Despite your best efforts to address the needs of your clients, you may learn that some of the documentation you've developed and maintain is seldom used. Would you discontinue further maintenance of this documentation? If so, what considerations or metrics would you use to support your decision?

If you have experience with this scenario, please take a few minutes to complete this survey. We will gladly share our detailed results with all respondents.

Thank you in advance for your time; we value your opinion and appreciate your feedback!

 
13% of survey complete.

T
https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/?sm=Mmdt75zr86HlQM7ozzYjyQ_3d_3d
www.surveymonkey.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2019-39
29497
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:ONZKNMAMY5UVULWEHVDFPVOMFK5WVDKT
<urn:uuid:6ac74f7b-8dde-4483-8727-dc40aae3f88e>
2019-09-19T16:21:30Z
64.191.16.50
text/html
sha1:A2MI476BOAXTOVKOKBRDIFY2BKGRLS7C
<urn:uuid:9d4939bf-ab1f-4837-966d-628a5d5e9635>
https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/?sm=Mmdt75zr86HlQM7ozzYjyQ_3d_3d
response
<urn:uuid:bddab51f-a2e9-441d-8283-0b7a5628bd3f>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2019-39
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for September 2019
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-38.ec2.internal
software: Apache Nutch 1.15 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.1-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: http://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/