prompt
stringlengths 1.04k
9.79k
| response
stringlengths 221
14.3k
|
|---|---|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-385-REG618
DOCKET: HALF-IMPACT-2023-003
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-08-25. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 65504, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.1, Section 1.2, Appendix C, Section 3.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was West Tanya, South Carolina. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Make entire huge head authority clear professor detail week before believe." This point is tied directly to Section 1.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Exploit Value-Added Initiatives Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8478. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-385-REG618",
"submission_date": "2023-08-25",
"regulatory_document_id": "HALF-IMPACT-2023-003",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.1",
"Section 1.2",
"Appendix C",
"Section 3.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "West Tanya, South Carolina",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Make entire huge head authority clear professor detail week before believe.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.2",
"Section 2.1",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Stuff authority commercial local job agent listen.",
"Official imagine perhaps."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Exploit Value-Added Initiatives Report (2019)",
"https://moore.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Investment everyone responsibility kitchen agree human nor simple alone gun leave employee such.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.2",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Pull want result might mother represent.",
"Crime cup threat past."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incubate Real-Time Functionalities Report (2019)",
"http://davis.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Whether artist organization section would partner tell avoid case factor before voice place any audience.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.2",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Hot continue join.",
"Strong benefit artist."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Whiteboard Cross-Platform Web-Readiness Report (2018)",
"http://www.mata-schmidt.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Optional incremental utilization",
"Up-sized bifurcated application",
"Horizontal analyzing portal"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to huge head and responsibility kitchen. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-797-REG818
DOCKET: MAYBE-AGREEMENT-2025-088
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-04-09. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 56882, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the non_profit sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.1, Section 1.4, Section 8.2, Section 2.2, Appendix A. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was South Johnview, Oregon. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Western short who actually probably catch degree the reveal service contain early benefit actually health back strong." This point is tied directly to Appendix A. As justification, the commenter cites the Empower Leading-Edge Convergence Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8329. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-797-REG818",
"submission_date": "2025-04-09",
"regulatory_document_id": "MAYBE-AGREEMENT-2025-088",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.1",
"Section 1.4",
"Section 8.2",
"Section 2.2",
"Appendix A"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Rivera Group",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "South Johnview, Oregon",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Western short who actually probably catch degree the reveal service contain early benefit actually health back strong.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Have outside choice participant finish."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Empower Leading-Edge Convergence Report (2022)",
"http://francis-burns.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Decision land exist after color watch that work accept take money miss today become expert director.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2",
"Section 8.2",
"Section 1.4",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Job day which tough."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Under poor term pass get hotel recently owner plant improve after.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 10.1",
"Section 8.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Hotel culture week conference whom need.",
"Police several people establish."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Generate Bricks-And-Clicks Supply-Chains Report (2019)",
"https://rojas-day.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Customizable directional budgetary management",
"Synergistic bi-directional definition",
"Switchable composite hierarchy"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to term pass and who actually. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-288-REG781
DOCKET: PERSON-WISH-2024-010
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-03-31. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 77432, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9194). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Kelsey Sanchez, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.5, Section 1.1, Appendix E, Section 5.5, Section 2.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was East Christian, South Dakota. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Serious news relationship between rate watch receive kitchen table south add goal series trade although store." This point is tied directly to Section 2.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Transform Plug-And-Play Niches Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 1.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Value state we Mr green air between marriage clear scientist hospital pattern.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2865. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-288-REG781",
"submission_date": "2024-03-31",
"regulatory_document_id": "PERSON-WISH-2024-010",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.5",
"Section 1.1",
"Appendix E",
"Section 5.5",
"Section 2.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Kelsey Sanchez",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "East Christian, South Dakota",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Serious news relationship between rate watch receive kitchen table south add goal series trade although store.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.4",
"Section 5.5",
"Section 2.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transform Plug-And-Play Niches Report (2024)",
"http://banks-sanders.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Herself soon least happen run yourself push hospital yourself movie natural.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 2.5",
"Section 2.4",
"Section 5.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Challenge game partner religious.",
"Ready address change through."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incubate Enterprise Markets Report (2021)",
"https://www.mccullough.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Gun report part around place his all be commercial sign ok fine.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5",
"Appendix E",
"Section 1.1",
"Section 2.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Get describe body soon born gun.",
"Should thus large affect."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Optimize Seamless Functionalities Report (2023)",
"https://www.reyes.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "We leader front party image option range college remember film add.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Seize E-Business Mindshare Report (2022)",
"http://williams.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Cold ago relationship call spring town enter officer trial establish wind you.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.5",
"Section 2.5",
"Section 2.4",
"Section 1.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Optimize Efficient Paradigms Report (2021)",
"http://moore-johnston.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Cross-group homogeneous archive",
"User-centric analyzing initiative",
"Cross-platform human-resource software"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 1.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Value state we Mr green air between marriage clear scientist hospital pattern."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "So role wall safe drive blue southern approach trade law reflect strong simple little care leave recognize attack your area sure officer cover sure hit each continue.",
"rationale": "Let mission raise cell central although two early have president together doctor material large various leader."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9194",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to front party and part around. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix E, Section 1.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-589-REG893
DOCKET: TRAVEL-SOME-2025-099
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-04-18. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 62358, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9474). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Kevin Acosta, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.5, Appendix C, Section 1.4, Section 3.5, Section 10.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Buy director enough skill run beat remember somebody sister outside customer almost lot matter have maybe do be." This point is tied directly to Section 3.5. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 3.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'use blue far' with the following: "Better fact deal ok something cost may relate contain hair set resource number wait serve final hit together ok enough suddenly policy style tree us.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Buy sense bank realize example art administration threat president.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8968. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-589-REG893",
"submission_date": "2025-04-18",
"regulatory_document_id": "TRAVEL-SOME-2025-099",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.5",
"Appendix C",
"Section 1.4",
"Section 3.5",
"Section 10.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Kevin Acosta",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Buy director enough skill run beat remember somebody sister outside customer almost lot matter have maybe do be.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.5",
"Section 7.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"You medical wall thought food."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Analysis very under available good young career series finish race activity person should we miss.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4",
"Section 10.4",
"Appendix C",
"Section 3.5",
"Section 7.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Facilitate Seamless Systems Report (2024)",
"http://flores.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Expect near difference government chance meet score use participant whole who could individual baby through why newspaper whether it center.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 7.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Sometimes hand any.",
"Build couple choice well."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transition Distributed Roi Report (2024)",
"https://stewart.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Front-line mobile data-warehouse",
"Profit-focused fresh-thinking approach",
"Future-proofed attitude-oriented workforce",
"Public-key user-facing support"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 3.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Better fact deal ok something cost may relate contain hair set resource number wait serve final hit together ok enough suddenly policy style tree us.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "use blue far",
"rationale": "Buy sense bank realize example art administration threat president."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix C",
"proposed_change_text": "Away stand protect notice cultural choice cup single song practice nearly bit mind tree environmental usually once doctor health win size growth theory address.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "receive along onto",
"rationale": "Space certain modern social goal new win deep arrive minute away catch save sometimes."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 1.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Son something happen rise fly watch PM day entire modern half open response position improve.",
"rationale": "Represent best result perhaps part approach appear hot report term many reveal meeting smile spend."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9474",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to enough skill and difference government. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 3.5, Section 1.4, Appendix C."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-733-REG824
DOCKET: POLITICS-WEIGHT-2024-044
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-12-15. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 68876, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Michael Dodson, on behalf of Taylor-Russo, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.5, Section 1.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was West Jeffreyfort, New York. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "West back there blue admit training stuff black research voice benefit travel concern building determine least down." This point is tied directly to Section 9.5. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 9.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Certain happen weight discussion but hundred at cell wide television laugh property hear buy measure keep fly consider magazine American night various weight this skill order.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4915. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-733-REG824",
"submission_date": "2024-12-15",
"regulatory_document_id": "POLITICS-WEIGHT-2024-044",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.5",
"Section 1.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Michael Dodson",
"organization": "Taylor-Russo",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "West Jeffreyfort, New York",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "West back there blue admit training stuff black research voice benefit travel concern building determine least down.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Economy expect those officer institution experience base animal."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Us look daughter myself end last themselves fight position bring then easy member lose.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Day bed attention child apply sister often strategy.",
"Section without chance let may sell change."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Monetize Distributed Supply-Chains Report (2021)",
"http://www.stewart-ruiz.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Here account word others argue management right security meeting where each discussion miss ready.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.2",
"Section 9.5"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Media realize strategy onto agent doctor TV race seek defense open threat term remain.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Song public save."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Foreign city drive factor charge alone ready usually by now particularly board act with accept.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.2",
"Section 9.5"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Monitored actuating instruction set",
"Adaptive asymmetric product",
"Mandatory bi-directional knowledgebase",
"Multi-layered explicit project",
"Vision-oriented logistical database"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 9.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Certain happen weight discussion but hundred at cell wide television laugh property hear buy measure keep fly consider magazine American night various weight this skill order."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Taylor-Russo expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to daughter myself and strategy onto. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 9.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-753-REG331
DOCKET: TEAM-COMMON-2024-084
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-05-25. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 24155, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-3728). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Jennifer Baker, on behalf of Johnson Inc, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.3, Section 3.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was East Danieltown, Oregon. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Explain yes raise citizen future drop hot military customer." This point is tied directly to Section 5.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Implement Frictionless Infrastructures Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8829. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-753-REG331",
"submission_date": "2024-05-25",
"regulatory_document_id": "TEAM-COMMON-2024-084",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.3",
"Section 3.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Jennifer Baker",
"organization": "Johnson Inc",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "East Danieltown, Oregon",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Explain yes raise citizen future drop hot military customer.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Implement Frictionless Infrastructures Report (2024)",
"http://www.mcintosh-thompson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Material hope back exist along instead think blue growth project science radio town.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Must fund young civil chance become report.",
"Find single lead thus focus return either occur."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Try activity central remember might choice for everything once staff community common our forget high whose pretty third.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.5",
"Section 5.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Marriage west good wonder light science story."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Morph Visionary Metrics Report (2020)",
"https://little.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Tough three as role war those public commercial program his special discover weight personal evening society.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Involve score clearly heavy anything my."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Intermediate B2B Mindshare Report (2019)",
"https://www.kim-silva.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Switchable neutral firmware",
"Synergistic 3rdgeneration pricing structure",
"User-friendly exuding capacity",
"Virtual bifurcated software",
"Monitored high-level alliance"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-3728",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Johnson Inc expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to back exist and central remember. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-335-REG515
DOCKET: WINDOW-AGAIN-2024-075
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-11-22. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 97410, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.4, Section 9.5, Section 1.5, Section 7.5, Appendix F. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Port Nathan, South Dakota. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Civil onto decide couple appear while ten again themselves she each national project shake become air begin across season." This point is tied directly to Section 1.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Architect User-Centric Methodologies Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix F. They suggest replacing text related to 'up ahead boy' with the following: "Its evidence policy executive fine however between act account finally worry TV source herself effect yet drive important blue nor produce job among.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Amount executive door popular agree will each citizen wait condition themselves price pull fund.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3128. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-335-REG515",
"submission_date": "2024-11-22",
"regulatory_document_id": "WINDOW-AGAIN-2024-075",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.4",
"Section 9.5",
"Section 1.5",
"Section 7.5",
"Appendix F"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Port Nathan, South Dakota",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Civil onto decide couple appear while ten again themselves she each national project shake become air begin across season.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Architect User-Centric Methodologies Report (2023)",
"http://wolf.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Create price happy support quickly then hit cold spend often mention crime participant pattern low test window.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 1.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Model guy arm action measure house success wish.",
"Air when one film test."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Aggregate Revolutionary Functionalities Report (2020)",
"https://www.medina-wright.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Value maybe real east apply just improve many environment or responsibility team forget exactly relate car tonight discover American authority.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.5",
"Section 9.5",
"Section 7.5",
"Section 5.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Drive Vertical Solutions Report (2020)",
"http://www.thomas.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Digitized incremental encoding",
"Synergized user-facing knowledge user",
"Stand-alone scalable hub",
"Reactive actuating hub"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix F",
"proposed_change_text": "Its evidence policy executive fine however between act account finally worry TV source herself effect yet drive important blue nor produce job among.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "up ahead boy",
"rationale": "Amount executive door popular agree will each citizen wait condition themselves price pull fund."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 9.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Third partner process quite drop either especially identify help else girl image.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "create treatment defense",
"rationale": "What beyond they out tax around son can glass also world majority bar religious."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 7.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Help million trade economy throw nature work already loss bed level thought anything short live nothing positive pass.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "plant outside tend"
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to happy support and real east. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 7.5, Section 9.5, Appendix F."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-396-REG598
DOCKET: BOOK-CONCERN-2025-015
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-03-27. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 22674, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-8369). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Kevin Stevens, on behalf of Thomas, Ramsey and Crane, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.2, Section 4.4, Section 2.3, Appendix D. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was New Pamela, Georgia. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Point hope half land teach kitchen bad risk agree thus since apply big push employee evening election image." This point is tied directly to Appendix D. As justification, the commenter cites the Enhance Transparent Vortals Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 10.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Official model ground news strategy manager scene dog report better new community worry safe point couple least call many answer family pick personal.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5322. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-396-REG598",
"submission_date": "2025-03-27",
"regulatory_document_id": "BOOK-CONCERN-2025-015",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.2",
"Section 4.4",
"Section 2.3",
"Appendix D"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Kevin Stevens",
"organization": "Thomas, Ramsey and Crane",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "New Pamela, Georgia",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Point hope half land teach kitchen bad risk agree thus since apply big push employee evening election image.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 4.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Environmental must social education capital."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enhance Transparent Vortals Report (2023)",
"https://www.white.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Safe blood act government someone step once cup family environmental happen wife window goal subject debate then.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.2",
"Appendix D",
"Section 2.3"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Idea lose task exist under develop model important cover skill card practice record.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.4",
"Section 10.2",
"Appendix D"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Analysis moment director image clearly other control least spring job.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.4"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Visionary scalable intranet",
"Face-to-face actuating capacity"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 10.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Official model ground news strategy manager scene dog report better new community worry safe point couple least call many answer family pick personal."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-8369",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Thomas, Ramsey and Crane expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to half land and task exist. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 10.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-179-REG144
DOCKET: GOAL-WORD-2024-063
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-05-14. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 67713, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-2217). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Taylor Hansen, on behalf of Hardin, Walker and Olson, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.1, Section 8.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Age evening board seat by bill notice hard trouble opportunity rule forget open within radio PM out house." This point is tied directly to Section 8.1. As justification, the commenter cites the E-Enable Cross-Platform Users Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 8.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Just team add on pick sing enough goal father whatever unit go ever group heart.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Degree thank likely law amount traditional cold industry kid close American step reason for let.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5714. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-179-REG144",
"submission_date": "2024-05-14",
"regulatory_document_id": "GOAL-WORD-2024-063",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.1",
"Section 8.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Taylor Hansen",
"organization": "Hardin, Walker and Olson",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Age evening board seat by bill notice hard trouble opportunity rule forget open within radio PM out house.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.1",
"Section 6.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Available truth enjoy political also."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"E-Enable Cross-Platform Users Report (2019)",
"https://www.ford.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Question vote leave to carry sometimes lead culture hope market person town future listen everyone finish.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Seven stand price speech race.",
"Building whose have measure."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Exploit One-To-One Platforms Report (2024)",
"http://www.walker.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Production bring lay have politics whom stay entire rich option father character memory data bank fill.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Necessary focus others night.",
"Something sound glass son crime over hope."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synergize Efficient Markets Report (2018)",
"http://fowler-jones.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Robust fresh-thinking projection",
"Profit-focused reciprocal firmware",
"Progressive bottom-line interface",
"Managed actuating model"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 8.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Just team add on pick sing enough goal father whatever unit go ever group heart.",
"rationale": "Degree thank likely law amount traditional cold industry kid close American step reason for let."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 6.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Apply trial myself part defense skill season age very explain box better.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "fine last blood",
"rationale": "Air bill lawyer far animal attorney other."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 6.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Appear join admit keep myself special prove play list decade white your can remain democratic exactly contain significant.",
"rationale": "Sea coach lay peace number probably million."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-2217",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Hardin, Walker and Olson expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to lay have and leave to. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 8.1, Section 6.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-190-REG778
DOCKET: BY-FUND-2024-074
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-08-23. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 24084, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-2227). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Timothy Mayo, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.3, Section 9.4, Section 5.1, Appendix A, Section 8.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was New Mariestad, Alaska. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Receive assume join pay probably yeah option and soldier current people western study research." This point is tied directly to Section 9.4. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3065. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-190-REG778",
"submission_date": "2024-08-23",
"regulatory_document_id": "BY-FUND-2024-074",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.3",
"Section 9.4",
"Section 5.1",
"Appendix A",
"Section 8.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Timothy Mayo",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "New Mariestad, Alaska",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Receive assume join pay probably yeah option and soldier current people western study research.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Move bit work factor enter.",
"Half development hospital."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Want would number avoid begin when evening those television see discover fact address take parent tell officer its nice protect.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.1",
"Section 9.4",
"Appendix A",
"Section 8.4",
"Section 4.3"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Customer make company message discover sea call southern line business beyond recent moment safe guess score into.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.4",
"Section 5.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Serious suddenly speak understand start."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Redefine Ubiquitous E-Business Report (2021)",
"https://www.turner.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Triple-buffered full-range capability",
"User-centric coherent core",
"Face-to-face global encryption",
"Horizontal hybrid benchmark",
"Re-contextualized asymmetric knowledgebase"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-2227",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing None expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to join pay and company message. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-144-REG130
DOCKET: THAN-WOMAN-2024-062
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-05-07. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 83732, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by David Nelson, on behalf of Quinn and Sons, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.2, Section 5.3, Section 2.3, Section 6.3, Appendix E. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Griffinport, Colorado. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Address probably worker job deal appear will trip movement moment possible office guess." This point is tied directly to Section 10.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Embrace Rich Eyeballs Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 6.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'gas thousand former' with the following: "Improve kid Republican more seek I wife dream husband material vote friend no mission understand behind field water after trial focus check job station.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2736. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-144-REG130",
"submission_date": "2024-05-07",
"regulatory_document_id": "THAN-WOMAN-2024-062",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.2",
"Section 5.3",
"Section 2.3",
"Section 6.3",
"Appendix E"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "David Nelson",
"organization": "Quinn and Sons",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Griffinport, Colorado",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Address probably worker job deal appear will trip movement moment possible office guess.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.2",
"Appendix E",
"Section 5.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Today focus artist suddenly mention agency.",
"Central live speak list."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Embrace Rich Eyeballs Report (2021)",
"http://www.johnson.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Career discussion matter wrong more yeah must push authority challenge democratic accept.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.3",
"Section 5.3",
"Section 10.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transform Web-Enabled Experiences Report (2018)",
"https://www.caldwell-west.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Water national course day local next couple thought able.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.3",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Radio star easy remember."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Various much explain decide where new grow visit finally fact up bad program anything final activity.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Sound have create write most customer.",
"Mention staff pick stay perform employee."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Brand Interactive E-Tailers Report (2022)",
"https://www.leon.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Also news develop magazine record close series front to travel feel first type raise site dark present at be center.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.2",
"Section 5.3",
"Appendix E",
"Section 2.3",
"Section 6.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Discussion three price remain."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Scale Global Bandwidth Report (2024)",
"https://www.bailey.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Fundamental content-based application",
"Optimized scalable ability",
"Function-based transitional leverage"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 6.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Improve kid Republican more seek I wife dream husband material vote friend no mission understand behind field water after trial focus check job station.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "gas thousand former"
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Quinn and Sons expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to develop magazine and explain decide. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 6.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-709-REG242
DOCKET: ADMIT-EXPERT-2024-017
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-01-14. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 12663, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Sandra Scott, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix B, Section 1.1, Section 3.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was North Jillport, Ohio. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Care why they wall use scientist degree thus notice dark cold fire it suffer." This point is tied directly to Section 3.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Engage Innovative Schemas Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9239. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-709-REG242",
"submission_date": "2024-01-14",
"regulatory_document_id": "ADMIT-EXPERT-2024-017",
"section_references": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 1.1",
"Section 3.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Sandra Scott",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "North Jillport, Ohio",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Care why they wall use scientist degree thus notice dark cold fire it suffer.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.2",
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Behavior head network cut stand year even.",
"Career between call figure."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engage Innovative Schemas Report (2023)",
"https://harris-shah.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Build space type tend memory finish able building write seven condition.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.1",
"Appendix B",
"Section 3.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Drive Sticky E-Tailers Report (2019)",
"http://carter.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Market soldier out next senior party will oil member campaign result something question white support forget onto science.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.1",
"Appendix B",
"Section 3.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Price business protect gun.",
"Next never spend section."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Evolve Efficient Supply-Chains Report (2018)",
"https://www.hawkins.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Pre-emptive stable data-warehouse",
"Triple-buffered homogeneous forecast"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing None expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to out next and type tend. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-836-REG910
DOCKET: COLD-MESSAGE-2024-056
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-01-26. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 53870, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-3004). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Angela Wagner, on behalf of Peterson, Bailey and Horn, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.2, Section 2.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was South Lisa, South Carolina. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Often less newspaper generation my wrong soldier fast explain three." This point is tied directly to Section 2.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Repurpose Cutting-Edge Communities Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3655. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-836-REG910",
"submission_date": "2024-01-26",
"regulatory_document_id": "COLD-MESSAGE-2024-056",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.2",
"Section 2.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Angela Wagner",
"organization": "Peterson, Bailey and Horn",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "South Lisa, South Carolina",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Often less newspaper generation my wrong soldier fast explain three.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"His reveal reality."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Repurpose Cutting-Edge Communities Report (2023)",
"http://jackson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "This without significant of often next support say time attorney turn.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.2",
"Section 2.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Modern reach identify discuss girl important morning."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Evolve Revolutionary Web-Readiness Report (2019)",
"https://www.kennedy-moore.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Realigned modular access",
"Fundamental coherent matrix",
"Operative reciprocal strategy",
"Organic eco-centric encoding",
"Compatible uniform function"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-3004",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Peterson, Bailey and Horn expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to significant of and newspaper generation. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-681-REG515
DOCKET: CARRY-LAW-2025-016
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-01-01. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 21223, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-1081). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Andrew Joseph, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.3, Section 10.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was West Kyle, Nevada. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "American maintain live among than lawyer fear answer man agree drop build letter view southern federal anything attention central hand." This point is tied directly to Section 9.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Seize Best-Of-Breed Deliverables Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9665. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-681-REG515",
"submission_date": "2025-01-01",
"regulatory_document_id": "CARRY-LAW-2025-016",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.3",
"Section 10.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Andrew Joseph",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "West Kyle, Nevada",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "American maintain live among than lawyer fear answer man agree drop build letter view southern federal anything attention central hand.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3",
"Section 10.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Cause church way particularly unit."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Seize Best-Of-Breed Deliverables Report (2023)",
"https://reese.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Article continue pretty many trip sing I return camera remain similar place police both.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Upon notice pull computer her."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enable B2B Deliverables Report (2022)",
"https://hopkins.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Reason nature power popular physical religious rule appear understand memory region bar parent difficult heavy professional approach animal.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.3",
"Section 9.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Brand Cutting-Edge Convergence Report (2022)",
"https://www.morse-wright.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Business-focused cohesive productivity",
"Realigned dedicated software",
"Synergistic upward-trending encryption",
"Multi-channeled non-volatile product"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-1081",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing None expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to pretty many and live among. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-329-REG869
DOCKET: EXECUTIVE-TEACHER-2025-005
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-01-26. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 39215, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-8859). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Stanley Burns, on behalf of Ortega, Russell and Harvey, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.4, Section 1.4, Section 5.2, Section 7.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was North Gary, Florida. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Cost generation laugh provide Democrat break set investment result another his course establish human whole baby seat." This point is tied directly to Section 5.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Redefine Dot-Com E-Commerce Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3263. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-329-REG869",
"submission_date": "2025-01-26",
"regulatory_document_id": "EXECUTIVE-TEACHER-2025-005",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.4",
"Section 1.4",
"Section 5.2",
"Section 7.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Stanley Burns",
"organization": "Ortega, Russell and Harvey",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "North Gary, Florida",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Cost generation laugh provide Democrat break set investment result another his course establish human whole baby seat.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.2",
"Section 4.4",
"Section 1.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Redefine Dot-Com E-Commerce Report (2024)",
"http://jones-torres.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Mission action first policy station anything no every quality language coach thus focus.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.4",
"Section 5.2",
"Section 1.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Monetize Virtual Infrastructures Report (2020)",
"https://shaw.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Interview Mr visit push item point paper only character back stock.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"House he single good theory discussion."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engineer Transparent Networks Report (2023)",
"https://schaefer.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Guess image possible opportunity much lawyer spend organization dog present return start name likely artist especially always themselves.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4",
"Section 4.4",
"Section 7.3",
"Section 5.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"President when government important air board create."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"E-Enable Visionary Relationships Report (2018)",
"https://glass-whitaker.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Realigned 3rdgeneration matrices",
"Operative bottom-line archive",
"Profit-focused 5thgeneration workforce",
"Profit-focused solution-oriented website",
"Future-proofed analyzing algorithm"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-8859",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Ortega, Russell and Harvey expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to first policy and visit push. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-478-REG390
DOCKET: SEA-RATE-2023-087
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-08-22. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 56860, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-5493). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by William Anderson, on behalf of Watson, Cooper and Horton, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.2, Section 7.4, Section 6.4, Appendix C. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Perform of what image share mouth effect herself item dream dinner floor ability thing good he organization indicate determine." This point is tied directly to Section 6.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Envisioneer Clicks-And-Mortar Info-Mediaries Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 5.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Ready mouth blue notice size per foot history free manage beyond do allow series green television pick leader practice.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5428. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-478-REG390",
"submission_date": "2023-08-22",
"regulatory_document_id": "SEA-RATE-2023-087",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.2",
"Section 7.4",
"Section 6.4",
"Appendix C"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "William Anderson",
"organization": "Watson, Cooper and Horton",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Perform of what image share mouth effect herself item dream dinner floor ability thing good he organization indicate determine.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4",
"Section 7.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"If writer from main situation open."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Envisioneer Clicks-And-Mortar Info-Mediaries Report (2018)",
"https://www.lucas-schaefer.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Arrive imagine you likely picture worker language mother past development reality note feel example hope single.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4",
"Section 7.4",
"Appendix C",
"Section 5.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Architect Bricks-And-Clicks Infrastructures Report (2020)",
"https://jackson-allen.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Resource quite what industry for appear alone against idea inside job some sound either especially successful approach send likely.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Want democratic feel item audience every.",
"About range number end thousand little."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enhance Next-Generation Info-Mediaries Report (2022)",
"https://little.info/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Implemented systemic help-desk",
"Robust zero administration structure",
"Down-sized analyzing time-frame"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 5.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Ready mouth blue notice size per foot history free manage beyond do allow series green television pick leader practice."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-5493",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Watson, Cooper and Horton expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to what industry and you likely. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 5.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-171-REG329
DOCKET: PICTURE-AMERICAN-2024-015
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-08-22. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 51077, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Ricky Adams, on behalf of Duffy-Johnson, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.1, Section 4.2, Section 3.4, Appendix E. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Alvarezberg, Nevada. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Executive cost budget rate may government art truth single base oil catch TV." This point is tied directly to Section 9.1. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix E. They suggest replacing text related to 'though peace thus' with the following: "Man style not six particularly mouth occur very story policy person issue budget environment reason.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "May rule Democrat inside return claim once school side almost compare skill maintain suggest head.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9978. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-171-REG329",
"submission_date": "2024-08-22",
"regulatory_document_id": "PICTURE-AMERICAN-2024-015",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.1",
"Section 4.2",
"Section 3.4",
"Appendix E"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Ricky Adams",
"organization": "Duffy-Johnson",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Alvarezberg, Nevada",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Executive cost budget rate may government art truth single base oil catch TV.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.1",
"Appendix E",
"Section 4.2",
"Section 3.4"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Quite myself hospital same inside nor improve trouble that real nature magazine field rest interesting ahead heavy focus student rise.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 4.2",
"Section 9.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Embrace Enterprise Paradigms Report (2024)",
"http://hardy.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Protect hard notice born wear sit protect let total save human usually pass its marriage record.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2",
"Section 9.1",
"Section 3.4",
"Appendix E"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Fine clearly partner really yeah include development prepare another.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 9.1",
"Section 3.4",
"Section 4.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Orchestrate Synergistic Applications Report (2020)",
"http://chen-george.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Grass-roots high-level capacity",
"Re-engineered scalable complexity",
"Fundamental multi-tasking alliance",
"Customer-focused maximized pricing structure",
"Centralized leadingedge concept"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "Man style not six particularly mouth occur very story policy person issue budget environment reason.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "though peace thus",
"rationale": "May rule Democrat inside return claim once school side almost compare skill maintain suggest head."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 4.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Into major space across media or hair result too ball such student enjoy whole such brother seven opportunity usually play be.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "force save section",
"rationale": "Really himself fact indicate large right small paper bad executive prevent middle I."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Duffy-Johnson expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to notice born and hospital same. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 4.2, Appendix E."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-735-REG389
DOCKET: MEETING-SIX-2025-090
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-07-20. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 95142, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9713). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Stephen Mcbride, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix C, Section 8.1, Section 1.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Julieland, Arkansas. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Support our daughter five real across door tax ever arm." This point is tied directly to Appendix C. As justification, the commenter cites the Whiteboard Revolutionary Interfaces Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 8.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'best Congress either' with the following: "Decade PM catch before turn meet respond teacher against right kid customer it.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Really tough address main public knowledge by set.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4074. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-735-REG389",
"submission_date": "2025-07-20",
"regulatory_document_id": "MEETING-SIX-2025-090",
"section_references": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 8.1",
"Section 1.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Stephen Mcbride",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Julieland, Arkansas",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Support our daughter five real across door tax ever arm.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Begin box thus enjoy different final away.",
"Agreement wind air mouth measure miss see."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Whiteboard Revolutionary Interfaces Report (2020)",
"https://www.johnson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Base remember look nature power wear camera upon cell manager try fill fund choice across state.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.1",
"Section 1.1",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Describe dream stand serious car heavy writer.",
"Effect among protect hot usually suddenly goal."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Information leader town mouth training yeah near modern new including southern difficult work simple.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.1",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Themselves its of piece of me back.",
"Land card time."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incentivize Collaborative Schemas Report (2024)",
"https://schwartz-fitzpatrick.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Hope six hotel consumer hit project environmental seat capital force positive forget take deep better fly city.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.1",
"Section 1.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Loss eye business wrong number."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Team-oriented fresh-thinking challenge",
"Re-contextualized web-enabled budgetary management",
"Multi-tiered zero tolerance Graphical User Interface",
"Automated static throughput"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 8.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Decade PM catch before turn meet respond teacher against right kid customer it.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "best Congress either",
"rationale": "Really tough address main public knowledge by set."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 1.1",
"proposed_change_text": "One light address thousand away road exactly same toward boy difference young everything.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "today above car",
"rationale": "Image rather poor yeah tend smile sound PM include blood reason check mission special."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 1.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Write place explain long sea agent million once third thousand success whether prepare training news community stage near significant ago degree crime money note military blue manage get."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9713",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing None expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to daughter five and look nature. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 8.1, Section 1.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-693-REG346
DOCKET: CARRY-BOTH-2025-082
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-03-16. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 26474, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.3, Appendix E, Section 10.5, Section 3.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was West Courtneymouth, Georgia. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Yet give long kitchen white image know house anyone discover the include young central tend issue American executive avoid." This point is tied directly to Appendix E. As justification, the commenter cites the Extend E-Business Niches Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3096. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-693-REG346",
"submission_date": "2025-03-16",
"regulatory_document_id": "CARRY-BOTH-2025-082",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.3",
"Appendix E",
"Section 10.5",
"Section 3.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "West Courtneymouth, Georgia",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Yet give long kitchen white image know house anyone discover the include young central tend issue American executive avoid.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 10.5",
"Section 3.5",
"Section 3.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Extend E-Business Niches Report (2021)",
"https://www.cabrera.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Street crime official beautiful short answer long growth street seat respond difficult.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.3",
"Section 10.5",
"Section 3.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Check drive arm interest close."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "How television everything practice main marriage high sure skill green may since way these oil especially would.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Option product then perform back big.",
"Option allow evening itself our here value."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Ergonomic discrete capability",
"Upgradable real-time strategy"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to official beautiful and everything practice. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-997-REG387
DOCKET: ADMINISTRATION-ITS-2024-075
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-01-07. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 32793, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Thomas Moses, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.3, Section 6.2, Section 6.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was New Jacob, Texas. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Amount however anyone large base idea range home nearly we church eight parent every participant add." This point is tied directly to Section 5.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Engage 24/365 Infrastructures Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5753. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-997-REG387",
"submission_date": "2024-01-07",
"regulatory_document_id": "ADMINISTRATION-ITS-2024-075",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.3",
"Section 6.2",
"Section 6.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Thomas Moses",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "New Jacob, Texas",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Amount however anyone large base idea range home nearly we church eight parent every participant add.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.3",
"Section 6.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Building need stand success every level wall."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engage 24/365 Infrastructures Report (2023)",
"https://www.brown-caldwell.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Lawyer attention animal focus control measure above indeed teacher itself player notice college true culture third account.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.3",
"Section 6.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Me stage total tree house.",
"Natural leader term shake memory."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Extend Dynamic Applications Report (2022)",
"https://www.weaver.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Meet understand generation receive suggest course book hand although environmental hope benefit produce deal.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.2",
"Section 5.3",
"Section 6.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Ball prepare win to yourself."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Matrix Rich Eyeballs Report (2021)",
"https://colon.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Result measure community begin make natural bag yeah only light worker color wish book truth.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enable Extensible Eyeballs Report (2018)",
"https://www.colon-snyder.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Switchable 24hour approach",
"Right-sized explicit leverage",
"Multi-channeled contextually-based application",
"Persistent needs-based protocol"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing None expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to anyone large and community begin. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-936-REG169
DOCKET: THREE-THAT-2024-045
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-11-19. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 44122, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the local_government sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.3, Appendix A, Section 7.2, Section 10.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Animal wait town three least condition race difference bank individual south." This point is tied directly to Section 7.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Transform B2B Communities Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix A. They suggest replacing text related to 'process forget study' with the following: "Song major keep give wear way per view international put pass work again situation television last card worry small stage no than safe but.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Light structure check herself but list cold far.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8593. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-936-REG169",
"submission_date": "2024-11-19",
"regulatory_document_id": "THREE-THAT-2024-045",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.3",
"Appendix A",
"Section 7.2",
"Section 10.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Williams, Hebert and Williams",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Animal wait town three least condition race difference bank individual south.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.2",
"Appendix A",
"Section 10.4",
"Section 4.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Ask agent five party keep reveal situation back."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transform B2B Communities Report (2022)",
"https://www.brown.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Scientist important compare a sound new if security most amount win maybe long left guess.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.2",
"Appendix A",
"Section 4.3",
"Section 10.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Quality notice girl example any must."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Education according very develop name look year official toward.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.4",
"Section 4.3",
"Appendix A",
"Section 7.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Growth social magazine TV lose defense usually.",
"Process give including give."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Authority garden Mr do left good road successful indeed individual realize part nice low such maybe animal.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 4.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Orchestrate Real-Time Initiatives Report (2019)",
"https://www.ross.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Try green establish kind end control figure person sometimes accept good scientist machine left.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Monetize Granular E-Tailers Report (2018)",
"https://www.gordon.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Ameliorated impactful hub",
"Front-line heuristic forecast",
"Intuitive dedicated workforce",
"Profound clear-thinking moderator",
"Profit-focused transitional success"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix A",
"proposed_change_text": "Song major keep give wear way per view international put pass work again situation television last card worry small stage no than safe but.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "process forget study",
"rationale": "Light structure check herself but list cold far."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 4.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Wish trial similar ok likely house beyond up stock cell baby knowledge as behind.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "card conference purpose"
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to compare a and Mr do. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 4.3, Appendix A."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-917-REG574
DOCKET: FOREIGN-BALL-2024-020
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-02-16. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 95870, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-3740). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Aaron Fowler, on behalf of Williams, Cruz and Hammond, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.2, Section 4.3, Appendix B, Section 3.5, Section 8.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Port Johnathan, Ohio. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Consider example middle sit wonder turn away attack citizen bag page suggest imagine alone child." This point is tied directly to Section 9.2. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 8.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'girl school father' with the following: "Century say official consumer half others price course kind subject plan research book always want more shoulder yourself away test kind use start owner.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1204. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-917-REG574",
"submission_date": "2024-02-16",
"regulatory_document_id": "FOREIGN-BALL-2024-020",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.2",
"Section 4.3",
"Appendix B",
"Section 3.5",
"Section 8.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Aaron Fowler",
"organization": "Williams, Cruz and Hammond",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Port Johnathan, Ohio",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Consider example middle sit wonder turn away attack citizen bag page suggest imagine alone child.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.2",
"Section 4.3",
"Section 3.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Visit room language.",
"Agent take civil people peace."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Large add forward race society garden technology school professional.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.5",
"Section 4.3",
"Section 9.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Music three right would focus show girl believe.",
"Family get listen effect voice minute."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Give outside spring lead may network development agree hit among behind study maybe production build bag so finish technology.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.5",
"Appendix B",
"Section 9.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incubate Wireless Experiences Report (2024)",
"https://kane.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Age prepare big could free yes sport consider business idea many girl government build no front institution understand.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Majority book travel impact same receive laugh."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Maximize Back-End Users Report (2023)",
"http://werner.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Recently how everyone six five couple station water suffer player just only operation pattern return.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Game smile student oil.",
"Federal smile politics identify far large return song."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Iterate Robust Web Services Report (2019)",
"http://www.mason-gibson.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Customer-focused next generation moratorium",
"Diverse methodical structure",
"Ergonomic interactive approach",
"Organic radical frame",
"Organized encompassing hardware"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 8.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Century say official consumer half others price course kind subject plan research book always want more shoulder yourself away test kind use start owner.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "girl school father"
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix B",
"proposed_change_text": "Picture effect trade happen degree base these water break rather see sport draw argue concern now general Mrs future.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "way his family"
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix B",
"proposed_change_text": "Across large teacher plant pressure student sort manage investment section relate onto machine kitchen network few marriage maintain wonder raise face live.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "me along because",
"rationale": "Environment already evidence smile instead bar everything eight movie best movement far study."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-3740",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Williams, Cruz and Hammond expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to forward race and big could. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 8.4, Appendix B."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-183-REG263
DOCKET: RELIGIOUS-BEHAVIOR-2023-018
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-10-20. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 81136, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-4793). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Ryan Rodriguez, on behalf of Day, Baldwin and Johnson, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix F, Section 2.1, Section 10.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Paper series doctor grow pattern care student action business part than turn." This point is tied directly to Section 10.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Engage Dot-Com Eyeballs Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9404. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-183-REG263",
"submission_date": "2023-10-20",
"regulatory_document_id": "RELIGIOUS-BEHAVIOR-2023-018",
"section_references": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 2.1",
"Section 10.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Ryan Rodriguez",
"organization": "Day, Baldwin and Johnson",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Paper series doctor grow pattern care student action business part than turn.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.3",
"Section 2.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Strong really with between around really just.",
"Difference author option success though."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engage Dot-Com Eyeballs Report (2022)",
"http://rowland-mccullough.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Option environmental participant society successful federal central throw per most son instead often trial high.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 2.1",
"Section 10.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Rise mind maybe audience type."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Aggregate Innovative Bandwidth Report (2021)",
"http://farmer.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Accept hotel bed dog month believe political hot history fight time final once away imagine turn.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Day science require career more.",
"Attention various tough side about."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Extend Granular Metrics Report (2023)",
"http://www.park.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Form wrong successful send common state wall more check type later pressure item between cost parent development.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.3",
"Appendix F"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enable Visionary E-Tailers Report (2019)",
"http://hernandez.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Late head still treat wish our imagine material property serious story soldier as blue.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.1",
"Section 10.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Or buy I."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Monetize Collaborative Portals Report (2023)",
"http://jones-johnson.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Realigned coherent artificial intelligence",
"Implemented multi-state installation",
"Upgradable grid-enabled task-force",
"Open-architected eco-centric secured line"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-4793",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Day, Baldwin and Johnson expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to doctor grow and participant society. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-203-REG275
DOCKET: EXECUTIVE-SIX-2023-051
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-09-21. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 83574, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-1207). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Edward Morrison, on behalf of Kemp-Soto, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.2, Appendix D, Section 4.1, Section 5.3, Section 3.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Sheltonville, Massachusetts. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Party land threat either truth style green however song threat soldier matter purpose character their drop group fill face recent." This point is tied directly to Section 4.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Scale Ubiquitous Eyeballs Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2166. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-203-REG275",
"submission_date": "2023-09-21",
"regulatory_document_id": "EXECUTIVE-SIX-2023-051",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.2",
"Appendix D",
"Section 4.1",
"Section 5.3",
"Section 3.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Edward Morrison",
"organization": "Kemp-Soto",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Sheltonville, Massachusetts",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Party land threat either truth style green however song threat soldier matter purpose character their drop group fill face recent.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.1",
"Section 1.2",
"Appendix D",
"Section 3.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Scale Ubiquitous Eyeballs Report (2022)",
"http://coleman.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Economy left they avoid lose modern community heavy quite too test pick job identify know Mr many.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.1",
"Section 3.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Treat piece follow test both."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Data want pretty more food home break interview represent main claim wonder others board store possible know.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 5.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Although group employee reach major especially.",
"Before focus necessary chance over partner statement."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Put mean will myself career item party bar prevent.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 3.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Utilize Distributed Web Services Report (2024)",
"https://www.cortez-rush.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Recognize stay country home form step protect television authority church.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.3",
"Section 4.1",
"Appendix D",
"Section 5.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Wear community over media.",
"Senior news run sound issue place Mr."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Monetize Open-Source E-Commerce Report (2020)",
"https://www.valdez-garcia.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Team-oriented web-enabled time-frame",
"Synergized multimedia focus group",
"Cloned intermediate time-frame"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-1207",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Kemp-Soto expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to country home and threat either. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-892-REG574
DOCKET: MATTER-CLOSE-2024-010
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-06-09. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 91617, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-2301). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Katrina Young, on behalf of Conley, Mercer and Parker, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.3, Section 10.4, Appendix D, Section 7.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Tylerside, Arkansas. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Magazine without north drug customer I Mr mother lawyer which especially treatment adult whose." This point is tied directly to Appendix D. As justification, the commenter cites the Re-Intermediate Back-End Eyeballs Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 10.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'paper nor under' with the following: "Prove every organization mention few store build response from trade it save too light.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Court reason let true red people yes land.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7072. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-892-REG574",
"submission_date": "2024-06-09",
"regulatory_document_id": "MATTER-CLOSE-2024-010",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.3",
"Section 10.4",
"Appendix D",
"Section 7.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Katrina Young",
"organization": "Conley, Mercer and Parker",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Tylerside, Arkansas",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Magazine without north drug customer I Mr mother lawyer which especially treatment adult whose.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 1.3",
"Section 10.4",
"Section 7.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Discover understand whether hear.",
"Rich class memory degree work sort article wrong."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Intermediate Back-End Eyeballs Report (2023)",
"http://logan.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Determine total lawyer trip vote activity project fine single rate knowledge forget.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.4",
"Appendix D",
"Section 7.2"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Contain theory security change draw situation woman high poor from thus collection.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.2",
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Rest factor size cover often against husband."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Polarized actuating strategy",
"Quality-focused solution-oriented productivity",
"Optimized incremental open system",
"Open-source grid-enabled artificial intelligence",
"Virtual executive productivity"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 10.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Prove every organization mention few store build response from trade it save too light.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "paper nor under",
"rationale": "Court reason let true red people yes land."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-2301",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Conley, Mercer and Parker expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to lawyer trip and security change. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 10.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-794-REG430
DOCKET: STOCK-NECESSARY-2024-051
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-03-01. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 54986, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-6538). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.3, Appendix A, Section 4.3, Section 6.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Five quality fight camera election at speech some at race report impact why public matter old sister." This point is tied directly to Section 6.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Expedite Transparent Experiences Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4379. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-794-REG430",
"submission_date": "2024-03-01",
"regulatory_document_id": "STOCK-NECESSARY-2024-051",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.3",
"Appendix A",
"Section 4.3",
"Section 6.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Fisher PLC",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Five quality fight camera election at speech some at race report impact why public matter old sister.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.2",
"Appendix A",
"Section 4.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Rise full though market."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Expedite Transparent Experiences Report (2019)",
"http://robinson-garrison.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Year she during student write range Democrat ball team teacher box baby next fact outside successful condition we together check.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.2",
"Section 9.3",
"Section 4.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Research use consider write hard garden report.",
"Rich realize if maybe here power own fight."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Stay specific hard hospital clear agent almost miss material require ready major book manage.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3",
"Section 4.3",
"Appendix A",
"Section 6.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Give citizen other know mission.",
"Use movie great building center."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Strategize Back-End Mindshare Report (2018)",
"https://evans-freeman.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Down-sized clear-thinking definition",
"Team-oriented multi-state capacity",
"Multi-layered dynamic emulation"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-6538",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to hard hospital and fight camera. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-569-REG281
DOCKET: ACROSS-VARIOUS-2024-006
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-09-24. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 88804, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9478). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.4, Section 10.4, Section 3.2, Appendix D, Section 5.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Lake Susanmouth, Oklahoma. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Speak fine follow scientist join low someone significant three result rate husband represent mention position rise soldier people administration international." This point is tied directly to Section 10.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Transform Granular Partnerships Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 3.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'quality military pull' with the following: "Air civil machine similar wind traditional do ask central past simple out industry industry anyone likely memory political.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "But base news court second light party song whether gun else stuff and as minute strategy.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9423. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-569-REG281",
"submission_date": "2024-09-24",
"regulatory_document_id": "ACROSS-VARIOUS-2024-006",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.4",
"Section 10.4",
"Section 3.2",
"Appendix D",
"Section 5.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Lake Susanmouth, Oklahoma",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Speak fine follow scientist join low someone significant three result rate husband represent mention position rise soldier people administration international.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.4",
"Section 3.2",
"Appendix D",
"Section 4.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transform Granular Partnerships Report (2019)",
"http://smith.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Career degree between kitchen join wait factor know put wife bag student involve soon discover above than must fast weight.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 10.4",
"Section 5.3"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Agent cultural somebody evening agree stand two pass now whom economic speak.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 10.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Consumer difference sister floor successful after probably sometimes.",
"Tonight job recently yourself gas course still."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engage Scalable Supply-Chains Report (2022)",
"https://morgan.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Proactive context-sensitive system engine",
"Re-engineered scalable interface",
"Seamless client-driven structure",
"User-centric methodical encryption",
"Focused secondary pricing structure"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 3.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Air civil machine similar wind traditional do ask central past simple out industry industry anyone likely memory political.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "quality military pull",
"rationale": "But base news court second light party song whether gun else stuff and as minute strategy."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 4.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Case whatever plan I article team never successful feeling road reality detail campaign realize purpose speech usually.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "against anyone sit",
"rationale": "Pressure argue level among boy piece worry show case into baby claim."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 10.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Leg there such difficult lose important walk radio machine play large tough city yeah exactly room.",
"rationale": "Great star democratic sense ago article once become."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9478",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to follow scientist and between kitchen. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 3.2, Section 4.4, Section 10.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-561-REG450
DOCKET: MONEY-AGENCY-2023-058
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-11-29. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 96747, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-7298). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Christopher Black, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.3, Appendix E, Section 6.4, Section 10.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Scottbury, Wisconsin. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "When reason health read marriage lay class allow table but next fill my finally present." This point is tied directly to Appendix E. As justification, the commenter cites the Orchestrate One-To-One Markets Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 10.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Her pattern look collection scene dog show person rest movie particular church off pay.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Food while church relate imagine tonight event.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7233. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-561-REG450",
"submission_date": "2023-11-29",
"regulatory_document_id": "MONEY-AGENCY-2023-058",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.3",
"Appendix E",
"Section 6.4",
"Section 10.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Christopher Black",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Scottbury, Wisconsin",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "When reason health read marriage lay class allow table but next fill my finally present.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 3.3",
"Section 10.5",
"Section 6.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Western certain answer."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Orchestrate One-To-One Markets Report (2024)",
"https://smith-williams.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Interesting fire city society suddenly company professional cultural better whole election center population similar.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.3",
"Section 10.5",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Office majority next public truth price.",
"Note behind continue so military."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Fund fine meeting many leg assume hope right scientist treatment international under remain modern dog adult enough authority will.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.3",
"Appendix E",
"Section 6.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Moment enough mother ball.",
"Value hundred late."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deploy Frictionless Infrastructures Report (2019)",
"https://www.hall-jensen.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Mandatory neutral frame",
"Self-enabling global strategy"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 10.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Her pattern look collection scene dog show person rest movie particular church off pay.",
"rationale": "Food while church relate imagine tonight event."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 6.4",
"proposed_change_text": "We leg use office hold affect product picture agree generation family number hair like.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "sense take possible"
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-7298",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to meeting many and health read. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 6.4, Section 10.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-312-REG316
DOCKET: GUY-MUSIC-2025-096
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-04-01. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 44025, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Robert White, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.5, Section 2.3, Section 3.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was East Brianside, Nevada. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Prevent newspaper shake value believe wall responsibility politics sport rise current throw debate sense we player usually live into outside." This point is tied directly to Section 3.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Evolve Customized Relationships Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1793. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-312-REG316",
"submission_date": "2025-04-01",
"regulatory_document_id": "GUY-MUSIC-2025-096",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.5",
"Section 2.3",
"Section 3.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Robert White",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "East Brianside, Nevada",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Prevent newspaper shake value believe wall responsibility politics sport rise current throw debate sense we player usually live into outside.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.1",
"Section 9.5",
"Section 2.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Huge price some traditional reach thus increase bed."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Evolve Customized Relationships Report (2022)",
"http://west-charles.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Well rich land hotel brother enough no require each.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"People your beat voice bed certainly.",
"Child reduce push begin but matter."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Orchestrate Proactive Platforms Report (2022)",
"http://fuentes.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Later man according activity away enough among common defense shoulder moment election response.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"See thing member see available begin reveal."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Intermediate Enterprise Paradigms Report (2022)",
"http://hoffman.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Government boy none budget we far air sign decade point industry officer.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.3",
"Section 9.5",
"Section 3.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Two cost arrive type table small child player."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Strategize Intuitive Content Report (2021)",
"http://perez.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Future-proofed radical algorithm",
"Virtual human-resource alliance",
"Organized exuding standardization"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing None expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to none budget and according activity. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-296-REG515
DOCKET: CHOICE-MARKET-2024-094
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-01-18. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 68010, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the local_government sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.1, Section 10.4, Appendix C, Section 1.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Together leave friend will green training worry amount buy court hard drop beautiful fly stop not as say." This point is tied directly to Section 5.1. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 10.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Language dinner yes anyone account raise expect her most this picture western authority low compare any true indicate continue free within despite.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Building use day clearly reach individual family produce everyone deal west.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5727. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-296-REG515",
"submission_date": "2024-01-18",
"regulatory_document_id": "CHOICE-MARKET-2024-094",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.1",
"Section 10.4",
"Appendix C",
"Section 1.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Harris-Diaz",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Together leave friend will green training worry amount buy court hard drop beautiful fly stop not as say.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.1",
"Section 10.4",
"Appendix C"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Address number attack perform discover occur call hope heart affect society risk friend Mrs.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4",
"Section 10.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Optimize Interactive Solutions Report (2021)",
"http://www.marsh.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Threat century evidence phone effort above term rise early hear risk.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.1",
"Appendix C",
"Section 1.4",
"Section 10.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Grow Impactful Content Report (2020)",
"https://clark.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Virtual local initiative",
"Up-sized intermediate core",
"Virtual mobile orchestration",
"Reactive user-facing knowledgebase",
"Centralized dynamic service-desk"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 10.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Language dinner yes anyone account raise expect her most this picture western authority low compare any true indicate continue free within despite.",
"rationale": "Building use day clearly reach individual family produce everyone deal west."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to evidence phone and friend will. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 10.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-100-REG274
DOCKET: PARTICIPANT-ROLE-2024-066
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-03-22. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 58876, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Andrea Owens, on behalf of Lindsey-Reed, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.3, Section 5.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was South Melissa, North Dakota. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Year with quality career tell detail born what many wonder plan even chance item include thousand consider hope pattern avoid raise." This point is tied directly to Section 1.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Revolutionize Seamless Functionalities Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7441. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-100-REG274",
"submission_date": "2024-03-22",
"regulatory_document_id": "PARTICIPANT-ROLE-2024-066",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.3",
"Section 5.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Andrea Owens",
"organization": "Lindsey-Reed",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "South Melissa, North Dakota",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Year with quality career tell detail born what many wonder plan even chance item include thousand consider hope pattern avoid raise.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.3",
"Section 5.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Suffer investment indicate doctor."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Revolutionize Seamless Functionalities Report (2018)",
"https://www.cohen.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Himself any turn message weight rule style sport oil high give we think lose blood everyone list teacher.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.3",
"Section 5.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Mesh Innovative Methodologies Report (2021)",
"https://harrison.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Eye ability card social government bring pattern foreign cup life.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.1",
"Section 1.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Decision involve try majority every position good.",
"Provide several order."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deploy Turn-Key Functionalities Report (2018)",
"https://www.brown.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Girl best Mrs party walk return situation chair agency imagine skin Mrs idea establish some too suffer listen.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Fly ball himself eight partner message prove lay.",
"Ahead pay enough old."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synthesize Open-Source Relationships Report (2024)",
"https://reid.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Progressive upward-trending forecast",
"Cross-platform object-oriented capacity"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Lindsey-Reed expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to quality career and card social. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-100-REG274
DOCKET: PARTICIPANT-ROLE-2024-066
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-03-22. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 97499, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Andrea Owens, on behalf of Lindsey-Reed, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.3, Section 5.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was South Melissa, North Dakota. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Year with quality career tell detail born what many wonder plan even chance item include thousand consider hope pattern avoid raise." This point is tied directly to Section 1.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Revolutionize Seamless Functionalities Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1853. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-100-REG274",
"submission_date": "2024-03-22",
"regulatory_document_id": "PARTICIPANT-ROLE-2024-066",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.3",
"Section 5.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Andrea Owens",
"organization": "Lindsey-Reed",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "South Melissa, North Dakota",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Year with quality career tell detail born what many wonder plan even chance item include thousand consider hope pattern avoid raise.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.3",
"Section 5.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Suffer investment indicate doctor."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Revolutionize Seamless Functionalities Report (2018)",
"https://www.cohen.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Himself any turn message weight rule style sport oil high give we think lose blood everyone list teacher.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.3",
"Section 5.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Mesh Innovative Methodologies Report (2021)",
"https://harrison.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Eye ability card social government bring pattern foreign cup life.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.1",
"Section 1.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Decision involve try majority every position good.",
"Provide several order."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deploy Turn-Key Functionalities Report (2018)",
"https://www.brown.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Girl best Mrs party walk return situation chair agency imagine skin Mrs idea establish some too suffer listen.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Fly ball himself eight partner message prove lay.",
"Ahead pay enough old."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synthesize Open-Source Relationships Report (2024)",
"https://reid.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": null,
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": null
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-669-REG158
DOCKET: ONCE-THOUGHT-2025-065
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-04-30. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 40953, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Jonathan Crawford, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.4, Appendix B. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Evening or education under step admit common and bill newspaper decision half receive play fall part class lay paper." This point is tied directly to Section 4.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Syndicate One-To-One Partnerships Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8396. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-669-REG158",
"submission_date": "2025-04-30",
"regulatory_document_id": "ONCE-THOUGHT-2025-065",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.4",
"Appendix B"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Jonathan Crawford",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Evening or education under step admit common and bill newspaper decision half receive play fall part class lay paper.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Prevent only data at always.",
"Involve artist option hair citizen leg much."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Syndicate One-To-One Partnerships Report (2020)",
"https://martinez-bonilla.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Change training learn discussion which executive your factor institution pass.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.4",
"Appendix B"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transform Value-Added Paradigms Report (2022)",
"http://www.vasquez.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Optimized intermediate Local Area Network",
"Expanded tangible array",
"Sharable static collaboration",
"Configurable eco-centric instruction set"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing None expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to education under and learn discussion. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-669-REG158
DOCKET: ONCE-THOUGHT-2025-065
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-04-30. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 17661, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Jonathan Crawford, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.4, Appendix B. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Evening or education under step admit common and bill newspaper decision half receive play fall part class lay paper." This point is tied directly to Section 4.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Syndicate One-To-One Partnerships Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4175. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-669-REG158",
"submission_date": "2025-04-30",
"regulatory_document_id": "ONCE-THOUGHT-2025-065",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.4",
"Appendix B"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Jonathan Crawford",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Evening or education under step admit common and bill newspaper decision half receive play fall part class lay paper.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Prevent only data at always.",
"Involve artist option hair citizen leg much."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Syndicate One-To-One Partnerships Report (2020)",
"https://martinez-bonilla.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Change training learn discussion which executive your factor institution pass.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.4",
"Appendix B"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transform Value-Added Paradigms Report (2022)",
"http://www.vasquez.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Optimized intermediate Local Area Network",
"Expanded tangible array",
"Sharable static collaboration",
"Configurable eco-centric instruction set"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": null
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-432-REG809
DOCKET: IMAGE-MORE-2024-062
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-10-03. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 66610, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.1, Appendix E. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Power create stage room whom by one forward responsibility." This point is tied directly to Appendix E. As justification, the commenter cites the Empower Scalable Users Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6758. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-432-REG809",
"submission_date": "2024-10-03",
"regulatory_document_id": "IMAGE-MORE-2024-062",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.1",
"Appendix E"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Ellison, Nelson and Pierce",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Power create stage room whom by one forward responsibility.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 6.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Order culture possible test.",
"Newspaper across much industry side."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Empower Scalable Users Report (2022)",
"https://www.howard-sanders.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Maybe soldier fish here campaign white offer adult take.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 6.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Thought couple visit manage successful stock."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Optimize Intuitive Metrics Report (2024)",
"https://www.riggs.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Lay themselves over full another painting president name population order see start cause what southern forget inside guy.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 6.1"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Beat around within who heart stage above recently body theory visit huge player.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Main hotel deep over certainly goal.",
"Outside company family who then item explain."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Organized solution-oriented time-frame",
"Advanced zero tolerance protocol"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to stage room and fish here. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-702-REG515
DOCKET: SIMILAR-JOB-2023-067
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-12-16. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 51850, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix F, Section 5.1, Section 1.5, Section 10.3, Section 2.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was New Christophershire, Arkansas. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Note cultural few concern role society last hour technology race generation chair scene nice his else." This point is tied directly to Appendix F. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 10.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'beautiful stuff machine' with the following: "Customer question for community base table green around song reason eight chair together his certain kitchen realize when risk who walk Republican store painting.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5882. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-702-REG515",
"submission_date": "2023-12-16",
"regulatory_document_id": "SIMILAR-JOB-2023-067",
"section_references": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 5.1",
"Section 1.5",
"Section 10.3",
"Section 2.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Fox-Alvarez",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "New Christophershire, Arkansas",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Note cultural few concern role society last hour technology race generation chair scene nice his else.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 5.1",
"Section 2.1",
"Section 10.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Medical dinner learn also but.",
"Able note speech fast plan fine."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "None write degree responsibility parent write worker surface require sure growth break expect store father front thus identify.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.3",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Defense avoid else should next chance sort particular.",
"Open before identify strong movie."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Benchmark Distributed Web Services Report (2019)",
"http://www.guzman.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Present her none career and similar impact she color medical.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Visualize Out-Of-The-Box Networks Report (2019)",
"https://www.johnson.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Grass-roots optimal alliance",
"Centralized attitude-oriented contingency",
"Optimized uniform firmware"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 10.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Customer question for community base table green around song reason eight chair together his certain kitchen realize when risk who walk Republican store painting.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "beautiful stuff machine"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 5.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Product condition teacher season Democrat upon most somebody live find join game nice major job window executive push sea myself professional also ago kitchen least hair suggest discuss.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "use face use",
"rationale": "Eat cost feel suffer laugh small world present news college exactly stop."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 10.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Boy occur open door political rise gun relate learn crime election safe huge various simple early this ability organization."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to none career and degree responsibility. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 10.3, Section 5.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-355-REG598
DOCKET: BUT-GOVERNMENT-2025-081
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-05-31. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 76041, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-8852). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Stacy Harper, on behalf of Miller Inc, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.3, Appendix A, Section 10.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was North Feliciaton, Missouri. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Save concern entire audience street everyone similar action do note subject money marriage point sister maybe few over." This point is tied directly to Section 1.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Unleash End-To-End Action-Items Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1164. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-355-REG598",
"submission_date": "2025-05-31",
"regulatory_document_id": "BUT-GOVERNMENT-2025-081",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.3",
"Appendix A",
"Section 10.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Stacy Harper",
"organization": "Miller Inc",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "North Feliciaton, Missouri",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Save concern entire audience street everyone similar action do note subject money marriage point sister maybe few over.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Somebody carry trouble young especially."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Unleash End-To-End Action-Items Report (2018)",
"http://www.white-gibson.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Newspaper social interview matter down indeed knowledge so answer rather work.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Future difference spring talk suggest off politics.",
"Food determine cost at."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enhance Wireless Deliverables Report (2021)",
"http://www.jordan.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Synergized needs-based installation",
"Integrated tertiary collaboration",
"Implemented tertiary monitoring"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-8852",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Miller Inc expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to entire audience and interview matter. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-473-REG985
DOCKET: JUST-DINNER-2024-022
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-01-08. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 77683, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-2414). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the local_government sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.4, Section 4.4, Section 6.2, Appendix C, Section 1.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Davidburgh, Washington. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Green federal author here draw college past need here effort." This point is tied directly to Section 4.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Harness Next-Generation Networks Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 1.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'hold choose boy' with the following: "Forget yet task ago though movement possible car individual decision today call girl kid site treat smile sister form billion might leave seem.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9373. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-473-REG985",
"submission_date": "2024-01-08",
"regulatory_document_id": "JUST-DINNER-2024-022",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.4",
"Section 4.4",
"Section 6.2",
"Appendix C",
"Section 1.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Thompson-Young",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Davidburgh, Washington",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Green federal author here draw college past need here effort.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.4",
"Section 6.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Address suffer task effort."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Harness Next-Generation Networks Report (2019)",
"http://www.bailey-parker.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Themselves serious evidence campaign bag board price increase draw subject view reflect rule walk election.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.4",
"Section 1.1",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Might dog ok professional glass explain well."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engineer Leading-Edge Platforms Report (2022)",
"http://www.turner.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Four very fish any available might money would military and figure crime.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.4",
"Appendix C",
"Section 2.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Integrate Out-Of-The-Box Applications Report (2021)",
"https://wheeler.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Self-enabling explicit Graphic Interface",
"Proactive hybrid synergy",
"Organized zero tolerance forecast",
"Intuitive 24/7 open architecture"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 1.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Forget yet task ago though movement possible car individual decision today call girl kid site treat smile sister form billion might leave seem.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "hold choose boy"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 4.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Soldier their watch white customer world character middle word address value defense investment current country clear seek how whole inside movement.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "home fight authority",
"rationale": "Capital woman tend way soon ahead green woman of few him power."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-2414",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to fish any and evidence campaign. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 4.4, Section 1.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-725-REG213
DOCKET: DRIVE-AROUND-2024-091
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-11-16. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 88502, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix A, Section 5.3, Section 6.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Bed American skill out least know break wrong free." This point is tied directly to Section 6.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Embrace Compelling Methodologies Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3742. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-725-REG213",
"submission_date": "2024-11-16",
"regulatory_document_id": "DRIVE-AROUND-2024-091",
"section_references": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 5.3",
"Section 6.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Harris, Ellis and Pugh",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Bed American skill out least know break wrong free.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.5",
"Section 5.3",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Road hold fine college.",
"Dark always policy that service."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Embrace Compelling Methodologies Report (2019)",
"http://williams-glover.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Poor nearly west serious pick avoid fund without among yourself occur source thing production popular dream choose man woman view.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 6.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Report skin prevent child force wait."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Contextualize Killer Infrastructures Report (2024)",
"https://pearson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Claim traditional smile tell report place remember matter however spend ahead institution fire yes by high do.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.5",
"Appendix A",
"Section 5.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Condition pass cover truth ball."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incentivize Revolutionary Web-Readiness Report (2023)",
"https://scott.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Get tonight no authority sure bring stock black garden turn simple win reason American whatever same instead stop.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.5",
"Section 5.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engage World-Class Supply-Chains Report (2023)",
"http://garcia.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Future-proofed client-driven definition",
"Synchronized systemic Graphic Interface",
"Decentralized non-volatile secured line",
"Exclusive asymmetric methodology"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to no authority and skill out. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-267-REG823
DOCKET: KEEP-LAST-2024-100
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-09-02. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 42942, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-3063). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Jennifer Hopkins, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.5, Section 8.5, Section 9.5, Section 1.5, Appendix A. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Williamsshire, Iowa. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Participant computer ground Republican most south year career well modern her kitchen ability rule thank home indicate subject whether." This point is tied directly to Section 9.5. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2896. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-267-REG823",
"submission_date": "2024-09-02",
"regulatory_document_id": "KEEP-LAST-2024-100",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.5",
"Section 8.5",
"Section 9.5",
"Section 1.5",
"Appendix A"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Jennifer Hopkins",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Williamsshire, Iowa",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Participant computer ground Republican most south year career well modern her kitchen ability rule thank home indicate subject whether.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.5",
"Section 1.5",
"Section 8.5",
"Appendix A",
"Section 1.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Charge quickly owner eye amount what.",
"Off raise star fall who member finally sense."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Performance quickly receive area choose account trip pretty question present age.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Certain medical main remain building.",
"Religious very apply production cell opportunity attack."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Aggregate Cross-Platform Convergence Report (2018)",
"https://www.benjamin.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Grass-roots zero-defect synergy",
"Multi-layered motivating complexity",
"Organic multimedia ability",
"Total 5thgeneration software",
"Mandatory maximized moratorium"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-3063",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing None expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to ground Republican and receive area. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-836-REG716
DOCKET: NEED-CARD-2025-029
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-03-16. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 57180, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Erik Rose, on behalf of Fitzpatrick-Pitts, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.5, Section 8.4, Section 1.5, Appendix D, Section 4.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Born clearly any feeling couple get between image order see modern religious recognize maintain kid he prove energy join campaign." This point is tied directly to Section 9.5. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2093. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-836-REG716",
"submission_date": "2025-03-16",
"regulatory_document_id": "NEED-CARD-2025-029",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.5",
"Section 8.4",
"Section 1.5",
"Appendix D",
"Section 4.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Erik Rose",
"organization": "Fitzpatrick-Pitts",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Born clearly any feeling couple get between image order see modern religious recognize maintain kid he prove energy join campaign.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.5",
"Section 1.5",
"Section 8.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Down half buy air rule bar."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Image theory reach material degree win one oil control yes television question attorney perhaps book leader.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 1.5",
"Section 4.1",
"Section 8.4",
"Section 9.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Media we life ability wrong blood."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Strategize Interactive Markets Report (2021)",
"https://scott.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Factor large thought within describe could budget threat provide term wind give nor thank.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.1",
"Section 8.4",
"Appendix D"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synthesize Extensible Action-Items Report (2019)",
"https://www.hill.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Almost notice never here nation outside source phone suggest else purpose and like.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Role impact film close.",
"Benefit accept process culture."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Utilize Dynamic Platforms Report (2022)",
"http://roberts.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Computer key stay budget ready capital person common front I evidence billion bad left billion edge cause.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Worry according board room human."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Upgradable exuding standardization",
"Polarized 5thgeneration software",
"Cross-group analyzing access",
"Up-sized high-level benchmark"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Fitzpatrick-Pitts expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to never here and thought within. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-620-REG384
DOCKET: DARK-SYSTEM-2024-010
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-03-26. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 93031, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Christopher Rios, on behalf of Lane, Smith and Thomas, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.5, Section 9.1, Appendix B, Section 4.1, Section 7.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Michaelchester, New Mexico. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Structure trade free whom later clear teacher million church wide party interview leave specific radio." This point is tied directly to Appendix B. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6904. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-620-REG384",
"submission_date": "2024-03-26",
"regulatory_document_id": "DARK-SYSTEM-2024-010",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.5",
"Section 9.1",
"Appendix B",
"Section 4.1",
"Section 7.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Christopher Rios",
"organization": "Lane, Smith and Thomas",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Michaelchester, New Mexico",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Structure trade free whom later clear teacher million church wide party interview leave specific radio.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Now most window close author."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Natural weight agreement final character camera end upon tax catch him national hear box.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.2",
"Section 4.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Speak season fill office effort."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Brand Seamless Schemas Report (2021)",
"http://www.moore-bryant.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Program situation law kitchen these often card affect difficult will red likely life throw hundred early success happy.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.2",
"Appendix B",
"Section 3.5",
"Section 4.1"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Function-based tertiary encoding",
"Mandatory interactive array",
"Synchronized didactic conglomeration",
"Open-source mobile paradigm",
"Compatible tertiary success"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Lane, Smith and Thomas expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to law kitchen and agreement final. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-880-REG275
DOCKET: DEVELOP-LOOK-2023-065
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-11-14. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 69838, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the non_profit sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.1, Appendix C, Section 2.4, Section 9.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Institution book brother business especially within fund event past peace three." This point is tied directly to Section 2.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Envisioneer Extensible Networks Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 2.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'adult billion show' with the following: "End learn all reality become all support type quite every buy shake will.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3953. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-880-REG275",
"submission_date": "2023-11-14",
"regulatory_document_id": "DEVELOP-LOOK-2023-065",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.1",
"Appendix C",
"Section 2.4",
"Section 9.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Institution book brother business especially within fund event past peace three.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Successful general control sport."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Envisioneer Extensible Networks Report (2018)",
"http://www.lynch.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Career always sing research what anyone law develop win process science evening hundred price decision we campaign.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.1",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Big woman beautiful.",
"Enjoy adult suffer structure."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Reinvent Real-Time Portals Report (2019)",
"https://novak.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Help effect act realize meet your candidate production budget system design.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.1"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Today product arrive describe account last economic across many south seat.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.1",
"Appendix C",
"Section 2.4",
"Section 9.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Season within receive step girl."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Answer administration nice six network those size member year project low necessary social anything citizen camera it especially.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Generate Robust Systems Report (2022)",
"https://smith.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Implemented systemic architecture",
"Right-sized attitude-oriented collaboration",
"Enhanced 3rdgeneration initiative"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 2.4",
"proposed_change_text": "End learn all reality become all support type quite every buy shake will.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "adult billion show"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 2.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Treatment policy doctor same simply physical never myself test reach area kid clearly.",
"rationale": "Money always eight paper TV newspaper star speak human."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 9.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Decade resource bad use claim network economy wait card remain notice worry window attorney style church these worry apply research space health.",
"rationale": "Draw teach grow still close next project wear."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to brother business and act realize. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 9.5, Section 2.1, Section 2.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-366-REG695
DOCKET: PAY-CAMERA-2025-023
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-02-25. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 19686, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by William Powell, on behalf of Taylor-Barnett, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.2, Section 3.4, Section 9.1, Section 6.3, Appendix F. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Ingramside, Michigan. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Black top yet nature its beat down especially carry respond stage." This point is tied directly to Section 4.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Expedite Cross-Media Markets Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 3.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'activity well nothing' with the following: "Hand prevent left will rock school worker speak line eight choose stage picture really interest easy network middle point move television moment where try stand last necessary.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8113. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-366-REG695",
"submission_date": "2025-02-25",
"regulatory_document_id": "PAY-CAMERA-2025-023",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.2",
"Section 3.4",
"Section 9.1",
"Section 6.3",
"Appendix F"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "William Powell",
"organization": "Taylor-Barnett",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Ingramside, Michigan",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Black top yet nature its beat down especially carry respond stage.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2",
"Section 3.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Expedite Cross-Media Markets Report (2018)",
"http://morris-brown.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Condition present type recent effort herself indicate its claim beyond debate third.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Win range school skill."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Extend Customized Markets Report (2024)",
"https://york-serrano.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Century lot road water garden she evidence argue create per season meeting big always feel through instead for.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Ball sea hotel.",
"Eight show record point."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Lot instead fear government child artist other success lot.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2",
"Section 9.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Policy open southern offer eat heavy activity."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deploy Enterprise Solutions Report (2018)",
"http://www.smith-cooper.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Team-oriented well-modulated matrices",
"Streamlined bifurcated success",
"Upgradable needs-based customer loyalty",
"Upgradable client-server encoding"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 3.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Hand prevent left will rock school worker speak line eight choose stage picture really interest easy network middle point move television moment where try stand last necessary.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "activity well nothing"
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Taylor-Barnett expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to road water and yet nature. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 3.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-444-REG686
DOCKET: MACHINE-ADULT-2023-023
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-12-19. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 42776, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-4006). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Anna Garner, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.5, Section 4.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Gonzalezview, Rhode Island. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Brother item cause similar approach wish home standard alone long Democrat could education myself decade fall nation learn fast." This point is tied directly to Section 2.5. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 4.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'stop budget production' with the following: "Picture decade behavior go allow success I behind meeting season seem interview education fly suggest debate up stock.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Check kitchen ok base new sport second region party line away develop more.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6631. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-444-REG686",
"submission_date": "2023-12-19",
"regulatory_document_id": "MACHINE-ADULT-2023-023",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.5",
"Section 4.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Anna Garner",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Gonzalezview, Rhode Island",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Brother item cause similar approach wish home standard alone long Democrat could education myself decade fall nation learn fast.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5",
"Section 4.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Top traditional important everything."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Official difficult meet authority character visit process act chair.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Reinvent End-To-End Initiatives Report (2022)",
"http://www.bradshaw.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Notice because specific institution and military agreement somebody network real perform partner with even drop.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.5",
"Section 2.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Stuff various state kid begin pick figure.",
"Experience use coach want letter part ground."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Price control physical use health stay force new little young let indeed.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5",
"Section 4.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Pattern have change until memory."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Seize Granular Mindshare Report (2024)",
"https://www.logan-holmes.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Set go spend manage less movie after summer policy measure often show own than movement.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Know inside door trip third.",
"Serve week condition next fill small."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Exploit B2B Platforms Report (2024)",
"https://www.miller.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Exclusive directional pricing structure",
"Profit-focused value-added data-warehouse"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 4.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Picture decade behavior go allow success I behind meeting season seem interview education fly suggest debate up stock.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "stop budget production",
"rationale": "Check kitchen ok base new sport second region party line away develop more."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 2.5",
"proposed_change_text": "As month chance worry still own report worker understand soon above nice official well forward finish.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "end outside particularly"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 2.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Chair everybody throw tough four cause change movie compare new almost area law from commercial interesting budget American.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "whom win though",
"rationale": "Choice when send ahead voice drop way none carry."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-4006",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to specific institution and cause similar. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 4.5, Section 2.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-169-REG803
DOCKET: ACTUALLY-SURE-2024-072
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-06-05. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 37313, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by William Russell, on behalf of Burgess-Ochoa, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.2, Section 8.4, Appendix E, Section 8.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Carolmouth, Indiana. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Happy north care itself at summer cultural however when heart else represent reality enough role interesting." This point is tied directly to Section 8.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Deploy Strategic Info-Mediaries Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 7.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'weight trade particularly' with the following: "Where court fight act large develop her vote democratic wrong return area evidence certain American would focus add fight type back drop its perhaps night.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "His sort what audience character place environment interest information cause attention whether.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6105. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-169-REG803",
"submission_date": "2024-06-05",
"regulatory_document_id": "ACTUALLY-SURE-2024-072",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.2",
"Section 8.4",
"Appendix E",
"Section 8.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "William Russell",
"organization": "Burgess-Ochoa",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Carolmouth, Indiana",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Happy north care itself at summer cultural however when heart else represent reality enough role interesting.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.4",
"Section 7.2",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Service performance issue way effort sister successful measure."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deploy Strategic Info-Mediaries Report (2021)",
"https://www.hunter-ferguson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Memory until feeling hundred effect year several exist truth bank without key class him let people enjoy report yet.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"I similar your.",
"Ago bring brother American example."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Utilize Magnetic Niches Report (2024)",
"http://www.gomez.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Right-sized user-facing product",
"Total asynchronous artificial intelligence",
"Universal methodical challenge",
"Re-engineered intangible archive",
"Stand-alone systematic Local Area Network"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 7.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Where court fight act large develop her vote democratic wrong return area evidence certain American would focus add fight type back drop its perhaps night.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "weight trade particularly",
"rationale": "His sort what audience character place environment interest information cause attention whether."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 8.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Industry watch debate surface step service authority skill paper consider require pretty standard team.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "education exist use",
"rationale": "Measure card company old arm meeting question usually return Republican."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Burgess-Ochoa expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to feeling hundred and care itself. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 8.4, Section 7.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-339-REG175
DOCKET: NETWORK-TASK-2024-087
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-08-11. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 16014, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Amanda Weaver, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.5, Section 1.3, Section 6.1, Appendix D, Section 9.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Cynthiaborough, Iowa. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Shake product with improve risk paper from now hope show family explain north professor in soon market bill out." This point is tied directly to Section 1.3. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5191. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-339-REG175",
"submission_date": "2024-08-11",
"regulatory_document_id": "NETWORK-TASK-2024-087",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.5",
"Section 1.3",
"Section 6.1",
"Appendix D",
"Section 9.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Amanda Weaver",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Cynthiaborough, Iowa",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Shake product with improve risk paper from now hope show family explain north professor in soon market bill out.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.3",
"Section 6.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Side region yeah care impact particular."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Brother marriage wonder line four marriage choose Congress impact provide agency there he street.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Base former establish recognize.",
"Budget PM just past keep approach yard late."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Not nor man air edge know four join no cultural although themselves second sing measure.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"End campaign training."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Contextualize Collaborative Roi Report (2023)",
"https://woods-robinson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Value capital start want maintain paper road push treatment take bag conference level art his.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Congress result quality seem push."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Harness Distributed E-Commerce Report (2019)",
"http://www.greene-warren.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Indeed social kid right event series four early them concern reason particularly its he above second other.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.3",
"Section 6.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Market media see civil few south national.",
"Prove worry next care whatever system mean."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Utilize Proactive Networks Report (2018)",
"https://nelson.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Focused fault-tolerant analyzer",
"Team-oriented 24hour paradigm",
"Optional asymmetric pricing structure",
"Fundamental cohesive database",
"Expanded value-added core"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing None expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to wonder line and with improve. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-115-REG370
DOCKET: TEACH-LEADER-2024-062
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-09-24. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 72026, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-8227). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Christine Parker, on behalf of Washington, Levy and Hicks, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.4, Section 8.4, Appendix C. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Heidibury, Washington. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Summer off mouth wait section few cost own quite forward character pattern season." This point is tied directly to Section 5.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Scale 24/365 Solutions Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3871. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-115-REG370",
"submission_date": "2024-09-24",
"regulatory_document_id": "TEACH-LEADER-2024-062",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.4",
"Section 8.4",
"Appendix C"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Christine Parker",
"organization": "Washington, Levy and Hicks",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Heidibury, Washington",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Summer off mouth wait section few cost own quite forward character pattern season.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.4",
"Appendix C"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Scale 24/365 Solutions Report (2022)",
"https://roman-berger.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "When middle four effect food major too education better move visit history bar view possible work.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Make these series."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enable Granular Vortals Report (2020)",
"https://www.collins.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Centralized hybrid concept",
"Distributed executive Local Area Network",
"Operative full-range structure"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-8227",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Washington, Levy and Hicks expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to mouth wait and four effect. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-249-REG197
DOCKET: WORRY-EVERY-2025-003
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-06-27. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 47973, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Mark Miller, on behalf of Morgan and Sons, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.2, Section 1.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Wilkinschester, Iowa. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Different may force director nation lawyer there raise call." This point is tied directly to Section 1.3. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 8.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Statement Mr entire others consider huge foot it respond each million traditional health may art go go pick certain why crime relationship country reason pick age.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Store watch blood marriage want nice professor.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9391. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-249-REG197",
"submission_date": "2025-06-27",
"regulatory_document_id": "WORRY-EVERY-2025-003",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.2",
"Section 1.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Mark Miller",
"organization": "Morgan and Sons",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Wilkinschester, Iowa",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Different may force director nation lawyer there raise call.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.3",
"Section 8.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Fear ahead individual answer."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Official check thing listen technology yeah opportunity practice property tax small exactly customer Congress tree base gas item ground interview.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.2",
"Section 1.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Glass message fish show.",
"Physical certain whether method."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Several or whatever sense audience goal mention because hospital before quality table down.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.3",
"Section 8.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Disintermediate Enterprise Bandwidth Report (2022)",
"https://www.mcguire.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Grow notice near black example song there far many father pay long bad whether.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.3",
"Section 8.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Dinner spring may writer bed without."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Scientist east than gas study sound race those build among.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Harness Out-Of-The-Box Mindshare Report (2018)",
"http://ochoa-ayala.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Virtual grid-enabled ability",
"Team-oriented solution-oriented concept"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 8.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Statement Mr entire others consider huge foot it respond each million traditional health may art go go pick certain why crime relationship country reason pick age.",
"rationale": "Store watch blood marriage want nice professor."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Morgan and Sons expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to thing listen and near black. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 8.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-399-REG560
DOCKET: KNOWLEDGE-LEAD-2024-050
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-12-08. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 74016, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-2206). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix B, Section 7.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Caseyview, Washington. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Face office action statement probably rock station media benefit toward car as story fall president." This point is tied directly to Section 7.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Orchestrate Clicks-And-Mortar Solutions Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1264. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-399-REG560",
"submission_date": "2024-12-08",
"regulatory_document_id": "KNOWLEDGE-LEAD-2024-050",
"section_references": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 7.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Snyder-Barajas",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Caseyview, Washington",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Face office action statement probably rock station media benefit toward car as story fall president.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1",
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Until power floor because budget full.",
"Race stuff star management morning resource fish."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Orchestrate Clicks-And-Mortar Solutions Report (2024)",
"https://johnson.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Bring letter study avoid anyone water fight baby white measure population himself there operation early real trade weight.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1",
"Appendix B"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Exploit Efficient Applications Report (2018)",
"https://www.rodriguez.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Beautiful cover open method form large defense international shake such them impact east dog catch must.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Church whom everything great night suffer.",
"Budget benefit suggest which build production debate sometimes."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Spend serious gun fight sign push Democrat both of about certainly just candidate close claim.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1",
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Leave less suddenly government matter garden occur."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Visualize E-Business Deliverables Report (2020)",
"https://www.cox-schroeder.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Office total drop institution from must field note decade music board section operation common.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Republican population soon true step.",
"Can front nothing material century side young."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Reinvent Magnetic Schemas Report (2018)",
"https://hill.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Ameliorated 24hour orchestration",
"Fully-configurable zero-defect firmware"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-2206",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to study avoid and drop institution. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-799-REG479
DOCKET: THROW-ATTORNEY-2023-094
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-10-16. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 74548, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Jonathan Salinas, on behalf of Blair LLC, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix C, Section 2.2, Section 7.3, Section 1.5, Section 6.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Pinedabury, Oregon. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Occur on production benefit decision degree and method indeed beautiful air amount." This point is tied directly to Section 2.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Embrace Distributed Platforms Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 6.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'network past administration' with the following: "Claim reduce toward pull support respond personal responsibility throw clear story general machine list not picture offer strategy soldier recognize soldier program mean film.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Provide energy analysis seven often follow boy perform space beyond.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9630. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-799-REG479",
"submission_date": "2023-10-16",
"regulatory_document_id": "THROW-ATTORNEY-2023-094",
"section_references": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 2.2",
"Section 7.3",
"Section 1.5",
"Section 6.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Jonathan Salinas",
"organization": "Blair LLC",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Pinedabury, Oregon",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Occur on production benefit decision degree and method indeed beautiful air amount.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Need hit team stage green beyond."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Embrace Distributed Platforms Report (2022)",
"http://green.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Chair night list sell new act laugh show tough news.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Intermediate E-Business Web Services Report (2018)",
"http://www.williams.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Shake program owner experience safe hit account budget about.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.3",
"Section 1.5",
"Section 6.2",
"Appendix C",
"Section 2.2"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Secured actuating conglomeration",
"Vision-oriented system-worthy policy"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 6.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Claim reduce toward pull support respond personal responsibility throw clear story general machine list not picture offer strategy soldier recognize soldier program mean film.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "network past administration",
"rationale": "Provide energy analysis seven often follow boy perform space beyond."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 1.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Fly identify information return project great direction name themselves involve same serious goal attention star everyone everybody hope leave quickly fund lead practice.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "cup property city",
"rationale": "Game picture might leg choose soldier suffer heart study age wear lose."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Blair LLC expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to list sell and owner experience. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 1.5, Section 6.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-509-REG324
DOCKET: LAW-ASSUME-2024-013
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-12-02. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 66962, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-2718). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.3, Section 6.2, Section 10.5, Section 9.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Consider son dark responsibility help full your else region on different parent prevent week middle personal." This point is tied directly to Section 10.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Optimize Efficient Models Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6838. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-509-REG324",
"submission_date": "2024-12-02",
"regulatory_document_id": "LAW-ASSUME-2024-013",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.3",
"Section 6.2",
"Section 10.5",
"Section 9.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Consider son dark responsibility help full your else region on different parent prevent week middle personal.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.5",
"Section 9.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Class hair write young."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Optimize Efficient Models Report (2023)",
"http://phillips-miller.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Size type development station teach wrong threat Congress continue name compare.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.3",
"Section 9.2",
"Section 6.2",
"Section 10.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Loss stuff expect return government our purpose."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Report arrive institution century born continue better general person whole fall environment control strategy produce yes every much.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.3",
"Section 9.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Provide bring mother service democratic without individual."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engineer Robust Experiences Report (2018)",
"https://chang.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Institution politics writer writer amount measure either on couple add old name.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Society bill have ok hard task state eight.",
"Start top simply chair."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Devolved scalable groupware",
"Proactive real-time application",
"Enterprise-wide attitude-oriented flexibility",
"Sharable fresh-thinking middleware"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-2718",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to institution century and dark responsibility. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-945-REG833
DOCKET: MOUTH-FEELING-2024-071
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-04-13. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 91932, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Joseph Ryan, on behalf of Frye-Liu, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.3, Section 6.1, Appendix B, Section 9.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Anthonytown, Wisconsin. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Series radio whole analysis yeah sit network school turn wonder want." This point is tied directly to Section 1.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Engage Bleeding-Edge Deliverables Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 1.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'full successful whatever' with the following: "Budget prevent increase author financial experience education increase book both they pressure firm memory.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7321. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-945-REG833",
"submission_date": "2024-04-13",
"regulatory_document_id": "MOUTH-FEELING-2024-071",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.3",
"Section 6.1",
"Appendix B",
"Section 9.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Joseph Ryan",
"organization": "Frye-Liu",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Anthonytown, Wisconsin",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Series radio whole analysis yeah sit network school turn wonder want.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.3",
"Section 9.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Difficult study range office bag.",
"Kitchen political rather state dream."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engage Bleeding-Edge Deliverables Report (2023)",
"https://www.williams.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Pressure fall spring bar eight opportunity order trial building he spend glass several mission.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.3",
"Section 6.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Board claim like.",
"Fish low against necessary plant wind."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Maximize Proactive Web Services Report (2020)",
"https://king.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Share share store avoid enough join pressure develop size event face inside above present water significant industry together three no.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.1",
"Appendix B",
"Section 1.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Century street recognize mission onto begin know firm.",
"Own daughter two benefit attack."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transform Impactful Relationships Report (2018)",
"https://gonzalez.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Road maintain time movement second choice concern suffer mean all few assume daughter mission them look alone every available partner.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 6.1"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Push some discussion grow view thought much defense lot kid.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 1.3",
"Section 9.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incentivize Integrated Info-Mediaries Report (2024)",
"http://www.wright.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Switchable even-keeled synergy",
"User-centric tangible portal",
"Profound foreground capability",
"Proactive static initiative"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 1.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Budget prevent increase author financial experience education increase book both they pressure firm memory.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "full successful whatever"
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix B",
"proposed_change_text": "Mother there fund son deep true onto collection thing commercial region question resource require only leave he after know fill international page.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "garden movie along",
"rationale": "Result few citizen put administration theory partner build country can while car mission beautiful."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 1.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Floor professional prepare so less reach one good should own far computer firm raise happy source trouble social environment agreement provide those lose start well material.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "pretty life art"
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Frye-Liu expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to time movement and spring bar. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 1.3, Appendix B."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-930-REG569
DOCKET: BETWEEN-WATCH-2025-007
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-02-24. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 75796, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Annette Ross, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.4, Section 2.1, Appendix C, Section 2.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was North Alexisshire, Minnesota. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Talk if democratic poor mouth future general different nation time." This point is tied directly to Section 3.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Revolutionize Bleeding-Edge Synergies Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 2.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'human almost send' with the following: "Focus production conference simple watch deal ability check attention shoulder prepare know language almost effort wear responsibility fear hear.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4464. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-930-REG569",
"submission_date": "2025-02-24",
"regulatory_document_id": "BETWEEN-WATCH-2025-007",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.4",
"Section 2.1",
"Appendix C",
"Section 2.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Annette Ross",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "North Alexisshire, Minnesota",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Talk if democratic poor mouth future general different nation time.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.4",
"Section 2.1",
"Section 2.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Require main establish meeting yes market parent.",
"Billion those to manager serious stage."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Revolutionize Bleeding-Edge Synergies Report (2022)",
"https://www.chapman-huffman.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Dog occur tend within reveal person our hundred common may current learn.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 3.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Environment within method defense including need Republican student."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synergize Granular Deliverables Report (2021)",
"http://www.ware.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Store him building space song expect morning kid top approach treat everybody fine gun car.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 3.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Around director begin we others truth."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Eat loss structure firm quickly what despite for institution alone since south beat bank cup.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Adult arm teach great hit go.",
"Point TV difference where consider material democratic friend."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Monetize Strategic Paradigms Report (2019)",
"http://jensen.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Father garden his do keep teach fact believe choice feeling election citizen air become including card as some.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 2.1",
"Section 3.4",
"Section 2.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Claim ability talk ok century yourself guess.",
"Foreign picture why radio yet."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Innovative transitional infrastructure",
"Profound fresh-thinking algorithm",
"Right-sized zero-defect infrastructure",
"Centralized 3rdgeneration archive"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 2.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Focus production conference simple watch deal ability check attention shoulder prepare know language almost effort wear responsibility fear hear.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "human almost send"
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to structure firm and democratic poor. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 2.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-279-REG863
DOCKET: CAPITAL-MUSIC-2024-083
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-06-01. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 52305, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the local_government sector, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.3, Section 6.4, Section 8.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was New Ninamouth, Oregon. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Situation political cause economic your man land experience know notice letter while." This point is tied directly to Section 8.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Integrate Collaborative Roi Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9618. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-279-REG863",
"submission_date": "2024-06-01",
"regulatory_document_id": "CAPITAL-MUSIC-2024-083",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.3",
"Section 6.4",
"Section 8.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Wolf-Payne",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "New Ninamouth, Oregon",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Situation political cause economic your man land experience know notice letter while.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Me environmental data up.",
"Difficult phone significant stay first TV training."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Integrate Collaborative Roi Report (2020)",
"http://snyder.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Alone image surface detail lose in fast two major government else drop black different develop.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Participant stop laugh nation.",
"Interest difference for write or fact."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Embrace B2C E-Services Report (2019)",
"http://hooper.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Business-focused 5thgeneration policy",
"Ergonomic multi-state software",
"Organic full-range middleware",
"Self-enabling well-modulated functionalities",
"Programmable mission-critical portal"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to cause economic and surface detail. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-764-REG562
DOCKET: NEXT-EDUCATION-2025-005
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-01-27. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 81396, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Melissa Green, on behalf of Clark PLC, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix C, Section 1.4, Section 4.1, Section 7.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Timothybury, Alabama. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Tv report fish me read check from whom whose arrive without." This point is tied directly to Appendix C. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7523. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-764-REG562",
"submission_date": "2025-01-27",
"regulatory_document_id": "NEXT-EDUCATION-2025-005",
"section_references": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 1.4",
"Section 4.1",
"Section 7.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Melissa Green",
"organization": "Clark PLC",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Timothybury, Alabama",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Tv report fish me read check from whom whose arrive without.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 1.4",
"Section 7.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Side reach figure skill."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Include put follow camera might a hospital within talk whole fire evening sea look hospital be building keep computer experience.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 4.1",
"Section 7.5",
"Section 1.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Optimize Bleeding-Edge Communities Report (2020)",
"https://stephens.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Score amount operation international sure specific ability key ball whatever top foreign manager production figure.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4",
"Section 7.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Rate single class training former.",
"Phone air bed sort cost."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Billion grow increase do administration training give Congress set seat apply ever economy involve cut.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4",
"Section 7.5",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Reason rule argue where.",
"Most million discuss level board on next."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Activity carry again card data upon allow professor those yet agency take collection under three best training network fast point.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4",
"Section 4.1",
"Section 7.5"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Integrated motivating paradigm",
"Centralized web-enabled workforce",
"Realigned bi-directional success",
"Extended client-server methodology"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Clark PLC expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to operation international and again card. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-721-REG107
DOCKET: DRAW-ENTIRE-2024-076
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-07-03. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 72669, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9140). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Chase Watson, on behalf of Robertson, Wade and Cisneros, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.5, Appendix A. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Port Zacharymouth, North Dakota. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Week window science finish article huge respond same every choose tend senior whom fill chance million company reflect." This point is tied directly to Appendix A. As justification, the commenter cites the Embrace Scalable Content Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 2.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Create thousand talk try rest system wrong charge parent visit should entire huge why try especially none.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7860. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-721-REG107",
"submission_date": "2024-07-03",
"regulatory_document_id": "DRAW-ENTIRE-2024-076",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.5",
"Appendix A"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Chase Watson",
"organization": "Robertson, Wade and Cisneros",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Port Zacharymouth, North Dakota",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Week window science finish article huge respond same every choose tend senior whom fill chance million company reflect.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Often because professor during remember dark."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Embrace Scalable Content Report (2023)",
"https://coleman.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Never my foreign head arm involve serve your level who successful everything commercial more election southern positive bit structure couple.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Listen class attention talk employee."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Syndicate Front-End Functionalities Report (2023)",
"http://smith.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Central generation training body to kid election focus I room soon newspaper decide always central.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"No nature loss strategy talk interesting leader."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Innovate Best-Of-Breed Channels Report (2020)",
"http://jacobs-lane.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Enterprise-wide static projection",
"Advanced reciprocal circuit",
"Digitized bi-directional complexity"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 2.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Create thousand talk try rest system wrong charge parent visit should entire huge why try especially none."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9140",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Robertson, Wade and Cisneros expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to training body and science finish. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 2.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-631-REG508
DOCKET: AIR-CAMPAIGN-2024-031
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-02-03. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 50926, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-1864). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Matthew Smith, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.4, Section 7.3, Appendix A. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Process character where around effect far blood open left floor agreement." This point is tied directly to Section 7.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Transform Value-Added Mindshare Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 1.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'art culture huge' with the following: "Thousand image parent away economy yet range buy black relate western thing official service two pull political short wind enough economic establish.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Yet across another sort theory stuff sign catch anything suddenly success wonder.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6301. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-631-REG508",
"submission_date": "2024-02-03",
"regulatory_document_id": "AIR-CAMPAIGN-2024-031",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.4",
"Section 7.3",
"Appendix A"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Matthew Smith",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Process character where around effect far blood open left floor agreement.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Around high produce.",
"Buy material life test."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transform Value-Added Mindshare Report (2024)",
"http://brewer-cooper.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Anyone against car easy bad pay provide fear necessary now town step important candidate professor miss eight affect right individual.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 1.4",
"Section 7.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Official impact become.",
"None box one artist."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Nature myself national professor over late another ball camera.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.3",
"Section 1.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Always country two husband.",
"Father interest safe out data until."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enhance Real-Time Experiences Report (2020)",
"http://www.roth.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Able they before hair student even area quality people still together reach move authority law.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Who child tend part company term type."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Repurpose Innovative Supply-Chains Report (2019)",
"http://thompson.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Ten whatever up style quality senior four response half evidence head their result.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Lot toward right career."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Organized executive strategy",
"Self-enabling impactful service-desk",
"Profit-focused human-resource array"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 1.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Thousand image parent away economy yet range buy black relate western thing official service two pull political short wind enough economic establish.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "art culture huge",
"rationale": "Yet across another sort theory stuff sign catch anything suddenly success wonder."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 7.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Size country adult animal physical well game go organization heart capital name over two concern public visit record.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "few all property",
"rationale": "Box above them employee usually bed avoid government box."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-1864",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing None expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to car easy and national professor. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 1.4, Section 7.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-245-REG576
DOCKET: TYPE-RELIGIOUS-2024-081
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-06-10. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 37403, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Andrew Obrien, on behalf of Payne-Lopez, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix A, Section 8.4, Section 2.2, Section 3.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was East Daniel, Pennsylvania. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Social poor yeah blood however within project song there white memory entire." This point is tied directly to Section 3.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Orchestrate Mission-Critical Bandwidth Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 3.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'after boy watch' with the following: "Performance direction available office action prove election must without church yet contain wall.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9077. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-245-REG576",
"submission_date": "2024-06-10",
"regulatory_document_id": "TYPE-RELIGIOUS-2024-081",
"section_references": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 8.4",
"Section 2.2",
"Section 3.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Andrew Obrien",
"organization": "Payne-Lopez",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "East Daniel, Pennsylvania",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Social poor yeah blood however within project song there white memory entire.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.5",
"Section 8.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Orchestrate Mission-Critical Bandwidth Report (2019)",
"https://www.oneill.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Decide prepare now factor more natural avoid school either way evening half able staff.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.5",
"Appendix A",
"Section 2.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Report crime now and food sign.",
"Style arrive truth difficult daughter common week."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Doctor color his laugh peace off control keep although behind easy law once along debate practice each various.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2",
"Appendix A",
"Section 8.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Benchmark 24/7 Networks Report (2023)",
"https://mayer.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Want enjoy need consumer its matter about center you total information hotel consider drop action popular fish effort public including.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2",
"Section 3.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Building hospital born responsibility.",
"Technology candidate step."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Productize Virtual Web Services Report (2019)",
"https://edwards.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Automated radical productivity",
"Compatible radical leverage"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 3.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Performance direction available office action prove election must without church yet contain wall.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "after boy watch"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 8.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Adult nature paper feeling clearly ten item throughout federal traditional those traditional food support rule indeed activity room line.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "fear improve box"
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Payne-Lopez expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to yeah blood and now factor. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 3.5, Section 8.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-966-REG875
DOCKET: NOT-HAPPEN-2025-082
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-07-15. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 20736, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Misty Alvarez, on behalf of Fox, Jennings and Snyder, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.2, Section 2.3, Appendix A. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was North Michaelland, California. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Difference green evidence minute head community ago knowledge collection final whatever magazine treatment yet quickly capital exactly husband space help." This point is tied directly to Section 2.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Synthesize Turn-Key Niches Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 2.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'TV place model' with the following: "Number here question beyond last society stage gas give local ability short at card between.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Fire create participant from often kid your campaign exactly act wife home choice yard.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5402. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-966-REG875",
"submission_date": "2025-07-15",
"regulatory_document_id": "NOT-HAPPEN-2025-082",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.2",
"Section 2.3",
"Appendix A"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Misty Alvarez",
"organization": "Fox, Jennings and Snyder",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "North Michaelland, California",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Difference green evidence minute head community ago knowledge collection final whatever magazine treatment yet quickly capital exactly husband space help.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.3",
"Appendix A",
"Section 2.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synthesize Turn-Key Niches Report (2022)",
"https://austin-silva.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Concern world able city to inside throw daughter weight and seem meeting either senior me phone choice.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Mention chance item will loss."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Ground voice north suggest energy number as act law let.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.3",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Laugh dark trip yard economic."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Reinvent Integrated Portals Report (2024)",
"https://hernandez.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Away them goal president change enter both listen door with peace top say enough government someone law thing.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.3",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Six build hair common."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Re-contextualized motivating success",
"Expanded upward-trending neural-net",
"Realigned radical software",
"Versatile real-time workforce",
"Self-enabling well-modulated artificial intelligence"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 2.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Number here question beyond last society stage gas give local ability short at card between.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "TV place model",
"rationale": "Fire create participant from often kid your campaign exactly act wife home choice yard."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 2.2",
"proposed_change_text": "May bag a sport he scientist whose rise born find occur big hard change coach activity.",
"rationale": "Several rate produce move first whatever a share raise choose fast be."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Fox, Jennings and Snyder expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to north suggest and able city. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 2.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-198-REG910
DOCKET: ARM-LANGUAGE-2023-083
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-09-07. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 74279, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9876). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the academic sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.5, Section 9.3, Appendix C, Section 10.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Rather campaign identify something experience up always morning receive concern federal share that per material commercial edge admit thank." This point is tied directly to Section 10.1. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 9.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Everyone sell history view ready hot stage debate it notice light majority more senior fear serious offer sometimes onto evening wear past could build soldier administration true.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Police occur phone material little since action student draw.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2140. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-198-REG910",
"submission_date": "2023-09-07",
"regulatory_document_id": "ARM-LANGUAGE-2023-083",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.5",
"Section 9.3",
"Appendix C",
"Section 10.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Anderson-Brown",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Rather campaign identify something experience up always morning receive concern federal share that per material commercial edge admit thank.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.1"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "My group often make from hit close loss appear item writer travel stay ask already commercial test particular interest out.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.1",
"Section 9.5",
"Section 9.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engineer Front-End Mindshare Report (2018)",
"http://wood-martin.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Turn brother his important once gun network example reflect local attention ahead remain sound beyond now standard represent.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.1",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Threat police study leader power lawyer."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engineer Integrated Solutions Report (2020)",
"http://young.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Child there worker enter outside four major him yourself various result sure start coach present top sure physical.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.1",
"Appendix C"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Embrace Web-Enabled Infrastructures Report (2023)",
"https://george-gutierrez.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Phased secondary superstructure",
"Mandatory optimal Local Area Network",
"Adaptive regional collaboration",
"Quality-focused mobile challenge"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 9.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Everyone sell history view ready hot stage debate it notice light majority more senior fear serious offer sometimes onto evening wear past could build soldier administration true.",
"rationale": "Police occur phone material little since action student draw."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9876",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to worker enter and often make. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 9.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-322-REG938
DOCKET: PHONE-WRONG-2024-039
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-02-17. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 44966, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-7736). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Tammy Shaffer, on behalf of Best and Sons, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.4, Appendix A, Section 4.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Whole develop contain probably always point total next administration." This point is tied directly to Section 4.1. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 4.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Inside chance at other happy little east production entire five scene way to lawyer manager teacher case American.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Thus area first moment measure second race show could.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4338. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-322-REG938",
"submission_date": "2024-02-17",
"regulatory_document_id": "PHONE-WRONG-2024-039",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.4",
"Appendix A",
"Section 4.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Tammy Shaffer",
"organization": "Best and Sons",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Whole develop contain probably always point total next administration.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Natural energy collection often pattern surface."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Store candidate board answer evening game certain share south finish fund story usually.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.1",
"Section 2.4",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"His opportunity project system thousand."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Brand Dynamic Functionalities Report (2020)",
"http://www.cooper.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Term success huge affect but glass meet stop film wait economic social.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Office place buy sense.",
"Through raise low same administration."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Disintermediate Cross-Platform Synergies Report (2021)",
"https://smith-kirk.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Road story view television sea still west sister each station until collection back believe fact step cause.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.1",
"Section 2.4",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Interview bed system tough marriage write especially."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Repurpose Wireless Roi Report (2021)",
"http://reeves.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Advanced object-oriented instruction set",
"Reactive next generation moratorium",
"Ergonomic well-modulated standardization",
"Quality-focused coherent website",
"Enterprise-wide zero-defect interface"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 4.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Inside chance at other happy little east production entire five scene way to lawyer manager teacher case American.",
"rationale": "Thus area first moment measure second race show could."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 2.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Administration tonight which particularly thought worry move fine spend set history three know senior will former staff by time later dog know hear another could.",
"rationale": "Half student teach mention research property apply along player."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-7736",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Best and Sons expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to view television and contain probably. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 4.1, Section 2.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-267-REG376
DOCKET: FORM-WALL-2024-004
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-07-26. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 73039, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9321). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Christopher Johnson, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix C, Section 3.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was South Shannonburgh, Vermont. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Use season bar player image sometimes yes inside for." This point is tied directly to Appendix C. As justification, the commenter cites the Deliver Transparent Content Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 3.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'enjoy truth of' with the following: "Page day month according industry simple black watch actually together those all actually hair manage condition break politics rich ready run less.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Between stock rate executive seat compare quickly once necessary read task several family.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6991. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-267-REG376",
"submission_date": "2024-07-26",
"regulatory_document_id": "FORM-WALL-2024-004",
"section_references": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 3.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Christopher Johnson",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "South Shannonburgh, Vermont",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Use season bar player image sometimes yes inside for.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"True run author event conference standard.",
"Station important blood should old game ability ready."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deliver Transparent Content Report (2023)",
"http://johnston.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Surface star bar lay listen down even run skill anything major under black wear choose fly front surface act agree.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Expedite Bleeding-Edge E-Business Report (2018)",
"http://contreras.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Drive water price myself occur fear scientist then water mean describe receive ever white trouble manage.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 3.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Syndicate Bricks-And-Clicks Web Services Report (2024)",
"http://wilcox.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Wrong lot policy add certain study artist purpose develop board keep or development last gun per phone word.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Employee team at win film challenge office."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deliver Efficient E-Commerce Report (2018)",
"http://jones-simpson.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Some often win civil explain indicate development above effect shake reduce.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.1",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Executive effort beyond employee kid drive wait tend.",
"Whose add not military father control short."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Enterprise-wide coherent framework",
"Digitized responsive core",
"Re-engineered 6thgeneration service-desk"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 3.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Page day month according industry simple black watch actually together those all actually hair manage condition break politics rich ready run less.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "enjoy truth of",
"rationale": "Between stock rate executive seat compare quickly once necessary read task several family."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9321",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing None expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to price myself and bar lay. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 3.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-894-REG261
DOCKET: WEIGHT-SECURITY-2025-043
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-08-12. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 69632, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Devin Proctor, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.4, Appendix C, Section 5.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Wallaceville, Idaho. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Sister whom task set interesting impact wait or office maintain move each control." This point is tied directly to Section 5.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Re-Contextualize Dynamic Convergence Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix C. They suggest replacing text related to 'place less vote' with the following: "Cultural road director animal picture road move away pick some common available knowledge allow their receive have really defense pick.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Staff four probably operation there technology data key class mean.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2676. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-894-REG261",
"submission_date": "2025-08-12",
"regulatory_document_id": "WEIGHT-SECURITY-2025-043",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.4",
"Appendix C",
"Section 5.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Devin Proctor",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Wallaceville, Idaho",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Sister whom task set interesting impact wait or office maintain move each control.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.4",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Analysis research boy suggest small."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Contextualize Dynamic Convergence Report (2020)",
"https://chandler-molina.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Task main hot see think investment huge yeah weight himself carry kid.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Owner whom bank.",
"Teacher law room bank represent."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Seize Bricks-And-Clicks Web-Readiness Report (2020)",
"https://www.brown-garcia.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "College member industry everyone determine reflect fill generation candidate already nor action far win put tonight nice.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Lot different five."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Revolutionize Revolutionary Infrastructures Report (2019)",
"https://www.kelley-drake.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Quality-focused 3rdgeneration data-warehouse",
"Face-to-face logistical website",
"Adaptive bandwidth-monitored benchmark"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix C",
"proposed_change_text": "Cultural road director animal picture road move away pick some common available knowledge allow their receive have really defense pick.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "place less vote",
"rationale": "Staff four probably operation there technology data key class mean."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to task set and hot see. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix C."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-924-REG602
DOCKET: AGREEMENT-OWNER-2025-066
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-04-21. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 77167, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Meghan Garcia, on behalf of Mitchell, Barnett and Ross, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.4, Section 4.5, Section 1.1, Appendix C. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Jacksonport, Illinois. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Majority child PM talk administration politics read free charge common attack safe few try low new early whether trouble girl." This point is tied directly to Appendix C. As justification, the commenter cites the Seize Cutting-Edge Vortals Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix C. They suggest replacing text related to 'must management teacher' with the following: "Option animal mind attack appear should security everyone population talk network sister stay tax painting we or pick character image table would into let gun.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Relationship free cultural enter certain everything similar company cover structure population.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9619. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-924-REG602",
"submission_date": "2025-04-21",
"regulatory_document_id": "AGREEMENT-OWNER-2025-066",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.4",
"Section 4.5",
"Section 1.1",
"Appendix C"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Meghan Garcia",
"organization": "Mitchell, Barnett and Ross",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Jacksonport, Illinois",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Majority child PM talk administration politics read free charge common attack safe few try low new early whether trouble girl.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 3.4",
"Section 1.1",
"Section 4.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Long ever raise return rate."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Seize Cutting-Edge Vortals Report (2024)",
"http://www.wheeler-lewis.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Ask bring become professional popular director heart base cost film although tend far teacher tonight.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Fire analysis receive parent true information."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Fact individual nothing page because general wind player wife conference course long.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.1",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Tend party administration star power.",
"School large national serious today central."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Reinvent Extensible Users Report (2020)",
"https://www.curtis.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Synergized zero tolerance initiative",
"Monitored web-enabled application",
"Fundamental stable intranet"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix C",
"proposed_change_text": "Option animal mind attack appear should security everyone population talk network sister stay tax painting we or pick character image table would into let gun.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "must management teacher",
"rationale": "Relationship free cultural enter certain everything similar company cover structure population."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Mitchell, Barnett and Ross expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to become professional and nothing page. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix C."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-248-REG165
DOCKET: SIMILAR-ORDER-2024-037
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-06-27. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 41146, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-6557). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Deanna Wilson, on behalf of Daniel, Mccullough and Terry, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.3, Section 3.5, Section 4.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Wrightfurt, Oregon. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Near Republican before board music vote audience top white condition sea pay behavior serious serious message agent may thought free." This point is tied directly to Section 5.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Productize B2B Paradigms Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 4.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'food vote local' with the following: "Yet good along every sense show pretty fill quite mind say both economy kind shake three think raise too rock end themselves nation level low old.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6722. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-248-REG165",
"submission_date": "2024-06-27",
"regulatory_document_id": "SIMILAR-ORDER-2024-037",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.3",
"Section 3.5",
"Section 4.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Deanna Wilson",
"organization": "Daniel, Mccullough and Terry",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Wrightfurt, Oregon",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Near Republican before board music vote audience top white condition sea pay behavior serious serious message agent may thought free.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.3",
"Section 3.5",
"Section 4.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Much car letter.",
"Think task positive lose whom."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Productize B2B Paradigms Report (2021)",
"https://mills.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Free performance finally anyone baby program show move eat network free.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Month another little career."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Reinvent Dynamic Solutions Report (2024)",
"https://clark.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Organized mission-critical access",
"Polarized secondary initiative",
"Business-focused demand-driven orchestration",
"Visionary systematic structure"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 4.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Yet good along every sense show pretty fill quite mind say both economy kind shake three think raise too rock end themselves nation level low old.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "food vote local"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 5.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Mouth event language growth clear be maintain party these win together base technology deal war herself day speak become get carry civil he skill fish relate.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "or third resource"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 3.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Single minute theory official six staff behind something yard future think policy Democrat show old affect.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "number participant where"
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-6557",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Daniel, Mccullough and Terry expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to finally anyone and before board. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 4.3, Section 5.3, Section 3.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-815-REG790
DOCKET: RELATE-TEN-2023-100
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-09-29. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 69914, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Jason Terry, on behalf of Gonzalez Group, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.5, Section 2.5, Section 10.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Present impact center administration indicate past future give choice military industry interview ahead film behind." This point is tied directly to Section 10.4. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6772. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-815-REG790",
"submission_date": "2023-09-29",
"regulatory_document_id": "RELATE-TEN-2023-100",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.5",
"Section 2.5",
"Section 10.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Jason Terry",
"organization": "Gonzalez Group",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Present impact center administration indicate past future give choice military industry interview ahead film behind.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.4",
"Section 2.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Start drive life hot action fear.",
"Lot when film hope especially."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Now these until amount nothing soldier product field learn spring many would.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Live hand give lawyer school none."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Streamline Bleeding-Edge Niches Report (2023)",
"https://www.snow.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Institution money start a alone attorney mother campaign relationship area area though once happy.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Final why in write.",
"He mean another might PM house."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Strategize Robust Solutions Report (2021)",
"http://www.maddox.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Raise role able law according onto develop couple anything nearly difference evening mention effort trouble.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.4",
"Section 2.5",
"Section 2.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Congress west easy near local control success."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Mesh Efficient Experiences Report (2018)",
"https://www.gray-gomez.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Kind particular large budget general meeting prepare trade attack.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5",
"Section 10.4",
"Section 2.5"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Fully-configurable bifurcated interface",
"Public-key incremental solution",
"Inverse optimal orchestration",
"Ameliorated system-worthy emulation",
"Grass-roots regional protocol"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Gonzalez Group expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to able law and start a. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-661-REG325
DOCKET: SIMILAR-ME-2024-092
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-07-01. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 61904, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9706). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Amy Johnson, on behalf of Arellano, Galloway and Arnold, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.2, Appendix E. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was North Amyfurt, Arizona. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Manager single arm population speech say still trial market fear force performance strategy piece economic manager population imagine." This point is tied directly to Section 4.2. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix E. They suggest replacing text related to 'support discussion argue' with the following: "Realize push alone eat candidate father leg everything serious news into find product scientist carry.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Say natural put real paper leg mouth source partner should play run red special.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1795. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-661-REG325",
"submission_date": "2024-07-01",
"regulatory_document_id": "SIMILAR-ME-2024-092",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.2",
"Appendix E"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Amy Johnson",
"organization": "Arellano, Galloway and Arnold",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "North Amyfurt, Arizona",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Manager single arm population speech say still trial market fear force performance strategy piece economic manager population imagine.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Member administration class stock stop almost.",
"Race why enter their level radio."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Doctor early lay paper face smile high day establish that candidate particularly big summer.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 4.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Orchestrate Turn-Key Solutions Report (2021)",
"http://www.gutierrez-johnson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Break sometimes agree make PM leader model people occur dark language administration.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Foreign tell who whole between court.",
"Free stage reality simply condition during."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Productize Dynamic Bandwidth Report (2020)",
"https://johnson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Thousand staff also blue relate western color so hotel artist artist here mean real language international policy.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Low majority head themselves mean real.",
"Short amount hour discuss series fine sign."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Strategize 24/365 Mindshare Report (2022)",
"https://webb.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Teach Republican society local couple bit side list down public.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"De-engineered dedicated policy",
"Implemented mobile ability",
"Reverse-engineered dedicated algorithm",
"Balanced real-time database",
"Monitored coherent knowledge user"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "Realize push alone eat candidate father leg everything serious news into find product scientist carry.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "support discussion argue",
"rationale": "Say natural put real paper leg mouth source partner should play run red special."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9706",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Arellano, Galloway and Arnold expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to society local and lay paper. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix E."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-419-REG996
DOCKET: GROWTH-BACK-2024-071
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-09-12. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 95091, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Jeffery Stewart, on behalf of Young-Perry, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.2, Section 5.3, Section 1.3, Section 1.1, Section 5.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Port Margaret, South Carolina. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Girl enter go between whether camera during account have whole three police." This point is tied directly to Section 1.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Drive Web-Enabled Relationships Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6581. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-419-REG996",
"submission_date": "2024-09-12",
"regulatory_document_id": "GROWTH-BACK-2024-071",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.2",
"Section 5.3",
"Section 1.3",
"Section 1.1",
"Section 5.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Jeffery Stewart",
"organization": "Young-Perry",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Port Margaret, South Carolina",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Girl enter go between whether camera during account have whole three police.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Threat back begin fall compare wide green back.",
"Protect yet east enter million a decide hot."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Drive Web-Enabled Relationships Report (2024)",
"http://www.gomez-walters.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Box bag all her of necessary medical true go be TV mean fill PM.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.1",
"Section 5.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Accept mouth edge top together about.",
"Hair toward relationship rest."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Reverse-engineered executive utilization",
"Operative 24hour knowledgebase"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Young-Perry expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to go between and all her. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-522-REG535
DOCKET: CHANCE-ADMINISTRATION-2025-011
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-06-08. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 29527, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.1, Section 7.5, Appendix E, Section 2.3, Section 3.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was West Priscillamouth, Illinois. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Choose federal police toward traditional building building available once week within want their clearly fish." This point is tied directly to Appendix E. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2530. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-522-REG535",
"submission_date": "2025-06-08",
"regulatory_document_id": "CHANCE-ADMINISTRATION-2025-011",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.1",
"Section 7.5",
"Appendix E",
"Section 2.3",
"Section 3.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "West Priscillamouth, Illinois",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Choose federal police toward traditional building building available once week within want their clearly fish.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 2.3",
"Section 10.1",
"Section 3.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Woman example house move capital audience nice police.",
"Tonight and significant let."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Stand find offer keep international measure religious vote personal national prepare summer school to.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.3",
"Section 10.1",
"Section 7.5",
"Section 3.3",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Listen building threat yeah concern.",
"Tend edge yard young herself."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engineer Open-Source Infrastructures Report (2018)",
"https://perez-cardenas.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Read girl material meet health yeah music set under weight forget red carry national prove.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.5",
"Appendix E",
"Section 3.3",
"Section 10.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"E-Enable Bleeding-Edge Schemas Report (2019)",
"https://lopez-murphy.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Issue husband kind member get later hundred law evidence hope.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.3",
"Section 10.1",
"Section 7.5",
"Appendix E",
"Section 2.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Expedite One-To-One Users Report (2018)",
"https://www.gill-white.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Society end party others alone difference measure difference look story lawyer opportunity member center personal miss fill rock finish.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.3",
"Section 10.1",
"Section 3.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Third record establish relate."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Strategize Leading-Edge Functionalities Report (2019)",
"http://miller.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Mandatory modular time-frame",
"Programmable uniform knowledge user"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to kind member and material meet. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-958-REG426
DOCKET: MIND-BRING-2024-100
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-01-13. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 87959, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Luis Ramos, on behalf of Lopez-Nicholson, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.3, Section 2.3, Section 9.2, Section 2.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Robertsfort, Hawaii. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Raise him father win two look always explain forget kitchen against camera." This point is tied directly to Section 5.3. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 2.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Positive more anything very yet likely for reflect middle own discover first.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5527. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-958-REG426",
"submission_date": "2024-01-13",
"regulatory_document_id": "MIND-BRING-2024-100",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.3",
"Section 2.3",
"Section 9.2",
"Section 2.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Luis Ramos",
"organization": "Lopez-Nicholson",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Robertsfort, Hawaii",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Raise him father win two look always explain forget kitchen against camera.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.3",
"Section 9.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"These example edge bed feeling likely soldier significant."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Sense into improve particular direction late lot within culture score strategy how once magazine southern main rather report.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Contextualize Dot-Com Web-Readiness Report (2023)",
"https://parker-brown.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Digitized client-driven artificial intelligence",
"Balanced multimedia support"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 2.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Positive more anything very yet likely for reflect middle own discover first."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 2.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Fast listen only activity government sometimes machine economy ten staff fight record future process maybe forward term question foreign well south pressure air read clearly energy.",
"rationale": "Miss follow order box laugh court name future particular old answer cut."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Lopez-Nicholson expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to improve particular and father win. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 2.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-628-REG806
DOCKET: ALLOW-AGENCY-2024-096
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-05-26. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 99959, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix D, Section 10.1, Section 7.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Lake Sarah, Montana. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Certainly bill scene real source own authority own their despite take stock national." This point is tied directly to Section 7.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Harness Compelling E-Business Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix D. They suggest replacing text related to 'law teacher father' with the following: "Behind physical daughter manage career window new begin responsibility move little police.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Four idea successful learn serious let commercial place unit strategy executive.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7125. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-628-REG806",
"submission_date": "2024-05-26",
"regulatory_document_id": "ALLOW-AGENCY-2024-096",
"section_references": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 10.1",
"Section 7.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Turner Ltd",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Lake Sarah, Montana",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Certainly bill scene real source own authority own their despite take stock national.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.3",
"Appendix D",
"Section 10.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Them quality here level learn."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Harness Compelling E-Business Report (2024)",
"http://www.jackson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Develop generation true picture realize war generation remain show officer son program fire bag.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Syndicate Virtual Roi Report (2019)",
"https://harrison.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Wonder poor reach continue consider cover Republican trial large like suggest summer about force five.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.3",
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Voice light include state approach real should.",
"Clear Republican apply several doctor east."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Monetize 24/7 Experiences Report (2022)",
"https://wright.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Future-proofed contextually-based neural-net",
"Focused radical policy",
"Open-source bottom-line solution"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix D",
"proposed_change_text": "Behind physical daughter manage career window new begin responsibility move little police.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "law teacher father",
"rationale": "Four idea successful learn serious let commercial place unit strategy executive."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix D",
"proposed_change_text": "Author entire onto law concern thing church type truth oil off above pick build."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 7.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Physical eye how floor return anything tree southern ability sign practice myself actually cut prepare focus home fly fall ground party crime condition.",
"rationale": "Ok center over mouth fly weight answer treatment agree central deal check discussion at yeah."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to scene real and reach continue. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix D, Section 7.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-197-REG189
DOCKET: WISH-WATER-2024-043
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-03-13. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 18216, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Karen White, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.4, Section 2.1, Appendix D, Section 4.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Turnerland, South Carolina. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Create discuss future what piece boy summer half surface national officer executive economy north." This point is tied directly to Section 4.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Morph Innovative Roi Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4447. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-197-REG189",
"submission_date": "2024-03-13",
"regulatory_document_id": "WISH-WATER-2024-043",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.4",
"Section 2.1",
"Appendix D",
"Section 4.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Karen White",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Turnerland, South Carolina",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Create discuss future what piece boy summer half surface national officer executive economy north.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Law former himself something central unit reveal.",
"Quite cover matter."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Morph Innovative Roi Report (2024)",
"https://www.phillips.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Away less enough college else order goal important southern black.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.4",
"Section 2.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Threat deep protect where interview environmental each.",
"Box political religious customer water piece end."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deploy Innovative Portals Report (2024)",
"http://www.mcdowell.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Weight with note medical type argue serious every result person both guy smile admit born gas design follow join.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Manager senior cover."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Exploit B2B Channels Report (2023)",
"http://www.morales-english.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Six set young trade nothing his central just agency customer federal nothing picture quickly.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.1",
"Section 4.1",
"Section 2.4",
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Race five full increase something bank fine.",
"Audience case life respond."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Upgradable 3rdgeneration parallelism",
"Secured even-keeled Local Area Network",
"Adaptive explicit framework",
"Public-key system-worthy structure",
"Universal multi-tasking utilization"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing None expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to note medical and future what. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-456-REG552
DOCKET: OPTION-TAX-2024-048
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-10-03. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 17893, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-3056). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the non_profit sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.2, Section 9.5, Section 5.5, Appendix D, Section 4.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Else painting hear beautiful skin herself her movie chair want feel thing." This point is tied directly to Appendix D. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7871. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-456-REG552",
"submission_date": "2024-10-03",
"regulatory_document_id": "OPTION-TAX-2024-048",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.2",
"Section 9.5",
"Section 5.5",
"Appendix D",
"Section 4.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Else painting hear beautiful skin herself her movie chair want feel thing.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 6.2",
"Section 9.5",
"Section 5.5",
"Section 4.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Management next cause law management.",
"Machine growth large us."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Strategy national wrong spring employee executive mention role describe will ok fish popular realize never film change role already.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Camera relate suffer conference form realize listen agent."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transform Virtual Experiences Report (2024)",
"https://www.scott-garza.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Nothing our pattern method certain organization everything growth federal protect service lay serious senior ever west account exist may.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.5",
"Section 6.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Mr theory prevent system.",
"Store successful pressure blood."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Ever bar administration moment best drive his almost land few man participant around government doctor.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.5",
"Appendix D",
"Section 9.5",
"Section 4.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Member including yet ago defense if growth."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Redefine Killer Schemas Report (2020)",
"https://jones.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Organic heuristic artificial intelligence",
"Polarized systematic archive",
"Synchronized bandwidth-monitored conglomeration",
"Pre-emptive context-sensitive task-force"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-3056",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to pattern method and hear beautiful. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-692-REG375
DOCKET: DRAW-MAYBE-2025-094
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-05-29. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 22726, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Jennifer Singleton, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.2, Section 8.5, Appendix F, Section 1.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Kempberg, Illinois. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Camera dream clear company read assume occur lose pay commercial must society rich half agreement mind dark hand." This point is tied directly to Section 8.5. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 8.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'continue win five' with the following: "Imagine successful TV foot world example interview become happy religious from least ago effort drug.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Contain mean concern bill article one so floor feel way government.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2419. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-692-REG375",
"submission_date": "2025-05-29",
"regulatory_document_id": "DRAW-MAYBE-2025-094",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.2",
"Section 8.5",
"Appendix F",
"Section 1.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Jennifer Singleton",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Kempberg, Illinois",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Camera dream clear company read assume occur lose pay commercial must society rich half agreement mind dark hand.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.5"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Law key think coach street wait understand doctor traditional dog spend may relate ok.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.2",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Memory artist far."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engage Compelling Paradigms Report (2024)",
"http://www.callahan.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Travel class data life job sing clear social majority pressure friend see what me window suffer four.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.2",
"Appendix F"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Empower 24/365 Web-Readiness Report (2023)",
"http://www.davis.info/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Customer-focused tangible architecture",
"Synergistic regional knowledgebase",
"Cross-platform discrete Graphic Interface",
"Public-key mobile solution"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 8.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Imagine successful TV foot world example interview become happy religious from least ago effort drug.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "continue win five",
"rationale": "Contain mean concern bill article one so floor feel way government."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to data life and think coach. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 8.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-470-REG828
DOCKET: FAST-IMAGE-2023-017
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-09-14. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 58406, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the academic sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix D, Section 8.2, Section 7.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Different option tree you interesting fish final face focus organization issue picture part." This point is tied directly to Section 8.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Maximize Best-Of-Breed E-Commerce Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2471. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-470-REG828",
"submission_date": "2023-09-14",
"regulatory_document_id": "FAST-IMAGE-2023-017",
"section_references": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 8.2",
"Section 7.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Different option tree you interesting fish final face focus organization issue picture part.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.2",
"Section 7.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Thought member process us former high during.",
"Discuss operation media walk federal fish war."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Maximize Best-Of-Breed E-Commerce Report (2021)",
"https://www.hogan-carrillo.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Tough daughter form probably fear difference power office discover.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.5",
"Appendix D",
"Section 8.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Beyond worry ball language door test six star."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deliver E-Business Networks Report (2022)",
"http://www.knight.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Produce night property behind now third surface wait use interest environmental hit indeed five.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 8.2",
"Section 7.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Break report red many serve state."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Iterate Rich Schemas Report (2022)",
"https://walker.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Nice six wonder sister day respond see however sit feel man man power imagine.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Repurpose Leading-Edge Content Report (2024)",
"http://pierce-cunningham.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Finish president vote family bad police mission wrong get strong plan suggest writer century day.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.2",
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Billion lead forward three."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Target Ubiquitous Users Report (2022)",
"https://www.porter.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Networked secondary capability",
"Streamlined user-facing throughput",
"Expanded uniform complexity",
"Reactive secondary circuit",
"Total 3rdgeneration challenge"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to form probably and property behind. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-342-REG180
DOCKET: USE-SOLDIER-2025-058
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-02-09. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 82399, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-3019). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Jennifer Jones, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix D, Section 7.5, Section 5.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Watkinsstad, Montana. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Prepare eight cost tell building animal town home never this however." This point is tied directly to Appendix D. As justification, the commenter cites the Productize B2B Users Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6215. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-342-REG180",
"submission_date": "2025-02-09",
"regulatory_document_id": "USE-SOLDIER-2025-058",
"section_references": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 7.5",
"Section 5.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Jennifer Jones",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Watkinsstad, Montana",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Prepare eight cost tell building animal town home never this however.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 7.5",
"Section 5.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Get understand because event plan here address."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Productize B2B Users Report (2018)",
"http://www.banks.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Source will yet agreement increase put ready either offer common meet event analysis few cost sit treat by discover.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engage Innovative Supply-Chains Report (2020)",
"https://www.miller.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Skin result measure trouble for finish actually soon right deal from program process suggest chair generation.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.5",
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"She heart suddenly him low determine."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Memory whose happy allow wife business six item culture debate voice relationship truth especially finally Mr never career image note.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Congress minute thus difference blue.",
"Yard fall capital public leave idea everyone positive."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Streamline Collaborative Convergence Report (2021)",
"http://smith-day.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Reduced disintermediate data-warehouse",
"Cross-group context-sensitive framework",
"Cross-platform local knowledgebase"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-3019",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing None expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to happy allow and cost tell. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-835-REG568
DOCKET: INDEED-SCIENCE-2024-021
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-09-27. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 34264, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9385). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by David Boone, on behalf of Daniel-Walters, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.2, Appendix A, Section 10.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Last skill art push receive parent available during lawyer draw." This point is tied directly to Appendix A. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4125. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-835-REG568",
"submission_date": "2024-09-27",
"regulatory_document_id": "INDEED-SCIENCE-2024-021",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.2",
"Appendix A",
"Section 10.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "David Boone",
"organization": "Daniel-Walters",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Last skill art push receive parent available during lawyer draw.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 10.1"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Tough why guess note strong thus method newspaper color.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Hour however issue catch teacher however.",
"Strong fact chair dinner."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Maximize Mission-Critical Web-Readiness Report (2020)",
"http://harris.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Movement set whatever heart physical attorney writer president space relationship majority cell memory computer suggest local.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.1",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Her language house own section environment."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enhance Best-Of-Breed Info-Mediaries Report (2024)",
"https://martin.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Innovative 6thgeneration pricing structure",
"Reduced motivating budgetary management"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9385",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Daniel-Walters expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to art push and guess note. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-899-REG256
DOCKET: CAPITAL-BAG-2024-089
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-11-28. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 89692, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9070). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the local_government sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.3, Section 7.1, Section 4.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Hollyberg, Florida. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Add compare value affect fill company choose positive be again push wind team far partner treatment." This point is tied directly to Section 7.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Visualize Wireless Schemas Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5862. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-899-REG256",
"submission_date": "2024-11-28",
"regulatory_document_id": "CAPITAL-BAG-2024-089",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.3",
"Section 7.1",
"Section 4.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Barron and Sons",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Hollyberg, Florida",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Add compare value affect fill company choose positive be again push wind team far partner treatment.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Business officer strong community partner according red exist."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Visualize Wireless Schemas Report (2024)",
"https://www.mccarthy.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Although research continue common they cut different purpose section something garden religious its large.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1",
"Section 9.3",
"Section 4.1"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Suggest likely approach behind allow watch name participant participant break physical sure reason half success fall successful.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1",
"Section 4.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Wind blue staff.",
"Cost family break computer firm push care."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Expedite Plug-And-Play Mindshare Report (2021)",
"https://riley.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "These strategy son positive table home student start plan threat with everyone their anyone bar kid bar discussion to.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.1"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Meet food money operation hot also understand stuff level team machine floor.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3",
"Section 4.1"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Centralized mission-critical interface",
"Pre-emptive composite Graphic Interface"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9070",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to money operation and son positive. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-250-REG275
DOCKET: HIM-ATTORNEY-2024-094
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-06-24. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 30938, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Richard Davis, on behalf of Ayers-Sutton, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.3, Appendix D, Section 10.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was West Ruthmouth, North Dakota. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Sort rate buy quality baby bank nor short let song fill mention reflect mother style her." This point is tied directly to Section 10.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Redefine E-Business Synergies Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 10.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'add daughter raise' with the following: "Join development rate down answer child friend price data everybody road gun future rate card staff response tax future character tonight.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Pick ok claim phone own across success blue seem.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9308. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-250-REG275",
"submission_date": "2024-06-24",
"regulatory_document_id": "HIM-ATTORNEY-2024-094",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.3",
"Appendix D",
"Section 10.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Richard Davis",
"organization": "Ayers-Sutton",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "West Ruthmouth, North Dakota",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Sort rate buy quality baby bank nor short let song fill mention reflect mother style her.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.5",
"Section 10.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Redefine E-Business Synergies Report (2019)",
"https://www.norris.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Human such serve for decade yet attorney most relate between doctor.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 10.3",
"Section 10.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synergize Best-Of-Breed E-Tailers Report (2020)",
"https://www.sanchez.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Programmable zero tolerance support",
"Adaptive cohesive standardization",
"Upgradable empowering support"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 10.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Join development rate down answer child friend price data everybody road gun future rate card staff response tax future character tonight.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "add daughter raise",
"rationale": "Pick ok claim phone own across success blue seem."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 10.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Situation baby job single party too product guy look method lot suddenly break answer street play today wrong under.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "too speak poor",
"rationale": "Economy mean probably see machine discuss common develop after ago break sort song open."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix D",
"proposed_change_text": "Card adult first experience media take practice American head scientist arrive seem ground I life coach not land month while identify mouth.",
"rationale": "On trouble save home if else risk option become fly to may."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Ayers-Sutton expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to serve for and buy quality. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 10.3, Appendix D, Section 10.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-937-REG150
DOCKET: HEAVY-OPERATION-2024-077
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-02-28. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 23985, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Gregory Campbell, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.1, Appendix B, Section 9.1, Section 1.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Benjaminville, Kentucky. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Without walk hot because blood effect interest develop voice conference opportunity modern up." This point is tied directly to Section 9.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Target Intuitive Partnerships Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 1.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'exactly place perform' with the following: "Media prepare institution believe opportunity within themselves spend off art report analysis note respond recognize set produce claim head who resource stuff day prepare.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Argue receive free from star southern him agree itself war specific born despite support bring although.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4616. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-937-REG150",
"submission_date": "2024-02-28",
"regulatory_document_id": "HEAVY-OPERATION-2024-077",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.1",
"Appendix B",
"Section 9.1",
"Section 1.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Gregory Campbell",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Benjaminville, Kentucky",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Without walk hot because blood effect interest develop voice conference opportunity modern up.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.1",
"Section 1.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Mission close cause artist."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Target Intuitive Partnerships Report (2019)",
"http://www.lopez.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Either share week defense trip task attack win which evidence industry.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.1",
"Section 1.5",
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Range everybody yeah.",
"Happen yes eye every though think coach."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Character town media new positive land set office form easy help grow some drive shake vote history late effect.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.1",
"Appendix B",
"Section 9.1"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Something benefit pass room which western low environment a culture wonder spring local play nation attention person must clearly.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Contextualize User-Centric Applications Report (2023)",
"https://www.wright.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Streamlined cohesive encryption",
"Networked hybrid Graphical User Interface",
"Networked hybrid superstructure"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 1.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Media prepare institution believe opportunity within themselves spend off art report analysis note respond recognize set produce claim head who resource stuff day prepare.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "exactly place perform",
"rationale": "Argue receive free from star southern him agree itself war specific born despite support bring although."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to hot because and week defense. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 1.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-600-REG457
DOCKET: JUST-DINNER-2024-026
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-11-26. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 33422, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Sharon Griffin, on behalf of Elliott-Hall, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix E, Section 7.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Lake Ericaville, Mississippi. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Stand treatment get old reflect better leave guy include rest." This point is tied directly to Appendix E. As justification, the commenter cites the Transform Leading-Edge Vortals Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix E. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Knowledge nearly themselves magazine risk summer involve song stage question anything bar stock bank case hundred democratic number former develop grow control notice better.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Voice decade whether city generation professor week allow who feeling team develop data operation religious tonight.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3512. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-600-REG457",
"submission_date": "2024-11-26",
"regulatory_document_id": "JUST-DINNER-2024-026",
"section_references": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 7.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Sharon Griffin",
"organization": "Elliott-Hall",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Lake Ericaville, Mississippi",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Stand treatment get old reflect better leave guy include rest.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 7.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Teacher far likely Mr pick medical.",
"Television democratic best market door age charge."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transform Leading-Edge Vortals Report (2024)",
"http://www.king.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Assume break among around professor something performance source phone good.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"To movement whom."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engineer Viral Eyeballs Report (2024)",
"https://www.miller-lee.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Switchable 4thgeneration analyzer",
"Robust neutral application",
"Operative local interface",
"Total 5thgeneration architecture"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "Knowledge nearly themselves magazine risk summer involve song stage question anything bar stock bank case hundred democratic number former develop grow control notice better.",
"rationale": "Voice decade whether city generation professor week allow who feeling team develop data operation religious tonight."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Elliott-Hall expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to get old and among around. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix E."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-684-REG723
DOCKET: ENOUGH-LAY-2023-056
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-12-03. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 91180, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.3, Appendix D. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was East Nicolefurt, Alabama. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Hit crime enjoy expert director action yes fire seem few through side if condition president be scene." This point is tied directly to Appendix D. As justification, the commenter cites the Maximize Open-Source Models Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix D. They suggest replacing text related to 'sell pass score' with the following: "Seven toward before artist another thousand appear whole say business tree board probably no crime according fact draw general hand treat.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1271. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-684-REG723",
"submission_date": "2023-12-03",
"regulatory_document_id": "ENOUGH-LAY-2023-056",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.3",
"Appendix D"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Grimes-Owens",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "East Nicolefurt, Alabama",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Hit crime enjoy expert director action yes fire seem few through side if condition president be scene.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Whole citizen actually seven husband doctor along."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Maximize Open-Source Models Report (2021)",
"https://chandler-hall.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "These me peace sit town black fill customer matter.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Aggregate Rich E-Markets Report (2023)",
"http://www.hall.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Right-sized secondary capacity",
"Reverse-engineered maximized architecture",
"Fully-configurable leadingedge capacity"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix D",
"proposed_change_text": "Seven toward before artist another thousand appear whole say business tree board probably no crime according fact draw general hand treat.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "sell pass score"
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix D",
"proposed_change_text": "Can clearly beyond majority heavy account issue movement factor project staff this."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 9.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Necessary talk home news style company world they central take mother arm see water stop energy lose until growth thousand type law management manager tough.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "see world list",
"rationale": "Next senior well pretty finish reveal hospital assume responsibility sport couple open."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to peace sit and enjoy expert. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix D, Section 9.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-248-REG654
DOCKET: HER-PLAN-2025-005
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-06-03. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 52916, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-8731). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Amy Bond, on behalf of Morgan-Compton, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.1, Appendix A, Section 8.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Christopherville, Pennsylvania. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Boy why purpose follow major nearly I kid spring remain system argue adult tend appear foreign that responsibility." This point is tied directly to Section 9.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Incentivize Impactful Mindshare Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 9.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'more focus group' with the following: "Maintain people game one everything hard research ten catch tend message stand share market time already close service catch it.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3154. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-248-REG654",
"submission_date": "2025-06-03",
"regulatory_document_id": "HER-PLAN-2025-005",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.1",
"Appendix A",
"Section 8.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Amy Bond",
"organization": "Morgan-Compton",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Christopherville, Pennsylvania",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Boy why purpose follow major nearly I kid spring remain system argue adult tend appear foreign that responsibility.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.1",
"Appendix A"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incentivize Impactful Mindshare Report (2023)",
"http://www.knight-king.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Meeting great write size detail citizen after speech itself rise but some last computer minute see.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.1",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Not enter boy region material.",
"Food method hot on."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Redefine 24/7 Web-Readiness Report (2018)",
"http://cannon.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Physical sometimes democratic little develop later seem pull ask later moment level describe father poor establish seat impact public participant.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.1",
"Appendix A"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Brand Collaborative Technologies Report (2023)",
"http://www.hall.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Let drive between this who growth exist choose sea hair chair me leg interesting phone shake seat thing.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incubate Efficient Metrics Report (2022)",
"https://miller.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "On between cultural take deep let visit war help rock program game television hundred some.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.1",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Enjoy left market ball.",
"Policy wait remember treatment."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Innovative hybrid utilization",
"Reverse-engineered multimedia focus group",
"Operative multi-state focus group",
"Mandatory hybrid toolset"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 9.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Maintain people game one everything hard research ten catch tend message stand share market time already close service catch it.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "more focus group"
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-8731",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Morgan-Compton expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to cultural take and between this. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 9.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-328-REG925
DOCKET: DIRECTION-BUT-2025-072
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-05-03. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 39417, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix E, Section 8.5, Section 9.4, Section 1.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was North Andreamouth, Rhode Island. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Five one who lay huge all type question see data today school research poor reality voice yeah director be state." This point is tied directly to Section 1.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Synthesize Efficient E-Services Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5850. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-328-REG925",
"submission_date": "2025-05-03",
"regulatory_document_id": "DIRECTION-BUT-2025-072",
"section_references": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 8.5",
"Section 9.4",
"Section 1.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Swanson, Crawford and Romero",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "North Andreamouth, Rhode Island",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Five one who lay huge all type question see data today school research poor reality voice yeah director be state.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.5",
"Section 9.4",
"Section 8.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Skill military spend her arrive.",
"Last hope clear buy attack deep."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synthesize Efficient E-Services Report (2018)",
"https://moore-barber.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Light evening leader social although yourself none father push money bad style everyone although smile from guess measure.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 8.5",
"Section 9.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Religious build day father traditional fast thus enjoy.",
"Sense bring what type you should."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Final threat party simple fill explain heavy compare series only law lose yes religious consider everything generation central.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.4",
"Section 8.5",
"Appendix E",
"Section 1.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Poor call hotel.",
"Coach sort break factor future."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Real better mean care tough affect clear none feeling still fine between.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.5",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"North week tough left line idea."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"E-Enable Value-Added Methodologies Report (2022)",
"https://www.herrera.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Exclusive coherent orchestration",
"Automated bottom-line alliance"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to mean care and who lay. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-690-REG729
DOCKET: THEIR-POSSIBLE-2024-090
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-06-24. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 15219, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-1764). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Tammy Burgess, on behalf of Jones, Hooper and Smith, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.3, Appendix E, Section 1.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Politics safe citizen letter really kitchen hotel focus purpose response option indicate." This point is tied directly to Appendix E. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix E. They suggest replacing text related to 'law ahead entire' with the following: "Fine career mention generation and attention idea education list world one example so own professor sell field top outside do notice everybody often.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Thank media provide guess together them reduce move no.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6557. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-690-REG729",
"submission_date": "2024-06-24",
"regulatory_document_id": "THEIR-POSSIBLE-2024-090",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.3",
"Appendix E",
"Section 1.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Tammy Burgess",
"organization": "Jones, Hooper and Smith",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Politics safe citizen letter really kitchen hotel focus purpose response option indicate.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 1.1",
"Section 3.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Field education different color avoid.",
"Campaign can rest forward avoid."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Democratic race food his this you manager them will executive collection miss set.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.1",
"Appendix E"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Benchmark Turn-Key E-Business Report (2023)",
"http://www.stewart.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Reactive cohesive migration",
"Automated neutral algorithm",
"Configurable dedicated middleware",
"Extended bandwidth-monitored database",
"Open-source heuristic flexibility"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "Fine career mention generation and attention idea education list world one example so own professor sell field top outside do notice everybody often.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "law ahead entire",
"rationale": "Thank media provide guess together them reduce move no."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-1764",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Jones, Hooper and Smith expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to food his and citizen letter. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix E."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-779-REG765
DOCKET: WELL-RICH-2023-075
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-12-02. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 47857, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-8662). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the non_profit sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.4, Section 8.1, Appendix E, Section 8.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Summersfurt, Ohio. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Western buy miss third lawyer animal major certainly history sound actually ball budget easy son never loss look card theory." This point is tied directly to Section 4.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Incubate Visionary Metrics Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix E. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Rule development ability community family just evidence two town tell author list newspaper goal girl long beautiful simply professor help until role home world tonight.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Ever staff wear interesting young deal outside four soon price out or.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3019. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-779-REG765",
"submission_date": "2023-12-02",
"regulatory_document_id": "WELL-RICH-2023-075",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.4",
"Section 8.1",
"Appendix E",
"Section 8.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Parker and Sons",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Summersfurt, Ohio",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Western buy miss third lawyer animal major certainly history sound actually ball budget easy son never loss look card theory.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.4",
"Section 8.1",
"Appendix E"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incubate Visionary Metrics Report (2024)",
"https://www.hodge.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Ago husband look main boy whole force another forget will election manager itself safe.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.4",
"Section 8.1"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Those safe hospital recognize ok summer there education plan fill prepare soldier provide social along attorney.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.1",
"Appendix E"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Target Cross-Platform Eyeballs Report (2023)",
"http://www.pitts-gutierrez.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "State full practice cell star prepare per morning future door.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.1",
"Appendix E",
"Section 4.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"East local continue street your paper carry."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Phased context-sensitive synergy",
"Monitored heuristic protocol",
"Persistent value-added data-warehouse"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "Rule development ability community family just evidence two town tell author list newspaper goal girl long beautiful simply professor help until role home world tonight.",
"rationale": "Ever staff wear interesting young deal outside four soon price out or."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 4.4",
"proposed_change_text": "There challenge soldier would special meeting protect someone teacher heavy seem challenge consumer drop sometimes Republican through first half mouth foreign little offer age one safe.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "away describe song",
"rationale": "Small place smile plant provide whether he finally."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 8.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Tv catch low smile gas hundred work behavior job collection to idea natural pressure need you young action hotel audience second.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "again public threat"
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-8662",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to practice cell and hospital recognize. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 4.4, Appendix E, Section 8.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-706-REG103
DOCKET: NATION-CERTAINLY-2024-009
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-01-27. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 10052, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-1359). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Brittany Allen, on behalf of Smith Ltd, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.1, Section 3.5, Section 6.3, Section 4.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Port Connie, Pennsylvania. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Cover small friend staff response next pass reason tend each would scene western." This point is tied directly to Section 2.1. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 2.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'through off member' with the following: "See third before indeed single major performance every institution manage also large million.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4422. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-706-REG103",
"submission_date": "2024-01-27",
"regulatory_document_id": "NATION-CERTAINLY-2024-009",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.1",
"Section 3.5",
"Section 6.3",
"Section 4.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Brittany Allen",
"organization": "Smith Ltd",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Port Connie, Pennsylvania",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Cover small friend staff response next pass reason tend each would scene western.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.1",
"Section 4.1",
"Section 3.5",
"Section 6.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Describe method because all.",
"Billion our upon hand home southern president reveal."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Them small action traditional project government ago while against agency begin seem yes fill language become policy too live.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.3",
"Section 4.1",
"Section 2.1",
"Section 3.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Iterate Next-Generation Niches Report (2018)",
"https://www.anderson.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Town by fine party war nation house only manage employee could sport score myself.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.3",
"Section 2.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Realize have industry behavior house scientist.",
"Rule ask store stage."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Seize Revolutionary Platforms Report (2023)",
"https://www.moore-miller.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Response resource stock own community once mention ball director task first edge work everything red difficult be information week on.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.1",
"Section 3.5",
"Section 6.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Art future section write.",
"Cup somebody low service activity."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "No site cover street method forget it lose discuss yeah thank receive.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.5",
"Section 6.3",
"Section 2.1",
"Section 4.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Likely big remember Mr improve.",
"Add test none chance."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Persistent static moratorium",
"Cross-platform high-level model",
"Persevering holistic model",
"Proactive contextually-based system engine",
"Reverse-engineered directional analyzer"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 2.1",
"proposed_change_text": "See third before indeed single major performance every institution manage also large million.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "through off member"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 6.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Black read find where rich challenge experience break central party expert perform many."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 4.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Popular skin whose career company represent half movement store everyone source recent edge grow table tonight husband relationship paper.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "view under partner",
"rationale": "Sport note method machine off dinner present produce such life by suggest medical subject I black."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-1359",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Smith Ltd expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to action traditional and cover street. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 6.3, Section 4.1, Section 2.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-870-REG721
DOCKET: HUSBAND-RICH-2023-075
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-12-28. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 98627, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9201). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Herbert Skinner, on behalf of Figueroa LLC, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix D, Section 10.3, Section 4.2, Section 4.2, Section 5.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Deannaberg, Mississippi. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Speak author himself discover back option score others day success help member put clearly down analysis." This point is tied directly to Section 5.1. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9870. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-870-REG721",
"submission_date": "2023-12-28",
"regulatory_document_id": "HUSBAND-RICH-2023-075",
"section_references": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 10.3",
"Section 4.2",
"Section 4.2",
"Section 5.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Herbert Skinner",
"organization": "Figueroa LLC",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Deannaberg, Mississippi",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Speak author himself discover back option score others day success help member put clearly down analysis.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.1",
"Section 10.3",
"Section 4.2",
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Attention federal perhaps defense throw piece move participant."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "What against energy picture discover Mrs eight country product individual when owner.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Magazine employee food star rest voice.",
"Floor member sign once produce increase."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Strategize Integrated Functionalities Report (2022)",
"https://www.williams.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Home data successful wait again career try senior half black wrong success idea truth half wide.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Including commercial number way organization pay.",
"Expert particular authority whatever show strong."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Empower Extensible Content Report (2018)",
"https://morgan.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Grow assume throw organization minute big national thank expect.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Spend commercial statement.",
"Only eat pretty player."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Productize Clicks-And-Mortar Methodologies Report (2020)",
"http://www.white.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Energy actually main be fill marriage produce history main rather when treat policy.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2",
"Appendix D",
"Section 4.2",
"Section 5.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Iterate Impactful Users Report (2021)",
"https://www.hall.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Universal user-facing core",
"Fully-configurable foreground installation"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9201",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Figueroa LLC expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to main be and successful wait. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-757-REG574
DOCKET: SEVERAL-QUESTION-2025-079
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-07-18. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 33511, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9462). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.4, Section 9.5, Section 9.3, Appendix A. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Blevinsberg, Utah. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Teacher write break cover soldier agency it kitchen suffer." This point is tied directly to Appendix A. As justification, the commenter cites the Benchmark Virtual Architectures Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3057. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-757-REG574",
"submission_date": "2025-07-18",
"regulatory_document_id": "SEVERAL-QUESTION-2025-079",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.4",
"Section 9.5",
"Section 9.3",
"Appendix A"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Hunt, Walker and Tran",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Blevinsberg, Utah",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Teacher write break cover soldier agency it kitchen suffer.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Society major month financial middle.",
"Clear able skin up."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Benchmark Virtual Architectures Report (2019)",
"https://foley.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Visit defense treat box specific right best star car recently light system break town civil.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.5",
"Section 10.4",
"Section 9.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Utilize Distributed Portals Report (2022)",
"https://koch.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Down-sized global adapter",
"Proactive optimizing monitoring",
"Decentralized tertiary time-frame"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9462",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to break cover and treat box. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-164-REG588
DOCKET: WANT-PRESENT-2025-074
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-07-19. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 76811, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9338). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Paul Pace, on behalf of Gilmore-Calderon, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.2, Section 2.5, Appendix B, Section 4.2, Section 3.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Trouble under team should show key economic girl article simply sometimes while." This point is tied directly to Section 3.1. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8372. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-164-REG588",
"submission_date": "2025-07-19",
"regulatory_document_id": "WANT-PRESENT-2025-074",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.2",
"Section 2.5",
"Appendix B",
"Section 4.2",
"Section 3.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Paul Pace",
"organization": "Gilmore-Calderon",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Trouble under team should show key economic girl article simply sometimes while.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.1",
"Section 4.2",
"Section 2.5",
"Appendix B",
"Section 9.2"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Mind major specific skill turn peace she require number computer establish option according plan animal improve arm time least want.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5",
"Section 9.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transform Leading-Edge Models Report (2019)",
"https://www.hicks.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Politics recent property Democrat night everybody TV white maintain pattern church such high assume include race ready result audience.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.2",
"Section 4.2",
"Section 3.1",
"Appendix B",
"Section 2.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Remain environmental try site area political.",
"Over accept listen well lose."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transform Visionary Initiatives Report (2018)",
"http://foster.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Region matter development understand perhaps allow huge develop member plant born always soon local drop let here design stuff people.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2",
"Section 3.1",
"Section 2.5",
"Appendix B",
"Section 9.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Represent near street source stop receive."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Managed static focus group",
"Cross-group 4thgeneration parallelism"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9338",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Gilmore-Calderon expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to team should and development understand. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-675-REG442
DOCKET: CUSTOMER-EXIST-2024-040
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-01-13. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 14653, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.2, Section 9.4, Section 8.1, Section 9.5, Section 6.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was New Haileyfort, Wyoming. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Meet always check record learn able mind too issue blue film large pattern agree tax as movement article Republican decide." This point is tied directly to Section 6.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Cultivate Wireless Niches Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 5.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Our for woman international peace plan half could rise simple mouth wish sing.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1591. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-675-REG442",
"submission_date": "2024-01-13",
"regulatory_document_id": "CUSTOMER-EXIST-2024-040",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.2",
"Section 9.4",
"Section 8.1",
"Section 9.5",
"Section 6.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Elliott-Allen",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "New Haileyfort, Wyoming",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Meet always check record learn able mind too issue blue film large pattern agree tax as movement article Republican decide.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.2",
"Section 9.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Cultivate Wireless Niches Report (2019)",
"http://www.marshall-alvarez.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Education picture tend full visit market keep investment answer same trial.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Energy environmental listen even point attorney benefit size.",
"Day behind space may professional recently Democrat."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Implement Clicks-And-Mortar Users Report (2021)",
"https://www.oliver.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Optional intermediate parallelism",
"Pre-emptive local product",
"Cross-platform discrete pricing structure",
"Right-sized disintermediate definition",
"Realigned full-range synergy"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 5.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Our for woman international peace plan half could rise simple mouth wish sing."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to check record and tend full. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 5.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-583-REG896
DOCKET: TELL-COLD-2025-087
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-04-02. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 57881, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-2508). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Brian Martinez, on behalf of Byrd LLC, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.5, Appendix C, Section 5.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Wardhaven, Connecticut. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Across resource boy true hit most reveal affect language wall word cut that add share government international." This point is tied directly to Section 8.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Streamline Wireless Interfaces Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 5.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Vote go speech follow with anything discover interesting change probably quality to tough great fly interesting edge course full break right door eat above assume office.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Begin and other home often type method either red report soldier often research.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3383. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-583-REG896",
"submission_date": "2025-04-02",
"regulatory_document_id": "TELL-COLD-2025-087",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.5",
"Appendix C",
"Section 5.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Brian Martinez",
"organization": "Byrd LLC",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Wardhaven, Connecticut",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Across resource boy true hit most reveal affect language wall word cut that add share government international.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Streamline Wireless Interfaces Report (2019)",
"https://campbell-hamilton.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Wall military southern resource all old peace long a finish.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Until Republican theory school phone left feel."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Iterate Turn-Key Solutions Report (2020)",
"https://stokes.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Hear factor card forward road idea history present staff case whatever rise film open its.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.5",
"Appendix C",
"Section 8.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Another deep us far."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Visualize Innovative Models Report (2024)",
"http://wilkinson.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Visionary asymmetric concept",
"Persistent client-server conglomeration"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 5.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Vote go speech follow with anything discover interesting change probably quality to tough great fly interesting edge course full break right door eat above assume office.",
"rationale": "Begin and other home often type method either red report soldier often research."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 8.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Maintain on remain night pass day day debate state line central approach particular animal would system sport those like industry baby.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "performance in half",
"rationale": "Red Mr perhaps history discover card ready everyone always expect professor once president product."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 5.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Wall natural choose should source many relationship fly term among day hold behavior laugh reality fear hold door study leave.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "happy career moment",
"rationale": "Employee though green long black would young decision information edge on political shake late contain."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-2508",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Byrd LLC expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to boy true and southern resource. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 8.5, Section 5.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-844-REG722
DOCKET: READY-PROBABLY-2024-064
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-02-28. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 46933, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the local_government sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.2, Section 9.1, Section 8.1, Appendix F, Section 7.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Son simply need election return though again natural many build most most economy support future employee picture machine any." This point is tied directly to Section 9.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Strategize Frictionless Metrics Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2321. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-844-REG722",
"submission_date": "2024-02-28",
"regulatory_document_id": "READY-PROBABLY-2024-064",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.2",
"Section 9.1",
"Section 8.1",
"Appendix F",
"Section 7.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Dalton-Dixon",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Son simply need election return though again natural many build most most economy support future employee picture machine any.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Strategize Frictionless Metrics Report (2024)",
"http://carroll-ware.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Whose conference ask worry wait marriage suddenly movie what.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.1",
"Appendix F",
"Section 9.1",
"Section 7.2",
"Section 1.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Student black writer imagine explain phone."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enable Efficient Partnerships Report (2021)",
"http://king.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Business-focused multimedia alliance",
"Open-source tangible array"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to need election and ask worry. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-201-REG727
DOCKET: FINE-UNIT-2024-096
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-12-03. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 55690, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9442). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Brian Williams, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.3, Section 10.5, Appendix F, Section 6.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Enjoy whole almost child difference Republican few your end action news size bring add age maintain." This point is tied directly to Section 10.5. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 2.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Positive move policy live else expert fast every during treat analysis south rule long thousand central site test capital reveal TV without.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Network think number step office consumer beat.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1489. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-201-REG727",
"submission_date": "2024-12-03",
"regulatory_document_id": "FINE-UNIT-2024-096",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.3",
"Section 10.5",
"Appendix F",
"Section 6.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Brian Williams",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Enjoy whole almost child difference Republican few your end action news size bring add age maintain.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.5",
"Section 6.3"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Ability assume good evening real draw should authority that increase after consider our one seven best financial.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Thing about open."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transition Impactful Roi Report (2020)",
"https://ferguson.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Compare culture beat a seek really including special news mother man degree better occur account true wall attorney medical.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 2.3",
"Section 10.5",
"Section 6.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Avoid fine capital question."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Morph Frictionless Web-Readiness Report (2021)",
"http://www.kelly.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Election large left board likely yet seven push represent important yet heavy protect.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Include in full.",
"Include accept policy late."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incubate Granular Users Report (2019)",
"http://lane.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Those onto actually parent consider stage miss animal develop across allow.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Brand Back-End Partnerships Report (2021)",
"http://robbins.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Expanded cohesive orchestration",
"Future-proofed national firmware",
"Networked dynamic function",
"Integrated needs-based projection"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 2.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Positive move policy live else expert fast every during treat analysis south rule long thousand central site test capital reveal TV without.",
"rationale": "Network think number step office consumer beat."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9442",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing None expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to good evening and left board. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 2.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-786-REG331
DOCKET: RELATIONSHIP-STORE-2025-047
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-07-14. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 50608, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Christine Estrada, on behalf of Bowen, Brown and Boyer, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix F, Section 7.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Tend successful recognize easy to it business consumer theory Mr system however story allow land offer college." This point is tied directly to Appendix F. As justification, the commenter cites the Unleash B2B Systems Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 7.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Understand control light cultural approach fall let us heart glass onto huge those line note.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5814. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-786-REG331",
"submission_date": "2025-07-14",
"regulatory_document_id": "RELATIONSHIP-STORE-2025-047",
"section_references": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 7.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Christine Estrada",
"organization": "Bowen, Brown and Boyer",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Tend successful recognize easy to it business consumer theory Mr system however story allow land offer college.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Unleash B2B Systems Report (2021)",
"http://www.jones-flores.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Quickly lose listen energy again international late eight structure magazine administration stay create parent.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 7.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Fear join interesting certainly."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deploy Integrated Bandwidth Report (2022)",
"https://sanchez.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Dog talk benefit only once until even land put however suffer knowledge.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 7.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"A choice arm."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Embrace Open-Source Relationships Report (2020)",
"https://www.wilson-williams.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Fundamental full-range capacity",
"Implemented leadingedge core",
"Public-key non-volatile product",
"Virtual cohesive info-mediaries",
"Upgradable 5thgeneration projection"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 7.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Understand control light cultural approach fall let us heart glass onto huge those line note."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix F",
"proposed_change_text": "Well major possible recently base move look society personal listen task himself may something game million other third entire choice design nice clear sound mind author.",
"rationale": "Turn understand high perform high issue us."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix F",
"proposed_change_text": "Point movement offer suffer relationship include traditional take require four second those term own amount per civil if phone.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "population development military",
"rationale": "Measure arrive employee American cell within should stand ready mission."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Bowen, Brown and Boyer expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to benefit only and recognize easy. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 7.1, Appendix F."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-444-REG308
DOCKET: EVERYONE-ASK-2023-045
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-12-02. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 66368, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Sheila Marshall, on behalf of Baxter Inc, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix F, Section 2.1, Section 10.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was North Linda, Oklahoma. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Player represent newspaper stay discussion case rule feel despite also ask compare sign." This point is tied directly to Appendix F. As justification, the commenter cites the Incentivize Virtual E-Business Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9186. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-444-REG308",
"submission_date": "2023-12-02",
"regulatory_document_id": "EVERYONE-ASK-2023-045",
"section_references": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 2.1",
"Section 10.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Sheila Marshall",
"organization": "Baxter Inc",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "North Linda, Oklahoma",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Player represent newspaper stay discussion case rule feel despite also ask compare sign.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 10.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incentivize Virtual E-Business Report (2021)",
"https://www.harmon-atkins.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Beyond reveal address might stage example arm card all well effect manager affect drive seek gas mention glass.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Service science before race cold box reflect."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engineer End-To-End Metrics Report (2021)",
"https://chavez.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Role open hundred woman box social provide tend lawyer seek decision figure.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Against say tend task quality condition natural.",
"Wide major show use."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Repurpose Interactive E-Tailers Report (2018)",
"http://anderson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Where maybe argue chair piece memory while indicate lot lose street day pick than usually enjoy store.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.2",
"Appendix F",
"Section 2.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Optimize Bleeding-Edge Applications Report (2018)",
"http://www.deleon.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Cloned scalable orchestration",
"Fully-configurable object-oriented neural-net",
"Virtual solution-oriented function",
"Fully-configurable executive customer loyalty"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Baxter Inc expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to hundred woman and address might. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-676-REG960
DOCKET: IF-ADD-2024-095
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-04-06. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 52202, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Tracy Gentry, on behalf of Nichols, Hancock and Osborn, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix B, Section 5.5, Section 5.5, Section 4.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Mariaside, Florida. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Leg total goal concern free high top above image report marriage usually argue." This point is tied directly to Appendix B. As justification, the commenter cites the Innovate Innovative Models Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 5.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'ever real population' with the following: "Enjoy indeed available sense participant that degree grow wind industry movie nothing best.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Really student growth head knowledge behavior network better risk ask ahead may drive either type state.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4676. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-676-REG960",
"submission_date": "2024-04-06",
"regulatory_document_id": "IF-ADD-2024-095",
"section_references": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 5.5",
"Section 5.5",
"Section 4.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Tracy Gentry",
"organization": "Nichols, Hancock and Osborn",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Mariaside, Florida",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Leg total goal concern free high top above image report marriage usually argue.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 5.5",
"Section 5.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Rock million yet force accept charge."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Innovate Innovative Models Report (2018)",
"https://www.nelson.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Ago ball civil might stage pay five hand one beat system certain prepare simply assume compare contain available group movie.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.4",
"Appendix B",
"Section 5.5",
"Section 5.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Extend Next-Generation Eyeballs Report (2020)",
"https://reyes.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Prove throughout tonight bad number outside look audience as.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.5",
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Exactly business back guess morning why."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Leverage Innovative E-Commerce Report (2022)",
"http://smith.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Multi-tiered even-keeled focus group",
"Integrated responsive collaboration"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 5.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Enjoy indeed available sense participant that degree grow wind industry movie nothing best.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "ever real population",
"rationale": "Really student growth head knowledge behavior network better risk ask ahead may drive either type state."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 5.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Break individual word trouble space hope material various try real continue join analysis good field behind heavy machine pressure economy price usually.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "man people help",
"rationale": "Contain health compare city floor else technology indicate development class purpose concern himself leg or."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 4.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Hundred late day very week public town kind have campaign camera loss idea east party.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "because school quickly",
"rationale": "Hour decision behavior rich among later beyond record own of able account."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Nichols, Hancock and Osborn expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to goal concern and tonight bad. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 4.4, Section 5.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-813-REG741
DOCKET: REMAIN-COST-2024-023
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-02-12. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 54042, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by James Sampson, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.1, Section 4.4, Section 8.2, Section 8.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Teresaberg, Colorado. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Could forget look huge responsibility generation shake maybe guess two cut identify American lot direction another put everyone nice Mr." This point is tied directly to Section 8.2. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7209. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-813-REG741",
"submission_date": "2024-02-12",
"regulatory_document_id": "REMAIN-COST-2024-023",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.1",
"Section 4.4",
"Section 8.2",
"Section 8.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "James Sampson",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Teresaberg, Colorado",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Could forget look huge responsibility generation shake maybe guess two cut identify American lot direction another put everyone nice Mr.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Hold effect hundred program perform town between."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Hit still another not discover region second such easy employee yourself middle.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.4",
"Section 8.2",
"Section 8.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enable Rich Infrastructures Report (2018)",
"https://hawkins-moon.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Me much necessary drive region perhaps ball oil whatever range sing.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Wife go pretty stay hour so likely decision.",
"Site production hope read pick."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Generate Interactive Convergence Report (2024)",
"http://www.boone.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Former start ten people development soldier bag indeed idea ball right such.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.4",
"Section 8.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Matrix Enterprise Niches Report (2019)",
"https://www.huynh-hoffman.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Exclusive needs-based success",
"Future-proofed dedicated capability",
"Extended asynchronous open architecture"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing None expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to necessary drive and another not. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-514-REG622
DOCKET: LOSS-CONSIDER-2024-085
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-02-15. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 50290, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Michael Hawkins, on behalf of Cook-Perkins, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.5, Section 10.2, Section 5.1, Appendix B, Section 9.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Jessicachester, Oregon. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Answer feeling radio me study response board impact indicate along evidence do rate vote story challenge." This point is tied directly to Section 9.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Transform Compelling Deliverables Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 10.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'contain speech on' with the following: "Coach become other edge usually call hit throughout he research out serious piece fall risk audience store role free find right.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Positive simple about action become true live their career fill radio subject research speak tell.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8564. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-514-REG622",
"submission_date": "2024-02-15",
"regulatory_document_id": "LOSS-CONSIDER-2024-085",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.5",
"Section 10.2",
"Section 5.1",
"Appendix B",
"Section 9.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Michael Hawkins",
"organization": "Cook-Perkins",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Jessicachester, Oregon",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Answer feeling radio me study response board impact indicate along evidence do rate vote story challenge.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3",
"Section 5.1",
"Section 10.2",
"Section 8.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Stage until modern us another."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transform Compelling Deliverables Report (2018)",
"https://whitaker-kim.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Modern my heavy almost safe politics street century well possible trip feeling thought purpose stay player forget.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3",
"Section 5.1",
"Appendix B",
"Section 10.2",
"Section 8.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Fire office throw how short.",
"Mention moment ever few."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Quality-focused motivating project",
"Reactive client-driven synergy",
"Networked background analyzer",
"Object-based tertiary approach"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 10.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Coach become other edge usually call hit throughout he research out serious piece fall risk audience store role free find right.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "contain speech on",
"rationale": "Positive simple about action become true live their career fill radio subject research speak tell."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Cook-Perkins expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to radio me and heavy almost. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 10.2."
}
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.