air quality, but it’s different in every city,” Robinson says.


Question: What is Čauševići?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What is Čauševići?

Čauševići is a village in the municipality of Prijepolje, Serbia. According to the 2002 census, the village has a population of 132 people.


Question: What's going on in Zimbabwe?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What's going on in Zimbabwe?

Three people have been killed in Harare as soldiers and police fought running battles with hundreds of protesters, firing live ammunition, teargas and water cannon amid rising tension following Zimbabwe’s presidential election.
The army was deployed in the capital on Wednesday after police proved unable to quell demonstrators who claim Monday’s historic election is being rigged.
“The opposition... have perhaps interpreted our understanding to be weak, and I think they are testing our resolve and I think they are making a big mistake,” he said.
Amnesty International urged authorities to launch “a prompt and effective” investigation into the deadly military crackdown. “People must be guaranteed their right to protest,” said Colm O Cuanachain, its acting secretary general.
Opposition supporters have expressed growing impatience over delays in releasing the results of the historic vote, the first since Robert Mugabe was ousted after four decades in charge.
The scenes of violence contrasted dramatically with the jubilation and joy on the same streets that greeted the end of Mugabe’s rule in November. Then soldiers were seen as patriotic heroes. On Wednesday afternoon, in the opposition stronghold of Harare at least, they were seen once more as thuggish defenders of the ruling Zanu-PF party.
Early clashes took place outside the headquarters of the Zimbabwe Electoral Commission (ZEC), which opposition supporters accuse of bias, and spread rapidly.
“We support [opposition leader Nelson] Chamisa and we want him to be our president. The electoral commission is not fair. Our election is being stolen,” said a 19-year-old student among the protesters.
Some chanted: “This is war,” while others shouted slogans calling for the country’s president, Emmerson Mnangagwa, to step down.
Chamisa, 40, said the presidential results were fraudulent.
“We have won this one together. No amount of results manipulation will alter your will,” he tweeted before the army was deployed.
Priscilla Chigumba, chairwoman of the Zimbabwe Electoral Commission and a high court judge, has denied allegations of bias and strongly disputed accusations of rigging.
The authorities are under increasing pressure to release the results of Monday’s poll, which pitted Chamisa, a 40-year-old lawyer, pastor and leader of the main opposition party the Movement for Democratic Change, against Mnangagwa, 75, a longtime Mugabe aide and head of the Zanu-PF.
Zimbabwe’s rulers know that the widespread perception overseas that they have rigged an election would block the country’s reintegration into the international community and deny it the huge bailout package needed to avoid economic meltdown.
So too could scenes such as those seen in Harare on Wednesday afternoon. Images of soldiers firing on civilian protesters recall the darkest days of Mugabe’s rule and are a serious setback to Zanu-PF’s effort to improve its image overseas.
The US embassy said it was “deeply concerned by events unfolding in Harare”, called on leaders of all parties to call for calm and urged the military “to use restraint in dispersing” protesters.
Less than an hour before the violence, election monitors called for votes to be counted in an open and timely way.
Zanu-PF has already won a massive majority in parliament after sweeping rural constituencies by significant margins, official results show, but the parliamentary outcome does not necessarily indicate voters’ choice of head of state.
Under electoral law the result in the presidential vote has to be announced by 4 August.
Elmar Brok, the head of the first EU monitors to be allowed into Zimbabwe for 16 years, praised an “opening up of political space” before the poll but said the government had failed to ensure a level playing field and accused the ZEC of bias.
Brok called on the ZEC to make detailed results public to ensure the credibility of the election given earlier shortcomings. Other monitors also expressed concerns as the count went into a third day.
The two presidential candidates represent dramatically different ideologies and political styles, as well as generations. Pre-election opinion polls gave Mnangagwa, a dour former spy chief known as “the Crocodile” due to his reputation for ruthless cunning, a slim lead over Chamisa, a brilliant if sometimes wayward orator.


Question: What is George Clarke's Amazing Spaces?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What is George Clarke's Amazing Spaces?

George Clarke's Amazing Spaces is a British television series that first aired on Channel 4 on 23 October 2012.


Question: Respond in 2 sentences. "Who is Alan Ezard?"

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Respond in 2 sentences. "Who is Alan Ezard?"

Alan Ezard (born 15 April 1963) is a former Australian rules footballer who played in the VFL/AFL. He played 184 games for 200 goals, retiring in 1993.


Question: Provide a summary of Adam Rhys Mekki's career Respond in 8 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Provide a summary of Adam Rhys Mekki's career Respond in 8 sentences.

Adam Rhys Mekki (born 24 December 1991) is an English football midfielder of Welsh descent who plays for Bromley.
Mekki spent his youth at the Reading academy, before switching to Aldershot Town in 2006. He signed a professional contract with the club in the summer of 2009. In January 2011 he was loaned out to Southern Football League Premier Division side Oxford City, scoring two goals in six appearances. He made his Aldershot debut on 12 February 2011, replacing Jermaine McGlashan 81 minutes into a goalless draw at the Recreation Ground. He made his second appearance on 8 March, playing 45 minutes of a 1–0 win over Torquay United after replacing Albert Jarrett at half-time. On 26 April, it was announced that he had signed a two-year contract extension with the club. Mekki left Aldershot on 17 June 2014 after failing to agree terms on a new deal.


Question: "What can you tell me about ION MAIDEN?"

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 "What can you tell me about ION MAIDEN?"

ION MAIDEN will release for Windows PC, Mac, Linux, Xbox One, PS4 and Nintendo Switch in Q2 2019.
If you order now (Early Access), you'll be granted immediate access to an exclusive multi-hour preview campaign! (PC, Linux).
3D Realms and Voidpoint are proud to bring back the Build engine, which powered Duke. The full ION MAIDEN experience will be available in English, French, Italian, German, Spanish, and Russian in Q2 2019.


Question: What can you tell me about the Chinese government's loan to the Trump-backed development in Indonesia?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What can you tell me about the Chinese government's loan to the Trump-backed development in Indonesia?

You probably saw the news yesterday that just days before President Trump tweeted that he was intent on saving that sanctions-busting Chinese telecommunications company, China had agreed to loan $500 million to a major Trump-backed development in Indonesia. These kinds of situations are now basically commonplace in the Trump Era. But it is important to look at them from a macro- and a micro-perspective. The details are quite complex in the latter case. We are still digging into them. But I wanted to give you a first sense of what we’re finding, because they make Trump’s connection to the operation and potential profits look considerably tighter than what I’d been led to expect yesterday from early reports.
First some basic details. The mega project is something called the Lido City development about an hour outside of Jakarta. It’s like a mini-luxury city set on 3,000 hectares, which is just over 7,400 acres. Trump has a hotel there and a golf course and various other facilities. There’s also an amusement park planned on the grounds. That’s going to be built by a subsidiary of a Chinese state-owned company called Metallurgical Corporation of China (MCC). They appear to be essentially bringing with them $500 million in Chinese-government backed loans for the development of the amusement park. Makes sense: they’re both parts of the Chinese government. That’s the commitment that came just before Trump’s tweet and which has gotten all the attention.
So MNC actually says that it and Trump Org. are developing the theme park jointly. That sounds pretty tight. They actually refer to the whole project as a “Trump Community.” In other documents, they refer to the Trump Organization having licensing and management contracts for facilities in Lido City beyond the Trump buildings and residences.
To be clear, these are phrases. We don’t know what the underlying contractual connections are or what the value of these various relationships and management contracts are. If experience is any guide, Trump tends to keep his investments limited and relies on the Trump brand to leverage upsides and revenues from management and licensing. But the press references to this project being “connected to” Trump seem to significantly understate the relationship.