zrguo
commited on
Commit
·
99c8d80
1
Parent(s):
beb4bc2
Move batch_eval.py to ./reproduce/
Browse files- README.md +1 -1
- reproduce/batch_eval.py +108 -0
README.md
CHANGED
@@ -1243,7 +1243,7 @@ Output the results in the following structure:
|
|
1243 |
|
1244 |
### Batch Eval
|
1245 |
|
1246 |
-
To evaluate the performance of two RAG systems on high-level queries, LightRAG uses the following prompt, with the specific code available in `
|
1247 |
|
1248 |
<details>
|
1249 |
<summary> Prompt </summary>
|
|
|
1243 |
|
1244 |
### Batch Eval
|
1245 |
|
1246 |
+
To evaluate the performance of two RAG systems on high-level queries, LightRAG uses the following prompt, with the specific code available in `reproduce/batch_eval.py`.
|
1247 |
|
1248 |
<details>
|
1249 |
<summary> Prompt </summary>
|
reproduce/batch_eval.py
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
import re
|
2 |
+
import json
|
3 |
+
import jsonlines
|
4 |
+
|
5 |
+
from openai import OpenAI
|
6 |
+
|
7 |
+
|
8 |
+
def batch_eval(query_file, result1_file, result2_file, output_file_path):
|
9 |
+
client = OpenAI()
|
10 |
+
|
11 |
+
with open(query_file, "r") as f:
|
12 |
+
data = f.read()
|
13 |
+
|
14 |
+
queries = re.findall(r"- Question \d+: (.+)", data)
|
15 |
+
|
16 |
+
with open(result1_file, "r") as f:
|
17 |
+
answers1 = json.load(f)
|
18 |
+
answers1 = [i["result"] for i in answers1]
|
19 |
+
|
20 |
+
with open(result2_file, "r") as f:
|
21 |
+
answers2 = json.load(f)
|
22 |
+
answers2 = [i["result"] for i in answers2]
|
23 |
+
|
24 |
+
requests = []
|
25 |
+
for i, (query, answer1, answer2) in enumerate(zip(queries, answers1, answers2)):
|
26 |
+
sys_prompt = """
|
27 |
+
---Role---
|
28 |
+
You are an expert tasked with evaluating two answers to the same question based on three criteria: **Comprehensiveness**, **Diversity**, and **Empowerment**.
|
29 |
+
"""
|
30 |
+
|
31 |
+
prompt = f"""
|
32 |
+
You will evaluate two answers to the same question based on three criteria: **Comprehensiveness**, **Diversity**, and **Empowerment**.
|
33 |
+
|
34 |
+
- **Comprehensiveness**: How much detail does the answer provide to cover all aspects and details of the question?
|
35 |
+
- **Diversity**: How varied and rich is the answer in providing different perspectives and insights on the question?
|
36 |
+
- **Empowerment**: How well does the answer help the reader understand and make informed judgments about the topic?
|
37 |
+
|
38 |
+
For each criterion, choose the better answer (either Answer 1 or Answer 2) and explain why. Then, select an overall winner based on these three categories.
|
39 |
+
|
40 |
+
Here is the question:
|
41 |
+
{query}
|
42 |
+
|
43 |
+
Here are the two answers:
|
44 |
+
|
45 |
+
**Answer 1:**
|
46 |
+
{answer1}
|
47 |
+
|
48 |
+
**Answer 2:**
|
49 |
+
{answer2}
|
50 |
+
|
51 |
+
Evaluate both answers using the three criteria listed above and provide detailed explanations for each criterion.
|
52 |
+
|
53 |
+
Output your evaluation in the following JSON format:
|
54 |
+
|
55 |
+
{{
|
56 |
+
"Comprehensiveness": {{
|
57 |
+
"Winner": "[Answer 1 or Answer 2]",
|
58 |
+
"Explanation": "[Provide explanation here]"
|
59 |
+
}},
|
60 |
+
"Empowerment": {{
|
61 |
+
"Winner": "[Answer 1 or Answer 2]",
|
62 |
+
"Explanation": "[Provide explanation here]"
|
63 |
+
}},
|
64 |
+
"Overall Winner": {{
|
65 |
+
"Winner": "[Answer 1 or Answer 2]",
|
66 |
+
"Explanation": "[Summarize why this answer is the overall winner based on the three criteria]"
|
67 |
+
}}
|
68 |
+
}}
|
69 |
+
"""
|
70 |
+
|
71 |
+
request_data = {
|
72 |
+
"custom_id": f"request-{i+1}",
|
73 |
+
"method": "POST",
|
74 |
+
"url": "/v1/chat/completions",
|
75 |
+
"body": {
|
76 |
+
"model": "gpt-4o-mini",
|
77 |
+
"messages": [
|
78 |
+
{"role": "system", "content": sys_prompt},
|
79 |
+
{"role": "user", "content": prompt},
|
80 |
+
],
|
81 |
+
},
|
82 |
+
}
|
83 |
+
|
84 |
+
requests.append(request_data)
|
85 |
+
|
86 |
+
with jsonlines.open(output_file_path, mode="w") as writer:
|
87 |
+
for request in requests:
|
88 |
+
writer.write(request)
|
89 |
+
|
90 |
+
print(f"Batch API requests written to {output_file_path}")
|
91 |
+
|
92 |
+
batch_input_file = client.files.create(
|
93 |
+
file=open(output_file_path, "rb"), purpose="batch"
|
94 |
+
)
|
95 |
+
batch_input_file_id = batch_input_file.id
|
96 |
+
|
97 |
+
batch = client.batches.create(
|
98 |
+
input_file_id=batch_input_file_id,
|
99 |
+
endpoint="/v1/chat/completions",
|
100 |
+
completion_window="24h",
|
101 |
+
metadata={"description": "nightly eval job"},
|
102 |
+
)
|
103 |
+
|
104 |
+
print(f"Batch {batch.id} has been created.")
|
105 |
+
|
106 |
+
|
107 |
+
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
108 |
+
batch_eval()
|