moderated Re: suspend/reinstate user rather than ban/unban/resubscribe


 

My point is that people might want to have a look to see what’s been said about this before. What is YOUR point? 🙁

On Mar 14, 2019, at 12:45 PM, Jim Higgins <HigginsJ@sc.rr.com> wrote:

Received from J_Catlady at 3/14/2019 07:15 PM UTC:

This conversation is paralleling the conversation I just posted a link to a couple of messages back, including the discussion of automatic vs manual reinstatement, etc.

That conversation was 5 messages back in August 2018. Today is March 14, 2019.

So your point is...?

Jim H



--
J

Messages are the sole opinion of the author, especially the fishy ones.
My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together. - Desmond Tutu

Join main@beta.groups.io to automatically receive all group messages.
https://beta.groups.io/g/main/message/20291
beta.groups.io
crawl=CC-MAIN-2021-10
31585
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:K6ZYGF3TXQDOWL3YYAPRGALJH564MKUM
<urn:uuid:2d0262fe-ca5d-4812-a25a-45dc30fc21cc>
2021-03-01T17:12:46Z
45.79.81.153
text/html
sha1:EDUTAQQW2T4X3HBEOK56NDLAHWFO22QB
<urn:uuid:290fb42a-992c-47ce-907f-86ae7de0ec01>
https://beta.groups.io/g/main/message/20291
response
<urn:uuid:2ce07d4c-c974-4bea-b7b5-999ec0a6ea1b>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2021-10
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for February/March 2021
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-35.ec2.internal
software: Apache Nutch 1.18 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.2-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: http://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/