W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-admin@w3.org > December 2012

FW: [HTMLWG] CfC: Create a Mailing List for administrative matters and notifications?

From: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 19:27:50 +0000
To: "public-html-admin@w3.org" <public-html-admin@w3.org>
Message-ID: <AB5704B0EEC35B4691114DC04366B37F1F690374@TK5EX14MBXC291.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
> Specifically, the things I have heard cited are bugzilla new bug 
> notifications, and CFCs and other "call" type emails.

This list will be used as described above for HTML WG administrative items as per the below CfC.

/paulc
HTML WG co-chair

Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329


-----Original Message-----
From: Maciej Stachowiak [mailto:mjs@apple.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 11:48 PM
To: Sam Ruby
Cc: HTML WG (public-html@w3.org)
Subject: Re: [HTMLWG] CfC: Create a Mailing List for administrative matters and notifications?


This CFC has now passed. The Chairs will work with the W3C Team to create new lists and will announce results once they are ready.

 - Maciej

On Nov 6, 2012, at 11:53 AM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:

> On 10/22/2012 03:46 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>> 
>> I've heard from some that the major objection to using public-html 
>> for certain technical discussions is not so much the other technical 
>> discussion, so much as administrative matters that are considered noise.
>> Specifically, the things I have heard cited are bugzilla new bug 
>> notifications, and CFCs and other "call" type emails. How would folks 
>> feel about having a single unified technical discussion list, and 
>> then one or more separate (still mandatory-subscription) lists for 
>> administrative matters and notifications? If we can get consensus on 
>> such an approach, it might supersede the need for a survey, but I 
>> will try to get the survey out ASAP nonetheless, perhaps including 
>> this as an option.
> 
> This proposal got some support and if there was any objections, I missed it.  This Call for Consensus is intended to determine if there are indeed any objections.
> 
> So to be clear: the proposal is to create another mailing list and to redirect the types of discussions described above to that mailing list.  If this call passes, the name of that mailing list would be determined by W3C staff, though constructive suggestions are welcome.
> 
> If you have any comments or concerns about this CfC, please respond by Wednesday, November 13th, 2012. Positive response is welcome and silence will be considered as agreement with the proposal.
> 
> If your comment is an objection, please clearly state that.
> 
> - Sam Ruby
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 4 December 2012 19:28:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 4 December 2012 19:28:32 GMT
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-admin/2012Dec/0000.html
lists.w3.org
crawl=CC-MAIN-2014-52
12662
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:L6PIIS5QAOXPAWO66Y4B6L2WJOY5ZUYM
<urn:uuid:d15196d0-6c06-488a-8346-148426dce831>
2014-12-21T14:48:40Z
128.30.52.56
sha1:H7PZERKAEVDBK5XI3ZYLCVWRVSD7JBMW
<urn:uuid:d393cc0f-41d6-4bcc-913f-4c99aa9f165d>
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-admin/2012Dec/0000.html
response
<urn:uuid:770b59fa-2239-4fdf-bab7-804843570685>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-231-17-201.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)/CC WarcExport 1.0
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2014-52
operator: CommonCrawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web with URLs provided by Blekko for December 2014
publisher: CommonCrawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf