RE: Change Proposals and Counter-Proposals (was Re: Issues 89 through 97)

I'd rather the group focus on technical issues rather than process,
so I sent this request to the chairs, but I did cc: www-archive
for reference:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2010Jan/0048.html


I think getting some clarifications on what the chairs think the
process is would help reduce the amount of group email traffic
focused on process rather than technology.

Larry
--
http://larry.masinter.net

Received on Tuesday, 19 January 2010 17:41:58 UTC
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Jan/0914.html
lists.w3.org
CC-MAIN-2024-33
8700
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:XF6CSXAN26OYUB26CZ7LJWSEXJ2JPC6Y
<urn:uuid:22fccf4f-d6ca-4893-8c9f-4797b6c5f551>
2024-08-12T18:19:59Z
104.18.23.19
application/xhtml+xml
sha1:MCQ2V65BU36RE7A46VK6K3KC25ECB6BL
<urn:uuid:eb42c70f-cd52-490d-bbf3-2705cecef52f>
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Jan/0914.html
response
<urn:uuid:2f4ee73d-b246-4796-9743-550fa7d8e08f>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2024-33
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for August 2024
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-201
software: Apache Nutch 1.20 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.5-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: https://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/