Rename imagenet2012 -> imagenet-1k
MEMBER
> Later we can add imagenet-21k as a new dataset if we want.

isn't it what models refer to as `imagenet` already?
2022-05-02T10:29:54Z
https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/pull/4263#issuecomment-1114706127
https://api.github.com/repos/huggingface/datasets/issues/4263
IC_kwDODunzps5CcRDP
https://api.github.com/repos/huggingface/datasets/issues/comments/1114706127/reactions
2022-05-02T10:29:54Z
https://api.github.com/repos/huggingface/datasets/issues/comments/1114706127
https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/326577?v=4
https://api.github.com/users/julien-c/events{/privacy}
https://api.github.com/users/julien-c/followers
https://api.github.com/users/julien-c/following{/other_user}
https://api.github.com/users/julien-c/gists{/gist_id}
https://github.com/julien-c
julien-c
MDQ6VXNlcjMyNjU3Nw==
https://api.github.com/users/julien-c/orgs
https://api.github.com/users/julien-c/received_events
https://api.github.com/users/julien-c/repos
https://api.github.com/users/julien-c/starred{/owner}{/repo}
https://api.github.com/users/julien-c/subscriptions
User
https://api.github.com/users/julien-c
public
MEMBER
> isn't it what models refer to as imagenet already?

I wasn't sure, but it looks like it indeed. Therefore having a dataset `imagenet` for ImageNet 21k makes sense actually.

EDIT: actually not all `imagenet` tag refer to ImageNet 21k - we will need to correct some of them
2022-05-02T10:32:56Z
https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/pull/4263#issuecomment-1114708184
https://api.github.com/repos/huggingface/datasets/issues/4263
IC_kwDODunzps5CcRjY
https://api.github.com/repos/huggingface/datasets/issues/comments/1114708184/reactions
2022-05-02T12:15:43Z
https://api.github.com/repos/huggingface/datasets/issues/comments/1114708184
https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/42851186?v=4
https://api.github.com/users/lhoestq/events{/privacy}
https://api.github.com/users/lhoestq/followers
https://api.github.com/users/lhoestq/following{/other_user}
https://api.github.com/users/lhoestq/gists{/gist_id}
https://github.com/lhoestq
lhoestq
MDQ6VXNlcjQyODUxMTg2
https://api.github.com/users/lhoestq/orgs
https://api.github.com/users/lhoestq/received_events
https://api.github.com/users/lhoestq/repos
https://api.github.com/users/lhoestq/starred{/owner}{/repo}
https://api.github.com/users/lhoestq/subscriptions
User
https://api.github.com/users/lhoestq
public
NONE
_The documentation is not available anymore as the PR was closed or merged._
2022-05-02T10:37:06Z
https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/pull/4263#issuecomment-1114710802
https://api.github.com/repos/huggingface/datasets/issues/4263
IC_kwDODunzps5CcSMS
https://api.github.com/repos/huggingface/datasets/issues/comments/1114710802/reactions
2022-05-02T16:40:00Z
https://api.github.com/repos/huggingface/datasets/issues/comments/1114710802
https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/99929124?v=4
https://api.github.com/users/HuggingFaceDocBuilderDev/events{/privacy}
https://api.github.com/users/HuggingFaceDocBuilderDev/followers
https://api.github.com/users/HuggingFaceDocBuilderDev/following{/other_user}
https://api.github.com/users/HuggingFaceDocBuilderDev/gists{/gist_id}
https://github.com/HuggingFaceDocBuilderDev
HuggingFaceDocBuilderDev
U_kgDOBfTMJA
https://api.github.com/users/HuggingFaceDocBuilderDev/orgs
https://api.github.com/users/HuggingFaceDocBuilderDev/received_events
https://api.github.com/users/HuggingFaceDocBuilderDev/repos
https://api.github.com/users/HuggingFaceDocBuilderDev/starred{/owner}{/repo}
https://api.github.com/users/HuggingFaceDocBuilderDev/subscriptions
User
https://api.github.com/users/HuggingFaceDocBuilderDev
public
MEMBER
should we remove the repo mirror on the hub side or will you do it?
2022-05-02T17:50:45Z
https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/pull/4263#issuecomment-1115175704
https://api.github.com/repos/huggingface/datasets/issues/4263
IC_kwDODunzps5CeDsY
https://api.github.com/repos/huggingface/datasets/issues/comments/1115175704/reactions
2022-05-02T17:50:45Z
https://api.github.com/repos/huggingface/datasets/issues/comments/1115175704
https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/326577?v=4
https://api.github.com/users/julien-c/events{/privacy}
https://api.github.com/users/julien-c/followers
https://api.github.com/users/julien-c/following{/other_user}
https://api.github.com/users/julien-c/gists{/gist_id}
https://github.com/julien-c
julien-c
MDQ6VXNlcjMyNjU3Nw==
https://api.github.com/users/julien-c/orgs
https://api.github.com/users/julien-c/received_events
https://api.github.com/users/julien-c/repos
https://api.github.com/users/julien-c/starred{/owner}{/repo}
https://api.github.com/users/julien-c/subscriptions
User
https://api.github.com/users/julien-c
public
On the Hugging Face Hub, users refer to imagenet2012 (from #4178 ) as imagenet-1k in their model tags.

To correctly link models to imagenet, we should rename this dataset `imagenet-1k`.

Later we can add `imagenet-21k` as a new dataset if we want.

Once this one is merged we can delete the `imagenet2012` dataset repository on the Hub.

EDIT: to complete the rationale on why we should name it `imagenet-1k`:
If users specifically added the tag `imagenet-1k` , then it could be for two reasons (not sure which one is predominant), either they
- wanted to make it explicit that it’s not 21k -> the distinction is important for the community
- or they have been following this convention from other models -> the convention implicitly exists already