Skip to Main Content

Education & Integrative Studies

Planning Your Review

Planning Your Literature Review

Writing a literature review will take time to gather and analyze the research relevant to your topic. It is best to start early and give yourself enough time to gather and analyze your sources.  The process of writing a literature review usually covers the following steps:

  1. Define your research question
  2. Plan your approach to your research and your review
  3. Search the literature
  4. Analyze the material you’ve found
  5. Managing the results of your research
  6. Writing your review

Defining Your Research Question

One of the hardest parts of a literature review is to develop a good research question.  You don't want a research question that is so broad it encompasses too many research areas, and can't be reasonably answered. 

Defining your topic may require an initial review of literature on your topic to get a sense of the scope about your topic.   Select a topic of interest, and do a preliminary search to see what kinds of research is being done and what is trending in that topic area.  This will give you a better sense of the topic, and help you focus your research question

In specifying your topic or research question, you should think about setting appropriate limitations on the research you are seeking. Limiting, for example, by time, personnel, gender, age, location, nationality etc. results in a more focused and meaningful topic. 

Questions to Ask

Some questions to think about as you develop your literature review:

  • What is known about the subject?
  • Are there any gaps in the knowledge of the subject?
  • Have areas of further study been identified by other researchers that you may want to consider?
  • Who are the significant research personalities in this area?
  • Is there consensus about the topic?
  • What aspects have generated significant debate on the topic?
  • What methods or problems were identified by others studying in the field and how might they impact your research?
  • What is the most productive methodology for your research based on the literature you have reviewed?
  • What is the current status of research in this area?
  • What sources of information or data were identified that might be useful to you?
  • How detailed? Will it be a review of ALL relevant material or will the scope be limited to more recent material, e.g., the last five years.
  • Are you focusing on methodological approaches; on theoretical issues; on qualitative or quantitative research?

 

Source: University of Pittsburg Library System - Literature Reviews
https://libguides.library.cpp.edu/c.php?g=327106&p=8600227
libguides.library.cpp.edu
CC-MAIN-2024-22
33141
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:3YUWG5TJFQY42VID7DVB4GZLTKKG5UA5
<urn:uuid:eff9b323-a977-4131-8f25-18fe2a321a6f>
2024-05-23T16:22:16Z
54.85.246.96
text/html
sha1:CO3MWQCU47J7JVYD2WYI7PO5DGTR75WX
<urn:uuid:bae5e100-de82-4100-bddc-dcb4a269924d>
https://libguides.library.cpp.edu/c.php?g=327106&p=8600227
response
<urn:uuid:765acef6-af0e-4f0e-bad4-5d519cfec67d>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2024-22
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for May 2024
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-96
software: Apache Nutch 1.19 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.5-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: https://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/