chat_round_order
float64 1
3
⌀ | event_order
int64 1
266
| event_type
stringclasses 6
values | worker_id
stringlengths 5
10
| sender_id
stringlengths 5
10
⌀ | recipient_id
stringlengths 5
10
⌀ | field
nullclasses 18
values | text
stringlengths 1
1.38k
⌀ | sliderValue
float64 1
6
⌀ | agreement_level
nullclasses 7
values | validity
nullclasses 2
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
null | 1
|
Initial Opinion
|
67e71E9YMX
| null | null | null |
I dont think it's feasible to have citizens vote directly on every major decision. The logistics involved are simply to large.
| 3
| null | null |
null | 2
|
Initial Opinion
|
67b65E9YMX
| null | null | null |
I think this is not a bad one because we should have the power to decide who we want to rule us for a period based on certain things we see in them
| 3
| null | null |
null | 3
|
Initial Opinion
|
67e7cE9YMX
| null | null | null |
I agree. Since electected leaders at most times give their decisions on a biased manner, I believe this will counter such. This will give a broader picture of what the real people feel and want. This equally will enhance equality and social justice .
| 3
| null | null |
null | 4
|
Initial Opinion
|
67e90E9YMX
| null | null | null |
increased
| 4
| null | null |
1
| 5
|
tweet
|
67e7cE9YMX
|
67e7cE9YMX
|
67e71E9YMX
| null |
Hey, I believe this is a good move since it encourages honesty and since at times the elected leaders give biased opinions.
| null | null | null |
1
| 6
|
tweet
|
67b65E9YMX
|
67b65E9YMX
|
67e90E9YMX
| null |
Well this democratic way of electing is not bad. I mean we have the voting power to decide who rules every year so doing this will even strength our voting rights
| null | null | null |
1
| 7
|
tweet
|
67e71E9YMX
|
67e71E9YMX
|
67e7cE9YMX
| null |
A democratic system where the citizens vote directly is simply not feasible. The costs associated with this are simply to large. Deciding what constitutes a major decision is a debacle in itself. Having representatives is the unfort
| null | null | null |
1
| 8
|
tweet
|
67e90E9YMX
|
67e90E9YMX
|
67b65E9YMX
| null |
increased citizen participation , accountability elected officials may be more responsive to citizens concern minority right , emotional decision making direct
| null | null | null |
1
| 9
|
message_sent
|
67b65E9YMX
|
67b65E9YMX
|
67e90E9YMX
| null |
Yes yes
| null | null | null |
1
| 10
|
message_recieved
|
67e90E9YMX
|
67b65E9YMX
|
67e90E9YMX
| null |
Yes yes
| null | null | null |
1
| 11
|
message_sent
|
67e71E9YMX
|
67e71E9YMX
|
67e7cE9YMX
| null |
Well it may be a good idea, but, the time and cost would be too great, dont you think?
| null | null | null |
1
| 12
|
message_recieved
|
67e7cE9YMX
|
67e71E9YMX
|
67e7cE9YMX
| null |
Well it may be a good idea, but, the time and cost would be too great, dont you think?
| null | null | null |
1
| 13
|
message_sent
|
67e7cE9YMX
|
67e7cE9YMX
|
67e71E9YMX
| null |
I get you. However, this whole idea is focusing on openness and everyone feeling well served in his/her own country. Don't you think we should ignore the issue of cost a bit here?
| null | null | null |
1
| 14
|
message_recieved
|
67e71E9YMX
|
67e7cE9YMX
|
67e71E9YMX
| null |
I get you. However, this whole idea is focusing on openness and everyone feeling well served in his/her own country. Don't you think we should ignore the issue of cost a bit here?
| null | null | null |
1
| 15
|
message_sent
|
67e71E9YMX
|
67e71E9YMX
|
67e7cE9YMX
| null |
Actually, no. Thats a perspective you have chosen. But no matter the persepctive, the cost factor is there
| null | null | null |
1
| 16
|
message_recieved
|
67e7cE9YMX
|
67e71E9YMX
|
67e7cE9YMX
| null |
Actually, no. Thats a perspective you have chosen. But no matter the persepctive, the cost factor is there
| null | null | null |
2
| 17
|
tweet
|
67e7cE9YMX
|
67e7cE9YMX
|
67b65E9YMX
| null |
I believe this idea is good since it promotes equality. It gives each an opportunity to contribute to the betterment of the country.
| null | null | null |
2
| 18
|
tweet
|
67e71E9YMX
|
67e71E9YMX
|
67e90E9YMX
| null |
The costs associated with this are simply to high. The time and resource mobilization to achieve this every time a decision needs to be made is very huge as well. We are better off with elected officials.
| null | null | null |
2
| 19
|
tweet
|
67e90E9YMX
|
67e90E9YMX
|
67e71E9YMX
| null |
representative oversight elected officials still play a role in shaping policies and ensuring tht
| null | null | null |
2
| 20
|
message_sent
|
67e71E9YMX
|
67e71E9YMX
|
67e90E9YMX
| null |
So you agree that elected officials are still needed?
| null | null | null |
2
| 21
|
message_recieved
|
67e90E9YMX
|
67e71E9YMX
|
67e90E9YMX
| null |
So you agree that elected officials are still needed?
| null | null | null |
2
| 22
|
message_sent
|
67b65E9YMX
|
67b65E9YMX
|
67e7cE9YMX
| null |
Yes you can say that because we do vote but we all feel things are done in the background to determine who wins
| null | null | null |
2
| 23
|
message_recieved
|
67e7cE9YMX
|
67b65E9YMX
|
67e7cE9YMX
| null |
Yes you can say that because we do vote but we all feel things are done in the background to determine who wins
| null | null | null |
2
| 24
|
message_sent
|
67e90E9YMX
|
67e90E9YMX
|
67e71E9YMX
| null |
a potential solution could be hybrid approach that combines element of direct democracy with representative democracy. involving citizen to propose legislation or vote specific issues
| null | null | null |
2
| 25
|
message_recieved
|
67e71E9YMX
|
67e90E9YMX
|
67e71E9YMX
| null |
a potential solution could be hybrid approach that combines element of direct democracy with representative democracy. involving citizen to propose legislation or vote specific issues
| null | null | null |
3
| 26
|
tweet
|
67e7cE9YMX
|
67e7cE9YMX
|
67e90E9YMX
| null |
I believe this is the best idea since in any case the government belongs to us as a people. This enhances equality.
| null | null | null |
3
| 27
|
tweet
|
67b65E9YMX
|
67b65E9YMX
|
67e71E9YMX
| null |
Yes it is a very good way and it also strengthens the importance of local citizens in deciding elections
| null | null | null |
3
| 28
|
tweet
|
67e90E9YMX
|
67e90E9YMX
|
67e7cE9YMX
| null |
potential for more accountable governance increased citizen engagement an participation scalability and practicalty
| null | null | null |
3
| 29
|
tweet
|
67e71E9YMX
|
67e71E9YMX
|
67b65E9YMX
| null |
What do you think the major challenges for this would be? I foresee cost, time and resource mobilization to be the major challenges. The other tricky part would be to decide what gets to be voted for and what is "minor"
| null | null | null |
3
| 30
|
message_sent
|
67e71E9YMX
|
67e71E9YMX
|
67b65E9YMX
| null |
What challenges do you think would be there?
| null | null | null |
3
| 31
|
message_recieved
|
67b65E9YMX
|
67e71E9YMX
|
67b65E9YMX
| null |
What challenges do you think would be there?
| null | null | null |
3
| 32
|
message_sent
|
67e7cE9YMX
|
67e7cE9YMX
|
67e90E9YMX
| null |
Absolutely. This idea should be implemented.
| null | null | null |
3
| 33
|
message_recieved
|
67e90E9YMX
|
67e7cE9YMX
|
67e90E9YMX
| null |
Absolutely. This idea should be implemented.
| null | null | null |
3
| 34
|
message_sent
|
67e90E9YMX
|
67e90E9YMX
|
67e7cE9YMX
| null |
yes its should to help strengthen our country
| null | null | null |
3
| 35
|
message_recieved
|
67e7cE9YMX
|
67e90E9YMX
|
67e7cE9YMX
| null |
yes its should to help strengthen our country
| null | null | null |
3
| 36
|
message_sent
|
67b65E9YMX
|
67b65E9YMX
|
67e71E9YMX
| null |
I also delays in decision making or?
| null | null | null |
3
| 37
|
message_recieved
|
67e71E9YMX
|
67b65E9YMX
|
67e71E9YMX
| null |
I also delays in decision making or?
| null | null | null |
3
| 38
|
message_sent
|
67e7cE9YMX
|
67e7cE9YMX
|
67e90E9YMX
| null |
sure
| null | null | null |
3
| 39
|
message_recieved
|
67e90E9YMX
|
67e7cE9YMX
|
67e90E9YMX
| null |
sure
| null | null | null |
3
| 40
|
message_sent
|
67e71E9YMX
|
67e71E9YMX
|
67b65E9YMX
| null |
sure, it would take a long time to come up with a a single legislation
| null | null | null |
3
| 41
|
message_recieved
|
67b65E9YMX
|
67e71E9YMX
|
67b65E9YMX
| null |
sure, it would take a long time to come up with a a single legislation
| null | null | null |
null | 42
|
Post Opinion
|
67e71E9YMX
| null | null | null |
Still hold the same point of view
| 3
| null | null |
null | 43
|
Post Opinion
|
67b65E9YMX
| null | null | null |
I agree a hundred percent to this
| 6
| null | null |
null | 44
|
Post Opinion
|
67e90E9YMX
| null | null | null |
disagree
| 2
| null | null |
null | 45
|
Post Opinion
|
67e7cE9YMX
| null | null | null |
I agree with the statement since it carries the views of the majority. It enhances equality in social,political and economic justice.
| 3
| null | null |
null | 46
|
exit_survey
|
67b65E9YMX
| null | null | null |
male
| null | null | null |
null | 47
|
exit_survey
|
67b65E9YMX
| null | null | null |
40
| null | null | null |
null | 48
|
exit_survey
|
67b65E9YMX
| null | null | null |
United States of America
| null | null | null |
null | 49
|
exit_survey
|
67b65E9YMX
| null | null | null |
United States of America
| null | null | null |
null | 50
|
exit_survey
|
67b65E9YMX
| null | null | null |
master-doctoral
| null | null | null |
null | 51
|
exit_survey
|
67b65E9YMX
| null | null | null |
150k-200k
| null | null | null |
null | 52
|
exit_survey
|
67b65E9YMX
| null | null | null |
independent
| null | null | null |
null | 53
|
exit_survey
|
67b65E9YMX
| null | null | null |
moderate
| null | null | null |
null | 54
|
exit_survey
|
67b65E9YMX
| null | null | null |
['white']
| null | null | null |
null | 55
|
exit_survey
|
67b65E9YMX
| null | null | null |
married
| null | null | null |
null | 56
|
exit_survey
|
67b65E9YMX
| null | null | null |
urban
| null | null | null |
null | 57
|
exit_survey
|
67b65E9YMX
| null | null | null |
literal
| null | null | null |
null | 58
|
exit_survey
|
67b65E9YMX
| null | null | null |
yes
| null | null | null |
null | 59
|
exit_survey
|
67b65E9YMX
| null | null | null |
['private']
| null | null | null |
null | 60
|
exit_survey
|
67b65E9YMX
| null | null | null |
protestant
| null | null | null |
null | 61
|
exit_survey
|
67b65E9YMX
| null | null | null |
finance
| null | null | null |
null | 62
|
exit_survey
|
67e71E9YMX
| null | null | null |
28
| null | null | null |
null | 63
|
exit_survey
|
67e71E9YMX
| null | null | null |
['white']
| null | null | null |
null | 64
|
exit_survey
|
67e71E9YMX
| null | null | null |
master-doctoral
| null | null | null |
null | 65
|
exit_survey
|
67e71E9YMX
| null | null | null |
100k-150k
| null | null | null |
null | 66
|
exit_survey
|
67e71E9YMX
| null | null | null |
republican
| null | null | null |
null | 67
|
exit_survey
|
67e71E9YMX
| null | null | null |
conservative
| null | null | null |
null | 68
|
exit_survey
|
67e71E9YMX
| null | null | null |
married
| null | null | null |
null | 69
|
exit_survey
|
67e71E9YMX
| null | null | null |
['public']
| null | null | null |
null | 70
|
exit_survey
|
67e71E9YMX
| null | null | null |
urban
| null | null | null |
null | 71
|
exit_survey
|
67e71E9YMX
| null | null | null |
inspired
| null | null | null |
null | 72
|
exit_survey
|
67e71E9YMX
| null | null | null |
United States of America
| null | null | null |
null | 73
|
exit_survey
|
67e71E9YMX
| null | null | null |
male
| null | null | null |
null | 74
|
exit_survey
|
67e71E9YMX
| null | null | null |
United States of America
| null | null | null |
null | 75
|
exit_survey
|
67e71E9YMX
| null | null | null |
no
| null | null | null |
null | 76
|
exit_survey
|
67e71E9YMX
| null | null | null |
roman-catholic
| null | null | null |
null | 77
|
exit_survey
|
67e71E9YMX
| null | null | null |
finance
| null | null | null |
null | 78
|
exit_survey
|
67e7cE9YMX
| null | null | null |
42
| null | null | null |
null | 79
|
exit_survey
|
67e7cE9YMX
| null | null | null |
male
| null | null | null |
null | 80
|
exit_survey
|
67e7cE9YMX
| null | null | null |
Kenya
| null | null | null |
null | 81
|
exit_survey
|
67e7cE9YMX
| null | null | null |
United States of America
| null | null | null |
null | 82
|
exit_survey
|
67e7cE9YMX
| null | null | null |
['black']
| null | null | null |
null | 83
|
exit_survey
|
67e7cE9YMX
| null | null | null |
master-doctoral
| null | null | null |
null | 84
|
exit_survey
|
67e7cE9YMX
| null | null | null |
100k-150k
| null | null | null |
null | 85
|
exit_survey
|
67e7cE9YMX
| null | null | null |
republican
| null | null | null |
null | 86
|
exit_survey
|
67e7cE9YMX
| null | null | null |
['public']
| null | null | null |
null | 87
|
exit_survey
|
67e7cE9YMX
| null | null | null |
conservative
| null | null | null |
null | 88
|
exit_survey
|
67e7cE9YMX
| null | null | null |
suburban
| null | null | null |
null | 89
|
exit_survey
|
67e7cE9YMX
| null | null | null |
inspired
| null | null | null |
null | 90
|
exit_survey
|
67e7cE9YMX
| null | null | null |
roman-catholic
| null | null | null |
null | 91
|
exit_survey
|
67e7cE9YMX
| null | null | null |
married
| null | null | null |
null | 92
|
exit_survey
|
67e7cE9YMX
| null | null | null |
education
| null | null | null |
null | 93
|
exit_survey
|
67e7cE9YMX
| null | null | null |
yes
| null | null | null |
null | 94
|
exit_survey
|
67e90E9YMX
| null | null | null |
36
| null | null | null |
null | 95
|
exit_survey
|
67e90E9YMX
| null | null | null |
female
| null | null | null |
null | 96
|
exit_survey
|
67e90E9YMX
| null | null | null |
United States of America
| null | null | null |
null | 97
|
exit_survey
|
67e90E9YMX
| null | null | null |
United States of America
| null | null | null |
null | 98
|
exit_survey
|
67e90E9YMX
| null | null | null |
master-doctoral
| null | null | null |
null | 99
|
exit_survey
|
67e90E9YMX
| null | null | null |
['black']
| null | null | null |
null | 100
|
exit_survey
|
67e90E9YMX
| null | null | null |
50k-75k
| null | null | null |
DEBATE Submit Data – Human Conversation Datasets
This repository contains CSV files from the DEBATE project: large-scale human conversation experiments organized around controversial and opinion-based topics. The data consists of multi-round conversations between participants discussing political, social, and belief-related topics, following the protocol described in:
Chuang et al., “DEBATE: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Role-Playing LLM Agents in Multi-Agent, Long-Form Debates”,
39th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2025) Workshop: Scaling Environments for Agents (SEA),
arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.25110, 2025.
Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2510.25110
Directory Structure
submit_data/
├── depth/ # Phase 1: Depth topics (fewer topics, more conversations each)
│ ├── [topic_name]/ # Individual topic folders
│ │ ├── *.csv # Conversation data files
│ │ └── ...
│ └── ...
├── breadth/ # Phase 2: Breadth topics (many topics, fewer conversations each)
│ ├── [topic_name]/ # Individual topic folders
│ │ ├── *.csv # Conversation data files
│ │ └── ...
│ └── ...
└── README.md # This file
Data Organization
Depth vs Breadth
- Depth Topics: Focused exploration of a smaller set of topics with multiple conversation sessions per topic
- Breadth Topics: Broad coverage across many different topics with fewer sessions per topic
Topic Categories
The conversations cover a wide range of controversial and opinion-based topics including:
Depth Topics (Phase 1)
- For more information on topics, check Appendix.
Breadth Topics (Phase 2)
- For more information on topics, check Appendix.
File Naming Convention
Each CSV file follows this naming pattern:
YYYYMMDD_HHMMSS_TOPIC_NAME_UNIQUE_ID_VERSION.csv
Where:
YYYYMMDD: Date (Year/Month/Day)HHMMSS: Time (Hour/Minute/Second)TOPIC_NAME: Underscored topic descriptionUNIQUE_ID: 26-character unique identifierVERSION: Version number (e.g., "0.0.1")
Data File Structure
Each CSV file contains conversation data with the following key columns:
- Event tracking:
event_order,event_type - Participants:
worker_id,sender_id,recipient_id - Content:
text(messages, opinions, slider values) - Conversation flow:
chat_round_order,message_id - User interaction:
is_slider_changed(opinion rating changes)
Event Types
Initial Opinion: Participant's starting position on the topictweet: Short messages during conversationmessage_sent/message_received: Direct messages between participants
Special Notation
[SLIDER_VALUE=X]: Indicates participant's opinion rating (typically 1-5 scale)[AUTOSUBMISSION DUE TO TIME LIMIT]: System-generated due to timeout
Data Usage
This dataset is suitable for research on:
- Opinion dynamics and persuasion
- Human-AI conversation patterns
- Political and social belief systems
- Argumentation and debate analysis
- Consensus building in controversial topics
Data Quality
- Files contain real human conversation data
- Some conversations may be incomplete due to participant dropout
- Time limits may have caused automatic submissions
- Processed data may contain empty rows: Consecutive messages from the same user are concatenated and treated as a single message, which can result in empty rows in the processed dataset
License & Usage Restrictions
This dataset is released under the:
DEBATE Dataset Research-Only License (Non-Commercial, v1.0) (see the LICENSE file in this repository).
Citation
Please cite the following work when using this dataset in your research:
@article{chuang2025debate,
title={DEBATE: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Role-Playing LLM Agents in Multi-Agent, Long-Form Debates},
author={Chuang, Yun-Shiuan and Tu, Ruixuan and Dai, Chengtao and Vasani, Smit and Yao, Binwei and Tessler, Michael Henry and Yang, Sijia and Shah, Dhavan V and Hawkins, Robert D and Hu, Junjie and others},
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.25110},
year={2025}
}
- Downloads last month
- 51