Talk:Evolution

From RogueBasin
Jump to: navigation, search

Did this really have a release on 2006 Jul 04 ? No official site I could find. PaulBlay

This is not wikipedia. If you are not able to confirm something it is not good enough reason to delete informaion. There is no offical site currently. â€“Michal BielinskiTalk 23:34, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
I actually agree with paulblay here, a release is not just any old content, it specifically states that this game was released SOMEWHERE. And if it wasn't, I think the offending "release date" should be removed. There's been a glut of these talkie talkie pages recently. I don't mind them, but it's going too far if they claim to have fake releases. - elig
I happen to be game author and one who added this content. Effectively that accuses me of providing false information. Unfortunately site where release was announced (World of Roguelike) is down long ago. Now I cannot prove it. Besides, you'd need to understand Polish well to dig through. Wait! Do you consider Actively Developing Roguelikes to be reliable source? If yes, the date July 4th 2006 is written there. â€“Michal BielinskiTalk 08:58, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
Elig, if Michal says that's when there was a release, then we should believe it. What makes you think it would be a fake release date? And if it was a fake release date, whats the big deal in the overall scheme of things... nothing! Lets not go down the crapper like wikipedia and start demanding that if it wasn't in a print magazine or newspaper, it didn't happen. Stu 13:12, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
I would not have bothered as a matter of internal politics. (The reference revision before your edits, PaulBlay, was by â€“Michal BielinskiTalk.)
It turns out that the current Talkie-Talkie template (which was in place at that revision) does not display either release dates or updated dates. I went ahead and selectively reverted your sabotage as the information is not displayed anyway. -- Bessarion, 15:37, 27 August 2009
Looks like RogueBasin:About needs improvement urgently. If the vision of this wiki was clearer this probably would not have happened. â€“Michal BielinskiTalk 13:31, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
Personal tools
http://roguebasin.com/index.php?title=Talk:Evolution
roguebasin.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2019-35
14432
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:CZTGVWRCTLC5IT7WWUOQZMFS4HIZQ7C7
<urn:uuid:d39d25aa-a510-4c0e-84bf-802ad5c39144>
2019-08-18T12:58:59Z
195.74.38.65
text/html
sha1:AX2QSKVZMW2AZJPZEGOV4WRYI36BJNVN
<urn:uuid:59e3b826-61c3-49f9-86c1-542da720e23a>
http://roguebasin.com/index.php?title=Talk:Evolution
response
<urn:uuid:edd1d2a3-8996-401a-8f25-fed55b271bc4>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2019-35
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for August 2019
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-156.ec2.internal
software: Apache Nutch 1.15 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.1-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: http://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/