added irc disentangle dataset
CONTRIBUTOR
@lhoestq sorry, this was the only way I was able to fix the pull request 
2020-12-16T13:30:23Z
https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/pull/1586#issuecomment-746287581
https://api.github.com/repos/huggingface/datasets/issues/1586
MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc0NjI4NzU4MQ==
https://api.github.com/repos/huggingface/datasets/issues/comments/746287581/reactions
2020-12-16T13:30:23Z
https://api.github.com/repos/huggingface/datasets/issues/comments/746287581
https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/32560035?v=4
https://api.github.com/users/dhruvjoshi1998/events{/privacy}
https://api.github.com/users/dhruvjoshi1998/followers
https://api.github.com/users/dhruvjoshi1998/following{/other_user}
https://api.github.com/users/dhruvjoshi1998/gists{/gist_id}
https://github.com/dhruvjoshi1998
dhruvjoshi1998
MDQ6VXNlcjMyNTYwMDM1
https://api.github.com/users/dhruvjoshi1998/orgs
https://api.github.com/users/dhruvjoshi1998/received_events
https://api.github.com/users/dhruvjoshi1998/repos
https://api.github.com/users/dhruvjoshi1998/starred{/owner}{/repo}
https://api.github.com/users/dhruvjoshi1998/subscriptions
User
https://api.github.com/users/dhruvjoshi1998
public
CONTRIBUTOR
@lhoestq Thank you for the feedback. I wondering whether I should be passing an 'id' field in the dictionary since the 'connections' reference the 'id' of the linked messages. This 'id' would just be the same as the id_ that is in the yielded tuple.
2020-12-16T20:20:35Z
https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/pull/1586#issuecomment-746952324
https://api.github.com/repos/huggingface/datasets/issues/1586
MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc0Njk1MjMyNA==
https://api.github.com/repos/huggingface/datasets/issues/comments/746952324/reactions
2020-12-16T20:20:35Z
https://api.github.com/repos/huggingface/datasets/issues/comments/746952324
https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/32560035?v=4
https://api.github.com/users/dhruvjoshi1998/events{/privacy}
https://api.github.com/users/dhruvjoshi1998/followers
https://api.github.com/users/dhruvjoshi1998/following{/other_user}
https://api.github.com/users/dhruvjoshi1998/gists{/gist_id}
https://github.com/dhruvjoshi1998
dhruvjoshi1998
MDQ6VXNlcjMyNTYwMDM1
https://api.github.com/users/dhruvjoshi1998/orgs
https://api.github.com/users/dhruvjoshi1998/received_events
https://api.github.com/users/dhruvjoshi1998/repos
https://api.github.com/users/dhruvjoshi1998/starred{/owner}{/repo}
https://api.github.com/users/dhruvjoshi1998/subscriptions
User
https://api.github.com/users/dhruvjoshi1998
public
MEMBER
Yes indeed it would be cool to have the ids in the dictionary. This way the dataset can be shuffled and all without losing information about the connections. Can you add it if you don't mind ?
2020-12-17T18:04:56Z
https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/pull/1586#issuecomment-747604852
https://api.github.com/repos/huggingface/datasets/issues/1586
MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc0NzYwNDg1Mg==
https://api.github.com/repos/huggingface/datasets/issues/comments/747604852/reactions
2020-12-17T18:04:56Z
https://api.github.com/repos/huggingface/datasets/issues/comments/747604852
https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/42851186?v=4
https://api.github.com/users/lhoestq/events{/privacy}
https://api.github.com/users/lhoestq/followers
https://api.github.com/users/lhoestq/following{/other_user}
https://api.github.com/users/lhoestq/gists{/gist_id}
https://github.com/lhoestq
lhoestq
MDQ6VXNlcjQyODUxMTg2
https://api.github.com/users/lhoestq/orgs
https://api.github.com/users/lhoestq/received_events
https://api.github.com/users/lhoestq/repos
https://api.github.com/users/lhoestq/starred{/owner}{/repo}
https://api.github.com/users/lhoestq/subscriptions
User
https://api.github.com/users/lhoestq
public
MEMBER
Thanks :) could you also add the ids in the dictionary since they're useful for the connection links ?
2020-12-23T17:12:02Z
https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/pull/1586#issuecomment-750393120
https://api.github.com/repos/huggingface/datasets/issues/1586
MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1MDM5MzEyMA==
https://api.github.com/repos/huggingface/datasets/issues/comments/750393120/reactions
2020-12-23T17:12:02Z
https://api.github.com/repos/huggingface/datasets/issues/comments/750393120
https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/42851186?v=4
https://api.github.com/users/lhoestq/events{/privacy}
https://api.github.com/users/lhoestq/followers
https://api.github.com/users/lhoestq/following{/other_user}
https://api.github.com/users/lhoestq/gists{/gist_id}
https://github.com/lhoestq
lhoestq
MDQ6VXNlcjQyODUxMTg2
https://api.github.com/users/lhoestq/orgs
https://api.github.com/users/lhoestq/received_events
https://api.github.com/users/lhoestq/repos
https://api.github.com/users/lhoestq/starred{/owner}{/repo}
https://api.github.com/users/lhoestq/subscriptions
User
https://api.github.com/users/lhoestq
public
MEMBER
Thanks !
Also it looks like the dummy_data.zip were regenerated and are now back to being too big (300KB each).
Can you reduce their sizes ? You can actually just revert to the ones you had before the last commit
2020-12-28T09:36:42Z
https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/pull/1586#issuecomment-751650578
https://api.github.com/repos/huggingface/datasets/issues/1586
MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1MTY1MDU3OA==
https://api.github.com/repos/huggingface/datasets/issues/comments/751650578/reactions
2020-12-28T09:36:42Z
https://api.github.com/repos/huggingface/datasets/issues/comments/751650578
https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/42851186?v=4
https://api.github.com/users/lhoestq/events{/privacy}
https://api.github.com/users/lhoestq/followers
https://api.github.com/users/lhoestq/following{/other_user}
https://api.github.com/users/lhoestq/gists{/gist_id}
https://github.com/lhoestq
lhoestq
MDQ6VXNlcjQyODUxMTg2
https://api.github.com/users/lhoestq/orgs
https://api.github.com/users/lhoestq/received_events
https://api.github.com/users/lhoestq/repos
https://api.github.com/users/lhoestq/starred{/owner}{/repo}
https://api.github.com/users/lhoestq/subscriptions
User
https://api.github.com/users/lhoestq
public
added irc disentanglement dataset