Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet
chat_round_order
float64
1
3
event_order
int64
1
266
event_type
stringclasses
6 values
worker_id
stringlengths
5
10
sender_id
stringlengths
5
10
recipient_id
stringlengths
5
10
field
nullclasses
18 values
text
stringlengths
1
1.38k
sliderValue
float64
1
6
agreement_level
nullclasses
7 values
validity
nullclasses
2 values
null
1
Initial Opinion
67e71E9YMX
null
null
null
I dont think it's feasible to have citizens vote directly on every major decision. The logistics involved are simply to large.
3
null
null
null
2
Initial Opinion
67b65E9YMX
null
null
null
I think this is not a bad one because we should have the power to decide who we want to rule us for a period based on certain things we see in them
3
null
null
null
3
Initial Opinion
67e7cE9YMX
null
null
null
I agree. Since electected leaders at most times give their decisions on a biased manner, I believe this will counter such. This will give a broader picture of what the real people feel and want. This equally will enhance equality and social justice .
3
null
null
null
4
Initial Opinion
67e90E9YMX
null
null
null
increased
4
null
null
1
5
tweet
67e7cE9YMX
67e7cE9YMX
67e71E9YMX
null
Hey, I believe this is a good move since it encourages honesty and since at times the elected leaders give biased opinions.
null
null
null
1
6
tweet
67b65E9YMX
67b65E9YMX
67e90E9YMX
null
Well this democratic way of electing is not bad. I mean we have the voting power to decide who rules every year so doing this will even strength our voting rights
null
null
null
1
7
tweet
67e71E9YMX
67e71E9YMX
67e7cE9YMX
null
A democratic system where the citizens vote directly is simply not feasible. The costs associated with this are simply to large. Deciding what constitutes a major decision is a debacle in itself. Having representatives is the unfort
null
null
null
1
8
tweet
67e90E9YMX
67e90E9YMX
67b65E9YMX
null
increased citizen participation , accountability elected officials may be more responsive to citizens concern minority right , emotional decision making direct
null
null
null
1
9
message_sent
67b65E9YMX
67b65E9YMX
67e90E9YMX
null
Yes yes
null
null
null
1
10
message_recieved
67e90E9YMX
67b65E9YMX
67e90E9YMX
null
Yes yes
null
null
null
1
11
message_sent
67e71E9YMX
67e71E9YMX
67e7cE9YMX
null
Well it may be a good idea, but, the time and cost would be too great, dont you think?
null
null
null
1
12
message_recieved
67e7cE9YMX
67e71E9YMX
67e7cE9YMX
null
Well it may be a good idea, but, the time and cost would be too great, dont you think?
null
null
null
1
13
message_sent
67e7cE9YMX
67e7cE9YMX
67e71E9YMX
null
I get you. However, this whole idea is focusing on openness and everyone feeling well served in his/her own country. Don't you think we should ignore the issue of cost a bit here?
null
null
null
1
14
message_recieved
67e71E9YMX
67e7cE9YMX
67e71E9YMX
null
I get you. However, this whole idea is focusing on openness and everyone feeling well served in his/her own country. Don't you think we should ignore the issue of cost a bit here?
null
null
null
1
15
message_sent
67e71E9YMX
67e71E9YMX
67e7cE9YMX
null
Actually, no. Thats a perspective you have chosen. But no matter the persepctive, the cost factor is there
null
null
null
1
16
message_recieved
67e7cE9YMX
67e71E9YMX
67e7cE9YMX
null
Actually, no. Thats a perspective you have chosen. But no matter the persepctive, the cost factor is there
null
null
null
2
17
tweet
67e7cE9YMX
67e7cE9YMX
67b65E9YMX
null
I believe this idea is good since it promotes equality. It gives each an opportunity to contribute to the betterment of the country.
null
null
null
2
18
tweet
67e71E9YMX
67e71E9YMX
67e90E9YMX
null
The costs associated with this are simply to high. The time and resource mobilization to achieve this every time a decision needs to be made is very huge as well. We are better off with elected officials.
null
null
null
2
19
tweet
67e90E9YMX
67e90E9YMX
67e71E9YMX
null
representative oversight elected officials still play a role in shaping policies and ensuring tht
null
null
null
2
20
message_sent
67e71E9YMX
67e71E9YMX
67e90E9YMX
null
So you agree that elected officials are still needed?
null
null
null
2
21
message_recieved
67e90E9YMX
67e71E9YMX
67e90E9YMX
null
So you agree that elected officials are still needed?
null
null
null
2
22
message_sent
67b65E9YMX
67b65E9YMX
67e7cE9YMX
null
Yes you can say that because we do vote but we all feel things are done in the background to determine who wins
null
null
null
2
23
message_recieved
67e7cE9YMX
67b65E9YMX
67e7cE9YMX
null
Yes you can say that because we do vote but we all feel things are done in the background to determine who wins
null
null
null
2
24
message_sent
67e90E9YMX
67e90E9YMX
67e71E9YMX
null
a potential solution could be hybrid approach that combines element of direct democracy with representative democracy. involving citizen to propose legislation or vote specific issues
null
null
null
2
25
message_recieved
67e71E9YMX
67e90E9YMX
67e71E9YMX
null
a potential solution could be hybrid approach that combines element of direct democracy with representative democracy. involving citizen to propose legislation or vote specific issues
null
null
null
3
26
tweet
67e7cE9YMX
67e7cE9YMX
67e90E9YMX
null
I believe this is the best idea since in any case the government belongs to us as a people. This enhances equality.
null
null
null
3
27
tweet
67b65E9YMX
67b65E9YMX
67e71E9YMX
null
Yes it is a very good way and it also strengthens the importance of local citizens in deciding elections
null
null
null
3
28
tweet
67e90E9YMX
67e90E9YMX
67e7cE9YMX
null
potential for more accountable governance increased citizen engagement an participation scalability and practicalty
null
null
null
3
29
tweet
67e71E9YMX
67e71E9YMX
67b65E9YMX
null
What do you think the major challenges for this would be? I foresee cost, time and resource mobilization to be the major challenges. The other tricky part would be to decide what gets to be voted for and what is "minor"
null
null
null
3
30
message_sent
67e71E9YMX
67e71E9YMX
67b65E9YMX
null
What challenges do you think would be there?
null
null
null
3
31
message_recieved
67b65E9YMX
67e71E9YMX
67b65E9YMX
null
What challenges do you think would be there?
null
null
null
3
32
message_sent
67e7cE9YMX
67e7cE9YMX
67e90E9YMX
null
Absolutely. This idea should be implemented.
null
null
null
3
33
message_recieved
67e90E9YMX
67e7cE9YMX
67e90E9YMX
null
Absolutely. This idea should be implemented.
null
null
null
3
34
message_sent
67e90E9YMX
67e90E9YMX
67e7cE9YMX
null
yes its should to help strengthen our country
null
null
null
3
35
message_recieved
67e7cE9YMX
67e90E9YMX
67e7cE9YMX
null
yes its should to help strengthen our country
null
null
null
3
36
message_sent
67b65E9YMX
67b65E9YMX
67e71E9YMX
null
I also delays in decision making or?
null
null
null
3
37
message_recieved
67e71E9YMX
67b65E9YMX
67e71E9YMX
null
I also delays in decision making or?
null
null
null
3
38
message_sent
67e7cE9YMX
67e7cE9YMX
67e90E9YMX
null
sure
null
null
null
3
39
message_recieved
67e90E9YMX
67e7cE9YMX
67e90E9YMX
null
sure
null
null
null
3
40
message_sent
67e71E9YMX
67e71E9YMX
67b65E9YMX
null
sure, it would take a long time to come up with a a single legislation
null
null
null
3
41
message_recieved
67b65E9YMX
67e71E9YMX
67b65E9YMX
null
sure, it would take a long time to come up with a a single legislation
null
null
null
null
42
Post Opinion
67e71E9YMX
null
null
null
Still hold the same point of view
3
null
null
null
43
Post Opinion
67b65E9YMX
null
null
null
I agree a hundred percent to this
6
null
null
null
44
Post Opinion
67e90E9YMX
null
null
null
disagree
2
null
null
null
45
Post Opinion
67e7cE9YMX
null
null
null
I agree with the statement since it carries the views of the majority. It enhances equality in social,political and economic justice.
3
null
null
null
46
exit_survey
67b65E9YMX
null
null
null
male
null
null
null
null
47
exit_survey
67b65E9YMX
null
null
null
40
null
null
null
null
48
exit_survey
67b65E9YMX
null
null
null
United States of America
null
null
null
null
49
exit_survey
67b65E9YMX
null
null
null
United States of America
null
null
null
null
50
exit_survey
67b65E9YMX
null
null
null
master-doctoral
null
null
null
null
51
exit_survey
67b65E9YMX
null
null
null
150k-200k
null
null
null
null
52
exit_survey
67b65E9YMX
null
null
null
independent
null
null
null
null
53
exit_survey
67b65E9YMX
null
null
null
moderate
null
null
null
null
54
exit_survey
67b65E9YMX
null
null
null
['white']
null
null
null
null
55
exit_survey
67b65E9YMX
null
null
null
married
null
null
null
null
56
exit_survey
67b65E9YMX
null
null
null
urban
null
null
null
null
57
exit_survey
67b65E9YMX
null
null
null
literal
null
null
null
null
58
exit_survey
67b65E9YMX
null
null
null
yes
null
null
null
null
59
exit_survey
67b65E9YMX
null
null
null
['private']
null
null
null
null
60
exit_survey
67b65E9YMX
null
null
null
protestant
null
null
null
null
61
exit_survey
67b65E9YMX
null
null
null
finance
null
null
null
null
62
exit_survey
67e71E9YMX
null
null
null
28
null
null
null
null
63
exit_survey
67e71E9YMX
null
null
null
['white']
null
null
null
null
64
exit_survey
67e71E9YMX
null
null
null
master-doctoral
null
null
null
null
65
exit_survey
67e71E9YMX
null
null
null
100k-150k
null
null
null
null
66
exit_survey
67e71E9YMX
null
null
null
republican
null
null
null
null
67
exit_survey
67e71E9YMX
null
null
null
conservative
null
null
null
null
68
exit_survey
67e71E9YMX
null
null
null
married
null
null
null
null
69
exit_survey
67e71E9YMX
null
null
null
['public']
null
null
null
null
70
exit_survey
67e71E9YMX
null
null
null
urban
null
null
null
null
71
exit_survey
67e71E9YMX
null
null
null
inspired
null
null
null
null
72
exit_survey
67e71E9YMX
null
null
null
United States of America
null
null
null
null
73
exit_survey
67e71E9YMX
null
null
null
male
null
null
null
null
74
exit_survey
67e71E9YMX
null
null
null
United States of America
null
null
null
null
75
exit_survey
67e71E9YMX
null
null
null
no
null
null
null
null
76
exit_survey
67e71E9YMX
null
null
null
roman-catholic
null
null
null
null
77
exit_survey
67e71E9YMX
null
null
null
finance
null
null
null
null
78
exit_survey
67e7cE9YMX
null
null
null
42
null
null
null
null
79
exit_survey
67e7cE9YMX
null
null
null
male
null
null
null
null
80
exit_survey
67e7cE9YMX
null
null
null
Kenya
null
null
null
null
81
exit_survey
67e7cE9YMX
null
null
null
United States of America
null
null
null
null
82
exit_survey
67e7cE9YMX
null
null
null
['black']
null
null
null
null
83
exit_survey
67e7cE9YMX
null
null
null
master-doctoral
null
null
null
null
84
exit_survey
67e7cE9YMX
null
null
null
100k-150k
null
null
null
null
85
exit_survey
67e7cE9YMX
null
null
null
republican
null
null
null
null
86
exit_survey
67e7cE9YMX
null
null
null
['public']
null
null
null
null
87
exit_survey
67e7cE9YMX
null
null
null
conservative
null
null
null
null
88
exit_survey
67e7cE9YMX
null
null
null
suburban
null
null
null
null
89
exit_survey
67e7cE9YMX
null
null
null
inspired
null
null
null
null
90
exit_survey
67e7cE9YMX
null
null
null
roman-catholic
null
null
null
null
91
exit_survey
67e7cE9YMX
null
null
null
married
null
null
null
null
92
exit_survey
67e7cE9YMX
null
null
null
education
null
null
null
null
93
exit_survey
67e7cE9YMX
null
null
null
yes
null
null
null
null
94
exit_survey
67e90E9YMX
null
null
null
36
null
null
null
null
95
exit_survey
67e90E9YMX
null
null
null
female
null
null
null
null
96
exit_survey
67e90E9YMX
null
null
null
United States of America
null
null
null
null
97
exit_survey
67e90E9YMX
null
null
null
United States of America
null
null
null
null
98
exit_survey
67e90E9YMX
null
null
null
master-doctoral
null
null
null
null
99
exit_survey
67e90E9YMX
null
null
null
['black']
null
null
null
null
100
exit_survey
67e90E9YMX
null
null
null
50k-75k
null
null
null
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
YAML Metadata Warning: empty or missing yaml metadata in repo card (https://huggingface.co/docs/hub/datasets-cards)

DEBATE Submit Data – Human Conversation Datasets

This repository contains CSV files from the DEBATE project: large-scale human conversation experiments organized around controversial and opinion-based topics. The data consists of multi-round conversations between participants discussing political, social, and belief-related topics, following the protocol described in:

Chuang et al., “DEBATE: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Role-Playing LLM Agents in Multi-Agent, Long-Form Debates”,
39th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2025) Workshop: Scaling Environments for Agents (SEA),
arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.25110, 2025.

Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2510.25110

Directory Structure

submit_data/
├── depth/                     # Phase 1: Depth topics (fewer topics, more conversations each)
│   ├── [topic_name]/         # Individual topic folders
│   │   ├── *.csv             # Conversation data files
│   │   └── ...
│   └── ...
├── breadth/                   # Phase 2: Breadth topics (many topics, fewer conversations each)
│   ├── [topic_name]/         # Individual topic folders
│   │   ├── *.csv             # Conversation data files
│   │   └── ...
│   └── ...
└── README.md                  # This file

Data Organization

Depth vs Breadth

  • Depth Topics: Focused exploration of a smaller set of topics with multiple conversation sessions per topic
  • Breadth Topics: Broad coverage across many different topics with fewer sessions per topic

Topic Categories

The conversations cover a wide range of controversial and opinion-based topics including:

Depth Topics (Phase 1)

  • For more information on topics, check Appendix.

Breadth Topics (Phase 2)

  • For more information on topics, check Appendix.

File Naming Convention

Each CSV file follows this naming pattern:

YYYYMMDD_HHMMSS_TOPIC_NAME_UNIQUE_ID_VERSION.csv

Where:

  • YYYYMMDD: Date (Year/Month/Day)
  • HHMMSS: Time (Hour/Minute/Second)
  • TOPIC_NAME: Underscored topic description
  • UNIQUE_ID: 26-character unique identifier
  • VERSION: Version number (e.g., "0.0.1")

Data File Structure

Each CSV file contains conversation data with the following key columns:

  • Event tracking: event_order, event_type
  • Participants: worker_id, sender_id, recipient_id
  • Content: text (messages, opinions, slider values)
  • Conversation flow: chat_round_order, message_id
  • User interaction: is_slider_changed (opinion rating changes)

Event Types

  • Initial Opinion: Participant's starting position on the topic
  • tweet: Short messages during conversation
  • message_sent/message_received: Direct messages between participants

Special Notation

  • [SLIDER_VALUE=X]: Indicates participant's opinion rating (typically 1-5 scale)
  • [AUTOSUBMISSION DUE TO TIME LIMIT]: System-generated due to timeout

Data Usage

This dataset is suitable for research on:

  • Opinion dynamics and persuasion
  • Human-AI conversation patterns
  • Political and social belief systems
  • Argumentation and debate analysis
  • Consensus building in controversial topics

Data Quality

  • Files contain real human conversation data
  • Some conversations may be incomplete due to participant dropout
  • Time limits may have caused automatic submissions
  • Processed data may contain empty rows: Consecutive messages from the same user are concatenated and treated as a single message, which can result in empty rows in the processed dataset

License & Usage Restrictions

This dataset is released under the:

DEBATE Dataset Research-Only License (Non-Commercial, v1.0) (see the LICENSE file in this repository).

Citation

Please cite the following work when using this dataset in your research:

@article{chuang2025debate,
  title={DEBATE: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Role-Playing LLM Agents in Multi-Agent, Long-Form Debates},
  author={Chuang, Yun-Shiuan and Tu, Ruixuan and Dai, Chengtao and Vasani, Smit and Yao, Binwei and Tessler, Michael Henry and Yang, Sijia and Shah, Dhavan V and Hawkins, Robert D and Hu, Junjie and others},
  journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.25110},
  year={2025}
}
Downloads last month
51