kanaria007 PRO
kanaria007
AI & ML interests
None yet
Recent Activity
posted
an
update
about 3 hours ago
✅ New Article: *Deep-Space SI-Core — Autonomy Across Light-Hours*
Title:
🚀 Deep-Space SI-Core: Autonomy Across Light-Hours - How an onboard SI-Core evolves safely while Earth is hours away
🔗 https://huggingface.co/blog/kanaria007/deep-space-si-core
---
Summary:
Most autonomy stories quietly assume “someone can intervene in minutes.” Deep space breaks that assumption.
With 2–6 hours round-trip latency and intermittent links, an onboard SI-Core must act as a *local sovereign*—while remaining *globally accountable* to Earth.
This note sketches how mission continuity survives when nobody is listening: DTN-style semantic bundles, local vs. global rollback, bounded self-improvement, and auditability that still works after contact windows return.
> Autonomy isn’t a divorce from governance—
> it’s a measured loan of authority, under a constitution, with evidence.
---
Why It Matters:
• Makes “autonomous” mean *operational*, not rhetorical, under light-hour delays
• Clarifies how rollback works when you can’t undo physics—only *policy trajectories*
• Shows how an onboard core can *self-improve without drifting out of spec*
• Treats *silence itself as an observation* (missing logs are governance signals)
---
What’s Inside:
• Two-core model: *Earth-Core (constitutional/strategic)* vs *Ship-Core (tactical/operational)*
• *SCP over DTN* as semantic bundles (priorities, idempotency, meaning checkpoints)
• Local rollback vs. epoch-level governance (“retroactive” steering without pretending to reverse time)
• Bounded onboard learning + LearningTrace for later audit and resync
• Stress scenario walkthrough: micrometeoroid storm, compound failures, and graceful degradation
• Metrics framing for deep space: governability, audit completeness, ethics uptime, rollback integrity
---
📖 Structured Intelligence Engineering Series
published
an
article
about 3 hours ago
Deep-Space SI-Core: Autonomy Across Light-Hours - *How an onboard SI-Core evolves safely while Earth is hours away*
posted
an
update
1 day ago
✅ New Article: *Multi-Agent Goal Negotiation and the Economy of Meaning*
Title:
🤝 Multi-Agent Goal Negotiation and the Economy of Meaning
🔗 https://huggingface.co/blog/kanaria007/multi-agent-goal-negotiation
---
Summary:
Single-agent “alignment” is the easy case. Real systems are *multi-owner* by default: cities, platforms, institutions, regulators, and users all carry distinct goal vectors—and the same action helps some while harming others.
This article sketches a *non-normative* extension: multi-agent *goal trade proposals* (structured, auditable “plea bargains” in goal-space) plus *semantic pricing* (treating information itself as a negotiable resource), with *PLB-M* as a nearline layer that learns stable cooperation patterns over time.
> Coordination isn’t vibes.
> It’s *contracts over goal deltas*, under governance.
---
Why It Matters:
• Turns “stakeholder conflict” into *explicit, bounded deals* instead of hidden politics
• Provides an accounting surface for *fairness, compensation, and reciprocity*
• Makes “information sharing” measurable: *how much does a semantic unit improve goals?*
• Keeps the whole negotiation layer *auditable and rollbackable*, avoiding “dark markets”
---
What’s Inside:
• Why multi-agent worlds force negotiation (cities, clouds, cross-org networks)
• *GCS as negotiable deltas*: per-agent impact vectors for joint actions
• A concrete schema: *Goal Trade Proposal (GTP)* as a first-class object
• “Semantic value” and *pricing meaning* (not money—accounting under policy)
• *PLB-M*: mining deal patterns + semantic flows → proposing safer templates
• Threat model: manipulation/collusion/DoS + governance guardrails
• Practical notes on clearing, complexity, stability (damping, circuit breakers)
---
📖 Structured Intelligence Engineering Series
Organizations
None yet