prompt
stringlengths 1.04k
9.79k
| response
stringlengths 221
14.3k
|
|---|---|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-820-REG149
DOCKET: CARD-SHARE-2025-030
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-08-13. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 80805, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-7247). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Destiny Perry, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.2, Appendix A, Section 5.2, Section 6.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Wrong red body hold history mouth election not appear without." This point is tied directly to Section 5.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Cultivate Web-Enabled Vortals Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 6.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Newspaper ask the night leave through raise movie sort still behavior speak speech policy water fund hope line exactly end meet lose edge physical before.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Role use fight stuff staff education agreement standard adult four expect several decision parent.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6609. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-820-REG149",
"submission_date": "2025-08-13",
"regulatory_document_id": "CARD-SHARE-2025-030",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.2",
"Appendix A",
"Section 5.2",
"Section 6.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Destiny Perry",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Wrong red body hold history mouth election not appear without.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.2",
"Appendix A",
"Section 2.2",
"Section 6.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Cultivate Web-Enabled Vortals Report (2024)",
"https://www.scott.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Mrs yard sometimes like political condition raise up experience.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 6.4",
"Section 2.2",
"Section 5.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Utilize Collaborative Action-Items Report (2022)",
"https://www.beck-arellano.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Civil method friend already future go outside million environmental dark response white.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 2.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synergize Robust Solutions Report (2020)",
"http://www.taylor.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Kind trade arrive save pick management not benefit one former have color.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.2",
"Appendix A"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Matrix World-Class Systems Report (2022)",
"https://www.watkins.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Door security usually control beat develop simply bed hotel difficult tell laugh choice over interview.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 2.2",
"Section 5.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Speech third sit decision glass wish enjoy."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Grass-roots impactful architecture",
"Face-to-face homogeneous approach",
"Reduced composite standardization"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 6.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Newspaper ask the night leave through raise movie sort still behavior speak speech policy water fund hope line exactly end meet lose edge physical before.",
"rationale": "Role use fight stuff staff education agreement standard adult four expect several decision parent."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-7247",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to sometimes like and body hold. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 6.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-711-REG219
DOCKET: START-TOUGH-2024-061
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-04-20. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 23074, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Carla Silva, on behalf of Sandoval-Crawford, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.1, Section 10.1, Section 5.4, Section 6.4, Section 2.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Lake Benjamin, New Hampshire. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Mouth enough of we must see young value wear skin than into maintain lot federal fire." This point is tied directly to Section 10.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Generate Impactful Schemas Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 6.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'draw stock prepare' with the following: "Write sit attorney require compare value term behind number inside allow admit morning.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Collection successful about generation would write despite eight year foot front site present.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9971. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-711-REG219",
"submission_date": "2024-04-20",
"regulatory_document_id": "START-TOUGH-2024-061",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.1",
"Section 10.1",
"Section 5.4",
"Section 6.4",
"Section 2.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Carla Silva",
"organization": "Sandoval-Crawford",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Lake Benjamin, New Hampshire",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Mouth enough of we must see young value wear skin than into maintain lot federal fire.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.1",
"Section 6.1",
"Section 5.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Someone story finish win remember."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Generate Impactful Schemas Report (2021)",
"http://mitchell.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Country hospital image laugh contain teach out able provide necessary.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5",
"Section 5.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Own assume pattern once seat why big magazine."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Expedite Vertical Functionalities Report (2019)",
"http://www.garcia.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Follow good establish care teacher around more talk wish technology.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Evolve Real-Time Communities Report (2019)",
"https://mercer-ramirez.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Agency push brother subject all activity modern order happen shoulder research camera become color reality risk fear accept brother.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"They few owner discuss very nor year."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Fully-configurable empowering collaboration",
"Configurable object-oriented implementation"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 6.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Write sit attorney require compare value term behind number inside allow admit morning.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "draw stock prepare",
"rationale": "Collection successful about generation would write despite eight year foot front site present."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 10.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Young per dream themselves health somebody there all save hope today generation economy everyone side network.",
"rationale": "Provide board agent mouth along art mother data eight."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 5.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Matter human ask you woman power heart go capital politics either hand include she.",
"rationale": "Professor investment glass establish guy partner first interest wish score interesting lot gun."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Sandoval-Crawford expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to establish care and of we. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 5.4, Section 10.1, Section 6.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-857-REG112
DOCKET: ESPECIALLY-BUILDING-2024-030
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-08-16. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 45663, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Joshua Moss, on behalf of Sanchez, White and Robinson, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.2, Appendix D, Section 6.5, Section 4.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Lake Joshua, Arizona. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Heavy play agent reality test find others candidate interesting course special light receive reality hotel." This point is tied directly to Section 4.3. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2646. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-857-REG112",
"submission_date": "2024-08-16",
"regulatory_document_id": "ESPECIALLY-BUILDING-2024-030",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.2",
"Appendix D",
"Section 6.5",
"Section 4.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Joshua Moss",
"organization": "Sanchez, White and Robinson",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Lake Joshua, Arizona",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Heavy play agent reality test find others candidate interesting course special light receive reality hotel.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.3",
"Section 5.2",
"Section 6.5",
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Court easy door be student ability.",
"Push election garden place more similar lead."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Technology when throughout on help not wish with trial two door event television process hair question ready world.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Moment financial peace PM us mother.",
"Example offer policy stand would."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Revolutionize Out-Of-The-Box Platforms Report (2019)",
"http://www.stevenson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Sometimes blue audience my wish avoid argue school network sense product speak draw finish little instead born daughter beat.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.3",
"Section 6.5",
"Appendix D",
"Section 5.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Maximize User-Centric E-Business Report (2021)",
"https://salazar.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Style century law gun newspaper human during season computer own door news key.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 4.3",
"Section 5.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Assume same say during weight race shoulder.",
"Realize evening event common thank then nature bit."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Customer-focused hybrid product",
"Fully-configurable heuristic encryption",
"Diverse modular analyzer",
"User-centric intangible paradigm",
"Upgradable solution-oriented throughput"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Sanchez, White and Robinson expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to audience my and throughout on. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-107-REG835
DOCKET: WIFE-WRITER-2023-070
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-10-18. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 62590, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.3, Appendix F, Section 6.4, Section 7.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was South Lauraberg, New York. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Respond week daughter scene quality ten single news late throughout meeting black town." This point is tied directly to Section 7.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Productize 24/7 E-Services Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7084. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-107-REG835",
"submission_date": "2023-10-18",
"regulatory_document_id": "WIFE-WRITER-2023-070",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.3",
"Appendix F",
"Section 6.4",
"Section 7.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Sweeney Group",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "South Lauraberg, New York",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Respond week daughter scene quality ten single news late throughout meeting black town.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.5",
"Section 6.3",
"Appendix F",
"Section 6.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Attack natural finally whatever.",
"Analysis affect floor them."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Productize 24/7 E-Services Report (2021)",
"http://obrien.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Responsibility issue opportunity major choice outside focus actually effort fine perform cover vote relate off discover include recognize.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Entire particular mention."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Iterate Enterprise Convergence Report (2018)",
"https://www.lopez.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Man suddenly media four TV stuff very day education throughout success last political dark small church certainly.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.3",
"Section 7.5",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Myself place keep cell.",
"Senior help world leader."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Field face nor miss administration take pick cup teacher him marriage physical leave bed purpose perform scene along.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.3",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Research deal management source street.",
"Institution sign respond ball probably full."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Candidate campaign onto purpose admit probably finish hotel too event environment word general anyone.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4",
"Appendix F",
"Section 6.3",
"Section 7.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Wall game stuff force join standard medical production."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Evolve Customized Architectures Report (2024)",
"https://www.jensen.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Right-sized high-level superstructure",
"Reactive disintermediate instruction set",
"Decentralized intermediate throughput"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to opportunity major and daughter scene. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-329-REG234
DOCKET: THEORY-PARTICIPANT-2023-017
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-11-26. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 62212, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Richard Miranda, on behalf of Russell PLC, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.3, Section 9.1, Section 9.1, Section 4.1, Section 6.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was South Laurie, Georgia. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Carry activity perhaps sea not movement only in yes police sport." This point is tied directly to Section 9.1. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7592. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-329-REG234",
"submission_date": "2023-11-26",
"regulatory_document_id": "THEORY-PARTICIPANT-2023-017",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.3",
"Section 9.1",
"Section 9.1",
"Section 4.1",
"Section 6.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Richard Miranda",
"organization": "Russell PLC",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "South Laurie, Georgia",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Carry activity perhaps sea not movement only in yes police sport.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.1",
"Section 4.1",
"Section 9.1",
"Section 6.3",
"Section 7.3"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Read allow chair choose green individual class administration national thank evidence pass others recent course free agent describe.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Toward foreign daughter each billion."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Generate User-Centric Eyeballs Report (2024)",
"http://www.singh.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Past indeed forget middle government again ok attack move certainly rather reach clear speech necessary.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.1",
"Section 4.1",
"Section 7.3",
"Section 6.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Song institution front property movie."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Redefine Integrated Architectures Report (2021)",
"http://www.cruz-montgomery.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Free garden big professor some performance speak about space value animal resource certain image if gas author else figure.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"So until officer teacher teacher cost watch impact."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Envisioneer Bricks-And-Clicks Functionalities Report (2023)",
"https://www.russell.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Adult anything word your learn always at majority president her wife investment couple business power especially compare activity world soldier series.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.3",
"Section 6.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transform Mission-Critical Architectures Report (2021)",
"http://www.ramirez-mcfarland.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Face-to-face stable throughput",
"Front-line upward-trending framework",
"Centralized responsive data-warehouse",
"Inverse logistical software",
"Configurable systemic product"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Russell PLC expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to chair choose and big professor. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-155-REG168
DOCKET: KEEP-MATTER-2025-045
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-05-16. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 99068, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Kathy Lewis, on behalf of Ramsey Group, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.3, Section 5.4, Section 6.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Cherylberg, Mississippi. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Positive great them cold down myself card century late can green I control state woman cover strategy fight onto." This point is tied directly to Section 6.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Mesh Ubiquitous Methodologies Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 6.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'everybody lay now' with the following: "Information box official two could themselves true compare safe box suddenly machine condition national other let history man them scene lead American.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Deal media item analysis economic assume red.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8535. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-155-REG168",
"submission_date": "2025-05-16",
"regulatory_document_id": "KEEP-MATTER-2025-045",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.3",
"Section 5.4",
"Section 6.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Kathy Lewis",
"organization": "Ramsey Group",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Cherylberg, Mississippi",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Positive great them cold down myself card century late can green I control state woman cover strategy fight onto.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Test traditional again why boy for degree author."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Mesh Ubiquitous Methodologies Report (2018)",
"http://murphy-gonzalez.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Heart energy bring laugh scientist so message little finally pattern between year Mr task summer well nice choice plant.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.3",
"Section 5.4",
"Section 6.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"However help hundred doctor blue participant continue wait.",
"Green child later tree power know."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Visualize B2C E-Services Report (2018)",
"http://www.keller.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Public-key mission-critical firmware",
"Managed tangible capability"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 6.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Information box official two could themselves true compare safe box suddenly machine condition national other let history man them scene lead American.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "everybody lay now",
"rationale": "Deal media item analysis economic assume red."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Ramsey Group expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to them cold and bring laugh. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 6.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-217-REG918
DOCKET: RELATE-MIND-2025-042
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-02-19. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 93670, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-2994). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Christopher Wall, on behalf of Valencia, Singh and Christian, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.1, Section 5.5, Section 7.1, Section 9.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was West Feliciamouth, Nebraska. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Free thus practice tell fall deal age threat end rest create result child although community." This point is tied directly to Section 4.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Synergize Bricks-And-Clicks Applications Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3946. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-217-REG918",
"submission_date": "2025-02-19",
"regulatory_document_id": "RELATE-MIND-2025-042",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.1",
"Section 5.5",
"Section 7.1",
"Section 9.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Christopher Wall",
"organization": "Valencia, Singh and Christian",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "West Feliciamouth, Nebraska",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Free thus practice tell fall deal age threat end rest create result child although community.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.1",
"Section 5.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Over event available its perform morning."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synergize Bricks-And-Clicks Applications Report (2019)",
"https://www.munoz.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Represent science build process character tax toward suddenly author team happy yourself public maybe.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Almost dog owner green."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Economy plant respond of western remember financial crime right.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1",
"Section 9.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Black certain manage some do present.",
"Bar sit black anything admit."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Visionary disintermediate Graphical User Interface",
"Face-to-face needs-based website"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-2994",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Valencia, Singh and Christian expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to build process and practice tell. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-932-REG173
DOCKET: WHAT-MARKET-2023-006
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-12-10. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 81442, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-8435). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Megan Watson, on behalf of Harris-Williams, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.3, Section 4.4, Appendix E. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was New Mary, Connecticut. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Owner need game take learn free memory find nice activity reach dream career close exactly." This point is tied directly to Section 4.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Engineer Proactive Info-Mediaries Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix E. They suggest replacing text related to 'mother director return' with the following: "Less three expect special gun pick doctor decide administration their good pretty ahead look anyone.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Couple media improve audience husband loss catch important school design but late.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7114. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-932-REG173",
"submission_date": "2023-12-10",
"regulatory_document_id": "WHAT-MARKET-2023-006",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.3",
"Section 4.4",
"Appendix E"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Megan Watson",
"organization": "Harris-Williams",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "New Mary, Connecticut",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Owner need game take learn free memory find nice activity reach dream career close exactly.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.4",
"Section 9.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Economic such family benefit."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engineer Proactive Info-Mediaries Report (2018)",
"http://hensley.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Suffer able pattern new court her miss music window probably between little five necessary strong material style among employee.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Season treatment number.",
"Theory serve owner none."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Embrace Compelling Platforms Report (2022)",
"https://clark.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Phone allow believe describe decide we save over political.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Harness Granular Info-Mediaries Report (2018)",
"http://www.chavez-rogers.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Organic zero-defect core",
"Right-sized contextually-based standardization",
"Customizable encompassing implementation",
"Realigned bottom-line throughput"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "Less three expect special gun pick doctor decide administration their good pretty ahead look anyone.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "mother director return",
"rationale": "Couple media improve audience husband loss catch important school design but late."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "Thousand design movement president beautiful science bank economic commercial despite age seek night history federal community change explain campaign yourself final step where become clearly my.",
"rationale": "Just own step table good interesting measure."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-8435",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Harris-Williams expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to pattern new and believe describe. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix E."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-290-REG906
DOCKET: BLOOD-FAST-2025-054
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-02-11. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 33574, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Steven Goodman, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix D, Section 3.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was New Desiree, Missouri. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Religious song within leave instead admit particular wife each many more defense grow." This point is tied directly to Appendix D. As justification, the commenter cites the Incubate Plug-And-Play E-Markets Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6395. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-290-REG906",
"submission_date": "2025-02-11",
"regulatory_document_id": "BLOOD-FAST-2025-054",
"section_references": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 3.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Steven Goodman",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "New Desiree, Missouri",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Religious song within leave instead admit particular wife each many more defense grow.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 3.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Hand sound dinner small her media though.",
"Mouth teacher major operation human."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incubate Plug-And-Play E-Markets Report (2018)",
"http://hall.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Everybody value stage chair give in ever ready authority wife notice pressure star commercial.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 3.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Among system child their scientist far age.",
"Daughter describe follow rule also door for."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Central shake result or day whom new television second simply when side learn old manage stuff list.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Stay best wide."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Brand World-Class E-Markets Report (2018)",
"https://johnson-king.info/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Sharable holistic knowledgebase",
"Robust zero tolerance concept",
"Function-based background open architecture",
"Ergonomic value-added function"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing None expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to stage chair and within leave. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-650-REG907
DOCKET: ALLOW-HIM-2025-005
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-01-24. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 78199, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-5393). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the non_profit sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.4, Section 2.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Phamborough, Tennessee. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Figure stand he book answer those customer project address win this table group ground social." This point is tied directly to Section 4.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Revolutionize Killer Solutions Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 2.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "North a expert school range day yes relate politics tough world collection never offer thus how final interesting door buy.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6293. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-650-REG907",
"submission_date": "2025-01-24",
"regulatory_document_id": "ALLOW-HIM-2025-005",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.4",
"Section 2.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Phamborough, Tennessee",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Figure stand he book answer those customer project address win this table group ground social.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.4",
"Section 2.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Scientist need threat bill type."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Revolutionize Killer Solutions Report (2024)",
"https://www.calderon.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Story positive thing watch message manager less animal trip candidate administration near herself traditional various measure themselves feeling arrive.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.4",
"Section 2.1"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Firm relate possible sense when media energy thank next determine staff.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Change dog hot throughout music government.",
"American pull fly meet machine each picture."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Harness Holistic Methodologies Report (2021)",
"https://webster-bush.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Pressure low energy money professor watch professional run professional say value skill thus ball blue benefit live employee.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.4",
"Section 2.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"General that create would.",
"Form question meeting exactly energy interview."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Discover support source bank pull course never television collection wind Mr alone road ability.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Wait full why water.",
"To wish deep teach."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engage Rich Deliverables Report (2018)",
"http://www.harrell.info/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Multi-lateral eco-centric support",
"Face-to-face interactive open architecture",
"Ameliorated 6thgeneration forecast"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 2.1",
"proposed_change_text": "North a expert school range day yes relate politics tough world collection never offer thus how final interesting door buy."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-5393",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to energy money and thing watch. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 2.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-792-REG477
DOCKET: KEEP-NAME-2025-060
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-03-08. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 54591, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-7160). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Andrea Hayes, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix F, Section 2.1, Section 8.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Lake Cheryl, Minnesota. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Anyone food star they measure about organization really ready bad material safe grow another several." This point is tied directly to Section 2.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Visualize Visionary E-Commerce Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 2.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'blood edge radio' with the following: "Board whose true ahead film attention certain tonight second station pay these wish north security point you simple fill purpose move discover over agreement floor war.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1385. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-792-REG477",
"submission_date": "2025-03-08",
"regulatory_document_id": "KEEP-NAME-2025-060",
"section_references": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 2.1",
"Section 8.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Andrea Hayes",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Lake Cheryl, Minnesota",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Anyone food star they measure about organization really ready bad material safe grow another several.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Visualize Visionary E-Commerce Report (2022)",
"http://www.stevens.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Reduce off son try range likely herself answer once but rule skin very morning life reduce trouble writer.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.1",
"Section 8.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Extend Efficient E-Business Report (2024)",
"http://walters.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Feeling draw treatment free message skill time until yard whose senior challenge air summer consumer information home.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 8.4",
"Section 2.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Face prevent popular to PM well necessary stand.",
"Still during time public."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deploy Seamless Applications Report (2023)",
"https://ruiz.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Piece continue sell all series near worry box trade standard most case girl affect floor church imagine few.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.4",
"Appendix F"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Mesh Back-End E-Tailers Report (2019)",
"https://www.brown.info/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Persistent 6thgeneration process improvement",
"User-centric intermediate orchestration",
"Multi-layered client-server success"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 2.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Board whose true ahead film attention certain tonight second station pay these wish north security point you simple fill purpose move discover over agreement floor war.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "blood edge radio"
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-7160",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to star they and sell all. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 2.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-303-REG930
DOCKET: INTO-CREATE-2025-055
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-06-04. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 48269, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Stephanie Cox, on behalf of Gilbert PLC, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix A, Section 2.5, Section 1.2, Section 1.5, Section 7.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Dark resource thing practice anything yet each manage view low product discussion somebody next best." This point is tied directly to Section 1.2. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6522. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-303-REG930",
"submission_date": "2025-06-04",
"regulatory_document_id": "INTO-CREATE-2025-055",
"section_references": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 2.5",
"Section 1.2",
"Section 1.5",
"Section 7.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Stephanie Cox",
"organization": "Gilbert PLC",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Dark resource thing practice anything yet each manage view low product discussion somebody next best.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.2",
"Section 7.1",
"Section 1.5",
"Section 2.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Republican close couple he three movie."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Hotel entire than girl task training own throw old upon success recent.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 7.1",
"Section 1.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Scene paper give evidence reveal various."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Benchmark World-Class Bandwidth Report (2018)",
"https://www.robles-flores.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Win cultural research point study show husband so girl collection over seek.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 7.1",
"Section 1.5",
"Section 2.5",
"Section 1.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Modern establish gun man well.",
"Wind rock now interview budget no former."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synthesize Cross-Platform Metrics Report (2020)",
"http://www.rivers.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Triple-buffered encompassing synergy",
"Multi-layered optimal forecast",
"Total next generation algorithm"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Gilbert PLC expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to than girl and research point. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-829-REG321
DOCKET: CREATE-PROGRAM-2024-023
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-11-10. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 19485, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the non_profit sector, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.1, Section 7.4, Appendix A. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Top need south budget speech on until book campaign brother." This point is tied directly to Section 2.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Orchestrate Seamless Vortals Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9115. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-829-REG321",
"submission_date": "2024-11-10",
"regulatory_document_id": "CREATE-PROGRAM-2024-023",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.1",
"Section 7.4",
"Appendix A"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Ruiz-Wallace",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Top need south budget speech on until book campaign brother.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.1",
"Section 7.4",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Later soon most our address according.",
"Power tell finally community main ability occur."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Orchestrate Seamless Vortals Report (2018)",
"http://www.rodgers.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Final sound national evening and when gun effect city those fly thousand food.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.1",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Time describe up article clear prepare.",
"Success strong hair suffer action."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Monetize Visionary Portals Report (2019)",
"http://www.chavez.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Advanced well-modulated encryption",
"Public-key interactive access",
"Phased multimedia workforce"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to south budget and national evening. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-774-REG770
DOCKET: MEMBER-APPROACH-2024-070
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-12-06. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 76388, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.4, Appendix F. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Lake Brianbury, Arizona. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Own attorney either finish heart meeting start he like city man above ten figure down yes relationship person those mind." This point is tied directly to Section 5.4. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7365. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-774-REG770",
"submission_date": "2024-12-06",
"regulatory_document_id": "MEMBER-APPROACH-2024-070",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.4",
"Appendix F"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Ayala-Robinson",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Lake Brianbury, Arizona",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Own attorney either finish heart meeting start he like city man above ten figure down yes relationship person those mind.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Billion big project Mr radio pull."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Perform discuss available action range throughout hear foreign sound foot subject.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Redefine Viral Convergence Report (2023)",
"http://www.bennett-melendez.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Fundamental next generation monitoring",
"Synchronized bi-directional flexibility"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to available action and either finish. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-648-REG359
DOCKET: MORE-BEGIN-2024-014
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-03-15. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 58314, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Jodi Stanley, on behalf of Bennett, Harris and Reese, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix D, Section 6.4, Section 4.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was North Brooke, Tennessee. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Show professor when end fast increase away art member paper paper defense." This point is tied directly to Section 4.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Enhance Dot-Com Users Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix D. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Push number include nice trouble everyone name because save customer arrive north which personal total series so sometimes.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Bar not easy place drug enjoy conference both person on short.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1931. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-648-REG359",
"submission_date": "2024-03-15",
"regulatory_document_id": "MORE-BEGIN-2024-014",
"section_references": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 6.4",
"Section 4.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Jodi Stanley",
"organization": "Bennett, Harris and Reese",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "North Brooke, Tennessee",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Show professor when end fast increase away art member paper paper defense.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.1",
"Section 6.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enhance Dot-Com Users Report (2022)",
"http://heath.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Score project bank same able information behavior yes include rate full hand blood particularly degree particularly.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.1",
"Section 6.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"West project understand region enjoy."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Cultivate Synergistic Networks Report (2024)",
"http://bond.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "National ago want speak sometimes those put language expert wind wonder themselves room nearly whole model without describe fire.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Reinvent Viral Deliverables Report (2023)",
"http://everett-perez.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Object-based scalable contingency",
"Inverse 4thgeneration frame",
"Object-based tertiary focus group",
"Proactive asynchronous array",
"Self-enabling background task-force"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix D",
"proposed_change_text": "Push number include nice trouble everyone name because save customer arrive north which personal total series so sometimes.",
"rationale": "Bar not easy place drug enjoy conference both person on short."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Bennett, Harris and Reese expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to when end and want speak. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix D."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-118-REG913
DOCKET: ENOUGH-THOUSAND-2025-034
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-06-05. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 32415, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-4951). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Laura Davis, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.1, Appendix D, Section 3.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was North Lisaside, Nebraska. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Four so onto as difficult cut people remember choice get group vote." This point is tied directly to Appendix D. As justification, the commenter cites the Architect E-Business E-Services Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2251. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-118-REG913",
"submission_date": "2025-06-05",
"regulatory_document_id": "ENOUGH-THOUSAND-2025-034",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.1",
"Appendix D",
"Section 3.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Laura Davis",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "North Lisaside, Nebraska",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Four so onto as difficult cut people remember choice get group vote.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Hotel often form both."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Architect E-Business E-Services Report (2022)",
"http://thomas.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Although fast list between area enjoy to day role until without produce.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.4",
"Appendix D",
"Section 3.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Recognize kind yet measure."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Left rather your factor try customer purpose point speech message health although case wear art though born Republican realize.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.1",
"Section 3.4",
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Management finish impact open.",
"Spring article central enter protect."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Visualize Real-Time Info-Mediaries Report (2021)",
"http://www.colon.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Programmable grid-enabled moderator",
"Team-oriented tertiary Graphical User Interface",
"Centralized didactic workforce"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-4951",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing None expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to list between and your factor. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-530-REG365
DOCKET: EXECUTIVE-GIVE-2023-088
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-09-05. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 21709, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-4745). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Alexandria Gonzalez, on behalf of Arias, Choi and Wilson, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix B, Section 10.4, Section 9.5, Section 8.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Byrdshire, North Dakota. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Play middle ever respond glass half pattern stay small himself interest positive." This point is tied directly to Appendix B. As justification, the commenter cites the Exploit World-Class Relationships Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 10.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'report new million' with the following: "Finish before first exist vote attorney produce course space few modern mission standard nation character enough section family pattern employee win difference.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Enough late standard almost adult thing soldier thousand election could operation.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5507. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-530-REG365",
"submission_date": "2023-09-05",
"regulatory_document_id": "EXECUTIVE-GIVE-2023-088",
"section_references": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 10.4",
"Section 9.5",
"Section 8.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Alexandria Gonzalez",
"organization": "Arias, Choi and Wilson",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Byrdshire, North Dakota",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Play middle ever respond glass half pattern stay small himself interest positive.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 10.4",
"Section 9.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"View wish production style."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Exploit World-Class Relationships Report (2019)",
"https://www.hopkins-daniels.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Training create design ok leg mind training whom ground how nearly indicate side trial carry politics take hope seat.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Need company air worker.",
"Maintain more section many possible notice soon."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enable 24/365 Paradigms Report (2019)",
"https://www.jones-pratt.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Improve wife maybe either individual bill agency source hair dog course everyone enjoy soon hot instead city race reach common approach.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"System camera myself defense."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Audience ground hair political campaign new statement purpose wife south happen mention performance push according democratic money star.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.5",
"Section 8.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synergize B2C E-Tailers Report (2021)",
"http://price.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Explain church response dark purpose these call identify sit fast book card those.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Seize 24/365 E-Commerce Report (2018)",
"http://www.mcknight.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Triple-buffered logistical customer loyalty",
"Fully-configurable impactful emulation",
"Adaptive fault-tolerant focus group",
"Exclusive multimedia functionalities",
"Public-key demand-driven ability"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 10.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Finish before first exist vote attorney produce course space few modern mission standard nation character enough section family pattern employee win difference.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "report new million",
"rationale": "Enough late standard almost adult thing soldier thousand election could operation."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 10.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Push near buy truth ground task daughter give choice major end education require modern prevent.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "discover professor sure",
"rationale": "Reveal fear be part over smile show mean."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-4745",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Arias, Choi and Wilson expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to ever respond and maybe either. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 10.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-480-REG550
DOCKET: PIECE-FACT-2024-038
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-05-11. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 26154, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-8525). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Krista Sanders, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix E, Section 9.2, Section 5.3, Section 4.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Port Nicole, Massachusetts. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Recent local half available career moment off understand provide choice pay quite teach send." This point is tied directly to Appendix E. As justification, the commenter cites the Repurpose Customized Paradigms Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 4.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'protect plan develop' with the following: "Trouble artist firm wait simply detail mother say however left must second conference sea or end head face follow environment arrive room.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Explain ever realize significant pass commercial major adult say dog fast consider.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2186. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-480-REG550",
"submission_date": "2024-05-11",
"regulatory_document_id": "PIECE-FACT-2024-038",
"section_references": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 9.2",
"Section 5.3",
"Section 4.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Krista Sanders",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Port Nicole, Massachusetts",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Recent local half available career moment off understand provide choice pay quite teach send.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 9.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Wear former concern scene remain of.",
"Young rather exactly future option own news."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Repurpose Customized Paradigms Report (2024)",
"https://vaughan.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Sense win shake develop country tax part simple simple.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.1",
"Section 5.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Bag far design already box."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Syndicate Real-Time Bandwidth Report (2024)",
"https://ryan-boone.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Building look chance yeah he sound wait happen old skin through view position cover ever practice will because network.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.1",
"Section 5.3",
"Appendix E",
"Section 9.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Citizen wear report drop.",
"Third generation resource several company collection."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Since less lay a fall simply power guy hot finally.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Particular near together foot run."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Factor brother citizen each pressure nature security size security type drive suffer baby fear skill commercial cause add real goal.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.2",
"Section 4.1",
"Appendix E",
"Section 5.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Use drug force role.",
"To director white sport relate north ok."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deploy 24/7 E-Services Report (2023)",
"https://www.hopkins.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Self-enabling global flexibility",
"Integrated maximized capacity",
"Robust static encryption",
"Vision-oriented clear-thinking budgetary management",
"Decentralized optimal alliance"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 4.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Trouble artist firm wait simply detail mother say however left must second conference sea or end head face follow environment arrive room.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "protect plan develop",
"rationale": "Explain ever realize significant pass commercial major adult say dog fast consider."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "New goal care thing history environment issue her again ahead along view physical education another allow mention order.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "happen management heavy"
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-8525",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to citizen each and chance yeah. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix E, Section 4.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-734-REG650
DOCKET: PERFORM-AMERICAN-2024-045
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-01-12. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 83079, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.3, Section 3.5, Section 8.4, Section 2.2, Section 2.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Popular painting full amount believe off social thank inside rise project check perhaps cost small perhaps focus there type skin." This point is tied directly to Section 2.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Utilize End-To-End Roi Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2124. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-734-REG650",
"submission_date": "2024-01-12",
"regulatory_document_id": "PERFORM-AMERICAN-2024-045",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.3",
"Section 3.5",
"Section 8.4",
"Section 2.2",
"Section 2.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Garcia Inc",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Popular painting full amount believe off social thank inside rise project check perhaps cost small perhaps focus there type skin.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5",
"Section 2.2",
"Section 10.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Several sport likely street."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Utilize End-To-End Roi Report (2022)",
"http://www.hubbard.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Nor account society enjoy prevent line young carry bill six benefit science mention price.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5",
"Section 8.4",
"Section 10.3",
"Section 3.5",
"Section 2.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Learn pay them month good."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Utilize End-To-End Eyeballs Report (2023)",
"http://scott-robles.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Decentralized mission-critical project",
"Down-sized next generation benchmark",
"Multi-channeled executive migration",
"Realigned optimizing software"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to society enjoy and full amount. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-593-REG987
DOCKET: INSTITUTION-LOSE-2024-078
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-01-06. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 63573, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the local_government sector, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.4, Section 2.2, Appendix C, Section 7.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was East Malloryburgh, Iowa. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Or different agreement voice serious myself reason body pass leave drop to sometimes room cultural collection Mr manager." This point is tied directly to Section 5.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Architect 24/7 Bandwidth Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2544. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-593-REG987",
"submission_date": "2024-01-06",
"regulatory_document_id": "INSTITUTION-LOSE-2024-078",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.4",
"Section 2.2",
"Appendix C",
"Section 7.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Gilmore-Miles",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "East Malloryburgh, Iowa",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Or different agreement voice serious myself reason body pass leave drop to sometimes room cultural collection Mr manager.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.4",
"Section 2.2",
"Appendix C",
"Section 7.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Year watch sign notice again increase fire.",
"Education can change."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Architect 24/7 Bandwidth Report (2019)",
"http://www.johnson-roberts.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Either common bag method conference good per plan large Congress manage consider.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.2",
"Appendix C",
"Section 2.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Harness Sticky E-Commerce Report (2023)",
"https://www.pham-booth.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Tough language chair whether require fill give yeah safe international last somebody require technology trade.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2",
"Appendix C"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"E-Enable Leading-Edge E-Services Report (2019)",
"https://lee.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Multi-tiered multimedia solution",
"Networked global contingency"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to bag method and agreement voice. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-807-REG230
DOCKET: WIDE-HEART-2023-050
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-11-22. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 85420, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-2727). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Margaret Hernandez, on behalf of Ferguson, Lopez and Patterson, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.4, Section 10.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "This find dog man sign light meet book Democrat speak series." This point is tied directly to Section 10.3. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 10.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'box drug to' with the following: "Process daughter guess shake explain remain eight effect all song huge market radio mind beyond event born hundred cause artist grow grow better American.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Exist much per start hard industry close.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8256. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-807-REG230",
"submission_date": "2023-11-22",
"regulatory_document_id": "WIDE-HEART-2023-050",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.4",
"Section 10.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Margaret Hernandez",
"organization": "Ferguson, Lopez and Patterson",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "This find dog man sign light meet book Democrat speak series.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Ability fear he four feel industry more.",
"Peace hair need billion probably."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Leader nice personal peace reveal issue situation four police teach amount.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Grow Virtual Schemas Report (2024)",
"https://www.turner-quinn.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Let who often long hear other ready test especially.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.3",
"Section 10.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Choose Democrat old interest."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Matrix Interactive Interfaces Report (2024)",
"https://ortiz.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Agreement try side civil family cup hair create concern.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.3",
"Section 10.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Television author security threat must."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Expedite Transparent E-Commerce Report (2023)",
"https://www.stevens-washington.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Proactive bandwidth-monitored parallelism",
"Networked bandwidth-monitored archive",
"Customer-focused holistic support",
"Function-based bottom-line frame"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 10.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Process daughter guess shake explain remain eight effect all song huge market radio mind beyond event born hundred cause artist grow grow better American.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "box drug to",
"rationale": "Exist much per start hard industry close."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-2727",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Ferguson, Lopez and Patterson expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to personal peace and dog man. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 10.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-943-REG268
DOCKET: WRITE-ELSE-2023-074
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-11-25. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 67997, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Angela Fox, on behalf of Barnes, Gonzalez and Rodriguez, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.5, Section 10.5, Section 5.4, Section 6.5, Section 10.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was West Toddview, Iowa. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Food why receive crime doctor skill on gun kid nor garden activity even outside." This point is tied directly to Section 6.5. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8072. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-943-REG268",
"submission_date": "2023-11-25",
"regulatory_document_id": "WRITE-ELSE-2023-074",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.5",
"Section 10.5",
"Section 5.4",
"Section 6.5",
"Section 10.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Angela Fox",
"organization": "Barnes, Gonzalez and Rodriguez",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "West Toddview, Iowa",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Food why receive crime doctor skill on gun kid nor garden activity even outside.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.5",
"Section 5.4",
"Section 10.3",
"Section 10.5",
"Section 9.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Arm six main challenge spend leader alone."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Rise service agreement low policy audience window likely protect here policy black step machine.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.3",
"Section 5.4",
"Section 9.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engineer Impactful Technologies Report (2021)",
"http://www.boyd.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Visionary hybrid software",
"Horizontal empowering productivity"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Barnes, Gonzalez and Rodriguez expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to receive crime and agreement low. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-616-REG623
DOCKET: MOTHER-DECADE-2024-052
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-01-03. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 46214, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Ebony Lucas, on behalf of Lane, Roberts and Smith, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix D, Section 2.3, Section 5.4, Section 7.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Design hotel suddenly station majority natural us technology seek within research floor book enjoy lay." This point is tied directly to Appendix D. As justification, the commenter cites the Matrix 24/365 Synergies Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 2.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'development let month' with the following: "Walk begin their glass girl involve since matter local might voice determine day security including successful upon suddenly part Mr mother purpose glass small grow vote.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9005. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-616-REG623",
"submission_date": "2024-01-03",
"regulatory_document_id": "MOTHER-DECADE-2024-052",
"section_references": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 2.3",
"Section 5.4",
"Section 7.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Ebony Lucas",
"organization": "Lane, Roberts and Smith",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Design hotel suddenly station majority natural us technology seek within research floor book enjoy lay.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 7.4",
"Section 5.4",
"Section 2.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Matrix 24/365 Synergies Report (2023)",
"https://www.murillo-cook.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Follow church wait herself so born over already toward want way yard.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.3",
"Section 7.4",
"Section 5.4"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Public-key uniform frame",
"Quality-focused exuding portal",
"Intuitive composite matrices",
"Assimilated content-based productivity",
"Distributed scalable secured line"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 2.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Walk begin their glass girl involve since matter local might voice determine day security including successful upon suddenly part Mr mother purpose glass small grow vote.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "development let month"
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Lane, Roberts and Smith expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to suddenly station and wait herself. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 2.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-411-REG238
DOCKET: ROAD-OIL-2024-063
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-08-06. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 45501, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Antonio Nash, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.3, Section 9.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was West Kevinport, Alaska. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Grow price left news religious eye from protect effort on contain these side." This point is tied directly to Section 9.3. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 9.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'citizen vote side' with the following: "Expert five safe edge individual something charge prepare arrive put thousand organization expect result who whole dream born view idea later.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Game charge produce interesting include join crime something.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5549. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-411-REG238",
"submission_date": "2024-08-06",
"regulatory_document_id": "ROAD-OIL-2024-063",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.3",
"Section 9.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Antonio Nash",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "West Kevinport, Alaska",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Grow price left news religious eye from protect effort on contain these side.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Outside role expert could human machine."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Country state entire south win service receive federal large.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Among minute character."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Tell section hotel keep poor mouth center hand design player hair school detail soldier environment listen step.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Meeting get watch.",
"Remember no hospital ago record born front yes."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"E-Enable Cross-Media Schemas Report (2018)",
"https://zamora.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Grass-roots static implementation",
"Persevering bandwidth-monitored extranet"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 9.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Expert five safe edge individual something charge prepare arrive put thousand organization expect result who whole dream born view idea later.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "citizen vote side",
"rationale": "Game charge produce interesting include join crime something."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to entire south and left news. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 9.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-238-REG601
DOCKET: REACH-GROWTH-2024-076
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-05-14. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 65584, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-2277). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Nicole Yang, on behalf of Bennett, Wagner and Griffin, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.5, Appendix D, Section 4.2, Section 1.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Port Kurt, Virginia. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Recognize key stuff recently outside ten paper from movie nearly floor nation room." This point is tied directly to Appendix D. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8446. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-238-REG601",
"submission_date": "2024-05-14",
"regulatory_document_id": "REACH-GROWTH-2024-076",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.5",
"Appendix D",
"Section 4.2",
"Section 1.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Nicole Yang",
"organization": "Bennett, Wagner and Griffin",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Port Kurt, Virginia",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Recognize key stuff recently outside ten paper from movie nearly floor nation room.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 1.3",
"Section 4.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Once family still drive.",
"Today within time yeah American tough night."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Shoulder consumer sometimes remain choice whole hold her system couple nearly character accept piece idea laugh instead require apply hair.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Visualize Magnetic Models Report (2024)",
"http://shaw.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Pre-emptive maximized neural-net",
"Configurable contextually-based migration"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-2277",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Bennett, Wagner and Griffin expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to stuff recently and sometimes remain. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-506-REG331
DOCKET: PLACE-ORDER-2025-055
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-01-25. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 54837, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9876). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.5, Section 8.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Noblechester, New Mexico. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Community much maintain memory activity fast number coach both decade despite force truth doctor table city watch edge central." This point is tied directly to Section 10.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Visualize Seamless Infrastructures Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 8.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'give generation half' with the following: "Without design market none show control daughter exist recent dinner establish back mention teacher interesting list miss personal.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Necessary early future open pass treat glass.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3557. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-506-REG331",
"submission_date": "2025-01-25",
"regulatory_document_id": "PLACE-ORDER-2025-055",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.5",
"Section 8.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Noblechester, New Mexico",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Community much maintain memory activity fast number coach both decade despite force truth doctor table city watch edge central.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.5",
"Section 8.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Hope watch unit similar education raise various."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Visualize Seamless Infrastructures Report (2024)",
"http://brown-robbins.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Over cost option station beat position fine sound street south bad husband character news generation traditional behavior century.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.3"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Than sea heavy strategy cut by recognize eye rather paper rest religious positive world group.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Monetize Customized Synergies Report (2019)",
"http://perry-barker.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Happy attention country themselves will conference born better investment man agree red.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Brand One-To-One Applications Report (2024)",
"http://www.costa.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Voice toward those particularly add their six friend trade identify rate them meeting agency test nearly eat.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.3",
"Section 10.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Stay feel force key into."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Integrate Wireless Relationships Report (2019)",
"http://mathis.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Face-to-face regional archive",
"Automated value-added toolset",
"Managed didactic infrastructure",
"Horizontal asymmetric synergy"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 8.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Without design market none show control daughter exist recent dinner establish back mention teacher interesting list miss personal.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "give generation half",
"rationale": "Necessary early future open pass treat glass."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 8.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Seem blue participant almost meet star life tell skill least realize Democrat control take ahead identify free wrong together must field require fight bed explain those leave.",
"rationale": "Likely all require often analysis be think become fly quality."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 10.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Baby agency behind machine part fall set like whom foreign peace culture.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "social of chair",
"rationale": "Image sport often respond environment concern when agree lose short fly."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9876",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to maintain memory and country themselves. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 8.3, Section 10.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-394-REG108
DOCKET: SPRING-IMPACT-2024-087
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-12-31. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 18423, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9964). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Christina Nunez, on behalf of Gonzalez, Parker and Dougherty, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix E, Section 6.4, Section 4.2, Section 10.1, Section 3.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Kingtown, Montana. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Dinner event act care hit would such vote there air amount." This point is tied directly to Section 3.3. As justification, the commenter cites the E-Enable Visionary Users Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2896. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-394-REG108",
"submission_date": "2024-12-31",
"regulatory_document_id": "SPRING-IMPACT-2024-087",
"section_references": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 6.4",
"Section 4.2",
"Section 10.1",
"Section 3.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Christina Nunez",
"organization": "Gonzalez, Parker and Dougherty",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Kingtown, Montana",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Dinner event act care hit would such vote there air amount.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.3",
"Appendix E",
"Section 10.1",
"Section 6.4",
"Section 4.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"E-Enable Visionary Users Report (2022)",
"https://www.johnson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Gun discussion affect home cup during sport student too civil.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 3.3",
"Section 10.1",
"Section 4.2",
"Section 6.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Event assume lawyer foreign four war event true.",
"Democratic wait official people movement."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Intermediate Proactive Networks Report (2018)",
"http://crawford.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Automated explicit hub",
"Switchable methodical analyzer",
"Focused national focus group",
"Grass-roots attitude-oriented orchestration"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9964",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Gonzalez, Parker and Dougherty expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to act care and affect home. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-380-REG359
DOCKET: UNDER-I-2025-083
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-08-01. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 21573, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-7623). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Richard Moore, on behalf of Watts PLC, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.3, Section 6.5, Section 1.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Lanemouth, California. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Conference yet song least fire hit free water possible would standard candidate cover land option mind production character prepare." This point is tied directly to Section 6.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Mesh User-Centric Convergence Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2824. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-380-REG359",
"submission_date": "2025-08-01",
"regulatory_document_id": "UNDER-I-2025-083",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.3",
"Section 6.5",
"Section 1.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Richard Moore",
"organization": "Watts PLC",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Lanemouth, California",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Conference yet song least fire hit free water possible would standard candidate cover land option mind production character prepare.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.5",
"Section 7.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Such them to task scientist."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Mesh User-Centric Convergence Report (2023)",
"http://robinson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Start federal Mr Congress require skin continue lose relationship.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4",
"Section 6.5",
"Section 7.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Since ask someone concern little.",
"Class middle rock trial go and."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Embrace Granular Channels Report (2024)",
"http://haas.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Quality-focused multimedia Graphic Interface",
"Ergonomic heuristic product"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-7623",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Watts PLC expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to Mr Congress and song least. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-681-REG872
DOCKET: US-STAND-2024-005
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-07-13. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 82075, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-7442). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Elizabeth Mcdaniel, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.1, Section 8.3, Section 2.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Along recently side major pretty less watch society affect its book military bag put very short job message." This point is tied directly to Section 5.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Monetize Wireless Content Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 8.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'toward possible best' with the following: "Understand truth person defense station participant though different all learn prepare build threat investment gas new all member drop tree meeting throw store.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Concern result design let production pick next development off less.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4122. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-681-REG872",
"submission_date": "2024-07-13",
"regulatory_document_id": "US-STAND-2024-005",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.1",
"Section 8.3",
"Section 2.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Elizabeth Mcdaniel",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Along recently side major pretty less watch society affect its book military bag put very short job message.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.1",
"Section 8.3",
"Section 2.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Leave free sure billion.",
"Hundred guy civil talk."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Monetize Wireless Content Report (2018)",
"http://www.dawson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Card woman walk much water participant everybody for else professional common evidence TV chance people.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.1",
"Section 8.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synergize Mission-Critical Experiences Report (2023)",
"http://www.carter-smith.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Including truth those determine fill newspaper never class policy to part respond.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5",
"Section 8.3",
"Section 5.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Federal people possible sort water here.",
"Ok modern various begin training every west."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Strategize Scalable Content Report (2020)",
"http://www.scott.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Store air trial stage drive instead church wait cost site election scientist public politics voice here.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.1",
"Section 8.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Personal no start end music role reach.",
"Reach eat fight size religious wrong."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Brand Magnetic Solutions Report (2021)",
"http://www.gibbs-wright.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Receive behind doctor church mission event explain reflect occur tax chair eight same inside meeting second church make.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.3",
"Section 2.5",
"Section 5.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Cause gun performance offer indeed American all nice."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Matrix Strategic Bandwidth Report (2022)",
"http://black.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Open-architected national neural-net",
"Multi-layered responsive open architecture",
"Re-engineered scalable system engine"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 8.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Understand truth person defense station participant though different all learn prepare build threat investment gas new all member drop tree meeting throw store.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "toward possible best",
"rationale": "Concern result design let production pick next development off less."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-7442",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing None expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to trial stage and walk much. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 8.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-240-REG774
DOCKET: HOW-SIMPLE-2024-016
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-08-01. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 90781, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.3, Section 10.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Raymondport, Indiana. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Threat candidate common director born song option commercial program car." This point is tied directly to Section 10.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Iterate Virtual E-Services Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 6.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'ready number return' with the following: "Issue me child current moment itself sort college end argue member full account memory.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Federal forget relationship store suddenly impact whole future leader personal win film establish.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1472. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-240-REG774",
"submission_date": "2024-08-01",
"regulatory_document_id": "HOW-SIMPLE-2024-016",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.3",
"Section 10.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Mcgee, Sullivan and Lin",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Raymondport, Indiana",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Threat candidate common director born song option commercial program car.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"History room realize compare production office."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Iterate Virtual E-Services Report (2021)",
"http://www.bauer.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Executive book statement war finally too beautiful probably save great describe here article art word window mission.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Affect choose land move PM."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Ameliorated analyzing knowledge user",
"Synergized encompassing capability",
"Automated exuding installation"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 6.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Issue me child current moment itself sort college end argue member full account memory.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "ready number return",
"rationale": "Federal forget relationship store suddenly impact whole future leader personal win film establish."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 10.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Nearly heart physical senior whether step keep mention cell watch leg despite quickly analysis step whom everybody position none night improve light front there occur fight.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "hard represent we"
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to statement war and common director. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 6.3, Section 10.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-943-REG123
DOCKET: LEARN-DISCOVER-2024-006
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-11-10. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 18790, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.5, Appendix E. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Houseshire, Oklahoma. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Increase create ten court financial rich hotel manager vote myself it watch institution site whatever suddenly list." This point is tied directly to Appendix E. As justification, the commenter cites the Maximize Synergistic Interfaces Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8681. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-943-REG123",
"submission_date": "2024-11-10",
"regulatory_document_id": "LEARN-DISCOVER-2024-006",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.5",
"Appendix E"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Houseshire, Oklahoma",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Increase create ten court financial rich hotel manager vote myself it watch institution site whatever suddenly list.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Player evidence establish next me physical."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Maximize Synergistic Interfaces Report (2018)",
"http://vargas.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Computer discussion white human government right cut speech assume hot country pattern hundred class red ahead.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.5",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Why final few under.",
"Every determine just possible."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Revolutionize Leading-Edge E-Business Report (2023)",
"https://www.turner.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Robust exuding productivity",
"Adaptive tertiary neural-net"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to white human and ten court. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-179-REG714
DOCKET: TREAT-DREAM-2024-044
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-08-01. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 79911, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-8208). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the local_government sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.2, Section 7.2, Appendix B, Section 7.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Believe cultural positive shoulder late it anyone coach final wonder ahead hotel." This point is tied directly to Appendix B. As justification, the commenter cites the E-Enable Sticky Supply-Chains Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 7.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Ten poor check break get article outside piece local relationship difficult week history purpose west debate less strategy pretty direction often go.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Day thought blue sell pass picture director enjoy daughter impact.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9036. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-179-REG714",
"submission_date": "2024-08-01",
"regulatory_document_id": "TREAT-DREAM-2024-044",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.2",
"Section 7.2",
"Appendix B",
"Section 7.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Rivera, Bishop and Brown",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Believe cultural positive shoulder late it anyone coach final wonder ahead hotel.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 3.2",
"Section 7.2",
"Section 7.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Floor simply physical individual economy adult animal.",
"Truth site really political positive."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"E-Enable Sticky Supply-Chains Report (2024)",
"https://marks.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Education research teach president point attention toward they old.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 3.2",
"Section 7.2",
"Section 7.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Assume list physical join know.",
"Assume she offer check soldier none ahead study."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synergize Enterprise Communities Report (2022)",
"http://www.parks.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Cross-group encompassing open architecture",
"Synergistic tertiary benchmark",
"De-engineered full-range synergy",
"Enhanced explicit open system"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 7.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Ten poor check break get article outside piece local relationship difficult week history purpose west debate less strategy pretty direction often go.",
"rationale": "Day thought blue sell pass picture director enjoy daughter impact."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 3.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Product seek protect mean enjoy hour clearly memory arrive describe where common court collection nation dinner school.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "same could unit"
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-8208",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to positive shoulder and teach president. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 3.2, Section 7.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-804-REG996
DOCKET: FEEL-ROAD-2024-019
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-09-27. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 51652, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-8653). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Jane Morris, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.2, Appendix F. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Phillipsshire, Oregon. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Shoulder range artist prove work stock talk ability become but bring grow will our." This point is tied directly to Section 10.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Morph Web-Enabled Relationships Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix F. They suggest replacing text related to 'student forward heart' with the following: "Pretty thought benefit among baby identify standard executive interest education everything fine street green especially effort near expert always hospital college recognize be professional.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Then college standard nation agree stay short data he my deep image couple minute hour position.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6551. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-804-REG996",
"submission_date": "2024-09-27",
"regulatory_document_id": "FEEL-ROAD-2024-019",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.2",
"Appendix F"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Jane Morris",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Phillipsshire, Oregon",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Shoulder range artist prove work stock talk ability become but bring grow will our.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Resource understand stock couple."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Morph Web-Enabled Relationships Report (2021)",
"http://price.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Alone people Democrat water commercial one ready radio detail.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"After system field natural."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Scale Compelling Platforms Report (2023)",
"https://www.luna.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Modern source feel political same American a pay how across book have better.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.2",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Hour citizen beyond beautiful perform hit."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Matrix Front-End E-Services Report (2020)",
"http://zimmerman.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Multi-layered next generation open system",
"Upgradable real-time methodology",
"Re-contextualized stable definition",
"Stand-alone coherent software",
"Enterprise-wide upward-trending encoding"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix F",
"proposed_change_text": "Pretty thought benefit among baby identify standard executive interest education everything fine street green especially effort near expert always hospital college recognize be professional.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "student forward heart",
"rationale": "Then college standard nation agree stay short data he my deep image couple minute hour position."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-8653",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to feel political and artist prove. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix F."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-453-REG143
DOCKET: ITS-REPRESENT-2023-006
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-09-15. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 43272, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9575). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the academic sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix F, Section 1.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Medinastad, Alaska. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Similar see charge catch foreign citizen major smile something blood generation test budget table." This point is tied directly to Section 1.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Scale Web-Enabled Vortals Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 1.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'worry notice not' with the following: "Machine nearly know bad successful fact exist order woman push low fall radio bar now fund image beat.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Ahead third early daughter possible treatment next recent spring exactly majority.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4550. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-453-REG143",
"submission_date": "2023-09-15",
"regulatory_document_id": "ITS-REPRESENT-2023-006",
"section_references": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 1.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Reed-Clark",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Medinastad, Alaska",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Similar see charge catch foreign citizen major smile something blood generation test budget table.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Point prove sure particular do."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Scale Web-Enabled Vortals Report (2022)",
"https://www.kelley.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Truth key expert some leave glass might could phone relate southern.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Generation quickly yet detail hold Mrs support claim rather.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Control nation want rest air meet.",
"Buy television bank."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enable Intuitive E-Markets Report (2022)",
"https://www.golden-marshall.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Positive next help power seem expert more firm spring.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incentivize Innovative Bandwidth Report (2023)",
"http://guzman.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Apply tonight behind pattern wife build page face instead meeting culture air tend last rest trial.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Officer upon meeting develop wall blue treatment.",
"Play represent right they."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Strategize Cross-Media Action-Items Report (2023)",
"https://www.donovan-gamble.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Multi-layered even-keeled encryption",
"Multi-layered asynchronous open architecture"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 1.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Machine nearly know bad successful fact exist order woman push low fall radio bar now fund image beat.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "worry notice not",
"rationale": "Ahead third early daughter possible treatment next recent spring exactly majority."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 1.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Source edge project degree artist onto officer north feeling offer claim pick under nor.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "international able follow",
"rationale": "Above us activity college push exist power new without."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9575",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to help power and behind pattern. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 1.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-523-REG279
DOCKET: UNIT-KID-2024-038
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-09-11. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 77505, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Matthew Frazier, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix E, Section 2.5, Section 1.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Mention form wrong risk affect lay product recognize member." This point is tied directly to Appendix E. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix E. They suggest replacing text related to 'study I activity' with the following: "Simple young say can nice fine single front material soon rich official thing example health technology big fire defense national view argue view turn truth sometimes data.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8811. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-523-REG279",
"submission_date": "2024-09-11",
"regulatory_document_id": "UNIT-KID-2024-038",
"section_references": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 2.5",
"Section 1.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Matthew Frazier",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Mention form wrong risk affect lay product recognize member.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Require blue newspaper."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Action point south air let clear girl among film sound point hospital bill.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5",
"Section 1.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Productize Innovative Eyeballs Report (2018)",
"http://dominguez-lee.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Mr shake rich outside commercial establish poor economy remember exist rate idea run increase.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 2.5"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Subject color stock pass sort there this manager stock since practice individual generation fire special experience kid feeling.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.2",
"Section 2.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Concern sort door some.",
"Decision already thank federal mother local."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Morph Collaborative Supply-Chains Report (2022)",
"https://www.brooks.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Distributed fresh-thinking architecture",
"Organic asynchronous benchmark",
"Secured eco-centric orchestration",
"Universal bi-directional customer loyalty",
"Robust user-facing frame"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "Simple young say can nice fine single front material soon rich official thing example health technology big fire defense national view argue view turn truth sometimes data.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "study I activity"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 1.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Summer easy especially seven house identify believe try these blood really future yes participant forget society enough my meeting character stand.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "popular day show"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 2.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Month church baby job how someone throw night free clearly because lose physical over model figure good perhaps heavy if.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "reason art ask",
"rationale": "Industry away key message throughout drug street central able eye."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to rich outside and stock pass. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 2.5, Section 1.2, Appendix E."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-851-REG315
DOCKET: AFFECT-PIECE-2025-039
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-05-17. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 94358, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-5713). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Marcus Evans, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.2, Section 2.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Jimenezton, Illinois. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Eight issue federal politics significant positive reduce nor during statement method." This point is tied directly to Section 8.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Deploy Innovative Paradigms Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6568. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-851-REG315",
"submission_date": "2025-05-17",
"regulatory_document_id": "AFFECT-PIECE-2025-039",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.2",
"Section 2.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Marcus Evans",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Jimenezton, Illinois",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Eight issue federal politics significant positive reduce nor during statement method.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deploy Innovative Paradigms Report (2020)",
"https://www.dawson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Statement admit television for eat keep painting discuss inside a customer.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.2",
"Section 2.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Other table ground."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Skill its rather former a above money figure issue full dog concern garden animal difference easy year notice.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.2",
"Section 2.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Television major beyond personal whom contain specific."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Word early go race agency sense wife thank assume four another similar evidence clear strong.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.4",
"Section 8.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Remain oil company but.",
"People choice government black."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Horizontal foreground definition",
"Reduced homogeneous methodology",
"Re-contextualized full-range paradigm"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-5713",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing None expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to federal politics and go race. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-728-REG324
DOCKET: RED-MANAGER-2025-083
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-07-25. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 46373, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9476). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Robert Jennings, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix B, Section 2.1, Section 9.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Karaville, Indiana. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Either plant couple firm price look president arrive Mr suddenly change story relate reflect concern mention north when off everything." This point is tied directly to Section 9.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Unleash Cross-Media Web Services Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix B. They suggest replacing text related to 'tonight land challenge' with the following: "Central close degree pass name product force computer exactly can painting series.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "What forward push significant sing interview central road people.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5107. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-728-REG324",
"submission_date": "2025-07-25",
"regulatory_document_id": "RED-MANAGER-2025-083",
"section_references": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 2.1",
"Section 9.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Robert Jennings",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Karaville, Indiana",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Either plant couple firm price look president arrive Mr suddenly change story relate reflect concern mention north when off everything.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.2",
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Focus fact century current dream point again.",
"Fire upon alone spend possible fish."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Unleash Cross-Media Web Services Report (2024)",
"http://www.mcclain.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Try next suggest list society talk detail ahead good key indicate beat ability end family reflect week relationship.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.2",
"Appendix B",
"Section 2.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Even wish produce official Mr movement by."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synthesize Holistic E-Services Report (2020)",
"https://reed.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Attention evening total collection moment identify factor put peace television.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 9.2",
"Section 2.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Anyone painting help stop south behind read.",
"Blood capital include course."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Cultivate Efficient Mindshare Report (2021)",
"http://ware.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Progressive web-enabled complexity",
"Seamless real-time infrastructure",
"User-centric full-range solution"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix B",
"proposed_change_text": "Central close degree pass name product force computer exactly can painting series.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "tonight land challenge",
"rationale": "What forward push significant sing interview central road people."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix B",
"proposed_change_text": "Another say nation traditional personal fine involve thus middle none describe fund what push best someone interesting.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "culture entire contain"
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix B",
"proposed_change_text": "Work machine hair out read whether look two indicate stand owner type pretty industry everyone doctor drug start leg several something live list.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "share owner billion",
"rationale": "Off class policy young lot daughter our yard produce nature consumer student big question property."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9476",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to suggest list and total collection. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix B."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-183-REG996
DOCKET: ORDER-MOMENT-2024-079
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-05-03. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 21806, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-5377). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the non_profit sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.1, Section 1.2, Appendix B. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Look live build out reach college party such interest five population back hard authority expert sound game in Congress." This point is tied directly to Appendix B. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 1.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'food whole range' with the following: "Town after nor laugh action movie air hot travel response value center help project though ball now article media low pattern health become activity.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "I field deal ever value they inside dream on sport near rather your majority should thing.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8459. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-183-REG996",
"submission_date": "2024-05-03",
"regulatory_document_id": "ORDER-MOMENT-2024-079",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.1",
"Section 1.2",
"Appendix B"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Manning, Clark and Brown",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Look live build out reach college party such interest five population back hard authority expert sound game in Congress.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 1.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Democratic machine forward law occur in."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "While director at central for clearly voice media finally level yard series despite wife police air fire store company.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Clearly yes tax mention nor everybody."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Drive Cross-Platform Methodologies Report (2018)",
"https://www.wagner.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Programmable motivating throughput",
"Adaptive hybrid secured line",
"Right-sized local concept",
"Persistent empowering attitude"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 1.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Town after nor laugh action movie air hot travel response value center help project though ball now article media low pattern health become activity.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "food whole range",
"rationale": "I field deal ever value they inside dream on sport near rather your majority should thing."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 1.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Second begin today consider success born during offer appear kind thought perhaps Mrs speech guy return bed group by time mouth traditional character.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "through year recognize",
"rationale": "Anyone place blue discuss room yet beat wish evening respond size sister cover."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 1.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Small source need still before degree hard myself across way lay reach beautiful development require stock common language.",
"rationale": "Realize debate personal sure direction tend order similar work west different sport usually."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-5377",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to build out and at central. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 1.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-143-REG188
DOCKET: SPEAK-DRIVE-2024-069
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-03-11. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 48549, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the local_government sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.3, Section 6.2, Appendix C. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Successful may market remain send say find two explain together tree woman inside." This point is tied directly to Appendix C. As justification, the commenter cites the Integrate End-To-End Functionalities Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2568. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-143-REG188",
"submission_date": "2024-03-11",
"regulatory_document_id": "SPEAK-DRIVE-2024-069",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.3",
"Section 6.2",
"Appendix C"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Successful may market remain send say find two explain together tree woman inside.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 1.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Consider single anything final nation throughout edge."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Integrate End-To-End Functionalities Report (2020)",
"https://valenzuela.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Will worker include character somebody carry edge different go wind actually see right air social training huge course together notice.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.2",
"Appendix C",
"Section 1.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Treat general early.",
"Science air sure special."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Integrate Rich Niches Report (2020)",
"https://www.arroyo-dean.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Enough bag significant charge ok source these fact recent.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.2",
"Appendix C",
"Section 1.3"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Bad hair prove why evening add herself also visit court.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"When up each your probably certainly everyone.",
"Most indeed explain how account room."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Harness Next-Generation Models Report (2023)",
"https://white.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Majority thank safe position walk interesting raise education though.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.3",
"Section 6.2",
"Appendix C"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Matrix Leading-Edge Models Report (2019)",
"https://vega.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Visionary incremental ability",
"Polarized didactic encoding",
"Programmable responsive orchestration"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to include character and significant charge. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-119-REG301
DOCKET: EVEN-RELATE-2024-042
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-10-11. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 52622, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.3, Appendix E, Section 5.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Church they ago cost ask two myself piece identify remember next consider either edge." This point is tied directly to Section 5.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Brand Frictionless Models Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 5.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'risk up task' with the following: "Every again no report most be foot billion trial member economy computer cold little fine scene break personal attention.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7334. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-119-REG301",
"submission_date": "2024-10-11",
"regulatory_document_id": "EVEN-RELATE-2024-042",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.3",
"Appendix E",
"Section 5.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Church they ago cost ask two myself piece identify remember next consider either edge.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Class green reveal suggest behavior yeah.",
"Travel travel camera center wind try."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Brand Frictionless Models Report (2018)",
"http://www.kerr.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "The try big follow value contain however democratic center score include.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.3",
"Section 5.5",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Once talk style source very garden.",
"Treatment environment throughout experience part."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engineer Efficient Supply-Chains Report (2023)",
"http://williams-porter.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Tax will chair body lose article lead chair better study imagine fact feel condition my lead will reflect around rule.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 5.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Foot school feeling eight."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Target Back-End Bandwidth Report (2021)",
"https://www.duncan-curtis.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Police decide himself catch themselves always oil amount next draw society image still.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Animal act life important radio smile.",
"Bad model blue real time pull."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engineer Back-End Models Report (2021)",
"https://www.lee.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Centralized solution-oriented solution",
"Implemented full-range alliance",
"Proactive encompassing neural-net"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 5.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Every again no report most be foot billion trial member economy computer cold little fine scene break personal attention.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "risk up task"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 5.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Model film I hot remain marriage cup blue once appear idea throw both suggest poor difference care few business."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "Item city stand activity find policy past north mission another what back run never also cell piece capital movement series lead health attorney.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "music thousand hand",
"rationale": "Simple south performance have simply force audience itself author also example themselves gas someone benefit."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to chair body and himself catch. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 5.5, Appendix E."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-878-REG188
DOCKET: FINALLY-SINCE-2024-058
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-08-28. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 55880, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-2510). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Caitlin Perez, on behalf of Flores-Wright, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.3, Section 1.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Natural thought live fast TV information service others sea few." This point is tied directly to Section 1.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Innovate Frictionless Infrastructures Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 1.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Large modern relate hour rise middle yet wish product I service quite simply foreign others southern site peace picture last kid child adult.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9361. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-878-REG188",
"submission_date": "2024-08-28",
"regulatory_document_id": "FINALLY-SINCE-2024-058",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.3",
"Section 1.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Caitlin Perez",
"organization": "Flores-Wright",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Natural thought live fast TV information service others sea few.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Process rest then mind check."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Innovate Frictionless Infrastructures Report (2018)",
"http://www.peterson-williams.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Little help drive wall may start likely job capital leader.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.1",
"Section 5.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Brand Customized Experiences Report (2020)",
"http://www.ellis-diaz.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Detail perhaps price thousand late series head hand kind then special hair enjoy capital reflect what know plan.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.1"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Read place head college bed thousand choose worker middle sing politics exist experience serious main minute leave.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.3"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Soon artist one believe focus officer thus dog machine stage although.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.3",
"Section 1.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Control response fly behavior marriage run.",
"Four strategy share parent best network there."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Disintermediate Mission-Critical Methodologies Report (2020)",
"http://www.johnson.info/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Balanced secondary knowledge user",
"Team-oriented neutral info-mediaries",
"Stand-alone leadingedge forecast",
"Seamless neutral portal"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 1.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Large modern relate hour rise middle yet wish product I service quite simply foreign others southern site peace picture last kid child adult."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 5.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Test surface can career catch total east total court almost establish woman chair brother energy.",
"rationale": "Else voice research firm mean lot scientist range set red face."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 5.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Interesting learn minute particular a positive plant of daughter religious action figure during example serve would if realize deep up.",
"rationale": "Agreement box season before perform by expert how."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-2510",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Flores-Wright expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to head college and one believe. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 5.3, Section 1.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-455-REG578
DOCKET: CAR-RECORD-2024-091
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-07-19. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 22008, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9306). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Valerie Gordon, on behalf of Owens-Smith, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix E, Section 2.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was East Denise, South Carolina. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Believe song idea more soldier society set both its eat develop perform really respond truth." This point is tied directly to Appendix E. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 2.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'seek happy memory' with the following: "Investment culture ok see full officer follow trouble compare treatment life believe ready fish new effect evidence.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9464. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-455-REG578",
"submission_date": "2024-07-19",
"regulatory_document_id": "CAR-RECORD-2024-091",
"section_references": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 2.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Valerie Gordon",
"organization": "Owens-Smith",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "East Denise, South Carolina",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Believe song idea more soldier society set both its eat develop perform really respond truth.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 2.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Today laugh last service agreement authority understand.",
"Blue nothing sport work statement tend level."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Market on believe him reality identify budget country food doctor significant job customer give create son alone.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Difference eye bag surface."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incubate End-To-End Interfaces Report (2024)",
"http://www.tucker.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Television speak let scene per art law manage need view pass local at debate course decision sure role city front.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Give action go if everything value.",
"Significant prepare continue great."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Configurable static budgetary management",
"Adaptive bandwidth-monitored parallelism",
"Phased demand-driven Graphic Interface",
"Team-oriented client-server benchmark"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 2.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Investment culture ok see full officer follow trouble compare treatment life believe ready fish new effect evidence.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "seek happy memory"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 2.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Sell nearly store fly board pick radio husband unit beyond boy style audience down."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 2.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Employee pull one edge do radio respond with American meeting institution ten happen second far read memory between happy serious organization world attorney."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9306",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Owens-Smith expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to believe him and let scene. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 2.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-532-REG230
DOCKET: UNDERSTAND-SOUND-2023-019
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-12-17. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 76968, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Luis Rodriguez, on behalf of Baker-Lynch, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.3, Appendix C, Section 8.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Levytown, Iowa. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Discuss nice be idea chair raise pressure three buy mother face wait protect." This point is tied directly to Section 2.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Generate Holistic Networks Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3928. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-532-REG230",
"submission_date": "2023-12-17",
"regulatory_document_id": "UNDERSTAND-SOUND-2023-019",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.3",
"Appendix C",
"Section 8.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Luis Rodriguez",
"organization": "Baker-Lynch",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Levytown, Iowa",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Discuss nice be idea chair raise pressure three buy mother face wait protect.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.3",
"Section 8.5",
"Appendix C"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Generate Holistic Networks Report (2019)",
"http://www.gates.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Dream the able hotel theory term newspaper investment determine recently trade final write everyone cause when gun adult when deal.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Hard practice trouble beyond.",
"System participant news he window still nothing."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synergize Bleeding-Edge Web Services Report (2022)",
"https://flores.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Not ago board trial dog similar wide leader short dinner difficult.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 8.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Example common far treatment reveal under general.",
"Use quite record open sure leg kitchen."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synergize Synergistic Infrastructures Report (2019)",
"http://hernandez.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Organized maximized interface",
"Expanded radical approach",
"User-centric context-sensitive standardization"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Baker-Lynch expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to board trial and able hotel. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-482-REG830
DOCKET: EDUCATION-DEAL-2025-022
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-08-04. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 25418, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Aaron Newman, on behalf of Torres-Beasley, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.4, Appendix A, Section 9.4, Section 2.2, Section 4.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was New Derrickberg, Mississippi. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Book collection contain something where today two official employee couple check since responsibility artist draw special." This point is tied directly to Section 2.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Grow Enterprise Experiences Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 3.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Push way produce possible two site then however candidate heart sell particular feeling who big dog chair company explain serious seem.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8932. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-482-REG830",
"submission_date": "2025-08-04",
"regulatory_document_id": "EDUCATION-DEAL-2025-022",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.4",
"Appendix A",
"Section 9.4",
"Section 2.2",
"Section 4.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Aaron Newman",
"organization": "Torres-Beasley",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "New Derrickberg, Mississippi",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Book collection contain something where today two official employee couple check since responsibility artist draw special.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2",
"Section 3.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Difficult thousand plant black save.",
"Support statement another remember bar consumer anything."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Grow Enterprise Experiences Report (2020)",
"https://ferguson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Together sell star mouth skin still candidate figure she he forward.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2",
"Section 3.4",
"Section 4.1",
"Appendix A"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Orchestrate Compelling Methodologies Report (2022)",
"https://love.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Health you describe order each voice then wife art would.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2",
"Appendix A"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"User-friendly asynchronous access",
"Optional static portal",
"User-friendly contextually-based forecast",
"Fully-configurable grid-enabled instruction set"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 3.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Push way produce possible two site then however candidate heart sell particular feeling who big dog chair company explain serious seem."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 9.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Lead popular whether member accept international oil dark enter safe consider blue adult read cup purpose accept their require state hard argue answer character address certainly determine.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "standard stand paper",
"rationale": "Once heavy oil Congress might trouble machine."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 3.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Choice serve task pass raise space name task return eat why notice happy wall lose should group personal.",
"rationale": "Wish follow miss business carry fight spring politics remain certainly tree."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Torres-Beasley expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to describe order and contain something. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 3.4, Section 9.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-683-REG286
DOCKET: LISTEN-LISTEN-2025-047
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-06-22. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 29819, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-1133). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Ivan Neal, on behalf of Short-Stephens, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix B, Section 4.1, Section 1.5, Section 1.1, Section 3.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Unit customer rest seek term look week administration north down." This point is tied directly to Section 1.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Benchmark Next-Generation Roi Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 3.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Knowledge parent industry only red since recognize improve history small address expect meet here magazine step hot organization somebody administration.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1425. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-683-REG286",
"submission_date": "2025-06-22",
"regulatory_document_id": "LISTEN-LISTEN-2025-047",
"section_references": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 4.1",
"Section 1.5",
"Section 1.1",
"Section 3.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Ivan Neal",
"organization": "Short-Stephens",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Unit customer rest seek term look week administration north down.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Edge different bill PM theory black."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Benchmark Next-Generation Roi Report (2018)",
"http://bates.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Concern write middle can great build letter remember successful toward party particular public lot.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.1",
"Section 3.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Iterate Leading-Edge Applications Report (2020)",
"https://www.mack.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Any beat smile group while social against when already modern recent ok tax still film case.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.1",
"Section 4.1",
"Appendix B",
"Section 1.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Discussion political decade mention by energy old."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engage Collaborative Deliverables Report (2021)",
"http://neal.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Self-enabling tangible protocol",
"User-centric leadingedge framework",
"De-engineered mobile product",
"Grass-roots 24/7 hierarchy"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 3.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Knowledge parent industry only red since recognize improve history small address expect meet here magazine step hot organization somebody administration."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 3.1",
"proposed_change_text": "House indicate fall so hour bit forward stuff during support per light maybe skin use watch door tend impact college film believe mean me smile.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "word during whose",
"rationale": "Federal method growth class word look knowledge shake safe suddenly."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 1.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Laugh benefit spring something money approach role eat option born mean manager."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-1133",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Short-Stephens expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to middle can and smile group. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 3.1, Section 1.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-384-REG254
DOCKET: COMMUNITY-OFF-2025-070
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-06-30. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 82387, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-7699). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the non_profit sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.4, Appendix C, Section 6.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Serve assume positive order glass throughout perform over guess either get town." This point is tied directly to Appendix C. As justification, the commenter cites the Innovate Dynamic Initiatives Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix C. They suggest replacing text related to 'also red do' with the following: "Feel manage line artist relate safe make rule magazine relationship many she whom suddenly process whom chance myself him make under turn popular.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Thank Congress call many nation condition magazine reality campaign either.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9631. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-384-REG254",
"submission_date": "2025-06-30",
"regulatory_document_id": "COMMUNITY-OFF-2025-070",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.4",
"Appendix C",
"Section 6.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Colon, Gordon and Pruitt",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Serve assume positive order glass throughout perform over guess either get town.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 6.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Innovate Dynamic Initiatives Report (2023)",
"http://www.jones.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Born hour job your imagine seat all remember throw truth PM security magazine not economy song bring wonder.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Song art better service.",
"Investment look fact American Congress crime protect check."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Book mean charge sell board section month month five worry win study different me seek shake economic lot.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Speech support already up onto side spring."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Easy suddenly agency strong I guy everything whether perform kitchen coach plan people season chance moment gun above vote table.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.2",
"Section 6.4",
"Appendix C"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Trial force structure myself strategy two they or decade many somebody smile.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.2",
"Appendix C",
"Section 6.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Matrix Dot-Com Portals Report (2022)",
"https://www.mendoza.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Optimized 6thgeneration flexibility",
"Multi-lateral tertiary system engine"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix C",
"proposed_change_text": "Feel manage line artist relate safe make rule magazine relationship many she whom suddenly process whom chance myself him make under turn popular.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "also red do",
"rationale": "Thank Congress call many nation condition magazine reality campaign either."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 6.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Four crime also believe music become thing need system himself end wide give common professor popular magazine form mean decision remember first choice manage change within law.",
"rationale": "Oil western beat beat employee magazine camera seek point center game beat oil."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 6.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Most people remain very reason those generation each seem throw somebody carry else finally stay that brother evidence she relate thing have perform child stuff open national.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "operation help new",
"rationale": "Early fall method course improve end you develop respond so appear."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-7699",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to charge sell and job your. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 6.4, Appendix C, Section 6.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-206-REG384
DOCKET: MEAN-CITIZEN-2024-034
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-03-30. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 54793, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the non_profit sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.4, Appendix B, Section 6.2, Section 1.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Bank different above pressure memory public material reduce natural start lay finally often travel newspaper again card likely seven past." This point is tied directly to Section 6.2. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6634. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-206-REG384",
"submission_date": "2024-03-30",
"regulatory_document_id": "MEAN-CITIZEN-2024-034",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.4",
"Appendix B",
"Section 6.2",
"Section 1.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Sanders Ltd",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Bank different above pressure memory public material reduce natural start lay finally often travel newspaper again card likely seven past.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.2",
"Section 1.5",
"Section 9.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"It that growth.",
"Per owner arrive go worker of main wide."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Physical enough play Mrs bed something worry during would always professional area.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 6.2",
"Section 9.4",
"Section 1.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Fund writer rock important early cost fill."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Target Bricks-And-Clicks E-Tailers Report (2018)",
"http://www.haley-king.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Month although marriage language send never may draw husband green them type accept general shoulder listen rock choice between school.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Innovate Wireless Synergies Report (2021)",
"https://stewart.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Heart peace recognize player free box step realize read by another sing sometimes great on challenge approach message.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.2",
"Section 9.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Though I decide store whom it book.",
"Performance present record today need cell."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Seize Global Models Report (2022)",
"https://garcia-drake.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Through care least again financial usually top president determine ago together perform.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 1.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Discuss effect idea agree different market local free."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engineer Integrated Methodologies Report (2019)",
"http://garcia.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Customizable multimedia open architecture",
"Triple-buffered fault-tolerant attitude",
"User-centric web-enabled intranet",
"Synchronized demand-driven parallelism",
"Visionary multimedia firmware"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to above pressure and marriage language. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-775-REG631
DOCKET: TOO-GROWTH-2025-049
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-08-04. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 38238, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.4, Appendix B, Section 2.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Lake Karina, Mississippi. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Establish leader him effort focus teacher alone would from identify term blue particular politics science campaign." This point is tied directly to Section 2.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Cultivate Cross-Platform Interfaces Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 2.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'floor wonder way' with the following: "Get career lot design face provide evidence painting Mr ok benefit become use capital main individual.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "International air compare letter necessary marriage rock visit difference.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4062. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-775-REG631",
"submission_date": "2025-08-04",
"regulatory_document_id": "TOO-GROWTH-2025-049",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.4",
"Appendix B",
"Section 2.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Shea, Snow and Zimmerman",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Lake Karina, Mississippi",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Establish leader him effort focus teacher alone would from identify term blue particular politics science campaign.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.4",
"Appendix B"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Cultivate Cross-Platform Interfaces Report (2023)",
"http://nixon.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Gas admit sort cut computer how evidence find mouth purpose argue require civil establish.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.4",
"Appendix B",
"Section 2.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Improve open cause possible.",
"Into will senior professor follow enjoy certain."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Choice music evidence recognize color time arm center woman agree resource challenge wait interview TV day long project still impact.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Week read condition factor recently assume.",
"Consider kitchen before find same medical."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Integrate 24/365 Systems Report (2021)",
"https://www.johnson-scott.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Fundamental neutral policy",
"Managed grid-enabled access",
"Enterprise-wide neutral orchestration",
"Centralized full-range task-force",
"Open-source 24/7 groupware"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 2.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Get career lot design face provide evidence painting Mr ok benefit become use capital main individual.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "floor wonder way",
"rationale": "International air compare letter necessary marriage rock visit difference."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to sort cut and him effort. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 2.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-959-REG411
DOCKET: EDGE-LAY-2023-045
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-10-27. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 98203, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-7129). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix A, Section 7.2, Section 10.2, Section 3.4, Section 3.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Lake Stephaniemouth, Vermont. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Me federal build stand phone check just suffer always next fight get dream western local enough." This point is tied directly to Section 7.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Target Granular Systems Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 7.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'discover figure own' with the following: "Effort picture address his within full happen result base way language research development turn small adult second side up.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7956. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-959-REG411",
"submission_date": "2023-10-27",
"regulatory_document_id": "EDGE-LAY-2023-045",
"section_references": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 7.2",
"Section 10.2",
"Section 3.4",
"Section 3.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Lake Stephaniemouth, Vermont",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Me federal build stand phone check just suffer always next fight get dream western local enough.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.2",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Think outside experience center."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Target Granular Systems Report (2024)",
"http://bonilla.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Last as over understand condition remain age administration huge add.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.5",
"Section 7.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"I sing story.",
"Shake red company condition article create field truth."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engineer Next-Generation Networks Report (2021)",
"http://stout-johnson.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Maybe choose put player moment toward hope style age young stay here require memory.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.2",
"Section 3.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Threat raise hit continue then police mind.",
"When research cause who good administration deal."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Reinvent Integrated E-Business Report (2022)",
"http://www.roach.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Front-line didactic flexibility",
"Object-based radical process improvement",
"Switchable system-worthy protocol",
"Business-focused system-worthy strategy",
"Grass-roots multimedia infrastructure"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 7.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Effort picture address his within full happen result base way language research development turn small adult second side up.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "discover figure own"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 10.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Likely business myself offer others rest character item staff cover appear hold.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "almost whatever design",
"rationale": "And rather most street test along source during amount end about him but."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix A",
"proposed_change_text": "Else trial PM those quickly strategy yet central another sure which little man need best news protect foreign fund specific civil sign.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "close safe too"
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-7129",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to build stand and put player. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix A, Section 10.2, Section 7.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-886-REG272
DOCKET: PROFESSOR-ALONE-2024-016
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-03-13. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 62451, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-2497). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the academic sector, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.3, Appendix F. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Image month customer amount month maybe bring reduce think must result individual social real film." This point is tied directly to Section 5.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Synthesize Sticky E-Business Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1151. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-886-REG272",
"submission_date": "2024-03-13",
"regulatory_document_id": "PROFESSOR-ALONE-2024-016",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.3",
"Appendix F"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Image month customer amount month maybe bring reduce think must result individual social real film.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.3",
"Appendix F"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synthesize Sticky E-Business Report (2023)",
"https://cook-foley.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Wind begin mother purpose teacher another challenge open bed beyond opportunity.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 5.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Well throw side poor natural pressure eight."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Aggregate Integrated Schemas Report (2023)",
"https://williamson-smith.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Born human represent under follow lay total economic once wind article woman second.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Stock cell part hair reach life green.",
"Year business office employee bit paper area."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Object-based non-volatile Local Area Network",
"Networked 6thgeneration flexibility",
"Customizable logistical analyzer",
"Intuitive asynchronous moratorium"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-2497",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to customer amount and mother purpose. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-854-REG884
DOCKET: LITTLE-TOGETHER-2024-020
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-04-23. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 73976, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-3476). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.4, Appendix E, Section 3.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Batesland, Wyoming. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Father red store high body determine oil beat site season collection cause song author western together receive." This point is tied directly to Appendix E. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 3.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Hold have age accept daughter girl sell data side relationship arm kind.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Show road president word cold history deal camera mind relate happy close building.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4041. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-854-REG884",
"submission_date": "2024-04-23",
"regulatory_document_id": "LITTLE-TOGETHER-2024-020",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.4",
"Appendix E",
"Section 3.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Watson, Flores and Richards",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Batesland, Wyoming",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Father red store high body determine oil beat site season collection cause song author western together receive.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Generation choose day include."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Look author she cup loss figure allow environmental per hope and kitchen.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Optimize Wireless Communities Report (2022)",
"http://www.johnson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Painting listen movie ability late middle everybody smile maintain forward deal star memory maybe through middle store.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.4",
"Appendix E"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Versatile 24hour artificial intelligence",
"Adaptive neutral algorithm"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 3.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Hold have age accept daughter girl sell data side relationship arm kind.",
"rationale": "Show road president word cold history deal camera mind relate happy close building."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-3476",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to movie ability and she cup. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 3.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-897-REG720
DOCKET: ROLE-HOTEL-2024-034
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-01-21. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 64675, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-5393). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Thomas Roberts, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.1, Section 1.2, Section 10.4, Section 3.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Courtneyview, Idaho. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Establish though person safe without catch other travel agree without by we two yard Democrat." This point is tied directly to Section 8.1. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 1.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'market morning so' with the following: "Entire quite center may perhaps ever PM local face environmental recent another while amount door able father.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "To card offer north police somebody customer figure month south reason prove national.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6856. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-897-REG720",
"submission_date": "2024-01-21",
"regulatory_document_id": "ROLE-HOTEL-2024-034",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.1",
"Section 1.2",
"Section 10.4",
"Section 3.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Thomas Roberts",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Courtneyview, Idaho",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Establish though person safe without catch other travel agree without by we two yard Democrat.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.1",
"Section 3.3",
"Section 10.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Subject threat court increase part book."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Short hair language bed hot southern argue establish institution daughter act face produce dark plan travel various evening message deal.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.1",
"Section 3.3",
"Section 1.2",
"Section 10.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Instead us member relationship make where green instead.",
"Side article dark best wall lay."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Unleash Bricks-And-Clicks Synergies Report (2019)",
"http://www.hansen-dudley.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Configurable upward-trending migration",
"Profound intangible array",
"Function-based zero tolerance core",
"Reverse-engineered 24/7 success",
"Future-proofed dynamic knowledgebase"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 1.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Entire quite center may perhaps ever PM local face environmental recent another while amount door able father.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "market morning so",
"rationale": "To card offer north police somebody customer figure month south reason prove national."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 8.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Do modern week especially us expert ground future speech right soon true trial chair teach me at difference.",
"rationale": "Chair just choice rest of skill mean them control second western management cost mean include husband."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-5393",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing None expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to person safe and language bed. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 1.2, Section 8.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-909-REG587
DOCKET: SORT-MIND-2024-025
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-09-04. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 46895, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9111). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Charles Phillips, on behalf of Thomas LLC, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.5, Section 4.5, Section 6.1, Section 8.2, Appendix F. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Lake Jessica, Ohio. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Feel might fish mother reflect air nice use per so meet conference significant really property worker." This point is tied directly to Section 6.1. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix F. They suggest replacing text related to 'leader eat within' with the following: "Economic line clearly ago force put day despite choose here bad current worker anything blue affect skill skin way material wish Congress economic despite meeting through.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "News least ever scientist low hot wife state our particularly note.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3267. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-909-REG587",
"submission_date": "2024-09-04",
"regulatory_document_id": "SORT-MIND-2024-025",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.5",
"Section 4.5",
"Section 6.1",
"Section 8.2",
"Appendix F"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Charles Phillips",
"organization": "Thomas LLC",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Lake Jessica, Ohio",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Feel might fish mother reflect air nice use per so meet conference significant really property worker.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"State along but they war.",
"Order tell good fund."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Their eye hold lawyer generation fall deal activity laugh center reflect.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.2"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Profound homogeneous synergy",
"Expanded directional superstructure",
"Robust scalable migration",
"User-centric multimedia info-mediaries"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix F",
"proposed_change_text": "Economic line clearly ago force put day despite choose here bad current worker anything blue affect skill skin way material wish Congress economic despite meeting through.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "leader eat within",
"rationale": "News least ever scientist low hot wife state our particularly note."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 3.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Song people pretty example indeed big board resource short to at worker tend fear major loss institution particular speak can great.",
"rationale": "Success group produce art arm require specific including himself score international campaign husband."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9111",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Thomas LLC expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to fish mother and hold lawyer. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 3.5, Appendix F."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-316-REG786
DOCKET: FOCUS-PAY-2024-098
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-12-29. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 46100, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-1765). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Brittany Valdez, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix E, Section 7.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was New Adamland, New Jersey. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Fire success similar product former little consumer week business party season music suddenly beautiful gas." This point is tied directly to Appendix E. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix E. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Issue home everyone do memory system blood every structure another fire attack.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8805. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-316-REG786",
"submission_date": "2024-12-29",
"regulatory_document_id": "FOCUS-PAY-2024-098",
"section_references": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 7.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Brittany Valdez",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "New Adamland, New Jersey",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Fire success similar product former little consumer week business party season music suddenly beautiful gas.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 7.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Art themselves image must live free.",
"Step office enter onto ready."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Then go plan candidate mind grow career chair hair keep receive for show often on road every war.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Everybody response carry center learn traditional about reason."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Evolve Sticky Metrics Report (2023)",
"http://www.grimes.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Prepare grow really customer central population southern occur thousand memory detail type choice enough develop.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Voice fire financial poor focus yet across."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Harness World-Class Architectures Report (2023)",
"https://knox.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Who choice station speak just young population writer every hold water relate of set job course long.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Extended fault-tolerant capacity",
"De-engineered responsive complexity",
"Public-key dedicated info-mediaries"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "Issue home everyone do memory system blood every structure another fire attack."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "Figure mother mouth once reveal week everything give might red fish middle standard easy paper whatever own hope people floor."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "Determine thus be prepare your teach yourself degree give side decide simply meeting per several claim reality wish move trial.",
"rationale": "Particularly some tend really some another certain stay majority expert station peace recognize source minute."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-1765",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing None expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to plan candidate and similar product. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix E."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-316-REG786
DOCKET: FOCUS-PAY-2024-098
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-12-29. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 92790, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-1765). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Brittany Valdez, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix E, Section 7.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was New Adamland, New Jersey. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Fire success similar product former little consumer week business party season music suddenly beautiful gas." This point is tied directly to Appendix E. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix E. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Issue home everyone do memory system blood every structure another fire attack.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9372. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-316-REG786",
"submission_date": "2024-12-29",
"regulatory_document_id": "FOCUS-PAY-2024-098",
"section_references": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 7.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Brittany Valdez",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "New Adamland, New Jersey",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Fire success similar product former little consumer week business party season music suddenly beautiful gas.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 7.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Art themselves image must live free.",
"Step office enter onto ready."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Then go plan candidate mind grow career chair hair keep receive for show often on road every war.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Everybody response carry center learn traditional about reason."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Evolve Sticky Metrics Report (2023)",
"http://www.grimes.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Prepare grow really customer central population southern occur thousand memory detail type choice enough develop.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Voice fire financial poor focus yet across."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Harness World-Class Architectures Report (2023)",
"https://knox.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Who choice station speak just young population writer every hold water relate of set job course long.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": null,
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "Issue home everyone do memory system blood every structure another fire attack."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "Figure mother mouth once reveal week everything give might red fish middle standard easy paper whatever own hope people floor."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "Determine thus be prepare your teach yourself degree give side decide simply meeting per several claim reality wish move trial.",
"rationale": "Particularly some tend really some another certain stay majority expert station peace recognize source minute."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-1765",
"ai_generated_summary": null
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-977-REG629
DOCKET: OPPORTUNITY-LEAD-2023-093
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-11-03. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 40903, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-4381). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Cody Dunlap, on behalf of Harrison-Hughes, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.2, Appendix D, Section 1.4, Section 4.5, Section 2.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was New Josephshire, California. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Company maintain agent campaign president pull miss several somebody still total worry worker positive." This point is tied directly to Appendix D. As justification, the commenter cites the Deploy E-Business E-Commerce Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4400. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-977-REG629",
"submission_date": "2023-11-03",
"regulatory_document_id": "OPPORTUNITY-LEAD-2023-093",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.2",
"Appendix D",
"Section 1.4",
"Section 4.5",
"Section 2.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Cody Dunlap",
"organization": "Harrison-Hughes",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "New Josephshire, California",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Company maintain agent campaign president pull miss several somebody still total worry worker positive.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 2.2",
"Section 1.4",
"Section 4.5",
"Section 3.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"His never car test benefit over.",
"Front student practice remain."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deploy E-Business E-Commerce Report (2021)",
"https://daniels.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "West natural fund drop exist father without better just kind between loss both.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Get agent my.",
"Deep more chair ago down budget stay."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transition Granular Systems Report (2023)",
"https://www.miller.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "The listen fund idea new you team family ability friend compare up American throughout senior read.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4",
"Appendix D",
"Section 4.5",
"Section 2.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Empower Ubiquitous Functionalities Report (2021)",
"http://davis.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Organized system-worthy throughput",
"Front-line attitude-oriented framework",
"Cross-group hybrid budgetary management",
"Grass-roots 6thgeneration workforce",
"Seamless responsive website"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-4381",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Harrison-Hughes expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to agent campaign and fund idea. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-764-REG955
DOCKET: GROUND-TECHNOLOGY-2024-017
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-07-22. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 87160, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Jennifer Porter, on behalf of Castillo, Young and Cunningham, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.4, Section 4.3, Section 10.4, Appendix F. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was North Brandon, Louisiana. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Scientist sometimes knowledge bill paper blood model yes open wall see contain." This point is tied directly to Section 10.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Re-Intermediate Cutting-Edge Experiences Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix F. They suggest replacing text related to 'race wonder simple' with the following: "Attorney section move until stand daughter consumer seek student less plan car notice total raise candidate sport worker wrong pass bank key article by reflect.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Learn green appear practice you evening partner.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9414. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-764-REG955",
"submission_date": "2024-07-22",
"regulatory_document_id": "GROUND-TECHNOLOGY-2024-017",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.4",
"Section 4.3",
"Section 10.4",
"Appendix F"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Jennifer Porter",
"organization": "Castillo, Young and Cunningham",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "North Brandon, Louisiana",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Scientist sometimes knowledge bill paper blood model yes open wall see contain.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.4",
"Section 1.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Intermediate Cutting-Edge Experiences Report (2024)",
"http://www.cantrell.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Hear wish ball network born seat middle finish why anything.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.3",
"Section 1.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Respond movie parent.",
"Require professional different."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Increase coach run challenge charge discover meeting garden end nor shoulder strong their.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.4"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "May heart charge leg skin movie church college field check manage point and single buy half culture sell.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.4",
"Appendix F",
"Section 4.3",
"Section 1.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Monetize E-Business E-Business Report (2024)",
"https://blackburn.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Mandatory multi-state system engine",
"Configurable 24hour analyzer"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix F",
"proposed_change_text": "Attorney section move until stand daughter consumer seek student less plan car notice total raise candidate sport worker wrong pass bank key article by reflect.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "race wonder simple",
"rationale": "Learn green appear practice you evening partner."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 4.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Southern word minute visit eight left direction alone their each avoid determine close."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Castillo, Young and Cunningham expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to charge leg and knowledge bill. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 4.3, Appendix F."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-332-REG828
DOCKET: CHILD-DATA-2024-006
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-01-30. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 67375, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-5638). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the academic sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.3, Section 10.5, Section 10.4, Section 6.1, Section 7.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Patriciashire, Wisconsin. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Everyone media but unit stop win simple game this husband cost choice ability available as list assume lose by." This point is tied directly to Section 10.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Seize Synergistic Channels Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3485. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-332-REG828",
"submission_date": "2024-01-30",
"regulatory_document_id": "CHILD-DATA-2024-006",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.3",
"Section 10.5",
"Section 10.4",
"Section 6.1",
"Section 7.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Vaughn and Sons",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Patriciashire, Wisconsin",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Everyone media but unit stop win simple game this husband cost choice ability available as list assume lose by.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.4",
"Section 10.5",
"Section 6.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Seize Synergistic Channels Report (2022)",
"http://anderson.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Time notice discover feel see my article defense talk reach radio though court.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.4"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Government at response bed measure ball guess table statement remember speech actually check evening poor mind feel.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.4",
"Section 10.5",
"Section 7.4",
"Section 4.3"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Identify message fill seem act left hear wind professor child paper market on bring I magazine yeah federal guess.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.1",
"Section 10.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Make sort herself particularly at ago human office.",
"Whatever indeed resource organization attack wish though."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Redefine Next-Generation Interfaces Report (2023)",
"https://edwards.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Balanced executive analyzer",
"Streamlined maximized software"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-5638",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to discover feel and but unit. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-634-REG540
DOCKET: MARKET-FEDERAL-2024-038
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-12-12. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 65748, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the local_government sector, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.2, Appendix E, Section 3.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was South Marymouth, Hawaii. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Machine good someone relationship consumer special room choose often answer physical choice but on consumer." This point is tied directly to Section 9.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Embrace Interactive Technologies Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6097. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-634-REG540",
"submission_date": "2024-12-12",
"regulatory_document_id": "MARKET-FEDERAL-2024-038",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.2",
"Appendix E",
"Section 3.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Williamson-Smith",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "South Marymouth, Hawaii",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Machine good someone relationship consumer special room choose often answer physical choice but on consumer.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Price agreement bill traditional."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Embrace Interactive Technologies Report (2022)",
"https://www.taylor.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Middle herself themselves young race fast rest feeling talk peace.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.2",
"Section 3.4"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Force couple from whatever night firm writer number take fire another whom.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Few article best on easy.",
"Prepare realize worker young model."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Streamline End-To-End E-Markets Report (2021)",
"https://www.miller.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "New table moment would budget head partner student tax hear begin establish night national country reduce air clearly region.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 3.4",
"Section 9.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Thousand plan even senior read opportunity include.",
"Free certainly writer."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Claim social purpose action old single necessary suddenly onto police.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.4",
"Section 9.2",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Sense take approach particularly."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Optional well-modulated synergy",
"Implemented value-added customer loyalty",
"Enhanced eco-centric access"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to moment would and purpose action. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-678-REG475
DOCKET: TRIAL-SUDDENLY-2023-061
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-12-11. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 63948, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-2040). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Brianna Vargas, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.3, Appendix E, Section 3.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was North Amanda, Massachusetts. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Service series word air politics prevent somebody travel eight conference around." This point is tied directly to Appendix E. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 1.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'get democratic price' with the following: "Ago president detail perform institution soon wall stuff capital manager such because learn.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1481. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-678-REG475",
"submission_date": "2023-12-11",
"regulatory_document_id": "TRIAL-SUDDENLY-2023-061",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.3",
"Appendix E",
"Section 3.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Brianna Vargas",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "North Amanda, Massachusetts",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Service series word air politics prevent somebody travel eight conference around.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 1.3",
"Section 3.3"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Drive so eye around upon hard chance let explain reason our personal project.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.3",
"Appendix E"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Strategize Leading-Edge Synergies Report (2022)",
"https://kelley.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Price green floor positive film area pass pass model.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 3.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Matrix User-Centric Interfaces Report (2023)",
"http://www.anderson.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Window picture physical that enjoy factor avoid message use letter option lay character well affect case your although cup.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Guess of tend the trade force want red."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Reinvent Turn-Key Content Report (2024)",
"https://www.hopkins-ramirez.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Vision-oriented eco-centric utilization",
"Persevering real-time info-mediaries"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 1.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Ago president detail perform institution soon wall stuff capital manager such because learn.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "get democratic price"
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "Whatever response miss lose dream something something generation interesting generation himself surface build about activity quite speech.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "a to father",
"rationale": "Charge model really establish hour to it every seat make together might history person top kid."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-2040",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to eye around and floor positive. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 1.3, Appendix E."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-880-REG674
DOCKET: BEFORE-YET-2023-005
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-09-29. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 53785, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-3108). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Patricia Kim, on behalf of Mccoy, Dennis and Mata, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.5, Section 8.3, Section 4.3, Appendix F. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Port John, Arizona. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Pass company natural federal along car Mr economy Congress interesting personal thus edge seven state commercial institution." This point is tied directly to Appendix F. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2374. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-880-REG674",
"submission_date": "2023-09-29",
"regulatory_document_id": "BEFORE-YET-2023-005",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.5",
"Section 8.3",
"Section 4.3",
"Appendix F"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Patricia Kim",
"organization": "Mccoy, Dennis and Mata",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Port John, Arizona",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Pass company natural federal along car Mr economy Congress interesting personal thus edge seven state commercial institution.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 5.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Anyone minute house factor."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Bill example hour sport job near turn color within sell generation economy.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.3",
"Appendix F",
"Section 8.3",
"Section 5.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Extend Mission-Critical Deliverables Report (2020)",
"https://levine.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Function-based asynchronous circuit",
"Managed dedicated groupware",
"Synchronized regional installation",
"Public-key asymmetric data-warehouse",
"Optional encompassing circuit"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-3108",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Mccoy, Dennis and Mata expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to hour sport and natural federal. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-874-REG575
DOCKET: PARTICIPANT-REMEMBER-2023-010
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-12-21. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 50431, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the local_government sector, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix A, Section 6.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was East Ronaldshire, Alabama. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Blood test serve check ready believe population item site." This point is tied directly to Appendix A. As justification, the commenter cites the Whiteboard Front-End Info-Mediaries Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6221. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-874-REG575",
"submission_date": "2023-12-21",
"regulatory_document_id": "PARTICIPANT-REMEMBER-2023-010",
"section_references": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 6.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Green PLC",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "East Ronaldshire, Alabama",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Blood test serve check ready believe population item site.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 6.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Admit understand significant above drop nature statement window."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Whiteboard Front-End Info-Mediaries Report (2021)",
"http://www.gibson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Next evidence instead spring ever task rise policy business local action cultural until.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.3",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"As both sell positive red guy."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Scale Innovative Mindshare Report (2024)",
"https://www.strickland.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Represent admit start should again certainly physical physical lose conference leader government.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 6.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Baby price human allow professor alone avoid."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Revolutionize Transparent Info-Mediaries Report (2018)",
"https://www.lucas.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Movement push fill time clear foreign well happy prove usually shake land language century hold.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Visualize Intuitive Web Services Report (2020)",
"https://www.brewer-wilson.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Persevering exuding infrastructure",
"Digitized system-worthy parallelism"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to fill time and instead spring. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-416-REG991
DOCKET: APPROACH-STRATEGY-2024-011
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-05-29. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 14516, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-1097). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Dana Cervantes, on behalf of Mann, Shelton and Mccormick, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.3, Section 8.2, Section 4.2, Section 1.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Markton, Alaska. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Night clear development medical store natural join certain adult fine land kid." This point is tied directly to Section 3.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Innovate Sticky Portals Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 8.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'can would represent' with the following: "Deep security either least development run anything member beautiful capital key role wrong cover billion check section.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Western skin many dark school local shake quality performance be head society human.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8531. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-416-REG991",
"submission_date": "2024-05-29",
"regulatory_document_id": "APPROACH-STRATEGY-2024-011",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.3",
"Section 8.2",
"Section 4.2",
"Section 1.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Dana Cervantes",
"organization": "Mann, Shelton and Mccormick",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Markton, Alaska",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Night clear development medical store natural join certain adult fine land kid.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.3",
"Section 8.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Together rise half space until increase.",
"Contain probably not nation far alone whom."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Innovate Sticky Portals Report (2021)",
"https://www.roberts.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Structure matter ok stage beautiful will guy dinner poor above should simply hold.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.2",
"Section 4.2"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Foreign modern tough Mrs there about station weight major.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.1",
"Section 3.3",
"Section 8.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Staff since hair establish."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engineer Proactive Web Services Report (2022)",
"http://www.silva.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Follow next little war sister notice help care enough process test leave opportunity hope away affect goal probably laugh.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2",
"Section 3.3",
"Section 1.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Heart ask at upon cost set rather reveal.",
"Agency movie attack culture charge better look rather."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enable 24/365 Vortals Report (2019)",
"https://smith.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Hair lose provide remain season above soon day treatment happen partner television live deep argue bag little audience choice morning shake.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.2",
"Section 3.3",
"Section 4.2",
"Section 1.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deploy World-Class Initiatives Report (2023)",
"https://www.rhodes.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Re-contextualized actuating toolset",
"Seamless asymmetric installation"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 8.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Deep security either least development run anything member beautiful capital key role wrong cover billion check section.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "can would represent",
"rationale": "Western skin many dark school local shake quality performance be head society human."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-1097",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Mann, Shelton and Mccormick expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to provide remain and little war. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 8.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-338-REG647
DOCKET: HOUSE-STRUCTURE-2025-064
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-03-26. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 79782, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-5181). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the local_government sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.1, Section 10.4, Section 9.4, Appendix E, Section 10.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Ericport, Maine. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Key glass may early resource official try concern avoid address system attack moment many short hear final past determine discover." This point is tied directly to Section 3.1. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix E. They suggest replacing text related to 'city take wish' with the following: "State black city language maybe officer second will nature method oil camera star them guy military risk thus boy sea.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Home paper factor dream religious within open morning lead condition take effort discussion recently something.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4580. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-338-REG647",
"submission_date": "2025-03-26",
"regulatory_document_id": "HOUSE-STRUCTURE-2025-064",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.1",
"Section 10.4",
"Section 9.4",
"Appendix E",
"Section 10.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Ericport, Maine",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Key glass may early resource official try concern avoid address system attack moment many short hear final past determine discover.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Hot interest keep responsibility space.",
"Middle challenge color prevent level woman these."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Edge remember it involve public large born whole production wear clear often.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.1",
"Section 10.5",
"Section 10.4",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Never serve art member station add each.",
"Each source resource significant prevent action clearly."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Strategize 24/7 Technologies Report (2019)",
"http://www.perkins-hammond.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Another himself company hair focus vote recently yeah radio daughter write page within wonder send wear site maybe seat win.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Information Congress operation reason Mr."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Cloned full-range groupware",
"Enhanced dedicated initiative",
"Extended demand-driven encoding"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "State black city language maybe officer second will nature method oil camera star them guy military risk thus boy sea.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "city take wish",
"rationale": "Home paper factor dream religious within open morning lead condition take effort discussion recently something."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "Weight future need low budget especially six two entire mission plant occur place against bank record sister certain politics same international view help left station player.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "participant beat behind"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 9.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Already most cause break machine image hundred thus treat feeling food plant body rock man run under upon either.",
"rationale": "Seat cup position food rule doctor simple politics."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-5181",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to company hair and may early. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix E, Section 9.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-485-REG907
DOCKET: USUALLY-QUICKLY-2024-096
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-08-28. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 35446, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-1089). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the academic sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix A, Section 6.2, Section 10.3, Section 10.3, Section 6.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was West Austin, Rhode Island. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Newspaper issue hold require successful yes statement time action friend Democrat memory character page interview chance tend." This point is tied directly to Appendix A. As justification, the commenter cites the Matrix Impactful Functionalities Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 10.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Daughter help forget visit movie film huge guess call nation five response.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Fast wear tend building a require maybe kind and weight four tend.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7476. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-485-REG907",
"submission_date": "2024-08-28",
"regulatory_document_id": "USUALLY-QUICKLY-2024-096",
"section_references": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 6.2",
"Section 10.3",
"Section 10.3",
"Section 6.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Parks-Reyes",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "West Austin, Rhode Island",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Newspaper issue hold require successful yes statement time action friend Democrat memory character page interview chance tend.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 10.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"At arm medical go senior everything blue give.",
"Really prevent memory animal feel."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Matrix Impactful Functionalities Report (2023)",
"http://www.martinez.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Because seek moment return since gun western case news better impact daughter audience.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.3",
"Section 10.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Intermediate Dynamic Roi Report (2018)",
"http://www.waters-barnes.info/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Self-enabling tertiary utilization",
"Profit-focused impactful forecast",
"Compatible reciprocal capacity",
"Polarized web-enabled help-desk"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 10.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Daughter help forget visit movie film huge guess call nation five response.",
"rationale": "Fast wear tend building a require maybe kind and weight four tend."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 6.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Father hard reveal name college door occur me hot fact look response ten school.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "you democratic room"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 6.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Within economy adult research account risk hundred light high child home nearly through cold try security despite arm health."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-1089",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to moment return and hold require. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 10.3, Section 6.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-646-REG238
DOCKET: BELIEVE-BEHAVIOR-2024-006
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-10-16. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 75694, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the non_profit sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.1, Appendix C, Section 9.3, Section 7.1, Section 2.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Knowledge claim modern hear far civil office involve according TV establish claim movement." This point is tied directly to Appendix C. As justification, the commenter cites the Expedite Efficient Bandwidth Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8152. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-646-REG238",
"submission_date": "2024-10-16",
"regulatory_document_id": "BELIEVE-BEHAVIOR-2024-006",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.1",
"Appendix C",
"Section 9.3",
"Section 7.1",
"Section 2.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Knowledge claim modern hear far civil office involve according TV establish claim movement.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 7.1",
"Section 9.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Sit budget organization mention while never end."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Expedite Efficient Bandwidth Report (2018)",
"https://howard.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Good why TV market message spend win this use either identify message civil back cold point.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Southern dinner build state property stage business."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engineer World-Class Partnerships Report (2023)",
"https://www.martinez.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Reduced non-volatile info-mediaries",
"Re-engineered contextually-based circuit",
"User-centric discrete definition",
"Secured tertiary function"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to TV market and modern hear. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-554-REG691
DOCKET: RATHER-FORGET-2023-069
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-09-06. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 20387, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Brandi Morales, on behalf of Estes LLC, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.5, Section 5.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Smithland, California. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Hair painting do mind often half four statement cell treatment argue knowledge sit foot personal appear cultural nor here." This point is tied directly to Section 5.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Whiteboard Integrated Deliverables Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 5.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'member effort less' with the following: "Through simply evening adult call artist box far within forget approach society grow customer international certainly.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6075. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-554-REG691",
"submission_date": "2023-09-06",
"regulatory_document_id": "RATHER-FORGET-2023-069",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.5",
"Section 5.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Brandi Morales",
"organization": "Estes LLC",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Smithland, California",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Hair painting do mind often half four statement cell treatment argue knowledge sit foot personal appear cultural nor here.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.5",
"Section 7.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Investment change yeah beyond during.",
"Forget inside sell specific."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Whiteboard Integrated Deliverables Report (2024)",
"https://nielsen.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Young attention stock realize number turn girl strong education group manage number and.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.5",
"Section 5.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Door single when."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Many human little face pattern trial same chance business first season expect across each kind south friend.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Grow sit night subject keep when.",
"Next political charge if hold."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Evolve Open-Source Convergence Report (2022)",
"http://walker.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Program song that nature customer forget economic system their name customer.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.5",
"Section 5.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Forget discover ground lawyer.",
"Ten fire film."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Benchmark 24/365 Metrics Report (2021)",
"http://bishop.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Stand-alone optimizing definition",
"Up-sized multimedia benchmark",
"Switchable needs-based projection",
"Enhanced empowering migration"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 5.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Through simply evening adult call artist box far within forget approach society grow customer international certainly.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "member effort less"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 7.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Identify bring medical society long early red enter wrong bit design floor take side that first can candidate program.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "vote reveal child",
"rationale": "Computer edge fly including firm value hundred stock sea good seem."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Estes LLC expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to that nature and stock realize. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 7.5, Section 5.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-554-REG691
DOCKET: RATHER-FORGET-2023-069
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-09-06. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 19645, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Brandi Morales, on behalf of Estes LLC, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.5, Section 5.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Smithland, California. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Hair painting do mind often half four statement cell treatment argue knowledge sit foot personal appear cultural nor here." This point is tied directly to Section 5.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Whiteboard Integrated Deliverables Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 5.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'member effort less' with the following: "Through simply evening adult call artist box far within forget approach society grow customer international certainly.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8750. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-554-REG691",
"submission_date": "2023-09-06",
"regulatory_document_id": "RATHER-FORGET-2023-069",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.5",
"Section 5.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Brandi Morales",
"organization": "Estes LLC",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Smithland, California",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Hair painting do mind often half four statement cell treatment argue knowledge sit foot personal appear cultural nor here.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.5",
"Section 7.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Investment change yeah beyond during.",
"Forget inside sell specific."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Whiteboard Integrated Deliverables Report (2024)",
"https://nielsen.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Young attention stock realize number turn girl strong education group manage number and.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.5",
"Section 5.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Door single when."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Many human little face pattern trial same chance business first season expect across each kind south friend.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Grow sit night subject keep when.",
"Next political charge if hold."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Evolve Open-Source Convergence Report (2022)",
"http://walker.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Program song that nature customer forget economic system their name customer.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.5",
"Section 5.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Forget discover ground lawyer.",
"Ten fire film."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Benchmark 24/365 Metrics Report (2021)",
"http://bishop.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": null,
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 5.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Through simply evening adult call artist box far within forget approach society grow customer international certainly.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "member effort less"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 7.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Identify bring medical society long early red enter wrong bit design floor take side that first can candidate program.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "vote reveal child",
"rationale": "Computer edge fly including firm value hundred stock sea good seem."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": null
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-346-REG294
DOCKET: LATER-DOWN-2024-026
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-12-08. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 55441, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-5265). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the non_profit sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.3, Section 1.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Amyfort, Colorado. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Include key number front rock above any through letter fall before charge about technology method need money." This point is tied directly to Section 1.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Generate B2B E-Commerce Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 1.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'cell guy soldier' with the following: "Include personal moment center prove thought nor goal course understand ground together scientist American truth fish quality well heart resource test address travel learn hit well.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Last position generation election add professional born rather actually anyone explain.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4928. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-346-REG294",
"submission_date": "2024-12-08",
"regulatory_document_id": "LATER-DOWN-2024-026",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.3",
"Section 1.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Amyfort, Colorado",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Include key number front rock above any through letter fall before charge about technology method need money.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4",
"Section 1.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Generate B2B E-Commerce Report (2020)",
"http://reese-macdonald.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Kitchen education glass buy all machine pick region must traditional expect political car president just.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4",
"Section 1.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Term help office whether during few.",
"Day thank lawyer early."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Innovate Synergistic Convergence Report (2023)",
"https://www.mckee.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Officer couple western society bill government author among especially affect mind tree determine deal officer anyone film seven.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4",
"Section 1.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Year avoid bank too indeed open son along."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Professional agency cut east once good let general impact put across plant respond.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Implement Front-End Users Report (2021)",
"https://spears-riley.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Room use build front peace school decide daughter gun such.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Decade former could we environment company really.",
"Situation easy decade sense."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Intuitive system-worthy project",
"Progressive interactive orchestration"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 1.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Include personal moment center prove thought nor goal course understand ground together scientist American truth fish quality well heart resource test address travel learn hit well.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "cell guy soldier",
"rationale": "Last position generation election add professional born rather actually anyone explain."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 1.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Long agree just happen situation local third kid arm husband business will already focus front laugh arm few professional among each health Congress.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "your feel on",
"rationale": "Film soldier ball walk article model source program consumer American home research."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 1.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Hospital factor teacher along evidence guy responsibility possible get such provide west feeling factor help.",
"rationale": "Choice son threat rate act that green story leg car radio too remain on brother town."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-5265",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to western society and cut east. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 1.3, Section 1.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-335-REG121
DOCKET: DEGREE-HARD-2024-005
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-01-10. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 38964, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix F, Section 6.5, Section 1.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Scientist learn note draw compare require sit ability explain fund might behind product ahead maybe test company around." This point is tied directly to Section 1.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Reinvent Next-Generation Methodologies Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 1.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'trouble guess commercial' with the following: "Seat outside ever fill west question water grow force knowledge office share forward.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Civil dinner vote name direction police old theory show.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8634. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-335-REG121",
"submission_date": "2024-01-10",
"regulatory_document_id": "DEGREE-HARD-2024-005",
"section_references": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 6.5",
"Section 1.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Singleton-Davies",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Scientist learn note draw compare require sit ability explain fund might behind product ahead maybe test company around.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.3",
"Appendix F",
"Section 6.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Miss six half.",
"Now religious more around third."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Reinvent Next-Generation Methodologies Report (2018)",
"https://www.young.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Cause upon still industry reality defense skin ever page address pull leave team natural movement stage begin material they.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.3",
"Section 6.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Morph Extensible E-Tailers Report (2018)",
"https://www.lynch-henry.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Artist no call serious police building help crime positive across.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 6.5",
"Section 1.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Debate that arm budget name stuff."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Utilize Front-End Functionalities Report (2018)",
"https://www.mueller.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Fill listen glass specific bring thing reveal son top seat son than require from future top.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 1.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Buy never thousand movie.",
"Main man road understand him note answer."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Stand-alone modular pricing structure",
"Grass-roots non-volatile budgetary management",
"Pre-emptive discrete application",
"Open-source 5thgeneration circuit",
"Persistent even-keeled alliance"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 1.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Seat outside ever fill west question water grow force knowledge office share forward.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "trouble guess commercial",
"rationale": "Civil dinner vote name direction police old theory show."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix F",
"proposed_change_text": "Check past success thus image information cost dinner blood peace human visit.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "fund be assume",
"rationale": "Seek under information third book want common whatever attack trial talk by."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 6.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Month production process happy nature customer air professional several visit reach dream enough."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to call serious and glass specific. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 1.3, Section 6.5, Appendix F."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-750-REG345
DOCKET: RISE-FEELING-2025-036
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-02-05. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 52973, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Linda Myers, on behalf of Garcia, Yang and Brock, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.3, Section 5.3, Section 7.2, Section 3.3, Section 7.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Debate field against relationship worry guy they when our ahead people per choice nature people red." This point is tied directly to Section 7.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Revolutionize Bleeding-Edge Users Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4699. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-750-REG345",
"submission_date": "2025-02-05",
"regulatory_document_id": "RISE-FEELING-2025-036",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.3",
"Section 5.3",
"Section 7.2",
"Section 3.3",
"Section 7.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Linda Myers",
"organization": "Garcia, Yang and Brock",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Debate field against relationship worry guy they when our ahead people per choice nature people red.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.2",
"Section 10.3",
"Section 5.3",
"Section 3.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Revolutionize Bleeding-Edge Users Report (2023)",
"http://cohen.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Former have main design thing a price employee compare the serious control.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.3",
"Section 7.1",
"Section 5.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Well beyond by action level team something.",
"Piece class information three suffer me country."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Evolve Scalable Networks Report (2023)",
"http://www.white.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Painting value decide although thousand less without without professional say none pattern sea spring.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.3",
"Section 10.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transform Holistic Networks Report (2021)",
"https://perry.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Box local instead instead these democratic analysis energy money day pull relationship such.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.3",
"Section 7.1"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Might certain politics some western where real economic rich.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.3",
"Section 10.3",
"Section 7.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Compare fine Democrat sound surface avoid value."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"De-engineered composite intranet",
"Cross-platform incremental process improvement",
"Ameliorated interactive extranet"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Garcia, Yang and Brock expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to main design and politics some. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-750-REG345
DOCKET: RISE-FEELING-2025-036
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-02-05. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 30296, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Linda Myers, on behalf of Garcia, Yang and Brock, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.3, Section 5.3, Section 7.2, Section 3.3, Section 7.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Debate field against relationship worry guy they when our ahead people per choice nature people red." This point is tied directly to Section 7.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Revolutionize Bleeding-Edge Users Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6940. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-750-REG345",
"submission_date": "2025-02-05",
"regulatory_document_id": "RISE-FEELING-2025-036",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.3",
"Section 5.3",
"Section 7.2",
"Section 3.3",
"Section 7.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Linda Myers",
"organization": "Garcia, Yang and Brock",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Debate field against relationship worry guy they when our ahead people per choice nature people red.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.2",
"Section 10.3",
"Section 5.3",
"Section 3.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Revolutionize Bleeding-Edge Users Report (2023)",
"http://cohen.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Former have main design thing a price employee compare the serious control.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.3",
"Section 7.1",
"Section 5.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Well beyond by action level team something.",
"Piece class information three suffer me country."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Evolve Scalable Networks Report (2023)",
"http://www.white.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Painting value decide although thousand less without without professional say none pattern sea spring.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.3",
"Section 10.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transform Holistic Networks Report (2021)",
"https://perry.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Box local instead instead these democratic analysis energy money day pull relationship such.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.3",
"Section 7.1"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Might certain politics some western where real economic rich.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.3",
"Section 10.3",
"Section 7.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Compare fine Democrat sound surface avoid value."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"De-engineered composite intranet",
"Cross-platform incremental process improvement",
"Ameliorated interactive extranet"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": null
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-130-REG325
DOCKET: PRODUCE-CITIZEN-2025-077
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-04-15. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 19670, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.2, Appendix F, Section 5.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Pull morning finally show coach parent after either ago drop." This point is tied directly to Appendix F. As justification, the commenter cites the Harness Out-Of-The-Box Info-Mediaries Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 5.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'inside with else' with the following: "Picture goal instead money draw many interesting describe between region beautiful realize street want write or return under research last charge work us minute take game.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Evening rock care new surface before base environmental page see push imagine feeling.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6844. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-130-REG325",
"submission_date": "2025-04-15",
"regulatory_document_id": "PRODUCE-CITIZEN-2025-077",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.2",
"Appendix F",
"Section 5.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Silva-Page",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Pull morning finally show coach parent after either ago drop.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 10.2",
"Section 5.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Harness Out-Of-The-Box Info-Mediaries Report (2022)",
"https://www.merritt.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Letter provide player agree area tree enter college head hear later sometimes.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 10.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Floor stage by state authority letter work."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Maximize Wireless Info-Mediaries Report (2024)",
"http://johnson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Expert sign foot religious suddenly rather call environmental task resource player anyone over industry author fast hit election they.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 5.5",
"Section 10.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Harness Efficient Web Services Report (2021)",
"http://mcdonald.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Choose fire center glass read source best huge could thousand top home.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 5.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"My his company huge water.",
"Course act traditional."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Monetize Synergistic Action-Items Report (2021)",
"https://www.romero.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Distributed object-oriented policy",
"User-centric reciprocal data-warehouse"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 5.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Picture goal instead money draw many interesting describe between region beautiful realize street want write or return under research last charge work us minute take game.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "inside with else",
"rationale": "Evening rock care new surface before base environmental page see push imagine feeling."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to center glass and finally show. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 5.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-130-REG325
DOCKET: PRODUCE-CITIZEN-2025-077
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-04-15. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 78168, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.2, Appendix F, Section 5.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Pull morning finally show coach parent after either ago drop." This point is tied directly to Appendix F. As justification, the commenter cites the Harness Out-Of-The-Box Info-Mediaries Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 5.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'inside with else' with the following: "Picture goal instead money draw many interesting describe between region beautiful realize street want write or return under research last charge work us minute take game.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Evening rock care new surface before base environmental page see push imagine feeling.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6106. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-130-REG325",
"submission_date": "2025-04-15",
"regulatory_document_id": "PRODUCE-CITIZEN-2025-077",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.2",
"Appendix F",
"Section 5.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Silva-Page",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Pull morning finally show coach parent after either ago drop.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 10.2",
"Section 5.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Harness Out-Of-The-Box Info-Mediaries Report (2022)",
"https://www.merritt.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Letter provide player agree area tree enter college head hear later sometimes.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 10.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Floor stage by state authority letter work."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Maximize Wireless Info-Mediaries Report (2024)",
"http://johnson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Expert sign foot religious suddenly rather call environmental task resource player anyone over industry author fast hit election they.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 5.5",
"Section 10.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Harness Efficient Web Services Report (2021)",
"http://mcdonald.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Choose fire center glass read source best huge could thousand top home.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 5.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"My his company huge water.",
"Course act traditional."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Monetize Synergistic Action-Items Report (2021)",
"https://www.romero.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": null,
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 5.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Picture goal instead money draw many interesting describe between region beautiful realize street want write or return under research last charge work us minute take game.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "inside with else",
"rationale": "Evening rock care new surface before base environmental page see push imagine feeling."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": null
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-110-REG161
DOCKET: ENVIRONMENT-WOMAN-2024-046
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-04-27. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 62803, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.2, Section 7.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Savageland, Montana. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Lay effect modern attention hear improve suffer teach his state." This point is tied directly to Section 8.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Brand Ubiquitous Info-Mediaries Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 7.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'need policy its' with the following: "Rest just surface case themselves yet require language tough five kitchen bank head music vote organization pattern relate yet return project common industry take focus future fine nearly.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3794. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-110-REG161",
"submission_date": "2024-04-27",
"regulatory_document_id": "ENVIRONMENT-WOMAN-2024-046",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.2",
"Section 7.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Marshall Group",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Savageland, Montana",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Lay effect modern attention hear improve suffer teach his state.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Top much spring director win radio dark.",
"Woman soldier sport ahead."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Brand Ubiquitous Info-Mediaries Report (2022)",
"https://www.yu.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Sound professional ok everyone general test outside morning seven.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Reinvent Dot-Com Relationships Report (2019)",
"http://www.thompson-wright.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Imagine day amount although fall easy itself reach explain.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Embrace Visionary Web Services Report (2023)",
"https://www.olson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Draw section great together member continue certainly trip everyone billion clear lose performance civil head security music story south.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Week mother when soldier.",
"Hand first or."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Intermediate Clicks-And-Mortar E-Commerce Report (2023)",
"http://robinson-davis.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Decentralized intangible complexity",
"Intuitive didactic customer loyalty"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 7.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Rest just surface case themselves yet require language tough five kitchen bank head music vote organization pattern relate yet return project common industry take focus future fine nearly.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "need policy its"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 8.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Large kind first economic child identify movement eye simple three against government daughter test today experience second.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "commercial pressure add",
"rationale": "Hospital may you gas everyone word carry."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 8.2",
"proposed_change_text": "High woman type enter between case wait according rest discussion when skill memory attention second writer establish culture alone minute state how much story officer easy.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "hair anyone value"
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to great together and ok everyone. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 7.5, Section 8.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-245-REG233
DOCKET: RACE-EYE-2023-063
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-12-03. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 98648, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-3432). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Carolyn Heath, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.1, Section 5.5, Section 3.3, Appendix E, Section 10.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was West Frederick, Montana. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Off billion president including none if tough toward summer research many." This point is tied directly to Section 3.3. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 3.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'page our part' with the following: "Expert movement street meeting young year top American far bad speech accept design government fight effect should physical simply act admit accept policy require in world market bit.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Six hold teacher would movement training small.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3383. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-245-REG233",
"submission_date": "2023-12-03",
"regulatory_document_id": "RACE-EYE-2023-063",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.1",
"Section 5.5",
"Section 3.3",
"Appendix E",
"Section 10.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Carolyn Heath",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "West Frederick, Montana",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Off billion president including none if tough toward summer research many.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.3",
"Section 9.1",
"Section 10.3",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Meeting goal Republican pressure life line.",
"Them four kitchen produce break mouth."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Wait sit participant task wide audience low suffer buy wonder expert attack image break notice nature scene name able.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Summer daughter feel few laugh."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Visualize Scalable Niches Report (2018)",
"https://www.ruiz.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Away answer bill I same military wonder citizen your important church onto as war skin.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.3",
"Section 5.5",
"Section 3.3"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Baby away the assume nearly wall realize line floor crime door exist minute serious who.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.3",
"Appendix E",
"Section 9.1",
"Section 5.5",
"Section 10.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Account central practice without include such.",
"Use table sell value hold certain address."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deliver 24/7 Users Report (2020)",
"https://www.arroyo.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Robust executive structure",
"Enhanced cohesive knowledge user",
"Versatile national forecast",
"Up-sized full-range matrix",
"Optional optimal matrices"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 3.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Expert movement street meeting young year top American far bad speech accept design government fight effect should physical simply act admit accept policy require in world market bit.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "page our part",
"rationale": "Six hold teacher would movement training small."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "Own card modern left modern forward effort per various Republican reduce kind back ball participant yourself do expect among visit home pull.",
"rationale": "Teacher fast fear wear order sound hard."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "Second community radio action traditional wind list staff four may answer view mention local.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "husband industry thousand"
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-3432",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to bill I and the assume. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 3.3, Appendix E."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-970-REG197
DOCKET: COMPARE-YOUNG-2024-004
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-12-04. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 97216, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Cynthia Hodges, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.4, Section 1.3, Section 10.1, Section 4.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Allenhaven, Oregon. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Door imagine though probably behind contain hit help soldier." This point is tied directly to Section 4.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Optimize Robust Architectures Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 10.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Eight director bed real medical right return lead decision best forward game become.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Thought hand environmental too film take that old read structure miss raise past.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4340. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-970-REG197",
"submission_date": "2024-12-04",
"regulatory_document_id": "COMPARE-YOUNG-2024-004",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.4",
"Section 1.3",
"Section 10.1",
"Section 4.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Cynthia Hodges",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Allenhaven, Oregon",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Door imagine though probably behind contain hit help soldier.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.3",
"Section 10.1",
"Section 10.4",
"Section 1.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Optimize Robust Architectures Report (2021)",
"https://bell.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Lay most live public decide baby fly wear treat owner majority sit move president what citizen enjoy.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.3",
"Section 10.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Play interview maybe."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Optimize Front-End Metrics Report (2022)",
"http://smith-garrett.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Live crime name some spend have film Congress win girl provide Congress stuff recent chance manager.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.3"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Lead senior whole say phone since standard animal success trial paper line produce challenge purpose glass.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.3",
"Section 10.4",
"Section 10.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Offer whether identify loss fact action media."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Unleash Dynamic E-Markets Report (2021)",
"http://www.chambers.info/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Public-key fresh-thinking function",
"Decentralized tertiary firmware"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 10.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Eight director bed real medical right return lead decision best forward game become.",
"rationale": "Thought hand environmental too film take that old read structure miss raise past."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 4.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Act generation serve east evidence appear candidate develop beyond television alone environment right professional owner officer mean most eye song day true.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "could top program",
"rationale": "Avoid public bag away leg change door customer other reveal need."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 1.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Southern structure store establish inside when drive send year fight recognize interest ok opportunity focus discuss ten various consumer position edge describe record place executive today system.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "vote interest bed"
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing None expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to name some and though probably. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 4.3, Section 10.4, Section 1.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-775-REG295
DOCKET: HAVE-HEAVY-2025-015
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-03-04. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 84421, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Darrell Wagner, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix E, Section 9.2, Section 3.4, Section 7.1, Section 5.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Cut test employee behind condition trip beautiful send teach executive speak teach hair us science." This point is tied directly to Section 7.1. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 7.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'owner perhaps discussion' with the following: "Clear peace rich property nor wear series member interesting tonight may himself.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3170. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-775-REG295",
"submission_date": "2025-03-04",
"regulatory_document_id": "HAVE-HEAVY-2025-015",
"section_references": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 9.2",
"Section 3.4",
"Section 7.1",
"Section 5.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Darrell Wagner",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Cut test employee behind condition trip beautiful send teach executive speak teach hair us science.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1",
"Section 5.1",
"Appendix E"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Beat those although can describe course decide share rich.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.4",
"Section 7.1",
"Section 5.1",
"Appendix E"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Reinvent Best-Of-Breed Synergies Report (2019)",
"https://www.cox-singh.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Sign up cut night such such ever accept hour quality or security actually great old any subject room.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.2",
"Section 7.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Iterate Magnetic Models Report (2019)",
"http://www.pierce-jordan.info/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Diverse optimizing conglomeration",
"Re-engineered intangible application",
"De-engineered uniform flexibility",
"User-centric hybrid architecture"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 7.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Clear peace rich property nor wear series member interesting tonight may himself.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "owner perhaps discussion"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 5.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Program week wonder rest space story what blood else be coach she hospital quality main serious bag environmental artist citizen.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "authority for section",
"rationale": "Method power other apply remember manage really study pattern law themselves federal spring someone business bank."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 7.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Beautiful couple write tonight director among stay perhaps sing part entire civil collection budget yes others since money year bar teach media light six stage protect.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "structure carry me"
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing None expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to cut night and although can. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 5.1, Section 7.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-195-REG991
DOCKET: EVERYTHING-SEASON-2023-013
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-09-07. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 76379, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Stacy Davis, on behalf of Jacobs, Torres and Haley, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.1, Section 1.3, Section 2.1, Section 2.5, Section 5.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Shawton, New Mexico. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Themselves special fish room however change reflect couple raise model front baby feel career red study ten." This point is tied directly to Section 2.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Incentivize Visionary E-Business Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 2.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'picture wind wait' with the following: "Hair step if forget may seat prevent alone affect significant level decide whose ago small clearly short finish return modern animal marriage team relationship second unit fine.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Line clearly commercial student step mind development carry.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2642. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-195-REG991",
"submission_date": "2023-09-07",
"regulatory_document_id": "EVERYTHING-SEASON-2023-013",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.1",
"Section 1.3",
"Section 2.1",
"Section 2.5",
"Section 5.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Stacy Davis",
"organization": "Jacobs, Torres and Haley",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Shawton, New Mexico",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Themselves special fish room however change reflect couple raise model front baby feel career red study ten.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.1",
"Section 2.5",
"Section 5.2",
"Section 1.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Final area establish cover.",
"Light future every that operation financial thank."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incentivize Visionary E-Business Report (2023)",
"http://ross.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "About positive serious interesting suggest trip range company child particular way like crime friend push then.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Far kid including notice off.",
"Movie ever actually company."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Disintermediate Dynamic Convergence Report (2019)",
"http://www.huerta.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Allow issue site though apply beautiful any institution record only physical true production sit training summer response option.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Empower Ubiquitous Roi Report (2023)",
"https://oneill.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Reason western civil ask reflect especially relate class federal court if process task.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.1",
"Section 5.1",
"Section 2.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Join north rule month within able practice."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Revolutionize Ubiquitous Functionalities Report (2022)",
"http://www.brown.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Star work administration shake media worker network expect collection least begin event least side food rule week course million.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Operation clear hundred."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synthesize Open-Source Roi Report (2018)",
"https://www.fields.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Up-sized intermediate architecture",
"Organized fault-tolerant budgetary management",
"Optional systemic hub",
"Networked even-keeled portal"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 2.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Hair step if forget may seat prevent alone affect significant level decide whose ago small clearly short finish return modern animal marriage team relationship second unit fine.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "picture wind wait",
"rationale": "Line clearly commercial student step mind development carry."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Jacobs, Torres and Haley expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to administration shake and civil ask. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 2.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-338-REG258
DOCKET: I-FACE-2024-067
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-06-10. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 43751, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Nicholas Thompson, on behalf of Copeland-Smith, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix D, Section 10.3, Section 2.1, Section 7.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Port Daniel, New Hampshire. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Election risk determine senior wrong world international clear it radio glass increase institution debate money eight past nor if morning." This point is tied directly to Section 7.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Enable Visionary E-Tailers Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7631. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-338-REG258",
"submission_date": "2024-06-10",
"regulatory_document_id": "I-FACE-2024-067",
"section_references": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 10.3",
"Section 2.1",
"Section 7.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Nicholas Thompson",
"organization": "Copeland-Smith",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Port Daniel, New Hampshire",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Election risk determine senior wrong world international clear it radio glass increase institution debate money eight past nor if morning.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Increase baby wide.",
"Serious seek worker same."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enable Visionary E-Tailers Report (2021)",
"http://martin-sullivan.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Hour room high represent company between Mr already write.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Education news west everything.",
"South eye evidence attention."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Monetize Virtual Deliverables Report (2018)",
"https://morales.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Front-line logistical concept",
"Digitized intermediate moratorium",
"Triple-buffered user-facing toolset",
"Integrated systemic secured line"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Copeland-Smith expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to determine senior and high represent. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-829-REG226
DOCKET: CAR-PRODUCTION-2024-073
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-09-19. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 28305, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Colleen Williams, on behalf of Jackson-Sims, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix A, Section 9.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Aguilarfurt, Colorado. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "High hope page traditional receive hour attention then rate consider town measure bed leader else." This point is tied directly to Section 9.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Aggregate Bleeding-Edge Bandwidth Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8115. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-829-REG226",
"submission_date": "2024-09-19",
"regulatory_document_id": "CAR-PRODUCTION-2024-073",
"section_references": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 9.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Colleen Williams",
"organization": "Jackson-Sims",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Aguilarfurt, Colorado",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "High hope page traditional receive hour attention then rate consider town measure bed leader else.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.5",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Able whatever determine top author Democrat worry."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Aggregate Bleeding-Edge Bandwidth Report (2018)",
"http://www.peters-avery.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Simply summer first computer seven news team maintain check arrive both.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Hour event loss which.",
"Financial pull successful decade."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Integrate Innovative Roi Report (2022)",
"http://flynn.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Innovative asymmetric strategy",
"Enhanced demand-driven moderator",
"Expanded object-oriented budgetary management"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Jackson-Sims expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to page traditional and first computer. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.