6JSC/DNB/Discussion/1

From CCDA
Revision as of 16:40, 12 September 2013 by Steve Kelley (Talk | contribs) (General comments)

Jump to: navigation, search

6JSC/DNB/Discussion/1 First issue v. latest (current) issue

To enter your comments in this click on the [edit] link for the section where you want to comment. You must be logged in to comment.

Please include in your comments:

  • Your name/liaison organization
  • Month/day/year

Never copy and paste over the entire original wiki document.

General comments

Text of proposal


I am in general agreement with the thrust of this discussion paper. It makes a persuasive argument that we should adopt a latest-issue approach for serials. I would even go further and eliminate most "major changes", but that's not on the table. It would be preferable to follow the "new design" described on p. 14ff. of the paper, as opposed to a lot of alternative rules. The paper is a little misleading in its frequent comparisons to the treatment of integrating resources. For integrating resources we don't make new descriptions even for major changes in title, so there will still be a difference in treatment even if the DNB proposal is accepted. The proposal keeps the rules for major changes in serials and only deals with the minor changes that sometimes happen in between the major ones. --John Hostage (talk) 14:03, 10 September 2013 (PDT)

I am also in general agreement with the discussion paper. Adding the option of latest entry description might be a little complicated to get in place, but I think it's a worthwhile change. -- Steve Kelley, CC:DA, Sept. 12, 2013

Constituency responses

All responses

Summary of ACOC response: ACOC’s preference would be to pursue the option to introduce a new set of elements to record information on both earlier and later states of a resource.
http://wikis.ala.org/ccda/index.php?title=6JSC/DNB/Discussion/1&oldid=9902
wikis.ala.org
crawl=CC-MAIN-2015-40
14522
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:DMHFXONPZCBYV5YSMWLCTP3I5SC4MLIQ
<urn:uuid:3cfd1587-be93-4322-81b3-d9ca7e7d0776>
2015-10-04T04:45:42Z
216.80.72.149
sha1:I5O22GMLL5PEB6RNIK74ISWBT6TCO6UJ
<urn:uuid:f00414a4-ecd9-46fd-ae82-88b002204b67>
http://wikis.ala.org/ccda/index.php?title=6JSC/DNB/Discussion/1&oldid=9902
length
response
<urn:uuid:006da407-93f7-4d1d-aadf-16a448811157>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-137-6-227.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)/CC WarcExport 1.0
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2015-40
operator: CommonCrawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web for September 2015
publisher: CommonCrawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf