Add missing "brief" entries to reuters
CONTRIBUTOR
@lhoestq I ran `make style` but CI code quality still failing and I don't have access to logs
2021-01-18T00:20:43Z
https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/pull/1744#issuecomment-761907361
https://api.github.com/repos/huggingface/datasets/issues/1744
MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc2MTkwNzM2MQ==
https://api.github.com/repos/huggingface/datasets/issues/comments/761907361/reactions
2021-01-18T00:20:43Z
https://api.github.com/repos/huggingface/datasets/issues/comments/761907361
https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/2238344?v=4
https://api.github.com/users/jbragg/events{/privacy}
https://api.github.com/users/jbragg/followers
https://api.github.com/users/jbragg/following{/other_user}
https://api.github.com/users/jbragg/gists{/gist_id}
https://github.com/jbragg
jbragg
MDQ6VXNlcjIyMzgzNDQ=
https://api.github.com/users/jbragg/orgs
https://api.github.com/users/jbragg/received_events
https://api.github.com/users/jbragg/repos
https://api.github.com/users/jbragg/starred{/owner}{/repo}
https://api.github.com/users/jbragg/subscriptions
User
https://api.github.com/users/jbragg
public
CONTRIBUTOR
It's also likely that due to the previous placement of the field initialization, much of the data about topics etc was simply wrong and carried over from previous entries. Model scores seem to improve significantly with this PR.
2021-01-18T08:09:42Z
https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/pull/1744#issuecomment-762066027
https://api.github.com/repos/huggingface/datasets/issues/1744
MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc2MjA2NjAyNw==
https://api.github.com/repos/huggingface/datasets/issues/comments/762066027/reactions
2021-01-18T08:09:42Z
https://api.github.com/repos/huggingface/datasets/issues/comments/762066027
https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/2238344?v=4
https://api.github.com/users/jbragg/events{/privacy}
https://api.github.com/users/jbragg/followers
https://api.github.com/users/jbragg/following{/other_user}
https://api.github.com/users/jbragg/gists{/gist_id}
https://github.com/jbragg
jbragg
MDQ6VXNlcjIyMzgzNDQ=
https://api.github.com/users/jbragg/orgs
https://api.github.com/users/jbragg/received_events
https://api.github.com/users/jbragg/repos
https://api.github.com/users/jbragg/starred{/owner}{/repo}
https://api.github.com/users/jbragg/subscriptions
User
https://api.github.com/users/jbragg
public
This brings the number of examples for ModApte to match the stated `Training set (9,603 docs)...Test Set (3,299 docs)`