 
2
   

PATTERNS IN A2K USE

 
 
Reply Wed 11 Dec, 2002 02:05 pm
Just curious, have any patterns been detected in A2K use? Forum most used? M/F? Humous vs serious? ect.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 2 • Views: 1,441 • Replies: 11
No top replies

 
Phoenix32890
 
  1  
Reply Wed 11 Dec, 2002 02:11 pm
Mapleleaf- If you go to "Forum Index", after each Forum, it lists the numbers of threads, and the total responses that they have recieved!
0 Replies
 
Craven de Kere
 
  1  
Reply Wed 11 Dec, 2002 02:22 pm
In the beginning god..

I mean in the beginning there is more humor because most everyone knows each other. As listings on search engines etc increase this will evolve.
0 Replies
 
Mapleleaf
 
  1  
Reply Wed 11 Dec, 2002 05:20 pm
Do we have any way of separating No. of views from No. of individual members, say 40 members have viewed 455 times?
0 Replies
 
Craven de Kere
 
  1  
Reply Wed 11 Dec, 2002 05:53 pm
It's possible but not all views are by members, many views will be from guests. And it would add an extra query to the database which would slow things down just a wee bit. So it's unlikely that I'd do that unless people think it's a must have.
0 Replies
 
Mapleleaf
 
  1  
Reply Wed 11 Dec, 2002 06:05 pm
No must have...I just like to play with numbers. An effective system, service and dependability are important now. When something works, it sometimes takes great disipline to avoid tinkering too much. Tinkering and over analyzing have gotten me into trouble before...it's like being an alcoholic.
0 Replies
 
Craven de Kere
 
  1  
Reply Wed 11 Dec, 2002 06:19 pm
I just thought of a way this could be done without an extra database query, I don't have time to code it but maybe I can do this in the future. But it will be a very low priority as this site is less than 30% finished (I dream big) and I have bunches of features to implement.
0 Replies
 
Mapleleaf
 
  1  
Reply Sun 15 Dec, 2002 09:55 am
I am now playing with what I call the REPLY %. You divide the NUMBER OF REPLIES by the TOTAL NUMBER OF VIEWS. For example:

*Dear Diary- 98/787 .......or 9.9 %
*Online dating...- 506/3845 ...or 13.2%
*Emily Dickinson- 33/213....... or 15.4%
*The neverending...4424/20719 or 21.4%

Some questions are raised:
*What kinds of threads maintain a 15+% rate over two weeks or more?
*What kinds of threads draw large numbers of viewers, but a low rate of replies?
*Other questions?
0 Replies
 
flyboy804
 
  1  
Reply Sun 15 Dec, 2002 11:57 am
This is more academic than a request for more information, but as it stands now fifty replies could be fifty people responding or two people having a fifty posting conversation.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Sun 15 Dec, 2002 12:02 pm
similarly, the view ratio doesn't tell us much, as we don't know who is viewing - the same member over and over, different forum members checking it out, or as Craven has told us in the case of the 'full frontal nudity thread' - hits from google.

what are you hoping to determine, Mapleleaf?
0 Replies
 
Mapleleaf
 
  1  
Reply Sun 15 Dec, 2002 12:10 pm
Just playing, looking for patterns that could suggest predictable behaviors. I was hoping folks would come by, such as you and flyboy, and educate me. All of this is my way of learning the system...what to expect and such.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sun 15 Dec, 2002 12:45 pm
Mapleleaf, Another q is, Who's responsible for the last entry in A2K forums - to kill it! Wink Wink Wink Just joking.... c.i.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How to use the new able2know - Discussion by Craven de Kere
New A2K feature requests. - Discussion by DrewDad
I'm the developer - Discussion by Nick Ashley
JIM NABORS WAS GOY? - Question by farmerman
A2K censors tags? - Discussion by hingehead
New A2K Bugs - Discussion by sozobe
New A2K annoyances - Discussion by sozobe
The a2k world is changing 3: about voting - Discussion by Craven de Kere
LOST & MISPLACED A2K people. - Discussion by msolga
Welcome to the 'New' My Posts - Discussion by Nick Ashley
The "I get folksonomy" club - Discussion by Robert Gentel
 
  1. Forums
  2. » PATTERNS IN A2K USE
Copyright © 2015 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 05/22/2015 at 01:05:43
http://able2know.org/topic/1958-1
able2know.org
crawl=CC-MAIN-2015-22
32747
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:T4X77ONNSTOS6YXIE5GAZDFE4GH24UVX
<urn:uuid:136eb8a5-4c37-4663-9e1c-067706cd72d6>
2015-05-22T19:05:43Z
208.115.227.195
sha1:FK2FG4NDHEELCPIYN3ARZ24B62DFULBY
<urn:uuid:fe187869-bf71-4f37-b058-f43466203904>
http://able2know.org/topic/1958-1
length
response
<urn:uuid:6bdeb5cd-460f-4270-8f9a-41caf905f643>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-180-206-219.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)/CC WarcExport 1.0
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2015-22
operator: CommonCrawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web for May 2015
publisher: CommonCrawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf