FANDOM


Identification Edit

in the TNG episode "The First Duty", we breifly glimpse a slightly different academy flight trainer. if i recall correctly, they resemble the Peregrine-class to a degree, but are smaller, have a smoother hull design, and lack the warp nacelles.

i know the Encyclopedia has an illustration of the craft, but is there a canon source? The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.102.25.90 (talk).

Can someone get a picture of the flybye made by the observer? --NeoExelor

well, i found a side veiw, although it's a fan drawn image. about halfway down the page: http://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/schematics/starfleet_shuttles.htm

should help the search The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.102.25.90 (talk).

I found Pictures. Perhaps these should be added? <links removed> -- NeoExelor
Images changed to links, to save the sites bandwidth and avoid copyright infringement. - AJ Halliwell 00:42, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Deleted content in page historyEdit

Seems as if content form this article was deleted, then the article rewritten from scratch afterwards. Eventually, some of the former content can still be re-used: [1] -- Cid Highwind 14:17, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

SFA TR-4707Edit

Why create a seperate article for this when it is mentioned on Federation attack fighter? Or should it be removed from that page? I think we may want to merge this, though, since the number only comes from the Encyclopedia. --31dot 23:27, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

I say we just Redirect to Academy_flight_trainer. — Morder 23:39, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
After further review the name only comes from the Encycopedia and therefore won't be linked from anywhere since nothing but the enc references it...and the screenshot from voyager only states Academy Trainer so a redirect would seem to be in order — Morder 23:58, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

I'm all for that- just a question, why is this mentioned on the attack fighter page? Should we take it off of there? This doesn't seem like it would be a fighter craft.--31dot 00:05, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

It's there because the user who created the article added it. — Morder 00:16, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Ah- I didn't investigate that far. Thanks.--31dot 00:19, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Whereabouts of the studio modelEdit

The studio model of the Academy trainer was neither on Star Trek: The Exhibition nor on Star Trek World Tour. I would have photos, and I would definitely remember seeing it! Bernd 23:42, March 22, 2012 (UTC)

The link to the citation given(when I looked at it to check Bernd's statement) does not seem to work. --31dot 23:45, March 22, 2012 (UTC)
Bernd is right, it was not there at the two oldest tours...the Exhibition (which I also visited and where I haven't noticed the model) being the wrong one, meant was the second, more recent one...Adjusted text and provided links which are (for the duration still) working...Sennim 18:22, March 23, 2012 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-NC unless otherwise noted.

Fandom may earn an affiliate commission on sales made from links on this page.

Stream the best stories.

Fandom may earn an affiliate commission on sales made from links on this page.

Get Disney+
https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Talk:Academy_flight_trainer
memory-alpha.fandom.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2020-16
226085
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:4DECDF52FBSLLZA2CYHHOTT277E4PN5W
<urn:uuid:3ee646dd-57e1-4cc7-a017-e6f2eeee6eee>
2020-04-10T20:01:20Z
151.101.128.194
text/html
sha1:CAJVIBXHP4LRRUAVAB4ZNP747UQ3HZZL
<urn:uuid:f0ae5e1e-c53f-4b27-a0cd-b7eaec94873b>
https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Talk:Academy_flight_trainer
response
<urn:uuid:271b9888-60f9-4c76-ade4-3eb00aa665b3>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2020-16
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for March/April 2020
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-222.ec2.internal
software: Apache Nutch 1.16 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.1-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: http://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/