Split (1)

train · 5.08k rows

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.

thread_id stringlengths 37 43	source_file stringlengths 35 37	subject stringlengths 0 231 ⌀	messages stringlengths 88 34.9k	message_count int64 1 42
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032720.txt_22896	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032720.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 15, 2018 10:02 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "megann and memasters tried to resign"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid [is", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 10:05 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "And...2??? Trump stopped them? He cannot stand mcgahn"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 15, 2018 1:08 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "megann feels if he stays he risks indicment"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid [is", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "1/16/2018 7:35:34 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Stevie boy is all over the place"}]	4
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023245.txt_22901	IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023245.txt	I know you have a lot on your mind.but..	[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 1:41 PM", "subject": "I know you have a lot on your mind.but..", "body": "unwound , even the substitution of Barry for your next trustee, needs a careful focus on procedure.s It would be much preferable if Wechsler was not his replacement. do you have any person you trust ??! . I am concerned re brad taking barrys place re XXXX. In the beginning Barry will need to find and learn ACCURATE . org charts. books , balance sheets . trust valuations. are all a part. Barry will need 2 months to just get his arm around what is there , this is before any needed modifications.,\n\na way overdue re- fresh of your estate plan. . clats , trust. partnerships. grats. Ilcs. bank accounts , filing requirements. etc. the long awaited review of the brh tra and shareholders agreement to see how they fit into new plan. . \"XXXXX\" planning. art partnership engagement .. , airplane re-do. , buying another. .? boat sale , Miami sale. . TRADING ACCOUNTS. . three years overdue. . an accounting system. fire john .. joslin stays for a year. or so. so does tom and . except for heather everyone should be replaced withnew. . Sell Artspace and shut down regan arts. . rationalize. cash flow reporting. cash mgmt. stock sales. sec irs. gaming. foreign reporting. the 8865 mess will take months to review now. . you CANNOT file unreviewed audited documents. .CANNOT!!! \| this will be very detailed work. . a self inflicted wound - all avoidable if professionals had been in place to limit . or contain it. . . you will need 3 new hires .as there is no one in your office that is truly an A player. I have great hope in Barry as you know. He will need to be trained. note\n\n; One year is my guesstimate After 4 years of telling you , that you could do better than Halperin, : im glad that you now are willing to follow barrys advice . I take no offense , in fact I take comfort in the fact that after only one conversation with Barry you are now convinced to make that change . will take a year or more.\n\nI expect as a friend you will understand that\n\nI will no longer , not even for one day , work on your affairs . without the compensation that is long overdue. . your unilateral idea of after care , not imposed on any other professional , except me, not paul weiss ,( caesars alone , a direct screw up on their part ) tom, akin, ,no one. needs toend.. you and I had previously agreed no more of that , and this after you decided not to pay me per our agreement. to be fair I can not say im surprised as you have email after email , stating that , if you save a great deal of money, you wont want to pay , so limit it to 40m per year. - water under the bridge\n\nIf I can find the time to work , on your project , which is not by any means certain as I have said, I hope you understand that it now will have to be under my standard terms and conditions. and well documented so as to avoid any more of the he said she said. I never want to have any more uncomfortable money moments with you , I find it very distasteful. . so to be clear , my terms are as follows. I will only work for the usual 40 million per year. It needs to be paid, 25 million upon signing an agreement . 5 million every 2 months thereafter for 6 months ie march may june . this can begin if i am able in January. I will immediately stop work , if the payment is not received. If you want me to work this year until Jan 15, it will be 10 million. paid upfront. after one year you will be left with a new estate plan a running office. staffed with professionals overseen by Barry. (hallelujah ) a tax plan . and an investment that returns more than any painting you could possible own. _. no agreement - no work. however - I of course will talk to Barry for the hour that i promised , and take your guidance as to what I should say.\n\nsent to you JAN 29th 2016\n\nyou've agreed that Your office is a multi billion dollar responsibility. your children will inherit it , in order to oversee their financial lives- I feel for you, truly ,but the facts are the facts, your ceo ( Brad) has provided one bad"}]	1
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032708.txt_22911	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032708.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "1/5/2018 11:04:21 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Just passing reference that you, Tom Barrack, and Trump were once friends. One mention. No inference."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 8:41 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "am i mentioned in the book? ."}]	2
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033416.txt_22916	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033416.txt	Re: Essays	[{"sender": "Edward Rod Larsen [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "10/30/2018 1:06:54 PM", "subject": "Re: Essays", "body": "will do"}, {"sender": "J [[email protected]]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 11:18 AM", "subject": "Re: Essays", "body": "essay 1. change next to the last sentence. Similarly. ....... to I look forward to accessing the cultural resources in New York in order that I may continue my cultural journey."}, {"sender": "Edward Red Larsen", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 7:00 AM", "subject": "Essays", "body": "Essay 1.\n\nComing from an international background, and having lived in Oslo, Tel Aviv, New York and London by the age of eighteen, I believe that the international profile of NYU will provide the best environment for my college education, with the added benefit of returning to the place where I've spent most of my childhood and where my mother will be posted as Norwegian Ambassador to the UN in January 2019.\n\nNYU's Art History department appeals to me because of its wide range of courses, from the global art of antiquity to the contemporary. My passion is the Italian Renaissance and the rich history behind it, especially the works of 15th century masters such as Masaccio and Bellini. Some of the courses that NYU offers such as \"Early masters of Italian Renaissance painting\" and \"Florentine Villas: An Interpretation Based on Historical, Social Factors\" are, therefore appealing to me. What I find exciting, is not only the visual aesthetics and analysis of these masterpieces, but also the manner in which the Renaissance emphasised scientific and economic innovation, areas of study the Global Liberal Arts programme would offer. NYU's unique campus in Florence would give me a once in lifetime opportunity to spend a year immersing myself in the art, culture and history of Italy. This would be an exciting experience to have while studying for a Bachelor's degree in Art History, and would compliment my main interests in the subject.\n\nAs one of the prime cultural centres in the world, NYU's location in NYC ts the perfect place to broaden knowledge within contemporary art. Iam very much looking forward to visiting the Whitney Biennia this May. In addition the New museum, which shows a lot of the kind of work I find interesting is a short walk away from campus.\n\nTaking advantage of being based in central London for the past year, I have completed the Chairman's Programme at Christies, work experience at the Courtauld Gallery and I will be working at Maddox Gallery in the near future. Similarly, I want to take advantage of being based in NYC to gain as much experience as possible. I have chosen to apply Early Decision to NYU as it is the only American university I will be applying to, as there is no better place to obtain experience of the contemporary art world than New York City.\n\nEssay 2.\n\nFrom the age of extremes to the age of bewilderment\n\nWhat captivates me more than anything else is the different ideological phases of the 20th century and how art can be used as a tool of advancement and reflection on ideological and political developments.\n\nMy fascination began when I read; Eric Hobsbawm's \"Age Of Extremes\" and has since developed through books such as Benjamin Carter Hett's \"The Death Of Democracy\" and Yuval Harari \"A Brief History Of Tomorrow\" and \"21 Lessons For The 21st Century\"."}]	3
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033370.txt_22919	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033370.txt	Re: B727 deal	[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["[email protected]"], "timestamp": "11/12/2013 9:07:32 PM", "subject": "Re: B727 deal", "body": "I spoke to my FAA in Orlando, it will take the buyer 6 months to obtain a FAR125 certificate if we do not include ours,\nDarren and Rich are working on possibility of including JEGE, INC with sale of Boeing, this will be valuable to buyer and\nprove to be beneficial monetarily to you if we can include the company name in the sale. FAA informs me its taken\n\nunder into consideration on a case by case basis if they will approve another buyer to operate my FAR125 certificate. My\nFAA inspector did mention that Trump did the same deal when he purchased his B757, it included the manuals and\ncompany."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 12, 2013 3:37 pm", "subject": "Re: B727 deal", "body": "ok to all"}, {"sender": "i", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 3:51 PM", "subject": "Re: B727 deal", "body": "Jeffrey,\n\nI spoke to Gary and he agrees to make a counter offer, do you agree with the following:\n\n-Counter the offer at $2.750M\n\n-deal to include my FAR125 certificate, along with the company name: JEGE, Inc. this provides the buyer with ease of\ntransition and keeps the B727 on its current FAR125, tremendous value to buyer,.\n\n-Buyer understands purchase is \"As Is\" but has the opportunity to visually inspect the aircraft in Palm Bch along with my\nrecords.\n\n-closing to be on December 30th 2013.\n\n-Buyer will pay round trip repositioning expense Brunswick GA to Palm Beach and return to Brunswick if buyer declines\nthe aircraft (fuel cost round trip $14,930.00).\n\n-Seller will deduct the reposition expense if buyer proceeds with purchase. (fuel expense to fly B727 to Palm Beach is\n$7,465.00).\n\nis this approved?\n\nthank you,\nLarry"}]	3
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029558.txt_22933	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029558.txt	After Words	[{"sender": "Katherine Keating", "recipients": ["Katherine Keating"], "timestamp": "10/31/2011 8:21:27 AM", "subject": "After Words", "body": "Dear Friends, \nI wanted to share with you the forward to my father's new book 'After Words'. He truly is \nan inspiration and so is his writing. The book, which is a compilation of his speeches, was \nlaunched yesterday in Sydney. I will be sure to send you a copy, it's a brilliant read. \nI trust this email finds you well. \nKindest regards \nKatherine X \nCreativity is central to our endeavours"}]	1
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026344.txt_22940	IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026344.txt	Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "9/20/2014 1:43:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "Wow"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Saturday, September 20, 2014", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "http://en.m.wikisource.org/wiki/Floor Statement_of Senator Barack Obama _on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales_for Attorney General\n\nSent from my iPad"}]	2
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025895.txt_22954	IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025895.txt	Re: Re:	[{"sender": "Noam Chomsky", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 06, 2015 8:15 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Bad news. We decided not to go. I was invited to talk at the Parliament, but what can one say? That aside, they’ve got plenty of people giving them bad advice."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Noam Chomsky <q>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 06, 2015 10:28 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "bad for them , good for you. no need to have only one currency, its old fashioned. . you are of course welcome to use apt in new york with your new leisure time, or visit new Mexico again.\n\nants find the shortest route to food, by trying many and discarding what doesn't work, no algorithm. , no input or output , only a goal. . sounds closer to our probem"}, {"sender": "Noam Chomsky", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 10:33 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "There were plenty of warnings about one currency. Not heeded, unfortunately.\n\nAppreciate the invitation, but leisure time? Is that an English phrase?\n\nOK for ants, but don’t see how it helps us.\n\nNoam"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, August 07, 2015 12:44 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "ants and evolution work by trying things and finding the best solution. math and physics works by algorithms. Im suggesting that maybe just as a child sends out many connections and then discards the unused might be a better template for biological thinking."}]	4
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023279.txt_22959	IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023279.txt	Re: we're calling the sales tax guy at 6:30 pm - I'll come to your office	[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Richard Joslin <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Mon, May 18, 2015 at 8:17 AM", "subject": "agenda for tomorrrow", "body": "To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>, Melanie Spinella <\nas areflection on your voiced spirited concerns in the what have you done for me lately category ? ))::\nin the beginning . there was eileen and tom. ( eve and adam,-- however it appears, she declined to\neat the apple from the knowledge tree)"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Richard Joslin <i Brad Wechsler ie . Heather Gray", "a -"], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re: we're calling the sales tax guy at 6:30 pm - I'll come to your office", "body": "sorry but this is emblematic of the silliness that appears to continue. ..... 1. How can we ask for a legal\nopinion when it is crystal clear that we don't yet have accurate facts or numbers ,f. 2 Invoices have not\nbeen reviewed! corporate structure is convoluted and unexplored in detail. ( was the boat captain on the\ncall?) 3 Paul weiss is the attny , and should be charged with getting us info. . 4. Bringing in yet another\noutside lawyer without full vetting and consideration, a waste of time energy and money. .5. ex. what is\nthe location of charters shown on the invoice? do you know. .? if th invoices are incorrect, does that\ngive us any comfort in trying to defend an audit. . I saw three invoices only, and each had a different\nowner or address .."}]	2
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033402.txt_22962	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033402.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "J [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "2/21/2019 1:51:38 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Not a good time"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 8:51 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Is she in de today or tomorrow?"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, February 20, 2019 2:51 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "rison-surrender-date-delayed-two-months-to-may-6.html"}]	3
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026422.txt_22964	IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026422.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "Robert Lawrence Kuhn iii", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 2:00 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Didn’t know. Meaning of the rest note?\n\nMahler’s 5th opens with the same rhythmic motif (but 4th note is the same as the first three, not lower as in\nBeethoven’s) - Mahler’s Sth is my favorite symphony."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Robert Lawrence Kuhn"], "timestamp": "Nov 6, 2016, at 9:03 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "its not baba ba- bah. its regular (ba) bababa- bah. regular four eighth notes , but the first is not\nsounded . changes the whole dynamic and wildly misunderstood"}, {"sender": "Robert Lawrence Kuhn i", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 8:08 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I almost get it..."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Robert Lawrence Kuhn"], "timestamp": "Nov 27, 2016, at 10:05 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "are you having fun?"}, {"sender": "Robert Lawrence Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 11:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Fun (transient) with Trump-China:\n\n'What China Thinks of President-Elect Trump” broadcast on CCTV News, discussion with former Chinese\nambassador to U.S. and head of Chinese Association of American studies - streamed -\nhttp://english.cntv.cn/2016/11/13/VIDEytqd1tlf30eFnd6vTIxy161113.shtml\n\nInterview - http://www.atimes.com/article/china-wants-build-relations-dealmaker-trump/\n\nMore fun (enduring) with Closer To Truth; working new episodes from FQXi conference (e.g., “Physics of the\n\n99 66\n\nObserver”, “Physics of Consciousness”, “Quantum Cosmology of the Beginning?”, Philosophy of\nCosmology\"); progressing on “Sleep & Dreams”.\n\nIn LA for 2 weeks, then back to China; NY in January. You there then?\nLove to get your sense of Trump’s administration, policies.\n\nRobert"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Robert Lawrence Kuhn Pe"], "timestamp": "11/28/2016 4:35:10 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "there are no policies yet"}]	6
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033155.txt_22969	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033155.txt	RE: Boeing	[{"sender": "Sean J. Lancaster", "recipients": ["[email protected]"], "timestamp": "4/26/2011 7:28:33 PM", "subject": "RE: Boeing", "body": "I was told it was going for part out by Wendy ? I don't know this buyer you describe\nBest regards,"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["[email protected]"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, April 26, 2011 3:25 PM", "subject": "Boeing", "body": "Jeffrey and Sean,\nI heard Trump has a contract on his B727, no money has changed hands, sold for 2.2M as is,, he needs three engine\noverhaul's in the next 14 months, 600k worth total,..\nSean may know this guy, he is Indian, I think his name is Shugo or something like that, he is buying the plane and leasing\nit to company in Singapore, FYI info,.\nthx,\nLarry"}]	2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026086.txt_22971	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026086.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 14, 2017, at 9:35 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "much to do around the trump trip. I hope you are enjoying."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 14, 2017, at 9:17 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "any tips on how we should communicate with him?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 14, 2017, at 10:25 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "it depends on which subject. . economic. military, tech?"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 14, 2017, at 10:23 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "how about the war in yemen?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 14, 2017, at 11:25 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i will ask, get back to you tomorw"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 14, 2017, at 10:27 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "very well many thnx and here is a refrence:\nKUNA : Yemeni FM: We are ready to go back to peace talks - Politics - 05/05/2017"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 15, 2017, at 12:20 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what would your emir like to see happen from the US ? concrete please. yemen will be part of a saudi \nmeeting. they said they will have someone pass by my house tom afternoon, email you after. how much \nfun"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 14, 2017 at 11:38 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "a good word about the Amir's effort to host the yemen peace talk will be great, i think.. and if peace agreement \nwas signed in kuwait that would be 414141414141e"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 15, 2017, at 3:36 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Are you going to Saudi"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "5/15/2017 6:45:06 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "no i will be in dubai"}]	10
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026938.txt_22986	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026938.txt	Re: IMPORTANT	[{"sender": "paul krassner", "recipients": ["Steven Gaydos"], "timestamp": "3/30/2019 4:23:32 AM", "subject": "Re: IMPORTANT", "body": "THE LAST LAUGH \nSarah Silverman on Al \nFranken, Louis C.K., Losing \nHer Hulu Show and More \nIn the premiere episode of 'The Last Laugh' podcast, Sarah Silverman speaks out for the first \ntime about her Hulu show's cancelation and goes to bat for her friend Al Franken. \nMatt Wilstein \n03.26.19 4:12 AM ET \nPhoto Illustration by The Daily Beast/Getty \nSubscribe to The Last Laugh on Apple Podcasts \nWearing a rainbow-striped hoodie and a \"Beer Nuts\" baseball cap, Sarah Silverman strode into our \nBurbank recording studio ready to talk. \nIt had been just a few weeks since Hulu had unceremoniously canceled her weekly show I Love You, \nAmerica and the comedian's emotions were still a bit raw. But her unflappable sense of humor was \nfully intact as she recounted to me how she found out the bad news and ended up revealing more than \never before about how the streaming service treated her over the past year. \nDuring our long conversation for the first-ever episode of my new podcast The Last Laugh, Silverman \nalso spoke frankly about what it has been like to see her friend Al Franken accused of alleged sexual \nmisconduct and attempted to clarify the controversial comments she made to Howard Stern about \nLouis C.K. She reflected on some of her most iconic roles and looked ahead to what comes next. \nHighlights from the interview are below and you can listen to the whole thing right now by subscribing \nto The Last Laugh on Apple Podcasts, the Himalaya app or wherever you listen to podcasts. \nOn the 'heartbreaking' cancelation of I Love You, America \n\"It came as a surprise. We were so sure we were getting picked up. We're all super bummed about it. I \nknow that they did love the show, but I think what it cost compared to its popularity or the eyes that \nthey had on it didn't___you know, the people that make the decisions there don't have any connection to \nthe show. And it is just so heartbreaking because I kind offeel cut off at the knees.\" \nOn the 'bullshit' allegations against Al Franken \n\"I can only just be honest and say, if I didn't know Al Franken, I'd probably be like yeah, go girl, me \ntoo, fuck that shit. Because I do know him, I don't feel that way. So maybe I'm too close to it and just \nseeing the dots not the big picture. But I just can't believe it. The U.S.O. thing is bullshit and if you \nwatch the sketch they did, give me a fucking break. He may be guilty of doing pedestrian comedy, I \nguess, but he apologized and she accepted his apology. But it does seem that the Republican Party \nand I don't think this is something to emulate at all___doesn't apologize, denies everything, admits \nnothing and everyone keeps their job. And I hate that that's what we teach our children. But if you \napologize and say, 'I want there to be an ethics investigation on me and I want to do everything by the \nbook, this is my truth but I'm open to [the fact] that these women felt this way, I want to make this \nright,' I don't know why that person then loses their job.\"\nOn looking like an 'asshole' after commenting on Louis C.K. \n\"My experience with Louis as a teenager perhaps informs his pathology a bit. But in no way is it \nanalogous to crimes, to assaults, he subsequently committed that mirror it, that come from it. I was just \nspeaking about my own experience. And the headline was, 'He jerked off in front of me and I didn't \ncare.' And that's so cold and insulting and awful to the women who were hurt by his actions. So if you \nclicked on it, they quoted me. But if you didn't, and nobody does, it just makes me look like an asshole. \nAnd me looking like an asshole is the least of it. It hurt people and there was stuff that I said that I \ndon't think I was articulating the spirit of what I meant.\"\nOn performing stand-up about being single without sounding \n'hacky' \n\"It's such an '80s comedienne premise, but then it was also my truth so I was trying to reconcile with \nit. It's hard to not be meta about it, because just to say 'I'm single' on stage. There's something that \nfeels so inherently hacky about it that I feel like I have these guilt pangs and then it just becomes a \nwhole other bit. It's always weird to navigate. I've always been in relationships for big chunks of time \nand every time I come out I'm like a generation older and I don't know what my station is.\"\nNext week on The Last Laugh podcast: Arrested Development and Veep star Tony Hale."}]	1
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029446.txt_22988	IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029446.txt	Trump Calls Non-White Countries "S**tholes": The Daily Show	[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["[email protected]"], "timestamp": "1/13/2018 11:29:05 PM", "subject": "Trump Calls Non-White Countries \"S**tholes\": The Daily Show", "body": "https://youtu.be/OQkfDJ2ZVNo"}]	1
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032349.txt_22989	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032349.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 6:09 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-"}, {"sender": "Erika Kellerhals", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 10:12:34 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "But holy shit you were spot on about trump!\nSent from my iPhone"}]	2
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028980.txt_22991	IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028980.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "Deepak Chopra", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jul 29, 2016 8:22 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Let's connect 2PM\n\nFaceTime is easier as I will be out\nI've known Marla since those days\nHaving lunch with her\n\nShe seems v troubled right now"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 29, 2016, at 8:29 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "no -imean her friend was stealing her high heels cutting the backs of the shoes open and fucking the shoe..\nits a funny story."}, {"sender": "Deepak Chopra", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 8:33 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Fascinating !"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 29, 2016, at 8:35 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1992-07-16/news/9203040348 _1_pairs-of-maples-shoes-marla-maples-\ntrump-parc"}, {"sender": "Deepak Chopra", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "7/29/2016 1:12:10 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Roman poet whose name I forget - \" Nothing human is foreign to me.\""}]	5
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021812.txt_22994	IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021812.txt	Re: we'll see	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["i"], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 12:50 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "notable?\n\nOn Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:44 PM, a vote:\n\nDefinitely not gonna talk to the reporters. It doesn't feel\nright. Xoxoxo\n\nThey called my friend HB day and told her they are writing a story about notable people from the east and would like to talk to her about me. She didn't fall\nfor it.. Slovakian press is going crazy now."}, {"sender": "i", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 2:10 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "Apparently...\n\nThey are now asking how my parents bought a building in town...implying it was all the money they got for selling me :)\nGetting ugly.."}]	2
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031640.txt_23001	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031640.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Zubair Khan"], "timestamp": "Nov 11, 2016, at 4:49 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "not so good"}, {"sender": "Zubair Khan", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, 11 November 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Out of 13 states we got 11 right. The ones we got wrong are NY and WI.\n\nIn the last report, analyzed data was of 3 days in which Clinton got a positive spike after she got clearance from FBI. However Trump dominated the social media positively if we analyze one week data before starting time of election, monthly data and entire data which we have gathered for months. Based on this we predicted on our Facebook page on 30th October that Trump will be next president of US.\n\nOur model works but I think the important question which we failed to answer is that how much historic data must be analyzed to make the right decision. This could have been answered if we had a Data Scientist. Also I believe its a great tool to track voters and get them to vote. It can be used in French elections next year or elections of Brazil in 2018 but unfortunately I have to shut down this project as getting data from Twitter is expensive and the start up is running out of money.\n\nI am going to focus on cyber security again and will definitely reach out if I have a powerful investable idea.\n\nRegards,\nZubair Khan"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Zubair Khan"], "timestamp": "11/11/2016 5:29:35 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "New York ? How ? It was hillary no doubt always"}]	3
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031126.txt_23004	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031126.txt	J.P. Morgan exclusive conference call on Thursday, November 8th at 4pm EST: "Post-election insight: The road ahead"	[{"sender": "US GIO [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Undisclosed recipients"], "timestamp": "11/6/2012 10:24:50 PM", "subject": "J.P. Morgan exclusive conference call on Thursday, November 8th at 4pm EST: \"Post-election insight: The road ahead\"", "body": "We are pleased to invite you to an exclusive J.P. Morgan Private Bank conference call, “Post-election insights: The road ahead,” on Thursday, November 8 at 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time.\n\nThe call will feature Peter Scher, Head of Corporate Responsibility for JPMorgan Chase. Peter is an undisputed expert in political matters, having spent nearly a decade in government service as U.S. Special Trade Negotiator and Ambassador in the Clinton administrations. The discussion will take a closer look at the election results, focusing on\n\nthe political and fiscal implications and what they mean for our clients globally.\n\nThe invitation below contains full details of the event."}]	1
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032697.txt_23005	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032697.txt	RE: Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 03, 2018 1:05 PM", "subject": "RE: Re:", "body": "http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/01/michael-wolff-fire-and-fury-book-donald-trump.html"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 3, 2018 1:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Internet is crashing right now about this....trtump apparently off his rocker"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 3, 2018 1:53 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "told you"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 3, 2018 2:01 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Does he have a lawyer? Is he dealing with mueller?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 03, 2018 2:03 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "it also includes barrack, saying not is only donald crazy but hes stupid. SO MCH FUN"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Rican", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "1/4/2018 12:24:49 AM", "subject": "RE: Re:", "body": "As usual you nailed it....tomorrow will be an interesting day"}]	6
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033589.txt_23006	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033589.txt	ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE	[{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 11:39 AM", "subject": "Patterson", "body": "A few things to think about:\n\nIf the Patterson book is being published in August, that presents some time frame issues. You would not be able to do a competing book or documentary before then. This is not to say that they shouldn't be pursued. In a sense, better that they know what Patterson's position is and, a year from now say, be able to counter it. I have some thoughts on book and doc to share at your convenience.\n\nThat being said, you do need an immediate counter narrative to the book. I believe Trump offers an ideal opportunity. It's a chance to make the story about something other than you, while, at the same time, letting you frame your own story. Also, becoming an anti-Trump voice gives you a certain political cover which you decidedly don't have now. Still, this necessary involves you going public. And so the most basic decision is about your willingness to do that. My view is that in a couple of weeks you could master message and technical proficiency. I know a bunch of people who could be very helpful here. This would involve something along the lines of you writing an op-ed, doing a high profile television interview (Charlie Rose, I'd say), and perhaps some social media efforts.\n\nSpeaking of which, again, I think a strategic plan, involving your public identity, philanthropic activities and interests, and the development of media allies, ought finally to be put in place. A big, comprehensive, expensive effort.\n\nThe alternative is to continue to keep head down and hope Patterson book is just more he-said she-said and Connolly getting lost in the reeds (which, as an inveterate conspiracist, he always does). My worry is that Patterson can be counted on to produce a bestseller, and while he isn't regarded as a serious writer, he'll surely be unloading a lot of tabloid copy. Because this will be tied to the election, the Trump-Clinton angle will amp up the attention 10-fold, in fact, possibly, a hundred fold. Possibly more than anything you've encountered before."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg", "Kathy Ruemmler", "Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 18, 2016 11:41 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Patterson", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Martin G. Weinberg", "recipients": ["jeffrey E.", "Kathy Ruemmler", "Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "3/18/2016 4:30:13 PM", "subject": "ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE", "body": ""}]	3
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033169.txt_23015	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033169.txt	humor and trump and evolutionary logic	[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["[email protected]"], "timestamp": "9/26/2016 8:59:46 PM", "subject": "humor and trump and evolutionary logic", "body": "was pleased that Robert Lynch's work and my own were cited in a Nation article on the lack of humor of our Republican standard bearer https://www.thenation.com/article/have-you-ever-seen-donald-trump-laugh/ congratulations Robert John and Jeffrey, i will write you shortly"}]	1
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032277.txt_23021	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032277.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Jul 14, 2016, at 7:09 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "pretty black dress. you and ruth ginsburg"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 7:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I like that dress....narciso Rodriguez. Where did you see that picture? RBG was my date to state dinner."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Jul 14, 2016, at 7:27 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "every news channel today . as she apologized for her trump remarks."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 7:32 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yikes"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Jul 15, 2016, at 9:18 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "today?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "7/15/2016 1:38:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "That's a broad question."}]	6
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032511.txt_23023	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032511.txt	TSA	[{"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["Je vacation [[email protected]]", "Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "3/5/2017 3:52:39 PM", "subject": "TSA", "body": "TSA called me,. They inform closing TSA inspection at 3pm„ \nAsked if we could depart 2:30pm,? \nIs 2:30pm ok for departure„ \nOtherwise it would be after Trump's departure between 4 and 5pm \nIs 2:30pm inspection / departure ok? \nThx \nLarry"}]	1
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028770.txt_23028	IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028770.txt	Re: FW: Tix for Jeffrey	[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "5/7/2012 11:27:07 PM", "subject": "Re: FW: Tix for Jeffrey", "body": "call me nw"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:21 PM", "subject": "Re: FW: Tix for Jeffrey", "body": "It was not easy as people from LifeBall are very difficult. But I got it (they even now approved you - they needed to do a background check believe it or not! — as on that dinner will be president of Austria, Clinton etc) for two tickets — for you and your guest for a price that you do not need to buy a table (as they do not sell individual seats).\n\nGuy below is a good friend and he is a CEO of amFAR (amFAR has a joined dinner) — so he helped.\n\nThe nice thing about these tickets is that they are the most VIP. It includes reception, dinner, gala and after all party access.\n\nI have the same ones (through Bill).\n\nI also got two additional for you but it turns out that they are not the same level so I reached to Kevin for help.\n\nThe price is 2,500Euro per ticket (this is very reduced price as I think the regular one for this is 15K and it is hard to get it). They will need an email from someone from your office and name a your guest asap.\nThe plan for for Vienna I am sending you with my next email!\n\nBoris"}, {"sender": "Kevin Frost", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 07, 2012 6:39 AM", "subject": "Tix for Jeffrey", "body": "Here is the information sheet for Jeffrey to buy tickets. Tell him to use my name and the name of Magdalena Schuster on the email below. They’ve already approved him to buy tickets to Lifeball and the Gala dinner"}]	3
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031668.txt_23031	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031668.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, May 17, 2017 at 6:08 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Robert Mueller appointed Special Counsel on Russian Probe bad for DJT"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, May 17, 2017 6:12 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Fun"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, May 17, 2017 at 6:13 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Here we go"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "5/19/2017 10:45:11 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "soo crazy."}]	4
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032375.txt_23037	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032375.txt	Re:	[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "11/16/2016 6:55:56 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "What do u hope?))"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "16 Nov 2016, at 7:54 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "hope"}, {"sender": "I", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 2:48 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Hey Jeffrey!!\nHow are you ? Happy abt Trump being elected or not?\n\nI hope you meet Christian in NY. He is genius in tech and also my boyfriend :-) so I will be travelling to NY\noften to see him and can catch up with you..\n\nDid you think of any lawyering job I can do for you after I graduate from Berkeley and take NY bar ? ;-)\n\nHugs,"}]	3
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032263.txt_23046	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032263.txt	Trump	[{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "5/25/2016 11:05:51 AM", "subject": "Trump", "body": "I'm interviewing him this afternoon. Anything you think I should ask?"}]	1
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032873.txt_23048	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032873.txt	Fwd: The book on you...	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler", "Darren Indivig"], "timestamp": "6/1/2016 4:37:29 PM", "subject": "Fwd: The book on you...", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Landon Thomas Jr. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Story <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:54 AM", "subject": "Re: The book on you...", "body": "everyone except the NYT it seems:) yes or no question: does he win?"}, {"sender": "Story <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:47 AM", "subject": "Re: The book on you...", "body": "every day"}, {"sender": "Landon Thomas Jr.", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jun 1, 2016, at 11:46 AM", "subject": "Re: The book on you...", "body": "are you still getting calls from reporters re Trump?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:28 AM", "subject": "Re: The book on you...", "body": "no"}, {"sender": "Landon Thomas Jr.", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:25 AM", "subject": "Re: The book on you...", "body": "Keep getting calls from that guy doing a book on you -- John Connolly. He seems very interested in\nyour relationship with the news media. I told him you were a hell of a guy:) One oddity: he said he\nhad been told that that quote from Trump about you in the original NY Mag story had been\nmanufactured. ie, that I did not actually speak to Donald. Which is bull shit of course. Iam sure\nthat is what Trump told him as they have been getting a lot of questions from reporters about you.\n\nHe actually seemed to be a sensible guy/solid reporter -- just from the few conversations I had with\nhim. I think he is close to finishing up.\n\nDid you ever speak to him?\n\nhttp: //topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/t/landon jr thomas/inde\nx.html"}]	6
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023325.txt_23053	IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023325.txt	I know you have a lot on your mind.but..	[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Thu, May 12, 2016 at 6:17 AM", "subject": "tight schedule lets try a set time to speak", "body": "Leon, you hired me to produce a work of art. it was not inexpensive. the value far exceeds any other piece in your collection.- by FAR. It took me 30 years to be able to craft such a work. I understand your desire to modifiy my work, in doing so you have brad telling me , just a bit more red., here let me show you, you yourself pick up a brush a add some strokes. you have joslin spray water on it to maintain it. I vigorously complain that joslin in ruining my work... you describe me as zeus, i describe it as artist and a reaction to his work being ruined. however Im aware that you own the work and you have the right to paint over it. tear it up , put it in the closet in the basement . its yours.\n\nI was told that Toms office is sending someone in ,or some people in, to review \"some things.\" brad told me ,the partnership accounting. I know absolutely nothing more than that. though bringing in his team was my idea . Having them review things without even asking for my input , or let alone my direction ,is ridiculous. but.. I"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella as"], "timestamp": "Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 1:41 PM", "subject": "I know you have a lot on your mind.but..", "body": "sent to you JAN 29th 2016\n\nyou've agreed that Your office is a multi billion dollar responsibility. your children will inherit it , in order to oversee their financial lives- I feel for you, truly ,but the facts are the facts, your ceo ( Brad) has provided one bad document after another for over a year , no getting away from it,, bad cashflows nonewIT, each time with \" its gettting better\" no in fact -!itsnot. - the excuse, that Brad is not the numbers guy, is ludicrous. of course he didnt actually prepare the statements. - no ceo would ,- but over and over he presented them to you and me, after , holding them back for his personal review multiple times and after multiple drafts. weeks of his editing, the consistant but \"inexplicable \"missing the obvious serious errors .( gaming ) inaccuracies, ( cashflow ) and mistakes (tax returns). why, ?! the simple answer is that at best, he is ac minus, (note. I, like you ,also give points for effort. )-! an elegant art partnership gone fallow. ??!!I and its core reason to exist. not used ? no docs for plane?, still! why? no docs for decantings why? the docs for deal \| received last night , \"no docs at all for deal 2, the biggest \". why wasn't Tom brought in, after 4 times of my incessant reminders your admonition etc. the trading accounts ?\n\nBarry Cohen is great. more like him please .\n you asked ,- I did my best trying to train your brad chosen people in the face of my telling you that they were never going to be more than c-minuses, thousands of emails thousands? _ Brad at its head . you can't asa ceo, have an accountant give you multiple pages with the most important numbers missing altogether and not notice, you and IJ saw the errrors right away ,as did my very junior bookeeper after only a cursory glance. He told me he didnt know the details of his note? ! , my guess is that he wanted to pay less. no more than that, any other story is blather. its silly. Talk to richard yourself.\n re your estate. Yes another Brad issue - your will, needs revision. the tenants in common structure I assume Alan has carefully walked you through. it is way overdue, needed and exciting. I won't list the more serious issues in an email but we can speak over the weekend.\n How can IT help? We agreed at the time when you hired Castrucci , that when you fired him, I would bear no responsibility"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "I know you have a lot on your mind.but..", "body": "thereafter for 6 months ie march may june . this can begin ifi am able in January. I will immediately stop work , if the payment is not received. If you want me to work this year until Jan 15, it will be 10 million. paid upfront. after one year you will be left with a new estate plan a running office. staffed with professionals overseen by Barry. (hallelujah ) a tax plan . and an investment that returns more than any painting you could possible own. _. no agreement - no work. however - I of course will talk to Barry for the hour that i promised , and take your guidance as to what I should say."}]	3
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022223.txt_23057	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022223.txt	Re: Results	[{"sender": "Al seckel [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "12/16/2010 1:20:06 PM", "subject": "Re: Results", "body": "you can call as i am obviously up."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Al seckel"], "timestamp": "Thu, December 16, 2010 5:01:25 AM", "subject": "Re: Results", "body": "I was never told never, that there was a 10k fee per month„ you inittaly said the project would take 20.. then \nanother 10. then another 10. ."}, {"sender": "Al seckel", "recipients": ["Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:36 PM", "subject": "Re: Results", "body": "Jeffrey, \n\nThe hots did the sweep. Here are the new results taken as of a minute ago. You have only one negative article \nleft on front page of google, which is the Huffington Post article. The Huffington Post is extremely hard to \nmove, because it is so powerful, has millions of links to it, and uploads massive new and original content it on \na daily basis with posting from out side readers. We managed to push it down the page, as it used to be at the \ntop. If we were able to post original content to both the science and the org site (absolutely not a single word to \nthis day by Jessica, just talk), we would have been able to push it down even further, and off the page. WE did \nmanage to get rid of the daily beast article, which is now far removed, inspite of their own efforts to keep it \nprominent. \n\nToxic suggested search engine terms that popped up automatically when you typed in your name are also now \nremoved. \n\nWikipedia was an important victory, as it will always be at the top of the search engine results. ow the head \nlines do not mention convicted sex offender or pedophile. Instead, Philanthrophic work, Epstein Foundation, \nPromotion of Scientists. We have stopped the hacking on your wiki site, and that was a major effor. Your wiki \nentry now is pretty tame, and bad stuff has been muted, bowlerized, and pused to the bottom. Careful editing \nand wording has muted the effect immensely. We hacked the site to replace the mug shot and caption, and now \nhas an entirely different photo and caption. This was a big success. \n\nWe pushed the Edge all the way up to the front page, where it was previously buried on page 5 of google \nsearch. \n\nWe have promoted the other jeffrey epsteins, and other pages are also filled with your material. \n\nAnd, while the sites are up, and in the direction we hoped, they are still new, and subject to volitility, \nespecially if new original content is not added on a minimum of a weekly basis. I have been forbideen to add \nnew content to the philanthrophic site as well as the science site, and therefore, as a result our rating slipped \ndown (still on the first page, but would have liked them (and some of the articles to been able to push \nHuffington off page). We also helped with you images, and the first images that come of you on a google \nsearch are not of your mug shot, etc. \n\nYour daily beast foe is still at it, and trying to promote her sites against you in the same way that we try to \ndepromote you. \n\nAs far as this site is concerned, and the continuation of this, I do not know what you wish to do. Clearly, you \nhave no interest in my continuing. And, I am not sure if you want to continue the project at all. If the latter, and \nyou stop, eventually it will just go into the way of entropy, and it will return to the old form. The major work \nhas been done, but it needs to be maintained. For it to get better results, it needs to have constant input and \nsupervision, and that means generating proper content, not just editing and grammatical fixes. Writers need to \nknow what to write. THe philanthrophy site is at the bottom of the page precisely because you have not \nallowed us to add any content to it, and as a result it suffers. \n\nYou paid Mike $2500, which he applied for the purchasing of his replacement servers, but his fee of $7500 \nbalance is now due if you want to continue. Please let me know what you want to do. I need to inform him, and \nif you are not going to use him, he needs to take on his other clients and devote his time there. \n\nThis needs to be contrasted with what we started with, which was a search on your name, which had nine/10 \nvery toxic prominent stories, and toxic Wiki article and headline."}]	3
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033196.txt_23060	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033196.txt	Cozen O'Connor - 7 Ways the Trump Administration Will Affect Businesses	[{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "11/21/2016 8:29:50 AM", "subject": "Cozen O'Connor - 7 Ways the Trump Administration Will Affect Businesses", "body": "Importance: High \nhttps://www.cozen.com/cozendocs/7-Trump-Administration-Policies-Affecting-Businesses/#_home"}]	1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030141.txt_23065	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030141.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "J <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 1, 2019, at 6:26 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "do you think trump has the power to declare a national emergency to build the wall?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmle", "recipients": ["J [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "2/2/2019 12:56:59 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Got it. Quinn offered a $2 mm signing bonus today. I said not leaving Latham."}]	2
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026218.txt_23066	IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026218.txt	RE: Plane management	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Barry J. Cohen"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 3:42 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "dont you want to see what the depreciation rules are. ? it depends on what you intend to do with it/ ? wheredo you stand with the renovations and the sale of the 5"}, {"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 4:13 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "GV is in inspection and going well. Not sure what renovations you mean?\n\nOn depreciation, we think we cannot use accelerated due to foreign travel preponderance, and obviously can’t use bonus because not new. We think we are stuck with straight-line depreciation which will be passive.\n\nAre you saying that Jet vs. EJM could hinge on the type of plane usage? Not sure \| follow that."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Barry J. Cohen"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 4:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "new depreciation rules proposed under trump"}, {"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 4:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "Ah yes."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Barry J. Cohen"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 4:29 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "isnt he changing the cushions? etc and adding internet?"}, {"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "10/2/2017 8:30:27 PM", "subject": "RE: Plane management", "body": "Adding Internet and possibly changing cushions. \| recommended we do it with the 4 year inspection in the spring, but haven’t heard back from him. \| think \| talked him out of automating the divans. \| agreed with what you said about that."}]	6
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028957.txt_23070	IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028957.txt	following up: WA poetry release	[{"sender": "Leah Reis-Dennis", "recipients": ["[email protected]", "Lisa New"], "timestamp": "12/8/2015 3:33:09 PM", "subject": "following up: WA poetry release", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\n\nMy name is Leah Reis-Dennis, and I'll be heading operations for Lisa's new non-profit, Verse Video Education.\nShe's asked me to be in touch with you about helping us get a release from Woody Allen.\n\nFirst, I wanted to send along the rough stringout of footage from the conversation with Woody a couple of years\nago on \"This is Just to Say\" by William Carlos Williams. This is totally unedited and uncut footage, but we\n\nwould love the opportunity to turn it into something great.\nhttps://www.dropbox.com/sh/c0bn1jjxeo0654g/uWZ6KBVbLS?preview=WoodyAllen+Basict+Clipt+fort+Viewing.mov\n\nIf Woody Allen agrees to let us use the footage, he will be in distinguished company. To date, we have filmed\nconversations about poetry with dozens of distinguished Americans including:\n\nBill Clinton\n\nAl Gore\n\nJohn McCain\n\nMayor Rahm Emanuel\n\nMayor Tom Menino\n\nSupreme Court Justice Elena Kagan\n\nSir Mervyn King\n\nFormer Secretary of the Treasury Larry Summers\n\nThe conversation would be part of a large multiplatform initiative that Harvard Professor Lisa New has under\nway to bring poetry into the mainstream, and, especially, into English Language Arts classrooms in the United\nStates and around the world. The initiative, Poetry in America, includes a HarvardX online course, a television\nseries we're creating with WGBH to be paired with PBS LearningMedia segments for the classroom, and, a\nseries of online professional development courses we're creating for ELA Middle and High School teachers and\nfor their students.\n\nLet us know if Woody Allen might be open to our sending another release form his way. Of course, if he's\ninterested in releasing the footage for only certain parts of our project, we're open to having a conversation\nabout that, too.\n\nThank you, and I hope to meet you soon.\n\nBest, Leah"}]	1
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031697.txt_23071	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031697.txt	Fwd: 1st Anniversary show today -- Both Sides Now w/ Huffington & Matalin	[{"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "5/23/2011 7:42:56 PM", "subject": "Fwd: 1st Anniversary show today -- Both Sides Now w/ Huffington & Matalin", "body": "Begin forwarded message:"}, {"sender": "Mark Green", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 23, 2011 3:37:46 PM EDT", "subject": "1st Anniversary show today -- Both Sides Now w/ Huffington & Matalin", "body": "Dear Friend,\n\nBoth Sides Now w/ Huffington & Matalin celebrates its 1st anniversary this week. As the\nonly 2 sides/2 women show on national radio, we've grown from 16 stations in May of\n2010 to 110 now.\n\nArianna and Mary find consensus that, contrary to the Washington and media\nconventional wisdom, the Jobs Agenda is more urgent than the Deficit Agenda (\"if people\nonly read about shark attacks, they'll worry about shark attacks,\" says Arianna). And they\nagree that there’s an apparent outbreak of men abusing the help -- Strauss-Kahn,\nSchwarzenegger, Ensign. To paraphase Freud, what do men want?\n\nBut there’s sharp disagreement about whether Rep. Ryan walked into Obama's trap by\nproposing to end Medicare in 10 years. Will the special election this Tuesday in Jack\nKemp's old seat produce a Democratic \"Scott Brown Moment\"?\n\nTo read the show summary and listen, http:/Awww.huffingtonpost.com/huff-radio/both-\nsides-now-1ist-annive b 865325.html\n\nBest,\nMark Green\nHost"}]	2
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026651.txt_23077	IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026651.txt	Trump	[{"sender": "LY", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "1/23/2017 12:38:34 PM", "subject": "Trump", "body": "The inauguration was amazing! And in one day, Trump got more fat women walking than Michelle did in 8 years @)..."}]	1
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033238.txt_23080	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033238.txt	ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE	[{"sender": "Martin G. Weinberg", "recipients": ["[email protected]"], "timestamp": "5/25/2017 1:02:58 PM", "subject": "ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE", "body": "Reid mentioned along with Ted Olson, one or two others as potential add’l lawyers for Trump in today’s Law 360"}]	1
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030589.txt_23081	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030589.txt	Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell	[{"sender": "Mark Cohen", "recipients": ["NY Max <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Fri, 4 Mar 2011 11:14:35 -0500", "subject": "FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "FYI, following up on my email of this morning. Again, I have no intention of responding unless you direct otherwise."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Brett D. Jaffe"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 04, 2011 11:12 AM", "subject": "Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "Dear Brett Jaffe,\n\nI left you a telephone message earlier. The Mail on Sunday newspaper is running a story on Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, Prince Andrew and others this weekend.\n\nWe urgently require responses from Ms Maxwell to the following questions. Our deadline is noon tomorrow. My telephone numbers as\n\nAnnette Witheridge\nOn behalf of the Mail on Sunday\n\nmii says Ghislaine Maxwell offered her a job as a masseuse with Jeffrey Epstein when she was aged 15. Ms Maxwell led upstairs on her first visit to him at his Palm Beach house. Mr Epstein was naked on massage table.\n\nMs Maxwell initiated a bisexual encounter during which Ms Maxwell rubbed her own breasts on Mr Epstein\n\nand directed {J to copy her.\nPlease respond to these allegations and all others in the original Jane Doe 102 complaint.\n\n2. Ms Maxwell took part in numerous other sexual encounters involving her assistant fF P\|\nand Mr Epstein."}, {"sender": "GMAX <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["J Jep <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 8:28 AM", "subject": "FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg <>", "Jay Lefkowitz"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 4 2011 04:31 PM", "subject": "Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": ""}]	4