Question: Have you heard about the Travis Scott x Air Jordan 4s being sold at the Nike Outlet?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Have you heard about the Travis Scott x Air Jordan 4s being sold at the Nike Outlet?

UPDATE: A Jordan rep has reached out to confirm that “a limited number of Travis Scott x Air Jordan 4 “Cactus Jack” were misallocated” to the Nike outlet.
Though it was a hit shoe over the summer, Travis Scott‘s collaborative Air Jordan 4 “Cactus Jack” silhouette was recently spotted at a Nike outlet.
Alhough the store usually places sneakers on clearance, the the highly-sought Oilers-inspired model was not discounted and was sold at its original retail price of $225 USD. The price was still a lot cheaper than those who were willing to pay resell on them, which went up to double its retail value. Originally released in June, the Travis Scott x Air Jordan 4 “Cactus Jack” features a “University Blue” smooth nubuck upper with contrasting black laces, netting, soles, and heel tabs. Elsewhere a hit of red can be found on the inner lining while the back of the heels see “Cactus Jack” and Air Jordan co-branding.
Other models up for grabs are the “Win Like ‘96” Air Jordan 11s and “Gatorade” Air Jordan 6s discounted at $114 USD each. For more sneaker news, UNDERCOVER, YEEZY & Off-White™ face-off in this week’s footwear drops.
Hand-painted prints via wheat grass stalks.
Both American icons were born nearly a century ago.
Kevin Gates Drops Two New 'Luca Brasi 3' Singles, "Money Long" & "Great Man"


Question: Describe the 1954 Round Australia Trial. Respond in 53 words.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the 1954 Round Australia Trial. Respond in 53 words.

The 1954 Round Australia Trial, officially the Redex Trial was the second running of the Round Australia Trial. The rally took place between the 3rd and the 20th of July 1954. The event covered 16,900 kilometres around Australia. It was won by Jack 'Gelignite' Murray and Bill Murray, driving a Ford 1948 V8.


Question: What is radical 140 in the Kangxi radicals? Respond in 1 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What is radical 140 in the Kangxi radicals? Respond in 1 sentences.

Radical 140, meaning "grass", is one of 29 of the 214 Kangxi radicals that are composed of 6 strokes.


Question: What happened to Jews in France during WWII?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What happened to Jews in France during WWII?

This is a timeline of deportations of French Jews to Nazi extermination camps in German-occupied Europe during World War II. The overall total of Jews deported from France is a minimum of 75,721.


Question: Respond in detail. Explain the significance of the MCC-NPA's recent victory in Sitio Basakan, Manjuyod, and the struggle for liberation from US imperialism.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Respond in detail. Explain the significance of the MCC-NPA's recent victory in Sitio Basakan, Manjuyod, and the struggle for liberation from US imperialism.

A unit of the Mt. Cansermon Command – New People’s Army (MCC-NPA) victoriously ambushed a military operation of 15th Infantry Battalion (IB) Philippine Army troops in Sitio Basakan, Barangay Panciao, Manjuyod, Negros Oriental last September 3, 2:40 in the afternoon. An enemy soldier was killed in action and four were wounded.
This is in response to the long-running human rights violations brought about my military presence in the said areas for almost seven months. The people in the mountainous parts of Manjuyod especially in Barangays Panciao, Lukay and Lamugong and some parts of neighboring barangays in the town of Mabinay particularly in Barangays Luyang and Bagtik are suffering.
Widespread abuses against civilians is synchronous with triad operations (combat operation, intelligence gathering and civil-military operation) of the 15th IB: work and farming are restricted by the constant monitoring of every move of the residents, rampant stealing of farm animals, forcible entry of homes, structures near communities like Barrio Halls are occupied which sows fear among civilians and influences violent activities especially among youth and students. Furthermore, gambling is spread in the locality.
The 15th IB shows desperation because of its failure in defeating the NPA. Civilians are forced to confess the presence of the NPA, school teachers are accused of being NPA supporters and 15th IB elements threaten bombings in the area like that of Marawi City if something happens to the army conducting operations. So much worse, suspected NPA supporters are coerced to enlist as “surrenderees” so officials of the AFP can show off their alleged big accomplishment and also claim the reward money placed on supposed NPA officials from the milking cow program Enhanced Comprehensive Local Integration Program (E-CLIP).
As a matter of fact, the 303rd Brigade further increased its presence in the mountainous areas of Manjuyod, Mabinay, Ayungon and Bindoy in order to secure the interest of big mining firms in the said municipalities and the Ilog-Hilabangan River Basin Project that will bring harm to practically 30 barangays covered by Negros Occidental and Negros Oriental. The implementation of the river widening and mega dam construction will result to the dislocation of thousands of residents. This has been a long time plan under the Negros First Agenda of Gov. Alfredo Marañon of Negros Occidental.
The successive NPA offensives especially in Central Negros has been declared “alarming” by local government. As reaction, the newly-formed 94th IB was augmented to protect the multi-billion projects.
The genuine soldier of the people defends the interest and rights of the broad exploited masses, ensures the welfare of the livelihood of the people and not the interest of foreign capitalists, propagates pro-people culture and not anti-social activities and influences. Most of all, it is a weapon of the Filipino people for their liberation from prolonged slavery to US imperialism and the big compradors and landlords. This is the real soldier of the poor, this the NPA–the genuine soldier of the people.
The MCC-NPA will intensify tactical offensives to give justice to victims of militarization, violation of human rights, killings and destruction by the US-Duterte regime and its mercenary soldiers, the AFP and PNP.
The militarist and fascist regime of Duterte must be militantly confronted. The masses and progressive personalities must be careful of state-sponsored killings and must fervently oppose Martial Law even if it has not been declared nationwide. Overcome fear and be triumphant in overthrowing the US-Duterte regime!


Question: What is the US position on the Iraqi ultimatum to the Kurdistan Regional Government and the potential military action against the Kurdistan Region? Respond in 390 words.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What is the US position on the Iraqi ultimatum to the Kurdistan Regional Government and the potential military action against the Kurdistan Region? Respond in 390 words.

WASHINGTON DC, United States (Kurdistan24) – State Department Spokesperson Heather Nauert criticized the ultimatum that Iraqi Prime Minister Haidar al-Abadi issued on Tuesday to the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG), demanding that it turn over control of the Kurdistan Region’s airports and border crossings to Baghdad.
Erbil has three days to do so, or, Abadi threatened, Iraq would impose an international air embargo and ask neighboring countries to close their borders with the Kurdistan Region.
Nauert was challenged on the difference between the US position toward the Oct. 1 Catalonia independence referendum, which she called an “internal matter,” and its position on the Kurdistan independence referendum.
The difference was the threat from the Islamic State (IS), she said.
Kurdistan 24 later pressed a State Department official as to how they could claim that IS was nearly defeated in Syria, and it was time discuss the political settlement that should follow its defeat—as Satterfield had said—but claim that in Iraq, IS remained such a big threat that any such discussions must be postponed far into the future.
This official practically conceded the illogic, “I’m not the policymaker here.” As Davis suggested, IS is “an excuse” promoted by those who remain committed, for other reasons, to a “one-Iraq” policy.
Kurdistan 24 also asked Nauert about the US view of the threats of military action against the Kurdistan Region that have been made by Turkey, Iran, and Iraq.
“These threats of military action, you don’t firmly oppose them?,” Kurdistan 24 asked, again, more directly.
“We oppose violence from any party,” she responded.
Davis readily agreed that even the second answer was weak, and a weak US stance might tempt some party to attack the Kurdistan Region.
Davis believes that the most serious threat comes from Iran and the Iraqi militias under Tehran’s control.
President Barzani has repeatedly affirmed that the KRG will continue to fight IS, but if the Kurdistan Region were attacked, Peshmerga might have to be diverted to confront the new threat.
Davis also noted that Salih Muslim, head of the Democratic Union Party (PYD), the political wing of the People’s Protection Units (YPG), America’s most important ally in the fight against IS in Syria, affirmed that if the Kurdistan Region were attacked, YPG units were prepared to help defend the Region.
“That would also hurt the fight against IS,” Davis said.


Question: Respond in 1 sentences. What do you know about Christian August von Eyben?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Respond in 1 sentences. What do you know about Christian August von Eyben?

Christian August von Eyben (30 August 1700, Schleswig - 21 January 1785, Lübeck ) was a German lawyer and dean of the Bishopric of Lübeck.


Question: Describe the mission and goals of the Wall Street Bitcoin Alliance.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the mission and goals of the Wall Street Bitcoin Alliance.

The founders of the Wall Street Bitcoin Alliance (WSBA) announced this week the launch of the organization, which is composed of business and technology executives and leaders within the financial sector, including banks, broker-dealers, institutional investors, and hedge funds.
The WSBA said in a press release that its mission is to guide and promote comprehensive adoption of cryptocurrency and blockchain technology across financial markets.
To execute this strategy, the alliance will engage with policymakers, regulators, and technology innovators to guide the public dialogue about Bitcoin and blockchain technology so that financial markets can realize the full potential of these ever-changing and innovative capabilities.
Along with Quaranta, WSBA’s executive committee is composed of industry leaders across the brokerage, legal, and trading professions, including James Jalil, senior partner and head of the cryptocurrency practice at the law firm Thompson Hine; Gil Luria, managing director at Wedbush Securities; and Christian Martin, CEO of TeraExchange.


Question: What can citizens do to restore broadband privacy rights in California?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What can citizens do to restore broadband privacy rights in California?

What do they do when they can’t win the vote? Try to Stop a Vote.
Right now, politicians in Sacramento are holding up a bill that would restore your broadband privacy rights and directly reject Congress and the Trump Administration’s decision to side with Comcast, AT&T, and Verizon.
It is in fact the first bill ready to be enacted into California law that would be a direct response the latest string of efforts in Washington DC to curb consumer protections in broadband access. A.B. 375 (Chau) would ensure your broadband provider must secure your permission first before selling your personal information to third parties.
However, it has been stalled in the Senate Rules Committee – likely due to opposition from major cable and telephone companies. If they are successful at keeping the bill stalled until July 18th, then the bill is dead for the rest of this year.
They can’t win at the vote given the overwhelming public opposition to repealing our privacy rights in the first place, which is why this is their strategy.
In California, bills must make it past certain policy committees by specific deadlines, or they are dead for the year. But before a bill can be heard in any policy committee, it must be referred out by the Rules Committee in a fairly routine matter of deciding which committees should review and vote on the bill before presentation to the full Assembly and Senate.
Two weeks ago, AB375 became eligible to be referred out of the Senate Rules Committee. Assuming normal procedures, advocates expected to testify in support of the bill at a July 3rd hearing. However, the legislation has been mysteriously absent from consideration on the Rules Committee agenda. Two weeks have passed, the Senate Rules Committee has met twice, yet A.B. 375 has not been placed on the agenda, debated, or referred out to any policy committee.
Unless Senate President Pro Tempore Kevin de Leon, who leads the Senate - and chairs the Rule Committee - decides to ignore the pleas of Comcast, AT&T, and Verizon and, instead, follows normal procedural rules and moves the bill forward so it can receive a vote, the telecom lobby will win in arguably the worst way possible - by simply denying your elected representatives from even voting at all.
California is the 20th state to engage in restoring our broadband privacy rights, but it could be the first state to officially make it law by this year. A vast majority of conservative, liberal, and independent voters opposed Congress repealing our broadband privacy rights and naturally they demanded action. Several print publications in California have written positive reviews about AB 375. And the legislation itself has been thoroughly vetted and is ready for enactment.
We have until July 18th to push AB 375 to the finish line. Pick up the phone ASAP and make your voice heard!


Question: Where can I find adult cloth diapers?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Where can I find adult cloth diapers?

If you are looking for adult cloth diapers, then right place. you have found the Every day, more and more people are opting for the comfort and affordability that is provided by re-useable cloth diapers. On this page, you will find information on some of the tena adult diapers products.
These tena adult diapers are made of 100% cotton gauze. The outer gauze layer covers a terry-cloth center that is ultra absorbent so that it quickly soaks up moisture. The outer panels are made with extra fabric on the side to help prevent leaks. This is especially important if you tend to sleep on your side. The cotton gauze facilitates air movement to help prevent Tena Adult Diaper rash. Expect them to provide top of the line leak protection and to be extremely comfortable. Made in the USA, the tena Adult are environmentally friendly and easy to wash. This product has received a 5-star rating (on a scale of 1-5) on Amazon.com. Customers seem to be most impressed with the quality, comfort, absorbency, washability, fit and price.
These tena adult diaper are made of 100% cotton and work just like adult regular underwear – pull them up and down. No need for diaper pins, Velcro, or snaps. They have 2 complete layers of absorbent flannelette running throughout the body. There are 3 flannel layers along with a 3-inch soaker down the center of the liner. The soaker can be pulled out to speed up drying time. These diapers must be worn along with plastic pants. This product received a 5-star rating (on a scale of 1-5) from a gamer who wore them for over 36 hours straight.
2. Cloth diapers tend to be much more comfortable than their plastic counterparts.
3. Cloth diapers are usually made from 100% cotton which allows your skin to “breathe”. This, of course, helps to prevent that annoying diaper rash.
4. Using cloth diapers reduces the impact on the environment since fewer diapers are sent to the landfills.
5. It is easier to modify cloth diapers for a better fit.


Question: What is "chain migration" and why is the Trump administration against it?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What is "chain migration" and why is the Trump administration against it?

“CHAIN MIGRATION cannot be allowed to be part of any legislation on Immigration!” he exclaimed.
Trump was referring to an immigration-policy concept that allowing immigrants to sponsor nonnuclear family members causes migration to surge. Critics of liberal immigration policies argue that one immigrant will sponsor several others, who in turn sponsor even more.
Heidi Beirich, the director of the South Poverty Law Center’s (SPLC) Intelligence Project, told Yahoo News that “chain migration” is a phrase “from the anti-immigrant world.” It is popular among groups that want to reduce legal immigration levels like the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) and NumbersUSA.
Democratic leaders Sen. Chuck Schumer and Rep. Nancy Pelosi shocked Republicans Wednesday night when they announced that he had agreed not to deport the roughly 800,000 undocumented immigrants who had been shielded by DACA.
But Trump’s anti-chain-migration position may complicate negotiations going forward, depending on what, exactly, Trump is insisting. White House press secretary Sarah Sanders demurred Friday afternoon when asked about the “chain migration” tweet.
Regardless, immigration supporters see attacks against “chain migration” as an attempt to shift the U.S. to a less diverse population.
Stuart Anderson, the executive director of the National Foundation for American Policy, argued that “chain migration” is a contrived term that tries to scare people but that almost all the people who would be sponsored by a family member come through within the existing numerical limits.
In a 2011 op-ed for Forbes, Anderson said wait times for immigrants sponsoring family members are already long because of the State Department’s annual limits and that there are U.S. citizens still waiting to be reunited with siblings in the Philippines who submitted application back in the Reagan era.
U.S. immigration demographics significantly changed as a result of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, also known as the Hart-Celler Act, which abolished a national-origin quota system that favored immigrants from Northern and Western Europe. It was passed a year after the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the same year as the Voting Rights Act.
With the Hart-Celler Act, family reunification replaced national origin as the main deciding factor on permitting hopeful immigrants. There have been smaller changes to the immigration system, but this legislation — signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson on Liberty Island in New York Harbor — set the basic structure that’s still in place today. It committed the U.S. to accepting immigrants from all nations on a roughly equal basis.
The Trump administration has some ties to FAIR, which argues that less immigration “will allow America to manage growth, address environmental concerns and maintain a high quality of life.” Julie Kirchner, the former executive director of FAIR, is now the citizenship and immigration services ombudsman at the Department of Homeland Security. Jeff Sessions, who has spoken at FAIR events, is now the attorney general of the United States.
Beirich, of the SPLC, told Yahoo News there is no question that the number of immigrants went up because of the Hart-Celler Act.


Question: What is happening with the Great Wall of China? Respond in 12 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What is happening with the Great Wall of China? Respond in 12 sentences.

China’s cultural authorities are vowing to crack down on criminal damage along the sprawling Great Wall amid fears that the Unesco site is disappearing, brick by brick.
Officials at the state administration of cultural heritage (SACH) announced that regular inspections and random checks would be carried out along the estimated 13,000 miles (21,000km) of wall to ensure local municipalities are following national protection measures introduced a decade ago.
Until now, the laws have done little to preserve one of the world’s manmade wonders. While adverse environmental conditions such as wind and rain are blamed for eroding nearly a third of the Ming-era wall, officials have pointed to reckless human behaviour for destroying sections of it.
Villagers who live near the wall routinely steal bricks from it to use as building materials or to sell, according to China’s Great Wall Society. The group released a survey in 2014 that warned that many towers were also increasingly shaky.
Parts of the Great Wall date back to the 3rd century BC, though much of it – about 4,000 miles – was built during the Ming dynasty of 1368 to 1644. According to SACH figures, less than 10% of it is considered well preserved.
Dong said the degradation had grown worse over the years because of a lack of resources and oversight in municipalities across the 15 provinces that the wall traverses.
The Ming-era sections north of Beijing are the most popular with tourists, drawing millions of visitors every year and leaving parts of the massive heritage site defaced with graffiti. State media also reported that villagers took bricks or slabs with historic engraving to sell to tourists for 30 yuan (£3).
A surge of interest in “wild Great Wall” tourism, where hikes follow crumbling sections, also poses a threat to decaying stretches in remote regions, according to reports.


Question: Respond in detail. Can you explain what ‘daddy issues’ are and why some men may avoid or seek partners with them?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Respond in detail. Can you explain what ‘daddy issues’ are and why some men may avoid or seek partners with them?

What are ‘daddy issues’ and why do some men avoid or look for partners with them?
Sigmund Freud has got a lot to answer for, particularly when it comes to how we think about our parents.
While academics have proven time and time again that we learn our behaviour from our parents, it’s still a sore spot for people who don’t have great familial relationships to know that it could affect everything from personal finance to dating.
The term ‘daddy issues’ has come up in pop culture more times than can be counted, usually referring to women who are ‘damaged’ and might be easy to sleep with.
Tell a story about something you and your father did.
I always talked about how I raced go karts and that brought my pops and I closer together.
There are plenty of people out there who believe long term relationships are doomed to fail if you and your father didn’t get on, and it all dates back to Freud’s father complex (although he believed it was primarily a male issue).
Jung later developed theory that women could also be influenced by an absent or distant father, and would potentially try to overcompensate for that to try to gain affection or mistrust men as a result.
But what if you simply didn’t get on with your dad? How do you ensure that the prophecy doesn’t fulfil itself?
Healthy attachment – Dad is interested and well-engaged.
Detached father – Father is not there.
Unavailable father – Dad is there but focused on other things.
Sports dad – Father is intensely into sports and can only relate to his child on an athletic level, both as spectator and active participant.
Disciplinarian father – This dad has entered into a usually unspoken agreement that mum is the nurturer while Dad is positioned in the family as the disciplinarian.
‘Psychotherapy and high levels of motivation’ are Walfish’s recommendation for breaking the cycle of daddy issues, and making sure that not only do you avoid toxic relationships, but you avoid passing on these traits to any of your own children.
Walfish says: ‘If a parent thinks their parenting style falls into one of the less desirable categories, they need to take a painful, honest look within and become more self-aware.
In terms of dating specifically, try to stay away from partners who may be considered as having the same flaws as your father. Just because you lived a certain way as a child, doesn’t mean you need to experience it over and over.
Men can be trustworthy, attentive, and caring – even if that isn’t something you’ve been brought up with.
But, on that note, stay away from trying to seek affection at your own detriment. When you find someone that works with you to break the cycle of damaged familial relationships, you’ll understand that love is a two-way street.
If you’re worried that issues with your parents are affecting your relationships, speaking to an impartial professional is an important step in working through it.


Question: Explain the background of Lady Joan Holland.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Explain the background of Lady Joan Holland.

Lady Joan Holland (1350 – October 1384) was Duchess of Brittany as the second wife of John IV, Duke of Brittany. She was the daughter of Joan of Kent and Thomas Holland, 1st Earl of Kent. Her mother married secondly to Edward the Black Prince and was mother to Richard II. Her marriage to John IV took place in London in May 1366, but without the approval of King Edward III of England, Joan's step-grandfather, who claimed overlordship of Brittany. The couple had no children.


Question: What do you know about the plans of the "father of the world wide web" to decentralize the internet? Respond in 5 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What do you know about the plans of the "father of the world wide web" to decentralize the internet? Respond in 5 sentences.

A revolutionary startup was recently announced by the "father of the world wide web" which plans to radically decentralize the internet to give it back to the people.
(ZH) “For people who want to make sure the Web serves humanity, we have to concern ourselves with what people are building on top of it,” Tim Berners-Lee told Vanity Fair last month. “I was devastated” he said while going through a litany of harmful and dangerous developments of the past three decades of the web.
Berners-Lee’s new online platform and company Inrupt is being described as a “personal online data store,” or pod, where everything from messages, music, contacts or other personal data will be stored in one place overseen by the user instead of an array of platforms and apps run by corporations seeking to profit off personal information. The project seeks “personal empowerment through data” and aims to “take back” the web, according to company statements.


Question: Do you know who Antonio Duque is? Respond in 2 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Do you know who Antonio Duque is? Respond in 2 sentences.

Antonio Duque (born 13 November 1939) is a retired Mexican cyclist. He competed in the team time trial and the individual pursuit events at the 1964 Summer Olympics.


Question: Explain how exports can increase a country's economic pie.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Explain how exports can increase a country's economic pie.

Exports increase a country’s economic pie, but not the way you probably think.
Among economics data watchers, a country’s exports enjoy a hallowed status. The ability of producers in country A to sell goods and services to people in other countries is taken as a sign of A’s economic strength, although the underlying metric for economic strength goes unmentioned. In addition, job counters across the spectrum constantly count the number of jobs associated with exports. The more export-related jobs, the better. In a nutshell, exports are intrinsically beneficial—no questions asked.
The problem is that virtually no one, except perhaps for a workaholic, runs their personal economic affairs like this. Let's consider an example.
Countries export those products that, were it not for the exports, would obtain a lower price domestically than they would in the international marketplace. For example, suppose the United States banned the export of soybeans. If the world price of soybeans were, say, $10 per bushel, the U.S. export ban leads to a lower U.S. price, say, $5 per bushel, and an annual production level of, say, 50 million bushels.
Lifting the U.S. ban on soybean exports would cause the U.S. price to rise to the $10 world price. U.S. farmers would increase their soybean production as production deemed uneconomic at $5 becomes economic at $10. In addition, soybean related consumption in the United States would fall as consumption choices that are economic $5 per bushel become uneconomic at $10. Suppose soybean production rises to 60 million bushels and consumption falls to 45 million bushels. The difference between the higher level of production and lower level of consumption, 15 million bushels, would become U.S. soybean exports sold to foreigners at $10 per bushel.
Those who choose to export while importing as little as possible will find themselves ill-clad, ill-housed, ill-fed, and possibly dead in short order.
So, is the additional production of soybeans sold to foreigners intrinsically beneficial to the United States? Hardly. After all, additional production of soybeans is not costless. It means other agricultural products are not being produced; say it’s tomatoes. If the average cost of the additional soybean production in terms of tomatoes is, say, $7.00 per bushel, then the cost of the additional soybeans measured in foregone tomatoes would be $70 million. So Americans have fewer tomatoes worth $70 million as a consequence of soybeans going to foreigners. Where’s the gain?
Second, the 5 million bushel reduction in Americans’ soybean related consumption also imposes a cost on Americans. If the average consumption value of these foregone soybeans is, say, $7.00 per bushel, this means Americans incur a soybean consumption cost of $35 million. Again, where’s the gain?
It follows that exporting the 15 million bushels of soybeans imposes a cost on Americans equal to $105 million in terms of foregone tomatoes and foregone soybean consumption satisfaction. The idea that exports are intrinsically beneficial is bogus, regardless of who espouses it. Indeed, taken by themselves the soybean exports reduce the size of the U.S. economic pie!
Then how can we claim that the exported soybeans do in fact increase the U.S. economic pie? IT’S BECAUSE EXPORTS ENABLE AMERICANS TO IMPORT!!! Note the soybeans are sold to foreigners for $10 per bushel. That means Americans earn the ability to buy foreign goods (imports!) equal to $150 million. This means giving up soybean related consumption and tomatoes worth $105 million to Americans enables them to buy foreign goods worth $150 million. That’s a gain of $45 million for Americans!
That the gains associated with exports ultimately trace to imports is no doubt a bitter pill for many to swallow! Nevertheless, virtually all of us organize our own economic lives consistent with this idea. In the marketplace we produce goods and services which we sell (export) to buyers. This is the source of our incomes which we use to buy goods and services from others—that is, import. The more imports, the better.
People who choose to export while importing as little as possible will find themselves ill-clad, ill-housed, ill-fed, and possibly dead in short order. How can it be that what is economic wisdom for the individual not apply to a nation? Hint: it can’t!


Question: What has been Alex Azar's record on drug pricing?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What has been Alex Azar's record on drug pricing?

His record suggests he’s unlikely to push pricing policies that would hit pharmaceutical companies’ pocketbooks.
President Donald Trump tweeted Monday that his nominee for HHS secretary, Alex Azar will “be a star for … lower drug prices!” But the record of the former top executive for Eli Lilly, which tripled the price of a top-selling insulin drug while he led its U.S. operation, suggests a different story.
Lilly is one of three drug companies targeted by a class-action lawsuit that accuses the company, then under Azar’s watch, of exploiting the drug pricing system to ensure higher profit for insulin and has been fined in Mexico for colluding on the pricing of the drug .
Azar, who spent almost a decade at Eli Lilly, rising to become president of the drug giant’s U.S. operations before leaving earlier this year, doesn’t deny drug costs are a consumer issue. But his record there and as a top official in George W. Bush’s administration suggests he’s unlikely to push pricing policies that would hit pharmaceutical companies’ pocketbooks.
In recent years, Azar has defended pricing practices, and argued against the approaches to reduce costs to consumer s as Trump endorsed during his campaign, such as allowing the government to negotiate drug prices and importing medicines from oversees.
Instead, Azar has followed the pharma messaging playbook on drug pricing — deflecting attention to other parts of the health system, and even other countries, blaming them for the high drug costs paid by U.S. patients. He’s also justified drug prices as the cost of innovation.
Trump’s focus on drug pricing in announcing Azar’s nomination didn’t win over doubters, who no longer believe he is serious about going after the industry he once slammed as “getting away with murder.” But it will make it easier for critics to pounce on what will likely be the toughest barrier for Azar to overcome during his confirmation process in the Senate.
Sen. Bernie Sanders said Monday he will “vigorously oppose” the nomination of Azar.
“During Mr. Azar’s tenure at Eli Lilly, this multi billion-dollar corporation dodged taxes while charging Americans outrageously high prices for life saving prescription drugs,” Sanders said.
Sanders and Rep. Elijah Cummings commenced an investigation into Eli Lilly’s rising prices for insulin last year, spurring attorneys generals in Washington and New Mexico to look into the matter. The lawmakers questioned why the prices of the diabetes medicine whose main patent expired 75 years ago have seen huge jumps in recent years, with competitors often raising prices in tandem. One of Eli Lilly’s insulins, Humulin R U-500, rose 325 percent in price from 2010 to 2015.
Cummings tweeted that picking Azar is “like a fox guarding the hen house,” and a “slap in the face,” to Americans waiting for action on lower drug prices.
Azar contends the outrage over drug pricing “erupted because we have seen a complete fundamental restructuring of health insurance,” with a shift to high-deductible plans that puts the burden of drug costs on employees and individuals, he said at a conference in May.
While Azar makes a valid point, changing insurance policies without addressing drugmakers’ markups of existing drug prices, or high launch prices for new medicines, “is avoiding the elephant in the room.” said Ameet Sarpatwari, who studies drug prices at Harvard Medical School.
Even Azar acknowledged in his speech that if insurance companies reduced consumers’ out of pocket charges for medicines, those costs would show up elsewhere, likely in premium increases.
Azar has also attacked government regulators and payers for devaluing pharmaceutical innovation, suggesting that if the U.S. cuts pharma profits, it will see decreased investment in new drugs and fewer new cures.
“The narrow focus of costs of medicine to the exclusion of innovation would be self-defeating in the long run,” Azar said in a 2014 speech.
Sarpatwari worries such views will lead Azar to promote the idea that making it quicker and easier for drug makers to introduce new medicines will reduce pharmaceutical costs. Researchers have found that drug companies don’t price their products any cheaper when FDA lets them use the accelerated approval process or other tactics to speed drugs to market. Former FDA Commissioner Robert Califf recently said that despite claims by the Trump administration that faster drug approvals lead to lower cost drugs, there is no direction relationship between the cost of development and price of drugs.
Nonetheless, in June, Azar told Fox Business that getting more new drugs to market to increase competition among brands would help bring U.S. prices down. Yet there’s only one example the drug industry can point to in the U.S. where brand competition has led to lower prices — and many where competitors simply raise prices in tandem. For example, Democrats recently launched a probe into the rising price of multiple sclerosis drugs where drugs introduced decades ago have raised prices to match their newer competitors.
And while Azar expresses support for competition, one of the major factors keeping generic versions of insulin off the market have been drug company tactics known as evergreening — making incremental tweaks to their insulin versions or the devices that deliver it, to extend their monopolies for decades.
An article published in The Lancet in late 2015 found that most of the recent innovation in the insulin market has centered on improvements in delivery devices, blocking generics by agents that are indirectly related to the drug.
Azar has also opposed other ideas to encourage competitive drug pricing. He’s spoken out against studies known as comparative effectiveness research, used to determine which drugs are most cost-effective for treating patients with a disease. He argues that all options should be available since different patients may need different medicines. The problem however, is that if payers must make all drugs available, they have little leverage to negotiate lower drug prices with industry.
The result is that despite Trump’s tweets praising Azar as a champion for lower costs , few fighting for lower drug prices are pinning their hopes on action by Azar.
“This nominee has impeccable big pharma credentials but non-existent credentials when it comes to concerns on drug prices,” said Peter Welch, co-chair of the House Democrats Drug Pricing Task Force.


Question: Who represents Mancherial Assembly constituency in the Telangana Legislative Assembly? Respond in 4 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Who represents Mancherial Assembly constituency in the Telangana Legislative Assembly? Respond in 4 sentences.

Mancherial Assembly constituency is a constituency of Telangana Legislative Assembly, India. It is one of 3 constituencies in Mancherial district. It comes under Peddapalli Lok Sabha constituency along with 6 other Assembly constituencies.
Diwakar Rao Nadipelli of Telangana Rashtra Samithi is representing the constituency for the second time


Question: Describe the football career of Asnawi Mangkualam Bahar. Respond in 47 words.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the football career of Asnawi Mangkualam Bahar. Respond in 47 words.

Asnawi Mangkualam Bahar (born 4 October 1999 in Makassar) is an Indonesian professional footballer who currently plays for PSM Makassar and the Indonesia under-23 team. Mainly a right back, he can also operate as a defensive midfielder or central midlfielder. He is the son of Bahar Muharram.


Question: Explain the implications of the different statements issued by the UK Government and Porton Down that pertain to the Skripal case.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Explain the implications of the different statements issued by the UK Government and Porton Down that pertain to the Skripal case.

The Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity : The Skripal Case: It Looks Like Mrs May Has Some Explaining to Do!
1) That the experts at Porton Down had made a positive identification of the substance used to poison Mr Skripal and his daughter, Yulia.
2) That this positive identification concluded that it was a military-grade nerve agent.
3) That this positive identification was that the substance was part of a group of nerve agents known as ‘Novichok’.
1) That the analysis at Porton Down indicated the substance used to poison Mr Skripal and his daughter, Yulia.
2) That this indication was not able to positively identify whether the substance used was actually a nerve agent (much less a military-grade nerve agent), and left open the possibility that it may have been a related compound.
3) That this indication could not positively identify whether the substance was part of a group of nerve agents known as ‘Novichok’, or whether it was a closely related agent.
Mrs May’s statement claims positive identification of a military grade nerve agent of the “Novichok” class of chemical weapons. Porton Down’s evidence to the High Court shows that no such positive identification took place.
Two statements. Both cannot be true.
I do not know who poisoned the Skripals, how it was done, or for what reason. I continue to keep an open mind. But I do know one thing. It looks like Mrs May has some explaining to do.
Reprinted with permission from The Blog Mire.


Question: What is the movie Sipayi Ramu about? Respond in 65 words.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What is the movie Sipayi Ramu about? Respond in 65 words.

Sipayi Ramu () is 1972 Indian Kannada language film directed by Y. R. Swamy, based on the novel "Barale Innu Yamune?" by Nuggehalli Pankaja. It stars Rajkumar, Leelavathi and Aarathi in the lead roles. The supporting cast includes K. S. Ashwath, Shivaram, Vajramuni and Thoogudeepa Srinivas. At the 1971-72 Karnataka State Film Awards, the film was awarded the Third Best Film and Best Actress (Leelavathi).


Question: Describe the use and implications of the E-Value metric for sensitivity analysis in observational studies.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the use and implications of the E-Value metric for sensitivity analysis in observational studies.

The world often reminds us that association is not causation: Ice cream consumption and murder rates are correlated, but the former does not cause the latter. Rather, both go up during summer months. When we try to draw causal inferences from observational data for the effect of some exposure or treatment or potential cause on some outcome, we must always worry about the possibility of unmeasured confounding — that some third factor might explain away the association between our exposure and outcome.
As a professor at Harvard University in the School of Public Health and at Harvard’s Institute for Quantitative Social Science, I spend most of my time trying to understand and assess causality, both methodologically and empirically. A major component of my work involves developing sensitivity analysis calculations for unmeasured confounding in observational studies.
Sensitivity analysis is a means of retrieving unknown data, as best as possible, and integrating it with known data, thereby strengthening the validity of a clinical trial. Unknown data arises frequently in both randomized and observational trials; but in randomized trials, both measurable covariates (e.g., age, weight) and nonmeasurable covariates (e.g., religion, whether or not someone is a soccer player, etc.) are balanced, increasing the likelihood that any outcome will be due to the intervention and not due to differences in the two groups’ compositions. This is not the case for observational studies or trials, which are only able to be matched for measurable covariates. Therefore, in observational studies, it can be difficult to accurately assess whether the results of a study are based on the treatment or on some underlying, confounding factor, which is precisely what my work addresses.
In the case of observational trials, unmeasured confounding would be unknown data that may impact medical results in a significant way. Studying sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding, then, is a technique that attempts to assess how strong an unmeasured factor would have to be so that the observed exposure-outcome association is no longer significant.
In a recent paper, my colleague Peng Ding and I examined the association between maternal breastfeeding and infant mortality due to respiratory infections. Prior investigators found that after controlling for measured covariates such as age, birth weight, social status, maternal education, and family income, formula-fed infants were 3.9 times more likely to die of respiratory infections than breastfed infants. But the investigators didn’t control for maternal smoking. Might maternal smoking then be associated with less breastfeeding and greater infant mortality? In this case, 3.9 would be the observed risk ratio (RR), and maternal smoking would be the unmeasured confounder potentially influencing the outcome of the study.
In the past, approaches for unmeasured confounding in observational studies have sometimes been based only on intuitive appeals and criticized for making arbitrary assumptions. In an attempt to introduce a more evidence-based approach in this area, Peng Ding and I recently introduced the E-value, a metric to get around these limitations.
The E-value is calculated by the formula E = RR + sqrt[ RR x (RR-1) ] where RR is the risk ratio between the treatment group and the comparison group, and sqrt represents square root. In the maternal breastfeeding example, formula-fed infants would be the treatment group, while breastfed infants would be the control group. The E-value calculates the minimum strength of association that an unmeasured confounder would need to have to explain away treatment-outcome association. The higher the E-value, the harder it is to attribute the results of a trial to an unmeasured covariate. We derived this formula by considering all possible associations an unmeasured covariate could have with the treatment and outcome.
I calculate an E-value of 7.2, which is quite high. (The lowest possible E-value is 1.) If the E-value was 1 or close to 1, maternal smoking could easily explain away the observed association between breastfeeding and respiratory infection death. However, the fact that the E-value is so high indicates that maternal smoking probably could not play a sufficiently strong role in the causal relationship between formula feeding and infant mortality to explain away a causal effect.
The E-value helps us to interpret how strong the confounding would have to be to explain away our estimate, and thus how much evidence we really have for causality. It is applicable to any unmeasured covariate. In this case, an E-value of 7.2 would indicate that an unmeasured confounder would have to increase the likelihood of breastfeeding and decrease the likelihood of death from a respiratory infection by 7.2-fold each if breastfeeding were to have no casual effect.
If the initial risk ratio is less than 1, I must first take the inverse before applying the E-value formula; the paper also provides formulas when differences are used instead of risk ratios, and I recommend computing an E-value for the confidence interval as well.
The E-value is easy to use, relatively simple to interpret, and I think could go a long way in making it much easier to assess how much evidence there is for causality (i.e., that the treatment is the cause of an outcome, and not attributed to bias from unmeasured covariates) in an observational study.
The E-value will be useful to data scientists who want to reason about causality. Is your association between the treatment and the outcome causal? To help answer that question, calculate the E-value. I recommend that any observational study trying to assess causality should either report the E-value or else use some other sensitivity analysis technique. I hope that its use becomes routine. Science from observational data would be vastly improved if it did, because it will be qualified with a precise metric, rather than an estimation.
VanderWeele, T.J. and Ding, P. (2017). Sensitivity Analysis in Observational Research: Introducing the E-Value. Annals of Internal Medicine, 167: 268-274.
Tyler J. VanderWeele, Ph.D., is a Professor of Epidemiology in the Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. His research concerns methodology for distinguishing between association and causation in observational studies.


Question: What is Twitter doing in response to the US' indictment of Russian officers over the DNC hacks?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What is Twitter doing in response to the US' indictment of Russian officers over the DNC hacks?

It's also reviewing its policies on these accounts in the process.
The US' indictment of Russian officers over the DNC hacks is having an effect... at least, on Twitter. The social network has banned accounts for both DCLeaks and Guccifer 2.0 in response to the indictment. In a statement explaining the suspensions, the company told Engadget that they were "connected to a network of accounts" that had already been shut down for violating rules. At the same time, Twitter was aware that the shutdowns were considered overdue -- DCLeaks and Guccifer 2.0 have long been linked to Russia, and the indictments just formalized the connections.
"We're reviewing our policies in light of this and expect to make updates soon," Twitter said in an additional statement to the New York Times' Jim Rutenberg. "We recognize that to promote healthy conversation we need to be responsive to ways the platform is being misused and we are committed to that here and everywhere."
It's not certain what those changes might be. However, Twitter has faced more than a handful of accusations that it only belatedly recognized the threat of electoral interference on its platform, with bot purges, candidate labels and other anti-manipulation tactics only coming after the 2016 US presidential vote. This may be an acknowledgment that it needs to be more proactive in dealing with accounts linked to hacking and other criminal activity, especially when politics are involved.


Question: Wow! What an awesome collection! Could you tell me a bit about it?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Wow! What an awesome collection! Could you tell me a bit about it?

Here’s my current Masters of the Universe collection. I’ve had all of these for around 30 years. I recently inserted a couple of shelves to make the display more organized.
This is my second Castle Grayskull. I know I had two of them because I still have two thrones. I’m quite sure I used to have the original He-Man figure. He was probably broken at some point and thrown away. Most of my Masters of the Universe accessories are currently in a separate box; I’m impressed I have as many as I do, considering the age of these figures.
I have no idea what (if any) toy line that caterpillar creature is from, but it’s always been with my He-Man figures, so there it stays. I need a vest for Prince Adam and a chest piece for Sy-klone.
I’m expecting my Club Grayskull figures to arrive any day now, maybe even tomorrow, so these figures will be welcoming He-Man and Trap Jaw.
nice shelves. get the weapons out! the caterpillar is from The Other World by Argo.
Oh, wow! That potentially solves a 30-year old mystery! Do you know what the caterpillar was called? I searched through a bunch of The Other World photos but didn’t see it. Love the customs on your site!


Question: "What's the latest poll data on the Ontario election?" Respond in 17 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 "What's the latest poll data on the Ontario election?" Respond in 17 sentences.

Who is winning in Ontario and by how much?
In most elections, all of these approaches report similar findings, but there are differences in reliability.
In order to provide an estimate of sampling error, pollsters must use a sampling process that gives every voter a known probability of being selected. It is not possible to do that in an online survey for two reasons. First, we are still in a world in which not everyone is online, although this is becoming a smaller and smaller concern. Second, there is no standard system for selecting email or social media addresses which remains a fundamental problem. Pollsters manage this by establishing quotas of different demographic groups and/or weighting the results to ensure the sample looks like the broader public. But it is against opinion research ethical standards to apply margins of error to that data.
Since Doug Ford became the leader of the PC Party, we have conducted two online surveys and one telephone survey. All of these surveys used quotas to ensure the sample was generally representative and were then weighted to ensure the final sample reflects Ontario in terms of age and gender.
There is no question the PCs are in lead. In all three surveys, we found roughly 36 out of 100 people supporting the PC party with support varying from 34 to 37%.
There is some question about the relative strength of the NDP and Liberals.
While in all three surveys the Liberals were second, Liberal support varied from 21% to 28%.
While the NDP is third in all three polls, the telephone poll shows them much closer to the Liberals than either of the online surveys. In fact, they are within the margin of error of the Liberals in the phone poll.
As we track this election, we will continue to rely primarily on phone polling for the horserace and online polling to probe specific events and issues or to profile particular groups.


Question: Describe the decision of the Lahore High Court to allow the PTI candidate to contest the July 25 elections, and explain your opinion on it. Respond in 33 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the decision of the Lahore High Court to allow the PTI candidate to contest the July 25 elections, and explain your opinion on it. Respond in 33 sentences.

The Lahore High Court (LHC) on Tuesday gave permission to contest the July 25 elections to a Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) candidate who had used the pictures of the chief justice of Pakistan and the army chief in his campaign advertisements and posters.
The Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) had earlier this month disqualified Nasir Cheema, a candidate from Gujranwala's PP-53 constituency, after he was found to have violated the electoral code of conduct by using photos of two heads of institutions on his election posters.
The lawyer for Cheema, who had challenged the ECP decision in the high court, informed a two-judge bench today that his client had been ruled ineligible to contest the polls over alleged violation of the ECP code of conduct.
However, he asked why the ECP had disqualified Cheema on the basis of election posters that were put up on April 18, 2018, while the code of conduct had been issued on June 14, and the election schedule was published on May 31.
The counsel also complained that the person who had filed the complaint against Cheema never personally appeared before the ECP. "The complainant also doesn't belong to the PTI candidate's constituency but is a resident of Karachi," he pointed out.
The lawyer also asked why the commission had not revealed the specific law under which the candidate was disqualified.
The LHC should therefore allow Cheema to contest the elections, he maintained.
After hearing the arguments by the lawyer and ECP legal adviser Imran Arif Ranjha, the LHC bench, comprising Justices Aminuddin Khan and Sajid Mehmood Sethi, ruled that Cheema was eligible to contest the elections.
The ECP had earlier in July quizzed Cheema over the controversial posters and asked him to submit a reply explaining as to why he should not be disallowed from contesting the polls.
“Are they related to you? What is the army chief’s and CJP’s link to the elections? On what basis did you put up their pictures?” an infuriated Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Sardar Mohammad Raza Khan had asked the PTI candidate.
Before Cheema was disqualified, the CEC had emphasised that it was not a question of when the posters had been put on display, but why these images had been put up at all.
Whereas NS will have to appeal until after the elections. Free and fair elections for all to see. Brilliant election engineering. Well done!
The poor guy was just telling the facts.
Inevitable, selection is already done.
Good decision by the Lahore High Court. In a true democracy, everybody should be allowed to contest the elections. It's up to the voters to elect whomsoever they want to represent them in a legislative assembly of a country. Moreover, the candidates must be allowed to put up any picture of their choice on their election banners, posters, hoardings, pamphlets etc.
Under PTI banner everything is fine. Green signal for all PTI members no matter how serious the crime is.
As a compensation for his 'inconvenience' he should also be declared elected unopposed.
@Azam Qadeer , dear brother i agree with you.
Good common sense has prevailed. . He should have been cautioned but not barred from contesting election as I pointed out earlier in the comments.
Posters were put up BEFORE the EC code of conduct was published...az long as he agreed to remove the posters he should have been allowed to run in the first case.
The picture of anybody does not matter, still the contestants must have common sense, and refrain from using pics of persons not connected with election. Anyways it good that Cheema Sahab will contest the elections.


Question: Describe the events of a recent knife attack in Hamburg, Germany.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the events of a recent knife attack in Hamburg, Germany.

One person has been stabbed to death in a Hamburg supermarket and six people have been injured after being attacked by a man wielding a knife.
German police said the suspected attacker fled the shop in the Barmbek district of the north German city and headed towards a metro station, but was followed by witnesses who tackled him to the ground. The man was then arrested by plainclothes police officers. He was slightly injured.
The suspect was a 26-year-old born in the United Arab Emirates, police said, though they were still working to establish his nationality. Hamburg’s mayor said the man had apparently sought shelter in Germany and that authorities had been unable to deport him because he had no papers.
The person who was killed was described by police as a customer of the shop and believed to be a 50-year-old German man. One of the six victims injured in the attack is in a serious condition.
Zill said he had no information as to the man’s motive. “First reports about a possible robbery cannot be confirmed so far,” he said.
Police said they were confident he had been acting alone. One witness described his weapon as a kitchen knife.
Two witnesses to the attack said the man shouted “Allahu Akbar” but police said they were unable to confirm the reports. They declined to say whether the attack was being treated as a terrorist incident.
Bild newspaper reported late on Friday that armed police forces had searched the migrant housing centre where the attacker had lived.
A police spokeswoman said the motive for the attack was still under investigation. She said she had no information that the attacker was known to authorities as an Islamist, as reported by the newspaper Tagesspiegel.
Police said a 50-year-old woman and four men aged between 19 and 64 were injured in the attack, all of whom were German. A 35-year-old Turkish man was injured while trying to stop the attacker, they said. Media reports said he injured his shoulder while throwing a metal rod.


Question: Describe the life of Raymon W. Herndon.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the life of Raymon W. Herndon.

Raymon W. Herndon (1918–1942) was a United States Marine who received a posthumous Navy Cross for his actions in the Guadalcanal campaign during World War II.
Raymon W. Herndon was born on 1 November 1918 at Walterboro, South Carolina. He reported for active duty with the United States Marine Corps on 29 April 1942 at New River, North Carolina.


Question: Describe your favorite snack food.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe your favorite snack food.

I do love pizza rolls. Especially dipped in ranch. Did you know that you can mix pizza rolls into mac and cheese?! It's amazing!
Anyway, that's why I'll probably die before I'm 30 (either from a heart attack or fatal mouth burns).


Question: Describe the official response to the IRA's claim that it gave precise warnings about the Warrington bombs. Respond in 19 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the official response to the IRA's claim that it gave precise warnings about the Warrington bombs. Respond in 19 sentences.

A declassified document backs up official dismissals of a claim by the IRA that it gave precise warnings about the Warrington bombs before they killed two children.
In the aftermath of the attack, which killed three-year-old Johnathan Ball and 12-year-old Tim Parry, the IRA claimed that it had given the authorities detailed information which could have saved their lives by evacuating the area.
That was always denied by the police and by the government.
Now a document in a file declassified at the Public Record Office in Belfast shows that the version of events which the Home Office sent to Downing Street in the immediate aftermath of the bomb was consistent with the public denials that there had been clear warnings.
The two-page timeline of how the attack unfolded was sent to Number 10 two days after the bombing with a covering note by the home secretary’s private secretary, Miss J MacNaughton.
She said that the timeline dealt specifically with “the police denials of the terrorists’ claim to have given adequate and precise warning”.
Referring to the inaccurate claim by the IRA that it had given warnings which could have prevented deaths or injuries, she said that “we are considering what our approach should be for the future to this increasingly common terrorist tactic”.
She said that the government’s strategy was to deny terrorists “widespread news coverage of the results of their activities” by senior government figures “eschewing high profile statements”.
Alongside that, she said that the government wanted to “take advantage of opportunities to reinforce the pointlessness of PIRA’s actions, keeping the focus on the victims, and to counter any backlash against the Irish community generally”.
The two-page synopsis set out the Home Office’s understanding of what had happened: “At 8am on Saturday, 20 March, a male caller with a heavy Irish accent telephoned the office of the Samaritans in Manchester warning that a bomb had been placed at Manchester Piccadilly and that it would explode in 30 minutes.
“The codeword which he gave, as reported to the police, was not a recognised PIRA codeword, but in retrospect it bore a vague superficial similarity. There was no explosion, no device was found and the warning was later discounted as a hoax.
“At 11.58am the Samaritans office in Merseyside was telephoned by a male caller with a heavy Irish accent who said that a bomb had been placed outside Boots, and in response to a request for clarification indicated that he was talking about the centre of Liverpool.
The document went on: “In response to this call the Merseyside Police cleared the areas around a number of Boots premises in the city. However, at 12.25pm a bomb exploded in a litter bin in Bridge Street, Warrington.
“This was followed within a minute by a second explosion, again in a litter bin, nearby. Army bomb disposal experts have estimated the explosive charge as comprising about 0.5lb of high explosive.
“A three year old child was killed immediately and 56 people were taken to hospital with injuries, about five of which were described as extremely serious.
The note said that the police had “firmly rebutted” the IRA claim that there were “precise and adequate warnings beforehand”, adding of that IRA claim: “This is, of course, quite untrue.