EXAONE-4.0-32B GGUF Models
Model Generation Details
This model was generated using llama.cpp at commit bf9087f5
.
Quantization Beyond the IMatrix
I've been experimenting with a new quantization approach that selectively elevates the precision of key layers beyond what the default IMatrix configuration provides.
In my testing, standard IMatrix quantization underperforms at lower bit depths, especially with Mixture of Experts (MoE) models. To address this, I'm using the --tensor-type
option in llama.cpp
to manually "bump" important layers to higher precision. You can see the implementation here:
👉 Layer bumping with llama.cpp
While this does increase model file size, it significantly improves precision for a given quantization level.
I'd love your feedback—have you tried this? How does it perform for you?
Click here to get info on choosing the right GGUF model format
🎉 License Updated! We are pleased to announce our more flexible licensing terms 🤗
✈️ Try on FriendliAI
EXAONE-4.0-32B
Introduction
We introduce EXAONE 4.0, which integrates a Non-reasoning mode and Reasoning mode to achieve both the excellent usability of EXAONE 3.5 and the advanced reasoning abilities of EXAONE Deep. To pave the way for the agentic AI era, EXAONE 4.0 incorporates essential features such as agentic tool use, and its multilingual capabilities are extended to support Spanish in addition to English and Korean.
The EXAONE 4.0 model series consists of two sizes: a mid-size 32B model optimized for high performance, and a small-size 1.2B model designed for on-device applications.
In the EXAONE 4.0 architecture, we apply new architectural changes compared to previous EXAONE models as below:
- Hybrid Attention: For the 32B model, we adopt hybrid attention scheme, which combines Local attention (sliding window attention) with Global attention (full attention) in a 3:1 ratio. We do not use RoPE (Rotary Positional Embedding) for global attention for better global context understanding.
- QK-Reorder-Norm: We reorder the LayerNorm position from the traditional Pre-LN scheme by applying LayerNorm directly to the attention and MLP outputs, and we add RMS normalization right after the Q and K projection. It helps yield better performance on downstream tasks despite consuming more computation.
For more details, please refer to our technical report, HuggingFace paper, blog, and GitHub.
Model Configuration
- Number of Parameters (without embeddings): 30.95B
- Number of Layers: 64
- Number of Attention Heads: GQA with 40-heads and 8-KV heads
- Vocab Size: 102,400
- Context Length: 131,072 tokens
Quickstart
You should install the transformers library forked from the original, available in our PR. Once this PR is merged and released, we will update this section.
You can install the latest version of transformers with support for EXAONE 4.0 by following the command:
pip install git+https://github.com/lgai-exaone/transformers@add-exaone4
Non-reasoning mode
For general use, you can use the EXAONE 4.0 models with the following example:
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
model_name = "LGAI-EXAONE/EXAONE-4.0-32B"
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(
model_name,
torch_dtype="bfloat16",
device_map="auto"
)
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_name)
# choose your prompt
prompt = "Explain how wonderful you are"
prompt = "Explica lo increíble que eres"
prompt = "너가 얼마나 대단한지 설명해 봐"
messages = [
{"role": "user", "content": prompt}
]
input_ids = tokenizer.apply_chat_template(
messages,
tokenize=True,
add_generation_prompt=True,
return_tensors="pt"
)
output = model.generate(
input_ids.to(model.device),
max_new_tokens=128,
do_sample=False,
)
print(tokenizer.decode(output[0]))
Reasoning mode
The EXAONE 4.0 models have reasoning capabilities for handling complex problems. You can activate reasoning mode by using the enable_thinking=True
argument with the tokenizer, which opens a reasoning block that starts with <think>
tag without closing it.
messages = [
{"role": "user", "content": "Which one is bigger, 3.12 vs 3.9?"}
]
input_ids = tokenizer.apply_chat_template(
messages,
tokenize=True,
add_generation_prompt=True,
return_tensors="pt",
enable_thinking=True,
)
output = model.generate(
input_ids.to(model.device),
max_new_tokens=128,
do_sample=True,
temperature=0.6,
top_p=0.95
)
print(tokenizer.decode(output[0]))
The model generation with reasoning mode can be affected sensitively by sampling parameters, so please refer to the Usage Guideline for better quality.
Agentic tool use
The EXAONE 4.0 models can be used as agents with their tool calling capabilities. You can provide tool schemas to the model for effective tool calling.
import random
def roll_dice(max_num: int):
return random.randint(1, max_num)
tools = [
{
"type": "function",
"function": {
"name": "roll_dice",
"description": "Roll a dice with the number 1 to N. User can select the number N.",
"parameters": {
"type": "object",
"required": ["max_num"],
"properties": {
"max_num": {
"type": "int",
"description": "Max number of the dice"
}
}
}
}
}
]
messages = [
{"role": "user", "content": "Roll D6 dice twice!"}
]
input_ids = tokenizer.apply_chat_template(
messages,
tokenize=True,
add_generation_prompt=True,
return_tensors="pt",
tools=tools,
)
output = model.generate(
input_ids.to(model.device),
max_new_tokens=1024,
do_sample=True,
temperature=0.6,
top_p=0.95,
)
print(tokenizer.decode(output[0]))
Deployment
TensorRT-LLM
TensorRT-LLM officially supports EXAONE 4.0 models in the latest commits. Before it is released, you need to clone the TensorRT-LLM repository to build from source.
git clone https://github.com/NVIDIA/TensorRT-LLM.git
After cloning the repository, you need to build the source for installation. Please refer to the official documentation for a guide to build the TensorRT-LLM environment.
You can run the TensorRT-LLM server by following steps:
Write extra configuration YAML file
# extra_llm_api_config.yaml kv_cache_config: enable_block_reuse: false
Run server with the configuration
trtllm-serve serve [MODEL_PATH] --backend pytorch --extra_llm_api_options extra_llm_api_config.yaml
For more details, please refer to the documentation of EXAONE from TensorRT-LLM.
Other inference engines including
vllm
andsglang
don't support the EXAONE 4.0 officially now. We will update as soon as these libraries are updated.
Performance
The following tables show the evaluation results of each model, with reasoning and non-reasoning mode. The evaluation details can be found in the technical report.
- ✅ denotes the model has a hybrid reasoning capability, evaluated by selecting reasoning / non-reasoning on the purpose.
- To assess Korean practical and professional knowledge, we adopt both the KMMLU-Redux and KMMLU-Pro benchmarks. Both datasets are publicly released!
32B Reasoning Mode
EXAONE 4.0 32B | Phi 4 reasoning-plus | Magistral Small-2506 | Qwen 3 32B | Qwen 3 235B | DeepSeek R1-0528 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model Size | 32.0B | 14.7B | 23.6B | 32.8B | 235B | 671B |
Hybrid Reasoning | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | |||
World Knowledge | ||||||
MMLU-Redux | 92.3 | 90.8 | 86.8 | 90.9 | 92.7 | 93.4 |
MMLU-Pro | 81.8 | 76.0 | 73.4 | 80.0 | 83.0 | 85.0 |
GPQA-Diamond | 75.4 | 68.9 | 68.2 | 68.4 | 71.1 | 81.0 |
Math/Coding | ||||||
AIME 2025 | 85.3 | 78.0 | 62.8 | 72.9 | 81.5 | 87.5 |
HMMT Feb 2025 | 72.9 | 53.6 | 43.5 | 50.4 | 62.5 | 79.4 |
LiveCodeBench v5 | 72.6 | 51.7 | 55.8 | 65.7 | 70.7 | 75.2 |
LiveCodeBench v6 | 66.7 | 47.1 | 47.4 | 60.1 | 58.9 | 70.3 |
Instruction Following | ||||||
IFEval | 83.7 | 84.9 | 37.9 | 85.0 | 83.4 | 80.8 |
Multi-IF (EN) | 73.5 | 56.1 | 27.4 | 73.4 | 73.4 | 72.0 |
Agentic Tool Use | ||||||
BFCL-v3 | 63.9 | N/A | 40.4 | 70.3 | 70.8 | 64.7 |
Tau-bench (Airline) | 51.5 | N/A | 38.5 | 34.5 | 37.5 | 53.5 |
Tau-bench (Retail) | 62.8 | N/A | 10.2 | 55.2 | 58.3 | 63.9 |
Multilinguality | ||||||
KMMLU-Pro | 67.7 | 55.8 | 51.5 | 61.4 | 68.1 | 71.7 |
KMMLU-Redux | 72.7 | 62.7 | 54.6 | 67.5 | 74.5 | 77.0 |
KSM | 87.6 | 79.8 | 71.9 | 82.8 | 86.2 | 86.7 |
MMMLU (ES) | 85.6 | 84.3 | 68.9 | 82.8 | 86.7 | 88.2 |
MATH500 (ES) | 95.8 | 94.2 | 83.5 | 94.3 | 95.1 | 96.0 |
32B Non-Reasoning Mode
EXAONE 4.0 32B | Phi 4 | Mistral-Small-2506 | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen3 32B | Qwen3 235B | Llama-4-Maverick | DeepSeek V3-0324 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model Size | 32.0B | 14.7B | 24.0B | 27.4B | 32.8B | 235B | 402B | 671B |
Hybrid Reasoning | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | |||||
World Knowledge | ||||||||
MMLU-Redux | 89.8 | 88.3 | 85.9 | 85.0 | 85.7 | 89.2 | 92.3 | 92.3 |
MMLU-Pro | 77.6 | 70.4 | 69.1 | 67.5 | 74.4 | 77.4 | 80.5 | 81.2 |
GPQA-Diamond | 63.7 | 56.1 | 46.1 | 42.4 | 54.6 | 62.9 | 69.8 | 68.4 |
Math/Coding | ||||||||
AIME 2025 | 35.9 | 17.8 | 30.2 | 23.8 | 20.2 | 24.7 | 18.0 | 50.0 |
HMMT Feb 2025 | 21.8 | 4.0 | 16.9 | 10.3 | 9.8 | 11.9 | 7.3 | 29.2 |
LiveCodeBench v5 | 43.3 | 24.6 | 25.8 | 27.5 | 31.3 | 35.3 | 43.4 | 46.7 |
LiveCodeBench v6 | 43.1 | 27.4 | 26.9 | 29.7 | 28.0 | 31.4 | 32.7 | 44.0 |
Instruction Following | ||||||||
IFEval | 84.8 | 63.0 | 77.8 | 82.6 | 83.2 | 83.2 | 85.4 | 81.2 |
Multi-IF (EN) | 71.6 | 47.7 | 63.2 | 72.1 | 71.9 | 72.5 | 77.9 | 68.3 |
Long Context | ||||||||
HELMET | 58.3 | N/A | 61.9 | 58.3 | 54.5 | 63.3 | 13.7 | N/A |
RULER | 88.2 | N/A | 71.8 | 66.0 | 85.6 | 90.6 | 2.9 | N/A |
LongBench v1 | 48.1 | N/A | 51.5 | 51.5 | 44.2 | 45.3 | 34.7 | N/A |
Agentic Tool Use | ||||||||
BFCL-v3 | 65.2 | N/A | 57.7 | N/A | 63.0 | 68.0 | 52.9 | 63.8 |
Tau-Bench (Airline) | 25.5 | N/A | 36.1 | N/A | 16.0 | 27.0 | 38.0 | 40.5 |
Tau-Bench (Retail) | 55.9 | N/A | 35.5 | N/A | 47.6 | 56.5 | 6.5 | 68.5 |
Multilinguality | ||||||||
KMMLU-Pro | 60.0 | 44.8 | 51.0 | 50.7 | 58.3 | 64.4 | 68.8 | 67.3 |
KMMLU-Redux | 64.8 | 50.1 | 53.6 | 53.3 | 64.4 | 71.7 | 76.9 | 72.2 |
KSM | 59.8 | 29.1 | 35.5 | 36.1 | 41.3 | 46.6 | 40.6 | 63.5 |
Ko-LongBench | 76.9 | N/A | 55.4 | 72.0 | 73.9 | 74.6 | 65.6 | N/A |
MMMLU (ES) | 80.6 | 81.2 | 78.4 | 78.7 | 82.1 | 83.7 | 86.9 | 86.7 |
MATH500 (ES) | 87.3 | 78.2 | 83.4 | 86.8 | 84.7 | 87.2 | 78.7 | 89.2 |
WMT24++ (ES) | 90.7 | 89.3 | 92.2 | 93.1 | 91.4 | 92.9 | 92.7 | 94.3 |
1.2B Reasoning Mode
EXAONE 4.0 1.2B | EXAONE Deep 2.4B | Qwen 3 0.6B | Qwen 3 1.7B | SmolLM3 3B | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model Size | 1.28B | 2.41B | 596M | 1.72B | 3.08B |
Hybrid Reasoning | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | |
World Knowledge | |||||
MMLU-Redux | 71.5 | 68.9 | 55.6 | 73.9 | 74.8 |
MMLU-Pro | 59.3 | 56.4 | 38.3 | 57.7 | 57.8 |
GPQA-Diamond | 52.0 | 54.3 | 27.9 | 40.1 | 41.7 |
Math/Coding | |||||
AIME 2025 | 45.2 | 47.9 | 15.1 | 36.8 | 36.7 |
HMMT Feb 2025 | 34.0 | 27.3 | 7.0 | 21.8 | 26.0 |
LiveCodeBench v5 | 44.6 | 47.2 | 12.3 | 33.2 | 27.6 |
LiveCodeBench v6 | 45.3 | 43.1 | 16.4 | 29.9 | 29.1 |
Instruction Following | |||||
IFEval | 67.8 | 71.0 | 59.2 | 72.5 | 71.2 |
Multi-IF (EN) | 53.9 | 54.5 | 37.5 | 53.5 | 47.5 |
Agentic Tool Use | |||||
BFCL-v3 | 52.9 | N/A | 46.4 | 56.6 | 37.1 |
Tau-Bench (Airline) | 20.5 | N/A | 22.0 | 31.0 | 37.0 |
Tau-Bench (Retail) | 28.1 | N/A | 3.3 | 6.5 | 5.4 |
Multilinguality | |||||
KMMLU-Pro | 42.7 | 24.6 | 21.6 | 38.3 | 30.5 |
KMMLU-Redux | 46.9 | 25.0 | 24.5 | 38.0 | 33.7 |
KSM | 60.6 | 60.9 | 22.8 | 52.9 | 49.7 |
MMMLU (ES) | 62.4 | 51.4 | 48.8 | 64.5 | 64.7 |
MATH500 (ES) | 88.8 | 84.5 | 70.6 | 87.9 | 87.5 |
1.2B Non-Reasoning Mode
EXAONE 4.0 1.2B | Qwen 3 0.6B | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen 3 1.7B | SmolLM3 3B | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model Size | 1.28B | 596M | 1.00B | 1.72B | 3.08B |
Hybrid Reasoning | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | |
World Knowledge | |||||
MMLU-Redux | 66.9 | 44.6 | 40.9 | 63.4 | 65.0 |
MMLU-Pro | 52.0 | 26.6 | 14.7 | 43.7 | 43.6 |
GPQA-Diamond | 40.1 | 22.9 | 19.2 | 28.6 | 35.7 |
Math/Coding | |||||
AIME 2025 | 23.5 | 2.6 | 2.1 | 9.8 | 9.3 |
HMMT Feb 2025 | 13.0 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 5.1 | 4.7 |
LiveCodeBench v5 | 26.4 | 3.6 | 1.8 | 11.6 | 11.4 |
LiveCodeBench v6 | 30.1 | 6.9 | 2.3 | 16.6 | 20.6 |
Instruction Following | |||||
IFEval | 74.7 | 54.5 | 80.2 | 68.2 | 76.7 |
Multi-IF (EN) | 62.1 | 37.5 | 32.5 | 51.0 | 51.9 |
Long Context | |||||
HELMET | 41.2 | 21.1 | N/A | 33.8 | 38.6 |
RULER | 77.4 | 55.1 | N/A | 65.9 | 66.3 |
LongBench v1 | 36.9 | 32.4 | N/A | 41.9 | 39.9 |
Agentic Tool Use | |||||
BFCL-v3 | 55.7 | 44.1 | N/A | 52.2 | 47.3 |
Tau-Bench (Airline) | 10.0 | 31.5 | N/A | 13.5 | 38.0 |
Tau-Bench (Retail) | 21.7 | 5.7 | N/A | 4.6 | 6.7 |
Multilinguality | |||||
KMMLU-Pro | 37.5 | 24.6 | 9.7 | 29.5 | 27.6 |
KMMLU-Redux | 40.4 | 22.8 | 19.4 | 29.8 | 26.4 |
KSM | 26.3 | 0.1 | 22.8 | 16.3 | 16.1 |
Ko-LongBench | 69.8 | 16.4 | N/A | 57.1 | 15.7 |
MMMLU (ES) | 54.6 | 39.5 | 35.9 | 54.3 | 55.1 |
MATH500 (ES) | 71.2 | 38.5 | 41.2 | 66.0 | 62.4 |
WMT24++ (ES) | 65.9 | 58.2 | 76.9 | 76.7 | 84.0 |
Usage Guideline
To achieve the expected performance, we recommend using the following configurations:
- For non-reasoning mode, we recommend using a lower temperature value such as
temperature<0.6
for better performance.- For reasoning mode (using
<think>
block), we recommend usingtemperature=0.6
andtop_p=0.95
.
- If you suffer from the model degeneration, we recommend using
presence_penalty=1.5
.- For Korean general conversation with 1.2B model, we suggest to use
temperature=0.1
to avoid code switching.
Limitation
The EXAONE language model has certain limitations and may occasionally generate inappropriate responses. The language model generates responses based on the output probability of tokens, and it is determined during learning from training data. While we have made every effort to exclude personal, harmful, and biased information from the training data, some problematic content may still be included, potentially leading to undesirable responses. Please note that the text generated by EXAONE language model does not reflect the views of LG AI Research.
- Inappropriate answers may be generated, which contain personal, harmful or other inappropriate information.
- Biased responses may be generated, which are associated with age, gender, race, and so on.
- The generated responses rely heavily on statistics from the training data, which can result in the generation of semantically or syntactically incorrect sentences.
- Since the model does not reflect the latest information, the responses may be false or contradictory.
LG AI Research strives to reduce potential risks that may arise from EXAONE language models. Users are not allowed to engage in any malicious activities (e.g., keying in illegal information) that may induce the creation of inappropriate outputs violating LG AI's ethical principles when using EXAONE language models.
License
The model is licensed under EXAONE AI Model License Agreement 1.2 - NC
The main difference from the older version is as below:
- We removed the claim of model output ownership from the license.
- We restrict the model use against the development of models that compete with EXAONE.
- We allow the model to be used for educational purposes, not just research.
Citation
@article{exaone-4.0,
title={EXAONE 4.0: Unified Large Language Models Integrating Non-reasoning and Reasoning Modes},
author={{LG AI Research}},
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.11407},
year={2025}
}
Contact
LG AI Research Technical Support: [email protected]
🚀 If you find these models useful
Help me test my AI-Powered Quantum Network Monitor Assistant with quantum-ready security checks:
The full Open Source Code for the Quantum Network Monitor Service available at my github repos ( repos with NetworkMonitor in the name) : Source Code Quantum Network Monitor. You will also find the code I use to quantize the models if you want to do it yourself GGUFModelBuilder
💬 How to test:
Choose an AI assistant type:
TurboLLM
(GPT-4.1-mini)HugLLM
(Hugginface Open-source models)TestLLM
(Experimental CPU-only)
What I’m Testing
I’m pushing the limits of small open-source models for AI network monitoring, specifically:
- Function calling against live network services
- How small can a model go while still handling:
- Automated Nmap security scans
- Quantum-readiness checks
- Network Monitoring tasks
🟡 TestLLM – Current experimental model (llama.cpp on 2 CPU threads on huggingface docker space):
- ✅ Zero-configuration setup
- ⏳ 30s load time (slow inference but no API costs) . No token limited as the cost is low.
- 🔧 Help wanted! If you’re into edge-device AI, let’s collaborate!
Other Assistants
🟢 TurboLLM – Uses gpt-4.1-mini :
- **It performs very well but unfortunatly OpenAI charges per token. For this reason tokens usage is limited.
- Create custom cmd processors to run .net code on Quantum Network Monitor Agents
- Real-time network diagnostics and monitoring
- Security Audits
- Penetration testing (Nmap/Metasploit)
🔵 HugLLM – Latest Open-source models:
- 🌐 Runs on Hugging Face Inference API. Performs pretty well using the lastest models hosted on Novita.
💡 Example commands you could test:
"Give me info on my websites SSL certificate"
"Check if my server is using quantum safe encyption for communication"
"Run a comprehensive security audit on my server"
- '"Create a cmd processor to .. (what ever you want)" Note you need to install a Quantum Network Monitor Agent to run the .net code on. This is a very flexible and powerful feature. Use with caution!
Final Word
I fund the servers used to create these model files, run the Quantum Network Monitor service, and pay for inference from Novita and OpenAI—all out of my own pocket. All the code behind the model creation and the Quantum Network Monitor project is open source. Feel free to use whatever you find helpful.
If you appreciate the work, please consider buying me a coffee ☕. Your support helps cover service costs and allows me to raise token limits for everyone.
I'm also open to job opportunities or sponsorship.
Thank you! 😊
- Downloads last month
- 1,019
1-bit
2-bit
3-bit
4-bit
5-bit
6-bit
8-bit
16-bit