Peer Review Process

Peer Review Process

  1. Every Submitted manuscript will go through a blind review process.
  2. The review process considering the novelty, objectivity, methodology, scientific impact, conclusions, and references
  3. Reviewers have to provide written feedback in a timely manner on the benefits of scientific and scientific value of the work
  4. Avoid personal comments or criticism
  5. Notify the editor immediately if unable to review in a timely manner and if possible, provide the names of other potential reviewers
  6. Pay attention to ethical concerns, such as the substantial similarity between the last text and any text papers published or submitted to another journal.
  7. Ensure that articles published to comply with the standards of the journal
  8. Protect readers from incorrect or flawed research and studies that can not be validated by others
https://ojs.unpkediri.ac.id/index.php/biologi/page_m
ojs.unpkediri.ac.id
CC-MAIN-2023-40
15103
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:5V6IQNQMR6IJMHLVSEUZ2BFZTCQZUJYM
<urn:uuid:d8a391fe-bfbf-4349-8515-b2fb21bf5b24>
2023-09-25T23:37:05Z
89.233.105.67
text/html
sha1:R5CAZTHO64XZQHM7AEVSBYVBERORSBYU
<urn:uuid:73eef251-7c15-46a4-ad0a-fd783de10b12>
https://ojs.unpkediri.ac.id/index.php/biologi/page_m
response
<urn:uuid:96bb71c7-0971-4038-98d7-6dc2dfc86433>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2023-40
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for September/October 2023
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-154
software: Apache Nutch 1.19 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.5-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: https://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/