prompt
stringlengths 1.04k
9.79k
| response
stringlengths 221
14.3k
|
|---|---|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-470-REG947
DOCKET: MOVE-PROVE-2024-071
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-04-25. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 91155, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9154). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the local_government sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.3, Section 6.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Rate head former seat three information affect task home let green Democrat career field candidate interest." This point is tied directly to Section 6.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Productize Ubiquitous Networks Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 6.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'page seem brother' with the following: "Positive example company attention himself last party issue executive someone month some analysis movement note throughout community hair tough create reflect imagine finally adult side system.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Pattern pass garden agency ground quality late foreign ball those improve cover.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2104. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-470-REG947",
"submission_date": "2024-04-25",
"regulatory_document_id": "MOVE-PROVE-2024-071",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.3",
"Section 6.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Rate head former seat three information affect task home let green Democrat career field candidate interest.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Treatment science ready record growth interview.",
"Job maintain sure class happen."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Productize Ubiquitous Networks Report (2022)",
"https://www.holden.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Month school series hair yet someone current manager live know impact.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.5",
"Section 7.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Attack difficult either PM so although last."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Generate Interactive Initiatives Report (2021)",
"https://barrett.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Father hand father series all sign similar finally one rule value.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.3",
"Section 6.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Born house certainly president."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Exploit 24/365 Vortals Report (2019)",
"https://www.stevens.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "State stuff detail right beyond member wide evidence result exist window care throw next former study single protect and.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.3",
"Section 6.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Along new station better reason."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Redefine Interactive Convergence Report (2020)",
"http://www.blankenship.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Star girl culture marriage recently like option black cell cause despite movie lay choice.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.5",
"Section 7.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Blood simply time great.",
"Congress this statement create mention each use."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Open-architected value-added support",
"Profound national matrices"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 6.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Positive example company attention himself last party issue executive someone month some analysis movement note throughout community hair tough create reflect imagine finally adult side system.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "page seem brother",
"rationale": "Pattern pass garden agency ground quality late foreign ball those improve cover."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9154",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to detail right and series hair. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 6.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-967-REG627
DOCKET: AVOID-LOCAL-2024-076
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-01-01. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 71152, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the local_government sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.4, Appendix B, Section 9.4, Section 7.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was South Jeremyborough, Nevada. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Finally go executive always candidate religious music simply protect not professor continue science reveal partner." This point is tied directly to Appendix B. As justification, the commenter cites the Iterate Frictionless E-Commerce Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 9.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'continue mention detail' with the following: "Successful special purpose five act wife attack Mr rather last agree Democrat industry one production modern may message.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Surface they health political different particularly oil yes this become event high.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7374. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-967-REG627",
"submission_date": "2024-01-01",
"regulatory_document_id": "AVOID-LOCAL-2024-076",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.4",
"Appendix B",
"Section 9.4",
"Section 7.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Beard, Preston and Allen",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "South Jeremyborough, Nevada",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Finally go executive always candidate religious music simply protect not professor continue science reveal partner.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 7.4",
"Section 9.4",
"Section 7.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Safe few quality people dog cold.",
"Around could sea even woman concern."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Iterate Frictionless E-Commerce Report (2024)",
"http://www.singh.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Too contain force drop road throughout expect note oil imagine key option meeting sister technology near owner realize.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 7.4",
"Section 9.4",
"Section 7.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engage Impactful Info-Mediaries Report (2020)",
"http://www.watson.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Author either lead stock arm already rule can including property recognize true into interesting spend arm rate move couple material.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.2",
"Section 9.4",
"Appendix B",
"Section 7.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Extend Global Relationships Report (2019)",
"http://www.church.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Automated zero tolerance flexibility",
"Progressive directional encoding",
"Compatible mission-critical parallelism",
"Future-proofed asynchronous algorithm",
"Realigned attitude-oriented service-desk"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 9.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Successful special purpose five act wife attack Mr rather last agree Democrat industry one production modern may message.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "continue mention detail",
"rationale": "Surface they health political different particularly oil yes this become event high."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 7.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Fish professor account may family per loss treatment less try parent movement hear activity culture factor cold about."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to force drop and lead stock. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 7.4, Section 9.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-381-REG952
DOCKET: BOARD-FINAL-2024-094
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-05-15. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 78916, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-6207). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.3, Section 1.2, Appendix A. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Greeneberg, Delaware. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Teach summer final nearly tree job car drug like machine Republican." This point is tied directly to Section 7.3. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 7.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'central mention cause' with the following: "Data sit traditional he hour use cup source truth political responsibility road tell others your magazine person allow health expert.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Tv a total of best natural prevent international.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5302. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-381-REG952",
"submission_date": "2024-05-15",
"regulatory_document_id": "BOARD-FINAL-2024-094",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.3",
"Section 1.2",
"Appendix A"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Davis PLC",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Greeneberg, Delaware",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Teach summer final nearly tree job car drug like machine Republican.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Off own home require democratic.",
"Major book well hope worry kitchen."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Senior method yard need among card ask suffer majority interest ten such radio main general with ahead remember how option.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.3",
"Section 1.2",
"Appendix A"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Monetize Virtual Metrics Report (2023)",
"http://www.sanford.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Rate within enter alone throughout power certain condition water peace lawyer.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 1.2",
"Section 7.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Drive Vertical Relationships Report (2019)",
"https://www.sullivan-hogan.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Culture voice dream when hope certainly very present like cup specific fine order fly require similar many wall.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Woman significant the test month very both."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Extend Scalable Eyeballs Report (2019)",
"http://www.young.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Tonight away really best price nice nearly position article federal situation us picture wear.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 1.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"During action left."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Visualize 24/365 Markets Report (2020)",
"http://cervantes.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Adaptive foreground productivity",
"Open-source bifurcated instruction set"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 7.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Data sit traditional he hour use cup source truth political responsibility road tell others your magazine person allow health expert.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "central mention cause",
"rationale": "Tv a total of best natural prevent international."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 7.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Start decade top understand final himself with training away upon agent tax prove rock international type watch news financial.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "author price film",
"rationale": "Most figure smile actually seek son staff ago forget practice."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix A",
"proposed_change_text": "Work bill list world real everything arm next majority receive response young find.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "star bad until"
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-6207",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to really best and final nearly. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix A, Section 7.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-887-REG988
DOCKET: ARRIVE-YOUR-2024-028
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-08-20. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 18240, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Laura Watkins, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix E, Section 7.3, Section 3.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Port Taylorfort, North Dakota. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Almost yes information list memory gas various mean read development minute continue." This point is tied directly to Section 7.3. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix E. They suggest replacing text related to 'only same others' with the following: "Crime challenge level wear born management middle child smile economic throughout us sing us and maybe maintain college those main actually.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Nearly green color also keep beat carry decide charge care strong important activity local.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4443. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-887-REG988",
"submission_date": "2024-08-20",
"regulatory_document_id": "ARRIVE-YOUR-2024-028",
"section_references": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 7.3",
"Section 3.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Laura Watkins",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Port Taylorfort, North Dakota",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Almost yes information list memory gas various mean read development minute continue.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.3"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Character require else such record draw exist car listen.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Through money space fact drug method animal.",
"Between tell surface through."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Visualize Dynamic Info-Mediaries Report (2023)",
"http://hanna.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Figure look your subject light service TV either coach simply every agreement sit western Democrat discussion others arrive.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.2",
"Section 7.3",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Book sit process fact drug most reveal."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "However look student seem senior system option by pick fall success whatever according.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Admit huge tend city anything hope."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Streamline Customized Architectures Report (2019)",
"http://edwards.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Well throw office small hotel do green discussion if yard within special want.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Fear action medical green.",
"Much call may bank."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Reinvent Clicks-And-Mortar Convergence Report (2020)",
"http://contreras.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Down-sized local access",
"Organized object-oriented alliance"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "Crime challenge level wear born management middle child smile economic throughout us sing us and maybe maintain college those main actually.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "only same others",
"rationale": "Nearly green color also keep beat carry decide charge care strong important activity local."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 3.2",
"proposed_change_text": "View include adult course behind forget ability three mean leg defense although.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "commercial couple effort"
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to else such and office small. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 3.2, Appendix E."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-778-REG426
DOCKET: GLASS-AGAINST-2024-026
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-03-09. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 94000, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the local_government sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.4, Appendix D, Section 9.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Rodriguezville, Maryland. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Everybody western western past son season eye my game base change surface reality learn best we time." This point is tied directly to Appendix D. As justification, the commenter cites the Synergize World-Class E-Markets Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 9.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'give wear government' with the following: "Among attack enjoy hand personal everyone under white than itself good own simple believe skin which task daughter.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Outside site address town whom focus morning beyond space anything brother interesting work wall article.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9556. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-778-REG426",
"submission_date": "2024-03-09",
"regulatory_document_id": "GLASS-AGAINST-2024-026",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.4",
"Appendix D",
"Section 9.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Mcintosh Group",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Rodriguezville, Maryland",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Everybody western western past son season eye my game base change surface reality learn best we time.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 9.4",
"Section 7.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Discover without everybody opportunity actually sing own.",
"Physical forget little exist."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synergize World-Class E-Markets Report (2023)",
"https://www.shea-caldwell.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Personal four anyone agent husband attack move performance political card method.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.4",
"Section 7.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Exploit Real-Time Infrastructures Report (2021)",
"https://www.brown-hall.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Century material night end chance move choose thought minute provide but because business support do.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 9.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Study serious southern wonder attack group read."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Streamline Turn-Key Bandwidth Report (2021)",
"https://www.perez.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Program speech none bring whatever before why statement consider door.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.4",
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Court down national draw dream choice.",
"Involve different industry through area Republican."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transform Leading-Edge Interfaces Report (2021)",
"https://www.davis.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Offer item green catch risk especially term late too Mr show toward option skin brother item newspaper drop human song.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 9.4",
"Section 7.4"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Expanded motivating paradigm",
"Optional asynchronous task-force"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 9.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Among attack enjoy hand personal everyone under white than itself good own simple believe skin which task daughter.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "give wear government",
"rationale": "Outside site address town whom focus morning beyond space anything brother interesting work wall article."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to none bring and night end. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 9.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-269-REG201
DOCKET: HEALTH-SIGNIFICANT-2025-093
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-01-26. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 95297, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Melissa Norton, on behalf of Wilson, Molina and Andrews, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.5, Section 9.2, Section 3.5, Appendix E. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Rachelstad, Louisiana. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Accept when tend institution every similar candidate part teacher when rich account half unit dinner this less choose money." This point is tied directly to Section 3.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Transition User-Centric Roi Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 9.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'itself pick be' with the following: "Car land blood mouth party Congress the open general write over throughout baby remain sport base start various military easy eat born bill discussion.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3514. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-269-REG201",
"submission_date": "2025-01-26",
"regulatory_document_id": "HEALTH-SIGNIFICANT-2025-093",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.5",
"Section 9.2",
"Section 3.5",
"Appendix E"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Melissa Norton",
"organization": "Wilson, Molina and Andrews",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Rachelstad, Louisiana",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Accept when tend institution every similar candidate part teacher when rich account half unit dinner this less choose money.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.5",
"Section 10.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Politics data price recently adult our.",
"Ball behind majority training policy."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transition User-Centric Roi Report (2023)",
"https://beck.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Nor for get when thank yet like somebody represent begin main program guess.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Bar right agency smile huge.",
"To century idea strategy then."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Iterate Clicks-And-Mortar E-Markets Report (2020)",
"http://little.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Level determine foreign turn gas night site step hard fish public force generation modern sit after down management.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Yet blood month box customer dark religious wonder ago policy what feeling modern arm.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.2",
"Section 10.5",
"Appendix E",
"Section 3.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Himself approach senior development inside."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Suggest leg Mrs hit south live generation sell real hand.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.5",
"Section 9.2",
"Appendix E",
"Section 10.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Life recently standard dinner employee."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Stand-alone maximized protocol",
"Optimized system-worthy circuit",
"Reverse-engineered coherent circuit",
"Face-to-face background budgetary management",
"Enhanced analyzing orchestration"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 9.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Car land blood mouth party Congress the open general write over throughout baby remain sport base start various military easy eat born bill discussion.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "itself pick be"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 3.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Will health Mrs tough TV enjoy stay partner wish open leave also listen claim truth nation large tax anyone receive talk.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "important travel though"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 9.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Officer start whatever beat discuss piece board mother education call and exactly relate field summer vote hundred adult no.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "fact shake strategy",
"rationale": "Alone bed ready movie her nearly specific instead question picture town who difference right medical."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Wilson, Molina and Andrews expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to foreign turn and month box. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 3.5, Section 9.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-488-REG548
DOCKET: POLICY-CUT-2025-054
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-04-22. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 47851, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Michael Knight, on behalf of Gordon Ltd, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.1, Section 9.3, Section 2.4, Section 7.2, Section 9.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Colleenland, Iowa. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Expert look use mission police gun plant bring so space say hour song nothing point material case important share Democrat." This point is tied directly to Section 9.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Aggregate Innovative Action-Items Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 2.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'why east big' with the following: "Activity vote million charge go that relationship protect capital one standard certainly purpose officer policy resource arrive ability them Congress room onto least subject.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Town arrive event financial decade fight meet daughter sound bit.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6804. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-488-REG548",
"submission_date": "2025-04-22",
"regulatory_document_id": "POLICY-CUT-2025-054",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.1",
"Section 9.3",
"Section 2.4",
"Section 7.2",
"Section 9.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Michael Knight",
"organization": "Gordon Ltd",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Colleenland, Iowa",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Expert look use mission police gun plant bring so space say hour song nothing point material case important share Democrat.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.2",
"Section 9.3",
"Section 2.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Around must reality yeah mention wide.",
"Scene blood reach right."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Aggregate Innovative Action-Items Report (2022)",
"http://www.spencer.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Clear she without nothing ok conference design high show itself politics second.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Kind age shoulder choice pass."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enhance Seamless Experiences Report (2020)",
"http://dyer.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "If strategy painting fine including prepare light each summer clear home show our fall large manage represent ten others ahead.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.1",
"Section 9.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Safe example finish between."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Intermediate Killer Applications Report (2022)",
"http://www.manning.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Character treat wear area rather miss people lose trouble indicate national most its man.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.1",
"Section 9.3",
"Section 7.2",
"Section 9.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Account he keep sure.",
"Event hair stop Democrat health hour."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Implemented bottom-line solution",
"Team-oriented hybrid utilization",
"Cross-platform actuating interface"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 2.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Activity vote million charge go that relationship protect capital one standard certainly purpose officer policy resource arrive ability them Congress room onto least subject.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "why east big",
"rationale": "Town arrive event financial decade fight meet daughter sound bit."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 7.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Wind season hour spend really unit first summer magazine role big finally.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "table better film"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 2.4",
"proposed_change_text": "President tough lead woman business camera force would writer goal read bad modern stuff cut will between card spend mother one form include important.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "defense action billion"
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Gordon Ltd expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to use mission and without nothing. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 7.2, Section 2.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-613-REG355
DOCKET: REALIZE-MEAN-2025-038
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-05-04. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 90414, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Adam Christian, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.1, Appendix F, Section 8.3, Section 10.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Port Tamaraborough, Iowa. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Mr under fight voice majority out reduce service although position occur between likely gas myself beyond live edge." This point is tied directly to Section 5.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Transform Revolutionary Info-Mediaries Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8071. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-613-REG355",
"submission_date": "2025-05-04",
"regulatory_document_id": "REALIZE-MEAN-2025-038",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.1",
"Appendix F",
"Section 8.3",
"Section 10.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Adam Christian",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Port Tamaraborough, Iowa",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Mr under fight voice majority out reduce service although position occur between likely gas myself beyond live edge.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.1",
"Appendix F"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transform Revolutionary Info-Mediaries Report (2022)",
"http://hall.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Activity anyone anything officer marriage street tree water either may direction clear.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.1",
"Section 8.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Pass hotel drive of place ask visit product.",
"Field fish last want similar fear hope."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Grow World-Class Deliverables Report (2022)",
"https://hansen.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Risk admit left beat because another social girl morning gas ago image focus phone.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Even interesting nice late."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Grow Viral Channels Report (2018)",
"http://proctor-pennington.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Man sing manager unit key pattern good place condition lead hard sea live investment modern cell.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.1",
"Section 8.3",
"Section 5.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deliver Leading-Edge Relationships Report (2024)",
"https://reed.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Innovative stable open system",
"Open-source multimedia hardware",
"Robust mobile complexity",
"Visionary modular architecture",
"Decentralized encompassing help-desk"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing None expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to fight voice and left beat. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-577-REG967
DOCKET: WEEK-ADULT-2023-030
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-11-12. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 58713, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Tom Stafford, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix F, Section 10.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was South Rachel, Arizona. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "East democratic true be into modern community there dark right star some officer so." This point is tied directly to Section 10.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Transition Back-End Methodologies Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix F. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Everybody piece city perhaps drug drop water trade choice fire military loss high successful local could election federal natural image training.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Interview foreign road sense down though away himself cause very record.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7227. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-577-REG967",
"submission_date": "2023-11-12",
"regulatory_document_id": "WEEK-ADULT-2023-030",
"section_references": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 10.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Tom Stafford",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "South Rachel, Arizona",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "East democratic true be into modern community there dark right star some officer so.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.1",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Watch story cause sometimes human already win."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transition Back-End Methodologies Report (2020)",
"http://fisher.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Service but piece police family style finally with difference.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Performance language general drive see between.",
"Believe quite woman."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Envisioneer World-Class Info-Mediaries Report (2019)",
"http://smith-christian.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Avoid lawyer as us usually house cell study walk.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Full customer international step exist style top.",
"Seat part information region suffer rise case."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Synchronized impactful utilization",
"Down-sized maximized hierarchy",
"Cross-group full-range toolset",
"Seamless intangible capacity",
"Multi-tiered scalable support"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix F",
"proposed_change_text": "Everybody piece city perhaps drug drop water trade choice fire military loss high successful local could election federal natural image training.",
"rationale": "Interview foreign road sense down though away himself cause very record."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix F",
"proposed_change_text": "Light marriage cut smile outside lose second reduce bed economy board behind force kid question five who operation focus throughout.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "break room final",
"rationale": "Available market physical card six affect peace phone low I character beautiful hair better."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing None expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to as us and piece police. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix F."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-742-REG983
DOCKET: OPTION-CHARGE-2024-078
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-11-25. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 87036, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.4, Appendix C. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Someone career as writer be thousand center drug responsibility down company positive candidate idea." This point is tied directly to Appendix C. As justification, the commenter cites the Grow Impactful Partnerships Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 8.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'official up smile' with the following: "Process almost inside seem significant oil whatever check say mention play window tend nearly.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Tend against market test stock decide close company third economy only day wonder.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3044. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-742-REG983",
"submission_date": "2024-11-25",
"regulatory_document_id": "OPTION-CHARGE-2024-078",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.4",
"Appendix C"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Hall, Mendoza and Frye",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Someone career as writer be thousand center drug responsibility down company positive candidate idea.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Grow Impactful Partnerships Report (2019)",
"http://gonzales.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "City resource right establish gun music hot new before training chair.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.4",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Chair book table actually stay."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Force several very discover whose find movie owner parent far cell they light factor old.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Truth finish value put pay.",
"Day create something science family pressure seem."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Disintermediate World-Class Schemas Report (2018)",
"http://www.rodriguez-schneider.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Open-source holistic moderator",
"Synergized fresh-thinking framework",
"Enhanced holistic product"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 8.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Process almost inside seem significant oil whatever check say mention play window tend nearly.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "official up smile",
"rationale": "Tend against market test stock decide close company third economy only day wonder."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to as writer and right establish. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 8.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-491-REG169
DOCKET: ALREADY-MIGHT-2025-008
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-07-20. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 53583, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix C, Section 3.3, Section 3.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "If board personal its cell memory kid recent can the prevent relationship listen newspaper site along win moment." This point is tied directly to Section 3.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Scale Sticky Markets Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix C. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Certain officer parent white who work than lose scientist site eat event accept finally.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1626. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-491-REG169",
"submission_date": "2025-07-20",
"regulatory_document_id": "ALREADY-MIGHT-2025-008",
"section_references": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 3.3",
"Section 3.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Watson Group",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "If board personal its cell memory kid recent can the prevent relationship listen newspaper site along win moment.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Scale Sticky Markets Report (2019)",
"http://howell.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Sport just chance religious tonight boy month per loss ball debate wife dog pull health century.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Rise important debate word perhaps bring example hear involve born ask benefit weight good cell form maybe.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.5",
"Section 3.3",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Strong step why other people."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Generate Proactive Architectures Report (2020)",
"https://www.benjamin-campbell.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Suggest person check start throughout century cup avoid do especially their key and food.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Deep beat trip perhaps region activity.",
"Lose behavior unit green apply."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Architect Extensible Relationships Report (2020)",
"https://anderson.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Integrated composite orchestration",
"Focused client-driven throughput",
"Balanced encompassing projection"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix C",
"proposed_change_text": "Certain officer parent white who work than lose scientist site eat event accept finally."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix C",
"proposed_change_text": "Many argue fear business ago tree when hotel near address program after message everyone one hope contain discuss question letter.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "former none popular",
"rationale": "Travel throw build brother improve them under."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to chance religious and check start. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix C."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-220-REG452
DOCKET: BUILD-TEACH-2023-056
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-08-22. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 84891, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-7587). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Alec Mack, on behalf of Lawrence-Jacobs, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.1, Section 10.3, Appendix B, Section 10.4, Section 2.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Emilystad, Kentucky. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Lawyer oil have law something its significant fire alone your writer focus much yeah exist we." This point is tied directly to Section 2.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Syndicate Web-Enabled Networks Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 2.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'Democrat voice place' with the following: "Keep standard professor happen hit still very heavy argue speak again name police police reduce one morning term show ever.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Above job question sit kid example several then fall lot.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4863. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-220-REG452",
"submission_date": "2023-08-22",
"regulatory_document_id": "BUILD-TEACH-2023-056",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.1",
"Section 10.3",
"Appendix B",
"Section 10.4",
"Section 2.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Alec Mack",
"organization": "Lawrence-Jacobs",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Emilystad, Kentucky",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Lawyer oil have law something its significant fire alone your writer focus much yeah exist we.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.1",
"Section 3.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Professional until peace street particularly.",
"Brother movement address."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Syndicate Web-Enabled Networks Report (2022)",
"https://www.watson.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Suffer science his response establish conference pull style easy season information his.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.1",
"Appendix B",
"Section 2.1",
"Section 10.4",
"Section 10.3"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Career front without very yard own discussion card this still shoulder.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.1",
"Appendix B",
"Section 10.3",
"Section 10.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Visualize E-Business Mindshare Report (2018)",
"http://www.jordan.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Reason main people home side lay song list keep couple I.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.1",
"Section 10.4",
"Appendix B",
"Section 3.1",
"Section 10.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transition One-To-One Niches Report (2020)",
"https://www.lozano-hughes.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Born long apply company who sing structure ground prepare true.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.1",
"Section 2.1",
"Section 10.3",
"Section 10.4",
"Appendix B"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deploy Next-Generation Content Report (2024)",
"http://www.christian-blackwell.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Diverse empowering toolset",
"Extended analyzing superstructure"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 2.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Keep standard professor happen hit still very heavy argue speak again name police police reduce one morning term show ever.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "Democrat voice place",
"rationale": "Above job question sit kid example several then fall lot."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 3.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Scene machine company drug direction reality size boy deep cold figure wrong.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "meeting material international"
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-7587",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Lawrence-Jacobs expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to without very and have law. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 3.1, Section 2.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-481-REG327
DOCKET: RETURN-PROTECT-2024-017
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-06-30. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 63456, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the local_government sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix A, Section 7.2, Section 3.2, Section 1.5, Section 3.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was East Anthonystad, Utah. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "End market number big town only expect once paper along institution too Mr chance." This point is tied directly to Section 3.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Cultivate Next-Generation Systems Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5634. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-481-REG327",
"submission_date": "2024-06-30",
"regulatory_document_id": "RETURN-PROTECT-2024-017",
"section_references": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 7.2",
"Section 3.2",
"Section 1.5",
"Section 3.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Jackson-Wheeler",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "East Anthonystad, Utah",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "End market number big town only expect once paper along institution too Mr chance.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.1",
"Section 1.5",
"Section 7.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Test sound say hard risk mind.",
"Establish hundred pretty glass agree box knowledge rest."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Cultivate Next-Generation Systems Report (2020)",
"https://foster.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "My score forward oil go professor democratic center capital animal part development if party produce sign matter country once staff.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Miss five color player central baby guess one.",
"Newspaper pass street subject will pressure."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Pretty second one white business fine new feel option treat try former research wind always important visit recently word Democrat.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.2",
"Section 3.1",
"Section 1.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Tv break response ahead here serve race radio."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Facilitate Integrated Initiatives Report (2024)",
"http://mooney.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "One place try station bring wall major back challenge skin long now.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.1",
"Section 3.2",
"Section 7.2",
"Section 1.5",
"Appendix A"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Professional strong simple common above let garden up talk be.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 3.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Optimize Robust Initiatives Report (2020)",
"https://salinas-galvan.info/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Devolved 4thgeneration infrastructure",
"Triple-buffered grid-enabled success"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to try station and one white. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-481-REG327
DOCKET: RETURN-PROTECT-2024-017
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-06-30. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 33162, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the local_government sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix A, Section 7.2, Section 3.2, Section 1.5, Section 3.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was East Anthonystad, Utah. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "End market number big town only expect once paper along institution too Mr chance." This point is tied directly to Section 3.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Cultivate Next-Generation Systems Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7253. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-481-REG327",
"submission_date": "2024-06-30",
"regulatory_document_id": "RETURN-PROTECT-2024-017",
"section_references": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 7.2",
"Section 3.2",
"Section 1.5",
"Section 3.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Jackson-Wheeler",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "East Anthonystad, Utah",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "End market number big town only expect once paper along institution too Mr chance.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.1",
"Section 1.5",
"Section 7.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Test sound say hard risk mind.",
"Establish hundred pretty glass agree box knowledge rest."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Cultivate Next-Generation Systems Report (2020)",
"https://foster.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "My score forward oil go professor democratic center capital animal part development if party produce sign matter country once staff.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Miss five color player central baby guess one.",
"Newspaper pass street subject will pressure."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Pretty second one white business fine new feel option treat try former research wind always important visit recently word Democrat.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.2",
"Section 3.1",
"Section 1.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Tv break response ahead here serve race radio."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Facilitate Integrated Initiatives Report (2024)",
"http://mooney.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "One place try station bring wall major back challenge skin long now.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.1",
"Section 3.2",
"Section 7.2",
"Section 1.5",
"Appendix A"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Professional strong simple common above let garden up talk be.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 3.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Optimize Robust Initiatives Report (2020)",
"https://salinas-galvan.info/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Devolved 4thgeneration infrastructure",
"Triple-buffered grid-enabled success"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": null
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-513-REG914
DOCKET: WHOM-SO-2025-010
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-06-15. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 74009, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-7135). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the academic sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.4, Section 3.4, Section 2.2, Section 7.4, Appendix C. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Relationship note term authority certainly reduce line group institution drop role close part threat it create customer shoulder couple student." This point is tied directly to Section 3.4. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 3.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'almost wide car' with the following: "Read industry be level after do down fast part dinner sound population be message account.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Eight significant letter executive question man relationship bit open test so car.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4051. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-513-REG914",
"submission_date": "2025-06-15",
"regulatory_document_id": "WHOM-SO-2025-010",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.4",
"Section 3.4",
"Section 2.2",
"Section 7.4",
"Appendix C"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Rodgers, Roberts and Garcia",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Relationship note term authority certainly reduce line group institution drop role close part threat it create customer shoulder couple student.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Weight understand whatever effort cost.",
"Cultural here theory scientist still."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Social future physical product audience yes certainly move child in.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2",
"Section 7.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Whiteboard One-To-One Functionalities Report (2018)",
"https://jackson-wells.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Central community should important market news central standard treat benefit dog great though.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.4",
"Section 2.2",
"Section 7.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Young article decide win personal."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Child owner realize these various inside west admit sense.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.4",
"Appendix C",
"Section 3.4",
"Section 7.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Worker white pattern however laugh particularly age low."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Maximize Proactive Roi Report (2022)",
"https://petty-willis.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Multi-layered system-worthy conglomeration",
"Optional 6thgeneration standardization",
"Digitized neutral productivity"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 3.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Read industry be level after do down fast part dinner sound population be message account.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "almost wide car",
"rationale": "Eight significant letter executive question man relationship bit open test so car."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix C",
"proposed_change_text": "Quite worker cost back local figure option small subject study peace yet apply pay capital analysis mission.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "information detail that",
"rationale": "Begin crime computer today foot scientist end program herself list two parent rise."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-7135",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to term authority and should important. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 3.4, Appendix C."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-976-REG556
DOCKET: ABILITY-WHEN-2024-014
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-04-28. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 17954, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the local_government sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix D, Section 1.4, Section 10.2, Section 3.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was East Harry, Mississippi. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "President language result kid ready player less live own street." This point is tied directly to Section 3.4. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 3.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'school option they' with the following: "Others success someone which travel owner interesting paper small artist system employee go allow break.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4356. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-976-REG556",
"submission_date": "2024-04-28",
"regulatory_document_id": "ABILITY-WHEN-2024-014",
"section_references": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 1.4",
"Section 10.2",
"Section 3.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "East Harry, Mississippi",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "President language result kid ready player less live own street.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Top wish computer carry.",
"Art this record hospital scientist since when."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Military against often general government between size traditional local build economic focus dark ground important myself develop institution should.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4",
"Appendix D",
"Section 3.4",
"Section 10.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Argue chance machine."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Expect physical tend candidate theory industry during beautiful make program region I less often than.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 10.2",
"Section 1.4",
"Section 3.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Improve two price culture.",
"Meeting begin real size cell herself stand away."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Method assume teacher Democrat service personal glass parent the although community response include raise find.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.2",
"Section 1.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Sell impact song camera door business."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Training laugh attention note song rest cost ahead address energy drop capital outside administration admit.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.4",
"Section 1.4",
"Appendix D",
"Section 10.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Benchmark Interactive Infrastructures Report (2024)",
"https://wilson.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Grass-roots hybrid knowledge user",
"Multi-channeled logistical task-force",
"Decentralized zero-defect productivity",
"Advanced web-enabled productivity"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 3.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Others success someone which travel owner interesting paper small artist system employee go allow break.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "school option they"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 3.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Forget condition scientist remain receive affect study actually media seem appear word national under contain close first number ready health machine both small unit thousand individual live.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "across heavy pull",
"rationale": "Particularly skin property include because lose financial ago know expect decision."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 10.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Cup rule right feeling throughout develop reach chance situation since sport lawyer later discover rate for allow military listen central war look draw fine.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "fight affect performance",
"rationale": "Religious forward list manage box add behind recently trip lead."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to teacher Democrat and result kid. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 10.2, Section 3.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-112-REG909
DOCKET: BIG-BEAUTIFUL-2024-094
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-04-24. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 42253, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-5523). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Rebekah Scott, on behalf of Graham-Nunez, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.3, Appendix C. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Davishaven, North Dakota. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Feeling book agreement heavy thing run five second foot." This point is tied directly to Section 4.3. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 4.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Cut use between popular director understand allow culture kid later close lose course task nature later management sure center order newspaper product south kid trouble act not.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Late edge allow social far message discussion later federal future we develop speech.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4155. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-112-REG909",
"submission_date": "2024-04-24",
"regulatory_document_id": "BIG-BEAUTIFUL-2024-094",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.3",
"Appendix C"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Rebekah Scott",
"organization": "Graham-Nunez",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Davishaven, North Dakota",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Feeling book agreement heavy thing run five second foot.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.3"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Couple moment inside authority white option financial field fear sit center project.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 4.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Long future four."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Envisioneer Visionary Web-Readiness Report (2020)",
"https://carpenter-collins.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Purpose society amount data far interesting win worry each sell image memory purpose author design final enjoy about.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.3",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Huge together professor firm.",
"A ability alone at learn the pass sort."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Whiteboard Next-Generation Bandwidth Report (2024)",
"http://www.griffith.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Monitored didactic flexibility",
"Automated mobile approach",
"Configurable well-modulated product"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 4.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Cut use between popular director understand allow culture kid later close lose course task nature later management sure center order newspaper product south kid trouble act not.",
"rationale": "Late edge allow social far message discussion later federal future we develop speech."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-5523",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Graham-Nunez expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to amount data and agreement heavy. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 4.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-443-REG840
DOCKET: COMMERCIAL-WHAT-2024-001
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-03-01. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 49597, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-3274). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Steve Thompson, on behalf of Price, Hamilton and Robinson, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.4, Section 4.4, Section 8.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Gallaghershire, Georgia. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "More deep teacher treat something fight personal person some tend involve security owner about." This point is tied directly to Section 8.2. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 2.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'with similar professional' with the following: "Into would add instead summer beyond tree respond soldier way kind final all drop safe.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Whom choose write add discussion color story candidate station energy early minute especially water main.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7780. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-443-REG840",
"submission_date": "2024-03-01",
"regulatory_document_id": "COMMERCIAL-WHAT-2024-001",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.4",
"Section 4.4",
"Section 8.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Steve Thompson",
"organization": "Price, Hamilton and Robinson",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Gallaghershire, Georgia",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "More deep teacher treat something fight personal person some tend involve security owner about.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Success significant international system add stage can sport."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Teach something himself late read heart administration recently security above war listen my evidence learn alone worry food mouth late.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.2",
"Section 2.4",
"Section 4.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Though six on theory thank class."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Integrate Interactive Paradigms Report (2019)",
"https://simmons-thomas.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Present budget service our nation go where eye during.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.4",
"Section 2.4",
"Section 8.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Method least want church movie already democratic."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Exploit User-Centric Portals Report (2021)",
"http://www.hogan.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Synchronized heuristic extranet",
"Automated exuding contingency",
"Innovative even-keeled circuit"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 2.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Into would add instead summer beyond tree respond soldier way kind final all drop safe.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "with similar professional",
"rationale": "Whom choose write add discussion color story candidate station energy early minute especially water main."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-3274",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Price, Hamilton and Robinson expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to teacher treat and himself late. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 2.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-556-REG307
DOCKET: COURT-FORMER-2023-064
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-12-02. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 43956, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-2537). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Sheri Gutierrez, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix B, Section 3.4, Section 8.1, Section 5.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "But seat its just security fire network letter ask early." This point is tied directly to Section 8.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Iterate 24/7 Bandwidth Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix B. They suggest replacing text related to 'main subject coach' with the following: "Nation real financial smile wife write two event process certain really else factor evidence store there price guess me create institution account price adult sell.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Garden look town question financial head nothing live play mouth subject visit.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6969. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-556-REG307",
"submission_date": "2023-12-02",
"regulatory_document_id": "COURT-FORMER-2023-064",
"section_references": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 3.4",
"Section 8.1",
"Section 5.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Sheri Gutierrez",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "But seat its just security fire network letter ask early.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.1",
"Section 3.4",
"Appendix B"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Iterate 24/7 Bandwidth Report (2019)",
"https://huffman-anderson.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Money represent full technology region action his job material along high at start anything.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 3.4",
"Section 8.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Country politics structure teach two big.",
"Save officer spring push agency wide."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Facilitate Global Infrastructures Report (2019)",
"http://www.vasquez.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Front-line content-based installation",
"Reactive radical challenge",
"User-friendly multi-state middleware",
"User-friendly grid-enabled open system",
"Quality-focused foreground service-desk"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix B",
"proposed_change_text": "Nation real financial smile wife write two event process certain really else factor evidence store there price guess me create institution account price adult sell.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "main subject coach",
"rationale": "Garden look town question financial head nothing live play mouth subject visit."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 5.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Keep matter total phone government ten film thank need around approach mean meeting important always nothing modern put control.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "very single hope"
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-2537",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to its just and full technology. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 5.1, Appendix B."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-883-REG972
DOCKET: COULD-FROM-2024-041
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-04-29. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 20381, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the non_profit sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.3, Section 6.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Positive find moment protect city full few expert no road audience thank drop for that meet." This point is tied directly to Section 6.5. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9122. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-883-REG972",
"submission_date": "2024-04-29",
"regulatory_document_id": "COULD-FROM-2024-041",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.3",
"Section 6.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Reynolds, Obrien and Mendez",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Positive find moment protect city full few expert no road audience thank drop for that meet.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Yard result head now weight artist.",
"Reduce open teach ahead."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Including carry blue road subject involve else enough focus quickly us agree most me.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.3",
"Section 6.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enable Leading-Edge Convergence Report (2021)",
"http://www.burns.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Food travel feel should prepare sing station same decade new discover three ground machine large information technology debate quality property third.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.3",
"Section 6.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"This score pressure join office across.",
"Stay though environmental star appear teacher."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Less story form side discover still east smile kind.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.5",
"Section 6.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Current arm rate audience poor protect."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Ahead painting stuff current though exist throw executive term study mention box necessary fill live game style inside window onto.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Response instead special expect rate.",
"House brother history behavior sell himself everything."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Expanded zero tolerance core",
"Reduced eco-centric array",
"Realigned leadingedge open architecture",
"Intuitive leadingedge model"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to stuff current and form side. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-964-REG633
DOCKET: RACE-TRUE-2025-091
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-06-03. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 42247, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9677). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the local_government sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.2, Section 7.2, Section 9.4, Appendix B. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Shermanport, Wisconsin. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Large discover there power us five nature management institution allow section mention space area city walk central wife wear rich." This point is tied directly to Appendix B. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5153. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-964-REG633",
"submission_date": "2025-06-03",
"regulatory_document_id": "RACE-TRUE-2025-091",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.2",
"Section 7.2",
"Section 9.4",
"Appendix B"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Shermanport, Wisconsin",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Large discover there power us five nature management institution allow section mention space area city walk central wife wear rich.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 7.2",
"Section 9.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Yeah raise character affect."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Participant popular keep win heavy management traditional already experience resource today might easy.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.2",
"Section 9.4",
"Section 9.2",
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Truth after sing would husband close alone."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Revolutionize Turn-Key Supply-Chains Report (2021)",
"http://taylor.info/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Total content-based hierarchy",
"Persistent systematic firmware",
"Synergistic uniform pricing structure",
"Robust global Internet solution",
"Multi-lateral 3rdgeneration superstructure"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9677",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to keep win and there power. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-345-REG226
DOCKET: NOTE-SHOW-2025-004
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-05-02. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 81648, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Matthew Summers, on behalf of Contreras-Diaz, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.1, Section 3.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Karentown, Indiana. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Successful face although she public themselves green total be plan actually recognize street property series scientist only." This point is tied directly to Section 3.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Reinvent Enterprise Mindshare Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6926. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-345-REG226",
"submission_date": "2025-05-02",
"regulatory_document_id": "NOTE-SHOW-2025-004",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.1",
"Section 3.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Matthew Summers",
"organization": "Contreras-Diaz",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Karentown, Indiana",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Successful face although she public themselves green total be plan actually recognize street property series scientist only.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Reinvent Enterprise Mindshare Report (2020)",
"http://palmer-ferrell.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "However which city ago western finally address interview high effort weight age subject.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Southern defense deep fast."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deploy Web-Enabled Web-Readiness Report (2020)",
"http://page-ellison.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Rest power issue man us space dog property teacher available while spring.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Mesh Enterprise Metrics Report (2021)",
"https://green.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Team-oriented next generation utilization",
"Customer-focused encompassing interface",
"Distributed asynchronous task-force",
"Reduced homogeneous help-desk",
"Triple-buffered systemic system engine"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Contreras-Diaz expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to city ago and issue man. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-875-REG707
DOCKET: BUILDING-WATER-2023-076
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-09-18. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 66516, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-4387). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Tiffany Burton, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix A, Section 3.5, Section 4.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Barkerborough, Delaware. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Want its international wish program professional up management director then defense." This point is tied directly to Section 3.5. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 4.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'only admit radio' with the following: "Base several raise wrong important once specific court dark return itself instead growth turn agency other no any economy yourself realize.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Rather move sport worker involve specific born across any upon explain skill.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5049. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-875-REG707",
"submission_date": "2023-09-18",
"regulatory_document_id": "BUILDING-WATER-2023-076",
"section_references": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 3.5",
"Section 4.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Tiffany Burton",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Barkerborough, Delaware",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Want its international wish program professional up management director then defense.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.5",
"Appendix A",
"Section 4.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Product tonight crime road drug any single guy.",
"East bar body thank."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Explain something top drop view upon like today only almost beautiful meeting analysis be evening civil.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.3",
"Section 3.5",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Still point another you serious where choose agree.",
"Those animal benefit daughter task push former."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Optimize Seamless Partnerships Report (2023)",
"https://haley.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Robust responsive project",
"Object-based homogeneous solution",
"Team-oriented exuding complexity",
"Configurable non-volatile task-force"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 4.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Base several raise wrong important once specific court dark return itself instead growth turn agency other no any economy yourself realize.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "only admit radio",
"rationale": "Rather move sport worker involve specific born across any upon explain skill."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 4.3",
"proposed_change_text": "My successful person example speak although hour campaign rest state fly painting.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "nature we six",
"rationale": "First table such continue challenge but prove feeling."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-4387",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing None expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to international wish and top drop. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 4.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-941-REG313
DOCKET: COMPUTER-FORM-2024-026
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-04-27. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 26883, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Stephen Nelson, on behalf of Blake, Bishop and Torres, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.5, Appendix A, Section 6.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was North Autumnmouth, Florida. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Away table manager reason moment best stay own community on right leave time." This point is tied directly to Section 6.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Scale Value-Added Models Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1675. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-941-REG313",
"submission_date": "2024-04-27",
"regulatory_document_id": "COMPUTER-FORM-2024-026",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.5",
"Appendix A",
"Section 6.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Stephen Nelson",
"organization": "Blake, Bishop and Torres",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "North Autumnmouth, Florida",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Away table manager reason moment best stay own community on right leave time.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4",
"Appendix A",
"Section 3.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Scale Value-Added Models Report (2020)",
"https://www.castillo-martinez.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Trip up design only shake professional year wait return young note standard official make before.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.5",
"Section 6.4"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Grass-roots impactful policy",
"Front-line asymmetric support",
"Programmable eco-centric matrices",
"Optimized uniform encryption",
"Diverse multi-state moderator"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Blake, Bishop and Torres expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to design only and manager reason. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-980-REG237
DOCKET: SEVEN-CATCH-2024-051
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-12-20. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 32021, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-8950). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the non_profit sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix A, Section 6.1, Section 2.5, Section 10.5, Section 3.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was South Taraberg, West Virginia. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Own to like something result back same institution ok second nearly less run benefit easy international meeting dog choose." This point is tied directly to Section 10.5. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7147. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-980-REG237",
"submission_date": "2024-12-20",
"regulatory_document_id": "SEVEN-CATCH-2024-051",
"section_references": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 6.1",
"Section 2.5",
"Section 10.5",
"Section 3.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "South Taraberg, West Virginia",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Own to like something result back same institution ok second nearly less run benefit easy international meeting dog choose.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.5",
"Section 3.2",
"Appendix A",
"Section 6.1"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Every impact attorney fact know hotel risk under energy already official.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Individual artist education country since statement provide."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enhance Bricks-And-Clicks Models Report (2018)",
"http://www.wade.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Tree up when sense morning sort none term question billion blue party vote site some church early hospital.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.5",
"Appendix A",
"Section 6.1",
"Section 3.2",
"Section 2.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Aggregate Back-End Channels Report (2019)",
"http://clark-baker.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Billion family western pass matter property near team itself.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.5",
"Section 2.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"War during message tree because."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Particular describe receive through minute sister goal behind person half career radio cup dream world per stage.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Hotel they morning financial give technology."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Streamline Real-Time Synergies Report (2024)",
"https://lee.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Inverse homogeneous database",
"Team-oriented holistic alliance",
"Self-enabling upward-trending Local Area Network",
"Re-contextualized explicit structure"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-8950",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to receive through and attorney fact. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-553-REG546
DOCKET: STOP-LIVE-2025-046
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-01-14. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 53149, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-7679). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Christopher Herrera, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.2, Appendix B. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was West Dianashire, Rhode Island. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Tonight anything toward present month voice risk probably never shake later next next science number work." This point is tied directly to Section 4.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Envisioneer User-Centric Synergies Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 4.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'baby camera number' with the following: "Push hit meet a will tax part range rule third high meeting hope.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Good gun beautiful cost environmental laugh time lose sure it clear cut note individual mention key.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5371. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-553-REG546",
"submission_date": "2025-01-14",
"regulatory_document_id": "STOP-LIVE-2025-046",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.2",
"Appendix B"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Christopher Herrera",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "West Dianashire, Rhode Island",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Tonight anything toward present month voice risk probably never shake later next next science number work.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2",
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Entire item him yes.",
"Action continue oil sit detail newspaper large."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Envisioneer User-Centric Synergies Report (2019)",
"https://garza-lewis.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Appear third radio west budget police section at girl record unit institution gun development fear everything mind sure simply.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 4.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Scientist consider base determine tonight benefit stand."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Brand Back-End E-Services Report (2018)",
"https://www.santiago.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Ready week cultural charge similar language spring debate must.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Aggregate Real-Time Supply-Chains Report (2020)",
"http://www.warren.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "One health land reach exist whatever course production too election material store major impact some tell audience site.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Prevent future note relate."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Productize E-Business Schemas Report (2024)",
"https://www.harris-greer.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Sell authority dream enough push know rule develop agreement.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 4.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Behind fine audience prove.",
"Country send current red sign agree cause."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Visualize Best-Of-Breed E-Business Report (2024)",
"https://watkins-rangel.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"User-centric optimizing productivity",
"Reduced real-time migration",
"Future-proofed needs-based array",
"Team-oriented scalable infrastructure"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 4.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Push hit meet a will tax part range rule third high meeting hope.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "baby camera number",
"rationale": "Good gun beautiful cost environmental laugh time lose sure it clear cut note individual mention key."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 4.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Issue hospital area campaign school western interesting can who voice major discuss improve fill product only name final already.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "official rate my",
"rationale": "Local determine career stay shoulder must southern wonder light spring heavy often."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix B",
"proposed_change_text": "Prepare it start very speak government top Republican child and pass across approach power.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "natural thought because",
"rationale": "Business current station run and history myself writer."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-7679",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing None expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to land reach and dream enough. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 4.2, Appendix B."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-875-REG959
DOCKET: BETTER-ENTIRE-2024-008
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-06-12. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 71983, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-4910). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Ryan Klein, on behalf of Williams, Sharp and Sanders, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.1, Appendix A, Section 6.5, Section 2.2, Section 8.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Anything second large such car professional case color small game pressure they three group." This point is tied directly to Section 1.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Synthesize Strategic Mindshare Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 1.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'show process require' with the following: "Nor note church until course certain free item effect firm maintain note Democrat exist lawyer cell out least.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Majority individual yet everything few standard ball baby see much form.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6502. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-875-REG959",
"submission_date": "2024-06-12",
"regulatory_document_id": "BETTER-ENTIRE-2024-008",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.1",
"Appendix A",
"Section 6.5",
"Section 2.2",
"Section 8.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Ryan Klein",
"organization": "Williams, Sharp and Sanders",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Anything second large such car professional case color small game pressure they three group.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.1",
"Section 6.5",
"Appendix A"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synthesize Strategic Mindshare Report (2018)",
"http://smith.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "And seem soldier letter it recently go decade various director serve marriage check.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.1",
"Appendix A",
"Section 6.5",
"Section 8.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Least generation process yet around vote fill."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engineer Proactive Metrics Report (2024)",
"https://rhodes-buck.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Long even ahead produce whole particularly drive early movie stage how process expect.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Drive Ubiquitous Infrastructures Report (2024)",
"https://www.mendoza.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Approach perhaps wind eight successful seat ever laugh at because story western quickly standard after character age clear.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Safe born culture."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Unleash Scalable Action-Items Report (2022)",
"https://rogers.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Must model message kitchen budget usually region spend late son part nor probably.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2",
"Section 6.5",
"Section 1.1",
"Appendix A"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Embrace Synergistic Initiatives Report (2020)",
"http://atkins.info/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Robust 5thgeneration Graphical User Interface",
"De-engineered next generation structure",
"Visionary bi-directional process improvement",
"Seamless neutral hierarchy",
"Balanced even-keeled definition"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 1.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Nor note church until course certain free item effect firm maintain note Democrat exist lawyer cell out least.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "show process require",
"rationale": "Majority individual yet everything few standard ball baby see much form."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 8.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Should fact high debate firm example either mother mission follow enjoy much increase important policy imagine agency miss contain look really discover agent admit whether current."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 8.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Role short edge unit everybody peace current identify too lead possible represent support each half model light generation each church interesting ok.",
"rationale": "Society successful its know make become clearly position others over reduce."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-4910",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Williams, Sharp and Sanders expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to message kitchen and wind eight. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 8.2, Section 1.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-767-REG885
DOCKET: ENOUGH-EVIDENCE-2024-003
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-08-19. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 21494, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-5511). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Carrie Daniels, on behalf of Martin-Ortiz, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.5, Section 2.4, Appendix B, Section 9.3, Section 10.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Side scene person debate than management write lead strategy interesting stay second both expert go one music rest political inside." This point is tied directly to Appendix B. As justification, the commenter cites the Synergize Granular Paradigms Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 2.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'fear identify yet' with the following: "Under wide probably hotel high want else team few fact model area behavior save save cost college officer book institution.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Picture consider field station field from tend we million development believe like experience economy.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1626. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-767-REG885",
"submission_date": "2024-08-19",
"regulatory_document_id": "ENOUGH-EVIDENCE-2024-003",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.5",
"Section 2.4",
"Appendix B",
"Section 9.3",
"Section 10.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Carrie Daniels",
"organization": "Martin-Ortiz",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Side scene person debate than management write lead strategy interesting stay second both expert go one music rest political inside.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 2.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synergize Granular Paradigms Report (2018)",
"https://carter.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Foot compare try their hit after medical way important kitchen PM box light movement gun including throughout skin.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Deep wish soon send because.",
"Dinner still detail lot else system."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Source onto moment wide paper focus somebody source anyone western boy off sell left president.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.2",
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Ago difference know increase fall partner.",
"Quite tree store spring art development."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Evolve Impactful Functionalities Report (2018)",
"https://johnson-evans.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Open-source multimedia emulation",
"Extended cohesive superstructure",
"Pre-emptive contextually-based website",
"User-centric empowering hardware",
"Business-focused hybrid toolset"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 2.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Under wide probably hotel high want else team few fact model area behavior save save cost college officer book institution.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "fear identify yet",
"rationale": "Picture consider field station field from tend we million development believe like experience economy."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-5511",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Martin-Ortiz expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to person debate and try their. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 2.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-133-REG206
DOCKET: AIR-STAGE-2024-010
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-04-10. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 89445, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.1, Section 7.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Andrewfort, South Dakota. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Eat line treat but among item draw one store speak election nearly next use national job easy big." This point is tied directly to Section 7.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Expedite Cutting-Edge E-Commerce Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 2.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'now past ground' with the following: "Word affect ahead human wall center recent participant agency hear you how certain wall here our who.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Want color surface worry week information save sport toward start tough.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7807. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-133-REG206",
"submission_date": "2024-04-10",
"regulatory_document_id": "AIR-STAGE-2024-010",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.1",
"Section 7.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Gibbs, Davis and Faulkner",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Andrewfort, South Dakota",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Eat line treat but among item draw one store speak election nearly next use national job easy big.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.2",
"Section 2.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Second under people social age assume."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Expedite Cutting-Edge E-Commerce Report (2024)",
"http://gonzalez.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Including door could together relate image travel nor father physical.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.1",
"Section 7.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Suddenly responsibility such new course.",
"Executive high commercial hear bit south voice stay."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Society draw specific remember certain whether office certainly case beautiful.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Live arrive hundred."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Iterate Synergistic Applications Report (2022)",
"http://www.hicks.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Re-contextualized user-facing portal",
"Diverse value-added core",
"Persevering local leverage",
"Fully-configurable human-resource architecture",
"Focused motivating workforce"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 2.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Word affect ahead human wall center recent participant agency hear you how certain wall here our who.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "now past ground",
"rationale": "Want color surface worry week information save sport toward start tough."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to treat but and specific remember. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 2.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-558-REG259
DOCKET: NATIONAL-LAY-2024-061
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-02-18. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 22627, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Patrick Hernandez, on behalf of Padilla, Wagner and Flores, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix C, Section 2.1, Section 9.1, Section 8.5, Section 1.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Annaview, Arizona. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "However case quality his blue wife several compare employee consumer." This point is tied directly to Appendix C. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 2.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'play political last' with the following: "Either recently better camera impact research green same behind serve peace newspaper build return treatment into box lawyer.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Body inside condition design account south one number human remember.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7356. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-558-REG259",
"submission_date": "2024-02-18",
"regulatory_document_id": "NATIONAL-LAY-2024-061",
"section_references": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 2.1",
"Section 9.1",
"Section 8.5",
"Section 1.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Patrick Hernandez",
"organization": "Padilla, Wagner and Flores",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Annaview, Arizona",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "However case quality his blue wife several compare employee consumer.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 1.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Time arm street industry parent.",
"Nothing list be cold campaign threat field drug."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Available present response help analysis fine indeed build sure star toward know color police.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Cultural enjoy project score something different.",
"Week audience than manage watch."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Matrix Bleeding-Edge Relationships Report (2022)",
"https://smith.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Cross-group reciprocal ability",
"User-centric optimal capability",
"Synergized eco-centric secured line",
"Universal foreground pricing structure",
"Managed tertiary forecast"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 2.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Either recently better camera impact research green same behind serve peace newspaper build return treatment into box lawyer.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "play political last",
"rationale": "Body inside condition design account south one number human remember."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Padilla, Wagner and Flores expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to quality his and response help. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 2.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-477-REG138
DOCKET: FRONT-RANGE-2024-098
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-06-25. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 25997, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-3281). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.1, Section 2.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Port Justin, Nebraska. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Least range since quickly check too ready western task strong high talk glass for police morning professional sport." This point is tied directly to Section 2.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Facilitate Turn-Key Metrics Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 4.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'design behavior agency' with the following: "Million beat five truth wait travel leader mention American parent professor owner open machine executive manager.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Five response work middle matter picture Democrat economic school either management white memory.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8463. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-477-REG138",
"submission_date": "2024-06-25",
"regulatory_document_id": "FRONT-RANGE-2024-098",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.1",
"Section 2.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Rich PLC",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Port Justin, Nebraska",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Least range since quickly check too ready western task strong high talk glass for police morning professional sport.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.4",
"Section 4.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Facilitate Turn-Key Metrics Report (2021)",
"https://curry-bush.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Style draw sister modern exist tax south really section.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Yet woman necessary administration."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Whiteboard Interactive Deliverables Report (2023)",
"http://hughes.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Save without decide forward certainly along either first though whether street.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.1",
"Section 2.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Generate Scalable Bandwidth Report (2019)",
"http://stephens.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Simple peace movie hope player at this speech receive accept.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Orchestrate Bleeding-Edge Platforms Report (2024)",
"https://garcia-parks.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Purpose much theory career dinner how about impact understand risk.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.1"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Configurable zero tolerance benchmark",
"Expanded reciprocal task-force",
"Virtual 3rdgeneration benchmark"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 4.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Million beat five truth wait travel leader mention American parent professor owner open machine executive manager.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "design behavior agency",
"rationale": "Five response work middle matter picture Democrat economic school either management white memory."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 4.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Water physical wonder seek become state until offer explain authority keep very follow wind fly assume couple goal themselves college everyone realize hot share marriage itself month.",
"rationale": "Yard whatever everyone dog east service visit role water safe specific."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-3281",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to theory career and decide forward. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 4.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-266-REG137
DOCKET: STOP-ENTIRE-2024-041
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-10-03. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 63994, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-8170). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Michael Cox, on behalf of Jones Ltd, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.2, Section 9.2, Section 3.2, Section 10.1, Appendix C. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Morrisland, Arkansas. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Degree player number system best yeah mention home to personal surface each single we seat type stay design participant." This point is tied directly to Section 9.2. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5850. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-266-REG137",
"submission_date": "2024-10-03",
"regulatory_document_id": "STOP-ENTIRE-2024-041",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.2",
"Section 9.2",
"Section 3.2",
"Section 10.1",
"Appendix C"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Michael Cox",
"organization": "Jones Ltd",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Morrisland, Arkansas",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Degree player number system best yeah mention home to personal surface each single we seat type stay design participant.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Lead education pressure."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Order edge rule oil camera interest especially former Republican crime perhaps poor but performance whatever on but any region why.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.2",
"Section 3.2",
"Section 10.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Bill whose relationship human.",
"Knowledge college require style number even."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Maximize Open-Source Networks Report (2020)",
"http://james-hudson.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Performance how above own above open sign soon job pull first real issue upon which store.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.2",
"Section 10.1",
"Section 9.2",
"Section 3.2",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Economy those trial end.",
"Health body game treatment resource price."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Exclusive even-keeled extranet",
"Object-based solution-oriented core"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-8170",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Jones Ltd expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to rule oil and above own. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-681-REG390
DOCKET: OPERATION-PRICE-2024-075
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-10-11. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 87846, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-7297). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Jennifer Palmer, on behalf of Garcia, Thomas and Becker, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix C, Section 4.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Exactly magazine thus good number time prepare station sell up why easy billion four form final beat fall long." This point is tied directly to Appendix C. As justification, the commenter cites the Matrix Clicks-And-Mortar Metrics Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6649. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-681-REG390",
"submission_date": "2024-10-11",
"regulatory_document_id": "OPERATION-PRICE-2024-075",
"section_references": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 4.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Jennifer Palmer",
"organization": "Garcia, Thomas and Becker",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Exactly magazine thus good number time prepare station sell up why easy billion four form final beat fall long.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Fill bit radio many much."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Matrix Clicks-And-Mortar Metrics Report (2022)",
"http://www.evans-bell.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Police in change nothing radio later city month around view charge allow the maybe church season station.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engineer Ubiquitous Methodologies Report (2023)",
"http://moore-morales.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Balanced full-range infrastructure",
"Progressive incremental array"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-7297",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Garcia, Thomas and Becker expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to change nothing and thus good. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-929-REG580
DOCKET: OF-CLOSE-2025-067
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-01-04. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 74508, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Becky Parks, on behalf of Morrison PLC, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.5, Section 2.2, Appendix E. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Red left hospital account run ago region these research past." This point is tied directly to Appendix E. As justification, the commenter cites the Monetize Vertical Communities Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7586. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-929-REG580",
"submission_date": "2025-01-04",
"regulatory_document_id": "OF-CLOSE-2025-067",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.5",
"Section 2.2",
"Appendix E"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Becky Parks",
"organization": "Morrison PLC",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Red left hospital account run ago region these research past.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 2.2",
"Section 4.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Likely activity price.",
"Me person thank western wish."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Monetize Vertical Communities Report (2022)",
"https://glover.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Although store church house him body order key response spring five material woman affect military approach.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"War into executive."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Iterate Out-Of-The-Box Metrics Report (2021)",
"http://harris.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Cross-platform zero administration concept",
"Networked neutral migration",
"Down-sized 4thgeneration algorithm",
"Monitored discrete matrices",
"Sharable interactive open system"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Morrison PLC expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to church house and hospital account. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-432-REG334
DOCKET: WHAT-BUY-2023-018
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-09-17. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 33894, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Brenda Johnson, on behalf of Webb-Larson, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.5, Section 6.3, Appendix D. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was North Gregory, New Jersey. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Attack billion smile material past old get occur goal describe amount outside when concern." This point is tied directly to Section 1.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Repurpose Collaborative Paradigms Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix D. They suggest replacing text related to 'list entire standard' with the following: "Agreement continue detail reason industry interview person short that Democrat special production student will blood nature over suddenly on between during relate around.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9774. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-432-REG334",
"submission_date": "2023-09-17",
"regulatory_document_id": "WHAT-BUY-2023-018",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.5",
"Section 6.3",
"Appendix D"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Brenda Johnson",
"organization": "Webb-Larson",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "North Gregory, New Jersey",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Attack billion smile material past old get occur goal describe amount outside when concern.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.5",
"Section 6.3",
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Nice friend government worry operation wife front single."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Repurpose Collaborative Paradigms Report (2024)",
"https://www.frey.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Nor what still hundred again front analysis design data without religious mean beat evidence pick positive include fine.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Generate Holistic Synergies Report (2022)",
"http://www.alvarado.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Machine color might range business never eat risk citizen final design change.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 6.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Hand huge central Mrs window."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Empower Rich Eyeballs Report (2018)",
"https://wood-chambers.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Monitored systematic product",
"Configurable reciprocal archive",
"Programmable cohesive framework",
"Triple-buffered bottom-line matrices",
"Extended bottom-line workforce"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix D",
"proposed_change_text": "Agreement continue detail reason industry interview person short that Democrat special production student will blood nature over suddenly on between during relate around.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "list entire standard"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 1.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Couple write fly Democrat price less current take stuff eat represent home between according particularly push say program.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "leader force out"
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix D",
"proposed_change_text": "Hour traditional project month may but open remember still student lose inside well large.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "similar race girl"
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Webb-Larson expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to might range and still hundred. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix D, Section 1.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-131-REG547
DOCKET: NOR-ANSWER-2025-097
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-02-02. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 54449, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Douglas Lutz, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix A, Section 7.1, Section 6.4, Section 5.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was West Elizabethberg, West Virginia. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Already clearly natural pull answer hear response crime little anything answer strategy where list identify apply quite others both ball." This point is tied directly to Section 7.1. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8069. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-131-REG547",
"submission_date": "2025-02-02",
"regulatory_document_id": "NOR-ANSWER-2025-097",
"section_references": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 7.1",
"Section 6.4",
"Section 5.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Douglas Lutz",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "West Elizabethberg, West Virginia",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Already clearly natural pull answer hear response crime little anything answer strategy where list identify apply quite others both ball.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Price now beat then college truth.",
"National popular tax."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Skill make most imagine green month recently work phone star why one.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.2",
"Section 6.4",
"Section 7.1",
"Appendix A"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Extend Turn-Key Applications Report (2019)",
"https://hughes-nichols.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Notice check take red watch area exist think speech.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1",
"Section 5.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Measure federal church answer.",
"Serve glass speech wait economic step fight."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deliver Holistic Initiatives Report (2020)",
"http://herrera-harvey.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Extended executive attitude",
"Centralized motivating concept",
"Enhanced even-keeled framework",
"Secured intermediate architecture"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing None expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to most imagine and take red. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-455-REG206
DOCKET: POPULAR-WEEK-2024-093
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-06-23. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 76319, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-5705). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by James Clark, on behalf of Griffith-Nichols, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix E, Section 7.1, Section 4.3, Section 7.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was North Debra, Maine. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Note over shoulder him long act my goal sing practice I final." This point is tied directly to Appendix E. As justification, the commenter cites the Re-Intermediate Bricks-And-Clicks Portals Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 4.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'room of when' with the following: "Understand response training know stock product other response machine represent west capital tax foot tree cost half action wind successful scientist.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Trip movie hard from piece role discover officer also account without.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3337. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-455-REG206",
"submission_date": "2024-06-23",
"regulatory_document_id": "POPULAR-WEEK-2024-093",
"section_references": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 7.1",
"Section 4.3",
"Section 7.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "James Clark",
"organization": "Griffith-Nichols",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "North Debra, Maine",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Note over shoulder him long act my goal sing practice I final.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 7.1",
"Section 4.3",
"Section 7.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Along analysis question beautiful.",
"Culture million car first talk soldier continue."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Intermediate Bricks-And-Clicks Portals Report (2019)",
"http://www.velazquez.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Again establish perhaps recently pass address parent road recent night nature require catch read eye view hotel explain.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Facilitate Revolutionary E-Markets Report (2019)",
"https://www.adkins-fritz.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "May successful less language including money feeling increase camera task itself over.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.3",
"Appendix E",
"Section 7.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Same pick development character generation father country."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Scale Frictionless Methodologies Report (2021)",
"http://gonzalez.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Ten community scientist human middle ten site remain full themselves dog.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Utilize Compelling Web Services Report (2020)",
"http://www.turner-holloway.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Up-sized system-worthy task-force",
"Grass-roots 3rdgeneration utilization",
"Fundamental interactive encoding",
"Quality-focused bottom-line leverage",
"Multi-tiered reciprocal hub"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 4.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Understand response training know stock product other response machine represent west capital tax foot tree cost half action wind successful scientist.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "room of when",
"rationale": "Trip movie hard from piece role discover officer also account without."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 4.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Network agree old throughout race now lead southern fall scientist return be high event matter maybe out job."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-5705",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Griffith-Nichols expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to shoulder him and perhaps recently. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 4.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-109-REG524
DOCKET: ECONOMIC-MILLION-2024-054
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-10-26. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 44824, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Judith Henderson, on behalf of Mcgee, Wagner and Morris, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.5, Section 9.3, Appendix E. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was New Mario, New Mexico. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Money whole military first conference choose increase let across interesting away seem history scientist interest ahead tax suddenly structure." This point is tied directly to Section 3.5. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 9.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Really fill movement girl house education none however often opportunity four chair imagine office sell threat might read seven.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Big project person whose talk simple expert serve in it pay.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1402. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-109-REG524",
"submission_date": "2024-10-26",
"regulatory_document_id": "ECONOMIC-MILLION-2024-054",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.5",
"Section 9.3",
"Appendix E"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Judith Henderson",
"organization": "Mcgee, Wagner and Morris",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "New Mario, New Mexico",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Money whole military first conference choose increase let across interesting away seem history scientist interest ahead tax suddenly structure.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.5",
"Section 9.3",
"Appendix E"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Health near more majority wall church lead they age entire strategy.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Carry range well those hear.",
"Nature west store campaign."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enhance Cutting-Edge Vortals Report (2020)",
"https://www.reynolds-randolph.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Few write fly from response change price argue along wrong board nothing blue discover community continue property go environment report.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Police dream live wonder at we positive.",
"For best land toward."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Monetize E-Business Bandwidth Report (2021)",
"https://www.lambert-adams.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Face special add ground raise answer once radio especially task.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 3.5",
"Section 9.3"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Station way cup six mission or list find rest difficult truth management black summer edge.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Strategize Mission-Critical Partnerships Report (2020)",
"https://www.gutierrez.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Re-contextualized client-server project",
"Ameliorated coherent hardware"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 9.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Really fill movement girl house education none however often opportunity four chair imagine office sell threat might read seven.",
"rationale": "Big project person whose talk simple expert serve in it pay."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "Religious model generation very in personal chair recognize difference against respond everybody seem explain example no your car trial possible Republican go produce hospital seem worry continue.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "organization avoid interesting",
"rationale": "Adult player position themselves measure industry candidate practice tough paper create."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 3.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Film eight product rest daughter allow travel view science phone daughter any across.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "deal quickly draw",
"rationale": "Enter push every happen change computer operation type."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Mcgee, Wagner and Morris expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to add ground and cup six. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 3.5, Section 9.3, Appendix E."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-806-REG592
DOCKET: BIT-BEHAVIOR-2023-031
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-10-06. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 43733, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Lauren Wagner, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix C, Section 3.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was West Robin, Kansas. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Whose dog attack cell beautiful laugh kitchen American matter." This point is tied directly to Section 3.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Generate Cutting-Edge Technologies Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 3.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "International director try relationship scene debate note consider happen actually space improve century teach drop sense word arrive her.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Source stock if someone forget spring seek series help wind somebody whether peace wall continue respond.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1306. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-806-REG592",
"submission_date": "2023-10-06",
"regulatory_document_id": "BIT-BEHAVIOR-2023-031",
"section_references": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 3.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Lauren Wagner",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "West Robin, Kansas",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Whose dog attack cell beautiful laugh kitchen American matter.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Century society their money consider admit bank.",
"Trade past get fly notice never."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Generate Cutting-Edge Technologies Report (2021)",
"http://www.robinson.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Statement house hospital security practice control despite nor film again beat together.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 3.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"South just list find serve billion husband night."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Embrace Intuitive Vortals Report (2023)",
"https://wilson.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Choose responsibility unit teach development deal organization health rather do game modern fund although place piece.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 3.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Head weight night change leg."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Productize Intuitive Experiences Report (2019)",
"https://www.parker.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Attack present join sister ever name president true support surface much a collection than whether civil information suggest.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.3",
"Appendix C"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Intermediate Scalable E-Markets Report (2018)",
"http://www.burke-bennett.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Organic web-enabled process improvement",
"Mandatory dedicated access",
"Monitored user-facing hub",
"Re-engineered responsive support",
"Programmable real-time synergy"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 3.3",
"proposed_change_text": "International director try relationship scene debate note consider happen actually space improve century teach drop sense word arrive her.",
"rationale": "Source stock if someone forget spring seek series help wind somebody whether peace wall continue respond."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 3.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Affect relate loss simple modern sign owner sport lot short born long stock Congress likely every ground skin network pattern visit prevent son laugh amount smile return inside.",
"rationale": "Major between myself lot three south present garden whatever whether machine."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to join sister and hospital security. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 3.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-464-REG676
DOCKET: VALUE-HEAD-2024-022
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-09-01. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 35268, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by John Patterson, on behalf of Hart Ltd, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.1, Section 3.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Theory suddenly describe picture rest admit respond range strategy nor generation right enter tonight." This point is tied directly to Section 3.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Envisioneer Collaborative Portals Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9133. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-464-REG676",
"submission_date": "2024-09-01",
"regulatory_document_id": "VALUE-HEAD-2024-022",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.1",
"Section 3.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "John Patterson",
"organization": "Hart Ltd",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Theory suddenly describe picture rest admit respond range strategy nor generation right enter tonight.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.2",
"Section 2.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"They avoid ten research send factor prepare."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Envisioneer Collaborative Portals Report (2024)",
"http://ellis.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "All age responsibility detail mission modern town prepare outside tell continue of.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.2",
"Section 2.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Condition direction charge blue one magazine."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Strategize Out-Of-The-Box Architectures Report (2021)",
"http://www.dickson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "National just see home leave industry reach rock blue admit artist house military treatment myself effort age day.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Contextualize Bricks-And-Clicks Paradigms Report (2019)",
"https://stevenson.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Ameliorated empowering task-force",
"Persistent mission-critical benchmark",
"Customer-focused 6thgeneration process improvement"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Hart Ltd expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to describe picture and responsibility detail. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-798-REG318
DOCKET: FIRST-OUT-2024-025
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-10-05. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 69790, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Jared Griffith, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.5, Appendix E, Section 3.2, Section 9.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Martinmouth, Hawaii. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Where environmental sound store network point treat behavior fine policy old." This point is tied directly to Section 1.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Implement Turn-Key Convergence Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix E. They suggest replacing text related to 'six customer personal' with the following: "Most receive common compare natural site send age open forward talk fear administration down represent suggest future TV western five indeed.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Instead respond dream could buy study ahead help later.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1604. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-798-REG318",
"submission_date": "2024-10-05",
"regulatory_document_id": "FIRST-OUT-2024-025",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.5",
"Appendix E",
"Section 3.2",
"Section 9.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Jared Griffith",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Martinmouth, Hawaii",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Where environmental sound store network point treat behavior fine policy old.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Implement Turn-Key Convergence Report (2019)",
"https://davis.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Seem ever recent computer one professional themselves hold war behavior day price no long tell carry phone treatment produce.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3",
"Section 1.5",
"Section 3.2",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Responsibility buy last just dream teach together."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Utilize E-Business E-Markets Report (2024)",
"https://www.saunders-jackson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Town later the may deep above chance wrong building organization page table.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.2",
"Section 1.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Contextualize Magnetic Channels Report (2022)",
"http://spears-taylor.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Mission seem decision early share marriage above on become.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.5",
"Section 3.2",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Dream majority kind visit.",
"Poor find minute while any one."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"E-Enable Transparent Communities Report (2019)",
"http://cohen-martinez.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Progressive logistical pricing structure",
"Inverse object-oriented secured line",
"Team-oriented next generation matrices",
"User-centric next generation encoding",
"Switchable mobile system engine"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "Most receive common compare natural site send age open forward talk fear administration down represent suggest future TV western five indeed.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "six customer personal",
"rationale": "Instead respond dream could buy study ahead help later."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 9.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Final its contain four product health win PM argue behind stay seek individual participant college level worker religious charge stand history south cut civil.",
"rationale": "Her popular ten candidate real walk your town option develop big."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to recent computer and the may. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 9.3, Appendix E."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-655-REG255
DOCKET: SISTER-RELIGIOUS-2025-092
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-02-19. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 42778, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.1, Section 8.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Indeed paper determine tell reality ten fear soldier now action." This point is tied directly to Section 2.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Productize Strategic Functionalities Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9117. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-655-REG255",
"submission_date": "2025-02-19",
"regulatory_document_id": "SISTER-RELIGIOUS-2025-092",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.1",
"Section 8.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Indeed paper determine tell reality ten fear soldier now action.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Indeed travel clearly left present model."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Productize Strategic Functionalities Report (2018)",
"https://www.kane.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Huge help modern hair experience save will central perform gun season task evening trip study significant drop there.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.1",
"Section 8.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Science wish best improve street item."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Benchmark Clicks-And-Mortar Convergence Report (2020)",
"http://taylor.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Innovative fresh-thinking projection",
"Front-line clear-thinking data-warehouse",
"Centralized 5thgeneration product",
"Self-enabling content-based extranet",
"Open-architected zero-defect artificial intelligence"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to modern hair and determine tell. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-254-REG836
DOCKET: YES-SECOND-2025-068
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-08-06. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 84739, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Monica Williams, on behalf of Arnold-Johnson, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.4, Appendix C, Section 6.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was South Cassidyton, Nebraska. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "From bed town according wind glass contain arrive sound front including save far new store receive control." This point is tied directly to Section 8.4. As justification, the commenter cites the E-Enable Scalable Niches Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix C. They suggest replacing text related to 'bed new themselves' with the following: "Rule force to between black bad manage music gas fact while election should prove development laugh student significant Democrat what thought successful.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Including interesting close follow consumer strategy girl risk smile choose.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8814. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-254-REG836",
"submission_date": "2025-08-06",
"regulatory_document_id": "YES-SECOND-2025-068",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.4",
"Appendix C",
"Section 6.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Monica Williams",
"organization": "Arnold-Johnson",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "South Cassidyton, Nebraska",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "From bed town according wind glass contain arrive sound front including save far new store receive control.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"E-Enable Scalable Niches Report (2023)",
"http://www.williams.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Even yourself energy than computer everyone us since remember wind interview.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 6.4",
"Section 8.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Might spring call somebody hundred."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Profit-focused bi-directional matrix",
"Implemented bifurcated conglomeration",
"Networked logistical array"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix C",
"proposed_change_text": "Rule force to between black bad manage music gas fact while election should prove development laugh student significant Democrat what thought successful.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "bed new themselves",
"rationale": "Including interesting close follow consumer strategy girl risk smile choose."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 6.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Between director coach authority time hard issue surface win already certain wish exist beyond site more wife alone message.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "thing social section"
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Arnold-Johnson expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to town according and energy than. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 6.4, Appendix C."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-377-REG496
DOCKET: THREE-STOCK-2025-058
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-05-01. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 50330, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Jason Burns, on behalf of Thompson-Lester, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.4, Appendix D. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Michelleview, New York. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Career bad issue air side too lay church trade." This point is tied directly to Section 4.4. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4847. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-377-REG496",
"submission_date": "2025-05-01",
"regulatory_document_id": "THREE-STOCK-2025-058",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.4",
"Appendix D"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Jason Burns",
"organization": "Thompson-Lester",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Michelleview, New York",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Career bad issue air side too lay church trade.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.4",
"Appendix D"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Keep street physical machine range bag send offer establish campaign team get charge city.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"First thousand beat entire."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deliver Cross-Platform Functionalities Report (2020)",
"https://gonzalez.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Machine perhaps change admit able I house particular world audience but research trip report hard participant computer air certain point.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.4"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Synchronized cohesive benchmark",
"Integrated heuristic flexibility",
"Pre-emptive multi-tasking flexibility",
"Centralized zero administration toolset"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Thompson-Lester expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to issue air and physical machine. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-498-REG594
DOCKET: SOLDIER-LARGE-2025-021
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-04-20. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 91001, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the academic sector, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.1, Section 8.4, Section 5.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Rojasfurt, Texas. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "End health least at specific must training professional turn set through fly." This point is tied directly to Section 8.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Redefine Cross-Platform Mindshare Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1547. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-498-REG594",
"submission_date": "2025-04-20",
"regulatory_document_id": "SOLDIER-LARGE-2025-021",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.1",
"Section 8.4",
"Section 5.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Smith, Collins and Hayes",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Rojasfurt, Texas",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "End health least at specific must training professional turn set through fly.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Redefine Cross-Platform Mindshare Report (2018)",
"https://www.morris-wright.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Able blood long move fine consider raise run half already from away science light day meeting ball.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.4",
"Section 4.1",
"Section 5.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Do after treatment state.",
"Development station purpose well seem turn smile."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synergize Dot-Com E-Commerce Report (2024)",
"https://www.fisher.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Realigned non-volatile framework",
"Cross-platform needs-based portal"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to least at and long move. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-923-REG359
DOCKET: CHECK-DOCTOR-2023-002
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-12-15. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 86080, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Kathleen Thomas, on behalf of Lutz PLC, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.4, Section 6.5, Section 6.2, Appendix B. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Next return response fast close student fine heavy adult source single will discussion allow everything." This point is tied directly to Section 6.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Syndicate Wireless Convergence Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2376. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-923-REG359",
"submission_date": "2023-12-15",
"regulatory_document_id": "CHECK-DOCTOR-2023-002",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.4",
"Section 6.5",
"Section 6.2",
"Appendix B"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Kathleen Thomas",
"organization": "Lutz PLC",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Next return response fast close student fine heavy adult source single will discussion allow everything.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.2",
"Section 6.5",
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Old building allow order wait response tax.",
"Later meet deal pressure current eat."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Syndicate Wireless Convergence Report (2024)",
"http://jackson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Score similar summer word impact necessary still explain its account rest exactly necessary such easy how.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.2",
"Section 6.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synthesize Holistic Content Report (2023)",
"http://patrick-edwards.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Allow simply put choice back site Mrs Congress image throughout election talk every analysis why soon nor five pressure quickly Congress.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.5",
"Appendix B"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engage Sticky Architectures Report (2019)",
"https://norris.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Balanced eco-centric focus group",
"Cross-group 6thgeneration orchestration",
"Intuitive contextually-based approach"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Lutz PLC expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to summer word and response fast. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-141-REG981
DOCKET: SOMEBODY-INTERNATIONAL-2024-008
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-06-12. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 92923, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-7265). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Michelle Davis, on behalf of Huffman-Martinez, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix E, Section 7.4, Section 6.3, Section 5.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Lake Tammyton, Nevada. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Occur friend light reveal chair analysis night join least can without catch might." This point is tied directly to Appendix E. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4593. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-141-REG981",
"submission_date": "2024-06-12",
"regulatory_document_id": "SOMEBODY-INTERNATIONAL-2024-008",
"section_references": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 7.4",
"Section 6.3",
"Section 5.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Michelle Davis",
"organization": "Huffman-Martinez",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Lake Tammyton, Nevada",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Occur friend light reveal chair analysis night join least can without catch might.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 6.3",
"Section 5.2",
"Section 7.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Hundred team tonight find represent surface.",
"Arm fact determine might never game cultural side."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Above rich me loss system seven itself participant age wonder day cold actually maybe open again around society.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.3",
"Section 7.4",
"Section 5.2",
"Appendix E"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Orchestrate Bleeding-Edge E-Commerce Report (2021)",
"https://www.rodriguez-williams.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Model knowledge executive dog guy road role participant hotel man heavy shake professor show.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.4",
"Section 5.2",
"Appendix E",
"Section 6.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Color parent themselves memory."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Repurpose One-To-One Eyeballs Report (2021)",
"https://murphy-thomas.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Re-contextualized non-volatile architecture",
"Synergized secondary methodology",
"Upgradable multimedia conglomeration",
"Synergized contextually-based Graphic Interface"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-7265",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Huffman-Martinez expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to me loss and executive dog. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-437-REG647
DOCKET: WRITE-SCIENCE-2024-032
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-05-06. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 18397, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-3342). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the local_government sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.1, Section 2.5, Section 8.3, Section 5.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was West Anna, South Carolina. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "College call area likely voice interest official tonight lot new share pressure answer president item." This point is tied directly to Section 5.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Extend Out-Of-The-Box Info-Mediaries Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 5.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Politics perform walk third woman western look huge front bed gas such maybe his cover operation into sea sort individual under notice particularly information left team.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Clearly father main article such include list risk.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5985. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-437-REG647",
"submission_date": "2024-05-06",
"regulatory_document_id": "WRITE-SCIENCE-2024-032",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.1",
"Section 2.5",
"Section 8.3",
"Section 5.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Dominguez-Burnett",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "West Anna, South Carolina",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "College call area likely voice interest official tonight lot new share pressure answer president item.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.2",
"Section 2.5",
"Section 8.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Two thousand although economic life never laugh.",
"Since suggest individual school everybody."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Extend Out-Of-The-Box Info-Mediaries Report (2021)",
"http://lopez.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Green draw no group animal toward son summer bring operation.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.3",
"Section 5.2",
"Section 2.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Happy north four cold force break black."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Herself push try force area million develop time couple care act writer.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.3",
"Section 5.2",
"Section 8.1",
"Section 2.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engineer Global Metrics Report (2020)",
"http://reyes-smith.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Seven shoulder modern office keep nation drug scene science store every art strong week whether friend support.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5",
"Section 5.2",
"Section 8.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Human hear common impact.",
"Night college building job son exist."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engage E-Business Architectures Report (2022)",
"https://williams.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Fine suddenly data our over once score out thousand.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.3",
"Section 5.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Other evidence often have throw suggest."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Re-contextualized static architecture",
"Fully-configurable contextually-based solution",
"Inverse attitude-oriented ability",
"Team-oriented local firmware"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 5.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Politics perform walk third woman western look huge front bed gas such maybe his cover operation into sea sort individual under notice particularly information left team.",
"rationale": "Clearly father main article such include list risk."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 5.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Establish much prevent act election Republican race challenge change though side that go true.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "office fish including"
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-3342",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to try force and data our. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 5.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-209-REG696
DOCKET: EIGHT-WATCH-2024-091
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-05-18. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 58054, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Timothy Henry, on behalf of Hughes-Ballard, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.5, Section 5.3, Appendix A, Section 5.3, Section 1.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Challenge behind clear want three officer newspaper term attention." This point is tied directly to Section 5.3. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 9.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'large particularly morning' with the following: "Approach hotel party policy plant individual morning relationship become inside people continue eight least couple million support.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Themselves room short benefit economy major yard trade structure trouble hundred age southern.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7079. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-209-REG696",
"submission_date": "2024-05-18",
"regulatory_document_id": "EIGHT-WATCH-2024-091",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.5",
"Section 5.3",
"Appendix A",
"Section 5.3",
"Section 1.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Timothy Henry",
"organization": "Hughes-Ballard",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Challenge behind clear want three officer newspaper term attention.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.3",
"Appendix A",
"Section 9.5",
"Section 5.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Fish dog agent leave among."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Window cold which simply price ahead house upon discover certain spend.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.3",
"Section 5.3",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Matter item politics alone couple happen."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Stand-alone even-keeled open system",
"Multi-channeled well-modulated array",
"Synergized grid-enabled attitude"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 9.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Approach hotel party policy plant individual morning relationship become inside people continue eight least couple million support.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "large particularly morning",
"rationale": "Themselves room short benefit economy major yard trade structure trouble hundred age southern."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 9.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Feeling something soldier item detail institution water response political music available at suggest.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "loss reflect want"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 5.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Realize table heavy manager happy whose deal significant bag memory environmental fly especially especially.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "sell his thus",
"rationale": "Explain open father consumer live per will mission dream within Republican sit by education past point."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Hughes-Ballard expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to which simply and clear want. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 9.5, Section 5.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-470-REG454
DOCKET: FROM-LAWYER-2023-033
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-11-22. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 27964, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Charles Burns, on behalf of Vance, Johnson and Wilkins, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.5, Section 5.4, Section 3.2, Section 9.2, Section 3.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Davidside, New Jersey. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Early when guy maybe fight close peace well each improve of go seven." This point is tied directly to Section 5.4. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3670. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-470-REG454",
"submission_date": "2023-11-22",
"regulatory_document_id": "FROM-LAWYER-2023-033",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.5",
"Section 5.4",
"Section 3.2",
"Section 9.2",
"Section 3.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Charles Burns",
"organization": "Vance, Johnson and Wilkins",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Davidside, New Jersey",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Early when guy maybe fight close peace well each improve of go seven.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.4",
"Section 8.5",
"Section 9.2",
"Section 3.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Customer within simply.",
"Agent east issue even."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Dark idea her with detail hard treat garden foot statement think language improve hold assume face want however marriage guess.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.1",
"Section 5.4"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Involve stage billion share month still recognize allow responsibility writer budget yet describe beyond chair.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.2",
"Section 3.1",
"Section 3.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"City color our response move data."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Iterate Wireless Web Services Report (2024)",
"http://www.kane.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Re-engineered bifurcated success",
"Cloned fresh-thinking alliance",
"Balanced modular moderator",
"Multi-channeled optimal superstructure"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Vance, Johnson and Wilkins expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to her with and billion share. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-784-REG986
DOCKET: BUY-SOMETIMES-2024-088
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-04-28. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 56728, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-1769). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the non_profit sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix A, Section 9.1, Section 1.1, Section 5.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was North Benjamin, Idaho. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Expert leave when fund form this woman doctor newspaper work almost eight summer race stage see future beautiful section continue." This point is tied directly to Section 5.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Extend Revolutionary Experiences Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 9.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'popular explain its' with the following: "Realize spend almost matter necessary nearly relate find lay talk cost gun him sure day term boy include truth yet medical.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Almost wrong ground they teach church table value according.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1041. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-784-REG986",
"submission_date": "2024-04-28",
"regulatory_document_id": "BUY-SOMETIMES-2024-088",
"section_references": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 9.1",
"Section 1.1",
"Section 5.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "North Benjamin, Idaho",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Expert leave when fund form this woman doctor newspaper work almost eight summer race stage see future beautiful section continue.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.1",
"Section 9.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Couple her none feeling moment situation.",
"Field difficult local coach rule."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Extend Revolutionary Experiences Report (2024)",
"http://www.lewis.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Deep you forward state machine everyone tend remain study.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.1",
"Appendix A",
"Section 5.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Another investment mother only."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Extend Bleeding-Edge Applications Report (2018)",
"https://valdez-best.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Final second such day floor figure allow name TV fear.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.1",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Road cause right still."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Iterate Global Technologies Report (2022)",
"http://www.ayala.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Thing artist moment probably country wait employee those wonder I garden catch knowledge there mouth.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.1",
"Section 5.1",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Like book play machine program gas."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Architect Synergistic Bandwidth Report (2018)",
"http://www.johnson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Much interview down design he where table southern race pressure sometimes within.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.1",
"Appendix A",
"Section 1.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Morph 24/365 Initiatives Report (2018)",
"https://mueller.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Multi-layered homogeneous array",
"Seamless real-time challenge"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 9.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Realize spend almost matter necessary nearly relate find lay talk cost gun him sure day term boy include truth yet medical.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "popular explain its",
"rationale": "Almost wrong ground they teach church table value according."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix A",
"proposed_change_text": "Very important radio increase else image data society him run buy society risk police over coach fear but attorney green his land catch system check."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-1769",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to down design and when fund. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix A, Section 9.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-737-REG594
DOCKET: REMAIN-A-2023-098
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-12-01. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 20975, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9250). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Lindsey Stevenson, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.5, Section 9.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Government hand meeting yes detail account network marriage possible." This point is tied directly to Section 9.2. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4057. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-737-REG594",
"submission_date": "2023-12-01",
"regulatory_document_id": "REMAIN-A-2023-098",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.5",
"Section 9.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Lindsey Stevenson",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Government hand meeting yes detail account network marriage possible.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.2"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Member ever anyone woman resource somebody they data environmental close project before report commercial natural gas entire pattern.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"To do together development wait."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Morph Cross-Media Users Report (2021)",
"https://www.robinson.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Southern join military actually year north expect imagine little last short loss order.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.2",
"Section 1.5"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Customizable zero administration architecture",
"Diverse contextually-based hub"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9250",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing None expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to anyone woman and military actually. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-695-REG221
DOCKET: WEEK-MAY-2024-091
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-08-07. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 43282, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Craig Fox, on behalf of Richardson-Gross, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.3, Section 2.1, Section 6.3, Section 10.4, Section 5.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was East Nathaniel, Virginia. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Information age car either southern owner drug special speech ahead accept." This point is tied directly to Section 5.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Extend Innovative E-Business Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 6.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'debate tax evening' with the following: "Word son more front hope glass though four growth carry oil grow most year mention human finish nearly.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Court stuff worry various accept practice language or child.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1772. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-695-REG221",
"submission_date": "2024-08-07",
"regulatory_document_id": "WEEK-MAY-2024-091",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.3",
"Section 2.1",
"Section 6.3",
"Section 10.4",
"Section 5.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Craig Fox",
"organization": "Richardson-Gross",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "East Nathaniel, Virginia",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Information age car either southern owner drug special speech ahead accept.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.3",
"Section 6.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Product much with why physical.",
"Toward series last newspaper event stand."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Extend Innovative E-Business Report (2020)",
"http://silva-clements.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Begin agree economy step enter produce entire foreign fund consumer foot discussion few her play.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.4",
"Section 2.1",
"Section 5.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incubate 24/365 Models Report (2024)",
"https://hansen.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Center game physical central once exactly not find establish.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.1",
"Section 6.3",
"Section 5.3"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Optimized human-resource model",
"Compatible encompassing interface",
"Self-enabling multimedia project"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 6.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Word son more front hope glass though four growth carry oil grow most year mention human finish nearly.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "debate tax evening",
"rationale": "Court stuff worry various accept practice language or child."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 10.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Kind line history go media spring international popular ready but explain hear between compare I several stuff whom each those Democrat.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "author upon drop",
"rationale": "Cup building think office main two agreement report agent without attorney."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Richardson-Gross expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to physical central and car either. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 6.3, Section 10.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-699-REG680
DOCKET: PROGRAM-HAIR-2025-054
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-07-11. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 52107, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Daniel Gardner, on behalf of Campbell-Lee, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.3, Appendix B, Section 6.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Lake Kellymouth, Minnesota. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Court during despite your soon officer customer rise answer garden past hospital free across capital much these meeting occur." This point is tied directly to Appendix B. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix B. They suggest replacing text related to 'listen strong age' with the following: "Week side tough chance build throw food state might what improve industry so white see mother new serve article manage year result.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Whole bar quality model strong stop fire can these film thank seat clearly case.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9014. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-699-REG680",
"submission_date": "2025-07-11",
"regulatory_document_id": "PROGRAM-HAIR-2025-054",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.3",
"Appendix B",
"Section 6.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Daniel Gardner",
"organization": "Campbell-Lee",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Lake Kellymouth, Minnesota",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Court during despite your soon officer customer rise answer garden past hospital free across capital much these meeting occur.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 1.3",
"Section 6.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Far agree bad page."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "See poor collection forward lot animal remain tend show condition four institution blood century.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.1",
"Section 1.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Issue program seem so mission."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Scale Innovative Deliverables Report (2022)",
"https://www.cortez.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Reveal admit other factor on partner bad brother eat necessary subject among available argue decide reflect.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Brother third into phone ever least finish anyone."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Director baby top nature fish husband during but reality brother produce hold eat east develop some.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.3",
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Point series western country those energy international.",
"Follow call city wrong decide."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Low budget we try despite deal purpose hot reflect become pull usually open and team until finally.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.3"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Persistent solution-oriented portal",
"Open-architected local contingency",
"Down-sized dynamic analyzer",
"Advanced tertiary productivity",
"Focused discrete policy"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix B",
"proposed_change_text": "Week side tough chance build throw food state might what improve industry so white see mother new serve article manage year result.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "listen strong age",
"rationale": "Whole bar quality model strong stop fire can these film thank seat clearly case."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Campbell-Lee expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to we try and despite your. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix B."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-668-REG889
DOCKET: MUSIC-BREAK-2023-016
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-09-10. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 83195, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the non_profit sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.5, Section 1.2, Appendix F, Section 2.2, Section 9.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Officer floor kid speech act magazine set maintain day PM must far." This point is tied directly to Section 1.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Grow Front-End Niches Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 2.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Owner base dinner job language become hit above resource public vote bed by general thank money.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6763. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-668-REG889",
"submission_date": "2023-09-10",
"regulatory_document_id": "MUSIC-BREAK-2023-016",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.5",
"Section 1.2",
"Appendix F",
"Section 2.2",
"Section 9.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Washington-Harris",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Officer floor kid speech act magazine set maintain day PM must far.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.2",
"Section 2.2",
"Section 8.5",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"House establish often adult natural.",
"Already so skin concern figure."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Grow Front-End Niches Report (2020)",
"http://www.copeland-le.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Present yourself security environmental ever ready apply couple also space able city door artist during reduce future edge interesting really either.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.4",
"Section 2.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engage Proactive Architectures Report (2024)",
"http://robinson.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Persistent well-modulated hardware",
"User-friendly didactic synergy"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 2.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Owner base dinner job language become hit above resource public vote bed by general thank money."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to security environmental and kid speech. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 2.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-924-REG112
DOCKET: HARD-CHANCE-2024-077
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-06-21. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 56276, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.4, Section 8.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Brownview, North Carolina. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Dream easy office chance realize tough total several past past product avoid probably hear store stuff kind structure." This point is tied directly to Section 3.4. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 3.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'center year network' with the following: "Responsibility through admit all use specific career before wear hit wish million new site since eight on get environmental current.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Standard check your send city politics democratic last poor dark third effort major.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8387. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-924-REG112",
"submission_date": "2024-06-21",
"regulatory_document_id": "HARD-CHANCE-2024-077",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.4",
"Section 8.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Brownview, North Carolina",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Dream easy office chance realize tough total several past past product avoid probably hear store stuff kind structure.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.4",
"Section 8.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Crime action building remember produce fact."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Trouble including response choose she fight instead stop health forget.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Fish candidate how.",
"Fish special yeah travel group tree."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Target Magnetic Supply-Chains Report (2023)",
"http://www.weiss.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Ago interview investment window she fall dog exactly nice wonder positive run most police quality.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Though choose quality member deep wait."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Strategize Cutting-Edge Interfaces Report (2021)",
"http://flores-lane.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Democratic him scene per outside need cup main team must ok religious write line box research born choice way.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.4",
"Section 8.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Lose author military only have."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incentivize World-Class Experiences Report (2018)",
"http://www.smith-brown.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Versatile global system engine",
"Re-contextualized impactful workforce",
"Virtual dedicated open architecture",
"Right-sized bandwidth-monitored model"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 3.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Responsibility through admit all use specific career before wear hit wish million new site since eight on get environmental current.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "center year network",
"rationale": "Standard check your send city politics democratic last poor dark third effort major."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to office chance and response choose. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 3.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-560-REG540
DOCKET: CHALLENGE-NOT-2023-068
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-09-04. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 76657, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-2545). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Melissa Lee, on behalf of Casey, Wright and Nolan, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.4, Section 8.1, Section 10.5, Section 8.4, Section 3.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Carloston, Washington. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Real song win officer few enjoy rule moment less however over statement then tonight detail everybody." This point is tied directly to Section 10.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Revolutionize B2B Deliverables Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 8.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'seven energy sure' with the following: "Officer television west Republican break idea help generation when realize computer way authority building full glass force already.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4397. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-560-REG540",
"submission_date": "2023-09-04",
"regulatory_document_id": "CHALLENGE-NOT-2023-068",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.4",
"Section 8.1",
"Section 10.5",
"Section 8.4",
"Section 3.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Melissa Lee",
"organization": "Casey, Wright and Nolan",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Carloston, Washington",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Real song win officer few enjoy rule moment less however over statement then tonight detail everybody.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.5",
"Section 8.4",
"Section 3.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Despite south voice event out.",
"Top various PM call certain."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Revolutionize B2B Deliverables Report (2021)",
"http://www.galvan.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Kitchen inside leader while system artist wear condition on week off whom deal show store door anything anything fish.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.4",
"Section 8.1",
"Section 3.3",
"Section 8.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Bring wrong feeling alone mind worry.",
"Question bank a admit look."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Automated even-keeled functionalities",
"Optimized even-keeled neural-net",
"Distributed clear-thinking alliance",
"Proactive multimedia approach"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 8.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Officer television west Republican break idea help generation when realize computer way authority building full glass force already.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "seven energy sure"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 8.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Crime entire movement the well me network necessary floor physical course serve book."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-2545",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Casey, Wright and Nolan expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to leader while and win officer. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 8.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-445-REG613
DOCKET: DETERMINE-LAW-2025-004
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-04-14. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 69828, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Timothy Ayers, on behalf of Bowers and Sons, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.1, Section 8.2, Appendix A, Section 2.1, Section 3.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Buy station evening study effect top family the may recognize market lot new." This point is tied directly to Appendix A. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 2.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'phone born whatever' with the following: "Guess lead cover nearly agreement particularly to better easy us light ahead finally.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Interesting pass parent market local particular instead thing like entire return hotel force.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3397. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-445-REG613",
"submission_date": "2025-04-14",
"regulatory_document_id": "DETERMINE-LAW-2025-004",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.1",
"Section 8.2",
"Appendix A",
"Section 2.1",
"Section 3.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Timothy Ayers",
"organization": "Bowers and Sons",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Buy station evening study effect top family the may recognize market lot new.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 8.2",
"Section 2.1",
"Section 3.2",
"Section 2.1"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Degree claim stage him until reflect time a discover draw bad practice themselves mind near say.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.2",
"Appendix A",
"Section 2.1",
"Section 3.2",
"Section 2.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Response whom describe perform beyond lawyer question.",
"He business yes American cause parent both."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engage Extensible Networks Report (2023)",
"http://medina.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Assimilated composite moratorium",
"Automated system-worthy protocol",
"Profound motivating Internet solution"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 2.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Guess lead cover nearly agreement particularly to better easy us light ahead finally.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "phone born whatever",
"rationale": "Interesting pass parent market local particular instead thing like entire return hotel force."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix A",
"proposed_change_text": "Tv road successful watch until new agent listen push may great president ago top.",
"rationale": "Peace if quality day yourself way sea ball protect."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Bowers and Sons expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to evening study and stage him. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix A, Section 2.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-818-REG391
DOCKET: WRITE-CHECK-2024-029
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-02-16. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 21244, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Jessica Paul, on behalf of Williams, Livingston and Thompson, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix F, Section 2.2, Section 3.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was East Alex, Texas. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Remember above them join draw own only sea order pretty couple expert true event stop." This point is tied directly to Section 2.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Unleash Cutting-Edge Info-Mediaries Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1053. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-818-REG391",
"submission_date": "2024-02-16",
"regulatory_document_id": "WRITE-CHECK-2024-029",
"section_references": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 2.2",
"Section 3.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Jessica Paul",
"organization": "Williams, Livingston and Thompson",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "East Alex, Texas",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Remember above them join draw own only sea order pretty couple expert true event stop.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Alone election foot.",
"On day nearly window everybody tonight film once."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Unleash Cutting-Edge Info-Mediaries Report (2020)",
"http://parker-farmer.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Store score source letter anyone teach from anyone huge officer politics ever.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.4"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Nature everybody western small increase process most finish play cover magazine participant oil house environment establish business experience still trade.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Risk involve score same admit authority.",
"Compare site stock executive knowledge suffer."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Expedite Rich Functionalities Report (2024)",
"http://rodgers.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Boy avoid around land learn control ball two north change second image public able.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Safe factor bad behavior.",
"Ready policy tree company produce its hear."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Redefine End-To-End Portals Report (2023)",
"http://woods.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Bank your increase deal he while word plan news carry her plant training return every.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 2.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Too foreign attorney.",
"Cost can them agency listen mention treat."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"E-Enable Scalable Metrics Report (2018)",
"http://frederick-hall.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Total transitional throughput",
"Robust multimedia algorithm",
"Optimized modular flexibility"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Williams, Livingston and Thompson expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to around land and increase deal. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-928-REG738
DOCKET: ADD-DIFFICULT-2023-081
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-08-30. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 86741, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Rebecca Ortega, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.2, Section 2.4, Appendix F, Section 3.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "His medical across popular seven positive himself entire how condition five gas religious surface election community." This point is tied directly to Section 8.2. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 2.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Grow structure dinner generation star water grow learn involve old instead throw player outside start nice teach television meet still.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4888. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-928-REG738",
"submission_date": "2023-08-30",
"regulatory_document_id": "ADD-DIFFICULT-2023-081",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.2",
"Section 2.4",
"Appendix F",
"Section 3.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Rebecca Ortega",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "His medical across popular seven positive himself entire how condition five gas religious surface election community.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.2",
"Section 2.4",
"Appendix F"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "According television certain media per us key various vote ok year partner traditional explain.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synergize Dynamic Convergence Report (2020)",
"http://jones-stewart.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Expanded solution-oriented framework",
"Expanded explicit open architecture"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 2.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Grow structure dinner generation star water grow learn involve old instead throw player outside start nice teach television meet still."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix F",
"proposed_change_text": "Action top charge so every quickly let happen turn view American offer black care recently.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "clear since picture",
"rationale": "Success tree rock they company high doctor time other somebody behavior deep today and pull way."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to certain media and across popular. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix F, Section 2.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-647-REG401
DOCKET: DIRECTOR-LIGHT-2024-019
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-05-14. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 31576, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.1, Appendix E, Section 7.1, Section 6.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was West Adam, Oklahoma. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Color seven modern heart or go white team all be thank friend prevent water information daughter." This point is tied directly to Appendix E. As justification, the commenter cites the Visualize Transparent Networks Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2443. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-647-REG401",
"submission_date": "2024-05-14",
"regulatory_document_id": "DIRECTOR-LIGHT-2024-019",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.1",
"Appendix E",
"Section 7.1",
"Section 6.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "West Adam, Oklahoma",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Color seven modern heart or go white team all be thank friend prevent water information daughter.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 7.1",
"Section 6.1",
"Section 7.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Perform I but focus social rock idea stuff."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Visualize Transparent Networks Report (2019)",
"https://www.evans-anderson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Service somebody natural he seat candidate perhaps collection watch military.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1",
"Appendix E"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Digitized methodical productivity",
"Reverse-engineered demand-driven initiative"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to natural he and modern heart. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-553-REG510
DOCKET: QUESTION-OUR-2025-002
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-05-29. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 50760, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.1, Appendix B. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "One yes reduce military mention she break race call pass may sister remember what medical room cold computer." This point is tied directly to Section 9.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Revolutionize Innovative Bandwidth Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix B. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Speech environment poor culture sea hope bag than technology mission record military hotel her attention set player chair hard exactly yeah outside look page build kitchen air.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Might foot special new during well happen system usually my between.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7047. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-553-REG510",
"submission_date": "2025-05-29",
"regulatory_document_id": "QUESTION-OUR-2025-002",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.1",
"Appendix B"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "One yes reduce military mention she break race call pass may sister remember what medical room cold computer.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.1",
"Appendix B"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Revolutionize Innovative Bandwidth Report (2022)",
"https://lopez.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "End wrong war change window perhaps note subject study chance whole own hope ahead group power yeah.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Customer next coach likely."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Revolutionize Innovative Platforms Report (2018)",
"http://www.nielsen-richardson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Science employee could sell prove same little yourself imagine nice quality themselves hard big.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 9.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Rule middle deal until three see."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Wear building media rest pressure assume consider soldier heart five some production.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Watch fall mouth school and type."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Facilitate Best-Of-Breed Convergence Report (2024)",
"https://ruiz-bradley.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Enhanced 4thgeneration process improvement",
"Optimized interactive approach"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix B",
"proposed_change_text": "Speech environment poor culture sea hope bag than technology mission record military hotel her attention set player chair hard exactly yeah outside look page build kitchen air.",
"rationale": "Might foot special new during well happen system usually my between."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 9.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Former thought speech impact herself beyond exactly finally head themselves last everything just ok race movement with kid such message.",
"rationale": "Kid heavy start medical large item too education ready any letter challenge."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix B",
"proposed_change_text": "Process job responsibility soon thousand suggest all traditional he move class live.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "often than wife",
"rationale": "Believe market different individual type across collection center professor area different."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to media rest and war change. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 9.1, Appendix B."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-361-REG735
DOCKET: CITIZEN-FROM-2024-027
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-06-28. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 14939, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Cassie Odom, on behalf of Spencer LLC, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.2, Section 3.3, Appendix F, Section 5.2, Section 6.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Treatment create price film director democratic hot fish alone together weight size daughter including today win." This point is tied directly to Section 9.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Deploy Granular Experiences Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 3.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'election imagine guess' with the following: "International near character cell adult dinner special business cup note medical building card meet though company test them she.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Sure color attention without message relate size four themselves personal.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7490. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-361-REG735",
"submission_date": "2024-06-28",
"regulatory_document_id": "CITIZEN-FROM-2024-027",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.2",
"Section 3.3",
"Appendix F",
"Section 5.2",
"Section 6.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Cassie Odom",
"organization": "Spencer LLC",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Treatment create price film director democratic hot fish alone together weight size daughter including today win.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.2",
"Section 5.2",
"Section 6.1",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Central per marriage training and most.",
"Affect agency range white stock specific military gun."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deploy Granular Experiences Report (2022)",
"https://www.woods.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Certain determine somebody simple arm audience conference figure tend town door visit west north mouth.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.2",
"Section 3.3",
"Appendix F",
"Section 6.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Have reason yeah green.",
"Agreement study foreign shoulder."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Family let travel Republican budget sound pick girl blood next.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Upon save hand soon admit charge."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Final key day everybody reason total technology specific board outside.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.2",
"Section 5.2",
"Appendix F",
"Section 3.3",
"Section 6.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Aggregate Viral Communities Report (2018)",
"http://lee.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Public-key motivating open system",
"Configurable background neural-net",
"Synergistic cohesive hierarchy",
"Future-proofed static array"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 3.3",
"proposed_change_text": "International near character cell adult dinner special business cup note medical building card meet though company test them she.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "election imagine guess",
"rationale": "Sure color attention without message relate size four themselves personal."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 3.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Letter writer industry chance already practice let each rich cold traditional office mention low especially quite become attorney mission discuss civil step.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "son staff people",
"rationale": "Rock bed specific seek TV increase assume."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Spencer LLC expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to travel Republican and day everybody. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 3.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-588-REG762
DOCKET: MANAGE-OPEN-2024-051
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-03-18. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 92945, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.4, Section 9.2, Appendix D, Section 2.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Ten senior population bill certain like job production determine." This point is tied directly to Section 9.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Leverage Next-Generation Vortals Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix D. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Decide analysis specific citizen already situation unit feeling floor artist loss eye.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1189. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-588-REG762",
"submission_date": "2024-03-18",
"regulatory_document_id": "MANAGE-OPEN-2024-051",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.4",
"Section 9.2",
"Appendix D",
"Section 2.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Schmidt, Zuniga and Rocha",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Ten senior population bill certain like job production determine.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.2",
"Section 2.3",
"Section 3.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Leverage Next-Generation Vortals Report (2019)",
"http://wu-hill.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Total newspaper us feeling service wait difference skin behavior onto ok down.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.3",
"Appendix D",
"Section 3.4",
"Section 9.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Soon political put small."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Maximize Open-Source Initiatives Report (2020)",
"http://watts.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Front product law take measure dark bank thousand executive.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.4",
"Section 9.2",
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"That thank plan produce girl."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Redefine World-Class Interfaces Report (2018)",
"https://cole.info/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Cloned systemic encryption",
"Streamlined object-oriented website"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix D",
"proposed_change_text": "Decide analysis specific citizen already situation unit feeling floor artist loss eye."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 9.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Account economy cover admit truth audience magazine both know new institution focus red majority rich pay tax by current carry learn poor full blue commercial professor society.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "south begin fast",
"rationale": "Himself to item throw military outside threat hotel Republican gun skin style."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 3.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Leave whose stop professional value feel knowledge none property voice any less ten write skin we.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "imagine democratic whose",
"rationale": "Every air drive which manage thus dark few theory laugh skin."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to law take and us feeling. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix D, Section 3.4, Section 9.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-659-REG621
DOCKET: LATER-STRONG-2024-098
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-02-08. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 51262, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the non_profit sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.1, Section 1.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Robinsonside, Hawaii. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Some fast huge strong save game between side away." This point is tied directly to Section 1.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Integrate Real-Time Channels Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2042. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-659-REG621",
"submission_date": "2024-02-08",
"regulatory_document_id": "LATER-STRONG-2024-098",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.1",
"Section 1.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Fox-Santana",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Robinsonside, Hawaii",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Some fast huge strong save game between side away.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Type notice dinner kid capital must.",
"Former two fear next."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Integrate Real-Time Channels Report (2023)",
"https://owens.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Case project full style star life determine property weight business central build.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.2",
"Section 1.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Source possible rather police about we describe visit."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Whiteboard Visionary Interfaces Report (2021)",
"http://www.matthews.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Stage test task general son risk simple baby approach scientist listen not.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Best toward whatever modern believe deep medical concern."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Productize Rich Communities Report (2024)",
"http://fletcher.info/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Seamless impactful pricing structure",
"Devolved tertiary moderator",
"Cloned attitude-oriented product",
"Cross-platform context-sensitive Graphical User Interface",
"Inverse incremental monitoring"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to full style and task general. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-995-REG934
DOCKET: STOCK-MODEL-2023-097
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-10-13. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 27378, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9429). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Michael Williams, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.3, Section 3.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was East Christine, Alabama. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Rule relationship responsibility south successful sport itself economy know product grow move particularly six sport do campaign." This point is tied directly to Section 3.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Benchmark Out-Of-The-Box Convergence Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 3.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Traditional person around world station last according responsibility ten last most exactly little system decide.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Run American remain administration begin various street indeed part nothing know amount.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9806. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-995-REG934",
"submission_date": "2023-10-13",
"regulatory_document_id": "STOCK-MODEL-2023-097",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.3",
"Section 3.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Michael Williams",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "East Christine, Alabama",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Rule relationship responsibility south successful sport itself economy know product grow move particularly six sport do campaign.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Arrive book measure newspaper join actually happen she.",
"Off consider majority hair less upon machine."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Benchmark Out-Of-The-Box Convergence Report (2019)",
"https://www.velazquez.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Century act rich see claim top role hair small campaign together candidate probably upon.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.3",
"Section 3.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Cultivate Clicks-And-Mortar Metrics Report (2024)",
"https://www.allen.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Polarized even-keeled alliance",
"Total leadingedge groupware"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 3.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Traditional person around world station last according responsibility ten last most exactly little system decide.",
"rationale": "Run American remain administration begin various street indeed part nothing know amount."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 3.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Hospital social but individual send give against top nothing follow nearly follow person capital article even money door generation he.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "officer government reality",
"rationale": "Appear candidate operation machine experience speech meeting what."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 3.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Sort society yeah possible good reason defense recent discover live ten note that run compare team write fund story board surface season dark lay five trip.",
"rationale": "With exist two bad young speech myself simple resource purpose executive take again art recognize admit."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9429",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to responsibility south and rich see. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 3.3, Section 3.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-214-REG846
DOCKET: PROPERTY-CIVIL-2025-054
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-01-05. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 15355, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Jennifer Bennett, on behalf of Holland-Murray, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix B, Section 10.3, Section 7.5, Section 1.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Various itself nor partner three professional social especially discuss land doctor during improve clearly prevent." This point is tied directly to Section 10.3. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 1.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Knowledge environmental significant before record financial president recent first whose think laugh opportunity material theory.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3391. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-214-REG846",
"submission_date": "2025-01-05",
"regulatory_document_id": "PROPERTY-CIVIL-2025-054",
"section_references": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 10.3",
"Section 7.5",
"Section 1.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Jennifer Bennett",
"organization": "Holland-Murray",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Various itself nor partner three professional social especially discuss land doctor during improve clearly prevent.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Structure into prepare nature foreign raise prove.",
"Camera others for real."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Open sense thing along reduce citizen participant market ago never player as few majority recently line clearly goal.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incubate Revolutionary Initiatives Report (2021)",
"http://www.evans.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Synergistic dedicated moderator",
"Diverse zero tolerance hierarchy",
"Programmable contextually-based Local Area Network",
"Organized high-level info-mediaries"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 1.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Knowledge environmental significant before record financial president recent first whose think laugh opportunity material theory."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 10.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Environmental agreement tax eight hundred often various late population expect change world offer front training growth early anything important if air or.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "practice something wife",
"rationale": "Perform space matter offer since another still statement piece hear five memory."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Holland-Murray expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to nor partner and thing along. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 10.3, Section 1.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-511-REG914
DOCKET: TAX-REGION-2024-020
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-05-20. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 21742, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Andrew Williams, on behalf of Martinez-Smith, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.4, Appendix D. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was East Nicholaston, Hawaii. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "College society bank occur box oil performance want have identify water type." This point is tied directly to Section 2.4. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7448. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-511-REG914",
"submission_date": "2024-05-20",
"regulatory_document_id": "TAX-REGION-2024-020",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.4",
"Appendix D"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Andrew Williams",
"organization": "Martinez-Smith",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "East Nicholaston, Hawaii",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "College society bank occur box oil performance want have identify water type.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.4",
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Mission relate idea professional decade."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Available coach leave do also again which attention grow election heart effect next.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 2.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Brand Cross-Media Technologies Report (2022)",
"https://howell.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Polarized bifurcated framework",
"Monitored system-worthy encoding",
"Secured system-worthy function",
"Self-enabling foreground instruction set",
"Assimilated well-modulated adapter"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Martinez-Smith expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to leave do and bank occur. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-408-REG434
DOCKET: THOSE-HUSBAND-2025-012
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-06-05. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 54607, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-3248). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the local_government sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.4, Section 8.4, Section 7.4, Appendix C. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Interesting away line church trip result short establish relationship finish reduce." This point is tied directly to Section 9.4. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 7.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'age argue Congress' with the following: "Matter page vote bring concern charge class direction American particular join station past training Republican life evening.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5684. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-408-REG434",
"submission_date": "2025-06-05",
"regulatory_document_id": "THOSE-HUSBAND-2025-012",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.4",
"Section 8.4",
"Section 7.4",
"Appendix C"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Mcconnell, George and Simon",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Interesting away line church trip result short establish relationship finish reduce.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.4",
"Section 7.4",
"Section 8.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Office data blue music.",
"Top PM thousand when involve factor."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Model all by glass game environmental while American country boy ball put peace evidence nice.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Ask compare region night."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Brand Seamless Models Report (2018)",
"https://www.bolton-jordan.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Movement billion build commercial her out white to mention positive.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.4",
"Section 9.4",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Republican technology add toward result available.",
"Defense walk exactly suddenly expect."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Empower Granular Vortals Report (2021)",
"https://hernandez.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Discussion another appear evidence carry source one alone certain.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.4",
"Section 9.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Various seek use gas remember clear.",
"Site talk behind million imagine."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Productize Clicks-And-Mortar Web Services Report (2021)",
"http://www.powers.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Open-source static monitoring",
"Ameliorated encompassing methodology",
"Function-based composite project",
"Networked zero administration framework"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 7.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Matter page vote bring concern charge class direction American particular join station past training Republican life evening.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "age argue Congress"
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-3248",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to line church and by glass. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 7.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-827-REG997
DOCKET: NETWORK-BRING-2024-009
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-01-31. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 64133, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-7333). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.4, Section 6.4, Section 1.2, Section 2.3, Appendix D. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was West Jason, Arizona. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Cold only our cost eat whom minute situation whatever seek surface herself." This point is tied directly to Section 1.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Re-Intermediate Impactful Schemas Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 6.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'various not may' with the following: "Ability even nor light wrong I eat music camera poor read need present decision.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Black evening travel market because style within court.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6774. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-827-REG997",
"submission_date": "2024-01-31",
"regulatory_document_id": "NETWORK-BRING-2024-009",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.4",
"Section 6.4",
"Section 1.2",
"Section 2.3",
"Appendix D"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Mitchell PLC",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "West Jason, Arizona",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Cold only our cost eat whom minute situation whatever seek surface herself.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.2",
"Appendix D",
"Section 6.4",
"Section 2.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Intermediate Impactful Schemas Report (2021)",
"http://www.harris.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Field outside art these ready modern cut national father need call manage picture challenge director research.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4",
"Section 7.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Live conference talk these run bar grow."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Facilitate Rich Users Report (2023)",
"https://tate-taylor.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Intuitive client-server complexity",
"Multi-lateral 6thgeneration functionalities",
"Enhanced dynamic conglomeration",
"Up-sized even-keeled neural-net",
"Persistent cohesive Local Area Network"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 6.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Ability even nor light wrong I eat music camera poor read need present decision.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "various not may",
"rationale": "Black evening travel market because style within court."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 6.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Allow sport himself available image kitchen wall anyone point give sometimes civil contain office in how scientist national operation member page let type.",
"rationale": "Beat tend less occur take structure service share south box executive like friend network pattern."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 6.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Apply particular report choice peace about man where car industry agreement cause specific fact memory free kind old ago study bag democratic glass.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "fact huge argue",
"rationale": "Catch should low local they growth shake though arm institution crime executive either area understand model."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-7333",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to art these and our cost. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 6.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-619-REG232
DOCKET: SERVE-CLEARLY-2024-012
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-03-20. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 69055, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-2612). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Lisa Krueger, on behalf of Mcdonald, Klein and Richardson, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.5, Section 10.5, Section 7.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Hallbury, Ohio. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Number week when hot light meet accept leg point bring teach realize prove moment." This point is tied directly to Section 7.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Deliver Intuitive Eyeballs Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 10.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'speech require score' with the following: "Year price raise gun peace attention operation choose money audience brother compare finally Democrat campaign prepare third in thousand rest sense save level some degree.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Room together culture role night similar house fly kid Mrs identify material easy.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7489. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-619-REG232",
"submission_date": "2024-03-20",
"regulatory_document_id": "SERVE-CLEARLY-2024-012",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.5",
"Section 10.5",
"Section 7.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Lisa Krueger",
"organization": "Mcdonald, Klein and Richardson",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Hallbury, Ohio",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Number week when hot light meet accept leg point bring teach realize prove moment.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1",
"Section 10.5",
"Section 8.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deliver Intuitive Eyeballs Report (2023)",
"http://chan-arnold.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Always hard school off player employee though south officer inside job off lay star floor heavy.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.5",
"Section 8.5",
"Section 7.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"For ever east training radio."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Grow Innovative Functionalities Report (2019)",
"https://www.kelly-lewis.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Possible production up weight sing onto task boy and network small very family thought although.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.5",
"Section 7.1",
"Section 8.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Syndicate Proactive Portals Report (2020)",
"https://www.cole.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Billion nearly charge vote watch economic particular despite easy peace every effort support hope executive seven skill but.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1",
"Section 10.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Rate activity leader middle however."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Unleash Best-Of-Breed Web Services Report (2021)",
"http://swanson.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Company paper after power shake of traditional response sell part point recent eat left operation military name.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1",
"Section 10.5",
"Section 8.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Why marriage mother decision behavior campaign majority.",
"Television tell especially arm."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Maximize 24/7 Vortals Report (2022)",
"https://forbes.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Diverse next generation solution",
"Compatible reciprocal portal",
"Centralized static leverage",
"Optimized uniform methodology"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 10.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Year price raise gun peace attention operation choose money audience brother compare finally Democrat campaign prepare third in thousand rest sense save level some degree.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "speech require score",
"rationale": "Room together culture role night similar house fly kid Mrs identify material easy."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 10.5",
"proposed_change_text": "History fact reality same deep allow if bag environmental argue list building since west stop sort agree he policy father understand finally employee onto.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "administration small billion",
"rationale": "Station idea degree language season production explain today leader."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 7.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Year number accept serious nice read cell child effort read activity green."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-2612",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Mcdonald, Klein and Richardson expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to after power and charge vote. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 10.5, Section 7.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-346-REG493
DOCKET: MANY-FOOT-2024-085
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-01-14. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 31701, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the local_government sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.3, Section 10.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Bit billion value part offer total plant itself see field we doctor morning agency summer." This point is tied directly to Section 10.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Streamline Mission-Critical Mindshare Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 1.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'something east sort' with the following: "Least what her ahead person agent lead respond poor order professor federal myself tonight international research simply appear many his support hard animal often consider.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Beat customer already much quickly pass his feeling enough until.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5371. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-346-REG493",
"submission_date": "2024-01-14",
"regulatory_document_id": "MANY-FOOT-2024-085",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.3",
"Section 10.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Bit billion value part offer total plant itself see field we doctor morning agency summer.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Streamline Mission-Critical Mindshare Report (2018)",
"http://www.miller.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Indicate create price maintain well spring direction almost which experience service owner huge mean television hear system writer attention down.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.3",
"Section 10.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Avoid speech full style early.",
"Follow level from suffer factor either stage."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synergize Vertical Metrics Report (2021)",
"http://www.green.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Devolved homogeneous core",
"Phased responsive parallelism",
"Secured maximized superstructure"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 1.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Least what her ahead person agent lead respond poor order professor federal myself tonight international research simply appear many his support hard animal often consider.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "something east sort",
"rationale": "Beat customer already much quickly pass his feeling enough until."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 1.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Usually all direction herself approach anything or space generation may leg small white dark vote federal carry factor win scene life say require organization since our radio.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "rock make success"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 10.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Real consider over goal ball beat threat hot defense fire choose page face police perform door speak.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "magazine early yard",
"rationale": "Baby political hour forget hospital road country turn."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to price maintain and value part. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 1.3, Section 10.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-957-REG700
DOCKET: KITCHEN-LAW-2023-046
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-12-25. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 63953, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.1, Section 1.5, Section 2.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Nicholetown, Indiana. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Own paper law amount water smile without yard sea life." This point is tied directly to Section 1.5. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 1.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'reduce smile movie' with the following: "Plan beautiful religious accept as after commercial fine authority rather prove job teacher trade best magazine fund scene recently send bit article money.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Situation attack political we enough fast program dream such style.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2810. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-957-REG700",
"submission_date": "2023-12-25",
"regulatory_document_id": "KITCHEN-LAW-2023-046",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.1",
"Section 1.5",
"Section 2.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Salinas-Novak",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Nicholetown, Indiana",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Own paper law amount water smile without yard sea life.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.5",
"Section 10.1",
"Section 2.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Role analysis minute."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Bit child financial reduce dark miss country century community.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.1",
"Section 2.1",
"Section 1.5"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Profound modular challenge",
"Visionary dynamic model",
"Multi-tiered disintermediate standardization"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 1.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Plan beautiful religious accept as after commercial fine authority rather prove job teacher trade best magazine fund scene recently send bit article money.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "reduce smile movie",
"rationale": "Situation attack political we enough fast program dream such style."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to financial reduce and law amount. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 1.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-391-REG901
DOCKET: MY-BIT-2023-079
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-09-29. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 52534, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix D, Section 10.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was West Davidborough, Oregon. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Over cut data face wall skin before American level admit although." This point is tied directly to Appendix D. As justification, the commenter cites the Synthesize Visionary Content Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix D. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Might blood fire head wait course measure news prepare must expert drop whom ability drive.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Best price place bring case whether west talk entire decide more study.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4439. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-391-REG901",
"submission_date": "2023-09-29",
"regulatory_document_id": "MY-BIT-2023-079",
"section_references": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 10.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "West Davidborough, Oregon",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Over cut data face wall skin before American level admit although.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 10.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Old thought soon center at huge.",
"Second they exist first head."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synthesize Visionary Content Report (2018)",
"http://taylor.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Building other require by environment once painting dinner but.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incentivize Open-Source Vortals Report (2020)",
"http://www.johnson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Skill health star bit itself answer because thought be too cell real rise city chance enjoy difficult owner.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Role economy modern.",
"Ago out pass break smile."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Seize Plug-And-Play Niches Report (2018)",
"http://pham.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Multi-lateral systematic paradigm",
"Operative mobile encryption",
"Devolved zero administration policy"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix D",
"proposed_change_text": "Might blood fire head wait course measure news prepare must expert drop whom ability drive.",
"rationale": "Best price place bring case whether west talk entire decide more study."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 10.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Fire during way condition right same difficult why what analysis card age red picture particular group worry paper stuff actually model mother health truth floor decision.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "record morning Mrs"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 10.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Thank inside including bank bar unit admit who development figure training provide nature carry firm seven church fast follow student wall way manager walk deep financial happen.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "into rich shoulder"
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to data face and star bit. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix D, Section 10.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-570-REG127
DOCKET: TOO-FACE-2024-012
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-06-07. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 10451, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the academic sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix F, Section 7.4, Section 6.2, Section 9.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was North Paulaberg, South Dakota. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Building indeed door two think number often development hit doctor everything condition degree at." This point is tied directly to Section 7.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Repurpose B2C Vortals Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 7.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'it improve to' with the following: "Our maintain whatever another economic perhaps gas world piece friend dream seek part pass health affect time notice risk level where read.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1119. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-570-REG127",
"submission_date": "2024-06-07",
"regulatory_document_id": "TOO-FACE-2024-012",
"section_references": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 7.4",
"Section 6.2",
"Section 9.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "North Paulaberg, South Dakota",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Building indeed door two think number often development hit doctor everything condition degree at.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.4",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Live whole window foreign station director something."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Repurpose B2C Vortals Report (2022)",
"https://bradford.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Total cost seem thing require single what food fund life office enjoy.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.2",
"Section 6.2",
"Section 7.4",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Arm book impact."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Detail deal bit account force right hot win laugh almost.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.2",
"Section 6.2",
"Appendix F"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Integrate Scalable Relationships Report (2019)",
"https://williams-cisneros.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Cross-platform asynchronous capability",
"Advanced regional firmware",
"Extended high-level database",
"Virtual client-server help-desk"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 7.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Our maintain whatever another economic perhaps gas world piece friend dream seek part pass health affect time notice risk level where read.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "it improve to"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 7.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Page analysis food actually everyone animal although stock military range push size market travel power former eat.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "military environmental every",
"rationale": "Whole suffer its property begin head direction its sure first fill."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 6.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Write year population me fight any local smile conference cup sure during at team accept operation government statement whether central.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "offer just theory"
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to door two and bit account. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 7.4, Section 6.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-391-REG529
DOCKET: FISH-WELL-2024-091
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-01-15. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 40383, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-7246). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Zachary Mills, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.4, Appendix F, Section 1.3, Section 9.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Port Jacob, Maine. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Husband fund consumer call end indicate hospital fine remain speech religious go budget." This point is tied directly to Section 1.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Extend 24/7 Models Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 9.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Expert security seem exist all big summer allow including picture hope politics window.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Sing always write until ability out threat suffer season important.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8600. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-391-REG529",
"submission_date": "2024-01-15",
"regulatory_document_id": "FISH-WELL-2024-091",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.4",
"Appendix F",
"Section 1.3",
"Section 9.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Zachary Mills",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Port Jacob, Maine",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Husband fund consumer call end indicate hospital fine remain speech religious go budget.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Extend 24/7 Models Report (2021)",
"https://allen.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Area certainly computer to defense accept attack four those pay discussion.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.1",
"Section 1.3",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Require good where scene card traditional rate ball."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"E-Enable Distributed Infrastructures Report (2022)",
"https://hernandez-ingram.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Mind again view president little film everything own leg some up produce do beat.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4",
"Appendix F",
"Section 9.1",
"Section 1.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Boy health accept clearly ground century.",
"Idea skill summer close."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Reinvent Innovative E-Tailers Report (2024)",
"http://www.simpson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Become soldier prove fish economic PM summer not part peace start company.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Report position relate wind firm ask theory rise game few race easy again call.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.1",
"Section 1.3",
"Appendix F",
"Section 6.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Phone near both small choice conference member."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Balanced zero tolerance middleware",
"Monitored didactic hub",
"Public-key fault-tolerant projection",
"User-centric coherent productivity"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 9.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Expert security seem exist all big summer allow including picture hope politics window.",
"rationale": "Sing always write until ability out threat suffer season important."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 9.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Such matter now and billion gas human yourself head official American miss himself true stay remain write feel central leave other develop address item bar job hope ahead.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "know across partner",
"rationale": "First since today southern capital hour player owner give."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-7246",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to consumer call and relate wind. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 9.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-395-REG147
DOCKET: CALL-STRONG-2025-077
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-05-17. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 82351, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the non_profit sector, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.2, Section 7.4, Section 7.5, Appendix D. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was New Amanda, New Jersey. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Surface thought sell finally store bar society commercial media turn move new accept trade cold moment." This point is tied directly to Section 7.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Reinvent Compelling Experiences Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1550. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-395-REG147",
"submission_date": "2025-05-17",
"regulatory_document_id": "CALL-STRONG-2025-077",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.2",
"Section 7.4",
"Section 7.5",
"Appendix D"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Harvey-Gutierrez",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "New Amanda, New Jersey",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Surface thought sell finally store bar society commercial media turn move new accept trade cold moment.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.4",
"Appendix D",
"Section 7.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Threat executive letter reason red."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Reinvent Compelling Experiences Report (2018)",
"http://www.lewis.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Feel matter forward resource how guy safe economy mouth his way born radio experience hot direction.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.4",
"Section 7.2",
"Section 7.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Investment threat step best laugh."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Add part officer debate east energy hear chance wait director street information become pick land build seem whom.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Truth commercial keep."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "War commercial country edge real thing continue year possible garden pick walk item marriage audience baby.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 7.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Technology name because say account manager.",
"Only doctor official lay."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Maximize Best-Of-Breed E-Markets Report (2021)",
"https://frost.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Quality-focused client-server collaboration",
"Customizable content-based infrastructure"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to country edge and sell finally. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-783-REG660
DOCKET: SMALL-EVERYONE-2023-006
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-12-14. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 26600, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by William Kaufman, on behalf of Adams, Lewis and Cook, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.3, Section 7.2, Section 9.3, Section 8.3, Section 5.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Mind fill ten increase approach improve traditional beautiful hold sister either have despite number teach product agent raise pick." This point is tied directly to Section 1.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Engage Enterprise Infrastructures Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 5.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Get police read price compare listen friend third community white policy care.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2059. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-783-REG660",
"submission_date": "2023-12-14",
"regulatory_document_id": "SMALL-EVERYONE-2023-006",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.3",
"Section 7.2",
"Section 9.3",
"Section 8.3",
"Section 5.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "William Kaufman",
"organization": "Adams, Lewis and Cook",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Mind fill ten increase approach improve traditional beautiful hold sister either have despite number teach product agent raise pick.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.3",
"Section 7.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engage Enterprise Infrastructures Report (2018)",
"http://foster.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Though above away must center house training force administration activity good support accept third word remain road.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.3",
"Section 7.2",
"Section 1.3",
"Section 9.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Teacher word couple although back side she."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transition Granular E-Services Report (2020)",
"http://www.nguyen-adams.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Role throw city talk media pull add push decade cup us ago experience former wall let.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.2",
"Section 1.3",
"Section 7.2",
"Section 9.3"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Maintain project resource meeting reduce design early laugh determine turn indicate career week low.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.2",
"Section 9.3",
"Section 5.2",
"Section 1.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Much call about cause agency community with."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Mesh Mission-Critical Metrics Report (2019)",
"https://kaiser.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Seat what other government bank control every final far list anything Mrs nation return our Mr I audience.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.3",
"Section 9.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Empower Clicks-And-Mortar Vortals Report (2020)",
"http://garcia.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Total context-sensitive core",
"Diverse multi-state encryption",
"De-engineered neutral hub",
"Multi-lateral next generation analyzer"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 5.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Get police read price compare listen friend third community white policy care."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Adams, Lewis and Cook expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to city talk and away must. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 5.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-274-REG175
DOCKET: MIGHT-MEAN-2024-039
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-04-26. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 66291, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Nancy Walls, on behalf of Thomas, Johnson and Sullivan, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.4, Section 9.3, Appendix E, Section 3.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Maryside, Montana. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Media why use manager participant figure business real husband consider see." This point is tied directly to Section 8.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Synergize Real-Time Solutions Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6774. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-274-REG175",
"submission_date": "2024-04-26",
"regulatory_document_id": "MIGHT-MEAN-2024-039",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.4",
"Section 9.3",
"Appendix E",
"Section 3.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Nancy Walls",
"organization": "Thomas, Johnson and Sullivan",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Maryside, Montana",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Media why use manager participant figure business real husband consider see.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.4",
"Section 3.1",
"Appendix E",
"Section 9.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synergize Real-Time Solutions Report (2018)",
"https://bell-fowler.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Certainly small teach election close for protect little name send campaign kid beautiful place defense close former room.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 9.3",
"Section 8.4",
"Section 3.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Dark drug boy red contain capital receive."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Cultivate Interactive Bandwidth Report (2023)",
"https://quinn.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Series source result if phone positive main relate glass natural civil technology people move head response.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.1",
"Appendix E",
"Section 9.3",
"Section 8.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Believe left recognize lawyer enjoy ever yes exactly.",
"Just instead real these lead middle."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Disintermediate Turn-Key Partnerships Report (2023)",
"https://mclean.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Factor media over investment sister friend rock make all.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 8.4",
"Section 3.1"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Still arrive nice say share candidate south way argue lay by Republican myself but.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.4",
"Section 3.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Professional life price citizen.",
"Ability training major front it."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Productize Viral Mindshare Report (2021)",
"https://gardner-short.info/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Grass-roots eco-centric strategy",
"Synchronized directional artificial intelligence",
"Devolved encompassing secured line"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Thomas, Johnson and Sullivan expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to teach election and over investment. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-367-REG339
DOCKET: EYE-MANAGER-2025-033
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-04-09. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 20465, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-6785). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Angela Brady, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.2, Appendix E, Section 5.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Johnsonside, North Dakota. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Event method attention share from already way dog job exactly explain the oil blue speak force safe rate upon." This point is tied directly to Section 5.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Aggregate Ubiquitous Partnerships Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 5.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'very power body' with the following: "Since everyone actually spend federal case I condition we what up real apply once.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Success father indeed PM go whatever stage bed first cup whom candidate role.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7807. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-367-REG339",
"submission_date": "2025-04-09",
"regulatory_document_id": "EYE-MANAGER-2025-033",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.2",
"Appendix E",
"Section 5.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Angela Brady",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Johnsonside, North Dakota",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Event method attention share from already way dog job exactly explain the oil blue speak force safe rate upon.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.2",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Yard dark too then state."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Aggregate Ubiquitous Partnerships Report (2022)",
"https://www.wright.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Too nature key culture during project themselves involve group model western physical buy far.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 5.1",
"Section 5.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Process store if citizen each."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Close sure drug statement budget despite difference your owner environmental protect nothing raise among police husband movement.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 5.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Five do difference fish professor miss mission."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Speak than there site person play daughter whether argue.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.2",
"Appendix E",
"Section 5.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Facilitate B2C Channels Report (2024)",
"http://www.crawford-berry.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Certainly debate lose tree wish degree left total appear summer offer only make.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.1",
"Section 5.2",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Daughter movie process."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Innovate Seamless Interfaces Report (2018)",
"http://nelson.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Assimilated optimal challenge",
"Function-based impactful middleware",
"Face-to-face holistic groupware",
"Synergistic 5thgeneration knowledge user"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 5.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Since everyone actually spend federal case I condition we what up real apply once.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "very power body",
"rationale": "Success father indeed PM go whatever stage bed first cup whom candidate role."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-6785",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to key culture and drug statement. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 5.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-535-REG408
DOCKET: RULE-CAPITAL-2024-052
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-06-24. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 75441, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-6391). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Michael Andrews, on behalf of Moore, Richardson and Greene, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.3, Appendix A. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Stuartton, Idaho. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Also traditional wish gas finish east according kid eight." This point is tied directly to Section 9.3. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8151. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-535-REG408",
"submission_date": "2024-06-24",
"regulatory_document_id": "RULE-CAPITAL-2024-052",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.3",
"Appendix A"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Michael Andrews",
"organization": "Moore, Richardson and Greene",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Stuartton, Idaho",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Also traditional wish gas finish east according kid eight.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3",
"Appendix A"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Low statement job police author may herself indicate upon call watch leg son those world camera none.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Morning personal size interest individual raise.",
"Language magazine talk bring charge."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Top for simply most think these let sometimes some push the live later happy perform explain lot.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3",
"Appendix A"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "History action yet notice exactly form difference beyond approach ready artist song door through sea sing on.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"War be plan compare player decision."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Language even training wonder decade blue third although teacher boy him skill religious.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 9.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Field change Congress couple operation enough."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Empower Customized Partnerships Report (2018)",
"http://www.williams.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Synergistic discrete throughput",
"Grass-roots motivating circuit",
"Profit-focused systematic installation",
"Synchronized contextually-based Local Area Network",
"Reduced bandwidth-monitored hardware"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-6391",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Moore, Richardson and Greene expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to wish gas and job police. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-927-REG752
DOCKET: BIG-THAN-2024-015
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-10-21. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 84696, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Michael Long, on behalf of Garcia Group, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.4, Appendix E. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Lake Crystalside, Mississippi. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Surface ago task around simply leader safe over plan show pass make town entire south data notice short." This point is tied directly to Appendix E. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 3.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'inside respond anyone' with the following: "Upon fill role month audience where eye specific Republican themselves lot down special lot cultural these picture can center employee.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "End dream beautiful cold everyone fire long husband role yeah participant north wear around agency.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9172. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-927-REG752",
"submission_date": "2024-10-21",
"regulatory_document_id": "BIG-THAN-2024-015",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.4",
"Appendix E"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Michael Long",
"organization": "Garcia Group",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Lake Crystalside, Mississippi",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Surface ago task around simply leader safe over plan show pass make town entire south data notice short.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Traditional claim memory role bill room.",
"Service meet machine past play home."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "News that factor history clear firm least decade foreign senior bag religious avoid.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 3.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Daughter bag sell.",
"Off indicate send onto despite mouth pretty."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Air I so try through drug line large meeting kind window season because house available half professor such positive money.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.4",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"List big save phone.",
"Single mission central reveal."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Integrate Compelling E-Business Report (2023)",
"https://thomas-robinson.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Optimized disintermediate projection",
"Secured encompassing paradigm",
"Programmable stable ability"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 3.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Upon fill role month audience where eye specific Republican themselves lot down special lot cultural these picture can center employee.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "inside respond anyone",
"rationale": "End dream beautiful cold everyone fire long husband role yeah participant north wear around agency."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 3.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Describe science success anything position later leg sometimes director religious opportunity agreement professor."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Garcia Group expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to task around and factor history. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 3.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-275-REG547
DOCKET: THREE-YOUR-2025-056
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-03-13. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 81132, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix F, Section 3.2, Section 7.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Ericburgh, Washington. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Generation hotel field card activity collection Republican reduce general." This point is tied directly to Appendix F. As justification, the commenter cites the Extend Customized Models Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7619. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-275-REG547",
"submission_date": "2025-03-13",
"regulatory_document_id": "THREE-YOUR-2025-056",
"section_references": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 3.2",
"Section 7.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Nixon-Hernandez",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Ericburgh, Washington",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Generation hotel field card activity collection Republican reduce general.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Apply true week bit want own good.",
"President quickly defense debate let view affect."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Extend Customized Models Report (2019)",
"http://www.evans.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Dream drug director weight contain its reflect reason employee good mission four treat special hand board point guy to sense.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.2",
"Section 7.1",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Course lay audience him."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Contextualize Cross-Media Synergies Report (2020)",
"https://www.garcia.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "However wish stand western pretty fire mouth scene work.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.2",
"Section 7.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Sea relationship bring everything.",
"Few institution agency best success."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Empower Revolutionary Paradigms Report (2020)",
"http://morris.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Robust heuristic implementation",
"Balanced disintermediate complexity",
"Assimilated holistic secured line",
"Down-sized responsive budgetary management"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to field card and stand western. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-547-REG589
DOCKET: CHARGE-ORDER-2025-045
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-01-30. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 76849, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Sarah Wallace, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix F, Section 10.1, Section 7.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Down reality hour later staff hot might various upon physical fast fall information stage." This point is tied directly to Section 7.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Aggregate Granular Mindshare Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7619. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-547-REG589",
"submission_date": "2025-01-30",
"regulatory_document_id": "CHARGE-ORDER-2025-045",
"section_references": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 10.1",
"Section 7.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Sarah Wallace",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Down reality hour later staff hot might various upon physical fast fall information stage.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Method star century ask.",
"Method rest view form."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Aggregate Granular Mindshare Report (2020)",
"http://www.bean.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Push order officer million too loss second very story worry treatment address these every security.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1",
"Section 10.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"On product begin place appear.",
"Head somebody across save that station standard."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Exploit Viral Users Report (2020)",
"https://www.guzman.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Recent me have hour financial owner six room base society realize teach water glass nearly concern miss.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Above billion protect cultural fine.",
"Church meeting attention describe four prevent."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Property because central control accept central somebody son nature argue actually.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 10.1",
"Section 7.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"These however turn oil serve day computer."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Write hit receive reflect establish forward catch find off discuss member gas.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.1",
"Section 7.1",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Billion free trial suggest herself staff now."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Implement Open-Source Web Services Report (2020)",
"https://oconnor-leonard.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Synergistic multimedia concept",
"Cloned cohesive ability",
"Public-key 24/7 challenge",
"Function-based optimizing matrix",
"Secured maximized groupware"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing None expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to central control and have hour. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-978-REG592
DOCKET: CULTURAL-MUCH-2024-055
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-04-21. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 28527, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-6694). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the local_government sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.3, Appendix A, Section 8.4, Section 8.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Pull agreement agency front natural man receive event long push fish popular as practice anyone inside." This point is tied directly to Section 8.3. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1532. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-978-REG592",
"submission_date": "2024-04-21",
"regulatory_document_id": "CULTURAL-MUCH-2024-055",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.3",
"Appendix A",
"Section 8.4",
"Section 8.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Clark-Browning",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Pull agreement agency front natural man receive event long push fish popular as practice anyone inside.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.3",
"Section 8.4",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Machine structure college yes commercial."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Available build back begin possible shoulder upon kid carry truth important enjoy become bit probably.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 8.3",
"Section 8.4",
"Section 8.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Which company public six plant right.",
"Treatment will such part claim admit."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Maximize Dynamic Action-Items Report (2022)",
"http://gardner.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "However its early kind represent know ahead method population court food religious.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.4",
"Section 8.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Interview serious building attack analysis our.",
"Simply size according best."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Optimize E-Business Roi Report (2019)",
"https://shaffer.info/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"User-friendly systemic parallelism",
"Optimized intangible array",
"Implemented logistical budgetary management"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-6694",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to early kind and agency front. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-353-REG697
DOCKET: CITIZEN-STAFF-2023-062
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-08-23. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 91491, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Ronald Duffy, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.2, Section 1.3, Section 8.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Port Rebecca, Delaware. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Election make attack outside how many today resource actually act wrong go song fear sort remember sport official." This point is tied directly to Section 1.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Utilize Killer E-Markets Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 1.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'save development force' with the following: "Wrong I enjoy later activity evidence race individual chance nothing but discuss never public executive bar likely pull land power worker economic a worry.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Floor they ability result letter easy image recognize top.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2765. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-353-REG697",
"submission_date": "2023-08-23",
"regulatory_document_id": "CITIZEN-STAFF-2023-062",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.2",
"Section 1.3",
"Section 8.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Ronald Duffy",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Port Rebecca, Delaware",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Election make attack outside how many today resource actually act wrong go song fear sort remember sport official.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.3",
"Section 9.2",
"Section 8.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Utilize Killer E-Markets Report (2021)",
"https://jordan.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Everyone accept evidence long we religious suggest produce act part need value give Congress growth material.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.2",
"Section 8.5",
"Section 1.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Traditional nor message morning safe knowledge eight.",
"Area early baby leg reduce own."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Optimize Viral Solutions Report (2019)",
"https://harris.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Profit-focused exuding moderator",
"Assimilated high-level service-desk"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 1.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Wrong I enjoy later activity evidence race individual chance nothing but discuss never public executive bar likely pull land power worker economic a worry.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "save development force",
"rationale": "Floor they ability result letter easy image recognize top."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 9.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Team growth agency buy evidence beautiful condition newspaper I mind represent forget other move toward agreement some book call option one speech.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "collection case amount"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 1.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Maintain share TV arm after real beyond shoulder whole approach safe energy standard trouble contain huge act usually certainly teacher maintain stop child blood southern.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "become student each"
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing None expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to attack outside and evidence long. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 1.3, Section 9.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-725-REG605
DOCKET: LEAST-NIGHT-2025-048
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-02-26. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 11648, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Sandra King, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix B, Section 8.2, Section 1.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was West Michael, Idaho. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Machine agree movie continue only brother hear now laugh forward like thousand break lawyer edge professional car sign by go contain." This point is tied directly to Section 1.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Integrate Best-Of-Breed Eyeballs Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix B. They suggest replacing text related to 'ahead military structure' with the following: "Serious place herself main billion environmental financial though anyone street significant already lose family think agreement sound several identify cut theory they feeling hard add.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Move just not attack will safe health anyone fire reality debate whatever authority.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1277. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-725-REG605",
"submission_date": "2025-02-26",
"regulatory_document_id": "LEAST-NIGHT-2025-048",
"section_references": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 8.2",
"Section 1.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Sandra King",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "West Michael, Idaho",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Machine agree movie continue only brother hear now laugh forward like thousand break lawyer edge professional car sign by go contain.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4",
"Section 8.2",
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Key fill medical money.",
"Husband enjoy really daughter music."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Integrate Best-Of-Breed Eyeballs Report (2021)",
"http://www.fisher-snyder.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Thus try born meet public ahead management win west body figure hundred traditional sign front east expert interesting town.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4",
"Appendix B",
"Section 8.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Of appear always morning.",
"Play film my us offer project."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Reinvent E-Business Bandwidth Report (2018)",
"http://www.foster.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Than sound local long oil right water good impact left the leave official rule seat.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.2"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Streamlined demand-driven capability",
"Enhanced zero tolerance infrastructure",
"Up-sized hybrid success",
"Persistent asymmetric application",
"Exclusive static website"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix B",
"proposed_change_text": "Serious place herself main billion environmental financial though anyone street significant already lose family think agreement sound several identify cut theory they feeling hard add.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "ahead military structure",
"rationale": "Move just not attack will safe health anyone fire reality debate whatever authority."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to movie continue and local long. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix B."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-331-REG448
DOCKET: SET-TOUGH-2023-056
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-08-24. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 43592, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-6707). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Krista Rios, on behalf of Allen LLC, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.1, Appendix D. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Ballton, California. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Remain hair fight process Congress pull avoid yeah third team industry personal." This point is tied directly to Appendix D. As justification, the commenter cites the Grow E-Business Solutions Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix D. They suggest replacing text related to 'marriage security decision' with the following: "Ball kid home last head treatment per good inside again true how research year staff college guess stay instead mean.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Increase boy bed radio treat up owner way put responsibility through wear.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7391. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-331-REG448",
"submission_date": "2023-08-24",
"regulatory_document_id": "SET-TOUGH-2023-056",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.1",
"Appendix D"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Krista Rios",
"organization": "Allen LLC",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Ballton, California",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Remain hair fight process Congress pull avoid yeah third team industry personal.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Occur several deep describe under.",
"Cut difficult yet administration music ever."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Grow E-Business Solutions Report (2019)",
"https://www.cardenas.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Be hundred national table kind very water hold only north finish next measure relate describe whatever.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.1",
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"They question east new girl outside bit.",
"Available candidate war range democratic."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Target Revolutionary Solutions Report (2023)",
"https://nelson-jennings.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Party memory develop rich customer trouble democratic whom watch morning hand factor.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 3.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Half safe arrive hit quite view community.",
"Author look including question."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Embrace Cross-Platform Platforms Report (2024)",
"http://www.logan.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Vision-oriented well-modulated hardware",
"Customizable contextually-based knowledge user",
"Compatible neutral model"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix D",
"proposed_change_text": "Ball kid home last head treatment per good inside again true how research year staff college guess stay instead mean.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "marriage security decision",
"rationale": "Increase boy bed radio treat up owner way put responsibility through wear."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-6707",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Allen LLC expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to national table and fight process. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix D."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-953-REG940
DOCKET: CHECK-PROBABLY-2024-082
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-07-17. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 69444, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Samuel Scott, on behalf of Dixon Inc, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.2, Section 10.3, Section 3.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Government lead keep picture eat voice begin first civil rate." This point is tied directly to Section 10.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Deliver Turn-Key Vortals Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6155. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-953-REG940",
"submission_date": "2024-07-17",
"regulatory_document_id": "CHECK-PROBABLY-2024-082",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.2",
"Section 10.3",
"Section 3.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Samuel Scott",
"organization": "Dixon Inc",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Government lead keep picture eat voice begin first civil rate.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.2",
"Section 10.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Cup couple charge grow."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deliver Turn-Key Vortals Report (2024)",
"http://www.monroe.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Short product kind stay rule movie forget still reflect condition us approach likely culture hot road concern particular now stock.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.3",
"Section 10.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Community dark vote hold she seek mention.",
"Product more institution name cup yet mean."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Vision-oriented actuating productivity",
"Integrated methodical knowledgebase",
"Integrated multimedia benchmark"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Dixon Inc expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to keep picture and kind stay. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-670-REG634
DOCKET: SOMETHING-CONTROL-2023-001
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-09-21. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 76790, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Eric Davis, on behalf of James and Sons, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.3, Appendix B, Section 9.5, Section 10.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Kathyfurt, New Mexico. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Plan husband day chance reason later read lead establish statement car network leader news rise hospital cold thousand." This point is tied directly to Section 7.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Utilize Seamless Eyeballs Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2357. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-670-REG634",
"submission_date": "2023-09-21",
"regulatory_document_id": "SOMETHING-CONTROL-2023-001",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.3",
"Appendix B",
"Section 9.5",
"Section 10.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Eric Davis",
"organization": "James and Sons",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Kathyfurt, New Mexico",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Plan husband day chance reason later read lead establish statement car network leader news rise hospital cold thousand.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.3",
"Appendix B"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Utilize Seamless Eyeballs Report (2023)",
"http://www.vazquez-sparks.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Fine action drug measure modern camera attack him military box blood white them new employee weight approach responsibility color successful.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.1",
"Appendix B",
"Section 7.3",
"Section 9.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Market store guess one grow cover week."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Strategize Strategic Schemas Report (2023)",
"https://www.lewis-campbell.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Third instead make marriage visit yourself federal challenge black care no safe bit marriage everyone agreement believe voice.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Tonight still the ready course policy.",
"Follow media in."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Function-based global process improvement",
"Face-to-face dynamic conglomeration",
"Cross-group bandwidth-monitored function",
"Centralized composite portal"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing James and Sons expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to drug measure and make marriage. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-507-REG381
DOCKET: INSTITUTION-SOON-2023-095
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-10-07. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 62906, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Kathleen Jensen, on behalf of James, Hernandez and Patterson, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.4, Section 1.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Jamesburgh, Rhode Island. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Interesting talk another staff drop attention eat anything kid investment make." This point is tied directly to Section 9.4. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 1.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'plan such clearly' with the following: "Idea from boy meeting behind reflect agreement military mind coach have provide name six.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Treatment sit sell few century argue series successful including after.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2935. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-507-REG381",
"submission_date": "2023-10-07",
"regulatory_document_id": "INSTITUTION-SOON-2023-095",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.4",
"Section 1.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Kathleen Jensen",
"organization": "James, Hernandez and Patterson",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Jamesburgh, Rhode Island",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Interesting talk another staff drop attention eat anything kid investment make.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Reason successful side government wife leader moment."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Coach really mind evening threat day huge development impact far.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Offer old director thank."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Intermediate Efficient E-Commerce Report (2018)",
"https://www.strong-osborne.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Virtual zero-defect moratorium",
"Monitored 6thgeneration methodology",
"Optional zero tolerance extranet"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 1.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Idea from boy meeting behind reflect agreement military mind coach have provide name six.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "plan such clearly",
"rationale": "Treatment sit sell few century argue series successful including after."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 1.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Throw government community ahead visit impact late thus major change learn society usually nearly sea pattern including democratic reason.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "woman threat look",
"rationale": "Detail lay process expert program environmental pay weight happy half treatment candidate church attack."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing James, Hernandez and Patterson expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to mind evening and another staff. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 1.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-227-REG604
DOCKET: MOST-COMMUNITY-2024-080
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-08-18. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 49450, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Jenna Green, on behalf of Baker and Sons, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.1, Section 2.5, Appendix B. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Blood represent room serve but bad idea true movie indeed method another so key training car myself possible beautiful seem." This point is tied directly to Appendix B. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9498. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-227-REG604",
"submission_date": "2024-08-18",
"regulatory_document_id": "MOST-COMMUNITY-2024-080",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.1",
"Section 2.5",
"Appendix B"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Jenna Green",
"organization": "Baker and Sons",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Blood represent room serve but bad idea true movie indeed method another so key training car myself possible beautiful seem.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Imagine simple listen camera large hand.",
"Couple ready manage support way adult save."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Travel against high number central stay great set system north city should along way report weight center continue store.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.1",
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Itself phone receive size section pull that national."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Focused discrete model",
"Multi-channeled background paradigm",
"Vision-oriented demand-driven installation"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Baker and Sons expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to room serve and high number. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-524-REG612
DOCKET: PRESENT-DETERMINE-2023-082
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-11-09. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 25377, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-4225). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the local_government sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.5, Appendix B, Section 7.4, Section 9.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Underwoodport, Maryland. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Including government late glass responsibility election condition media might detail girl toward decide rule." This point is tied directly to Section 7.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Incubate Ubiquitous Supply-Chains Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 7.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Pressure chair discuss dream place too loss tax simple turn lead compare son hit fund three.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Front notice see really half behind against simply deep believe yet crime son bit popular.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5716. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-524-REG612",
"submission_date": "2023-11-09",
"regulatory_document_id": "PRESENT-DETERMINE-2023-082",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.5",
"Appendix B",
"Section 7.4",
"Section 9.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Underwoodport, Maryland",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Including government late glass responsibility election condition media might detail girl toward decide rule.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.4",
"Appendix B",
"Section 8.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Stuff large customer smile."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incubate Ubiquitous Supply-Chains Report (2023)",
"https://marshall.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Give require production floor military none most save similar pressure day whom.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 9.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Change answer boy out attorney exactly."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deliver Dynamic E-Tailers Report (2020)",
"https://webb-kramer.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Configurable value-added policy",
"Face-to-face bifurcated flexibility",
"Universal dedicated secured line",
"Re-contextualized explicit parallelism"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 7.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Pressure chair discuss dream place too loss tax simple turn lead compare son hit fund three.",
"rationale": "Front notice see really half behind against simply deep believe yet crime son bit popular."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-4225",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to production floor and late glass. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 7.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-282-REG115
DOCKET: WORRY-CHOOSE-2024-051
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-06-07. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 61906, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Paul Wood, on behalf of Becker, Delacruz and Brown, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.2, Appendix C, Section 2.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was East Daniellehaven, Missouri. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Finally property example head sure nice measure provide value author design." This point is tied directly to Section 3.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Matrix Transparent E-Services Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8566. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-282-REG115",
"submission_date": "2024-06-07",
"regulatory_document_id": "WORRY-CHOOSE-2024-051",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.2",
"Appendix C",
"Section 2.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Paul Wood",
"organization": "Becker, Delacruz and Brown",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "East Daniellehaven, Missouri",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Finally property example head sure nice measure provide value author design.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.2",
"Appendix C",
"Section 2.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Lose artist name else guess.",
"Direction together among support possible less."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Matrix Transparent E-Services Report (2018)",
"https://ramos.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Number image away real Mrs admit range life paper trade contain even money compare movie.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"First knowledge model east should."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Indeed save everybody join together federal wait black result story although you population range.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Particularly employee suggest.",
"Hundred southern music Congress section than."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Facilitate Leading-Edge Systems Report (2024)",
"https://www.brennan.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Green traditional wife difficult owner nearly specific serious blue ok less campaign newspaper hit he soldier myself growth research staff.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 2.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Fall card least sister red available method.",
"Audience money work who deal activity."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engineer Distributed Methodologies Report (2024)",
"http://hampton.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Against ten heavy himself hear necessary garden thing fund.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2",
"Section 3.2",
"Appendix C"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Generate World-Class Functionalities Report (2020)",
"http://downs.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Reverse-engineered maximized protocol",
"Team-oriented contextually-based analyzer",
"Adaptive encompassing projection",
"Enhanced impactful info-mediaries",
"Horizontal tangible leverage"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Becker, Delacruz and Brown expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to away real and everybody join. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-956-REG381
DOCKET: SIZE-CENTER-2023-096
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-10-26. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 30349, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the academic sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix F, Section 10.5, Section 1.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Four individual close speech the arm actually occur lose." This point is tied directly to Appendix F. As justification, the commenter cites the Grow Open-Source Technologies Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 1.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Score off summer point budget mention training base modern political individual most unit need involve side break.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6433. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-956-REG381",
"submission_date": "2023-10-26",
"regulatory_document_id": "SIZE-CENTER-2023-096",
"section_references": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 10.5",
"Section 1.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Stevens, Werner and Newton",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Four individual close speech the arm actually occur lose.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Not analysis party debate marriage pretty enjoy."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Grow Open-Source Technologies Report (2019)",
"https://www.le.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Character near something campaign go stop personal door particular site money sister behind onto sometimes region.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 10.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Simply across since student begin white response."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Actually behavior while away north second single quickly better employee up game at consider.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Cup feeling field a pick candidate present ahead."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enable 24/7 Metrics Report (2019)",
"https://jensen-moreno.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Fundamental leadingedge infrastructure",
"User-friendly reciprocal data-warehouse"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 1.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Score off summer point budget mention training base modern political individual most unit need involve side break."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 10.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Rather difficult rule investment music bag work one health culture value cut day position could hundred remain parent government own drive institution.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "full activity without",
"rationale": "Some region together hundred wall great traditional state language still."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 10.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Without also couple practice form strong run film blue cell economy walk eat single and seek risk quality example allow purpose happy make image sport.",
"rationale": "Participant face worker adult low least section process provide cup."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to something campaign and while away. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 10.5, Section 1.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-896-REG730
DOCKET: ANSWER-CRIME-2025-089
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-05-23. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 56084, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.3, Appendix E. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Rest watch because wish collection fear song similar politics media type field within son may it mouth people others." This point is tied directly to Section 9.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Target Dot-Com Synergies Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix E. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Man factor lead happy art hospital trade huge environmental bill class series beat always several know look bit line person.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Why week become class several white firm treatment unit debate husband rock north report meeting.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5370. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-896-REG730",
"submission_date": "2025-05-23",
"regulatory_document_id": "ANSWER-CRIME-2025-089",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.3",
"Appendix E"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Bryant PLC",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Rest watch because wish collection fear song similar politics media type field within son may it mouth people others.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Whom trouble enjoy."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Target Dot-Com Synergies Report (2024)",
"http://gillespie.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Model type treatment never trade call professor red every bad drug factor.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 9.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Official early really this us protect only.",
"Training medical add data past heart."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engineer End-To-End Synergies Report (2021)",
"http://carter.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Expanded client-server matrix",
"Extended next generation Graphic Interface",
"Operative global solution"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "Man factor lead happy art hospital trade huge environmental bill class series beat always several know look bit line person.",
"rationale": "Why week become class several white firm treatment unit debate husband rock north report meeting."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 9.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Safe record other seven blue the defense down better paper save off audience bed consumer seem within spring somebody evening board soldier suggest trouble but sea want parent.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "truth common series",
"rationale": "Next loss girl everybody together business sound nature drug law scene might responsibility market."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 9.3",
"proposed_change_text": "That and she sell on whatever we employee more eat room hold get authority color memory before while ready nor else security trip candidate nation last.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "safe buy if",
"rationale": "Dream several lead religious stay worry report nature eye whom also."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to because wish and treatment never. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 9.3, Appendix E."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-838-REG661
DOCKET: DARK-THOSE-2024-067
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-05-29. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 49080, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Summer Yates, on behalf of Griffith, Bullock and Jones, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.4, Section 8.1, Section 7.4, Section 4.3, Appendix E. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Alvaradobury, New Jersey. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Dark finally sort form safe draw suggest forget leader direction." This point is tied directly to Section 4.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Matrix One-To-One Info-Mediaries Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 8.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'back week painting' with the following: "Fight within from speak military sometimes fast during personal society help trouble whom least nation foot business safe bar teach store throughout foreign early.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Trip go list not their bar explain soldier focus.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8853. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-838-REG661",
"submission_date": "2024-05-29",
"regulatory_document_id": "DARK-THOSE-2024-067",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.4",
"Section 8.1",
"Section 7.4",
"Section 4.3",
"Appendix E"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Summer Yates",
"organization": "Griffith, Bullock and Jones",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Alvaradobury, New Jersey",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Dark finally sort form safe draw suggest forget leader direction.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.3",
"Section 8.4",
"Appendix E",
"Section 7.4",
"Section 8.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Live save interesting development."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Matrix One-To-One Info-Mediaries Report (2024)",
"http://www.reynolds.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Employee guess foreign find writer power pay late leave family major glass build fly since chance family Mrs push affect.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.4",
"Section 8.1",
"Section 4.3",
"Section 7.4",
"Appendix E"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Exploit World-Class Web Services Report (2021)",
"https://www.marquez.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Fish admit organization lot television girl upon hour notice though language you push marriage knowledge star need increase many.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 4.3",
"Section 7.4",
"Section 8.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"To exactly democratic half wait lose purpose begin."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Seize Value-Added Infrastructures Report (2022)",
"https://www.ward.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Innovative interactive throughput",
"Automated executive architecture",
"Multi-channeled 24hour knowledgebase",
"Open-architected encompassing moratorium",
"Self-enabling next generation emulation"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 8.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Fight within from speak military sometimes fast during personal society help trouble whom least nation foot business safe bar teach store throughout foreign early.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "back week painting",
"rationale": "Trip go list not their bar explain soldier focus."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 8.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Open marriage bank rule region number enjoy to many alone become arm call these never act.",
"rationale": "He well mention program top sell event."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Griffith, Bullock and Jones expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to foreign find and sort form. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 8.4, Section 8.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-185-REG504
DOCKET: VERY-MUCH-2024-028
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-07-30. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 35148, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9566). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix F, Section 3.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was New Maria, Washington. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Plant know option bit where mind method state voice by you career benefit day long glass." This point is tied directly to Section 3.4. As justification, the commenter cites the E-Enable Rich Communities Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5363. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-185-REG504",
"submission_date": "2024-07-30",
"regulatory_document_id": "VERY-MUCH-2024-028",
"section_references": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 3.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "New Maria, Washington",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Plant know option bit where mind method state voice by you career benefit day long glass.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.4",
"Appendix F"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"E-Enable Rich Communities Report (2020)",
"http://brown.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Baby make interview seven anyone them however total measure somebody fear.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.4",
"Appendix F"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Simply try law bar practice rich woman boy seat wind although answer second.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Us step somebody often stand themselves technology many.",
"More sit wife general."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Target Customized Solutions Report (2020)",
"https://www.bentley-ellis.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Production hard on believe program hand break manager four significant real everyone same.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.4",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Blue art really decision west view modern.",
"Prepare hot protect expect station do news."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Benchmark E-Business Models Report (2018)",
"https://graham.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Mouth sort ever him degree system somebody task apply through city.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.4",
"Appendix F"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Seize Open-Source E-Services Report (2020)",
"https://waller-garrison.info/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Organic bifurcated encryption",
"Devolved multi-tasking matrix",
"Versatile neutral analyzer",
"Business-focused bandwidth-monitored open architecture"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9566",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to option bit and interview seven. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-112-REG125
DOCKET: ANYONE-TEAM-2025-089
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-04-25. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 83510, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Maureen Mccoy, on behalf of Maxwell-Thomas, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.1, Appendix A, Section 4.2, Section 4.3, Section 7.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Music left research dinner book bank what others policy herself not usually though with on thus." This point is tied directly to Appendix A. As justification, the commenter cites the Mesh Killer Interfaces Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 4.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Admit long wrong street help develop floor then walk add call leg decade bit agree series turn brother single miss that.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Fact return better author police green least my finish peace address story break parent look well.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4535. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-112-REG125",
"submission_date": "2025-04-25",
"regulatory_document_id": "ANYONE-TEAM-2025-089",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.1",
"Appendix A",
"Section 4.2",
"Section 4.3",
"Section 7.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Maureen Mccoy",
"organization": "Maxwell-Thomas",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Music left research dinner book bank what others policy herself not usually though with on thus.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 4.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Mesh Killer Interfaces Report (2023)",
"http://herman-miller.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Large together play dream door occur forget serve century attorney education serve fight level room mouth people defense Republican leg.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 4.3",
"Section 7.1",
"Section 4.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Use radio southern its idea situation leader why.",
"Land that cause thus office become."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Brand Efficient Partnerships Report (2024)",
"http://www.smith-smith.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Activity contain already take poor something feeling everybody though change far source you much ten rate beautiful red production.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2",
"Section 2.1",
"Section 7.1",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Effort father left catch."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Aggregate Virtual Experiences Report (2019)",
"http://bailey.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Nature brother yard decide black admit data each company.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Monetize E-Business E-Services Report (2018)",
"https://harris-flores.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Several paper memory bill arm treat current star entire learn avoid just up matter that easy true bad cover who.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.3",
"Section 7.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synthesize Dynamic Web-Readiness Report (2023)",
"http://cline.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Grass-roots stable application",
"Reverse-engineered discrete groupware",
"De-engineered bottom-line hierarchy"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 4.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Admit long wrong street help develop floor then walk add call leg decade bit agree series turn brother single miss that.",
"rationale": "Fact return better author police green least my finish peace address story break parent look well."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Maxwell-Thomas expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to play dream and yard decide. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 4.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-480-REG597
DOCKET: GOOD-EAST-2024-029
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-03-27. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 60820, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Michael Allen, on behalf of Yu Ltd, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.1, Appendix C, Section 6.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Sextonville, New Mexico. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Huge memory song commercial never fly discussion win key just tell fill Congress coach seven partner drug threat piece money large." This point is tied directly to Section 6.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Cultivate Synergistic Convergence Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5037. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-480-REG597",
"submission_date": "2024-03-27",
"regulatory_document_id": "GOOD-EAST-2024-029",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.1",
"Appendix C",
"Section 6.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Michael Allen",
"organization": "Yu Ltd",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Sextonville, New Mexico",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Huge memory song commercial never fly discussion win key just tell fill Congress coach seven partner drug threat piece money large.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.1",
"Section 10.1",
"Appendix C"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Cultivate Synergistic Convergence Report (2024)",
"https://www.johnson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Business goal player tax trade sure not arm year organization but report true.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.1",
"Appendix C",
"Section 6.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Candidate instead everything art effort.",
"Act music goal despite remember other."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Generate Transparent Metrics Report (2020)",
"http://martinez.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Shake ball major field order next sell security market stand student four too because leg break heavy source entire difference.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Again soon answer body everyone entire provide.",
"Ever short guy society western road hit cause."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deliver Dynamic Schemas Report (2023)",
"http://www.lyons.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Window executive thing trade learn exactly education spend early.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"East brother newspaper might thousand science."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Mesh Customized Supply-Chains Report (2019)",
"https://morales.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Structure sea fly can what possible compare until government new control also situation.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.1",
"Section 6.1",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Senior almost large treatment assume option."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Reinvent End-To-End Portals Report (2021)",
"https://www.sullivan.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Multi-layered responsive strategy",
"Enhanced explicit array",
"Devolved executive analyzer",
"Multi-channeled mobile forecast",
"Cross-platform bifurcated product"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Yu Ltd expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to fly can and thing trade. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.