MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2016-09-17 10:27 pm (UTC)(link)

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2016-09-18 05:53 pm (UTC)(link)
The regular result of going on memes, contacting or being contacted by a player, being asked to start a meme/psl, writing a starter, talking more about it with the other player to sure everything is a-okay and the way they want and then they never tag it. Just sits there, a starter they asked for, tailored to meet their needs.

Certainly, no one is obligated to play with anyone, but why do all of that and waste another person's (and your own) time? I just don't understand the thought behind it.

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2016-09-18 06:00 pm (UTC)(link)
maybe your starter just sucked

op

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-18 18:06 (UTC) - Expand

Re: op

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-19 11:59 (UTC) - Expand

Re: op

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-19 20:01 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2016-09-19 09:06 pm (UTC)(link)
I've been on both the receiving and giving end of this. And being on the former really sucks because you're just left going ??? but what did I do?

Sometimes it is because the starter sucked or was not quite so "what you discussed" as you thought. Or you realize that you said you wanted you don't want anymore. Sometimes something comes up and the person just doesnt get to the reply and moves on or forgets to go back or just isn't quite sure what to do now. sometimes you get this great idea and you know what you want to see but can't quite make the words to get there.

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2016-09-21 02:30 am (UTC)(link)
When I played mostly in memes at first this was a real bug up my butt. I discovered that I had to pull back my investment a lot and expect to only get replies to maybe one in three starters, and for maybe only one of those to get more than three replies in.

Meme-RP is a slog for that. I've since abandoned bakerstreet for games because at least people tend to be interested in carrying threads and building CR with lasting consequences.

http://bakerstreet.dreamwidth.org/3655480.html?thread=1708686648#cmt1708686648

(Anonymous) 2016-09-21 11:19 am (UTC)(link)
what terrible trashy vampire movie???

you don't have the canon in your profile. you don't have any posts in your journal. i can't tell shit from your shitty four icons.

i hate people like you.

Re: http://bakerstreet.dreamwidth.org/3655480.html?thread=1708686648#cmt1708686648

(Anonymous) 2016-09-21 01:12 pm (UTC)(link)
i thought this would be twilight, wtf

those are the only canons that can get away with it

who is this guy

ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-22 01:15 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2016-09-21 06:00 pm (UTC)(link)
http://fortanon.dreamwidth.org/82473.html?thread=77395497#cmt77395497
http://fortanon.dreamwidth.org/82473.html?thread=77396009#cmt77396009

two misspelled usernames in a row, amazing

http://bakerstreet.dreamwidth.org/3659968.html

(Anonymous) 2016-09-22 06:46 am (UTC)(link)
Is this meme offensive? I'm pretty sure I'm offended by this meme.

Re: http://bakerstreet.dreamwidth.org/3659968.html

(Anonymous) 2016-09-22 06:53 am (UTC)(link)
yep, +1. i actively try not to go full on tumblr about stuff but imo this is pretty tasteless and i'm super sick of this stereotype dominating media everywhere.

Re: http://bakerstreet.dreamwidth.org/3659968.html

(Anonymous) 2016-09-22 07:42 am (UTC)(link)
what the hell are you even supposed to do in this meme?? drink cosmos and ~dish about your ideal man~ mmmm gurlfrand or some shit??

there are a lot of boring memes but jesus christ i can't imagine anything duller and less inspired

Re: http://bakerstreet.dreamwidth.org/3659968.html

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-22 08:20 (UTC) - Expand

Re: http://bakerstreet.dreamwidth.org/3659968.html

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-22 08:51 (UTC) - Expand

Re: http://bakerstreet.dreamwidth.org/3659968.html

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-22 21:19 (UTC) - Expand

Re: http://bakerstreet.dreamwidth.org/3659968.html

(Anonymous) 2016-09-22 02:54 pm (UTC)(link)
the fuck?

yes, it's offensive, but what do we expect from the current internet fandom culture that loves to collect gay people like pokemon?

Re: http://bakerstreet.dreamwidth.org/3659968.html

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-22 15:03 (UTC) - Expand

ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-22 16:58 (UTC) - Expand

Re: http://bakerstreet.dreamwidth.org/3659968.html

(Anonymous) 2016-09-22 09:37 pm (UTC)(link)
gone already. what was it, exactly? the gay best friend meme?

Re: http://bakerstreet.dreamwidth.org/3659968.html

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-24 00:44 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2016-09-23 07:24 pm (UTC)(link)
idk man people just care way too much about what other people are posting

i guess my pet peeve is that instead of making or posting to the things they want, anons run here to piss themselves over what's already on bs like there's some kinda space limit

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2016-09-23 07:25 pm (UTC)(link)
i agree for the most part. we went from having a completely mia mod and free run on memes, to a kind of odd overpolicing and scheduling of something that's an open community. it's overcompensation and now that they know someone's listening, they're whining more than they should.

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-24 00:43 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-24 01:12 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-24 01:47 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-24 05:54 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-24 10:08 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-26 02:22 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2016-09-25 05:10 am (UTC)(link)
a little musedumping is fine. everyone does it from time to time, especially if you actively play several characters but there should be a limitation, especially when you rarely tag back or don't have any interest in actually playing the characters. what's the point of posting almost two pages' worth other than what? to show off that you have usernames and characters? you don't have to tag out, but show some restraint.

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2016-09-25 06:53 am (UTC)(link)
is this about brian again?

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-25 15:39 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-25 16:06 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-25 16:20 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-25 16:54 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-25 16:57 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-25 17:04 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-25 17:09 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-25 17:11 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-25 18:02 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-25 20:07 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-25 20:12 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-25 20:17 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-25 22:58 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-26 00:43 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-26 01:03 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-26 01:16 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-26 01:23 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-26 03:00 (UTC) - Expand

ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-26 01:40 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-26 14:29 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-25 16:54 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-25 17:00 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-25 17:04 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-25 17:09 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-25 17:11 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-25 17:14 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-25 17:42 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-25 17:46 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-25 18:38 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-25 17:57 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-25 18:02 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-25 18:05 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-25 18:13 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-25 18:08 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-25 18:31 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-25 17:52 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-25 18:07 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-25 18:14 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-25 18:19 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-25 18:35 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-25 18:15 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2016-09-25 05:19 pm (UTC)(link)
Scroll past it. More options isn't a bad thing from my perspective.

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-25 18:04 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-26 01:02 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2016-09-25 05:26 pm (UTC)(link)
http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/582/861/e26.jpg

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-25 22:59 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2016-09-26 06:11 pm (UTC)(link)
The Locker Room Meme - why is his nipple in his armpit tho

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2016-09-27 05:34 pm (UTC)(link)
the pettiest of pet peeves, but I always get a little skeeved out at seeing those Band of Brothers/The Pacific type characters on memes because a: some of the people they're based on are still alive which b: makes the fact that they're 100% in it just for the cock a little gross

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2016-09-27 07:36 pm (UTC)(link)
tbh it's no different than celeb rp for me. if it's based on real people that heavily, it shouldn't be welcome here even if it's told historically.

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2016-09-27 08:09 pm (UTC)(link)
maybe it's petty, but i feel you too anon. really creeps me out.

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-27 22:07 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-28 13:53 (UTC) - Expand

http://bakerstreet.dreamwidth.org/3676170.html?thread=1715828234#cmt1715828234

(Anonymous) 2016-09-29 08:31 pm (UTC)(link)
If you're gonna use images that damn big, LINK THEM, for Pete's sake.

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2016-09-29 10:33 pm (UTC)(link)
there are now two. two humanized judy hopps. why? stop?

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-29 22:52 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-29 22:56 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-30 09:24 (UTC) - Expand
http://wankgate.dreamwidth.org/45837.html?thread=181325069
wankgate.dreamwidth.org
crawl=CC-MAIN-2017-22
174297
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:ZNU75WR5MALORE6QHTWCPMD2KDG4EWJO
<urn:uuid:c22db561-59b8-44b3-ad86-d674a12168bd>
2017-05-27T23:10:44Z
104.20.63.115
text/html
sha1:4WFXB5RKIYBT2ZOEWBZ57WM6MJPTDDTM
<urn:uuid:630a74f1-725c-47ed-8be4-f22ce7b83acc>
http://wankgate.dreamwidth.org/45837.html?thread=181325069
response
<urn:uuid:fe651f61-ffc2-4d34-b015-afcce77616d0>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-185-224-210.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)/CC WarcExport 1.0
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2017-22
operator: Common Crawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web for May 2017
publisher: Common Crawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf