Add full tagset to conll2003 README
MEMBER
I also added the missing `pretty_name` tag in the dataset card to fix the CI
2021-11-08T16:20:32Z
https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/pull/3230#issuecomment-963321332
https://api.github.com/repos/huggingface/datasets/issues/3230
IC_kwDODunzps45ax30
https://api.github.com/repos/huggingface/datasets/issues/comments/963321332/reactions
2021-11-08T16:20:32Z
https://api.github.com/repos/huggingface/datasets/issues/comments/963321332
https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/42851186?v=4
https://api.github.com/users/lhoestq/events{/privacy}
https://api.github.com/users/lhoestq/followers
https://api.github.com/users/lhoestq/following{/other_user}
https://api.github.com/users/lhoestq/gists{/gist_id}
https://github.com/lhoestq
lhoestq
MDQ6VXNlcjQyODUxMTg2
https://api.github.com/users/lhoestq/orgs
https://api.github.com/users/lhoestq/received_events
https://api.github.com/users/lhoestq/repos
https://api.github.com/users/lhoestq/starred{/owner}{/repo}
https://api.github.com/users/lhoestq/subscriptions
User
https://api.github.com/users/lhoestq
public
Even though it is possible to manually get the tagset list with

```python
dset.features[field_name].feature.names
```

I think it is useful to have an overview of the used tagset on the dataset card. This is particularly useful in light of the **dataset viewer**: the tags are encoded, so it is not immediately obvious what they are for a given sample. Adding a label-int mapping should make it easier for visitors to get a grasp of what they mean.

From user-experience perspective, I would urge the full tagsets to always be available in the README's but I understand that that would take a lot of work, probably. Perhaps it can be automated?

closes #3189 