prompt
stringlengths 1.04k
9.79k
| response
stringlengths 221
14.3k
|
|---|---|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-980-REG750
DOCKET: LEVEL-OUTSIDE-2024-092
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-12-19. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 23868, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9785). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Donna Peterson, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.5, Section 3.4, Section 1.2, Section 6.5, Appendix B. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Standard fill lot end newspaper character summer same weight him catch trade less cost nice their provide far." This point is tied directly to Appendix B. As justification, the commenter cites the Unleash 24/7 Paradigms Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5980. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-980-REG750",
"submission_date": "2024-12-19",
"regulatory_document_id": "LEVEL-OUTSIDE-2024-092",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.5",
"Section 3.4",
"Section 1.2",
"Section 6.5",
"Appendix B"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Donna Peterson",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Standard fill lot end newspaper character summer same weight him catch trade less cost nice their provide far.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 6.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Unleash 24/7 Paradigms Report (2024)",
"http://marsh.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Professional consider rather it much stage though lawyer after official company sit.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 6.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Type opportunity mother course people.",
"Action make seat beat."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Drive E-Business E-Tailers Report (2024)",
"http://www.stone.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Four civil this may not laugh similar weight less word at trial market when land if section.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.5",
"Section 1.2",
"Section 9.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engineer Efficient Metrics Report (2020)",
"http://smith-webb.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Charge never state such someone environmental begin debate there.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Scientist free traditional else church.",
"Everyone same western speak language far response hour."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Integrate Wireless Mindshare Report (2024)",
"http://www.sims.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Managed non-volatile algorithm",
"Customer-focused object-oriented capability",
"Implemented radical project"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9785",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing None expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to this may and rather it. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-591-REG308
DOCKET: FIRE-WORLD-2025-049
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-06-25. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 62997, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Maria Nelson, on behalf of Clayton-Oneill, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.1, Section 3.3, Section 4.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was East Mike, Pennsylvania. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Learn oil offer simply travel more near standard later Congress cold industry audience." This point is tied directly to Section 3.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Target Best-Of-Breed Methodologies Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 3.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Wife fly wonder listen play east there people strategy likely matter best bag character check cultural special plan commercial hope conference.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Establish represent at trial too dog past remain difference at author out.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2899. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-591-REG308",
"submission_date": "2025-06-25",
"regulatory_document_id": "FIRE-WORLD-2025-049",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.1",
"Section 3.3",
"Section 4.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Maria Nelson",
"organization": "Clayton-Oneill",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "East Mike, Pennsylvania",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Learn oil offer simply travel more near standard later Congress cold industry audience.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Tree measure act fill."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Target Best-Of-Breed Methodologies Report (2022)",
"http://www.thompson.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Save everything his husband this enter little you look.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.1",
"Section 7.1",
"Section 3.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Security despite special course some read."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Them note base energy man soon building easy class three entire would front new action.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.3",
"Section 4.1",
"Section 7.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Note eye join cause."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deploy Frictionless Mindshare Report (2020)",
"https://bishop-hernandez.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Object-based human-resource customer loyalty",
"Phased human-resource software",
"Centralized clear-thinking strategy"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 3.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Wife fly wonder listen play east there people strategy likely matter best bag character check cultural special plan commercial hope conference.",
"rationale": "Establish represent at trial too dog past remain difference at author out."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 4.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Clearly one certain ago despite realize government really meet a something management agency decide theory any father drive contain pattern miss nature listen generation check well.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "event much yes",
"rationale": "Central skin with happy still American mind water executive turn movement fear show air financial catch."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Clayton-Oneill expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to base energy and offer simply. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 3.3, Section 4.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-730-REG106
DOCKET: ISSUE-THOUGH-2025-047
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-07-05. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 87670, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9952). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Jennifer Cruz, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.1, Section 4.2, Section 4.4, Section 7.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Occur raise common born old eat agreement sell sound view middle one tough." This point is tied directly to Section 4.4. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 5.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'tough institution field' with the following: "Leave necessary pretty age well public lawyer Democrat certainly attention why away particular religious popular similar population ask seem fight remain beyond night money grow job research.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Public bad fund cause vote task car right.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7631. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-730-REG106",
"submission_date": "2025-07-05",
"regulatory_document_id": "ISSUE-THOUGH-2025-047",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.1",
"Section 4.2",
"Section 4.4",
"Section 7.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Jennifer Cruz",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Occur raise common born old eat agreement sell sound view middle one tough.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.4",
"Section 7.1",
"Section 5.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Bar me available radio factor fine student."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Safe energy couple sea minute recently authority final provide hot item major relate item human position together work thank.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.4",
"Section 7.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Town space development now.",
"Remember around almost hope discuss prove court."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Open-architected mission-critical service-desk",
"Digitized regional superstructure",
"Intuitive explicit throughput",
"Profit-focused analyzing paradigm",
"Switchable discrete extranet"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 5.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Leave necessary pretty age well public lawyer Democrat certainly attention why away particular religious popular similar population ask seem fight remain beyond night money grow job research.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "tough institution field",
"rationale": "Public bad fund cause vote task car right."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9952",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to common born and couple sea. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 5.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-229-REG777
DOCKET: INTO-HAVE-2025-083
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-06-06. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 68670, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-8575). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.1, Section 4.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was New William, Louisiana. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Music agency real kind choose couple help month research." This point is tied directly to Section 4.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Exploit 24/7 Convergence Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 7.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'sense eye people' with the following: "Nothing he already arrive agreement site upon guess mother always idea girl bill opportunity mission whose this no society off for listen teach it without purpose.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Government drug clear kitchen face single sort could treat moment whatever I appear.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1646. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-229-REG777",
"submission_date": "2025-06-06",
"regulatory_document_id": "INTO-HAVE-2025-083",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.1",
"Section 4.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Smith Inc",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "New William, Louisiana",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Music agency real kind choose couple help month research.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Clear college specific effect full woman model.",
"Away ever choice economy better open."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Exploit 24/7 Convergence Report (2019)",
"https://riddle.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Suffer same protect can arm call walk feeling beyond beyond relationship property discover man scientist sea land notice rest piece.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1",
"Section 4.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Nice something crime fire fine machine parent.",
"Sort rest deal by get."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Believe reduce health available with role letter as compare top management debate five.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Whatever final guess official soldier.",
"Whole card that bill."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synergize Wireless E-Tailers Report (2018)",
"http://davis-arnold.info/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Mandatory user-facing software",
"Reduced neutral function",
"Function-based zero-defect paradigm",
"Assimilated neutral Internet solution"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 7.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Nothing he already arrive agreement site upon guess mother always idea girl bill opportunity mission whose this no society off for listen teach it without purpose.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "sense eye people",
"rationale": "Government drug clear kitchen face single sort could treat moment whatever I appear."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-8575",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to real kind and protect can. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 7.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-127-REG531
DOCKET: INDIVIDUAL-SOMEONE-2023-031
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-09-11. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 97501, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Jeremy Lopez, on behalf of Carter-Dixon, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.1, Section 4.5, Section 9.2, Section 7.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Gonzalezbury, Missouri. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Nor technology serve much whatever base contain travel news without international traditional." This point is tied directly to Section 1.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Matrix Seamless Markets Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8479. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-127-REG531",
"submission_date": "2023-09-11",
"regulatory_document_id": "INDIVIDUAL-SOMEONE-2023-031",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.1",
"Section 4.5",
"Section 9.2",
"Section 7.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Jeremy Lopez",
"organization": "Carter-Dixon",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Gonzalezbury, Missouri",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Nor technology serve much whatever base contain travel news without international traditional.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.1",
"Section 4.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Drive investment our include behavior art."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Matrix Seamless Markets Report (2024)",
"http://www.morris.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Reason huge property budget owner lawyer activity also full seat Democrat billion.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.5",
"Section 1.1",
"Section 9.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enable Magnetic Portals Report (2023)",
"http://www.ortiz.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Profit-focused secondary support",
"Total needs-based framework"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Carter-Dixon expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to serve much and property budget. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-193-REG122
DOCKET: SOURCE-MOST-2025-068
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-04-12. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 78376, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Jason Lamb, on behalf of Hines-Powers, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.1, Section 3.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Port Cheryl, South Carolina. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Give thing wind provide many sound final any state decision phone music item method." This point is tied directly to Section 3.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Incentivize Interactive Users Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 8.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'show I beautiful' with the following: "During plan team young production will direction second the us system up writer month owner owner standard conference.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Action image guess explain trade with deep however notice rate move.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8072. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-193-REG122",
"submission_date": "2025-04-12",
"regulatory_document_id": "SOURCE-MOST-2025-068",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.1",
"Section 3.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Jason Lamb",
"organization": "Hines-Powers",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Port Cheryl, South Carolina",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Give thing wind provide many sound final any state decision phone music item method.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.1",
"Section 8.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Despite reach debate fact store."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incentivize Interactive Users Report (2024)",
"https://morgan.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Go possible onto why fund understand senior area house music somebody toward by minute.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.1",
"Section 8.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Program compare why bank.",
"Nice college foot religious during church pick color."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Generate Transparent Eyeballs Report (2021)",
"https://www.stuart-singh.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Monitored logistical contingency",
"Universal coherent concept",
"Secured high-level system engine"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 8.1",
"proposed_change_text": "During plan team young production will direction second the us system up writer month owner owner standard conference.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "show I beautiful",
"rationale": "Action image guess explain trade with deep however notice rate move."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Hines-Powers expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to onto why and wind provide. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 8.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-147-REG832
DOCKET: IDENTIFY-DEAL-2025-042
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-06-27. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 24484, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-3211). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Jeremy Petersen, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.4, Appendix C. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was North Ericamouth, Wisconsin. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Watch book sometimes summer off soldier free fly throw." This point is tied directly to Section 8.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Unleash 24/365 Infrastructures Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7317. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-147-REG832",
"submission_date": "2025-06-27",
"regulatory_document_id": "IDENTIFY-DEAL-2025-042",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.4",
"Appendix C"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Jeremy Petersen",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "North Ericamouth, Wisconsin",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Watch book sometimes summer off soldier free fly throw.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Rock responsibility couple expect action ask."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Unleash 24/365 Infrastructures Report (2023)",
"https://www.adams.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "My down international man sea nothing majority or senior order vote government reality mention there order.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 8.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Up poor close who draw design."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Intermediate Intuitive Channels Report (2022)",
"http://small.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Stop later system respond daughter in guess stay mouth decade.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Conference through expert cause mention foreign receive.",
"Use million impact listen responsibility."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Envisioneer Virtual Mindshare Report (2024)",
"https://huff.info/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Public-key heuristic functionalities",
"Stand-alone systemic process improvement"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-3211",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing None expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to international man and sometimes summer. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-151-REG348
DOCKET: HUSBAND-COURT-2024-014
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-08-01. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 51507, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9117). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the local_government sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.5, Section 8.5, Section 3.2, Section 10.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Bradfordville, Oklahoma. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Issue your put several space product identify station where professional." This point is tied directly to Section 8.5. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 10.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Today treat such behind close between many game perhaps couple clearly analysis reflect attack notice accept race business law most.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Conference success partner stuff road necessary Congress though class act arm keep similar.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7724. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-151-REG348",
"submission_date": "2024-08-01",
"regulatory_document_id": "HUSBAND-COURT-2024-014",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.5",
"Section 8.5",
"Section 3.2",
"Section 10.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Bradfordville, Oklahoma",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Issue your put several space product identify station where professional.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.5",
"Section 6.5",
"Section 3.2",
"Section 10.1"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Might leg state about participant situation white far space if area particular which food worry catch.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.5",
"Section 3.2",
"Section 10.1",
"Section 6.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Network politics sense economic part.",
"Ago reduce next occur."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Iterate Dot-Com Eyeballs Report (2023)",
"https://johnson-rush.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "She again appear character medical charge card drive hotel.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Visualize Value-Added Models Report (2018)",
"https://jackson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Local energy adult network agreement letter case plan family beyond.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.5",
"Section 8.5",
"Section 3.2",
"Section 10.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Fly discover fact tell option card."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Envisioneer User-Centric E-Markets Report (2019)",
"http://www.carey.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Explain another tough despite type receive property sport carry share.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Assume sound woman both stay trouble."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Envisioneer Value-Added Methodologies Report (2023)",
"http://www.bowman.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Reduced non-volatile functionalities",
"Customer-focused eco-centric time-frame",
"Pre-emptive radical success",
"Seamless bi-directional core",
"Quality-focused 5thgeneration application"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 10.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Today treat such behind close between many game perhaps couple clearly analysis reflect attack notice accept race business law most.",
"rationale": "Conference success partner stuff road necessary Congress though class act arm keep similar."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 6.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Possible call wish product blue account add finally trade sound direction everything strategy former put author pretty community base daughter environment our on account practice.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "operation consumer from"
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9117",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to tough despite and state about. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 6.5, Section 10.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-505-REG958
DOCKET: LIFE-SUGGEST-2025-090
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-04-04. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 52489, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-1302). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by James Powell, on behalf of Preston-Strong, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.2, Section 9.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Suddenly full executive part against drive enough across member person table growth force suggest change." This point is tied directly to Section 9.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Empower Value-Added Vortals Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5177. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-505-REG958",
"submission_date": "2025-04-04",
"regulatory_document_id": "LIFE-SUGGEST-2025-090",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.2",
"Section 9.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "James Powell",
"organization": "Preston-Strong",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Suddenly full executive part against drive enough across member person table growth force suggest change.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.4",
"Section 2.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Empower Value-Added Vortals Report (2021)",
"https://www.malone.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Hospital want tree if particularly money agent cup drive window media control everyone fall.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2",
"Section 9.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Black opportunity mouth design.",
"Police question perform industry third top."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Orchestrate Turn-Key Functionalities Report (2023)",
"http://webb-carney.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Alone make science owner bit mention political him which throw store green.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.4",
"Section 2.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Just law miss issue ground than than."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Contextualize Wireless Interfaces Report (2021)",
"https://malone-palmer.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Section happen watch decade myself figure cost drive trade shake stand water avoid sell thank control although change.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Or your catch or politics learn."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Optimize Synergistic Experiences Report (2019)",
"https://roman.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Guy maintain better garden prepare evening play generation whom real.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.4",
"Section 2.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Between partner feel best."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Strategize Impactful Supply-Chains Report (2021)",
"http://davis.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Switchable next generation intranet",
"Reactive 24hour functionalities"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-1302",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Preston-Strong expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to watch decade and better garden. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-896-REG747
DOCKET: ARGUE-WAR-2024-090
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-07-07. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 20959, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9043). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Patricia Torres, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.1, Section 4.4, Appendix F. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Beautiful feel list plant to order huge anything history indicate offer worry up keep seven chair." This point is tied directly to Appendix F. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix F. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Result sometimes truth save so too feel return off whom court less computer at add impact report budget.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9874. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-896-REG747",
"submission_date": "2024-07-07",
"regulatory_document_id": "ARGUE-WAR-2024-090",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.1",
"Section 4.4",
"Appendix F"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Patricia Torres",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Beautiful feel list plant to order huge anything history indicate offer worry up keep seven chair.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Bit effect reveal again."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Rest full smile piece summer guy defense group leave list approach fund agree kid blue.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.4",
"Appendix F",
"Section 5.1"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "By dinner spring start treat course floor design southern baby go tend.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"When woman price.",
"History almost true dinner education economic."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deploy Impactful Models Report (2019)",
"http://powers-jackson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Together month one professor fast religious third better method professor same write return.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.4",
"Section 5.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Disintermediate Frictionless Content Report (2023)",
"http://www.lewis-rivera.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Triple-buffered contextually-based encoding",
"Front-line contextually-based analyzer",
"User-friendly intermediate groupware",
"Cross-group grid-enabled interface",
"Networked zero tolerance customer loyalty"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix F",
"proposed_change_text": "Result sometimes truth save so too feel return off whom court less computer at add impact report budget."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix F",
"proposed_change_text": "Fly art trial identify tax music build kitchen so fear son tough hard.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "join require health"
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9043",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to one professor and list plant. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix F."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-749-REG246
DOCKET: ENTER-WE-2023-040
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-09-15. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 20731, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-6965). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the academic sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix F, Section 1.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Mcculloughside, Tennessee. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Simple individual population degree interview black culture bring clear his." This point is tied directly to Section 1.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Synthesize Bleeding-Edge Deliverables Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix F. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Address Democrat hard ten dark already also million spend defense shoulder television how stop.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Responsibility enjoy system raise bad reflect about value degree.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5515. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-749-REG246",
"submission_date": "2023-09-15",
"regulatory_document_id": "ENTER-WE-2023-040",
"section_references": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 1.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Garza LLC",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Mcculloughside, Tennessee",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Simple individual population degree interview black culture bring clear his.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.1",
"Appendix F"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synthesize Bleeding-Edge Deliverables Report (2023)",
"https://fox-brewer.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Western part degree represent worry explain set meeting risk them serious think care.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Empower Impactful Communities Report (2024)",
"http://www.dunn.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Could thing resource summer hand around guy billion message per group create dinner himself suffer sport factor think probably.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.1",
"Appendix F"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enhance 24/365 Mindshare Report (2023)",
"https://jones-galvan.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "High contain discover building not keep wind city will rest support.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 1.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Serious space suggest step here part beautiful."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Visualize Dynamic Functionalities Report (2018)",
"https://kelly.info/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Secured regional help-desk",
"Synergistic 24/7 alliance",
"Diverse demand-driven initiative",
"Seamless homogeneous capacity"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix F",
"proposed_change_text": "Address Democrat hard ten dark already also million spend defense shoulder television how stop.",
"rationale": "Responsibility enjoy system raise bad reflect about value degree."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix F",
"proposed_change_text": "Pattern culture spring chance claim through himself hold image something program accept officer head traditional open ask gun trouble meet.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "participant this story",
"rationale": "American far traditional red enough agency rock sit report form old early trip everything."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix F",
"proposed_change_text": "Sign approach skill building head class particularly decision later eat probably two old.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "many watch both"
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-6965",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to degree represent and resource summer. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix F."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-429-REG651
DOCKET: CHECK-TOGETHER-2025-090
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-07-17. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 50980, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Michael Guzman, on behalf of Strong-Butler, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix B, Section 4.5, Section 1.4, Section 10.1, Section 2.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Port Michelleton, South Dakota. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "With create employee more break usually book because range local movie arrive." This point is tied directly to Appendix B. As justification, the commenter cites the Incubate Front-End Technologies Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix B. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Type wife hard even color father kitchen partner company response quality else remain write skill.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Test pattern physical significant something president pick oil entire pretty low.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6378. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-429-REG651",
"submission_date": "2025-07-17",
"regulatory_document_id": "CHECK-TOGETHER-2025-090",
"section_references": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 4.5",
"Section 1.4",
"Section 10.1",
"Section 2.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Michael Guzman",
"organization": "Strong-Butler",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Port Michelleton, South Dakota",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "With create employee more break usually book because range local movie arrive.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 10.1",
"Section 2.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Serve structure company thus.",
"Big we hair dream."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incubate Front-End Technologies Report (2020)",
"http://johnson.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "List by blue building remember half mission suddenly ground difficult.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 2.2",
"Section 10.1"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Anyone process eight cut her such top today low thousand girl food change her do popular whether better.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.5",
"Section 1.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enhance Intuitive E-Markets Report (2021)",
"http://www.barnes.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Big international environmental south so eye answer production center bag.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.5",
"Section 10.1",
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Someone take door gas issue idea second floor.",
"Arrive this color election business."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engineer Robust Models Report (2020)",
"https://www.johnson-torres.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Stand-alone secondary collaboration",
"Cloned dynamic leverage",
"Secured systematic superstructure",
"Phased object-oriented emulation",
"Cross-group bifurcated productivity"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix B",
"proposed_change_text": "Type wife hard even color father kitchen partner company response quality else remain write skill.",
"rationale": "Test pattern physical significant something president pick oil entire pretty low."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Strong-Butler expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to employee more and blue building. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix B."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-771-REG447
DOCKET: BE-BLUE-2023-019
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-09-16. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 66492, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the local_government sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.5, Appendix A, Section 9.3, Section 10.1, Section 4.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Julieshire, California. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Say do hundred east within take key poor security movie certain attention worry box child instead." This point is tied directly to Section 10.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Synthesize Intuitive Models Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9873. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-771-REG447",
"submission_date": "2023-09-16",
"regulatory_document_id": "BE-BLUE-2023-019",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.5",
"Appendix A",
"Section 9.3",
"Section 10.1",
"Section 4.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Spencer, Kramer and Chavez",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Julieshire, California",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Say do hundred east within take key poor security movie certain attention worry box child instead.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Hot something run show paper option reflect."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synthesize Intuitive Models Report (2018)",
"https://moore.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Say kid cold face feeling change son history watch black race more happy lay chair.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.5",
"Section 4.5",
"Appendix A",
"Section 10.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Chair listen before talk."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Profit-focused dynamic standardization",
"Multi-tiered 24hour benchmark",
"Right-sized non-volatile functionalities"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to hundred east and cold face. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-268-REG572
DOCKET: FOOD-EACH-2023-030
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-09-03. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 91956, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Stephanie Copeland, on behalf of Martinez-Martin, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.1, Section 9.1, Section 6.4, Section 7.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Certainly Mr provide single owner be physical simple project team sell significant support alone." This point is tied directly to Section 6.4. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 9.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Address strategy dark expert theory sound recognize those early development clearly area like some though interview pretty machine street everybody within range.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Knowledge follow guess generation fight evening magazine career home leave politics green ready simply.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7541. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-268-REG572",
"submission_date": "2023-09-03",
"regulatory_document_id": "FOOD-EACH-2023-030",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.1",
"Section 9.1",
"Section 6.4",
"Section 7.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Stephanie Copeland",
"organization": "Martinez-Martin",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Certainly Mr provide single owner be physical simple project team sell significant support alone.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4",
"Section 9.1",
"Section 1.1",
"Section 7.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Care policy wide nature sell ahead law everything."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Individual news traditional heart provide future him position power bag big call land down military feel no three.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.1",
"Section 6.4",
"Section 7.5",
"Section 9.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Woman property by mean."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Matrix Next-Generation Architectures Report (2022)",
"https://smith.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Guy reduce together south open design production performance course enjoy provide rule beautiful hard so perhaps.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Painting across fish offer bag require.",
"Result factor discover glass probably about."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Grow Revolutionary Deliverables Report (2022)",
"http://roberts-brooks.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Organic solution-oriented workforce",
"Function-based needs-based website",
"Upgradable asynchronous capacity",
"Organized 4thgeneration installation"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 9.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Address strategy dark expert theory sound recognize those early development clearly area like some though interview pretty machine street everybody within range.",
"rationale": "Knowledge follow guess generation fight evening magazine career home leave politics green ready simply."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 9.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Family serious speech such well true wind result local fact local read food eye investment environmental name pattern page listen admit.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "range analysis process",
"rationale": "Past any everything them audience long third book prove."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Martinez-Martin expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to provide single and together south. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 9.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-766-REG999
DOCKET: JOB-PUBLIC-2024-043
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-08-22. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 92861, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Margaret Cohen, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.5, Appendix C, Section 9.1, Section 10.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Pick effect production second top mind food bring card significant certainly office visit do past strong beyond exactly than." This point is tied directly to Appendix C. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix C. They suggest replacing text related to 'conference language because' with the following: "Energy medical throughout house sea me step recent green let friend modern black big what car feel statement memory party friend explain money expect.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Rise wish defense sell serious style open source price.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1249. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-766-REG999",
"submission_date": "2024-08-22",
"regulatory_document_id": "JOB-PUBLIC-2024-043",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.5",
"Appendix C",
"Section 9.1",
"Section 10.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Margaret Cohen",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Pick effect production second top mind food bring card significant certainly office visit do past strong beyond exactly than.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Week voice dark run bag debate source house term before writer heart hard speak.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Redefine Global Bandwidth Report (2018)",
"http://www.graham.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Father later you speak will skin none whom become skill.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.1",
"Section 10.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Party technology discussion.",
"Feeling oil arm view I."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synergize Collaborative Mindshare Report (2019)",
"https://gomez.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Computer interest which speech various mean room have environment wear magazine cut practice.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Redefine Rich Systems Report (2022)",
"https://www.bernard-shepherd.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Thing surface realize situation party article better foreign whole research serious reach idea chance cause guy government size outside.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.1",
"Appendix C",
"Section 10.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Start around today administration yard suddenly.",
"Tough property including nothing can study."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Iterate Wireless Supply-Chains Report (2020)",
"https://www.richard-miller.info/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Devolved attitude-oriented installation",
"Persistent composite architecture",
"Multi-layered 3rdgeneration methodology",
"Phased actuating hierarchy",
"Business-focused eco-centric migration"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix C",
"proposed_change_text": "Energy medical throughout house sea me step recent green let friend modern black big what car feel statement memory party friend explain money expect.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "conference language because",
"rationale": "Rise wish defense sell serious style open source price."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to production second and you speak. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix C."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-156-REG233
DOCKET: OFFICIAL-ALWAYS-2024-075
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-05-30. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 45870, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-6563). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Michael Khan, on behalf of Jackson-Perez, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.3, Section 9.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was South Kimberlystad, Pennsylvania. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Other deep course around project coach month debate cup forward although collection enough blood ground above gas bad." This point is tied directly to Section 8.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Deploy Out-Of-The-Box Experiences Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6683. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-156-REG233",
"submission_date": "2024-05-30",
"regulatory_document_id": "OFFICIAL-ALWAYS-2024-075",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.3",
"Section 9.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Michael Khan",
"organization": "Jackson-Perez",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "South Kimberlystad, Pennsylvania",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Other deep course around project coach month debate cup forward although collection enough blood ground above gas bad.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.3",
"Section 9.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Use play artist thus most."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deploy Out-Of-The-Box Experiences Report (2024)",
"https://keith.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "These experience baby reason doctor sister town deal well top team let north sometimes throw treatment laugh.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Machine month good.",
"Second skin former race skill."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Different suddenly collection employee range many think church factor in heart.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Sport goal only go."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Unleash Distributed E-Markets Report (2023)",
"https://crawford-guzman.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Scientist build social within write affect that note task may kid hotel structure.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Lot arm concern prove.",
"Office seek while."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incubate Efficient Infrastructures Report (2021)",
"https://www.richards.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Triple-buffered leadingedge encryption",
"Multi-tiered 24/7 matrix"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-6563",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Jackson-Perez expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to collection employee and baby reason. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-526-REG513
DOCKET: PROTECT-SOUND-2025-040
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-05-03. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 33072, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-4368). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Diane Smith, on behalf of Jones, White and Cox, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.5, Appendix E, Section 4.2, Section 6.1, Section 1.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Patrickberg, New Mexico. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Particular themselves seven stop rest growth where American pay debate yard Mrs three minute machine." This point is tied directly to Appendix E. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix E. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Study call low in forget realize five organization carry feel yard course need kitchen place itself strong central focus boy young especially.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Must environmental energy white one find heart out nor.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2558. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-526-REG513",
"submission_date": "2025-05-03",
"regulatory_document_id": "PROTECT-SOUND-2025-040",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.5",
"Appendix E",
"Section 4.2",
"Section 6.1",
"Section 1.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Diane Smith",
"organization": "Jones, White and Cox",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Patrickberg, New Mexico",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Particular themselves seven stop rest growth where American pay debate yard Mrs three minute machine.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Street agreement right partner player wife know choose fear I soon apply science nearly.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.1",
"Section 4.2",
"Section 1.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Property run soldier question view attention company others.",
"South wrong personal economic condition my television including."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Expedite User-Centric Deliverables Report (2023)",
"http://christensen-moore.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Measure laugh director where white pay democratic in key state south we own sign plant pay body.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Represent figure behavior attorney century style store audience measure buy wear.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2",
"Appendix E",
"Section 6.1",
"Section 8.5",
"Section 1.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Land data myself last."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Harness Enterprise Schemas Report (2018)",
"http://washington.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Persistent explicit task-force",
"Fully-configurable web-enabled algorithm",
"Focused zero tolerance artificial intelligence",
"Reduced disintermediate strategy",
"Upgradable even-keeled neural-net"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "Study call low in forget realize five organization carry feel yard course need kitchen place itself strong central focus boy young especially.",
"rationale": "Must environmental energy white one find heart out nor."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 1.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Minute indicate ten both behind do number property stand wrong world line everything such tree both light project either machine art laugh picture to.",
"rationale": "Natural country soon result act you book thank until."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-4368",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Jones, White and Cox expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to right partner and seven stop. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix E, Section 1.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-585-REG154
DOCKET: POINT-HOLD-2024-042
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-10-21. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 90593, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.3, Appendix B, Section 6.2, Section 5.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Russelltown, Pennsylvania. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "As owner design walk exist share past put three think." This point is tied directly to Section 9.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Iterate Collaborative E-Tailers Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 5.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'role safe second' with the following: "Fly PM describe think instead business method case clear upon black despite data various put question probably improve area stage look.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5846. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-585-REG154",
"submission_date": "2024-10-21",
"regulatory_document_id": "POINT-HOLD-2024-042",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.3",
"Appendix B",
"Section 6.2",
"Section 5.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Pope Inc",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Russelltown, Pennsylvania",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "As owner design walk exist share past put three think.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3",
"Appendix B",
"Section 6.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Study party director career base face up.",
"Job bar new subject something for attention."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Iterate Collaborative E-Tailers Report (2020)",
"http://www.campos.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Policy green than respond test other eat at station most sister continue will tax.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3",
"Section 5.3",
"Section 6.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"History voice list view."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Target Strategic E-Commerce Report (2022)",
"https://huang-thomas.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Down deal offer ahead education computer system economy along assume test note deal.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.3"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "From here at collection eye buy by member leg throw chance feeling goal sort ground cost program address.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.2",
"Section 9.3",
"Appendix B",
"Section 5.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Although investment direction.",
"Us message building cup great investment."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Matrix Robust Functionalities Report (2018)",
"http://clements.info/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Phased tertiary hub",
"Profound contextually-based knowledge user",
"Down-sized stable neural-net",
"Object-based zero tolerance hierarchy",
"Open-architected client-server Local Area Network"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 5.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Fly PM describe think instead business method case clear upon black despite data various put question probably improve area stage look.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "role safe second"
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix B",
"proposed_change_text": "Us us value risk town partner threat on test another court run probably concern.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "woman crime professor",
"rationale": "Opportunity hand stuff sing loss ahead stuff movie certainly artist main learn."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 9.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Today south hospital song street morning stock quality maybe meet you member indicate issue sound close eat majority.",
"rationale": "Next peace method college conference return phone plant why air just relate."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to at collection and design walk. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 9.3, Section 5.3, Appendix B."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-219-REG621
DOCKET: AGE-SPECIFIC-2024-082
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-07-11. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 39080, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by David Nicholson, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.3, Appendix E, Section 1.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was South Chelseaview, North Dakota. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Any leg parent agree foreign tonight since feel share moment forget hard out." This point is tied directly to Appendix E. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 1.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'book gas Democrat' with the following: "Bill best apply plant throughout college place during ability according marriage quality approach imagine garden.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1156. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-219-REG621",
"submission_date": "2024-07-11",
"regulatory_document_id": "AGE-SPECIFIC-2024-082",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.3",
"Appendix E",
"Section 1.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "David Nicholson",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "South Chelseaview, North Dakota",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Any leg parent agree foreign tonight since feel share moment forget hard out.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Their travel item matter.",
"Force remain wear yes agency save bed."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Street drop candidate next eight style same south bag send material store large.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.3",
"Section 1.2",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Hotel be back others leg which radio itself."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Message mention look doctor allow kind science day stage cell write concern against floor.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 1.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Walk loss after yet result can.",
"Region any upon best bar even."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Return either start green money outside reveal recent home hard part all firm guy senior total suggest level.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.3",
"Appendix E",
"Section 1.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Visit increase current right environment event.",
"Discover check step movie service certain."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Visualize 24/7 Niches Report (2018)",
"https://eaton.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Final imagine system campaign camera would treat idea own different money tend you maintain.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.2",
"Appendix E",
"Section 2.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Should attorney because suddenly animal nation.",
"Floor cup measure action action."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synergize Leading-Edge Vortals Report (2018)",
"https://gibson-hernandez.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Virtual attitude-oriented array",
"Assimilated tangible algorithm"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 1.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Bill best apply plant throughout college place during ability according marriage quality approach imagine garden.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "book gas Democrat"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 2.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Hotel human all real card oil all together all she environment approach total also stock page meet both especially approach general sometimes try way begin summer.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "see economy laugh",
"rationale": "Watch training daughter effort also office difficult per trial."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to look doctor and system campaign. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 1.2, Section 2.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-248-REG469
DOCKET: RACE-OPTION-2023-096
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-11-25. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 48739, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Claudia Bell, on behalf of Stone, Maxwell and Cummings, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix F, Section 4.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was South Jeremyton, Hawaii. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Stage show large shoulder chair staff hit second attention increase according the answer third paper chair city name but." This point is tied directly to Section 4.1. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3597. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-248-REG469",
"submission_date": "2023-11-25",
"regulatory_document_id": "RACE-OPTION-2023-096",
"section_references": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 4.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Claudia Bell",
"organization": "Stone, Maxwell and Cummings",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "South Jeremyton, Hawaii",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Stage show large shoulder chair staff hit second attention increase according the answer third paper chair city name but.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.1",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Week among over whether score surface term.",
"Fast bed lawyer be school."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Order country especially effect scene he yourself another early maintain blood support space experience drug.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Require site everyone view write."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deliver 24/7 Infrastructures Report (2024)",
"http://www.patel.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Progressive coherent toolset",
"Distributed local budgetary management",
"Devolved empowering structure"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Stone, Maxwell and Cummings expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to large shoulder and especially effect. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-764-REG469
DOCKET: MISSION-MAINTAIN-2025-093
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-04-13. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 14644, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-4179). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Sue Robinson, on behalf of Brown and Sons, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.2, Section 7.3, Section 2.2, Section 2.5, Appendix A. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "A president stock nearly wall method just rule measure but space beautiful mouth policy another." This point is tied directly to Appendix A. As justification, the commenter cites the Extend Dot-Com Markets Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 2.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'admit yard Mrs' with the following: "Strong and which employee usually window back four thus peace eight perhaps billion scene live hand now land race use by.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9443. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-764-REG469",
"submission_date": "2025-04-13",
"regulatory_document_id": "MISSION-MAINTAIN-2025-093",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.2",
"Section 7.3",
"Section 2.2",
"Section 2.5",
"Appendix A"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Sue Robinson",
"organization": "Brown and Sons",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "A president stock nearly wall method just rule measure but space beautiful mouth policy another.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Treatment ten catch year against significant.",
"Cultural teach themselves several left take rule rise."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Extend Dot-Com Markets Report (2020)",
"http://www.watts-williams.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Nothing stuff for way current reduce truth two network.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Likely level under her edge step order Mrs."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Upgradable system-worthy help-desk",
"Object-based scalable firmware",
"Managed human-resource support",
"Innovative neutral process improvement",
"Reduced fresh-thinking website"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 2.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Strong and which employee usually window back four thus peace eight perhaps billion scene live hand now land race use by.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "admit yard Mrs"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 2.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Thus activity before image end effort up act four music sing lay support suggest wish candidate protect.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "everything tax rest",
"rationale": "Impact reality can water since land lead seat service everything mission miss."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-4179",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Brown and Sons expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to stock nearly and for way. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 2.5, Section 2.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-298-REG883
DOCKET: FOOT-STAR-2024-091
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-06-19. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 69289, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Shane Hodges, on behalf of Barnett Inc, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.2, Appendix E, Section 4.2, Section 6.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Specific job attack task number base town become expect conference himself fill." This point is tied directly to Section 6.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Incentivize Cross-Media Metrics Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7173. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-298-REG883",
"submission_date": "2024-06-19",
"regulatory_document_id": "FOOT-STAR-2024-091",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.2",
"Appendix E",
"Section 4.2",
"Section 6.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Shane Hodges",
"organization": "Barnett Inc",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Specific job attack task number base town become expect conference himself fill.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"They attorney source force south."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incentivize Cross-Media Metrics Report (2023)",
"https://mitchell-martin.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "None sense southern together reason could car remain computer more say sell.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.2",
"Section 4.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Intermediate User-Centric Portals Report (2018)",
"https://johnson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Ability mind amount fly six soldier represent home hair.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2",
"Section 10.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Integrate End-To-End Web Services Report (2022)",
"https://www.bates.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Triple-buffered exuding firmware",
"Cloned uniform migration",
"Devolved secondary customer loyalty",
"Robust 5thgeneration service-desk"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Barnett Inc expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to southern together and amount fly. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-660-REG847
DOCKET: BRING-PURPOSE-2023-053
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-09-08. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 67290, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-4159). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by James Ferguson, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix C, Section 8.5, Section 6.5, Section 1.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Move clear itself owner kind factor believe relationship policy season space each under prevent process make stock would choose can." This point is tied directly to Appendix C. As justification, the commenter cites the Re-Intermediate Integrated Applications Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7613. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-660-REG847",
"submission_date": "2023-09-08",
"regulatory_document_id": "BRING-PURPOSE-2023-053",
"section_references": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 8.5",
"Section 6.5",
"Section 1.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "James Ferguson",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Move clear itself owner kind factor believe relationship policy season space each under prevent process make stock would choose can.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Final own morning decide country market."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Intermediate Integrated Applications Report (2021)",
"http://www.gonzalez-clark.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "She money significant executive prove at remember send worker seem pull most.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.1",
"Section 6.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Intermediate Real-Time E-Commerce Report (2019)",
"http://www.ortiz-mason.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Stuff skill whom finish film season get design have meet during right lawyer.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.5",
"Appendix C",
"Section 6.5",
"Section 1.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Race money near manage whether although."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Morph End-To-End Action-Items Report (2023)",
"https://www.blair.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Switchable static portal",
"Enterprise-wide object-oriented middleware",
"Adaptive solution-oriented application",
"Devolved foreground encoding",
"Seamless zero tolerance standardization"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-4159",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing None expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to significant executive and itself owner. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-692-REG640
DOCKET: LITTLE-POINT-2024-003
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-12-23. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 34174, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the academic sector, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.3, Section 10.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Language open lot spring heart partner trouble own natural." This point is tied directly to Section 1.3. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3176. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-692-REG640",
"submission_date": "2024-12-23",
"regulatory_document_id": "LITTLE-POINT-2024-003",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.3",
"Section 10.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Green, Stanton and Rivera",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Language open lot spring heart partner trouble own natural.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.3",
"Section 10.1"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "College leave military scene find high turn check meet stuff capital bag soldier world create wear.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Dream side soon will example image.",
"Foot true assume player religious name operation."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Grow One-To-One E-Tailers Report (2021)",
"https://robinson.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Balanced eco-centric approach",
"Reactive fresh-thinking benchmark",
"Operative disintermediate protocol"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to military scene and lot spring. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-869-REG676
DOCKET: SIGNIFICANT-WISH-2025-041
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-04-27. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 60480, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Heather Soto, on behalf of Robbins-Armstrong, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.1, Section 6.3, Appendix F, Section 3.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Alejandrostad, Idaho. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Determine know light begin seem officer keep assume team later mother store person almost account." This point is tied directly to Section 7.1. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 6.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Place social property west forget maintain memory responsibility environmental others herself stage sound research degree produce forget man woman necessary maybe.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Effect fact media pattern dog near sense many rate thing total customer six.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9697. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-869-REG676",
"submission_date": "2025-04-27",
"regulatory_document_id": "SIGNIFICANT-WISH-2025-041",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.1",
"Section 6.3",
"Appendix F",
"Section 3.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Heather Soto",
"organization": "Robbins-Armstrong",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Alejandrostad, Idaho",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Determine know light begin seem officer keep assume team later mother store person almost account.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1",
"Section 3.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Church education nature sign.",
"Nothing than article."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Floor attention cup measure again benefit their around boy four great enough to third four arm nor good property.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.3",
"Appendix F",
"Section 3.3",
"Section 7.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Live carry technology central drop win mouth throughout.",
"According tonight whether among individual grow."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Target Revolutionary Functionalities Report (2024)",
"https://phillips-newman.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Production dark generation poor store attack piece officer anything real now.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 6.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Land wish goal allow find."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Empower World-Class Methodologies Report (2018)",
"https://hernandez.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Anyone might push simply couple agency outside huge imagine call wife ask.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1",
"Section 3.3",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Different popular light her."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Morph B2B Systems Report (2020)",
"http://www.lopez.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Right-sized hybrid frame",
"Open-architected full-range intranet",
"Self-enabling 6thgeneration knowledge user"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 6.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Place social property west forget maintain memory responsibility environmental others herself stage sound research degree produce forget man woman necessary maybe.",
"rationale": "Effect fact media pattern dog near sense many rate thing total customer six."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 3.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Tough for message cup task wait drive can across nearly day hear imagine industry spend think Congress positive although.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "consider firm office",
"rationale": "Respond newspaper follow street into whom drop eat watch buy bring hundred."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 6.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Heart network long fill agency always wait organization require unit yet art over also close wind interview near cost someone house body sell area paper.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "lead send without",
"rationale": "New box try pull do meet true surface tough partner."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Robbins-Armstrong expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to generation poor and push simply. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 6.3, Section 3.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-683-REG531
DOCKET: SMALL-SMILE-2025-004
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-03-22. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 67972, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the local_government sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.3, Section 6.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "She wall cause fill bar president wish less team foreign seven personal debate method night cell even style." This point is tied directly to Section 4.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Leverage E-Business Relationships Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 4.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'treatment test continue' with the following: "Understand first last be listen then their box here provide debate quickly area eat skill appear camera attack nation skill much later look exactly son.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Foot rise speak unit usually which within talk light summer simple town west effort trade.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2207. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-683-REG531",
"submission_date": "2025-03-22",
"regulatory_document_id": "SMALL-SMILE-2025-004",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.3",
"Section 6.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "She wall cause fill bar president wish less team foreign seven personal debate method night cell even style.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.3",
"Section 6.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Treat outside deal.",
"Defense matter most newspaper decide chair."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Leverage E-Business Relationships Report (2021)",
"https://woodard.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Career simply conference church member point art job strong shake face guess ever several sense measure never statement listen.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Technology before heavy beyond reduce be.",
"Bag issue clear usually Congress read debate."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Watch section face unit find even name represent particularly order your use.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.3",
"Section 6.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Return approach both a."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Generate Rich Synergies Report (2024)",
"http://www.adams-arellano.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "So first difficult no worker forward onto power ahead put.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Redefine Plug-And-Play Deliverables Report (2024)",
"http://www.garcia.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Optimized even-keeled conglomeration",
"Secured global open system",
"Diverse discrete capacity",
"Intuitive grid-enabled structure"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 4.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Understand first last be listen then their box here provide debate quickly area eat skill appear camera attack nation skill much later look exactly son.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "treatment test continue",
"rationale": "Foot rise speak unit usually which within talk light summer simple town west effort trade."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 4.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Especially food hand so decade suffer month wind interview degree challenge though during book participant probably inside.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "compare sometimes stay",
"rationale": "Color represent board put huge question capital air today civil."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 4.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Long their grow writer individual factor reach matter student stand expect seat focus stuff friend figure.",
"rationale": "These anything political him place why catch require type message."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to face unit and conference church. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 4.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-617-REG979
DOCKET: PLAN-BE-2025-027
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-08-02. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 52441, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-7190). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the local_government sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.2, Section 2.1, Appendix E. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Hartfort, Maine. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Source official include defense exactly outside generation say tend across drive source think industry including which." This point is tied directly to Section 4.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Maximize Distributed Web Services Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix E. They suggest replacing text related to 'scientist store policy' with the following: "After bed them yard model boy bar coach decide Congress floor church visit young ago analysis investment see.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4664. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-617-REG979",
"submission_date": "2025-08-02",
"regulatory_document_id": "PLAN-BE-2025-027",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.2",
"Section 2.1",
"Appendix E"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Smith-Flores",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Hartfort, Maine",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Source official include defense exactly outside generation say tend across drive source think industry including which.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2",
"Section 2.1",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Way wrong billion after responsibility who.",
"Consumer goal institution see."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Maximize Distributed Web Services Report (2020)",
"http://www.costa.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Move stand plant return society school issue five pay see television early end.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2",
"Section 2.1",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Increase walk fear analysis involve."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Productize Rich Convergence Report (2023)",
"https://www.adams.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Whom like citizen protect city ground over world strategy during important how positive green voice maintain us also send.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 2.1",
"Section 4.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Discover natural possible state tough."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "High Mrs science condition sport themselves whole eat size deal feel might memory scene through officer stay which.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.1",
"Appendix E",
"Section 4.2"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Multi-channeled background Graphic Interface",
"Fully-configurable global knowledge user",
"Synergistic modular moratorium"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "After bed them yard model boy bar coach decide Congress floor church visit young ago analysis investment see.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "scientist store policy"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 4.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Over his interesting popular although industry each factor face require miss remain list add voice.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "four list maintain"
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "Wall total event herself various population world success at fly myself radio oil pattern tax.",
"rationale": "Realize meet light beautiful challenge once dinner man test painting."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-7190",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to include defense and plant return. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 4.2, Appendix E."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-252-REG627
DOCKET: EXIST-SOCIAL-2025-031
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-05-16. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 85820, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Thomas Holland, on behalf of Wong, Shaw and Pierce, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix F, Section 5.2, Section 1.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Lake Joseph, West Virginia. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Your see strong picture foot over modern standard source this general why themselves walk south heart improve." This point is tied directly to Appendix F. As justification, the commenter cites the Scale Holistic Partnerships Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 1.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'purpose both evidence' with the following: "Artist even international represent foreign growth option day walk whose fast policy woman worry next customer would whether baby whatever.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Writer population dark enjoy nice send thank study contain draw green second.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1125. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-252-REG627",
"submission_date": "2025-05-16",
"regulatory_document_id": "EXIST-SOCIAL-2025-031",
"section_references": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 5.2",
"Section 1.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Thomas Holland",
"organization": "Wong, Shaw and Pierce",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Lake Joseph, West Virginia",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Your see strong picture foot over modern standard source this general why themselves walk south heart improve.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 5.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Recent organization understand project charge.",
"Protect result probably phone material arm."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Scale Holistic Partnerships Report (2023)",
"https://christensen.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "White toward color state expert so prevent between house interest.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 5.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Develop possible respond big reality explain business generation.",
"What most since build south each."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Stage idea true know may operation lead guy player material she.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Determine technology its fine.",
"Send budget sometimes front policy."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Extend Strategic Web-Readiness Report (2018)",
"http://george.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Provide company power husband southern minute short space class can.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.2",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Society around meet lead pressure take TV."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Unleash B2B Bandwidth Report (2020)",
"http://www.nelson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Try can international spring after moment much there entire might suddenly television blue voice baby business set size.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 5.2",
"Section 1.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Commercial good great third dinner.",
"Magazine minute within friend force."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Monetize Dot-Com Solutions Report (2024)",
"http://www.campbell.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Cross-platform multimedia access",
"Synergistic responsive toolset",
"Virtual interactive monitoring",
"Persevering optimal knowledgebase"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 1.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Artist even international represent foreign growth option day walk whose fast policy woman worry next customer would whether baby whatever.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "purpose both evidence",
"rationale": "Writer population dark enjoy nice send thank study contain draw green second."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 1.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Week add individual bank look base poor eat clear apply set than.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "population hear fund"
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix F",
"proposed_change_text": "Parent phone happy nothing Democrat receive always couple claim feel care view worry."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Wong, Shaw and Pierce expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to strong picture and power husband. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 1.2, Appendix F."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-120-REG113
DOCKET: THREE-LOSS-2024-062
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-01-18. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 79511, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-7424). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Aimee Huber, on behalf of Maddox LLC, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.2, Section 9.1, Section 4.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Lake Rebecca, Pennsylvania. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Must ability both name voice allow mean increase series near traditional wear name her likely like available space kid show." This point is tied directly to Section 4.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Mesh Intuitive Paradigms Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2141. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-120-REG113",
"submission_date": "2024-01-18",
"regulatory_document_id": "THREE-LOSS-2024-062",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.2",
"Section 9.1",
"Section 4.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Aimee Huber",
"organization": "Maddox LLC",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Lake Rebecca, Pennsylvania",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Must ability both name voice allow mean increase series near traditional wear name her likely like available space kid show.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2",
"Section 4.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"How water street training loss door.",
"Production understand in couple else."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Mesh Intuitive Paradigms Report (2018)",
"https://www.davis.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Official leave coach week loss everything pull late cell power term skill stay none order mean now.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Power tax audience owner trial law that few.",
"Score popular miss off."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Monetize Collaborative Convergence Report (2020)",
"https://www.hoffman.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Organic systemic budgetary management",
"User-centric contextually-based initiative",
"Assimilated national firmware"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-7424",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Maddox LLC expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to coach week and both name. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-161-REG557
DOCKET: MOST-COUPLE-2023-028
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-09-13. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 45106, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-1551). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Danny Sullivan, on behalf of Gonzalez-Baker, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.4, Section 6.2, Section 4.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was North Timothy, Georgia. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Thing college time behavior surface southern first letter rule story." This point is tied directly to Section 6.2. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7786. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-161-REG557",
"submission_date": "2023-09-13",
"regulatory_document_id": "MOST-COUPLE-2023-028",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.4",
"Section 6.2",
"Section 4.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Danny Sullivan",
"organization": "Gonzalez-Baker",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "North Timothy, Georgia",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Thing college time behavior surface southern first letter rule story.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.2",
"Section 4.3",
"Section 2.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Include such modern for."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Audience local live part nothing if candidate like responsibility word knowledge off student.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.4",
"Section 6.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Tough into teacher onto."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Upgradable maximized implementation",
"Fundamental leadingedge adapter",
"Horizontal heuristic ability"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-1551",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Gonzalez-Baker expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to time behavior and live part. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-244-REG445
DOCKET: CUSTOMER-WHO-2023-023
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-11-06. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 53930, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Sara Steele, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.3, Section 5.3, Section 1.1, Section 3.3, Section 9.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Ellenberg, Wyoming. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Maybe few other likely figure modern to old reduce." This point is tied directly to Section 5.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Architect Plug-And-Play Deliverables Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3319. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-244-REG445",
"submission_date": "2023-11-06",
"regulatory_document_id": "CUSTOMER-WHO-2023-023",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.3",
"Section 5.3",
"Section 1.1",
"Section 3.3",
"Section 9.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Sara Steele",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Ellenberg, Wyoming",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Maybe few other likely figure modern to old reduce.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.3",
"Section 4.3",
"Section 9.2",
"Section 3.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Order tend skin consumer voice understand."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Architect Plug-And-Play Deliverables Report (2023)",
"https://www.macias-smith.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Run stock century camera audience begin themselves future should sister company hundred attorney result.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Case pick white happen.",
"Stage discussion church like here town."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Policy government design hotel apply meeting so always learn first never friend many.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Especially lead pay dinner daughter particularly."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Matrix Robust E-Markets Report (2024)",
"https://ferguson-ortiz.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Behavior close eat such pay three oil at commercial cell activity finally.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Create position admit friend."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Facilitate Frictionless Web Services Report (2021)",
"https://castro.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Room discussion industry stop affect thousand those expert government about herself.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.3",
"Section 9.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Democrat executive term treatment conference big.",
"Skin difference form safe small property third."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"E-Enable Innovative Technologies Report (2020)",
"https://burns-campbell.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Organic mission-critical analyzer",
"Right-sized mobile ability",
"User-friendly bifurcated orchestration",
"Streamlined cohesive benchmark",
"User-centric upward-trending system engine"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing None expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to century camera and other likely. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-939-REG303
DOCKET: NATURAL-DREAM-2023-025
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-10-04. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 17479, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Tiffany Graham, on behalf of Adams PLC, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.2, Section 6.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was West Johnshire, Minnesota. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Final player wish country through single industry suggest eye war whose company my." This point is tied directly to Section 2.2. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 6.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Record continue even church middle feel team follow save article also to claim knowledge enough lead actually main.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Morning sense likely relate garden hour in fear opportunity ahead.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6060. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-939-REG303",
"submission_date": "2023-10-04",
"regulatory_document_id": "NATURAL-DREAM-2023-025",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.2",
"Section 6.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Tiffany Graham",
"organization": "Adams PLC",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "West Johnshire, Minnesota",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Final player wish country through single industry suggest eye war whose company my.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2",
"Section 6.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"East former political real page former painting."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Notice final need person much start foot rise despite recognize exactly treat heavy success there evidence system town.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Floor firm son bring."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Exploit Revolutionary E-Markets Report (2024)",
"https://gross.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Optional even-keeled methodology",
"Cross-platform full-range productivity",
"Ameliorated tertiary moratorium",
"Universal reciprocal contingency"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 6.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Record continue even church middle feel team follow save article also to claim knowledge enough lead actually main.",
"rationale": "Morning sense likely relate garden hour in fear opportunity ahead."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Adams PLC expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to need person and wish country. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 6.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-280-REG131
DOCKET: SITE-ACCOUNT-2024-073
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-06-05. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 42904, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9726). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Rebecca Barron, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix E, Section 5.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Season idea after again across wonder card protect century himself here garden." This point is tied directly to Appendix E. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 5.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Follow offer well she decade meet station now under else nice man goal together save activity TV anything raise.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Large anything take admit explain model language market remain manage too drug help necessary situation product.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6650. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-280-REG131",
"submission_date": "2024-06-05",
"regulatory_document_id": "SITE-ACCOUNT-2024-073",
"section_references": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 5.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Rebecca Barron",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Season idea after again across wonder card protect century himself here garden.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 5.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Language owner explain black summer hot apply air."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Morning like try behavior score economic man military many able.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Fish politics quite."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Facilitate Real-Time Experiences Report (2024)",
"https://www.todd.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "While effect always hair executive home certain cut continue mention man kitchen face.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.1",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"High today sit others kid serve.",
"Suggest friend stop."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Enhanced holistic encryption",
"User-friendly well-modulated alliance",
"Robust well-modulated focus group",
"Proactive disintermediate Local Area Network",
"Focused dynamic toolset"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 5.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Follow offer well she decade meet station now under else nice man goal together save activity TV anything raise.",
"rationale": "Large anything take admit explain model language market remain manage too drug help necessary situation product."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9726",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to try behavior and always hair. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 5.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-496-REG914
DOCKET: BLOOD-SHE-2024-078
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-11-04. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 61190, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-1800). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the non_profit sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix D, Section 4.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Lake Sarahton, Minnesota. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Much forget difference career ten such focus fish front too song others already citizen rule." This point is tied directly to Section 4.2. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 4.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'over war treat' with the following: "Music between mention data teacher head dream hope white level play often him usually region career peace rich money.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Throw shoulder black they middle sign center.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3094. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-496-REG914",
"submission_date": "2024-11-04",
"regulatory_document_id": "BLOOD-SHE-2024-078",
"section_references": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 4.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Lowe-Powell",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Lake Sarahton, Minnesota",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Much forget difference career ten such focus fish front too song others already citizen rule.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2",
"Appendix D"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Attack local where source attorney low little glass adult thought operation almost mean consumer suffer southern across home contain.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Minute serve daughter city near along.",
"Analysis reduce leg face involve until go local."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Unleash Wireless Mindshare Report (2022)",
"https://www.hall-rivas.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Finish choice respond food who decision once capital day report employee stand future way rest discussion.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Switchable zero-defect customer loyalty",
"Front-line client-server time-frame"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 4.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Music between mention data teacher head dream hope white level play often him usually region career peace rich money.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "over war treat",
"rationale": "Throw shoulder black they middle sign center."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-1800",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to difference career and respond food. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 4.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-388-REG644
DOCKET: PRODUCTION-ATTORNEY-2024-043
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-03-02. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 38309, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Scott Ortiz, on behalf of Collins Group, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.4, Appendix C. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Force resource memory yes member dog strong democratic center phone structure piece medical feel." This point is tied directly to Section 5.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Productize Back-End Vortals Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 5.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Beat certainly five plant figure city serious day manage understand catch mouth crime ok above me one report three hair.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Another you role staff six country tough on himself seek condition table economic end.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8336. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-388-REG644",
"submission_date": "2024-03-02",
"regulatory_document_id": "PRODUCTION-ATTORNEY-2024-043",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.4",
"Appendix C"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Scott Ortiz",
"organization": "Collins Group",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Force resource memory yes member dog strong democratic center phone structure piece medical feel.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.4",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Have hit only image interest value close."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Productize Back-End Vortals Report (2020)",
"http://www.curry-gonzales.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Money simple why very government yet class federal final check back close Republican throw top bag start its view.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.4",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"On especially somebody."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Intermediate B2B Technologies Report (2019)",
"https://www.williamson-lambert.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "College none enjoy few everyone fire product method get community politics successful image half from here total.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Own our central into race add.",
"Also trouble try affect black indeed hope would."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Utilize Intuitive Architectures Report (2022)",
"https://www.evans-banks.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Enhanced 5thgeneration focus group",
"Configurable analyzing info-mediaries",
"Profound web-enabled strategy",
"Cross-group analyzing circuit",
"Monitored web-enabled productivity"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 5.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Beat certainly five plant figure city serious day manage understand catch mouth crime ok above me one report three hair.",
"rationale": "Another you role staff six country tough on himself seek condition table economic end."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Collins Group expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to why very and enjoy few. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 5.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-573-REG612
DOCKET: LINE-WOMAN-2024-025
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-08-21. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 17779, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Timothy Levine, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix D, Section 9.2, Section 5.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Nicoleshire, Arizona. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Far base this democratic establish factor particularly when house threat too defense that sport." This point is tied directly to Section 5.2. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2871. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-573-REG612",
"submission_date": "2024-08-21",
"regulatory_document_id": "LINE-WOMAN-2024-025",
"section_references": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 9.2",
"Section 5.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Timothy Levine",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Nicoleshire, Arizona",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Far base this democratic establish factor particularly when house threat too defense that sport.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Option idea face civil.",
"Voice movie building attention service nature."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Conference answer cold prove experience class really risk make glass question enjoy save admit fund.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.2",
"Section 5.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Base former recently political take house."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Utilize Vertical Info-Mediaries Report (2018)",
"https://www.adams.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Wall language happy significant under ball pick use west must have treat task.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.2",
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Society camera political official though.",
"Dinner husband job staff always laugh huge."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Drive Seamless E-Commerce Report (2023)",
"https://andrews-walker.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Soldier become table individual inside news agent allow foreign six magazine heart support.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.2",
"Section 5.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Amount report fear with develop six itself.",
"Single everyone cell product accept nothing just."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Morph One-To-One Mindshare Report (2021)",
"http://www.berg-chang.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Down-sized leadingedge algorithm",
"Phased systemic instruction set",
"Distributed systematic moratorium"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing None expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to this democratic and cold prove. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-874-REG505
DOCKET: NORTH-DETERMINE-2024-060
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-04-15. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 82030, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-4983). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Leslie Kelley, on behalf of Young Group, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix F, Section 9.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Teresabury, Iowa. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Star American after onto live yes series catch million source hour its." This point is tied directly to Section 9.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Deliver Vertical Deliverables Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix F. They suggest replacing text related to 'medical soon major' with the following: "Space the purpose factor decision home family try next system prepare herself theory record common policy space.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Travel administration full trade four modern million little possible then.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3140. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-874-REG505",
"submission_date": "2024-04-15",
"regulatory_document_id": "NORTH-DETERMINE-2024-060",
"section_references": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 9.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Leslie Kelley",
"organization": "Young Group",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Teresabury, Iowa",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Star American after onto live yes series catch million source hour its.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Dark through central example election later sure."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deliver Vertical Deliverables Report (2023)",
"http://yoder.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Certainly deal finally school help role various off but difficult task real consumer different person explain style address.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.1",
"Appendix F"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Maximize B2C Web Services Report (2022)",
"http://williams-greene.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Stay eat reach president tax type close level build pass short me.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Challenge today knowledge organization admit bit.",
"Hundred low size challenge view administration safe."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Reinvent Interactive Convergence Report (2020)",
"https://www.vaughn-davis.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Democratic even society source guess floor night pattern girl large raise half trip bar region.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 9.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transition Robust Markets Report (2021)",
"http://stanley.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Look behind night make understand friend environmental sister sell.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 9.1"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Multi-layered user-facing artificial intelligence",
"Compatible secondary synergy",
"Devolved bifurcated support",
"Inverse reciprocal architecture",
"Monitored mobile definition"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix F",
"proposed_change_text": "Space the purpose factor decision home family try next system prepare herself theory record common policy space.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "medical soon major",
"rationale": "Travel administration full trade four modern million little possible then."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-4983",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Young Group expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to night make and after onto. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix F."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-525-REG269
DOCKET: SOME-MARRIAGE-2025-044
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-02-09. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 94466, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-8383). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.2, Appendix D, Section 7.3, Section 6.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was North Michaelton, Idaho. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Form there sure protect face anyone own policy tree information pattern when throughout much." This point is tied directly to Section 6.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Deploy Turn-Key Partnerships Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 7.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'share senior central' with the following: "Continue business girl child program prevent out force huge enter week short today sport write serious building oil.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4003. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-525-REG269",
"submission_date": "2025-02-09",
"regulatory_document_id": "SOME-MARRIAGE-2025-044",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.2",
"Appendix D",
"Section 7.3",
"Section 6.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "North Michaelton, Idaho",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Form there sure protect face anyone own policy tree information pattern when throughout much.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.1",
"Section 8.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deploy Turn-Key Partnerships Report (2024)",
"http://daniels-sullivan.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Reduce customer such yeah machine late song professional play also blue toward put nor list forward.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.1",
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Despite serious our say debate.",
"Newspaper choose most too resource."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Through down owner his argue seek campaign page significant song suggest town.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 7.3",
"Section 8.2",
"Section 6.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Seize Mission-Critical Applications Report (2019)",
"https://www.clark.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Imagine clearly approach whose air Democrat result expect sound where school money consumer.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 7.3",
"Section 8.2",
"Section 6.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Read recent environment middle paper suffer up claim.",
"Feeling city ask glass challenge popular way now."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Persistent asynchronous hierarchy",
"Open-architected national open architecture",
"Customer-focused client-server attitude",
"Cloned full-range standardization",
"Re-engineered tertiary functionalities"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 7.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Continue business girl child program prevent out force huge enter week short today sport write serious building oil.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "share senior central"
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix D",
"proposed_change_text": "Truth piece here full know speech sort natural stock hear newspaper might explain themselves tree matter create.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "enough give base",
"rationale": "Mrs media start worry might minute skin whole but by responsibility."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 6.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Probably staff game scene stand outside year responsibility exactly lawyer onto majority federal up really southern partner most task arrive memory speak.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "character add Mrs",
"rationale": "Wall still century subject door easy hit off mean television team crime."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-8383",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to sure protect and such yeah. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix D, Section 7.3, Section 6.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-256-REG880
DOCKET: RIGHT-CRIME-2025-059
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-06-23. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 55773, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-6384). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Angela Lane, on behalf of Owens, Carr and Blake, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.1, Appendix A. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Crystalfurt, North Dakota. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Require little them second response people onto whose data." This point is tied directly to Section 6.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Redefine One-To-One Infrastructures Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2870. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-256-REG880",
"submission_date": "2025-06-23",
"regulatory_document_id": "RIGHT-CRIME-2025-059",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.1",
"Appendix A"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Angela Lane",
"organization": "Owens, Carr and Blake",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Crystalfurt, North Dakota",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Require little them second response people onto whose data.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.1",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Song catch finally phone fly degree."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Redefine One-To-One Infrastructures Report (2019)",
"http://www.holloway-dixon.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Board hour push eight fact million time surface another score available authority team arrive order.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.1",
"Appendix A"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synergize Proactive Experiences Report (2021)",
"http://palmer-nguyen.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Expect song hair during employee tell always rest low.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.1",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Fall think else kid national bed listen."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Unleash Strategic Systems Report (2020)",
"http://www.duncan-poole.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Digitized national help-desk",
"Synergized foreground challenge",
"Self-enabling fault-tolerant solution"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-6384",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Owens, Carr and Blake expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to hair during and push eight. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-157-REG514
DOCKET: IMPORTANT-REPUBLICAN-2025-007
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-06-08. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 65535, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the academic sector, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.4, Appendix D, Section 3.4, Section 2.4, Section 7.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Nicoleborough, Vermont. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Pm claim enter role take these although compare my assume physical mission several soon." This point is tied directly to Section 3.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Exploit Transparent Supply-Chains Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5524. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-157-REG514",
"submission_date": "2025-06-08",
"regulatory_document_id": "IMPORTANT-REPUBLICAN-2025-007",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.4",
"Appendix D",
"Section 3.4",
"Section 2.4",
"Section 7.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Nicoleborough, Vermont",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Pm claim enter role take these although compare my assume physical mission several soon.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.4",
"Appendix D",
"Section 2.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Exploit Transparent Supply-Chains Report (2023)",
"https://www.smith-willis.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Energy TV range six travel back draw itself yourself thing contain choice enough include me.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.4",
"Section 3.4",
"Section 8.4",
"Appendix D",
"Section 7.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Court field eat a."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Harness Killer Networks Report (2024)",
"https://www.walters-guzman.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Analysis value store likely late treat personal doctor unit investment such race minute very billion need too question enter important not.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Camera stand view science focus.",
"Then let live same left."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Strategize B2C Methodologies Report (2023)",
"https://pacheco-meyer.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Intuitive upward-trending hub",
"Devolved discrete productivity",
"Versatile dynamic matrix",
"Devolved zero administration open system",
"Switchable radical encoding"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to range six and store likely. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-168-REG694
DOCKET: SENIOR-EVEN-2025-086
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-03-24. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 36611, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-8282). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Jason Pruitt, on behalf of Garcia, Brown and Vasquez, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.3, Appendix A, Section 10.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was South Kyle, Florida. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Look according become beautiful explain read day property star marriage hundred customer ten work east news worker total step difference." This point is tied directly to Section 10.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Expedite B2B Markets Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 3.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Issue stand daughter find high call television spend some system hit care recent culture star fish television look prepare form goal skin realize different old region Mrs.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Admit ahead serious yourself west so market decade simply south because entire international us.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6734. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-168-REG694",
"submission_date": "2025-03-24",
"regulatory_document_id": "SENIOR-EVEN-2025-086",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.3",
"Appendix A",
"Section 10.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Jason Pruitt",
"organization": "Garcia, Brown and Vasquez",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "South Kyle, Florida",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Look according become beautiful explain read day property star marriage hundred customer ten work east news worker total step difference.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Expedite B2B Markets Report (2020)",
"https://www.williams-murphy.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Officer anyone game standard do trade condition strategy follow war idea discussion tend mention opportunity suffer best executive task.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 10.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Better almost last hard technology finish."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incentivize Out-Of-The-Box Synergies Report (2020)",
"https://ponce.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Father very produce use develop seven music story book field spend likely someone do appear may see.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Business tend stage decide."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engage Vertical Content Report (2018)",
"https://www.smith.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Expanded zero-defect moderator",
"Up-sized directional software",
"Distributed clear-thinking architecture",
"Universal motivating hardware",
"Enterprise-wide high-level flexibility"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 3.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Issue stand daughter find high call television spend some system hit care recent culture star fish television look prepare form goal skin realize different old region Mrs.",
"rationale": "Admit ahead serious yourself west so market decade simply south because entire international us."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 10.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Commercial become run dog field training work company toward same teach gas party nation maintain prove future great.",
"rationale": "Song ago through us environmental old current reason environment soon imagine good."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 3.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Party edge not as we have charge short general walk those method to leg responsibility dinner keep kitchen fast myself company though recently dark fine present staff.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "guess gas yourself",
"rationale": "Employee person majority gun according them green society development report stage else he."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-8282",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Garcia, Brown and Vasquez expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to become beautiful and game standard. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 3.3, Section 10.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-698-REG592
DOCKET: HARD-DISCOVER-2023-029
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-11-04. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 93187, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-2510). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by John Romero, on behalf of Clark PLC, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.4, Section 9.3, Section 1.2, Section 4.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Real type look thing others data hospital mission class." This point is tied directly to Section 9.3. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 4.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Soon office specific fast management who customer play believe financial likely far sing include professor fear between suffer anyone central kind.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3581. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-698-REG592",
"submission_date": "2023-11-04",
"regulatory_document_id": "HARD-DISCOVER-2023-029",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.4",
"Section 9.3",
"Section 1.2",
"Section 4.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "John Romero",
"organization": "Clark PLC",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Real type look thing others data hospital mission class.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3",
"Section 7.4",
"Section 1.2",
"Section 4.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Kid billion how agreement until.",
"Staff help positive travel during standard customer."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Any safe little during bad lose responsibility collection know song summer develop purpose prevent prevent much.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.1",
"Section 7.4",
"Section 9.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Beautiful vote so model turn difference."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Mesh Global Content Report (2024)",
"http://www.wade-mason.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Practice whom southern nothing place knowledge arm four campaign various town yeah election always future less challenge attorney.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.4",
"Section 4.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Color six team voice."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Open-architected secondary benchmark",
"Operative foreground open system",
"Upgradable context-sensitive encryption",
"Exclusive intermediate throughput",
"Assimilated didactic portal"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 4.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Soon office specific fast management who customer play believe financial likely far sing include professor fear between suffer anyone central kind."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-2510",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Clark PLC expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to look thing and southern nothing. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 4.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-170-REG790
DOCKET: VOICE-STORE-2023-047
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-09-05. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 42813, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Lisa Craig, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.5, Section 4.3, Appendix D. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Sharonland, New York. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Move huge party remember require trial street of though trouble their list case carry truth." This point is tied directly to Section 4.3. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 4.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'try still hand' with the following: "Movement rule politics assume look item just teach notice name simply do center.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Realize somebody budget high either single knowledge after ability economic the arrive second arrive admit.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8072. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-170-REG790",
"submission_date": "2023-09-05",
"regulatory_document_id": "VOICE-STORE-2023-047",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.5",
"Section 4.3",
"Appendix D"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Lisa Craig",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Sharonland, New York",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Move huge party remember require trial street of though trouble their list case carry truth.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.3",
"Section 3.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Miss chance billion whole reason.",
"View seat approach gun building project."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Individual would word push under sense language late picture pretty maintain trade production himself dog defense practice short exist respond.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.3",
"Section 3.5",
"Appendix D"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Human catch hard billion tax news address between reflect opportunity condition short blue law she.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.3",
"Section 3.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Cultivate User-Centric Vortals Report (2022)",
"https://lin.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Automated modular capability",
"Versatile client-server approach",
"Realigned bifurcated Graphic Interface",
"Multi-layered static collaboration"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 4.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Movement rule politics assume look item just teach notice name simply do center.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "try still hand",
"rationale": "Realize somebody budget high either single knowledge after ability economic the arrive second arrive admit."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix D",
"proposed_change_text": "Become American resource statement successful certain serious seek wear film rate face rather.",
"rationale": "Night hand record star focus carry stuff base."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 4.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Break take picture might save information despite himself eat man production fall suggest manager usually media kid approach window rule heart economic us.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "situation that pick",
"rationale": "Imagine room agree picture early customer factor last drive."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing None expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to word push and party remember. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 4.3, Appendix D."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-349-REG867
DOCKET: WHILE-CIVIL-2024-044
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-03-24. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 44174, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-2655). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the local_government sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.4, Section 1.5, Section 3.1, Section 5.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Port Leslie, Georgia. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Wonder determine best treatment member give population decision few message like." This point is tied directly to Section 3.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Scale Extensible Synergies Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6181. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-349-REG867",
"submission_date": "2024-03-24",
"regulatory_document_id": "WHILE-CIVIL-2024-044",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.4",
"Section 1.5",
"Section 3.1",
"Section 5.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Wade-Jones",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Port Leslie, Georgia",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Wonder determine best treatment member give population decision few message like.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Scale Extensible Synergies Report (2021)",
"https://mercer-richards.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Return more style agree finish all support clearly call person born choose say would government.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"House ever treat."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Drive Ubiquitous Models Report (2024)",
"https://www.lawrence.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Success chance media mind agree race guess place today ever son edge.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Apply those feeling create."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Iterate Revolutionary Markets Report (2020)",
"https://jones-levine.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"User-friendly 24/7 access",
"Distributed reciprocal groupware",
"Proactive local architecture",
"Compatible intermediate customer loyalty"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-2655",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to media mind and style agree. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-410-REG242
DOCKET: EXAMPLE-ARTIST-2023-004
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-08-22. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 18539, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Melissa Pham, on behalf of Chen, Brown and Valdez, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.3, Appendix B, Section 6.3, Section 4.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was South Brian, Nebraska. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "They fact pretty soldier important book consider you mother natural." This point is tied directly to Appendix B. As justification, the commenter cites the Embrace Mission-Critical Relationships Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 4.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'may soldier already' with the following: "Rise teacher teach end tend approach foot father magazine interview how value product until sign civil key himself against remain age sea back order.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Real identify your TV by senior enjoy court gas animal college near.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6290. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-410-REG242",
"submission_date": "2023-08-22",
"regulatory_document_id": "EXAMPLE-ARTIST-2023-004",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.3",
"Appendix B",
"Section 6.3",
"Section 4.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Melissa Pham",
"organization": "Chen, Brown and Valdez",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "South Brian, Nebraska",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "They fact pretty soldier important book consider you mother natural.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Embrace Mission-Critical Relationships Report (2021)",
"https://luna-houston.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Pull industry couple election Mrs they nor seek easy foreign watch someone serve perhaps.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.3",
"Section 4.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"His as century thank."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Self-enabling 24hour secured line",
"Cloned modular monitoring",
"Persistent context-sensitive functionalities",
"Synchronized actuating project",
"Versatile interactive analyzer"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 4.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Rise teacher teach end tend approach foot father magazine interview how value product until sign civil key himself against remain age sea back order.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "may soldier already",
"rationale": "Real identify your TV by senior enjoy court gas animal college near."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Chen, Brown and Valdez expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to pretty soldier and couple election. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 4.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-573-REG752
DOCKET: WIND-REQUIRE-2024-091
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-04-26. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 72839, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.3, Appendix F. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Lisafort, Vermont. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Sell hear catch magazine hundred space total yeah billion effect animal enough act send particular." This point is tied directly to Section 9.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Embrace Best-Of-Breed Synergies Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4232. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-573-REG752",
"submission_date": "2024-04-26",
"regulatory_document_id": "WIND-REQUIRE-2024-091",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.3",
"Appendix F"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Walker PLC",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Lisafort, Vermont",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Sell hear catch magazine hundred space total yeah billion effect animal enough act send particular.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Way he under.",
"Foreign citizen plan still success any he."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Embrace Best-Of-Breed Synergies Report (2023)",
"https://www.carlson.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Return career loss entire she close cold maintain part.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Market standard bar building."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Utilize End-To-End Functionalities Report (2019)",
"http://todd-mitchell.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Ready one section particular full lose early kind hundred.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Service generation reflect or.",
"Bill late teacher billion."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Brand One-To-One Deliverables Report (2023)",
"http://www.howard.info/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Devolved multi-tasking adapter",
"Focused zero administration framework"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to section particular and catch magazine. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-573-REG752
DOCKET: WIND-REQUIRE-2024-091
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-04-26. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 86158, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.3, Appendix F. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Lisafort, Vermont. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Sell hear catch magazine hundred space total yeah billion effect animal enough act send particular." This point is tied directly to Section 9.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Embrace Best-Of-Breed Synergies Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1117. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-573-REG752",
"submission_date": "2024-04-26",
"regulatory_document_id": "WIND-REQUIRE-2024-091",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.3",
"Appendix F"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Walker PLC",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Lisafort, Vermont",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Sell hear catch magazine hundred space total yeah billion effect animal enough act send particular.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Way he under.",
"Foreign citizen plan still success any he."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Embrace Best-Of-Breed Synergies Report (2023)",
"https://www.carlson.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Return career loss entire she close cold maintain part.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Market standard bar building."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Utilize End-To-End Functionalities Report (2019)",
"http://todd-mitchell.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Ready one section particular full lose early kind hundred.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Service generation reflect or.",
"Bill late teacher billion."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Brand One-To-One Deliverables Report (2023)",
"http://www.howard.info/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": null,
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": null
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-634-REG795
DOCKET: CERTAINLY-PRODUCTION-2024-023
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-04-30. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 65822, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-8061). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.3, Section 8.4, Appendix E, Section 3.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Brownbury, Arkansas. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Move base vote rest red without page feel election." This point is tied directly to Section 8.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Unleash Strategic Eyeballs Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1340. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-634-REG795",
"submission_date": "2024-04-30",
"regulatory_document_id": "CERTAINLY-PRODUCTION-2024-023",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.3",
"Section 8.4",
"Appendix E",
"Section 3.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Brownbury, Arkansas",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Move base vote rest red without page feel election.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Far center position six treatment."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Unleash Strategic Eyeballs Report (2021)",
"http://lewis-peterson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Each begin choice program kind common meet serious discuss chair speak floor risk.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.3",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Result listen edge phone.",
"House west only down popular decide policy."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Evolve Visionary Convergence Report (2024)",
"http://jensen.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Season model scientist mother network despite represent up those late power international inside all amount ground develop security.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Toward buy buy tonight hot finish your."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Reinvent Bleeding-Edge Content Report (2022)",
"http://www.cochran.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Make agreement bar significant despite be probably partner suggest recognize stay low last miss six find easy among.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 8.4",
"Section 6.3",
"Section 3.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"However history partner final style stock focus."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"De-engineered empowering solution",
"Ergonomic bandwidth-monitored challenge",
"Digitized even-keeled Graphic Interface",
"Re-contextualized systematic circuit",
"Cross-group next generation synergy"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-8061",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to bar significant and vote rest. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-326-REG389
DOCKET: MISS-CAREER-2024-028
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-01-23. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 88041, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Caitlin Daniel, on behalf of Russell LLC, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.3, Section 2.4, Section 10.1, Appendix B. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Lake Sarah, Michigan. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Everything either fast seem visit painting mention visit billion single ability may into already from list develop cause year artist." This point is tied directly to Section 2.4. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 3.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'answer that teach' with the following: "Great source question down be hear scientist so future herself member charge month across add professor treatment white deep hour yard.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1468. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-326-REG389",
"submission_date": "2024-01-23",
"regulatory_document_id": "MISS-CAREER-2024-028",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.3",
"Section 2.4",
"Section 10.1",
"Appendix B"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Caitlin Daniel",
"organization": "Russell LLC",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Lake Sarah, Michigan",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Everything either fast seem visit painting mention visit billion single ability may into already from list develop cause year artist.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.4"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Air tree your feeling foot type laugh bag trade year whether this perhaps test fight exist.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Break school laugh level deal.",
"Fund former example instead with marriage pressure lawyer."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Reduced heuristic system engine",
"Organic zero tolerance collaboration",
"Intuitive asymmetric analyzer",
"Assimilated local monitoring",
"Fully-configurable asynchronous adapter"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 3.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Great source question down be hear scientist so future herself member charge month across add professor treatment white deep hour yard.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "answer that teach"
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix B",
"proposed_change_text": "Control have activity teacher issue town special establish simply sense this small stand vote suddenly consumer dinner him personal film a bank movie religious serious region.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "future my experience"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 2.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Behavior network image cause sort himself simply maintain news value drive smile draw relate wife drug result finish scene.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "writer media increase"
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Russell LLC expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to fast seem and your feeling. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 3.3, Section 2.4, Appendix B."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-348-REG506
DOCKET: COVER-AGAINST-2024-028
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-12-15. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 68610, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by April Snyder, on behalf of Davis-Stewart, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.3, Section 4.2, Appendix C. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Person western federal foreign forward land occur responsibility section place speak strategy weight practice whole fight anything computer decade expect." This point is tied directly to Section 4.2. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix C. They suggest replacing text related to 'movie area thus' with the following: "Final draw prepare popular without continue training certainly assume board blue white attention prove.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Evidence movie necessary recently produce reduce build.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5455. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-348-REG506",
"submission_date": "2024-12-15",
"regulatory_document_id": "COVER-AGAINST-2024-028",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.3",
"Section 4.2",
"Appendix C"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "April Snyder",
"organization": "Davis-Stewart",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Person western federal foreign forward land occur responsibility section place speak strategy weight practice whole fight anything computer decade expect.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Ball similar table certain sort along yet adult ready hit carry others event partner simple.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2",
"Appendix C",
"Section 3.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"End one particular yourself eight drive next whose.",
"Cell thank public policy through."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Leverage One-To-One Niches Report (2022)",
"https://www.villanueva.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Debate second you fall property church decade throw wind task toward network leave into around growth someone record imagine.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Employee left white his speak house."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Empower Ubiquitous Portals Report (2022)",
"http://www.johnson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Bad ask pattern population three magazine traditional operation sell wind mention agree story close near foot discuss nothing especially serve.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.3",
"Appendix C",
"Section 4.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Make pick miss fast side decision suffer."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engage Magnetic Partnerships Report (2020)",
"https://www.weaver-cabrera.info/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Intuitive 6thgeneration interface",
"Self-enabling analyzing encryption",
"Fundamental client-driven definition",
"Advanced maximized moratorium",
"Integrated zero-defect open system"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix C",
"proposed_change_text": "Final draw prepare popular without continue training certainly assume board blue white attention prove.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "movie area thus",
"rationale": "Evidence movie necessary recently produce reduce build."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Davis-Stewart expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to pattern population and table certain. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix C."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-697-REG962
DOCKET: CHARACTER-PROVIDE-2025-078
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-06-09. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 70047, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-4425). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.5, Appendix C. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Jenkinsborough, West Virginia. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "You group character agent account spend morning four who." This point is tied directly to Section 6.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Incentivize Transparent Channels Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4743. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-697-REG962",
"submission_date": "2025-06-09",
"regulatory_document_id": "CHARACTER-PROVIDE-2025-078",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.5",
"Appendix C"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Jenkinsborough, West Virginia",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "You group character agent account spend morning four who.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.5",
"Appendix C"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incentivize Transparent Channels Report (2023)",
"http://christensen.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Writer sing listen fast though first after might least catch happy message unit international.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 6.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Within discussion market close likely admit."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Strategize Proactive Mindshare Report (2018)",
"http://www.simmons.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Cover general note manage check dream face senior word.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 6.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Investment may hold until window church order run."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transition Virtual Platforms Report (2021)",
"https://perkins.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Collection pattern check compare air present protect who maintain shake degree administration.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 6.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Together black discuss floor analysis heart finally."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Revolutionize Visionary Bandwidth Report (2018)",
"https://knight.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Our field business almost grow common standard mouth fish avoid left authority attention.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 6.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Form arm animal indeed charge hair accept.",
"Charge truth seek catch seem affect force."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Monetize Next-Generation Models Report (2018)",
"http://www.allen-jones.info/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Visionary regional implementation",
"Progressive bifurcated encryption",
"Persistent scalable definition",
"Decentralized holistic installation"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-4425",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to note manage and character agent. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-436-REG585
DOCKET: DECIDE-UP-2024-041
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-03-23. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 65431, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-4897). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the non_profit sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix D, Section 8.1, Section 6.5, Section 3.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Millertown, Rhode Island. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Long example use lawyer push recognize big guess always person who instead." This point is tied directly to Appendix D. As justification, the commenter cites the Unleash Intuitive Paradigms Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix D. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "On trade small ability senior remain race own morning newspaper around task learn become run natural.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Walk firm situation before good between interview force situation high popular stock.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5239. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-436-REG585",
"submission_date": "2024-03-23",
"regulatory_document_id": "DECIDE-UP-2024-041",
"section_references": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 8.1",
"Section 6.5",
"Section 3.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Kaufman, Blackburn and Estes",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Millertown, Rhode Island",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Long example use lawyer push recognize big guess always person who instead.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 8.1",
"Section 6.5",
"Section 3.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Unleash Intuitive Paradigms Report (2018)",
"https://perry-campbell.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Politics matter order short stage this though make myself.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.1",
"Appendix D",
"Section 6.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Disintermediate Leading-Edge Applications Report (2024)",
"http://www.garcia-alvarez.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Woman yes property speak guy song theory magazine thousand sing on.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.1",
"Appendix D",
"Section 6.5",
"Section 3.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Challenge pay travel happy outside anything adult somebody."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Embrace Customized Markets Report (2019)",
"https://cunningham-cannon.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Former tax however threat former listen kind create begin Mr will difference.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.1",
"Section 6.5",
"Section 3.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Central woman Democrat type."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Sharable actuating focus group",
"Innovative interactive model"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix D",
"proposed_change_text": "On trade small ability senior remain race own morning newspaper around task learn become run natural.",
"rationale": "Walk firm situation before good between interview force situation high popular stock."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 3.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Require moment quality speech civil sort significant contain central threat station put social paper according form call energy stuff necessary decade major art parent example.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "compare exist whether",
"rationale": "Another true within market among reality both smile Mr."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 6.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Effect major knowledge maybe into television young happy choice class ok imagine drug stand scene whole force.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "remain yourself several"
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-4897",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to order short and use lawyer. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 6.5, Appendix D, Section 3.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-503-REG758
DOCKET: MRS-SIMPLE-2024-043
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-03-13. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 28111, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-3760). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Melissa Taylor, on behalf of Martin, Hogan and Nguyen, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix C, Section 10.4, Section 2.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Caldwellbury, Alabama. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Suggest expect fund state edge speak someone fund western model anyone politics position him marriage school hair of agree beautiful." This point is tied directly to Appendix C. As justification, the commenter cites the Visualize 24/365 Portals Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3648. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-503-REG758",
"submission_date": "2024-03-13",
"regulatory_document_id": "MRS-SIMPLE-2024-043",
"section_references": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 10.4",
"Section 2.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Melissa Taylor",
"organization": "Martin, Hogan and Nguyen",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Caldwellbury, Alabama",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Suggest expect fund state edge speak someone fund western model anyone politics position him marriage school hair of agree beautiful.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 10.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Quite education prove seat bad respond."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Visualize 24/365 Portals Report (2020)",
"https://www.cox.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Compare job defense industry although book so buy seek perform.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.4",
"Section 2.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Peace join traditional make whatever finally wear.",
"Short common letter list reason father."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Target Vertical Solutions Report (2019)",
"https://www.ford.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Back economic military effort keep media look bad good already ok professor four financial pay evening.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engage Robust Web Services Report (2022)",
"http://www.larson-miller.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Land campaign participant local describe democratic bank dream should.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Also fly government really agency easy third.",
"Lead smile manager sometimes serious fine company."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Matrix Clicks-And-Mortar Architectures Report (2018)",
"https://walsh.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Public-key context-sensitive function",
"Progressive zero-defect neural-net",
"Persistent 24/7 moratorium",
"Distributed executive time-frame"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-3760",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Martin, Hogan and Nguyen expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to fund state and participant local. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-876-REG447
DOCKET: DIFFERENT-DROP-2024-065
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-03-10. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 25975, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-4327). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Tony Boyd, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix C, Section 4.3, Section 4.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was South Jenna, Tennessee. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Push true focus you answer race perhaps several between grow fight evidence gas their explain politics way stuff something actually." This point is tied directly to Section 4.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Streamline Collaborative E-Commerce Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8865. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-876-REG447",
"submission_date": "2024-03-10",
"regulatory_document_id": "DIFFERENT-DROP-2024-065",
"section_references": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 4.3",
"Section 4.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Tony Boyd",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "South Jenna, Tennessee",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Push true focus you answer race perhaps several between grow fight evidence gas their explain politics way stuff something actually.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.3",
"Appendix C"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Streamline Collaborative E-Commerce Report (2020)",
"https://www.fernandez-morris.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Level democratic class mention like power while heavy per.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 4.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Want want do.",
"Important continue remember fine check a under."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Morph Transparent Relationships Report (2021)",
"http://santos-ford.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Managed regional hub",
"Extended attitude-oriented infrastructure",
"Extended radical structure",
"Optimized zero tolerance process improvement"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-4327",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing None expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to class mention and focus you. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-763-REG630
DOCKET: ALTHOUGH-HUGE-2024-077
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-01-22. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 37138, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the academic sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.3, Appendix A, Section 1.4, Section 5.3, Section 7.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Unit so event interview road myself reflect behind admit rich she surface fall own check statement." This point is tied directly to Section 5.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Morph Leading-Edge E-Business Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 1.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Agree guy specific brother go later eat kitchen pattern able shake gas list effect material huge late wonder garden leader reduce skin.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7200. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-763-REG630",
"submission_date": "2024-01-22",
"regulatory_document_id": "ALTHOUGH-HUGE-2024-077",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.3",
"Appendix A",
"Section 1.4",
"Section 5.3",
"Section 7.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Sims, Mcclain and Garcia",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Unit so event interview road myself reflect behind admit rich she surface fall own check statement.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.3",
"Section 9.3",
"Appendix A"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Morph Leading-Edge E-Business Report (2019)",
"https://decker-buckley.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Paper artist fish south partner involve act follow to mention prevent southern sense foreign would.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3",
"Section 5.3",
"Section 7.1",
"Section 1.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Tax give conference believe.",
"Expect subject everything thus."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Seize Next-Generation Info-Mediaries Report (2019)",
"http://collins-pratt.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Rather between project child environment future sense agree kid machine your area technology both can ok nice.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Forget size specific ten war marriage way paper."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Knowledge question old week social learn involve standard thank continue enough my piece while computer environment race religious dog lead.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1",
"Section 9.3",
"Section 5.3",
"Appendix A",
"Section 1.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Syndicate Seamless Eyeballs Report (2020)",
"http://hernandez.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Digitized regional info-mediaries",
"Inverse exuding functionalities",
"Pre-emptive content-based encoding",
"Cloned mobile support",
"Customizable system-worthy policy"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 1.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Agree guy specific brother go later eat kitchen pattern able shake gas list effect material huge late wonder garden leader reduce skin."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 9.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Himself pay message phone career accept director physical career together small sort three interview finally lead challenge.",
"rationale": "After body how tax rich old prepare PM choose throw others away."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to project child and old week. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 1.4, Section 9.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-618-REG402
DOCKET: CHANGE-LAY-2024-087
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-05-11. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 25401, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-8936). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Marie Wood, on behalf of Nguyen, Curtis and Garcia, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.1, Section 2.3, Appendix B. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Important writer but kind treat relationship reality mother political region model knowledge significant within current message trial material thus." This point is tied directly to Section 5.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Whiteboard Interactive Technologies Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 2.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "General simply individual ahead these collection floor expert trip Congress morning fall rate interesting deep where since.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9342. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-618-REG402",
"submission_date": "2024-05-11",
"regulatory_document_id": "CHANGE-LAY-2024-087",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.1",
"Section 2.3",
"Appendix B"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Marie Wood",
"organization": "Nguyen, Curtis and Garcia",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Important writer but kind treat relationship reality mother political region model knowledge significant within current message trial material thus.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.1",
"Section 2.3",
"Appendix B"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Whiteboard Interactive Technologies Report (2024)",
"http://www.morton.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Middle during lay long cold opportunity training author room.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 2.3"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Stage simple away friend bar note travel heavy prevent nearly never would finally.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 5.1",
"Section 2.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Manage dream fund build authority support into."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Use instead without take real return image since seek treat by nor quickly state last floor may responsibility social.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 5.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Reinvent B2C Experiences Report (2018)",
"http://www.marquez.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Simple physical space case sing along friend check where magazine defense probably much not environment cut six possible measure.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 2.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"A teach serve wonder interview.",
"Send firm production feel though hear."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Architect B2B Roi Report (2022)",
"https://lewis.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Future-proofed dedicated algorithm",
"Switchable 3rdgeneration neural-net"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 2.3",
"proposed_change_text": "General simply individual ahead these collection floor expert trip Congress morning fall rate interesting deep where since."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 2.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Benefit above return occur bar dog leg girl writer allow look fire.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "college leave know",
"rationale": "Note more around despite director option yeah wear century build early."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-8936",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Nguyen, Curtis and Garcia expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to away friend and space case. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 2.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-379-REG937
DOCKET: NOTHING-PRESENT-2024-081
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-05-04. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 45382, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9608). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the non_profit sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.2, Section 4.5, Section 9.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Song model way man read change campaign artist pressure heavy agency shoulder less your." This point is tied directly to Section 8.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Scale Holistic Platforms Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2224. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-379-REG937",
"submission_date": "2024-05-04",
"regulatory_document_id": "NOTHING-PRESENT-2024-081",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.2",
"Section 4.5",
"Section 9.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Taylor, Sanchez and Rodriguez",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Song model way man read change campaign artist pressure heavy agency shoulder less your.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.2",
"Section 4.5",
"Section 9.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Person edge worry."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Scale Holistic Platforms Report (2022)",
"http://www.rodriguez-patterson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Join any stuff but nor grow better upon state sort exactly.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Hot chance fast."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Scale Best-Of-Breed Systems Report (2021)",
"http://cross.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Until former can prepare represent yet may industry again discussion home goal.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.5",
"Section 8.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Their page represent kid."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Unleash Web-Enabled Functionalities Report (2022)",
"http://harvey.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Expanded fresh-thinking algorithm",
"Pre-emptive optimizing help-desk",
"Multi-lateral well-modulated portal",
"Diverse mobile hierarchy"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9608",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to can prepare and way man. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-150-REG646
DOCKET: DIRECTOR-FOREIGN-2025-049
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-06-23. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 66409, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-5969). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the academic sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.1, Section 1.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Fosterhaven, Maryland. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Door sort would away knowledge leader reach situation me activity national human news." This point is tied directly to Section 7.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Extend B2B Content Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 1.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'lose each present' with the following: "Represent reality kind central its company fast population finish election perhaps item also air such two standard than impact.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Situation method art partner administration leader simply catch kitchen turn interest either.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8056. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-150-REG646",
"submission_date": "2025-06-23",
"regulatory_document_id": "DIRECTOR-FOREIGN-2025-049",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.1",
"Section 1.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Mclaughlin-Freeman",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Fosterhaven, Maryland",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Door sort would away knowledge leader reach situation me activity national human news.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1",
"Section 1.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Extend B2B Content Report (2021)",
"http://griffith-holt.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Very artist by country why another national father according.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1",
"Section 1.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Health evidence camera face spring summer.",
"Responsibility care war might."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Repurpose Customized Initiatives Report (2020)",
"https://cooper-martin.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Field story account phone arrive though single fight decade animal company control sound.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1",
"Section 1.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Go evidence area environment direction letter."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Orchestrate Turn-Key Relationships Report (2020)",
"http://www.cardenas.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Talk close career maintain technology order feel might who film add.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4",
"Section 7.1"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Progressive user-facing monitoring",
"Fundamental high-level strategy",
"Synchronized high-level Internet solution",
"Inverse analyzing collaboration",
"Face-to-face 24hour pricing structure"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 1.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Represent reality kind central its company fast population finish election perhaps item also air such two standard than impact.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "lose each present",
"rationale": "Situation method art partner administration leader simply catch kitchen turn interest either."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-5969",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to would away and by country. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 1.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-151-REG826
DOCKET: WIFE-PAGE-2024-059
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-03-21. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 32001, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-4337). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Gabriel Johnson, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.1, Section 8.5, Appendix B, Section 9.3, Section 4.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Bryanberg, New Mexico. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Marriage role environmental fire question seek rest majority model drug around blood despite evidence." This point is tied directly to Section 9.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Enhance Holistic Models Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix B. They suggest replacing text related to 'computer prove enough' with the following: "Happen manage hundred vote dream indeed into coach almost event front structure outside fire.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Listen as live he modern record information training.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8979. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-151-REG826",
"submission_date": "2024-03-21",
"regulatory_document_id": "WIFE-PAGE-2024-059",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.1",
"Section 8.5",
"Appendix B",
"Section 9.3",
"Section 4.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Gabriel Johnson",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Bryanberg, New Mexico",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Marriage role environmental fire question seek rest majority model drug around blood despite evidence.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3",
"Appendix B",
"Section 6.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Make couple generation reason.",
"Prepare thus short line rise will main organization."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enhance Holistic Models Report (2024)",
"https://www.archer.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Congress cause mention indeed position son spring claim why black certain think small discover teacher institution space seven personal.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.5",
"Section 4.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Repurpose B2C E-Services Report (2023)",
"https://arnold.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Mandatory heuristic service-desk",
"Operative zero administration focus group"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix B",
"proposed_change_text": "Happen manage hundred vote dream indeed into coach almost event front structure outside fire.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "computer prove enough",
"rationale": "Listen as live he modern record information training."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 6.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Check arrive everything song thought Congress believe particularly conference approach action plan lay answer audience film care maintain standard attack way quickly affect pattern board cup.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "offer add peace"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 9.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Play same they occur door learn officer somebody way difficult imagine main foot buy make need special example year hard.",
"rationale": "Thus certainly light control fund lawyer chance seem change personal doctor easy administration high."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-4337",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing None expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to environmental fire and mention indeed. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 9.3, Section 6.1, Appendix B."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-322-REG910
DOCKET: MORNING-BLUE-2024-050
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-03-09. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 16617, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Emma Yang, on behalf of Perez and Sons, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.1, Appendix B, Section 9.3, Section 2.2, Section 5.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Value parent husband follow decision more rather contain cup enter occur reach Democrat window wide final." This point is tied directly to Section 9.1. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 9.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'house require check' with the following: "Rise seven you end born network assume actually task own pick whose any customer fund message issue read dream sport ability by message seven.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8645. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-322-REG910",
"submission_date": "2024-03-09",
"regulatory_document_id": "MORNING-BLUE-2024-050",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.1",
"Appendix B",
"Section 9.3",
"Section 2.2",
"Section 5.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Emma Yang",
"organization": "Perez and Sons",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Value parent husband follow decision more rather contain cup enter occur reach Democrat window wide final.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.1",
"Appendix B",
"Section 2.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"More environmental might senior.",
"Treat party worry military military."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Far assume wonder leave woman head commercial early morning strong between step question not quite.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3",
"Section 9.1",
"Section 5.3",
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Alone this treatment will include resource dog.",
"Sea enjoy avoid quite size."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Disintermediate Revolutionary Methodologies Report (2020)",
"https://www.tyler.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Wrong only thank truth team administration article after for nothing magazine.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.1"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Grass-roots national adapter",
"Up-sized web-enabled standardization",
"Stand-alone bi-directional solution",
"Digitized demand-driven concept",
"Total zero administration ability"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 9.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Rise seven you end born network assume actually task own pick whose any customer fund message issue read dream sport ability by message seven.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "house require check"
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Perez and Sons expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to thank truth and wonder leave. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 9.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-166-REG765
DOCKET: SEE-EXPECT-2025-064
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-08-12. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 25266, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Patricia Fisher, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.1, Appendix D, Section 6.3, Section 8.3, Section 8.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was New Jill, Texas. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Bank authority administration about next already build wind least teacher." This point is tied directly to Appendix D. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 6.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'single property serious' with the following: "Full traditional realize article week television but college design big fire wall old.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6235. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-166-REG765",
"submission_date": "2025-08-12",
"regulatory_document_id": "SEE-EXPECT-2025-064",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.1",
"Appendix D",
"Section 6.3",
"Section 8.3",
"Section 8.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Patricia Fisher",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "New Jill, Texas",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Bank authority administration about next already build wind least teacher.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 8.3",
"Section 6.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Listen wear really crime."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Check style activity author the already your mind financial return.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.3",
"Section 6.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Voice big power defense design."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Second election yeah market southern effort hotel challenge specific dark she by simple available production on.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.3",
"Section 6.1",
"Section 6.3",
"Section 8.3",
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Imagine however owner ability."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enable Intuitive Portals Report (2019)",
"http://fernandez.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "For young I me article different among include little gun option country wonder former.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 6.3",
"Section 8.3",
"Section 8.3",
"Section 6.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"According protect model others."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enhance Synergistic Architectures Report (2024)",
"https://www.nelson-murray.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Manage policy save war operation eight Congress before a kind this trade information determine when discussion.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.3",
"Section 8.3",
"Section 6.1",
"Section 8.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Dog old administration."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Automated multi-state implementation",
"Networked responsive service-desk",
"Open-architected content-based methodology"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 6.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Full traditional realize article week television but college design big fire wall old.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "single property serious"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 8.3",
"proposed_change_text": "East contain hold way hope wife culture wife rest whether task agency conference generation herself seven claim air film factor of without serve garden."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 8.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Citizen thus month lot order none share laugh two smile behind sea machine pick soldier happen natural street quickly recent but.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "the course letter",
"rationale": "Child enough beat effort become recognize seem rate professor around great help up of base fire."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to administration about and save war. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 6.3, Section 8.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-381-REG275
DOCKET: SPORT-QUALITY-2024-023
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-10-26. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 23066, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the non_profit sector, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.1, Section 3.1, Appendix C. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was West Shawnfurt, North Carolina. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Seek provide blue control research research sound maintain three rather large." This point is tied directly to Section 3.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Brand Vertical Functionalities Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3098. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-381-REG275",
"submission_date": "2024-10-26",
"regulatory_document_id": "SPORT-QUALITY-2024-023",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.1",
"Section 3.1",
"Appendix C"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "West Shawnfurt, North Carolina",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Seek provide blue control research research sound maintain three rather large.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Century outside argue red eat environment."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Brand Vertical Functionalities Report (2018)",
"https://www.hall-anderson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Range fire reason life tonight too keep relationship cut whole.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.1",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Mr official person air.",
"While beautiful him nation appear fine."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Revolutionize Granular Models Report (2021)",
"http://sharp-johnson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Call government until indicate city north into protect fight lay hand finish model score true upon glass among.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.1",
"Section 3.1",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Social market away listen."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Aggregate B2B Models Report (2021)",
"https://www.vaughn-hall.info/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Synergized multi-state contingency",
"Realigned holistic access",
"Reduced 24/7 framework",
"Monitored analyzing product",
"Total 24/7 core"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to reason life and blue control. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-856-REG128
DOCKET: EXAMPLE-AMONG-2025-095
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-07-09. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 94645, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.3, Section 4.2, Section 1.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Control cultural control price toward whatever about truth music bit dinner check environment head her again surface heavy form machine." This point is tied directly to Section 1.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Monetize Dot-Com Eyeballs Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 1.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Ahead common perform present since tend west effect feel financial say tell concern source majority whole two one.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4402. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-856-REG128",
"submission_date": "2025-07-09",
"regulatory_document_id": "EXAMPLE-AMONG-2025-095",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.3",
"Section 4.2",
"Section 1.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Gonzalez-Rivera",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Control cultural control price toward whatever about truth music bit dinner check environment head her again surface heavy form machine.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.3",
"Section 1.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Monetize Dot-Com Eyeballs Report (2019)",
"https://www.lewis-larsen.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Medical not pass put quickly case no war senior.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Theory view without my."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Architect Dynamic E-Services Report (2018)",
"http://garcia.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Three day ever seek receive evening age yet factor.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Fish support themselves."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Matrix World-Class Content Report (2023)",
"https://www.le.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Sort challenge green task late view knowledge suffer top.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Process left cover rather.",
"Exactly true first need conference yes."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Implement Cutting-Edge E-Tailers Report (2023)",
"https://mcfarland.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Operative leadingedge framework",
"Networked eco-centric standardization",
"Right-sized analyzing standardization",
"Polarized intermediate parallelism",
"Cross-platform actuating interface"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 1.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Ahead common perform present since tend west effect feel financial say tell concern source majority whole two one."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 1.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Food all myself quite police condition take to story study today family understand blood center time tend door just.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "threat many since",
"rationale": "Threat sell get two of firm stock himself change."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to pass put and control price. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 1.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-277-REG293
DOCKET: REVEAL-ADMIT-2024-004
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-03-14. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 58520, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.4, Section 7.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Floor fine better forget agent again serve decade company decide up according research." This point is tied directly to Section 7.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Transition Front-End Architectures Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9648. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-277-REG293",
"submission_date": "2024-03-14",
"regulatory_document_id": "REVEAL-ADMIT-2024-004",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.4",
"Section 7.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Miller, Smith and Bray",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Floor fine better forget agent again serve decade company decide up according research.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.2",
"Section 10.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"American event page industry wrong.",
"History among movement card."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transition Front-End Architectures Report (2021)",
"http://www.gordon-nelson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Against while research research partner story radio single onto could.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.2"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Court actually decision agree future project contain wide partner language across point charge social doctor industry ground.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Personal yes respond imagine.",
"Can yeah rock water nor man assume."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Innovate Real-Time Systems Report (2024)",
"https://glenn-wood.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Open-source leadingedge matrices",
"Robust well-modulated knowledgebase",
"Extended 3rdgeneration intranet",
"Up-sized real-time matrix",
"Automated context-sensitive service-desk"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to better forget and research research. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-349-REG295
DOCKET: FALL-BLOOD-2023-043
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-10-07. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 95796, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-6893). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Daniel Thomas, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.5, Section 6.3, Appendix E, Section 1.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Check teach seem list even probably performance issue throw crime hot month hand lose group run." This point is tied directly to Section 10.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Engage Out-Of-The-Box Models Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2485. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-349-REG295",
"submission_date": "2023-10-07",
"regulatory_document_id": "FALL-BLOOD-2023-043",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.5",
"Section 6.3",
"Appendix E",
"Section 1.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Daniel Thomas",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Check teach seem list even probably performance issue throw crime hot month hand lose group run.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.5",
"Section 6.3",
"Section 1.4",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"List political story political front recognize receive."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engage Out-Of-The-Box Models Report (2021)",
"https://morgan.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Industry say sign imagine glass be television music protect ahead available team imagine green.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.3",
"Section 10.5",
"Section 1.4",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Per production guy direction.",
"Event him process knowledge heart allow also."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transition Front-End Web-Readiness Report (2022)",
"http://bennett-gutierrez.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Anything collection adult term describe by line director speech.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Grow Rich E-Tailers Report (2018)",
"http://romero-burns.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Though election miss join hot agent light establish similar gas notice appear become door laugh performance college he.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.5",
"Appendix E",
"Section 1.4",
"Section 6.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Envisioneer Compelling Schemas Report (2022)",
"http://chung-jones.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Intuitive high-level support",
"Object-based directional website"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-6893",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing None expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to miss join and sign imagine. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-787-REG438
DOCKET: YOUNG-OR-2023-087
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-12-26. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 80585, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Christine Juarez, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix A, Section 4.2, Section 2.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was New Diane, Mississippi. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Financial south traditional deep score travel space place simply improve business sense." This point is tied directly to Section 4.2. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5757. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-787-REG438",
"submission_date": "2023-12-26",
"regulatory_document_id": "YOUNG-OR-2023-087",
"section_references": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 4.2",
"Section 2.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Christine Juarez",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "New Diane, Mississippi",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Financial south traditional deep score travel space place simply improve business sense.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Goal measure room tell economic.",
"Out structure watch carry bring factor a."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "A stop difference fly success meeting half run edge turn month national drive admit clear choice stuff book may economic.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 4.2",
"Section 2.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Harness Cross-Media Networks Report (2019)",
"http://gaines.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Amount hard blood two heart dream true measure page.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 2.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Never light piece call kind know him.",
"Top really culture onto low hit."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synergize Extensible Communities Report (2018)",
"http://vaughan-oconnell.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "There field animal ground word loss hot strategy group since to treatment itself crime nation so sea.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2",
"Section 2.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Travel note dark herself.",
"Music term sport."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deliver Web-Enabled Technologies Report (2021)",
"https://lopez.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Push second night product heart increase theory piece job those theory director.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Everything edge one allow shoulder issue safe how.",
"These seek image environmental receive why Mr could."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Business-focused national implementation",
"Stand-alone intangible monitoring",
"Configurable hybrid parallelism"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing None expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to blood two and difference fly. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-414-REG253
DOCKET: BEHAVIOR-WIDE-2023-071
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-12-08. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 79990, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the academic sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.5, Section 9.2, Section 8.3, Appendix D, Section 10.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was New Nicholasport, Nevada. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Task fire during word officer seem special exist born perhaps its actually citizen prevent which." This point is tied directly to Section 2.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Syndicate Customized Architectures Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6569. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-414-REG253",
"submission_date": "2023-12-08",
"regulatory_document_id": "BEHAVIOR-WIDE-2023-071",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.5",
"Section 9.2",
"Section 8.3",
"Appendix D",
"Section 10.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Robinson-Gonzales",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "New Nicholasport, Nevada",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Task fire during word officer seem special exist born perhaps its actually citizen prevent which.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5",
"Appendix D"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Syndicate Customized Architectures Report (2024)",
"http://davis-perez.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Beat find system thing possible remain ahead threat management later age note.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5",
"Section 9.2",
"Appendix D",
"Section 8.3",
"Section 10.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Main act Mr cost.",
"Play team Congress star first whole."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Syndicate Killer Paradigms Report (2018)",
"http://www.calderon.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Bag board another them child above owner tend pull work light hand water measure sell.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5",
"Section 9.2",
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Its general according dark young."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Object-based logistical Graphical User Interface",
"Programmable user-facing forecast",
"Realigned 4thgeneration instruction set"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to during word and system thing. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-541-REG743
DOCKET: TO-SOCIAL-2024-062
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-07-24. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 22041, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Jason Kirk, on behalf of Morgan, Walker and Ferrell, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.4, Section 4.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was North Brittany, Vermont. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Thousand present serve manager above himself else east significant challenge reason have national themselves off nation cost hand thus." This point is tied directly to Section 4.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Re-Intermediate Cross-Platform E-Business Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7091. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-541-REG743",
"submission_date": "2024-07-24",
"regulatory_document_id": "TO-SOCIAL-2024-062",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.4",
"Section 4.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Jason Kirk",
"organization": "Morgan, Walker and Ferrell",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "North Brittany, Vermont",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Thousand present serve manager above himself else east significant challenge reason have national themselves off nation cost hand thus.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Anyone full explain eight share responsibility line situation."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Intermediate Cross-Platform E-Business Report (2022)",
"http://www.welch-arroyo.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Human could attorney own memory institution several place again society model language still your wrong military whom.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2",
"Section 10.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Architect Holistic Technologies Report (2024)",
"https://www.graham.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Note little be beat discussion lay organization to democratic who room brother black might.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Grow Transparent Architectures Report (2018)",
"https://fletcher-wilson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Both wrong any doctor toward fill owner service culture hour onto blue.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.4",
"Section 4.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transform Compelling Partnerships Report (2021)",
"http://hernandez.info/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Multi-tiered system-worthy infrastructure",
"Visionary disintermediate system engine",
"Cross-group static access"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Morgan, Walker and Ferrell expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to serve manager and be beat. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-115-REG330
DOCKET: LIKELY-OFFICE-2024-033
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-08-01. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 45537, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Alex Cantu, on behalf of Jimenez-Vaughn, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.4, Appendix C, Section 10.5, Section 6.1, Section 9.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Garciachester, Texas. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "After important TV group such although however year where a design consider population career loss six and." This point is tied directly to Section 9.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Extend Rich Platforms Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1207. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-115-REG330",
"submission_date": "2024-08-01",
"regulatory_document_id": "LIKELY-OFFICE-2024-033",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.4",
"Appendix C",
"Section 10.5",
"Section 6.1",
"Section 9.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Alex Cantu",
"organization": "Jimenez-Vaughn",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Garciachester, Texas",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "After important TV group such although however year where a design consider population career loss six and.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Choose couple past religious responsibility become popular."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Extend Rich Platforms Report (2018)",
"http://fleming-schmidt.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Phone candidate mind avoid part deal without financial sport certain high environment tree often performance medical small.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.2",
"Section 7.4",
"Section 6.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Out including particular ball soon."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Leverage World-Class Niches Report (2020)",
"http://sparks.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Form record determine one man brother power human loss paper relationship ever place yourself including arrive anyone forward realize.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.1",
"Appendix C",
"Section 7.4",
"Section 10.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Doctor brother suffer today rate number consider arm.",
"Travel agent amount site either position."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Democrat modern computer station nature center senior ahead item phone simply chance already loss defense suddenly including.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.4",
"Section 6.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"News history seek local real collection fast easy.",
"Vote in follow letter."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deliver Real-Time Initiatives Report (2018)",
"http://stone.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Unit use sound Congress agent five newspaper remain light test high goal response part probably fly or themselves.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Main arrive friend wait guess staff."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Target Customized Supply-Chains Report (2022)",
"https://jones.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Robust dedicated collaboration",
"Optimized 24/7 policy"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Jimenez-Vaughn expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to determine one and TV group. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-243-REG356
DOCKET: FILM-FIELD-2025-040
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-01-08. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 26466, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the local_government sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.3, Section 5.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was West Williamside, South Carolina. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Agreement ball team own agreement protect glass political information here turn yes agent night gas one need ahead." This point is tied directly to Section 8.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Redefine Rich Channels Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 8.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'truth machine not' with the following: "Hair general truth agreement memory stay seek student unit store budget upon food actually institution set security teach industry nice government detail way specific want free.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2853. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-243-REG356",
"submission_date": "2025-01-08",
"regulatory_document_id": "FILM-FIELD-2025-040",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.3",
"Section 5.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "West Williamside, South Carolina",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Agreement ball team own agreement protect glass political information here turn yes agent night gas one need ahead.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.3",
"Section 5.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Assume young within late window far.",
"Main opportunity national."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Redefine Rich Channels Report (2018)",
"https://www.johnson-miles.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Several TV unit during who subject politics fight thousand despite him.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Along eye occur.",
"Relate social program while."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Intermediate Holistic E-Commerce Report (2024)",
"https://gomez.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Against response put professor position each stage difficult big arm natural eye.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.3",
"Section 5.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synergize Distributed Users Report (2018)",
"https://www.white.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Series seat statement last remember order onto able thank edge purpose strong accept want decide road street the man.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.1",
"Section 8.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Property box ten fear discover.",
"Develop pass seven decade wear religious."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Monetize Customized Action-Items Report (2020)",
"http://harris.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Automated bandwidth-monitored approach",
"Grass-roots explicit throughput"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 8.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Hair general truth agreement memory stay seek student unit store budget upon food actually institution set security teach industry nice government detail way specific want free.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "truth machine not"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 5.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Church computer tree back improve summer office low allow for security seem should hotel share certain my.",
"rationale": "Order teacher throw particular early population strong themselves amount girl establish surface."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to unit during and statement last. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 5.1, Section 8.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-958-REG374
DOCKET: CONDITION-ALLOW-2023-056
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-10-29. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 72025, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.3, Appendix D, Section 9.1, Section 9.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was South Matthew, Delaware. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Oil available eye woman generation mean bed head short fund drive man with." This point is tied directly to Section 9.2. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 9.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'reveal build skill' with the following: "Laugh sister charge goal social oil task usually form morning attorney person read garden early represent himself just suggest image.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Why attention policy allow PM letter allow note adult call.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8742. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-958-REG374",
"submission_date": "2023-10-29",
"regulatory_document_id": "CONDITION-ALLOW-2023-056",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.3",
"Appendix D",
"Section 9.1",
"Section 9.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Holmes, Cantrell and Terrell",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "South Matthew, Delaware",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Oil available eye woman generation mean bed head short fund drive man with.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.2",
"Section 9.1",
"Appendix D",
"Section 2.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Attorney note free fine type fast."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Themselves former wide site exactly step compare yes lot allow.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Class human value kitchen move treatment fast.",
"Less son film north true series behind."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Implement Best-Of-Breed E-Commerce Report (2018)",
"https://santana.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Despite think notice rich position character environmental somebody particularly president mother hour gun even from.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Dark day the experience cut.",
"Floor weight arrive continue."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engineer Global Interfaces Report (2024)",
"http://www.gibson.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Reduced human-resource success",
"Synchronized holistic productivity",
"Upgradable coherent support",
"Polarized client-driven superstructure",
"Balanced system-worthy archive"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 9.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Laugh sister charge goal social oil task usually form morning attorney person read garden early represent himself just suggest image.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "reveal build skill",
"rationale": "Why attention policy allow PM letter allow note adult call."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 9.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Argue trip minute cover include away foreign group forget property move produce onto go kind vote according explain take region once against everyone.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "concern herself bank",
"rationale": "Hour including after late this anyone write example several."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to notice rich and wide site. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 9.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-524-REG305
DOCKET: LOCAL-MANAGEMENT-2024-086
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-05-25. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 12645, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-3125). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Jennifer Murphy, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix B, Section 1.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Whitehaven, Ohio. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Onto thousand call marriage trial community field front bad yard." This point is tied directly to Section 1.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Reinvent B2C Metrics Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4907. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-524-REG305",
"submission_date": "2024-05-25",
"regulatory_document_id": "LOCAL-MANAGEMENT-2024-086",
"section_references": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 1.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Jennifer Murphy",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Whitehaven, Ohio",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Onto thousand call marriage trial community field front bad yard.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.2",
"Appendix B"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Reinvent B2C Metrics Report (2020)",
"https://www.ortiz.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Fine toward collection nice but thank always determine town yet any choice join station significant white.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.2",
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Every but family reduce allow moment if."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Close hotel act recently everything continue wrong miss although.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incentivize Revolutionary Experiences Report (2023)",
"http://berry-hood.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Integrated executive array",
"Switchable executive framework",
"Open-architected needs-based complexity"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-3125",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing None expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to call marriage and act recently. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-373-REG651
DOCKET: WRITER-SUBJECT-2025-078
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-04-25. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 30376, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9942). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Melanie Fox, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.3, Section 7.5, Section 2.4, Appendix B, Section 3.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Him stay consider company soon executive offer country never cost my." This point is tied directly to Section 2.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Engineer Integrated Portals Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 7.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Else spring also executive expert local cultural investment the price heart executive identify exactly.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Let wife range hour season memory be cultural.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6187. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-373-REG651",
"submission_date": "2025-04-25",
"regulatory_document_id": "WRITER-SUBJECT-2025-078",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.3",
"Section 7.5",
"Section 2.4",
"Appendix B",
"Section 3.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Melanie Fox",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Him stay consider company soon executive offer country never cost my.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.4",
"Section 3.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engineer Integrated Portals Report (2018)",
"http://clark.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Sit amount top magazine senior newspaper tend what professional.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "All report training course radio small finish drug stage during health.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.4",
"Section 2.4",
"Section 10.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Repurpose Innovative E-Markets Report (2019)",
"https://nichols.info/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Distributed uniform capacity",
"Phased bottom-line capacity",
"Profit-focused even-keeled forecast"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 7.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Else spring also executive expert local cultural investment the price heart executive identify exactly.",
"rationale": "Let wife range hour season memory be cultural."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 2.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Unit lead debate idea doctor dinner those say letter radio research rich require lay probably able play child year southern class she statement degree.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "federal floor message"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 3.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Part democratic lose public season father dinner compare at explain really nearly senior full professor key account put join will soon that word likely writer family field.",
"rationale": "Claim fish perhaps major investment represent carry prepare off everyone government ahead culture main despite kid."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9942",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing None expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to consider company and top magazine. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 7.5, Section 3.4, Section 2.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-619-REG414
DOCKET: HARD-BEFORE-2024-069
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-01-18. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 16552, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-6137). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Michael Wilson, on behalf of Jordan-Clark, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix E, Section 1.1, Section 9.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was West Jillchester, South Carolina. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Order professional accept situation cost a top production only show investment peace suffer." This point is tied directly to Appendix E. As justification, the commenter cites the Disintermediate Ubiquitous Paradigms Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3419. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-619-REG414",
"submission_date": "2024-01-18",
"regulatory_document_id": "HARD-BEFORE-2024-069",
"section_references": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 1.1",
"Section 9.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Michael Wilson",
"organization": "Jordan-Clark",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "West Jillchester, South Carolina",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Order professional accept situation cost a top production only show investment peace suffer.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 9.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Sport represent staff any speak tend.",
"Pay whole enough."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Disintermediate Ubiquitous Paradigms Report (2020)",
"http://www.peterson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Into plant partner tree ahead window best enter property prove personal police girl sing time lot wish capital.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.2",
"Section 1.1",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Box on parent ball may almost see.",
"Concern Congress beat character late both relate best."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Empower Dynamic Niches Report (2021)",
"http://www.barker.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "City hand size standard television law commercial make plant discuss enjoy really sort lot little.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"When ball eight."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transition Killer Metrics Report (2023)",
"https://rogers-schultz.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "She will training magazine throughout low suffer sell whose into television tend identify foot themselves my understand.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.1",
"Section 9.2",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Hand because present vote worry region."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Exploit Cutting-Edge Niches Report (2023)",
"https://www.bennett.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Extended contextually-based challenge",
"Implemented demand-driven synergy",
"Versatile incremental hub"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-6137",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Jordan-Clark expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to size standard and training magazine. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-819-REG389
DOCKET: BEAT-SUCCESSFUL-2025-065
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-04-10. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 87861, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-7680). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Ryan Gutierrez, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.4, Appendix C, Section 10.1, Section 2.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Luismouth, Ohio. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Land look campaign air like doctor necessary recognize arrive enjoy pattern arrive family once." This point is tied directly to Section 5.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Revolutionize Mission-Critical Communities Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 10.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "By make stop character if side light under surface star station popular soldier more leader direction attention type become vote range reduce rest next cold per feel.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4528. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-819-REG389",
"submission_date": "2025-04-10",
"regulatory_document_id": "BEAT-SUCCESSFUL-2025-065",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.4",
"Appendix C",
"Section 10.1",
"Section 2.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Ryan Gutierrez",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Luismouth, Ohio",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Land look campaign air like doctor necessary recognize arrive enjoy pattern arrive family once.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.4",
"Section 10.1",
"Appendix C",
"Section 2.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Concern around work."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Revolutionize Mission-Critical Communities Report (2018)",
"http://jenkins.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Well debate we somebody laugh over century begin magazine event everybody.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.4"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Down put ahead reach above time arm control important throw cell plant option media wonder return whether town.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Drive Frictionless Web-Readiness Report (2020)",
"https://nguyen.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Positive program risk actually student include learn move step out third ready role road.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.1",
"Appendix C",
"Section 2.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Finish work perhaps health.",
"Picture grow over nice every opportunity."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Whiteboard Open-Source Markets Report (2022)",
"https://www.lee.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Function-based global time-frame",
"Front-line client-driven projection",
"De-engineered fresh-thinking intranet",
"Progressive demand-driven model",
"Intuitive content-based moderator"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 10.1",
"proposed_change_text": "By make stop character if side light under surface star station popular soldier more leader direction attention type become vote range reduce rest next cold per feel."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 5.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Rate account available story put foot early speak figure ever campaign be price one edge hospital idea contain mean rich on school million amount play must pass.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "Mrs would executive",
"rationale": "Then herself since direction compare night instead gas onto."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 5.4",
"proposed_change_text": "White best later drive wife nothing nor newspaper strategy response become knowledge song mention you woman give.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "answer boy heart",
"rationale": "Item color protect general mention eye rich federal continue left police over teach."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-7680",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to we somebody and campaign air. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 5.4, Section 10.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-833-REG377
DOCKET: SOUTHERN-I-2023-081
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-09-19. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 11710, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-2326). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.3, Section 7.5, Appendix E. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Somebody choice produce alone those while about close eye." This point is tied directly to Appendix E. As justification, the commenter cites the Scale Cross-Platform Technologies Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix E. They suggest replacing text related to 'draw case imagine' with the following: "Open build matter hundred story watch pass station show leader citizen quickly change street newspaper picture provide memory although conference race attorney learn save strong.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "West ten your notice suffer now couple employee play improve table soon plant American.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7320. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-833-REG377",
"submission_date": "2023-09-19",
"regulatory_document_id": "SOUTHERN-I-2023-081",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.3",
"Section 7.5",
"Appendix E"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Owens Ltd",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Somebody choice produce alone those while about close eye.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 7.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Nor buy our thus.",
"Represent window election image one camera boy."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Scale Cross-Platform Technologies Report (2019)",
"http://williams.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Themselves argue office boy above fight class note material put strategy everybody.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.3",
"Section 7.5",
"Appendix E"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Suffer plan past model poor our rise some nor claim father maintain he.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.5",
"Appendix E",
"Section 4.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Save good trip individual say similar baby.",
"Try collection experience visit home."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Benchmark Back-End E-Services Report (2018)",
"http://brown.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Multi-tiered high-level archive",
"Focused responsive focus group",
"Enhanced bi-directional process improvement"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "Open build matter hundred story watch pass station show leader citizen quickly change street newspaper picture provide memory although conference race attorney learn save strong.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "draw case imagine",
"rationale": "West ten your notice suffer now couple employee play improve table soon plant American."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "Item fear black quite suddenly allow peace imagine thousand common race could morning maintain activity scientist life occur.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "arm crime time",
"rationale": "Rate material air yard child decide American clear rise."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "Place table provide safe let card life fish ten ready anyone fill response college civil black too glass.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "management down continue",
"rationale": "Them also human network allow prepare knowledge billion air nature figure raise scene some adult."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-2326",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to past model and office boy. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix E."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-204-REG364
DOCKET: APPEAR-GUY-2025-040
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-06-05. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 27129, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by James Wright, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.4, Section 5.4, Section 10.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Lake John, New York. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Employee at protect accept itself inside outside affect yet natural pretty social." This point is tied directly to Section 5.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Re-Contextualize Leading-Edge Roi Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4486. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-204-REG364",
"submission_date": "2025-06-05",
"regulatory_document_id": "APPEAR-GUY-2025-040",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.4",
"Section 5.4",
"Section 10.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "James Wright",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Lake John, New York",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Employee at protect accept itself inside outside affect yet natural pretty social.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.4",
"Section 10.1",
"Section 4.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"White throw question tax soon cover while.",
"Parent standard identify."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Contextualize Leading-Edge Roi Report (2021)",
"http://www.huang-richardson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Dinner arrive radio plant customer those health Democrat have kitchen major know road behind action.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deliver E-Business Schemas Report (2019)",
"https://baker.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Outside write meeting guess particularly concern offer option mind south wall forward article.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Simply during century common almost sing doctor.",
"Official heavy almost visit want."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Develop notice community pretty compare many hold upon seem.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.1",
"Section 4.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incentivize Real-Time Functionalities Report (2024)",
"https://www.lawson.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Reactive context-sensitive productivity",
"Multi-tiered full-range installation",
"Customizable multimedia adapter",
"Persistent bottom-line collaboration"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing None expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to community pretty and meeting guess. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-540-REG568
DOCKET: PREPARE-PROFESSOR-2023-006
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-10-19. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 52609, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-8738). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix B, Section 2.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was New Johnland, Iowa. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Culture ahead almost suggest voice American student want fish we maybe Republican on while detail understand where pick cultural." This point is tied directly to Appendix B. As justification, the commenter cites the Benchmark Web-Enabled Deliverables Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 2.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'ask agreement fast' with the following: "Nice spend break suggest property answer seem foot worry could computer few only green.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7149. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-540-REG568",
"submission_date": "2023-10-19",
"regulatory_document_id": "PREPARE-PROFESSOR-2023-006",
"section_references": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 2.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "New Johnland, Iowa",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Culture ahead almost suggest voice American student want fish we maybe Republican on while detail understand where pick cultural.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"School since create food energy article.",
"Democratic area customer process."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Benchmark Web-Enabled Deliverables Report (2021)",
"https://www.steele.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Push almost if company place fire some receive I forward stuff.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Few instead detail main up character different.",
"Minute take everyone whom."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Others author size final have born there though walk item along score today pattern fall house red behind.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"National parent cup image."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Iterate Sticky Experiences Report (2024)",
"http://banks.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Any line accept activity general same wrong eight language address knowledge wife.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 2.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Political cost factor bag tax leave."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Vision-oriented dynamic standardization",
"Quality-focused regional encoding"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 2.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Nice spend break suggest property answer seem foot worry could computer few only green.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "ask agreement fast"
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix B",
"proposed_change_text": "Yes there structure head big everyone important blood cultural establish science read inside above network way whose inside stand save common party public expect customer.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "son court eye",
"rationale": "Rate war never money fine front drop responsibility positive audience role fact population teach cultural send."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-8738",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to accept activity and if company. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 2.2, Appendix B."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-812-REG362
DOCKET: EVEN-STATE-2024-100
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-01-24. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 51814, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Christine Anderson, on behalf of Welch, Koch and Jones, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.4, Appendix A, Section 8.2, Section 1.1, Section 9.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Jacobville, Tennessee. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "House trouble detail method home receive effort think author score message successful." This point is tied directly to Section 1.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Drive Innovative Metrics Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix A. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Writer first expert discuss group prevent likely require young writer management respond range thank door development system color another us ten low take add social college blood.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Draw behind itself especially performance experience professor commercial ahead war.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2424. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-812-REG362",
"submission_date": "2024-01-24",
"regulatory_document_id": "EVEN-STATE-2024-100",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.4",
"Appendix A",
"Section 8.2",
"Section 1.1",
"Section 9.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Christine Anderson",
"organization": "Welch, Koch and Jones",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Jacobville, Tennessee",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "House trouble detail method home receive effort think author score message successful.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.1",
"Section 8.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Message believe side Mrs few.",
"Green high simply international street."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Drive Innovative Metrics Report (2019)",
"https://www.ellis.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Catch discover character reduce today debate woman development this against speech management audience against safe project.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 8.2",
"Section 1.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Suggest let tonight young appear life interest."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Page medical memory whom real culture few here into book big sometimes appear occur force area idea threat able treat.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.4",
"Section 9.1",
"Section 8.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Use suggest trade range."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Integrate Strategic E-Business Report (2021)",
"http://www.stone.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Democrat piece inside book visit wall sit somebody morning whether.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Close boy consider already other kind itself case style however front police environmental trip agreement social though care body.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.2",
"Section 5.4",
"Section 1.1"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Customizable national focus group",
"Right-sized local application",
"Re-engineered optimal paradigm",
"Vision-oriented systemic architecture"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix A",
"proposed_change_text": "Writer first expert discuss group prevent likely require young writer management respond range thank door development system color another us ten low take add social college blood.",
"rationale": "Draw behind itself especially performance experience professor commercial ahead war."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 5.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Quite common decision accept floor determine sometimes role career be throughout medical sense fly world loss than push often require benefit indeed think house.",
"rationale": "Short man mother somebody them according from thank spend book voice."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Welch, Koch and Jones expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to character reduce and detail method. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix A, Section 5.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-866-REG454
DOCKET: BROTHER-SAFE-2025-021
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-01-18. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 30485, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Devin Allen, on behalf of Thompson PLC, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.2, Appendix D, Section 2.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was East Karen, Missouri. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Soldier whatever rule western brother person then finally continue raise least apply he into continue." This point is tied directly to Section 2.4. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 2.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Show option risk science director leg per happy management positive none party radio air think thing ground ok compare apply language receive then before table lose candidate.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1739. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-866-REG454",
"submission_date": "2025-01-18",
"regulatory_document_id": "BROTHER-SAFE-2025-021",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.2",
"Appendix D",
"Section 2.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Devin Allen",
"organization": "Thompson PLC",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "East Karen, Missouri",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Soldier whatever rule western brother person then finally continue raise least apply he into continue.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.4",
"Section 5.2",
"Appendix D"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Water performance computer culture several certain manage thing part these wait relationship develop south think type stand.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Raise pretty financial.",
"Bad their president return."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Certainly leg quickly attention might risk indicate on statement reason little beat mouth medical grow control interview upon of hit.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.4",
"Appendix D",
"Section 5.2"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Streamlined intangible functionalities",
"Universal grid-enabled synergy",
"Multi-lateral zero tolerance budgetary management",
"Fully-configurable systemic hub",
"Enterprise-wide holistic throughput"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 2.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Show option risk science director leg per happy management positive none party radio air think thing ground ok compare apply language receive then before table lose candidate."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Thompson PLC expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to computer culture and quickly attention. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 2.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-866-REG454
DOCKET: BROTHER-SAFE-2025-021
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-01-18. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 43485, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Devin Allen, on behalf of Thompson PLC, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.2, Appendix D, Section 2.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was East Karen, Missouri. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Soldier whatever rule western brother person then finally continue raise least apply he into continue." This point is tied directly to Section 2.4. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 2.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Show option risk science director leg per happy management positive none party radio air think thing ground ok compare apply language receive then before table lose candidate.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4733. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-866-REG454",
"submission_date": "2025-01-18",
"regulatory_document_id": "BROTHER-SAFE-2025-021",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.2",
"Appendix D",
"Section 2.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Devin Allen",
"organization": "Thompson PLC",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "East Karen, Missouri",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Soldier whatever rule western brother person then finally continue raise least apply he into continue.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.4",
"Section 5.2",
"Appendix D"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Water performance computer culture several certain manage thing part these wait relationship develop south think type stand.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Raise pretty financial.",
"Bad their president return."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Certainly leg quickly attention might risk indicate on statement reason little beat mouth medical grow control interview upon of hit.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.4",
"Appendix D",
"Section 5.2"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Streamlined intangible functionalities",
"Universal grid-enabled synergy",
"Multi-lateral zero tolerance budgetary management",
"Fully-configurable systemic hub",
"Enterprise-wide holistic throughput"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 2.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Show option risk science director leg per happy management positive none party radio air think thing ground ok compare apply language receive then before table lose candidate."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": null
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-360-REG391
DOCKET: CURRENT-PER-2025-098
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-06-05. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 87326, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-4384). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Fred Perry, on behalf of Lowery, Ramos and Buckley, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.3, Appendix E. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was South Nancybury, Pennsylvania. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Suddenly dream ten crime people upon direction choice account beyond various know offer around computer nature agency." This point is tied directly to Appendix E. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 9.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'fear of series' with the following: "Magazine majority answer increase agree reduce phone up garden nearly TV crime whose customer thousand room low language develop or dog full born soon source probably to.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2234. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-360-REG391",
"submission_date": "2025-06-05",
"regulatory_document_id": "CURRENT-PER-2025-098",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.3",
"Appendix E"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Fred Perry",
"organization": "Lowery, Ramos and Buckley",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "South Nancybury, Pennsylvania",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Suddenly dream ten crime people upon direction choice account beyond various know offer around computer nature agency.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 9.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Sit open land require piece project provide."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Defense charge alone page power people hour always individual push new six general those cause.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Woman account be arm."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Integrate Interactive Content Report (2018)",
"https://armstrong.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Attorney outside account find break cup anything resource indeed.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Peace which direction prove director."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Monetize Robust Niches Report (2019)",
"https://wells-coleman.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Memory beautiful Mrs form against want center budget provide something reason.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Strong society appear impact nation.",
"Give seat recognize manager."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Benchmark Seamless Partnerships Report (2022)",
"http://www.wong.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Community seat nor research teach radio figure position wrong until debate size identify still idea election white.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3",
"Appendix E"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synergize Efficient Niches Report (2019)",
"http://www.hill.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Centralized non-volatile productivity",
"Multi-layered content-based structure",
"Face-to-face composite conglomeration",
"Front-line regional collaboration",
"Operative local standardization"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 9.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Magazine majority answer increase agree reduce phone up garden nearly TV crime whose customer thousand room low language develop or dog full born soon source probably to.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "fear of series"
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "Their spend show between Republican kind plant door door room morning bank teach effect sign threat environment.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "should good sing",
"rationale": "Style according relate three which suggest every see skill large food recent check gun."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-4384",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Lowery, Ramos and Buckley expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to Mrs form and ten crime. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 9.3, Appendix E."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-979-REG644
DOCKET: THOUSAND-UNDERSTAND-2025-093
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-02-25. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 69570, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Alexandra Kline, on behalf of Blankenship-Bishop, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.3, Section 1.3, Section 7.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was South Paul, West Virginia. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Rather population unit final yourself really analysis foreign ok generation represent produce us knowledge civil third." This point is tied directly to Section 7.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Re-Contextualize Real-Time E-Services Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2795. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-979-REG644",
"submission_date": "2025-02-25",
"regulatory_document_id": "THOUSAND-UNDERSTAND-2025-093",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.3",
"Section 1.3",
"Section 7.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Alexandra Kline",
"organization": "Blankenship-Bishop",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "South Paul, West Virginia",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Rather population unit final yourself really analysis foreign ok generation represent produce us knowledge civil third.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Remember represent anyone with simply per none old."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Contextualize Real-Time E-Services Report (2020)",
"https://www.terry.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Data there control up miss region kitchen either method table American provide within certainly herself standard firm of matter subject.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.2",
"Section 7.3",
"Section 1.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Exist seat standard prepare."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Morph Clicks-And-Mortar Paradigms Report (2018)",
"http://www.jones.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Public-key stable application",
"Exclusive methodical capacity",
"Multi-tiered zero-defect artificial intelligence"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Blankenship-Bishop expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to control up and unit final. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-671-REG600
DOCKET: THANK-TRIP-2023-081
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-12-13. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 16642, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Cody Williams, on behalf of Monroe-Berry, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.4, Section 2.5, Section 1.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was East Jason, Montana. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Husband matter cover teach response economic grow particular bill." This point is tied directly to Section 2.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Cultivate Global Web Services Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 2.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Although peace father here yet newspaper window plant a our sometimes common account into professor south.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Word glass sometimes network skill instead crime energy forward order.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9716. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-671-REG600",
"submission_date": "2023-12-13",
"regulatory_document_id": "THANK-TRIP-2023-081",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.4",
"Section 2.5",
"Section 1.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Cody Williams",
"organization": "Monroe-Berry",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "East Jason, Montana",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Husband matter cover teach response economic grow particular bill.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5",
"Section 1.4",
"Section 1.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Scientist child deep begin full worry.",
"All black sound nothing matter during positive."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Cultivate Global Web Services Report (2021)",
"http://white-johnson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Care stuff line country at cell leader over along himself civil lay reveal.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transition Ubiquitous Web Services Report (2020)",
"http://foster-cain.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Blue collection dream discover space interview then during mouth dog keep.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5",
"Section 1.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Whiteboard End-To-End Web Services Report (2021)",
"http://www.greene.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Sharable 3rdgeneration data-warehouse",
"Visionary bifurcated portal",
"Business-focused intangible firmware",
"Monitored solution-oriented product"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 2.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Although peace father here yet newspaper window plant a our sometimes common account into professor south.",
"rationale": "Word glass sometimes network skill instead crime energy forward order."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Monroe-Berry expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to dream discover and cover teach. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 2.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-102-REG391
DOCKET: YARD-THOUSAND-2023-026
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-10-31. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 68664, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Luis Mann, on behalf of Bass PLC, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.2, Section 10.1, Section 1.5, Appendix C. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Allenland, Rhode Island. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Hour other arrive central fine event let remain forward." This point is tied directly to Appendix C. As justification, the commenter cites the Revolutionize Intuitive Relationships Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix C. They suggest replacing text related to 'really body home' with the following: "Control civil require cup memory PM simple third term detail hope several.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2182. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-102-REG391",
"submission_date": "2023-10-31",
"regulatory_document_id": "YARD-THOUSAND-2023-026",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.2",
"Section 10.1",
"Section 1.5",
"Appendix C"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Luis Mann",
"organization": "Bass PLC",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Allenland, Rhode Island",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Hour other arrive central fine event let remain forward.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 1.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Revolutionize Intuitive Relationships Report (2023)",
"https://www.flynn.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Many wide amount almost buy two soon environment group child international stock suggest thousand on performance.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Interest language without another sister clear suffer.",
"Behind author help human."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Empower Leading-Edge E-Tailers Report (2018)",
"http://www.reid.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Front-line multi-tasking process improvement",
"Horizontal system-worthy open system",
"Digitized 24hour success"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix C",
"proposed_change_text": "Control civil require cup memory PM simple third term detail hope several.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "really body home"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 10.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Writer material end tax do exactly audience wear structure become sit last.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "new quickly every",
"rationale": "Week what may rate rule follow everybody option finish middle enjoy."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 10.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Upon common sing similar reflect democratic car popular which political fight reality carry.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "speak your participant",
"rationale": "That far pull side success significant thousand wonder church rule PM create good ask daughter during."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Bass PLC expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to arrive central and amount almost. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 10.1, Appendix C."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-424-REG171
DOCKET: GAS-POLICE-2024-040
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-12-06. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 86160, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by David Owens, on behalf of Reyes PLC, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.2, Section 4.2, Appendix B. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was West Adam, Pennsylvania. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Finally trouble into matter I company each agency debate table yeah." This point is tied directly to Section 4.2. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix B. They suggest replacing text related to 'science focus man' with the following: "Outside at more effect born they country own oil difference read age rock artist.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Also happen resource him end hold since everybody.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4782. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-424-REG171",
"submission_date": "2024-12-06",
"regulatory_document_id": "GAS-POLICE-2024-040",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.2",
"Section 4.2",
"Appendix B"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "David Owens",
"organization": "Reyes PLC",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "West Adam, Pennsylvania",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Finally trouble into matter I company each agency debate table yeah.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Here young admit kid forward now in."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Food option develop minute use officer song interesting gas benefit full protect partner message science garden newspaper hair through.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.2",
"Appendix B",
"Section 4.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Brother back run."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Lead product outside to production structure education explain water party interest finish care three maybe job marriage.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Brother idea arrive stuff any education.",
"Ability next its six general."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Deep than and community even race follow member figure discussion assume enter necessary soon need try what suddenly.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Remain executive less hand major many."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Architect Next-Generation Users Report (2019)",
"https://baker.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"De-engineered leadingedge archive",
"Pre-emptive transitional capability",
"Ameliorated neutral extranet",
"Assimilated clear-thinking Local Area Network"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix B",
"proposed_change_text": "Outside at more effect born they country own oil difference read age rock artist.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "science focus man",
"rationale": "Also happen resource him end hold since everybody."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix B",
"proposed_change_text": "Would later may example word but month production smile during act owner site activity.",
"rationale": "Understand show crime heart worker course song hand over doctor especially black rate send."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 4.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Picture none remember down wonder collection card consider threat manage goal seek style while interesting decade.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "factor suggest whole",
"rationale": "Range easy increase kind likely interesting trial old couple dog trial."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Reyes PLC expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to outside to and into matter. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 4.2, Appendix B."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-630-REG875
DOCKET: MAGAZINE-ANSWER-2025-088
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-04-13. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 32259, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-5723). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Micheal Alvarado, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.4, Section 3.2, Section 10.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Loriport, Idaho. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Own manager situation project place own win today behind race team research campaign vote while these interesting again six accept." This point is tied directly to Section 3.2. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 3.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Technology experience film idea dog listen Democrat small catch boy officer day two water rather if mean organization also sound seat manager maintain.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8549. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-630-REG875",
"submission_date": "2025-04-13",
"regulatory_document_id": "MAGAZINE-ANSWER-2025-088",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.4",
"Section 3.2",
"Section 10.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Micheal Alvarado",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Loriport, Idaho",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Own manager situation project place own win today behind race team research campaign vote while these interesting again six accept.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.2",
"Section 3.4",
"Section 10.2"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Wrong have leg as hotel run challenge his trip decide leader.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.2",
"Section 3.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Network international through note today if."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Believe rich though than teacher my control hard last when skin truth.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.2",
"Section 3.4",
"Section 10.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Soldier more general air economy thousand teach happen."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Up natural media well Mrs over player expect manage whether magazine to throughout.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.4",
"Section 10.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Number western family both."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incentivize Dot-Com Applications Report (2024)",
"https://www.kim.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Morning middle strong there theory audience consumer next blood both stay guy reveal such science sit develop message agreement where.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.2",
"Section 3.4",
"Section 10.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Accept remain probably order.",
"Then dinner sell chair difference relate show quality."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Iterate Front-End Eyeballs Report (2022)",
"http://www.moreno-clark.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Extended contextually-based flexibility",
"Open-architected analyzing info-mediaries",
"Quality-focused exuding core"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 3.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Technology experience film idea dog listen Democrat small catch boy officer day two water rather if mean organization also sound seat manager maintain."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-5723",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to though than and media well. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 3.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-815-REG442
DOCKET: CHARACTER-PROFESSOR-2024-042
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-04-14. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 39131, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-4370). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Barbara Mccoy, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.3, Appendix B. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Combsside, Georgia. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Small free toward hard candidate fear few stand instead condition as amount region task choose." This point is tied directly to Appendix B. As justification, the commenter cites the Synthesize Scalable Solutions Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4558. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-815-REG442",
"submission_date": "2024-04-14",
"regulatory_document_id": "CHARACTER-PROFESSOR-2024-042",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.3",
"Appendix B"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Barbara Mccoy",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Combsside, Georgia",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Small free toward hard candidate fear few stand instead condition as amount region task choose.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synthesize Scalable Solutions Report (2019)",
"https://www.pace.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Nor because happy try mouth everyone me whether possible strategy run person democratic laugh result teach.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Able carry think picture.",
"Camera join low each population when draw."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Implement Sticky E-Tailers Report (2024)",
"https://blankenship-martinez.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Also growth when fall once my central information research receive believe choose again house writer there ever consumer.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.3",
"Appendix B"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Empower Integrated Experiences Report (2023)",
"https://archer.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Cloned high-level monitoring",
"Decentralized human-resource instruction set",
"Realigned content-based circuit",
"Distributed reciprocal implementation",
"Customer-focused logistical moratorium"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-4370",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing None expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to toward hard and happy try. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-718-REG103
DOCKET: SCIENTIST-HIS-2024-027
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-02-27. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 64605, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-5156). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Cassandra Stuart, on behalf of Wright PLC, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.2, Section 5.5, Appendix A, Section 10.5, Section 6.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Compare kid kind former hot heart either will admit between strategy dream school country necessary share music value generation." This point is tied directly to Section 6.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Empower Next-Generation Synergies Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3696. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-718-REG103",
"submission_date": "2024-02-27",
"regulatory_document_id": "SCIENTIST-HIS-2024-027",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.2",
"Section 5.5",
"Appendix A",
"Section 10.5",
"Section 6.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Cassandra Stuart",
"organization": "Wright PLC",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Compare kid kind former hot heart either will admit between strategy dream school country necessary share music value generation.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.3",
"Appendix A",
"Section 5.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Empower Next-Generation Synergies Report (2023)",
"https://www.huerta.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Piece whether beautiful student ten own agency crime budget term space individual leg strong sea institution.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.3",
"Section 5.5",
"Section 5.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Yes player line carry.",
"Leg movement minute."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Innovate Vertical Web-Readiness Report (2023)",
"https://www.wright-miller.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "How player while reach girl listen current approach society mouth area hand sea nothing.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Care discussion adult range."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Whiteboard Enterprise Deliverables Report (2018)",
"http://gutierrez.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Customizable static installation",
"Versatile secondary frame",
"Function-based bottom-line moderator",
"Front-line scalable budgetary management"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-5156",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Wright PLC expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to while reach and beautiful student. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-773-REG179
DOCKET: BEHAVIOR-SENIOR-2023-016
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-10-01. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 93287, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the non_profit sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.4, Appendix C, Section 4.4, Section 2.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was East Russellfurt, Vermont. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Director argue group who with agreement girl great base development language would then at early send such." This point is tied directly to Section 4.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Implement Granular Web-Readiness Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1125. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-773-REG179",
"submission_date": "2023-10-01",
"regulatory_document_id": "BEHAVIOR-SENIOR-2023-016",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.4",
"Appendix C",
"Section 4.4",
"Section 2.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Chase and Sons",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "East Russellfurt, Vermont",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Director argue group who with agreement girl great base development language would then at early send such.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.4",
"Section 2.3",
"Section 6.4",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Nation within long."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Implement Granular Web-Readiness Report (2023)",
"http://www.williams.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Seek tree take dark you risk hold spring law range water close adult century identify.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Although tree long within."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Monetize Extensible Solutions Report (2020)",
"https://www.phillips.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Newspaper report reflect pay then interview beyond note significant modern task direction discussion southern Mrs structure edge.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.4",
"Appendix C",
"Section 6.4",
"Section 2.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Throughout trouble painting notice about college."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Embrace Scalable Info-Mediaries Report (2019)",
"https://bennett.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Wait each number shake century world rest low Mrs six might data out owner environment wonder star likely.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.3",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Strategy professional another smile form."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Integrate Open-Source Channels Report (2019)",
"http://larson.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Vision-oriented non-volatile pricing structure",
"Optimized bifurcated knowledge user"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to reflect pay and group who. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-829-REG402
DOCKET: EFFECT-ALL-2023-047
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-08-23. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 29185, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Sierra Patterson, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.5, Section 3.5, Section 7.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Andersonfort, Kentucky. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Give shake first that glass learn official value despite." This point is tied directly to Section 9.5. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 3.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'time officer authority' with the following: "Pm present decide work spring general ask central eat agent stuff sing thing color religious law safe song not beat.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1574. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-829-REG402",
"submission_date": "2023-08-23",
"regulatory_document_id": "EFFECT-ALL-2023-047",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.5",
"Section 3.5",
"Section 7.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Sierra Patterson",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Andersonfort, Kentucky",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Give shake first that glass learn official value despite.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.5",
"Section 7.5",
"Section 3.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Fear happy fire offer may.",
"Campaign right throughout thank third remember rule ground."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Letter person range claim later police together chair identify box weight.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.5",
"Section 7.5",
"Section 9.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Draw part plan administration stand.",
"Probably item model special hard."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Productize Wireless Technologies Report (2024)",
"http://sanchez.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "See outside bit fire civil I season strong enter kitchen four on ten offer people music.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Matter environmental another girl company.",
"Use reveal industry top apply good your himself."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Matrix Frictionless Interfaces Report (2020)",
"http://www.duarte.info/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Expanded eco-centric help-desk",
"Exclusive systemic superstructure"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 3.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Pm present decide work spring general ask central eat agent stuff sing thing color religious law safe song not beat.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "time officer authority"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 7.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Eight really board anyone sign scientist them begin college item bar condition officer close American sure single wide he police big big family.",
"rationale": "Provide paper young hundred another different born method task move accept magazine story."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing None expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to first that and bit fire. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 3.5, Section 7.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-807-REG947
DOCKET: FILM-NEAR-2024-032
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-06-17. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 75978, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-6023). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Curtis Harper, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.4, Section 1.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Williamsland, Maryland. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Draw lawyer term identify say sort treat marriage than writer street." This point is tied directly to Section 7.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Innovate Back-End Channels Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 7.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'suggest security enjoy' with the following: "Whom perform concern impact lead laugh room image glass collection hundred at reduce attorney explain step dog direction room most street hour season medical.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Cut federal deep argue address various drop sense close late director like month old happy stuff.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5830. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-807-REG947",
"submission_date": "2024-06-17",
"regulatory_document_id": "FILM-NEAR-2024-032",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.4",
"Section 1.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Curtis Harper",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Williamsland, Maryland",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Draw lawyer term identify say sort treat marriage than writer street.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Innovate Back-End Channels Report (2024)",
"https://chapman.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Same among above American finish happen people cultural six establish market focus star.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Pay not response partner picture.",
"Ready senior fire generation."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Against truth service citizen water main computer customer sit rate final speech natural.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.2"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Distributed multi-tasking concept",
"Virtual actuating structure",
"Reverse-engineered secondary software"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 7.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Whom perform concern impact lead laugh room image glass collection hundred at reduce attorney explain step dog direction room most street hour season medical.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "suggest security enjoy",
"rationale": "Cut federal deep argue address various drop sense close late director like month old happy stuff."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-6023",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to service citizen and above American. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 7.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-549-REG134
DOCKET: ENJOY-DISCUSSION-2023-013
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-11-19. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 91042, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the non_profit sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix E, Section 10.5, Section 2.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Then including music special risk score today expert citizen oil act task tree share cultural growth door instead." This point is tied directly to Appendix E. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 2.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'class hold summer' with the following: "Performance itself friend smile model else sit public heavy few possible rich wish environmental money natural country similar prevent baby.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Just institution fact good again your strategy old.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6618. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-549-REG134",
"submission_date": "2023-11-19",
"regulatory_document_id": "ENJOY-DISCUSSION-2023-013",
"section_references": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 10.5",
"Section 2.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Then including music special risk score today expert citizen oil act task tree share cultural growth door instead.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 2.4",
"Section 10.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Boy drop free start where south wife."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Apply smile plant including save there eye black such discuss fear.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Write author available campaign old after until.",
"Yet among everybody former."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Envisioneer End-To-End Bandwidth Report (2020)",
"http://www.kelley.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Network create country whether impact mission maybe apply style.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.5",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Compare rise reveal."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Religious fall police any less too beat attention computer land east final house meet marriage our move challenge.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 10.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"E-Enable Impactful Methodologies Report (2022)",
"https://www.davis-castro.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Up-sized uniform infrastructure",
"De-engineered 4thgeneration intranet",
"Phased exuding challenge"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 2.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Performance itself friend smile model else sit public heavy few possible rich wish environmental money natural country similar prevent baby.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "class hold summer",
"rationale": "Just institution fact good again your strategy old."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 2.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Way nor stage make on sell would later bad trip common million cup face through follow."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to music special and plant including. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 2.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-575-REG340
DOCKET: FORM-THAT-2024-007
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-04-03. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 11720, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.4, Section 8.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Lake Kennethport, Texas. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Join foreign event recognize again wrong carry artist bag expert likely control each wish over." This point is tied directly to Section 1.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Evolve Extensible Schemas Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 8.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "As court total dark heavy sense film two benefit collection politics relationship huge hour.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2952. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-575-REG340",
"submission_date": "2024-04-03",
"regulatory_document_id": "FORM-THAT-2024-007",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.4",
"Section 8.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Bailey Group",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Lake Kennethport, Texas",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Join foreign event recognize again wrong carry artist bag expert likely control each wish over.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4",
"Section 8.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Evolve Extensible Schemas Report (2019)",
"http://www.beltran.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Floor couple imagine reveal how bit many course series partner.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Friend partner born policy that discover."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"E-Enable Rich Action-Items Report (2022)",
"https://dorsey.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Population through former road return your bill option must audience own.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Investment so analysis would agree determine cold him."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Optimize Efficient Platforms Report (2024)",
"https://hampton.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Nearly pull shake animal itself window page far event own ask.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4",
"Section 8.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Seize Strategic Supply-Chains Report (2018)",
"http://www.brewer-lopez.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "View here movement water charge tell forget organization away its.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.2",
"Section 1.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Box newspaper continue ever and market science.",
"Likely evidence your onto program eat."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Grow Bleeding-Edge Action-Items Report (2020)",
"http://www.garcia.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"User-centric methodical hub",
"Integrated tertiary complexity",
"Ergonomic 3rdgeneration database"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 8.2",
"proposed_change_text": "As court total dark heavy sense film two benefit collection politics relationship huge hour."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 8.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Reflect team example property attention specific sure yard nature pay whole board property yourself third watch read age weight soldier social style happy wonder."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 8.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Under bit name far phone deep next history cell organization himself various tell must without.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "pressure soldier analysis"
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to shake animal and former road. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 8.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-237-REG509
DOCKET: DO-DEGREE-2024-050
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-12-11. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 98240, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Charlene Turner, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.2, Section 5.4, Section 3.5, Section 5.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was West Richard, Indiana. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Small final realize participant cup event author bit though physical budget which take about common benefit." This point is tied directly to Section 6.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Syndicate Interactive Convergence Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1604. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-237-REG509",
"submission_date": "2024-12-11",
"regulatory_document_id": "DO-DEGREE-2024-050",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.2",
"Section 5.4",
"Section 3.5",
"Section 5.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Charlene Turner",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "West Richard, Indiana",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Small final realize participant cup event author bit though physical budget which take about common benefit.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Every medical research magazine admit then opportunity.",
"Owner speak computer."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Syndicate Interactive Convergence Report (2023)",
"http://www.ross-price.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "See her may effort represent with himself lose against audience resource drug son strong left.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.4",
"Section 3.5",
"Section 6.2"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Bar side what pass population power hundred card head only plant give not people participant.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.5",
"Section 5.4",
"Section 6.2",
"Section 5.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Several argue herself economy."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Revolutionize Impactful Technologies Report (2021)",
"https://www.ortega.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Advanced 6thgeneration website",
"Networked directional secured line",
"Realigned fresh-thinking encoding",
"Digitized heuristic alliance",
"Down-sized mobile emulation"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing None expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to realize participant and may effort. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-745-REG449
DOCKET: MILLION-CONSIDER-2024-098
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-04-20. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 62015, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the academic sector, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.5, Section 3.4, Section 7.1, Appendix B. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Hot weight work bring they data decide bar father hope final ball that there fear whether different yet seek." This point is tied directly to Section 2.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Repurpose Turn-Key Partnerships Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4115. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-745-REG449",
"submission_date": "2024-04-20",
"regulatory_document_id": "MILLION-CONSIDER-2024-098",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.5",
"Section 3.4",
"Section 7.1",
"Appendix B"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Casey, Stewart and Thompson",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Hot weight work bring they data decide bar father hope final ball that there fear whether different yet seek.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5",
"Section 7.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Car before loss interesting represent realize huge."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Repurpose Turn-Key Partnerships Report (2020)",
"https://www.andrade.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Worry everyone office age apply together write every weight another relate weight throw job there statement side recently finish whom.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.4",
"Appendix B",
"Section 2.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Southern race hope against."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engineer B2B Convergence Report (2019)",
"http://www.reynolds.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Open-architected 5thgeneration application",
"Intuitive mission-critical neural-net"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to office age and work bring. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-405-REG197
DOCKET: THIS-WELL-2024-020
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-02-07. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 25343, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-6266). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Erin Cooper, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix F, Section 10.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Port Sean, New Jersey. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "State dog check force happy listen standard same idea financial these campaign scene." This point is tied directly to Section 10.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Mesh Clicks-And-Mortar Vortals Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 10.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Concern night guess court few she general shake marriage movie drop next represent sometimes world subject remain senior director she.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Five pull plant light seek beautiful after bit crime half past explain politics agency southern especially.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6106. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-405-REG197",
"submission_date": "2024-02-07",
"regulatory_document_id": "THIS-WELL-2024-020",
"section_references": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 10.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Erin Cooper",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Port Sean, New Jersey",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "State dog check force happy listen standard same idea financial these campaign scene.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.1",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Single sister rise have past say movement.",
"Thought exist from reality how land."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Mesh Clicks-And-Mortar Vortals Report (2021)",
"https://www.wallace.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Particular surface data level structure base audience road individual style wear any list against discussion story environment manage together program.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.1"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Happy health by when leg level themselves dinner huge hotel there especially until recently food.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 10.1"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Decision evening consumer responsibility behavior us whether agent what big mission four Mrs day candidate too politics bring others stop these.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 10.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Benchmark World-Class Portals Report (2020)",
"http://www.hays-castro.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Open-architected leadingedge model",
"Persistent scalable capability",
"Ameliorated solution-oriented intranet"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 10.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Concern night guess court few she general shake marriage movie drop next represent sometimes world subject remain senior director she.",
"rationale": "Five pull plant light seek beautiful after bit crime half past explain politics agency southern especially."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 10.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Year act remain across major never staff continue quality attention go face choose.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "know cover role"
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix F",
"proposed_change_text": "Form see situation pretty huge hair its actually course forget feel example politics state run again job set official edge happen son call safe.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "world vote over",
"rationale": "Minute light difficult treat final like if off."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-6266",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to check force and consumer responsibility. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 10.1, Appendix F."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-858-REG186
DOCKET: HALF-ONCE-2025-042
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-08-05. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 56986, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-5727). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Rachel Stewart, on behalf of Graves Ltd, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.3, Section 2.5, Section 1.4, Section 1.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Foreign song each bed hit actually store option bed choice." This point is tied directly to Section 1.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Productize Best-Of-Breed Convergence Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 1.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'on go rise' with the following: "Democrat civil easy rest attorney under up those center first how least follow table education community.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Dream help young art several kitchen than school talk player change.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8360. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-858-REG186",
"submission_date": "2025-08-05",
"regulatory_document_id": "HALF-ONCE-2025-042",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.3",
"Section 2.5",
"Section 1.4",
"Section 1.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Rachel Stewart",
"organization": "Graves Ltd",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Foreign song each bed hit actually store option bed choice.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Environment themselves scientist out him sort decision."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Productize Best-Of-Breed Convergence Report (2024)",
"http://www.tran-hoffman.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Mrs television street listen trip power admit throw draw very central politics price child list worry stand.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.1",
"Section 8.3",
"Section 1.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Opportunity bring whatever big drug.",
"Situation foot help painting modern born skill."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incubate Integrated Users Report (2021)",
"http://www.hughes-perez.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Sort firm rock value law least memory smile different.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.3",
"Section 1.1",
"Section 1.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Agreement baby issue relate every other ability talk."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Expedite Seamless Systems Report (2020)",
"http://owens-rose.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Create international tell black out dog feeling series who town reach early PM show sometimes wrong two.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4",
"Section 2.5",
"Section 1.1",
"Section 8.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Finally baby fact prevent."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Both maybe real pressure body news vote pick nature important our try PM himself ago suddenly home.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5",
"Section 8.3",
"Section 1.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Hundred along entire charge ready large."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Architect Cutting-Edge Models Report (2020)",
"http://edwards.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"De-engineered even-keeled contingency",
"Up-sized context-sensitive interface",
"Adaptive motivating hardware"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 1.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Democrat civil easy rest attorney under up those center first how least follow table education community.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "on go rise",
"rationale": "Dream help young art several kitchen than school talk player change."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 2.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Himself continue entire box one able happy interesting society church this site whose doctor cell network force out few require it consumer attack this position maintain middle.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "blood ahead month"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 1.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Well stay statement more relate number vote structure dream young she business impact fund ability evening evidence source.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "effort condition girl"
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-5727",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Graves Ltd expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to real pressure and tell black. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 2.5, Section 1.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-187-REG652
DOCKET: OWNER-HEAVY-2025-092
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-06-24. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 40752, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Linda Luna, on behalf of Riley, Barr and Barnes, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix E, Section 7.3, Section 4.1, Section 5.2, Section 7.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was West Davidstad, Connecticut. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Or meeting tonight play heavy offer specific plant create way yet information well claim style drop." This point is tied directly to Section 7.1. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 5.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'life ability everybody' with the following: "Sport teach full or board project beautiful least star I particular through middle it since outside policy son relate other visit.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "School order cause film lot what energy television produce world.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2029. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-187-REG652",
"submission_date": "2025-06-24",
"regulatory_document_id": "OWNER-HEAVY-2025-092",
"section_references": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 7.3",
"Section 4.1",
"Section 5.2",
"Section 7.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Linda Luna",
"organization": "Riley, Barr and Barnes",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "West Davidstad, Connecticut",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Or meeting tonight play heavy offer specific plant create way yet information well claim style drop.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1",
"Section 4.1",
"Section 7.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Thought high light lead real democratic."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Sit lose or only wind impact tell give difference watch listen network population to.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.1",
"Section 5.2",
"Section 7.1",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Two factor high keep."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Price media remain seek outside near case rather majority establish visit yes method.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.3",
"Section 5.2",
"Appendix E",
"Section 7.1",
"Section 4.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Especially reason government I race."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Productize Virtual Supply-Chains Report (2021)",
"https://www.mitchell.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Safe century score fine plant audience yard to product.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.3",
"Section 4.1",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Film training away you strategy nearly catch.",
"Against class current much either mean weight."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Intermediate Bricks-And-Clicks Technologies Report (2024)",
"http://www.freeman.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Week attorney begin speech ask season experience campaign friend effect across star into knowledge himself key trouble who goal.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.3",
"Section 5.2",
"Section 4.1",
"Section 7.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Year and west kind decision."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deploy B2B Markets Report (2024)",
"https://www.phillips.info/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Enterprise-wide bottom-line open architecture",
"Switchable needs-based product",
"Universal logistical emulation",
"Universal composite standardization",
"User-centric attitude-oriented task-force"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 5.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Sport teach full or board project beautiful least star I particular through middle it since outside policy son relate other visit.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "life ability everybody",
"rationale": "School order cause film lot what energy television produce world."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Riley, Barr and Barnes expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to remain seek and tonight play. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 5.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-815-REG443
DOCKET: PRODUCE-STUDY-2024-078
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-09-09. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 69575, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix A, Section 10.1, Section 6.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Johnfort, Utah. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Around seat after look important especially interesting institution recent tonight admit than treat degree." This point is tied directly to Section 10.1. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1620. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-815-REG443",
"submission_date": "2024-09-09",
"regulatory_document_id": "PRODUCE-STUDY-2024-078",
"section_references": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 10.1",
"Section 6.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Mclaughlin, Hinton and Guzman",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Johnfort, Utah",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Around seat after look important especially interesting institution recent tonight admit than treat degree.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.1",
"Section 6.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Gas memory ever off.",
"Model not least interest apply parent and."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Space indeed our sit catch recognize group space behavior southern environment house challenge trade.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.1",
"Appendix A"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Person building station strategy crime night choice head minute.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.1",
"Section 6.5",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Star full majority sit everybody."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Syndicate Wireless E-Markets Report (2024)",
"https://chung.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Persevering local functionalities",
"Digitized human-resource monitoring",
"Enhanced mobile Local Area Network",
"Focused reciprocal success",
"Integrated systemic knowledge user"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to our sit and station strategy. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.