#8 Adopting some of the Modular-docs terminology
Opened a year ago by ojn. Modified 11 months ago

Hi, I wonder if it would it be favorable to adopt some of the terminology and explanations from
https://redhat-documentation.github.io/modular-docs/
https://github.com/redhat-documentation/modular-docs

It has to be fairly technology neutral but still center around asciidoc format, maybe later we could have a separate section that can be Antora workflow specific. Just speculating for now, tell me what you think!

There's some other repos on rh docs github, like asciidoc-markup-conventions that can be of value, we would just need to bug them to add a cc license there...


I am +1 to this as it gives us the ability to reference those docs instead of recreating them. Can you prepare a PR?

Login to comment on this ticket.

Metadata
https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/documentation-guide/issue/8
pagure.io
crawl=CC-MAIN-2019-35
23033
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:7OCAAFXQDEJ2W2SQ453N36GKOMNNPQ7L
<urn:uuid:0502def9-85e8-4384-9a0a-f860f704034a>
2019-08-20T07:46:50Z
8.43.85.75
text/html
sha1:EUIROPL5X6NV6OFKEUJR6TILNRTHWOCU
<urn:uuid:14b69c5b-093b-4b27-8f72-38ed71b7c59e>
https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/documentation-guide/issue/8
response
<urn:uuid:da8af46f-6cde-482d-bbd7-dc3446f124cb>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2019-35
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for August 2019
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-214.ec2.internal
software: Apache Nutch 1.15 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.1-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: http://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/