  1. You are currently viewing our forum as a guest which gives you limited access.

    By joining you will gain full access to thousands of Videos, Pictures & Much More!

    Membership is absolutely FREE and registration is FAST & SIMPLE so please, Register Today and join one of the friendliest communities on the net!

Watermark... I Thought We Were Over This Already

Discussion in 'Ideas for new forums go here!' started by midnightfapper, Oct 2, 2017.

  1. midnightfapper

    midnightfapper Slut Lover! Beloved Member :)

    Seriously guys, come on. The "Slutwives" logo is so damn big on some of these pictures that it completely blocks out the captions. I remember that we've been through this one already.

    [​IMG]
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  2. xxxeccentric

    xxxeccentric Not quite a lurker Author!

    See my recent post in General Talk.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. midnightfapper

    midnightfapper Slut Lover! Beloved Member :)

    QUOTE="xxxeccentric, post: 779726, member: 654883"]See my recent post in General Talk.[/QUOTE]

    I agree completely. It ruins the picture and is pointless because most people here WANT their pics shared and reposted, and the creator of the pic should decided whether or not it gets a stamp, not Slutwives.

    There's a reason I host my pics externally and just link them. Slutwives always finds a way to screw them up, whether it be sloppy compression/resizing or shitty watermarks or whatever. This forum has a great community but the site itself is not the best, and the owners make a lot of questionable changes.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  4. tcfranklin

    tcfranklin Slut Lover! Beloved Member :)

    I agree completely. It ruins the picture and is pointless because most people here WANT their pics shared and reposted, and the creator of the pic should decided whether or not it gets a stamp, not Slutwives.

    There's a reason I host my pics externally and just link them. Slutwives always finds a way to screw them up, whether it be sloppy compression/resizing or shitty watermarks or whatever. This forum has a great community but the site itself is not the best, and the owners make a lot of questionable changes.[/QUOTE]

    I totally agree. I deleted as many of my posts as I could find and will never post here again. This is the second time I got burned by the mindless actions of the moderators. They create almost no content and then brand the contributions of their members. FYI, if you own the first post in a thread, you can delete the entire thread by deleting the first post. I used watermarks as my reason for deleting. Why do these moderators keep fixing things that aren't broken? Most members offer no feedback and the moderators are intrusive. Out of here.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  5. cheshireset

    cheshireset Not quite a lurker VERIFIED!

    It's a free site. You want control of images hosted on a website pay a subscription to support it.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  6. xxxeccentric

    xxxeccentric Not quite a lurker Author!

    That is not quite the reality. Many sites say free, then grab the contributions and place them in an archive. That archive is then only available to a paying clientele. Thus, they are claiming and making money for photos that were generated of and by others. Sites, like Xhamster prove that uncensored free sites are possible. To me, a site like Xham is the gold standard. When they and others pull the plug or start abusing the original ownership of images, then I can just not post...anywhere... I love the more folksy, more everyday life, environment at a site like SW, and would hate to see it change. In ways, I would actually hate to see it lose its character more than I would seeing Xham and others change. SW does allow for good discussions and thorough labeling of photos = many times the story that goes with a pic is as important as the pic. This watermark or image obliteration discussion is important. I see that it has been hashed out here at SW before. But, I will continue to bring up that even the commercial art sites have dropped or are in the process of dropping watermarks. They realize that people do NOT want to see an altered or hidden image. Thus, those commercial sites had seen traffic fall off of a cliff, with marking, and escalate without marking. Commercial sites rely on the artist (here the photo owner) to digitally encrypt the image, showing ownership without affecting the image. As well, they understand that the file that the public sees is small, compared to a master. And all that I just said is on commercial, "protect the product", sites. None of that applies on a site where users publicly post with the hope of copying, transfer to other sites, acquisition for home libraries, etc. The major meaning of "amateur cuckolding" (as in the above SW title) is that the wife or partner is seen, is preferably seen with someone other than the husband, and that the other someone is hung much better than the husband, and is obviously giving much more intense and frequent orgasms to the wife or partner. That IS the give away. That is the goal. That it is seen more often and at more sites??? Even better. That is a goal of "amateur cuckolding".
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  7. cheshireset

    cheshireset Not quite a lurker VERIFIED!

    With regards to Xhamster not watermarking I presume you haven't uploaded a video recently.
     
  8. mitch-l

    mitch-l New around here... Beloved Member :)

    The morons moderating this site seem intent on ruining it. Already some of the best contributors have resigned. The moderators are imbeciles.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  9. mitch-l

    mitch-l New around here... Beloved Member :)

    A loser moderator living in his parents' basement has a boring weekend and fucks up a good web site. Out of here. Somebody needs to take charge, but I doubt anybody has the balls.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  10. cheshireset

    cheshireset Not quite a lurker VERIFIED!

    I'm sure the site will miss the copious amount of material you have posted to the site in the 4 years you have been on it mitch.

    Thank you for your contributions.
     
http://www.slutwives.com/threads/watermark-i-thought-we-were-over-this-already.79945/
www.slutwives.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2018-13
56552
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:TZI2UL2CKBZUYDBXA2MQK2WOAWNMNUGQ
<urn:uuid:9ffcb5e0-6b85-4714-b160-e898da6af36c>
2018-03-24T19:52:39Z
104.27.160.98
text/html
sha1:7A5GPKS57JJ3LGIKANYAOI3E4IOMQGRD
<urn:uuid:1e24ec54-28f1-4d9c-8f60-c5cd0af2b54a>
http://www.slutwives.com/threads/watermark-i-thought-we-were-over-this-already.79945/
length
response
<urn:uuid:192afc8d-354d-4229-ada8-46af1986d2bb>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-228-172-248.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2018-13
operator: Common Crawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web for March 2018
publisher: Common Crawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf