tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22792751.post7080489328164313087..comments2020-02-26T08:34:50.294-08:00Comments on The Sacred Page: My SBL Paper on Weblogs and the AcademyMichael Barberhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09245959720626825944noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22792751.post-64863364758060339692010-05-09T16:41:02.508-07:002010-05-09T16:41:02.508-07:00I have been meaning to write a comment on this pos...I have been meaning to write a comment on this post for a week! Sorry it took so long... I just want to point out that some bloggers (you are one of them) make it easy to differentiate between academic blogging and informal conversation through a blog. They do it very simply through the footnotes. <br /><br />It seems to me the inclusion of footnotes on serious academic posts is a good way to share sources and ideas with other scholars. The fact that sources are cited immediately shows that the post has research behind it. At the same time, bloggers can post lighter, more informal stuff on the same blog and not worry about being misunderstood.<br /><br />To help scholars who want to use blogs to find helpful sources, I wonder if it would help to include the sources in the labels of each blog. For example, the last name of authors or even the title of each work cited as a label. Those label tags might make relevant sources show up more easily in search engines. People can also click on your label and instantly find every time you have used that label throughout the blog.<br /><br />Just a thought. Congratulations on completing your dissertation!Sister Mary Agneshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08631140716274074099noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22792751.post-61659728513125144102010-05-02T06:14:20.000-07:002010-05-02T06:14:20.000-07:00Congrats!Congrats!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22792751.post-1394905598393147082010-05-01T21:15:30.839-07:002010-05-01T21:15:30.839-07:00I&#39;ll be interested in your thoughts. You will ...I&#39;ll be interested in your thoughts. You will need to distinguish between the academic biblioblogs and the popular ones, which tend to be strong on entertainment value and light on original research. I see huge benefits in the electronic media. Feedback is often very swift, whereas it can take decades to get freedback through the printed media.<br /><br />Perhaps you could address the question of whether posting material on the web or in blogs prevents one from subsequently publishing it in print. Also, I would be interested to know if there are ways of publishing material in print, while still being at liberty to maintain an updated version of it on the web. The problem with print material is that it can&#39;t be kept up to date with new insights or corrections.Richard Fellowshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06777460488456330838noreply@blogger.com
https://www.thesacredpage.com/feeds/7080489328164313087/comments/default
www.thesacredpage.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2020-10
7618
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:NSEYSF4NZR27B3E3EW5U7QJNPKIFTKFU
<urn:uuid:de328959-bc17-4cb3-9803-261982132508>
2020-02-28T02:20:36Z
172.217.5.243
application/atom+xml
sha1:ERZHXPMDILJNA5H5TOPPWFXN7GCTS326
<urn:uuid:f989dc69-b7e5-48a2-b0aa-1aea8a108006>
https://www.thesacredpage.com/feeds/7080489328164313087/comments/default
response
<urn:uuid:4dc935d5-b1a7-408a-bbd3-ec7186997909>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2020-10
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for February 2020
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-233.ec2.internal
software: Apache Nutch 1.16 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.1-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: http://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/