UID int64 1.96k 182k | original_image imagewidth (px) 768 1.34k | edit_prompt stringlengths 27 73 | edited_image imagewidth (px) 768 1.34k | SC_edit_success float32 0 10 | SC_overediting float32 0 10 | SC_reasoning stringlengths 113 419 | SC_min_score float32 0 10 | PQ_artifacts float32 2 10 | PQ_reasoning stringlengths 138 425 | O_score float32 0 9.49 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
115,549 | Replace the Bugatti logo with Nike swoosh | 0 | 0 | The edited image does not follow the instruction of replacing the Bugatti logo with the Nike swoosh. Instead, the entire car is replaced with Nike-branded items, drastically altering the scene. | 0 | 3 | The image contains noticeable distortions and unusual object shapes. The hat appears to be misshapen and oversized, which is inconsistent with realistic proportions. There are visible artifacts on the surface of the hat, and the textures are not harmoniously blended. | 0 | ||
115,549 | Replace the car tire with giant clock | 9 | 9 | The car tires have been effectively replaced with giant clocks as per the instructions. The clocks fit well into the image without disrupting the overall integrity of the car. The edited image retains much of the original scene, indicating minimal yet effective editing. | 9 | 9 | The image has clear details and the car looks well-defined and proportional. The reflections and lighting are consistent. However, there is a slight blur in certain areas, particularly towards the edges of the car which prevents it from being a perfect 10. | 9 | ||
115,549 | Replace the headlights with dragon eyes | 8 | 9 | The headlights have been successfully replaced with dragon eyes, fulfilling the editing instruction effectively. The overall scene and car remain consistent with the original image, indicating minimal overediting. | 8 | 7 | The car and surroundings are generally well-rendered with good detail. However, there are some noticeable distortions, especially around the headlamps and reflections which appear slightly off. Also, the wheels have subtle irregularities that detract from realism. | 7.483315 | ||
115,549 | Replace the headlights with pair of candles | 0 | 10 | The edited image does not show any visible change; the headlights have not been replaced with candles, indicating the editing instruction was not followed at all. Both images are identical, showing minimal editing. | 0 | 10 | The image looks artifact-free with no visible distortions, unusual body parts or proportions, unnatural object shapes, blurred faces, or disharmony among subjects. | 0 | ||
115,549 | Replace the car mirrors with robotic arms | 0 | 0 | The edited image completely transformed the car into a robotic entity, which does not follow the instruction to replace only the car mirrors with robotic arms. The entire car appears to be replaced, making the scene entirely different from the original image. | 0 | 9 | The image appears very realistic with well-detailed machinery, appropriate proportions, and no obvious distortions or blurring. The integration of different parts is seamless. Any minor artifacts are not significant enough to impact the visual quality. | 0 | ||
30,636 | Replace the boy in hoodie with ninja | 10 | 10 | The boy in the hoodie has been replaced with a ninja successfully, and the rest of the image remains largely unchanged, matching the instructions perfectly. | 10 | 9 | The AI-generated image shows a high level of detail and quality. The proportions of the characters are accurate and natural, and there are no distortions or unusual body parts. The faces are clear and detailed without any blurring. The characters are well harmonized with each other and the background. | 9.486833 | ||
30,636 | Replace the brown hair on boy with purple dreadlocks | 7 | 5 | The brown hair on the boy has been replaced with purple dreadlocks as instructed. However, the edit also applied to the other individuals in the image and altered the facial expressions and details significantly, which constitutes overediting. | 5 | 9 | The image demonstrates a high level of technical quality with clear and consistent details. The body proportions and object shapes are natural, and there are no significant distortions. There is a minor blending issue with the face on the right, but it does not detract significantly from the overall visual coherence. | 6.708204 | ||
30,636 | Replace the long black hair with unicorn horn | 2 | 8 | The original image editing instruction was not successfully followed. Instead of fully replacing the long black hair with a unicorn horn, a unicorn horn was simply added to the hair. Although the hair still exists, the over-editing is minimal. | 2 | 7 | The image is mostly free of distortions, and body proportions are generally consistent with anime-style art. However, the hand on the head of the left character is somewhat awkward, and there are minor irregularities in hair and clothing details. Faces are clear, but there is a slight issue with the perspective of the ... | 3.741657 | ||
30,636 | Replace the pink bows background with forest scenery | 9 | 9 | The background has been effectively replaced with a forest scenery, fulfilling the editing instruction well. There is minimal overediting, as the characters remain unchanged, and the transition between the characters and the new background is seamless. | 9 | 9 | The image is overall very clean with well-defined and proportionate characters. There are no noticeable distortions or unusual body parts. The objects are well-shaped and natural-looking. The faces are clear and harmonized. The only minor issue is the subtle edge blending between characters and background. | 9 | ||
30,636 | Replace the pink bows background with city skyline | 0 | 9 | The pink bows background has not been replaced with a city skyline. The background is still pink, although with a slightly different pattern. The overall image remains quite similar to the original with minimal changes. | 0 | 9 | The image demonstrates high technical quality with clear and sharp features, well-proportioned body parts, and harmonious subjects. Only minor distortions are present. | 0 | ||
1,963 | Replace the man with opera singer | 10 | 9 | The man in the original image has been successfully replaced with an opera singer, maintaining the pose and environment. The modification is clear and the new character fits the description perfectly. The editing is minimal as the background remains mostly unchanged except for the necessary details to accommodate the n... | 9 | 9 | The image has a high-quality rendering with no obvious distortions or unusual object shapes. Body parts and proportions appear natural. The face isn't blurred and fits well with the body. The subject is well harmonized. Minor improvements could be made in blending the subject with the background. | 9 | ||
1,963 | Replace the man with cartoon character | 10 | 9 | The man has been successfully replaced with a cartoon character, matching the instruction perfectly. The rest of the scene remains highly consistent with the original, indicating minimal overediting. | 9 | 9 | The image is well-executed with minimal AI-artifacts. Proportions and object shapes seem natural, and the overall scene is harmonized. The only minor issue is a slight unnaturalness in the character's facial expression. | 9 | ||
1,963 | Replace the blue shirt with red hoodie | 10 | 10 | The blue shirt in the original image has been replaced perfectly with a red hoodie in the edited image without altering other elements of the scene. | 10 | 9 | The image has high technical quality with well-defined subjects and objects. There are no noticeable distortions, unusual body parts, or unnatural object shapes. The face is clear and not blurred. The subject appears harmonized with the environment. Minor artifacts may exist but are not immediately apparent. | 9.486833 | ||
1,963 | Replace the blue shirt with pirate costume | 10 | 10 | The blue shirt has been successfully replaced with a pirate costume, and the rest of the image remains unchanged, indicating minimal overediting. | 10 | 9 | The image is largely free of distortions and unusual body parts or proportions. The object shapes are natural, and the face is clear and not blurred. The subject is harmonized with the background. Minor artifacts or unnatural aspects, if any, are indiscernible. | 9.486833 | ||
1,963 | Replace the lamp with magic orb | 0 | 10 | The lamp is still present in the edited image, so the objective to replace it with a magic orb has not been accomplished at all. However, the rest of the image remains unchanged which means no overediting took place. | 0 | 9 | The image quality is high with no visible distortions, unnatural body proportions, or blurred faces. The subject appears well-integrated into the environment. Minor artifacts may exist but are not easily noticeable. | 0 | ||
23,764 | Replace the woman with cartoon character | 10 | 10 | The woman in the original image has been successfully replaced with a cartoon character in the edited image, matching the editing instruction perfectly. The rest of the scene remains entirely unchanged, making it a minimal yet effective edit. | 10 | 8 | The image is largely free of major distortions and unusual body parts. The proportions of the character appear natural, and the objects in the background are well-defined with natural shapes. However, the blending of the AI-generated character with the real-world background is slightly disharmonized. The lighting on th... | 8.944272 | ||
23,764 | Replace the woman with robot | 10 | 10 | The woman in the first image has been successfully replaced with a robot in the second image, matching the editing instruction perfectly. The background and other elements remain unchanged, indicating minimal overediting. | 10 | 8 | The robot has a well-rendered design, but there are minor issues with how it integrates with the background. The lighting on the robot doesn't perfectly match the scene's lighting, leading to a slight unnatural appearance. Additionally, the reflection on the bar counter does not show the robot, which slightly diminishe... | 8.944272 | ||
23,764 | Replace the jacket with kimono | 10 | 10 | The jacket in the original image has been successfully replaced with a kimono in the edited image. The image still largely resembles the original with minimal additional changes. | 10 | 9 | The image exhibits high technical quality with sharp details. There are no apparent distortions, unusual body parts, or unnatural object shapes. The subject is well harmonized with the background, and there are no blurred faces. However, there is a minor light anomaly on the right side of the image which slightly affec... | 9.486833 | ||
23,764 | Replace the salt shaker with tiny cactus | 10 | 9 | The salt shaker has been successfully replaced with a tiny cactus, fulfilling the editing instruction perfectly. The surroundings remain largely unchanged, bearing minimal overediting. | 9 | 8 | The image is mostly artifact-free with high technical quality. However, there are minor distortions around the edges of the subject's hair and a minor issue with lighting consistency. The proportions and object shapes are natural and the subject is well harmonized with the background. | 8.485281 | ||
23,764 | Replace the menu holder with tablet stand | 0 | 10 | The menu holder is still present and has not been replaced with a tablet stand. There is no overediting as the images are virtually identical. | 0 | 10 | The image shows no noticeable distortions, unusual body parts, unnatural object shapes, or blurred faces. The subject and objects are harmonized well. | 0 | ||
152,649 | Replace the boy climbing wall with mountain climber | 3 | 5 | The boy climbing the wall has not been replaced by a mountain climber. The wall texture has been changed to a rock-like texture, but the original boy is still present. Overediting has occurred in changing the wall texture, but the primary instruction has not been followed. | 3 | 4 | Unusual body proportions and unnatural poses, especially the legs and feet of the subjects. Some faces and hands appear blurred and distorted. Overall lack of harmonization among subjects. | 3.464102 | ||
152,649 | Replace the boy climbing wall with gymnast | 0 | 7 | The boy climbing the wall has not been replaced by a gymnast. Only the boy has been blended out, and it's noticeable due to mismatched textures with the background. The overall scene retains most of its original elements and continuity, hence a higher score for retaining its original form. | 0 | 2 | The image exhibits significant distortions, especially in the body proportions and unnatural shapes of the subjects. Some faces are blurred and certain areas appear to be poorly harmonized with each other. | 0 | ||
152,649 | Replace the boy in black jacket with chef | 10 | 8 | The boy in the black jacket has been successfully replaced with a chef, matching the editing instruction well. The rest of the scene remains largely unchanged, though subtle details around the replaced person show minor differences. | 8 | 2 | The image exhibits several AI-artifacts. The proportions of the humans, particularly the forefront subject, are distorted. The body parts appear unusual and not anatomically correct, such as the overly large head and mismatched limbs. The faces, especially of the individuals in the background, are blurred and lack deta... | 4 | ||
152,649 | Replace the grey backpack with red kite | 8 | 9 | The grey backpack has been successfully replaced with a red kite, following the editing instruction closely. The edited image maintains the original scene with minimal changes beyond the instructed edit. | 8 | 4 | The image contains several distortions and unnatural body proportions. The children appear to have unusual arm and leg positions, and there is significant distortion around the edges of the objects. The faces are also somewhat blurred and lack detail. The overall harmonization of subjects in the image is poor. | 5.656854 | ||
152,649 | Replace the tree trunk with lamppost | 7 | 8 | The tree trunk has been replaced with a lamppost, meeting the editing instruction, but it could be a bit more realistic in integration. The scene overall remains fairly consistent with minimal changes apart from the replacement. | 7 | 5 | The image shows noticeable distortions and unnatural object shapes. The child in the front has a proportionally irregular head and hands. The children in the background exhibit awkward positioning and blending with the environment, indicating lack of harmonization. There are no evident blurred faces, but overall propor... | 5.91608 | ||
9,156 | Replace the person with knight in armor | 10 | 8 | The person has been successfully replaced with a knight in armor, matching the instruction perfectly. The knight's posture and placement closely mirror the original person's position, maintaining the scene's context with minimal overediting. | 8 | 6 | The image has generally good detail, but there are some noticeable AI-artifacts. The armor on the closer subject has an unusual body proportion around the arm area. Lightning effects seem slightly unnatural and lack integration with the scene. There are minor distortions or blending issues with the background elements. | 6.928203 | ||
9,156 | Replace the blaster with magic staff | 0 | 10 | The edited image does not replace the blaster with a magic staff, as instructed. Both images appear identical, indicating the editing instruction was not successfully executed. However, since there is no overediting, the degree of overediting score is 10. | 0 | 8 | The overall quality of the image is high with a good level of detail and minimal distortions. There are no apparent unusual body parts or proportions among the human subjects. The objects and subjects are well harmonized within the scene. However, there are slight blurriness and less detailed areas, particularly around... | 0 | ||
9,156 | Replace the blaster with ray gun | 10 | 9 | The blaster has been successfully replaced with a ray gun in the edited image, following the editing instruction perfectly. The degree of overediting is minimal as the scene remains largely unchanged except for the replacement of the specified object. | 9 | 7 | The image is generally well-rendered with clear and distinct elements. However, there are noticeable issues such as slightly unnatural body proportions of the character on the left and some minor distortions in the electrical effects. The overall harmonization of the scene is quite good, but a more detailed inspection ... | 7.937254 | ||
9,156 | Replace the lightning with vines | 1 | 8 | The lightning has not been replaced by vines. Instead, vines have been added in the background while the lightning remains unchanged. The scene is still recognizable, indicating minimal overediting. | 1 | 8 | The overall image quality is high with a good blending of elements and effects. There are no obvious distortions or unusual body proportions. However, there is a minor blurring of faces and slight inconsistency in the lighting of some elements. | 2.828427 | ||
9,156 | Replace the robot with mech suit | 10 | 10 | The editing instruction to replace the robots with mech suits has been perfectly executed. The robots in the original image have been replaced by mech suits in the edited image, and the rest of the scene remains intact, indicating a minimal yet effective edit. | 10 | 8 | The image overall is of high quality with impressive details and lighting effects. There are minor distortions in the form of slightly unusual body proportions on the robots and some slight blurring. However, it does not significantly detract from the overall image quality. | 8.944272 | ||
176,074 | Replace the church spires with giant red mushrooms | 2 | 8 | The edited image has the church spires colored red and slightly modified in shape, but they do not resemble giant red mushrooms. The degree of overediting is minimal as the overall scene remains almost unchanged. | 2 | 6 | The structure and proportions of the buildings seem unusual, particularly with the oddly shaped spires on the church. The overall image is harmonious and clear, with no noticeable distortions or blurred areas. However, the roof and tower proportions appear unrealistic, which slightly detracts from the overall technical... | 3.464102 | ||
176,074 | Replace the roof with solar panels | 0 | 9 | The edited image does not follow the instruction to replace the roof with solar panels. The roof has been modified, but it does not resemble solar panels at all. However, the overall scene remains mostly unchanged, indicating minimal overediting. | 0 | 7 | The overall image quality is high with smooth details and effective blending of elements. There are slight distortions around the steeples and the rooflines, with minor blur and shape inconsistency in areas. These minor artifacts slightly detract from the overall realism. | 0 | ||
176,074 | Replace the parking lot with swimming pool | 8 | 9 | The parking lot in the foreground has been successfully replaced by a swimming pool in the edited image. The overall scene remains similar with minimal changes outside the edited area. | 8 | 9 | The image is generally free of AI artifacts. The architecture and objects look natural with proper proportions. The only minor issue is a very slight blur near the edges, but it is barely noticeable. | 8.485281 | ||
176,074 | Replace the parking lot with market stalls | 0 | 9 | The parking lot has not been replaced with market stalls. The scene remains largely the same, indicating minimal change. | 0 | 8 | The image is generally well-rendered, with good attention to architectural details. However, there are minor distortions and blending issues around the connection points of the church spires and the rooflines, which could indicate some AI generation artifacts. The overall structure and composition of the buildings are ... | 0 | ||
176,074 | Replace the tree with giant lollipop | 9 | 9 | The image successfully replaced the tree with giant lollipops as instructed. The lollipops are clearly visible and prominent in the edited image. The edited image remains highly recognizable as a minimal yet effective version of the original scene. | 9 | 4 | The image contains multiple distortions, particularly in the unusual shapes of objects in the foreground. These objects appear unnatural and inconsistent with their surroundings. The church and background elements are mostly clear and free from significant artifacts, but the distortions in the foreground greatly detrac... | 6 | ||
181,717 | Replace the bridge with futuristic skyway | 8 | 9 | The bridge has been successfully replaced with a futuristic skyway, matching the instruction well. The overall composition and background remain nearly identical, indicating minimal overediting. | 8 | 9 | The image is almost artifact-free with smooth and realistic reflections in the water, and well-defined buildings and structures. There is only a minor distortion on the tip of the bridge, which could be overlooked easily. | 8.485281 | ||
181,717 | Replace the water with fiery lava | 10 | 9 | The water has been successfully replaced with fiery lava, as per the instruction. The overall scene and composition remain largely unchanged, reflecting minimal overediting. | 9 | 8 | The image is mostly artifact-free with a clear skyline and detailed structures. However, the red color in the water has an unnatural glow that suggests AI artifacts. The bridge and buildings are well-formed and proportional, indicating good overall rendering. | 8.485281 | ||
181,717 | Replace the water with starry galaxy | 0 | 10 | The edited image does not replace the water with a starry galaxy. Instead, the water appears to be replaced with a plain texture. However, the overall structure of the image remains identical, resulting in a high degree of overediting score. | 0 | 8 | The image has a high level of detail, and the structures appear smooth and well-defined. However, there is some minor blurring and unusual lighting that causes slight inconsistencies in the reflection and shadows. Overall, the image is mostly artifact-free with just a few minor issues. | 0 | ||
181,717 | Replace the lights with neon signs | 3 | 6 | The editing instruction to replace the lights with neon signs was partially followed as one building has been altered to include a neon sign. However, most of the original lights were not replaced, thus the execution is incomplete. The degree of overediting is moderate since only a small part of the image has been chan... | 3 | 9 | The image has excellent clarity, proper object proportions, and no visible distortions or blurred areas. The subjects are well-harmonized with the environment. However, the text on the building appears slightly unrealistic, indicating a minor AI artifact. | 5.196152 | ||
181,717 | Replace the lights with fireflies | 0 | 10 | The edited image does not show any visible fireflies replacing the lights. The images are almost identical, indicating no effective editing. | 0 | 9 | The image is mostly free of AI-artifacts. The buildings, sky, and reflections in the water appear realistic. The only minor issue is that the shape of the bridge's sail seems slightly exaggerated, but this does not significantly impact the overall image quality. | 0 | ||
22,005 | Replace the tall building with giant tree | 9 | 9 | The tall building has been replaced with a giant tree, successfully following the editing instruction. The overall scene remains very similar to the original, with minimal overediting. | 9 | 9 | The image is almost free of artifacts, with natural-looking proportions and clear details. There are no significant distortions or unnatural object shapes. Slightly noticeable blending issues where the buildings meet the ground. | 9 | ||
22,005 | Replace the tall building with lighthouse | 10 | 9 | The tall building has been successfully replaced with a lighthouse that fits the scene well. The overall composition remains very similar, maintaining the same lighting and overall aesthetic. There is minimal overediting with the lighthouse blending naturally into the scene. | 9 | 9 | The image is largely artifact-free with clear and well-defined elements. There are no visible distortions, unusual body parts, or unnatural object shapes. The subjects are well harmonized with largely accurate proportions. One minor point is a slight blurriness in the distant background elements, but this does not sign... | 9 | ||
22,005 | Replace the houses with modern villas | 3 | 5 | The buildings were replaced, but they do not resemble modern villas and appear too abstract and stark. The edited image still retains a notable portion of the original scene, though the editing is quite noticeable. | 3 | 6 | The image has a relatively harmonious blend of subjects and background. However, the large white buildings lack texture and detail, making them appear unnatural. The shore and reflections are fairly well done, but the overall composition feels somewhat artificial. | 4.24264 | ||
22,005 | Replace the houses with tents | 7 | 7 | The houses have been effectively replaced with tent-like structures, successfully completing the editing instruction. However, the tents appear somewhat unnatural and oversized compared to traditional tents, leading to a slight reduction in the execution score. The scene is still recognizable and minimal editing has be... | 7 | 9 | The image has high technical quality with clear details and no noticeable distortions or unusual shapes. However, there is a slight unnatural texture on the structure covered by the white fabric, which could indicate some minor artifacts. | 7.937254 | ||
22,005 | Replace the waves with lava flow | 8 | 9 | The edited image effectively replaces the waves with a lava flow; the lava looks natural in the scene. However, some parts of the original waves are still slightly visible. The overall scene remains nearly identical except for the change in the water, indicating minimal overediting. | 8 | 8 | The image shows minimal distortions and no unusual body parts or proportions due to the absence of humans. There is a slight unnatural blending between the lava and the water, indicating some minor AI artifacts. The subject, consisting of the landscape and buildings, is generally well harmonized. The image quality is h... | 8 | ||
25,803 | Replace the woman with lion | 10 | 10 | The woman has been successfully replaced with a lion, perfectly following the instruction. The degree of overediting is minimal as the background remains unchanged, making the scene consistent with the original image. | 10 | 4 | The lion has an unusual body shape, particularly around the shoulders and legs, where the proportions appear distorted and unnatural. The legs do not align correctly with the body, and the right side of the face and mane exhibit some blurring. | 6.324555 | ||
25,803 | Replace the dress with suit of armor | 8 | 9 | The dress has been successfully replaced with a suit of armor, effectively following the editing instruction. The edited suit of armor looks well integrated with the original image. However, the suit only covers the chest and part of the lower body, and no additional armor pieces are present which could have improved t... | 8 | 9 | The image exhibits high technical quality with minimal distortions. The body proportions appear natural, and there are no unusual object shapes. The facial features are clear without noticeable blurriness. However, there is a slight unnatural sheen on the armor, which prevents a perfect score. | 8.485281 | ||
25,803 | Replace the long hair with glowing halo | 0 | 10 | The editing instruction to replace the long hair with a glowing halo was not followed at all. The long hair is still present, albeit with a different color. However, the edited image retains the original scene perfectly without any overediting. | 0 | 9 | The image is generally very high quality with minimal distortions. The body proportions are natural and the object shapes are well-defined. There are no apparent blurred faces and the subject is harmonized with the background. Minor attention to detail in hair transition could be improved. | 0 | ||
25,803 | Replace the beige background with underwater coral reef | 10 | 9 | The beige background in the edited image has been effectively replaced with an underwater coral reef scene. The subject remains intact and there are minimal changes to the original image beyond the background replacement. | 9 | 9 | The image is technically well-produced with minimal artifacts. The human figure is proportionate and well-integrated into the scene. The coral and underwater background are detailed and vibrant. The only minor issue is a slight unnatural blending of lighting and shadows between the subject and the background. | 9 | ||
25,803 | Replace the arms with wings | 0 | 10 | The editing instruction to replace the arms with wings has not been followed at all, as the arms are still present in the edited image. However, the edited image retains the original details, indicating no overediting. | 0 | 9 | The image has minimal distortions and the subject is well-proportioned. The face is clear with no blurring. The body parts look natural and object shapes are correctly rendered. The subject is harmonized with the background. Minor imperfections may be present but are not easily noticeable. | 0 | ||
92,976 | Replace the rugby player with astronaut in space suit | 8 | 8 | The editing successfully replaced the rugby players with astronauts in space suits. However, some elements, like the grass field and the gameplay scenario, remain unchanged which slightly compromises the context of space. The overediting is minimal but noticeable, especially due to the change in clothing while retainin... | 8 | 8 | The image is overall quite realistic, with natural-looking body proportions and clear faces. However, there are slight distortions in the shapes of the objects, such as the rugby ball, and minor unnatural bends in the subjects' limbs. These small artifacts prevent a perfect score. | 8 | ||
92,976 | Replace the rugby ball with magic crystal orb | 10 | 9 | The rugby ball has been successfully replaced with a magic crystal orb, accurately following the editing instruction. The edited image maintains the original scene with minimal changes besides the ball, making it highly recognizable. | 9 | 9 | The image appears to be of high quality with no significant distortions, unusual body parts, or unnatural shapes. The faces are clear and well-defined, and the subjects are harmonized. Minor issues, if present, are not easily noticeable. | 9 | ||
92,976 | Replace the goal post with fire-breathing dragon | 2 | 8 | The goal post was replaced with fire, but there is no recognizable dragon. The degree of overediting is minimal, as the image mostly remains the same except for the goal post area. | 2 | 6 | The overall composition is mostly clear, but there are noticeable issues: the flames from the player in white's back look unnatural and the overlapping of the hands and ball show some distortion. The body proportions appear accurate, but there are some oddities in the positioning of limbs. | 3.464102 | ||
92,976 | Replace the red shoes with sparkling glass slippers | 10 | 9 | The red shoes in the original image have been successfully replaced with sparkling glass slippers in the edited image. The change is visible and clear. The overall scene remains unchanged, maintaining the context and details of the original image. | 9 | 9 | The image is of high quality with well-defined subjects and natural body proportions. There are no noticeable distortions or unusual object shapes. Blurring is minimal and does not affect facial features significantly. Overall, the subjects are harmonized well. | 9 | ||
92,976 | Replace the white jersey with colorful clown costume | 8 | 9 | The white jersey has been successfully replaced with a colorful clown costume, following the instruction. The overall scene and pose have been minimally altered, maintaining high similarity with the original image. | 8 | 8 | The image quality is high with minimal artifacts. The body proportions and object shapes are mostly natural. However, there is a slight blurriness in the faces and some minor distortions in the body postures. | 8 | ||
62,086 | Replace the man with gray scarf with superhero in costume | 10 | 9 | The man with the gray scarf has been successfully replaced by a superhero in costume, following the editing instruction perfectly. The rest of the image remains largely unchanged, preserving the original context and details. | 9 | 2 | The image exhibits several noticeable AI-artifacts. The proportions of the central figure's body are unusual and do not blend naturally with the surrounding people. The body parts of some individuals appear distorted, with unnatural arm and hand positions. Some faces are blurred and lack detail, and the objects in the ... | 4.24264 | ||
62,086 | Replace the woman in red sleeveless outfit with fairy with wings | 8 | 9 | The woman in the red sleeveless outfit has been replaced with a fairy with wings. The scene follows the editing instruction well, though the fairy appears somewhat out of place in the context. The rest of the image remains largely the same, preserving the original context effectively. | 8 | 7 | The image has a generally high quality, but there are some noticeable issues. A few faces and body parts appear slightly blurred or distorted. Some individuals in the background have unclear features, and the proportions of certain body parts seem slightly off. | 7.483315 | ||
62,086 | Replace the woman in red sleeveless outfit with robot with metallic armor | 10 | 9 | The woman in the red sleeveless outfit has been effectively replaced with a robot with metallic armor, precisely following the instruction. The rest of the image remains largely unaltered, maintaining high recognition of the original scene. | 9 | 4 | The image contains notable AI-artifacts, most prominently the presence of an out-of-place robotic figure that contrasts sharply with the rest of the image. The robot's features and proportions are unnatural compared to the humans. There is also some visible distortion in the faces and body parts of the people, along wi... | 6 | ||
62,086 | Replace the woman in beige dress with knight in armor | 9 | 8 | The editing instruction to replace the woman in a beige dress with a knight in armor has been successfully executed. The knight in armor is clearly placed in the right position and looks natural in the context of the image. There is a slight mismatch in the lighting and positioning of the arm which slightly affects rea... | 8 | 4 | The image contains noticeable artifacts. The presence of the knight in armor is unnatural, with proportions that don't match the other subjects. There are some unusual body part proportions, particularly in how the knight's arm connects to its body. Additionally, some faces in the background appear slightly blurred. | 5.656854 | ||
62,086 | Replace the woman in beige dress with wizard with staff | 9 | 9 | The woman in the beige dress has been effectively replaced with a wizard holding a staff. The scene is mostly the same except for the intended change, demonstrating minimal overediting. | 9 | 6 | There are minor distortions and unusual body proportions, particularly around the faces and the hands of several subjects. Some faces are slightly blurred, and the harmony between subjects is somewhat lacking. Overall, the image presents some noticeable AI-generated artifacts. | 7.348469 | ||
4,568 | Replace the tablet with painting | 0 | 0 | The edited image does not follow the instruction at all. Instead of replacing the tablet with a painting, all the devices have been changed with unrelated objects. The edited image is completely different from the original. | 0 | 9 | The image has no noticeable distortions, unusual object shapes, or blurs. The objects look harmonized and well-integrated. However, the patterns on the objects might seem slightly repetitive, which is a minor artifact. | 0 | ||
4,568 | Replace the tablet with aquarium | 0 | 0 | The edited image does not contain any elements of the original image and does not follow the editing instruction. It drastically differs from the original image, showing an entire different setup instead of replacing only the tablet with an aquarium. | 0 | 9 | The image displays a high level of detail with clear and well-defined objects, including the aquarium, fish, and plants. The proportions of the furniture and objects are natural and harmonious. Minor artificial textures are slightly noticeable on the cabinet surfaces, but overall, the image is largely artifact-free. | 0 | ||
4,568 | Replace the tablet with map | 0 | 0 | The edited image is completely different from the original, and it does not fulfill the instruction to replace the tablet with a map. The scene has been overedited, resulting in no recognizable elements from the original image. | 0 | 7 | The image appears to be mostly coherent, but there are some distortions and unnatural object shapes. The lower part of the image has some elements that are not well-defined, and the edges of the main object have somewhat irregular forms that may indicate AI artifacts. | 0 | ||
4,568 | Replace the tablet with sketchpad | 0 | 0 | The edited image does not follow the instruction to replace the tablet with a sketchpad. Instead, all devices have been completely obscured, making it impossible to recognize any specific editing related to the instruction. The scene is completely different from the original. | 0 | 8 | The objects are generally well-formed and the image is mostly artifact-free. However, there are some minor inconsistencies in the shapes and edges of the devices that slightly reduce realism. | 0 | ||
4,568 | Replace the coffee cup with glass of juice | 0 | 2 | The coffee cup was not replaced with a glass of juice. Instead, various other objects were added to the scene, deviating significantly from the original composition. | 0 | 3 | The square piece of fruit is unnatural in shape, the large glass of juice is disproportionately larger compared to the other objects, and the overall composition lacks harmony. | 0 | ||
8,078 | Replace the fountain with garden bed | 10 | 9 | The fountain has been successfully replaced with a garden bed, following the editing instruction perfectly. The overall scene remains largely unchanged, except for the edited object. | 9 | 9 | Image is sharp with balanced colors. Minimal distortions and proportions of humans and objects look natural but slight blur in some faces. | 9 | ||
8,078 | Replace the fountain with rock formation | 0 | 10 | The edited image appears identical to the original image; the fountain has not been replaced by a rock formation. | 0 | 8 | The image is overall well-executed with minimal visible artifacts. The architectural elements and landscape are well-rendered, and the perspectives are correct. However, there are minor inconsistencies in the reflections on the windows and some blurriness in the human figures in the mid-ground, which slightly detract f... | 0 | ||
8,078 | Replace the balcony with glass greenhouse | 9 | 8 | The balcony has been replaced with a glass greenhouse effectively, which aligns well with the instruction. The changes are prominent, making the edited image look quite different from the original, but the surrounding environment and background remain consistent. | 8 | 9 | The image is largely free of distortions and unusual proportions. Object shapes appear natural, and the scene is well-rendered. Some minor artifacts are present in the vegetation and the water texture, but they are minimal and not overly distracting. | 8.485281 | ||
8,078 | Replace the balcony with water slide | 9 | 9 | The balcony has been successfully replaced with a water slide in the edited image. The scene remains very similar to the original, with minimal overediting. | 9 | 9 | The image is mostly artifact-free with vibrant colors and clear detailing. However, some minor distortions can be observed at the edges of the water slide and a slight unnatural blending with the background foliage. | 9 | ||
8,078 | Replace the tree with sculpture | 2 | 5 | The edited image includes the addition of multiple sculptures, however, the trees are still present. The original instruction was to replace the tree with a sculpture, but the editing resulted in an overabundance of sculptures while retaining the trees. | 2 | 7 | The image has a high level of technical quality; however, there are a few noticeable artifacts. The unusual shapes of the brown objects seem out of place and don't resemble natural objects, which can be a distracting element. The building and people appear well-rendered with proper proportions, but some individuals lac... | 3.741657 | ||
4,152 | Replace the hood ornament with unicorn horn | 0 | 0 | The edited image does not contain the original car or any scene related to it, thus failing to follow the editing instruction. The editing is also completely different from the original. | 0 | 8 | The image is mostly artifact-free with smooth textures and well-defined shapes. However, the object has a slightly unusual shape with what appears to be misaligned spikes and some subtle distortions in the surface texture. | 0 | ||
4,152 | Replace the wheels with hover pads | 4 | 8 | The wheels have been replaced with hover pads, fulfilling the basic requirement of the instruction. However, the hover pads lack the futuristic appearance and proper integration one would expect. The edited image retains most of the original elements, indicating minimal overediting. | 4 | 4 | The image has significant artifacts, particularly with the wheels of the car, which appear unnatural and poorly rendered. The rest of the car is well-defined and lacks noticeable blurring or distortions, but the issues with the wheels heavily impact the overall quality. | 4 | ||
4,152 | Replace the engine with solar panel array | 0 | 0 | The edited image completely replaces the car with a structure covered in a solar panel array, which is far beyond the original instruction of replacing just the engine with a solar panel array. The original car is not present at all. | 0 | 8 | The image is largely artifact-free with a clear and coherent shape. However, the edges of the object show minor distortions, and there are slight irregularities in object shapes when viewed closely. | 0 | ||
4,152 | Replace the engine with jet turbine | 0 | 0 | The scene in the edited image does not follow the editing instruction at all. The image is completely different from the original. | 0 | 7 | The image is mostly clear with good detail, but there are some distortions and unusual object shapes in the blade-like structures that do not look quite realistic. Additionally, some minor blurring is present in the background. | 0 | ||
4,152 | Replace the car decals with glowing neon lines | 2 | 1 | The edited image has incorporated glowing neon lines, which matches the instruction. However, the entire car design has changed, not just the decals. The car's shape and structure are significantly altered from the original, making it largely unrecognizable as a minimally edited version. | 1 | 8 | The image is largely free from significant AI-artifacts, with the car and its outlines appearing clear and well-defined. However, there are slight distortions in the outline design, and the wireframe looks somewhat imbalanced in certain areas, particularly around the wheels and front grille. | 2.828427 | ||
90,736 | Replace the goat with griffin | 10 | 9 | The original goat has been successfully replaced with a griffin, achieving the editing goal perfectly. The background and environment remain almost identical, indicating minimal overediting. | 9 | 9 | The image exhibits excellent detail and clarity without noticeable distortions, unusual body proportions, or unnatural object shapes. The creature is well-integrated into the background with consistent lighting. The only minor issue is a slight unnatural blending of the creature's texture with the environment, but it i... | 9 | ||
90,736 | Replace the mountains with underwater coral reefs | 10 | 10 | The mountains have been successfully replaced with underwater coral reefs, fulfilling the editing instruction perfectly. The edited image maintains the integrity of the original scene with minimal changes to elements aside from the background, indicating no overediting. | 10 | 6 | The image appears mostly clear with no significant blurring. However, the goat's positioning and integration with the underwater scene seem slightly unnatural, with the lighting and shadows not fully harmonized. There are minor distortions in the goat's legs and hooves, which appear somewhat merged with the coral. | 7.745967 | ||
90,736 | Replace the rock with waterfall | 0 | 7 | The rock has been replaced with grass, not a waterfall, hence it does not follow the editing instruction at all. However, the rest of the image is minimally edited and retains much of the original scenery. | 0 | 9 | The image is of high quality with very few noticeable artifacts. The animal's body proportions and features appear natural, the background is clear and blends well. There is a slight softening of details around the animal's fur, but it is minor. | 0 | ||
90,736 | Replace the rock with ancient ruins | 8 | 9 | The rocks are successfully replaced with what appears to be ancient ruins. The structure and texture fit the description, but there's some blending inconsistency. The goat and background remain unchanged, indicating minimal overediting. | 8 | 8 | The image displays an effective blending of elements with a realistic background and subject. The goat appears natural, but there are minor distortions around the edges, and the fur texture is slightly inconsistent. The stone wall and mountains behind are well rendered, though there is a slight unnatural sharpness. Ove... | 8 | ||
90,736 | Replace the goat's horns with flower crown | 2 | 6 | The flower crown has been added on top of the horns, but the horns are still visible. Thus, while some attempt at overlaying the flower crown has been made, the instruction was not fully followed. Overediting is low-medium as the rest of the goat remains largely unchanged, except for some minor adjustments in its color... | 2 | 6 | The image has good visual quality overall, but there is a noticeable unnatural object shape with the flowers on the antlers. The limbs and body proportions of the deer seem slightly unusual. The background appears natural and harmonized with the subject. | 3.464102 | ||
169,978 | Replace the foreground grass with rocky terrain | 10 | 8 | The foreground grass has been successfully replaced with rocky terrain, matching the instruction perfectly. Although the scene remains mostly unchanged except for the foreground, there is some slight overediting present with some unnatural elements added above the kangaroo. | 8 | 6 | The kangaroo and joey are well-formed and proportionate, but there are visible distortions and unnatural shapes in the surrounding environment, particularly among the rocks and blurred elements in the foreground. | 6.928203 | ||
169,978 | Replace the tree in background with large umbrella | 3 | 8 | The tree has been replaced by an umbrella, but the size and positioning of the umbrella do not convincingly fill the space originally occupied by the tree. The editing is minimal, but the execution is not very effective. | 3 | 8 | The image has high technical quality with clear details. However, minor distortions can be observed in the background, particularly in the blurriness of distant objects. The foreground subject appears well-proportioned and harmonized. Overall, minimal AI-artifacts are present. | 4.89898 | ||
169,978 | Replace the tree in background with ancient ruin | 0 | 10 | The editing instruction to replace the tree in the background with an ancient ruin was not followed. The tree is still present in the second image. The second image can still be recognized as a minimal edit of the original. | 0 | 8 | The image displays a high level of detail and clarity without significant distortions. However, the foreground animals are slightly out of harmony with the background and there are minor unnatural object shapes, such as the tree branches and fence posts. | 0 | ||
169,978 | Replace the sitting kangaroo's head with giraffe's head | 0 | 0 | The edited image does not follow the instruction as the entire kangaroo has been replaced with a giraffe, not just the head. The scene in the edited image is completely different from the original. | 0 | 9 | The image is mostly artifact-free, showing a giraffe from behind without significant distortions. The proportions and shapes are natural, and the background elements are harmonized. However, the areas slightly out of focus in the distance might indicate minor blending issues. | 0 | ||
169,978 | Replace the sitting kangaroo's head with dog's head | 8 | 8 | The edited image successfully replaced the kangaroo's head with a dog's head, following the instruction closely. The editing is visible, though there is notable overediting as the body texture and image integration show some inconsistencies. The kangaroo's pouch area appears smoother, contributing to the overediting sc... | 8 | 2 | The image shows significant AI artifacts, most notably the grotesquely distorted shape of the animal. The head and ears are unnaturally stretched and there is a lack of coherence in body proportions. There is also noticeable blurring and inconsistency in the surrounding background. | 4 | ||
163,414 | Replace the barrel with treasure chest | 10 | 9 | The barrel has been successfully replaced with a treasure chest. There is minimal overediting apart from the change, maintaining the original scene effectively. | 9 | 3 | The image shows several issues: the chest is floating in an unnatural way, the railings have distortions and irregular shapes, and there are mismatched perspectives that make parts of the image seem disjointed. | 5.196152 | ||
163,414 | Replace the barrel with giant cup of coffee | 7 | 9 | The barrel has been successfully replaced with a large cup of coffee, which aligns well with the editing instruction. The overall scene remains largely unchanged apart from the cup replacing the barrel. | 7 | 3 | The image has noticeable blurring, particularly around the brick wall and the second plant pot. The metal structures at the top of the image are distorted and disproportionate. There is also a slight unnatural orientation of some of the elements in the scene. | 4.582576 | ||
163,414 | Replace the barrel with robot | 8 | 9 | The editing instruction to replace the barrel with a robot has been mostly followed. The barrel is replaced by a boxy object with red dots that appear to resemble a robot. There is minimal overediting, and the scene remains largely the same except for the replaced object. | 8 | 3 | The image contains several distortions and unusual object shapes. The ladder and the object at the top appear unnatural with disproportionate elements. The overall composition lacks harmony, creating an unrealistic scene. | 4.89898 | ||
163,414 | Replace the brick wall with waterfall | 1 | 9 | The brick wall appears to have been changed to a textured surface resembling rocks or mud, but it does not effectively resemble a waterfall. The overall scene remains largely unchanged apart from the wall texture. | 1 | 3 | The image shows noticeable distortions, particularly in the structure of the ladder and the barrel, which have unnatural shapes. There are also blurred areas and artifacts on the ladder edges. The overall composition looks uneven and artificial. | 1.732051 | ||
163,414 | Replace the balcony with art sculpture | 0 | 8 | The edited image does not replace the balcony with an art sculpture as instructed. The background shows some changes but the main instruction was not followed. | 0 | 4 | The image exhibits several issues such as unnatural object shapes, noticeable distortions, and lack of clarity in some areas. The wooden barrel appears distorted and not proportionate, and the wooden structure looks warped and blurred, detracting from the overall realism. | 0 | ||
126,958 | Replace the man with glasses with owl with glasses | 10 | 6 | The man with glasses has been successfully replaced with an owl with glasses. However, an additional owl with glasses has been added unnecessarily, hence the overediting. | 6 | 6 | The owls are well-rendered with reasonable proportions and details, but there are noticeable distortions at the edges and unnatural object shapes. The glasses on the owls appear slightly skewed and there is a lack of harmonization with the background. | 6 | ||
126,958 | Replace the man with glasses with alien observer | 10 | 9 | The man with glasses has been successfully replaced with an alien observer as instructed. The second image maintains the original scene with minimal overediting. | 9 | 8 | The image is generally high quality with well-defined and harmonized subjects. There is no noticeable blurring of faces or unusual object shapes. However, there is a slight disproportion in the body parts, specifically in the arms and torsos, which appear slightly unnatural. | 8.485281 | ||
126,958 | Replace the man with glasses with vintage movie director | 8 | 9 | The man with glasses has been replaced effectively with a person who looks like a vintage movie director. The setting and positions remain quite similar. However, some changes like the lighting and minor elements are slightly different. | 8 | 6 | The image exhibits some unusual body proportions, particularly in the person sitting with the camera, whose limbs and posture appear slightly unnatural. There's a slight distortion on the standing person's hand, suggesting potential AI-artifacts. Faces are relatively clear but not perfectly sharp, and the overall scene... | 6.928203 | ||
126,958 | Replace the green shirt with superhero cape | 8 | 8 | The green shirt has been successfully replaced with a superhero cape, achieving the desired effect. There are minor elements of the original shirt still visible and the lighting differs slightly, but overall the updated image maintains the original scene with minimal edits beyond the instruction. | 8 | 7 | The image appears to be mostly free of distortions and unusual body proportions. The faces are relatively clear, and the subjects are generally harmonized. However, there are some notable issues with unusual light effects on the seated person, and the hand and foot of the seated individual appear slightly unrealistic. | 7.483315 | ||
126,958 | Replace the green shirt with pirate coat | 10 | 9 | The green shirt has been successfully replaced with a pirate coat which follows the editing instruction perfectly. The rest of the image remains largely the same, indicating minimal yet effective editing. | 9 | 6 | The image shows some technical issues with lighting and blending. The person sitting has an unnatural glow and shadow, indicating AI-generated lighting artifacts. Additionally, the individual on the left has a somewhat blurred face, and the hand details are not clearly defined. However, the overall proportions and body... | 7.348469 | ||
161,457 | Replace the black dress with punk rocker outfit | 7 | 9 | The black dress on the right individual has been replaced with a punk rocker outfit, but the changes are subtle and might not immediately stand out. The overall scene remains very similar to the original image, with minimal overediting. | 7 | 9 | The image appears to be mostly free of significant AI-artifacts. The faces are clear and well-defined, with no unusual body parts or proportions. However, there is a slight blur in the background, particularly around some of the individuals, which could impact the overall clarity. The subjects harmonize well with each ... | 7.937254 | ||
161,457 | Replace the black dress with medieval knight armor | 3 | 8 | The edited image attempts to replace the black dress with medieval knight armor, but the resulting change is minimal. The dress color and texture have altered slightly, but it doesn't resemble medieval knight armor. The rest of the image remains largely identical to the original, indicating minimal overediting. | 3 | 8 | The image shows minimal distortions and body parts appear normal. The faces are clear and not blurred. However, the background subjects are slightly less harmonized with minor unnatural object shapes. | 4.89898 | ||
161,457 | Replace the man in sweater with pirate captain | 9 | 9 | The man in the sweater has been successfully replaced with a pirate captain, aligning well with the editing instruction. The surrounding elements and context are largely maintained with minimal overediting. | 9 | 7 | The image has overall good quality with vibrant colors and mostly natural proportions. However, there are minor issues such as the pirate character's slightly distorted hand, and the second woman's face appears slightly blurred. | 7.937254 | ||
161,457 | Replace the woman with booklet with scientist with microscope | 1 | 8 | The woman with the booklet has not been replaced; a microscope has been added in front of her. The scene still largely resembles the original image without significant overediting. | 1 | 8 | The image generally looks well-rendered with minimal AI artifacts. However, there are some slight distortions in the hand of the woman with blue hair and minor unnatural proportions in the face. The background is well-blended, but some subjects lack harmonization. | 2.828427 | ||
161,457 | Replace the beanie hat with wide-brimmed sun hat | 2 | 7 | The beanie hat has been replaced, but with a peculiar hat that doesn't quite match the description of a wide-brimmed sun hat. However, the rest of the image remains largely unchanged. | 2 | 9 | The image is mostly artifact-free with well-proportioned subjects and clear, sharp faces. There are no noticeable distortions or unnatural object shapes. The subjects are well harmonized. Slight background blurriness is present but does not detract significantly from the quality. | 4.24264 |
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 3