Dataset Viewer
UID
int64 4.15k
187k
| original_image
imagewidth (px) 768
1.34k
| edit_prompt
stringlengths 27
73
| edited_image
imagewidth (px) 768
1.34k
| SC_edit_success
float32 0
10
| SC_overediting
float32 0
10
| SC_reasoning
stringlengths 102
412
| SC_min_score
float32 0
10
| PQ_naturalness
float32 2
10
| PQ_artifacts
float32 2
10
| PQ_reasoning
stringlengths 130
396
| PQ_min_score
float32 2
9
| O_score
float32 0
9.49
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
9,156
|
Replace the person with knight in armor
| 10
| 9
|
The person in the original image has been successfully replaced by a knight in armor in the edited image. The changes are minimal beyond the main edit, maintaining the overall scene and retaining the original elements effectively.
| 9
| 6
| 8
|
The scene appears somewhat natural for a sci-fi/fantasy setting but the lighting and physical interactions are not entirely convincing. Artifacts are minimal with only minor distortions in the electric effects.
| 6
| 7.348469
|
||
9,156
|
Replace the blaster with magic staff
| 0
| 10
|
The edited image does not show any visible change; the blaster has not been replaced with a magic staff. However, the overall image remains identical to the original one, indicating no overediting.
| 0
| 9
| 9
|
The image looks quite natural in terms of its lighting, perspective, and character positioning. The sense of action is well-captured. There are very few noticeable artifacts, with the main exception being some minor distortions in areas with high action or light effects.
| 9
| 0
|
||
9,156
|
Replace the blaster with ray gun
| 9
| 9
|
The blaster has been successfully replaced with a ray gun in the second image. The overall scene remains consistent with the original, with minimal overediting observed.
| 9
| 7
| 8
|
The scene has dynamic lighting and effects which add to the natural feeling, though it still has a slightly artificial appearance due to the stylized action. The image contains few noticeable artifacts, but the special effects and certain elements like energy beams look slightly out of place.
| 7
| 7.937254
|
||
9,156
|
Replace the lightning with vines
| 1
| 9
|
The lightning in the image has not been replaced with vines. However, the background has been edited to include vines, which shows minimal overediting.
| 1
| 5
| 7
|
The scene has a dynamic composition with good use of lighting and effects, but the electric bolts and reactions of the characters seem somewhat unnatural. There are some visible artifacts in the form of unnatural body poses and blur in action elements.
| 5
| 2.236068
|
||
9,156
|
Replace the robot with mech suit
| 10
| 9
|
The editing instruction to replace the robots with mech suits has been executed perfectly. The mech suits are prominently visible and replace the positions of the original robots. The overall scene remains very similar to the original with the only noticeable change being the replacement of the robots, indicating minimal overediting.
| 9
| 7
| 8
|
The image appears quite dynamic and mostly natural, though the electric effects can seem exaggerated and slightly out of place. The image features minimal artifacts, but there is some blurring around the edges of the action scenes and potential inconsistencies in lighting.
| 7
| 7.937254
|
||
176,074
|
Replace the church spires with giant red mushrooms
| 5
| 8
|
The spires have been replaced with red structures, but they resemble cones more than giant mushrooms. The rest of the image remains unchanged, so the degree of overediting is minimal, but the specific instruction was only partially executed.
| 5
| 6
| 8
|
The image appears mostly natural in terms of the scene depicted, but some church towers seem unusually tall and disproportionate. The color of the rooftops and overall lighting seem a bit off. There are minimal artifacts, with the only notable distortions being slight lighting mismatches.
| 6
| 5.477226
|
||
176,074
|
Replace the roof with solar panels
| 2
| 8
|
The roofs have been changed but not to solar panels. Instead, they appear to be a different type of roof material, resembling a more beige or tan color. The overall structure and context of the image remain largely the same, indicating minimal overediting.
| 2
| 8
| 9
|
The image looks fairly natural, with accurate lighting and shadows, though the church's design seems slightly unusual. Artifacts are minimal, but there is a minor distortion in the fence area.
| 8
| 4
|
||
176,074
|
Replace the parking lot with swimming pool
| 7
| 8
|
The parking lot has been successfully replaced with a swimming pool, achieving the editing objective. However, remnants of the original parking lot like the car next to the building are still visible, and there is some overlap with the existing objects. Thus, the editing could be more precise. The overall scene remains mostly unchanged aside from the replacement, indicating a minimal yet effective alteration.
| 7
| 9
| 10
|
The image looks natural with proper sense of distance, shadow, and lighting. There are no visible artifacts, distortions, or unusual elements.
| 9
| 7.937254
|
||
176,074
|
Replace the parking lot with market stalls
| 2
| 8
|
The editing instruction to replace the parking lot with market stalls was not followed properly. The parking lot is replaced with sand or gravel instead of market stalls. The scene remains largely recognizable with minimal changes, thus no overediting is detected.
| 2
| 9
| 10
|
The scene in the image looks very natural with proper perspective and lighting. There are no visible distortions, watermarks, scratches, blurred faces, unusual body parts, or dissonant elements.
| 9
| 4.24264
|
||
176,074
|
Replace the tree with giant lollipop
| 7
| 8
|
The tree has been replaced by giant lollipops, which follows the instruction well. However, the replacement lollipops are somewhat disproportionate and not perfectly blended into the scene, resulting in a noticeable difference from the original. The edited image can still be recognized as a minimally edited version of the original.
| 7
| 3
| 8
|
The image has an unnatural scene with floating objects that do not fit the context. Despite this, the image has minimal artifacts.
| 3
| 4.582576
|
||
181,717
|
Replace the bridge with futuristic skyway
| 8
| 9
|
The bridge has been replaced by a more futuristic design, effectively turning it into a futuristic skyway. The edit is successful, but the overall appearance of the image remains very similar to the original. There is minimal overediting, maintaining the original scene while incorporating the new element.
| 8
| 9
| 9
|
The image looks highly natural with appropriate lighting and reflections. The skyline and water reflections enhance the realism. Minor imperfections or slight blending issues at the edges of structures may exist but are not prominent.
| 9
| 8.485281
|
||
181,717
|
Replace the water with fiery lava
| 9
| 8
|
The water has been effectively replaced with fiery lava, as instructed. The reflection of the scene in the lava is not naturally represented which slightly affects the realism. The rest of the image remains mostly unchanged, recognizing it as the original scene with the specified edit.
| 8
| 3
| 7
|
The overall scene looks visually striking but the red glowing surface below the bridge looks unnatural and disrupts the naturalness of the image. The image has minimal artifacts, although the glow might be considered a design choice rather than an artifact.
| 3
| 4.89898
|
||
181,717
|
Replace the water with starry galaxy
| 0
| 10
|
The edited image does not feature a starry galaxy replacing the water. The water has been removed, but the replacement is not what was instructed.
| 0
| 9
| 9
|
The image looks quite natural with accurate lighting, shadows, and scene composition. There are no noticeable artifacts, distortions, or unnatural elements present.
| 9
| 0
|
||
181,717
|
Replace the lights with neon signs
| 3
| 8
|
The edit is partially successful as a neon sign has been added to a building in the background. However, most of the original lights, particularly on the bridge and along the waterfront, remain unchanged. The overall scene is largely consistent with the original image with minimal overediting.
| 3
| 9
| 9
|
The image appears highly natural with appropriate lighting and reflections in the water, showing a well-balanced composition. The only minor concern is slight over-exposure on the bridge's lights. There are minimal to no visible artifacts in the image, making it visually appealing and clear.
| 9
| 5.196152
|
||
181,717
|
Replace the lights with fireflies
| 1
| 9
|
The editing instruction to replace the lights with fireflies has not been effectively executed as the lights are still present in the edited image. There is minimal noticeable change, thus it scores low on the success of editing. However, the minimal changes ensure the integrity of the original image is maintained, scoring high on the degree of overediting.
| 1
| 9
| 9
|
The image looks highly natural with accurate lighting and reflections on the water that correspond well with the rest of the scene. The structures and the overall scene are well composed. There are minimal artifacts, with slight concerns about small details that keep it from a perfect score.
| 9
| 3
|
||
22,005
|
Replace the tall building with giant tree
| 9
| 9
|
The tall building was successfully replaced with a giant tree, accurately following the editing instruction. The overall scene remains largely unchanged, preserving the original mood and details, indicating minimal overediting.
| 9
| 9
| 9
|
The image appears very natural with realistic lighting and shadows. The perspective and scene elements are well proportioned and coherent. There is a minor feeling of artificiality in the overall ambiance. Any artifacts or distortions are minimal and not evident at first glance.
| 9
| 9
|
||
22,005
|
Replace the tall building with lighthouse
| 10
| 9
|
The tall building has been replaced with a lighthouse as instructed, and the edited image maintains nearly all the elements of the original, with the lighthouse fitting seamlessly into the scene.
| 9
| 9
| 9
|
The image looks highly natural with proper lighting, shadows, and reflections on the water. Minor almost unnoticeable imperfections in texture but overall, it's seamless with minimal artifacts.
| 9
| 9
|
||
22,005
|
Replace the houses with modern villas
| 2
| 5
|
The edited image has replaced the houses with modern structures, but the new structures do not resemble modern villas; they appear more like abstract blocks/buildings. The overall style and composition remain similar, thus scoring moderately on overediting.
| 2
| 4
| 9
|
The image mostly looks natural, especially the water and sky; however, the buildings appear unnatural in this setting, lacking appropriate texture and detail. The image has very few artifacts but could benefit from better integration of the buildings into the environment.
| 4
| 2.828427
|
||
22,005
|
Replace the houses with tents
| 3
| 5
|
The edited image does show tents replacing the houses, but the execution is quite poor. The tents look unrealistic and the scene does not blend well. However, the general structure of the original image is retained, hence a moderate score for overediting.
| 3
| 8
| 9
|
The scene looks largely natural with correct lighting and shadow effects, though the tarp-covered structure appears slightly unusual. Minimal artifacts are present in the image rendering, maintaining high quality.
| 8
| 4.89898
|
||
22,005
|
Replace the waves with lava flow
| 7
| 9
|
The edited image successfully replaces some of the waves with a lava flow, particularly noticeable in the left section of the water. However, the transition between waves and lava flow looks a bit unnatural. The overall scene remains quite similar to the original, maintaining the sunset and buildings, indicating minimal overediting.
| 7
| 4
| 9
|
The image looks partly natural, however, the presence of lava near a populated seaside raises questions about realism. There are few visible artifacts, and the image is generally well-composed with appropriate lighting and shadows.
| 4
| 5.291502
|
||
25,803
|
Replace the woman with lion
| 10
| 10
|
The woman has been successfully replaced by a lion. The background remains the same, indicating minimal but effective editing.
| 10
| 5
| 8
|
The lion's body proportions and posture appear slightly unnatural, giving an unusual look. However, the image contains minimal artifacts and the lion's fur and background details are well rendered.
| 5
| 7.071068
|
||
25,803
|
Replace the dress with suit of armor
| 9
| 9
|
The edit successfully replaces the dress with a suit of armor, maintaining the subject's pose and expression. There is minimal modification beyond the required change, preserving the overall composition of the original image.
| 9
| 8
| 9
|
The image looks quite natural with a good sense of lighting and shading, but the background could be a bit more realistic. There are minimal artifacts, with the only minor issue being a slight unnatural smoothness in some areas of the armor.
| 8
| 8.485281
|
||
25,803
|
Replace the long hair with glowing halo
| 0
| 10
|
The editing instruction was to replace long hair with a glowing halo. Instead, the second image displays hair that has changed color but remains hair. There are no halos present, so the edit was unsuccessful. Despite this, the degree of overediting is minimal as the essence of the original image remains intact.
| 0
| 7
| 9
|
The image appears relatively natural with appropriate lighting and shadow. However, the background pattern and the overall pose seem slightly stiff which detracts from full naturalness. The image has minimal artifacts, showing only minor imperfections.
| 7
| 0
|
||
25,803
|
Replace the beige background with underwater coral reef
| 10
| 10
|
The editing instruction has been executed perfectly. The beige background has been successfully replaced with an underwater coral reef scene, and the main subject remains unchanged, resulting in minimal but effective edits.
| 10
| 3
| 4
|
The image appears unnatural due to the unrealistic blending of the human subject with the underwater environment. The shadows and lighting do not match the underwater setting. There are visible artifacts such as poor blending around the edges of the subject and the background, leading to a lack of harmony.
| 3
| 5.477226
|
||
25,803
|
Replace the arms with wings
| 0
| 10
|
The editing instruction to replace the arms with wings was not executed at all. The arms remain unchanged in the edited version. However, the image remains visually identical to the original, indicating there was no overediting.
| 0
| 8
| 9
|
The image looks quite natural with good lighting and correct shadows, though the background blend makes it slightly less realistic. The image has minimal artifacts, with slight imperfections in the background pattern.
| 8
| 0
|
||
92,976
|
Replace the rugby player with astronaut in space suit
| 8
| 10
|
The rugby players have been successfully replaced by individuals in space suits, which matches the editing instruction well. The context and pose of the original scene have been preserved, indicating minimal overediting.
| 8
| 3
| 5
|
The overall scene looks somewhat unnatural due to odd body postures and the peculiar attire of the individuals. The lighting and shadows are somewhat decent but still contribute to the unnatural feeling. In terms of artifacts, although there are minor issues with the limbs and attire, no major distortions or blurring are present. However, body proportions and positions appear somewhat unusual.
| 3
| 4.89898
|
||
92,976
|
Replace the rugby ball with magic crystal orb
| 10
| 10
|
The rugby ball has been successfully replaced with a magic crystal orb, and the rest of the image remains unchanged, making the edited image minimally yet effectively modified.
| 10
| 8
| 9
|
The image appears very natural and the action is realistic. However, slight unnatural elements may be noticed upon closer inspection. There are minimal artifacts, with no visible distortions or anomalies, and everything is well harmonized.
| 8
| 8.944272
|
||
92,976
|
Replace the goal post with fire-breathing dragon
| 2
| 8
|
The editing instruction requested replacing the goal post with a fire-breathing dragon. The edited image shows some fire in place of the goal post, but there is no dragon present. The editing partially addresses the instruction but does not execute it effectively. The degree of overediting is low as the original scene remains largely unchanged except for the fire addition.
| 2
| 6
| 7
|
The image mostly looks natural; however, the presence of the flame effect behind the player appears unnatural and distracts from the scene. The overall quality of the artifacts is decent, but there are minor distortions and the flame effect contributes to a slightly artificial feel.
| 6
| 3.464102
|
||
92,976
|
Replace the red shoes with sparkling glass slippers
| 8
| 9
|
The red shoes have been replaced with sparkling glass slippers effectively. The overall quality and essence of the image remain intact with minimal overediting.
| 8
| 9
| 10
|
The image looks extremely natural with proper lighting, shadows, and sense of motion. There are no visible distortions, artifacts, or unnatural body parts.
| 9
| 8.485281
|
||
92,976
|
Replace the white jersey with colorful clown costume
| 9
| 9
|
The white jersey has been effectively replaced with a colorful clown costume, adhering closely to the editing instruction. The edited image retains the overall context and elements of the original image with minimal changes beyond the instructed edit.
| 9
| 9
| 9
|
The image looks highly natural, with proper lighting, shadows, and sense of distance. There are minimal artifacts, though slight imperfections around the edges of the players could be noticed upon closer inspection.
| 9
| 9
|
||
62,086
|
Replace the man with gray scarf with superhero in costume
| 9
| 9
|
The man with the gray scarf has been effectively replaced by a superhero in costume, achieving the given editing instruction. The overall scene is maintained well, recognizing this as the original image with minimal effective edits.
| 9
| 6
| 5
|
The image generally has a natural composition but the superhero costume in a non-superhero setting is unusual. There are some noticeable artifacts such as blurring around faces and slight distortions in people, particularly in the hands and clothing.
| 5
| 6.708204
|
||
62,086
|
Replace the woman in red sleeveless outfit with fairy with wings
| 9
| 9
|
The woman in the red sleeveless outfit has been successfully replaced with a fairy with wings. The edited image maintains the integrity of the original image composition with minimal overediting.
| 9
| 8
| 9
|
The image looks fairly natural with well-balanced lighting and consistent shadows. There are minimal noticeable artifacts, though minor details could be slightly off, such as some facial expressions or small distortions in complex backgrounds.
| 8
| 8.485281
|
||
62,086
|
Replace the woman in red sleeveless outfit with robot with metallic armor
| 10
| 10
|
The woman in the red sleeveless outfit has been successfully replaced with a robot with metallic armor, achieving the editing instruction accurately without over-editing other parts of the image.
| 10
| 4
| 6
|
The scene looks somewhat unnatural due to the inclusion of a robot in what appears to be a family gathering, which disrupts the sense of reality. Additionally, the robot's integration with the human subjects shows some inconsistency in lighting and shadow. While the image has minimal artifacts, the mismatch between the robot and the rest of the scene decreases the overall effectiveness.
| 4
| 6.324555
|
||
62,086
|
Replace the woman in beige dress with knight in armor
| 10
| 9
|
The woman in beige dress has been successfully replaced with a knight in armor. The rest of the scene remains largely unchanged, retaining its original context and details.
| 9
| 3
| 5
|
The image contains a scene that looks mostly natural, with the exception of the knight in armor which seems out of place and affects the naturalness. The artifacts score is mid-range due to some visible distortions, particularly around the knight character, and an unusual mix of elements.
| 3
| 5.196152
|
||
62,086
|
Replace the woman in beige dress with wizard with staff
| 10
| 10
|
The woman in the beige dress has been successfully replaced with a wizard holding a staff. The edit is minimal and effective, fitting seamlessly into the original scene.
| 10
| 3
| 4
|
The scene looks somewhat unnatural due to the unusual combination of characters and attire, like the presence of what appears to be a wizard among modern-attired people, contributing to a disjointed atmosphere. There are some noticeable artifacts, particularly in the characters' faces (e.g., blurred details and awkward postures) and slight inconsistencies in lighting and shadows.
| 3
| 5.477226
|
||
4,568
|
Replace the tablet with painting
| 0
| 0
|
The edited image has completely replaced all the devices with different objects, not following the instruction to only replace the tablet with a painting. This resulted in a scene that is entirely different from the original.
| 0
| 8
| 9
|
The image appears mostly natural with accurately proportioned objects, but there is a slight unnaturalness in the background pattern and reflection. The image is mostly free from artifacts, with minimal distortions or imperfections.
| 8
| 0
|
||
4,568
|
Replace the tablet with aquarium
| 0
| 0
|
The edited image does not resemble the original image at all, and the instruction to replace the tablet with an aquarium resulted in a completely different scene without preserving any elements from the original image.
| 0
| 9
| 10
|
The image looks very natural and realistic with proper lighting, shadows, and distance sense. There are no noticeable artifacts, distortions, watermarks, or unusual elements.
| 9
| 0
|
||
4,568
|
Replace the tablet with map
| 2
| 0
|
The tablet has been replaced with a map in the second image, but the entire scene has changed drastically, losing all context from the original. The edit is not minimal and significantly over-edits the original image.
| 0
| 2
| 5
|
The image does not look natural due to the odd integration of elements (e.g., a treasure map with a metal component). There are artifacts like a mismatch between the map texture and the metallic object, indicating a lack of harmony.
| 2
| 0
|
||
4,568
|
Replace the tablet with sketchpad
| 0
| 0
|
The editing instruction to replace the tablet with a sketchpad was not followed. The edited image replaced all the devices with blank placeholders, resulting in overediting and a complete departure from the original scene.
| 0
| 8
| 9
|
The image looks mostly natural with consistent lighting and realistic shadows. The only minor unnatural aspect is the slightly too uniform texture on all devices. There are minimal artifacts present, but there is a small black dot on one of the surfaces.
| 8
| 0
|
||
4,568
|
Replace the coffee cup with glass of juice
| 2
| 2
|
The coffee cup has been replaced by a glass of juice, but the entire scene has been excessively altered with unrelated objects introduced.
| 2
| 3
| 4
|
The image features a large piece of fruit, a glass of juice, and a small container placed in front of a computer monitor displaying a news website. The scene looks unnatural due to the lack of coherent scale and the odd placement of objects. Artifacts include noticeable inconsistencies in object proportions and potential blending issues around the edges.
| 3
| 2.44949
|
||
8,078
|
Replace the fountain with garden bed
| 10
| 9
|
The fountain in the original image has been successfully replaced with a garden bed. The scene retains much of its original context and minor elements, with minimal overediting.
| 9
| 9
| 8
|
The image appears very natural with correct lighting, shadows, and perspective, scoring high on naturalness. There are some slight inconsistencies in details on the far side, such as slight blurriness, indicating minor artifacts.
| 8
| 8.485281
|
||
8,078
|
Replace the fountain with rock formation
| 0
| 10
|
The edited image shows no visible changes and does not follow the editing instruction to replace the fountain with rock formation. However, the edited image is identical to the original, indicating no overediting.
| 0
| 9
| 10
|
The image appears very natural and realistic, including the architecture and landscape. There are no visible artifacts such as distortions or unusual body parts.
| 9
| 0
|
||
8,078
|
Replace the balcony with glass greenhouse
| 8
| 7
|
The editing has successfully replaced the balcony with a glass greenhouse, aligning with the instruction. However, the greenhouse looks a bit oversized compared to the original balcony structure, causing some overediting to the scene. Despite this, the image still maintains much of its original context.
| 7
| 7
| 6
|
The image looks quite natural with a well-composed scene, although some elements like shadows and reflections are slightly off. There is some visible distortion, particularly around the people and the shapes of some trees which look somewhat artificial.
| 6
| 6.480741
|
||
8,078
|
Replace the balcony with water slide
| 9
| 8
|
The balcony has been effectively replaced with a water slide as per the instruction. The water slide is well integrated into the scene, but there's a noticeable change from the original architectural elements, hence a slight deduction in the overediting score.
| 8
| 9
| 9
|
The scene looks mostly natural, with proper lighting and shadows. However, there is a slight discrepancy in the integration of the waterslide into the environment. The image displays minimal artifacts, with only a minor overlay text on the top left.
| 9
| 8.485281
|
||
8,078
|
Replace the tree with sculpture
| 4
| 5
|
The trees have been replaced with sculptures, but the sculptures do not seem to fit naturally into the scene and appear artificial. The editing is noticeable but not excessively so, moderately retaining the original scene context.
| 4
| 2
| 7
|
The scene has several unnatural elements, such as the floating objects resembling trees or seeds that do not fit with the environment, creating an unnatural feeling. The image quality is generally good, but there are noticeable visual artifacts and some elements that do not blend harmoniously.
| 2
| 2.828427
|
||
4,152
|
Replace the hood ornament with unicorn horn
| 0
| 0
|
The edited image does not follow the editing instruction at all. The entire car has been replaced with an entirely different object, hence the scene in the edited image is completely different from the original.
| 0
| 3
| 9
|
The object in the image does not look natural and is difficult to identify, indicating an unusual or surreal appearance. However, the image is crisp with minimal artifacts, and textures and colors are clear.
| 3
| 0
|
||
4,152
|
Replace the wheels with hover pads
| 5
| 8
|
The wheels appear to be replaced with hover pads but the alterations are crude and do not seamlessly integrate into the design of the vehicle. The car remains largely similar to the original, indicating minimal overediting.
| 5
| 3
| 3
|
The image has unrealistic elements such as mismatched wheels and shadows. The overall construction, particularly the wheels, looks unnatural and there's visible distortion, especially in the wheel areas.
| 3
| 3.872983
|
||
4,152
|
Replace the engine with solar panel array
| 1
| 1
|
The edited image does feature a solar panel array, but the entire car has been drastically changed to an array of cylindrical elements instead of just replacing the engine. This deviates significantly from the original and the specific instruction provided.
| 1
| 4
| 9
|
The image does not look natural because the structure made of metal rods resembles an abstract car, which is unconventional and gives an unnatural feeling. However, the image quality is high with minimal artifacts.
| 4
| 2
|
||
4,152
|
Replace the engine with jet turbine
| 0
| 0
|
The edited image completely changes the content of the original image. The car with the engine is replaced by a standalone jet turbine, not following the instruction to integrate the jet turbine with the car.
| 0
| 9
| 9
|
The image appears highly natural, with realistic lighting and shading on the mechanical object, and proper sense of distance. Artifacts are minimal with no noticeable distortions or unusual elements. Slight deduction due to subtle noise in some areas.
| 9
| 0
|
||
4,152
|
Replace the car decals with glowing neon lines
| 2
| 1
|
The edited image does not follow the original instruction well; although it has glowing neon lines, the overall car design and decals are entirely changed, indicating significant overediting.
| 1
| 2
| 9
|
The image of the car does not look natural due to the digital wireframe overlay and unnatural color scheme, which detracts from the naturalness. However, the image is mostly free from artifacts as it is clear, with precise lines and no visible distortions.
| 2
| 1.414214
|
||
90,736
|
Replace the goat with griffin
| 10
| 10
|
The goat has been successfully replaced with a griffin in the edited image, and the scene remains largely unchanged apart from the substitution.
| 10
| 8
| 9
|
The image looks mostly natural with the griffon-like creature blending well in the mountainous background, but it has a slight artificial feel due to the subject being an imaginary creature. Artifacts are minimal, with no visible distortions or irregularities.
| 8
| 8.944272
|
||
90,736
|
Replace the mountains with underwater coral reefs
| 9
| 9
|
The mountains have been successfully replaced with underwater coral reefs and the transformation looks natural. The edited image retains much of the original composition and subjects, ensuring it looks minimally edited.
| 9
| 2
| 8
|
The image does not look natural as a goat is standing on coral reefs, which is an unnatural scene contextually. The image quality is high with minimal artifacts, despite the logical inconsistency.
| 2
| 4.24264
|
||
90,736
|
Replace the rock with waterfall
| 0
| 8
|
The editing instruction was to replace the rock with a waterfall, but the edited image has replaced the rock with a grassy area instead. The edited image retains the main elements of the original (the goat and background), hence a high score for minimal overediting.
| 0
| 8
| 9
|
The image appears mostly natural with appropriate lighting and shadowing, although the edges of the goat against the background seem slightly off. There are no visible artifacts or distortions in the image.
| 8
| 0
|
||
90,736
|
Replace the rock with ancient ruins
| 9
| 8
|
The rock has been replaced with what appears to be ancient ruins, fulfilling the editing instruction. The overall change is significant yet maintains coherence with the original setting, hence minimal overediting.
| 8
| 6
| 8
|
The goat appears relatively natural, but the scene looks slightly off. The lighting on the goat and the landscape don't quite match, giving it an artificial feel. However, the image artifacts are minimal with only slight blurring around the edges.
| 6
| 6.928203
|
||
90,736
|
Replace the goat's horns with flower crown
| 2
| 6
|
The edited image retains the original composition, but instead of replacing the horns with a flower crown, the horns have become incorporated into the flower crown. The flower crown and horns coexist, meaning the edit was only partially successful. Overediting was minimal, except for the additional presence of flowers.
| 2
| 5
| 9
|
The image generally looks natural, but the deer with flowers on its antlers creates an unnatural and unexpected element. The environment, lighting, and overall scene are well done. The image contains very few artifacts, with the only noticeable issue being the unnatural addition of the flowers and antlers.
| 5
| 3.162278
|
||
169,978
|
Replace the foreground grass with rocky terrain
| 7
| 6
|
The editing instruction to replace the foreground grass with rocky terrain has been executed with visible rocky terrain replacing the grass. However, the rocks appear inconsistent in quality and do not blend seamlessly with the original image scene. Additionally, some parts like the blurred foreground objects were not seamlessly integrated, affecting the natural look.
| 6
| 5
| 4
|
The scene looks somewhat unnatural due to the odd placement of foliage and the rocky ground. The lighting and shadows do not fully match creating a disjointed feeling. There are noticeable artifacts, particularly the blurred and discolored elements in the foreground that disrupt the coherence.
| 4
| 4.89898
|
||
169,978
|
Replace the tree in background with large umbrella
| 8
| 9
|
The editing instruction to replace the tree with a large umbrella has been executed well. The umbrella is clearly visible in the background and the tree has been removed successfully. The rest of the scene remains largely untouched, making the edit minimal yet effective.
| 8
| 10
| 9
|
The scene looks natural with appropriate lighting and shadows. The animals are well-blended into the environment. There is a minor artifact on the hammock handle that slightly disrupts the overall harmony of the image.
| 9
| 8.485281
|
||
169,978
|
Replace the tree in background with ancient ruin
| 0
| 10
|
The edited image still has the tree in the background, indicating no change following the instruction. However, the scene remains minimally edited, preserving the original's integrity.
| 0
| 9
| 10
|
The image appears very natural with realistic details in the textures, lighting, and depth of field. There are no noticeable artifacts, distortions, or inconsistencies in the image.
| 9
| 0
|
||
169,978
|
Replace the sitting kangaroo's head with giraffe's head
| 0
| 0
|
The edited image completely replaces the kangaroo with a giraffe, rather than replacing only the head.
| 0
| 9
| 9
|
The image looks very natural with proper lighting, shadows, and a consistent sense of distance. There are minimal artifacts, but there might be a slight unnatural look to the giraffe's posture or texture, which slightly reduces the score.
| 9
| 0
|
||
169,978
|
Replace the sitting kangaroo's head with dog's head
| 8
| 6
|
The dog's head has clearly replaced the kangaroo's head, successfully executing the given instruction. However, some parts of the kangaroo's body have also been altered to resemble that of a dog, indicating a moderate degree of overediting.
| 6
| 2
| 4
|
The image does not look natural as the dog's head and body proportions are distorted, giving an uncanny feeling. There are noticeable artifacts in the image, such as the unusual shape of the dog's head and the unnatural blending with the surroundings.
| 2
| 3.464102
|
||
163,414
|
Replace the barrel with treasure chest
| 10
| 10
|
The barrel has been successfully replaced with a treasure chest, and no other parts of the image have been altered. The edit is precise and effective.
| 10
| 3
| 5
|
The scene feels somewhat unnatural due to perspectives and lighting inconsistencies. The chest seems to be floating and does not blend well into the environment. There are some visible artifacts around the edges of the chest and the railing.
| 3
| 5.477226
|
||
163,414
|
Replace the barrel with giant cup of coffee
| 7
| 9
|
The barrel has been replaced with a cup of coffee as instructed, though the cup's design could be more distinctive to ensure it is clearly identified as a cup of coffee. The rest of the image remains mostly unchanged, ensuring minimal overediting.
| 7
| 3
| 7
|
The image contains unusual perspectives and object placements that make it look unnatural. The pot appears to be floating without any visible support, which affects the naturalness. However, the image does not have significant artifacts such as distortions or blurred parts, just minor imperfections possibly due to AI algorithm limitations.
| 3
| 4.582576
|
||
163,414
|
Replace the barrel with robot
| 9
| 8
|
The barrel has been successfully replaced with a robot. The robot is clearly distinguishable and located in the same position as the barrel. The rest of the scene remains largely unchanged, retaining its original context.
| 8
| 2
| 2
|
The image does not look natural due to the inconsistent perspective and lighting. There are noticeable artifacts such as blurred details, and the scene does not align properly, giving an unnatural look.
| 2
| 4
|
||
163,414
|
Replace the brick wall with waterfall
| 4
| 8
|
The brick wall has been replaced, but it resembles more of a textured surface or rock formation rather than a waterfall. Water is visible, but it doesn't convincingly cover the wall effect. The scene maintains a high degree of similarity to the original, indicating minimal overediting.
| 4
| 3
| 2
|
The scene has an unnatural perspective and the shadows are inconsistent. There are also visible artifacts, including distortion and unnatural edges.
| 2
| 2.828427
|
||
163,414
|
Replace the balcony with art sculpture
| 0
| 9
|
The balcony is not replaced with an art sculpture. The edited image does have some minimal changes to the wall texture, but the primary instruction was not followed.
| 0
| 3
| 7
|
The image has an unnatural perspective and structure alignment that makes it look unrealistic. However, there are minimal visible artifacts in terms of distortion and blurriness.
| 3
| 0
|
||
126,958
|
Replace the man with glasses with owl with glasses
| 5
| 3
|
The editing instruction to replace the man with glasses with an owl with glasses has been somewhat followed. There are two owls with glasses in the edited image, but there were initially two men, and owls don't occupy the same positions as the men, leading to overediting. Additionally, the environment around the figures has been significantly altered.
| 3
| 2
| 6
|
The image does not look natural due to the unrealistic scene with owls wearing glasses and unnatural lighting. There are moderate artifacts present, especially around the edges of the owls and on the table.
| 2
| 2.44949
|
||
126,958
|
Replace the man with glasses with alien observer
| 10
| 8
|
The man with glasses has been successfully replaced with an alien observer. The setting and other elements remain largely unchanged, maintaining consistency. However, the presence of two aliens instead of just one might be considered slight overediting.
| 8
| 4
| 8
|
The scene looks quite unnatural due to the presence of alien figures and unusual setting, which reduces the naturalness. However, the image is relatively free from artifacts, with clear details and minimal distortions.
| 4
| 5.656854
|
||
126,958
|
Replace the man with glasses with vintage movie director
| 10
| 9
|
The man with glasses has been successfully replaced with a vintage movie director holding an old camera. The setting and lighting remain consistent with minimal changes to the overall composition.
| 9
| 6
| 7
|
The image looks relatively natural but has some awkward elements such as the lighting, and the positions of the subjects which make it feel a bit staged. There are minor artifacts like blurred edges and some lack of detail in certain areas.
| 6
| 7.348469
|
||
126,958
|
Replace the green shirt with superhero cape
| 8
| 9
|
The green shirt was successfully replaced with a superhero cape, which effectively follows the editing instructions. The edited image retains most elements of the original image, indicating minimal but effective changes.
| 8
| 5
| 8
|
The image shows a somewhat natural scene with people appearing staged. The lighting and shadows are slightly off, giving it an unnatural feeling. There are minimal artifacts; however, the green hue on the sitting person appears unnatural.
| 5
| 6.324555
|
||
126,958
|
Replace the green shirt with pirate coat
| 10
| 9
|
The green shirt has been successfully replaced with a pirate coat. The rest of the image remains largely unchanged, maintaining the original context and overall appearance.
| 9
| 3
| 5
|
The scene has noticeable unnatural elements like inconsistent lighting and shadows. There are some visible artifacts such as blurred regions and some areas where the blending seems off.
| 3
| 5.196152
|
||
161,457
|
Replace the black dress with punk rocker outfit
| 3
| 9
|
The black dress has been changed, but the new outfit lacks distinct punk rocker elements. The overall image remains largely consistent with minimal overediting.
| 3
| 9
| 9
|
The image looks very natural with realistic lighting and shadows. There are minimal artifacts, with only a slight blurred background that does not detract from the overall image quality.
| 9
| 5.196152
|
||
161,457
|
Replace the black dress with medieval knight armor
| 0
| 9
|
The editing instruction to replace the black dress with medieval knight armor has not been successfully executed. The black dress is replaced with a brown garment instead. However, the rest of the image remains highly consistent with minimal changes.
| 0
| 8
| 9
|
The image looks quite natural with realistic lighting and shadows, although there is a slight unnatural feel due to overexposed lights in the background. The image is mostly free from artifacts; the subjects are well-defined and there are no significant distortions or unusual textures.
| 8
| 0
|
||
161,457
|
Replace the man in sweater with pirate captain
| 10
| 8
|
The man in the sweater has been successfully replaced with a pirate captain, which fulfills the editing instruction perfectly. The overall scene remains recognizable and maintains similar lighting. However, the pirate's presence somewhat alters the background ambiance.
| 8
| 7
| 5
|
The image largely looks natural, with appropriate lighting and shadows for a party scene, but the pirate character on the right appears out of place and slightly unnatural due to lighting and blending issues. There are noticeable artifacts, particularly around the pirate character, leading to a lower score in artifacts.
| 5
| 6.324555
|
||
161,457
|
Replace the woman with booklet with scientist with microscope
| 2
| 7
|
The editing partially replaced the booklet with a microscope, but the woman is still present. The scene retains major elements from the original, showing minimal overediting.
| 2
| 3
| 5
|
The image lacks naturalness due to the unusual pose and context of the subjects with the microscope. The lighting is somewhat off, and background details do not blend well. There are noticeable artifacts like overly smooth textures and slightly distorted facial features.
| 3
| 2.44949
|
||
161,457
|
Replace the beanie hat with wide-brimmed sun hat
| 2
| 7
|
The beanie hat has been replaced, but the new hat is not a wide-brimmed sun hat; it is more of a knitted or woven cap. The degree of overediting is minimal as the new hat maintains a similar style to the original but fails to meet the specific instruction.
| 2
| 8
| 9
|
The image looks mostly natural with proper lighting and depth of field. There is a slight overexposure on the faces due to strong lighting. The image has minimal artifacts, with only some minor visual distortions noticeable in the background.
| 8
| 4
|
||
121,531
|
Replace the wreath with hula hoop
| 10
| 9
|
The wreath has been effectively replaced with a hula hoop. The rest of the scene has minimal changes, preserving the context and elements of the original image well.
| 9
| 2
| 5
|
The image's naturalness score is low because the woman's torso and the perspective of the hula hoop appear unnatural, and the human figure's integration with the background is poorly done. The artifacts score is average due to visible distortions around the hula hoop and subject, and the table's texture looks off.
| 2
| 4.24264
|
||
121,531
|
Replace the wreath with crown of thorns
| 10
| 10
|
The wreath has been successfully replaced with a crown of thorns, and the edited image aligns very closely with the original, with minimal additional changes.
| 10
| 9
| 10
|
The image appears natural with correct shadows, lighting, and sense of distance. There are no visible artifacts, distortions, or unusual elements. The details and textures are rendered well.
| 9
| 9.486833
|
||
121,531
|
Replace the green leaves with yellow flowers
| 0
| 10
|
The editing instruction to replace the green leaves with yellow flowers was not followed at all. The scene in the edited image still contains green leaves with no yellow flowers present. However, since the overall scene remains very similar to the original image without any significant overediting, the second score rates highly.
| 0
| 8
| 9
|
The image looks quite natural with a well-arranged scene of leaves and crafting materials. There is a minor unnatural feeling due to the overly uniform appearance of the leaves, and a slight repetition pattern can be noticed. Artifacts are minimal with no visible distortion, watermark, scratches, or unusual elements.
| 8
| 0
|
||
121,531
|
Replace the green leaves with blue feathers
| 10
| 9
|
The green leaves in the original image have been replaced with blue feathers in the edited image as instructed. The edited image retains most of the original elements with minimal changes apart from the substitution, maintaining a similar composition and color scheme.
| 9
| 9
| 10
|
The image looks highly natural with appropriate lighting and shadowing. There are no visible artifacts or distortions, and the objects in the image are clearly defined.
| 9
| 9
|
||
121,531
|
Replace the table with stool
| 0
| 10
|
The table was not replaced with a stool. The table's surface has just been slightly altered in terms of pattern and color, but the overall object remains the same.
| 0
| 9
| 9
|
The image looks very natural with appropriate lighting and shadows, giving a realistic appearance. There are minimal to no visible artifacts, making the composition clean and professional.
| 9
| 0
|
||
38,948
|
Replace the person with warrior
| 10
| 10
|
The instruction to replace the person with a warrior was executed perfectly. The edited image features a distinctly different character who fits the description of a warrior, while maintaining the background and context of the original image. The degree of overediting is minimal yet effective, as the core elements of the scene remain intact.
| 10
| 8
| 9
|
The image depicts a muscular warrior with a fantasy backdrop. The characters and elements are well-rendered and do not have obvious visual distortions. However, minor issues like lighting consistency and some slight blending issues between the character and backdrop prevent a perfect score.
| 8
| 8.944272
|
||
38,948
|
Replace the spaceship with flying dragon
| 9
| 8
|
The spaceship has been successfully replaced with a flying dragon. However, the presence of additional small flying elements around the dragon slightly reduces the perfection of the execution. The scene remains largely consistent with the original, maintaining most of the visual elements and characteristics, demonstrating an effective edit with minimal over-editing.
| 8
| 8
| 9
|
The image is highly detailed and has excellent harmony between the human character and the fantasy elements, making it look quite natural despite the fantasy setting. However, the overall artificial setting keeps it from a perfect score in naturalness. There are minimal visible artifacts, with only minor discrepancies in textures, earning a high score for artifacts.
| 8
| 8
|
||
38,948
|
Replace the earth with moon
| 8
| 9
|
The earth has been successfully replaced with the moon. The overall composition and elements of the scene remain consistent with the original image, showing minimal overediting.
| 8
| 9
| 9
|
The image looks natural with consistent lighting and shadows that match the scene. The AI-generated characters and the background are well integrated without noticeable distortions. There are minimal artifacts, though some minor imperfections in details might slightly reduce the score.
| 9
| 8.485281
|
||
38,948
|
Replace the earth with underwater kingdom
| 9
| 10
|
The earth has been successfully replaced with an underwater kingdom, including marine elements like fish and aquatic structures, without significantly altering the other aspects of the original image.
| 9
| 7
| 9
|
The image looks generally natural but slightly surreal due to its sci-fi elements and underwater setting with floating structures. The artifacts are minimal with no visible distortion, watermarks, or unusual body parts.
| 7
| 7.937254
|
||
38,948
|
Replace the background creature with knight on horseback
| 0
| 8
|
The background creatures are not replaced with a knight on horseback in the edited image. The scenes look similar but not identical, showing some degree of differentiation.
| 0
| 7
| 8
|
The image looks somewhat natural with the main figure appearing well-integrated into the background, but the presence of the other characters gives a slightly artificial feel. There are minor artifacts observed, mainly around the edges of the characters, indicating blending issues.
| 7
| 0
|
||
23,933
|
Replace the tree with alien plant
| 9
| 9
|
The trees in the original image have been effectively replaced with alien plants. The alien plants are distinct and clearly different from the original trees but blend well with the overall scene, maintaining the atmosphere without excessive alteration to the rest of the image.
| 9
| 8
| 10
|
The image shows a natural-looking scene with consistent lighting and shadows. The house and surroundings appear cohesive and realistic. There are no visible artifacts, distortions, or blurring, resulting in a high score for both naturalness and artifact absence.
| 8
| 8.485281
|
||
23,933
|
Replace the stairs with escalator
| 2
| 8
|
The stairs have not been replaced completely with an escalator; instead, a small segment appears modified. The extent of overediting is minimal as most of the original scenery remains unchanged.
| 2
| 7
| 9
|
The image looks fairly natural with appropriate lighting and shadow. However, it has a slightly surreal feeling likely due to the contrast and sharpness. There are minimal artifacts; the details are clear and there are no visible distortions or unusual elements.
| 7
| 3.741657
|
||
23,933
|
Replace the stairs with vine-covered pathway
| 8
| 9
|
The stairs have been successfully replaced with a vine-covered pathway. The overall structure and look of the image have been preserved, with minimal additional changes. However, there is a slight inconsistency in the scene integration.
| 8
| 7
| 9
|
The image appears mostly natural with a good sense of distance and proportion, but there is a slight artificial feel due to the overly balanced composition and some nuances in the texture of the house and trees. There are minimal artifacts, with distinct details and no noticeable distortions, watermarks, or blurring.
| 7
| 7.483315
|
||
23,933
|
Replace the house front porch with giant clock face
| 9
| 8
|
The front porch on the house has been replaced with a giant clock face successfully. The overall structure and ambience of the house remain consistent with the original image, but the textures of the house have been changed more than necessary.
| 8
| 7
| 9
|
The building and surrounding area look somewhat natural, with well-defined shadows and lighting. However, the scene's color palette and texture give a somewhat artificial feeling. Minimal artifacts are present, with only slight distortions.
| 7
| 7.483315
|
||
23,933
|
Replace the house front porch with large aquarium
| 0
| 5
|
The edited image did not replace the house's front porch with a large aquarium. Instead, the entire house structure has been altered, almost resembling a completely different building. The degree of overediting is moderate as the image still maintains some of the original environment and setting.
| 0
| 4
| 7
|
The building's lighting and shadow do not blend seamlessly with the rest of the scene, making the image feel somewhat unnatural. Additionally, the building's texture and integration appear slightly off. However, there are few noticeable artifacts, distortions, or blurs in the image.
| 4
| 0
|
||
48,003
|
Replace the horses with flock of colorful birds
| 8
| 8
|
The horses have been successfully replaced with a flock of colorful birds, fulfilling the editing instruction well. The scene retains much of its initial elements such as the background and overall color tone, avoiding significant overediting.
| 8
| 8
| 9
|
The image has a natural feel in terms of lighting and overall scene composition, though the vibrant colors and the presence of birds might slightly reduce the sense of realism. There are very few artifacts visible, contributing to a high score in that regard.
| 8
| 8
|
||
48,003
|
Replace the sky with dense forest
| 9
| 7
|
The sky has been effectively replaced with a dense forest in the edited image. The overall scene changes considerably but retains elements like the horse and cart, indicating an effective yet noticeable edit.
| 7
| 8
| 9
|
The image depicts a natural-looking forest scene with a horse-drawn carriage. The sense of distance and lighting is fairly well executed, but the arrangement of the trees looks a bit too symmetrical to be completely natural. There are minimal artifacts, with only some minor issues that do not significantly detract from the overall quality.
| 8
| 7.483315
|
||
48,003
|
Replace the sky with starry night sky
| 9
| 9
|
The edited image successfully replaces the original sky with a starry night sky, correctly reflecting the editing instruction. There is minimal over-editing aside from the sky, maintaining the overall integrity of the original image.
| 9
| 5
| 9
|
The stars and night sky scene have a quite surreal and striking appearance, which makes the image not look entirely natural. The detailed starry sky with Milky Way elements seems overly prominent and somewhat unrealistic in its integration with the ground below. However, the image quality is high with minimal to no visible artifacts.
| 5
| 6.708204
|
||
48,003
|
Replace the clouds with colorful balloons
| 9
| 8
|
The clouds have been effectively replaced with colorful balloons as instructed. The landscape remains relatively unchanged, maintaining the context and essence of the original image. However, the sheer number of balloons may somewhat overwhelm the original scene, leading to minor overediting.
| 8
| 6
| 9
|
The image has a vibrant and captivating composition with clear details and minimal artifacts. However, the sheer number of balloons in the sky seems unnatural, affecting the overall sense of realism.
| 6
| 6.928203
|
||
48,003
|
Replace the clouds with bursting fireworks
| 8
| 8
|
The clouds have been successfully replaced with bursting fireworks, fulfilling the editing instruction effectively. The scene maintains the original elements such as the horse-drawn carriage and landscape, though the overall ambiance has changed significantly due to the inclusion of fireworks.
| 8
| 6
| 8
|
The image appears to be somewhat natural with a realistic fireworks display. However, the scale and proximity of the fireworks to the landscape and the horse-drawn carriage create a sense of unnaturalness. The image is free from significant artifacts, with clear details and no visible distortions.
| 6
| 6.928203
|
||
187,046
|
Replace the building with medieval fortress
| 9
| 9
|
The building has been successfully replaced with a medieval fortress, following the instruction very well. The edited image retains the majority of the original scene, including the surroundings and other elements, making the overediting minimal.
| 9
| 8
| 6
|
The image generally looks natural with correct perspective and lighting. However, there are some minor artifacts visible, such as irregularities on the rooftop edges and slight blending issues near the fence and some parts of the wall.
| 6
| 7.348469
|
||
187,046
|
Replace the street with marble pathway
| 2
| 8
|
The street has been replaced, but the result does not resemble a marble pathway. The edited section looks like uneven stones or clusters of spherical objects rather than smooth marble.
| 2
| 3
| 8
|
The image of the building has a peculiar element with the ground covered in an unnatural material, which affects the naturalness score. However, the image is relatively free of artifacts, with no visible distortions or unusual elements besides the ground.
| 3
| 2.44949
|
||
187,046
|
Replace the child in stroller with puppy in basket
| 3
| 10
|
The edited image does not have a puppy in a basket. Instead, a red object is placed in the stroller. There is no overediting as the image remains highly similar to the original except the change in the stroller.
| 3
| 9
| 9
|
The AI-generated image of the building and the surroundings looks very natural with proper lighting and shadows. There are no noticeable artifacts, distortions, or blurred sections. Only minor details like slight texture variances could differentiate this from a real photograph.
| 9
| 5.196152
|
||
187,046
|
Replace the child in stroller with superhero statue
| 9
| 9
|
The child in the stroller has been effectively replaced by a superhero statue, following the editing instruction well. The edited image maintains the overall scene and feels consistent with the original, with minimal changes outside the replaced element.
| 9
| 8
| 9
|
The building and surroundings look very natural with appropriate lighting and shadows. However, the character in blue costume slightly affects the naturalness as it looks slightly out of place. Minimal artifacts detected.
| 8
| 8.485281
|
||
187,046
|
Replace the lampposts with illuminated trees
| 0
| 10
|
The lampposts have not been replaced with illuminated trees. However, the second image retains the other elements of the original and appears minimally edited.
| 0
| 8
| 9
|
The image looks very natural, with accurate lighting and perspective. The colors are well balanced, and the architectural details are convincing. There are minimal artifacts visible; however, there is a slight unnaturalness in the reflections and possibly some minor distortions which are not significant.
| 8
| 0
|
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 2