Open Access Archivangelism - Comments http://openaccess.eprints.org/ Open Access Archivangelism - by Stevan Harnad en Serendipity 1.4.1 - http://www.s9y.org/ Sat, 28 Mar 2015 22:11:25 GMT http://openaccess.eprints.org/templates/default/img/s9y_banner_small.png RSS: Open Access Archivangelism - Comments - Open Access Archivangelism - by Stevan Harnad http://openaccess.eprints.org/ 100 21 Eduardmag: New Open Access Repository for Unrefereed Preprints: PLoS Contents http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/621-New-Open-Access-Repository-for-Unrefereed-Preprints-PLoS-Contents.html#c32208 http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/621-New-Open-Access-Repository-for-Unrefereed-Preprints-PLoS-Contents.html#comments http://openaccess.eprints.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=621 nospam@example.com (Eduardmag) Welcome to http://www.magnetik.com.ua <br /> ----------------------------------------------- <br /> ???????? ????? ????????-??????? ?????????? ? ??????????? ??????? http://www.magnetik.com.ua. <br /> ?????? ?????? ?? ?????? ?????. ??????? ????????, ?????, ??????????. Sat, 28 Mar 2015 07:49:30 +0000 http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/621-guid.html#c32208 sandra: A Positive Example for Hungarian Society http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/1123-A-Positive-Example-for-Hungarian-Society.html#c32036 http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/1123-A-Positive-Example-for-Hungarian-Society.html#comments http://openaccess.eprints.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=1123 nospam@example.com (sandra) Medcrave is an open access Publishing group of peer reviewed scientific journals in several fields including cell biology, medicine, oncology, genetics. The journals, which are published in Medcrave, is scrutinized and edited by editors and peer reviewed in order to provide feedbacks in an impartial manner.<br /> <br /> The papers are visible to the global audience and thus by publishing the papers through MedCrave online publishing <br /> , the scholars can reach the global audience and get their paper reviewed by them. Mon, 03 Nov 2014 18:14:33 +0000 http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/1123-guid.html#c32036 jimmy choo flats: Fool's Gold: Publisher Ransom for Freedom from Publisher Embargo? http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/1066-Fools-Gold-Publisher-Ransom-for-Freedom-from-Publisher-Embargo.html#c31830 http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/1066-Fools-Gold-Publisher-Ransom-for-Freedom-from-Publisher-Embargo.html#comments http://openaccess.eprints.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=1066 nospam@example.com (jimmy choo flats) It will be called a societal movement fencing, mainly because it provides services multiple people. Mon, 25 Aug 2014 18:33:49 +0000 http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/1066-guid.html#c31830 Hilton Gibson: If You Were Composing the Subversive Proposal Today... http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/1118-If-You-Were-Composing-the-Subversive-Proposal-Today....html#c31586 http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/1118-If-You-Were-Composing-the-Subversive-Proposal-Today....html#comments http://openaccess.eprints.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=1118 nospam@example.com (Hilton Gibson) http://wiki.lib.sun.ac.za/index.php/SUNScholar/Open_Access Tue, 01 Jul 2014 10:26:27 +0000 http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/1118-guid.html#c31586 G1ng3r: Only Thing Oz or Gaia Need for Global OA is Effective Green OA Mandates http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/1036-Only-Thing-Oz-or-Gaia-Need-for-Global-OA-is-Effective-Green-OA-Mandates.html#c31543 http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/1036-Only-Thing-Oz-or-Gaia-Need-for-Global-OA-is-Effective-Green-OA-Mandates.html#comments http://openaccess.eprints.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=1036 nospam@example.com (G1ng3r) Best for knowledge. I want to go to Australia =) Fri, 13 Jun 2014 09:59:19 +0000 http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/1036-guid.html#c31543 Ala ud din Jutt: RCUK & Gold OA: Counting the Needless Doubled PC/APC Costs http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/969-RCUK-Gold-OA-Counting-the-Needless-Doubled-PCAPC-Costs.html#c31398 http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/969-RCUK-Gold-OA-Counting-the-Needless-Doubled-PCAPC-Costs.html#comments http://openaccess.eprints.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=969 nospam@example.com (Ala ud din Jutt) Best for knowledge. Sat, 10 May 2014 04:35:18 +0000 http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/969-guid.html#c31398 Sylvain Ribault: HEFCE/REF Adopts Optimal Complement to RCUK OA Mandate http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/1103-HEFCEREF-Adopts-Optimal-Complement-to-RCUK-OA-Mandate.html#c31352 http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/1103-HEFCEREF-Adopts-Optimal-Complement-to-RCUK-OA-Mandate.html#comments http://openaccess.eprints.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=1103 nospam@example.com (Sylvain Ribault) Meanwhile, in France, the national science agency CNRS is only planning to study the issue, with its new "Strategy for technical and scientific information" which does not include any concrete steps towards OA, as far as I understand. <br /> <br /> My comments on this strategy (in French), and a link to the CNRS document explaining their strategy (also in French), can be found here:<br /> http://researchpracticesandtools.blogspot.fr/2014/04/le-boeuf-qui-voulait-se-faire-aussi.html Fri, 11 Apr 2014 19:42:12 +0000 http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/1103-guid.html#c31352 Ernesto Priego: The Wellcome Trust's Deep Pockets http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/1101-The-Wellcome-Trusts-Deep-Pockets.html#c31346 http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/1101-The-Wellcome-Trusts-Deep-Pockets.html#comments http://openaccess.eprints.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=1101 nospam@example.com (Ernesto Priego) Thanks for linking to my LSE Impact blog on the image taken from it. The source data should ideally be cited too:<br /> <br /> Priego, Ernesto; Neylon, Cameron (2014): Wellcome Trust APC spend (2012-13) Spreadsheet with Publisher Names Refined. figshare. http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.966427<br /> <br /> Thanks for your post. Wed, 26 Mar 2014 09:48:51 +0000 http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/1101-guid.html#c31346 Bernhard Mittermaier: Dutch Echoes of Finch: Fool's Gold vs. Fair Gold http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/1099-Dutch-Echoes-of-Finch-Fools-Gold-vs.-Fair-Gold.html#c31308 http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/1099-Dutch-Echoes-of-Finch-Fools-Gold-vs.-Fair-Gold.html#comments http://openaccess.eprints.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=1099 nospam@example.com (Bernhard Mittermaier) Unfortunately it's even worse. Look at the end of Wouters blog http://wowter.net/2014/03/05/costs-going-gold-netherlands/<br /> He says: "Applying the average APC of  1087,- I arrive at an estimated  43,500,000,- for the Netherlands if all Dutch research would be published in Gold Open Access journals. That figure should be compared to the current spending on journal subscriptions in the Netherlands by Dutch Universities, which is about  34 million per year Euro at the moment. Going for gold will cost therefore  10.5 million. That is a lot of money."<br /> That means in fact: <br /> - Publishing all Dutch articles in Gold Open Access journals and <strong>reading nothing but Open Access Articles</strong> is 43.5 M p.a., which is 10.5 M more than corrently spent. <br /> - Publishing all Dutch articles in Gold Open Access journals and <strong>reading the same subscription journals like before</strong> is 77.5 M p.a., which is 43.5 M more than currently spent. <br /> I must admit that the latter number is a bit to high, because under these circumstances some subscription journals would become Gold Open Access journals (e.g. journals published in Dutch language) and therefore theis subscription fees would vanish, but certainly this would be the minority of journals. You can take a plus of 100% for granted. Thu, 06 Mar 2014 08:16:22 +0000 http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/1099-guid.html#c31308 David Crotty: More Skulduggery from SSP's Scholarly Scullery http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/1098-More-Skulduggery-from-SSPs-Scholarly-Scullery.html#c31299 http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/1098-More-Skulduggery-from-SSPs-Scholarly-Scullery.html#comments http://openaccess.eprints.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=1098 nospam@example.com (David Crotty) DAVID CROTTY: To be accurate, I did not use the word "instead" implying "in place of". My suggestion was meant to be in addition to. I fail to see how the creation of an additional resource would harm anyone in any way.<br /> <br /> STEVAN HARNAD: As I replied in your blog: anyone is free to create additional resources ("derivative works") out of ROARMAP: it's both OA and compliant with the OAI metadata harvesting protocol. Tue, 18 Feb 2014 20:39:02 +0000 http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/1098-guid.html#c31299 Stevan Harnad: More Skulduggery from SSP's Scholarly Scullery http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/1098-More-Skulduggery-from-SSPs-Scholarly-Scullery.html#c31297 http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/1098-More-Skulduggery-from-SSPs-Scholarly-Scullery.html#comments http://openaccess.eprints.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=1098 nospam@example.com (Stevan Harnad) Call attributed to David Crotty, as indicated.<br /> Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:45:26 +0000 http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/1098-guid.html#c31297 David Crotty: More Skulduggery from SSP's Scholarly Scullery http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/1098-More-Skulduggery-from-SSPs-Scholarly-Scullery.html#c31296 http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/1098-More-Skulduggery-from-SSPs-Scholarly-Scullery.html#comments http://openaccess.eprints.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=1098 nospam@example.com (David Crotty) DAVID CROTTY: "Your characterization of my suggestion is also inaccurate. By using the word "instead" you suggests a zero sum game where any actions or contributions from publishers would eliminate or prevent resources from other groups. This "us against them" mentality continues to plague some advocates who have been unable to move past what Cameron Neylon calls the "angry protest movement" stage of OA to the practical implementation stage. Having a listing of policies created by publishers would in no way harm ROARMAP, just as MELIBEA does not harm ROARMAP." <br /> <br /> "I remain confused by a movement that calls itself "open" while only selectively allowing those who pass a litmus test to participate."<br /> <br /> STEVAN HARNAD: My reply has been appended to the main entry above. Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:12:38 +0000 http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/1098-guid.html#c31296 Rick Anderson: More Skulduggery from SSP's Scholarly Scullery http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/1098-More-Skulduggery-from-SSPs-Scholarly-Scullery.html#c31295 http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/1098-More-Skulduggery-from-SSPs-Scholarly-Scullery.html#comments http://openaccess.eprints.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=1098 nospam@example.com (Rick Anderson) COMMENT_DELETED Tue, 18 Feb 2014 17:41:42 +0000 http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/1098-guid.html#c31295 Stevan Harnad: BiorXiv: Deposit Institutionally, Export Centrally http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/1070-BiorXiv-Deposit-Institutionally,-Export-Centrally.html#c31236 http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/1070-BiorXiv-Deposit-Institutionally,-Export-Centrally.html#comments http://openaccess.eprints.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=1070 nospam@example.com (Stevan Harnad) Arxiv users have been self-archiving there, unmandated, for over 20 years. They should not have to change their ways, institutional repositories can and should import. <br /> <br /> Bio researchers have not been self-archiving. And most do not, and will not, except if mandated. <br /> <br /> So mandates are needed. Problem with institutional repositories is not that they are unsupported but that they are unmandated, hence empty.<br /> <br /> Researchers should self-archive in their current institutions, and can also export if/when they change institutions.<br /> <br /> Yes, DSpace and EPrints repositories can import/export, but the problem is getting researchers to self-archive. Institutions are the universal providers of research publications, and in a position to monitor and and ensure that their researchers self-archive; institution-external disciplinary repositories are not.<br /> <br /> Funder and institutional mandates need to be integrated and harmonized to make them work: Deposit institutionally, then deposits can be imported, exported or harvested elsewhere too. Sat, 14 Dec 2013 12:32:05 +0000 http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/1070-guid.html#c31236 Donald Forsdyke: The Mechanics Behind the Magic http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/1088-The-Mechanics-Behind-the-Magic.html#c31235 http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/1088-The-Mechanics-Behind-the-Magic.html#comments http://openaccess.eprints.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=1088 nospam@example.com (Donald Forsdyke) Do not forget that Bionet.journals.note was started in 1994 as a centre for discussion of the issues, with the support of some publishers. Stevan Harnad used it, but basically everyone was looking over their shoulder in this publish-or-perish world and we never had a full and open discussion. Sat, 14 Dec 2013 10:57:40 +0000 http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/1088-guid.html#c31235
http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/feeds/comments.rss2
openaccess.eprints.org
crawl=CC-MAIN-2015-14
19630
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:EE6Y4EYI5BGO7W7EKRQU6CVKYQUFDCKF
<urn:uuid:8cbc399a-da13-4b95-a381-c90609fd4909>
2015-03-28T22:11:25Z
152.78.189.252
sha1:7GRYVH5FJ3EQTOT2VVEXOGAPO6TQL3Y6
<urn:uuid:5fb8ce3d-f1b4-423a-9cbc-3e84be9793d2>
http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/feeds/comments.rss2
response
<urn:uuid:a916e258-3ae8-4d62-ae6e-985d2eee4d38>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-168-14-71.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)/CC WarcExport 1.0
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2015-14
operator: CommonCrawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web with URLs provided by Blekko for March 2015
publisher: CommonCrawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf