Skip to Main Content

Evaluating the Credibility of Sources

Evaluating Online Information - The CRAAP Test

You can check our other subject guides on evaluating information sources generally, including evaluation methods such as the CRAAP Test, but did you know that we can extend those methods to better address online resources?  

The CRAAP Test 

The CRAAP Test is one of several information evaluation methods that evaluates the credibility of a source by looking at characteristics like Relevancy; Verifiability; Authority; Date; Rationale; Objectivity, and Coverage.  I've included the graphic below, if you'd like a refresher on what each letter stands for.  

We can extend this method to address online sources of information simply by understanding what each characteristics looks like on a web page! For example, Currency still refers to the date of the information; can you determine when the information was posted or updated on the website?  You can't use the copyright date of the site for this facet, since those often update without content changing.  Because they also understand (and use!) this standard for evaluating information, reputable sites with credible information often indicate a date when the content was last posted or updated. 

Let's look at the entire mnemonic and see how each facet applies to online information. The questions on the form still apply, but you may need to search the site, or even refer to other sites, for answers!

C - Currency

Look for a date when the information content of the page was posted or updated and think about whether the date of the information is appropriate to your research needs.  Check out the bottom of this page for an example of what this might look like!

R - Relevancy

In addition to the questions on the graphic, consider whether the site covers all aspects of the issue and at what depth.  While you can get credible information from an imbalanced site, you won't get the whole picture unless you use additional sources of information.

A - Authority

Remember that anyone can publish information on the web and be particularly assiduous with this facet of evaluation!  Can you determine who is responsible for the information and for the web site? Note that you can find credible information on sites sites with group authors (e.g. .gov, .edu, or .org) as long as the organization itself is a reputable source.

A - Accuracy

You are still looking to see if the author of the site provides a source for their information that you could use in turn to independently verify the data.  Since many websites use links instead of reference lists, check to see whether those links are broken and where they point; credible sites use information from credible sites, so evaluate the sources of that information, too.  Also be on the lookout for proper spelling, grammar, professional language, etc., that indicate the site is well written and properly maintained.

P - Purpose

Finally, the issue of why the site exists is especially important for online information, as it is so easy to publish and to disguise one's intent to persuade or sell an agenda with a polished page using certain language.  Does the author have a known bias or affiliation with an advocacy group? Is it a company that might benefit from one-sided information?  Note that the creator's purpose doesn't mean the information is wrong, just be aware of how their perspective influences the site's content.

Online Verification - The Problem

Have you ever seen a post on social media, a blog, or been on a website and wondered about whether the information on it was true? Is the writer telling the entire story? Did they take information out of context? Are they recycling old information?  Why are they sharing this information? Ultimately, can you trust this source of information?

One method for evaluating online information that goes beyond the superficial characteristics of the webpage, and helps you evaluate the information content of the page using lateral readings strategies, is called SIFT. SIFT stands for: Stop; Investigate the source; Find the original source; and collect Trustworthy sources.

  • You should always STOP whenever you encounter a digital source of information.
  • Before you even read the page, INVESTIGATE THE SOURCE: what do dependable sources say about the trustworthiness of the author or organization? Are they known to have a bias or agenda? If they are trustworthy and credible, then you're done. Go ahead and use the information on the site, with proper citations, of course!
  • If they are not trustworthy, then you need to FIND THE ORIGINAL SOURCE of the information, and investigate and interrogate that source for trustworthiness and bias.
  • Over the course of several investigations, you'll develop a list of TRUSTWORHTY SOURCES, making the process faster each time you practice these skills.

The sequence of brief videos below will introduce you to these skills, so let's begin! Select the tabs in sequence to learn more about each skill.

SIFT - The Solution

The cited Stanford research report, Lateral Reading: Reading Less and Learning More When Evaluating Digital Information, can be found here: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.c...

Visit https://www.ctrl-f.ca/ for more information and resources.

Visit https://www.ctrl-f.ca/ for more information and resources.

Visit https://www.ctrl-f.ca/ for more information and resources.

Visit https://www.ctrl-f.ca/ for more information and resources.
https://libguides.gateway.kctcs.edu/c.php?g=1273899&p=9349639
libguides.gateway.kctcs.edu
CC-MAIN-2024-38
34065
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:ZPUZOOZ56OGGOBKFP7RHUGD4NZH2CRAW
<urn:uuid:54802765-e26b-40b9-9665-b1b3a47325d6>
2024-09-09T05:29:07Z
3.86.37.148
text/html
sha1:ZGFCWA3O2CFR6BKAK5FHESVVQGWUFFTX
<urn:uuid:2be6a3b9-43a1-40ff-8901-56ccd929da22>
https://libguides.gateway.kctcs.edu/c.php?g=1273899&p=9349639
response
<urn:uuid:8b5eb254-3843-478e-b872-38a1a58523b7>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2024-38
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for September 2024
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-98
software: Apache Nutch 1.20 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.5-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: https://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/