Treasure Hunt: Real-time Targeting of the Long Tail using Training-Time Markers
Abstract
A principled approach to fine-tuning models for better performance and controllability on underrepresented use cases is developed through automatic inference of generation attributes.
One of the most profound challenges of modern machine learning is performing well on the long-tail of rare and underrepresented features. Large general-purpose models are trained for many tasks, but work best on high-frequency use cases. After training, it is hard to adapt a model to perform well on specific use cases underrepresented in the training corpus. Relying on prompt engineering or few-shot examples to maximize the output quality on a particular test case can be frustrating, as models can be highly sensitive to small changes, react in unpredicted ways or rely on a fixed system prompt for maintaining performance. In this work, we ask: "Can we optimize our training protocols to both improve controllability and performance on underrepresented use cases at inference time?" We revisit the divide between training and inference techniques to improve long-tail performance while providing users with a set of control levers the model is trained to be responsive to. We create a detailed taxonomy of data characteristics and task provenance to explicitly control generation attributes and implicitly condition generations at inference time. We fine-tune a base model to infer these markers automatically, which makes them optional at inference time. This principled and flexible approach yields pronounced improvements in performance, especially on examples from the long tail of the training distribution. While we observe an average lift of 5.7% win rates in open-ended generation quality with our markers, we see over 9.1% gains in underrepresented domains. We also observe relative lifts of up to 14.1% on underrepresented tasks like CodeRepair and absolute improvements of 35.3% on length instruction following evaluations.
Community
Relying on prompt engineering to maximize the output quality on a particular test case can be frustrating, as models can be highly sensitive to small changes, react in unpredicted ways or rely on a fixed system prompt for maintaining performance.
In this work, we ask:
Can we optimize our training protocols to both improve controllability and performance on underrepresented use cases at inference time?
We create a detailed taxonomy of data characteristics and task provenance to annotate our training data. This enables the model to implicitly condition generations and the user to explicitly control generation attributes at inference time.
This framework leads to :
🔍Boosts in long-tail performance ✅
🎛️Explicit user-control at inference ✅
📈Generalizable gains across tasks ✅
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- Statement-Tuning Enables Efficient Cross-lingual Generalization in Encoder-only Models (2025)
- Spotlight Your Instructions: Instruction-following with Dynamic Attention Steering (2025)
- How to Improve the Robustness of Closed-Source Models on NLI (2025)
- Text-to-LoRA: Instant Transformer Adaption (2025)
- Embedding-to-Prefix: Parameter-Efficient Personalization for Pre-Trained Large Language Models (2025)
- BLEUBERI: BLEU is a surprisingly effective reward for instruction following (2025)
- Data Whisperer: Efficient Data Selection for Task-Specific LLM Fine-Tuning via Few-Shot In-Context Learning (2025)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment:
@librarian-bot
recommend
Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper