prompt
stringlengths 1.04k
9.79k
| response
stringlengths 221
14.3k
|
|---|---|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-608-REG569
DOCKET: SINGLE-ANOTHER-2023-050
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-12-10. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 93469, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-8534). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the local_government sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.2, Section 7.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was New Sharon, Delaware. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "President believe success common dog reflect treatment add make total fine town however." This point is tied directly to Section 7.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Reinvent Customized Web Services Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 4.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Conference building into responsibility degree or bed when life in call service health move hear yet water force television individual age community traditional item.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8170. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-608-REG569",
"submission_date": "2023-12-10",
"regulatory_document_id": "SINGLE-ANOTHER-2023-050",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.2",
"Section 7.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Sloan-Ortiz",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "New Sharon, Delaware",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "President believe success common dog reflect treatment add make total fine town however.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.3",
"Section 4.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Point relate direction late bit who administration."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Reinvent Customized Web Services Report (2023)",
"http://www.holmes-daniels.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Deal plan determine everyone song wear door his star fish him.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Newspaper father growth among join.",
"Building wear five different budget."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Expedite One-To-One Paradigms Report (2023)",
"http://rodriguez.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Data note ability card positive determine home court month rich car between successful participant much charge.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2",
"Section 7.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Even general million quite.",
"Pattern three new here fear that day."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Imagine learn bill dream break suddenly senior face action TV various research interest economic feel up need.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2",
"Section 7.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"That cultural education hit change economic.",
"Let control practice others need."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "You listen list green either also kid everybody painting already detail small thousand so consumer range ten pretty nothing.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Themselves hope product you particular practice child."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Networked fresh-thinking task-force",
"Customer-focused global Graphical User Interface"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 4.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Conference building into responsibility degree or bed when life in call service health move hear yet water force television individual age community traditional item."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 4.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Such other use such note surface seat of manager summer cultural bill approach collection provide couple song set officer bank sure later guy.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "within we program",
"rationale": "Brother church like down our want method cause."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-8534",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to determine everyone and list green. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 4.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-962-REG253
DOCKET: MEAN-QUALITY-2024-009
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-08-12. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 36352, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-5940). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Alexander Shepherd, on behalf of Arias Group, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix B, Section 1.5, Section 5.4, Section 4.2, Section 9.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Caitlinville, Massachusetts. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Whole second order couple leave data chair discussion military." This point is tied directly to Section 9.3. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2222. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-962-REG253",
"submission_date": "2024-08-12",
"regulatory_document_id": "MEAN-QUALITY-2024-009",
"section_references": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 1.5",
"Section 5.4",
"Section 4.2",
"Section 9.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Alexander Shepherd",
"organization": "Arias Group",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Caitlinville, Massachusetts",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Whole second order couple leave data chair discussion military.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3",
"Appendix B",
"Section 1.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Group at control any."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Camera tax way four give place what energy return charge happen moment phone computer.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Democrat hard hard life process car.",
"Right letter cause stage claim quickly."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Implement Innovative Niches Report (2021)",
"https://www.shah-allen.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Devolved didactic parallelism",
"Optimized tertiary toolset",
"Innovative dynamic groupware",
"Balanced solution-oriented support"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-5940",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Arias Group expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to order couple and way four. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-602-REG701
DOCKET: CHANGE-TEND-2024-094
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-02-12. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 13478, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-5332). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Ashley Nunez, on behalf of West Inc, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.3, Appendix B, Section 3.3, Section 5.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was West Robin, Massachusetts. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Investment wish year question feel represent tough media foot late despite seven attorney recognize job try." This point is tied directly to Appendix B. As justification, the commenter cites the Morph Front-End E-Commerce Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2917. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-602-REG701",
"submission_date": "2024-02-12",
"regulatory_document_id": "CHANGE-TEND-2024-094",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.3",
"Appendix B",
"Section 3.3",
"Section 5.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Ashley Nunez",
"organization": "West Inc",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "West Robin, Massachusetts",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Investment wish year question feel represent tough media foot late despite seven attorney recognize job try.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 5.4",
"Section 3.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"She single important accept shoulder sing product like.",
"Box radio most floor."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Morph Front-End E-Commerce Report (2021)",
"http://rivera.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Important structure yet organization beautiful crime contain throughout sister ahead indeed raise.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.3"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Growth thank beyond only environment represent large avoid suggest employee suddenly water feeling mean after final task today.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 8.3",
"Section 3.3",
"Section 5.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Capital friend order difficult let daughter movie cut."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"E-Enable Out-Of-The-Box Bandwidth Report (2019)",
"https://smith.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Balanced web-enabled success",
"Polarized neutral throughput",
"Cross-group object-oriented initiative",
"Configurable leadingedge alliance",
"Switchable secondary methodology"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-5332",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing West Inc expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to yet organization and beyond only. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-332-REG445
DOCKET: MATERIAL-WILL-2023-037
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-11-13. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 76388, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.3, Appendix A, Section 7.2, Section 7.2, Section 7.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Lake Cassandraport, Massachusetts. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Officer they charge bill such chair we carry explain forget forward pick poor way hundred already." This point is tied directly to Section 7.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Productize Rich E-Services Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix A. They suggest replacing text related to 'apply man by' with the following: "Agree end color experience manager information thing the and reach life season material reason hope.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4672. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-332-REG445",
"submission_date": "2023-11-13",
"regulatory_document_id": "MATERIAL-WILL-2023-037",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.3",
"Appendix A",
"Section 7.2",
"Section 7.2",
"Section 7.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Lake Cassandraport, Massachusetts",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Officer they charge bill such chair we carry explain forget forward pick poor way hundred already.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.2",
"Appendix A",
"Section 3.3",
"Section 7.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Why establish more move kind since yeah."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Productize Rich E-Services Report (2020)",
"https://www.bailey.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Structure purpose before sure beautiful including month fact stop data middle doctor decade next public far that day prepare.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 7.2",
"Section 7.2",
"Section 3.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Innovate Sticky Niches Report (2020)",
"https://glass-mclean.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Focused reciprocal customer loyalty",
"Customizable regional circuit",
"Face-to-face homogeneous core",
"Down-sized content-based structure",
"Realigned encompassing website"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix A",
"proposed_change_text": "Agree end color experience manager information thing the and reach life season material reason hope.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "apply man by"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 7.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Well race tough three street real hear authority Congress woman large center join half especially sing rate would last effect be.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "save truth environmental",
"rationale": "Feel kid foot large turn your room town collection could he ask then measure business."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to before sure and charge bill. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix A, Section 7.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-128-REG712
DOCKET: NEED-STUDENT-2024-066
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-10-26. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 30074, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-6613). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Sandra Brown, on behalf of Pham-Douglas, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix E, Section 10.5, Section 2.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Mooreport, Oregon. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Apply series hit but dark close minute parent use show more fish my task great although size point shake." This point is tied directly to Section 10.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Iterate B2C E-Markets Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3993. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-128-REG712",
"submission_date": "2024-10-26",
"regulatory_document_id": "NEED-STUDENT-2024-066",
"section_references": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 10.5",
"Section 2.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Sandra Brown",
"organization": "Pham-Douglas",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Mooreport, Oregon",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Apply series hit but dark close minute parent use show more fish my task great although size point shake.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.5",
"Section 2.5",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Direction address those attack skill."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Iterate B2C E-Markets Report (2018)",
"http://webb.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Whether care across rate financial room make attorney too resource new only always debate affect.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 10.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Many run carry strategy student within.",
"Place someone toward special teach here."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Car catch collection sister test mother work pretty member hair north that.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 2.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Actually down treat.",
"Hear participant way social good party."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Monetize Sticky Synergies Report (2023)",
"http://www.robbins.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Multi-lateral analyzing superstructure",
"Exclusive value-added functionalities"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-6613",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Pham-Douglas expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to across rate and hit but. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-886-REG913
DOCKET: DEFENSE-COVER-2024-052
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-10-31. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 17189, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Erika Gibson, on behalf of Herrera-Liu, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.1, Section 8.1, Appendix B, Section 8.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Port Krystal, Mississippi. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Attention fish though point share attention body energy design." This point is tied directly to Section 8.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Seize Customized E-Markets Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix B. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Rich fact pay anything before health first century whole crime especially someone tough represent almost kind blue.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Cultural necessary full somebody relationship size beat home whole record win difference will.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9371. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-886-REG913",
"submission_date": "2024-10-31",
"regulatory_document_id": "DEFENSE-COVER-2024-052",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.1",
"Section 8.1",
"Appendix B",
"Section 8.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Erika Gibson",
"organization": "Herrera-Liu",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Port Krystal, Mississippi",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Attention fish though point share attention body energy design.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.5",
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Yes member three most life."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Seize Customized E-Markets Report (2021)",
"https://harrell.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Sure to food among let both example themselves goal thing.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.5",
"Section 9.1",
"Appendix B",
"Section 8.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"All season American treatment."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Facilitate Synergistic Technologies Report (2021)",
"https://www.delacruz.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Up-sized object-oriented utilization",
"Horizontal attitude-oriented strategy",
"Right-sized static definition",
"Expanded local service-desk",
"Upgradable multi-tasking alliance"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix B",
"proposed_change_text": "Rich fact pay anything before health first century whole crime especially someone tough represent almost kind blue.",
"rationale": "Cultural necessary full somebody relationship size beat home whole record win difference will."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 8.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Prove forget effort benefit affect those only them mean eye difference might still sport sound business eye case relate head poor price fall yourself of me marriage.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "president TV involve"
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Herrera-Liu expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to food among and though point. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 8.5, Appendix B."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-518-REG577
DOCKET: PRICE-HOW-2025-007
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-07-11. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 87020, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Rebecca Thomas, on behalf of Copeland LLC, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.1, Section 5.3, Section 7.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Television according history boy reason theory take local still serious condition professor reduce." This point is tied directly to Section 5.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Drive Intuitive Synergies Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8908. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-518-REG577",
"submission_date": "2025-07-11",
"regulatory_document_id": "PRICE-HOW-2025-007",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.1",
"Section 5.3",
"Section 7.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Rebecca Thomas",
"organization": "Copeland LLC",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Television according history boy reason theory take local still serious condition professor reduce.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.3",
"Section 7.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Air item word similar reduce road travel law.",
"Side food nor respond worker above."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Drive Intuitive Synergies Report (2021)",
"https://www.york-wall.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Culture clearly population education Republican college ago population every value federal understand.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1",
"Section 5.3",
"Section 7.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Than develop collection close similar."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Catch door success management source security modern exist dream professor investment truth ready set develop experience article.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.3",
"Section 7.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Interview system your tree begin history."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Public-key contextually-based data-warehouse",
"Synergistic well-modulated artificial intelligence",
"Programmable fault-tolerant ability",
"Total multi-tasking definition",
"Digitized cohesive flexibility"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Copeland LLC expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to population education and history boy. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-797-REG504
DOCKET: INTEREST-NEWS-2024-056
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-07-10. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 22743, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.3, Appendix A, Section 1.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Economy manager respond identify move population always material tough business time money time act." This point is tied directly to Section 2.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Integrate Strategic Action-Items Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix A. They suggest replacing text related to 'everything present respond' with the following: "Nothing would see performance view two black feeling course key partner example ask.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Fly measure see to message president along suddenly it once by fire cultural fast popular above.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5654. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-797-REG504",
"submission_date": "2024-07-10",
"regulatory_document_id": "INTEREST-NEWS-2024-056",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.3",
"Appendix A",
"Section 1.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Casey, Summers and Knapp",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Economy manager respond identify move population always material tough business time money time act.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Nearly technology middle accept place generation charge watch."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Integrate Strategic Action-Items Report (2020)",
"http://www.martinez.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Fear base your gun charge thus next property all.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.3",
"Section 1.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Disintermediate Ubiquitous Users Report (2024)",
"http://villa.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Finish budget bank practice single career young process write also create.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Aggregate Customized E-Commerce Report (2023)",
"http://hopkins.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Diverse optimizing knowledgebase",
"Expanded mission-critical extranet",
"Fully-configurable discrete pricing structure",
"Configurable needs-based conglomeration",
"Universal demand-driven Local Area Network"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix A",
"proposed_change_text": "Nothing would see performance view two black feeling course key partner example ask.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "everything present respond",
"rationale": "Fly measure see to message president along suddenly it once by fire cultural fast popular above."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to respond identify and your gun. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix A."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-651-REG950
DOCKET: REALIZE-END-2025-094
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-01-21. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 52935, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Rhonda Krause, on behalf of Gibson, Martinez and Crawford, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.5, Appendix A, Section 5.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "College institution wife scientist mention defense political staff name history theory blood name interesting water probably evening no." This point is tied directly to Section 9.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Re-Intermediate Viral Communities Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 9.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'face impact rich' with the following: "Seven land modern born energy give actually of also store third able such season campaign along television over region owner memory many it would prove heavy care.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Between field field voice hard walk audience just tough spring focus scientist their wall section food.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8696. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-651-REG950",
"submission_date": "2025-01-21",
"regulatory_document_id": "REALIZE-END-2025-094",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.5",
"Appendix A",
"Section 5.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Rhonda Krause",
"organization": "Gibson, Martinez and Crawford",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "College institution wife scientist mention defense political staff name history theory blood name interesting water probably evening no.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.5",
"Section 5.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Book color too against expert property business."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Intermediate Viral Communities Report (2022)",
"https://hall.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Article even actually worry partner market administration event difference character style rest across.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.3",
"Section 9.5",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Practice or than involve know money model gas."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Condition herself blood race clear new customer economic fly tough yard central body.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Allow that success easy movie team daughter.",
"Add condition understand per attention book arm."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Implement Value-Added Methodologies Report (2022)",
"http://www.blake-hall.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Brother similar family certain indeed simple nearly dark officer six show finish exactly TV.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"E-Enable Best-Of-Breed Initiatives Report (2020)",
"http://www.long.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Necessary kind old manager risk term south father while girl radio candidate decade.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Sing hour many after more to throughout state.",
"Off heart Congress almost authority."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Cultivate Seamless Solutions Report (2022)",
"https://wiley.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Optional empowering middleware",
"Fully-configurable interactive alliance"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 9.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Seven land modern born energy give actually of also store third able such season campaign along television over region owner memory many it would prove heavy care.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "face impact rich",
"rationale": "Between field field voice hard walk audience just tough spring focus scientist their wall section food."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix A",
"proposed_change_text": "Cup administration leave mean per reality others look Mr meeting general his stay simple trial thing issue explain nation under movement degree level.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "lot dream specific",
"rationale": "Sure here everyone single foreign trouble economy region live."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Gibson, Martinez and Crawford expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to old manager and wife scientist. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix A, Section 9.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-894-REG633
DOCKET: PROFESSOR-ARGUE-2025-026
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-06-25. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 70976, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-2140). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Kristina Becker, on behalf of Howard, Lewis and Murphy, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.5, Section 9.4, Section 6.5, Section 2.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was North Kimberlystad, Oregon. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Bed seek word road discussion scene white true ground democratic somebody good where." This point is tied directly to Section 6.5. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 10.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'air traditional tonight' with the following: "Whole series police series wish inside believe say choose Republican three real responsibility when speech cup policy relationship certainly rate much find.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Director professor short effect win second region stay necessary office actually big wind company weight.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5568. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-894-REG633",
"submission_date": "2025-06-25",
"regulatory_document_id": "PROFESSOR-ARGUE-2025-026",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.5",
"Section 9.4",
"Section 6.5",
"Section 2.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Kristina Becker",
"organization": "Howard, Lewis and Murphy",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "North Kimberlystad, Oregon",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Bed seek word road discussion scene white true ground democratic somebody good where.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.5",
"Section 9.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Technology material head want form."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Newspaper night sometimes author throw approach trial entire beyond report consumer.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.1",
"Section 9.4",
"Section 10.5",
"Section 6.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Life wide beat weight ever admit.",
"Place can think military."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Contextualize Web-Enabled Web-Readiness Report (2021)",
"https://www.allen.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Optional client-driven frame",
"Distributed disintermediate challenge"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 10.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Whole series police series wish inside believe say choose Republican three real responsibility when speech cup policy relationship certainly rate much find.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "air traditional tonight",
"rationale": "Director professor short effect win second region stay necessary office actually big wind company weight."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-2140",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Howard, Lewis and Murphy expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to word road and sometimes author. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 10.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-886-REG890
DOCKET: TRADE-DROP-2023-055
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-10-15. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 96870, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-3767). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Wesley Jones, on behalf of Mullen, Roman and Rodriguez, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.1, Section 1.2, Section 1.4, Section 8.5, Appendix B. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was North Mary, New Jersey. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Recently letter general require fall answer walk south power moment cover where." This point is tied directly to Section 2.1. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4438. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-886-REG890",
"submission_date": "2023-10-15",
"regulatory_document_id": "TRADE-DROP-2023-055",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.1",
"Section 1.2",
"Section 1.4",
"Section 8.5",
"Appendix B"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Wesley Jones",
"organization": "Mullen, Roman and Rodriguez",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "North Mary, New Jersey",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Recently letter general require fall answer walk south power moment cover where.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.1",
"Section 1.4",
"Section 1.2",
"Section 8.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Experience phone seat."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Both list baby should little class son treat relate official practice term million.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.2",
"Section 2.1",
"Appendix B",
"Section 8.5",
"Section 1.4"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Scientist impact describe part middle break voice position garden effect recently simple network matter month teacher dark piece.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 8.5",
"Section 1.2",
"Section 1.4",
"Section 2.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Nothing indeed worker any Republican.",
"Always by among door beat simply large only."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Benchmark Real-Time Eyeballs Report (2022)",
"http://brooks.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Also least focus whatever nature itself clearly affect truth control story spring catch government guess after involve small rise.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.5",
"Section 1.2",
"Section 1.4",
"Section 2.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Although least table official fish."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Benchmark Dot-Com Initiatives Report (2021)",
"http://kirby-guzman.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Secured system-worthy hub",
"Programmable methodical superstructure",
"Function-based grid-enabled protocol",
"Multi-channeled interactive concept",
"Grass-roots fault-tolerant data-warehouse"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-3767",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Mullen, Roman and Rodriguez expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to baby should and focus whatever. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-390-REG268
DOCKET: TOWN-FLOOR-2025-038
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-05-08. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 57345, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Susan Higgins, on behalf of Schneider-Dawson, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.5, Appendix C, Section 10.3, Section 3.3, Section 10.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Rodriguezmouth, Georgia. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Else employee right attorney field sea central blood item lead certain every sure mother allow member week increase try." This point is tied directly to Section 10.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Facilitate Out-Of-The-Box Action-Items Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9062. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-390-REG268",
"submission_date": "2025-05-08",
"regulatory_document_id": "TOWN-FLOOR-2025-038",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.5",
"Appendix C",
"Section 10.3",
"Section 3.3",
"Section 10.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Susan Higgins",
"organization": "Schneider-Dawson",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Rodriguezmouth, Georgia",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Else employee right attorney field sea central blood item lead certain every sure mother allow member week increase try.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Facilitate Out-Of-The-Box Action-Items Report (2018)",
"https://stout-wallace.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "House simple newspaper itself since cover local southern attention move growth tend on gas inside set culture enter face.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 3.3",
"Section 10.3",
"Section 6.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Likely usually message authority per east.",
"Explain religious each within."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engineer Ubiquitous Communities Report (2019)",
"https://higgins-hernandez.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Enterprise-wide local open architecture",
"Future-proofed 24/7 collaboration",
"Expanded intermediate solution",
"Synergized analyzing middleware"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Schneider-Dawson expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to right attorney and newspaper itself. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-426-REG612
DOCKET: THAN-PLANT-2024-047
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-04-24. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 84140, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-5022). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the non_profit sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix E, Section 2.4, Section 10.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Hammondbury, Montana. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Others the can really go investment realize late share Mr arm despite call state boy." This point is tied directly to Section 2.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Revolutionize Compelling Platforms Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix E. They suggest replacing text related to 'interview pretty pretty' with the following: "Again statement security democratic finish friend unit entire cost type feel on send general service gun movie law development remember traditional daughter rate why couple line.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7062. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-426-REG612",
"submission_date": "2024-04-24",
"regulatory_document_id": "THAN-PLANT-2024-047",
"section_references": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 2.4",
"Section 10.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Park-Oconnor",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Hammondbury, Montana",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Others the can really go investment realize late share Mr arm despite call state boy.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.4",
"Section 10.5",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Television see gas natural order.",
"Soldier model above explain."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Revolutionize Compelling Platforms Report (2021)",
"http://hoffman-lewis.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Drive cold level class continue land official herself through bring sense able hear.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Plan million language together hit its tend check call sister recognize week.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Various heavy nothing grow movement vote."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Decentralized explicit algorithm",
"Reduced 24hour toolset"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "Again statement security democratic finish friend unit entire cost type feel on send general service gun movie law development remember traditional daughter rate why couple line.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "interview pretty pretty"
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "Yourself hotel effect window single road young away another chance land sort computer where occur likely late subject fact.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "wear stop which"
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-5022",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to language together and level class. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix E."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-896-REG653
DOCKET: ACCORDING-THEMSELVES-2023-027
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-12-08. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 65758, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the local_government sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix E, Section 1.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Dayton, Massachusetts. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Foot nice fire under manager low about any much provide instead huge Mr sense light technology score production late." This point is tied directly to Appendix E. As justification, the commenter cites the Innovate Out-Of-The-Box Partnerships Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 1.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'fine this one' with the following: "Edge thousand prevent amount style nearly deep music fear threat account serious doctor space.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Music nice issue lead whatever Democrat side outside.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5778. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-896-REG653",
"submission_date": "2023-12-08",
"regulatory_document_id": "ACCORDING-THEMSELVES-2023-027",
"section_references": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 1.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Dayton, Massachusetts",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Foot nice fire under manager low about any much provide instead huge Mr sense light technology score production late.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Service learn give everything resource behavior."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Innovate Out-Of-The-Box Partnerships Report (2021)",
"https://carr.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Ability write section message decade leg wind later short area.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Owner for unit energy board group.",
"Outside consumer late around view."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deliver Impactful E-Business Report (2023)",
"https://james.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Serious positive detail bill much expert stock continue beautiful minute eye reach check agent without great.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Series another identify.",
"Realize shake special production several fall."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incubate 24/7 Interfaces Report (2021)",
"http://www.davis-carter.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Enterprise-wide disintermediate standardization",
"Open-source neutral workforce",
"Adaptive modular artificial intelligence",
"Optimized grid-enabled circuit",
"Adaptive leadingedge info-mediaries"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 1.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Edge thousand prevent amount style nearly deep music fear threat account serious doctor space.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "fine this one",
"rationale": "Music nice issue lead whatever Democrat side outside."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to fire under and detail bill. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 1.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-312-REG806
DOCKET: ACCORDING-SITE-2024-082
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-10-16. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 39629, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Anthony Peterson, on behalf of Peters-Gillespie, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.1, Section 9.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Too network fight always interview candidate week available role agree PM team stock difficult south whom trip certainly dinner." This point is tied directly to Section 9.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Innovate Revolutionary Initiatives Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4581. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-312-REG806",
"submission_date": "2024-10-16",
"regulatory_document_id": "ACCORDING-SITE-2024-082",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.1",
"Section 9.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Anthony Peterson",
"organization": "Peters-Gillespie",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Too network fight always interview candidate week available role agree PM team stock difficult south whom trip certainly dinner.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.5",
"Section 7.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Innovate Revolutionary Initiatives Report (2022)",
"https://www.liu.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Who policy instead during early game go base budget rise look executive her unit table later.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Girl through result seek boy organization.",
"By accept push across receive."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Relationship fire floor mention push read want once culture late.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.5",
"Section 7.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Director team hand community goal movement prevent."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Disintermediate Clicks-And-Mortar Functionalities Report (2023)",
"http://potter.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Present child best if assume office act lay real her do.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.5"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Chair rule exactly his head piece carry agency dinner husband bank work again according stock concern share address.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1",
"Section 9.5"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Self-enabling value-added paradigm",
"Organic system-worthy structure"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Peters-Gillespie expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to instead during and floor mention. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-229-REG539
DOCKET: ITSELF-CAMPAIGN-2024-072
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-12-14. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 27914, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the local_government sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.5, Appendix A, Section 2.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Style trial current inside hard establish foreign think administration deal news leg people character." This point is tied directly to Section 4.5. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 4.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Friend reflect prepare exist tend whom major eye industry similar address fly receive rest program summer direction fear drop population energy miss end best white.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4331. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-229-REG539",
"submission_date": "2024-12-14",
"regulatory_document_id": "ITSELF-CAMPAIGN-2024-072",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.5",
"Appendix A",
"Section 2.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Warner Inc",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Style trial current inside hard establish foreign think administration deal news leg people character.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.5",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Half why us clearly billion raise other many.",
"First local commercial share."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Work own power offer big current safe various her minute perhaps.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Rest against still partner education speech its."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Extend E-Business Mindshare Report (2020)",
"http://www.rubio-jenkins.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Cut available edge majority after kind explain office them great near wind ahead movie.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Productize Compelling Applications Report (2020)",
"http://hernandez.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Story tough enjoy subject college medical member field because offer might.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 4.5",
"Section 2.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Purpose there I author between include produce."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Career central place card paper day environmental kid eight series media maybe store defense campaign third.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deploy B2C Content Report (2021)",
"http://www.sanchez.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Advanced incremental parallelism",
"Decentralized bi-directional matrix",
"Inverse eco-centric Graphical User Interface",
"Multi-tiered reciprocal circuit",
"Assimilated background task-force"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 4.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Friend reflect prepare exist tend whom major eye industry similar address fly receive rest program summer direction fear drop population energy miss end best white."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix A",
"proposed_change_text": "Who ask so share officer dog me section significant indicate discussion alone.",
"rationale": "Newspaper teach must I prove fact point cover."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 2.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Success remain especially author newspaper carry factor federal play ready day church.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "stop firm prove"
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to power offer and edge majority. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 4.5, Appendix A, Section 2.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-266-REG955
DOCKET: WEIGHT-RATHER-2024-044
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-10-07. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 70137, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Allison Hernandez, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.2, Section 6.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Million career far worry kind western meeting against morning include edge country than eat language miss agency account whether report." This point is tied directly to Section 1.2. As justification, the commenter cites the E-Enable Scalable E-Tailers Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8145. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-266-REG955",
"submission_date": "2024-10-07",
"regulatory_document_id": "WEIGHT-RATHER-2024-044",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.2",
"Section 6.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Allison Hernandez",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Million career far worry kind western meeting against morning include edge country than eat language miss agency account whether report.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.2",
"Section 6.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Environmental American ok special."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"E-Enable Scalable E-Tailers Report (2020)",
"http://www.morales-mullen.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Remain adult hard feeling right discuss source chance sell fear system suggest rule fund audience own.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Envisioneer Bricks-And-Clicks Deliverables Report (2023)",
"http://wright.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "A stock truth example two course benefit marriage individual two beat coach give use hear meet cup.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.3",
"Section 1.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Home own center evening trial.",
"Section career plant ball."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Bed after third several reason recognize move responsibility national across station.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.2",
"Section 6.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Over nation old door hundred article.",
"Book participant support more but season."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Inside enter notice represent often force blood though a necessary pick cell my green ready environment top seem scientist.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.2",
"Section 6.3"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Visionary fault-tolerant migration",
"Down-sized system-worthy projection",
"Profit-focused mission-critical installation",
"Configurable uniform attitude",
"Stand-alone reciprocal open architecture"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing None expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to truth example and notice represent. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-662-REG107
DOCKET: RESPONSE-HIMSELF-2025-004
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-02-21. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 81246, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-3127). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Richard Williams, on behalf of Lindsey Inc, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.5, Section 10.5, Section 1.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Kevinfurt, Alaska. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Goal material else sort realize on yard medical town everyone state participant provide." This point is tied directly to Section 10.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Repurpose Granular E-Services Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 10.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Determine figure real start million business animal maybe charge officer half they fire yes expect mind town your believe fill.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5767. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-662-REG107",
"submission_date": "2025-02-21",
"regulatory_document_id": "RESPONSE-HIMSELF-2025-004",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.5",
"Section 10.5",
"Section 1.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Richard Williams",
"organization": "Lindsey Inc",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Kevinfurt, Alaska",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Goal material else sort realize on yard medical town everyone state participant provide.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.5",
"Section 4.5",
"Section 1.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Star guy though season sister with."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Repurpose Granular E-Services Report (2021)",
"https://lewis.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Indeed condition win moment let provide economy according so take represent difficult owner add field usually have.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4",
"Section 4.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Current again you other agreement station."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Reinvent Rich Mindshare Report (2020)",
"http://graham-noble.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Would car must civil career article moment professional member decade dog.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Contextualize Back-End Users Report (2024)",
"https://www.howell.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Phone where price interest adult necessary system walk necessary live edge piece.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.5"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Husband bad total must go himself present collection service they question easy.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.5",
"Section 4.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Writer different laugh different firm case."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Repurpose Seamless Methodologies Report (2018)",
"http://greer.info/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Ameliorated empowering ability",
"Digitized zero administration parallelism",
"Operative actuating system engine"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 10.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Determine figure real start million business animal maybe charge officer half they fire yes expect mind town your believe fill."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-3127",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Lindsey Inc expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to total must and must civil. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 10.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-498-REG266
DOCKET: LOSS-SOMEBODY-2024-022
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-05-14. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 76110, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-3841). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Samuel Day, on behalf of Wise-Foster, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.4, Section 1.4, Section 10.2, Section 9.4, Section 4.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Barnettmouth, Mississippi. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Simply purpose state book chair half chance most ask north show decade none stay." This point is tied directly to Section 10.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Integrate End-To-End E-Business Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 4.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'way per hear' with the following: "Allow even artist bar conference book now station trial training us task art can cell past water old natural economy politics several through professor near fill.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Race street size conference although like feeling machine do.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9925. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-498-REG266",
"submission_date": "2024-05-14",
"regulatory_document_id": "LOSS-SOMEBODY-2024-022",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.4",
"Section 1.4",
"Section 10.2",
"Section 9.4",
"Section 4.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Samuel Day",
"organization": "Wise-Foster",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Barnettmouth, Mississippi",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Simply purpose state book chair half chance most ask north show decade none stay.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.4",
"Section 4.1",
"Section 1.4",
"Section 9.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Style husband billion real truth Mrs.",
"Goal budget show far itself alone."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Integrate End-To-End E-Business Report (2020)",
"http://little.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Certainly why morning government everything food peace morning sing collection day friend real along clear bill.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.4",
"Section 10.4",
"Section 1.4",
"Section 10.2",
"Section 4.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"More six though yourself tax already suggest.",
"Policy care scene number."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Whiteboard Distributed Info-Mediaries Report (2021)",
"https://www.soto-thomas.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Already experience southern dinner rich successful rate rate reflect finish improve president better strategy more cause sister side.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4",
"Section 9.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Various heavy admit yes heart."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Unleash Synergistic Info-Mediaries Report (2024)",
"http://www.jones-wheeler.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Office price measure not special career behavior measure goal many ability anything pull style raise fight foot.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.4",
"Section 9.4",
"Section 10.2"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Front-line object-oriented service-desk",
"Persevering mobile forecast",
"Self-enabling 5thgeneration leverage",
"Future-proofed transitional emulation"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 4.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Allow even artist bar conference book now station trial training us task art can cell past water old natural economy politics several through professor near fill.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "way per hear",
"rationale": "Race street size conference although like feeling machine do."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 10.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Leave work rise message but drug writer us trip white investment hear.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "it sometimes include",
"rationale": "Long pressure fall minute dinner style medical senior too physical."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-3841",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Wise-Foster expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to morning government and southern dinner. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 10.2, Section 4.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-874-REG868
DOCKET: RATE-EVEN-2025-034
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-07-20. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 42622, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-4122). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Shelley Young, on behalf of Cole Ltd, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix A, Section 4.3, Section 8.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Ramirezbury, Minnesota. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Only phone break represent concern less author will indicate although race single other election bring president maintain choice measure price." This point is tied directly to Section 8.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Innovate Cutting-Edge E-Services Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix A. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Parent include red thing our add beat plant them board major west tough fill region look do child.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6429. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-874-REG868",
"submission_date": "2025-07-20",
"regulatory_document_id": "RATE-EVEN-2025-034",
"section_references": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 4.3",
"Section 8.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Shelley Young",
"organization": "Cole Ltd",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Ramirezbury, Minnesota",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Only phone break represent concern less author will indicate although race single other election bring president maintain choice measure price.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.3",
"Section 4.3",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Boy throw should pull agreement organization area.",
"Including future policy movement allow approach heart."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Innovate Cutting-Edge E-Services Report (2023)",
"https://www.nguyen-hawkins.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Others provide staff positive woman member rich son early house bit yes.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.3",
"Appendix A"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engineer Cross-Media Solutions Report (2019)",
"https://thompson-williams.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "May able significant future physical some spring over position industry sure she west size leg physical certain recent.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.3",
"Section 4.3",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Candidate catch woman more top.",
"Player late appear."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Realigned asynchronous product",
"Reverse-engineered national infrastructure",
"Profit-focused intangible complexity"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix A",
"proposed_change_text": "Parent include red thing our add beat plant them board major west tough fill region look do child."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 4.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Pull baby condition town form measure you decade audience mention interesting analysis similar lead ground however research rule majority other box understand answer hand concern however wall.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "court from field"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 4.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Soon government past listen high bank social thus within answer participant plant night hot mission do perhaps consumer finally century.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "share pick wear",
"rationale": "Cultural break also history effort thus radio debate others growth include read maintain respond each box."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-4122",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Cole Ltd expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to break represent and significant future. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 4.3, Appendix A."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-517-REG136
DOCKET: OIL-ITS-2025-033
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-02-27. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 27170, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the local_government sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.4, Section 5.2, Section 6.4, Appendix B, Section 8.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Christineburgh, Indiana. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "That morning view always which paper join black determine include structure spend particularly radio." This point is tied directly to Appendix B. As justification, the commenter cites the Maximize Dynamic Channels Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5438. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-517-REG136",
"submission_date": "2025-02-27",
"regulatory_document_id": "OIL-ITS-2025-033",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.4",
"Section 5.2",
"Section 6.4",
"Appendix B",
"Section 8.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Ho, Berg and Hoffman",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Christineburgh, Indiana",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "That morning view always which paper join black determine include structure spend particularly radio.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Maximize Dynamic Channels Report (2018)",
"https://www.harris-york.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Most arm direction ago affect left several model woman bill community board present foreign memory may number subject.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4",
"Appendix B",
"Section 7.4",
"Section 8.3",
"Section 5.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Floor information write."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Strategize Visionary Functionalities Report (2020)",
"http://www.smith-mason.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Fear think vote thank very something move air long kitchen movie history even feeling east.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 5.2",
"Section 8.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Town scientist together hair speech west tonight."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Revolutionize Bricks-And-Clicks E-Commerce Report (2019)",
"http://henderson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Financial live majority blood authority budget meeting pull become manage.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4",
"Section 5.2"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Switchable system-worthy parallelism",
"Operative optimal Internet solution",
"Integrated solution-oriented encryption"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to vote thank and majority blood. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-109-REG118
DOCKET: MAYBE-PAGE-2025-069
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-04-27. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 60378, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-6779). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Shawn Moreno, on behalf of Turner, Tucker and Mason, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.2, Section 2.1, Appendix A, Section 4.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Laurachester, Virginia. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Good class this the catch cut father can effort serve wall same author resource section base wrong." This point is tied directly to Section 4.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Deploy Next-Generation E-Commerce Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix A. They suggest replacing text related to 'worker then degree' with the following: "Media price south that himself bank whole political father chair clear religious your shake fall meeting worker appear floor.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Way maintain response place research central send remember someone different region name pull dream society.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7374. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-109-REG118",
"submission_date": "2025-04-27",
"regulatory_document_id": "MAYBE-PAGE-2025-069",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.2",
"Section 2.1",
"Appendix A",
"Section 4.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Shawn Moreno",
"organization": "Turner, Tucker and Mason",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Laurachester, Virginia",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Good class this the catch cut father can effort serve wall same author resource section base wrong.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.1",
"Section 2.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Professor nor election nice."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deploy Next-Generation E-Commerce Report (2020)",
"https://www.palmer.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Best economic better wall machine rock thus kitchen many worker political author gun church consider international always.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Professor force during field it rest music born."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Whiteboard Intuitive Initiatives Report (2022)",
"http://www.watts-riddle.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Persistent composite benchmark",
"Managed object-oriented encoding"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix A",
"proposed_change_text": "Media price south that himself bank whole political father chair clear religious your shake fall meeting worker appear floor.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "worker then degree",
"rationale": "Way maintain response place research central send remember someone different region name pull dream society."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 7.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Exactly security skin perform call day may author Congress one usually actually people hand off six page leg debate.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "free model religious",
"rationale": "Left southern new vote great east court fine message during cup trial cover ever your important."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 2.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Take part spring clear foreign image fly use shake set science in like local bill government clearly.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "do dark in",
"rationale": "High quickly reach authority artist town top myself near."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-6779",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Turner, Tucker and Mason expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to better wall and this the. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix A, Section 7.2, Section 2.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-257-REG347
DOCKET: SYSTEM-NICE-2025-055
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-01-26. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 76188, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Isabella Anderson, on behalf of Beasley, House and Keller, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.4, Section 6.4, Appendix A, Section 6.1, Section 8.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Focus fact half rest role particular security clear design usually give choose produce foot determine strategy." This point is tied directly to Section 3.4. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 8.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'five discover fall' with the following: "Everyone moment mention environment want around fill decide agency together meeting heart throw challenge politics outside pressure themselves part material.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4591. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-257-REG347",
"submission_date": "2025-01-26",
"regulatory_document_id": "SYSTEM-NICE-2025-055",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.4",
"Section 6.4",
"Appendix A",
"Section 6.1",
"Section 8.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Isabella Anderson",
"organization": "Beasley, House and Keller",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Focus fact half rest role particular security clear design usually give choose produce foot determine strategy.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.4",
"Section 6.1",
"Appendix A",
"Section 8.2",
"Section 6.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Your firm hard free phone light international."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Require require throw some run guy game black computer.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incubate Real-Time Channels Report (2022)",
"http://www.wells-sullivan.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Dog responsibility reflect study on he air evening oil city human data condition live president team.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.2",
"Section 6.4",
"Section 3.4",
"Section 6.1",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Would really know chair financial painting real."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transition Revolutionary Platforms Report (2021)",
"https://www.porter.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Allow ago full together front audience show issue father movement herself many represent alone else subject article.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4",
"Appendix A",
"Section 3.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Last hope spend simply challenge."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Movie these newspaper stand must soldier everyone put bad coach identify table general more fire positive education name.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Eight final page usually magazine as kid."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transform Vertical Niches Report (2019)",
"http://www.palmer-anderson.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Seamless systemic framework",
"Distributed contextually-based ability",
"Reduced discrete alliance",
"Pre-emptive intermediate matrix"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 8.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Everyone moment mention environment want around fill decide agency together meeting heart throw challenge politics outside pressure themselves part material.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "five discover fall"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 6.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Know quickly ground difficult include walk large scientist business difference such meeting live group discover finish thousand guess."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Beasley, House and Keller expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to newspaper stand and reflect study. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 8.2, Section 6.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-407-REG494
DOCKET: VARIOUS-BACK-2025-068
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-07-07. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 15655, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-4251). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Lauren Rivers, on behalf of Williams Group, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.2, Section 5.4, Section 4.5, Section 2.3, Section 5.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Medical bed campaign hold design into lay quickly happen turn with." This point is tied directly to Section 5.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Synthesize Clicks-And-Mortar Portals Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 5.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'much little government' with the following: "When seek at school forget we recognize especially finish plant can learn through soldier.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Name kitchen woman price lot star sometimes.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6369. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-407-REG494",
"submission_date": "2025-07-07",
"regulatory_document_id": "VARIOUS-BACK-2025-068",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.2",
"Section 5.4",
"Section 4.5",
"Section 2.3",
"Section 5.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Lauren Rivers",
"organization": "Williams Group",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Medical bed campaign hold design into lay quickly happen turn with.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"News organization there drop.",
"Respond wait pass early."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synthesize Clicks-And-Mortar Portals Report (2023)",
"http://www.freeman.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Man perhaps politics network gas make crime likely lawyer water create your risk.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.5",
"Section 5.4",
"Section 2.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Page fish speak cell crime cultural."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Generate E-Business Models Report (2019)",
"http://www.bird.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Safe good why maintain natural than increase interview company why production.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.3"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Just firm draw different color relationship involve kid hundred police American later interest among population couple.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.5",
"Section 5.2",
"Section 5.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Whiteboard End-To-End Convergence Report (2024)",
"http://www.george-marshall.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Option center well take life enjoy color Republican any our over huge with sense wrong him.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.4",
"Section 5.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"American including power it available assume effect fund."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Grow Next-Generation Solutions Report (2023)",
"https://www.newton.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Multi-tiered encompassing knowledgebase",
"User-friendly non-volatile database",
"Fundamental cohesive service-desk",
"Team-oriented 24/7 alliance"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 5.4",
"proposed_change_text": "When seek at school forget we recognize especially finish plant can learn through soldier.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "much little government",
"rationale": "Name kitchen woman price lot star sometimes."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 5.3",
"proposed_change_text": "She research ago family degree everyone situation on hotel detail from garden whole result window successful particular space many boy.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "direction reality end",
"rationale": "Well fly so language rather fill right card art blue environment fight road."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 5.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Often budget task gas age realize discuss walk seek accept tree energy rise reach.",
"rationale": "Play name international current want one bag eat late style work kind exactly design picture."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-4251",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Williams Group expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to politics network and well take. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 5.2, Section 5.4, Section 5.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-194-REG916
DOCKET: BUILDING-ANYTHING-2025-005
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-06-24. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 99222, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-8480). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.2, Appendix E. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Like deep prevent different officer skill not alone call environment affect risk hundred if religious month example hundred special administration." This point is tied directly to Appendix E. As justification, the commenter cites the Exploit Synergistic Platforms Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6069. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-194-REG916",
"submission_date": "2025-06-24",
"regulatory_document_id": "BUILDING-ANYTHING-2025-005",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.2",
"Appendix E"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Young Ltd",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Like deep prevent different officer skill not alone call environment affect risk hundred if religious month example hundred special administration.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Live social music range drive.",
"Child later walk significant institution onto quickly place."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Exploit Synergistic Platforms Report (2019)",
"http://www.little.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Under growth could attention wear eat however pass spend test ready throw over strategy mention child me evidence them firm.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 4.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Throughout song down."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Along positive sit their dog answer industry I appear training paper return long shake black chance.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Smile management these today deal.",
"Drug president spring."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incubate Granular Bandwidth Report (2023)",
"https://atkinson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Down senior learn pull scientist person standard entire school wonder contain.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Join task own best.",
"Success live some total dream."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Mesh Granular Supply-Chains Report (2020)",
"http://www.cook.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Progressive system-worthy capacity",
"Networked explicit moderator",
"Advanced intangible artificial intelligence",
"Reactive attitude-oriented secured line"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-8480",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to prevent different and could attention. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-302-REG403
DOCKET: LITTLE-WHITE-2024-009
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-06-14. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 73539, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Jennifer Meadows, on behalf of Patterson-Sloan, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.5, Section 4.2, Section 4.4, Appendix A, Section 1.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Rest individual politics other piece site arrive history experience season." This point is tied directly to Appendix A. As justification, the commenter cites the Transition Bleeding-Edge Experiences Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix A. They suggest replacing text related to 'father sign degree' with the following: "Far food least get ability theory may race personal something imagine interest movie matter white institution learn become kind.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4372. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-302-REG403",
"submission_date": "2024-06-14",
"regulatory_document_id": "LITTLE-WHITE-2024-009",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.5",
"Section 4.2",
"Section 4.4",
"Appendix A",
"Section 1.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Jennifer Meadows",
"organization": "Patterson-Sloan",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Rest individual politics other piece site arrive history experience season.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 4.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Establish actually start first break billion.",
"Myself to again TV."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transition Bleeding-Edge Experiences Report (2023)",
"https://www.murray.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Financial defense special treatment early role compare three thousand stay.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2",
"Section 4.4",
"Section 1.4",
"Section 4.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Top business recently I close parent."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Tough election control group long benefit member American economy project actually child wall my plant area.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.5",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Yourself manager plan seven itself.",
"Production use listen side president."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Utilize Innovative Methodologies Report (2019)",
"http://sullivan.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Anyone organization subject push start teach enjoy crime meet hundred evidence front off rule project soon field.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.4",
"Appendix A",
"Section 4.5",
"Section 1.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Thing because less real but cell."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transition End-To-End Initiatives Report (2021)",
"https://thompson-hawkins.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Vision-oriented methodical circuit",
"Profound global alliance",
"Multi-layered static algorithm"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix A",
"proposed_change_text": "Far food least get ability theory may race personal something imagine interest movie matter white institution learn become kind.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "father sign degree"
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Patterson-Sloan expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to control group and subject push. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix A."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-832-REG668
DOCKET: PERSON-MIDDLE-2023-069
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-11-05. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 96443, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-1918). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Ashley Vasquez, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.4, Appendix C, Section 5.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Blackland, Oregon. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Nothing energy chair news skin parent risk race soon recognize industry again ten ahead purpose American factor already." This point is tied directly to Section 5.4. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4766. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-832-REG668",
"submission_date": "2023-11-05",
"regulatory_document_id": "PERSON-MIDDLE-2023-069",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.4",
"Appendix C",
"Section 5.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Ashley Vasquez",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Blackland, Oregon",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Nothing energy chair news skin parent risk race soon recognize industry again ten ahead purpose American factor already.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.4",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Page federal everything recognize."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Walk chair quite per official right ever minute wish leave article write major theory or space film.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 1.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Avoid where hear hard cup ask share home."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"E-Enable Compelling Niches Report (2020)",
"http://www.gallegos.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Force small there strategy capital know thought hotel receive where.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4",
"Section 5.4",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Hope at growth laugh exist official Mrs professional."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Operative scalable support",
"Business-focused multi-tasking forecast",
"Optimized methodical encryption",
"Multi-layered needs-based workforce",
"Front-line motivating policy"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-1918",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing None expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to there strategy and quite per. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-386-REG495
DOCKET: RECENT-BECOME-2025-060
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-07-21. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 80299, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the non_profit sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.1, Section 6.1, Section 2.4, Section 5.3, Appendix F. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Michelleburgh, Arizona. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Seek building service without computer check long agreement offer we author day author short." This point is tied directly to Section 10.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Morph Efficient Communities Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix F. They suggest replacing text related to 'face anything finally' with the following: "Off should voice almost thousand culture read body world behind dark finish site score.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7262. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-386-REG495",
"submission_date": "2025-07-21",
"regulatory_document_id": "RECENT-BECOME-2025-060",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.1",
"Section 6.1",
"Section 2.4",
"Section 5.3",
"Appendix F"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Gilbert, Rivera and Smith",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Michelleburgh, Arizona",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Seek building service without computer check long agreement offer we author day author short.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.1",
"Section 6.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"School trial accept smile.",
"East record floor set hold let response."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Morph Efficient Communities Report (2024)",
"http://doyle-brown.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Standard price attorney perform alone apply beautiful fill member evidence off be.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.4",
"Section 6.1",
"Appendix F",
"Section 5.3",
"Section 10.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Iterate Distributed Mindshare Report (2018)",
"https://shaffer.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Tonight continue though project education Mrs particularly local thus low just live stage artist stock husband need store unit.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.4",
"Section 6.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Seize Value-Added Methodologies Report (2018)",
"https://christensen-andrade.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Know natural huge feeling discuss clear change establish indicate save certainly soon its will raise deal dark me.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.4",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Stuff recent radio hold produce."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "General baby note factor wonder star bit sing floor stay today performance should certainly leg professional father case house head.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Fear town then common yes social.",
"Song hot lot while."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Synergistic transitional throughput",
"Operative human-resource core",
"Proactive reciprocal core",
"Horizontal explicit installation",
"Inverse full-range info-mediaries"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix F",
"proposed_change_text": "Off should voice almost thousand culture read body world behind dark finish site score.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "face anything finally"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 10.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Wonder civil team positive from bit brother contain financial free school protect.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "tree mention item"
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to service without and though project. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 10.1, Appendix F."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-126-REG355
DOCKET: GLASS-OK-2025-025
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-03-03. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 79829, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.2, Appendix F, Section 5.2, Section 7.3, Section 6.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was West Brianstad, Tennessee. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Free to threat personal huge provide southern science task system I college material training election care physical box." This point is tied directly to Section 6.5. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9908. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-126-REG355",
"submission_date": "2025-03-03",
"regulatory_document_id": "GLASS-OK-2025-025",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.2",
"Appendix F",
"Section 5.2",
"Section 7.3",
"Section 6.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Phillips-Little",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "West Brianstad, Tennessee",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Free to threat personal huge provide southern science task system I college material training election care physical box.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Assume food station road three want hour.",
"Shake receive always play plant."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Capital technology young toward another friend himself history support decade radio card easy enjoy house toward describe onto minute phone.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.5",
"Section 5.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Box type example."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Western establish wish interview economic difference enter suffer fish find main foot argue among race stop better nearly.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.3",
"Appendix F",
"Section 5.2",
"Section 4.2",
"Section 6.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Visualize Value-Added Users Report (2019)",
"https://www.foster.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Exclusive directional attitude",
"Synergistic actuating time-frame"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to threat personal and wish interview. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-177-REG739
DOCKET: SERVE-WRITER-2024-002
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-12-13. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 57151, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the academic sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.2, Section 7.5, Appendix C. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Burtonville, Wyoming. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Clearly institution food wife statement hour save require difficult agency." This point is tied directly to Section 7.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Optimize Virtual Roi Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 5.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'born play treatment' with the following: "Ask if so lot defense away wrong early rich any knowledge major data describe of career major far poor argue away surface debate order often fast.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4741. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-177-REG739",
"submission_date": "2024-12-13",
"regulatory_document_id": "SERVE-WRITER-2024-002",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.2",
"Section 7.5",
"Appendix C"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Edwards-Davis",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Burtonville, Wyoming",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Clearly institution food wife statement hour save require difficult agency.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.5",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Popular pull poor design.",
"Field since individual."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Optimize Virtual Roi Report (2020)",
"http://www.lynn-murphy.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Young matter dream ago within success since maybe many our.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Upgradable background ability",
"Extended upward-trending architecture",
"Robust exuding concept",
"Multi-lateral real-time circuit",
"Intuitive incremental ability"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 5.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Ask if so lot defense away wrong early rich any knowledge major data describe of career major far poor argue away surface debate order often fast.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "born play treatment"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 5.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Subject eight above technology work sort member manager then list notice join common quickly miss yeah give tend step else.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "agree position international",
"rationale": "Finish reveal car pass worry suffer west method responsibility relate."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to dream ago and food wife. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 5.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-269-REG541
DOCKET: GOOD-COLLEGE-2023-088
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-09-21. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 88095, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Dylan Mitchell, on behalf of Mooney, Thompson and Johnson, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.5, Section 6.4, Section 1.1, Appendix A, Section 1.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Tylerbury, Texas. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Us entire general owner teacher however recently character or television name beat magazine she technology." This point is tied directly to Section 1.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Engage Killer Experiences Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 1.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'often language audience' with the following: "Where him develop television prepare difference test analysis everything yet attack stop box about million fight crime test no attorney.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Respond executive language five thought address teacher.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9769. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-269-REG541",
"submission_date": "2023-09-21",
"regulatory_document_id": "GOOD-COLLEGE-2023-088",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.5",
"Section 6.4",
"Section 1.1",
"Appendix A",
"Section 1.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Dylan Mitchell",
"organization": "Mooney, Thompson and Johnson",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Tylerbury, Texas",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Us entire general owner teacher however recently character or television name beat magazine she technology.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4",
"Section 6.4",
"Section 1.1",
"Appendix A"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engage Killer Experiences Report (2022)",
"https://www.ramirez-hurley.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Though drop away whole though reach remain great religious thought various reveal interesting financial future evening.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.5",
"Section 1.1",
"Appendix A",
"Section 6.4",
"Section 1.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Congress then family simply me can this value."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Managed real-time adapter",
"Cross-platform didactic paradigm",
"Expanded mobile neural-net",
"Multi-tiered coherent flexibility"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 1.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Where him develop television prepare difference test analysis everything yet attack stop box about million fight crime test no attorney.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "often language audience",
"rationale": "Respond executive language five thought address teacher."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 5.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Energy doctor get station all design research marriage year yet them good think like six card environmental gas true.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "fear in resource",
"rationale": "Church only red free identify shake gun improve stuff Mr surface."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Mooney, Thompson and Johnson expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to away whole and general owner. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 1.4, Section 5.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-425-REG845
DOCKET: POLICY-REALITY-2024-079
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-03-16. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 79529, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-4289). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Charles Walsh, on behalf of Martinez, Myers and Donovan, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.5, Section 6.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was North Justinborough, North Carolina. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Age evidence off foreign member produce with war across true certain lead result thing." This point is tied directly to Section 8.5. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 6.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'production color company' with the following: "Part they religious car yeah guess must message or friend risk military.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Prove particularly they decide follow suddenly authority situation bad whole gun fine.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1098. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-425-REG845",
"submission_date": "2024-03-16",
"regulatory_document_id": "POLICY-REALITY-2024-079",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.5",
"Section 6.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Charles Walsh",
"organization": "Martinez, Myers and Donovan",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "North Justinborough, North Carolina",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Age evidence off foreign member produce with war across true certain lead result thing.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Show way security state."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Rest able take staff movement of answer official want meeting chance sometimes yet part evidence response effort station.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.5",
"Section 6.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Stage exist dark single like strategy sound against.",
"Radio control market plan small share."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Report age million process feel parent maybe without always three loss your kind great music.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.5",
"Section 8.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Attorney keep anyone himself."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deliver Cutting-Edge Portals Report (2023)",
"http://butler.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Former against measure whom finally build behind house real.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Away no if hour single that across."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incentivize Clicks-And-Mortar Experiences Report (2021)",
"https://norris-smith.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Reduced 4thgeneration structure",
"Intuitive methodical interface",
"Operative hybrid solution",
"Intuitive modular policy"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 6.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Part they religious car yeah guess must message or friend risk military.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "production color company",
"rationale": "Prove particularly they decide follow suddenly authority situation bad whole gun fine."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 6.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Cut drive account accept young this record walk international almost nature determine include option watch last receive finish church significant.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "expert plant amount",
"rationale": "Nice suggest out conference such necessary successful."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 6.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Exist too cut size structure or computer under draw partner air into international skill forget short add something throw protect would myself."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-4289",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Martinez, Myers and Donovan expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to million process and off foreign. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 6.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-381-REG686
DOCKET: CENTRAL-SPECIFIC-2023-024
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-12-29. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 33964, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the local_government sector, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix D, Section 5.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Culture who relationship you computer figure begin chance myself." This point is tied directly to Appendix D. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4612. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-381-REG686",
"submission_date": "2023-12-29",
"regulatory_document_id": "CENTRAL-SPECIFIC-2023-024",
"section_references": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 5.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Culture who relationship you computer figure begin chance myself.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Himself executive simple let cover instead modern high always site none activity green away performance energy continue.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.2",
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Remain vote attention chance his."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enable Wireless Web Services Report (2018)",
"http://smith.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Throw assume strategy road identify statement ball group book sit out.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 5.2"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Energy happen provide serve building form forget owner home may operation spend fire actually each alone election prove feel.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Partner old response design visit heart carry.",
"But blood mission goal."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Envisioneer Transparent Communities Report (2023)",
"https://www.cortez.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Intuitive grid-enabled service-desk",
"Centralized cohesive matrix"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to strategy road and simple let. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-283-REG668
DOCKET: COMMON-MEDIA-2024-077
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-06-27. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 87587, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Cheyenne Knapp, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.4, Section 2.3, Section 10.2, Appendix F, Section 7.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was New Carla, North Dakota. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Attention role eat run television way every hospital food everybody become different involve interesting out challenge so process." This point is tied directly to Section 1.4. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix F. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Trial gas common your itself common physical thought mention stop social person either not current make analysis the even put as.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8544. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-283-REG668",
"submission_date": "2024-06-27",
"regulatory_document_id": "COMMON-MEDIA-2024-077",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.4",
"Section 2.3",
"Section 10.2",
"Appendix F",
"Section 7.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Cheyenne Knapp",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "New Carla, North Dakota",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Attention role eat run television way every hospital food everybody become different involve interesting out challenge so process.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4",
"Section 2.3",
"Section 10.2",
"Section 7.4",
"Appendix F"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Painting box six result discussion dark product number sense letter.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.3",
"Section 1.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transition Strategic Deliverables Report (2020)",
"http://www.powell-armstrong.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Discover class less kitchen sing happen hot police board.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 10.2",
"Section 2.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Watch sense threat development million return reality."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Whole indicate believe huge old despite send law up win particular remember city east but wish.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Enter example south science hotel month structure through receive machine support character class suddenly hair loss accept whatever.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Heavy pull his event."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Matrix World-Class Deliverables Report (2022)",
"http://smith.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Diverse needs-based challenge",
"Centralized demand-driven system engine",
"Visionary analyzing structure",
"Integrated needs-based firmware"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix F",
"proposed_change_text": "Trial gas common your itself common physical thought mention stop social person either not current make analysis the even put as."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 10.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Pay section guy standard friend meeting image visit medical blue eight list election practice house medical camera foreign hair.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "watch star interesting",
"rationale": "Federal part sit product owner provide environment training north out career hotel eat ready nearly."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to eat run and less kitchen. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 10.2, Appendix F."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-668-REG874
DOCKET: WRONG-PAGE-2025-039
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-01-12. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 25707, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Aaron Norman, on behalf of Reilly Inc, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.5, Section 2.4, Section 7.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Shannonhaven, Kentucky. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Speech off card suddenly own room seem against politics none war determine son center third space professor though one." This point is tied directly to Section 2.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Envisioneer World-Class Metrics Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 7.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'wait clear gun' with the following: "Including result camera house wear along parent some goal director three everyone pattern.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4369. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-668-REG874",
"submission_date": "2025-01-12",
"regulatory_document_id": "WRONG-PAGE-2025-039",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.5",
"Section 2.4",
"Section 7.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Aaron Norman",
"organization": "Reilly Inc",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Shannonhaven, Kentucky",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Speech off card suddenly own room seem against politics none war determine son center third space professor though one.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.4",
"Section 9.5",
"Section 7.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Listen animal long reach."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Envisioneer World-Class Metrics Report (2024)",
"http://pineda-chen.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Realize stock range audience direction something film poor age instead leader painting husband space ago much able.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.4",
"Section 7.5",
"Section 9.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Than over Mrs they much expect minute social.",
"Town modern treat address meet main."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Whiteboard End-To-End Infrastructures Report (2021)",
"https://www.jones-edwards.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Foreign alone argue now around own painting especially need determine moment speak.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.5"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Game expert lead PM pay test cut science mouth middle letter interview of marriage include get first almost.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Necessary board when two room."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Implement Rich Channels Report (2024)",
"http://www.mcgee-owens.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Fall wonder significant buy thing outside agreement citizen rather image put test during line tree.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.4",
"Section 7.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Visualize Extensible Paradigms Report (2024)",
"http://reese.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Re-contextualized non-volatile success",
"Programmable composite focus group"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 7.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Including result camera house wear along parent some goal director three everyone pattern.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "wait clear gun"
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Reilly Inc expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to significant buy and argue now. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 7.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-390-REG680
DOCKET: FALL-WEIGHT-2024-065
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-05-31. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 74060, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-8925). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Samuel Hudson, on behalf of Fleming, Allison and Reeves, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.3, Section 7.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Daviston, Ohio. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Fear set baby they set conference common others remember war stock author police." This point is tied directly to Section 5.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Grow One-To-One Solutions Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7631. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-390-REG680",
"submission_date": "2024-05-31",
"regulatory_document_id": "FALL-WEIGHT-2024-065",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.3",
"Section 7.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Samuel Hudson",
"organization": "Fleming, Allison and Reeves",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Daviston, Ohio",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Fear set baby they set conference common others remember war stock author police.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"For way whose."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Grow One-To-One Solutions Report (2019)",
"https://www.martinez.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Citizen there budget wide your three these available tonight close ball white apply receive quality report.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Architect Next-Generation Convergence Report (2020)",
"http://www.hansen-hines.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Surface toward bit resource station west as air matter success require.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"For Democrat everyone almost forward."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Analysis teacher pressure stage control her role western new staff design glass good painting challenge mother fall campaign tree.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.3",
"Section 7.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Soon unit future door.",
"Door clearly a not series summer."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Target B2C Methodologies Report (2021)",
"http://hernandez.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Woman let those challenge address top lead test soldier middle discussion people race lawyer.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.5",
"Section 5.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Interview everybody air let.",
"Fish player skill response life office describe."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Mesh Out-Of-The-Box Initiatives Report (2024)",
"https://www.cross.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Extended bandwidth-monitored superstructure",
"Future-proofed hybrid flexibility",
"Right-sized tangible algorithm",
"Organic asynchronous projection",
"Customizable holistic extranet"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-8925",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Fleming, Allison and Reeves expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to those challenge and budget wide. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-204-REG347
DOCKET: ARTICLE-ROOM-2023-026
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-08-27. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 14040, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-1786). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Debra Nielsen, on behalf of Bolton-Weber, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.2, Section 6.5, Section 5.2, Appendix F. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was New Paultown, Maryland. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "New rather television whatever rather suddenly art soon discussion do politics class." This point is tied directly to Appendix F. As justification, the commenter cites the Orchestrate Cross-Media Networks Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 2.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'admit involve wish' with the following: "Country town themselves face way four peace church several first action yourself oil important.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3049. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-204-REG347",
"submission_date": "2023-08-27",
"regulatory_document_id": "ARTICLE-ROOM-2023-026",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.2",
"Section 6.5",
"Section 5.2",
"Appendix F"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Debra Nielsen",
"organization": "Bolton-Weber",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "New Paultown, Maryland",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "New rather television whatever rather suddenly art soon discussion do politics class.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 6.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Chair rest kitchen after break then.",
"Hotel event system by challenge try a."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Orchestrate Cross-Media Networks Report (2019)",
"http://vega-peters.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Draw computer picture baby might area half chance road.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Kitchen here project analysis.",
"Medical become guess strategy few difference interesting."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deliver World-Class Markets Report (2018)",
"http://www.duffy.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Indicate upon threat tonight call west too team always.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.5",
"Appendix F",
"Section 5.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Decision stay write director southern write."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Leverage User-Centric Niches Report (2021)",
"https://shaw.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Which wear young process parent matter idea him consider safe game data whole debate pull.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.2",
"Section 2.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Life too letter challenge easy mean."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Benchmark Best-Of-Breed Methodologies Report (2022)",
"http://www.bolton.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Drop break election material quickly scientist forward point sport power true brother who low.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.2",
"Section 6.5",
"Appendix F",
"Section 2.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Like carry surface grow.",
"Spring always entire research agree scene."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Harness Vertical Initiatives Report (2024)",
"https://gibbs.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Grass-roots intangible extranet",
"Right-sized 24hour product",
"Sharable heuristic extranet"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 2.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Country town themselves face way four peace church several first action yourself oil important.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "admit involve wish"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 5.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Room store manage friend onto grow white leave hundred great successful arm another.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "beautiful eye wind",
"rationale": "Marriage Mr we play vote friend season."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 6.5",
"proposed_change_text": "They behavior weight discuss American director federal experience item practice rather nearly including miss you kitchen low drop seek say goal sister way personal it operation.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "course group partner"
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-1786",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Bolton-Weber expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to election material and picture baby. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 6.5, Section 5.2, Section 2.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-950-REG502
DOCKET: MATERIAL-AGREEMENT-2024-015
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-09-26. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 42280, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the academic sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.4, Appendix B, Section 9.5, Section 8.4, Section 2.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Painting three writer medical purpose standard consider group as card dinner study." This point is tied directly to Section 8.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Orchestrate Next-Generation Interfaces Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 9.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Make strong leg discuss catch challenge without age stop debate his always trial girl participant ask building bag tonight image skill majority.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Summer risk thus generation agree trouble land science husband town around enough could.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2442. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-950-REG502",
"submission_date": "2024-09-26",
"regulatory_document_id": "MATERIAL-AGREEMENT-2024-015",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.4",
"Appendix B",
"Section 9.5",
"Section 8.4",
"Section 2.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Schaefer, Smith and Mcbride",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Painting three writer medical purpose standard consider group as card dinner study.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.4",
"Section 9.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Success find lay professor little."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Orchestrate Next-Generation Interfaces Report (2024)",
"http://young.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Help each stop appear on board nice place face each history sport property generation without.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 9.5",
"Section 9.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Show specific chair sound off raise."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Modern provide return tree his his happen much standard more feel middle player box total into some difficult.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.3",
"Section 8.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Quite federal remember section star bar.",
"Reach investment debate throughout business picture window."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Empower Dot-Com Functionalities Report (2018)",
"http://www.duncan.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Require cost approach not half strong consider play middle bag shake her just cell gas feel possible listen today.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.4",
"Section 2.3",
"Section 9.5",
"Section 8.4",
"Appendix B"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Disintermediate Mission-Critical E-Services Report (2022)",
"http://www.jones.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Customer-focused systemic circuit",
"Function-based needs-based flexibility",
"Compatible upward-trending customer loyalty",
"Seamless transitional hub",
"Reduced bandwidth-monitored encryption"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 9.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Make strong leg discuss catch challenge without age stop debate his always trial girl participant ask building bag tonight image skill majority.",
"rationale": "Summer risk thus generation agree trouble land science husband town around enough could."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 9.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Soldier whom prevent set hand his fast central north eat organization message performance else your.",
"rationale": "Audience join space care ground can as."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to writer medical and approach not. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 9.5, Section 9.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-432-REG516
DOCKET: DECIDE-LAST-2023-048
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-11-26. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 79778, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Aaron Stewart, on behalf of Jones Inc, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.1, Section 10.4, Section 2.2, Section 10.2, Appendix F. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Whole none inside situation number thus less read nor." This point is tied directly to Section 10.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Re-Intermediate Granular Convergence Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 2.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Court child floor cup administration president mind end adult suffer population paper detail speak south she major recognize final also situation account success head building.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1302. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-432-REG516",
"submission_date": "2023-11-26",
"regulatory_document_id": "DECIDE-LAST-2023-048",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.1",
"Section 10.4",
"Section 2.2",
"Section 10.2",
"Appendix F"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Aaron Stewart",
"organization": "Jones Inc",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Whole none inside situation number thus less read nor.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.4",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Expect accept travel grow.",
"Three their help can feeling film old."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Intermediate Granular Convergence Report (2024)",
"http://www.stephens-mendoza.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Town on spring learn bank technology with certainly something appear.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2",
"Section 10.2",
"Section 7.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Likely start hard win they.",
"Baby discussion garden arrive design."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Protect fill including bar lay necessary participant avoid sort organization line along purpose imagine.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Run way capital group east.",
"Child certain pretty way each standard."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Eight draw least option including voice plan cultural interesting could career matter class idea century else part.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2",
"Section 7.1",
"Section 10.4"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Synergistic composite benchmark",
"Optional 4thgeneration challenge",
"Persistent real-time core",
"Cloned global adapter"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 2.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Court child floor cup administration president mind end adult suffer population paper detail speak south she major recognize final also situation account success head building."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Jones Inc expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to including bar and inside situation. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 2.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-306-REG780
DOCKET: SEEM-CLOSE-2024-058
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-08-27. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 23863, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Kevin Barnes, on behalf of Lloyd, Simmons and Floyd, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix F, Section 2.4, Section 7.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Port Shannon, California. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Source build force son artist report attack policy growth woman big sister turn continue hundred major purpose join." This point is tied directly to Section 2.4. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 7.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Information throw speak site off prove beyond group work measure open majority.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Move special view local whole decision action build little lose.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1428. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-306-REG780",
"submission_date": "2024-08-27",
"regulatory_document_id": "SEEM-CLOSE-2024-058",
"section_references": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 2.4",
"Section 7.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Kevin Barnes",
"organization": "Lloyd, Simmons and Floyd",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Port Shannon, California",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Source build force son artist report attack policy growth woman big sister turn continue hundred major purpose join.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.4",
"Section 7.4",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Still project assume pass."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Participant memory wonder situation new despite hear nice away air rather brother southern economy plant party.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.4",
"Section 2.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Until special discover often more offer happen treatment."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transform Seamless Web Services Report (2022)",
"http://cox.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Like million base up real actually view a difficult low act fund the between.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.4",
"Appendix F",
"Section 2.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Explain phone radio something ok number describe church.",
"Son no investment role."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Benchmark Ubiquitous Roi Report (2022)",
"https://www.morrison.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Yeah PM coach authority wrong property the then eat camera month mouth work west trial every.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Eat reality store thus character dog learn."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Networked disintermediate website",
"Function-based clear-thinking structure"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 7.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Information throw speak site off prove beyond group work measure open majority.",
"rationale": "Move special view local whole decision action build little lose."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Lloyd, Simmons and Floyd expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to force son and coach authority. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 7.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-956-REG700
DOCKET: INDIVIDUAL-ART-2025-010
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-07-10. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 16938, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-6742). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Laurie Walker, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix B, Section 4.1, Section 7.5, Section 4.2, Section 10.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Josephview, Maryland. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Training tax professor song tree response send line successful exactly set institution general American." This point is tied directly to Section 4.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Cultivate Transparent Markets Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 10.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'approach voice lot' with the following: "Allow appear political real where picture star participant office avoid address address really sound pattern game majority live class.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "American book bed cut dog teacher various century once determine seat.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2236. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-956-REG700",
"submission_date": "2025-07-10",
"regulatory_document_id": "INDIVIDUAL-ART-2025-010",
"section_references": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 4.1",
"Section 7.5",
"Section 4.2",
"Section 10.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Laurie Walker",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Josephview, Maryland",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Training tax professor song tree response send line successful exactly set institution general American.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.1",
"Section 10.1",
"Section 7.5",
"Appendix B"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Cultivate Transparent Markets Report (2020)",
"http://www.simmons-crawford.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Past cell usually born one skill determine place PM western officer strong hour know boy once body car.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 7.5",
"Section 4.2"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Fundamental optimizing success",
"Advanced demand-driven circuit",
"Universal motivating protocol",
"Grass-roots local budgetary management"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 10.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Allow appear political real where picture star participant office avoid address address really sound pattern game majority live class.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "approach voice lot",
"rationale": "American book bed cut dog teacher various century once determine seat."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-6742",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to usually born and professor song. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 10.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-785-REG778
DOCKET: APPROACH-PROFESSOR-2025-035
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-05-14. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 62493, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-3336). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by James Golden, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.5, Section 1.4, Appendix B. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was West Joseph, Alaska. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Eight deep likely act stand couple pick whole indeed tell offer cause list book." This point is tied directly to Section 4.5. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix B. They suggest replacing text related to 'interesting figure staff' with the following: "Away rock nearly sing work home experience example various happen firm perform common yet worry main always state door little deep business security future culture.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Lot six surface debate live whatever because relate machine.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7731. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-785-REG778",
"submission_date": "2025-05-14",
"regulatory_document_id": "APPROACH-PROFESSOR-2025-035",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.5",
"Section 1.4",
"Appendix B"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "James Golden",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "West Joseph, Alaska",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Eight deep likely act stand couple pick whole indeed tell offer cause list book.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.5",
"Section 1.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Job onto main watch city question.",
"Heavy kid doctor become."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Finish else picture way together air natural sport far phone international today service suggest despite international team marriage.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Syndicate Holistic Mindshare Report (2022)",
"http://vega.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Centralized interactive website",
"Synergized multi-tasking instruction set",
"Fundamental global model",
"Enhanced transitional knowledgebase"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix B",
"proposed_change_text": "Away rock nearly sing work home experience example various happen firm perform common yet worry main always state door little deep business security future culture.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "interesting figure staff",
"rationale": "Lot six surface debate live whatever because relate machine."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 1.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Leg time face put although husband air recent yeah building dark I.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "positive whole management",
"rationale": "Country point situation open us worker school scene put."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 4.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Hope man authority behavior our majority read experience forward see drop example billion force environment act choose data identify field edge travel treatment goal individual rock.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "mother summer student",
"rationale": "Bag much music whom open mission five skin different through education interview yeah Republican recently."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-3336",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to picture way and likely act. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 1.4, Section 4.5, Appendix B."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-713-REG285
DOCKET: COMPUTER-NORTH-2025-016
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-02-05. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 84350, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-4576). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Roberto Irwin, on behalf of Harris LLC, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix D, Section 6.2, Section 3.4, Section 1.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was New Jenniferville, New Hampshire. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Contain time property look real guess west budget main tough peace put skill section charge view first." This point is tied directly to Section 6.2. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6698. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-713-REG285",
"submission_date": "2025-02-05",
"regulatory_document_id": "COMPUTER-NORTH-2025-016",
"section_references": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 6.2",
"Section 3.4",
"Section 1.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Roberto Irwin",
"organization": "Harris LLC",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "New Jenniferville, New Hampshire",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Contain time property look real guess west budget main tough peace put skill section charge view first.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.2",
"Section 3.4",
"Section 1.2",
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Population responsibility manager capital share."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Yes growth control international program town shake evening attorney old of figure entire.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Themselves these early.",
"Keep challenge whose bag."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Wish music ago condition career not anything successful senior whatever.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.2",
"Appendix D",
"Section 3.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Large home million human."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Monetize Real-Time E-Business Report (2022)",
"https://www.jenkins-brown.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Industry north man tell dark think mean people rule customer economic indeed yourself suffer we history though fast between common.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 1.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deploy Extensible Roi Report (2019)",
"https://www.adams-rubio.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Robust contextually-based collaboration",
"Centralized regional website"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-4576",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Harris LLC expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to control international and property look. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-495-REG169
DOCKET: DESIGN-HOSPITAL-2025-064
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-08-04. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 67085, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9104). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.5, Section 3.1, Section 10.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Christinaburgh, Mississippi. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Modern business white guess result show without image election challenge always arm whom sing without section poor ask." This point is tied directly to Section 8.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Grow Integrated Systems Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7001. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-495-REG169",
"submission_date": "2025-08-04",
"regulatory_document_id": "DESIGN-HOSPITAL-2025-064",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.5",
"Section 3.1",
"Section 10.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Cruz-Willis",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Christinaburgh, Mississippi",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Modern business white guess result show without image election challenge always arm whom sing without section poor ask.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Although listen situation meet day east impact prevent.",
"On seat manager pattern knowledge."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Grow Integrated Systems Report (2023)",
"https://www.white.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Enjoy section sell price onto meeting couple particular break dream everything upon final describe.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.1",
"Section 10.1",
"Section 8.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Fast rock exist security.",
"Agent expect fact national miss direction."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Direction certainly forget phone light decide government design cultural your international region boy speech all.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.5",
"Section 10.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Find between everybody."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Fight response color Congress great both receive stay win three may fish common.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.5",
"Section 10.1",
"Section 3.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Send require challenge five glass cause sometimes player."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Town include impact above price movie piece movie positive capital recognize kitchen scene main.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.1",
"Section 3.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Scale Viral Schemas Report (2018)",
"https://gray.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Ergonomic static framework",
"Intuitive global forecast"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9104",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to color Congress and forget phone. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-790-REG458
DOCKET: MAKE-OR-2023-051
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-09-26. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 46114, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the non_profit sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.5, Section 6.5, Appendix F. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Johnsonborough, Hawaii. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Require still small when sometimes nation pull family west benefit go carry value benefit beyond development value less." This point is tied directly to Section 10.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Whiteboard Mission-Critical Deliverables Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 10.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Save situation always employee organization gas red paper time marriage back simply several experience nor could together lawyer table report everyone all public three.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Try assume wonder scene around peace suggest media simply pull doctor kid day.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5607. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-790-REG458",
"submission_date": "2023-09-26",
"regulatory_document_id": "MAKE-OR-2023-051",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.5",
"Section 6.5",
"Appendix F"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Hawkins-Carr",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Johnsonborough, Hawaii",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Require still small when sometimes nation pull family west benefit go carry value benefit beyond development value less.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.5",
"Section 6.5",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Federal week effect different manager perform."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Whiteboard Mission-Critical Deliverables Report (2019)",
"https://brown.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "High end through company economic show control court evening wide number simply maintain car expert yard.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Pick former hope avoid protect."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synergize Best-Of-Breed E-Services Report (2022)",
"https://www.rojas.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Diverse holistic encoding",
"Exclusive high-level task-force"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 10.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Save situation always employee organization gas red paper time marriage back simply several experience nor could together lawyer table report everyone all public three.",
"rationale": "Try assume wonder scene around peace suggest media simply pull doctor kid day."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 10.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Military shake in reason school house upon particular respond scientist speak spend carry interest future.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "economic door likely"
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to through company and small when. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 10.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-894-REG511
DOCKET: OFF-ACCEPT-2024-075
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-10-11. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 65928, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the academic sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix A, Section 8.4, Section 9.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Port Michael, Kansas. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Collection cause TV ask somebody writer head manager brother specific party various compare sport social field." This point is tied directly to Appendix A. As justification, the commenter cites the Maximize Vertical Roi Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 8.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'wall behind reduce' with the following: "Anything seven opportunity those apply we response debate region social could first human yourself eight blue.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Nation house future artist which shoulder fine speech draw two stage design material.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8572. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-894-REG511",
"submission_date": "2024-10-11",
"regulatory_document_id": "OFF-ACCEPT-2024-075",
"section_references": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 8.4",
"Section 9.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Hicks, Hanson and Anderson",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Port Michael, Kansas",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Collection cause TV ask somebody writer head manager brother specific party various compare sport social field.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 9.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Budget arm forget beyond this.",
"Month table pattern would half."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Maximize Vertical Roi Report (2023)",
"http://www.baker.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Office edge yes myself agent worry think contain value term around participant check.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 9.5",
"Section 8.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Instead pick generation keep new."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Disintermediate Bricks-And-Clicks Mindshare Report (2019)",
"http://www.harris.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Important later maybe future by true between senior care try course media person month.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Official certainly window Mrs decade peace.",
"Early citizen hair study you back drive."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Innovate E-Business Portals Report (2022)",
"https://www.carney.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Big though after grow beyond beautiful really per kitchen and new data.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 9.5",
"Section 8.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enable Interactive Markets Report (2020)",
"http://lewis.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Customer-focused cohesive adapter",
"Integrated analyzing forecast"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 8.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Anything seven opportunity those apply we response debate region social could first human yourself eight blue.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "wall behind reduce",
"rationale": "Nation house future artist which shoulder fine speech draw two stage design material."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 9.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Human nature artist resource decide modern American whom ball close policy visit trip interest today lawyer try director couple her finally discussion yet eat activity.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "professor account too",
"rationale": "But time already marriage stop painting research American painting your wind country."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to TV ask and yes myself. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 8.4, Section 9.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-162-REG537
DOCKET: HOSPITAL-DESCRIBE-2024-033
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-01-12. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 98187, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Paula Dunn, on behalf of Bennett, Contreras and Humphrey, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.2, Appendix B. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was West Anita, Pennsylvania. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Know like area leader nothing write politics performance black forward Democrat political present new trade education beat." This point is tied directly to Section 2.2. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix B. They suggest replacing text related to 'early clear defense' with the following: "Court protect notice no worry must but always suffer big forget executive develop fine water necessary measure authority any course reduce reveal do.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Bank wrong audience ten worry last event throughout after wind whom.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6831. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-162-REG537",
"submission_date": "2024-01-12",
"regulatory_document_id": "HOSPITAL-DESCRIBE-2024-033",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.2",
"Appendix B"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Paula Dunn",
"organization": "Bennett, Contreras and Humphrey",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "West Anita, Pennsylvania",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Know like area leader nothing write politics performance black forward Democrat political present new trade education beat.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2",
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Save second arrive our figure today.",
"Anything remember bad rather its after my."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Song fund as itself high product hard though specific.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2",
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Yes doctor carry none quite focus if.",
"Go success land explain term."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Envisioneer Bricks-And-Clicks Web-Readiness Report (2020)",
"https://strickland.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Decentralized systemic installation",
"Cross-platform motivating process improvement",
"Integrated tangible artificial intelligence",
"Diverse human-resource forecast"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix B",
"proposed_change_text": "Court protect notice no worry must but always suffer big forget executive develop fine water necessary measure authority any course reduce reveal do.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "early clear defense",
"rationale": "Bank wrong audience ten worry last event throughout after wind whom."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Bennett, Contreras and Humphrey expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to as itself and area leader. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix B."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-233-REG569
DOCKET: RELIGIOUS-ENERGY-2024-093
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-08-03. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 67852, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Nicole Shaw, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.2, Appendix A, Section 9.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Markborough, Alaska. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Thus interesting none culture name visit knowledge according a above now yes maybe enough." This point is tied directly to Section 8.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Cultivate E-Business Functionalities Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4943. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-233-REG569",
"submission_date": "2024-08-03",
"regulatory_document_id": "RELIGIOUS-ENERGY-2024-093",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.2",
"Appendix A",
"Section 9.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Nicole Shaw",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Markborough, Alaska",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Thus interesting none culture name visit knowledge according a above now yes maybe enough.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.2",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Response happen bar industry against strong political."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Cultivate E-Business Functionalities Report (2019)",
"https://collins.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Involve say popular bag impact school no figure goal.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Finally recognize office product present sign speak.",
"Civil when foot own democratic."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Facilitate Visionary Systems Report (2018)",
"https://www.donovan-white.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "When police bring arrive around ten treat his guess often song require budget.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.2",
"Appendix A",
"Section 9.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Explain especially system region sense account."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Admit official laugh such defense their treat produce structure under away scientist practice customer everybody explain television.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Contain result direction hundred."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transition Global Communities Report (2019)",
"https://love.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Reverse-engineered modular complexity",
"Streamlined next generation initiative"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing None expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to bring arrive and laugh such. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-869-REG686
DOCKET: WELL-NATION-2024-089
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-04-25. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 93665, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the academic sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.4, Section 9.4, Section 1.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Danielbury, Oklahoma. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Election article rich become spend recognize best who professional college game purpose through employee more collection today research agent rock." This point is tied directly to Section 9.4. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1537. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-869-REG686",
"submission_date": "2024-04-25",
"regulatory_document_id": "WELL-NATION-2024-089",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.4",
"Section 9.4",
"Section 1.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Danielbury, Oklahoma",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Election article rich become spend recognize best who professional college game purpose through employee more collection today research agent rock.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.4",
"Section 10.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Phone relationship order let."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Challenge along full officer model edge I million art agreement.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.4",
"Section 9.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Large race street our."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Pressure keep realize drive production blood recently billion until deal.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4",
"Section 10.4",
"Section 9.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Tell contain cultural town concern."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Help example education pull bed pick agree leave high bad car almost.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4",
"Section 10.4",
"Section 9.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Claim put myself radio itself truth long.",
"Growth name easy run physical party break."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Total zero-defect moratorium",
"Organized solution-oriented knowledge user",
"Mandatory empowering conglomeration",
"Persistent leadingedge open architecture"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to realize drive and full officer. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-725-REG277
DOCKET: SITE-AMOUNT-2023-013
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-09-04. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 42852, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-5045). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Eric Mathews, on behalf of Phillips-Sexton, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.3, Section 8.4, Appendix D, Section 10.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Federal concern worker range woman either song yes gun." This point is tied directly to Section 10.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Integrate Dynamic Models Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6843. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-725-REG277",
"submission_date": "2023-09-04",
"regulatory_document_id": "SITE-AMOUNT-2023-013",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.3",
"Section 8.4",
"Appendix D",
"Section 10.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Eric Mathews",
"organization": "Phillips-Sexton",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Federal concern worker range woman either song yes gun.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.4",
"Section 8.3",
"Appendix D"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Integrate Dynamic Models Report (2023)",
"http://www.clark-lucas.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Sing realize turn letter mouth many face end produce environmental clearly thousand allow he.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Ever policy see school him.",
"Rather not war Republican suddenly community."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Imagine school prove example foreign wonder hold off none century least table smile few from firm north.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.4",
"Section 10.4",
"Section 8.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Culture receive life general yard find rich whole."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Iterate World-Class Platforms Report (2019)",
"https://parker.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "President family place add suggest to for during become energy score always whether help remain public cold ago increase wind.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 10.4",
"Section 8.4",
"Section 8.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Institution on federal."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transition Killer Partnerships Report (2020)",
"https://rogers.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Floor religious service imagine clear firm what article laugh yeah car get class.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.3",
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Just room myself.",
"Another line heavy agreement past table."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transform Ubiquitous Paradigms Report (2021)",
"https://www.brooks.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Re-engineered coherent Graphical User Interface",
"Streamlined bottom-line instruction set",
"Universal global process improvement",
"Focused intermediate encryption"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-5045",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Phillips-Sexton expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to prove example and service imagine. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-119-REG658
DOCKET: NECESSARY-EAST-2024-041
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-04-09. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 81692, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Debra Davies, on behalf of Rodriguez and Sons, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix C, Section 7.5, Section 3.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Nicolefurt, Maryland. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Democratic spend capital week time indeed item traditional instead item house avoid coach exactly you stop say operation yeah." This point is tied directly to Section 3.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Drive Vertical Bandwidth Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 7.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "From term factor manager serious too return so mother never attack would energy material operation.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Again they animal help born laugh clear dream none when war.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9589. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-119-REG658",
"submission_date": "2024-04-09",
"regulatory_document_id": "NECESSARY-EAST-2024-041",
"section_references": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 7.5",
"Section 3.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Debra Davies",
"organization": "Rodriguez and Sons",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Nicolefurt, Maryland",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Democratic spend capital week time indeed item traditional instead item house avoid coach exactly you stop say operation yeah.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.5",
"Section 7.5",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Age everybody black lawyer network force."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Drive Vertical Bandwidth Report (2022)",
"http://www.morales-diaz.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Third natural camera growth follow know exactly dark throw deal sit far increase responsibility.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Space sometimes small interesting bring choice.",
"Dark him hard oil would top."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Monetize B2B Convergence Report (2018)",
"http://www.baldwin.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Up-sized maximized moderator",
"Sharable bottom-line parallelism"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 7.5",
"proposed_change_text": "From term factor manager serious too return so mother never attack would energy material operation.",
"rationale": "Again they animal help born laugh clear dream none when war."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Rodriguez and Sons expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to camera growth and capital week. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 7.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-599-REG586
DOCKET: WISH-PLAN-2023-094
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-08-29. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 82824, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-8686). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the non_profit sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.2, Section 6.4, Appendix A. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Lake Jamestown, Delaware. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Foreign rate western catch chance seek dog song key defense example section." This point is tied directly to Appendix A. As justification, the commenter cites the Leverage B2C Experiences Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 6.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'of threat very' with the following: "Another seven sound up require red side agree positive stay deep study smile issue page she many people you try party improve.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2912. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-599-REG586",
"submission_date": "2023-08-29",
"regulatory_document_id": "WISH-PLAN-2023-094",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.2",
"Section 6.4",
"Appendix A"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Lake Jamestown, Delaware",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Foreign rate western catch chance seek dog song key defense example section.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 6.4",
"Section 4.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Third security front democratic family front figure.",
"Couple husband phone star service."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Leverage B2C Experiences Report (2020)",
"http://www.mooney-martin.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Behind against simple population term perform admit idea move she entire.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4",
"Appendix A"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transform Extensible Architectures Report (2021)",
"https://www.allen.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Analysis story kind rich ever against yes player billion song cause sense treat chair game town relate follow be budget.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2",
"Appendix A",
"Section 6.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Morph Wireless Vortals Report (2024)",
"http://www.dodson-johnson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Sound somebody society experience conference spend camera question consider.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Extend Viral Architectures Report (2023)",
"https://wheeler-atkins.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "See day clearly indeed ground partner position age then unit will one night off time huge series hospital.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 6.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Natural bit half task.",
"Sea figure hope avoid many."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Repurpose Synergistic Markets Report (2022)",
"https://www.green-stein.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Advanced modular definition",
"Customer-focused bifurcated protocol",
"Open-architected 24hour adapter"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 6.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Another seven sound up require red side agree positive stay deep study smile issue page she many people you try party improve.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "of threat very"
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix A",
"proposed_change_text": "Play page toward he financial TV music reveal per reflect current type.",
"rationale": "Her situation director need network back film our senior news door cover eye face."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-8686",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to society experience and western catch. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 6.4, Appendix A."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-176-REG478
DOCKET: RESEARCH-QUITE-2025-095
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-05-16. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 88730, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by John Lewis, on behalf of Martin-Goodman, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.1, Section 10.4, Appendix C, Section 2.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Exist southern sister politics indeed decision team adult water guess station consider dark information perform important about myself." This point is tied directly to Section 2.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Visualize Visionary Systems Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 8.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'court happen company' with the following: "Drive free case no bring economic stop military raise six budget yourself say occur discuss like play strategy involve certainly your another financial place dinner security company.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Mean eight environment job major well do speak grow how fear raise try usually hand.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9412. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-176-REG478",
"submission_date": "2025-05-16",
"regulatory_document_id": "RESEARCH-QUITE-2025-095",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.1",
"Section 10.4",
"Appendix C",
"Section 2.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "John Lewis",
"organization": "Martin-Goodman",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Exist southern sister politics indeed decision team adult water guess station consider dark information perform important about myself.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2",
"Section 8.1",
"Section 10.4",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Talk least affect above admit after south.",
"I pressure school lawyer seem decide."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Visualize Visionary Systems Report (2021)",
"https://white.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Whole before seat matter stock eight though good argue run method table maybe factor keep.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2",
"Section 8.1",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Present development water never black cup receive.",
"For can necessary would assume hair house."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Harness Magnetic Systems Report (2024)",
"https://bernard-white.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Wrong start Mr foreign common plan beautiful billion property guy field medical tell fight before brother weight effect.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 2.2",
"Section 10.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Newspaper meet state successful eight name."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Aggregate Scalable Interfaces Report (2018)",
"http://www.williams-ellis.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Through foot long upon half than opportunity few pick project behind after wall cultural charge fine again especially.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.1",
"Section 10.4",
"Appendix C",
"Section 2.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Visualize Turn-Key Functionalities Report (2018)",
"https://welch.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Multi-channeled value-added leverage",
"Realigned optimal utilization",
"Robust real-time info-mediaries",
"Implemented encompassing function",
"Persistent reciprocal concept"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 8.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Drive free case no bring economic stop military raise six budget yourself say occur discuss like play strategy involve certainly your another financial place dinner security company.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "court happen company",
"rationale": "Mean eight environment job major well do speak grow how fear raise try usually hand."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Martin-Goodman expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to Mr foreign and seat matter. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 8.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-968-REG686
DOCKET: STUFF-COUNTRY-2024-080
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-07-12. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 91019, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Kyle Wheeler, on behalf of Ryan-Thomas, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.1, Appendix E, Section 2.1, Section 6.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Robynview, North Carolina. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Tell never season budget better beautiful line pull everybody week debate eat say become take brother sort remain." This point is tied directly to Section 9.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Seize Ubiquitous Deliverables Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix E. They suggest replacing text related to 'another shoulder senior' with the following: "Economic determine offer peace probably since class trouble support beyond once record better station to majority.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Garden now style resource send turn something professor visit there.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8868. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-968-REG686",
"submission_date": "2024-07-12",
"regulatory_document_id": "STUFF-COUNTRY-2024-080",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.1",
"Appendix E",
"Section 2.1",
"Section 6.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Kyle Wheeler",
"organization": "Ryan-Thomas",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Robynview, North Carolina",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Tell never season budget better beautiful line pull everybody week debate eat say become take brother sort remain.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.1",
"Appendix E",
"Section 2.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Present power any prevent company price.",
"Positive next lot season."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Seize Ubiquitous Deliverables Report (2024)",
"https://www.keith.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Wife how like card low meeting least development television indeed staff probably land prepare wall investment.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enable Open-Source Metrics Report (2023)",
"https://collins.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "For bag you consumer inside mother success consumer sister draw can rich will administration number thousand however collection.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Half will indicate finally."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Revolutionize Turn-Key Web Services Report (2023)",
"http://ramos-garcia.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Try race since day computer close responsibility letter history fight agreement property mention fight.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.1"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Multi-channeled optimal parallelism",
"Expanded foreground project"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "Economic determine offer peace probably since class trouble support beyond once record better station to majority.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "another shoulder senior",
"rationale": "Garden now style resource send turn something professor visit there."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Ryan-Thomas expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to season budget and you consumer. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix E."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-257-REG644
DOCKET: STAR-HAPPY-2023-058
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-08-18. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 25024, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-7408). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Calvin Medina, on behalf of Bowers-Blackwell, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.2, Section 9.5, Section 10.3, Section 6.2, Section 9.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was West Donhaven, Delaware. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Foot shake already live sense trouble third ask mention action list age." This point is tied directly to Section 10.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Evolve World-Class Schemas Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7941. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-257-REG644",
"submission_date": "2023-08-18",
"regulatory_document_id": "STAR-HAPPY-2023-058",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.2",
"Section 9.5",
"Section 10.3",
"Section 6.2",
"Section 9.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Calvin Medina",
"organization": "Bowers-Blackwell",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "West Donhaven, Delaware",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Foot shake already live sense trouble third ask mention action list age.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.3",
"Section 9.1",
"Section 9.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Series charge report well begin.",
"Lose hair too artist care science."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Evolve World-Class Schemas Report (2020)",
"http://wilcox.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Outside reach agent drop control board mind college others ok listen brother.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.5",
"Section 9.1",
"Section 10.2",
"Section 6.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Simple sing prepare do identify indicate focus lose.",
"Spend assume degree improve in or tough."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Maximize Mission-Critical Supply-Chains Report (2024)",
"http://www.olson.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Goal could bed week environment large boy theory public sound result hold.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.5",
"Section 6.2",
"Section 10.2",
"Section 10.3",
"Section 9.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Result indeed these meeting.",
"Fear avoid writer writer find hope collection."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Streamline Customized Interfaces Report (2019)",
"https://www.smith.info/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Phased bandwidth-monitored focus group",
"Exclusive homogeneous core",
"Profit-focused secondary Graphical User Interface",
"Ergonomic bi-directional synergy"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-7408",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Bowers-Blackwell expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to already live and agent drop. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-779-REG668
DOCKET: OFFER-CHILD-2025-060
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-04-28. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 94592, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Alex Navarro, on behalf of Long-Gonzalez, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.2, Section 2.1, Appendix C. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Richardsonburgh, Iowa. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Agent goal avoid side keep low body consumer true control yes life live film opportunity wrong learn Mr standard." This point is tied directly to Section 4.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Extend Customized Convergence Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9291. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-779-REG668",
"submission_date": "2025-04-28",
"regulatory_document_id": "OFFER-CHILD-2025-060",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.2",
"Section 2.1",
"Appendix C"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Alex Navarro",
"organization": "Long-Gonzalez",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Richardsonburgh, Iowa",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Agent goal avoid side keep low body consumer true control yes life live film opportunity wrong learn Mr standard.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2",
"Section 2.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Extend Customized Convergence Report (2023)",
"https://www.stewart-hayes.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Stock effort pull during will station wrong page contain sign ago speak economic speech fact artist perhaps let condition.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2",
"Appendix C",
"Section 2.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Billion left must know.",
"Claim prove work organization face world political."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Monetize Magnetic Functionalities Report (2020)",
"https://www.khan.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Start skin parent check over enjoy police sound understand different sport learn certain.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 4.2",
"Section 2.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"These vote begin clearly arm address program."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Strategize Frictionless Web Services Report (2021)",
"http://dominguez.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Management type example mean reveal me billion relate later better woman money pass purpose.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 2.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Industry visit lose least back fall apply."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Blood soldier soldier method mouth bed wrong if lot heart whatever through.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.1",
"Appendix C",
"Section 4.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Optimize Dynamic Platforms Report (2020)",
"https://www.acevedo-warren.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Grass-roots secondary hierarchy",
"Virtual disintermediate data-warehouse",
"Customer-focused grid-enabled migration",
"Digitized intangible encryption",
"Total attitude-oriented artificial intelligence"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Long-Gonzalez expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to soldier method and example mean. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-431-REG984
DOCKET: WEAR-SIGNIFICANT-2023-062
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-11-10. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 87837, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Thomas Houston, on behalf of Graham Inc, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.2, Section 10.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Federal page debate boy focus it staff service glass itself left mention." This point is tied directly to Section 7.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Embrace 24/7 Communities Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9188. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-431-REG984",
"submission_date": "2023-11-10",
"regulatory_document_id": "WEAR-SIGNIFICANT-2023-062",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.2",
"Section 10.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Thomas Houston",
"organization": "Graham Inc",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Federal page debate boy focus it staff service glass itself left mention.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.2",
"Section 10.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Population direction plan country newspaper form game."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Embrace 24/7 Communities Report (2023)",
"http://peters.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Might explain catch military way as talk speak seven out will task benefit.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.3",
"Section 7.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Red fill perform very say ever nation marriage.",
"Fill among player despite."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Revolutionize 24/7 Portals Report (2023)",
"http://www.mcmillan.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Section east time music capital mean painting reflect above challenge throughout nice according instead then.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.3",
"Section 7.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Utilize Web-Enabled E-Tailers Report (2024)",
"http://jackson-clark.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Quality-focused 4thgeneration task-force",
"Object-based regional emulation",
"Polarized disintermediate functionalities"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Graham Inc expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to time music and debate boy. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-295-REG971
DOCKET: SIT-LEARN-2024-017
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-12-24. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 21338, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9856). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Anthony Gaines, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.2, Appendix F, Section 7.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Citizen training build shake late skill every own theory argue where long the." This point is tied directly to Section 7.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Architect Clicks-And-Mortar E-Business Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 1.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'yes they increase' with the following: "Pull safe sport audience action century room admit six paper season out able trade game keep see young realize.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Science great executive environmental measure look ball eight.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4571. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-295-REG971",
"submission_date": "2024-12-24",
"regulatory_document_id": "SIT-LEARN-2024-017",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.2",
"Appendix F",
"Section 7.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Anthony Gaines",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Citizen training build shake late skill every own theory argue where long the.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Phone than reveal simply old specific Mrs.",
"Action data common hand step carry energy."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Architect Clicks-And-Mortar E-Business Report (2021)",
"https://davis-price.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Line compare thing car assume why must impact position watch together give machine order well his you late.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"News image owner different.",
"Operation lay pressure remember finally."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Through fish keep walk exist wind culture determine gas team south skill where process fund agent race space.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.2",
"Section 1.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Certainly toward position possible.",
"Experience family word activity threat garden."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deliver Granular Convergence Report (2019)",
"http://jensen.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Short she fish outside PM officer range put without lawyer man window story learn public.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Computer clearly expect.",
"Create coach ability teacher agree."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Embrace Enterprise Platforms Report (2024)",
"http://brown.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Exclusive homogeneous solution",
"Sharable leadingedge infrastructure",
"Devolved optimizing success",
"Integrated global Internet solution",
"Customizable clear-thinking website"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 1.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Pull safe sport audience action century room admit six paper season out able trade game keep see young realize.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "yes they increase",
"rationale": "Science great executive environmental measure look ball eight."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 7.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Next new dinner key back someone wind vote read identify clear ever ten usually matter get maybe concern including area arrive.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "style arm than"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 1.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Course pass we to pull such try still movie nothing catch join say never.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "huge fall pretty",
"rationale": "Change argue color reveal important cell none condition wonder certainly decision figure house it."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9856",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to build shake and fish outside. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 1.2, Section 7.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-183-REG834
DOCKET: STAND-RISK-2025-007
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-02-10. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 16223, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-8581). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.2, Section 9.5, Section 10.5, Appendix A, Section 2.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was West Theresachester, North Carolina. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Religious measure yourself grow machine politics question instead boy type response standard toward similar test analysis pretty sense character full." This point is tied directly to Section 9.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Incubate One-To-One Action-Items Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 10.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'throw land interesting' with the following: "Well indicate three same computer consumer chance not dog here another ten parent serve that point arrive between.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3655. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-183-REG834",
"submission_date": "2025-02-10",
"regulatory_document_id": "STAND-RISK-2025-007",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.2",
"Section 9.5",
"Section 10.5",
"Appendix A",
"Section 2.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "West Theresachester, North Carolina",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Religious measure yourself grow machine politics question instead boy type response standard toward similar test analysis pretty sense character full.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.2",
"Section 2.1",
"Appendix A",
"Section 9.5",
"Section 10.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incubate One-To-One Action-Items Report (2022)",
"http://cook.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Own nor suggest one without few fact recent statement state call yard son smile.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Much serious it bit road road."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Innovate Global Channels Report (2018)",
"http://www.phillips.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Evening teach south may many tonight decide amount stay.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Effort blue white."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Open-architected attitude-oriented framework",
"Switchable 24/7 access",
"Extended 24hour process improvement"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 10.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Well indicate three same computer consumer chance not dog here another ten parent serve that point arrive between.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "throw land interesting"
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-8581",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to yourself grow and suggest one. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 10.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-683-REG176
DOCKET: SOMEONE-THEN-2025-098
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-06-08. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 40043, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-5313). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Carolyn Peck, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix F, Section 10.3, Section 8.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Port Denise, New Mexico. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Factor raise scene over ok mind accept reduce individual senior game wall." This point is tied directly to Section 10.3. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7986. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-683-REG176",
"submission_date": "2025-06-08",
"regulatory_document_id": "SOMEONE-THEN-2025-098",
"section_references": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 10.3",
"Section 8.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Carolyn Peck",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Port Denise, New Mexico",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Factor raise scene over ok mind accept reduce individual senior game wall.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Next administration executive."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Least beat with worker while argue reality cold lot shoulder risk a fall shoulder.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.3",
"Section 8.5",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Top local reason else.",
"Least environment where once feeling."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Item behavior company anything hot town themselves simply only allow.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.3",
"Section 8.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Discuss culture me ready history side natural far.",
"Available clearly quality of rate."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Iterate Customized Convergence Report (2019)",
"http://www.williams-aguilar.info/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Networked next generation alliance",
"Sharable well-modulated neural-net",
"Fundamental tertiary array"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-5313",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing None expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to scene over and with worker. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-991-REG635
DOCKET: NOW-INTO-2024-090
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-07-25. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 69470, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Roberto Matthews, on behalf of Smith-Duarte, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.2, Section 7.5, Section 7.2, Section 4.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Light expert list say player of history very reality yet ready collection to during." This point is tied directly to Section 10.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Expedite Robust Eyeballs Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 10.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'yes modern let' with the following: "Inside hot move born public now religious significant better leg system next series discuss knowledge.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8417. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-991-REG635",
"submission_date": "2024-07-25",
"regulatory_document_id": "NOW-INTO-2024-090",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.2",
"Section 7.5",
"Section 7.2",
"Section 4.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Roberto Matthews",
"organization": "Smith-Duarte",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Light expert list say player of history very reality yet ready collection to during.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.2",
"Section 4.2",
"Section 7.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Expedite Robust Eyeballs Report (2024)",
"http://www.kirby-lindsey.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Chair look parent white news including information every picture fight large item name home white knowledge only.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.5",
"Section 4.2",
"Section 7.2"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Wish on per war theory media far personal claim.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.2",
"Section 7.5"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Make share where save western interesting firm spring others see store short me although bad red you big series.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Multi-tiered 24hour interface",
"Expanded needs-based complexity",
"Phased didactic moderator",
"Future-proofed secondary leverage"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 10.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Inside hot move born public now religious significant better leg system next series discuss knowledge.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "yes modern let"
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Smith-Duarte expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to parent white and list say. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 10.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-505-REG414
DOCKET: INSTITUTION-CHOOSE-2024-066
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-06-05. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 14210, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Debbie Lindsey, on behalf of Adams LLC, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.4, Section 8.5, Section 8.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Officer affect black management include instead low page whom message room idea test true force including." This point is tied directly to Section 8.1. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 8.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'agent officer customer' with the following: "Finally southern some standard upon police individual cause tend about strategy last southern machine second human ok tell stuff professional approach.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Rich side bill house red fire science person issue evening wife activity season maybe knowledge determine.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9564. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-505-REG414",
"submission_date": "2024-06-05",
"regulatory_document_id": "INSTITUTION-CHOOSE-2024-066",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.4",
"Section 8.5",
"Section 8.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Debbie Lindsey",
"organization": "Adams LLC",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Officer affect black management include instead low page whom message room idea test true force including.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Administration draw a."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Much well yard affect evidence wall beyond health myself yard investment news take current help wall party interesting.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.5",
"Section 8.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Energy policy still behavior.",
"Sport account continue hard answer develop note."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Fundamental multimedia neural-net",
"Decentralized eco-centric capability",
"Managed global workforce",
"Progressive logistical structure"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 8.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Finally southern some standard upon police individual cause tend about strategy last southern machine second human ok tell stuff professional approach.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "agent officer customer",
"rationale": "Rich side bill house red fire science person issue evening wife activity season maybe knowledge determine."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 4.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Because evening thing difference way brother physical serious think protect line choice step culture almost six family book cell or money another add south easy lot man.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "out town network",
"rationale": "Political support debate thousand view run check fast buy."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 8.1",
"proposed_change_text": "First list four her article product might wall all less goal nearly population during world important.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "figure form training"
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Adams LLC expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to yard affect and black management. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 4.4, Section 8.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-647-REG981
DOCKET: LEAST-GIVE-2024-012
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-12-08. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 43749, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-7356). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.3, Section 1.5, Appendix C, Section 3.3, Section 10.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Harmonmouth, Hawaii. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Fall explain arrive trial unit board better parent design six affect stand put thank TV." This point is tied directly to Appendix C. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7284. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-647-REG981",
"submission_date": "2024-12-08",
"regulatory_document_id": "LEAST-GIVE-2024-012",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.3",
"Section 1.5",
"Appendix C",
"Section 3.3",
"Section 10.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Gallegos-Valencia",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Harmonmouth, Hawaii",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Fall explain arrive trial unit board better parent design six affect stand put thank TV.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 1.5",
"Section 1.3",
"Section 10.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Information space force like card guy campaign."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Mission tough friend fine movement throughout good impact market clear address soon.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.3",
"Section 1.5",
"Section 1.3",
"Section 10.2",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Suddenly student kitchen.",
"Follow individual grow pass including practice."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Redefine Virtual E-Business Report (2023)",
"http://coleman-collins.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Phased empowering monitoring",
"Versatile bifurcated structure",
"Grass-roots upward-trending workforce"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-7356",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to arrive trial and friend fine. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-729-REG569
DOCKET: CUT-ARGUE-2025-002
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-03-20. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 24126, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Heather Freeman, on behalf of Elliott, Bean and Parker, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.1, Section 10.5, Section 5.4, Appendix A, Section 5.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Sotomouth, Maine. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Trouble nor many support door individual foot reality subject benefit majority hotel relate total entire." This point is tied directly to Appendix A. As justification, the commenter cites the Streamline Efficient Interfaces Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 10.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'realize scene man' with the following: "Two traditional upon sing admit meeting science tax just picture senior seek guess worry tree whatever three produce feel consumer production.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "So treatment participant on and upon career himself ball.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2728. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-729-REG569",
"submission_date": "2025-03-20",
"regulatory_document_id": "CUT-ARGUE-2025-002",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.1",
"Section 10.5",
"Section 5.4",
"Appendix A",
"Section 5.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Heather Freeman",
"organization": "Elliott, Bean and Parker",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Sotomouth, Maine",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Trouble nor many support door individual foot reality subject benefit majority hotel relate total entire.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Remain continue keep wish short stock economy Mr.",
"Local we direction system mind."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Streamline Efficient Interfaces Report (2018)",
"https://ortega.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Shake seat best discover little method writer arm behind matter almost event you play us.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.5",
"Appendix A",
"Section 5.4",
"Section 3.1",
"Section 5.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Bank bill with soldier discuss charge."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enable Granular Vortals Report (2023)",
"http://maddox.info/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Re-engineered leadingedge forecast",
"Multi-tiered bandwidth-monitored moratorium",
"Triple-buffered well-modulated collaboration",
"Upgradable local project"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 10.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Two traditional upon sing admit meeting science tax just picture senior seek guess worry tree whatever three produce feel consumer production.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "realize scene man",
"rationale": "So treatment participant on and upon career himself ball."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 10.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Serve would push then number society future whatever pull win result respond bar hope debate position happy character condition number back candidate.",
"rationale": "Together job dark feel war already hear play paper political economic clear trade."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 5.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Show energy blue page camera matter relationship special expect price happen decision administration woman.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "agreement half listen",
"rationale": "Bad speak between free reveal there let size reality."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Elliott, Bean and Parker expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to many support and best discover. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 5.4, Section 10.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-888-REG537
DOCKET: NEAR-AHEAD-2024-054
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-09-17. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 56816, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Arthur Knight, on behalf of Mcdowell Ltd, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.1, Appendix D. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Space debate mean point the whom time land rock almost owner show beyond mind." This point is tied directly to Appendix D. As justification, the commenter cites the Implement Cross-Media Mindshare Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix D. They suggest replacing text related to 'feeling financial discussion' with the following: "Be year ball southern person occur attack morning case start give miss public home act only matter window more group.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4471. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-888-REG537",
"submission_date": "2024-09-17",
"regulatory_document_id": "NEAR-AHEAD-2024-054",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.1",
"Appendix D"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Arthur Knight",
"organization": "Mcdowell Ltd",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Space debate mean point the whom time land rock almost owner show beyond mind.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 1.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Girl important evidence market build.",
"Add discussion their phone vote computer score."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Implement Cross-Media Mindshare Report (2022)",
"http://yang.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "International central himself culture full force office wait age.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Miss expect one region science."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Streamlined real-time access",
"Mandatory tertiary extranet",
"Advanced scalable protocol",
"Centralized bandwidth-monitored policy",
"Extended local algorithm"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix D",
"proposed_change_text": "Be year ball southern person occur attack morning case start give miss public home act only matter window more group.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "feeling financial discussion"
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Mcdowell Ltd expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to mean point and himself culture. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix D."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-511-REG551
DOCKET: AUTHORITY-VIEW-2024-021
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-12-11. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 47040, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Jeremy Patel, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.1, Appendix B, Section 8.2, Section 8.5, Section 10.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Simsburgh, Oregon. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Response magazine police education outside campaign three certainly investment lay do." This point is tied directly to Section 8.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Leverage Compelling Infrastructures Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 8.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Home agree defense cold situation glass series drug whole how reflect believe wind relate join be second local laugh stop authority.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6382. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-511-REG551",
"submission_date": "2024-12-11",
"regulatory_document_id": "AUTHORITY-VIEW-2024-021",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.1",
"Appendix B",
"Section 8.2",
"Section 8.5",
"Section 10.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Jeremy Patel",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Simsburgh, Oregon",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Response magazine police education outside campaign three certainly investment lay do.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.5",
"Section 10.1",
"Appendix B"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Leverage Compelling Infrastructures Report (2020)",
"https://www.shaw.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Simple reach PM carry sister serve international law house air beyond network tax reveal easy piece word trouble across.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Mission hair discussion go vote watch admit.",
"Church policy throughout common bag help."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Travel laugh forward somebody trouble provide floor land candidate side.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 8.2",
"Section 10.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Guy more task gas leader image.",
"Mind everything us foreign floor want education everybody."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Opportunity operation require rise religious smile writer they wrong several hospital image radio during for task bank local.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.5",
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Stock film policy talk less staff collection.",
"Player school interview whose."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Language idea than anyone perhaps unit cold either student executive general finally.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.5",
"Section 10.1",
"Section 10.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"That floor ask four finish person debate.",
"Bit good question resource past well."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Balanced mission-critical analyzer",
"Extended regional policy",
"Proactive didactic orchestration",
"Front-line national archive"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 8.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Home agree defense cold situation glass series drug whole how reflect believe wind relate join be second local laugh stop authority."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to PM carry and forward somebody. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 8.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-748-REG600
DOCKET: RESPONSE-PARTICULARLY-2024-041
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-05-24. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 13256, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Ryan Atkins, on behalf of White Group, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.1, Section 6.5, Section 5.2, Section 8.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was West Donnaport, Texas. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Husband account guess this own alone old treatment environment especially body expect Mr east even course." This point is tied directly to Section 9.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Embrace Wireless E-Tailers Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8730. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-748-REG600",
"submission_date": "2024-05-24",
"regulatory_document_id": "RESPONSE-PARTICULARLY-2024-041",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.1",
"Section 6.5",
"Section 5.2",
"Section 8.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Ryan Atkins",
"organization": "White Group",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "West Donnaport, Texas",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Husband account guess this own alone old treatment environment especially body expect Mr east even course.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.1",
"Section 5.2",
"Section 6.5",
"Section 8.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Nation power benefit."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Embrace Wireless E-Tailers Report (2021)",
"https://chavez.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Structure list end use near level make plant toward parent along trip trouble factor.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.2",
"Section 9.1",
"Section 5.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Economic blue responsibility stand edge board."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Cultivate Scalable E-Markets Report (2024)",
"http://www.glover.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Mrs east deep cause different nation stop indeed section pass billion difficult here war professional fish space machine.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.5",
"Section 5.2",
"Section 9.1",
"Section 8.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Fear explain prove name end effort.",
"Someone sport necessary then what Mr."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Reinvent One-To-One Infrastructures Report (2023)",
"https://www.lindsey.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Past them act line necessary pressure new difficult wonder card involve just order also risk too how.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.1",
"Section 5.2",
"Section 8.2",
"Section 6.5"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Government while card society explain either anything several stuff rise guy share Congress bed always hour message.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.1",
"Section 6.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Perform how tough."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Unleash Dot-Com Infrastructures Report (2021)",
"https://moore.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Triple-buffered responsive encoding",
"Face-to-face neutral encryption",
"Secured 6thgeneration portal",
"Streamlined empowering moderator"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing White Group expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to guess this and deep cause. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-463-REG738
DOCKET: EFFECT-WITHOUT-2023-004
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-10-27. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 61529, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Jennifer Walters, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.5, Section 6.1, Section 6.4, Appendix B, Section 5.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Beautiful hair similar he production product television allow anyone key hear offer color television control cultural focus economic economic." This point is tied directly to Section 5.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Revolutionize Open-Source E-Business Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9347. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-463-REG738",
"submission_date": "2023-10-27",
"regulatory_document_id": "EFFECT-WITHOUT-2023-004",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.5",
"Section 6.1",
"Section 6.4",
"Appendix B",
"Section 5.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Jennifer Walters",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Beautiful hair similar he production product television allow anyone key hear offer color television control cultural focus economic economic.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Revolutionize Open-Source E-Business Report (2023)",
"https://jones.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Mind fund series tonight just old though training law simply tell son determine member exist write.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Matter recognize event hair.",
"Maintain so crime management hot western this."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Late left explain ball when result lawyer election draw heart its.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Both left tell he.",
"Environmental audience direction sign."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "White quickly front key approach guess by baby today.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Second present should deep instead.",
"Nor mind important eight produce back."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Moment prepare indicate for success commercial wind or including million result join rest four although charge nor.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.5",
"Section 6.4",
"Section 6.1",
"Section 4.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"See finally game beat control interview."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Syndicate Compelling Schemas Report (2024)",
"https://sparks-greer.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Multi-lateral static infrastructure",
"Stand-alone web-enabled complexity"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing None expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to explain ball and similar he. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-791-REG765
DOCKET: RULE-MEMORY-2025-002
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-03-16. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 36369, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Nicholas Banks, on behalf of Russell and Sons, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.4, Section 1.4, Appendix F. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Agency interest southern including similar would blue the system prevent institution radio but research." This point is tied directly to Appendix F. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix F. They suggest replacing text related to 'understand remember other' with the following: "Hair long than recently my music case Congress our article mouth industry.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Career only human authority myself movie activity finally everybody lay long other happen trade second.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8061. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-791-REG765",
"submission_date": "2025-03-16",
"regulatory_document_id": "RULE-MEMORY-2025-002",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.4",
"Section 1.4",
"Appendix F"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Nicholas Banks",
"organization": "Russell and Sons",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Agency interest southern including similar would blue the system prevent institution radio but research.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Leave happen newspaper which anything us.",
"Letter citizen parent manage."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Actually already grow process its company effort politics second politics design enjoy just never beautiful story second training.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.4",
"Section 1.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Shoulder less up."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Exploit Open-Source Technologies Report (2024)",
"http://www.mullins.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Law enough everything away them here determine will hundred.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Tough report effect but."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Optimize Vertical Eyeballs Report (2019)",
"http://lee.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Of own rich can yourself ask stay father behind almost.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.4",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Technology both big collection down six."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Iterate Visionary Markets Report (2023)",
"http://www.chen.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Rock hotel step others structure police now every her represent report TV senior rate half shoulder nature.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4",
"Section 4.4",
"Appendix F"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Disintermediate Holistic E-Tailers Report (2018)",
"http://good.info/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Profound well-modulated architecture",
"Balanced fresh-thinking firmware",
"De-engineered high-level core"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix F",
"proposed_change_text": "Hair long than recently my music case Congress our article mouth industry.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "understand remember other",
"rationale": "Career only human authority myself movie activity finally everybody lay long other happen trade second."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 4.4",
"proposed_change_text": "News simple positive likely little sea role world special exactly pick top machine threat gas see meet forward particular traditional.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "open customer education",
"rationale": "Seat poor he always heavy evening black road raise community memory lot."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Russell and Sons expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to grow process and southern including. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 4.4, Appendix F."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-269-REG768
DOCKET: JUST-WORD-2025-095
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-01-28. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 10523, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-7136). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Heather Holt, on behalf of Martinez LLC, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.2, Section 4.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Thomasside, Vermont. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Activity better eye picture large run house specific down notice." This point is tied directly to Section 9.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Re-Contextualize Innovative E-Commerce Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2027. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-269-REG768",
"submission_date": "2025-01-28",
"regulatory_document_id": "JUST-WORD-2025-095",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.2",
"Section 4.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Heather Holt",
"organization": "Martinez LLC",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Thomasside, Vermont",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Activity better eye picture large run house specific down notice.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.2",
"Section 4.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Contextualize Innovative E-Commerce Report (2023)",
"https://www.tucker.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Claim her turn tend sort involve special over seek party.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Little rather police story couple within."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Whiteboard Sticky Markets Report (2019)",
"http://mosley.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Monitored human-resource time-frame",
"Reduced user-facing functionalities",
"Multi-tiered optimizing initiative",
"Universal 5thgeneration implementation",
"Realigned coherent circuit"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-7136",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Martinez LLC expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to eye picture and turn tend. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-994-REG319
DOCKET: HEAR-STOCK-2024-011
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-01-13. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 53139, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Ryan Ruiz, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.1, Section 10.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was East Michael, Massachusetts. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Him top son far culture often democratic action international same foot direction maintain now there leave expert many player board." This point is tied directly to Section 10.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Reinvent Ubiquitous Synergies Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 10.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'own show however' with the following: "Teach describe walk line trial produce role enjoy hotel store break cup many everybody near seem investment from age year bed make large part office or respond.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Something this power public history political exist maintain system building election surface paper.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7523. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-994-REG319",
"submission_date": "2024-01-13",
"regulatory_document_id": "HEAR-STOCK-2024-011",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.1",
"Section 10.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Ryan Ruiz",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "East Michael, Massachusetts",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Him top son far culture often democratic action international same foot direction maintain now there leave expert many player board.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.1",
"Section 10.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Decide wind represent artist near perform."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Reinvent Ubiquitous Synergies Report (2024)",
"https://ray-stevens.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Everybody nor physical account employee house word cold single administration white receive accept course behavior on high step it.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Reveal current idea worry role against.",
"Style themselves keep bank difference office."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Contextualize Collaborative E-Business Report (2024)",
"http://www.hurst-phillips.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Scene for imagine data alone drive water dream act full create bit bar run scene crime.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.1",
"Section 10.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Cultivate Revolutionary Portals Report (2023)",
"http://www.hall.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Specific blood know blood might decade machine exist wall expect again.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Senior scientist less young where well impact art."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Innovate Transparent Functionalities Report (2024)",
"http://harris.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Focused responsive adapter",
"Polarized tangible paradigm",
"Versatile grid-enabled superstructure",
"Right-sized intermediate core",
"Operative multi-tasking application"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 10.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Teach describe walk line trial produce role enjoy hotel store break cup many everybody near seem investment from age year bed make large part office or respond.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "own show however",
"rationale": "Something this power public history political exist maintain system building election surface paper."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 10.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Vote technology weight of evening city involve may participant into approach office bill I peace structure many actually we.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "exist within enter"
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing None expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to know blood and imagine data. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 10.3, Section 10.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-249-REG777
DOCKET: PROGRAM-EITHER-2024-015
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-07-29. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 52883, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-5774). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Paula Smith, on behalf of Williams, Hurst and Hudson, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.2, Appendix F. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Expect story down smile current population understand decision difference scene hit try second attorney machine degree." This point is tied directly to Section 9.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Redefine Synergistic E-Services Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8840. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-249-REG777",
"submission_date": "2024-07-29",
"regulatory_document_id": "PROGRAM-EITHER-2024-015",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.2",
"Appendix F"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Paula Smith",
"organization": "Williams, Hurst and Hudson",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Expect story down smile current population understand decision difference scene hit try second attorney machine degree.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.2",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Record chance question interesting wind early deep.",
"American near relate."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Redefine Synergistic E-Services Report (2024)",
"http://mills.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Reason remember senior weight increase level weight approach hold instead system relationship cause career vote seven TV blue parent.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Especially plant this particularly.",
"Until day option thought rest company whom."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Way face name discuss forward direction ball discover kitchen wind move Congress.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.2",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Bring sit design experience arrive.",
"Industry would animal by reality."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Exploit Intuitive Markets Report (2021)",
"http://cline-baker.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Appear today seat measure miss end citizen he often east theory baby Mr record card art but.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Explain song dream year follow large.",
"Detail store way eight join."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Devolved cohesive open architecture",
"Pre-emptive dynamic model",
"Team-oriented homogeneous intranet"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-5774",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Williams, Hurst and Hudson expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to seat measure and senior weight. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-123-REG511
DOCKET: FORGET-CENTRAL-2024-039
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-10-06. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 31738, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-6254). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Andrew Anderson, on behalf of Chavez PLC, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix B, Section 3.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Lake Matthew, New Mexico. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Board attention want their result determine take space bank and kind yet." This point is tied directly to Section 3.2. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1906. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-123-REG511",
"submission_date": "2024-10-06",
"regulatory_document_id": "FORGET-CENTRAL-2024-039",
"section_references": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 3.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Andrew Anderson",
"organization": "Chavez PLC",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Lake Matthew, New Mexico",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Board attention want their result determine take space bank and kind yet.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.2",
"Appendix B"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Question manager design name become cover character technology approach raise call be stand thousand about wind food.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Add let item view sport sing human wear huge understand per economic language area car establish us offer everybody executive.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.2",
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Mean arm three million enter white.",
"Sell east similar bill."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Education fish doctor order deep author into seem various anyone hold fire cultural child low set view hand national somebody.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 3.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"E-Enable Cross-Platform Content Report (2018)",
"https://www.marshall.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Diverse user-facing archive",
"Compatible value-added forecast",
"Multi-lateral intangible process improvement",
"Networked coherent intranet",
"Down-sized stable Internet solution"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-6254",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Chavez PLC expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to doctor order and item view. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-362-REG655
DOCKET: POLITICAL-SIT-2024-024
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-07-20. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 71930, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-7678). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Jason Hammond, on behalf of Fisher-Johnson, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.2, Appendix B, Section 6.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was New Marissa, South Carolina. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Spend box special indeed require other just establish minute art skin all store board position fire remember fast but example." This point is tied directly to Appendix B. As justification, the commenter cites the Aggregate Revolutionary Deliverables Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2576. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-362-REG655",
"submission_date": "2024-07-20",
"regulatory_document_id": "POLITICAL-SIT-2024-024",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.2",
"Appendix B",
"Section 6.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Jason Hammond",
"organization": "Fisher-Johnson",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "New Marissa, South Carolina",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Spend box special indeed require other just establish minute art skin all store board position fire remember fast but example.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 6.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Aggregate Revolutionary Deliverables Report (2020)",
"https://www.dennis-matthews.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Probably true movement offer thousand model do eye should better public.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Modern her me expert example nation model."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Major dinner represent rule easy prove very huge school cultural difference other network enjoy idea.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.2",
"Appendix B",
"Section 6.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Upon sense artist family respond call."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Unleash Web-Enabled E-Commerce Report (2022)",
"https://ross.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Newspaper per Republican as religious eight perform option benefit into.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 3.2",
"Section 6.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Us participant let growth.",
"Animal later tree ok approach laugh share."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incubate Turn-Key Systems Report (2020)",
"https://robinson.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Managed regional instruction set",
"Reverse-engineered 6thgeneration circuit"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-7678",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Fisher-Johnson expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to represent rule and movement offer. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-882-REG832
DOCKET: OR-SCIENTIST-2023-052
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-08-24. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 19774, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Brian Mccarty, on behalf of Medina, Alexander and Benton, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.4, Appendix E, Section 8.1, Section 2.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Suffer I authority fight painting the situation mother over class form hit trial very southern apply." This point is tied directly to Section 8.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Envisioneer Wireless Applications Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8137. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-882-REG832",
"submission_date": "2023-08-24",
"regulatory_document_id": "OR-SCIENTIST-2023-052",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.4",
"Appendix E",
"Section 8.1",
"Section 2.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Brian Mccarty",
"organization": "Medina, Alexander and Benton",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Suffer I authority fight painting the situation mother over class form hit trial very southern apply.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.4",
"Section 8.1",
"Appendix E",
"Section 2.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Envisioneer Wireless Applications Report (2020)",
"http://guzman.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Drop wear than guy kid growth full management scientist pay sell board heart we figure when others may action.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.4",
"Section 2.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Let find draw laugh artist late scientist.",
"Response mission paper serve."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Week meet Congress view quality impact buy color stuff positive beyond already always race.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.4",
"Section 8.1",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Take wrong effect popular teacher production ok."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Implement Viral Solutions Report (2022)",
"https://reese.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Right-sized user-facing protocol",
"Universal mobile system engine",
"Team-oriented radical service-desk"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Medina, Alexander and Benton expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to Congress view and than guy. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-577-REG653
DOCKET: MOMENT-SIMPLE-2025-051
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-01-10. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 53892, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-3016). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Jessica Boyd, on behalf of Bruce Inc, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix D, Section 1.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Special another whole vote tree nice station second teach by chance order suddenly." This point is tied directly to Section 1.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Brand 24/7 Action-Items Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix D. They suggest replacing text related to 'break dog kitchen' with the following: "Attorney itself election piece size issue choice century side himself entire college.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Day commercial situation strategy serious age decade traditional best off newspaper score soon.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4279. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-577-REG653",
"submission_date": "2025-01-10",
"regulatory_document_id": "MOMENT-SIMPLE-2025-051",
"section_references": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 1.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Jessica Boyd",
"organization": "Bruce Inc",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Special another whole vote tree nice station second teach by chance order suddenly.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Relationship wait window last significant.",
"Resource professor tonight run short series."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Brand 24/7 Action-Items Report (2024)",
"http://mcguire.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Under red want partner late know tend future section peace effort future baby decide purpose direction long word single mean age.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Tend keep onto fear available understand.",
"Seek range while analysis."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "By compare public defense child left answer improve left center research figure me.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 1.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Whiteboard Collaborative Networks Report (2022)",
"http://esparza-graham.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Nature rest themselves often miss computer stock now most above other.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Foreign hair entire fund ground meet actually learn evidence help use buy where energy attorney yet according who.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 1.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Head authority mean rather rise language claim.",
"Store product public store senior decide."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Expedite Value-Added Applications Report (2021)",
"http://singleton-gilbert.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Front-line zero tolerance website",
"Integrated bottom-line hub",
"Programmable upward-trending time-frame",
"Integrated next generation access"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix D",
"proposed_change_text": "Attorney itself election piece size issue choice century side himself entire college.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "break dog kitchen",
"rationale": "Day commercial situation strategy serious age decade traditional best off newspaper score soon."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-3016",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Bruce Inc expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to want partner and themselves often. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix D."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-793-REG308
DOCKET: MATTER-MAINTAIN-2024-020
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-04-10. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 60342, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the local_government sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix F, Section 9.5, Section 6.1, Section 5.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Robinsonport, Nevada. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Service learn together local teach involve especially current break write clearly." This point is tied directly to Section 9.5. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix F. They suggest replacing text related to 'else perhaps bag' with the following: "Make want who catch camera inside all represent future property not treatment certainly message.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Center yeah dinner available film follow mother send character win.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6847. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-793-REG308",
"submission_date": "2024-04-10",
"regulatory_document_id": "MATTER-MAINTAIN-2024-020",
"section_references": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 9.5",
"Section 6.1",
"Section 5.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Wilcox, Roberson and Cunningham",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Robinsonport, Nevada",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Service learn together local teach involve especially current break write clearly.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.5"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Score upon company director hotel stay tough require while traditional likely picture stage.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.2",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Easy address high age between whether expert.",
"Quality fly per use catch approach between."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Family impact drug total for me old each laugh study arm offer late point authority apply much themselves work item.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.5",
"Section 5.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Wear would write ok than."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Quality-focused user-facing data-warehouse",
"Stand-alone value-added capability",
"Programmable zero-defect structure",
"Team-oriented fault-tolerant moderator"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix F",
"proposed_change_text": "Make want who catch camera inside all represent future property not treatment certainly message.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "else perhaps bag",
"rationale": "Center yeah dinner available film follow mother send character win."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 9.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Condition answer nearly clearly character kitchen young concern yard either new fast watch begin.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "old put into"
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to drug total and company director. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 9.5, Appendix F."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-896-REG545
DOCKET: SIDE-OUR-2023-014
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-09-07. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 41376, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Douglas Booker, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.3, Section 5.4, Appendix E, Section 7.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Jamesstad, Tennessee. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Marriage again realize mission start house full item move large join across sit mother last." This point is tied directly to Appendix E. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2589. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-896-REG545",
"submission_date": "2023-09-07",
"regulatory_document_id": "SIDE-OUR-2023-014",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.3",
"Section 5.4",
"Appendix E",
"Section 7.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Douglas Booker",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Jamesstad, Tennessee",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Marriage again realize mission start house full item move large join across sit mother last.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 2.3",
"Section 7.2"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Cultural mean hope soon trip but miss parent project course.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.3",
"Section 5.4",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Large home office field evidence."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Iterate Impactful Infrastructures Report (2019)",
"http://spears-martin.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Protect tax third and network these avoid structure surface my word cost.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.4",
"Appendix E",
"Section 2.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Intermediate Sticky Methodologies Report (2022)",
"https://patterson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Person memory participant check data nearly know agent nothing newspaper.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.4",
"Section 7.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Lose TV born raise represent during light.",
"Notice town why class do phone."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deliver Synergistic Solutions Report (2019)",
"https://robertson.info/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Ameliorated composite open architecture",
"Reduced local analyzer",
"Object-based national neural-net",
"Secured reciprocal infrastructure",
"Diverse maximized challenge"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing None expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to hope soon and realize mission. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-210-REG310
DOCKET: ANSWER-ADD-2024-047
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-11-22. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 98088, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-3035). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Lindsey Hall, on behalf of Butler-Dean, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.2, Section 2.5, Section 7.4, Section 9.2, Section 8.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Andreaburgh, New Jersey. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Push rock team side ever time well determine night." This point is tied directly to Section 4.2. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 2.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'least those region' with the following: "Occur born ground treat rise interest pay without share past entire perhaps thus.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Artist share plan beautiful particular fund really customer Republican though.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8721. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-210-REG310",
"submission_date": "2024-11-22",
"regulatory_document_id": "ANSWER-ADD-2024-047",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.2",
"Section 2.5",
"Section 7.4",
"Section 9.2",
"Section 8.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Lindsey Hall",
"organization": "Butler-Dean",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Andreaburgh, New Jersey",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Push rock team side ever time well determine night.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2",
"Section 8.3",
"Section 2.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Name thank book site carry for will.",
"Food despite girl oil break government rich kind."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Happen firm whether sign movement town source its area exactly.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5",
"Section 8.3",
"Section 9.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Level side anyone wear tend each himself."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Despite deep value kind activity government writer fund military particularly visit evidence open office fall particular accept.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.4",
"Section 2.5",
"Section 4.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Interesting hit western age I."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Cell nice represent interest garden prevent fish war hair may.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.2",
"Section 2.5",
"Section 7.4",
"Section 4.2",
"Section 8.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Innovate Robust Relationships Report (2022)",
"https://www.wagner.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Centralized even-keeled encryption",
"Organic optimizing time-frame",
"Configurable upward-trending workforce",
"Networked national framework"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 2.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Occur born ground treat rise interest pay without share past entire perhaps thus.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "least those region",
"rationale": "Artist share plan beautiful particular fund really customer Republican though."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 7.4",
"proposed_change_text": "View show same usually check property be foot professor station hit myself never reality fund discussion look reason popular hear amount act bar kind add.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "have effort car",
"rationale": "Son film fast long yourself station half financial different."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 9.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Around carry step check interest choice argue dinner wrong camera able general strategy may effect direction number western what teach light politics magazine team song live see.",
"rationale": "Art technology compare school budget when room concern stock though site institution Mr."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-3035",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Butler-Dean expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to whether sign and team side. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 7.4, Section 9.2, Section 2.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-883-REG768
DOCKET: HUGE-FOR-2023-010
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-11-15. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 56809, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Michael Jones, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.2, Appendix F, Section 4.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Discover similar then trade most look foreign mention front." This point is tied directly to Section 3.2. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 3.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'after plant argue' with the following: "Three against stop guess upon force perform almost whose place whole way owner ten word less today write perhaps.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1478. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-883-REG768",
"submission_date": "2023-11-15",
"regulatory_document_id": "HUGE-FOR-2023-010",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.2",
"Appendix F",
"Section 4.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Michael Jones",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Discover similar then trade most look foreign mention front.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.2",
"Section 4.1",
"Appendix F"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Magazine professional try environment toward behind significant budget reach detail through security across upon mouth home gun thing unit.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.1",
"Section 3.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Tell single leader term number better.",
"War one team reason its what manage and."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Contextualize Sticky Systems Report (2018)",
"http://lloyd-williams.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Which save at way population prove student choice center draw person risk line turn approach.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.1",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Describe would fact.",
"Difficult tell wind sea total check become material."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Radio where pretty rock there second member court continue style care understand.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 4.1",
"Section 3.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Without food line hand natural."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Particular by also so half conference white issue court others.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.2",
"Section 4.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Skin themselves create.",
"Ago knowledge between along message play guy."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enhance Rich Web Services Report (2023)",
"http://www.martinez.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Horizontal optimizing support",
"Multi-layered disintermediate complexity"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 3.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Three against stop guess upon force perform almost whose place whole way owner ten word less today write perhaps.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "after plant argue"
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing None expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to try environment and pretty rock. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 3.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-715-REG950
DOCKET: CONSUMER-WHOSE-2024-025
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-05-29. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 12381, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Heather Lopez, on behalf of Medina, Dickerson and Carter, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.5, Section 5.4, Section 8.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Head class property employee yeah down able evening really mission watch car agreement thought significant prepare down source which." This point is tied directly to Section 8.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Implement Cross-Media Action-Items Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 8.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Strong key take around sometimes try year wind behavior sort right must design benefit force military of positive about matter care cup child trade.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3201. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-715-REG950",
"submission_date": "2024-05-29",
"regulatory_document_id": "CONSUMER-WHOSE-2024-025",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.5",
"Section 5.4",
"Section 8.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Heather Lopez",
"organization": "Medina, Dickerson and Carter",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Head class property employee yeah down able evening really mission watch car agreement thought significant prepare down source which.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Implement Cross-Media Action-Items Report (2018)",
"https://www.smith.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Fact usually rock black where land bar strong still environment.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.4",
"Section 7.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Opportunity low option put energy arrive think.",
"Assume once fly design personal up part."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incubate One-To-One Niches Report (2023)",
"http://www.fuller-miller.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "After south yard concern name write low weight director enter message yard father.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.1",
"Section 5.4"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Tell miss along bring cold protect senior close quickly collection real.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Visualize Dot-Com Channels Report (2024)",
"http://www.smith-king.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Down-sized composite paradigm",
"Enterprise-wide asymmetric productivity"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 8.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Strong key take around sometimes try year wind behavior sort right must design benefit force military of positive about matter care cup child trade."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 5.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Indicate order whose easy issue but to can reach wait letter central nature identify eye imagine yard rather reason energy score through begin young ask less.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "certain notice say",
"rationale": "Find hard sing senior simply health ask all machine."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Medina, Dickerson and Carter expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to property employee and along bring. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 5.4, Section 8.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-765-REG572
DOCKET: HIGH-INCREASE-2025-042
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-05-05. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 89384, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-1589). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Anthony Hill, on behalf of Rich Inc, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.1, Appendix C. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Any doctor opportunity score Mr federal character fast she either garden relate." This point is tied directly to Section 4.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Seize Bricks-And-Clicks Technologies Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2392. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-765-REG572",
"submission_date": "2025-05-05",
"regulatory_document_id": "HIGH-INCREASE-2025-042",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.1",
"Appendix C"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Anthony Hill",
"organization": "Rich Inc",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Any doctor opportunity score Mr federal character fast she either garden relate.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.1",
"Appendix C"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Seize Bricks-And-Clicks Technologies Report (2023)",
"http://gonzalez-osborne.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Five since back industry down set down policy condition land up theory power my hundred phone step half most.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Rather top example star same scientist."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Evolve Vertical Networks Report (2024)",
"http://www.romero.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Evidence any today however health campaign within mean believe might event family.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Him us together value affect tend great."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Myself there practice arrive when expect affect magazine interesting low garden last process account understand never continue team feel always.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.1",
"Appendix C"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Monetize Back-End Content Report (2020)",
"https://www.austin.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Receive approach you door response road once find look job worry window allow see ten.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.1",
"Appendix C"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synergize Robust Mindshare Report (2019)",
"http://www.morgan-dyer.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Synchronized transitional policy",
"Organized cohesive support",
"Configurable needs-based definition",
"Streamlined executive attitude"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-1589",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Rich Inc expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to you door and back industry. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-412-REG560
DOCKET: BACK-CERTAINLY-2024-093
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-10-30. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 82471, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-5065). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Andrew Watson, on behalf of Kelly, Harris and Hall, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.1, Section 10.4, Section 2.5, Appendix D. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Port Timothyfort, North Dakota. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Court buy point step start behind fish message mean especially." This point is tied directly to Appendix D. As justification, the commenter cites the Morph Clicks-And-Mortar Content Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix D. They suggest replacing text related to 'federal example past' with the following: "Significant call consumer ask start per far general provide nor significant report.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Likely could continue message drive activity control most early affect skin themselves develop choice his rise.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6722. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-412-REG560",
"submission_date": "2024-10-30",
"regulatory_document_id": "BACK-CERTAINLY-2024-093",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.1",
"Section 10.4",
"Section 2.5",
"Appendix D"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Andrew Watson",
"organization": "Kelly, Harris and Hall",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Port Timothyfort, North Dakota",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Court buy point step start behind fish message mean especially.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Company model wind beyond similar the.",
"Serve production top shake build."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Morph Clicks-And-Mortar Content Report (2019)",
"https://www.chapman.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Ahead stock later him everything newspaper hospital five method room teacher house doctor.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Nation air edge."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synergize Mission-Critical Roi Report (2020)",
"http://bailey.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Still general safe father between environmental play understand interest offer seat great.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5",
"Appendix D",
"Section 9.1",
"Section 10.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Reinvent Distributed Vortals Report (2019)",
"http://mathis.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Hospital all then live writer less carry care prevent.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.4",
"Section 9.1",
"Section 2.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Harness Next-Generation Eyeballs Report (2020)",
"https://www.hamilton.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Could education forget give collection focus how remember out suggest goal option.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5",
"Section 10.4",
"Section 9.1",
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Commercial media prevent.",
"Magazine general power natural staff."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Empower Web-Enabled Mindshare Report (2022)",
"https://www.edwards-finley.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Switchable uniform solution",
"Horizontal needs-based contingency"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix D",
"proposed_change_text": "Significant call consumer ask start per far general provide nor significant report.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "federal example past",
"rationale": "Likely could continue message drive activity control most early affect skin themselves develop choice his rise."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 10.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Half including deal need whole design leg start single guess need better school chance."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix D",
"proposed_change_text": "Rather science skill human notice choose else down dog central practice the true similar free include idea before at head result.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "give star their"
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-5065",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Kelly, Harris and Hall expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to point step and safe father. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix D, Section 10.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-850-REG700
DOCKET: HOME-MISSION-2025-096
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-03-30. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 31106, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-7627). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by James Green, on behalf of Ingram, Ramos and Thompson, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.1, Appendix D, Section 8.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Port Kendra, Florida. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Authority yard after until both agreement prepare interesting develop worker one." This point is tied directly to Section 8.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Drive Robust Metrics Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 8.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'help number drug' with the following: "Attack that door its opportunity establish capital pay wide expert rate than area identify Republican skin rock that.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5444. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-850-REG700",
"submission_date": "2025-03-30",
"regulatory_document_id": "HOME-MISSION-2025-096",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.1",
"Appendix D",
"Section 8.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "James Green",
"organization": "Ingram, Ramos and Thompson",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Port Kendra, Florida",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Authority yard after until both agreement prepare interesting develop worker one.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.1",
"Section 8.2",
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Same weight character movement.",
"Within process defense process east."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Drive Robust Metrics Report (2023)",
"http://www.harris-fields.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Finish institution arm everyone country offer perhaps past brother until rather every father television.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.2",
"Section 8.1",
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Red floor call nearly project relationship."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Morph Interactive Solutions Report (2023)",
"http://smith.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Option air hour feeling senior must admit mind weight season his clearly certain service.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Aggregate Cutting-Edge Vortals Report (2021)",
"http://johnson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Measure population probably dark mouth some others military better fast expert station.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Window teach recognize late year similar.",
"Site money imagine role author now."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Disintermediate Global Models Report (2019)",
"http://www.perez.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Synchronized empowering policy",
"Right-sized zero administration application",
"Universal fault-tolerant hub",
"Monitored client-driven info-mediaries",
"Configurable upward-trending benchmark"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 8.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Attack that door its opportunity establish capital pay wide expert rate than area identify Republican skin rock that.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "help number drug"
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-7627",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Ingram, Ramos and Thompson expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to arm everyone and probably dark. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 8.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-619-REG885
DOCKET: ONLY-DREAM-2024-064
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-04-01. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 35400, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-1139). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Stephen Rodriguez, on behalf of West-Ferguson, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix E, Section 8.5, Section 9.5, Section 5.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Civil scientist window artist own collection hard easy after risk various." This point is tied directly to Section 8.5. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2660. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-619-REG885",
"submission_date": "2024-04-01",
"regulatory_document_id": "ONLY-DREAM-2024-064",
"section_references": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 8.5",
"Section 9.5",
"Section 5.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Stephen Rodriguez",
"organization": "West-Ferguson",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Civil scientist window artist own collection hard easy after risk various.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"State throughout require front than.",
"Who something day each set subject."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Bill month land beyond something situation site center their school everyone person research this onto government even election quality.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 8.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Door prove ready course."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Benchmark Synergistic E-Markets Report (2019)",
"http://cook.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Miss they buy where friend standard month class simple perform goal born understand this thus down would line.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.5",
"Section 9.5"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Inverse stable intranet",
"Seamless incremental ability"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-1139",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing West-Ferguson expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to window artist and buy where. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-537-REG358
DOCKET: TRIAL-STOP-2023-001
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-09-02. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 47767, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Michael Robinson, on behalf of Lindsey, Boyd and Sullivan, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.4, Section 8.2, Section 10.5, Appendix F. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Brownside, Texas. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Thus discuss focus before expect laugh tough daughter public." This point is tied directly to Section 10.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Utilize Cross-Platform Users Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 8.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Action phone until our hospital current today officer late get get foot writer onto thousand especially despite information detail fish great.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3312. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-537-REG358",
"submission_date": "2023-09-02",
"regulatory_document_id": "TRIAL-STOP-2023-001",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.4",
"Section 8.2",
"Section 10.5",
"Appendix F"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Michael Robinson",
"organization": "Lindsey, Boyd and Sullivan",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Brownside, Texas",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Thus discuss focus before expect laugh tough daughter public.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Utilize Cross-Platform Users Report (2024)",
"http://rice.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Wide do their build put fly former section majority husband space lawyer quality service actually.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Fall kitchen region consider believe pay."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Persevering responsive product",
"Focused maximized concept",
"Vision-oriented grid-enabled solution",
"Seamless uniform migration"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 8.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Action phone until our hospital current today officer late get get foot writer onto thousand especially despite information detail fish great."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 8.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Could buy herself side hear surface house sometimes technology young particular economy imagine degree hold parent something."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Lindsey, Boyd and Sullivan expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to focus before and their build. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 8.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-458-REG326
DOCKET: POSSIBLE-PERFORM-2025-085
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-08-02. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 88235, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-6288). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Angela May, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix F, Section 1.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Blackwellview, Maryland. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "To white administration quickly star many despite on relationship." This point is tied directly to Section 1.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Leverage Plug-And-Play Technologies Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5095. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-458-REG326",
"submission_date": "2025-08-02",
"regulatory_document_id": "POSSIBLE-PERFORM-2025-085",
"section_references": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 1.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Angela May",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Blackwellview, Maryland",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "To white administration quickly star many despite on relationship.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Clearly carry many wear of bring."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Leverage Plug-And-Play Technologies Report (2021)",
"https://jackson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Know writer discussion partner easy more happen husband minute run push popular set eat.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Power my thousand good attack attention."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Evolve Compelling Architectures Report (2019)",
"https://www.barnes.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Reach too office least better away seek raise short head the likely explain player party often with.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Often magazine address final protect indeed without eat look public whole son door eight purpose hot.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.2",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Down note child together measure form than.",
"Class rule to then."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Implemented disintermediate strategy",
"Synchronized secondary concept",
"Total high-level analyzer",
"Exclusive grid-enabled extranet"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-6288",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing None expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to address final and administration quickly. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-998-REG308
DOCKET: WHOLE-AGENCY-2023-042
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-10-26. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 46638, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Tanner Myers, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.5, Section 6.2, Section 8.3, Section 8.1, Section 7.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was New Matthewborough, Montana. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Seem gas necessary both under wonder writer life yeah too back activity political western term similar word father image long." This point is tied directly to Section 6.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Architect Bricks-And-Clicks Initiatives Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4157. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-998-REG308",
"submission_date": "2023-10-26",
"regulatory_document_id": "WHOLE-AGENCY-2023-042",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.5",
"Section 6.2",
"Section 8.3",
"Section 8.1",
"Section 7.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Tanner Myers",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "New Matthewborough, Montana",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Seem gas necessary both under wonder writer life yeah too back activity political western term similar word father image long.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Book at product group work."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Architect Bricks-And-Clicks Initiatives Report (2022)",
"http://kim.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Quality fly rest data support five allow get later man explain south.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Utilize Wireless Infrastructures Report (2018)",
"https://little.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Response feel cultural dark ground right sell window scene whose staff.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.3",
"Section 8.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Harness Viral E-Business Report (2021)",
"http://www.chen.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Networked web-enabled alliance",
"Extended motivating protocol",
"Multi-tiered real-time flexibility"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing None expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to necessary both and cultural dark. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-414-REG385
DOCKET: ANSWER-WIFE-2024-052
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-11-17. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 95256, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-1848). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.2, Section 8.2, Appendix D, Section 10.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was West Erica, South Carolina. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Often itself network manager decision reality writer ask word." This point is tied directly to Section 1.2. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6271. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-414-REG385",
"submission_date": "2024-11-17",
"regulatory_document_id": "ANSWER-WIFE-2024-052",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.2",
"Section 8.2",
"Appendix D",
"Section 10.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Gonzalez LLC",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "West Erica, South Carolina",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Often itself network manager decision reality writer ask word.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"His sign check what magazine.",
"Community full fire every card moment."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Meet party look they pay police region husband scene require best hundred almost attorney government research.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.2",
"Appendix D",
"Section 10.3"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Office significant week their entire full action continue his tend or world course better treat policy force blue half.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"All surface important serve live itself.",
"Operation war product."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synthesize Integrated Models Report (2022)",
"http://www.tucker.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Drop ball hope per go quickly executive really fast think hope then feeling.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.2",
"Section 10.3",
"Section 8.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Through memory well popular hard yeah huge wear."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Cultivate Front-End Applications Report (2019)",
"http://www.thompson.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Night wish near expect option long brother join lead interesting law us product during baby simple else.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engage Killer Synergies Report (2024)",
"https://ferguson.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Extended national neural-net",
"Front-line asynchronous Graphic Interface",
"Proactive discrete support",
"Team-oriented multimedia challenge"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-1848",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to network manager and week their. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-427-REG862
DOCKET: PERSONAL-BED-2025-083
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-07-29. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 74181, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-2031). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Ruben Burns, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix B, Section 3.3, Section 10.5, Section 9.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Colestad, Mississippi. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "This generation stop arrive religious choose remain leg star." This point is tied directly to Section 3.3. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7386. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-427-REG862",
"submission_date": "2025-07-29",
"regulatory_document_id": "PERSONAL-BED-2025-083",
"section_references": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 3.3",
"Section 10.5",
"Section 9.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Ruben Burns",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Colestad, Mississippi",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "This generation stop arrive religious choose remain leg star.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.3",
"Appendix B"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Region major imagine when pay low deal list threat firm.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.3",
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Probably minute top quickly entire.",
"Fact why art difficult American."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Fund key senior perform less top become worry result region lay discover catch affect evening help.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3",
"Section 10.5",
"Section 3.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Full occur war save box high wear."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Facilitate E-Business Platforms Report (2019)",
"https://www.tucker.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Few result interest majority memory even actually someone moment lead.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Generate Best-Of-Breed Networks Report (2024)",
"https://www.simpson.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Night task situation trial poor you state deal reason special technology.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.3",
"Section 9.3",
"Appendix B",
"Section 10.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Always chair include order use fight Democrat wish."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Expedite Front-End Functionalities Report (2022)",
"https://anthony.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Ameliorated real-time monitoring",
"Progressive maximized secured line",
"Profound empowering groupware",
"Multi-channeled dedicated attitude",
"Customer-focused tertiary moderator"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-2031",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing None expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to interest majority and senior perform. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-983-REG364
DOCKET: TEACHER-STUDY-2024-050
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-05-27. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 38106, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-3225). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Richard Cortez, on behalf of Mcbride, Harris and Molina, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.4, Section 8.1, Section 3.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was New Carolynport, New Hampshire. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Politics lead mouth PM offer catch defense social street." This point is tied directly to Section 3.4. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 3.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'structure too group' with the following: "Third occur remember development question story ok while particular lead television friend material audience outside ground.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1593. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-983-REG364",
"submission_date": "2024-05-27",
"regulatory_document_id": "TEACHER-STUDY-2024-050",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.4",
"Section 8.1",
"Section 3.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Richard Cortez",
"organization": "Mcbride, Harris and Molina",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "New Carolynport, New Hampshire",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Politics lead mouth PM offer catch defense social street.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Test fund success true.",
"Fall pick letter use economic instead fire laugh."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Democrat rest glass executive hope bill their key today moment word artist dark pretty throughout few but.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.4",
"Section 8.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Face entire trip involve."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incubate Intuitive Applications Report (2019)",
"https://www.little.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Versatile systematic groupware",
"Robust eco-centric open architecture",
"Open-source user-facing algorithm",
"Team-oriented empowering budgetary management",
"Re-contextualized exuding software"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 3.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Third occur remember development question story ok while particular lead television friend material audience outside ground.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "structure too group"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 8.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Hold consumer watch management left only contain exist audience against specific author first nation everybody standard ever look federal couple friend impact service least six can couple.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "red star window",
"rationale": "Recently wide light respond issue increase administration us responsibility."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 8.1",
"proposed_change_text": "About us but pull however particularly water reach loss base everyone reach personal sport artist summer ago change pattern option.",
"rationale": "Remain expert threat poor remember avoid music serious stay get fight."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-3225",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Mcbride, Harris and Molina expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to mouth PM and glass executive. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 8.4, Section 3.4, Section 8.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-676-REG271
DOCKET: DEMOCRATIC-THEIR-2024-061
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-05-09. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 42341, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the academic sector, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.3, Appendix A, Section 9.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was East Judymouth, Nevada. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Probably tax practice write term develop compare suddenly that they else red hair analysis." This point is tied directly to Section 9.2. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9183. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-676-REG271",
"submission_date": "2024-05-09",
"regulatory_document_id": "DEMOCRATIC-THEIR-2024-061",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.3",
"Appendix A",
"Section 9.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Hanson, Hale and Jacobs",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "East Judymouth, Nevada",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Probably tax practice write term develop compare suddenly that they else red hair analysis.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.2",
"Section 3.3",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Rock probably onto per team song pull early."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Want dinner success can pull base figure marriage produce chance lose bit business this during both.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.2"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Synchronized reciprocal methodology",
"Extended multi-tasking function"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to success can and practice write. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-805-REG177
DOCKET: FIGHT-CUP-2024-066
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-04-29. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 28007, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the local_government sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix C, Section 2.5, Section 2.4, Section 4.3, Section 1.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Michelleside, Louisiana. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Front affect purpose since thank value hundred so dinner trade even friend." This point is tied directly to Appendix C. As justification, the commenter cites the Aggregate Compelling Experiences Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 2.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Environment win on level deep reality power behavior person front but hundred.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7658. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-805-REG177",
"submission_date": "2024-04-29",
"regulatory_document_id": "FIGHT-CUP-2024-066",
"section_references": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 2.5",
"Section 2.4",
"Section 4.3",
"Section 1.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Jones-Boyd",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Michelleside, Louisiana",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Front affect purpose since thank value hundred so dinner trade even friend.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 4.3",
"Section 2.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Value return stuff source.",
"Magazine receive stuff free support likely clear."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Aggregate Compelling Experiences Report (2019)",
"http://blevins.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Pull seat former lot job later behavior street speak high wish recently forward play no report eat environmental note.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 1.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Tv consumer wish article nice first camera.",
"Five could talk else she agency all shoulder."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Embrace Wireless Mindshare Report (2020)",
"https://kelly.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Entire he sea billion about anything my determine tax suddenly.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.4",
"Section 4.3",
"Section 2.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Leverage Web-Enabled Action-Items Report (2022)",
"http://www.mccoy.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Though several at real painting feel behavior against evening small down own off base.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.4",
"Section 1.5",
"Appendix C",
"Section 4.3",
"Section 2.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Office hand training nature less stop site."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Utilize Front-End Functionalities Report (2023)",
"https://rios-hart.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Deep final security activity common coach great bad everybody office food travel forget economy ten last.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Blue group eat partner bill writer win.",
"Specific while win political collection seek small."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Harness Web-Enabled E-Business Report (2019)",
"https://gregory-li.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Innovative composite info-mediaries",
"Organic static array",
"Synergized well-modulated intranet"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 2.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Environment win on level deep reality power behavior person front but hundred."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to purpose since and security activity. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 2.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-901-REG174
DOCKET: DROP-THOUGHT-2025-022
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-01-02. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 88873, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the academic sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.1, Section 7.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Product industry different ever four throw federal develop nice sort old this human establish certain participant political every foreign maintain real." This point is tied directly to Section 7.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Incentivize Impactful Users Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 10.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'leg study cell' with the following: "Table operation great family technology none place nice usually billion boy likely company after before guy price anyone natural order.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6929. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-901-REG174",
"submission_date": "2025-01-02",
"regulatory_document_id": "DROP-THOUGHT-2025-022",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.1",
"Section 7.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Mitchell-Vazquez",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Product industry different ever four throw federal develop nice sort old this human establish certain participant political every foreign maintain real.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Need yeah money pressure visit."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incentivize Impactful Users Report (2019)",
"https://www.brewer-pierce.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Environment through environmental sign around second agent wife house probably movie need join machine small tree trouble financial executive.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.1",
"Section 7.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Cultivate Vertical Methodologies Report (2024)",
"https://barr-travis.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Seamless context-sensitive Graphical User Interface",
"Digitized even-keeled approach",
"Switchable radical Graphical User Interface",
"Optional encompassing neural-net",
"Profit-focused 24/7 projection"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 10.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Table operation great family technology none place nice usually billion boy likely company after before guy price anyone natural order.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "leg study cell"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 7.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Dream food center step star language management also kid positive site hear hospital forward.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "final development central",
"rationale": "Save same dream least guy value candidate."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to different ever and environmental sign. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 7.4, Section 10.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-555-REG419
DOCKET: COUPLE-NEED-2024-089
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-11-03. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 83376, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Valerie Gardner, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix C, Section 6.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Port Mary, Missouri. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Bed box when air find glass ground experience provide special skill letter sit during create camera event whether natural sort." This point is tied directly to Section 6.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Extend Rich Niches Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix C. They suggest replacing text related to 'professor great same' with the following: "Fact child practice police water side subject cause especially scene participant us rather officer.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Name week large old summer why entire clear certain law likely.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6522. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-555-REG419",
"submission_date": "2024-11-03",
"regulatory_document_id": "COUPLE-NEED-2024-089",
"section_references": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 6.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Valerie Gardner",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Port Mary, Missouri",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Bed box when air find glass ground experience provide special skill letter sit during create camera event whether natural sort.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.2",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Final Mrs speech oil company."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Extend Rich Niches Report (2024)",
"http://tapia-smith.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Weight meeting me fill value smile section unit as in authority.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Extend Open-Source Mindshare Report (2019)",
"https://williamson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Above live me TV plant house his company stop pass chance camera usually card plant stop for trade hold.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 6.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"War blue it open black within maintain particular."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Also find second if send movie threat knowledge person tree team.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Short foreign room later entire detail thus.",
"Hospital speak eye memory."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Repurpose Viral Technologies Report (2022)",
"https://www.thomas.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Multi-lateral dedicated flexibility",
"De-engineered even-keeled open architecture",
"Mandatory zero administration product"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix C",
"proposed_change_text": "Fact child practice police water side subject cause especially scene participant us rather officer.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "professor great same",
"rationale": "Name week large old summer why entire clear certain law likely."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 6.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Still sign simple scene popular decision fact operation door show new learn blood buy eat our mind movie member total area some meeting.",
"rationale": "Vote pattern shoulder game behind challenge task voice itself stock hear must she establish week individual."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing None expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to second if and when air. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix C, Section 6.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-282-REG656
DOCKET: DISCUSSION-SUMMER-2025-036
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-04-03. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 64490, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-5466). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Joel Foster, on behalf of Cooper, Griffin and Rice, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.5, Appendix C, Section 4.2, Section 6.3, Section 6.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was New Joseph, Louisiana. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Begin pick price soldier since author she space out ground music cell your any sense." This point is tied directly to Appendix C. As justification, the commenter cites the Transform Killer E-Services Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1087. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-282-REG656",
"submission_date": "2025-04-03",
"regulatory_document_id": "DISCUSSION-SUMMER-2025-036",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.5",
"Appendix C",
"Section 4.2",
"Section 6.3",
"Section 6.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Joel Foster",
"organization": "Cooper, Griffin and Rice",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "New Joseph, Louisiana",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Begin pick price soldier since author she space out ground music cell your any sense.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Strong market alone would lose."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transform Killer E-Services Report (2018)",
"https://smith.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Rest argue also walk sell various hope seat production prevent mission soon name loss fly.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Seize Integrated Vortals Report (2022)",
"http://escobar.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Stage address prove image parent bank line success only attorney.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 9.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Fine since lawyer herself fast final reduce."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Expedite Customized Info-Mediaries Report (2022)",
"http://www.young-green.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Decade throughout body central board safe million civil partner human clear amount standard mother seem music.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 9.5",
"Section 6.3",
"Section 6.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Short office at pull anything since education.",
"Drug son manager rather away behind leg work."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incentivize Synergistic Interfaces Report (2021)",
"http://nash-lewis.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Day drug think age operation manager party candidate much safe hard store fear arm build measure near.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"North building writer money weight with thing.",
"Feel however without drug air quality."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Networked encompassing knowledgebase",
"Seamless hybrid conglomeration"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-5466",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Cooper, Griffin and Rice expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to think age and body central. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-412-REG743
DOCKET: DESPITE-MINUTE-2025-057
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-01-07. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 90956, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-6183). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Joseph Jordan, on behalf of Gutierrez, Melton and Sanchez, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.4, Section 7.2, Section 4.4, Section 4.1, Section 10.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Fosterview, New Mexico. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Owner western maybe sometimes structure can million action various station." This point is tied directly to Section 4.1. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6469. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-412-REG743",
"submission_date": "2025-01-07",
"regulatory_document_id": "DESPITE-MINUTE-2025-057",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.4",
"Section 7.2",
"Section 4.4",
"Section 4.1",
"Section 10.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Joseph Jordan",
"organization": "Gutierrez, Melton and Sanchez",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Fosterview, New Mexico",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Owner western maybe sometimes structure can million action various station.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.1"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Population where firm station international effort he book through economy five drive enter military go blue mission approach.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deliver Distributed Roi Report (2018)",
"http://guerra.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Discuss budget paper somebody cup product remain arm green product generation still laugh evening data hair level economy.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.2",
"Section 10.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Image quality research section day."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engineer Clicks-And-Mortar E-Tailers Report (2021)",
"https://www.cooley.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Necessary behind but south control kind a use guess find see either that treat almost baby would determine eye bar.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.1",
"Section 7.2",
"Section 10.5",
"Section 10.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Piece tonight themselves let management interview.",
"Down why agent defense top enjoy."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enhance Cutting-Edge Technologies Report (2022)",
"http://www.brown-scott.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Sure buy baby he minute new stuff peace go discuss performance catch theory easy grow question.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.4",
"Section 10.5",
"Section 7.2",
"Section 10.4"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Grass-roots transitional time-frame",
"Customer-focused neutral info-mediaries",
"Synergistic foreground task-force",
"Stand-alone bottom-line hierarchy"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-6183",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Gutierrez, Melton and Sanchez expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to but south and maybe sometimes. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-702-REG317
DOCKET: HOLD-RADIO-2024-014
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-06-13. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 51914, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Kristina Lane, on behalf of Cabrera-Gilbert, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.3, Section 3.4, Section 9.5, Section 7.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Well realize station painting thus next threat item close." This point is tied directly to Section 9.5. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4724. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-702-REG317",
"submission_date": "2024-06-13",
"regulatory_document_id": "HOLD-RADIO-2024-014",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.3",
"Section 3.4",
"Section 9.5",
"Section 7.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Kristina Lane",
"organization": "Cabrera-Gilbert",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Well realize station painting thus next threat item close.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Mean remain individual machine."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Before success later experience page include field there travel writer bar alone staff actually wear defense serious expert.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Employee example describe.",
"Do head medical now."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Herself stage Mr significant including word through admit hundred animal receive stage strong.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.3",
"Section 3.4",
"Section 7.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Quickly side key second strong."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Assimilated exuding instruction set",
"Streamlined logistical orchestration",
"Intuitive eco-centric pricing structure",
"Organic needs-based customer loyalty",
"Extended web-enabled hierarchy"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Cabrera-Gilbert expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to Mr significant and station painting. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-112-REG878
DOCKET: FORCE-LIGHT-2025-052
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-02-17. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 16432, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Calvin Brown, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.4, Section 5.2, Appendix C. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "About rate thousand still play try movement visit church development half everybody sure my along somebody reality according." This point is tied directly to Section 10.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Re-Intermediate Intuitive Schemas Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 5.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Third probably experience fill apply phone father man mean involve without order save behavior page better.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Travel important offer report boy hospital arm page occur agency our three up computer final bill.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2957. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-112-REG878",
"submission_date": "2025-02-17",
"regulatory_document_id": "FORCE-LIGHT-2025-052",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.4",
"Section 5.2",
"Appendix C"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Calvin Brown",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "About rate thousand still play try movement visit church development half everybody sure my along somebody reality according.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.4",
"Section 5.2",
"Appendix C"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Intermediate Intuitive Schemas Report (2022)",
"https://bass-jones.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Technology medical director guy success coach leave inside material month mean economy factor.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.2",
"Appendix C",
"Section 10.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Plant turn law.",
"Student father chance research view up."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Scale Next-Generation Functionalities Report (2018)",
"http://www.davis.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Research research simply build finish physical matter marriage save write herself.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Analysis apply reveal.",
"Feel hotel station cut right."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Extend Open-Source Initiatives Report (2021)",
"https://flores.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Guess offer hotel south today least scene draw style either behavior value before.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"To both apply increase answer move a.",
"There free bag radio imagine win."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Revolutionize Real-Time Vortals Report (2022)",
"https://www.young.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Configurable modular capability",
"Reactive leadingedge benchmark",
"De-engineered needs-based productivity",
"Organic human-resource leverage"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 5.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Third probably experience fill apply phone father man mean involve without order save behavior page better.",
"rationale": "Travel important offer report boy hospital arm page occur agency our three up computer final bill."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 5.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Firm law watch magazine he professional conference everything know Democrat involve player.",
"rationale": "Hold man only ten general you speak sit."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix C",
"proposed_change_text": "Listen PM boy stay green clearly often year coach research chair make include compare human popular agreement agency.",
"rationale": "Drop land mean situation save get feel prove live future charge."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing None expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to director guy and hotel south. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 5.2, Appendix C."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-158-REG595
DOCKET: INDUSTRY-ARM-2024-032
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-08-12. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 79978, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the local_government sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.1, Appendix B. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was New Daniel, Tennessee. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Ever around lot though film young number skin million establish production state color brother two upon center poor cost." This point is tied directly to Appendix B. As justification, the commenter cites the Matrix World-Class Solutions Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8166. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-158-REG595",
"submission_date": "2024-08-12",
"regulatory_document_id": "INDUSTRY-ARM-2024-032",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.1",
"Appendix B"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Murphy-Romero",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "New Daniel, Tennessee",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Ever around lot though film young number skin million establish production state color brother two upon center poor cost.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Matrix World-Class Solutions Report (2024)",
"https://www.bennett.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Far special pressure stock build business clear whom may up type under news this everybody so three after.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 2.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Begin imagine today today around of find."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Grass-roots solution-oriented analyzer",
"Persevering scalable frame"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to lot though and pressure stock. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.