JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DC-RDA Archives


DC-RDA Archives

DC-RDA Archives


DC-RDA@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DC-RDA Home

DC-RDA Home

DC-RDA  June 2007

DC-RDA June 2007

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Agenda for DC2007 - was update

From:

Gordon Dunsire <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

List for discussion on Resource Description and Access (RDA)

Date:

Thu, 21 Jun 2007 12:19:37 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (209 lines)

Robina and others
 
This is fine with me.
 
Cheers.
 
Gordon

________________________________

From: List for discussion on Resource Description and Access (RDA) on behalf of Clayphan, Robina
Sent: Thu 6/21/2007 11:56 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Agenda for DC2007 - was update



Gordon, All,

Thanks for your response - I think your suggestion is a bit different
from what I had envisaged.  I had started writing this before yours
arrived and focuses more on the joint aspects of the work - let me know
if it suits what you had in mind.  We have 90 minutes and this adds up
to 85:

1) Welcome and Introduction - Robina? 5 mins
2) Background to RDA and DC development. (Separate presentations from
Gordon and Diane) 15 mins each
3) Current RDA/DC work plan (Diane and/or Gordon) 20 mins altogether
4) Future developments (Diane and/or Gordon) 15 mins altogether
5) Discussion - Robina to moderate? 15 mins

Item 2 can clearly have two separately focussed strands from the
different perspectives.  Item 3 starts with the London meeting and
brings the story up to date describing the joint work proposed and where
it is now.  Item 4 could again have separate strands - Gordon doing a
more practical strand looking at what it will mean on the ground for
AACR library cataloguers and Diane could do something more futuristic. ?

There is a deadline of 24th June to send the conference organisers a
short description of the session (purpose and intended audience), the
agenda (bullets) with list of presentations, special technical
requirements.  I am just composing a paragraph for the short description
and will circulate shortly for comment.

Best,
Robina


-----Original Message-----
From: List for discussion on Resource Description and Access (RDA)
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Gordon Dunsire
Sent: 21 June 2007 10:12
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Update

Robina and others

The proposal for the RDA session sounds good to me, too. I have enough
stuff from the RDA presentations at the London meeting, plus my own, to
put together the RDA p-p-f (I think we'll need to present the
parallel-track futures for both RDA and DC before going on to London
meeting and collaborative/convergent futures).

Cheers.

Gordon

________________________________

From: List for discussion on Resource Description and Access (RDA) on
behalf of Diane I. Hillmann
Sent: Wed 6/20/2007 8:45 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Update



Gordon,

I'll keep your flight schedules in mind when I start feeling sorry for
myself somewhere over the North Pole.

>Gordon, All,
>
>I am sorry to hear about your punishing flight schedule Gordon - hope
>you are up to taking an active part when you get there!
>
>I have just started thinking about the content of the two sessions that

>have my name attached and I am open to suggestion as to how the RDA
>session should be handled.  I think it should be seen as an
>introduction, updating and discussion session.  I am happy to
>co-ordinate/chair but I really see it as the Diane and Gordon show:-)

I agree with this approach--I think a lot of folks will be very
interested in how this is going forward and what they can expect if
they're working in a "mixed" environment.

>I stand to be corrected but I suspect most attendees will be coming
>along to hear what is going on - and we should have a better idea of
>what the project consists of and how it is progressing by then.  Is
>there a specific output we want from this meeting?  Last year we were
>seeking feedback for Diane to take to JSC. Do you see this year as an
>opportunity to recruit volunteers, gather feedback etc. or more as a
>dissemination exercise?  My rather pedestrian suggestion is to do past,

>present and future + discussion.

I think the past-->present-->future + discussion will be just right.

>1) Background - a tale of two philosophies: AACR-RDA, DCAM and RDF - up

>to the London meeting.
>2) Current position - the work in the project proposal, where we are,
>who is doing what and how.
>3) Future developments - what comes next
>4) Discussion
>
>Any thoughts?
>
>Best,
>Robina
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: List for discussion on Resource Description and Access (RDA)
>[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Gordon Dunsire
>Sent: 20 June 2007 14:03
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Update
>
>Dear all
>
>1. I have now registered for DC2007 and booked my flights and
>accommodation. I will have to miss the first day of the conference
>proper to give me enough time to recover after IFLA in Durban; the need

>to keep expenses down means I have to fly Edinburgh-Durban return, then

>immediately followed by Edinburgh-Singapore (single tickets would have
>doubled the cost).
>
>So I will miss the session on Collections, which is a pity. But I'll be

>ok for the RDA session, and the Advisory Board on Saturday. Robina:
>please let me know what you want me to do in respect of the RDA
session.
>
>I'm booked in to the Intercontinental. The travel and accommodation
>have exhausted the budget allocated by JSC, unless the US dollar makes
>a significant recovery against the British pound. CDLR has agreed,
>however, that I should not starve, and will make up any additional
>expenses. I have been talking to Diane Hillman about the possibility of

>assisting in her metadata decisions workshop to get some additional
>funding.
>
>2. I have just returned from giving a presentation on RDA to the IFLA
>Libraries for the Blind Section workshop on Daisy (Digital Accessible
>Information System) cataloguing in Helsinki, Finland. See
>http://www.daisy.org/ for more about Daisy. The consortium is
>developing a global standard for metadata for digital talking books.
>They have already settled on using Dublin Core, so the cataloguers were

>very interested in the news about the work proposed for the DCMI
>Resource Description and Access Task Group. The vocabularies for
>content and carrier type proposed in RDA are of particular interest,
>especially if the equivalent RDA/ONIX framework values can be used to
>restrict union catalogue searches to exclude resources requiring visual
intermediation.
>There was also interest in using, if appropriate, the proposed RDA
>application profile.
>
>3. As you will have seen, I have added all members of the RDA Joint
>Steering Committee to this list. If you wish to add any
>technically-minded colleagues, please let me know.
>
>Cheers
>
>Gordon
>
>***********************************************************************
>***
>
>Experience the British Library online at www.bl.uk
>
>Help the British Library conserve the world's knowledge. Adopt a Book.
>www.bl.uk/adoptabook
>
>The Library's St Pancras site is WiFi - enabled
>
>***********************************************************************
>**
>
>The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and may be
>legally privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you
>are not the intended recipient, please delete this e-mail and notify
>the [log in to unmask] : The contents of this e-mail must not be
>disclosed or copied without the sender's consent.
>
>The statements and opinions expressed in this message are those of the
>author and do not necessarily reflect those of the British Library. The

>British Library does not take any responsibility for the views of the
>author.
>
>***********************************************************************
>**

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
August 2012
July 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
June 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
June 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
June 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005


WWW.JISCMAIL.AC.UK

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A2=dc-rda;d194b7ad.0706
www.jiscmail.ac.uk
crawl=CC-MAIN-2015-32
61859
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:5WIX6S6JEPFUXPFNKCKXPNVM7JQLKASA
<urn:uuid:eaac339d-1d7f-4eb9-8f58-8443b5a23707>
2015-07-28T08:37:41Z
54.229.126.31
sha1:WMMMZWANJLCPJQKYDVCMFH5AYMYC35BU
<urn:uuid:bac1e2a9-f589-42c0-b87f-f67008ee6d34>
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A2=dc-rda;d194b7ad.0706
length
response
<urn:uuid:f57ce242-7316-4bb6-8329-3e5ff7d69710>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-236-191-2.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)/CC WarcExport 1.0
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2015-32
operator: CommonCrawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web for August 2015
publisher: CommonCrawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf