Dataset Viewer
source_dataset
stringclasses 1
value | category
stringclasses 4
values | input_image
imagewidth (px) 119
3k
| edit_instruction
stringlengths 18
475
| output_reasoning_text
stringlengths 222
1.63k
| output_image
imagewidth (px) 512
1.02k
| score
int64 1
5
⌀ | reasoning
stringlengths 692
1.82k
⌀ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like after being kept in a daily environment for a year.
|
<think>
The question involves depicting the transformation of bananas over a year in a typical household environment. The question_image shows fresh, ripe bananas, while the question_text asks to visualize their state after a year.
To approach this, I consider the natural aging process of bananas. Over time, they typically turn from yellow to brown as they ripen and eventually spoil. The texture changes from smooth and firm to wrinkled and soft, and the color shifts from bright yellow to various shades of brown. Additionally, any spots or bruises may become more pronounced, and the overall appearance becomes less appealing.
The answer_image should reflect this progression, showing bananas that are significantly overripe and possibly starting to rot. The texture should appear soft and wrinkled, with brown spots and discoloration dominating the skin. The environment should still resemble a typical household, with elements like a kitchen or dining table to maintain context.
This reasoning ensures the answer image aligns with the user's request for a realistic depiction of bananas after a year in a daily environment.
</think>
| 5 |
1. Detect Difference: In the original image (A), the bananas appear fresh, bright yellow, with only a few small brown spots and smooth skin. In the edited image (B), the bananas are heavily discolored with large dark brown and black patches, the skin appears duller and possibly softer, and the stems look more dried and shriveled. The setting remains a typical household environment. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The bananas should appear heavily overripe or rotting, with significant browning or blackening, possible wrinkling or collapse of the skin, and an overall unappealing texture, while still being recognizable as the original bananas in a household context. 3. Instruction Match: The edited image faithfully shows the bananas after a year in a daily environment—skin is mottled and dark, texture appears soft and aged, and the scene retains the household context. The transformation is realistic and thorough. 4. Decision: All required aspects of aging, discoloration, and environmental consistency are present, so this is a perfect compliance. Score: 5.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like ten years later.
|
<think>
The question_image shows a young plant emerging from the soil, symbolizing growth and potential. The question_text asks to visualize what this plant will look like after ten years, implying a transformation into a mature tree.
To reason about the answer, I consider the natural progression of a tree's development. The young plant in the image likely represents a sapling, and after ten years, it would grow into a full-fledged tree with a thick trunk, a robust canopy, and possibly sprawling branches.
The answer_image should depict a mature tree, emphasizing its height, full foliage, and a strong, sturdy trunk. The setting might include a natural environment like a forest or a park, with surrounding elements such as other trees, grass, and a serene atmosphere. Details like sunlight filtering through the leaves or a clear sky could enhance the visual appeal and convey the passage of time.
The answer_text would describe the tree's growth and maturity, highlighting its transformation from a sapling to a full-grown tree. This aligns with the user's request to visualize the plant's future state after ten years.
</think>
| 5 |
1. Detect Difference: Image A shows a young plant (sapling) emerging from the soil, with a thin stem and a few green leaves. Image B depicts a large, mature tree with a thick trunk, widespread branches, and a dense, leafy canopy, set in a grassy landscape with other trees in the background and a bright sky. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The edited image should show the young plant as it would appear ten years later: a mature tree with a thick trunk, full foliage, and a robust canopy, potentially in a natural setting. 3. Instruction Match: The change from a sapling to a mature tree is accurately reflected—the correct object (the plant) is shown in its advanced stage, with all expected attributes of a decade-old tree depicted (height, trunk thickness, full foliage). The setting also matches the described environment. 4. Decision: All required changes are present and accurate; the image perfectly follows the reasoning process. Therefore, the score is 5.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like after three years.
|
<think>
The question image shows a young puppy with a light brown and white coat, sitting on grass. The question_text asks to visualize what this puppy will look like after three years, implying a transformation into a fully grown adult dog.
To reason about the answer, I consider the physical changes a puppy undergoes in three years. The puppy's coat will likely become more defined and mature, with a richer shade of brown and possibly a darker tone. Its size will increase significantly, and the body structure will become more robust and adult-like. The ears may stand taller or develop a more defined shape, and the face will show more maturity.
The answer image should depict a fully grown dog with a similar coat pattern but a larger, more muscular build. The grassy background remains consistent to maintain continuity between the puppy and adult stages. The adult dog should appear confident and poised, reflecting the transformation from a young puppy to a mature adult.
</think>
| 5 |
1. Detect Difference: In Image B, the dog is visibly larger, with a more muscular and mature body structure compared to the smaller, rounder puppy body in Image A. The coat color in Image B is richer and slightly darker, and the fur pattern remains similar. The grassy background is consistent between both images. The ears and posture also look more defined and adult-like in Image B. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The edited image should show the same dog, but now as an adult: larger, more robust, with a deeper, more saturated coat color, mature body proportions, and sitting on grass. 3. Instruction Match: The edited image accurately depicts the puppy from Image A after three years, with appropriate increases in size, body maturity, and coat richness, while retaining the same general fur pattern and background. 4. Decision: All expected changes are present and accurately implemented; therefore, the score is 5 for perfect compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what he will look like after exercising for a year.
|
<think>
To address the request, I first analyze the question_image, which shows a person with a heavy build, minimal muscle definition, and a tattoo on the left arm. The question_text asks for a depiction of the person after exercising for a year, implying a transformation into a leaner, more muscular physique.
I imagine the final answer_image would feature a significant reduction in body fat, highlighting defined muscle groups such as the chest, arms, and abdomen. The tattoo on the left arm would remain unchanged, ensuring continuity with the original image. The person's posture might appear more upright and confident, reflecting the positive effects of exercise.
To create the answer_text, I would describe the transformation, emphasizing the leaner physique, visible muscle tone, and overall improvement. The answer_image would likely show the person in a similar pose but with a visibly toned and athletic appearance, aligning with the request for a transformation after a year of exercise.
</think>
| 1 |
1. Detect Difference: The edited image is essentially the same as the original image. There are no significant visual changes to the body shape, muscle definition, or overall physique; only a decrease in image quality and resolution is apparent. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The edited image should display the same person with significantly reduced body fat, visible muscle definition (especially in the chest, arms, and abdomen), and an overall leaner, more athletic build. The tattoo on the left arm should remain unchanged, and the person's posture might look more upright and confident. 3. Instruction Match: The core transformation—showing a leaner, muscular, athletic body after a year of exercise—did not occur. The physical attributes remain unchanged. 4. Decision: As no required changes were implemented and the reasoning process was not followed at all, the appropriate score is 1 for non-compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what she will look like after a year without cutting her hair.
|
<think>
To address the request, I focus on the transformation of her hairstyle over a year. The original hairstyle is short and wavy, with a layered cut. Based on the question text, the goal is to visualize how her hair might look after a year without cutting it. This implies growth and changes in texture, volume, and length.
The answer image should depict longer hair, potentially reaching shoulder length or slightly below. The texture might appear fuller or thicker, with more volume, especially around the ends. The color remains consistent with the original, maintaining the blonde tone. The styling could be slightly tousled or styled in a way that complements the length, such as loose waves or a natural, effortless look.
The final image should emphasize the natural progression of her hair over time, showing the lengthened and fuller appearance while keeping the hairstyle recognizable as the same person. This aligns with the user's request for a transformation.
</think>
| 5 |
1. Detect Difference: The original image shows short, layered, wavy blonde hair ending above the shoulders. The edited image now shows significantly longer blonde hair that extends well past the shoulders, with a fuller and somewhat tousled, voluminous appearance. The hair color remains consistent, and the styling appears natural and loose. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The edited image should show the same woman with hair that has grown out for a year—shoulder-length or longer, fuller, possibly thicker, in the same blonde shade, styled naturally or with loose waves. 3. Instruction Match: The edit accurately depicts the same person with grown-out hair: the length, volume, texture, and color all match the described expected change. The core transformation (hair grown out for a year) is fully realized, and all details in the reasoning process are present. 4. Decision: The edited image perfectly fulfills the reasoning process and the instructions, so the score is 5.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like after being placed outdoors for ten year.
|
<think>
To reason through the transformation, I observe that the question_image depicts a vintage iron with a wooden handle and metallic base, showing signs of wear and age. The user wants to visualize what this object would look like after being exposed to the outdoors for ten years.
Considering the aging process, the metal would likely develop significant rust and patina, while the wooden handle would deteriorate and crack. The surface of the iron would become rough and uneven, with patches of corrosion and discoloration. The wooden handle might splinter or rot, losing its original smooth finish.
The answer image would need to reflect these changes, showing the iron with a heavily rusted metallic base and a weathered wooden handle. The texture would appear rough and uneven, with visible signs of decay. The background might include elements like dirt, grass, or other outdoor debris to emphasize the passage of time and exposure to the elements. This transformation aligns with the user's request for a realistic depiction of aging outdoors.
</think>
| 5 |
1. Detect Difference: The original image shows a vintage iron with a metallic base and a smooth wooden handle, placed indoors on a wooden surface. The edited image depicts the same iron but with a heavily rusted and corroded metal base, a weathered and stained wooden handle with visible patches of rot, and the iron is now placed outdoors on dirt with grass and small rocks, with a blurred natural background. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The iron should appear heavily rusted and weathered, with a deteriorated wooden handle, rough and uneven texture, and should be situated outdoors, possibly among dirt, grass, or other outdoor debris. 3. Instruction Match: The edited image accurately transforms the iron to appear as if left outdoors for ten years: the metal is rusted and pitted, the wood is decayed and stained, and the entire scene is convincingly set outdoors, matching both the environmental and material changes described in the reasoning process. 4. Decision: Every specified change is present and visually accurate, fulfilling the reasoning process with perfect compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what this species look like more than two million years ago.
|
<think>
To address the request, I observe the modern human traits in the question image, such as facial structure, hair style, and tattoos. The task is to imagine what this species would look like two million years ago.
Considering evolutionary trends, I would focus on a more primitive appearance, such as a more robust jawline, minimal or no tattoos, and a hairstyle that reflects ancient human characteristics. The answer image would depict a prehistoric human with a more rugged and natural look, possibly with a beard and a hairstyle that aligns with early human evolution.
</think>
| 5 |
1. Detect Difference: The edited image shows a subject with significantly more body hair, a more rugged and robust physique, a beard, and no visible tattoos or modern clothing. The hairstyle is simpler and more unkempt, and the setting is more neutral/earthy. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The edited image should depict a prehistoric human with a robust jawline, increased body hair, beard, absence of tattoos, and primitive hairstyle—overall, a rugged and natural appearance fitting early human evolution. 3. Instruction Match: The changes match the reasoning process exactly: the tattoos and modern hairstyle are gone, and primitive features such as body hair, beard, and a rugged physique are added. The clothing is removed, further enhancing the ancient look. 4. Decision: Every detail from the reasoning process is present and visually accurate, so the score is 5 for perfect compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like one hour later.
|
<think>
The question_image shows a smartphone plugged into a wall socket, with its battery indicator showing a low charge. The question_text asks to visualize the state of the phone one hour later, implying the need to show the battery charging progress over time.
To generate the answer, I consider that the battery will likely increase in charge level as it receives power. The answer_image should depict the phone with a battery indicator that is significantly higher than the original state, indicating substantial progress toward a full charge. The visual should also maintain the same setup (phone plugged into the wall socket) to ensure continuity.
The final image would likely show a battery icon with a larger red portion, signaling higher charge levels, while the rest remains gray. This conveys the passage of time and the charging process. The answer_text would describe this change, emphasizing the progress made in one hour.
</think>
| 4 |
1. Detect Difference: The only visual change between Image A and Image B is the battery indicator on the phone screen. In Image A, the battery indicator is mostly empty and red (low charge). In Image B, a green section has been added to the battery indicator, indicating a higher charge level, while the red section is still visible. The phone remains plugged into the wall socket in the same orientation and environment. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The edited image should show the same phone, still plugged in, but with a battery indicator that is significantly more filled (green or another color indicating charge progress), clearly showing that the battery has charged over time. 3. Instruction Match: The correct object (the battery indicator on the phone) is modified. The attribute (charge level) is increased by adding a green section, suggesting the phone is charging. However, the new green area is a vertical bar above the battery icon, which is not a standard battery fill and may be visually inconsistent with typical representations of battery charge (which fill horizontally within the battery icon). The intent is clear and mostly met, but the execution of the battery filling could be more accurate. 4. Decision: The core change (showing increased charge) is made, but the green bar's presentation is unusual and not perfectly accurate to standard battery filling visuals. This is a minor detail, so the score is 4.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it looks like after being exposed to the sun for a day.
|
<think>
The question involves transforming the snowy scene into one where the snow has melted, revealing the underlying road and surroundings. The user likely wants to visualize the effect of sunlight on the snow-covered area, showcasing a clear and sunny environment.
Analyzing the question_image, I notice a residential street covered in snow, with parked cars and houses lining both sides. The snow appears thick, and the atmosphere is cold. The question_text suggests the user is asking for a depiction of the same scene after the snow has melted, implying a bright, sunny day.
To create the answer_image, I would focus on removing the snow entirely, revealing the asphalt road and any textures or markings on it. The parked cars should remain visible, but their surfaces should appear dry and clean. The houses, trees, and fences would also need to be free of snow, showing their original colors and details. The sky would likely be bright blue or clear, emphasizing the sunny weather.
When forming the answer_text, I would describe the transformation, highlighting the absence of snow and the sunny atmosphere. The answer_image would match this description, showing a dry, clear road with no snow, and the surrounding environment illuminated by sunlight. This approach fulfills the user's request for a visual representation of the scene after the snow melts.
</think>
| 2 |
1. Detect Difference: In the edited image, the sky is brighter and more blue, and the lighting is warmer, suggesting sunlight. The snow on the road has partially melted, revealing some exposed asphalt and wet patches. However, significant amounts of snow remain along the sides of the road, on the cars, trees, fences, and house roofs. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The scene should show no snow at all: the entire road, sidewalks, cars, trees, fences, and houses should be free of snow, fully revealing their original surfaces and colors, under a clear, sunny sky. 3. Instruction Match: The reasoning process specifies that the snow should be entirely gone, not just reduced or partially melted. The edit only partially melts the snow (mostly on the road), while large amounts of snow remain elsewhere. Thus, the main aspect of the transformation is not fully realized. 4. Decision: Since the most important change (complete snow removal) is not implemented and only the initial stage of melting is depicted, this counts as 2—major omission.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like one hour later.
|
<think>
The question_image shows a faucet pouring water into a bucket, and the question_text asks to visualize the scene after one hour. This suggests the user wants to see the progression of the water level in the bucket over time.
To reason through the answer, I consider the steady flow of water from the faucet and the gradual increase in the bucket's water level. The bucket is transparent, so the water level will be visible, and the time progression will be represented by the water rising.
The answer_image should depict the same setup but with the water level noticeably higher, indicating the passage of time. The faucet should still be pouring water, but the bucket should now contain more water, showing the accumulation over the hour. The lighting and background should remain consistent with the original image to preserve continuity.
This approach ensures the user's request for the one-hour progression is met visually and contextually.
</think>
| 5 |
1. Detect Difference: In Image A, the water level in the transparent bucket is low, covering only the bottom portion. In Image B, the water level in the bucket is significantly higher, reaching to about halfway or more up the bucket's height. The faucet continues to pour water, and all other visual elements (lighting, bucket, faucet, background) remain unchanged. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The edited image should show the same scene, but with the water level in the bucket noticeably higher, indicating accumulation over one hour, while the faucet is still pouring water. 3. Instruction Match: The only requested change is to increase the water level in the bucket to represent the passage of one hour with continuous flow. The observed difference matches this exactly: the correct object (the water in the bucket) is modified, the attribute (water level) is increased appropriately, and all other aspects remain constant. 4. Decision: The edit fulfills the reasoning process perfectly, so the score is 5.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like one hour later.
|
<think>
The question_image shows a glass of tea with floating leaves, suggesting a freshly brewed beverage. The question_text asks for the appearance of the tea one hour later, implying the tea will have undergone changes due to steeping time.
To reason about this, I consider how tea typically evolves over time. The leaves may settle at the bottom, and the liquid could become more concentrated or slightly darker due to the extraction of flavors and tannins. The leaves might also lose some of their vibrant green color and appear more wilted or browned.
The answer_image should reflect these changes: the tea would likely appear darker and more concentrated, with fewer leaves floating on the surface. The leaves at the bottom of the glass would be visible and might look shriveled or browned, indicating they have steeped for an extended period. The background and lighting should remain consistent to maintain continuity with the original image.
</think>
| 4 |
1. Detect Difference: The main change between Image A and Image B is the color of the tea: in Image A, the liquid is a lighter yellowish-brown, while in Image B it has become noticeably darker and richer in color. The leaves remain floating at the surface in both images, though there may be a very slight increase in the number of leaves that appear to have sunk toward the bottom in Image B, but most leaves are still floating. The background and lighting remain consistent. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The edited image (one hour later) should show darker, more concentrated tea liquid, with leaves losing some green color, appearing wilted or browned, and more leaves settled at the bottom of the glass instead of floating. 3. Instruction Match: The color change (darker tea) is accurately depicted. However, the leaves are still mostly floating at the top rather than having mostly settled at the bottom, which is a minor omission compared to the reasoning process expectation. The leaves also do not look significantly more wilted or browned, but the degree of difference is subtle. 4. Decision: The edit captures the main temporal change (darker liquid), but does not fully show the leaves settling at the bottom and changing in appearance, so this is minor omission—a score of 4.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what they will look like ten years later.
|
<think>
To address the question, I observe that the original image features two individuals standing side by side, with clear differences in height and attire. The request is to visualize how they will look ten years later.
I would focus on the progression of their physical appearance, considering factors like aging, changes in height, and attire. For the older individual, I would expect features like wrinkles, gray hair, and a more mature build. For the younger individual, I would imagine increased height, more defined features, and perhaps a more confident or adventurous style.
The clothing would likely reflect their personal growth and preferences, such as the older individual wearing a slightly more formal or rugged outfit, while the younger individual might sport something more casual or expressive. The background could remain consistent, maintaining the natural setting with grass and flowers.
In the answer image, I would depict the older person with a more weathered appearance, perhaps wearing a jacket and boots, while the younger person appears taller and more confident, dressed in a casual outfit. The overall composition should convey a sense of time passing and personal development while maintaining the original setting.
</think>
| 5 |
1. Detect Difference: In the edited image, the younger individual is noticeably taller, with a more mature build and older clothing (now wearing jeans and a jacket instead of shorts and sneakers). The older individual’s appearance remains similar, but his attire also appears slightly more formal or rugged. The background and overall positioning are consistent. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The edited image should show the younger individual visibly older, taller, and dressed in attire that reflects age progression, while the older individual could show subtle signs of further aging and a shift in clothing style, all within the same setting. 3. Instruction Match: The core requirement—to show both individuals ten years later with appropriate physical and attire changes—has been met. The younger individual appears older, taller, and more confidently styled. The older individual’s clothing is slightly more mature, fitting the expected progression. 4. Decision: All required changes are present and accurately depicted, so this edit receives a 5 for perfect compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what they will look like one year later.
|
<think>
The question asks for a depiction of the kitten one year later. From the question_image, the kitten is small, standing on its hind legs, interacting with a young tree in a serene, natural setting. The user likely wants to see the progression of the kitten's growth and development over time.
To create the answer image, I would imagine the kitten as a larger, more mature version of itself. Its fur might be fuller and more defined, and its posture could reflect increased confidence or curiosity. The tree would likely grow taller, with more developed leaves, symbolizing the passage of time. The background could remain consistent with the original image's natural setting, maintaining continuity and emphasizing the growth theme.
The answer image would show the kitten in a similar environment but with a more developed appearance, standing upright and interacting with the now taller tree. This progression would visually communicate the passage of time and the kitten's growth.
</think>
| 1 |
1. Detect Difference: The kitten in both images is visually very similar in size, posture, and overall youthful appearance. The tree is also almost identical in height and development. There is little to no evidence of growth or aging in either the kitten or the tree between the two images. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The edited image should show a noticeably larger, more mature cat (not a kitten), with fuller fur and a more adult posture, alongside a taller and more developed tree. The background should remain similar. 3. Instruction Match: The edit does not display any significant changes to indicate the passage of a year: the kitten has not grown into a cat, and the tree has not matured. Both still appear as a kitten and a small sapling. 4. Decision: As the reasoning process is not followed at all and the intended modifications are completely missing, this is a clear case of non-compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like three months later.
|
<think>
The question_image shows a tadpole, which is in its early developmental stage. The question_text asks to visualize what the tadpole will look like three months later, implying a transformation into a more developed stage, likely a frog.
To reason about this, I consider the typical developmental stages of amphibians. Tadpoles undergo metamorphosis, where they lose their tail, develop legs, and gain a more frog-like appearance. Three months later, the tadpole would likely have fully developed legs, a shrinking tail, and a more defined body structure resembling a frog.
When creating the answer_image, I would depict a frog with fully developed limbs, a smaller tail, and a body adapted for terrestrial life. The coloration would likely shift to a more vibrant green, and the texture would appear smoother compared to the tadpole. The image would emphasize the transition from aquatic to terrestrial features, such as the legs and head shape.
The answer_text would describe this transformation, highlighting the physical changes that occur during this period. This reasoning ensures the response aligns with the developmental process of amphibians.
</think>
| 5 |
1. Detect Difference: The original image (Image A) shows a tadpole: an aquatic organism with a long tail, a rounded body, and no visible limbs except for a small emerging leg. The edited image (Image B) shows a fully formed green frog: it has a compact, robust body, fully developed front and hind legs, a much reduced (almost absent) tail, and a vibrant green coloration. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The edited image should show a frog with fully developed limbs (both front and hind), a greatly reduced or absent tail, a more terrestrial/mature body structure, and a green, smooth appearance, reflecting the transformation from tadpole to frog after three months. 3. Instruction Match: The correct organism has been depicted (the same individual is implied rather than replaced with a different species or unrelated animal). The requested attributes (loss of tail, full limb development, frog body shape and coloration) are all present and accurate. The degree of change (full frog, not intermediate) matches the time frame given in the reasoning. 4. Decision: The edit fulfills all aspects of the reasoning process and instruction accurately. Therefore, the score is 5 for perfect compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like a six hours later.
|
<think>
The question asks for a depiction of the scene six hours later, suggesting a change in time and lighting. The question_image shows a desert landscape with a bright sun overhead, indicating daytime. To create the answer, I would consider the progression of time and how the sun's position and lighting would change.
Six hours later, the sun would have moved in the sky, possibly setting or moving to a lower position, which would result in a softer, warmer light. The shadows would lengthen, and the sky might display hues of orange, pink, or purple, typical of a sunset. The desert landscape would still be visible but with a different ambiance, as the light source shifts.
The answer image would likely show a similar desert scene but with a sunset in the background, the sun either just below the horizon or partially set. The sky would transition to a gradient of warm colors, and the lighting would be softer, casting longer shadows across the ground. This aligns with the concept of time progression and the described change in the environment.
</think>
| 5 |
1. Detect Difference: In the original image (Image A), the desert scene is brightly lit with the sun high in the sky, producing strong sunlight and clear blue skies. In the edited image (Image B), the sun is no longer visible in the sky, and the scene is illuminated with a gradient of warm colors—orange, purple, and pink—suggestive of sunset. The lighting is softer, the sky is no longer blue, and the shadows across the desert are longer and more diffuse. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The edited image should show the same desert landscape, but with the sun either at or just below the horizon, a sky filled with warm sunset colors, and softer, angled lighting indicative of the passage of six hours toward sunset. 3. Instruction Match: The correct object (the desert scene) is retained. The lighting and sky color have been changed to match a sunset, with no sun visible or just below the horizon and a warm-toned sky. The change is comprehensive and accurate, clearly indicating a shift of six hours later in the day. 4. Decision: All required visual changes to depict six hours later are present and accurate, with no major omissions or errors. This is perfect compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what they will look like five seconds later.
|
<think>
The question image shows a sprint race in progress, with runners in various stages of acceleration. The question_text asks what they will look like five seconds later, implying a progression in the race. To generate the answer image, I would visualize the runners further along the track, with increased speed and effort.
The final image should depict the runners in a more advanced stage of the race, showcasing their positions relative to one another. Their postures would likely be more dynamic, with arms and legs extended further, and their bodies leaning forward to emphasize momentum. The track and surrounding environment would remain consistent, but the runners would be farther along the path, reflecting their continued acceleration.
This progression should convey the sense of competition and the dynamic nature of the race, aligning with the user's request for a depiction of what happens five seconds later.
</think>
| 5 |
1. Detect Difference: In Image A, the runners are just starting their sprint, with bodies low to the ground and clustered near the starting lines. In Image B, the runners are much farther down the track, with their bodies fully extended in mid-sprint, indicating significant forward movement and increased speed. The environment (track, lanes, and markings) remains consistent between the images. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The edited image should show the same runners further along the track, with more dynamic, extended running postures, demonstrating the passage of time (five seconds later) and the race's progression. The background and track should remain unchanged except for the runners' positions. 3. Instruction Match: The edit correctly advances the runners along the track, maintains their competitive positions, and depicts more dynamic sprinting forms, exactly as the reasoning process outlines. The key aspects—runners further ahead, more dynamic posture, and consistent environment—are all faithfully executed. 4. Decision: The edited image precisely matches the reasoning process and the expected outcome, so the score is 5 for perfect compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like after a week in a damp basement.
|
<think>
To reason through this, I observe that the question_image shows a loaf of bread with a golden-brown crust and a soft, airy interior. The question_text asks how the bread would look after a week in a damp basement. This implies a focus on the effects of prolonged exposure to moisture and humidity.
Considering typical bread behavior in such conditions, the bread would likely become moldy and discolored due to the damp environment. The crust might soften, and the mold could spread from the surface into the interior, causing discoloration and potentially a foul odor. The texture would appear spongy or crusty, and the bread would likely lose its appetizing appearance.
In the answer image, I would expect to see the bread with visible mold growth, possibly green or fuzzy patches on the surface and inside. The crust might appear darker or discolored, and the overall structure would look less appealing, reflecting the effects of prolonged dampness. This aligns with the user's request to visualize the bread's state after a week in a damp basement.
</think>
| 5 |
1. Detect Difference: The original image (Image A) shows a fresh loaf of bread with a golden-brown crust and a soft, clean interior. The edited image (Image B) displays the same loaf of bread, but now there are extensive fuzzy, greenish-black mold patches on the crust and interior, and some mold has also fallen onto the plate. The bread's appearance is discolored and unappetizing, clearly affected by mold. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The bread should appear moldy, with visible mold growth (likely green/blue/black fuzzy patches) on the crust and interior, perhaps with some discoloration, reflecting the effects of a week in a damp basement. The structure should look less fresh, and the overall impression should be of spoiled, unappetizing bread. 3. Instruction Match: The edit has correctly added mold growth across the bread, including the crust and interior, matching the expected effects of prolonged exposure to dampness. The object (the bread) is not replaced, just modified as required. The degree and nature of mold growth are appropriate, and the bread is now visually consistent with the reasoning process. 4. Decision: The edit precisely fulfills the reasoning process and instruction, with all required changes present and accurate. This warrants a score of 5 (Perfect Compliance).
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like after one month of being neglected.
|
<think>
The user wants to visualize the consequences of neglecting the plant for one month. From the question_image, the plant appears healthy and well-maintained, positioned near a window with good lighting. The question_text suggests the plant will deteriorate due to lack of care.
To create the answer_image, I would imagine the plant with signs of neglect: wilted leaves, discoloration, or drooping stems. The pot might appear dusty or dirty, and the overall environment could look less vibrant. The lighting might seem dimmer, emphasizing the lack of care. The plant's leaves could have brown edges or spots, and the soil might appear dry or sparse.
The answer_text would describe the plant's condition after neglect, emphasizing its deteriorated state. The image would visually represent the contrast between the initial healthy state and the neglected state, ensuring the user sees the impact of neglect clearly.
</think>
| 5 |
1. Detect Difference: In the edited image, the plant's leaves are wilted and have brown, dry edges, with some leaves showing significant damage. The pot is dirty with soil spilled onto the surface and sides, and the environment looks dimmer and less vibrant compared to the original, where the plant is healthy, upright, and green, and the pot and surrounding area are clean. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The plant should display clear signs of neglect such as wilted or drooping leaves, discoloration (browning or yellowing), damaged or dry leaf edges, possibly dry or sparse soil, and a generally less vibrant or dirtier environment. 3. Instruction Match: The edited image accurately reflects all specified signs of neglect: wilted and discolored leaves, a dirty pot, spilled soil, and a diminished sense of care in the environment. The correct object (the same plant) was modified, not replaced, and the degree of deterioration matches the expectation for one month of neglect. 4. Decision: All required changes are present and accurately implemented. This is perfect compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like after ten years of use.
|
<think>
To address the question, I first observe the question_image, which shows a sleek black leather jacket. The question_text asks for a depiction of what the jacket would look like after ten years of use. This implies a transformation due to wear and tear, such as fading, scuff marks, or discoloration.
I envision the jacket after prolonged use: the leather might lose its glossy finish and develop visible signs of aging, like creases, worn edges, and possible discoloration. The pockets and buttons might show signs of wear, and the overall structure could appear slightly frayed or less polished. The jacket might also have a slightly looser fit due to wear.
For the answer_image, I would depict the same jacket but with these characteristics: faded black tones, visible creases, and signs of aging. The texture might appear rougher, and the overall appearance would reflect a well-loved, used item rather than a new one. This aligns with the idea of a jacket that has been through ten years of use.
</think>
| 5 |
1. Detect Difference: The original image shows a pristine, glossy black leather jacket with no visible wear. The edited image depicts the same jacket with significant visible changes: the black leather is faded in various areas, with brownish discoloration, scuff marks, and an overall worn texture. The shine is reduced, and the surface appears rougher and aged. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The edited image should depict the original jacket but with worn, faded black leather, visible creasing, discoloration, scuffed areas, and an overall aged appearance consistent with ten years of use. 3. Instruction Match: The correct object (the same jacket) is present and not replaced. The requested attributes—fading, discoloration, scuff marks, and a generally aged appearance—have all been applied accurately and to an appropriate degree. The transformation is clearly visible and coherent with the reasoning process. 4. Decision: All aspects of the reasoning process are present and executed correctly, so this is a perfect compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like after three months in a busy urban environment.
|
<think>
To address the question, I first observe the question_image, which features a sleek, modern SUV in a clean, suburban setting. The question_text asks for a depiction of the vehicle after three months in a busy urban environment, implying wear and tear, dirt, and urban elements.
I consider the environmental factors that would affect the vehicle's appearance in a bustling city. These include dust, dirt from exhaust, and potential scratches or marks from driving through rougher streets. Additionally, urban elements like graffiti, street signs, and other vehicles might be visible in the background to emphasize the busy setting.
When forming the answer_image, I would depict the same SUV now covered in dirt and grime, with a gritty urban backdrop. The vehicle might have minor scratches or smudges on its surface, and the surrounding environment should include elements like graffiti-covered walls, parked cars, and pedestrians to reinforce the urban atmosphere.
The final answer_text would describe the vehicle's altered state, highlighting its dirty and weathered appearance, while the answer_image would visually support this by showing the SUV in a gritty urban environment with visible signs of wear.
</think>
| 5 |
1. Detect Difference: The original image shows the SUV clean and in front of a tidy, suburban brick building. The edited image shows the same SUV now heavily covered in dirt and grime, with visible mud splatters on the body and wheels. The background has changed to a gritty urban environment with graffiti on the walls, other parked vehicles, and a more worn street surface. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The SUV should appear dirty and weathered, with clear signs of accumulated grime and possibly minor wear, situated in a busy urban scene that includes graffiti, other cars, and a generally less pristine environment. 3. Instruction Match: The edits match the instruction and reasoning process exactly: the vehicle itself has not been replaced, only modified to appear dirty and weathered; the setting now clearly reads as urban, with graffiti and traffic present. All required changes are present and accurate. 4. Decision: The edited image fulfills all aspects of the reasoning process, so it receives a score of 5 for perfect compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like after a season of autumn.
|
<think>
The question asks for a transformation of the tree depicted in the question_image into what it would look like during autumn. Observing the question_image, the tree is lush and green, indicative of summer or spring. To meet the request, I would imagine the tree in autumn, where leaves typically turn shades of yellow, orange, and red, and some may fall, leaving a sparse appearance.
The answer_image should depict the same tree in autumn, with vibrant fall colors on the remaining leaves and a few scattered fallen leaves on the ground. The lighting and sky should remain consistent with the original image, ensuring continuity. The background buildings and grassy area should also remain unchanged to maintain the context of the location. This approach ensures the transformation is visually accurate and aligns with the user's request.
</think>
| 5 |
1. Detect Difference: The tree in the edited image has leaves that are now predominantly orange and yellow, with some red tones, replacing the green foliage of the original image. There appear to be a few scattered fallen leaves on the ground beneath the tree as well. The background, including buildings, grass, and sky, remains unchanged. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The tree should display autumnal colors—vibrant yellows, oranges, and reds—and may have a sparser appearance, with some leaves fallen to the ground. The rest of the scene should remain the same. 3. Instruction Match: The correct object (the main tree) has been modified, not replaced. The green leaves have been accurately transformed to autumnal colors, matching the requested attributes. Some fallen leaves are visible, fulfilling the expectation of autumn. All other contextual elements remain unchanged as required. 4. Decision: The edit precisely fulfills the reasoning process and instruction with no omissions or errors, so the score is 5.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like after being in storage for a century.
|
<think>
The user is asking for a depiction of the wooden chest after a century of storage. The question_image shows a vintage wooden chest with metal reinforcements and latches, indicating it was designed for durability and perhaps travel or storage purposes. The question_text suggests the chest has aged over time, and the user wants to visualize its appearance after a century.
To create the answer image, I would consider the effects of aging on wood and metal. The chest would likely show signs of wear, such as scratches, discoloration, and possible damage to the metal reinforcements. The wood might have a darker, weathered tone, with visible cracks or splits, especially around the joints and edges. The metal elements might develop rust or patina, and the latches could appear worn or corroded.
The answer image should reflect these characteristics, showing the chest's aged and weathered state. It would depict a rustic, antique appearance with visible signs of aging, such as faded paint, uneven surfaces, and a general sense of historical wear. This approach aligns with the user's request to visualize the chest after a century of storage.
</think>
| 5 |
1. Detect Difference: The edited image shows the same chest, but the wood appears significantly more weathered and faded, with a grayish tone replacing the original warm brown finish. The surface is uneven, with visible discoloration and apparent wear. The metal reinforcements and latches look more tarnished and corroded, some areas appearing rusty or dulled. There are visible scratches, small cracks, and chips along the edges and corners of the wood, indicating age and deterioration. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The chest should look aged and weathered, with faded or discolored wood, visible cracks or splits, worn or rusty metal elements, and an overall antique, neglected appearance. 3. Instruction Match: The changes perfectly match the reasoning process. The same chest is depicted, and all specified attributes—aged wood, discoloration, surface wear, cracks, and corroded metal—are present and accurate. The degree of aging is consistent with a century of storage. 4. Decision: All requested changes are present and accurately rendered, so this is perfect compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like an hour later.
|
<think>
The question_image shows a freshly cut apple with a clean, crisp appearance. The user asks to visualize what the apple will look like an hour later, suggesting the need to account for natural aging processes. Over time, apples typically change in appearance due to oxidation, moisture loss, and potential browning.
In forming the answer, I would consider the apple's exposed surfaces. The flesh would likely start to discolor slightly as it oxidizes, turning from a bright white to a pale yellow or light brown. The seeds and core might remain unchanged, but the surrounding flesh would show signs of drying. The stem area might also appear slightly darker or shriveled due to moisture loss.
The answer_image would depict the apple with these changes. The flesh would appear less vibrant, with some areas showing browning or discoloration. The overall texture would look slightly shriveled, and the stem might appear slightly wilted. These details would convey the passage of time and the natural aging process of the apple.
</think>
| 4 |
1. Detect Difference: In the edited image, the cut surface of the apple appears slightly less vibrant and there is a subtle yellow-brown tint around the exposed flesh, particularly near the core and edges. The flesh looks marginally less crisp and a bit drier, but there is no significant shriveling, deep browning, or dramatic textural change. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The apple should show mild to moderate browning due to oxidation on the cut surfaces, a slight loss of vibrancy, perhaps a hint of shriveling or dryness in the flesh, and a possibly slightly wilted stem. The seeds and core should remain unchanged. 3. Instruction Match: The edit introduces a gentle brownish-yellow discoloration and a slight dulling of the flesh, which matches the early stages of oxidation. However, the effect is quite minimal—there is no clear shriveling or evident moisture loss, and the stem does not appear notably wilted. 4. Decision: The core change (discoloration due to oxidation) is present but understated, and other minor aging details are missing. This is a minor omission, so the score is 4.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like after two years underwater.
|
<think>
The user wants to visualize the key underwater after two years. The original image shows a metallic key on a wooden surface. To meet the request, I would imagine the key submerged in water, with signs of corrosion or oxidation due to prolonged exposure. The surrounding environment should be underwater, with a focus on the key's texture and color changes. The final image would depict the key with a weathered, aged appearance, likely with rust or tarnish, set against a blurred underwater backdrop to emphasize the submerged state.
</think>
| 5 |
1. Detect Difference: The original image shows a clean metallic key on a wooden surface. In the edited image, the key is now depicted underwater with a blue-green aquatic background. The key itself shows significant corrosion, rust, and weathering, and the environment clearly indicates it is submerged, with bubbles and underwater lighting effects. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The edited image should display the original key underwater, showing signs of long-term submersion such as rust, tarnish, and a degraded appearance, with the background and lighting characteristic of an underwater environment. 3. Instruction Match: The correct object (the same key) is present and has been visually modified to appear heavily corroded and weathered as if aged underwater for two years. The background and lighting convincingly situate the key underwater. The degree of modification is accurate, with substantial yet plausible corrosion. 4. Decision: All aspects of the instruction and reasoning process have been faithfully fulfilled. The image precisely matches the intended modification, so the score is 5.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like 50 years after abandonment.
|
<think>
To address the request, I first observe the question_image, which shows a vibrant and well-maintained carousel in a fairground setting. The question_text asks for a depiction of the carousel 50 years after abandonment, implying a state of decay and neglect.
To create this, I imagine the carousel in a state of disrepair. The structure would likely show signs of rust, peeling paint, and broken or missing elements. The surrounding area would be overgrown with weeds, grass, and possibly debris, reflecting long-term abandonment. The lighting might appear dull or faded, with the once-bright lights now dim or absent. The horses would likely be missing or broken, and the metal framework might be corroded.
The answer image would emphasize these details, showing the carousel as a relic of its former glory, surrounded by nature reclaiming the space. The sky might be overcast, adding to the sense of desolation. This approach aligns with the user's request for a 50-year abandonment timeline.
</think>
| 5 |
1. Detect Difference: The edited image shows the carousel with notable decay: rust and grime are visible on the metal framework, paint is peeling and faded, some horses appear broken or missing, and the area is heavily overgrown with tall grass and weeds. The lights are off, and the entire scene has a dull, overcast lighting compared to the original’s bright, lively atmosphere. The background buildings also look more abandoned and the setting is more desolate. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The carousel should look decrepit, with rust, peeling paint, missing/broken horses, no working lights, and overgrown vegetation surrounding it. The overall scene should feel abandoned and forlorn, with muted or overcast lighting. 3. Instruction Match: Every key element specified in the reasoning process is present: rust, peeling paint, broken/missing horses, overgrown vegetation, absence of lights, and a gloomy sky. The carousel is the same (not replaced), just decayed as described. 4. Decision: All aspects of the reasoning process and editing instruction are accurately and faithfully represented. This is perfect compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it looked like ten years ago.
|
<think>
To address the question, I first observe the question_image, which shows a lone elephant in a dry savanna landscape. The question_text asks to depict what the scene looked like "ten years ago," suggesting a need to infer or recreate the environment and the elephant's state from a decade earlier.
Based on the current image, the elephant appears healthy, and the landscape is arid. To create a ten-year earlier depiction, I would consider environmental changes such as increased vegetation, possibly a wetter climate, and the elephant's physical condition might be slightly different due to aging or environmental factors.
The answer_image would likely show the same elephant, but its skin might appear slightly worn or weathered, and the surrounding landscape could have more lush greenery, indicating a wetter period. The elephant's posture might also reflect a more aged appearance, with subtle changes in its body structure or skin texture.
This reasoning ensures the answer aligns with the request and provides a plausible depiction of the scene from ten years ago.
</think>
| 5 |
1. Detect Difference: The original image (Image A) shows an elephant standing in a dry, arid savanna landscape with yellow grasses and sparse vegetation. The edited image (Image B) shows an elephant in a much greener environment: lush grass, some bushes, and a water source are visible. The elephant’s posture and angle are different, but it is clearly an adult elephant of similar appearance. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The edited image should show the same elephant (not a replacement) in the same general location, but with more greenery, possibly a wetter environment, and the elephant should appear slightly younger or less weathered, fitting the 'ten years ago' prompt. 3. Instruction Match: The edited image provides a much lusher, greener environment with water and vegetation, suggesting a wetter period. The elephant appears in similar health and stance, and though not identical in pose, it is plausible as the same individual from a decade earlier. The core requirements—more greenery, wetter climate, and plausible depiction of a younger time—are all met. 4. Decision: The edited image precisely matches the intended modification as described in the reasoning process, so the score is 5 (Perfect Compliance).
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like after six months.
|
<think>
The question asks for a depiction of how the scene will look after six months. Observing the question_image, I notice a framed rainbow artwork on a gray wall with shadows cast by trees. The surrounding environment includes a sidewalk, some greenery, and a visible street with parked cars.
To reason about the answer, I imagine seasonal changes over six months. The greenery at the base of the wall might become overgrown or less vibrant, while the shadows from the trees could shift due to changes in sunlight angle. The parked cars and street remain consistent, but the overall atmosphere might appear slightly altered due to weathering or seasonal effects.
For the answer_image, I would expect the artwork to remain unchanged, but the surrounding elements—such as the vegetation, wall texture, and lighting—might reflect a more aged or weathered look. The shadows could be longer or softer, and the greenery might appear less lush or slightly overgrown. The overall scene would convey a sense of time passing while maintaining the original composition.
</think>
| 5 |
1. Detect Difference: The edited image (B) shows increased and fuller plant growth at the base of the wall, with vegetation appearing taller and more lush compared to the original (A). The lighting is warmer, suggesting a change in season or time of day, and the wall and sidewalk show subtle signs of weathering. The rainbow artwork itself remains unchanged, and the overall composition is consistent. Shadows have shifted, being less prominent or softer. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The image six months later should show the same rainbow artwork and wall, but with more overgrown or changed greenery at the base, slightly altered lighting or shadows to reflect seasonal change, and possible light weathering in the environment. 3. Instruction Match: The correct elements were modified—the greenery is more overgrown, the lighting and atmosphere differ to suggest time passing, and the artwork itself is unchanged. No extraneous changes are introduced and all modifications are consistent with natural six-month progression. 4. Decision: All requested changes are present and accurately depicted, so this is perfect compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like two weeks after flowering.
|
<think>
The question asks for a depiction of the sunflower two weeks after flowering. Observing the question_image, it shows a vibrant, fully bloomed sunflower with bright yellow petals and a detailed center. The user likely wants to visualize the progression of the sunflower's lifecycle, specifically its post-flowering stage.
To reason about this, I consider the natural development of sunflowers. After flowering, the petals typically wilt and droop, and the center transitions from a vivid, greenish-yellow to a more muted brown or dry appearance. The seeds within the center will also start to mature and appear more defined.
In forming the answer_image, I would depict the sunflower with drooping petals, a faded center, and visible seeds. The surrounding environment might include dry soil or remnants of the plant, emphasizing the post-flowering state. The image should convey a sense of natural decay while maintaining the recognizable features of the sunflower. This approach aligns with the request to show the sunflower two weeks after flowering.
</think>
| 5 |
1. Detect Difference: In Image A, the sunflower is upright, vibrant, with bright yellow petals and a fresh green center. In Image B, the sunflower appears wilted and lying on the ground; the petals are drooping, shriveled, and discolored, the center is more muted and brownish, and there are visible mature seeds. The overall look is of decay and post-bloom aging. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The edited image should show the same sunflower two weeks after flowering: drooping, wilted petals, faded/dried center with visible seeds, and an overall sense of aging or decay, possibly with dry soil or plant remnants in the background. 3. Instruction Match: The edited image captures all key details from the reasoning process: wilted and drooping petals, faded and drier center, clear seed development, and an overall aged appearance. The sunflower is not replaced with a different object; rather, it is plausibly transformed to its post-flowering stage. 4. Decision: All requested visual changes are present and accurately depicted, fulfilling the reasoning process perfectly. Therefore, the score is 5 for perfect compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like after 200 years.
|
<think>
To address the question, I observe that the user wants to visualize the bust after 200 years. The original image shows a detailed stone sculpture with intricate carvings and a serene garden background. To create the answer, I would imagine the bust weathered over time, with visible signs of aging such as erosion, discoloration, and moss growth. The garden setting would also change, with overgrown plants and a more aged, natural look. The final image should reflect these changes while retaining the sculpture's original structure and placement.
</think>
| 5 |
1. Detect Difference: The edited image shows the bust with visible surface discoloration, dark spots, and what appears to be moss or lichen growth. The stone surface looks aged and weathered. The background plants are more overgrown, and the overall scene appears less manicured and more wild compared to the original, which is clean and pristine. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The bust should show significant weathering—erosion, discoloration, and signs of moss or lichens—while maintaining its overall form and placement. The surrounding garden should look older and more overgrown, with a natural, less maintained appearance. 3. Instruction Match: The edit matches the intended modifications: the bust is visually aged with appropriate discoloration and growth, and the garden has become overgrown and wild, reflecting the passage of 200 years. The structure and placement of the bust remain. 4. Decision: All required changes are present and accurately implemented, so this is perfect compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like after baking for 45 minutes.
|
<think>
The question involves visualizing the result of baking the dough shown in the question_image for 45 minutes. The dough appears to be in its pre-baked state, resting on a baking sheet dusted with flour. Based on the context, the user likely wants to see how the dough transforms after baking.
To reason through the transformation, I consider typical baking outcomes for dough like this. The dough will likely rise further and develop a golden-brown crust due to the heat. The texture will become more firm and slightly puffed, with a smooth and even surface. The lighting and oven environment in the question_image suggest warm tones, which are expected to carry over into the baked dough’s appearance.
The answer_image should depict the dough with a golden-brown crust, evenly baked, and possibly with a slight sheen from the oven’s heat. The baking tray and flour dusting should remain consistent with the original image, maintaining continuity. The dough's surface should look fully baked, with no visible cracks or uneven areas, indicating a successful bake.
</think>
| 4 |
1. Detect Difference: In the edited image, the dough now has a brown, baked-looking crust; the surface appears firmer and slightly puffed compared to the original, which looks pale and raw. The flour dusting and tray remain unchanged. The lighting is similar, with warm tones. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The dough should appear fully baked after 45 minutes, with an even, golden-brown crust, a firm and slightly puffed surface, and no visible cracks or uneven baking. The tray and flour dusting should remain the same. 3. Instruction Match: The correct object (the dough) was modified, and the main attribute (baked color and texture) was changed as intended. The surface is more brown and firm, indicating baking. However, while the dough is visibly browned, the color is not entirely even—there are some darker patches that could suggest slight overbaking or uneven browning, and the puff/rise is modest rather than pronounced. These are minor details that do not significantly detract from the core intent, but they do prevent a perfect score. 4. Decision: The edit closely matches the reasoning process, but minor unevenness in the baked surface and coloration keeps it from being a perfect compliance. Score: 4.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like after six hours outdoors on a snowy day.
|
<think>
The question_image shows a wooden bench in a park surrounded by trees and grass, indicating a sunny, clear day. The question_text asks to visualize the bench after six hours outdoors on a snowy day, implying a transformation of the environment to reflect winter conditions.
To create the answer, I would imagine the bench covered in a layer of snow, with the surrounding grass and ground blanketed in white. The trees might have snow-laden branches, and the lighting would shift to a colder, overcast tone. The bench itself might appear slightly weathered due to exposure to the elements.
The answer image would depict this transformation, showing the bench with snow on its surface and the ground, along with a wintry atmosphere. The trees might appear frosted or partially covered in snow, and the overall scene would convey the chilliness of a snowy day. This aligns with the request to visualize the bench after six hours outdoors in snowy conditions.
</think>
| 5 |
1. Detect Difference: The edited image (B) shows the entire scene transformed into a snowy, wintery environment. The grass and ground are covered with snow, the bench has a layer of snow on its seat and backrest, and the trees and background appear frosted and muted, with a colder overall lighting. In contrast, the original (A) is bright, green, and summery with no snow present. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The bench should be visibly covered with snow, the ground and grass blanketed in white, trees dusted or laden with snow, and the lighting should convey a cold, snowy day. The scene should feel wintery, as if it has experienced heavy snowfall over six hours. 3. Instruction Match: The edit faithfully implements all specified changes: the bench is the same object, now covered in snow; the environment has transitioned to a wintry, snow-covered landscape; the lighting and color temperature are cold and subdued as expected. 4. Decision: All required elements are present and accurately depicted, so the score is 5 for perfect compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw this scene in the style of 70 years ago.
|
<think>
To transform the scene into a 70-year-old style, I would focus on altering the architectural details to reflect older designs, such as shorter skyscrapers with simpler facades and less glass. The skyline would appear less modern, with a mix of older buildings and fewer skyscrapers. The river and surrounding landscape would be kept consistent, but the color palette would shift to warmer, faded tones to evoke a vintage atmosphere. The lighting would also change to a softer, more subdued glow, typical of older photography.
</think>
| 2 |
1. Detect Difference: The edited image introduces a warmer, faded color palette and a softer, vintage-like lighting, giving the image an aged, nostalgic feel. However, the architectural elements and the skyline remain unchanged—modern skyscrapers, including tall glass buildings, are still present with the same shapes and arrangement as the original. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The edited image should feature shorter skyscrapers with simpler, less glass-heavy facades, resembling architecture from 70 years ago. The skyline should appear less modern, with fewer tall buildings and more vintage or classic architectural styles. The color palette should be warm and faded, and the lighting softer, to evoke a vintage atmosphere. 3. Instruction Match: The color palette and lighting have been correctly altered to evoke a vintage look, but the buildings themselves remain distinctly modern—there are no architectural changes to reflect the era from 70 years ago. The most essential part of the reasoning process (modification of building style and skyline to appear less modern) is missing. 4. Decision: Since only the color and lighting were changed, and the main requirement (changing architectural style) was not met, this is a major omission, resulting in a score of 2.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what they will look like after frying for 5 minutes.
|
<think>
The question_image shows raw eggs in a pan, with bright orange yolks and clear whites. The question_text asks to visualize how these eggs will look after frying for 5 minutes, implying a transformation from raw to cooked.
To reason this out, I consider the typical frying process: heat causes the whites to solidify and become opaque, while the yolks may remain slightly runny or fully set, depending on the cooking time. The whites would develop a golden or slightly browned appearance, and the yolks might appear firmer but still retain some softness.
The answer_image should depict fully cooked eggs with the whites appearing opaque and slightly browned, and the yolks either fully set or still slightly runny. The pan's surface might show some oil or residue from the frying process, and the eggs should look appetizing and well-cooked. This aligns with the user's request for a 5-minute frying result.
</think>
| 5 |
1. Detect Difference: In Image A, the eggs are raw with clear, gelatinous whites and bright orange, glossy yolks. In Image B, the egg whites have turned opaque and white, with some areas showing slight browning. The yolks have changed from a bright orange to a paler, more yellowish color, and their surfaces appear firmer and partially set, with some browning present. The overall appearance suggests the eggs have been cooked. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The edited image should show eggs with whites that are opaque and slightly browned, and yolks that look firmer and paler, possibly with some browning or a slightly set appearance, as would be expected after frying for 5 minutes. The pan might also have some oil or residue from the cooking process. 3. Instruction Match: The correct objects (the eggs) are modified in their cooked state, not replaced. The whites are now opaque and browned, and the yolks are paler and look cooked, matching the expected result. The degree of transformation (from raw to cooked) is accurate and appropriate for a 5-minute fry. 4. Decision: The edited image faithfully follows the reasoning process and fully matches the expected visual outcome. This is perfect compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like after being frozen in the refrigerator.
|
<think>
The user wants to visualize how the strawberries in the bowl would appear after being frozen in the refrigerator. Observing the question_image, the strawberries are fresh and vibrant, with their bright red color and green leaves intact. The question_text specifies the transformation to a frozen state, so the goal is to depict the strawberries in a frozen form.
To achieve this, the strawberries should appear coated in frost or ice crystals, with a slightly duller appearance compared to their fresh state. The vibrant red color should still be recognizable, but the texture should shift to a frosty or icy surface. The green leaves may also appear slightly softened or coated in frost. The bowl and background should remain unchanged to maintain consistency with the original image.
When generating the answer_image, I would ensure the strawberries are depicted with a realistic frozen texture, emphasizing the contrast between the icy exterior and the underlying red flesh. The frosty effect should cover the entire surface of the strawberries, giving a clear indication of the freezing process. This approach aligns with the user's request and provides a visually accurate representation of the frozen strawberries.
</think>
| 5 |
1. Detect Difference: In the edited image, the strawberries now have a visible coating of frost or ice crystals on their surfaces. The red color appears slightly less vibrant, and the green leaves are also lightly covered in frost. The bowl and background remain unchanged. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The strawberries should appear with an icy or frosty coating across their surfaces, indicating they have been frozen. The red color should be somewhat dulled, but still recognizable, and the green leaves may also show frost. The bowl and background should not change. 3. Instruction Match: The visual changes in the edited image exactly match the expected outcome described in the reasoning process. The correct objects (the strawberries) have been modified with the appropriate attribute (frost/frozen texture), and the degree and style of modification are accurate and realistic. 4. Decision: All aspects of the reasoning process are fully satisfied, so the score is 5 for perfect compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like ten seconds later.
|
<think>
The question asks for the appearance of the scene ten seconds after the depicted moment, which shows a water droplet falling into a lake. The focus is on the ripples and reflections caused by the droplet's impact.
To reason through this, I consider the physics of water waves and reflections. The droplet creates concentric ripples that expand outward, and the impact point becomes a focal point where the water distorts. Ten seconds later, the ripples would have spread further, with the initial impact area becoming less pronounced and the wave patterns more diffuse.
The answer image should depict the lake's surface with larger, more spread-out ripples radiating from the center. The reflections of the surrounding mountains and sky would still be present but slightly distorted due to the water's movement. The overall effect should convey the passage of time and the dynamic nature of water waves.
</think>
| 5 |
1. Detect Difference: In the original image, there is a prominent water droplet falling and suspended above a point of impact in the lake, with tight concentric ripples forming around it. In the edited image, the droplet and column are gone, and the ripples are much wider and more spread out, indicating more time has passed since the impact, and the central disturbance is less pronounced. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The edited image should show the water surface after ten seconds, with no visible water droplet or splash, and with the concentric ripples much larger and more diffuse, spreading outwards from the original impact point. The reflections in the water may be slightly distorted by the ongoing wave movement. 3. Instruction Match: The changes match perfectly—the droplet and vertical splash are gone, and the ripples have expanded significantly, consistent with the passage of time after the droplet's impact. The scene maintains the overall setting and reflections, now with the expected water movement. 4. Decision: The edit faithfully fulfills all aspects of the reasoning process; therefore, it deserves a perfect score of 5.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like after a century of global warming.
|
<think>
The question asks for a depiction of the glacier after a century of global warming. Observing the question_image, the glacier is pristine and intact, with no visible signs of melting or erosion. The user likely wants to visualize the consequences of global warming on such a structure over a long period.
To create the answer, I would consider the effects of climate change, such as increased melting, ice shelf collapse, and reduced ice coverage. The answer_image should depict a significantly eroded glacier with visible cracks, melting edges, and reduced ice mass. The waterline might be higher, and the landscape could appear more rugged or fragmented. The sky might also reflect a warmer, overcast atmosphere to emphasize the environmental change.
The answer_text should describe these changes, emphasizing the melting and altered appearance of the glacier. The final image should visually represent these effects, contrasting the original pristine glacier with the eroded and melting state.
</think>
| 5 |
1. Detect Difference: In Image A, the glacier appears pristine, bright blue, and solid with no significant cracks or melting. The water is reflective and clear, the sky is bright blue. In Image B, the glacier is visibly more eroded, fragmented, and cracked. The ice is duller and more gray, with numerous fissures and broken sections, indicating substantial melting and loss of mass. The water is still present but appears higher and less vibrant, and the sky is overcast and gray, suggesting a warmer and less pristine environment. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The glacier should look significantly eroded, with pronounced cracks, melting, and reduced ice mass after a century of global warming. The sky should be less bright, and the scene should evoke a sense of environmental degradation. 3. Instruction Match: The edited image clearly shows the correct object (the glacier) in a much more degraded state, matching the expected effects of a century of global warming. The ice is not replaced but visibly altered with cracks and reduced brightness, and the atmosphere is gloomier. All required changes are present and accurate. 4. Decision: The edit matches the reasoning process perfectly and fulfills all specified changes, thus earning a score of 5.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like after after being used for a day.
|
<think>
The question focuses on depicting how a pencil would appear after being used for a day. Observing the question_image, the pencil is clean, sharp, and unused, with a bright yellow body and a pink eraser. The user likely wants to visualize the effects of daily use, such as wear, smudges, and marks.
To create the answer image, I would imagine the pencil after it has been sharpened, with a slightly worn yellow body and some marks or smudges near the tip, indicating usage. The eraser might remain intact but could show some minor wear or slight discoloration. The pencil would still be recognizable, but its pristine appearance would be compromised to reflect its usage.
When forming the answer text, I would describe the pencil's worn state and mention its functional marks, emphasizing the contrast between its original clean state and its current used condition. This aligns with the user's request to show the pencil after a day of use.
</think>
| 5 |
1. Detect Difference: Comparing Image A (original) and Image B (edited), the following changes are observed: The pencil in Image B now has a slightly worn-down tip, with visible graphite smudges and marks around the wood near the writing point. The yellow body shows minor discoloration and some dirt or smudge marks near the tip. The eraser appears slightly duller, but is still mostly intact. The sharp, pristine look from Image A is gone, replaced with a more used appearance. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The pencil should look as if it has been used for a day—slightly blunted or worn tip, some graphite and smudge marks near the tip, minor wear or discoloration on the yellow body, and a slightly less pristine eraser, but still recognizable as a pencil. 3. Instruction Match: The edited image matches the expected visual result. The tip is no longer perfectly sharp, there are visible signs of use (smudges and marks), and the overall body is less pristine, exactly as the reasoning process described. 4. Decision: All required changes are present and accurate. The edit precisely fulfills the reasoning process. Score: 5.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw the appearance of the tool in the image as it would have looked a hundred years ago.
|
<think>
To address the request, I first observe the question_image, which shows a modern black landline telephone with a numeric keypad, a display screen, and a handset connected by a coiled cord. The question_text asks to depict the appearance of this tool a hundred years ago, implying a historical or vintage representation.
I consider the evolution of telephones over the past century. Early telephones were often simpler, with fewer features and a more mechanical design. For instance, they might have used a rotary dial instead of a numeric keypad, and the handset could have been made of wood or metal, with a less ergonomic design. The display screen would not have existed in the early days, as digital screens were not invented until much later.
In the answer_image, I would expect to see a vintage telephone resembling early 20th-century designs. This might include a wooden base, a large rotary dial, and a handset with a curved design. The image would likely depict the telephone on a wooden desk or table, emphasizing its historical context. The visual would aim to evoke a sense of nostalgia and contrast with the modern device in the question_image.
</think>
| 5 |
1. Detect Difference: The original image (A) shows a modern black landline telephone with a numeric keypad, digital display, and plastic handset. The edited image (B) shows a vintage telephone with a wooden base, rotary dial, and a curved wooden handset with metal hardware. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The edited image should depict the same tool—a telephone—as it would have appeared a hundred years ago: rotary dial instead of keypad, no digital display, wood and metal construction, and an overall antique design. 3. Instruction Match: The correct object (telephone) has been modified, not replaced; the attributes (materials, dial type, absence of screen, and style) accurately reflect an early 20th-century telephone. All required changes—removal of digital elements and introduction of period-appropriate features—are present and correct. 4. Decision: The edited image perfectly matches the expected historical appearance based on the reasoning process. Therefore, the score is 5 for perfect compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it looked like one hour ago.
|
<think>
The question asks to visualize the candle one hour ago based on its current state in the question image. Observing the question image, the candle is waxed down, with melted wax dripping off the sides, and a bright flame at the top. This suggests the candle has been burning for some time.
To reason about the candle's appearance one hour ago, I would consider the amount of wax that has been consumed. The wax appears to have melted significantly, so one hour ago, the candle would have been taller and less waxed down. The flame might have been smaller or less intense, as the wax would have been thicker and less volatile. Additionally, the base of the candle would likely have less wax buildup.
For the answer image, I would depict the candle as taller, with less wax dripping and a smaller flame. The wax would appear thicker and less melted, and the overall appearance would reflect a candle that has not burned as much as it does now. This reasoning aligns with the user's request to visualize the candle in its earlier state.
</think>
| 5 |
1. Detect Difference: In the edited image, the candle is significantly taller, the wax sides are smooth with very little to no melted wax dripping, and the flame is smaller and less intense compared to the original image. The base also has less wax buildup. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The candle should appear taller, with minimal to no wax drippings on the sides, a thicker body, less wax pooled at the base, and a smaller, less intense flame—reflecting its state one hour prior to the current burned-down appearance. 3. Instruction Match: The edited image accurately depicts the same candle in a less-burned state: it is taller, cleaner, with less melted wax, and the flame is smaller. All aspects of the reasoning process are addressed correctly. 4. Decision: The edit precisely fulfills the reasoning process and the intended instruction, so the score is 5 (Perfect Compliance).
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it looked like three hours later.
|
<think>
The question involves an hourglass with blue sand and asks to visualize its state after three hours of passage. From the question_image, I observe the hourglass is upright with sand evenly divided between the upper and lower bulbs. The sand's color is bright blue, and the hourglass is framed by a wooden structure with black metal supports.
To reason through the answer, I consider the typical behavior of an hourglass: the sand flows from the upper bulb to the lower bulb at a steady rate. After three hours, the sand would have flowed downward, leaving less sand in the upper bulb and more in the lower bulb. The sand level would be closer to the bottom of the upper bulb, with some sand still in transit through the narrow neck.
For the answer image, I would depict the hourglass with the upper bulb containing significantly less blue sand, while the lower bulb has a larger accumulation. The sand's flow would appear dynamic, with some sand still in the process of descending. The wooden and metal frame should remain unchanged, maintaining the original structure and aesthetic.
This reasoning ensures the user's request is addressed by visually representing the hourglass's state after three hours of sand flow.
</think>
| 5 |
1. Detect Difference: In Image B, the amount of blue sand in the upper bulb of the hourglass is significantly reduced compared to Image A, while the amount of blue sand in the lower bulb has increased. The hourglass structure, color, and surroundings remain unchanged. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The edited image should show the hourglass with little blue sand left in the upper chamber and a much larger accumulation in the lower chamber, representing the passage of three hours. Some sand may still be seen flowing through the neck. 3. Instruction Match: The edit has modified the correct object (the blue sand within the hourglass), and the attribute (amount of sand in each bulb) is changed as specified by the reasoning process. The degree of modification is accurate, with a realistic and significant transfer of sand from the top to the bottom. The hourglass frame and environment are unaltered, as expected. 4. Decision: The edit perfectly fulfills the reasoning process and instruction, so the score is 5.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it looked like 24 hours earlier.
|
<think>
To address the question, I first observe the question_image, which shows a butterfly emerging from its chrysalis. The chrysalis is partially transparent, revealing the butterfly's wings and body underneath. The question_text asks to visualize what the scene looked like 24 hours earlier, implying the transformation process of the butterfly.
The reasoning involves understanding the butterfly's life cycle. Before emerging, the butterfly was inside the chrysalis, undergoing metamorphosis. The answer_image should depict the chrysalis in its earlier stage, with the butterfly still inside, unrecognizable as a butterfly. The image should focus on the chrysalis structure, the butterfly's body inside, and any visible details such as the chrysalis's attachment to the plant.
The answer_text would describe this earlier stage, emphasizing the chrysalis and the butterfly still enclosed within it. The answer_image should clearly show the chrysalis with the butterfly inside, capturing the transformation process visually. This approach aligns with the user's request to explore the earlier stage of the butterfly's life.
</think>
| 5 |
1. Detect Difference: In the original image, the butterfly is mostly emerged from the chrysalis, with its wings and body clearly visible and protruding. In the edited image, the chrysalis is intact, with the butterfly not yet emerged; the interior form is less distinct and the outer shell is more opaque, with only subtle hints of color and shape suggesting the presence of the developing butterfly inside. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The edited image should show a closed chrysalis, with the butterfly entirely inside, potentially with some vague outlines or coloration showing through, but not yet emerged or fully formed in visible detail. 3. Instruction Match: The change faithfully represents the '24 hours earlier' stage, focusing on a fully enclosed chrysalis with no butterfly emerged, matching the reasoning process which called for the pre-emergence metamorphosis state. The correct object (the chrysalis) is retained and simply visually reverted to its earlier stage. 4. Decision: The modification is accurate and complete, so this is a 5 for perfect compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like after one minute in a blender.
|
<think>
The question involves visualizing the transformation of the blended ingredients in the blender after one minute. The question_image shows a blender containing sliced bananas, strawberries, and raspberries, suggesting the preparation of a smoothie or similar mixture. The user likely wants to see how these ingredients would look once blended.
To reason through this, I consider the blending process: the fruits would mix into a smooth, uniform liquid. The final texture should be creamy and consistent, with the vibrant reds and yellows of the strawberries and bananas blending into a visually appealing mixture. The blender's blades should be visible, indicating the blending action.
The answer_image should depict the blender with a smooth, liquid mixture, showing the fruits fully integrated into a uniform texture. The liquid should retain some fruit particles for realism, and the blender's blades should be in motion, emphasizing the blending process. This visual representation aligns with the user's request for a depiction of the mixture after one minute.
</think>
| 4 |
1. Detect Difference: In the original image, there are clearly visible, distinct pieces of banana, strawberry, and raspberry inside the blender. In the edited image, these pieces are no longer visible; instead, there is a creamy, light pink liquid filling most of the blender, with some small red chunks remaining. The blender blades are visible in both images. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The blender should show a smooth, uniform creamy liquid with the colors of the blended fruits, some visible fruit particles for realism, and the blender blades should be visible. 3. Instruction Match: The edited image correctly shows the fruits blended into a mostly smooth mixture, with a realistic creamy texture and some remaining fruit pieces, which aligns with the described transformation after one minute of blending. The blades are still visible. However, the presence of a few larger fruit chunks is slightly more than the 'some fruit particles' suggested in the reasoning process, which expects mostly uniformity with only small bits. 4. Decision: The edit almost perfectly matches the reasoning process, but the slightly larger, more intact red fruit pieces suggest a very minor deviation from the ideal fully integrated blend with only small particles. Therefore, this is a minor omission, and the score is 4.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what they will look like after drying naturally for a day.
|
<think>
The question image shows jeans hanging on a line outdoors, with water dripping from them, indicating they are freshly washed and still wet. The question_text asks for a visualization of how they will look after drying naturally for a day. This implies the final image should depict the jeans in a dry state, with no visible water or dripping.
To reason through this, I would consider the natural drying process, which typically involves the jeans losing their moisture and becoming smooth and wrinkle-free. The final image should show the jeans hanging in the same position, but without water dripping or puddles forming on the ground. The background and setting should remain consistent with the original image, maintaining the outdoor environment and the line with wooden pegs.
When forming the answer image, I would ensure the jeans appear dry, with no wetness or water trails. The folds and creases should be more defined, and the colors should appear vibrant and uniform. The ground should no longer have puddles, and the overall scene should reflect a fully dried state, aligning with the user's request for a natural drying outcome.
</think>
| 1 |
1. Detect Difference: Both images display jeans hanging on a line in an outdoor setting, with similar background and arrangement. In both images, water is visibly dripping from the jeans and pooling on the ground beneath them, indicating the jeans are still wet. There is no significant difference between Image A and Image B in terms of the wetness or dryness of the jeans, nor have the water trails or puddles been removed.
2. Expected Visual Caption: The edited image should show the same jeans, in the same arrangement, but appearing fully dry. There should be no water dripping from the jeans, no puddles on the ground, and the denim should appear smooth and dry. The scene should otherwise be unchanged.
3. Instruction Match: The observed difference does not match the expected change. The instruction and reasoning process require the removal of all wetness indicators (drips, puddles), but the edited image still features both. There is no evidence that the jeans have dried at all.
4. Decision: Since the edit does not fulfill the requested modification in any way, this is a clear case of non-compliance. Score: 1.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it looked like two months ago.
|
<think>
To address the user's request, I first analyze the question_image, which shows a well-maintained garden with rows of vegetables and a clear pathway. The question_text asks for a depiction of what the garden looked like two months ago, implying a change in growth or appearance over time.
I consider the seasonal and growth stages of the plants. The garden appears lush and green, suggesting it is in a healthy growth phase, possibly during spring or summer. Two months ago, the garden might have been in an earlier stage of development, with smaller or less dense plant growth. The pathways could have been less worn, and the surrounding vegetation might not be as mature.
For the answer_image, I would visualize the garden with smaller, younger plants occupying the rows, possibly with fewer mature vegetables. The pathways might show less foot traffic, and the garden could appear less vibrant due to the earlier stage of growth. The overall scene would reflect a less developed state compared to the current image.
This reasoning ensures the final answer aligns with the user's request to show the garden in its earlier growth phase two months ago.
</think>
| 5 |
1. Detect Difference: In Image A, the garden is lush, full of mature and densely packed vegetable plants, with a well-trodden path down the center. In Image B, the garden rows are visible but sparsely populated with small, young seedlings and minimal vegetation. The path is not as defined, and the overall scene appears less developed and less vibrant. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The edited image should depict the same garden at an earlier stage—rows with small or immature plants, less density of growth, less vibrant greenery, and less worn pathways, reflecting the garden's state two months ago. 3. Instruction Match: The edited image (Image B) matches the expectations: the same garden area is shown, but the plants are noticeably younger and fewer, and the scene looks less mature, directly reflecting the earlier growth stage as described in the reasoning process. 4. Decision: The edit faithfully represents the intended modification, showing the same location at a younger development stage. Therefore, the score is 5 (Perfect Compliance).
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like after one hour on a hot grill.
|
<think>
To address the request, I first analyze the question_image, which shows fresh corn on the cob with vibrant yellow kernels and green husks. The question_text asks to visualize how the corn will look after one hour on a hot grill. This implies a transformation from raw to grilled, with changes in color, texture, and appearance.
Considering the grilling process, the kernels will likely turn golden brown, with some areas appearing darker or slightly charred due to the heat. The husks might also change, potentially becoming slightly crispy or showing signs of browning. The grilled corn could have grill marks or slight discoloration on the husk, indicating the grilling process.
When forming the answer_image, I would depict the corn with a golden-brown hue on the kernels, some areas darker for a realistic charred look. The husk might appear slightly shriveled or browned in places, with grill marks visible. The overall presentation should convey the texture and appearance of well-grilled corn, ensuring the transformation is visually evident.
</think>
| 5 |
1. Detect Difference: The main change between Image A and Image B is that the exposed corn cob in the foreground has shifted from a fresh, bright yellow with no marks to a golden-brown color with visible charred areas and dark grill marks. The husk also appears slightly more browned and shriveled along the edges. The underlying composition and arrangement of the corn and husks remain the same. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The edited image should show the same corn on the cob, but now the kernels are a golden-brown color with some areas darker and charred, likely featuring grill marks. The husk may be slightly browned or shriveled, indicating the effects of heat, and the overall look should be of a well-grilled corn cob. 3. Instruction Match: The correct object (the exposed corn cob) was modified in color and texture to show grilling, including realistic charring and browning, and the husk also exhibits the expected signs of heat exposure. The modification is precise in both object and degree, matching the reasoning process. 4. Decision: All required changes are present and accurate, and the image perfectly fulfills the intended reasoning process. This warrants a score of 5 for perfect compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like after one year of being frequently opened and closed.
|
<think>
The question involves visualizing how a book's condition changes over time after frequent use. The question_image shows a book in good condition, with clean pages and a sturdy binding. The question_text asks to imagine the book after one year of being opened and closed regularly.
To reason about this, I consider the wear and tear that occurs when a book is used frequently. The pages might show signs of creasing or slight discoloration, while the binding could appear slightly frayed or loose. The spine might also show signs of bending or wear due to repeated opening and closing.
The answer_image would need to reflect these changes. It could show the book with slightly worn pages, a slightly bent or loose spine, and a more aged appearance. The cover might have subtle creases or a faded look, emphasizing the passage of time and frequent use. This aligns with the user's request to visualize the book's condition after a year of use.
</think>
| 5 |
1. Detect Difference: The original image (Image A) shows a book in pristine condition: clean, crisp pages, a solid spine, and no visible damage or discoloration. The edited image (Image B) shows a book with yellowed, dirty, and worn pages; the edges are frayed, there are visible creases and stains, the spine appears bent and partially damaged, and the cover shows significant wear and tear. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The edited image should depict the same book, but with signs of frequent use over a year—worn or creased pages, aged or slightly discolored paper, a bent or loose spine, and a cover with minor creases or fading. 3. Instruction Match: The edited image accurately applies all these changes. The wear is visible on the pages (creased, yellowed), the binding and spine are clearly more worn and frayed, and the cover shows age. The degree of modification matches the expectation for a book that has been frequently opened and closed for a year. The edit did not replace the book but modified its state as requested. 4. Decision: All requested changes are present and visually accurate. This is perfect compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like after a year placed in a high-school classroom.
|
<think>
The question_image shows a blank whiteboard mounted on a wall, with a potted plant nearby. The question_text asks for a depiction of the same setup after a year in a high-school classroom. This implies the need to envision how the environment has evolved, incorporating typical classroom elements and signs of usage.
To create the answer image, I would consider the following: the whiteboard might have faint markings or writing, suggesting frequent use. The surrounding area could include educational materials, such as posters, charts, or notes, which are common in a high-school setting. The potted plant might remain unchanged, as it is a static element in the scene. The floor could show signs of wear or foot traffic, and the lighting might appear slightly dimmer due to typical classroom ambiance.
The reasoning for the answer text would emphasize the transformation of the space into a functional and lived-in classroom environment, reflecting the passage of time and the utilization of the whiteboard for teaching and learning purposes. This approach aligns with the user's request for a realistic depiction of the scene after a year.
</think>
| 1 |
1. Detect Difference: The only noticeable visual difference between Image A and Image B is a slightly different lighting and color tone; the edited image is marginally dimmer and the shadows are more pronounced. The whiteboard, potted plant, and floor appear unchanged in structure and content, and there are no new objects or visible signs of use. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The edited image should show the whiteboard with faint markings or remnants of writing to indicate frequent use, additional classroom-related items such as posters, notes, or educational materials on or around the whiteboard, and possibly signs of wear on the floor. The potted plant should remain unchanged. 3. Instruction Match: The edited image does not introduce any of the expected elements—no whiteboard markings, no classroom posters or notes, and no visible signs of wear or usage are present. The plant and board are identical in position and appearance to the original image. 4. Decision: Since the image does not fulfill any of the reasoning process requirements and does not visually reflect the passage of a year in a classroom, this is non-compliance. Score: 1.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
This picture is observed from the Northern Hemisphere. Draw what it will look like 7 days later.
|
<think>
To address the question, I first note that the question_image shows a crescent moon, which is a waxing crescent phase. The question_text asks what the moon will look like 7 days later, implying a progression in the lunar cycle. The lunar cycle spans about 29.5 days, so 7 days is roughly a quarter of the cycle.
The moon’s appearance changes as it progresses through phases: waxing crescent, first quarter, waxing gibbous, full moon, waning gibbous, last quarter, and waning crescent. In 7 days, the moon will likely be in the first quarter phase, where half of the moon is illuminated.
For the answer_image, I would depict the moon in its first quarter phase, showing a clear division between illuminated and dark areas. The image should maintain the same black background for consistency and focus on the moon’s details, such as craters and texture. The answer_text would describe this phase, confirming the lunar cycle progression.
</think>
| 2 |
1. Detect Difference: The original image (Image A) shows a clear, high-resolution first quarter moon—half of the lunar disk is illuminated on the right side, with crisp lunar surface details. The edited image (Image B) shows a moon with a similar division between light and dark, but the moon appears distorted, with irregular edges and less accurate lunar surface detail. The illuminated portion is also less cleanly defined, and the overall shape is less circular and more misshapen. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The edited image should depict a first quarter moon (right half illuminated, left half in shadow), with a sharp, straight terminator (the division between light and shadow), and clear, realistic lunar surface features, all against a black sky. 3. Instruction Match: The edit attempts to show a first quarter moon, but the execution is poor: the moon's shape is incorrect (misshapen, not a clean semicircle), the lunar detail is not crisp, and the terminator is not a clear, straight line. The core idea of showing a first quarter moon is present, but the implementation is flawed and lacks accuracy in both shape and detail. 4. Decision: Since the main phase change is attempted but poorly realized, this qualifies as a 2 (major omission).
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like after a week in a fish tank with algae growth.
|
<think>
To address the question, I first observe the original image, which depicts a fish tank with a castle-like structure, plants, and a single fish swimming. The question asks for an imagined transformation after a week of algae growth, suggesting the need to visualize how the tank's appearance changes over time.
Algae growth typically results in a greenish or murky appearance due to the accumulation of algae on surfaces, plants, and decorations. The tank's clarity and vibrancy would likely diminish as the algae spreads. The castle structure and plants might appear partially covered in green, and the fish could be surrounded by a slightly hazy environment.
When forming the answer image, I would depict the tank with a noticeable increase in algae coverage on the castle, plants, and decorations. The water might appear murkier, and the fish could be less visible due to the algae's density. The overall atmosphere should reflect a natural progression of algae growth, with the tank's aesthetic shifting toward a more subdued and overgrown look.
</think>
| 4 |
1. Detect Difference: The edited image (Image B) shows extensive greenish-yellow patches covering the castle structure, gravel, and some plants, simulating algae growth. The water appears murkier and the vibrant colors are dulled. The fish is missing in the edited image, and the overall appearance is less clear due to the simulated algae, particularly on the castle and other surfaces. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The edited image should depict the same fish tank scene with noticeable greenish algae covering the castle structure, plants, and decorations. The water should look less clear (murkier), and the fish might be less visible due to algae, but should ideally still be present. 3. Instruction Match: The image correctly applies algae growth to the expected surfaces (castle, plants, gravel), and the overall tank looks overgrown and less vibrant, matching the reasoning process. However, the fish is missing, which is a minor omission since it should ideally be present (albeit potentially less visible). Additionally, the algae effect is slightly exaggerated and somewhat artificial in appearance, but the intent is clear and matches the instruction. 4. Decision: Because the main transformation is present and accurate but the fish is missing (a minor but relevant detail), the score is a 4 for minor omission.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like 5 seconds later.
|
<think>
The question involves predicting the state of the traffic light 5 seconds after the current state. Observing the question_image, the traffic light is currently displaying an amber (yellow) signal. In standard traffic light sequences, amber typically transitions to red after a few seconds.
To reason through this, I would consider the typical timing of traffic light signals. Amber usually lasts for a short period, often around 2-3 seconds, before turning red. Therefore, in 5 seconds, the amber light would likely transition to red, and the green light would remain off.
The answer_image would depict the traffic light with the red signal illuminated, while the amber and green signals remain off. The background and structure of the traffic light would remain consistent, but the color change would be the primary focus.
</think>
| 5 |
1. Detect Difference: In the original image (Image A), the traffic light displays an illuminated amber (yellow) signal, with the red and green lights off. In the edited image (Image B), the amber light is off and the red light is illuminated; the green light remains off. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The traffic light should show only the red signal illuminated, with both amber and green lights turned off. 3. Instruction Match: The edit changes the illuminated light from amber to red, which matches the reasoning that the light would change from amber to red after 5 seconds. The correct object (traffic light) is modified, and the correct attribute (light color change) is updated accurately. 4. Decision: The edited image matches the expected outcome precisely; therefore, the score is 5 for perfect compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it looked like six months ago.
|
<think>
To address the request, I focus on the transformation of the belly from its current state to what it looked like six months ago. The question image shows a visibly pregnant belly, which suggests the person is in the later stages of pregnancy. The goal is to depict the belly in a less pronounced state, representing the earlier phase of pregnancy.
When conceptualizing the answer image, I would visualize a belly that is noticeably smaller and less rounded, indicating a six-month difference. The posture and clothing should remain consistent with the original image to maintain continuity. The belly should appear smoother and less stretched, with the skin texture appearing less stretched and more toned. The hands should still be placed gently on the belly to reflect the nurturing gesture.
The answer image should convey a sense of growth and development, showing the progress from the earlier stages of pregnancy to the later stages. This approach ensures the transformation is clear while maintaining the context and emotional connection to the subject.
</think>
| 1 |
1. Detect Difference: In the original image (Image A), the belly is visibly pregnant and prominent, but in the edited image (Image B), the belly appears even larger and more pronounced, with a rounder and more stretched appearance. The hand position and clothing are similar, but the overall belly size has increased. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The edited image should show a noticeably smaller, less rounded belly, corresponding to an earlier stage of pregnancy (six months prior), with less stretch and a smoother, less taut skin texture. 3. Instruction Match: The reasoning calls for a reduction in belly size to represent an earlier stage of pregnancy. However, the edit does the exact opposite: it increases the belly size, making the subject look further along in pregnancy rather than six months earlier. 4. Decision: Because the edit is the inverse of what was requested, and does not follow the reasoning process at all, this is a clear case of non-compliance. Score: 1.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like in spring.
|
<think>
To address the request, I first observe the question_image, which depicts a leafless tree in a snowy landscape, suggesting it is winter. The question_text asks to imagine what this tree will look like in spring, implying a transformation from barren branches to a blossoming tree.
For the answer image, I would envision the tree covered in vibrant green leaves, with clusters of colorful flowers or blossoms. The snow on the ground would be replaced by a lush, grassy area, and the atmosphere would shift to a warmer, brighter tone, reflecting springtime. This transformation should emphasize the tree's full and healthy appearance.
The final answer_text would describe the tree in full bloom, with vivid details of its blossoms and leaves, and the surrounding environment would be transformed into a lively spring scene. The answer image would depict the tree in full bloom, surrounded by green grass and colorful flowers, creating a vivid contrast to the barren tree in winter.
</think>
| 5 |
1. Detect Difference: The original image (Image A) shows a leafless tree in a snowy landscape with bare branches and a gray sky. In the edited image (Image B), the tree is now covered with vibrant green leaves and numerous bright pink blossoms. The snow on the ground has been replaced with lush, green grass, and the overall lighting is brighter, suggesting a warmer season. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The tree should appear in full bloom, with green leaves and colorful flowers covering its branches. The ground should be grassy and green, snow should be completely gone, and the overall scene should evoke a lively spring atmosphere. 3. Instruction Match: The changes in Image B match the reasoning process exactly: the tree is now full and healthy with leaves and blossoms, the ground is green and lush, and the winter atmosphere has been replaced with a clear sign of spring. All required changes are present and accurately depicted. 4. Decision: The edit precisely matches the intended modification as described in the reasoning process, so the reasoning_following_score is 5.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like after 30 minutes.
|
<think>
To reason through the question, I first observe the question_image, which shows a pot of liquid on a stove, likely milk or cream, heating up. The question_text asks about the appearance of the liquid after 30 minutes, implying a transformation due to heat exposure.
Considering the context, the liquid is likely to undergo a change such as curdling or separating into distinct layers. This is common when milk or cream is heated to high temperatures, especially if it contains proteins or other ingredients that coagulate.
The answer image would need to depict the liquid in a state of separation, with a clear layering effect. The top layer might appear thicker or creamier, while the bottom layer could be thinner or more fluid. The image should also retain the pot and stove setup to maintain continuity with the original scene.
The final answer_text would describe the transformation, emphasizing the separation and the resulting texture or appearance of the liquid. This aligns with the user's request for a visual representation of the liquid after 30 minutes of heating.
</think>
| 1 |
1. Detect Difference: Comparing Image A and Image B, there is essentially no visible difference in the liquid's appearance. The pot, stove, and lighting remain consistent. The surface of the liquid in Image B is still smooth and uniform, with no signs of separation, curdling, or distinct layering. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The edited image should show the liquid after 30 minutes of heating, as reasoned, with clear signs of separation—possibly a thicker, curdled top layer and a thinner, more translucent bottom layer, indicating coagulation or curdling. The scene should still depict the same pot and stove. 3. Instruction Match: The expected transformation (separation/curdling/layering) is not depicted in Image B. The liquid remains unchanged and smooth, failing to show the effects of prolonged heating. 4. Decision: Since the reasoning process is not followed at all and no required change is shown, this is a case of non-compliance and the score is 1.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
The image shows a coin in motion, draw what it will look like after ten seconds.
|
<think>
The question image shows a coin in motion, tilted at an angle, and the user wants to visualize its appearance after ten seconds. The coin's motion suggests it will likely rotate further or settle into a new position.
To reason about the final image, I consider the coin's current tilt and the direction of its motion. After ten seconds, the coin might have rotated further or settled upright. The answer image should depict the coin in a stable position, possibly upright or tilted slightly, depending on the motion's dynamics.
The final image should maintain the same background and lighting as the question image, ensuring consistency. The coin's surface details, including the embossed design, should remain clear and intact, emphasizing its metallic texture. The answer image should reflect the coin's new position after the passage of time, with a focus on realism and continuity.
</think>
| 2 |
1. Detect Difference: The main visual difference between Image A and Image B is that the coin in Image B has turned to a different angle: it appears to have rotated slightly counterclockwise, and the lighting and shadowing suggest a minor change in its position. The surface texture and background remain the same. However, the coin is still upright and not settled flat. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The edited image should show the coin in a stable position after ten seconds, most realistically lying flat on the surface, as a coin spun or set in motion typically settles down due to gravity and friction. The background and lighting should remain unchanged, and the coin’s design and details should still be clear. 3. Instruction Match: The edit only slightly changes the coin's angle but keeps it upright, which does not convincingly show the expected outcome after ten seconds—that is, the coin should be at rest, flat on the surface, rather than still standing upright. The edit does not fulfill the expected physical behavior after ten seconds. 4. Decision: Since the coin is still upright and only slightly rotated, the edit misses the main intended change (the coin settling), so this is a major omission. Score: 2.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like after three months of daily use.
|
<think>
The question involves visualizing the state of a wooden cutting board after three months of daily use. From the question_image, I observe a clean, new cutting board with a smooth surface and no visible wear. The question_text suggests the user wants to see the board's appearance after prolonged use, implying wear, scratches, and potential discoloration.
To create the answer, I would imagine the board showing signs of daily use—scratches from knives, possible staining from food residue, and a slightly worn texture. The edges might appear rounded or chipped due to frequent handling. The color could appear slightly darker or faded in areas where it has been exposed to moisture or food particles.
The answer_image should depict these characteristics: scratches across the surface, a slightly worn texture, and a more muted color tone. The edges might look rounded or slightly frayed, and there could be minor discoloration or stains. This visual representation aligns with the idea of a cutting board that has been actively used over time.
</think>
| 5 |
1. Detect Difference: The original image shows a clean, new wooden cutting board with a smooth, unblemished surface and sharp, intact edges. The edited image shows the same board but with numerous scratches across the surface, darker and possibly stained areas, and edges that appear visibly more worn and slightly rounded. There is also some discoloration and fraying at the corners and sides. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The edited image should depict the same cutting board, now visibly worn after three months of daily use, with scratches, stains, duller and possibly discolored wood, and edges that are less crisp—possibly frayed or chipped. 3. Instruction Match: The correct object (the original board) is maintained. All the requested attributes—surface scratches, discoloration/staining, worn texture, and edge wear—are present and closely match the description from the reasoning process. The degree of wear and detail in the aging is consistent with three months of regular use. 4. Decision: The edited image precisely and completely matches the intended visual changes as described in the detailed reasoning, so the score is 5 for perfect compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like after being continuously played for a month.
|
<think>
The question asks to visualize what the vinyl record looks like after being played for a month. The question_image shows a clean vinyl record with a red label, indicating it is in pristine condition. The user likely wants to see the wear and tear caused by continuous use.
To reason through this, I consider the physical effects of playing a record: scratches, scuffs, and wear on the grooves, especially near the center where the needle rests. The grooves may appear more worn, and the label might show signs of dust or dirt accumulation. The tone arm and stylus should also show signs of use, such as slight discoloration or dust buildup.
The answer image should depict these effects. The vinyl record might have visible scratches and scuffs, with the grooves appearing less smooth. The label could have dust or dirt, and the tone arm and stylus might look slightly worn or dirty. These details should align with the user's request to show the record after prolonged use.
</think>
| 4 |
1. Detect Difference: The edited image (Image B) shows the same vinyl record and tone arm, but with clear signs of wear: the red label has visible scuffs and smudges, and there are some smudges or dull patches on the vinyl surface itself, particularly near the center. The tone arm appears slightly more worn or dusty. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The record should look used, with visible scratches, scuffs, and wear on the grooves and label. The label should show dust or dirt accumulation, and the tone arm and stylus should appear a bit dirty or worn. 3. Instruction Match: The main signs of wear on the label and record surface are present in the edit, and the tone arm does look slightly more worn, matching the reasoning process. However, there is a minor omission: the vinyl grooves themselves do not display clearly visible scratches or heavy groove wear (they appear mostly smooth aside from the label area), and the overall dust accumulation is somewhat subtle. 4. Decision: Since the core changes—visible signs of wear and use—are implemented, but some minor details (like more pronounced groove wear and more dust) are understated, this merits a score of 4 for minor omission.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like after 50 years.
|
<think>
To address the question, I first observe the question_image, which shows an old wooden boat lying submerged in water. The question_text asks for a depiction of what the boat will look like after 50 years. This implies a transformation of the boat due to natural decay and environmental factors.
Considering the aging process, I would expect the boat to undergo significant deterioration. The wood would likely become more weathered, with visible cracks, splintering, and discoloration. The structure might also show signs of collapse or disintegration, especially if the boat is partially buried in the sediment. The surrounding environment would likely contribute to the decay, with algae or marine growth potentially covering parts of the boat.
For the answer_image, I would depict the boat in a state of advanced decay, with its wooden structure splintered, fragmented, and partially submerged in sediment. The surrounding water would remain clear, but the boat would appear fragile and fragile, with visible signs of prolonged exposure to water and environmental elements. This aligns with the idea of a 50-year passage and emphasizes the effects of time and natural forces on the boat.
</think>
| 4 |
1. Detect Difference: The main visual difference between Image A and Image B is the appearance of decay and growth on the boat. In Image B, the boat's wood exhibits darker areas, signs of algae or marine growth, and some evidence of wear, especially along the edges and surfaces. However, the overall structure of the boat remains mostly intact, with only minor warping or fragmentation visible. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The edited image should depict the boat as heavily decayed, with splintered and fragmented wood, visible cracks, possible collapse of some sections, and significant marine growth or sediment partially burying the structure. The boat should appear fragile and much more deteriorated than in the original. 3. Instruction Match: The edit adds algae or marine growth and some visual darkening, suggesting age and environmental effects. However, major signs of structural decay—such as significant fragmentation, collapsed or missing sections, and deep cracks—are minimal or absent. The degree of decay is less than expected for a 50-year-old submerged wooden boat. 4. Decision: While the core idea of aging and environmental deterioration is addressed, the transformation lacks the full extent of structural decay described in the reasoning process. Thus, this is a minor omission, earning a score of 4.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like after the seasons have fully cycled twice.
|
<think>
The question asks to visualize the forest after two full seasonal cycles. The initial image shows a vibrant autumn scene with orange and yellow leaves, suggesting the transition from summer to fall. To address the request, I would imagine the forest in winter, where the trees are bare and the ground is covered in snow.
The answer image should depict a stark contrast to the original, with snow blanketing the ground and the trees stripped of leaves. The lighting should appear colder and subdued, emphasizing the winter atmosphere. The path in the foreground would still be visible, but it would be covered in snow, creating a serene and quiet winter scene.
This transformation aligns with the seasonal cycle, showcasing the forest in its dormant state after two cycles of growth and decay. The final image would focus on capturing the stillness and coldness of winter, contrasting with the warmth and vibrancy of autumn.
</think>
| 5 |
1. Detect Difference: The original image (A) shows a forest in autumn, with trees full of orange/yellow leaves and a leaf-covered path. The edited image (B) shows the same forest scene, but now the trees are bare with no leaves, the ground and path are covered in snow, and the overall lighting is cold and subdued, evoking a winter atmosphere. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The edited image should depict the same forest, but in deep winter: trees should be leafless, the ground and path blanketed with snow, and the scene should feel cold and still, in stark contrast to the warm, colorful autumn. 3. Instruction Match: The correct elements were modified—the trees are now bare, and the snow covers the ground, accurately reflecting winter after two full seasonal cycles. The degree of transformation is appropriate, with the scene's mood and lighting correctly altered to convey winter. 4. Decision: All requested changes are present and accurate, so this is perfect compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like in twenty years.
|
<think>
To address the question, I first observe the question_image, which shows a modern apartment building with contemporary design elements such as large glass windows, balconies, and clean lines. The question_text asks for a depiction of what this building will look like in twenty years, implying a futuristic or advanced architectural style.
To reason about the answer, I consider advancements in sustainable and innovative design trends. Twenty years could see the integration of green technology, such as solar panels, vertical gardens, or energy-efficient materials. The structure might incorporate more dynamic and adaptive features, like self-healing surfaces or smart glass that changes color or transparency based on environmental conditions. Additionally, the building could include advanced features like smart home automation, improved structural resilience, and integration with urban infrastructure.
For the answer image, I would visualize the building with a futuristic aesthetic, featuring sleek, curved lines, extensive use of greenery, and advanced materials. The surrounding environment might include urban enhancements, such as elevated pathways, green rooftops, and a more integrated landscape. The lighting could emphasize the building's innovative features, with dynamic lighting effects or futuristic displays.
The final answer image would likely depict a modern, eco-friendly, and technologically advanced version of the original building, showcasing cutting-edge design elements that align with future architectural trends.
</think>
| 5 |
1. Detect Difference: The original image (Image A) depicts a standard modern apartment building with straight, clean lines, glass balconies, and a generally minimalist aesthetic. In the edited image (Image B), the building is dramatically transformed: it now features highly futuristic, curvilinear architecture, extensive integration of greenery (vertical gardens, rooftop gardens, and plant-covered facades), dynamic glass and lighting elements, and a more complex, innovative form. The surrounding environment also appears more integrated with the building's advanced design. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The edited image should show the original building as it might look in twenty years, with futuristic, eco-friendly, and technologically advanced features—sleek, curved forms, extensive greenery, innovative materials, and possibly smart lighting or displays. 3. Instruction Match: The observed changes align exactly with the expected transformation: the original structure is reimagined with highly advanced, green, and futuristic features. The edit does not simply replace the building but rather evolves its look in line with architectural trends forecasted in the reasoning process. 4. Decision: The edited image perfectly fulfills the instruction and the specified reasoning process, warranting a score of 5 for perfect compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like after a day.
|
<think>
The question asks for the appearance of the box after a day, implying changes due to environmental factors like weather or time progression. The question_image shows an open cardboard box floating on water, which suggests it could be exposed to elements like rain or sunlight.
To reason about the final answer, I consider how the box might change over time. If exposed to rain, the box could become wet, with water stains or visible water droplets on its surface. If exposed to sunlight, the cardboard might appear slightly darker due to fading or discoloration. The water surrounding the box could also show more pronounced ripples or changes in reflection.
The answer_image should depict the box after a day, likely with water stains or signs of water exposure, and the surrounding water could have a slightly different appearance due to ripples or reflections. The lighting might also appear softer, suggesting a transition from daylight to a later time of day. The box's position on the water could remain unchanged, but the visual details should reflect the passage of time and environmental effects.
</think>
| 5 |
1. Detect Difference: In the edited image, compared to the original, the cardboard box now shows visible water stains and wet patches on its surfaces, particularly on the top flaps and sides. The color of the cardboard in those areas appears darker, consistent with dampness. There are also some water droplets visible on the box. The water and background remain largely unchanged, though the lighting appears slightly softer and the box's position is the same. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The edited image should show the same box in the water, but after a day, with signs of water exposure such as stains, wet patches, and possibly water droplets, and a slightly changed lighting to indicate the passage of time. 3. Instruction Match: The changes made correspond exactly to the reasoning process: the box shows clear signs of water exposure (water stains, wet patches, and droplets), and the scene maintains the original composition, with only subtle lighting changes suggesting time has passed. No extraneous modifications are present. 4. Decision: The edited image perfectly matches the expected changes per the reasoning process, so the score is 5.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like after five years of continuous use.
|
<think>
The question asks for a depiction of the keyboard after five years of continuous use, implying wear and aging effects. Observing the question_image, the keyboard appears clean and well-maintained, suggesting it is in good condition initially. The user likely wants to visualize how the keyboard might look after prolonged use, including signs of wear such as dirt, discoloration, or damage.
To construct the answer, I would consider common aging effects on keyboards: dust accumulation on keys, potential scuffs or scratches on the casing, and faded or worn-out lettering. The image should reflect these changes, showing a less pristine appearance compared to the original. The answer_image would likely depict a slightly dirty keyboard with some discoloration or wear marks, especially on the edges or corners, to emphasize the passage of time.
The answer_text would describe these aging effects, focusing on the contrast between the original clean state and the worn-out look after five years. This approach ensures the user's request for a realistic depiction of aging is met.
</think>
| 5 |
1. Detect Difference: Compared to the original, the edited image shows significant visual changes: the keyboard is now much dirtier with brownish stains and discoloration on many keys and the casing, numerous keys have visibly worn or faded legends, and there are clear scuffs, scratches, and signs of heavy use, especially on high-contact keys and the edges. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The edited image should depict the same keyboard after five years of continuous use, featuring dirt, discoloration, faded/worn lettering, and marks of wear and tear, while still being the same object. 3. Instruction Match: The observed changes directly correspond to realistic aging effects described in the reasoning: visible dirt, discoloration, faded legends, and wear marks are all present and in logical locations. No major details are omitted and the edit is not excessive (e.g., no broken or missing keys, which is not specified in the instruction). 4. Decision: The edit faithfully and thoroughly implements the required aging and wear, matching the reasoning process perfectly. Therefore, the score is 5.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it looked like during rush hour.
|
<think>
To address the user's request, I first examine the question_image, which shows an aerial view of a complex highway interchange. The image features multiple lanes, ramps, and intersections, with a relatively sparse number of vehicles. The question_text asks for the appearance of this interchange during rush hour, implying a need to visualize increased traffic and congestion.
For the answer image, I would imagine a similar aerial view of the interchange but with a significant increase in the number of vehicles. This would include more cars, buses, and potentially trucks, filling the lanes and ramps. The image should convey congestion, with vehicles closely packed together and some appearing to be stuck in traffic. The ramps and intersections might show more pronounced bends or curves due to the density of vehicles.
The final answer text would describe this busy scene, emphasizing the increased traffic volume and the chaotic nature of rush hour. The answer image would visually depict this, showing a dense network of vehicles on the interchange, illustrating the contrast between the calm, empty scene in the question_image and the bustling environment of rush hour.
</think>
| 5 |
1. Detect Difference: The original image (Image A) shows an aerial view of a highway interchange with sparse traffic—only a few vehicles scattered across the lanes. The edited image (Image B) shows the same interchange now packed with vehicles; every lane is densely filled with cars, with visible congestion and barely any empty road space. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The edited image should show the same highway interchange, but with a heavy volume of traffic representative of rush hour—cars densely packed in all lanes, some at a standstill or moving very slowly, visually depicting congestion and a chaotic rush hour scene. 3. Instruction Match: The correct object (the highway interchange) is retained and not replaced. The attribute modified is the number and density of vehicles, which is accurately increased to represent rush hour congestion. The degree of modification is appropriate, as the edited image shows a dramatic and believable increase in traffic, exactly as the reasoning process described. 4. Decision: Since the edit precisely fulfills the instruction and matches the reasoning process with no omissions or inaccuracies, the score is 5 (Perfect Compliance).
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it looked like during the Jurassic period.
|
<think>
To address the question, I first observe the question_image, which shows a dinosaur skeleton in a museum setting. The dinosaur appears to be a theropod, likely a Tyrannosaurus rex or similar species, given its bipedal stance, sharp teeth, and clawed feet. The question_text asks for a depiction of what the creature looked like during the Jurassic period, implying a need for a prehistoric, lifelike representation.
For the answer_image, I would focus on creating a realistic and detailed depiction of the dinosaur in its natural Jurassic environment. This would include elements like vegetation, such as ferns and coniferous trees, as well as a setting that reflects the era's climate, such as a lush, prehistoric forest or a riverbank. The dinosaur should be portrayed in a dynamic pose, such as walking or hunting, to emphasize its predatory nature.
The final answer_text would describe the dinosaur in a lifelike manner, highlighting its physical features, such as its powerful jaws, sharp claws, and muscular build. The answer_image would likely show the dinosaur in a vivid, prehistoric landscape, with its body covered in realistic skin texture and coloration, such as a mix of greens and browns, to match the Jurassic period's ecological context.
</think>
| 5 |
1. Detect Difference: The original image (A) shows a dinosaur skeleton displayed in a museum setting, with bones exposed and mounted on a platform surrounded by artwork and artificial lighting. The edited image (B) transforms this into a lifelike, fully fleshed-out dinosaur in a lush, prehistoric forest. The dinosaur now has detailed skin, musculature, and coloration, with greenery and trees typical of a Jurassic environment surrounding it. The skeleton is no longer visible; instead, the dinosaur appears alive, posed dynamically near a water source. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The edited image should depict the same dinosaur species as a living creature in its natural Jurassic habitat, with a realistic body, skin, and coloration, surrounded by appropriate prehistoric vegetation. The scene should invoke the Jurassic period, with the dinosaur in a lifelike pose and a lush, forested environment. 3. Instruction Match: The correct object (the dinosaur) is modified by converting the skeleton into a living animal, as specified. The environment is changed from a museum to a prehistoric landscape, matching the reasoning process. The dinosaur's physical features, pose, and habitat are all consistent with the intended depiction of the Jurassic era. The degree of transformation is also appropriate: the skeleton is rendered as a muscular, detailed animal rather than replaced with a different dinosaur. 4. Decision: The edit precisely and fully matches the reasoning process and intended visual outcome. No required detail is omitted or altered incorrectly. Score: 5 (Perfect Compliance).
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it looks like during the Mid-Autumn Festival.
|
<think>
The question image shows a crescent moon in a dark sky, symbolizing a night scene. The question text asks for a transformation to depict the Mid-Autumn Festival, which traditionally involves a full moon. To achieve this, the crescent moon in the question image must be replaced with a full moon, ensuring it is centered and bright against the same dark sky. The stars in the background should remain consistent to preserve the night atmosphere. The answer image should reflect the festive and celebratory mood of the Mid-Autumn Festival by maintaining the moon's prominence and the overall night sky aesthetic.
</think>
| 5 |
1. Detect Difference: In Image A, the moon is a crescent shape, off-center, surrounded by several visible stars. In Image B, the moon is now a full, round shape, centered in the frame, and appears brighter. The background is still a dark night sky, though there are fewer visible stars. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The edited image should feature a bright, full moon centered in a dark night sky, maintaining the night atmosphere and emphasizing the moon's prominence to evoke the Mid-Autumn Festival mood. 3. Instruction Match: The crescent moon has been correctly changed to a full moon, which is the main symbolic change for the Mid-Autumn Festival. The moon is prominent and centered, and the night sky is preserved, matching the reasoning process. The reduction in star visibility does not detract from the core requirement, which is the transformation of the crescent to a full moon and maintaining the night sky. 4. Decision: The edit precisely fulfills the intended reasoning process, so the score is 5.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it looked like at sunrise.
|
<think>
The user wants the scene to reflect the appearance of the city at sunrise. To achieve this, the lighting and color tones in the image should change to warmer hues like orange, pink, and yellow, representing the soft glow of sunrise. The sky should be adjusted to show a gradient from darker tones near the horizon to lighter shades higher up. The sun should be repositioned to appear lower on the horizon, casting long shadows and creating a softer, more diffused light. The cityscape and road layout should remain unchanged to preserve the structure of the original image.
</think>
| 4 |
1. Detect Difference: The edited image (B) shows a notable shift in color tones compared to the original (A): the sky and overall lighting are much warmer, with strong pink, orange, and yellow hues replacing the original blue tones. The sun remains in the same position, high above the city, and the cityscape and road are unchanged. The lighting appears softer with warmer highlights and a slight increase in atmospheric haze, consistent with sunrise lighting effects. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The edited image should depict the city at sunrise, characterized by a sun low on the horizon (not high), casting long shadows, and bathing the scene in warm sunrise colors (orange, pink, yellow). The cityscape and road layout should remain unchanged. 3. Instruction Match: While the color palette and lighting now effectively evoke a sunrise atmosphere, the sun itself remains much higher in the sky than typical for sunrise, and the shadows are not significantly lengthened as would be expected at sunrise. The color and mood are correct, but the sun's position is inaccurate. 4. Decision: The edit captures the core change (sunrise colors and mood) but misses the important detail of the sun being low on the horizon, a key visual cue for sunrise. This constitutes a minor omission, so the score is 4.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like during the next king tide.
|
<think>
To address the question, I first observe the provided question_image, which depicts a serene tropical beach with clear skies, calm waters, and a few scattered clouds. The question_text asks to visualize the scene during the next king tide, implying a significant tidal event where water levels rise dramatically.
King tides typically occur during the full or new moon, when the gravitational pull of the moon and sun aligns, causing higher high tides and lower low tides. This results in a visually striking contrast between the water and the land, often flooding coastal areas.
For the answer image, I would depict the same beach but with the water level significantly higher, flooding the shoreline and surrounding areas. The waves would be more turbulent, and the sky might appear darker or more ominous to reflect the intense tidal event. The palm trees and vegetation would be partially submerged, emphasizing the dramatic impact of the king tide. The image should evoke a sense of power and change, contrasting with the calmness of the original scene.
</think>
| 5 |
1. Detect Difference: The edited image (Image B) shows a dramatic rise in water level compared to the original (Image A). The ocean is much higher, with large waves encroaching on the shoreline. The sky has become much darker and more ominous, suggesting stormy or intense tidal conditions. Some of the palm trees’ trunks are closer to the water due to the higher tide, and the overall mood of the scene has shifted from calm and sunny to powerful and foreboding. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The edited image should show the same beach but with water levels significantly higher, potentially flooding or nearly flooding the beach up to the vegetation and tree line. The waves should appear larger and more forceful, and the sky should be darker, possibly stormy, to emphasize the intensity of the king tide event. Beachfront vegetation and palm trees may appear partially submerged or threatened by the high water. 3. Instruction Match: The edited image faithfully follows the reasoning process. The water level is dramatically higher, the waves are much more turbulent, the sky is darker and stormy, and the shoreline is nearly flooded. All specified changes are present and accurately depicted. 4. Decision: All required visual modifications are present and correct, so the reasoning process is perfectly followed. Score: 5.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw the appearance of the Olympic opening ceremony held at this venue.
|
<think>
The question_image shows a large stadium with a track and field layout, likely a venue for major sporting events. The question_text asks for the appearance of the Olympic opening ceremony held at this location. This implies the user wants a depiction of the grand scale and ceremonial atmosphere of the opening ceremony.
To reason about the answer, I consider the iconic elements of an Olympic opening ceremony, such as a massive stage, fireworks, and a large audience. The stadium's design, with its circular seating and open roof, would be central to the visual representation. The answer image would likely feature a vibrant stage setup, fireworks lighting up the sky, and a crowd of spectators filling the stadium, all emphasizing the grandeur and scale of the event.
The description of the answer image would include details like the stage's elaborate design, the colors of the fireworks, and the crowd's enthusiasm. The image should convey the energy and spectacle of the opening ceremony, capturing the essence of the event held in this iconic venue.
</think>
| 5 |
1. Detect Difference: The original image (Image A) shows an empty stadium in daylight, with no people, decorations, or special lighting. The edited image (Image B) dramatically changes the scene: the stadium is filled with a large audience, an elaborate and brightly lit stage occupies the field, vibrant colored lights and decorations are present, and fireworks are displayed in the sky above the stadium. The lighting is now nighttime, and the atmosphere is festive. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The edited image should depict the stadium during the Olympic opening ceremony, with a grand stage setup in the center, a full audience, elaborate light displays, and fireworks illuminating the night sky—capturing the energy and spectacle of the event. 3. Instruction Match: The observed changes precisely match the reasoning process: the field is transformed into a ceremonial stage, the stands are filled with spectators, the lighting is appropriate for a night ceremony, and fireworks create a celebratory atmosphere. All required elements (stage, crowd, lights, fireworks) are present and accurately implemented. 4. Decision: Since all aspects of the reasoning process are faithfully and fully realized in the edited image, this merits a score of 5 for perfect compliance.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it looked like 1800 years ago.
|
<think>
To address the question, I focus on the historical context of the Colosseum and its appearance during its prime. The question_image shows the Colosseum in its current state, with visible ruins and modern elements. The user asks what it looked like 1800 years ago, implying the need to visualize its original glory.
Historically, the Colosseum was a bustling hub of entertainment and architecture during the Roman Empire. It housed gladiatorial contests, animal hunts, and public spectacles, with thousands of spectators filling its grand tiers. The structure would have been intact, with no visible damage or decay, and the arches and columns would have been pristine.
The answer image should depict the Colosseum in its prime, with vibrant colors, intact walls, and a bustling crowd of people. The lighting would likely be natural daylight, and the structure would appear majestic and well-maintained. The image should convey the scale and grandeur of the Colosseum during its peak era, emphasizing its role as an iconic Roman landmark.
</think>
| 2 |
1. Detect Difference: Image A depicts the Colosseum's interior in its current, ruined state, with missing upper tiers, exposed inner structures, and weathered stone. Image B shows the exterior of the Colosseum, with more complete walls, more vivid colors, and a large crowd of people at the base, suggesting activity and grandeur. The image is taken from a very different perspective (exterior rather than interior), and some of the upper facade appears more intact, but significant portions are still damaged or missing. The overall structure is not fully restored to its original, pristine state. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The edited image should show the Colosseum from a similar perspective as the original but restored to its ancient, pristine condition—no missing walls or ruined sections, vibrant and unweathered stone, and full seating and architectural details. It should include a bustling crowd (possibly inside and outside), natural daylight, and an overall sense of the Colosseum's grandeur in its prime. 3. Instruction Match: The edit attempts to address the instruction by depicting a more complete and lively Colosseum exterior with crowds, but it fails in several key areas: it switches to an exterior view (not matching the original's perspective), does not fully restore the structure (many ruinous elements remain), and does not accurately depict the interior with vibrant activity as described. The core idea of a more complete and lively Colosseum is partially present, but the reasoning process is not closely followed, and the most important elements (restoration to pristine, original state and correct viewpoint) are missing. 4. Decision: Because the edited image only partially implements the required changes and misses major aspects of the reasoning process, the score is 2 (major omission).
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it looked like on the morning of election day.
|
<think>
To address the request, I observe the original question_image, which depicts a well-maintained city hall building under clear skies. The question_text asks to visualize the scene on the morning of election day, implying a change in atmosphere and activity.
For the answer image, I would imagine the building with subtle alterations to reflect the morning of an election day. This could include elements such as a slightly overcast sky to suggest early morning or a softer light, possibly with the presence of election-related signs or posters on the building's walls. Additionally, the steps and surrounding area might have a few people or election-related banners to indicate activity and preparation for voting.
The answer image should maintain the structure and layout of the city hall but incorporate these subtle details to convey the specific time and event. The final image should evoke a sense of anticipation and preparation for the day's activities.
</think>
| 2 |
1. Detect Difference: The primary visual difference between Image A and Image B is the sky: it has changed from clear with scattered clouds (A) to a more overcast, moody sky (B), suggesting early morning or a different weather. The lighting on the building is also somewhat softened. However, there are no clear additions of election-related signs, posters, banners, or people around the city hall; the steps and entrance remain empty. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The edited image should show the same city hall with a softer or overcast morning light, visible election signs or posters on or near the building, possibly banners, and a few people or some activity indicating election day preparations. 3. Instruction Match: Only the atmospheric aspect (cloudier sky, softer light) from the reasoning process is present. The critical details for election day—election-related signage, posters, banners, or people—are entirely missing. The building is unchanged in this regard, and the scene does not visually indicate any election day activity or anticipation. 4. Decision: Because the image implements only the overcast/morning atmosphere and omits the core election-specific elements, this is a major omission, justifying a score of 2.
|
||
risebench
|
temporal_reasoning
|
Draw what it will look like after 30 minutes.
|
<think>
To address the question, I first analyze the initial setup in the question_image. It shows a pendulum suspended from a stand, swinging back and forth. The question_text asks for the appearance of the pendulum after 30 minutes, implying the pendulum has completed several cycles of motion.
The physics of pendulum motion suggests that after a certain number of swings, the pendulum will return to its original position. Given the context, 30 minutes is likely sufficient time for the pendulum to complete multiple cycles, returning to its initial state.
For the answer_image, I would depict the pendulum in its original position, with the ball hanging straight down from the string. The stand and base remain unchanged, and the background continues to be the same light blue color. This ensures consistency with the original setup while visually confirming the pendulum’s motion completion.
</think>
| 1 |
1. Detect Difference: In the original image (Image A), the pendulum bob is raised and held to the left side (at an angle from vertical), whereas in the edited image (Image B), the pendulum bob is lowered but still offset to the left and not hanging straight down. The background, stand, and base remain the same, but the pendulum is not in a vertical resting position. 2. Expected Visual Caption: The edited image should show the pendulum at rest in its equilibrium position, hanging straight down from the string, under the influence of gravity—directly beneath the pivot point. 3. Instruction Match: The reasoning process specifies that after 30 minutes, the pendulum should return to its original position, meaning it should be hanging straight down. The edited image does not show this; instead, the pendulum remains offset to the left, not vertically aligned. 4. Decision: Since the main and only required change—placing the pendulum in its straight-down equilibrium position—was not implemented at all, the image does not follow the reasoning process. This is a clear case of non-compliance, so the score is 1.
|
End of preview. Expand
in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 89