Stewards/Elections 2020/Votes/Sakretsu

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Warning

The 2020 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

Sakretsu[edit]

ContentsYesNoNeutral
Sakretsu talk • contribs • accounts (stalktoy) • globalcontribs • crosswiki-ness • confirm eligibility  — Translate: translation help, statement, template
  • Languages: it, en-3, ja-2
  • Personal info: (English)
    Hello. I'm Sakretsu, a wikipedian since a decade now. I'm mainly active on it.wiki, where I've been asked to serve as a sysop and an interface-admin. Among other things, I'm interested in every technical aspect of MediaWiki (templates, modules, etc.), and I happened to assist developers in testing experimental phases of the software, such as the switch from Tidy to RemexHTML or the deployment of new features like partial blocks. Lately, I've been focused on the development of simple gadgets to facilitate counter-vandalism on it.wiki. I'm glad that one of them turned out to be useful on Wikidata as well :-) You can also find me on Phabricator, TranslateWiki, other Italian and non-Italian Wikimedia projects, and IRC.

    As some of you may remember, in December 2018 I requested global rename permissions aiming to raise attention on renames and their impact on local projects. Over the past year, we managed to address some of the issues together, clarify the rename policy, and achieve better coordination. Personally, I processed requests whenever I felt confident enough both to avoid causing any kind of disruption in local projects' activities and to establish a decent level of communication in the language of each requester. I prioritise quality over quantity, so if you notice a wrong rename of mine, please let me know. As volunteers, we already accomplish something out of the ordinary, but I still believe that we could do better in order to improve our global ecosystem in mutual respect of each other's needs and community consensus.

    As a steward, I would keep the same mindset. To be honest, I'm always uncomfortable getting more responsibilities, let alone one like this. Moreover, I have no interest in collecting fancy flags that I would never use. The only reason I convinced myself to submit my candidacy this late lies in the encouragement of a couple of esteemed users. I'm very grateful for their consideration. Afterall, trusting the users who had believed in me on my home wiki has also been a good choice. I may not have as much cross-wiki experience as other users do, but I do understand, at least, the frustration of having to deal with cross-wiki harassment and abuse. If I had been granted the ability to perform global actions, I could be helpful by contributing to and keeping an eye on global abuse filters, blocking LTAs and IP address ranges, hiding Italian and Japanese gross or highly inappropriate usernames as the isechika socks that I've occasionally reported, and by listening to the concerns and suggestions of local communities about the global environment. Possibly I could do more, although I cannot guarantee anything until I realize how time-consuming these activities can be.

    As I'm conscious of privacy concerns, the issue of language barriers, and community dynamics and consensus, if I have your trust, I promise I will do my best so that the worst that could happen would be me being removed for inactivity next year :-) Regardless, let's hope for a great year to come. Thank you for reading and a special thanks goes to those who truly care about Wikimedia sites and protect them as best they can.
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2020/Questions#Sakretsu


Pictogram voting support.svg Yes[edit]

  1. TonyBallioni (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   Probably the user I am most happy to see running: their activity as a global renamer has been key to the changes we’ve seen with that permission where culturally the users who have it view the role as assisting local projects rather than as a disconnected global user group. They actually do have cross-wiki experience in this regard, and adding someone with multiple languages who gets that global permissions are tools to help projects develop rather than a status to be used when they want is a huge positive. Adding them as a steward would be a massive step in the right direction towards having the steward team serve where help is needed. They’re sane, competent, and trusted. Extremely happy to support. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:11, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   Looks like they have good local and cross-wiki experience, with participation on Meta but still a good involvement with local-wiki issues. – Ajraddatz (talk) 14:15, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  3. 5LZ (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   5LZ 14:18, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Lucauniverso (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020   Lucauniverso (talk) 14:20, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Minorax (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   Minorax (talk) 14:23, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  6. 1997kB (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   Yes, as TonyBallioni well explained above. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 14:28, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Daimona Eaytoy (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020   Daimona Eaytoy (talk) 14:46, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Kostas20142 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   Per TonyBallioni. Kostas20142 (talk) 14:48, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Richardkiwi (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   Richardkiwi (talk) 14:55, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Praxidicae (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   Praxidicae (talk) 15:20, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Érico (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   Not so impressed with statement or cross-wiki experience, but I'm willing to giving him a chance. Érico (talk) 15:25, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Frank Schulenburg (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:12, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Stwalkerster (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   stwalkerster (talk) 16:12, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   After much contemplation, I have decided to support them. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 16:51, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020   I agree that he might not have the experience as we usually like to see in candidates, but I'm confident he will be a good steward. Trijnsteltalk 17:48, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Андрей Перцев (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020   Андрей Перцев (talk) 18:06, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Stïnger (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020   Looks fine to me. --Stïnger （会話） 18:25, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Ferdi2005 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020   Sakretsu has strong technical competences. Strong support.--Ferdi2005[Mail] 18:27, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  19. RhinosF1 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   RhinosF1 (talk) 19:01, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  20. *Youngjin (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   *Youngjin (talk) 20:43, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Joalpe (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020   Joalpe (talk) 22:05, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Sintakso (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020   Sintakso (talk) 22:40, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Klaas van Buiten (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020   per TonyBallioni Klaas `Z4␟` V:  23:43, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Gotanda (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2020   --Gotanda (talk) 00:22, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Paperoastro (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   Paperoastro (talk) 00:55, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Hiàn (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   Hiàn (talk) 02:51, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:32, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Armbrust (Eligible, checked by Minorax)2020   Armbrust (talk) 03:51, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Rxy (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   I need you as my colleague. Well, sock farm of ISECHIKA and that copycat's (posting copyvio / privacy vio / creating abusive username , etc) is globally banned by WMF, but that handled by few stewards. I'm really tired for handling that. rxy (talk) 04:16, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Rachmat04 (Eligible, checked by WhitePhosphorus)2020   ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · 04:39, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Mirer (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020   Mirer (talk) 07:24, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Spasage (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   Spasage (talk) 08:18, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  33. AfroThundr3007730 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   — AfroThundr (u · t · c) 08:56, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Sg7438 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   Sg7438 (talk) 09:35, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Yodaspirine (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020   Yodaspirine (talk) 11:55, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  36. 1ForTheMoney (Eligible, checked by Pallerti)2020   1ForTheMoney (talk) 13:05, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Vituzzu (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020   Vituzzu (talk) 13:17, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Antonio1952 (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2020   Antonio1952 (talk) 14:31, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Jaqen (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2020   Jaqen (talk) 15:23, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Leo0428 (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2020   Leo0428 (talk) 15:23, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  41. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2020   MZaplotnik(talk) 15:53, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Minoo (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020  Minoo (talk) 15:57, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Ruthven (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Ruthven (msg) 16:59, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Gereon K. (talk) 17:13, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Actormusicus (Eligible, checked by Linedwell)2020   Actormusicus (talk) 19:02, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Johannnes89 (Eligible, checked by Linedwell)2020   Johannnes89 (talk) 19:28, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Linedwell (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Linedwell [talk] 19:38, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Daniel J Zhao (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Daniel J Zhao (talk) 19:47, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Hadrianus (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Hadrianus (talk) 19:57, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Dostojewskij (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Dostojewskij (talk) 21:40, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Streetdeck (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   --Wright Streetdeck 04:53, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Dave93b (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2020   Dave93b (talk) 08:01, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  53. M&A (Eligible, checked by WhitePhosphorus)2020   M&A (talk) 10:54, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Chz (Eligible, checked by WhitePhosphorus)2020   Chz (talk) 11:11, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   cyrfaw (talk) 13:29, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Plink (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Plink (talk) 13:35, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Veracious (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Veracious (talk) 14:32, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Dolotta (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Dolotta (talk) 16:15, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  59. ValeJappo (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   He has strong technical competences and he is appreciated by the whole (Italian Wikipedia's) community. I met him only on itwiki and I saw he opened some tasks on Phabricator, but in my opinion he has all the competences needed to be a steward. ValeJappo (talk) 16:27, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Fenikals (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Fenikals (talk) 18:21, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Waddie96 (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020   Waddie96 (talk) 19:54, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Hasley (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2020   Sgd. Hasley 19:59, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Phyrexian (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Phyrexian ɸ 20:48, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Cybularny (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   ~Cybularny Speak? 22:10, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  65. 隼鷹 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   隼鷹 (talk) 05:46, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  66. 人人生來平等 (Eligible, checked by Pallerti)2020   人人生來平等 (talk) 05:57, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
       HunMaster (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   HunMaster (talk) 08:51, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Peko (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   Peko (talk) 12:53, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Elcairo (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020   Elcairo (talk) 15:27, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Saederup92 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   Saederup92 (talk) 15:29, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  70. OrbiliusMagister (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   His future crosswiki activity is granted as trutworthy! I totally trust him: he will be a great steward. εΔω 18:07, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
  71. Der-Wir-Ing (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Der-Wir-Ing ("DWI") talk 19:47, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Rots61 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   Rots61 (talk) 21:16, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Melquíades (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2020   Melquíades (talk) 23:08, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Gianfranco (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   When he landed on it.wiki, some 10 years ago or so, he had a lot to learn about. He asked, and that's easy; but he listened to the answers, and that's fantastic. He learned rapidly and well, so he now is an excellent trustworthy sysop, well beyond our best expectations. One of those who make the difference. No doubt he'll learn quickly and correctly all what he's still missing to know (little, very little :-). g (talk) 23:58, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  75. LuCKY (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   LuCkY talk 06:14, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Aplasia (Eligible, checked by Streetdeck)2020   Aplasia (talk) 07:43, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Jfblanc (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Jfblanc (talk) 14:41, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
       Ελ Γκρέκο (Not eligible, checked by xaosflux)   Ελ Γκρέκο (talk) 21:11, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Parma1983 (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2020   Great admin on it.wiki Parma1983 (talk) 00:50, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Wagino 20100516 (talk) 13:07, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  80. CactusWriter (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   CactusWriter (talk) 15:23, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Frettie (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2020   Frettie (talk) 18:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  82. John M Wolfson (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   John M Wolfson (talk) 21:22, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Davey2010 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   I see no red flags here, Support as per everyone above. –Davey2010Talk 23:16, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  84. DannyS712 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   DannyS712 (talk) 05:23, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Jo-Jo Eumerus (Eligible, checked by WhitePhosphorus)2020   Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:20, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Rooiratel (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Rooiratel (talk) 10:27, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Wim b (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Wim b 17:59, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Kurtis (Eligible, checked by Streetdeck)2020   Kurtis (talk) 03:45, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Brunokito (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Brunokito (talk) 06:16, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Onverwacht (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Onverwacht (talk) 07:13, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  91. .avgas (Eligible, checked by Minorax)2020   .avgas 11:52, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Suvray (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Suvray (talk) 15:40, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Spinoziano (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2020   Spinoziano (talk) 10:08, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Mardus (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Mardus (talk) 11:47, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Harlock81 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Harlock81 (talk) 12:56, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  96. ~riley (Eligible, checked by DannyS712)2020   As another steward candidate has voted on others, I see no reason not to also offer my support. Tony's recommendation is spot on, although global experience is low. ~riley (talk) 04:07, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  97. AGK (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Per Tony AGK ■ 07:59, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  98. SixTwoEight (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   SixTwoEight (talk) 13:18, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Nesmir Kudilovic (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2020   Несмир Кудилович (разговор) 14:19, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Ulanwp (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Ulanwp (talk) 14:53, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Nightenbelle (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Nightenbelle (talk) 15:29, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Jtorquy (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Jtorquy (talk) 17:15, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Cabeza2000 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Cabeza2000 (talk) 17:22, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Patriccck (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   Patriccck (talk) 16:59, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  105. ArdiPras95 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   ArdiPras95 (talk) 02:35, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  106. WikiAviator (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   WikiAviator (talk) 04:44, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Equoreo (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Equoreo (talk) 10:30, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Nungalpiriggal (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Nungalpiriggal (talk) 11:48, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Chrism (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Chrism (talk) 13:31, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  110. OhKayeSierra (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2020   OhKayeSierra (talk) 04:33, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  111. MJL (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Surprised I didn't comment yet for this. Sakretsu made a really strong candidacy statement, and I do not see any obvious red flags. I'm happy to support here! –MJLTalk 05:34, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  112. JaventheAlderick (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   JaventheAlderick (talk) 06:57, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  113. ScholastikosSVK (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Experienced and eligible. ScholastikosSVK (talk) 07:06, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  114. .mau. (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   .mau. ✉ 10:59, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  115. Xaosflux (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   — xaosflux Talk 14:26, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  116. Enki Barthel (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   Enki Barthel (talk) 14:53, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Amorymeltzer (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Seems good ~ Amory (utc) 16:32, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  118. Darkhan (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Darkhan 16:48, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  119. Hergel (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   Hergel (talk) 23:43, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  120. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2020   Jusjih (talk) 03:30, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  121. Coffins (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Coffins (talk) 12:45, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  122. Centaur271188 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Centaur271188 (talk) 14:11, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  123. Pawnkingthree (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Pawnkingthree (talk) 14:14, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  124. Garam (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Good luck. Garam talk 18:59, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  125. %Pier% (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2020   %Pier% (talk) 21:47, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  126. Verud (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2020   Verud (talk) 22:30, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  127. Masumrezarock100 (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2020   Good answer to my questions. Masum Reza📞 03:07, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  128. Chipermc (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   Chipermc (talk) 04:04, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  129. Ferran Mir (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   --Ferran Mir (talk) 11:11, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  130. Ankry (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   Ankry (talk) 14:24, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  131. Daniuu (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2020   Kind regards, Daniuu (talk) 14:24, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  132. Ameisenigel (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Ameisenigel (talk) 19:39, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  133. علاء (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   --Alaa :)..! 21:39, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  134. TJH2018 (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2020   TJH2018talk 22:26, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  135. Stephan Tournay (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2020   Stephan Tournay (talk) 23:05, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
       Dany Crash (Not eligible, checked by xaosflux)   Dany Crash (talk) 23:28, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  136. Epicgenius (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   epicgenius (talk) 21:33, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  137. Brown Chocolate (Eligible, checked by WhitePhosphorus)2020   Brown Chocolate (talk) 10:16, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  138. Bencemac (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   Bencemac (talk) 16:18, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  139. L235 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Kevin (aka L235 · t · enwiki) 19:35, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  140. Novak Watchmen (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2020   Novak Watchmen (talk) 22:06, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  141. WieKo (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2020   WieKo (talk) 22:23, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  142. HMSLavender (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)|lambast 07:28, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  143. Euphydryas (Eligible, checked by Streetdeck)2020   Euphydryas (msg) 14:11, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  144. Epìdosis (Eligible, checked by Hasley)2020   Epìdosis 18:22, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  145. Eihel (Eligible, checked by Hasley)2020   a contrario of Camouflaged Mirage Eihel (talk) 22:11, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  146. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2020   GZWDer (talk) 22:21, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  147. Openbk (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   Openbk (talk) 09:53, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  148. Titore (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   While he may not have comprehensive cross-wiki experience, being a global renamer I think he acquired sufficient skill in his field of interest, that already requires being careful about local wikis' policies. He is trusted and esteemed on itwiki, having proved to be meticulous and fair. I strongly believe he can use the new tools to act independently at least in the activities he aims he would be active, but since he's a hungry learner in knowing and respecting policies, I'm confident he can bridge the gap and become a good all-around steward. Titore (talk) 11:34, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  149. NickK (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   The global experience is not really impressive but answers to the questions are good enough — NickK (talk) 12:58, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  150. RadiX (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   RadiX 13:26, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  151. Sotiale (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Sotiale (talk) 13:57, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pictogram voting oppose.svg No[edit]

  1. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Minorax)2020   Inadequate crosswiki experience Herby talk thyme 16:24, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  2. SickManWP (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   I no think he can do this very need job--SickManWP (talk) 05:34, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Vmavanti (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Vmavanti (talk) 17:34, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  4. La coince (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020   Not convinced La coince (talk) 19:47, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Tymon.r (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020   Per inadequate cross-wiki experience. Tymon.r (talk) 01:14, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Lemure Saltante (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   I think he needs more cross-wiki experience Lemure Saltante (talk) 06:13, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Not pleased with the cross-wiki experience. —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 14:46, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  8. OSeveno (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   --oSeveno (talk) 12:39, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Uğurkent (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   not enough crosswiki experience --Uğurkenttalk 19:16, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Hannes 24 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Hannes 24 (talk) 17:48, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pictogram voting neutral.svg Neutral[edit]

  1. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2020   Neutral. On the plus side we have admin on a large wiki, technical skills, language skills, and some Wikidata experience. But I'm not seeing enough crosswiki or other experience to where I can support (a bit surprising considering they are a global renamer - they don't seem to be that active on Meta). Rschen7754 14:05, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  2. CptViraj (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   CptViraj (📧) 14:30, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Camouflaged Mirage (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   Totally unhappy with his answer to my abusive username question, but then his proposal of userid is something I am very happy with, and in the end is something I hope we can use one day in SRG. Spambots answer is very good. Just a small lacking in experience. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:38, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Alexmar983 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   Cross-wikiness was my main issue. He is talented on the technical aspects but he probably needs one more year of diversification. He should request some other meta-related flags (e.g. global rollbacker) or being more active on smaller it-N wiki or maybe on Wikidata. I would support his request there. I would be more positive if we had not elected Wim b in 2019 who is already it-N. Since it seems that we will have enough new steward this time, I consider myself neutral. I will be very glad to support him next time. Alexmar983 (talk) 16:23, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Esteban16 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   Can't oppose someone with many habilities, but I would like to see more involment on crosswiki work. Esteban16 (talk) 17:48, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Krzysiek 123456789 (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2020   Krzysiek 123456789 (talk) 20:30, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2020   Miniapolis 16:56, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  8. ST47 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Very little cross wiki experience, and appears to be no experience with the functionary toolset. ST47 (talk) 18:09, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   Rzuwig 12:07, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Stephan1000000 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   Stephan1000000 (talk) 12:58, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Meiræ (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Meiræ 20:34, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Arraque (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Arraque (talk) 14:10, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  13. NGC 54 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   --FonAfon (talk | contribs) 13:05, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  14. JogiAsad (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   JogiAsad (talk) 13:26, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  15. DeltaQuad (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Doesn't seem to really wants the tools, and appears they will have a narrow focus. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 16:11, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Geonuch (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020   Geonuch (talk) 01:40, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Poti Berik (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   Poti Berik (talk) 08:59, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Nemo bis (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Need more time to ponder crosswikiness, Nemo 15:32, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Stewards/Elections_2020/Votes/Sakretsu
meta.wikimedia.org
crawl=CC-MAIN-2022-05
310245
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:HF3SIHM4ZYBKX4AEE3E47KTUJRB7ZSTG
<urn:uuid:dda86de2-3854-47ba-9368-bd3aea15da60>
2022-01-24T15:07:21Z
208.80.154.224
text/html
sha1:EWAOQWKJFU4D2P42PC3PY2IGU5JCP4LV
<urn:uuid:d7d49a61-f222-4bfb-93a2-0e52b104276c>
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Stewards/Elections_2020/Votes/Sakretsu
response
<urn:uuid:ad1630f6-7ca3-485b-841c-2c041ab21227>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2022-05
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for January 2022
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-243
software: Apache Nutch 1.18 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.3-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: https://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/