RE: Tools for Producing Datasheets

Subject: RE: Tools for Producing Datasheets
From: "Daniel Feiglin" <daniel_f -at- radwin -dot- com>
To: "Daniel Feiglin" <daniel_f -at- radwin -dot- com>, <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 14:32:54 +0200

Hello!



Thanks to all those who responded. Here is a brief summary of the
responses and my own conclusions:



1. (voxwoman, Peter Gold) InDesign - We use InDesign here for
commercial stuff. But again, it is licensed to a few folks in Marketing
who use it all the time. It's output options are not very extensive and
it is not readily interoperable with other Adobe products (!)like FM
(even unstructured). I note that Adobe now offers a common scripting
environment for InDesign, FM and possibly other products.

2. (Julie Stickler) OpenOffice - I've used OpenOffice (and lately
its new fork LibreOffice) on and off, on my Linux box since 1999 and
more lately on my laptop under Win 7. I don't think that they can do
what I want better than Word, but anyway it's academic - the company for
which I work is a Microsoft/Adobe shop.

3. (John G) Open/Free software - I'm broadly familiar with Scribus.


a. While I don't rule it out, it does have a rather steep
"learning curve"

b. Scripting uses the free Python language.

c. Scribus's export formats are (currently) limited to text, EPS,
PDF, image and SVG (release 1.4.0)

4. (Weissman, Jessica, Stephen Arrants, Margaret Cekis, Monique
Semp) Word based solutions - The ideas of "clamping" the printer driver
and blocking unwanted styles together with a decent template look
feasible; I'd still need to be convinced that there are no residual Word
version dependent glitches.



Of the four approaches, item 4 is probably the most "painless" and cost
effective if it can be made to work. I have a feeling that we will need
to wrap a WB script around one or more templates. And of course, if it
works for me, it should work for everyone else.



Item 3 as runner-up: Scribus - I can live with the idea of importing
prepared text and tables into a predefined form, but I could not easily
impose that discipline on our SMEs. If I still have to "concentrate"
everything at my desk, I'd rather stay with good old Frame.



About PagePlus: As the supplied review (link) says, it's functionality
appears to be a subset of Scribus but it is easier to use. Its "Save
as/Export " capabilities (the commercial version) are more limited than
Scribus.





Daniel

Daniel Feiglin| Technical Writer| RADWIN | t. +972 (3) 769 2827 | f.
+972 (3) 766 2902 | m. +972 (52) 3869986 | Skype baba_danny |
www.radwin.com <http://www.radwin.com/>

follow us on: Twitter <http://twitter.com/#!/radwin_ltd> . LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/groups?mostPopular=&gid=3669657&trk=myg_ugrp_ov
r> . Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Radwin/159209470770645>



From: Daniel Feiglin
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 09:07
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Subject: Tools for Producing Datasheets



Hello folks!



I have a feeling that this is an old story - but here we go again:



I am looking for a tool for datasheet production.



About the datasheets:

1. There are four major "styles" reflecting the major product types,
and then further "styles" for accessories and other bits and pieces

2. Each datasheet is typically one to two pages long, containing a
page of description with a picture followed by tabulated specifications

3. The datasheets are set up over a background graphic including
branding images

4. The descriptive section has a left sidebar with marcom text



Tool Requirements:

1. Whatever I come up with may not be too expensive. For example, a
few years back I looked a FrameMaker add-in that would have done the
job. The only problem was that it started out at about $5000 a throw and
I'd be the only person here, who could use it. That was a non-starter.

2. Further to 1, it should be readily usable by several people
(SMEs) without specific TW skills

3. It should be able to import/export several formats: PDF export is
a must, and XML (both ways) is now essential. (Well, I can live with
another portable format such as rtf.)

4. Rigorous preservation of text and table formatting as well as
graphics integrity across export / import (round-tripping)



What we have tried:

1. MS Word: It does a great job even with the most primitive
template but there are severe incompatibility issues across different
versions of Word and Windows. Many old datasheets produced using Word
2003 were corrupted under Word 2007, requiring extensive "fiddling" by
yours truly. In particular, graphics placed in table cells went awry. (I
know why. I can only guess what will happen if we try to work with these
things under Word 2010 or later.) Also, Requirement condition 4 may be
violated just moving a datasheet between two different workstations.
(Just try moving any Word document between MS Word 7 installed on an
English as against a Hebrew (or any other right to left) workstation, or
just between Win XP and Win 7.)

2. We have achieved good results (PDF) using MS Publisher 2010. The
problem is that it does not export to XML. Its rtf export is completely
useless. It doesn't even export to doc/docx. Although the PUB format is
based on an open source, it looks like ancient technology having no
serious third party filters (Google!). I have told the folks here, that
I regard the MS Publisher solution as stop-gap and dead-end.



Neither of the above two solutions can effectively handle OEM versions
or localization.



Wish list:

1. An XML/Style sheet based solution importable into FM, Word, XML
editor (I like Oxygen)

2. To be able to share data with our User Manual production, the R&D
folk and maybe even Marketing

3. To be able to handle OEM versions and localization



Any thoughts?

Success stories?

Horror stories?





Daniel

Daniel Feiglin| Technical Writer| RADWIN | t. +972 (3) 769 2827 | f.
+972 (3) 766 2902 | m. +972 (52) 3869986 | Skype baba_danny |
www.radwin.com <http://www.radwin.com/>

follow us on: Twitter <http://twitter.com/#!/radwin_ltd> . LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/groups?mostPopular=&gid=3669657&trk=myg_ugrp_ov
r> . Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Radwin/159209470770645>




^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help. Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need.

Try Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days.

http://bit.ly/doc-to-help

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


Previous by Author: Re: How you say... ?
Next by Author: Re: how about Toronto? (was: New York Meetup Feb 22?)
Previous by Thread: Re: Tools for Producing Datasheets
Next by Thread: Web help for dialog boxes


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads
http://www.techwr-l.com/archives/1202/techwhirl-1202-00452.html
www.techwr-l.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2018-47
27265
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:7XJSIGQVB3NYSLR6TFZ3QGYZ3THWUPVR
<urn:uuid:57e82aec-3372-41ac-859f-3a61c432f4c3>
2018-11-14T00:53:16Z
184.106.92.169
text/html
sha1:I4LGREYSUKYBPAPZVRNWUVVPLMVY4YWP
<urn:uuid:360827aa-57af-4d7d-a724-71282e9db933>
http://www.techwr-l.com/archives/1202/techwhirl-1202-00452.html
response
<urn:uuid:52c10500-4142-4868-af75-ea4260ea778b>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2018-47
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for November 2018
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-228-195-45.ec2.internal
software: Apache Nutch 1.15 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 0.11-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: http://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/