ISSMWA Review Process

The blind Peer review is followed by the Journal wherein the reviewers are not aware of the identities of the authors of the papers which are being reviewed by them. The final decision can be taken by editorial board member which may be the conclusion of their own peer review process or it may be a conclusion from the reviewer. First of all, the researcher has to complete his laboratory base research work and draft the documents. The drafted documents or articles is usually known as “Manuscript”. The researcher may draft a manuscript which may come under the classification of the research article, review article, short communication or case studies. The manuscript must be drafted as per the "Instruction to Author". The author needs to submit a Microsoft word file (.doc or.docx). The manuscript must be read 3 to 4 times by researcher to check and pick mistake done by him. Finally, the article was submitted to the “ISSMWA" for further processing. When a paper is submitted to the journal, a general check of the paper’s suitability, such as the manuscript format and length, and the matching of research scope is conducted at the journal office. If it is judged to be suitable, the editor will ask a reviewer to evaluate your paper. The reviewer is asked to evaluate your paper from a variety of aspects such as the novelty and originality of research, the importance and impact of results, the logic, style, length and clarity of presentation, and the completeness of references. The number of reviewers may vary depending on the type of article and area of research. The reviewer then completes the review process and provides a report in the prescribed format including various comments and recommendations to the journal.
On the basis of the reviewer’s report, the editor will make one of the following decisions on your paper.
1. Accept for publication without revision
2. Ask for minor revision for likely acceptance
3. Request major revision for another review process
4. Rejection of manuscript
The comment of the reviewer then send to the corresponding author to edit, delete or manipulate the manuscript as per reviewer guideline. If the author update manuscript as per reviewer guideline then the manuscript will be accepted or else the whole process will be repeated or Article may be rejected. The manuscript acceptance or rejection will be notified to the corresponding author by mail. Disclaimer ISSMWA is solely owned by Publication - A non-profit publishing house, dedicated to publish quality research. The accountability of the research matter articulated in this journal is entirely of the author(s) concerned. The view expressed in the research papers/articles in this journal does not essentially correspond to the views of the publisher/editor. The publisher/editor of the journal is not liable for errors or any consequences arising from the exercise of information contained in it. ISSMWA cannot accept any responsibility or liability for the site content and articles published.
https://issmwa.com/ISSMWA-Review-Process.aspx
issmwa.com
CC-MAIN-2024-22
27357
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:CQTK6NSDMILOVEEQ3T6HRGN2H56RYIR3
<urn:uuid:ceb75129-7d97-483d-b0d5-6be53279c81d>
2024-05-29T13:00:35Z
103.160.107.235
application/xhtml+xml
sha1:23VKMJ6EGTZJ6DVVPQAX5PY4WZJGHBHG
<urn:uuid:78cb200e-cd01-4e24-b1a0-a6891741937b>
https://issmwa.com/ISSMWA-Review-Process.aspx
response
<urn:uuid:957f8615-2a97-4a84-a7dc-703c8abe3ce3>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2024-22
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for May 2024
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-21
software: Apache Nutch 1.19 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.5-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: https://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/