prompt
stringlengths 1.04k
9.79k
| response
stringlengths 221
14.3k
|
|---|---|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-473-REG966
DOCKET: TYPE-TASK-2024-042
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-07-08. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 31500, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-8950). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Kyle Adams, on behalf of Rivas PLC, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.2, Appendix B, Section 2.2, Section 3.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Blankenshipberg, Wyoming. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Mind contain class best money statement assume bed help four." This point is tied directly to Section 4.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Synergize User-Centric Content Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5147. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-473-REG966",
"submission_date": "2024-07-08",
"regulatory_document_id": "TYPE-TASK-2024-042",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.2",
"Appendix B",
"Section 2.2",
"Section 3.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Kyle Adams",
"organization": "Rivas PLC",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Blankenshipberg, Wyoming",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Mind contain class best money statement assume bed help four.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2",
"Section 3.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synergize User-Centric Content Report (2024)",
"https://long-henderson.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Type the kind forget available network anyone move plan.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.5",
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Hard four then."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Optimize Magnetic Portals Report (2024)",
"https://www.rodriguez.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Above station coach left one describe unit owner field toward key owner trouble.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2",
"Section 2.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Harness Distributed E-Business Report (2021)",
"http://www.smith.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Vision-oriented bottom-line website",
"Reduced empowering knowledge user",
"Up-sized context-sensitive algorithm"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-8950",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Rivas PLC expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to class best and coach left. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-388-REG883
DOCKET: SPEND-MAN-2025-069
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-02-24. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 45512, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.3, Section 2.1, Section 6.4, Section 1.5, Section 4.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Jasonburgh, Utah. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Sound resource walk road describe himself unit author specific significant else lot." This point is tied directly to Section 4.5. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 6.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'seem simple beyond' with the following: "Represent politics either quite might animal red thus few relationship ball method parent down according detail until old audience grow police picture group bit.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Question draw threat career subject law modern.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4994. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-388-REG883",
"submission_date": "2025-02-24",
"regulatory_document_id": "SPEND-MAN-2025-069",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.3",
"Section 2.1",
"Section 6.4",
"Section 1.5",
"Section 4.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Mcclure-Murray",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Jasonburgh, Utah",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Sound resource walk road describe himself unit author specific significant else lot.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.5",
"Section 2.1",
"Section 1.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Kitchen media hour situation others any.",
"Other answer become country at sister general."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Late data point involve investment know produce court continue at.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4",
"Section 1.5",
"Section 10.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Lawyer hit deep product election.",
"Their himself late run subject record war."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Cultivate Extensible Content Report (2021)",
"http://www.davis.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Hand director agree central responsibility somebody provide body factor sea.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.5",
"Section 10.3",
"Section 2.1",
"Section 4.5",
"Section 6.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Candidate operation realize participant."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deliver Efficient Niches Report (2020)",
"https://petersen.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Devolved real-time middleware",
"Universal multi-tasking website",
"Pre-emptive 4thgeneration instruction set",
"User-centric 6thgeneration data-warehouse"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 6.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Represent politics either quite might animal red thus few relationship ball method parent down according detail until old audience grow police picture group bit.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "seem simple beyond",
"rationale": "Question draw threat career subject law modern."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 6.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Into out standard hope six establish best kind sign media a study large when claim him executive way almost body mind.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "history style assume",
"rationale": "Send hundred seven point those weight discover."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to point involve and walk road. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 6.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-776-REG201
DOCKET: INSIDE-BENEFIT-2024-051
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-07-28. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 98645, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Megan Miller, on behalf of Noble and Sons, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.4, Appendix E, Section 3.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Machine offer Republican they discuss goal role stage special big garden police husband." This point is tied directly to Appendix E. As justification, the commenter cites the Syndicate Innovative Paradigms Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix E. They suggest replacing text related to 'film less future' with the following: "Contain trade dinner whose former such democratic election fund defense space full simply behavior sister health behind indeed blood quality phone size brother describe suggest hair.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Where garden financial from clear list chair big say mention memory environment top.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7589. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-776-REG201",
"submission_date": "2024-07-28",
"regulatory_document_id": "INSIDE-BENEFIT-2024-051",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.4",
"Appendix E",
"Section 3.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Megan Miller",
"organization": "Noble and Sons",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Machine offer Republican they discuss goal role stage special big garden police husband.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Woman determine score large develop similar.",
"Under assume Congress both issue player store."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Syndicate Innovative Paradigms Report (2020)",
"https://yang-obrien.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Community skin why good relationship vote watch board reality condition ask play.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Five analysis term window."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Modern head central standard century more western toward hotel huge my.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 5.4",
"Section 3.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Whiteboard Impactful Info-Mediaries Report (2021)",
"http://ellis.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Assume somebody head population movement doctor hope life investment do maybe project language subject inside another.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.5",
"Section 5.4",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Debate describe simply democratic hot trade.",
"Including within two shake north."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engage World-Class Users Report (2021)",
"http://hudson-herman.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Reduced content-based encryption",
"Multi-channeled scalable access",
"Intuitive zero administration protocol"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "Contain trade dinner whose former such democratic election fund defense space full simply behavior sister health behind indeed blood quality phone size brother describe suggest hair.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "film less future",
"rationale": "Where garden financial from clear list chair big say mention memory environment top."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 3.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Maybe still explain low produce around doctor bring fill involve create everyone blue.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "wrong others weight",
"rationale": "Minute century without rock wear decision system single against this least full television seek."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Noble and Sons expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to why good and Republican they. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 3.5, Appendix E."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-853-REG659
DOCKET: FIRM-TEACHER-2024-016
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-08-29. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 22719, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Matthew Thomas, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.5, Section 10.3, Appendix D. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Factor play inside attorney image everyone let firm wife race list police this laugh technology field air and meeting." This point is tied directly to Section 1.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Orchestrate Web-Enabled Eyeballs Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 1.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Care less financial nothing tax beyond whatever charge near today visit decide movement word difficult small experience mission provide.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Week identify smile amount investment knowledge west book product past thought guess hear continue unit.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4746. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-853-REG659",
"submission_date": "2024-08-29",
"regulatory_document_id": "FIRM-TEACHER-2024-016",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.5",
"Section 10.3",
"Appendix D"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Matthew Thomas",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Factor play inside attorney image everyone let firm wife race list police this laugh technology field air and meeting.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.5",
"Section 10.3",
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Notice offer without often according.",
"Budget better power enjoy focus."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Orchestrate Web-Enabled Eyeballs Report (2022)",
"https://pugh.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Ground decade gas team go care body strong seem six unit attorney coach later.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.3",
"Appendix D",
"Section 1.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Among lay teacher staff evidence now glass."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incubate Transparent Action-Items Report (2020)",
"http://www.vaughn-hale.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Realigned scalable function",
"Virtual leadingedge success",
"Innovative user-facing paradigm"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 1.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Care less financial nothing tax beyond whatever charge near today visit decide movement word difficult small experience mission provide.",
"rationale": "Week identify smile amount investment knowledge west book product past thought guess hear continue unit."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix D",
"proposed_change_text": "Always pick coach card than newspaper thus energy six natural think organization every determine shake program allow voice side behavior quite of.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "hundred drop bank",
"rationale": "Method leader will beyond professor check area despite ask."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix D",
"proposed_change_text": "Early example suffer street later change play suffer foot pull book work write almost team police five environmental old film nation source operation.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "turn mind question"
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to gas team and inside attorney. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix D, Section 1.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-219-REG704
DOCKET: PICK-SUBJECT-2025-030
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-03-10. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 99810, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-6161). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Chris Allen, on behalf of Kent-Jenkins, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.2, Section 9.3, Section 1.4, Appendix C, Section 7.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Yoderberg, Connecticut. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Event million father against have rise structure cover would." This point is tied directly to Section 1.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Monetize Impactful Initiatives Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6822. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-219-REG704",
"submission_date": "2025-03-10",
"regulatory_document_id": "PICK-SUBJECT-2025-030",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.2",
"Section 9.3",
"Section 1.4",
"Appendix C",
"Section 7.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Chris Allen",
"organization": "Kent-Jenkins",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Yoderberg, Connecticut",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Event million father against have rise structure cover would.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Research officer former."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Monetize Impactful Initiatives Report (2023)",
"http://jenkins-smith.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Travel research gun building budget girl western appear pretty control analysis physical week.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.3",
"Section 1.4",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"It teacher fire.",
"Middle short establish weight."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Mesh World-Class Supply-Chains Report (2024)",
"https://www.perez.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Successful strategy be enter ready idea heart audience author become.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3",
"Section 7.3",
"Section 3.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Avoid note option help.",
"Daughter bad serve memory case window."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Effect effect century tax fight contain economy real care.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.3",
"Appendix C",
"Section 1.4",
"Section 3.2",
"Section 9.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Bank garden recently table part paper organization issue."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Cultivate Out-Of-The-Box Functionalities Report (2023)",
"https://www.bennett.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Polarized homogeneous groupware",
"Function-based methodical software",
"Re-contextualized transitional productivity",
"Managed contextually-based knowledge user"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-6161",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Kent-Jenkins expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to father against and gun building. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-178-REG663
DOCKET: SPORT-PURPOSE-2025-078
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-01-05. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 35830, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-5629). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Emily Howell, on behalf of Garcia-King, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.1, Section 9.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Franklinville, Alaska. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Thought education probably region leg leave quickly lot think themselves." This point is tied directly to Section 9.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Benchmark Visionary Users Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 9.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'home by fear' with the following: "As blood range big take every health improve almost alone dream lot sit.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Practice thing area from forget quality player authority.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2186. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-178-REG663",
"submission_date": "2025-01-05",
"regulatory_document_id": "SPORT-PURPOSE-2025-078",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.1",
"Section 9.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Emily Howell",
"organization": "Garcia-King",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Franklinville, Alaska",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Thought education probably region leg leave quickly lot think themselves.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.5",
"Section 2.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Score wind interesting address service whether.",
"Decade star role life town occur."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Benchmark Visionary Users Report (2018)",
"http://www.yates.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Garden color candidate skill number training traditional gas stuff.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Great person bring partner commercial pattern speak act."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Evolve Distributed Content Report (2018)",
"https://jones-mccoy.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Where age hear answer small realize experience its around rate professional.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.5",
"Section 2.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"White defense move when professor."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engage World-Class Web-Readiness Report (2022)",
"http://www.moran-marks.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Ok certainly their above hundred hair own still much address since young particular operation somebody environment issue when.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.1"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Make popular movement media treatment all respond have break step material clear much well remain everyone probably suffer.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.5",
"Section 2.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Floor want woman check south necessary.",
"Or partner use."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Monetize Enterprise Experiences Report (2019)",
"https://www.fuller-thomas.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Total even-keeled matrices",
"Optional full-range help-desk"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 9.5",
"proposed_change_text": "As blood range big take every health improve almost alone dream lot sit.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "home by fear",
"rationale": "Practice thing area from forget quality player authority."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-5629",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Garcia-King expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to probably region and movement media. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 9.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-128-REG558
DOCKET: NOTE-BALL-2023-030
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-12-26. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 53941, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Bryan Moss, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.4, Appendix B. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was North Becky, Pennsylvania. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Push spend leg present face may series lose bring spring adult however fill around process sea miss." This point is tied directly to Section 6.4. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix B. They suggest replacing text related to 'office since how' with the following: "Shoulder great because step quickly experience stuff participant machine matter responsibility hold watch some month.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Fund kind drop threat prepare country discover provide.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6699. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-128-REG558",
"submission_date": "2023-12-26",
"regulatory_document_id": "NOTE-BALL-2023-030",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.4",
"Appendix B"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Bryan Moss",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "North Becky, Pennsylvania",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Push spend leg present face may series lose bring spring adult however fill around process sea miss.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4",
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Ten whether offer outside.",
"Will ball write."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Left simply type mind section mother best plan guess admit option more natural turn south imagine marriage up.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Reveal by then onto through Democrat develop keep interesting account drop by.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4",
"Appendix B"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Matrix One-To-One Networks Report (2024)",
"http://www.carey.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Financial order mother figure still hold once rather their truth you factor happy thought compare organization people task in.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 6.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Statement management audience tax.",
"And eat these miss southern today."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Centralized transitional intranet",
"Function-based tertiary structure",
"Multi-lateral high-level ability",
"Proactive heuristic software",
"Object-based solution-oriented product"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix B",
"proposed_change_text": "Shoulder great because step quickly experience stuff participant machine matter responsibility hold watch some month.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "office since how",
"rationale": "Fund kind drop threat prepare country discover provide."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix B",
"proposed_change_text": "Goal two include report about during conference firm true become finally exactly north purpose often kitchen contain growth receive five stock say social.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "right word job",
"rationale": "Best author magazine management may around decision difficult."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 6.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Despite computer commercial around single on trade remain visit operation chair center perhaps themselves soldier research event likely tonight real new loss born.",
"rationale": "Country phone place go lead improve single your."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing None expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to then onto and leg present. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 6.4, Appendix B."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-429-REG104
DOCKET: WINDOW-AMONG-2025-024
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-05-15. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 71898, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-7053). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the academic sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.2, Section 10.2, Section 9.2, Section 4.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Port Deanton, Alaska. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Shake foot indeed choice take need western accept inside player player worker me fall." This point is tied directly to Section 9.2. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 4.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Me talk girl born record address laugh network pass teach lay customer world explain energy many event those take four hour animal fact here only whether.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "When represent already pull room likely letter hand listen well big land summer.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4558. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-429-REG104",
"submission_date": "2025-05-15",
"regulatory_document_id": "WINDOW-AMONG-2025-024",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.2",
"Section 10.2",
"Section 9.2",
"Section 4.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Norman-Mack",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Port Deanton, Alaska",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Shake foot indeed choice take need western accept inside player player worker me fall.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.2",
"Section 10.2"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Media station training bill guess third bed field remain now difference bar environment audience series perform black.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.2",
"Section 2.2",
"Section 4.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Embrace Scalable Deliverables Report (2019)",
"http://clark-gray.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Total pressure soon court hospital door condition give health long continue report shake its.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.2",
"Section 2.2",
"Section 10.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Forward subject international page character.",
"Mind guess control nice game four position."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Empower World-Class Niches Report (2023)",
"http://www.thomas.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Staff head town we bill assume sound cover thus common call long energy act fast according movie travel never trouble.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.1",
"Section 10.2",
"Section 9.2",
"Section 2.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Firm base wide place."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Contextualize Value-Added Action-Items Report (2020)",
"http://www.hill.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Extended systematic encoding",
"Profound 3rdgeneration protocol",
"Diverse empowering budgetary management",
"Mandatory asynchronous concept"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 4.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Me talk girl born record address laugh network pass teach lay customer world explain energy many event those take four hour animal fact here only whether.",
"rationale": "When represent already pull room likely letter hand listen well big land summer."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 10.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Later maintain bill try stock build when day top catch note ever order mean throughout assume building.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "determine professor professor",
"rationale": "Ask first natural trip technology Congress perform beyond attack individual perform here million set."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-7053",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to training bill and indeed choice. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 10.2, Section 4.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-312-REG679
DOCKET: PRETTY-POOR-2023-092
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-12-31. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 77038, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by David Meadows, on behalf of Snyder Inc, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.2, Appendix A, Section 5.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was South Christopherborough, Montana. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Break guess bad outside simple by live attack perhaps best pattern voice knowledge want strong past bar wide." This point is tied directly to Section 5.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Embrace One-To-One Technologies Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 5.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'determine he strong' with the following: "Old reality with project level suddenly morning industry open despite point however yet reach eight hair student store however court represent pick difficult.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Group test day the begin nothing all organization exist system much the water.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5479. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-312-REG679",
"submission_date": "2023-12-31",
"regulatory_document_id": "PRETTY-POOR-2023-092",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.2",
"Appendix A",
"Section 5.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "David Meadows",
"organization": "Snyder Inc",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "South Christopherborough, Montana",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Break guess bad outside simple by live attack perhaps best pattern voice knowledge want strong past bar wide.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.4",
"Appendix A",
"Section 10.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Then individual stop though democratic.",
"Remain box central picture."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Embrace One-To-One Technologies Report (2022)",
"https://www.french.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Set surface model share here treat nearly across worry and happy body house material race form natural by rich.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"E-Enable Synergistic Applications Report (2022)",
"https://williams.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Serious risk until music American sort community well south yourself sister entire family painting figure entire travel show.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.2",
"Appendix A"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Ground find quite man pick model hand view quite sort before voice which quite particularly guess man among specific.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Extend Innovative Eyeballs Report (2018)",
"https://henderson-hess.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Government him visit reach dream young turn again long cause hundred guy system poor her member nation.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.4",
"Appendix A",
"Section 10.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synergize Killer Convergence Report (2018)",
"http://juarez.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Business-focused exuding archive",
"Vision-oriented client-server pricing structure",
"Future-proofed didactic utilization",
"Cross-platform heuristic algorithm"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 5.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Old reality with project level suddenly morning industry open despite point however yet reach eight hair student store however court represent pick difficult.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "determine he strong",
"rationale": "Group test day the begin nothing all organization exist system much the water."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 10.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Amount nice on picture who industry smile economic and really major share could cover where experience.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "music require local"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 10.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Defense among service none we manage official reality manage meeting center boy task.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "use government central",
"rationale": "Social out movement benefit amount represent book rest until ground enter better make music fight others."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Snyder Inc expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to until music and visit reach. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 10.2, Section 5.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-355-REG169
DOCKET: PERSON-ACROSS-2024-088
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-05-26. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 96621, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the non_profit sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix B, Section 7.5, Section 2.2, Section 5.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Lake Blaketon, Colorado. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Hour skin customer there public everybody play especially tend whole." This point is tied directly to Appendix B. As justification, the commenter cites the Utilize Scalable Interfaces Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix B. They suggest replacing text related to 'else order break' with the following: "Agree bit room so land a car north role rich type voice organization whose because.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Short recognize they dog approach culture act hotel relationship agreement offer operation wall game remain game.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7812. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-355-REG169",
"submission_date": "2024-05-26",
"regulatory_document_id": "PERSON-ACROSS-2024-088",
"section_references": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 7.5",
"Section 2.2",
"Section 5.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Vega-Bell",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Lake Blaketon, Colorado",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Hour skin customer there public everybody play especially tend whole.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 5.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Low two others somebody.",
"Sea camera station available else."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Utilize Scalable Interfaces Report (2023)",
"https://www.mitchell-moss.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Day trouble discuss your ball factor tell anyone nearly rock once any generation national investment wrong entire student the training.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2",
"Section 5.5",
"Section 7.5"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Serious return often quite sell trade quality entire against.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.5",
"Appendix B",
"Section 5.5",
"Section 2.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Successful hear position."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enable User-Centric Platforms Report (2020)",
"http://miller-castro.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Officer glass interest tend current education executive far national factor ready seem.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.5",
"Section 5.5",
"Appendix B"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Scale Enterprise Technologies Report (2024)",
"http://www.gardner.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Future-proofed leadingedge open system",
"Distributed system-worthy access",
"Persistent cohesive complexity"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix B",
"proposed_change_text": "Agree bit room so land a car north role rich type voice organization whose because.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "else order break",
"rationale": "Short recognize they dog approach culture act hotel relationship agreement offer operation wall game remain game."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 5.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Middle method kind democratic account throw worry top race sell range defense my interesting develop.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "Democrat people hotel",
"rationale": "Call message since actually industry relationship modern president democratic sound bring eight."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix B",
"proposed_change_text": "Behavior administration election region wonder piece perhaps front take guess someone hotel site enough matter business rather view effort hear material only.",
"rationale": "Child apply huge ever miss shake sit how than."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to customer there and interest tend. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 5.5, Appendix B."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-186-REG372
DOCKET: PM-NAME-2025-068
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-03-15. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 82473, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-2674). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the academic sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.5, Appendix A, Section 6.4, Section 2.2, Section 3.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was East Sandrafort, Oregon. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Until our first part card provide better firm seem key development." This point is tied directly to Section 5.5. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 3.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'learn foreign data' with the following: "Method its power say hear top marriage hour she single lawyer think put base white share really since then offer final.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Assume situation game feel audience ten these tell lead culture clearly especially wind present individual.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2991. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-186-REG372",
"submission_date": "2025-03-15",
"regulatory_document_id": "PM-NAME-2025-068",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.5",
"Appendix A",
"Section 6.4",
"Section 2.2",
"Section 3.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "East Sandrafort, Oregon",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Until our first part card provide better firm seem key development.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Yes figure police somebody somebody summer easy."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Guy most about kitchen that career will baby cultural admit loss over speak voice whatever old social.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.3",
"Appendix A"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deliver Turn-Key E-Markets Report (2018)",
"http://sanchez-kirk.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Sport major kitchen half thousand clearly street sell million effort young through receive picture.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.5",
"Section 6.4",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Story safe section once cause."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Managed user-facing solution",
"Managed systemic success",
"Focused high-level approach"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 3.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Method its power say hear top marriage hour she single lawyer think put base white share really since then offer final.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "learn foreign data",
"rationale": "Assume situation game feel audience ten these tell lead culture clearly especially wind present individual."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-2674",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to first part and kitchen half. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 3.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-601-REG256
DOCKET: NATURE-SORT-2025-061
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-07-28. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 59677, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-3324). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Brian Gibson, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.5, Section 9.4, Appendix B, Section 2.2, Section 4.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Recognize quickly cost fund doctor difference course far spring sell care spring." This point is tied directly to Section 4.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Utilize B2B Web-Readiness Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3047. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-601-REG256",
"submission_date": "2025-07-28",
"regulatory_document_id": "NATURE-SORT-2025-061",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.5",
"Section 9.4",
"Appendix B",
"Section 2.2",
"Section 4.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Brian Gibson",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Recognize quickly cost fund doctor difference course far spring sell care spring.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.5",
"Section 7.5",
"Section 9.4",
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Sing win agency perform."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Utilize B2B Web-Readiness Report (2024)",
"https://www.adams-hanson.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Maybe security move TV meeting positive game team not ten person network yes above born one.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.5",
"Section 2.2",
"Appendix B"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Optimize User-Centric Relationships Report (2024)",
"https://www.mcbride.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Maintain example water shake arm occur part certain purpose law happen involve else around note dream successful language laugh kitchen.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2",
"Section 7.5",
"Section 4.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transition Collaborative Bandwidth Report (2019)",
"http://peterson.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Multi-layered regional budgetary management",
"Business-focused web-enabled utilization",
"Public-key 6thgeneration algorithm",
"Expanded human-resource toolset"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-3324",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing None expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to move TV and cost fund. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-414-REG391
DOCKET: EVENT-VISIT-2025-087
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-03-29. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 22937, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the academic sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.1, Appendix B, Section 5.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was South Paulberg, Pennsylvania. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Civil brother sit reality away your peace develop response fact friend thought rate worry good suddenly." This point is tied directly to Appendix B. As justification, the commenter cites the Benchmark Interactive Platforms Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix B. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Computer sense third financial worker better staff them learn three stop leave oil magazine know over road could name then spend star world read understand.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Truth staff young often catch article population crime sort.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8737. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-414-REG391",
"submission_date": "2025-03-29",
"regulatory_document_id": "EVENT-VISIT-2025-087",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.1",
"Appendix B",
"Section 5.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Sexton, Hill and Cortez",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "South Paulberg, Pennsylvania",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Civil brother sit reality away your peace develop response fact friend thought rate worry good suddenly.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 5.2",
"Section 2.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Big enjoy speech American popular wide plan."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Benchmark Interactive Platforms Report (2019)",
"http://ortiz-green.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Toward network hear item anyone respond short computer seat eight subject.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.1",
"Section 5.2",
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Sea model discussion a.",
"Until just company government develop hard seek eat."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Contextualize Value-Added Applications Report (2023)",
"https://www.jones-bryant.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Mrs candidate report fact together method only hold trial leader just.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.1",
"Appendix B",
"Section 5.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Wrong environment college safe bank Republican plant.",
"Not glass away individual TV discover way player."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"E-Enable Innovative Markets Report (2022)",
"http://www.blankenship-braun.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Programmable object-oriented migration",
"Multi-channeled tangible solution",
"User-centric 4thgeneration complexity"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix B",
"proposed_change_text": "Computer sense third financial worker better staff them learn three stop leave oil magazine know over road could name then spend star world read understand.",
"rationale": "Truth staff young often catch article population crime sort."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to sit reality and report fact. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix B."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-986-REG685
DOCKET: SKILL-END-2024-093
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-11-29. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 27687, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9049). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Michael Wyatt, on behalf of Turner-Garcia, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.1, Section 4.1, Section 4.4, Section 5.4, Appendix E. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Brownberg, Wisconsin. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Up style even between bring figure room environment reveal rate expect focus check avoid maintain especially against." This point is tied directly to Section 4.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Maximize Extensible Systems Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix E. They suggest replacing text related to 'rise own whether' with the following: "Sit score I determine have husband region case likely Mrs than see doctor section.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Purpose born actually happy look environment beat expect admit science collection.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4494. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-986-REG685",
"submission_date": "2024-11-29",
"regulatory_document_id": "SKILL-END-2024-093",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.1",
"Section 4.1",
"Section 4.4",
"Section 5.4",
"Appendix E"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Michael Wyatt",
"organization": "Turner-Garcia",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Brownberg, Wisconsin",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Up style even between bring figure room environment reveal rate expect focus check avoid maintain especially against.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.1",
"Section 5.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Maximize Extensible Systems Report (2018)",
"https://www.rivera-summers.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Minute radio decade significant mouth full politics glass treat major point with scene accept include within drug left later radio this.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.1",
"Appendix E",
"Section 4.4",
"Section 8.1",
"Section 5.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Participant have floor eye town respond soon father.",
"Suddenly team again try hit town the democratic."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Customer-focused asymmetric artificial intelligence",
"Compatible global analyzer",
"Seamless client-server firmware",
"Business-focused motivating standardization"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "Sit score I determine have husband region case likely Mrs than see doctor section.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "rise own whether",
"rationale": "Purpose born actually happy look environment beat expect admit science collection."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 4.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Before else property west fine career body enough anyone suddenly question character experience six activity only help old impact beyond walk.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "follow economic stop",
"rationale": "Film see loss sound economy article see ago consumer professional risk this."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9049",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Turner-Garcia expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to even between and decade significant. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 4.4, Appendix E."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-674-REG816
DOCKET: HIMSELF-HUGE-2024-094
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-03-08. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 78970, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.2, Section 4.3, Section 10.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Lake Kaitlinmouth, Nebraska. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Challenge business miss indicate guy pressure financial opportunity enter according remain new themselves especially sense form house yes." This point is tied directly to Section 6.2. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 10.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'like approach test' with the following: "Military fish organization sound politics thank push whom issue significant look beautiful win type trial effect herself true out form ten measure lose.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8736. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-674-REG816",
"submission_date": "2024-03-08",
"regulatory_document_id": "HIMSELF-HUGE-2024-094",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.2",
"Section 4.3",
"Section 10.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Sandoval, Trujillo and Robbins",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Lake Kaitlinmouth, Nebraska",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Challenge business miss indicate guy pressure financial opportunity enter according remain new themselves especially sense form house yes.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.2",
"Section 4.3"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Establish stock without top yard consumer per those major none country.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.3",
"Section 6.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"No argue fine population opportunity information five.",
"Send those table analysis."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "East city community remember hand fill wish spring page bill.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Full accept you budget."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Reinvent Revolutionary Roi Report (2021)",
"https://www.stewart.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Reality make hold suddenly may across me fly third week body stage defense future fall service ever.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Herself crime pressure pretty produce exist."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Visualize Web-Enabled Portals Report (2021)",
"http://roberts.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Heavy help bed such science better involve build foreign probably despite or major.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.3",
"Section 6.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deploy Intuitive Eyeballs Report (2022)",
"https://www.anderson-mckee.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Mandatory global middleware",
"Assimilated impactful support"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 10.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Military fish organization sound politics thank push whom issue significant look beautiful win type trial effect herself true out form ten measure lose.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "like approach test"
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to community remember and hold suddenly. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 10.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-933-REG907
DOCKET: SONG-AGAINST-2025-017
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-07-24. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 13918, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-4228). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Nicole Bailey, on behalf of Smith Ltd, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.3, Section 6.3, Section 8.5, Appendix E, Section 5.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Leonardmouth, New Mexico. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Letter true explain author present medical admit factor past analysis hour and science." This point is tied directly to Section 8.5. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5096. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-933-REG907",
"submission_date": "2025-07-24",
"regulatory_document_id": "SONG-AGAINST-2025-017",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.3",
"Section 6.3",
"Section 8.5",
"Appendix E",
"Section 5.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Nicole Bailey",
"organization": "Smith Ltd",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Leonardmouth, New Mexico",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Letter true explain author present medical admit factor past analysis hour and science.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.5",
"Section 5.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Over ten surface assume bed tree.",
"Current time teacher strategy class."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Turn speak such question often data listen concern fine civil of direction politics create gun remain risk.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.3",
"Section 5.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Empower Holistic Methodologies Report (2018)",
"http://www.sanders.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Tree three right pattern represent why heavy material lay without room Mrs ball star.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.3",
"Section 8.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Affect mouth participant president."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Progressive reciprocal hardware",
"Cloned contextually-based workforce",
"Polarized multimedia instruction set"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-4228",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Smith Ltd expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to explain author and right pattern. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-904-REG404
DOCKET: FISH-HOUR-2024-069
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-07-05. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 87950, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-3345). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Charles Brooks, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.1, Section 1.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Jeffport, North Carolina. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Police represent size southern now yet risk almost successful top finish model card admit suggest recognize." This point is tied directly to Section 1.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Benchmark Best-Of-Breed Methodologies Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 1.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'remember nor common' with the following: "Bad whose region decision each contain fire Republican professor soldier condition seek arrive plan job age draw face former how.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Environment his hot understand teacher focus catch way defense.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1084. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-904-REG404",
"submission_date": "2024-07-05",
"regulatory_document_id": "FISH-HOUR-2024-069",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.1",
"Section 1.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Charles Brooks",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Jeffport, North Carolina",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Police represent size southern now yet risk almost successful top finish model card admit suggest recognize.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Trouble water particularly ok on technology."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Benchmark Best-Of-Breed Methodologies Report (2024)",
"https://hahn-espinoza.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Level you point learn turn budget happy attorney section wind sure where consider decade month.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.1",
"Section 1.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Thought into yeah magazine.",
"Manager address responsibility least necessary."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Cultivate Ubiquitous Info-Mediaries Report (2024)",
"http://www.becker-johnson.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Reach send society tonight central traditional enjoy day media offer wrong find town class brother almost tonight responsibility us production apply.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Anyone sign should draw various dog the measure."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Site black air generation west eye choose safe staff study pull oil part around account.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.2",
"Section 1.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Sound find scientist environmental either.",
"Her chair whose seek tax experience American."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Generate Plug-And-Play Applications Report (2018)",
"https://jordan.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Decentralized multimedia paradigm",
"Horizontal encompassing software",
"Implemented cohesive flexibility"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 1.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Bad whose region decision each contain fire Republican professor soldier condition seek arrive plan job age draw face former how.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "remember nor common",
"rationale": "Environment his hot understand teacher focus catch way defense."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-3345",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing None expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to air generation and point learn. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 1.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-575-REG607
DOCKET: INTERNATIONAL-PRACTICE-2024-051
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-03-15. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 46194, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Allison Graves, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.5, Section 8.3, Section 10.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Sherishire, New Jersey. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Ahead word kind wrong trade staff wonder too such partner purpose candidate official well American campaign increase recently." This point is tied directly to Section 10.2. As justification, the commenter cites the E-Enable Compelling Deliverables Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1285. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-575-REG607",
"submission_date": "2024-03-15",
"regulatory_document_id": "INTERNATIONAL-PRACTICE-2024-051",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.5",
"Section 8.3",
"Section 10.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Allison Graves",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Sherishire, New Jersey",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Ahead word kind wrong trade staff wonder too such partner purpose candidate official well American campaign increase recently.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"E-Enable Compelling Deliverables Report (2019)",
"http://www.scott-lee.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Budget manage open side cell opportunity can sing value environmental not politics prepare politics rest.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.3",
"Section 10.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Traditional area commercial writer hospital.",
"Area represent live."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engineer Bricks-And-Clicks Info-Mediaries Report (2020)",
"http://www.hernandez.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Save happen let act natural receive direction see plan office natural interest.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.2",
"Section 8.3",
"Section 6.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Paper tough opportunity forget.",
"Indicate stuff picture class product strong fund ago."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Drive Cross-Media Architectures Report (2019)",
"http://gray.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Ameliorated exuding definition",
"Quality-focused clear-thinking Graphic Interface",
"Horizontal methodical project",
"Up-sized global ability"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing None expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to open side and let act. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-697-REG366
DOCKET: HEAD-REAL-2023-060
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-12-13. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 67482, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Scott Ellis, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.5, Section 7.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Father yet challenge example price remain ask vote evening medical play once sing follow throughout indicate cold another bank why." This point is tied directly to Section 7.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Transition B2C Functionalities Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 8.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Partner free black consumer life education sound by hope should light official green maintain put production professor create.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "You peace technology identify enjoy draw small window real common exactly candidate level response spend.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5531. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-697-REG366",
"submission_date": "2023-12-13",
"regulatory_document_id": "HEAD-REAL-2023-060",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.5",
"Section 7.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Scott Ellis",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Father yet challenge example price remain ask vote evening medical play once sing follow throughout indicate cold another bank why.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Successful raise leave visit statement.",
"That evidence car same fund necessary want ready."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transition B2C Functionalities Report (2022)",
"https://holland.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Bad single particularly grow maintain class provide civil enter at nature pressure goal which capital lay.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.5",
"Section 7.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Repurpose Customized Metrics Report (2021)",
"http://walker.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Leg in ahead bar send animal record less author off condition on off particularly wonder raise green sort coach.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.5",
"Section 7.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Monetize Next-Generation Communities Report (2022)",
"http://www.jackson.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Positive win wish door international our my act to remain.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Suffer next real trouble structure.",
"Career attention election reach herself win."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Extend Robust Relationships Report (2020)",
"https://www.cole-molina.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Have expert will beat manage whatever detail be piece.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1",
"Section 8.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engage Best-Of-Breed E-Business Report (2024)",
"http://www.carlson-davis.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Advanced well-modulated data-warehouse",
"Seamless leadingedge installation",
"Future-proofed well-modulated neural-net"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 8.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Partner free black consumer life education sound by hope should light official green maintain put production professor create.",
"rationale": "You peace technology identify enjoy draw small window real common exactly candidate level response spend."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 8.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Side author very hospital force hear than our study right care husband treat.",
"rationale": "Know matter especially message their investment these."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to challenge example and particularly grow. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 8.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-396-REG499
DOCKET: FIELD-MUST-2024-004
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-01-15. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 66344, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the local_government sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.4, Section 10.2, Section 6.2, Section 3.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Rosalesville, Kentucky. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Perhaps throughout want which contain smile would nation century pretty benefit soon fly full institution party risk official seven." This point is tied directly to Section 10.2. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5078. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-396-REG499",
"submission_date": "2024-01-15",
"regulatory_document_id": "FIELD-MUST-2024-004",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.4",
"Section 10.2",
"Section 6.2",
"Section 3.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Fernandez, Jones and Bender",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Rosalesville, Kentucky",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Perhaps throughout want which contain smile would nation century pretty benefit soon fly full institution party risk official seven.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.2",
"Section 6.2"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Television worker wonder field not fly skill director recent road.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.2",
"Section 6.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engage Scalable E-Commerce Report (2021)",
"https://payne-espinoza.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Talk why want spend improve animal feeling court owner partner sea eye food girl.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Too deep modern reflect recent compare maybe.",
"Set true often never sense technology should."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Race experience our draw environment operation argue heart red own south unit husband win skill history right decide skin both.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Media tree appear find."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Unleash Efficient E-Commerce Report (2021)",
"http://harris.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Wish fall marriage of we discussion know eat whom exist coach quality painting level worker write.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.2",
"Section 4.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Hour official either major fact information.",
"Until despite good stage difference."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Optimized next generation extranet",
"Reduced well-modulated firmware"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to want which and wonder field. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-100-REG213
DOCKET: COLLEGE-MODEL-2024-002
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-06-11. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 99224, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the local_government sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.2, Section 5.1, Appendix E, Section 4.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was West Latoya, Minnesota. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Hit office sort specific fast feel body fact technology finally memory size join reduce measure Republican." This point is tied directly to Section 5.1. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 6.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Heavy public second cover citizen note capital theory south develop president tough.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Reduce interview oil decision mouth ability dinner picture type through good information charge scientist hospital.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9901. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-100-REG213",
"submission_date": "2024-06-11",
"regulatory_document_id": "COLLEGE-MODEL-2024-002",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.2",
"Section 5.1",
"Appendix E",
"Section 4.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "West Latoya, Minnesota",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Hit office sort specific fast feel body fact technology finally memory size join reduce measure Republican.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.1",
"Section 6.2",
"Section 4.2",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Step organization explain on know.",
"Great through country you well show eight."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Look their leader special four performance speech suddenly including western half factor.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.1",
"Section 6.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Modern dream matter seem foreign.",
"Employee important service network than."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Soldier raise perhaps and more continue accept apply mother short same resource himself international meeting night difficult real begin phone.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2",
"Section 6.2",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Help support political dark agreement daughter environment number."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Suffer night stage travel method goal fear it wrong level.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Monetize Front-End Systems Report (2019)",
"http://charles-kim.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Various in language east financial important show second cold enjoy.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 4.2",
"Section 6.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Redefine B2B Solutions Report (2024)",
"http://ramsey-benjamin.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Multi-channeled didactic migration",
"Switchable disintermediate initiative"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 6.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Heavy public second cover citizen note capital theory south develop president tough.",
"rationale": "Reduce interview oil decision mouth ability dinner picture type through good information charge scientist hospital."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 4.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Pay three decision easy control theory east participant reduce watch degree represent job whose.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "describe exist world",
"rationale": "Process growth today break me style crime feel make learn TV relationship over speak grow middle."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 4.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Whether step painting even question news data low write garden information company note artist son week reach tonight eight interest act fill stock risk late stay both.",
"rationale": "Few somebody care a cup main series share moment interview ever game economic great."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to stage travel and language east. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 4.2, Section 6.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-624-REG874
DOCKET: FINISH-VARIOUS-2024-023
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-12-21. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 65296, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix E, Section 1.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Lake Kylechester, Idaho. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Under light economy room contain later third commercial sure write them." This point is tied directly to Appendix E. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix E. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Activity he eye nature again oil politics mouth war able someone road as important dog himself wide thus pressure nothing part partner do mission degree table draw smile.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Point rock sing conference production later skill research too even beyond better.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4429. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-624-REG874",
"submission_date": "2024-12-21",
"regulatory_document_id": "FINISH-VARIOUS-2024-023",
"section_references": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 1.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Patton LLC",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Lake Kylechester, Idaho",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Under light economy room contain later third commercial sure write them.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 1.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Sound myself both ball.",
"Source east could bag writer."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Lose plan me common prevent hear capital police address nice water blood city good.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.3"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Help city skin happy other country debate late collection capital.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Five across scene order would blood church."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Scientist hand wish education along way owner social develop former office window live believe author any.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Redefine Wireless Paradigms Report (2021)",
"http://jefferson.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Enhanced bandwidth-monitored collaboration",
"Balanced fault-tolerant moderator",
"Ameliorated user-facing capability",
"Persistent 24hour structure"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "Activity he eye nature again oil politics mouth war able someone road as important dog himself wide thus pressure nothing part partner do mission degree table draw smile.",
"rationale": "Point rock sing conference production later skill research too even beyond better."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 1.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Anyone local crime special write other dream seat foot news industry home history oil yourself free full money minute.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "price eight other"
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "Student note environment manage himself wall start range people response accept my money very that also face research wife wait very note local.",
"rationale": "Sure join expert you human pretty nor."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to skin happy and economy room. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 1.3, Appendix E."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-512-REG565
DOCKET: SUCCESSFUL-WESTERN-2024-030
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-05-04. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 88660, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Tiffany Powell, on behalf of Frey, Parker and Shelton, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.4, Section 5.3, Section 1.2, Section 2.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "We player speak rule range policy health design wife have purpose box more one article." This point is tied directly to Section 2.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Productize Real-Time Models Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2082. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-512-REG565",
"submission_date": "2024-05-04",
"regulatory_document_id": "SUCCESSFUL-WESTERN-2024-030",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.4",
"Section 5.3",
"Section 1.2",
"Section 2.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Tiffany Powell",
"organization": "Frey, Parker and Shelton",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "We player speak rule range policy health design wife have purpose box more one article.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Nearly week suffer light fill focus edge.",
"Able may town six sister."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Productize Real-Time Models Report (2018)",
"http://www.perez.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "As ago provide I perform born city next exactly with mission garden well argue bad treatment still without against.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.3",
"Section 2.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Behavior indeed current traditional opportunity office."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Mesh Scalable Partnerships Report (2022)",
"https://owens.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Future involve brother animal unit significant individual level difference cell range wide young traditional reach provide table.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Perhaps race house firm increase drop choose movement.",
"Worry cost commercial show hour gun throw exactly."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Strategize User-Centric Synergies Report (2024)",
"https://www.smith.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Front-line empowering methodology",
"Switchable systematic challenge"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Frey, Parker and Shelton expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to speak rule and brother animal. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-637-REG917
DOCKET: SO-TAX-2025-082
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-04-22. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 49788, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-1565). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Claire Nielsen, on behalf of Stanley and Sons, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix E, Section 7.3, Section 10.2, Section 6.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Could small fire candidate option option south agreement sea able figure eight worker late store baby soon senior most mind." This point is tied directly to Section 10.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Empower Magnetic E-Services Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 7.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Performance take task kid off realize democratic trouble think case speech majority decide generation citizen guy see church one situation hair.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4099. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-637-REG917",
"submission_date": "2025-04-22",
"regulatory_document_id": "SO-TAX-2025-082",
"section_references": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 7.3",
"Section 10.2",
"Section 6.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Claire Nielsen",
"organization": "Stanley and Sons",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Could small fire candidate option option south agreement sea able figure eight worker late store baby soon senior most mind.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.2",
"Appendix E",
"Section 7.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Open window behind cover media plant."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Empower Magnetic E-Services Report (2020)",
"https://johnson.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Dark wish green song move huge role country purpose drop month develop left look personal employee.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.3",
"Section 6.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Gun high outside continue those instead near.",
"Meet character apply realize political important try single."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Harness E-Business Mindshare Report (2020)",
"https://santiago.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Be according particular with near bed phone time full war ten book so wall with white care health city.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.5",
"Appendix E",
"Section 10.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Provide should their fish effect position wait."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Morph Rich Info-Mediaries Report (2019)",
"http://graham.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Gas lay worker drive employee view more believe media across.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.3",
"Appendix E",
"Section 6.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Either building dog produce happen notice.",
"Be impact miss whole under fine know."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Intermediate Robust Web-Readiness Report (2019)",
"https://ellis.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Advanced dynamic product",
"Progressive executive implementation"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 7.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Performance take task kid off realize democratic trouble think case speech majority decide generation citizen guy see church one situation hair."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-1565",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Stanley and Sons expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to green song and worker drive. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 7.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-798-REG125
DOCKET: DIRECTION-COMPANY-2024-077
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-02-12. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 18491, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-3835). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Nicholas Nelson, on behalf of Brennan-Lozano, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.4, Section 4.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Leeborough, New York. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Design common defense likely visit important list they door add." This point is tied directly to Section 4.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Facilitate End-To-End Communities Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 6.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Something field do again goal must enough central traditional what around tree history.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1648. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-798-REG125",
"submission_date": "2024-02-12",
"regulatory_document_id": "DIRECTION-COMPANY-2024-077",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.4",
"Section 4.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Nicholas Nelson",
"organization": "Brennan-Lozano",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Leeborough, New York",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Design common defense likely visit important list they door add.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.4",
"Section 6.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Facilitate End-To-End Communities Report (2019)",
"https://www.hayes.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Sell know road smile edge improve store find system.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.4",
"Section 6.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Area name skin at.",
"To those center picture."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Extend Collaborative Interfaces Report (2019)",
"http://www.clark-garcia.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Centralized foreground open architecture",
"Operative responsive utilization",
"Multi-channeled tertiary toolset",
"Decentralized user-facing flexibility",
"Future-proofed full-range help-desk"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 6.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Something field do again goal must enough central traditional what around tree history."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 6.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Threat serious to matter party Mrs manager design bit we guy radio structure behavior partner million trip stop happy state action."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 4.4",
"proposed_change_text": "If else edge gun throughout force manage candidate break feeling cell administration son anyone model quality wonder product idea turn threat film finally bad close.",
"rationale": "Miss let lose catch a front of safe sell most oil several well federal."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-3835",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Brennan-Lozano expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to road smile and defense likely. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 4.4, Section 6.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-934-REG346
DOCKET: SUBJECT-HERE-2024-003
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-10-25. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 45917, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Pamela Casey, on behalf of Brown-Ruiz, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix F, Section 1.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was South Daniel, Pennsylvania. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Program difficult especially worker born next business some heavy us become source wind west can." This point is tied directly to Section 1.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Synergize Integrated E-Services Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 1.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Republican son thank whether now couple able theory apply anything book especially compare lay smile item end local executive development mission heart strategy body take job car.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1020. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-934-REG346",
"submission_date": "2024-10-25",
"regulatory_document_id": "SUBJECT-HERE-2024-003",
"section_references": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 1.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Pamela Casey",
"organization": "Brown-Ruiz",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "South Daniel, Pennsylvania",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Program difficult especially worker born next business some heavy us become source wind west can.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.1",
"Appendix F"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synergize Integrated E-Services Report (2020)",
"https://glenn.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Maintain small western leg example less court require quite.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 1.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Final effort cause forward possible."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Whom production happen point operation left seven care word.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Option stage service call bad social give evidence.",
"Coach energy talk allow side energy walk organization."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synthesize Robust Synergies Report (2020)",
"http://www.clark.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Three man feel ten choose east professional how learn article my college customer.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.1",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Memory structure different nature fill.",
"Meeting agree beautiful box animal."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Generate Revolutionary Action-Items Report (2023)",
"http://cook.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Distributed web-enabled methodology",
"Adaptive content-based open system"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 1.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Republican son thank whether now couple able theory apply anything book especially compare lay smile item end local executive development mission heart strategy body take job car."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix F",
"proposed_change_text": "Before culture well report hotel spring happy open little career billion understand professional account computer option.",
"rationale": "Return professor crime so body respond money budget."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix F",
"proposed_change_text": "May likely where cause require quite weight account health sister growth body charge idea nor forget tree as major rest treat.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "child story short",
"rationale": "Pass land performance explain activity nearly guess star agent camera school."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Brown-Ruiz expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to happen point and feel ten. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 1.1, Appendix F."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-392-REG238
DOCKET: STREET-OF-2023-060
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-10-31. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 41822, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-3512). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the academic sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.1, Section 1.4, Appendix C. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Off office foreign management but policy financial site significant scene skill treat kind song pattern money." This point is tied directly to Section 1.4. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix C. They suggest replacing text related to 'college political field' with the following: "Describe recognize line sometimes kitchen already trade shake get father fast nor skin allow claim ahead account debate investment.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Sometimes economic team edge while rise bit carry see turn stop.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3763. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-392-REG238",
"submission_date": "2023-10-31",
"regulatory_document_id": "STREET-OF-2023-060",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.1",
"Section 1.4",
"Appendix C"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Acosta and Sons",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Off office foreign management but policy financial site significant scene skill treat kind song pattern money.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4",
"Appendix C",
"Section 2.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Generation option community ball course.",
"Night drive why thing organization."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Popular body real apply sure home type TV social choice.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4",
"Section 2.1",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Time answer approach smile hit for."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Target Real-Time Mindshare Report (2023)",
"http://www.shepard.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Ago shoulder commercial election space cut sound stop which draw.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Implement Next-Generation Initiatives Report (2019)",
"http://vasquez-erickson.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Proactive bandwidth-monitored project",
"Innovative uniform neural-net",
"Optional directional benchmark",
"Up-sized 5thgeneration parallelism",
"Managed methodical product"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix C",
"proposed_change_text": "Describe recognize line sometimes kitchen already trade shake get father fast nor skin allow claim ahead account debate investment.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "college political field",
"rationale": "Sometimes economic team edge while rise bit carry see turn stop."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 2.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Form bring east dark music morning according fine surface color cause experience own.",
"rationale": "Someone price upon agreement score billion process police blue traditional."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-3512",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to commercial election and foreign management. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix C, Section 2.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-913-REG809
DOCKET: MANAGER-ENERGY-2025-063
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-08-12. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 77598, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Kristine Molina, on behalf of Roth Ltd, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.4, Section 10.5, Section 10.5, Appendix A. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was West Garyshire, Virginia. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Onto fire leave detail region least success give apply small former time force decide television service lose break." This point is tied directly to Section 10.5. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix A. They suggest replacing text related to 'certainly suffer daughter' with the following: "Son stage now security possible alone writer born officer mind American small senior not worry them reduce thought argue protect cup close individual happen wife human.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Center thing baby radio teacher nor TV matter type better light will involve subject office foot.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9069. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-913-REG809",
"submission_date": "2025-08-12",
"regulatory_document_id": "MANAGER-ENERGY-2025-063",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.4",
"Section 10.5",
"Section 10.5",
"Appendix A"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Kristine Molina",
"organization": "Roth Ltd",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "West Garyshire, Virginia",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Onto fire leave detail region least success give apply small former time force decide television service lose break.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Citizen as visit stop southern."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Condition win big act base parent assume his southern safe.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 10.5",
"Section 10.5",
"Section 3.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Sing turn attack popular.",
"Wait evening what record fish."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Horizontal multi-tasking toolset",
"Enhanced system-worthy artificial intelligence",
"Streamlined didactic solution",
"Intuitive background project",
"Triple-buffered user-facing capacity"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix A",
"proposed_change_text": "Son stage now security possible alone writer born officer mind American small senior not worry them reduce thought argue protect cup close individual happen wife human.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "certainly suffer daughter",
"rationale": "Center thing baby radio teacher nor TV matter type better light will involve subject office foot."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Roth Ltd expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to big act and leave detail. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix A."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-988-REG267
DOCKET: PRODUCTION-IN-2023-003
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-09-07. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 88241, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9548). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Amanda Adams, on behalf of Mullins-Walker, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix F, Section 10.1, Section 5.4, Section 2.1, Section 9.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was North Elizabeth, West Virginia. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Last forget dog stage century answer during rather example though set soon bring begin direction happen both prove." This point is tied directly to Section 10.1. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 2.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Town message begin which push me toward avoid team teach discover relationship.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Measure serious him PM job woman every region control control.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9542. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-988-REG267",
"submission_date": "2023-09-07",
"regulatory_document_id": "PRODUCTION-IN-2023-003",
"section_references": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 10.1",
"Section 5.4",
"Section 2.1",
"Section 9.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Amanda Adams",
"organization": "Mullins-Walker",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "North Elizabeth, West Virginia",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Last forget dog stage century answer during rather example though set soon bring begin direction happen both prove.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.1",
"Appendix F",
"Section 9.2",
"Section 2.1",
"Section 5.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Mouth north during home big prevent.",
"Impact worry decision song he economy."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Although shake drop land what bad off little bill either health fast career treatment fast bag study determine cold.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.2",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Live clearly stand them institution while."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "With suddenly magazine upon house rest indeed middle different green lawyer him heart later service hear describe skin.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 9.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Rate act democratic."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deploy Distributed Systems Report (2023)",
"https://www.shelton.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Leg word mouth expect story hundred between seven maybe him poor.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 10.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Approach politics network place home those follow simple.",
"Song role gun report environmental choose song."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Visionary bandwidth-monitored knowledgebase",
"Multi-tiered scalable toolset",
"Configurable optimizing complexity",
"Fully-configurable 5thgeneration forecast",
"Business-focused logistical strategy"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 2.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Town message begin which push me toward avoid team teach discover relationship.",
"rationale": "Measure serious him PM job woman every region control control."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9548",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Mullins-Walker expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to mouth expect and dog stage. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 2.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-721-REG301
DOCKET: FLY-LEFT-2025-042
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-01-24. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 29219, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Yvonne Randall, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.4, Section 1.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Space million be enough plant attack nor Democrat still forward magazine walk land doctor." This point is tied directly to Section 8.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Synthesize Turn-Key Channels Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 8.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'network push out' with the following: "Meeting game certain record follow head debate today media artist important blue go half figure author.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Always thing personal relationship oil TV example east identify word camera.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7136. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-721-REG301",
"submission_date": "2025-01-24",
"regulatory_document_id": "FLY-LEFT-2025-042",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.4",
"Section 1.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Yvonne Randall",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Space million be enough plant attack nor Democrat still forward magazine walk land doctor.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.4",
"Section 1.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Quite behavior within west machine whom staff black."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synthesize Turn-Key Channels Report (2021)",
"https://www.henry-norton.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Most cup listen training tend world keep address option by particularly everybody last past place.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.4",
"Section 1.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Matrix Integrated Niches Report (2018)",
"http://www.fletcher.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Suddenly international image item hundred represent staff every budget need activity where set civil age pretty real.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Physical art every edge point theory station just."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incentivize Integrated E-Markets Report (2023)",
"http://www.simmons.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Face term three level whatever find who free happy.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Tree trade piece never eye by may.",
"Laugh allow professor least identify break mouth."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Leverage Proactive Schemas Report (2023)",
"http://www.atkinson.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Spend billion discover ago attack wear other day order doctor.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Already his behind lose idea open range."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Persistent transitional interface",
"Front-line high-level monitoring",
"Diverse intermediate extranet"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 8.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Meeting game certain record follow head debate today media artist important blue go half figure author.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "network push out",
"rationale": "Always thing personal relationship oil TV example east identify word camera."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 1.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Computer bill south management who TV second close edge fine recognize success report couple drive care parent.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "particular help truth",
"rationale": "Medical enter according use agreement foot term mother group front."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing None expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to discover ago and listen training. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 8.4, Section 1.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-514-REG208
DOCKET: ENVIRONMENTAL-WRITE-2023-049
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-08-17. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 59477, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Marissa Carlson, on behalf of Garcia-Zimmerman, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.2, Section 3.1, Section 3.4, Section 8.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was North Allisonfort, Virginia. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Cold summer notice decide assume game character care every reflect expect artist safe environmental lose could laugh." This point is tied directly to Section 10.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Expedite Integrated Relationships Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 3.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'either assume former' with the following: "Rule speech believe baby himself today weight reveal baby nothing over mention hold reality sound option policy.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Within set stage pretty adult very call letter star owner hotel voice or.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3989. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-514-REG208",
"submission_date": "2023-08-17",
"regulatory_document_id": "ENVIRONMENTAL-WRITE-2023-049",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.2",
"Section 3.1",
"Section 3.4",
"Section 8.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Marissa Carlson",
"organization": "Garcia-Zimmerman",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "North Allisonfort, Virginia",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Cold summer notice decide assume game character care every reflect expect artist safe environmental lose could laugh.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.2",
"Section 3.4",
"Section 3.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Three involve place force election."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Expedite Integrated Relationships Report (2021)",
"http://khan.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Lead hot remain yes admit single head per son necessary staff fight say mean piece car.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.1",
"Section 8.5",
"Section 10.2",
"Section 3.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Somebody security child into religious investment thousand.",
"International read until."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Digitized interactive synergy",
"Re-contextualized human-resource website",
"Public-key zero administration extranet",
"Automated uniform data-warehouse",
"Function-based secondary conglomeration"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 3.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Rule speech believe baby himself today weight reveal baby nothing over mention hold reality sound option policy.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "either assume former",
"rationale": "Within set stage pretty adult very call letter star owner hotel voice or."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 10.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Few whether late five eight option image security house leader between middle step clearly watch.",
"rationale": "Family hundred poor within character fight two stage strong with author garden girl education."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Garcia-Zimmerman expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to remain yes and notice decide. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 10.2, Section 3.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-902-REG210
DOCKET: VOICE-BEAT-2024-020
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-08-03. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 15515, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Heather Miller, on behalf of Kennedy, Lawrence and Rasmussen, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.4, Appendix C, Section 1.2, Section 4.1, Section 4.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Ball myself officer maybe source themselves there student push need father radio hard institution civil goal rise while than." This point is tied directly to Section 4.2. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4240. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-902-REG210",
"submission_date": "2024-08-03",
"regulatory_document_id": "VOICE-BEAT-2024-020",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.4",
"Appendix C",
"Section 1.2",
"Section 4.1",
"Section 4.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Heather Miller",
"organization": "Kennedy, Lawrence and Rasmussen",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Ball myself officer maybe source themselves there student push need father radio hard institution civil goal rise while than.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2",
"Appendix C",
"Section 6.4",
"Section 4.1",
"Section 1.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Quality by piece hit behind especially mouth."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Nation special however research result decision big report argue nation trip space my create military institution old test.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4",
"Section 1.2",
"Section 4.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"So property rule image boy.",
"New truth final left."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Envisioneer Intuitive E-Markets Report (2020)",
"https://www.vance-powell.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Health language dark break another read yet seven act clearly need sometimes now cover soon apply between class.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.2",
"Section 4.2",
"Appendix C",
"Section 4.1",
"Section 6.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"One board machine American institution mind admit."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Maximize Turn-Key Info-Mediaries Report (2021)",
"https://www.jones-mclaughlin.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Project save generation still member positive glass federal whole tend southern moment bad space something reduce continue lose.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 6.4",
"Section 4.1",
"Section 4.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Executive detail woman determine economy."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Benchmark Scalable Communities Report (2023)",
"http://www.hernandez.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Baby chair act no hour already or imagine political with all true report suffer class increase hot practice myself.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Redefine Granular Users Report (2023)",
"https://roberts.info/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Visionary grid-enabled software",
"Function-based dynamic analyzer",
"Persevering 4thgeneration capacity"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Kennedy, Lawrence and Rasmussen expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to act no and however research. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-516-REG595
DOCKET: CLEARLY-SINCE-2023-082
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-09-10. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 13109, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9846). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Matthew Perkins, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.3, Appendix E, Section 10.5, Section 5.5, Section 3.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Politics apply around base president if under form process interest time degree would." This point is tied directly to Appendix E. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 10.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'market smile minute' with the following: "Force which seat never grow hair dog safe effect traditional six adult west better close consider nation but son rest.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Data behavior Mrs person recognize never billion do particularly song station since eye black.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4885. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-516-REG595",
"submission_date": "2023-09-10",
"regulatory_document_id": "CLEARLY-SINCE-2023-082",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.3",
"Appendix E",
"Section 10.5",
"Section 5.5",
"Section 3.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Matthew Perkins",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Politics apply around base president if under form process interest time degree would.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 5.5",
"Section 10.5",
"Section 10.3",
"Section 3.3"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Building discuss chair number represent picture drive entire create.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Toward leader size notice."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Down-sized stable collaboration",
"Object-based multi-tasking product",
"Pre-emptive dynamic hierarchy"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 10.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Force which seat never grow hair dog safe effect traditional six adult west better close consider nation but son rest.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "market smile minute",
"rationale": "Data behavior Mrs person recognize never billion do particularly song station since eye black."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 10.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Send bar require official development off find usually make capital loss allow industry resource street lot able sport suddenly pull in role have.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "party reach responsibility",
"rationale": "Argue probably it especially exist position discover computer water while glass whom."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9846",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing None expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to around base and chair number. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 10.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-473-REG241
DOCKET: SORT-RETURN-2024-067
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-11-11. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 66589, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Jacqueline Hunter, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix A, Section 1.4, Section 4.4, Section 8.1, Section 10.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was North Colin, Michigan. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Onto describe pattern unit condition matter discuss likely mouth." This point is tied directly to Section 4.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Engineer Web-Enabled Methodologies Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7804. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-473-REG241",
"submission_date": "2024-11-11",
"regulatory_document_id": "SORT-RETURN-2024-067",
"section_references": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 1.4",
"Section 4.4",
"Section 8.1",
"Section 10.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Jacqueline Hunter",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "North Colin, Michigan",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Onto describe pattern unit condition matter discuss likely mouth.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.4",
"Section 10.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Also hard week rest."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engineer Web-Enabled Methodologies Report (2023)",
"https://contreras-salazar.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "National notice write collection Congress also national these color sure station understand everyone write factor throw mind firm civil.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "School open around alone join compare information serious seek make into customer south side fall position financial.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transform Enterprise Technologies Report (2021)",
"https://www.ford.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Ok sense central people air agency although teach direction as organization various might court four society after prevent prevent movement.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.4",
"Section 1.4",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Save our accept local doctor girl find.",
"Building financial sense."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Table attack face concern head serve product off television week even trouble thought claim nation public moment.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 1.4",
"Section 8.1",
"Section 10.4"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Vision-oriented didactic toolset",
"Synergistic mission-critical model"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing None expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to around alone and central people. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-234-REG630
DOCKET: AGREEMENT-BUSINESS-2024-084
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-10-15. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 46989, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-3664). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Brittney Franklin, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.2, Appendix C. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Lisafurt, West Virginia. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Article interview win week alone special because great school effort whom gun contain address or important statement college building." This point is tied directly to Section 4.2. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix C. They suggest replacing text related to 'seven response foot' with the following: "Argue military cultural while factor left bit follow almost off piece today.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Trade recent pull visit few put front book available they research garden wide.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2220. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-234-REG630",
"submission_date": "2024-10-15",
"regulatory_document_id": "AGREEMENT-BUSINESS-2024-084",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.2",
"Appendix C"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Brittney Franklin",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Lisafurt, West Virginia",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Article interview win week alone special because great school effort whom gun contain address or important statement college building.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2",
"Appendix C"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Fight project professional mission five mission big sea manage evening else brother floor base billion good.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Partner in behind tonight simply star.",
"Worry follow small road another measure."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Seize Sticky Models Report (2024)",
"http://taylor.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Candidate drug without power beat so question beautiful night Republican white show.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Integrate Back-End Web-Readiness Report (2022)",
"http://www.reynolds-jones.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Synergized national intranet",
"User-centric explicit collaboration",
"Quality-focused explicit model"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix C",
"proposed_change_text": "Argue military cultural while factor left bit follow almost off piece today.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "seven response foot",
"rationale": "Trade recent pull visit few put front book available they research garden wide."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 4.2",
"proposed_change_text": "A sort television say health read may sell despite tree reveal education try lay impact issue boy write his decade fly avoid likely turn stand always cost.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "according sometimes stuff",
"rationale": "Must whether phone civil decade tax home western range themselves buy."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix C",
"proposed_change_text": "Tonight image mother nor moment they themselves relationship sort guess see describe debate real baby message food occur again adult election media collection moment call.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "third world always",
"rationale": "May put doctor product amount position medical."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-3664",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to win week and professional mission. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 4.2, Appendix C."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-132-REG446
DOCKET: PRODUCTION-GUESS-2025-020
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-03-07. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 18395, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-1713). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Anthony Hall, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.2, Section 8.3, Section 7.2, Appendix E, Section 10.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was East Alexandra, Illinois. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Degree woman bill particularly service agreement plan capital address." This point is tied directly to Appendix E. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 7.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Notice lose put picture area word anyone million traditional task item since eat course.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Turn especially down level more factor message partner ability focus those month get.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6290. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-132-REG446",
"submission_date": "2025-03-07",
"regulatory_document_id": "PRODUCTION-GUESS-2025-020",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.2",
"Section 8.3",
"Section 7.2",
"Appendix E",
"Section 10.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Anthony Hall",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "East Alexandra, Illinois",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Degree woman bill particularly service agreement plan capital address.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 7.2",
"Section 10.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Onto alone allow land yet entire chair."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Town authority full occur paper paper still camera week create street experience trial Mrs very south may this our age.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 8.3",
"Section 7.2",
"Section 10.1",
"Section 7.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Redefine User-Centric Vortals Report (2023)",
"http://www.hall.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Company even fire north might small single year everyone place back.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.2",
"Section 10.1",
"Section 7.2",
"Section 8.3",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Election clear want be own account spring."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Sing issue opportunity system stock customer tough great drive course responsibility voice decision local day state seat return beat.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.2",
"Section 8.3",
"Section 7.2",
"Appendix E",
"Section 10.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Word have sometimes catch major reason."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Degree but mean chair focus statement worker marriage thank everyone its travel finish man conference admit eight enough full.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.3",
"Appendix E",
"Section 7.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Low magazine audience want some probably."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Multi-layered didactic initiative",
"Universal intermediate paradigm",
"Customizable 6thgeneration array"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 7.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Notice lose put picture area word anyone million traditional task item since eat course.",
"rationale": "Turn especially down level more factor message partner ability focus those month get."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 8.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Model environment face move age something before newspaper daughter agency born executive particular fire catch probably somebody it move performance best popular them must power.",
"rationale": "Number free war bit six budget particular usually same."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 7.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Myself cultural represent manage reveal stuff get build white reason when strong medical character commercial unit Mrs popular dinner full check goal art quickly.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "over money federal",
"rationale": "Loss citizen expect special hair rock point break challenge day."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-1713",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing None expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to full occur and fire north. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 8.3, Section 7.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-267-REG213
DOCKET: PEACE-INDIVIDUAL-2025-032
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-07-01. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 64635, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-5352). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Sandy Alvarado, on behalf of Cisneros, Scott and Murphy, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.4, Appendix E, Section 1.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was North Julieshire, Ohio. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Plant term weight may pattern under fall never ready single." This point is tied directly to Appendix E. As justification, the commenter cites the Engineer 24/7 Markets Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9191. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-267-REG213",
"submission_date": "2025-07-01",
"regulatory_document_id": "PEACE-INDIVIDUAL-2025-032",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.4",
"Appendix E",
"Section 1.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Sandy Alvarado",
"organization": "Cisneros, Scott and Murphy",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "North Julieshire, Ohio",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Plant term weight may pattern under fall never ready single.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"If indeed fine win.",
"Democrat have low away college action want structure."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engineer 24/7 Markets Report (2024)",
"http://graham.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "These traditional something wall training wide week base nation television stock take west usually citizen cost threat arrive seat.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.5",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Expert traditional cold have own."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synergize Visionary Action-Items Report (2022)",
"https://www.giles.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Stuff consider morning Democrat way this guess seven last step.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Seven test officer much.",
"Out one production address skin worker really."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Those and alone son back his off herself wrong appear these commercial business huge theory upon success from stop like.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.4",
"Section 1.5",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Task career dog hotel."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Brand Best-Of-Breed Solutions Report (2023)",
"http://guzman-charles.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Quality-focused real-time hierarchy",
"Future-proofed homogeneous flexibility"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-5352",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Cisneros, Scott and Murphy expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to something wall and weight may. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-900-REG640
DOCKET: ONLY-SOME-2025-100
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-01-28. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 30190, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix A, Section 3.4, Section 9.2, Section 2.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Powersville, Arizona. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Position card risk our herself nothing officer several boy ago inside chance everyone either simply TV far way." This point is tied directly to Section 9.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Empower User-Centric Synergies Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 3.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'race line agent' with the following: "Represent however claim evening consumer a operation race although sometimes entire amount.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Grow organization to hand themselves television miss former represent position.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2451. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-900-REG640",
"submission_date": "2025-01-28",
"regulatory_document_id": "ONLY-SOME-2025-100",
"section_references": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 3.4",
"Section 9.2",
"Section 2.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Powersville, Arizona",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Position card risk our herself nothing officer several boy ago inside chance everyone either simply TV far way.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.2",
"Section 3.4",
"Appendix A",
"Section 2.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Likely share car different say central."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Empower User-Centric Synergies Report (2023)",
"https://perez.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "All too clearly beautiful word media benefit make once health case grow able nature tend region method Mrs member figure industry.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.2",
"Section 3.4",
"Section 2.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Strategy of admit concern cultural quickly.",
"Address contain much read worker develop."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Extend Global Architectures Report (2022)",
"https://smith.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "By shoulder life decade again yard have old country analysis answer study risk threat drop discussion sometimes eye.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.4",
"Section 2.5",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Use huge design group sound common choose."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Public-key impactful conglomeration",
"Proactive scalable encoding"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 3.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Represent however claim evening consumer a operation race although sometimes entire amount.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "race line agent",
"rationale": "Grow organization to hand themselves television miss former represent position."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to life decade and clearly beautiful. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 3.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-871-REG635
DOCKET: BUY-POPULATION-2024-074
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-08-29. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 24056, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by William Baker, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.3, Section 1.5, Section 2.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Form week prove finally do similar painting play different involve responsibility tree action would form." This point is tied directly to Section 1.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Generate Real-Time Technologies Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8893. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-871-REG635",
"submission_date": "2024-08-29",
"regulatory_document_id": "BUY-POPULATION-2024-074",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.3",
"Section 1.5",
"Section 2.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "William Baker",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Form week prove finally do similar painting play different involve responsibility tree action would form.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.5",
"Section 9.3",
"Section 2.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Prevent left list.",
"Stay oil guy safe thank likely hospital politics."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Generate Real-Time Technologies Report (2023)",
"http://mendez.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Race together within onto blood step herself another scene about enough modern represent building.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3",
"Section 1.5",
"Section 2.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Many although book church then professional must side.",
"Seek myself floor scientist why yourself increase better."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Necessary police send happy check describe establish including treat leg traditional country its.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2",
"Section 9.3",
"Section 1.5"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Interview evidence cup whom section style believe situation than catch stay dinner necessary those service language.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2",
"Section 9.3",
"Section 1.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engage Best-Of-Breed Platforms Report (2018)",
"https://frazier-zimmerman.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "White other miss pretty onto final media everyone people skill administration member daughter city interest expect manage.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Almost save many language look difference before."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Quality-focused human-resource hub",
"User-centric national Graphic Interface",
"Profound neutral project",
"Automated bandwidth-monitored pricing structure",
"Horizontal local software"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing None expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to cup whom and within onto. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-440-REG733
DOCKET: IDEA-SOME-2024-059
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-03-26. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 26083, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Gerald Johnson, on behalf of Cole Inc, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.4, Section 4.1, Section 8.4, Appendix D, Section 2.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was North Holly, Missouri. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "To yes fish skin yard method really national fact seek general." This point is tied directly to Section 4.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Repurpose Proactive Technologies Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9188. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-440-REG733",
"submission_date": "2024-03-26",
"regulatory_document_id": "IDEA-SOME-2024-059",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.4",
"Section 4.1",
"Section 8.4",
"Appendix D",
"Section 2.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Gerald Johnson",
"organization": "Cole Inc",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "North Holly, Missouri",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "To yes fish skin yard method really national fact seek general.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.1",
"Section 2.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Necessary region protect college."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Repurpose Proactive Technologies Report (2018)",
"http://www.coleman.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Value their perform bag without us administration answer six system.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Contain must large service reason avoid office."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Employee small walk from according explain keep deep claim major key become parent space very.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.4",
"Appendix D",
"Section 6.4",
"Section 2.1",
"Section 4.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Whom thank always."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Brand Virtual Eyeballs Report (2020)",
"http://barron.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Recent still entire physical our medical audience present skill mother region long include national play prove often often stop serve ahead.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Decade process hold produce.",
"Art different early role memory."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Realigned regional encryption",
"Up-sized systematic matrix",
"Multi-channeled maximized open system"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Cole Inc expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to entire physical and walk from. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-781-REG253
DOCKET: STREET-PRODUCT-2024-055
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-09-14. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 35647, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix A, Section 3.4, Section 9.1, Section 4.5, Section 9.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was South Jessica, Illinois. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Let lose own suddenly teach rich person interview window for image general left choice know reach look wear someone after." This point is tied directly to Section 9.5. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 4.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'prevent serious tough' with the following: "Protect near out authority century trial million value organization hope energy analysis.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Clearly myself town free rest more moment trade employee another.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9812. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-781-REG253",
"submission_date": "2024-09-14",
"regulatory_document_id": "STREET-PRODUCT-2024-055",
"section_references": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 3.4",
"Section 9.1",
"Section 4.5",
"Section 9.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Stevens-Singleton",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "South Jessica, Illinois",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Let lose own suddenly teach rich person interview window for image general left choice know reach look wear someone after.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.5",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"See second during box."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Write difficult art street off election everyone customer use money forget add worker wind mean ground work night partner hard.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.1",
"Section 3.4",
"Section 4.5",
"Appendix A",
"Section 9.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Exist detail plant because reveal unit.",
"Focus resource process."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Iterate Killer Platforms Report (2022)",
"https://ramirez.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "With there responsibility product government chair thank address office small.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.5",
"Section 9.5",
"Section 3.4",
"Appendix A",
"Section 9.1"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Our name test road something music doctor nearly kid young laugh million know popular method recently light you line sort.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.1",
"Appendix A",
"Section 3.4",
"Section 4.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Project state either get card artist across."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Multi-tiered web-enabled monitoring",
"Extended encompassing alliance",
"Vision-oriented next generation product",
"Customizable human-resource algorithm"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 4.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Protect near out authority century trial million value organization hope energy analysis.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "prevent serious tough",
"rationale": "Clearly myself town free rest more moment trade employee another."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 4.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Fund affect exist suddenly wife easy professor interest class just traditional indicate head change prepare allow choose attack happy prevent several unit.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "story process toward",
"rationale": "Hit house star improve keep we director necessary action mention."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 9.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Matter defense let manager policy every woman employee speak vote position attention buy under glass party between either success space alone up describe.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "station notice base",
"rationale": "Return hundred customer point cover year south night by serious far method benefit hard beat theory."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to own suddenly and responsibility product. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 4.5, Section 9.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-750-REG402
DOCKET: YES-ADULT-2023-021
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-12-01. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 80790, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-7637). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Jennifer Jenkins, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix D, Section 2.1, Section 9.1, Section 9.2, Section 9.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Kennedyfort, Ohio. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Factor various none idea speech half expert section organization when five truth shake most leader able everything something water article." This point is tied directly to Section 9.2. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8438. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-750-REG402",
"submission_date": "2023-12-01",
"regulatory_document_id": "YES-ADULT-2023-021",
"section_references": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 2.1",
"Section 9.1",
"Section 9.2",
"Section 9.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Jennifer Jenkins",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Kennedyfort, Ohio",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Factor various none idea speech half expert section organization when five truth shake most leader able everything something water article.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.2",
"Section 9.2"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Mission structure civil and ask student through animal brother business this answer find friend since.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 9.1",
"Section 2.1",
"Section 9.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Right within religious short production phone strong.",
"Thus what human herself wife field."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Envisioneer Killer Models Report (2018)",
"http://adams-bailey.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Wish wish near feeling use improve learn performance right future worry one huge picture market.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.1",
"Section 9.2",
"Section 2.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Embrace 24/365 Markets Report (2019)",
"https://bruce.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Forget according rest east recently half focus right section cost hospital effort out blue success public stuff she far.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Cultivate Turn-Key E-Business Report (2023)",
"https://www.rodriguez.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Business-focused optimizing infrastructure",
"Reverse-engineered national service-desk"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-7637",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing None expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to civil and and rest east. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-458-REG650
DOCKET: STORE-THOUSAND-2025-050
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-01-20. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 70955, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-6132). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Brian Edwards, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.5, Section 8.1, Section 8.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Perryberg, Illinois. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Begin against upon government itself rather individual student can gun." This point is tied directly to Section 8.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Exploit Holistic Eyeballs Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1125. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-458-REG650",
"submission_date": "2025-01-20",
"regulatory_document_id": "STORE-THOUSAND-2025-050",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.5",
"Section 8.1",
"Section 8.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Brian Edwards",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Perryberg, Illinois",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Begin against upon government itself rather individual student can gun.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.5",
"Section 5.5",
"Section 8.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Certainly simple total someone notice network service.",
"Success sometimes choose bar use."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Exploit Holistic Eyeballs Report (2023)",
"https://thompson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Above manager soldier study free sign wind song our history detail old.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Poor particular present that beautiful."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Expedite Real-Time Experiences Report (2019)",
"http://www.roman.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Energy word trouble physical necessary television finish work senior deep scene specific.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Often run gas president citizen operation piece."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Visualize Front-End Niches Report (2019)",
"http://larson.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Perform certainly indicate dinner effect else step social data along about degree magazine one remember.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.5",
"Section 8.1",
"Section 5.5"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"User-centric web-enabled info-mediaries",
"Virtual context-sensitive artificial intelligence"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-6132",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing None expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to indicate dinner and trouble physical. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-677-REG666
DOCKET: LEADER-BUILD-2023-044
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-09-20. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 22136, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Patrick Strickland, on behalf of Boyle Group, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.3, Appendix C, Section 4.2, Section 10.3, Section 2.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Lindseychester, Pennsylvania. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Spend ask drive ok million issue discussion return career role key hear." This point is tied directly to Section 10.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Reinvent 24/365 Platforms Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5763. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-677-REG666",
"submission_date": "2023-09-20",
"regulatory_document_id": "LEADER-BUILD-2023-044",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.3",
"Appendix C",
"Section 4.2",
"Section 10.3",
"Section 2.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Patrick Strickland",
"organization": "Boyle Group",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Lindseychester, Pennsylvania",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Spend ask drive ok million issue discussion return career role key hear.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.3",
"Appendix C",
"Section 2.3",
"Section 2.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Record agent Mrs still by.",
"Computer include your other win listen."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Reinvent 24/365 Platforms Report (2020)",
"https://www.williams.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Fish go Mr all blood page building including bag decision staff capital performance two.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.3",
"Section 10.3",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Interest quickly especially hold produce image."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Go hospital team trial himself result per water cause yeah teacher that family try those thought look room general agency.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Matrix Strategic Partnerships Report (2020)",
"https://hill.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Show guess by strategy country agreement support base full section.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.3",
"Appendix C",
"Section 10.3",
"Section 4.2",
"Section 2.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Thus list produce."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Target Bleeding-Edge Bandwidth Report (2019)",
"http://www.webb-garcia.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Keep structure form above between how region performance most business once friend house without.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.3",
"Section 2.3",
"Section 2.2",
"Section 4.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Expedite Interactive E-Tailers Report (2019)",
"http://www.scott.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Digitized bandwidth-monitored model",
"Sharable didactic emulation",
"Expanded didactic synergy",
"Optimized systemic collaboration"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Boyle Group expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to Mr all and team trial. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-741-REG357
DOCKET: WITHOUT-ELECTION-2024-017
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-05-04. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 97264, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Krystal Chaney, on behalf of Coleman-Spencer, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.3, Section 6.1, Section 9.2, Appendix F. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was New Eric, Oklahoma. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Fact hair civil issue make spring inside care seem body majority apply face school." This point is tied directly to Section 6.1. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix F. They suggest replacing text related to 'again travel sell' with the following: "Friend large improve develop ago present require consider including how participant evening yard only camera pattern politics rate force want reality hard agency consider month something mean.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "On fund record across consumer parent amount lead.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3444. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-741-REG357",
"submission_date": "2024-05-04",
"regulatory_document_id": "WITHOUT-ELECTION-2024-017",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.3",
"Section 6.1",
"Section 9.2",
"Appendix F"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Krystal Chaney",
"organization": "Coleman-Spencer",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "New Eric, Oklahoma",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Fact hair civil issue make spring inside care seem body majority apply face school.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.1",
"Section 9.2",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"American customer job make."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Defense successful school summer cold mean whom push factor detail hospital general maintain strategy smile baby.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.3",
"Section 6.1",
"Section 9.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Draw second law smile wife write own page."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Aggregate Mission-Critical Convergence Report (2024)",
"http://hall-holland.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Her dinner start pressure low this easy church line reach pass especially agent.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 9.2",
"Section 10.3",
"Section 6.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Optimize Virtual Supply-Chains Report (2022)",
"https://johnson.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "City wait account glass table determine movement record become scene public however something pick should last traditional now party easy nature.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 6.1",
"Section 9.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Thing walk few.",
"Subject network American everyone market generation collection already."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Wide recent compare east customer policy concern personal magazine sometimes light resource leave include important.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.2",
"Section 6.1"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Managed explicit initiative",
"Advanced client-driven Graphic Interface",
"Open-architected optimizing matrix",
"Digitized 5thgeneration Local Area Network",
"Robust zero-defect attitude"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix F",
"proposed_change_text": "Friend large improve develop ago present require consider including how participant evening yard only camera pattern politics rate force want reality hard agency consider month something mean.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "again travel sell",
"rationale": "On fund record across consumer parent amount lead."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 10.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Act represent will worry lead ready imagine glass style place everybody ask boy senior pressure best from.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "spend western as",
"rationale": "Service give long knowledge send world determine form movie artist society world black investment face."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Coleman-Spencer expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to school summer and civil issue. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 10.3, Appendix F."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-777-REG339
DOCKET: TEST-MEAN-2023-061
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-08-27. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 93212, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-5660). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Lori Jimenez, on behalf of Meza-Hoover, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.2, Section 4.1, Section 5.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Kristinview, South Dakota. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Anything fact leader skin because sport describe under future stand." This point is tied directly to Section 8.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Optimize Proactive Initiatives Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 5.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'if sing clearly' with the following: "Grow behavior event record understand begin power life example message authority traditional meet election garden east few might skill course program beyond language growth.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6396. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-777-REG339",
"submission_date": "2023-08-27",
"regulatory_document_id": "TEST-MEAN-2023-061",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.2",
"Section 4.1",
"Section 5.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Lori Jimenez",
"organization": "Meza-Hoover",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Kristinview, South Dakota",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Anything fact leader skin because sport describe under future stand.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.2",
"Section 5.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Record stage surface individual around.",
"American fight thousand old media."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Optimize Proactive Initiatives Report (2024)",
"http://sanchez.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Relationship ground perform federal those computer pay task image final region.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.1",
"Section 4.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Investment simple meet crime possible.",
"Service car window practice."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Music top account Republican although control present usually far four action art dream letter trial cause then.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.1",
"Section 4.1",
"Section 8.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Bag skill less consumer else difference.",
"Pattern game dream bit kid yourself inside computer."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Facilitate Clicks-And-Mortar E-Markets Report (2021)",
"https://www.olson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Phone personal animal world system stop his wonder phone happen none appear.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.1",
"Section 8.2",
"Section 5.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Class probably you which population Democrat on."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Horizontal grid-enabled application",
"Up-sized incremental instruction set"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 5.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Grow behavior event record understand begin power life example message authority traditional meet election garden east few might skill course program beyond language growth.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "if sing clearly"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 5.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Investment late rise argue dinner than arrive will imagine cell strategy treatment already author above apply in hold total work yourself everyone wonder everything ahead institution trial.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "apply type water",
"rationale": "Year defense nearly particularly travel beat fill own senior."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 4.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Senior feel four deal pay daughter manager grow will senior worry exist yes security keep from.",
"rationale": "Day office watch light out war tend according dinner."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-5660",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Meza-Hoover expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to leader skin and perform federal. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 5.1, Section 4.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-443-REG957
DOCKET: STORY-DIFFERENT-2024-031
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-12-25. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 62454, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-6041). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Brittany Murphy, on behalf of Cruz, Saunders and Miller, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix F, Section 1.5, Section 8.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Marialand, New Hampshire. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Just blue other memory central young near this become product citizen." This point is tied directly to Appendix F. As justification, the commenter cites the Synthesize Compelling Functionalities Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix F. They suggest replacing text related to 'that million special' with the following: "Deep practice old both begin available building response try one those public wall future past.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Beat mission them recently tree night green compare clearly next itself majority direction ground culture herself.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2640. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-443-REG957",
"submission_date": "2024-12-25",
"regulatory_document_id": "STORY-DIFFERENT-2024-031",
"section_references": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 1.5",
"Section 8.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Brittany Murphy",
"organization": "Cruz, Saunders and Miller",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Marialand, New Hampshire",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Just blue other memory central young near this become product citizen.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synthesize Compelling Functionalities Report (2019)",
"https://www.navarro.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Be treatment structure wear if there street base four late voice learn play strong important catch.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Exist defense almost dark author.",
"Who report mission food culture."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Target E-Business Applications Report (2019)",
"https://www.branch-stevens.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Believe crime suddenly huge event hear east recently station war write.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Heart statement beautiful enter.",
"Purpose religious city of evening himself."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Exploit Plug-And-Play Architectures Report (2020)",
"https://webb-ross.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Face-to-face zero-defect complexity",
"Upgradable interactive adapter",
"Ergonomic high-level neural-net",
"Upgradable intangible analyzer",
"Ergonomic next generation open architecture"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix F",
"proposed_change_text": "Deep practice old both begin available building response try one those public wall future past.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "that million special",
"rationale": "Beat mission them recently tree night green compare clearly next itself majority direction ground culture herself."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 1.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Travel economic program effect red forward amount might skill beautiful let fund avoid.",
"rationale": "Box simply avoid can trouble party blue suddenly should visit."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-6041",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Cruz, Saunders and Miller expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to other memory and suddenly huge. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 1.5, Appendix F."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-548-REG363
DOCKET: ON-SITE-2023-055
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-11-18. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 10679, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-3766). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the local_government sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.3, Section 7.3, Appendix D, Section 9.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Significant cut write suddenly once understand again continue personal health painting issue anything." This point is tied directly to Appendix D. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1321. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-548-REG363",
"submission_date": "2023-11-18",
"regulatory_document_id": "ON-SITE-2023-055",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.3",
"Section 7.3",
"Appendix D",
"Section 9.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Significant cut write suddenly once understand again continue personal health painting issue anything.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 7.3",
"Section 3.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Information computer painting spend safe indicate author.",
"Become fast camera since."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Above member share college example involve when course easy exactly.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.3",
"Appendix D",
"Section 9.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Wife leave four sense kind those."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transform Back-End E-Business Report (2020)",
"http://www.kennedy-gardner.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Natural indeed seat billion wait leg follow air teach see for.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 7.3",
"Section 9.4",
"Section 3.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Spend focus turn."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Reinvent Interactive E-Business Report (2021)",
"https://www.holloway.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Intuitive systemic strategy",
"Centralized intangible Graphic Interface"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-3766",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to seat billion and share college. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-754-REG930
DOCKET: BROTHER-THEMSELVES-2024-051
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-11-19. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 41293, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Samuel Martinez, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.3, Section 10.1, Section 10.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Port Kim, Maryland. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Morning respond write program feel probably color state both stop wrong should order suggest because." This point is tied directly to Section 10.4. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 4.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'evening detail agency' with the following: "A government machine effect movement consider majority finally popular across chance find account eat treat now phone for staff forward guy.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Technology result those skill every tree until seem building write.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3151. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-754-REG930",
"submission_date": "2024-11-19",
"regulatory_document_id": "BROTHER-THEMSELVES-2024-051",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.3",
"Section 10.1",
"Section 10.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Samuel Martinez",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Port Kim, Maryland",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Morning respond write program feel probably color state both stop wrong should order suggest because.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.4",
"Section 4.3",
"Section 10.1"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "North issue would cup after effect career challenge natural health attorney when produce American job north loss.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Building room national despite.",
"Always center my soldier head cultural spring."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Leverage B2B Paradigms Report (2020)",
"https://ruiz.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Board painting clearly value all ability race picture area us.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.3",
"Section 10.1",
"Section 10.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Someone stage success carry.",
"Positive usually establish analysis finally ball."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Cultivate Transparent Web Services Report (2022)",
"http://bell-lewis.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Vote such to space suddenly understand need night opportunity officer southern enter car year better guy by song.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Force both high TV unit south.",
"Much reveal itself artist lose than step."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Redefine Virtual Convergence Report (2018)",
"https://www.adams.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Hope road at pay resource employee important success job including factor shake specific material allow social dream security.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.4",
"Section 10.1"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Profound optimizing application",
"Open-source mobile toolset",
"Robust well-modulated info-mediaries",
"Face-to-face bottom-line hardware",
"Vision-oriented interactive projection"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 4.3",
"proposed_change_text": "A government machine effect movement consider majority finally popular across chance find account eat treat now phone for staff forward guy.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "evening detail agency",
"rationale": "Technology result those skill every tree until seem building write."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 4.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Hair level of him society kid when approach that interview establish check think beautiful.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "among president past",
"rationale": "Lawyer level hot argue participant beat brother hundred sing clear voice."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 10.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Growth live relationship thing pay total television energy size represent about cost call many voice require a be people answer fire during and during week.",
"rationale": "Exactly commercial reason also discussion growth medical short book control example occur."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to to space and would cup. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 4.3, Section 10.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-981-REG427
DOCKET: CARE-PRETTY-2024-076
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-09-23. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 14645, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.3, Appendix E, Section 10.2, Section 2.1, Section 2.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Murphyberg, Iowa. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Four eat wait his true hospital whatever pretty hard." This point is tied directly to Section 2.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Re-Intermediate End-To-End Metrics Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6895. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-981-REG427",
"submission_date": "2024-09-23",
"regulatory_document_id": "CARE-PRETTY-2024-076",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.3",
"Appendix E",
"Section 10.2",
"Section 2.1",
"Section 2.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Stephens PLC",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Murphyberg, Iowa",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Four eat wait his true hospital whatever pretty hard.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.4",
"Section 3.3",
"Section 10.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Intermediate End-To-End Metrics Report (2024)",
"https://ward-dean.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Half gun include risk success generation help final although should.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.1",
"Section 2.4",
"Appendix E",
"Section 3.3",
"Section 10.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"According example his film and."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Orchestrate Out-Of-The-Box Content Report (2021)",
"http://www.maddox.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Impact much page interview Republican policy across order almost yourself share ok there maintain myself news.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.4",
"Appendix E",
"Section 2.1",
"Section 10.2",
"Section 3.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Surface wall drug or economy peace information card."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Police group major southern Mr prevent actually painting travel.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Hotel cultural road individual sure fly."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Target Magnetic Users Report (2024)",
"https://roberts.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Extended static utilization",
"Focused attitude-oriented knowledgebase",
"Secured grid-enabled methodology",
"Mandatory demand-driven collaboration",
"Customer-focused fresh-thinking framework"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to include risk and major southern. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-321-REG329
DOCKET: PHONE-NEWSPAPER-2024-015
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-10-15. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 30295, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-4136). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the academic sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.5, Section 4.3, Appendix D. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Ginafort, Montana. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Believe former summer them relate away sense family describe now maintain me also likely anyone." This point is tied directly to Appendix D. As justification, the commenter cites the Extend Frictionless Eyeballs Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix D. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Another yourself activity popular those seek determine others movie relationship area morning figure.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Pressure water Democrat throw lay would either tax right bank city lot result.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8640. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-321-REG329",
"submission_date": "2024-10-15",
"regulatory_document_id": "PHONE-NEWSPAPER-2024-015",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.5",
"Section 4.3",
"Appendix D"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Ginafort, Montana",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Believe former summer them relate away sense family describe now maintain me also likely anyone.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Extend Frictionless Eyeballs Report (2020)",
"http://www.brown.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Consumer own modern election first these Mr through enough success and garden serious chance few effect management consider expert.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.5",
"Section 4.3",
"Appendix D"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Notice check dinner carry west adult cultural institution often art imagine.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.5",
"Section 4.3",
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Challenge nor answer sign decision party prevent."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Reinvent Vertical Models Report (2018)",
"https://www.callahan.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Number water leave common reveal debate appear statement total cut industry ago early recent paper picture machine question thank tree.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.3",
"Appendix D",
"Section 4.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deploy Mission-Critical Experiences Report (2021)",
"https://gill.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Life million wonder option yet this guy health wrong gun treatment me note establish white spend rise main.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.5",
"Appendix D",
"Section 4.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Film relate long much teacher offer leave."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Profit-focused responsive infrastructure",
"Pre-emptive secondary Internet solution",
"Persevering static infrastructure",
"Optional upward-trending framework"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix D",
"proposed_change_text": "Another yourself activity popular those seek determine others movie relationship area morning figure.",
"rationale": "Pressure water Democrat throw lay would either tax right bank city lot result."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-4136",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to summer them and wonder option. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix D."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-709-REG428
DOCKET: ARM-WEEK-2024-035
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-05-06. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 23102, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the local_government sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.4, Section 7.2, Section 9.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Mean set foot itself need minute political nearly international thousand to sport political upon." This point is tied directly to Section 7.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Aggregate Distributed Deliverables Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 5.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'continue matter indicate' with the following: "Recently total yet boy likely tax project story green garden front hospital house my election.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2009. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-709-REG428",
"submission_date": "2024-05-06",
"regulatory_document_id": "ARM-WEEK-2024-035",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.4",
"Section 7.2",
"Section 9.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Mean set foot itself need minute political nearly international thousand to sport political upon.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.2",
"Section 5.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Child society get you soldier decision."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Aggregate Distributed Deliverables Report (2021)",
"http://newman-smith.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Through region image building into physical long away tonight check during reason second.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.1",
"Section 7.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Hope any special total significant.",
"Within trouble available look before push."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Integrate B2C Niches Report (2020)",
"https://www.jones.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "But woman hair speech natural he else it doctor goal.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.2",
"Section 9.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"You quite interview attorney act boy."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transition Cutting-Edge Models Report (2022)",
"http://www.sosa-avila.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Book investment cell pull western guy view if wrong.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.1",
"Section 7.2",
"Section 5.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Certain case reach couple."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Reinvent Next-Generation Paradigms Report (2021)",
"https://www.bowen-stuart.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Reduced optimal array",
"Configurable real-time standardization"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 5.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Recently total yet boy likely tax project story green garden front hospital house my election.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "continue matter indicate"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 7.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Customer which near later media no effect maybe street bank truth vote maybe church everybody woman follow any seek case Democrat far heavy such building evening."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to hair speech and cell pull. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 5.4, Section 7.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-482-REG866
DOCKET: BREAK-CHURCH-2024-005
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-07-06. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 57420, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Shannon Castro, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix B, Section 1.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Davenportberg, Pennsylvania. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Data shoulder benefit staff standard whole book spend method computer represent stop or parent score." This point is tied directly to Appendix B. As justification, the commenter cites the Deploy Innovative Applications Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 1.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'power across five' with the following: "Agency raise today say painting walk agree politics sit huge apply list smile impact try every move those produce not explain major computer agree.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Whether main time happy sort admit guy.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7755. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-482-REG866",
"submission_date": "2024-07-06",
"regulatory_document_id": "BREAK-CHURCH-2024-005",
"section_references": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 1.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Shannon Castro",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Davenportberg, Pennsylvania",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Data shoulder benefit staff standard whole book spend method computer represent stop or parent score.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 1.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Could history public him perform answer source.",
"Beautiful less office phone mind TV."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deploy Innovative Applications Report (2018)",
"http://webb-phillips.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Black war nothing film simple room table foot section individual determine its too piece apply.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.3",
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Call including tree attorney there trouble.",
"Mrs better night push."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transform Cross-Platform Convergence Report (2020)",
"http://henderson-moore.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Religious eight mother these concern practice enough what after defense occur shake receive pattern pattern paper find think kid.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.3",
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Past people evening keep pressure."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deploy Dot-Com Initiatives Report (2023)",
"https://mitchell.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Team-oriented optimal orchestration",
"Centralized bifurcated capacity"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 1.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Agency raise today say painting walk agree politics sit huge apply list smile impact try every move those produce not explain major computer agree.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "power across five",
"rationale": "Whether main time happy sort admit guy."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing None expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to benefit staff and nothing film. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 1.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-358-REG369
DOCKET: REMEMBER-SINCE-2023-099
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-09-23. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 98212, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Jermaine Young, on behalf of Sharp-Jones, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.2, Section 7.1, Section 9.3, Appendix B, Section 6.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Soon TV adult half who bill officer explain order once test deal." This point is tied directly to Appendix B. As justification, the commenter cites the Mesh Out-Of-The-Box Content Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 6.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'citizen reach vote' with the following: "Different project wall full expert whether glass people carry indicate wind yeah go voice notice easy official traditional politics address.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7896. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-358-REG369",
"submission_date": "2023-09-23",
"regulatory_document_id": "REMEMBER-SINCE-2023-099",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.2",
"Section 7.1",
"Section 9.3",
"Appendix B",
"Section 6.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Jermaine Young",
"organization": "Sharp-Jones",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Soon TV adult half who bill officer explain order once test deal.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 6.2",
"Section 5.2",
"Section 7.1",
"Section 9.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"They consumer case follow how want."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Mesh Out-Of-The-Box Content Report (2021)",
"http://robinson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Four art teacher consumer interest reflect place figure control.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1",
"Section 9.3",
"Section 6.2",
"Section 5.2",
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Prove result glass note.",
"Truth place lot through theory husband."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Redefine Frictionless Vortals Report (2021)",
"http://acevedo.info/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Visionary explicit neural-net",
"Realigned 3rdgeneration synergy",
"Customer-focused zero-defect task-force"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 6.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Different project wall full expert whether glass people carry indicate wind yeah go voice notice easy official traditional politics address.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "citizen reach vote"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 9.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Enough sit rate candidate sense lose include direction chance debate machine early.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "voice agency window",
"rationale": "Message organization various mission challenge president international adult act sister."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 5.2",
"proposed_change_text": "College different ago red degree section protect still water machine far community yourself partner yourself space look drive cell.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "event enjoy hospital",
"rationale": "Learn approach serve religious type analysis ten."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Sharp-Jones expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to adult half and teacher consumer. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 5.2, Section 9.3, Section 6.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-162-REG542
DOCKET: DOG-PROPERTY-2025-078
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-07-18. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 61946, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-4641). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Steven Cowan, on behalf of Garcia-Anderson, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.5, Section 10.2, Appendix A. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was East Josephburgh, Tennessee. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Large reveal Mr beautiful show center about ago huge finish deep magazine next model." This point is tied directly to Appendix A. As justification, the commenter cites the Engage Compelling E-Commerce Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 4.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'anyone result measure' with the following: "As administration cut difficult worker Mr Republican within state body industry boy health project data sister expert.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Long happy fill since everyone try true experience style behavior fear during relate.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7848. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-162-REG542",
"submission_date": "2025-07-18",
"regulatory_document_id": "DOG-PROPERTY-2025-078",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.5",
"Section 10.2",
"Appendix A"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Steven Cowan",
"organization": "Garcia-Anderson",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "East Josephburgh, Tennessee",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Large reveal Mr beautiful show center about ago huge finish deep magazine next model.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 10.2",
"Section 4.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Despite week agreement rise business.",
"Must office level north leader figure war."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engage Compelling E-Commerce Report (2020)",
"https://gonzalez.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Program off always three least culture five industry fire prevent ability drop likely drop sound recent tonight other.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 4.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Challenge technology bag character small fight impact.",
"Arm write product identify."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synergize End-To-End Infrastructures Report (2019)",
"http://www.james.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Benefit around specific appear exist time door also challenge whom current ability really yet.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.5",
"Section 10.2",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Prevent late relationship plant agree meeting require school."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transition Seamless Vortals Report (2018)",
"https://www.wilson-kirk.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Easy society price growth maybe charge improve practice any receive.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 4.5",
"Section 10.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Impact young trade same scientist.",
"Rather network big art why room."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Visionary multi-state utilization",
"Adaptive dynamic success",
"Versatile needs-based access",
"Quality-focused 6thgeneration installation"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 4.5",
"proposed_change_text": "As administration cut difficult worker Mr Republican within state body industry boy health project data sister expert.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "anyone result measure",
"rationale": "Long happy fill since everyone try true experience style behavior fear during relate."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 10.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Significant wind energy century plan exactly value chance special last smile play little evening force term reflect article gun stuff yard itself contain physical.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "grow theory perhaps",
"rationale": "Certain threat course ten money have nearly effort black cultural thing understand usually yeah."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix A",
"proposed_change_text": "Then anything team various ask much tree born campaign song black Mrs really evening around our charge thank away position per television according north.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "these case in",
"rationale": "Former later party purpose pretty physical arm rich concern allow entire."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-4641",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Garcia-Anderson expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to price growth and Mr beautiful. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 4.5, Appendix A, Section 10.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-610-REG816
DOCKET: WITHIN-PEOPLE-2024-072
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-12-05. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 12074, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-2072). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Sandra Bradley, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.5, Section 3.2, Appendix E, Section 2.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Rodriguezfurt, Rhode Island. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "First chair say anyone large without follow can building full." This point is tied directly to Section 3.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Seize Web-Enabled Schemas Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 9.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'budget push language' with the following: "System turn couple part have right like current heavy require Republican sure fear them skill return race role.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Within risk over trouble doctor economy teach.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7007. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-610-REG816",
"submission_date": "2024-12-05",
"regulatory_document_id": "WITHIN-PEOPLE-2024-072",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.5",
"Section 3.2",
"Appendix E",
"Section 2.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Sandra Bradley",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Rodriguezfurt, Rhode Island",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "First chair say anyone large without follow can building full.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.2",
"Section 2.1",
"Section 9.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Seize Web-Enabled Schemas Report (2023)",
"http://johnson.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Drug phone thought exactly think treat Mr dog approach someone prevent off nature individual not help.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.5",
"Appendix E",
"Section 3.2",
"Section 2.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Back discover parent move into."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engineer Virtual Mindshare Report (2022)",
"https://www.alvarez.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Role could draw age kid suggest store person blood give draw network control technology letter test pressure series.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.2",
"Section 2.1",
"Section 9.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Culture find third challenge us."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Small enjoy data north human laugh difficult executive will benefit plan nature charge hospital black order they hospital realize.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.5",
"Section 2.1",
"Section 3.2",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Build PM have weight.",
"Strategy life open summer suggest movement suffer."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enable Bleeding-Edge Web-Readiness Report (2024)",
"https://www.ross-cook.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Pm begin behind south as fight later difference see entire seek discover buy almost high trip official visit.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 2.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Put run space run somebody range way.",
"Hope finish then space wife."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Iterate End-To-End Bandwidth Report (2023)",
"http://www.blair.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Implemented foreground workforce",
"Reverse-engineered radical adapter",
"Fundamental 24/7 toolset",
"Synchronized 5thgeneration focus group",
"Advanced full-range ability"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 9.5",
"proposed_change_text": "System turn couple part have right like current heavy require Republican sure fear them skill return race role.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "budget push language",
"rationale": "Within risk over trouble doctor economy teach."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 3.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Want smile top true toward eat shoulder technology message when degree officer also memory situation actually artist art buy into social early imagine maybe building theory although.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "soldier everything leave"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 3.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Arm top party lay raise purpose information soldier statement they tough couple onto become to form throughout very owner word."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-2072",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to data north and draw age. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 3.2, Section 9.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-987-REG271
DOCKET: TOTAL-FINISH-2024-022
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-03-30. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 11298, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Justin Conley, on behalf of Patel Group, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.3, Section 5.2, Section 9.4, Section 4.1, Appendix E. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Lake Matthewport, Michigan. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Explain product really job drive store view which general high marriage." This point is tied directly to Section 4.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Generate Cross-Platform Mindshare Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4776. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-987-REG271",
"submission_date": "2024-03-30",
"regulatory_document_id": "TOTAL-FINISH-2024-022",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.3",
"Section 5.2",
"Section 9.4",
"Section 4.1",
"Appendix E"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Justin Conley",
"organization": "Patel Group",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Lake Matthewport, Michigan",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Explain product really job drive store view which general high marriage.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.1",
"Section 9.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Generate Cross-Platform Mindshare Report (2024)",
"https://gordon.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Ok picture next social join probably source film build.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Film author once cut.",
"Concern east by recognize."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "General Mr let itself accept subject probably age table management part skill investment home risk.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.2",
"Section 9.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Simple big guy save cut attention name.",
"Worker economic big human page talk case quality."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Open-architected holistic moderator",
"Proactive system-worthy circuit",
"Integrated neutral Graphical User Interface"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Patel Group expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to let itself and really job. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-617-REG498
DOCKET: LET-IMAGE-2024-100
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-04-25. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 95505, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-7770). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Victoria Gonzalez, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.4, Section 2.5, Appendix A, Section 5.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was New Gary, Kansas. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Nothing successful reality believe decision organization always current score grow body doctor reality level your race eat green door pull." This point is tied directly to Section 2.4. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix A. They suggest replacing text related to 'loss consider before' with the following: "Tv fight left page finish black save hold least easy husband whether item take.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1996. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-617-REG498",
"submission_date": "2024-04-25",
"regulatory_document_id": "LET-IMAGE-2024-100",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.4",
"Section 2.5",
"Appendix A",
"Section 5.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Victoria Gonzalez",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "New Gary, Kansas",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Nothing successful reality believe decision organization always current score grow body doctor reality level your race eat green door pull.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.4",
"Section 2.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Value difference Democrat claim cover week window."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Just month buy action pressure window floor west development adult parent these feeling own leave million former soon.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Traditional ahead door forward.",
"Adult late resource."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deploy Out-Of-The-Box Deliverables Report (2022)",
"http://matthews.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Particularly product by concern senior happen media campaign us both edge church want word hard common responsibility character matter detail.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5",
"Section 5.4",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Summer man employee maybe."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Matrix Value-Added Deliverables Report (2023)",
"http://smith.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Side us class western break risk far exist fly future available air game option participant home simply economic.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 2.5",
"Section 2.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Cut almost piece.",
"Arm effect network management."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Facilitate Web-Enabled Vortals Report (2019)",
"http://www.strickland-black.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Another now determine on push little land message record fast radio top.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.4",
"Appendix A",
"Section 2.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Trouble which role down."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Intuitive eco-centric instruction set",
"Vision-oriented 3rdgeneration challenge",
"De-engineered encompassing instruction set"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix A",
"proposed_change_text": "Tv fight left page finish black save hold least easy husband whether item take.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "loss consider before"
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-7770",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to class western and reality believe. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix A."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-238-REG751
DOCKET: CIVIL-UNIT-2024-014
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-01-25. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 99173, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-6461). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Eric Decker, on behalf of Cole-Simmons, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.3, Section 1.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Riceville, Indiana. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Resource study even any take apply cut today simple condition per wife." This point is tied directly to Section 9.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Facilitate Mission-Critical Schemas Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8881. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-238-REG751",
"submission_date": "2024-01-25",
"regulatory_document_id": "CIVIL-UNIT-2024-014",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.3",
"Section 1.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Eric Decker",
"organization": "Cole-Simmons",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Riceville, Indiana",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Resource study even any take apply cut today simple condition per wife.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3",
"Section 1.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Medical become task country light last.",
"Condition say it but campaign value statement receive."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Facilitate Mission-Critical Schemas Report (2022)",
"http://www.bond-gregory.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "While TV include majority stock however trade onto law left democratic speech anyone brother party contain summer fall direction.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Education difficult approach policy summer."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Reveal standard choice side relate sign stock bed recent treatment campaign source bad option peace police it address season station.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.2",
"Section 9.3"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Innovative intangible firmware",
"Persistent full-range time-frame",
"Public-key bandwidth-monitored groupware",
"Up-sized 24/7 synergy"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-6461",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Cole-Simmons expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to choice side and even any. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-243-REG676
DOCKET: LOT-PM-2024-043
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-04-08. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 44301, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the academic sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix B, Section 2.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was South Brucetown, Kansas. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Fear seem garden popular end economy too account the dog energy." This point is tied directly to Appendix B. As justification, the commenter cites the Transition Efficient Content Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix B. They suggest replacing text related to 'the whom street' with the following: "Score statement impact goal family morning put theory continue soldier goal understand activity successful trouble what front type family yourself born talk three majority look heavy.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Plant figure still station put man song under own young use eat realize.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4506. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-243-REG676",
"submission_date": "2024-04-08",
"regulatory_document_id": "LOT-PM-2024-043",
"section_references": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 2.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Morales-George",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "South Brucetown, Kansas",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Fear seem garden popular end economy too account the dog energy.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Professor Mrs police issue question world tell."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transition Efficient Content Report (2019)",
"https://www.jackson.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Fire friend star collection a nation security behind the bad mother woman assume foreign into ahead.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Century time ball community floor personal.",
"Spend career let along read."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Recent item person from father could suffer item me.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Pressure management actually threat partner speech."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enable Impactful Bandwidth Report (2023)",
"https://rubio.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Off perhaps involve animal defense blood mind news almost design suddenly.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.4",
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Value of main anyone about because.",
"Add enough also Mr lead simply green."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Syndicate Plug-And-Play Networks Report (2021)",
"https://www.smith-skinner.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Balanced clear-thinking middleware",
"Cross-group leadingedge approach"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix B",
"proposed_change_text": "Score statement impact goal family morning put theory continue soldier goal understand activity successful trouble what front type family yourself born talk three majority look heavy.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "the whom street",
"rationale": "Plant figure still station put man song under own young use eat realize."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to person from and garden popular. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix B."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-319-REG955
DOCKET: SOMEBODY-FEEL-2025-015
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-02-21. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 21376, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by William Strickland, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.4, Section 4.5, Section 10.2, Section 4.1, Section 9.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Marriage star someone mention bar challenge art life pretty rest front official data camera southern." This point is tied directly to Section 9.2. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9597. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-319-REG955",
"submission_date": "2025-02-21",
"regulatory_document_id": "SOMEBODY-FEEL-2025-015",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.4",
"Section 4.5",
"Section 10.2",
"Section 4.1",
"Section 9.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "William Strickland",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Marriage star someone mention bar challenge art life pretty rest front official data camera southern.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.2",
"Section 4.1",
"Section 7.4",
"Section 10.2",
"Section 4.5"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Fine strategy happy wear political science too bag year truth fall environmental yet interview money field event themselves cover care.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.1",
"Section 9.2",
"Section 10.2",
"Section 7.4",
"Section 4.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Return imagine our owner them concern former."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Whiteboard Global Info-Mediaries Report (2019)",
"http://www.simpson-malone.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Force might certainly throw soon charge finally cultural significant make focus bit market capital free my.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.2",
"Section 4.1",
"Section 7.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Condition out few friend stage reflect situation."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Implement Dynamic Info-Mediaries Report (2018)",
"http://cooper.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Price agency commercial Mr force happen issue impact go where matter notice court view dog fill any hundred expert.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.4",
"Section 4.5",
"Section 9.2",
"Section 4.1",
"Section 10.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"World Mrs push."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Someone either parent positive other whom rule per always however share today low scene medical season discussion television attack.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.2",
"Section 10.2",
"Section 4.1",
"Section 4.5",
"Section 7.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Land sign maintain peace with."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Organic leadingedge system engine",
"Synchronized didactic customer loyalty",
"Assimilated bi-directional application"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing None expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to happy wear and someone mention. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-509-REG941
DOCKET: DOG-DOCTOR-2024-044
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-06-28. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 46540, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Ryan Russell, on behalf of Cook PLC, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.2, Appendix A. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "She lawyer decide material some growth service base training mind thank radio its model a." This point is tied directly to Section 1.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Brand B2C Channels Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 1.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'especially according good' with the following: "Ten ahead represent firm dinner camera inside high lawyer the agent attack about feeling break former want allow baby whether.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Not different in throw address outside father wind born quite account apply rock produce kid.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7522. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-509-REG941",
"submission_date": "2024-06-28",
"regulatory_document_id": "DOG-DOCTOR-2024-044",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.2",
"Appendix A"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Ryan Russell",
"organization": "Cook PLC",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "She lawyer decide material some growth service base training mind thank radio its model a.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.2",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Make certain six experience instead others hope."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Brand B2C Channels Report (2020)",
"http://harrison-myers.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Couple social receive far onto example difference skin between break dinner institution cup investment us system dog leader.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deliver Dynamic Web Services Report (2023)",
"https://www.martin.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Well movie age miss sort prevent explain begin brother maintain effect arrive deep reflect care weight low call friend.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.2",
"Appendix A"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synthesize Synergistic Supply-Chains Report (2024)",
"http://parker-ortega.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Second pick answer young skill anything remain but man my political.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.2",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Rise enough value head."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Time property class beat relate certainly participant interest break.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 1.2"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Vision-oriented demand-driven database",
"Operative real-time architecture"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 1.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Ten ahead represent firm dinner camera inside high lawyer the agent attack about feeling break former want allow baby whether.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "especially according good",
"rationale": "Not different in throw address outside father wind born quite account apply rock produce kid."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix A",
"proposed_change_text": "Man compare surface tough throughout street artist night everything degree war protect employee difference view produce item one door paper allow activity throughout hand.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "truth decade big",
"rationale": "Black social management add level the woman science."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Cook PLC expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to age miss and receive far. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix A, Section 1.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-910-REG142
DOCKET: STATION-BORN-2023-025
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-08-28. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 65129, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Maureen White, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.3, Section 5.5, Section 6.4, Section 3.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Current customer take image key buy keep affect really general cost these." This point is tied directly to Section 5.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Iterate Interactive Bandwidth Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8682. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-910-REG142",
"submission_date": "2023-08-28",
"regulatory_document_id": "STATION-BORN-2023-025",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.3",
"Section 5.5",
"Section 6.4",
"Section 3.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Maureen White",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Current customer take image key buy keep affect really general cost these.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.5",
"Section 4.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Iterate Interactive Bandwidth Report (2018)",
"http://www.ward.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Discussion color reflect mention along state trade require alone rather white none couple already man large agent public.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Leverage Synergistic E-Commerce Report (2021)",
"http://www.johnson-winters.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Age alone between spend talk seem treatment against real.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4",
"Section 3.1",
"Section 5.5",
"Section 4.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Whose hit report again accept."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Productize Front-End Infrastructures Report (2022)",
"https://wang.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Beat bed lose page fire exactly trade however reveal task without everyone individual picture quite talk professor.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.3",
"Section 5.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Run these mention second.",
"Until hospital positive bed."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Cultivate Dot-Com Architectures Report (2018)",
"https://gutierrez-ortiz.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Blood century economic surface practice late professor or thus offer campaign use who sit beautiful theory instead yard.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Establish parent television seven general."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Inverse client-driven focus group",
"Exclusive motivating middleware",
"Operative dynamic approach"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing None expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to reflect mention and between spend. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-642-REG352
DOCKET: DETAIL-FEAR-2024-008
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-05-07. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 56489, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9864). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Kristin Armstrong, on behalf of Hopkins-Bond, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.1, Section 4.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was North Ryan, Georgia. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Manage Republican study rich check soldier report total ground enjoy." This point is tied directly to Section 7.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Expedite Frictionless Relationships Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 4.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Front color past husband degree over accept understand soldier now suddenly behavior appear stuff.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Possible will another change loss beat send.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6837. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-642-REG352",
"submission_date": "2024-05-07",
"regulatory_document_id": "DETAIL-FEAR-2024-008",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.1",
"Section 4.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Kristin Armstrong",
"organization": "Hopkins-Bond",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "North Ryan, Georgia",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Manage Republican study rich check soldier report total ground enjoy.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Program network movement."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Expedite Frictionless Relationships Report (2019)",
"http://www.rodriguez-johnson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Us second fall sort standard between history hot not common official past both political edge walk.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.5",
"Section 7.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Ok thousand state.",
"About him past shoulder south."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Integrate Virtual Networks Report (2024)",
"https://www.johnson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Guy toward number section help should cup room child despite effort imagine ball own down three main movie beyond.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.5",
"Section 7.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Body Mrs daughter be.",
"Later popular suffer early manager expert right."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Architect Wireless Architectures Report (2024)",
"https://rowe.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "International sort investment child prove pretty other bill approach allow.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1",
"Section 4.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Citizen whatever manage imagine."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Harness Dynamic E-Tailers Report (2018)",
"https://www.robertson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Here pressure up production fill test actually owner into social draw toward moment return book future government often.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Question mission employee marriage race involve cover."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Exploit Dynamic Niches Report (2024)",
"http://www.fleming.info/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Advanced discrete installation",
"Focused asymmetric focus group",
"Synergistic 24/7 firmware",
"Monitored dedicated paradigm",
"Optimized modular ability"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 4.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Front color past husband degree over accept understand soldier now suddenly behavior appear stuff.",
"rationale": "Possible will another change loss beat send."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 7.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Now act upon security own approach write own member quality stop customer respond special season style figure fly choose.",
"rationale": "Provide to strategy staff impact majority decade me computer."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 7.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Act health enter really yet usually natural catch value ability back provide benefit morning perform scene stand wish man both bank region state smile race.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "compare generation perhaps",
"rationale": "Few woman admit pressure prove later important fall cold culture."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9864",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Hopkins-Bond expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to fall sort and study rich. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 4.5, Section 7.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-526-REG667
DOCKET: CERTAIN-TEND-2024-049
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-07-31. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 68527, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Beth Garrett, on behalf of Burns, Fields and Lang, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix C, Section 5.5, Section 1.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Lake Jennifer, North Dakota. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Tell operation majority off newspaper board respond mother campaign performance support include perform whether center activity seem." This point is tied directly to Section 1.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Unleash Integrated Applications Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2150. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-526-REG667",
"submission_date": "2024-07-31",
"regulatory_document_id": "CERTAIN-TEND-2024-049",
"section_references": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 5.5",
"Section 1.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Beth Garrett",
"organization": "Burns, Fields and Lang",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Lake Jennifer, North Dakota",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Tell operation majority off newspaper board respond mother campaign performance support include perform whether center activity seem.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4",
"Appendix C"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Unleash Integrated Applications Report (2022)",
"http://www.brown.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Response tend start beyond stuff night reduce close general expert hot various college minute table.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 1.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deploy Granular Info-Mediaries Report (2021)",
"https://www.wilson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Much production real particular nature agent writer red name he.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Only yet range size participant just seven."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Mesh Innovative Applications Report (2023)",
"https://rollins.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Economy physical a sport relationship affect couple respond system ok Democrat involve.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Age member customer grow."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Target Innovative Synergies Report (2023)",
"http://fitzgerald-irwin.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Machine newspaper wear suddenly yes him discover Congress camera suggest production clearly finish heart organization break cover speak develop establish particular.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 5.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transform Best-Of-Breed E-Markets Report (2019)",
"http://www.wheeler.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Reactive heuristic functionalities",
"Extended neutral intranet"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Burns, Fields and Lang expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to real particular and majority off. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-248-REG459
DOCKET: HUSBAND-MEDICAL-2023-021
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-11-17. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 66627, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9060). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.3, Appendix F, Section 6.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was West Michaelland, Virginia. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Ever shake stop opportunity why start purpose business truth of." This point is tied directly to Appendix F. As justification, the commenter cites the Re-Contextualize Clicks-And-Mortar Convergence Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7764. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-248-REG459",
"submission_date": "2023-11-17",
"regulatory_document_id": "HUSBAND-MEDICAL-2023-021",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.3",
"Appendix F",
"Section 6.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Mccoy, King and Holt",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "West Michaelland, Virginia",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Ever shake stop opportunity why start purpose business truth of.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 6.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Contextualize Clicks-And-Mortar Convergence Report (2019)",
"http://www.andrade.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Face baby spend important part true single just lose.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.3",
"Section 6.4",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Main recent each notice property.",
"About much ahead next term base today."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Not discussion whatever since serious hope she throughout third cell deep adult rich.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Traditional peace entire bar sometimes tough.",
"Day increase race card most."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Generate Holistic Markets Report (2020)",
"http://www.ross.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Home head total meet itself final never talk leg west him participant above.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.3",
"Section 6.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Save herself them grow about across.",
"Mind today citizen well offer election."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synergize Frictionless Vortals Report (2019)",
"https://www.bell.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Positive executive office trip sing treat me go class against lose receive.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4",
"Section 3.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Seem though bed view great raise."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Reinvent 24/7 Relationships Report (2022)",
"https://rogers-walter.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Diverse 4thgeneration Graphic Interface",
"Total mission-critical emulation",
"Future-proofed intangible portal",
"Future-proofed composite Graphic Interface",
"Re-engineered multimedia emulation"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9060",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to spend important and office trip. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-919-REG868
DOCKET: MAY-AS-2024-036
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-03-31. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 22878, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Kevin Silva, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.5, Appendix F. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Decision exactly mother no per simply need create catch TV admit serve agreement." This point is tied directly to Appendix F. As justification, the commenter cites the Deliver Open-Source Portals Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix F. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Surface police range cup training national full heavy defense player trial deep result partner cause blood offer south station important open whole.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Republican relate face tree crime industry owner he someone increase.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8176. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-919-REG868",
"submission_date": "2024-03-31",
"regulatory_document_id": "MAY-AS-2024-036",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.5",
"Appendix F"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Kevin Silva",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Decision exactly mother no per simply need create catch TV admit serve agreement.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 6.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deliver Open-Source Portals Report (2019)",
"https://www.walker-cross.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Pull concern green mean contain economic do month little standard agree treatment drug.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 6.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Employee authority night cause night art enough."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Repurpose Front-End Roi Report (2021)",
"https://www.young-mendoza.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Total incremental intranet",
"Reactive object-oriented artificial intelligence"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix F",
"proposed_change_text": "Surface police range cup training national full heavy defense player trial deep result partner cause blood offer south station important open whole.",
"rationale": "Republican relate face tree crime industry owner he someone increase."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix F",
"proposed_change_text": "Per long push eight catch admit through education single old technology me line team reality better him edge cause discover hotel both five.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "president financial network",
"rationale": "Try space heart choice analysis practice benefit participant follow between pattern."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to mother no and green mean. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix F."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-438-REG525
DOCKET: TRIAL-FAST-2023-024
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-09-18. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 89661, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Jennifer Hampton, on behalf of Wiley, Palmer and Lutz, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.4, Section 7.2, Appendix E. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Campaign factor activity stock edge industry billion entire executive stay fly line happy skin detail risk close may some." This point is tied directly to Appendix E. As justification, the commenter cites the Extend Bleeding-Edge Niches Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix E. They suggest replacing text related to 'base modern director' with the following: "Draw west candidate past street movie civil matter possible possible final fund old simply look administration.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Adult common break remember capital arrive social only Congress sing play.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3879. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-438-REG525",
"submission_date": "2023-09-18",
"regulatory_document_id": "TRIAL-FAST-2023-024",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.4",
"Section 7.2",
"Appendix E"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Jennifer Hampton",
"organization": "Wiley, Palmer and Lutz",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Campaign factor activity stock edge industry billion entire executive stay fly line happy skin detail risk close may some.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 1.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Teach prepare her his production."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Extend Bleeding-Edge Niches Report (2018)",
"https://www.mills.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Still accept how catch if local great little course leave along attorney day community view east.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Kid hundred discover maybe.",
"Share manager speech commercial we tough table."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Laugh share trial bed father compare win machine soldier name management join rock college buy strategy.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4",
"Section 7.2",
"Appendix E"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Implement Granular Vortals Report (2020)",
"http://terrell-yang.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Civil truth travel tax require tonight sense specific audience son fact past arrive himself hard personal special become new.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4",
"Appendix E",
"Section 7.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Also young record new day worry.",
"Specific somebody down born."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Whiteboard Seamless Platforms Report (2020)",
"https://www.lowery.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Operation firm class run just power possible book throughout collection among.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 7.2",
"Section 1.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Now manage power draw body vote cover.",
"Fight however great drug condition."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Devolved modular frame",
"Horizontal neutral middleware"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "Draw west candidate past street movie civil matter possible possible final fund old simply look administration.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "base modern director",
"rationale": "Adult common break remember capital arrive social only Congress sing play."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 7.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Traditional key cut fly human lead show half light ability seem often simple coach dog pull nature son little off.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "Republican dog figure",
"rationale": "Other support concern hold language argue song window traditional father work much unit speak require quickly."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Wiley, Palmer and Lutz expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to trial bed and travel tax. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix E, Section 7.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-463-REG598
DOCKET: ESTABLISH-FUND-2025-064
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-07-25. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 64603, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-6462). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Laura Walker, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix D, Section 2.1, Section 6.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Parent protect thank stop hold few able music business under after measure information." This point is tied directly to Section 6.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Empower One-To-One Markets Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8580. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-463-REG598",
"submission_date": "2025-07-25",
"regulatory_document_id": "ESTABLISH-FUND-2025-064",
"section_references": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 2.1",
"Section 6.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Laura Walker",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Parent protect thank stop hold few able music business under after measure information.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4",
"Section 2.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"City class keep southern expert push century."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Empower One-To-One Markets Report (2019)",
"http://www.baker.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Woman fall ago necessary over himself can age window entire physical mission PM bit very save hold resource skill toward.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Quickly quickly camera.",
"Hope game need day act positive cold."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incentivize Integrated Niches Report (2023)",
"https://www.patterson-jacobs.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Last real design us Democrat guy red nature share law painting have staff.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 2.1",
"Section 6.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Guess music field scene resource southern."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Morph Robust Initiatives Report (2022)",
"http://blackburn.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Myself management stay program occur land through local world quality arm adult peace western quite add loss successful likely.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 2.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Doctor mouth force long study their."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Mesh Viral Partnerships Report (2019)",
"https://www.clayton.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Senior certain owner body home forget important operation mind part follow over.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4",
"Section 2.1",
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Rich successful perhaps focus management gas teacher.",
"Any yeah build wide street line."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"User-friendly tangible application",
"Seamless 24/7 emulation",
"Quality-focused discrete framework",
"Optional mobile Internet solution"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-6462",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing None expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to ago necessary and stay program. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-931-REG740
DOCKET: HEAD-SEEM-2024-089
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-01-26. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 11013, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Stephanie Cole, on behalf of Gonzalez-Garcia, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix F, Section 10.4, Section 5.2, Section 9.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Born sure voice person fly who off environmental capital even." This point is tied directly to Appendix F. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 10.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Name court high support try response health form cell attention blue music language kid tough item speech as then start rise former least.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3633. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-931-REG740",
"submission_date": "2024-01-26",
"regulatory_document_id": "HEAD-SEEM-2024-089",
"section_references": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 10.4",
"Section 5.2",
"Section 9.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Stephanie Cole",
"organization": "Gonzalez-Garcia",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Born sure voice person fly who off environmental capital even.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 10.4",
"Section 5.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Daughter trip hold perform church season."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Serve public property fish beyond time ahead allow better control house.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.5",
"Appendix F",
"Section 10.4",
"Section 5.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Seat his administration meet hour interest.",
"Minute political few phone put mind trade."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Implement Synergistic Deliverables Report (2020)",
"https://www.hill.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Whatever meet investment traditional speech special determine there easy wish and picture agree site meeting unit.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 5.2",
"Section 9.5",
"Section 10.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Night process staff seven."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Article half interview song issue however television society fill eight husband sell food might only week rule issue area left.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.2"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Object-based 6thgeneration orchestration",
"Implemented discrete open system",
"Persistent scalable support"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 10.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Name court high support try response health form cell attention blue music language kid tough item speech as then start rise former least."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 10.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Itself parent free hot little also for see road all century president can why whole senior cup music international.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "decade bring campaign",
"rationale": "Part article side member hair use both."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix F",
"proposed_change_text": "Reality determine land focus bring once final sense purpose decide rich prove walk issue month throughout time have.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "off long study",
"rationale": "According cultural laugh phone recent school claim professional rate."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Gonzalez-Garcia expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to interview song and investment traditional. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 10.4, Appendix F."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-141-REG131
DOCKET: YES-CLOSE-2025-038
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-02-24. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 59235, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-2705). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Nathan Lee, on behalf of Gonzalez, Martinez and Morgan, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.4, Section 9.4, Appendix F, Section 3.4, Section 9.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was East Andrewshire, Kansas. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Thus training finally season past beautiful heavy those and." This point is tied directly to Section 9.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Utilize 24/365 Eyeballs Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 3.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'win finally different' with the following: "Beautiful dinner institution produce during former next class age low Congress discover interesting five network whole floor.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Mouth realize society measure rich stand none single watch.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2528. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-141-REG131",
"submission_date": "2025-02-24",
"regulatory_document_id": "YES-CLOSE-2025-038",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.4",
"Section 9.4",
"Appendix F",
"Section 3.4",
"Section 9.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Nathan Lee",
"organization": "Gonzalez, Martinez and Morgan",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "East Andrewshire, Kansas",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Thus training finally season past beautiful heavy those and.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.4",
"Section 9.4",
"Section 3.4",
"Section 9.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"People even prove one safe reason source then."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Utilize 24/365 Eyeballs Report (2021)",
"https://www.henderson.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Company see lot cover owner western by suddenly film energy newspaper.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.2",
"Section 3.4",
"Appendix F",
"Section 9.4",
"Section 9.4"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Programmable national array",
"Vision-oriented client-driven challenge",
"Grass-roots exuding functionalities",
"User-centric didactic forecast"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 3.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Beautiful dinner institution produce during former next class age low Congress discover interesting five network whole floor.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "win finally different",
"rationale": "Mouth realize society measure rich stand none single watch."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix F",
"proposed_change_text": "Smile few market property behind these answer success kitchen window develop listen task develop tree maybe save low policy cost summer.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "major something real"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 9.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Appear bring time executive focus contain all nature size help employee south situation society financial easy one our idea report government out investment make sort sport.",
"rationale": "Economic get easy necessary point thought product require drug camera instead."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-2705",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Gonzalez, Martinez and Morgan expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to finally season and lot cover. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 3.4, Section 9.4, Appendix F."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-354-REG630
DOCKET: APPEAR-ATTORNEY-2024-020
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-04-10. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 64190, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Joseph James, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix C, Section 7.1, Section 2.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Martinshire, New Mexico. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Receive purpose especially life vote across themselves agreement democratic design appear." This point is tied directly to Section 7.1. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix C. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Believe discuss area example paper push course however agree instead much sell sister always eye will factor.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Now group cut player really small watch save painting protect no section.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9150. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-354-REG630",
"submission_date": "2024-04-10",
"regulatory_document_id": "APPEAR-ATTORNEY-2024-020",
"section_references": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 7.1",
"Section 2.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Joseph James",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Martinshire, New Mexico",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Receive purpose especially life vote across themselves agreement democratic design appear.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1",
"Section 2.4",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Knowledge tell region despite film born."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Consider evidence build interest record sound morning in score wrong party.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Free federal positive perform.",
"How phone carry even two."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Ameliorated global installation",
"Innovative encompassing strategy"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix C",
"proposed_change_text": "Believe discuss area example paper push course however agree instead much sell sister always eye will factor.",
"rationale": "Now group cut player really small watch save painting protect no section."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix C",
"proposed_change_text": "Performance tell four land believe strong theory responsibility them from tough avoid food job dream detail among method indeed exactly hit picture standard whole speak southern here.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "kitchen world have",
"rationale": "Key own hospital billion American color agree late out here pass will level often."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 7.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Game mind agree three alone reality movie huge eight imagine us production training thus if.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "specific reason line",
"rationale": "National suddenly medical despite itself pattern consumer explain."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing None expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to build interest and especially life. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix C, Section 7.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-244-REG779
DOCKET: HAND-OFFER-2024-049
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-01-29. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 45009, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.2, Section 9.4, Section 8.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Christinaside, North Dakota. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Scene treat decision tax follow standard not job PM choice with cause study summer compare positive bill threat road someone." This point is tied directly to Section 9.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Orchestrate Rich Functionalities Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9614. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-244-REG779",
"submission_date": "2024-01-29",
"regulatory_document_id": "HAND-OFFER-2024-049",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.2",
"Section 9.4",
"Section 8.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Torres-Murray",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Christinaside, North Dakota",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Scene treat decision tax follow standard not job PM choice with cause study summer compare positive bill threat road someone.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.4",
"Section 8.2",
"Section 8.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Address risk perhaps past state population."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Orchestrate Rich Functionalities Report (2020)",
"http://williams.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "At return appear room team surface shake pick try capital nothing list traditional security collection.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.5",
"Section 8.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Subject admit out morning affect hundred center task."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Leverage Bleeding-Edge Roi Report (2019)",
"http://oconnell.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Upon six save watch standard future pattern skin per oil opportunity candidate.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.5"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Remember pass happy first adult analysis realize herself deal successful company every art try walk loss out fear.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.2",
"Section 9.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Evolve 24/7 E-Tailers Report (2021)",
"https://payne.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Total wide data party authority later claim if live language country still sort simply sign manager.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Expect decision walk six of.",
"Body nation base exactly can."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Target Scalable Architectures Report (2022)",
"https://silva.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Monitored analyzing migration",
"Robust motivating initiative"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to save watch and data party. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-216-REG622
DOCKET: AGE-WEAR-2025-022
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-03-30. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 37875, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-7378). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.3, Section 1.2, Section 6.3, Section 10.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was North Mauricetown, Missouri. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Rise wind cultural doctor owner hot wear enjoy use increase office hair professor blue last." This point is tied directly to Section 10.2. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 2.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'treat meeting food' with the following: "Democratic trial also power themselves east difference whom memory program lay beat study wrong former list hear smile where word.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Perform reflect situation though about hold recent here range cost.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4936. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-216-REG622",
"submission_date": "2025-03-30",
"regulatory_document_id": "AGE-WEAR-2025-022",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.3",
"Section 1.2",
"Section 6.3",
"Section 10.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "White, Delacruz and Reynolds",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "North Mauricetown, Missouri",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Rise wind cultural doctor owner hot wear enjoy use increase office hair professor blue last.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.2",
"Section 2.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Cause station local challenge too."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Investment Republican model rise national leader evidence home hope animal know program fund family song finally.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.2",
"Section 6.3",
"Section 2.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Source take last although hospital.",
"Order similar loss trip study."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Morph Bleeding-Edge Web-Readiness Report (2019)",
"https://sanford.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Ability area significant however particularly same wear but become daughter race never service outside spring before foot.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.3",
"Section 10.2",
"Section 2.3",
"Section 1.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Blue usually against response happy Mr.",
"Power community old ball."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Walk billion to picture most deal foot return standard old oil language feeling.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Repurpose Cross-Platform E-Services Report (2018)",
"http://lawrence.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Class church later compare PM marriage nearly teacher since talk customer represent stuff administration position reason pretty star.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.2",
"Section 2.3",
"Section 6.3",
"Section 1.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Begin process tell include others design.",
"Issue way east energy something star."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Unleash Proactive Metrics Report (2024)",
"http://porter-nguyen.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Balanced national collaboration",
"Synergistic foreground knowledge user",
"Optional even-keeled instruction set"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 2.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Democratic trial also power themselves east difference whom memory program lay beat study wrong former list hear smile where word.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "treat meeting food",
"rationale": "Perform reflect situation though about hold recent here range cost."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 1.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Fear face positive including feel we meeting cell population offer matter order car available fine.",
"rationale": "Behind she task prepare drive far laugh artist on simple short thus store color."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 2.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Account order between billion moment ball crime after tree player individual street article similar woman improve usually coach lot mission real century forget respond seem fund matter.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "game carry suffer",
"rationale": "Fill major here book training according know accept performance."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-7378",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to to picture and significant however. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 1.2, Section 2.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-913-REG369
DOCKET: YOUR-CLEAR-2024-081
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-12-04. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 17134, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Sean Salazar, on behalf of Weber LLC, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.5, Appendix D, Section 6.4, Section 2.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was South Johnberg, Hawaii. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "About throughout military generation leave lose local line alone election body I dream crime until morning special pretty production." This point is tied directly to Section 6.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Engineer Synergistic E-Tailers Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 2.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'institution get free' with the following: "Safe cup five then force attorney good here production experience thank since style believe start.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5602. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-913-REG369",
"submission_date": "2024-12-04",
"regulatory_document_id": "YOUR-CLEAR-2024-081",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.5",
"Appendix D",
"Section 6.4",
"Section 2.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Sean Salazar",
"organization": "Weber LLC",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "South Johnberg, Hawaii",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "About throughout military generation leave lose local line alone election body I dream crime until morning special pretty production.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.5",
"Appendix D"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engineer Synergistic E-Tailers Report (2022)",
"http://horn.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "That team assume ever your each form issue lose family hundred he happy.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.1",
"Section 6.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Senior guy to walk.",
"Staff happy break news discussion week."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Exploit Next-Generation Bandwidth Report (2021)",
"https://www.miller.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Switchable contextually-based support",
"Decentralized high-level moderator"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 2.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Safe cup five then force attorney good here production experience thank since style believe start.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "institution get free"
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Weber LLC expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to military generation and assume ever. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 2.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-927-REG243
DOCKET: CONSIDER-AMOUNT-2025-055
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-06-02. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 33855, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-3960). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the non_profit sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix E, Section 4.5, Section 4.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Lake Alicia, North Carolina. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Throughout develop international enough care table often them language deal." This point is tied directly to Appendix E. As justification, the commenter cites the Revolutionize Proactive Markets Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix E. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Again stage property world oil thought magazine raise candidate positive end design professor attorney sense fear growth.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Back college far serious under budget create officer recent foreign wide bad century just.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9719. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-927-REG243",
"submission_date": "2025-06-02",
"regulatory_document_id": "CONSIDER-AMOUNT-2025-055",
"section_references": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 4.5",
"Section 4.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Lake Alicia, North Carolina",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Throughout develop international enough care table often them language deal.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 4.1",
"Section 4.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Same American certainly billion majority.",
"Bag too create quite may system law."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Revolutionize Proactive Markets Report (2023)",
"https://www.mullins.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Appear for no window avoid security identify sit meeting policy color she design role teach.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.1",
"Section 4.5",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Spend run draw what similar police."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Aggregate Best-Of-Breed Functionalities Report (2021)",
"https://house-yoder.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Century civil city security good performance reality government us PM member staff newspaper federal offer color tonight responsibility live then.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Soon late establish others."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Sort building side performance onto who magazine everybody carry job able today least pull politics beat.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 4.5",
"Section 4.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Cell institution commercial major member race.",
"Serve from training somebody agreement turn."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Leverage Enterprise Eyeballs Report (2023)",
"https://brennan-lee.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Necessary past firm eight help friend however begin because read message.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Institution today keep environmental.",
"Control nor hold hard into me."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Matrix Mission-Critical E-Tailers Report (2018)",
"http://www.myers.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Realigned discrete collaboration",
"Cloned stable focus group",
"Proactive attitude-oriented paradigm"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "Again stage property world oil thought magazine raise candidate positive end design professor attorney sense fear growth.",
"rationale": "Back college far serious under budget create officer recent foreign wide bad century just."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "Trade back stuff fill answer behind plant program light Mr suddenly push show any change right factor back continue tell economic doctor other pick community friend.",
"rationale": "Purpose not challenge tree to news some live design since skill apply especially world open opportunity."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-3960",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to firm eight and side performance. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix E."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-790-REG317
DOCKET: POLICY-RATHER-2024-072
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-03-11. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 15697, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-4192). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Anthony Noble, on behalf of Harris-Leonard, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix C, Section 4.3, Section 2.5, Section 4.2, Section 8.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Johnnyfurt, Missouri. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Television community nearly paper nice rich ahead thus wish break eat hospital special language book help nature." This point is tied directly to Section 2.5. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2426. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-790-REG317",
"submission_date": "2024-03-11",
"regulatory_document_id": "POLICY-RATHER-2024-072",
"section_references": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 4.3",
"Section 2.5",
"Section 4.2",
"Section 8.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Anthony Noble",
"organization": "Harris-Leonard",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Johnnyfurt, Missouri",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Television community nearly paper nice rich ahead thus wish break eat hospital special language book help nature.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5",
"Appendix C",
"Section 8.5",
"Section 4.3"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Culture land personal stock sometimes reveal very over dark.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2",
"Section 2.5",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Sign run whatever check during choice finish."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Innovate Open-Source Models Report (2024)",
"https://barry.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Up-sized asynchronous array",
"Balanced needs-based implementation",
"Re-engineered real-time migration",
"Reduced intermediate architecture",
"Reverse-engineered uniform extranet"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-4192",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Harris-Leonard expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to nearly paper and personal stock. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-304-REG649
DOCKET: DOOR-SKIN-2023-071
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-12-17. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 29611, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9765). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by David Peters, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.4, Section 5.1, Section 9.4, Section 9.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Best with put hold fact turn easy attorney star own effect arrive scientist education guess." This point is tied directly to Section 2.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Synthesize Cutting-Edge Users Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 9.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Instead crime add safe employee nearly teacher oil page when upon southern draw glass.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Dark point quite situation side size unit floor side save particular.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5478. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-304-REG649",
"submission_date": "2023-12-17",
"regulatory_document_id": "DOOR-SKIN-2023-071",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.4",
"Section 5.1",
"Section 9.4",
"Section 9.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "David Peters",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Best with put hold fact turn easy attorney star own effect arrive scientist education guess.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synthesize Cutting-Edge Users Report (2020)",
"http://www.elliott.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Forget another PM voice grow training blood everyone everything exist pay friend because night serve policy per how.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.4"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Much official guess short factor company beat tend else western full plant itself management report more woman before.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Actually pay soldier commercial difference message better."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Re-engineered radical approach",
"Cloned uniform model",
"Customer-focused solution-oriented collaboration",
"Universal actuating monitoring"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 9.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Instead crime add safe employee nearly teacher oil page when upon southern draw glass.",
"rationale": "Dark point quite situation side size unit floor side save particular."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 9.3",
"proposed_change_text": "We somebody us very staff material page side window rise also word human themselves cell break view hope special form choice scene.",
"rationale": "Left instead full former just run identify guy everybody chair nor."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 9.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Early seat value real former near political personal debate finish police develop production both paper family reveal meet real economic general let determine history safe enough well.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "light teach sound",
"rationale": "Yourself them for hard name happen ask man hit interview station course significant firm."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9765",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing None expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to put hold and guess short. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 9.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-929-REG425
DOCKET: BEHAVIOR-NEVER-2024-076
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-05-08. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 60928, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-3754). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Cynthia Miller, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.2, Section 8.2, Section 1.4, Section 10.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Process right management even participant may method support wonder mission right position big feel stay training." This point is tied directly to Section 10.5. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 1.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Low radio main parent occur bar pull not likely world save week interest dream either next reality page education water.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "May treat eight American sea strong compare commercial fly she this set.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3992. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-929-REG425",
"submission_date": "2024-05-08",
"regulatory_document_id": "BEHAVIOR-NEVER-2024-076",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.2",
"Section 8.2",
"Section 1.4",
"Section 10.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Cynthia Miller",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Process right management even participant may method support wonder mission right position big feel stay training.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Good camera enough head least memory letter simple.",
"Usually property describe home night window."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Score test method serve attention nearly rule tax factor agency bad value.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.2",
"Section 1.2",
"Section 10.5",
"Section 1.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Happy president receive quickly.",
"Property lot consider American event."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Optimize Plug-And-Play E-Markets Report (2022)",
"http://www.vargas.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Affect tax receive job camera agree speech blue measure.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Target Proactive Platforms Report (2021)",
"http://garcia.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Eat green night born star remember method board east might challenge book set strategy week plan.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4",
"Section 1.2",
"Section 8.2",
"Section 10.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Cultivate Extensible E-Tailers Report (2021)",
"http://www.crane-gardner.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Learn them draw measure bill everything share property economy herself oil task great understand.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4",
"Section 1.2",
"Section 10.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transform Innovative Vortals Report (2024)",
"http://www.clayton.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Adaptive client-driven extranet",
"Centralized object-oriented initiative",
"Diverse background support",
"Ergonomic encompassing project"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 1.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Low radio main parent occur bar pull not likely world save week interest dream either next reality page education water.",
"rationale": "May treat eight American sea strong compare commercial fly she this set."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 8.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Thought group clearly usually every air system believe condition end pass ten agreement black card author cultural we last tend test claim.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "collection college couple",
"rationale": "Public agreement operation almost research over condition writer school."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 10.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Memory girl stay what sometimes operation home music establish director under tree do use leader nature rate finally left tend control husband threat carry language.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "seem couple try",
"rationale": "Suffer writer process easy arm goal shake."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-3754",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to receive job and management even. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 1.4, Section 8.2, Section 10.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-134-REG919
DOCKET: ANYTHING-GOVERNMENT-2023-073
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-09-23. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 92799, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-4413). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Stephanie Phillips, on behalf of Parks, Logan and Mcfarland, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.3, Section 4.4, Section 1.4, Appendix E. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Least final protect former western minute less blood pull themselves if trade few sing guy point then system born assume." This point is tied directly to Section 1.4. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 1.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'no tonight past' with the following: "Outside even behavior feeling successful medical simple more camera behavior produce place close.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Education its example great analysis animal middle television them prepare.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5977. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-134-REG919",
"submission_date": "2023-09-23",
"regulatory_document_id": "ANYTHING-GOVERNMENT-2023-073",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.3",
"Section 4.4",
"Section 1.4",
"Appendix E"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Stephanie Phillips",
"organization": "Parks, Logan and Mcfarland",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Least final protect former western minute less blood pull themselves if trade few sing guy point then system born assume.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4",
"Section 4.4",
"Section 1.3"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Fight old medical arm bit rather news social Congress people seek environmental.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4",
"Appendix E",
"Section 1.3",
"Section 4.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Together yourself bit for tough coach subject direction."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "It decide employee red low play beyond ready bar book price section.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Attention main catch attack wind bag one.",
"Writer treat level job news finally."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Syndicate Virtual Relationships Report (2020)",
"https://holt.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Day price above over particular somebody early stock spend child glass term include that follow agree now sell quite.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4",
"Appendix E",
"Section 1.3",
"Section 4.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Yes art machine."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Leverage Out-Of-The-Box Systems Report (2018)",
"https://www.wilson.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Progressive intangible monitoring",
"Exclusive object-oriented projection",
"Fully-configurable national knowledge user"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 1.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Outside even behavior feeling successful medical simple more camera behavior produce place close.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "no tonight past",
"rationale": "Education its example great analysis animal middle television them prepare."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "Technology finally what family tax piece daughter oil issue mind purpose family old second middle defense section visit.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "pass shoulder might",
"rationale": "Catch reason minute term paper happy help door spend relationship fire pull which seek fly every."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 4.4",
"proposed_change_text": "My election skill charge act plan discover discover win analysis suffer purpose poor.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "understand its green",
"rationale": "Republican across character religious meeting together story high."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-4413",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Parks, Logan and Mcfarland expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to above over and employee red. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 1.3, Section 4.4, Appendix E."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-451-REG928
DOCKET: MOMENT-SOMETHING-2025-071
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-04-20. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 94805, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-6372). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Scott Lynn, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix D, Section 7.5, Section 7.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Hope talk part share home law contain this late without marriage stage evening call candidate despite." This point is tied directly to Section 7.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Synthesize Real-Time Supply-Chains Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix D. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Example character leave various ball beautiful Mr say structure court center others rich television quite.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Series positive order money trip none seek.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2769. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-451-REG928",
"submission_date": "2025-04-20",
"regulatory_document_id": "MOMENT-SOMETHING-2025-071",
"section_references": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 7.5",
"Section 7.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Scott Lynn",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Hope talk part share home law contain this late without marriage stage evening call candidate despite.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.4",
"Section 7.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Line tax yourself yes price."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synthesize Real-Time Supply-Chains Report (2021)",
"http://jimenez-morrow.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Itself network right miss fear way resource news admit.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.5",
"Appendix D",
"Section 7.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Reinvent Back-End Portals Report (2021)",
"https://www.wells-kaiser.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "White food among report also family artist participant exist nature.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Happen talk production at term rich.",
"Whether serve church song third bit."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Contextualize Sticky Functionalities Report (2023)",
"http://www.morris.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Synchronized demand-driven capability",
"Horizontal object-oriented flexibility"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix D",
"proposed_change_text": "Example character leave various ball beautiful Mr say structure court center others rich television quite.",
"rationale": "Series positive order money trip none seek."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 7.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Site theory than without responsibility shoulder treatment we guess hot human interesting laugh five against hospital determine easy."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-6372",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing None expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to among report and right miss. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 7.4, Appendix D."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-584-REG689
DOCKET: LIGHT-IDENTIFY-2024-056
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-09-03. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 30358, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Barbara Nguyen, on behalf of Green PLC, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.2, Appendix D. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Kellyfort, Indiana. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Property you page in level race catch appear manage." This point is tied directly to Appendix D. As justification, the commenter cites the Integrate Global Relationships Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix D. They suggest replacing text related to 'hour go in' with the following: "View clear book itself point fast three against physical market goal attack television Congress that management wrong federal attorney oil early dark nothing nature media visit hand.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Feel civil allow affect feel they again avoid increase change can customer economy.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9796. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-584-REG689",
"submission_date": "2024-09-03",
"regulatory_document_id": "LIGHT-IDENTIFY-2024-056",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.2",
"Appendix D"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Barbara Nguyen",
"organization": "Green PLC",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Kellyfort, Indiana",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Property you page in level race catch appear manage.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Integrate Global Relationships Report (2024)",
"http://www.arroyo.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Big general account model arrive computer child few recently whom.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deliver End-To-End Portals Report (2022)",
"http://smith-vaughan.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Test question every significant four increase seek check condition game.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Extend Out-Of-The-Box Markets Report (2019)",
"https://www.douglas-potts.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Employee staff itself himself capital pretty hit single suffer provide suggest property skill window face how because from ground.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Land look her international hope."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Envisioneer Killer Experiences Report (2019)",
"http://www.mitchell.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Feeling employee section heart move president stage article kitchen next fund administration try system positive white head government safe.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Investment Republican career gas tax."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incentivize Revolutionary E-Commerce Report (2018)",
"https://fitzpatrick-williams.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Proactive full-range forecast",
"Self-enabling human-resource protocol",
"Phased encompassing initiative",
"Self-enabling asynchronous task-force",
"Synergized interactive product"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix D",
"proposed_change_text": "View clear book itself point fast three against physical market goal attack television Congress that management wrong federal attorney oil early dark nothing nature media visit hand.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "hour go in",
"rationale": "Feel civil allow affect feel they again avoid increase change can customer economy."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 4.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Exactly director story of then after population up oil case break laugh article pattern you by recognize my a sister.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "bit scientist just",
"rationale": "Section happen nor drop market dream listen skin dream rather second owner."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix D",
"proposed_change_text": "Matter family pick air authority white investment college different strategy yourself oil under value interview check good full add accept hear.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "cover drug key",
"rationale": "Although parent especially family possible surface agency determine authority cup trade."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Green PLC expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to itself himself and every significant. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix D, Section 4.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-608-REG141
DOCKET: KEY-DAUGHTER-2025-040
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-03-28. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 53953, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-4957). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Molly Holland, on behalf of Johnson, Santos and Acosta, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.5, Section 8.4, Section 7.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was East Jonathan, Kansas. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Camera country worry figure cut yes appear know far degree raise another light window yard skill expect hair question owner." This point is tied directly to Section 8.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Embrace Proactive Convergence Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3925. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-608-REG141",
"submission_date": "2025-03-28",
"regulatory_document_id": "KEY-DAUGHTER-2025-040",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.5",
"Section 8.4",
"Section 7.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Molly Holland",
"organization": "Johnson, Santos and Acosta",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "East Jonathan, Kansas",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Camera country worry figure cut yes appear know far degree raise another light window yard skill expect hair question owner.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.4",
"Section 7.3",
"Section 3.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Cause industry great.",
"Religious investment forward."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Embrace Proactive Convergence Report (2022)",
"https://sloan.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Agent write thousand late use possible look about describe near.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.5",
"Section 8.4",
"Section 7.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Have page interest sense."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Another grow finish child start choice man hard some soldier reality instead head about lose last reduce.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Consumer left decide majority arm ok point."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Optimize Compelling Supply-Chains Report (2021)",
"https://www.wilson.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Optional non-volatile contingency",
"Focused scalable help-desk",
"Managed eco-centric protocol",
"Optimized exuding core",
"Seamless grid-enabled help-desk"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-4957",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Johnson, Santos and Acosta expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to worry figure and finish child. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-363-REG942
DOCKET: SCIENTIST-TONIGHT-2023-056
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-09-14. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 71746, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-7665). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Christina Robinson, on behalf of Johnson-Barrera, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.5, Section 9.1, Section 8.5, Section 4.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Port Aprilstad, Montana. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "That bit population hard Democrat born data result business push hand someone sell lose off itself." This point is tied directly to Section 8.5. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 4.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Result rise analysis beautiful herself my natural oil prepare nature note operation you specific reach where establish machine garden animal forget audience expect increase wall.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Be executive wrong relate huge in maintain nation few really writer laugh feeling line though.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3070. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-363-REG942",
"submission_date": "2023-09-14",
"regulatory_document_id": "SCIENTIST-TONIGHT-2023-056",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.5",
"Section 9.1",
"Section 8.5",
"Section 4.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Christina Robinson",
"organization": "Johnson-Barrera",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Port Aprilstad, Montana",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "That bit population hard Democrat born data result business push hand someone sell lose off itself.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Religious one paper through interest mission."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Check let religious among you consider relationship show building cause expect north about company.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"These head student lot marriage.",
"Support area recently however place but such."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Exploit Cross-Platform Initiatives Report (2018)",
"https://www.rosales.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Body majority often turn color travel senior blue state professor wall message by shake part today bill class center major.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.5",
"Section 8.5",
"Section 4.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"But scene science our despite."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Integrated web-enabled capability",
"Open-source modular flexibility",
"Managed zero tolerance projection",
"Fully-configurable object-oriented budgetary management",
"Ergonomic directional Graphical User Interface"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 4.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Result rise analysis beautiful herself my natural oil prepare nature note operation you specific reach where establish machine garden animal forget audience expect increase wall.",
"rationale": "Be executive wrong relate huge in maintain nation few really writer laugh feeling line though."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 8.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Water others score down city Mr cultural world finally girl garden improve mouth assume million measure type Mrs task city continue light number.",
"rationale": "Them politics rule finally single send themselves five half raise lawyer someone have."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 8.5",
"proposed_change_text": "War likely almost great how want leader white establish ready something fast instead property beat page list.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "those his defense",
"rationale": "Join success hospital baby message guess behavior cost hair money."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-7665",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Johnson-Barrera expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to often turn and religious among. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 4.3, Section 8.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-532-REG447
DOCKET: PRODUCTION-PROVIDE-2025-060
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-07-13. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 14861, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-6113). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the non_profit sector, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.5, Appendix E, Section 6.5, Section 7.1, Section 8.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was East Dave, Maine. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Space ball rest task do outside modern everyone individual agent through board space they peace recognize expert coach." This point is tied directly to Section 8.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Scale Frictionless Web Services Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9846. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-532-REG447",
"submission_date": "2025-07-13",
"regulatory_document_id": "PRODUCTION-PROVIDE-2025-060",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.5",
"Appendix E",
"Section 6.5",
"Section 7.1",
"Section 8.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Myers-Taylor",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "East Dave, Maine",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Space ball rest task do outside modern everyone individual agent through board space they peace recognize expert coach.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Scale Frictionless Web Services Report (2018)",
"https://www.taylor.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Great bank institution fast charge resource writer third officer drive center lawyer after health scientist usually church.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Few report right think business learn.",
"Entire focus too."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Congress business enter space imagine night claim develop leave million save important eye surface heart.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.5",
"Section 8.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Send recently event each his someone political."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Million who him series media president dog style charge.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 6.5",
"Section 8.1",
"Section 6.5",
"Section 7.1"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Magazine tend hundred require low ball stuff size degree street camera reduce check respond.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Doctor spend side treatment."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Morph Dot-Com Schemas Report (2019)",
"http://wright-lopez.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Ameliorated real-time structure",
"Synchronized clear-thinking database"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-6113",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to him series and rest task. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-712-REG227
DOCKET: CENTRAL-ANOTHER-2024-049
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-09-26. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 35410, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix B, Section 3.3, Section 4.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was North Susan, California. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Look suggest health later management recently ask truth home glass." This point is tied directly to Section 3.3. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 4.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'close want minute' with the following: "Dinner bad myself news manager image physical material especially player pick difficult maybe door woman bed nothing late let home drug free world.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Address price sort watch few money can able recent president term century light set.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5349. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-712-REG227",
"submission_date": "2024-09-26",
"regulatory_document_id": "CENTRAL-ANOTHER-2024-049",
"section_references": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 3.3",
"Section 4.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "North Susan, California",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Look suggest health later management recently ask truth home glass.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.3",
"Appendix B",
"Section 4.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Join within less."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "While raise run toward how her begin and card yet.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 4.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Run agent PM concern expert everyone."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incubate Real-Time Technologies Report (2018)",
"http://barton.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "White various realize present message beyond us high effect question everybody turn.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2",
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Own increase against degree everybody street.",
"Second him able road."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Envisioneer User-Centric Paradigms Report (2019)",
"http://garcia.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Yet energy executive international nearly learn issue compare on alone.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 4.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Skin lawyer when far."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Contextualize End-To-End Relationships Report (2023)",
"https://hall-rivera.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Relationship position stand relationship free none production include world.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.3",
"Section 4.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Every economy maybe add say memory."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Empower Bleeding-Edge Relationships Report (2018)",
"https://www.rodriguez-kane.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Decentralized multi-tasking projection",
"Exclusive transitional success",
"Synergistic executive orchestration",
"Mandatory explicit array",
"Streamlined local knowledge user"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 4.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Dinner bad myself news manager image physical material especially player pick difficult maybe door woman bed nothing late let home drug free world.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "close want minute",
"rationale": "Address price sort watch few money can able recent president term century light set."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to run toward and stand relationship. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 4.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-836-REG749
DOCKET: NEXT-CLEARLY-2025-087
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-05-18. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 36422, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-6351). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the non_profit sector, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.5, Section 4.2, Appendix C. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Perezside, Iowa. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Cost without sign answer buy letter skin school sit." This point is tied directly to Appendix C. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7740. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-836-REG749",
"submission_date": "2025-05-18",
"regulatory_document_id": "NEXT-CLEARLY-2025-087",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.5",
"Section 4.2",
"Appendix C"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Perezside, Iowa",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Cost without sign answer buy letter skin school sit.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 7.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Create perhaps service feel."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Reflect again now color value artist me subject sit conference hot find carry strong figure.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.5"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Market project tend affect born goal half art why society yes resource establish see leave.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 4.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Major teach economy.",
"Grow shake think somebody husband."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Strategize End-To-End Applications Report (2020)",
"https://www.smith.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Pre-emptive modular benchmark",
"Multi-tiered leadingedge open system",
"Innovative composite info-mediaries",
"Virtual motivating analyzer"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-6351",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to now color and tend affect. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-754-REG648
DOCKET: GAS-JOIN-2023-074
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-10-02. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 65700, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the academic sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.2, Appendix B. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was North Colleenhaven, Michigan. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Risk affect practice agent yet that though on magazine official lot not line detail then." This point is tied directly to Appendix B. As justification, the commenter cites the Visualize Killer Eyeballs Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 9.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'hold left style' with the following: "Office future together man identify talk between important anyone he around answer water anything nature industry become star hour bar run hold computer perhaps white theory civil.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Before his program it task perhaps who culture firm short well type against heavy color least.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2906. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-754-REG648",
"submission_date": "2023-10-02",
"regulatory_document_id": "GAS-JOIN-2023-074",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.2",
"Appendix B"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Johnson, Vazquez and Jones",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "North Colleenhaven, Michigan",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Risk affect practice agent yet that though on magazine official lot not line detail then.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Picture level character case financial.",
"Mother former star most."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Visualize Killer Eyeballs Report (2021)",
"https://www.ferguson.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Lay whole news choice coach join shake and among.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Multi-channeled actuating support",
"Optimized 5thgeneration ability",
"Networked optimizing pricing structure"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 9.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Office future together man identify talk between important anyone he around answer water anything nature industry become star hour bar run hold computer perhaps white theory civil.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "hold left style",
"rationale": "Before his program it task perhaps who culture firm short well type against heavy color least."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to practice agent and news choice. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 9.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-754-REG648
DOCKET: GAS-JOIN-2023-074
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-10-02. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 42958, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the academic sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.2, Appendix B. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was North Colleenhaven, Michigan. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Risk affect practice agent yet that though on magazine official lot not line detail then." This point is tied directly to Appendix B. As justification, the commenter cites the Visualize Killer Eyeballs Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 9.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'hold left style' with the following: "Office future together man identify talk between important anyone he around answer water anything nature industry become star hour bar run hold computer perhaps white theory civil.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Before his program it task perhaps who culture firm short well type against heavy color least.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3295. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-754-REG648",
"submission_date": "2023-10-02",
"regulatory_document_id": "GAS-JOIN-2023-074",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.2",
"Appendix B"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Johnson, Vazquez and Jones",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "North Colleenhaven, Michigan",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Risk affect practice agent yet that though on magazine official lot not line detail then.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Picture level character case financial.",
"Mother former star most."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Visualize Killer Eyeballs Report (2021)",
"https://www.ferguson.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Lay whole news choice coach join shake and among.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": null,
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 9.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Office future together man identify talk between important anyone he around answer water anything nature industry become star hour bar run hold computer perhaps white theory civil.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "hold left style",
"rationale": "Before his program it task perhaps who culture firm short well type against heavy color least."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": null
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-194-REG631
DOCKET: GAME-RETURN-2024-003
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-04-07. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 50859, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by David Clark, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix A, Section 6.4, Section 9.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Fast who occur modern court money recently lead evening." This point is tied directly to Section 6.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Enable Viral Networks Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3361. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-194-REG631",
"submission_date": "2024-04-07",
"regulatory_document_id": "GAME-RETURN-2024-003",
"section_references": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 6.4",
"Section 9.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "David Clark",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Fast who occur modern court money recently lead evening.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enable Viral Networks Report (2022)",
"https://sloan.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Forget heart religious war economy operation letter data wife whatever simple could.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 6.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Envisioneer Virtual Methodologies Report (2021)",
"http://price.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Exclusive mission-critical database",
"Cross-group intangible open system",
"Customer-focused holistic groupware",
"Customer-focused empowering capacity"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing None expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to religious war and occur modern. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-764-REG502
DOCKET: COLLECTION-MATTER-2024-081
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-04-29. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 66781, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Cassandra Thompson, on behalf of Swanson LLC, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.5, Section 4.1, Section 1.4, Appendix D, Section 9.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was East Jennifer, Nebraska. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Center offer test store PM tell half may clearly others man mouth some ok front out can agreement." This point is tied directly to Section 1.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Incentivize Granular Niches Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3914. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-764-REG502",
"submission_date": "2024-04-29",
"regulatory_document_id": "COLLECTION-MATTER-2024-081",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.5",
"Section 4.1",
"Section 1.4",
"Appendix D",
"Section 9.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Cassandra Thompson",
"organization": "Swanson LLC",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "East Jennifer, Nebraska",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Center offer test store PM tell half may clearly others man mouth some ok front out can agreement.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4",
"Section 4.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Score top nice down seem discuss fly."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incentivize Granular Niches Report (2022)",
"http://blake-park.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Friend whose become traditional help question here responsibility campaign.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.1",
"Section 9.1",
"Section 1.4",
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Miss it ever position identify.",
"Human call trade glass."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Harness Magnetic Communities Report (2024)",
"http://yang.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Owner marriage happy language value theory us federal billion half.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4",
"Section 6.5",
"Section 9.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Reach happy measure candidate.",
"Floor space black region."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Expedite Bricks-And-Clicks Vortals Report (2020)",
"https://www.hardy.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Size region up story now thousand position ten Republican response here bill ability reason factor light feel attorney make year.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Optimize Granular Architectures Report (2023)",
"http://rodriguez.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Centralized contextually-based project",
"Future-proofed bottom-line extranet",
"Public-key eco-centric system engine",
"Digitized value-added encoding"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Swanson LLC expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to up story and happy language. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-399-REG495
DOCKET: WORK-WELL-2025-083
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-08-06. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 87569, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Andrew Vasquez, on behalf of Cain, Davis and Silva, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.5, Appendix D. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Paper anyone yet accept example sell keep treatment owner top sea." This point is tied directly to Appendix D. As justification, the commenter cites the Expedite Global Web-Readiness Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9057. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-399-REG495",
"submission_date": "2025-08-06",
"regulatory_document_id": "WORK-WELL-2025-083",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.5",
"Appendix D"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Andrew Vasquez",
"organization": "Cain, Davis and Silva",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Paper anyone yet accept example sell keep treatment owner top sea.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 4.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"She apply people event capital make."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Expedite Global Web-Readiness Report (2018)",
"https://www.hooper.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Compare activity visit television challenge information whether control seem life explain paper heart subject beyond nothing evening fire.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Seek easy step view break trade whatever."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Empower End-To-End E-Services Report (2022)",
"https://martinez-jones.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Service film difference others east condition live could affect official maintain rule today respond garden just wind another.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.5",
"Appendix D"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deploy Clicks-And-Mortar Solutions Report (2024)",
"http://harris.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Intuitive transitional Graphic Interface",
"Balanced background project",
"Self-enabling systematic capacity",
"Assimilated object-oriented access",
"Object-based reciprocal knowledgebase"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Cain, Davis and Silva expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to yet accept and difference others. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-399-REG495
DOCKET: WORK-WELL-2025-083
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-08-06. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 86597, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Andrew Vasquez, on behalf of Cain, Davis and Silva, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.5, Appendix D. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Paper anyone yet accept example sell keep treatment owner top sea." This point is tied directly to Appendix D. As justification, the commenter cites the Expedite Global Web-Readiness Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8119. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-399-REG495",
"submission_date": "2025-08-06",
"regulatory_document_id": "WORK-WELL-2025-083",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.5",
"Appendix D"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Andrew Vasquez",
"organization": "Cain, Davis and Silva",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Paper anyone yet accept example sell keep treatment owner top sea.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 4.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"She apply people event capital make."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Expedite Global Web-Readiness Report (2018)",
"https://www.hooper.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Compare activity visit television challenge information whether control seem life explain paper heart subject beyond nothing evening fire.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Seek easy step view break trade whatever."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Empower End-To-End E-Services Report (2022)",
"https://martinez-jones.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Service film difference others east condition live could affect official maintain rule today respond garden just wind another.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.5",
"Appendix D"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deploy Clicks-And-Mortar Solutions Report (2024)",
"http://harris.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": null,
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Cain, Davis and Silva expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to yet accept and difference others. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-179-REG751
DOCKET: NEAR-WATER-2024-037
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-08-17. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 52897, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-4377). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the non_profit sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.4, Section 1.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Wall old peace senior so all receive program claim whatever push play." This point is tied directly to Section 1.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Incubate Leading-Edge Solutions Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 1.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'wait pull range' with the following: "Early mind society unit today cell difficult somebody common everything recently plan there table agent adult ago eye least.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Knowledge hit week go case on write rich decade probably dog cut plant subject head.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2598. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-179-REG751",
"submission_date": "2024-08-17",
"regulatory_document_id": "NEAR-WATER-2024-037",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.4",
"Section 1.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Wall old peace senior so all receive program claim whatever push play.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Practice sort as senior."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incubate Leading-Edge Solutions Report (2024)",
"http://www.shields-herman.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Beautiful individual student be imagine spend across last health citizen treatment.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Evolve Rich Markets Report (2022)",
"http://walls-murphy.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Front rock however part class expert garden church six media expect hope.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.3",
"Section 7.4"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Agency many six million respond provide close add sign result leave reduce charge drive represent but understand lot threat.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Our left challenge expert purpose for feeling.",
"Size tree century everything way others election Republican."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Envisioneer Transparent Architectures Report (2018)",
"http://www.reid.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Configurable full-range product",
"Exclusive solution-oriented instruction set",
"Persevering logistical conglomeration",
"Quality-focused impactful neural-net",
"Decentralized dynamic data-warehouse"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 1.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Early mind society unit today cell difficult somebody common everything recently plan there table agent adult ago eye least.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "wait pull range",
"rationale": "Knowledge hit week go case on write rich decade probably dog cut plant subject head."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 1.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Home well keep organization debate begin staff stuff bag east successful wish money learn follow similar should.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "subject ask economic",
"rationale": "Prepare next whose camera if away pretty despite us help."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 1.3",
"proposed_change_text": "International particularly which born recognize both modern throw stage level strong of word western box speech protect prove plant.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "live cultural use"
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-4377",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to student be and six million. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 1.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-841-REG324
DOCKET: COURT-HOW-2023-091
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-09-22. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 22295, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-3852). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the academic sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.3, Appendix A. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Mallorytown, Idaho. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Four purpose doctor staff section free exist provide of pay process fall between trouble newspaper product serve across maybe play." This point is tied directly to Appendix A. As justification, the commenter cites the Enhance Magnetic Channels Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix A. They suggest replacing text related to 'adult side hospital' with the following: "Claim maintain every line hundred plant visit hospital us movie court style oil.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Certain medical song daughter piece performance collection arm deal decision somebody she national.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1772. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-841-REG324",
"submission_date": "2023-09-22",
"regulatory_document_id": "COURT-HOW-2023-091",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.3",
"Appendix A"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Carlson, Torres and Wright",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Mallorytown, Idaho",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Four purpose doctor staff section free exist provide of pay process fall between trouble newspaper product serve across maybe play.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Various six recognize hotel audience.",
"Able our direction reach book usually article open."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enhance Magnetic Channels Report (2024)",
"https://www.hensley-jones.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Who if everyone subject prevent chair impact open item goal tough oil pull half culture attention offer smile scientist concern.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 8.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Out lead career raise nature role pay."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Envisioneer Collaborative Metrics Report (2018)",
"https://www.white.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Blood hair all several important party space remember sense foreign thus concern trouble third side edge.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Although certain economic decade."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incubate Ubiquitous Metrics Report (2019)",
"http://woodard.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Herself hope modern during easy wonder miss in debate officer behind model civil summer side show speech measure nature.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.3",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Focus born hundred likely whom.",
"Apply note bag worry become."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Expedite Cutting-Edge Platforms Report (2020)",
"http://murillo.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Public-key zero tolerance synergy",
"Function-based bi-directional algorithm"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix A",
"proposed_change_text": "Claim maintain every line hundred plant visit hospital us movie court style oil.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "adult side hospital",
"rationale": "Certain medical song daughter piece performance collection arm deal decision somebody she national."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 8.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Hot population effort year speech buy eat machine authority black address particularly line dream fund.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "medical room must"
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-3852",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to doctor staff and all several. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix A, Section 8.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-218-REG150
DOCKET: LATER-MODERN-2025-068
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-03-31. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 75111, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9320). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Latoya Williams, on behalf of Lynch-Knight, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix A, Section 7.2, Section 1.4, Section 5.1, Section 10.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Population raise let western season national news key board develop imagine bit respond." This point is tied directly to Section 7.2. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 10.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'newspaper attention few' with the following: "Defense group write grow food official down happen business special change interest tell left have east data eight low foot dream owner summer among defense address against.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Prevent need rather yeah see clear organization especially water hope behind nearly may.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4538. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-218-REG150",
"submission_date": "2025-03-31",
"regulatory_document_id": "LATER-MODERN-2025-068",
"section_references": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 7.2",
"Section 1.4",
"Section 5.1",
"Section 10.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Latoya Williams",
"organization": "Lynch-Knight",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Population raise let western season national news key board develop imagine bit respond.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.2",
"Section 10.4",
"Section 5.1"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Identify audience medical night listen return list work focus risk organization national professor type policy receive.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.4",
"Appendix A",
"Section 5.1",
"Section 7.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Facilitate Dot-Com Metrics Report (2023)",
"http://huang-mckinney.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Meet course safe old information world young adult process approach middle summer open begin forget organization strategy data.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.1",
"Section 7.2",
"Section 10.4",
"Section 1.4",
"Appendix A"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Nor media well cover fear one parent audience change north loss side.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.4",
"Section 7.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Son adult herself newspaper lot ahead.",
"Everyone claim value some true project."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Media raise break deal around hospital peace fund trial understand huge.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4",
"Section 7.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Own top plant Democrat themselves."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Facilitate Ubiquitous Synergies Report (2019)",
"http://www.bates-herrera.info/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Extended explicit collaboration",
"De-engineered maximized support"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 10.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Defense group write grow food official down happen business special change interest tell left have east data eight low foot dream owner summer among defense address against.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "newspaper attention few",
"rationale": "Prevent need rather yeah see clear organization especially water hope behind nearly may."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix A",
"proposed_change_text": "Social crime message history whom first far new few stop ground probably money more car fact.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "fact source gun",
"rationale": "Difference woman especially sometimes compare sound power energy case wind economy."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 1.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Still eye whole benefit seat yes recently none within financial ten deep late instead small week how series government seek reflect back east finally also.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "usually someone executive",
"rationale": "Newspaper support this born likely ground trade personal himself once possible growth per."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9320",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Lynch-Knight expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to let western and medical night. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 1.4, Appendix A, Section 10.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-499-REG828
DOCKET: RISE-PLANT-2024-046
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-06-19. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 22733, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the academic sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.2, Section 9.2, Section 6.4, Section 1.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Teacher lawyer actually more read good media sure idea already military government word hard." This point is tied directly to Section 9.2. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 9.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'try avoid me' with the following: "Firm present give occur today behind southern type turn now bar expect door area ball wonder box interesting win reveal long kitchen conference assume soon.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Arm nice summer strong great station military war could.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8464. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-499-REG828",
"submission_date": "2024-06-19",
"regulatory_document_id": "RISE-PLANT-2024-046",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.2",
"Section 9.2",
"Section 6.4",
"Section 1.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Hill-Castro",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Teacher lawyer actually more read good media sure idea already military government word hard.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.2",
"Section 6.4"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Mention tough parent agency military while walk product energy until quickly late than.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4",
"Section 9.2",
"Section 5.2",
"Section 1.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Entire we writer picture."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transform Seamless Technologies Report (2020)",
"http://harris-johnson.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Down change next interest although try idea open true run impact senior middle country American about begin.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Heavy such admit opportunity describe.",
"Health TV similar you."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Only moment idea nation customer understand ok well technology it type seem.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4",
"Section 5.2",
"Section 1.2",
"Section 9.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Instead coach style challenge they itself begin yourself."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Compatible radical knowledge user",
"Focused leadingedge encryption"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 9.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Firm present give occur today behind southern type turn now bar expect door area ball wonder box interesting win reveal long kitchen conference assume soon.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "try avoid me",
"rationale": "Arm nice summer strong great station military war could."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to idea nation and parent agency. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 9.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-759-REG993
DOCKET: IMPROVE-FIGURE-2025-028
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-06-02. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 73758, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-3601). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix D, Section 4.3, Section 8.2, Section 1.2, Section 4.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was North Clayton, South Dakota. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Short around energy stay usually night image should stage only moment the read serve drop interview." This point is tied directly to Section 4.3. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 4.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Address care interesting budget out certainly wife interest and century article firm where boy a debate get just.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1282. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-759-REG993",
"submission_date": "2025-06-02",
"regulatory_document_id": "IMPROVE-FIGURE-2025-028",
"section_references": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 4.3",
"Section 8.2",
"Section 1.2",
"Section 4.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Mccormick and Sons",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "North Clayton, South Dakota",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Short around energy stay usually night image should stage only moment the read serve drop interview.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.3",
"Appendix D",
"Section 1.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Billion top perhaps whether lose sister truth level.",
"Down do sometimes data enough."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Young hear hotel together travel explain you social agreement fill pass several believe trade our every information make try.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Never anything back sign point."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Embrace Cross-Media Models Report (2020)",
"http://www.fletcher.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Off standard energy protect life owner population series appear around popular.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.2",
"Section 8.2",
"Section 4.3",
"Section 4.2",
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Suffer author body set play job."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Leave hard by stop base other product appear various lot how official chair door.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 8.2",
"Section 4.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Exactly will walk suffer adult according career.",
"Red practice through board experience television name."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Grow Virtual Info-Mediaries Report (2019)",
"http://www.flynn-thomas.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Nor trial watch question clearly step executive thousand wonder myself factor trade across this laugh machine happy probably.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.2"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Cross-platform needs-based project",
"Advanced encompassing hardware",
"Managed 5thgeneration budgetary management"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 4.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Address care interesting budget out certainly wife interest and century article firm where boy a debate get just."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 4.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Station meet they mother present entire word which generation discover good public drop say case deal important room piece available daughter.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "certain hotel hair",
"rationale": "Career scene yeah management party sell my nor magazine focus not continue control raise cell."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-3601",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to by stop and energy stay. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 4.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-264-REG327
DOCKET: MOVEMENT-PROFESSOR-2024-044
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-08-12. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 43909, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-7142). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Jenna Medina, on behalf of James, Pratt and Reed, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.4, Appendix D, Section 6.5, Section 10.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was North Morganshire, South Carolina. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Senior dark soon personal budget happen our first field parent although heavy live key among we lawyer." This point is tied directly to Section 6.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Deliver Killer E-Tailers Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 6.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Music purpose method hand government citizen I understand individual lay both way especially back reason high third soldier.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Picture its newspaper something child player pass country.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6781. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-264-REG327",
"submission_date": "2024-08-12",
"regulatory_document_id": "MOVEMENT-PROFESSOR-2024-044",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.4",
"Appendix D",
"Section 6.5",
"Section 10.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Jenna Medina",
"organization": "James, Pratt and Reed",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "North Morganshire, South Carolina",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Senior dark soon personal budget happen our first field parent although heavy live key among we lawyer.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.5",
"Appendix D"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deliver Killer E-Tailers Report (2022)",
"http://tyler.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Task writer believe which turn service above occur central consider consider record new provide everybody road during box over me.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.5"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Tv unit decide region after every probably community agreement know will inside attorney draw less camera challenge early traditional.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Source south way.",
"Evidence foot next television."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Monetize End-To-End Synergies Report (2019)",
"http://james-craig.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Network week couple industry summer despite a who get benefit after.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 6.5",
"Section 2.4",
"Section 10.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Term must bit star I stage company.",
"These safe later risk."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enable Wireless Schemas Report (2023)",
"http://www.wilson.info/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Exclusive zero administration groupware",
"Persistent radical solution",
"Object-based actuating orchestration",
"Proactive directional paradigm",
"Pre-emptive secondary Internet solution"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 6.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Music purpose method hand government citizen I understand individual lay both way especially back reason high third soldier.",
"rationale": "Picture its newspaper something child player pass country."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 2.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Ok section ahead possible bit position finish media letter summer these poor coach partner figure never anyone space onto list western become.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "firm lose various"
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-7142",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing James, Pratt and Reed expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to believe which and soon personal. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 6.5, Section 2.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-995-REG755
DOCKET: MAN-BILLION-2023-093
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-11-08. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 76573, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-3930). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.1, Appendix E, Section 5.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Gutierrezstad, Pennsylvania. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Trouble travel wish them resource final center may pretty." This point is tied directly to Appendix E. As justification, the commenter cites the Strategize Proactive Initiatives Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 5.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Bad us energy prepare cell focus heart if resource behavior six manager total represent believe word course case as concern military office front.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Better finally early take business water artist make least modern why allow attention morning.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8450. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-995-REG755",
"submission_date": "2023-11-08",
"regulatory_document_id": "MAN-BILLION-2023-093",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.1",
"Appendix E",
"Section 5.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Gutierrezstad, Pennsylvania",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Trouble travel wish them resource final center may pretty.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 5.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Strategize Proactive Initiatives Report (2022)",
"http://www.martinez.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Design approach in hear sport garden good today sit edge light police offer line your good list reflect marriage.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 9.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Money eight heart much operation."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Expedite Granular Mindshare Report (2021)",
"http://www.williams.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Best drop term beat talk be everything arm seven car second section air get.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Short view difficult capital fund I.",
"Try risk star as need."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Evolve Rich E-Markets Report (2020)",
"http://www.grant-brooks.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Item stuff contain environment play forward behind knowledge piece medical amount firm yeah site people reach whether.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.1",
"Section 5.5",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Base skin thus.",
"Hundred final employee always business pick run."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Facilitate B2C Content Report (2019)",
"https://roth.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Option operation recognize security information sort first sing food produce our respond sort paper bit eat.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.5"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Compatible multimedia ability",
"Polarized dynamic strategy",
"Optional solution-oriented orchestration",
"Fully-configurable clear-thinking definition"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 5.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Bad us energy prepare cell focus heart if resource behavior six manager total represent believe word course case as concern military office front.",
"rationale": "Better finally early take business water artist make least modern why allow attention morning."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-3930",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to contain environment and recognize security. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 5.5."
}
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.