Recent Forum Posts
From categories:
page 1123...next »

Original Sentence.1

Original Sentence. [[ footnote ]] This Massage. [[ /footnote ]]
Just remove the empty space.

Also rating modules should go on top.

by Meta WonderratMeta Wonderrat, 19 Feb 2019 16:34

Thank you! I'm unsure how to do the footnote thing, unfortunately, which is how I would like to note the chemical imbalance you mentioned, so that I don't just have a paragraph thats mostly brackets.

by SerenaJFlemingSerenaJFleming, 18 Feb 2019 22:41

Except from a few minor things good job.

That thermal limit really got you out of the "all consuming flesh" territory.

I would never call something "totally save" (it sounds like a sales pitch) "generally save" would fit better, i think.

You still have that water problem i mentioned in the sandbox a long time ago.

Your chemistry is still off.
C + 2 H2O = CO2 + CH4 (endothermic) <— nerd for it needs heat to happen
So your liquid heating should be part of the anomaly report. Also your anomaly has a high imbalance of CO2 to CH4. If you stick with the 42% / 5% ratio AND the above chemical reaction, your liquid holds back a lot of CO2 per conversion.

That is all fine and good but it should be noted in the article somewhere.

But currently all that you need to add to get my +1 is a rating module.

by Meta WonderratMeta Wonderrat, 18 Feb 2019 17:09

A little bit of attention is always nice. It might bring a lot of people here. Most of them wont join and never speak up.
Now we have an army of invisible and silent ghosts hovering over our head
or no one comes here.
In both cases we will never know whether we perform in front of a full or empty theater.

Welcome back.

Re: On Characters by Meta WonderratMeta Wonderrat, 18 Feb 2019 16:22

The eastside show's a kinda big SCP channel, and they did a video on our Bed of Wealth :D

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q5Qy3agDYaw

Hah, God, I remember good old Creed. A shittonne of stuff has happened with me in the last few years, and I find myself coming to terms with both my own slow return to this site (hi everyone, it's Dr. Creed, gender and name changed now :D) and those events in my life, I figure I'll need to make a new character for myself if I wish to do more tales and the like.

Re: On Characters by SerenaJFlemingSerenaJFleming, 18 Feb 2019 06:15

Thanks for the +1.

by Meta WonderratMeta Wonderrat, 03 Feb 2019 18:51

We lost Divisions and Teams.

If it was not staff that deleted it i call for its immediate restoration.
When i noticed the page missing yesterday i was in an predicament. I do have a saved version of the page and its comments, but those are unavailable to me as the copies are on a device that is currently out of my reach.

If there is no reaction i will try to reinstate the site myself once i regain access to the saved data.

Major Page is down by Meta WonderratMeta Wonderrat, 03 Feb 2019 18:50

The item or its background?

If i can get this thing finished, i hope it to one day be a beacon to never abandon old ideas, whilst still moving on.

Re: Item: Bloody Wings by Meta WonderratMeta Wonderrat, 21 Jan 2019 16:06

hmm curious story…


Mr. Emperson

Re: Item: Bloody Wings by empersonemperson, 21 Jan 2019 05:46

"Bloody wings" was was something people called a step in the right direction, but whenever it came to actually fixing it the confusing nature of the item stopped it from ever going anywhere.
I recently tried to rebuild it. The result is less confusing i think, at the cost of a flowing text.
Some things are in the new version that i had in my head, but were never part of the original file. This includes the "holy" and "ritual" aspect of the item.
These aspects are there for completion and will become relevant once i flesh out the history of the item or these references will be removed when i drop the history of the item altogether.
Maybe this will be another step in the right direction and maybe this old project will finally take off.
Here it is, old and improved, now in list-form: "Bloody Wings Rebuild"

Item: Bloody Wings by Meta WonderratMeta Wonderrat, 17 Jan 2019 20:25

Not sure what page you are even referring to. If it was this page aka this command that's fine too.
Don't worry, people who assign meanings to "the number of comments a page has" are a rare sight.
Also tip with the hat to you for actually reading our guide. The amounts of time that someone writes about the Delta Command have made it clear that most new members don't read them.

Also since i could not find you introduce yourself threat i am just going to do it here:
Welcome to the Chaos Insurgency.

by Meta WonderratMeta Wonderrat, 17 Jan 2019 20:00

just realized that the discuss page for the scp wiki main page has 12 comments… I just broke it sorry :/

by nuclearpixelnuclearpixel, 16 Jan 2019 22:15

I love this.

by BaronjoeBaronjoe, 06 Jan 2019 18:00

Sorry for the late response.

I just fixed an error where you misspelled deploy.

by BaronjoeBaronjoe, 06 Jan 2019 17:58

I sat down recently to finish something.
That something was User Interface. What became of it was longer than what I had expected. There might still be some parts missing thou.
These parts are:

  • The Incident were someone came to the Interface and knew how to use it
  • The experiment were 1 human and the anomaly were locked in a room together (With a pile of electronics)
  • The experiment were 1 human and the anomaly were locked in a room together (With a pile of corpses)
  • A description of the structure mentioned in Appendix 2

All 4 of these things would add to the article, but i think it is kind of "full" already.
In an attempt not to fall into the anomaly myself aka adding to it and adding to it without it achieving any function, i will just ask here.

Some things are best not build alone. I might need some poison or just outside advice in general.

These are my main questions:

  • Is there something that can be cut without reducing the specificity of the article?
  • Is the item understandable (for reference referee to the concept on top of the article)?
  • Do the 4 things mentioned, need to be part of the article or are there results obvious enough?
  • Are there errors I am unaware of?
Item: User Interface by Meta WonderratMeta Wonderrat, 05 Jan 2019 04:53

Appreciated.

Also good German. Also Appreciated.

Slight flaw here thou…
You posted under Christmas of 2017. Funny and also Appreciated.
(Just had to point that out for archival purposes. I know a thread that was closed for Years until someone had to comment that it was out of order. That someone may or may not have been me.)

in frohes Weihnachtsfest und alles Gute zum neuen Jahr!


Mr. Emperson

page 1123...next »
Unless otherwise stated, the content of this page is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License
http://ci-wiki.wikidot.com/forum:recent-posts
ci-wiki.wikidot.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2019-09
73528
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:6RFNGINNBNHGME7DAT2QWFVTADQUPTFE
<urn:uuid:e98285a0-1c32-4867-85eb-c35d45cd3109>
2019-02-22T07:53:38Z
54.89.175.152
application/xhtml+xml
sha1:5JGMLCOEMEWAO6UYSK2K4PPNVSTH6DIX
<urn:uuid:b375de92-b34c-4704-8fac-b0d4e2954450>
http://ci-wiki.wikidot.com/forum:recent-posts
response
<urn:uuid:27fbce2f-2656-41b0-bdaf-b09fabb8ba08>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2019-09
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for February 2019
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-29-113-152.ec2.internal
software: Apache Nutch 1.15 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 0.11-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: http://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/