↓ Skip to main content

HOW TO WRITE ABOUT INFLUENCE: ASSESSING EDMUND BURKE'S CONSERVATIVE LEGACIES

Overview of attention for book
HOW TO WRITE ABOUT INFLUENCE: ASSESSING EDMUND BURKE'S CONSERVATIVE LEGACIES
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Overall attention for this book
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#38 of 530)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
24 tweeters
Title
HOW TO WRITE ABOUT INFLUENCE: ASSESSING EDMUND BURKE'S CONSERVATIVE LEGACIES
Published by
Historical Journal, October 2019
DOI 10.1017/s0018246x19000347
Authors

ARCENAS, CLAIRE RYDELL

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2019.
All research outputs
#915,628
of 13,635,041 outputs
Outputs from Historical Journal
#38
of 530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,421
of 168,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Historical Journal
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,635,041 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 530 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,183 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
https://www.altmetric.com/details/67613247
www.altmetric.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2019-43
23552
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:C7NFVBANBTD5PHXTLPPISARZANOUPF7B
<urn:uuid:d704d7fd-8eb3-46bd-953e-c2f1f8368473>
2019-10-17T22:59:04Z
151.101.250.2
text/html
sha1:J2FJKLLSRGEI3APIXPZ36XR4IIPHLDC2
<urn:uuid:d7ab3cec-8997-409b-8e28-db41b3cf9b5a>
https://www.altmetric.com/details/67613247
response
<urn:uuid:2edf55e0-7ffb-4ff2-b0a7-4d1db1698688>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2019-43
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for October 2019
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-242.ec2.internal
software: Apache Nutch 1.16 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.1-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: http://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/