Reply to a comment

Reply to this comment

Moondancer writes:

"Tongues unattached to brains have wagged since the dawn of creation. . "

And now, comments unattached to names . . .

Why does a Letter to the Editor require verification, while e-comments, which are even more widely distributed require nothing more than a unseen registration and a screen name? The humor provided in these anonymous comments is greatly reduced by the realization that most are made in earnest, and often express the worst in outright lies or verbal bullying.

Why does the KNS continue to allow itself to be the forum for such rubbish?

Want to participate in the conversation? Become a subscriber today. Subscribers can read and comment on any story, anytime. Non-subscribers will only be able to view comments on select stories.

Features
http://www.knoxnews.com/comments/reply/?target=61:433254&comment=2617093
www.knoxnews.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2013-48
89351
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:OBCLUAQGVTY7NVCOOD62C6XFS7OMOYXF
<urn:uuid:73ad66da-fd44-46be-a089-68bef551d6d6>
2013-12-12T16:56:05Z
164.109.40.120
sha1:W37ZXAHXFBFSWRM72PP2ISTWFAI7UWXY
<urn:uuid:51036a62-1728-47af-87eb-23add221e552>
http://www.knoxnews.com/comments/reply/?target=61:433254&comment=2617093
response
<urn:uuid:167af49e-dbe5-4837-9c4c-19d34c540860>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-33-133-15.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)/CC WarcExport 1.0
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2013-48
operator: CommonCrawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web with URLs provided by Blekko for Winter 2013
publisher: CommonCrawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf