We are currently solving the following issue within our repository. Here is the issue text:
--- BEGIN ISSUE ---
Convenience for wkcuber.api
To open/create a dataset with the cool new high-level API the following code is required:

```python
from wkcuber.api.Dataset import WKDataset
from pathlib import Path

ds1 = WKDataset.create(Path("path") / "to" / "dataset1", scale=(128,128,128))
ds2 = WKDataset.open(Path("path") / "to" / "dataset2")

```

For one-off scripts, I think that could be a bit more convenient, if we had an API like this

```python
from wkcuber import WKDataset

ds1 = WKDataset.create("path/to/dataset1", scale=(128, 128, 128))
ds2 = WKDataset.open("path/to/dataset2")
```

Any thoughts? @rschwanhold @jstriebel @philippotto 


--- END ISSUE ---

Below are some code segments, each from a relevant file. One or more of these files may contain bugs.
--- BEGIN FILES ---
Path: `wkcuber/__init__.py`
Content:
```
1 from .cubing import cubing
2 from .downsampling import downsample_mags
3 from .compress import compress_mag
4 from .metadata import write_webknossos_metadata
5
```
--- END FILES ---

Please first localize the bug based on the issue statement, and then generate a patch according to the `git diff` format fenced by three backticks.

Here is an example:

```diff
diff --git a/examples/server_async.py b/examples/server_async.py
--- a/examples/server_async.py
+++ b/examples/server_async.py
@@ -313,4 +313,4 @@
 
 
 if __name__ == "__main__":
-    asyncio.run(run_async_server("."), debug=True)
+    asyncio.run(run_async_server(), debug=True)
diff --git a/examples/server_sync.py b/examples/server_sync.py
--- a/examples/server_sync.py
+++ b/examples/server_sync.py
@@ -313,5 +313,5 @@
 
 
 if __name__ == "__main__":
-    server = run_sync_server(".")
+    server = run_sync_server()
     server.shutdown()

```

diff --git a/wkcuber/__init__.py b/wkcuber/__init__.py
--- a/wkcuber/__init__.py
+++ b/wkcuber/__init__.py
@@ -1,4 +1,6 @@
+from .api.Dataset import WKDataset
 from .cubing import cubing
 from .downsampling import downsample_mags
 from .compress import compress_mag
+from .mag import Mag
 from .metadata import write_webknossos_metadata

{"golden_diff": "diff --git a/wkcuber/__init__.py b/wkcuber/__init__.py\n--- a/wkcuber/__init__.py\n+++ b/wkcuber/__init__.py\n@@ -1,4 +1,6 @@\n+from .api.Dataset import WKDataset\n from .cubing import cubing\n from .downsampling import downsample_mags\n from .compress import compress_mag\n+from .mag import Mag\n from .metadata import write_webknossos_metadata\n", "issue": "Convenience for wkcuber.api\nTo open/create a dataset with the cool new high-level API the following code is required:\r\n\r\n```python\r\nfrom wkcuber.api.Dataset import WKDataset\r\nfrom pathlib import Path\r\n\r\nds1 = WKDataset.create(Path(\"path\") / \"to\" / \"dataset1\", scale=(128,128,128))\r\nds2 = WKDataset.open(Path(\"path\") / \"to\" / \"dataset2\")\r\n\r\n```\r\n\r\nFor one-off scripts, I think that could be a bit more convenient, if we had an API like this\r\n\r\n```python\r\nfrom wkcuber import WKDataset\r\n\r\nds1 = WKDataset.create(\"path/to/dataset1\", scale=(128, 128, 128))\r\nds2 = WKDataset.open(\"path/to/dataset2\")\r\n```\r\n\r\nAny thoughts? @rschwanhold @jstriebel @philippotto \r\n\n", "before_files": [{"content": "from .cubing import cubing\nfrom .downsampling import downsample_mags\nfrom .compress import compress_mag\nfrom .metadata import write_webknossos_metadata\n", "path": "wkcuber/__init__.py"}], "after_files": [{"content": "from .api.Dataset import WKDataset\nfrom .cubing import cubing\nfrom .downsampling import downsample_mags\nfrom .compress import compress_mag\nfrom .mag import Mag\nfrom .metadata import write_webknossos_metadata\n", "path": "wkcuber/__init__.py"}]}