Jump to content

Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2017/Sources/Wikimedia Italia

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

Information

[edit]

What group or community is this source coming from?

name of group Wikimedia Italia
virtual location (page-link) or physical location (city/state/country) Napoli, Italia
Location type (e.g. local wiki, Facebook, in-person discussion, telephone conference) In-person discussion (before the general assembly)
# of participants in this discussion (a rough count) 23

Summary

[edit]

The summary is a group of summary sentences and associated keywords that describe the relevant topic(s). Below is an example.

The first column (after the line number) should be a single sentence. The second column should be a comma-separated list of keywords about that sentence, and so on. Taken together, all the sentences should provide an accurate summary of what was discussed with the specific community.

Line Statement (summary sentence) keywords
1 [Example 1: Sentence] Wikimedia stands for a purity of knowledge and facts, untainted by commercial interests or political agendas, and promotes a knowledge culture of balanced information and cited sources. [Example 1: Keywords] independence, verifiability, facts matter
2 [Example 2: Sentence] We should explore new kinds of knowledge spaces, embracing innovation in order to survive and thrive in 2030. [Example 2: Keywords] innovation, forms of knowledge

Summary for the discussion:

Line Statement (summary sentence) Keywords
1 We should work more on existing "hinges" between general public and specialised reviews/sources, to reduce obstacles to digital literacy mediation, general public, specialised sources, digital literacy
2 We should challenge existing biases in the academic research fields, encouraging experts to continue to vary approaches and methodologies to include other points of view that may be of scientific interest. systemic bias, academic research, NPOV, cultural differences
3 We should focus more on fostering a multi-lingual approach to open data and open knowledge, to lower the barrier between projects and ensure translation of knowledges multi-linguism, open data, open knowledge, translation
4 “Wikify the world”: extending the participatory model of Wikipedia to the existing reality. globalisation, growth
5 "Bread and data": form as much as possible the current generations, because in 2030 will be those who will be in command ;-) growth, community building, participation, education
6 “Open by default”: the production of data and documents by public and private organizations, and by school and universities, will be open thanks to legal obligation. copyright, open content
7 Creating a network of relationships with associations with same vision, to increase political pressure for the sharing of data and knowledge. growth, diversity, community
8 Involving universities and scholastic centers to increase the quality of the content of the wiki projects. quality of wikimedia projects
9 Making the GLAM a real gateway for knowledge sharing with the territory and with the citizenry. GLAM, education, participation, social inclusion
10 Increasing integration of the wiki model and projects within the primary and secondary schools, developing the critical spirit. education, participation
11 Challenge: Education institutions and public institution still mistrust towards Wikipedia mistrust, skeptism, reliability
12 Challenge: Most people do not participate or participate passively to projects, without a pro-active attitude passitivy, lack of engagement
13 Challenge: [People outside the movement] do not know the project and the movement outreach, awareness
14 Challenge: Wikipedia suffers a problem of reputation reputation, reliability
15 Challenge: there is conflict within the community on Wikipedia conflict
16 We should strive to earn legitimacy from the institutions. reputation, legitimacy, institutions
17 We should aim for partnerships with high-profile insitutions (e.g. ministry) partnership, institution
18 We should swap the direction of the relationship between institution and Wikipedia (i.e. we should reach a situation where the istitution seeks Wikimedia as a partner and not the other way around) insitution, partnership
19 We should work for healing the relation between the affiliates and the community on the projects community, affiliates
20 We should collaborate with universities partnership, universities

If you need more lines, you can copy them from Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2017/Sources/Lines.

Detailed notes (Optional)

[edit]

If you have detailed notes in addition to the summary, you may add them here. For example, the notes may come from an in-person discussion or workshop. If your discussion happened on a wiki or other online space, you do not need to copy the detailed notes here.

See commons:Category:2017 Wikimedia movement strategy - Wikimedia Italia - Cycle 1 for pictures.
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Strategy/Wikimedia_movement/2017/Sources/Wikimedia_Italia
meta.wikimedia.org
CC-MAIN-2024-33
53160
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:TY242XXKBVGRLCJQLPOATBVYTVUEKH7U
<urn:uuid:a96041b5-08fc-4ace-9f1b-2ffc2a0a0301>
2024-08-11T05:29:00Z
208.80.154.224
text/html
sha1:J77W3EU5EYLP2XSZTDICGAJBJVM5UOLG
<urn:uuid:f35e1709-2ecb-443e-a8b9-363575b81a41>
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Strategy/Wikimedia_movement/2017/Sources/Wikimedia_Italia
response
<urn:uuid:f2842580-e34f-4dea-8341-ac78facfe42a>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2024-33
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for August 2024
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-250
software: Apache Nutch 1.20 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.5-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: https://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/