User talk:Thryduulf

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

I check this site generally at least every few days, and so I will read messages left here then. For more urgent messages, I will most likely see comments left on my talk page on the English Wikipedia sooner.
See also How to contact me. Thryduulf 01:09, 27 September 2005 (UTC)


Contents

Admin [edit]

You are now an admin here on Commons. Congratulations! villy 17:32, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

Attention [edit]

Please see User:Whitmare, and his latest uploads. / Fred Chess 17:17, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

Raedarum publicarum statio [edit]

Yeah, Machine translation tends to suck, but given that there is little call for Latin, the machine translation tends to suck even WORSE! Check this out.

And btw, the first word of the title shoudl be Raedarum not Readarun... not that it's that big a deal (afterall plenty of wikipedia images have misspellings or non-native grammar errors in their titles, so this is hardly out of place), but I figured I shoudl at least tell you. --Iustinus 02:33, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

I hate to do this to you, but it's still wrong. It should be Raedarum (or Rædarum), not readarum.
By the way, what machine translator did you use? Was it either of the ones mentioned in that blog entry I linked to? If not, I'd be interested in knowing about it. --Iustinus 03:54, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
Another question: Do you know if the station itself has been given an official Latin name? I mean "Wallsend" is, obviously, Segedumum, and "Metro Station" is given in various articles on the subject as Statio Metropolitana, but I'd rather not invent a name for the building if there's already an official one. So is there some sort of sign over the entrance proclaiming it to be the "STATIO•METROPOLITANA•SEGEDVNENSIS" or something like that? --Iustinus 02:31, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
OK, well I look forward to seeing such pictures. Let me know if/when that happens. In the meantime, if I write an article on the station I'll probably just use my guess and move the page if I get a more official name. --Iustinus 17:10, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

Richard Stallman photo [edit]

Hi. Just because I created an article for him. I moved images to that article from the category you refer. I know policies involving categories or articles are not clear defined, so if you think that it should be in the category as well, please add it. Regards, --Porao 17:18, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

Support [edit]

I am most grateful for your support. My bid for Administrative duties was successful. Thumbs up! Bas parler voir 16:20, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

Whitmair [edit]

You have been a victim of Whitmair's vandalism, which I reverted. Sorry for any inconvenience. Rama 18:12, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

I've protected your user page from move. Cary "Bastique" Bass parler voir 19:53, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
Anytime. Did you see what it earned me: [1]? Cary "Bastique" Bass parler voir 23:59, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

Railway photos [edit]

Some are good, e.g. Image:Virgin Voyager 220003 2005-06-09 03.jpg (which is in focus, and is of the whole unit, rather than just one coach (compare Image:220012 at york.JPG, which is hideous). That's good. Several others are too. Great, but very respectfully:

However, some are less good, e.g. I mean what's going on with Image:Freightliner-66526-01.jpg (underexposed) or Image:EWS 66221 2006-01-05 01.jpg (motion blur)? and then there's Image:EWS 66221 2006-01-05 02.jpg and Image:EWS 66221 2006-01-05 03.jpg. And sheds aren't exactly uncommon. I bet even Eric Treacy had some dud shots, and the only way to learn is by making mistakes.

I think the question you need to ask yourself is would you put them in a Wikipedia article? If you can't say, on merit alone (forget that they're your phots), that you would, then I humbly submit you ought not to upload them here. Commons:Commons is not free web hosting, and I think as Commons admin, you should be setting an example. A few great phots are better than a few good phots with lots of mediocre ones.

I can find you decent phots, there are enough trainphotters out there. Most of them hang out at fotopic and I humbly suggest therefore that it would be a good idea for you to get a fotopic website and upload your photos there, and then consider which ones are the best and most appropriate for Wikipedia (otherwise you could use flickr like Morven).

This isn't anything personal, I like you really, I just want the best for Commons. Dunc| 11:01, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Claiming a fake ownership [edit]

Hi! Here is an user, User:Gabri-co, that is uploading image files about Spanish flags and coat of arms. He's tagging all these files claiming to be himself the owner of the work, with a combined license of use cc-by-sa and gfdl. In adding, all those images are also used on a webpage, http://www.telecable.es/personales/panizo/indices/portada.htm, where the autor of the web are claiming also the ownership of the designs about flags and COAs, and are all these copyrighted. Exemples: Image:Flag of Ibi.gif with [[2]], or Image:Flag of Elche.gif with [3], etc... (See user's contribs). I've asked first him if he is being the same autor of this webpage. In the case he isn't the same person, how is it proceeded usually here in Commons? Obviously these files would be deleted, but what about the user?. --Joanot Martorell 19:41, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

User:Mr. Loyola College [edit]

Hi I think we got all of his edits well done! Gnangarra 14:55, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

Please don't upload junk [edit]

Wtf is this? Image:SVR - 7802 "Bradley Manor" 04.jpg when you have half-decent photo Image:SVR - 7802 "Bradley Manor" 09.jpg (the platform is nevertheless an issue). Use flickr or fotopic. Please. Dunc| 13:10, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Commons-l subscription [edit]

Hello Thryduulf,

as per Commons talk:Administrators, I am asking all admins to subscribe to commons-l, a mailing list for Wikimedia Commons policy and project discussion. Since many admins are only on Commons infrequently, this is a good way to alert people about important happenings. The mailing list is nominally multilingual, but predominantly English.

If you are already subscribed to commons-l, I apologize for bothering you, and you are free to ignore this message. If you don't want to use your regular e-mail account, feel free to leave me a message, and I can send you a GMail invite. Traffic on the mailing list is relatively low, and we do not expect admins to read all messages to the list, but it would be nice if you could check on it at least every few weeks. Thanks for your time,--Eloquence 23:17, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

British Rail [edit]

I shall roll the categories with errors back later in the day. Please take a look at my response on the talk page. I made an offer to make further rollbacks on british train cats provided I am convinced you understand the costs of such a move. -Mak 19:09, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Train talk pages [edit]

Are there any talk pages where folks discuss things like naming and orgainization and content standards?

I have a suggested change that all "Trains in" be changed to "Trains of", but I'd like to solicit opinion from train experts first. The issue came up here: Commons:Village_pump#Trains_of_the_world -Mak 17:16, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Admin news [edit]

Hello,

If you consent for statistics to be published about your actions as an administrator, please sign here: Commons:Administrator permission for statistics. (I expect that most people will not have a problem with it unless you are especially concerned with privacy.)

Also, please be aware that we now have a Commons:Administrators' noticeboard. Please put it on your watchlist, if you haven't already!

cheers, pfctdayelise (translate?) 05:33, 7 September 2006 (UTC) P.S.: Pardon if this is a repeat (bot debugging...)


Image Tagging Image:Wessex_Alphaline_158859_2006-01-19_08.jpg [edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | česky | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Wessex_Alphaline_158859_2006-01-19_08.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Lcarsdata (Talk) 16:40, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Administrative notice [edit]

Deutsch

Hi. This message is sent out to you because you are an administrator on Commons, and you made little use (or no use) of the admin tools lately: less than 5 times in the last five months.

Commons has a new policy on admin activity, Commons:Administrators/De-adminship, taken into use on June 13, 2007 (after a poll among users). According to that policy, admins who use their tools infrequently will be asked whether they still need their adminship, and if they do not respond or require them the removal of the tools will be requested.

If you feel you still need your admin tools, please sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section within 30 days from the date this message was sent out. However, if you then don't make 5 admin actions in the following 5 months, you will lose the adminship without any notice.

This is not a comment on the considerable help you have given to the project in the past but reflects the wish of the community to see active administrators and to ensure that possible security breaches are minimized.

This message is sent out by bot. If you want to give feedback on it, you can do so here — 08:50, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

racing robin reliants [edit]

hi i think the photo of the reliants racing is fantastic, i play in a band and one of the lyrics in our song refers to robn reliants. would it be possible to use the image as part of the artwork on our new album design as its perfect. any help i this issue would be geatly appreciated please contact me at westywales@hotmail.com. cheers martin

De-sysop [edit]

Hi! You have been de-sysoped because of your inactivity. Links are here and here. If you want to get your rights back please start a new Request for Adminship. Thanks for your work and best regards,abf /talk to me/ 18:33, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Stratford station 360 - August 2008.jpg [edit]

Your upload problems were due to the fact that you transcluded your user license instead of substing it. Commons basically has the policy that user licenses must be substed, not transcluded, and the full form enforces this. Lupo 11:26, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

TUSC token 6b572677fa5405e3919b2dd1e89f7de1 [edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

File:Dollis_Hill_tube_station_2005-12-10_01.jpg [edit]

File:Dollis_Hill_tube_station_2005-12-10_01.jpg this picture was actually of Willesden Green, not Dollis Hill.--77.103.210.112 20:39, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Walesby Ramblers Church - Font.jpg [edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 11:02, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Taken with [edit]

As I understand it the camera meta data is transferred with the picture image along with various other info like exposure, date, focal length etc. eg bottom of File:Preserved steam at Irwell Vale - geograph.org.uk - 331546.jpg I assume that at some later date this info will be searchable through a wiki software update, making it uneccessary to add it manually. I'll stop removing them.Shortfatlad (talk) 01:52, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

problem [edit]

I removed about ~10 of the above categories, but I can't remember from which files - is it possible you will be able to tell from your watchlist, or is there some sort of search tool I could use to find them in my contributions??Shortfatlad (talk) 20:35, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

  • Thanks, I've made the bot-work request - it seems like it should provide a solution.Shortfatlad (talk) 23:00, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Trains at Rannoch.jpg [edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Trains at Rannoch.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

— Cheers, JackLee talk 19:53, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Manchester Hub Rail Study [edit]

I was just reading this Network Rail report and thought one of the photos of Leeds station looked familar (page 2). Sure enough, a quick search turns up your photo File:Overview of Leeds City railway station 04.jpg. It doesn't look like you're attributed as required by the Creative Commons licence. Have they contacted you regarding using the image outside the terms of the licences you've released it under? Regards. Adambro (talk) 10:24, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Good spot, they have not contacted me regarding this photo. In any case I would be unlikely to allow use in a document like that without credit. It seems they have not credited any of the photographs used, not just mine.
How do you go about contacting an organisation about this sort of thing? What sort of action would it be reasonable to expect? Thryduulf (talk) 15:45, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
I'm not sure I'm afraid, I don't really have much in the way of experience regarding situations like this. Adambro (talk) 16:47, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi Thryduulf, you can contact NR here via an email form, alternatively their contact details are available here. CrossHouses (talk) 14:57, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Nudity guidelines [edit]

Hey Thryduulf, just wondering if you could respond to my comments here. I'm hoping we can find some kind of common ground on it. Thanks. Kaldari (talk) 22:41, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Commons:Sexual content [edit]

You seem like a reasonable person. I would like to ask you to work with me in developing a proposal that is meets the following objectives.

  1. Helps further the educational goal of Wikimedia
  2. Prevents possible legal battles, controversies, bad press, or investigations from authorities
  3. Helps promote the safe use of Wikimedia in educational institutions
  4. Allows content to be legally used for commercial purposes
  5. All other purposes stated in the talk page

I realize that there's a vocal opposition to this proposal, and since you started this vote to oppose it I would appreciate it if you would rescind it and allow the discussion to continue. As I stated on the proposal talk page, I've gone through a number of real-life setbacks recently and I haven't had time or energy to devote to this project. I do have several silent supporters who do not wish to be directly involved in controversy and since I do not believe this proposal is close to completion I do not think it should be submitted for approval at this time. - 11:57, 24 April 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stillwaterising (talk • contribs)


File:FGW-158855-05.jpg [edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:FGW-158855-05.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

-mattbuck (Talk) 01:51, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Langscript-class-konq.png [edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 20:41, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

File:Tpenewclass185.jpg [edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Tpenewclass185.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

---mattbuck (Talk) 13:57, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Cap_D'Agde_-_Port_Nature.JPG [edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | česky | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | русский | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Cap_D'Agde_-_Port_Nature.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Cap_D'Agde_-_Port_Nature.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

GeorgHHtalk   11:03, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Categories for individual units? [edit]

Hi. Thought you might want to weigh in at my en.wp talk page about potential categorisation by individual unit. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:49, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Slidingmoonroof.jpg [edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Slidingmoonroof.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

Bulwersator (talk) 14:26, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Categorisation of uncategorised photos [edit]

Hi Thry You recently (last June!) asked me to categorise several uncategorised pics. Happy to oblige....but how do I do it? Regards Sarah777 (talk) 20:42, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Baker Street-Bakerloo Line-Sherlock Holmes.jpg [edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Baker Street-Bakerloo Line-Sherlock Holmes.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

-mattbuck (Talk) 12:25, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

File:HST vestibule signs.jpg [edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:HST vestibule signs.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

-mattbuck (Talk) 00:41, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

File:BerwickUponTweedStation-siteofcastle.jpg [edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:BerwickUponTweedStation-siteofcastle.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

Wknight94 talk 02:48, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Deleted upload [edit]

Per COM:FOP#United Kingdom, two-dimensional signs like your upload are not allowed. Wknight94 talk 04:47, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

TUSC token 5768d8e2cc299bc31526ed7f53e23d76 [edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

File:SVR-GWR poster 01.jpg [edit]

You've uploaded a derivative work We're sorry, but File:SVR-GWR poster 01.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a derivative of a non-free work, please explain why on the file description page. In case the file has already been deleted, you may contact the administrator who deleted it or make an undeletion request.


Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Hrvatski | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | +/−

Yours sincerely Vera (talk) 10:29, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

File:SVR-GWR poster 01.jpg [edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:SVR-GWR poster 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

Sreejith K (talk) 14:11, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Gb-ltmd-1938ts Emergency Equipment.jpg [edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Gb-ltmd-1938ts Emergency Equipment.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

-mattbuck (Talk) 23:08, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

File:LU-Waterloo-northboundBakerloo-map.jpg [edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:LU-Waterloo-northboundBakerloo-map.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

-mattbuck (Talk) 13:58, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

File:KXSP subsurface WB map.jpg [edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:KXSP subsurface WB map.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

-mattbuck (Talk) 14:01, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Thryduulf
commons.wikimedia.org
crawl=CC-MAIN-2013-20
179454
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:7N7QC3RI3LLVJRN7PMXZ7ID2UUZ6Y3T5
<urn:uuid:b42bda41-e148-4f9f-aa24-e6b20f4dfe24>
2013-05-19T19:39:11Z
208.80.154.224
sha1:24UO64LWDIPNAHY55WT6YV4HYWWVXD3E
<urn:uuid:7c2e2acc-00b4-4306-8163-fb683af9523c>
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Thryduulf
response
<urn:uuid:0be89bc3-3ccc-44f6-925f-e13d7a364220>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-60-113-184.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)/CC WarcExport 1.0
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2013-20
operator: CommonCrawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web with URLs provided by Blekko for Spring 2013
publisher: CommonCrawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf