文章摘要
朱大明.基金论文与非基金论文作者自引对比分析.编辑学报,2009,21(3):274-275
基金论文与非基金论文作者自引对比分析
Comparative analysis on author self-citation of foundation-papers and non-foundation-papers
投稿时间：2008-07-21  修订日期：2008-07-21
DOI：
中文关键词: 作者自引  基金论文  非基金论文  相关性
英文关键词: author self-citation  foundation-paper  non-foundation-paper  correlation
基金项目:
作者单位
朱大明 防护工程编辑部,471023,河南洛阳 
摘要点击次数: 759
全文下载次数: 479
中文摘要:
      为探讨作者自引的规律和相对合理性,为期刊编辑、期刊评价和文献计量分析提供参考依据,对基金论文与非基金论文作者自引量进行随机抽样统计分析。结果表明:基金论文的自引篇率和自引率明显高于非基金论文；作者自引量与期刊论文质量存在一定的正相关性。
英文摘要:
      In order to study the laws and rationality of author self-citation, this paper analyzes the author self-citation quantity of foundation-papers and non-foundation-papers based on random sampling statistics. The results of comparative analysis show that the author self-citation quantity of foundation-papers is higher than that of non-foundation-papers. There is a positive correlation between quantity of author self-citation and quality of periodical paper.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭
http://bjxb.cessp.org.cn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20090337&flag=1
bjxb.cessp.org.cn
crawl=CC-MAIN-2022-33
18944
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:AT7NQJND6HP2HUQ5X7ZED35HSL7ODA25
<urn:uuid:39bea5a9-9e49-43b2-800b-165fecec673d>
2022-08-16T00:29:54Z
119.188.250.141
text/html
sha1:72RYJ4KEF3UTVPETWCYVFQLKYSPF7NQD
<urn:uuid:3e6b67bd-b5b1-4cf9-ab11-77a75f1ddd59>
http://bjxb.cessp.org.cn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20090337&flag=1
response
<urn:uuid:f41c2ef4-03ba-4644-b9fa-e4dba8ca44af>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2022-33
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for August 2022
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-66
software: Apache Nutch 1.18 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.4-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: https://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/