CongWei1230/iem_test_task2_s4_500 · Datasets at Hugging Face

UID int64 447 19.1k	edit_prompt stringlengths 9 33	SC_edit_success float32 0 10	SC_overediting float32 0 10	SC_reasoning stringlengths 60 445	SC_min_score float32 0 10	PQ_naturalness float32 0 10	PQ_artifacts float32 0 10	PQ_reasoning stringlengths 106 406	PQ_min_score float32 0 10	O_score float32 0 10
447	Remove brush strokes	10	4	The brush strokes have been effectively removed as per the editing instruction, but the final result looks notably different from the original image.	4	0	0	The image displays numerous artifacts making it extremely difficult to discern any natural scene. It contains significant distortion and lacks coherence or recognizable elements.	0	0
447	Remove red stamp	2	0	The red stamp has been removed but the rest of the image has been altered significantly, making it unrecognizable.	0	0	0	The image does not depict any clear recognizable scene or subject, and contains significant distortion or incomplete rendering.	0	0
447	Remove bottom icons	0	0	The edited image does not follow the editing instruction at all and has been significantly altered from the original, making it unrecognizable.	0	0	4	The image does not look natural at all as it appears to be a plain background with minimal content and incoherent text elements. There are visible distortions and artifacts such as unclear text and markings.	0	0
447	Remove black characters	0	0	The original characters were not removed but smeared or partially erased, resulting in an overedited, unrecognizable version of the original.	0	0	8	The image does not depict a natural scene, appearing more like abstract art. However, it has minimal visible artifacts or distortions.	0	0
447	Remove bottom-left watermark	0	0	The watermark has not been removed successfully. The edited image shows significant overediting, altering the entire image beyond recognition.	0	1	9	The image appears to be highly abstract or primarily composed of visual artifacts with minimal recognizable natural elements, resulting in a low naturalness score; however, there are no notable distortions or imperfections, thus a high artifact score.	1	0
485	Remove the person	2	9	The person has not been successfully removed, leaving an obvious outline. Minimal changes to the rest of the image indicate a high level of overediting control.	2	0	10	The image does not depict a natural scene, lacking natural elements, depth, or context. However, it is free from artifacts such as distortions, watermarks, or unusual body parts.	0	0
485	Remove suit	0	10	The edited image still shows the person wearing a suit, hence the instruction to remove the suit was not executed at all. However, no overediting is observed as the images are almost identical.	0	8	9	The image looks fairly natural with accurate lighting and shadows. Some minor unnatural details, such as the overly smooth skin, slightly detract from the naturalness. There are practically no noticeable artifacts.	8	0
485	Remove hand	6	8	The hand has been partially removed, but there is still a visible fragment of the hand left near the body. The edited image retains most of the original features, indicating minimal overediting.	6	8	9	The image appears mostly natural with proper lighting, shadows, and proportions. There are minimal artifacts; however, some minor smoothing effects and slight unnatural blending around the hairline can be noticed.	8	6.928203
485	Remove button-down	2	1	The button-down shirt has been removed, but the edit is extremely overdone with the entire appearance of the individual being drastically changed. The edited image does not resemble the original image and has lost its context entirely.	1	4	3	The image lacks naturalness as the proportions and textures appear slightly off, particularly the head which looks somewhat detached from the body. Additionally, there are visible artifacts, such as unnatural skin texture and blurred areas around the microphone and arm.	3	1.732051
485	Remove tie	0	10	The tie has not been removed in the edited image. The images look nearly identical apart from the possible color change of the tie.	0	9	9	The image looks very natural with good lighting and shadow, and the subject is well proportioned. There are no noticeable artifacts, distortions, or unusual body parts.	9	0
641	Remove flying demon	3	6	The flying demon has been partially removed, but its presence is still noticeable due to remnants of its silhouette and effects in the scene. The image retains much of its original elements, but the attempt to remove the flying demon is only partially successful.	3	6	8	The image generally looks natural; however, the crowd and action scenes give an artificial feel. The lighting and shadows are fairly consistent, contributing positively to naturalness. Artifacts are minimal with some distortions in character details and slight blurriness in certain areas.	6	4.24264
641	Remove the person	1	8	The person has not been removed effectively, only appears slightly less prominent. The edited image retains much of the original scene, showing minimal changes.	1	6	8	The image largely appears natural with good lighting and perspective, but some elements like the action effects and character movements make it slightly less realistic. There are minimal artifacts, though the scene contains game UI overlays which slightly detract from the overall seamlessness of the image.	6	2.44949
641	Remove crowd	3	9	The crowd has been partially removed, but some people remain visible in the scene. Minimal changes were made to other elements of the image, indicating a low degree of overediting.	3	3	6	The image looks somewhat unnatural due to the unrealistic scenario with a character flying and attacking in a city street, causing a low naturalness score. However, the artifacts are moderate as the image contains game-like visual elements and HUD, which are intentional and not a flaw.	3	3
641	Remove neon sign	8	9	The neon sign has been mostly removed in the edited image. However, there is a small remaining fragment of the sign on the left side of the building. The rest of the scene remains largely unchanged, indicating minimal overediting.	8	5	7	The image has some natural elements, but certain aspects like the flying character and the exaggerated lighting effects detract from the naturalness. Image artifacts are minimal, but the presence of game-like overlay elements affects the overall score.	5	6.324555
641	Remove lamppost	7	9	The lamppost has been successfully removed in the edited image. However, slight artifacts are noticeable at the area where the lamppost was located. The scene remains largely unchanged apart from the lamppost removal.	7	4	8	The image has a noticeable unnatural video game-like appearance, with exaggerated character actions and effects. However, the artifacts are minimal with clear details and little to no distortion.	4	5.291502
846	Remove sticker	2	2	The editing instruction was to remove the sticker, but the entire content including the skis has been removed, leaving minimal content. This does not effectively meet the instruction and significantly alters the original image.	2	0	10	The image presents a minimalistic graphic design rather than a natural scene. It does not give a sense of naturalness expected in a real-world scene. However, there are no apparent artifacts, distortions, or irregularities in the provided graphic.	0	0
846	Remove ski	9	8	The skis have been successfully removed as per the editing instruction. The remaining text and design are altered minimally, but the background and additional text are noticeable.	8	4	3	The image has a moderately unnatural look due to the awkward and distorted text, which indicates it was AI-generated. The text artifacts are significant, showing clear signs of AI imperfections. The main emblem appears clear and natural, but the distorted text underneath significantly detracts from the overall quality.	3	4.89898
846	Remove bindings	9	8	The bindings have been successfully removed, and the edited image maintains the general layout and visual style of the original image.	8	9	10	The image looks well-balanced and natural with proper lighting and shadows. There are no visible artifacts, distortions, or unusual elements present in the image.	9	8.485281
846	Remove label	0	10	The editing instruction was to remove the label, but the label was replaced with a different label instead of being removed. However, the rest of the image appears unaltered, hence no overediting.	0	2	9	The image looks artificial due to its isolated and plain background, giving it a promotional or catalog feel rather than a natural setting. However, the image is relatively free of artifacts, with clear and sharp details.	2	0
846	Remove white background	3	8	The white background was partially removed, revealing a grey background; however, significant text distortion and addition occurred, indicating excessive and incorrect editing.	3	2	3	The background looks flat and unnatural. The text in the image is distorted and unreadable, which significantly affects the image's clarity. The objects (skis) are clear but appear to be floating without any contextual reference for placement, making the scene look unnatural.	2	2.44949
1,515	Remove mirror	9	9	The mirror has been effectively removed and replaced with plants, fulfilling the editing objective. The edited image maintains the original scene with minimum additional alterations, making the modification subtle yet successful.	9	8	7	The image mostly appears natural with good lighting and coherent shadows. However, some minor unnatural elements may be present. The image has few artifacts, but the watermark and slight distortions detract from its perfection.	7	7.937254
1,515	Remove TV	3	9	The TV was not completely removed as specified in the editing instruction. Instead, it seems to have been altered but still remains partially visible. The rest of the image remains largely unchanged, indicating minimal overediting.	3	9	8	The image looks mostly natural with well-placed lighting and appropriate shadows. However, there is a watermark indicating this is an artificial creation and some minor distortions around the edges and reflective surfaces.	8	4.89898
1,515	Remove flower vase	0	10	The flower vase has not been removed. Both images look identical.	0	8	7	The image looks quite natural with correct lighting and shadowing. However, the mirror reflection appears slightly off and the text watermark is somewhat distracting. Minor artifacts are visible upon close inspection.	7	0
1,515	Remove white door	7	9	The white door has been effectively removed and replaced with a green surface, blending well with the surrounding wall color. However, the area where the door was still shows slight inconsistencies with the natural look of the rest of the wall, indicating the presence of an edit.	7	4	3	The scene in the image contains slightly unnatural elements, such as overly perfect lighting and somewhat unrealistic depth. There are also visible artifacts including watermarks and minor distortions in textures, reducing the overall photo quality.	3	4.582576
1,963	Remove the person	10	9	The person has been completely removed from the second image, following the editing instruction perfectly. The background has been seamlessly filled in, although there is a slightly visible editing artifact near the desk area which causes minimal deviation from the original scene.	9	7	9	The image generally looks natural, depicting a modern office setting. However, there is some blur and lack of detail in certain parts of the background which makes it slightly less natural. There are minimal artifacts present.	7	7.937254
1,963	Remove lamp	5	9	The lamp has been partially removed, but its base is still visible, indicating incomplete removal. The rest of the image remains largely unchanged, which means minimal overediting.	5	9	9	The image looks very natural with proper perspective, lighting, and a realistic scene. There are minimal artifacts, with the AI details well-rendered including facial expressions and body posture.	9	6.708204
1,963	Remove watch	0	10	The watch has not been removed; it is still present. However, the edited image is otherwise identical to the original, indicating no unnecessary changes.	0	9	9	The image looks very natural with appropriate lighting, shadows, and perspective. There is a small visible artifact near the arm of the subject.	9	0
1,963	Remove vase	10	10	The vase has been completely removed with no traces left. The rest of the image remains unchanged, indicating minimal yet effective editing.	10	8	9	The image appears mostly natural with realistic lighting and a coherent sense of distance. The individual’s pose and expression seem convincing. However, there is a slight unnaturalness in the background depth. There are minimal artifacts, with no noticeable distortion or defects.	8	8.944272
1,963	Remove files	0	10	The edited image is identical to the original image, indicating that no attempt was made to follow the editing instruction (Remove files).	0	9	10	The image looks very natural with proper lighting, shadow, and realistic facial expressions. There are no visible artifacts, distortions, or unusual body parts.	9	0
2,292	Remove bitcoin symbol	10	9	The bitcoin symbol has been completely removed as instructed. The edited image no longer contains the bitcoin symbol and maintains a similar background pattern to the original, though with slight modifications to the circuit board design.	9	8	9	The image appears mostly natural and depicts a circuit board with a metallic edge quite convincingly, though the color contrast is a bit intense. There are minimal artifacts, with no significant distortions or blurring.	8	8.485281
2,292	Remove decentralized text	0	0	The editing instruction specified the removal of decentralized text, but the entire content of the image has been removed and replaced with a solid green circle. This indicates a complete failure in maintaining any part of the original image, thus 0 for both the success of the editing and the degree of overediting.	0	6	9	The image of the green circle with texture seems fairly natural in its appearance, but the context of what it represents may be unclear, affecting its naturalness slightly. The image doesn't contain distortions, watermarks, or visible artifacts, so it scores high on artifacts.	6	0
2,292	Remove middle circle	0	0	The entire central area has been removed, resulting in significant overediting, and the requested task (removing just the middle circle) was not successfully completed.	0	0	10	The image is a plain white circle without any elements that could appear natural. However, there are no artifacts present.	0	0
2,292	Remove green color	2	2	The green color has been removed, but the primary design and context of the image (the Bitcoin symbol) were also removed, leading to a significant deviation from the original image.	2	2	8	The image does not depict a natural scene at all; it appears to be an abstract pattern. There are minimal artifacts noticed, making it relatively clear.	2	2
2,292	Remove circuit elements	0	0	The edited image does not resemble the original. The circuit elements are removed, but the entire image is vastly different, failing to maintain the original structure and context.	0	0	2	The image does not resemble a natural scene or object, showing only a textured, circular pattern. There are little to no discernible features or coherent elements that make it natural. It lacks clear artifacts, but the overall intentional blurring and texture might be distracting.	0	0
2,320	Remove boy	10	10	The boy has been completely removed, and the rest of the image remains consistent with the original, indicating successful editing without over-editing.	10	8	9	The scene looks quite natural in terms of the ocean waves and lighting, though not highly detailed in some areas. The image has minimal artifacts, with just a slight blur at certain points.	8	8.944272
2,320	Remove woman	9	9	The woman has been effectively removed from the image. The remaining individuals and the background are minimally affected, preserving the original scene.	9	7	9	The scene appears mostly natural with lifelike water splashes, although the positioning of the person's arm and the water interaction seems slightly off, impacting the naturalness. There are minimal to no visible artifacts throughout the image.	7	7.937254
2,320	Remove man	6	8	The main man holding the woman is successfully removed, but the scene looks somewhat overedited with noticeable changes in water splash patterns and textures. The overall scene is still recognizable, leading to a high score for minimal editing.	6	6	8	The water and splashes look quite realistic, but the blending of humans into the water looks slightly unnatural in places. There are minor distortions around some of the faces and edges.	6	6
2,320	Remove person swimming	8	9	The editing instruction to remove the person swimming has been mostly executed successfully. One person in the foreground has been altered, and the background swimmer on the right side has been removed completely. However, traces of additional swimmers in the distant background are still slightly visible. The image retains the original context and has minimal but perceptible overediting, which reflects a high degree of success with the task.	8	9	9	The image looks very natural with realistic water effects and lighting. The man in the water appears to be in proportion and aligned correctly with the environment. There are minimal artifacts, making it a clean and coherent image.	9	8.485281
2,320	Remove person far right	10	9	The person on the far right has been successfully removed from the scene, with minimal impact on the overall composition. The edited image maintains the original feel, aside from the removal of the specified person.	9	8	9	The image looks quite natural with an appropriate sense of motion and water effects. However, there is a slight lack of sharpness and some minor blurriness in distant figures. Overall, the image has minimal artifacts and looks coherent.	8	8.485281
2,499	Remove car	8	9	The car has been successfully removed, and the space it occupied has been replaced with a driveway that blends well with the original environment. However, there is a dark shadow-like mark on the ground that suggests where the car used to be, which slightly detracts from the seamlessness of the edit.	8	7	6	The image generally looks natural, but the shadows and texture transitions (e.g., from the driveway to the pavement) appear slightly off and unnatural. There is a noticeable dark patch or shadow at the bottom, which looks like an artifact.	6	6.928203
2,499	Remove headlight	9	9	The headlight on the right side (from the viewer's perspective) has been successfully removed in the edited image. The alteration is subtle and the rest of the image remains largely unchanged.	9	10	10	The image of the car looks very natural with correct lighting, shadows, and perspective. There are no noticeable artifacts or distortions present in the image.	10	9.486833
2,499	Remove wheel	1	9	The wheels are still present in the edited image despite the instruction to remove them. The changes are minimal, maintaining the overall look of the original image.	1	9	10	The image of the car looks very natural with appropriate lighting, shadows, and details. There are no visible distortions or artifacts present.	9	3
2,499	Remove window	10	0	The window has been completely removed, perfectly aligning with the editing instruction. However, the scene has been completely changed and does not resemble the original image at all.	0	9	9	The image appears highly natural with appropriate lighting, shadows, and sense of distance. There are very minimal, if any, noticeable artifacts.	9	0
2,499	Remove license plate	10	10	The license plate has been successfully removed, and the edited image is a minimal yet effective modification of the original.	10	9	9	The AI-generated image appears highly natural with appropriate lighting, shadow, and realistic reflections. The car looks well-integrated into the environment with no jarring elements. Minimal artifacts are present, as there are no noticeable distortions or unnatural features.	9	9.486833
2,902	Remove radar	0	0	The edited image does not follow the editing instruction to remove the radar at all. Additionally, the scene in the edited image is completely different from the original, indicating significant overediting.	0	2	4	The image has an unnatural feel due to the chaotic and unrealistic structure in the background, which does not align with real-world scenes. There are noticeable artifacts, like the repeated pattern and unrealistic texture on the ship, detracting from the image's quality.	2	0
2,902	Remove flag	0	10	The flag is still present in the edited image, indicating failure to follow the editing instruction. However, the edited image is identical to the original, showing no overediting.	0	8	9	The ship and its surroundings look realistic with appropriate lighting and shadows. There are minor artifacts visible in the distance and some edges, but they do not detract significantly from the overall quality.	8	0
2,902	Remove satellite dish	0	0	The edited image shows drastic changes that are unrelated to the removal of the satellite dish, making it unrecognizable from the original.	0	2	1	The unnaturalness of the scene is evident due to the fragmented and distorted structure of the ship, making it look highly unrealistic. Additionally, the image contains significant artifacts such as pixelation and unusual distortions throughout, reducing the overall quality.	1	0
2,902	Remove crew	10	10	The editing has successfully removed the crew from the ship. The edited image retains the original scene with no significant changes beyond the instructed edit.	10	8	9	The ship scene looks quite natural, with appropriate lighting and shadows. There is a slight unnatural feel due to the clean and perfect appearance of the ship, making it look a bit artificial. The image has minimal artifacts, with only minor imperfections that do not significantly detract from the overall quality.	8	8.944272
2,902	Remove crane	2	0	The crane has not been effectively removed; instead, there is a visible pattern overlay that distorts the original image. The scene is significantly altered while failing to execute the given instruction.	0	3	2	The image does not appear very natural due to the highly unrealistic and fragmented structure of the ship, and there are clear artifacts such as the grid-like pattern and unnatural segmentation on the ship.	2	0
2,755	Remove sheep	8	6	The sheep has been effectively removed from the second image, fulfilling the editing instruction well. However, the area where the sheep was removed looks somewhat unnatural, thus slightly impacting the overall image quality. The rest of the image remains largely unchanged, preserving the original scene.	6	3	8	The image appears intentionally surreal and does not aim for naturalism, which gives it an unnatural feeling. However, there are minimal artifacts or distortions visible in the image.	3	4.24264
2,755	Remove knife	10	9	The knife has been removed successfully without altering the rest of the scene significantly, making the edit effective and minimally intrusive.	9	4	8	The image has a stylized and surreal quality, which detracts from naturalness. While the lighting and shadows are intentionally exaggerated, they contribute to an unnatural feeling. The image has minimal artifacts, but the stylization may be perceived as intentional choices rather than errors.	4	6
2,755	Remove the person	8	9	The person has been successfully removed from the image, leaving the background intact. Minor remnants of the person's outline and slight color discrepancies are noticeable, but overall, the edit is minimal and effective.	8	3	8	The image contains a surreal and abstract atmosphere, which doesn't aim for a natural look. The lighting and shadows appear intentionally artistic rather than realistic. As for artifacts, the image is clear with no visible distortions, blurring, or other issues, but the abstract textures could be perceived as intentional artifacts.	3	4.89898
2,755	Remove person's hand	2	5	The person's hand is removed, but excessive parts of the image including the person and the knife were also removed, making the scene significantly altered and not focused solely on the instruction.	2	3	8	The image contains elements that do not appear in a natural setting, such as the imagined combination of shapes and figures, resulting in a lower naturalness score. However, the image is relatively free of artifacts, with its details and textures reasonably well rendered, thus receiving a higher score for artifacts.	3	2.44949
2,755	Remove dark tree	0	10	The dark tree in the background has not been removed. The edited image looks identical to the original.	0	5	9	The image has an artistic, almost painting-like quality that affects its naturalness, making it appear somewhat surreal. However, the image has minimal artifacts and is well-rendered without distortions.	5	0
3,832	Remove drawer	0	5	The drawer has not been removed; it has instead been changed to a different style. The second image still clearly shows a drawer, thus not following the remove instruction. However, the overall structure remains quite similar, hence a moderate overediting score.	0	3	6	The image composition gives an unnatural feeling with elements that do not align realistically. The shadows and lighting seem inconsistent. Furthermore, there are noticeable distortions, especially on the edges and reflections on the glass, which detract from the overall realism.	3	0
3,832	Remove white panel	9	10	The white panel has been successfully removed and replaced with a wood panel that matches the rest of the drawer unit. The editing is minimal and effective without noticeable overediting.	9	8	9	The image appears mostly natural, with some minor imperfections in lighting and texture. There are very few artifacts, with some slight blurring in certain areas, but overall it is well-executed.	8	8.485281
3,832	Remove cabinet	4	8	The cabinet has been partially removed, leaving remnants visible on the sides and in the background. The image still shows elements recognizable as part of the original cabinet, making the edit only partially successful. However, the degree of overediting is minimal, with only the affected area being changed.	4	8	9	The image appears largely natural and realistic but with slight issues in the overall cohesion. There is minimal artifact presence, with only a slight inconsistency in shadow or texture.	8	5.656854
3,832	Remove box inside	0	5	The box inside the drawer is still present, indicating no removal. The drawer front has been changed, which is not part of the instruction.	0	7	9	The image looks mostly natural with the drawer and wood textures appearing realistic. However, the drawer's connection to the main body looks slightly off, affecting the sense of naturalness. There are very few artifacts or distortions visible in the image.	7	0
3,832	Remove cabinet top	2	2	The cabinet top has not been removed, it has instead been covered with some sort of material, which is not the intended edit. Additionally, the alterations have introduced noticeable elements that were not in the original image, causing over-editing.	2	7	8	The image appears quite natural with coherent lighting and shadowing, though some parts like the fabric look slightly unnatural and rigid. There are minor artifacts such as the slightly irregular tearing of the fabric that break the naturalism.	7	3.741657
4,152	Remove car	9	8	The car has been successfully removed as per the instruction, with minimal surrounding context from the original image being affected, though noticeable that the platform underneath the car remains.	8	3	7	The image does not look very natural due to the lack of clear context and background details. However, the image has relatively few visible artifacts aside from some blurring and a watermark.	3	4.89898
4,152	Remove logo	0	0	The edited image has undergone extensive changes, completely altering the car design and appearance, which is unrelated to the original image. The instruction to remove the logo wasn't followed, resulting in a failure to achieve the editing objective.	0	8	9	The image appears mostly natural, though the seemingly melted or covered car has a slightly surreal look that makes it less than completely natural. The artifact score is high with minor distortions at the car edges, but overall, the image is clear with no significant artifacts.	8	0
4,152	Remove air intake	0	0	The edited image completely changed the subject, resulting in a completely different scene that does not preserve any characteristics of the original image.	0	8	9	The object in the image looks natural and well-blended with appropriate shadows and lighting. There is minimal visible distortion, artifacts, or blurring. However, the context of what the object is might be unclear to some viewers.	8	0
4,152	Remove front wheel	8	9	The front wheel has been successfully removed in the edited image. The car's overall structure and design remain consistent, with minimal overediting observed. There is a slight distortion where the wheel used to be, but overall, the edit is effective.	8	8	9	The car and its environment appear mostly natural with good lighting and shadows. Minor artificial aspects can be noticed upon close inspection. The image contains very few artifacts, if any.	8	8
4,152	Remove license plate	0	0	The edited image is completely different from the original image without any similarities. The objective of removing the license plate was not met.	0	10	9	The image presents a car grille with realistic reflections, accurate shadows, and appropriate lighting creating a natural appearance. There is a small visible watermark, but it does not detract significantly from the overall quality.	9	0
4,473	Remove boat	8	9	The boat has been successfully removed from the scene, fulfilling the editing instruction. The edited image retains most of the original elements with minimal but noticeable changes where the boat was removed.	8	10	10	The image depicts a seascape painting which looks natural and well-composed. There are no noticeable artifacts, distortions, or other issues.	10	8.944272
4,473	Remove seagulls	10	9	The seagulls have been successfully removed from the edited image without significant alterations to the rest of the scene. The edited image retains the elements and composition of the original, with only minimal changes around the area where the seagulls were.	9	9	10	The image looks almost completely natural with accurate lighting, shadows, and sense of distance. It contains no visible artifacts such as distortions, watermarks, or unusual body parts.	9	9
4,473	Remove grass	10	9	The edited image successfully removes the grass as instructed, leaving the scene largely unchanged except for the absence of grass.	9	8	9	The scene looks quite natural with accurate depiction of a boat on a shore and seagulls in the sky. The lighting and sense of distance are also correct, though the painting style slightly diminishes the naturalness. There are minimal artifacts present, indicating a clean generation process.	8	8.485281
4,473	Remove waves	9	7	The waves have been successfully removed from the image, achieving the editing instruction. However, additional changes such as the introduction of plants in the water and the change in water texture suggest a degree of overediting.	7	8	9	The image looks quite natural with a well-rendered scene, though the horizon and reflections could be slightly off. There are minimal artifacts, with a slight blur on the edges of some elements.	8	7.483315
4,473	Remove distant cloud	4	6	Distant clouds have been removed effectively, but the sky's color has changed significantly and other clouds have also been removed, leading to overediting.	4	10	10	The scene in the image looks highly natural with appropriate lighting and shadowing. The image is free of any artifacts, distortions, watermarks, or blurring.	10	6.324555
4,348	Remove car	9	10	The car is successfully removed from the image, with no significant alteration to the surrounding environment. There is no evidence of overediting, making the scene look natural and seamless.	9	7	9	The scene looks mostly natural but some elements, such as the abrupt end of the road and the slightly off perspective, detract from complete realism. There is minimal noise or distortion, and the elements are well-harmonized, resulting in almost no artifacts.	7	7.937254
4,348	Remove headlights	0	10	The headlights have not been removed; the original and edited images appear identical. However, the edited image maintains the original scene perfectly.	0	9	9	The image looks highly natural with realistic lighting, shadows, and reflections. There are no visible artifacts, distortion, or unnatural elements present. Only minor imperfections might be slightly noticeable upon close inspection.	9	0
4,348	Remove front wheel	0	10	The front wheel is still present in the edited image; therefore, the editing instruction has not been followed. However, there is minimal change between the two images, indicating no overediting has occurred.	0	9	10	The image of the car looks highly natural with accurate lighting and shadows, making it appear very realistic. There are no visible artifacts, distortions, or irregularities.	9	0
4,348	Remove license plate	0	0	The second image is a different car altogether, which does not correspond to the instruction of removing the license plate from the original car. The scene is completely different, not following the original edit instruction at all.	0	9	9	The scene in the image looks quite natural with appropriate shadowing and lighting. There are minor artifacts present on the car's body, but they are minimal and do not significantly affect the overall quality.	9	0
4,348	Remove roof rack	0	0	The edited image has removed the car entirely instead of just the roof rack.	0	6	9	The image appears mostly natural, but there is some blur and distortion in the foreground which affects the perception of distance. The background looks consistent and realistic. Minimal artifacts are present.	6	0
4,409	Remove white hill	10	10	The white hill has been completely removed in the edited image, and the overall scene remains consistent with minimal changes to the surrounding environment.	10	9	10	The landscape scene looks highly natural with accurate shadowing and lighting. There are no detectable artifacts or distortions.	9	9.486833
4,409	Remove rocks	9	7	The editing has successfully removed the rocks, replacing them with a sand-covered surface. However, the overall terrain looks much smoother now, altering the original landscape significantly.	7	8	9	The image generally looks natural with well-rendered textures of sand and the smooth gradient of the background. However, the transition from the sand to the background lacks a bit of natural blending, which slightly affects the overall realism. There are no noticeable artifacts or distortions.	8	7.483315
4,409	Remove debris	2	2	The debris has not been effectively removed; instead, the ground has been replaced with a different texture that still appears cluttered, though somewhat more uniform. The overall scene is highly altered, making it difficult to recognize as merely a cleaned version of the original.	2	4	9	The image has a somewhat unnatural feel due to the blending of the foreground and background elements, which don't seamlessly integrate, giving it a slightly artificial appearance. However, there are minimal to no noticeable artifacts, distortions, or blurring present.	4	2.828427
4,409	Remove boulders	10	10	The boulders have been successfully removed from the landscape, and the edited image maintains the original scene with no signs of overediting.	10	9	9	The landscape appears natural with realistic terrain and lighting. Slight artifacts are present, likely due to texture rendering, but they are minimal and not distracting.	9	9.486833
4,569	Remove doorbell	2	8	The doorbell has not been completely removed; instead, a rectangular object has replaced it. The edit is not highly obvious at first glance, maintaining the original scene somewhat, but it fails to completely follow the instruction of removing the doorbell.	2	8	9	The image looks mostly natural with good lighting and a clear sense of distance. There is minor unnatural feel in the composition of the plants and door frame, but it's minimal. The image has very few artifacts; no visible distortions, watermarks, or unusual elements, providing a high-quality appearance.	8	4
4,569	Remove door handle	10	10	The door handle has been completely removed in the edited image, and the area blends seamlessly with the rest of the door. Additionally, the change is minimal and does not affect other parts of the image.	10	9	10	The scene appears natural with appropriate lighting, shadows, and sense of distance. There are no visible artifacts, distortions, or unnatural elements.	9	9.486833
4,569	Remove plants	0	10	The plants have not been removed in the edited image. They are still present at the bottom with little change, indicating no successful editing. However, the rest of the image is unchanged, meaning there is no overediting.	0	9	10	The image appears very natural with appropriate lighting and shadow. The door and doorbell look realistic and well-integrated. There are no visible artifacts or distortions.	9	0
4,569	Remove door panel	2	8	The door panel has been partially removed, but the outline and shadow of the door are still evident. The edited image still highly resembles the original with minimal changes except for the attempted removal.	2	10	10	The image appears very natural with accurate lighting, shadows, and sense of distance. There are no visible artifacts, distortions, or unusual elements.	10	4.472136
4,569	Remove camera lens	10	9	The camera lens is completely removed in the second image, matching the editing instruction perfectly. The area where the lens was removed is seamlessly integrated with the surrounding wall, maintaining the original aesthetics of the image. However, a slight shadow remains indicating a minor trace of the original camera.	9	9	10	The image looks very natural with accurate lighting, shadow, and no sense of distance issues. There are no visible artifacts or distortions.	9	9
4,701	Remove rooster	10	9	The rooster has been successfully removed from the image. The background remains almost unchanged, with very minimal traces indicating that something has been edited.	9	2	9	The image has a very minimalistic and abstract composition, which doesn't represent a typical natural scene, hence the low score on naturalness. However, the image is free from distortions or artifacts, leading to a high score in that aspect.	2	4.24264
4,701	Remove left leg	7	8	The left leg of the origami chicken has been removed successfully, but slight remnants are still visible. The scene remains very similar to the original, with minimal changes besides the removal of the leg.	7	9	10	The image of the origami rooster looks very natural with proper lighting and shadows, resulting in high naturalness. There are no visible artifacts, distortions, or unnatural elements, indicating a perfect score for minimal artifacts.	9	7.937254
4,701	Remove right leg	10	9	The right leg of the paper bird has been successfully removed while maintaining the overall integrity and style of the original image. The scene is minimally but effectively altered.	9	9	10	The origami horse in the image looks skillfully crafted and natural within the context. There are no visible artifacts, distortions, or unnatural elements.	9	9
4,701	Remove comb	0	0	The comb and the entire original object have been removed instead of just the comb.	0	1	9	The image looks highly unnatural due to the unclear subject and unconvincing scene. However, there are very few artifacts present.	1	0
4,701	Remove tail	0	0	The edited image does not follow the instruction successfully. The entire origami rooster has been removed instead of just the tail. This represents a complete change from the original image.	0	0	10	The image does not depict a natural scene as it lacks distinguishable elements or context, resulting in a score of 0 for naturalness. There are no visible artifacts or distortions, so it scores 10 for the absence of artifacts.	0	0
4,629	Remove earring	10	10	The earrings have been completely removed as per the editing instruction, and the edited image looks minimal, completely free from the earrings, preserving the rest of the elements of the image.	10	7	8	The image overall looks natural with a good attempt at mimicking real branches. However, the texture and slight off in color blending give away its artificial nature. There are minimal artifacts, and the quality is generally high, just minor details that could be refined.	7	8.3666
4,629	Remove black stone	10	9	The black stone has been successfully removed in the edited image, meeting the editing instruction perfectly. The rest of the design remains very similar, maintaining the original style with minimal overediting.	9	8	9	The image looks quite natural with well-rendered lighting and shadows on the earrings, achieving an overall natural appeal. There are minimal visible artifacts, although a slight unnaturalness can be observed in shadow and reflections, and the overall harmony is slightly disrupted by the background. The logo placement appears integrated well, reducing distraction.	8	8.485281
4,629	Remove ear hook	10	9	The ear hooks have been successfully removed in the second image, satisfying the editing instruction perfectly. The overall design and elements of the earrings remain consistent with minimal overediting.	9	8	9	The image looks quite natural and the earrings are well-rendered with a convincing metallic texture. The lighting and shadows are plausible, though the background could be slightly more dynamic for a perfect score. There are minimal artifacts, with only a slight area where the hook meets the branch that could use refinement.	8	8.485281
4,629	Remove branch	9	9	The branch has been successfully removed from the background, achieving the primary editing instruction. The overall look of the earrings remains almost identical to the original, indicating a minimal but effective edit.	9	9	9	The image looks mostly natural with appropriate lighting and shadowing. There are minimal artifacts, though the top hook of the left earring looks slightly misaligned. Overall, the earrings appear harmoniously integrated into the scene.	9	9
4,629	Remove earrings	10	10	The earrings have been completely removed as per the instruction. The edited image shows no unnecessary changes beyond the removal of the earrings, making it a perfect minimal edit.	10	6	9	The branch in the image looks somewhat natural, but the background appears flat and unvaried, leading to an unnatural feeling. The image has minimal artifacts and is generally clean, apart from the slightly indistinct texture on the background.	6	7.745967
4,636	Remove the person	10	10	The person has been successfully removed from the image, and no other significant changes are noticed. The scene remains almost identical, indicating minimal and effective editing.	10	8	10	The background landscape looks natural, but the overlay form makes it look slightly artificial. No visible artifacts or distortions are present.	8	8.944272
4,636	Remove jacket	9	10	The jacket has been successfully removed from the person in the image, and the overall scene remains almost unchanged.	9	5	9	The image looks reasonably natural but the contact form overlay makes the scene feel somewhat artificial. There are minimal artifacts and the quality of the image and overlay is high.	5	6.708204
4,636	Remove gloves	0	10	The gloves are not visible in both images, making it impossible to determine if the instruction to remove them was executed. The edited image is identical to the original.	0	8	9	The image's naturalness is high, with a well-rendered outdoor scene and realistic background. However, the overlay of the contact form somewhat reduces the natural feel. Artifacts are minimal, as the generated elements including the human figure and landscape are clear and well-integrated.	8	0
4,636	Remove hat	0	10	The hat has not been removed in the edited image, making the editing unsuccessful. However, since the two images are identical, there is no overediting.	0	8	9	The background in the image looks natural and well-integrated with the subject. There is a slight artificial sense possibly due to the combination of different visual elements. However, there are minimal to no noticeable artifacts or distortions present on the image. Overall, the image is very natural with almost no artifacts.	8	0
4,636	Remove mountains	1	9	The mountains are still prominently visible in the edited image. There are slight changes in lighting and some minor modifications, but the main elements, specifically the mountains, remain almost the same.	1	8	9	The background image of the landscape looks natural with appropriate lighting and shadows, creating a realistic scene. The overlay form is well-integrated, although the overlapping text at the bottom slightly detracts from the clarity.	8	2.828427
4,669	Remove roulette wheel	2	5	The roulette wheel is not completely removed; it is covered by a blurred oval shape, which does not effectively remove it. The background and other elements remain mostly unchanged.	2	3	8	The image shows an unnatural floating green egg against a roulette table background, which breaks naturalness. However, the image has minimal artifacts.	3	2.44949
4,669	Remove metal spinner	2	8	The metal spinner in the center of the roulette wheel has been replaced, but its removal is not completely successful as the replaced object is relatively similar. The scene is minimally overedited, retaining the original layout and appearance closely.	2	9	9	The image is highly realistic with proper lighting, shadows, and textures that make the roulette wheel look natural. There are minimal artifacts with clear details and no visible distortions or unusual elements.	9	4.24264

447

Remove brush strokes

10

4

The brush strokes have been effectively removed as per the editing instruction, but the final result looks notably different from the original image.

4

0

The image displays numerous artifacts making it extremely difficult to discern any natural scene. It contains significant distortion and lacks coherence or recognizable elements.

0

447

Remove red stamp

2

0

The red stamp has been removed but the rest of the image has been altered significantly, making it unrecognizable.

0

The image does not depict any clear recognizable scene or subject, and contains significant distortion or incomplete rendering.

0

447

Remove bottom icons

0

The edited image does not follow the editing instruction at all and has been significantly altered from the original, making it unrecognizable.

0

4

The image does not look natural at all as it appears to be a plain background with minimal content and incoherent text elements. There are visible distortions and artifacts such as unclear text and markings.

0

447

Remove black characters

0

The original characters were not removed but smeared or partially erased, resulting in an overedited, unrecognizable version of the original.

0

8

The image does not depict a natural scene, appearing more like abstract art. However, it has minimal visible artifacts or distortions.

0

447

Remove bottom-left watermark

0

The watermark has not been removed successfully. The edited image shows significant overediting, altering the entire image beyond recognition.

0

1

9

The image appears to be highly abstract or primarily composed of visual artifacts with minimal recognizable natural elements, resulting in a low naturalness score; however, there are no notable distortions or imperfections, thus a high artifact score.

1

0

485

Remove the person

2

9

The person has not been successfully removed, leaving an obvious outline. Minimal changes to the rest of the image indicate a high level of overediting control.

2

0

10

The image does not depict a natural scene, lacking natural elements, depth, or context. However, it is free from artifacts such as distortions, watermarks, or unusual body parts.

0

485

Remove suit

0

10

The edited image still shows the person wearing a suit, hence the instruction to remove the suit was not executed at all. However, no overediting is observed as the images are almost identical.

0

8

9

The image looks fairly natural with accurate lighting and shadows. Some minor unnatural details, such as the overly smooth skin, slightly detract from the naturalness. There are practically no noticeable artifacts.

8

0

485

Remove hand

6

8

The hand has been partially removed, but there is still a visible fragment of the hand left near the body. The edited image retains most of the original features, indicating minimal overediting.

6

8

9

The image appears mostly natural with proper lighting, shadows, and proportions. There are minimal artifacts; however, some minor smoothing effects and slight unnatural blending around the hairline can be noticed.

8

6.928203

485

Remove button-down

2

1

The button-down shirt has been removed, but the edit is extremely overdone with the entire appearance of the individual being drastically changed. The edited image does not resemble the original image and has lost its context entirely.

1

4

3

The image lacks naturalness as the proportions and textures appear slightly off, particularly the head which looks somewhat detached from the body. Additionally, there are visible artifacts, such as unnatural skin texture and blurred areas around the microphone and arm.

3

1.732051

485

Remove tie

0

10

The tie has not been removed in the edited image. The images look nearly identical apart from the possible color change of the tie.

0

9

The image looks very natural with good lighting and shadow, and the subject is well proportioned. There are no noticeable artifacts, distortions, or unusual body parts.

9

0

641

Remove flying demon

3

6

The flying demon has been partially removed, but its presence is still noticeable due to remnants of its silhouette and effects in the scene. The image retains much of its original elements, but the attempt to remove the flying demon is only partially successful.

3

6

8

The image generally looks natural; however, the crowd and action scenes give an artificial feel. The lighting and shadows are fairly consistent, contributing positively to naturalness. Artifacts are minimal with some distortions in character details and slight blurriness in certain areas.

6

4.24264

641

Remove the person

1

8

The person has not been removed effectively, only appears slightly less prominent. The edited image retains much of the original scene, showing minimal changes.

1

6

8

The image largely appears natural with good lighting and perspective, but some elements like the action effects and character movements make it slightly less realistic. There are minimal artifacts, though the scene contains game UI overlays which slightly detract from the overall seamlessness of the image.

6

2.44949

641

Remove crowd

3

9

The crowd has been partially removed, but some people remain visible in the scene. Minimal changes were made to other elements of the image, indicating a low degree of overediting.

3

6

The image looks somewhat unnatural due to the unrealistic scenario with a character flying and attacking in a city street, causing a low naturalness score. However, the artifacts are moderate as the image contains game-like visual elements and HUD, which are intentional and not a flaw.

3

641

Remove neon sign

8

9

The neon sign has been mostly removed in the edited image. However, there is a small remaining fragment of the sign on the left side of the building. The rest of the scene remains largely unchanged, indicating minimal overediting.

8

5

7

The image has some natural elements, but certain aspects like the flying character and the exaggerated lighting effects detract from the naturalness. Image artifacts are minimal, but the presence of game-like overlay elements affects the overall score.

5

6.324555

641

Remove lamppost

7

9

The lamppost has been successfully removed in the edited image. However, slight artifacts are noticeable at the area where the lamppost was located. The scene remains largely unchanged apart from the lamppost removal.

7

4

8

The image has a noticeable unnatural video game-like appearance, with exaggerated character actions and effects. However, the artifacts are minimal with clear details and little to no distortion.

4

5.291502

846

Remove sticker

2

The editing instruction was to remove the sticker, but the entire content including the skis has been removed, leaving minimal content. This does not effectively meet the instruction and significantly alters the original image.

2

0

10

The image presents a minimalistic graphic design rather than a natural scene. It does not give a sense of naturalness expected in a real-world scene. However, there are no apparent artifacts, distortions, or irregularities in the provided graphic.

0

846

Remove ski

9

8

The skis have been successfully removed as per the editing instruction. The remaining text and design are altered minimally, but the background and additional text are noticeable.

8

4

3

The image has a moderately unnatural look due to the awkward and distorted text, which indicates it was AI-generated. The text artifacts are significant, showing clear signs of AI imperfections. The main emblem appears clear and natural, but the distorted text underneath significantly detracts from the overall quality.

3

4.89898

846

Remove bindings

9

8

The bindings have been successfully removed, and the edited image maintains the general layout and visual style of the original image.

8

9

10

The image looks well-balanced and natural with proper lighting and shadows. There are no visible artifacts, distortions, or unusual elements present in the image.

9

8.485281

846

Remove label

0

10

The editing instruction was to remove the label, but the label was replaced with a different label instead of being removed. However, the rest of the image appears unaltered, hence no overediting.

0

2

9

The image looks artificial due to its isolated and plain background, giving it a promotional or catalog feel rather than a natural setting. However, the image is relatively free of artifacts, with clear and sharp details.

2

0

846

Remove white background

3

8

The white background was partially removed, revealing a grey background; however, significant text distortion and addition occurred, indicating excessive and incorrect editing.

3

2

3

The background looks flat and unnatural. The text in the image is distorted and unreadable, which significantly affects the image's clarity. The objects (skis) are clear but appear to be floating without any contextual reference for placement, making the scene look unnatural.

2

2.44949

1,515

Remove mirror

9

The mirror has been effectively removed and replaced with plants, fulfilling the editing objective. The edited image maintains the original scene with minimum additional alterations, making the modification subtle yet successful.

9

8

7

The image mostly appears natural with good lighting and coherent shadows. However, some minor unnatural elements may be present. The image has few artifacts, but the watermark and slight distortions detract from its perfection.

7

7.937254

1,515

Remove TV

3

9

The TV was not completely removed as specified in the editing instruction. Instead, it seems to have been altered but still remains partially visible. The rest of the image remains largely unchanged, indicating minimal overediting.

3

9

8

The image looks mostly natural with well-placed lighting and appropriate shadows. However, there is a watermark indicating this is an artificial creation and some minor distortions around the edges and reflective surfaces.

8

4.89898

1,515

Remove flower vase

0

10

The flower vase has not been removed. Both images look identical.

0

8

7

The image looks quite natural with correct lighting and shadowing. However, the mirror reflection appears slightly off and the text watermark is somewhat distracting. Minor artifacts are visible upon close inspection.

7

0

1,515

Remove white door

7

9

The white door has been effectively removed and replaced with a green surface, blending well with the surrounding wall color. However, the area where the door was still shows slight inconsistencies with the natural look of the rest of the wall, indicating the presence of an edit.

7

4

3

The scene in the image contains slightly unnatural elements, such as overly perfect lighting and somewhat unrealistic depth. There are also visible artifacts including watermarks and minor distortions in textures, reducing the overall photo quality.

3

4.582576

1,963

Remove the person

10

9

The person has been completely removed from the second image, following the editing instruction perfectly. The background has been seamlessly filled in, although there is a slightly visible editing artifact near the desk area which causes minimal deviation from the original scene.

9

7

9

The image generally looks natural, depicting a modern office setting. However, there is some blur and lack of detail in certain parts of the background which makes it slightly less natural. There are minimal artifacts present.

7

7.937254

1,963

Remove lamp

5

9

The lamp has been partially removed, but its base is still visible, indicating incomplete removal. The rest of the image remains largely unchanged, which means minimal overediting.

5

9

The image looks very natural with proper perspective, lighting, and a realistic scene. There are minimal artifacts, with the AI details well-rendered including facial expressions and body posture.

9

6.708204

1,963

Remove watch

0

10

The watch has not been removed; it is still present. However, the edited image is otherwise identical to the original, indicating no unnecessary changes.

0

9

The image looks very natural with appropriate lighting, shadows, and perspective. There is a small visible artifact near the arm of the subject.

9

0

1,963

Remove vase

10

The vase has been completely removed with no traces left. The rest of the image remains unchanged, indicating minimal yet effective editing.

10

8

9

The image appears mostly natural with realistic lighting and a coherent sense of distance. The individual’s pose and expression seem convincing. However, there is a slight unnaturalness in the background depth. There are minimal artifacts, with no noticeable distortion or defects.

8

8.944272

1,963

Remove files

0

10

The edited image is identical to the original image, indicating that no attempt was made to follow the editing instruction (Remove files).

0

9

10

The image looks very natural with proper lighting, shadow, and realistic facial expressions. There are no visible artifacts, distortions, or unusual body parts.

9

0

2,292

Remove bitcoin symbol

10

9

The bitcoin symbol has been completely removed as instructed. The edited image no longer contains the bitcoin symbol and maintains a similar background pattern to the original, though with slight modifications to the circuit board design.

9

8

9

The image appears mostly natural and depicts a circuit board with a metallic edge quite convincingly, though the color contrast is a bit intense. There are minimal artifacts, with no significant distortions or blurring.

8

8.485281

2,292

Remove decentralized text

0

The editing instruction specified the removal of decentralized text, but the entire content of the image has been removed and replaced with a solid green circle. This indicates a complete failure in maintaining any part of the original image, thus 0 for both the success of the editing and the degree of overediting.

0

6

9

The image of the green circle with texture seems fairly natural in its appearance, but the context of what it represents may be unclear, affecting its naturalness slightly. The image doesn't contain distortions, watermarks, or visible artifacts, so it scores high on artifacts.

6

0

2,292

Remove middle circle

0

The entire central area has been removed, resulting in significant overediting, and the requested task (removing just the middle circle) was not successfully completed.

0

10

The image is a plain white circle without any elements that could appear natural. However, there are no artifacts present.

0

2,292

Remove green color

2

The green color has been removed, but the primary design and context of the image (the Bitcoin symbol) were also removed, leading to a significant deviation from the original image.

2

8

The image does not depict a natural scene at all; it appears to be an abstract pattern. There are minimal artifacts noticed, making it relatively clear.

2

2,292

Remove circuit elements

0

The edited image does not resemble the original. The circuit elements are removed, but the entire image is vastly different, failing to maintain the original structure and context.

0

2

The image does not resemble a natural scene or object, showing only a textured, circular pattern. There are little to no discernible features or coherent elements that make it natural. It lacks clear artifacts, but the overall intentional blurring and texture might be distracting.

0

2,320

Remove boy

10

The boy has been completely removed, and the rest of the image remains consistent with the original, indicating successful editing without over-editing.

10

8

9

The scene looks quite natural in terms of the ocean waves and lighting, though not highly detailed in some areas. The image has minimal artifacts, with just a slight blur at certain points.

8

8.944272

2,320

Remove woman

9

The woman has been effectively removed from the image. The remaining individuals and the background are minimally affected, preserving the original scene.

9

7

9

The scene appears mostly natural with lifelike water splashes, although the positioning of the person's arm and the water interaction seems slightly off, impacting the naturalness. There are minimal to no visible artifacts throughout the image.

7

7.937254

2,320

Remove man

6

8

The main man holding the woman is successfully removed, but the scene looks somewhat overedited with noticeable changes in water splash patterns and textures. The overall scene is still recognizable, leading to a high score for minimal editing.

6

8

The water and splashes look quite realistic, but the blending of humans into the water looks slightly unnatural in places. There are minor distortions around some of the faces and edges.

6

2,320

Remove person swimming

8

9

The editing instruction to remove the person swimming has been mostly executed successfully. One person in the foreground has been altered, and the background swimmer on the right side has been removed completely. However, traces of additional swimmers in the distant background are still slightly visible. The image retains the original context and has minimal but perceptible overediting, which reflects a high degree of success with the task.

8

9

The image looks very natural with realistic water effects and lighting. The man in the water appears to be in proportion and aligned correctly with the environment. There are minimal artifacts, making it a clean and coherent image.

9

8.485281

2,320

Remove person far right

10

9

The person on the far right has been successfully removed from the scene, with minimal impact on the overall composition. The edited image maintains the original feel, aside from the removal of the specified person.

9

8

9

The image looks quite natural with an appropriate sense of motion and water effects. However, there is a slight lack of sharpness and some minor blurriness in distant figures. Overall, the image has minimal artifacts and looks coherent.

8

8.485281

2,499

Remove car

8

9

The car has been successfully removed, and the space it occupied has been replaced with a driveway that blends well with the original environment. However, there is a dark shadow-like mark on the ground that suggests where the car used to be, which slightly detracts from the seamlessness of the edit.

8

7

6

The image generally looks natural, but the shadows and texture transitions (e.g., from the driveway to the pavement) appear slightly off and unnatural. There is a noticeable dark patch or shadow at the bottom, which looks like an artifact.

6

6.928203

2,499

Remove headlight

9

The headlight on the right side (from the viewer's perspective) has been successfully removed in the edited image. The alteration is subtle and the rest of the image remains largely unchanged.

9

10

The image of the car looks very natural with correct lighting, shadows, and perspective. There are no noticeable artifacts or distortions present in the image.

10

9.486833

2,499

Remove wheel

1

9

The wheels are still present in the edited image despite the instruction to remove them. The changes are minimal, maintaining the overall look of the original image.

1

9

10

The image of the car looks very natural with appropriate lighting, shadows, and details. There are no visible distortions or artifacts present.

9

3

2,499

Remove window

10

0

The window has been completely removed, perfectly aligning with the editing instruction. However, the scene has been completely changed and does not resemble the original image at all.

0

9

The image appears highly natural with appropriate lighting, shadows, and sense of distance. There are very minimal, if any, noticeable artifacts.

9

0

2,499

Remove license plate

10

The license plate has been successfully removed, and the edited image is a minimal yet effective modification of the original.

10

9

The AI-generated image appears highly natural with appropriate lighting, shadow, and realistic reflections. The car looks well-integrated into the environment with no jarring elements. Minimal artifacts are present, as there are no noticeable distortions or unnatural features.

9

9.486833

2,902

Remove radar

0

The edited image does not follow the editing instruction to remove the radar at all. Additionally, the scene in the edited image is completely different from the original, indicating significant overediting.

0

2

4

The image has an unnatural feel due to the chaotic and unrealistic structure in the background, which does not align with real-world scenes. There are noticeable artifacts, like the repeated pattern and unrealistic texture on the ship, detracting from the image's quality.

2

0

2,902

Remove flag

0

10

The flag is still present in the edited image, indicating failure to follow the editing instruction. However, the edited image is identical to the original, showing no overediting.

0

8

9

The ship and its surroundings look realistic with appropriate lighting and shadows. There are minor artifacts visible in the distance and some edges, but they do not detract significantly from the overall quality.

8

0

2,902

Remove satellite dish

0

The edited image shows drastic changes that are unrelated to the removal of the satellite dish, making it unrecognizable from the original.

0

2

1

The unnaturalness of the scene is evident due to the fragmented and distorted structure of the ship, making it look highly unrealistic. Additionally, the image contains significant artifacts such as pixelation and unusual distortions throughout, reducing the overall quality.

1

0

2,902

Remove crew

10

The editing has successfully removed the crew from the ship. The edited image retains the original scene with no significant changes beyond the instructed edit.

10

8

9

The ship scene looks quite natural, with appropriate lighting and shadows. There is a slight unnatural feel due to the clean and perfect appearance of the ship, making it look a bit artificial. The image has minimal artifacts, with only minor imperfections that do not significantly detract from the overall quality.

8

8.944272

2,902

Remove crane

2

0

The crane has not been effectively removed; instead, there is a visible pattern overlay that distorts the original image. The scene is significantly altered while failing to execute the given instruction.

0

3

2

The image does not appear very natural due to the highly unrealistic and fragmented structure of the ship, and there are clear artifacts such as the grid-like pattern and unnatural segmentation on the ship.

2

0

2,755

Remove sheep

8

6

The sheep has been effectively removed from the second image, fulfilling the editing instruction well. However, the area where the sheep was removed looks somewhat unnatural, thus slightly impacting the overall image quality. The rest of the image remains largely unchanged, preserving the original scene.

6

3

8

The image appears intentionally surreal and does not aim for naturalism, which gives it an unnatural feeling. However, there are minimal artifacts or distortions visible in the image.

3

4.24264

2,755

Remove knife

10

9

The knife has been removed successfully without altering the rest of the scene significantly, making the edit effective and minimally intrusive.

9

4

8

The image has a stylized and surreal quality, which detracts from naturalness. While the lighting and shadows are intentionally exaggerated, they contribute to an unnatural feeling. The image has minimal artifacts, but the stylization may be perceived as intentional choices rather than errors.

4

6

2,755

Remove the person

8

9

The person has been successfully removed from the image, leaving the background intact. Minor remnants of the person's outline and slight color discrepancies are noticeable, but overall, the edit is minimal and effective.

8

3

8

The image contains a surreal and abstract atmosphere, which doesn't aim for a natural look. The lighting and shadows appear intentionally artistic rather than realistic. As for artifacts, the image is clear with no visible distortions, blurring, or other issues, but the abstract textures could be perceived as intentional artifacts.

3

4.89898

2,755

Remove person's hand

2

5

The person's hand is removed, but excessive parts of the image including the person and the knife were also removed, making the scene significantly altered and not focused solely on the instruction.

2

3

8

The image contains elements that do not appear in a natural setting, such as the imagined combination of shapes and figures, resulting in a lower naturalness score. However, the image is relatively free of artifacts, with its details and textures reasonably well rendered, thus receiving a higher score for artifacts.

3

2.44949

2,755

Remove dark tree

0

10

The dark tree in the background has not been removed. The edited image looks identical to the original.

0

5

9

The image has an artistic, almost painting-like quality that affects its naturalness, making it appear somewhat surreal. However, the image has minimal artifacts and is well-rendered without distortions.

5

0

3,832

Remove drawer

0

5

The drawer has not been removed; it has instead been changed to a different style. The second image still clearly shows a drawer, thus not following the remove instruction. However, the overall structure remains quite similar, hence a moderate overediting score.

0

3

6

The image composition gives an unnatural feeling with elements that do not align realistically. The shadows and lighting seem inconsistent. Furthermore, there are noticeable distortions, especially on the edges and reflections on the glass, which detract from the overall realism.

3

0

3,832

Remove white panel

9

10

The white panel has been successfully removed and replaced with a wood panel that matches the rest of the drawer unit. The editing is minimal and effective without noticeable overediting.

9

8

9

The image appears mostly natural, with some minor imperfections in lighting and texture. There are very few artifacts, with some slight blurring in certain areas, but overall it is well-executed.

8

8.485281

3,832

Remove cabinet

4

8

The cabinet has been partially removed, leaving remnants visible on the sides and in the background. The image still shows elements recognizable as part of the original cabinet, making the edit only partially successful. However, the degree of overediting is minimal, with only the affected area being changed.

4

8

9

The image appears largely natural and realistic but with slight issues in the overall cohesion. There is minimal artifact presence, with only a slight inconsistency in shadow or texture.

8

5.656854

3,832

Remove box inside

0

5

The box inside the drawer is still present, indicating no removal. The drawer front has been changed, which is not part of the instruction.

0

7

9

The image looks mostly natural with the drawer and wood textures appearing realistic. However, the drawer's connection to the main body looks slightly off, affecting the sense of naturalness. There are very few artifacts or distortions visible in the image.

7

0

3,832

Remove cabinet top

2

The cabinet top has not been removed, it has instead been covered with some sort of material, which is not the intended edit. Additionally, the alterations have introduced noticeable elements that were not in the original image, causing over-editing.

2

7

8

The image appears quite natural with coherent lighting and shadowing, though some parts like the fabric look slightly unnatural and rigid. There are minor artifacts such as the slightly irregular tearing of the fabric that break the naturalism.

7

3.741657

4,152

Remove car

9

8

The car has been successfully removed as per the instruction, with minimal surrounding context from the original image being affected, though noticeable that the platform underneath the car remains.

8

3

7

The image does not look very natural due to the lack of clear context and background details. However, the image has relatively few visible artifacts aside from some blurring and a watermark.

3

4.89898

4,152

Remove logo

0

The edited image has undergone extensive changes, completely altering the car design and appearance, which is unrelated to the original image. The instruction to remove the logo wasn't followed, resulting in a failure to achieve the editing objective.

0

8

9

The image appears mostly natural, though the seemingly melted or covered car has a slightly surreal look that makes it less than completely natural. The artifact score is high with minor distortions at the car edges, but overall, the image is clear with no significant artifacts.

8

0

4,152

Remove air intake

0

The edited image completely changed the subject, resulting in a completely different scene that does not preserve any characteristics of the original image.

0

8

9

The object in the image looks natural and well-blended with appropriate shadows and lighting. There is minimal visible distortion, artifacts, or blurring. However, the context of what the object is might be unclear to some viewers.

8

0

4,152

Remove front wheel

8

9

The front wheel has been successfully removed in the edited image. The car's overall structure and design remain consistent, with minimal overediting observed. There is a slight distortion where the wheel used to be, but overall, the edit is effective.

8

9

The car and its environment appear mostly natural with good lighting and shadows. Minor artificial aspects can be noticed upon close inspection. The image contains very few artifacts, if any.

8

4,152

Remove license plate

0

The edited image is completely different from the original image without any similarities. The objective of removing the license plate was not met.

0

10

9

The image presents a car grille with realistic reflections, accurate shadows, and appropriate lighting creating a natural appearance. There is a small visible watermark, but it does not detract significantly from the overall quality.

9

0

4,473

Remove boat

8

9

The boat has been successfully removed from the scene, fulfilling the editing instruction. The edited image retains most of the original elements with minimal but noticeable changes where the boat was removed.

8

10

The image depicts a seascape painting which looks natural and well-composed. There are no noticeable artifacts, distortions, or other issues.

10

8.944272

4,473

Remove seagulls

10

9

The seagulls have been successfully removed from the edited image without significant alterations to the rest of the scene. The edited image retains the elements and composition of the original, with only minimal changes around the area where the seagulls were.

9

10

The image looks almost completely natural with accurate lighting, shadows, and sense of distance. It contains no visible artifacts such as distortions, watermarks, or unusual body parts.

9

4,473

Remove grass

10

9

The edited image successfully removes the grass as instructed, leaving the scene largely unchanged except for the absence of grass.

9

8

9

The scene looks quite natural with accurate depiction of a boat on a shore and seagulls in the sky. The lighting and sense of distance are also correct, though the painting style slightly diminishes the naturalness. There are minimal artifacts present, indicating a clean generation process.

8

8.485281

4,473

Remove waves

9

7

The waves have been successfully removed from the image, achieving the editing instruction. However, additional changes such as the introduction of plants in the water and the change in water texture suggest a degree of overediting.

7

8

9

The image looks quite natural with a well-rendered scene, though the horizon and reflections could be slightly off. There are minimal artifacts, with a slight blur on the edges of some elements.

8

7.483315

4,473

Remove distant cloud

4

6

Distant clouds have been removed effectively, but the sky's color has changed significantly and other clouds have also been removed, leading to overediting.

4

10

The scene in the image looks highly natural with appropriate lighting and shadowing. The image is free of any artifacts, distortions, watermarks, or blurring.

10

6.324555

4,348

Remove car

9

10

The car is successfully removed from the image, with no significant alteration to the surrounding environment. There is no evidence of overediting, making the scene look natural and seamless.

9

7

9

The scene looks mostly natural but some elements, such as the abrupt end of the road and the slightly off perspective, detract from complete realism. There is minimal noise or distortion, and the elements are well-harmonized, resulting in almost no artifacts.

7

7.937254

4,348

Remove headlights

0

10

The headlights have not been removed; the original and edited images appear identical. However, the edited image maintains the original scene perfectly.

0

9

The image looks highly natural with realistic lighting, shadows, and reflections. There are no visible artifacts, distortion, or unnatural elements present. Only minor imperfections might be slightly noticeable upon close inspection.

9

0

4,348

Remove front wheel

0

10

The front wheel is still present in the edited image; therefore, the editing instruction has not been followed. However, there is minimal change between the two images, indicating no overediting has occurred.

0

9

10

The image of the car looks highly natural with accurate lighting and shadows, making it appear very realistic. There are no visible artifacts, distortions, or irregularities.

9

0

4,348

Remove license plate

0

The second image is a different car altogether, which does not correspond to the instruction of removing the license plate from the original car. The scene is completely different, not following the original edit instruction at all.

0

9

The scene in the image looks quite natural with appropriate shadowing and lighting. There are minor artifacts present on the car's body, but they are minimal and do not significantly affect the overall quality.

9

0

4,348

Remove roof rack

0

The edited image has removed the car entirely instead of just the roof rack.

0

6

9

The image appears mostly natural, but there is some blur and distortion in the foreground which affects the perception of distance. The background looks consistent and realistic. Minimal artifacts are present.

6

0

4,409

Remove white hill

10

The white hill has been completely removed in the edited image, and the overall scene remains consistent with minimal changes to the surrounding environment.

10

9

10

The landscape scene looks highly natural with accurate shadowing and lighting. There are no detectable artifacts or distortions.

9

9.486833

4,409

Remove rocks

9

7

The editing has successfully removed the rocks, replacing them with a sand-covered surface. However, the overall terrain looks much smoother now, altering the original landscape significantly.

7

8

9

The image generally looks natural with well-rendered textures of sand and the smooth gradient of the background. However, the transition from the sand to the background lacks a bit of natural blending, which slightly affects the overall realism. There are no noticeable artifacts or distortions.

8

7.483315

4,409

Remove debris

2

The debris has not been effectively removed; instead, the ground has been replaced with a different texture that still appears cluttered, though somewhat more uniform. The overall scene is highly altered, making it difficult to recognize as merely a cleaned version of the original.

2

4

9

The image has a somewhat unnatural feel due to the blending of the foreground and background elements, which don't seamlessly integrate, giving it a slightly artificial appearance. However, there are minimal to no noticeable artifacts, distortions, or blurring present.

4

2.828427

4,409

Remove boulders

10

The boulders have been successfully removed from the landscape, and the edited image maintains the original scene with no signs of overediting.

10

9

The landscape appears natural with realistic terrain and lighting. Slight artifacts are present, likely due to texture rendering, but they are minimal and not distracting.

9

9.486833

4,569

Remove doorbell

2

8

The doorbell has not been completely removed; instead, a rectangular object has replaced it. The edit is not highly obvious at first glance, maintaining the original scene somewhat, but it fails to completely follow the instruction of removing the doorbell.

2

8

9

The image looks mostly natural with good lighting and a clear sense of distance. There is minor unnatural feel in the composition of the plants and door frame, but it's minimal. The image has very few artifacts; no visible distortions, watermarks, or unusual elements, providing a high-quality appearance.

8

4

4,569

Remove door handle

10

The door handle has been completely removed in the edited image, and the area blends seamlessly with the rest of the door. Additionally, the change is minimal and does not affect other parts of the image.

10

9

10

The scene appears natural with appropriate lighting, shadows, and sense of distance. There are no visible artifacts, distortions, or unnatural elements.

9

9.486833

4,569

Remove plants

0

10

The plants have not been removed in the edited image. They are still present at the bottom with little change, indicating no successful editing. However, the rest of the image is unchanged, meaning there is no overediting.

0

9

10

The image appears very natural with appropriate lighting and shadow. The door and doorbell look realistic and well-integrated. There are no visible artifacts or distortions.

9

0

4,569

Remove door panel

2

8

The door panel has been partially removed, but the outline and shadow of the door are still evident. The edited image still highly resembles the original with minimal changes except for the attempted removal.

2

10

The image appears very natural with accurate lighting, shadows, and sense of distance. There are no visible artifacts, distortions, or unusual elements.

10

4.472136

4,569

Remove camera lens

10

9

The camera lens is completely removed in the second image, matching the editing instruction perfectly. The area where the lens was removed is seamlessly integrated with the surrounding wall, maintaining the original aesthetics of the image. However, a slight shadow remains indicating a minor trace of the original camera.

9

10

The image looks very natural with accurate lighting, shadow, and no sense of distance issues. There are no visible artifacts or distortions.

9

4,701

Remove rooster

10

9

The rooster has been successfully removed from the image. The background remains almost unchanged, with very minimal traces indicating that something has been edited.

9

2

9

The image has a very minimalistic and abstract composition, which doesn't represent a typical natural scene, hence the low score on naturalness. However, the image is free from distortions or artifacts, leading to a high score in that aspect.

2

4.24264

4,701

Remove left leg

7

8

The left leg of the origami chicken has been removed successfully, but slight remnants are still visible. The scene remains very similar to the original, with minimal changes besides the removal of the leg.

7

9

10

The image of the origami rooster looks very natural with proper lighting and shadows, resulting in high naturalness. There are no visible artifacts, distortions, or unnatural elements, indicating a perfect score for minimal artifacts.

9

7.937254

4,701

Remove right leg

10

9

The right leg of the paper bird has been successfully removed while maintaining the overall integrity and style of the original image. The scene is minimally but effectively altered.

9

10

The origami horse in the image looks skillfully crafted and natural within the context. There are no visible artifacts, distortions, or unnatural elements.

9

4,701

Remove comb

0

The comb and the entire original object have been removed instead of just the comb.

0

1

9

The image looks highly unnatural due to the unclear subject and unconvincing scene. However, there are very few artifacts present.

1

0

4,701

Remove tail

0

The edited image does not follow the instruction successfully. The entire origami rooster has been removed instead of just the tail. This represents a complete change from the original image.

0

10

The image does not depict a natural scene as it lacks distinguishable elements or context, resulting in a score of 0 for naturalness. There are no visible artifacts or distortions, so it scores 10 for the absence of artifacts.

0

4,629

Remove earring

10

The earrings have been completely removed as per the editing instruction, and the edited image looks minimal, completely free from the earrings, preserving the rest of the elements of the image.

10

7

8

The image overall looks natural with a good attempt at mimicking real branches. However, the texture and slight off in color blending give away its artificial nature. There are minimal artifacts, and the quality is generally high, just minor details that could be refined.

7

8.3666

4,629

Remove black stone

10

9

The black stone has been successfully removed in the edited image, meeting the editing instruction perfectly. The rest of the design remains very similar, maintaining the original style with minimal overediting.

9

8

9

The image looks quite natural with well-rendered lighting and shadows on the earrings, achieving an overall natural appeal. There are minimal visible artifacts, although a slight unnaturalness can be observed in shadow and reflections, and the overall harmony is slightly disrupted by the background. The logo placement appears integrated well, reducing distraction.

8

8.485281

4,629

Remove ear hook

10

9

The ear hooks have been successfully removed in the second image, satisfying the editing instruction perfectly. The overall design and elements of the earrings remain consistent with minimal overediting.

9

8

9

The image looks quite natural and the earrings are well-rendered with a convincing metallic texture. The lighting and shadows are plausible, though the background could be slightly more dynamic for a perfect score. There are minimal artifacts, with only a slight area where the hook meets the branch that could use refinement.

8

8.485281

4,629

Remove branch

9

The branch has been successfully removed from the background, achieving the primary editing instruction. The overall look of the earrings remains almost identical to the original, indicating a minimal but effective edit.

9

The image looks mostly natural with appropriate lighting and shadowing. There are minimal artifacts, though the top hook of the left earring looks slightly misaligned. Overall, the earrings appear harmoniously integrated into the scene.

9

4,629

Remove earrings

10

The earrings have been completely removed as per the instruction. The edited image shows no unnecessary changes beyond the removal of the earrings, making it a perfect minimal edit.

10

6

9

The branch in the image looks somewhat natural, but the background appears flat and unvaried, leading to an unnatural feeling. The image has minimal artifacts and is generally clean, apart from the slightly indistinct texture on the background.

6

7.745967

4,636

Remove the person

10

The person has been successfully removed from the image, and no other significant changes are noticed. The scene remains almost identical, indicating minimal and effective editing.

10

8

10

The background landscape looks natural, but the overlay form makes it look slightly artificial. No visible artifacts or distortions are present.

8

8.944272

4,636

Remove jacket

9

10

The jacket has been successfully removed from the person in the image, and the overall scene remains almost unchanged.

9

5

9

The image looks reasonably natural but the contact form overlay makes the scene feel somewhat artificial. There are minimal artifacts and the quality of the image and overlay is high.

5

6.708204

4,636

Remove gloves

0

10

The gloves are not visible in both images, making it impossible to determine if the instruction to remove them was executed. The edited image is identical to the original.

0

8

9

The image's naturalness is high, with a well-rendered outdoor scene and realistic background. However, the overlay of the contact form somewhat reduces the natural feel. Artifacts are minimal, as the generated elements including the human figure and landscape are clear and well-integrated.

8

0

4,636

Remove hat

0

10

The hat has not been removed in the edited image, making the editing unsuccessful. However, since the two images are identical, there is no overediting.

0

8

9

The background in the image looks natural and well-integrated with the subject. There is a slight artificial sense possibly due to the combination of different visual elements. However, there are minimal to no noticeable artifacts or distortions present on the image. Overall, the image is very natural with almost no artifacts.

8

0

4,636

Remove mountains

1

9

The mountains are still prominently visible in the edited image. There are slight changes in lighting and some minor modifications, but the main elements, specifically the mountains, remain almost the same.

1

8

9

The background image of the landscape looks natural with appropriate lighting and shadows, creating a realistic scene. The overlay form is well-integrated, although the overlapping text at the bottom slightly detracts from the clarity.

8

2.828427

4,669

Remove roulette wheel

2

5

The roulette wheel is not completely removed; it is covered by a blurred oval shape, which does not effectively remove it. The background and other elements remain mostly unchanged.

2

3

8

The image shows an unnatural floating green egg against a roulette table background, which breaks naturalness. However, the image has minimal artifacts.

3

2.44949

4,669

Remove metal spinner

2

8

The metal spinner in the center of the roulette wheel has been replaced, but its removal is not completely successful as the replaced object is relatively similar. The scene is minimally overedited, retaining the original layout and appearance closely.

2

9

The image is highly realistic with proper lighting, shadows, and textures that make the roulette wheel look natural. There are minimal artifacts with clear details and no visible distortions or unusual elements.

9

4.24264