Peer Review Process

Firstly, the articles submitted to this journal will be evaluated through Initial Review processes by Editorial Team. The article can be declined if it does not meet into the journal scope. Next, the article will be checked for any indications of plagiarisms. Then, the articles will be sent to at least 2 Reviewers or Peer-Reviewer (Mitra Bestari) and will go to the next selection by Review Process. After that, the articles will be returned to the Authors to revise. These processes take between 6 weeks for a maximum time. In the each manuscript, Peer-Reviewer (Mitra Bestari) will be rated from the substantial and technical aspects. Final decision of articles acceptance will be made by Editors according to Reviewers comments. Peer-Reviewer (Mitra Bestari) that collaboration with Khen Journal are the experts in the Biblical and Practical Theology and issues around it.
https://pistis.sttii-yogyakarta.ac.id/index.php/jurnal/peereviewprocess
pistis.sttii-yogyakarta.ac.id
CC-MAIN-2024-26
15357
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:OTTQZJIHFT3QBX7JFRBBHH7MA7PDE66V
<urn:uuid:f08fd98e-5969-401a-b4a6-48f22fe8cf5d>
2024-06-22T07:06:23Z
103.253.213.48
text/html
sha1:YTXEWRWTUC63OEWPFVZ2P2IDOBERXOIM
<urn:uuid:f79495c5-e9bf-44ec-badc-27cbc13ac421>
https://pistis.sttii-yogyakarta.ac.id/index.php/jurnal/peereviewprocess
response
<urn:uuid:70943e37-4acb-4529-9ad8-37578139994a>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2024-26
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for June 2024
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-21
software: Apache Nutch 1.20 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.5-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: https://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/