Talk:Millennium '73

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Former featured article Millennium '73 is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophy This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on November 10, 2009.
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Houston (Rated C-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Houston, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Houston on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject United States / Texas (Rated C-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (marked as Low-importance).
 
WikiProject Religion (Rated C-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Spirituality (Rated C-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spirituality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spirituality-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
Checklist icon
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Prem Rawat (Rated C-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Prem Rawat, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Prem Rawat on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. WikiProject icon
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Traffic stats[edit]

[1], [2]. Interesting stuff. Cheers, Cirt (talk) 23:24, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Well, I've finally found an article that's less-read than Kodak DCS! -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 18:48, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

FAR?[edit]

An editor has suggested that this article may need to undergo a featured article review. I've copied his concerns below, for the consideration of any who may be watching this page. Nikkimaria (talk) 04:32, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

I am nominating this featured article for review because it is clear no one is maintaining it and it has fallen into a serious state of disrepair: there are 32 ref errors in the article staring at us in bold and 3 dead links. Note only 2 edits have been made this year, one by a bot. Wiki community needs to pay better attention to it's FAs. Amador Valley High School got to the main page a few days ago with 19, yes, 19 dead links. This is embarrassing. I will notify WP:Houston and WP:Prem Rawat, and user Momento. He's the only major editor still active. Will Beback alone accounted for over half the edits but he's been banned. He and Momento together account for over 90% of the edits. The talk page has 3-4 edits in two years, with the 2 edits this year to the article it's clear this one is not being maintained.PumpkinSky talk 02:13, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

How can I help?Momento (talk) 12:20, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
The best thing would probably be to see what you can do to address PS's concerns - fixing reference issues and dead links (PS, was there anything else?). This and this might be helpful. Nikkimaria (talk) 13:51, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
Someone good at writing should check the prose.PumpkinSky talk 14:43, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
I can write but if the main problem is "32 ref errors in the article staring at us in bold and 3 dead links" the article needs a technical over haul and I have no experience with Harvard citations. I am loath to copy edit this article as it is the result of two warring factions and removing anything may result in me being banned for 12 months for "removing sourced material".Momento (talk) 21:27, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
It seems to me that there are 19 broken footnotes and 17 "unused" references—many prolly due to the broken footnotes. What's really shocking is that this article actually passed FAC in this condition in teh first place. Br'er Rabbit (talk) 17:25, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

Untitled[edit]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Millennium_'73
en.wikipedia.org
crawl=CC-MAIN-2014-10
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-183-142-35.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)/CC WarcExport 1.0
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2014-10
operator: CommonCrawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web with URLs provided by Blekko for March 2014
publisher: CommonCrawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf