Reload features from Parquet metadata
Resolves #5482. 

Attaches feature metadata to parquet files serialised using `Dataset.to_parquet`. 

This allows retrieving data with "rich" feature types (e.g., `datasets.features.image.Image` or `datasets.features.audio.Audio`) from parquet files without cumbersome casting (for an example, see #5482).

@lhoestq It seems that it is sufficient to attach metadata to the schema prior to serialising and features are loaded back with correct types afterwards automatically. 

I used the following script to test the implementation:

```python
from pathlib import Path

import datasets

dataset_name = "Maysee/tiny-imagenet"
ds = datasets.load_dataset(dataset_name, split=datasets.Split.TRAIN)
output_directory_path = Path(__file__).parent.joinpath("example_test_outputs", dataset_name.replace("/", "_"))
output_directory_path.mkdir(exist_ok=True, parents=True)
output_filepath = output_directory_path.joinpath("ds.parquet")
ds.to_parquet(str(output_filepath))

reloaded_ds = datasets.load_dataset(str(output_directory_path), split=datasets.Split.TRAIN)

assert ds.features == reloaded_ds.features
```

Prior to the change in this PR this script raises an `AssertionError` and the `Image` features lose their type after serialisation. After the change in this PR, the assertion does not raise an error and manual inspection of the features shows type `Image` for the respective columns of `reloaded_ds `.

Some open questions:
* How/where can I best add new unit tests for this implementation?
* What dataset would I best use in the tests? I chose `Maysee/tiny-imagenet` mainly because it is small and contains an ?Image` feature that can be used to test, but I'd be happy for suggestions on a suitable data source to use.
* Currently I'm calling `datasets.arrow_writer.ArrowWriter._build_metadata` as I need the same logic. However, I'm not happy with the coupling between `datasets.io.parquet` and `datasets.arrow_writer` it leaves me with. Suggest to factor this common logic out into a helper function and reuse it from both of these. Do you agree and if yes, could you please guide me where I would best place this function?

Many thanks in advance and kind regards,
MFreidank


  